progrss report embu
DESCRIPTION
PROGRSS REPORT EMBU. J.O.Ouma 1 , J.Oduol 1 ,F.M.Murithi 2 __________________________ 1 Regional Research Centre – Embu 2 KARI – Headquarters – Nairobi. Background to study area. 3 locations, 12 sub-locations and covers an area of 197.1 km 2 . - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
PROGRSS REPORTEMBU
J.O.Ouma1, J.Oduol1,F.M.Murithi2
__________________________
1 Regional Research Centre – Embu2 KARI – Headquarters – Nairobi
Background to study area3 locations, 12 sub-locations and covers an area of 197.1 km2 . The study locations are Gaturi North and Ngandori . Kianjuki and Kavutiri extension units are in Gaturi North, while Mukangu and Manyatta are in Ngandori location. The major zones are UM1 and UM2. UM1 is the coffee – tea zone.
Background….cont’dIt lies at an altitude 1590m to 1830m above sea- level and annual rainfall is between 1400mm to 1830mm. Two rainy seasons – long rains (mid March to July) and short rains (mid October to December). The Climatic conditions are favorable for coffee, tea and maize.
Background….cont’d
Upper Midland 2(UM2) is the main coffee zone).
ACHIEVEMENTSRetracing of households, replacements and supplemental households
Implementation of surveys (module 1 part 1 and 2), data entry and cleaning and preliminary analysis
Tracing households
99 out of 113 households intereviewed in the baseline survey of 1998 were identified. Out of the 99 households identified, one migrated to a different location from the study area reducing the number of households traced to 98. This gives a sample attrition rate of 13.3%.
Tracing household…..cont’d
The 14 housholds that were not identified in Manyatta and Kianjuki extension units were replaced. In Kianjuki 11 households were replaced including 2 supplemental households while in Manyatta extension unit 4 households were replaced including 2 supplemental households. In Mukangu and Kavitiri extension units only supplemental households were added to the list of farmers to be interviewed.
Tracing households…..cont’d
The replaced households were randomly selected from a list of farmers generated for each sublocation by the local extension staff and sub-chiefs/sub-area .
Tracing of householdsExtn unit No hh
inter. 1998
No hh ident.
No hh avail 2002
No resp avail 2002
No resp. dead
No resp
separated with spouse
No resp Left hh
Manyatta 29 25 25 23 1 0 1
Kavutiri 29 29 29 25 1 1 2
Kianjuki 28 18 17 15 2 0 0
Mukangu
27 27 27 25 0 1 1
Total 113 99 98 88 4 2 4
Survey implementationModule 1questionnaire for long rains data 2002 was divided into two parts Questions covered in module one part 1- household demographics, assets, livelihood and shocks
116 farmers responded
Questions in module 1 part 2 - crop production(annual), livestock inventory,input and output market and consumption expenditure
115 farmers respondedOne farmer dropped out in part 2 because… ‘You are taking too much of my time and no benefit’
Survey data entry
Data entry for module 1 part 1 and 2 is complete and data cleaning in progress
The expenditure data was entered as a separate file and data cleaning is not complete
SURVEYPRELIMINARY RESULTS
Preliminary results
Gender of household(627 responses)
Males - 51% Female – 49 %
Level of education(626) None – 16.3 % Primary – 48.7 % Secondary – 27.0 % Middle level – 7 % University – 1 %
Type of dwelling house mud wall+thatched -0.9% mud wall+corrugated-
19.1% Wood wall+corrugated-
69.6 % Stone wall+corrugated –
10.4 %
Preliminary results…cont’d
Source of energy_____
Firewood- 67 %
Firewood +kerosene – 17.4 %
Firewood+charcoal – 12.2%
Firewood+solar – 0.9 %
Firewood+kerosene+gas – 2.6%
Source of water________
Tap – 54.4 %
River/stream – 22.8%
Borehole – 0.9 %
Tap + river – 21.1 %
Borehole +river – 0.9 %
Preliminary results….cont’dCrops grown
Crop counts %
Maize 164 30
beans 122 22.3
Irish potatoes 75 13.7
Sweet potatoes 21 3.8
Cassava 6 1.1
Kales 2 0.4
Cabbages 5 0.9
Tomatoes 5 0.9
na 146 26.7
Preliminary results…cont’dLivestock enterprise
Type yes no min max mean
cattle 68.7 31.3 0 3 1.0
sheep 13 87 0 6 0.3
goats 27.8 72.2 0 5 0.6
pigs 1.7 98.3 - - -
poultry 81.7 18.3 0 21 4.8
Preliminary results ….cont’dLand holding
min max mean
Total farm owned
0.05 5.31 1.02
Total farm cultivated
- 4.08 0.97
Preliminary results…cont’dcurrent land use
counts %
cultivated 170 87.2
fallow 7 3.6
pasture 10 5.1
woodlot 4 2.1
Napier grass 3 1.5
homestead 1 0.5
Preliminary results….cont’dLand allocation________ Maize 0.42 ha Beans 0.21 ha Irish potatoes 0.10 ha Others 0.29 ha
___________
Preliminary results…cont’soil fertility status
counts %
Has improved alot 49 11.9
Has improved little 195 47.3
Has not changed 86 20.9
Has deteriorated little 80 19.4
Has deteriorated alot 1 0.2
412
Preliminary results….cont’reasons for changes in fertility
counts %
Changed fallow practices 45 8.7
Changed fertilization practices 342 66.2
Increased soil erosion 33 6.4
Improved soil conservation 51 9.9
Continuous cultivation 8 1.5
Soils normally poor 21 4.1
Lack of manure 15 2.9
Preliminary resultsFinancial stockAccess to lending inst. Yes – 80.9 % No – 19.1 %
______________
Major lending institution is Cooperative
________________
Application for loan Yes – 43.5 % No – 56.5
Saving with formal banking inst
Yes – 74.8 % No – 25.2 %
_______________
Average mount borrowed
KSH 2000-320,000
Mean – 45,585.17
Survey implementation – Module 2Pre-testing doneQuestionnaire divided into two partsPart 1 – food crops and perennial crop productionPart 2 – agroforestry trees production, household incomes, expenditures and investment
END