progress report for extruded products division may 17, 2001 yongwook kim, phd student teoman peköz,...

21
PROGRESS REPORT FOR EXTRUDED PRODUCTS DIVISION May 17, 2001 Yongwook Kim, PhD Student Teoman Peköz, Professor SCHOOL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING Cornell University

Post on 21-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Slide 1
  • PROGRESS REPORT FOR EXTRUDED PRODUCTS DIVISION May 17, 2001 Yongwook Kim, PhD Student Teoman Pekz, Professor
  • Slide 2
  • Objective Develop reliable methods and Specifications for efficient and optimum design of extruded and rolled aluminum members Scope Extruded and rolled aluminum sections that are either not covered or covered inadequately in the AA Specifications. Types of Members Columns, beams and beam columns
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • AA Specification Actual Shape INACCURATE MODELING OF EXTRUSIONS BY THE AA SPECIFICATION
  • Slide 5
  • hinge
  • Slide 6
  • SOME EXTRUSIONS CANNOT BE DESIGNED ACCORDING TO THE AA SPECIFICATION
  • Slide 7
  • INTEGRATED NUMERICAL METHODS AND DESIGN PROVISIONS FOR ALUMINUM STRUCTURES thin beams columns thick beams simplecomplicatedthick & thinthin Year 1Year 2Year 3 Year 1 Year 2Year 3 additional 6 month lateral buckling modified plan original plan Spec recommendations
  • Slide 8
  • DOE AA FUNDING: DOE $399,225 AA $120,000 (The AA contribution enabled us to get the DOE funding) INTEGRATED NUMERICAL METHODS AND DESIGN PROVISIONS FOR ALUMINUM STRUCTURES
  • Slide 9
  • What Have We Found So Far ? AA Specification Does Not Consider Load Carrying Capacity Accurately Possible Design Approaches Developed by FEM Simulations for Sections of Fig. 1 FEM Simulations Are Proved by Physical Tests Fig. 1
  • Slide 10
  • What Have We Found So Far ? Current AA Specification Does Not Provisions Sections with Tapered Flanges (Fig. 2) Actual Behavior of Tapered Sections Are Simulated by FEM (Fig. 2) Fig. 2
  • Slide 11
  • Beam Capacity Comparison [ Fig.1 Section ] AA Standard I-Beam:I-3x1.64 (6063-T6) EC9 : Eurocode 9 TESTS : 3 Bending Tests FEM : Simulations Using Finite Element Method
  • Slide 12
  • Beam Capacity Comparison [ Fig.1 Section ] AA Standard I-Beam:I-3x1.64 (6061-T6) EC9 : Eurocode 9 APP1 ~4 : Possible Design Approaches 1~4 FEM : Simulations Using Finite Element Method
  • Slide 13
  • Tests vs. Simulation [Fig.1 Section] Tests Simulation
  • Slide 14
  • FEM Simulation [Fig.2 Section]
  • Slide 15
  • Aluminum Design Workshops Objective Informal exchange of ideas between the US and foreign researchers Held in 1998, 2000 and to be held in 2001
  • Slide 16
  • WORKSHOP 2 PARTICIPANTS
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • CORNELL RESEARCHERS WHO HELPED WITH WORKSHOP 2
  • Slide 20
  • A graduate student has completed a Master of Science thesis on the subject. He is now working on his PhD Thesis on the subject. Several papers have been prepared. Eight progress reports have been prepared and these reports are being reviewed by the AA Engineering Task Group. OTHER ACTIVITIES
  • Slide 21
  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The sponsorship of the Extruded Products Division, the Aluminum Association and the DOE is gratefully acknowledged.