project approval and interface 5 apr 2011

8/13/2019 Project Approval and Interface 5 Apr 2011

1/41

1

PROJECT PLANNING AND INTERFACE

WITH GOVT. AGENCIES

S.D.MATHUR

AGM (Systems)5th April, 2011


2/41

2

PROJECT FORMULATION AND

APPROVAL

Need for New Capacities

Site Selection

Preparation of Feasibility Report

Thermal ProjectsTie-ups / Clearances

Hydro Projects

Tie-ups / Clearances

Investment Approval


3/41

3

Need for New Capacities


4/41

4

Growth of Installed Capacity

End of 6thPlan-31.03.1985 42584.72 MWEnd of 7thPlan-31.03.1990 63636.34 MW

End of 2ndAnnual Plan-

31.03.1992

69065.19 MW

End of 8thPlan-31.03.1997 85795.37 MW

End of 9thPlan-31.03.2002 105045.96

End of 10thPlan-31.03.2007 143061.01MWDuring11thPlan-Upto31.03.2010

159398.49MW


5/41

5

High potential for Growth

2490

11446

6755

1440

6303

2246

594

14057

-1800 200 2200 4200 6200 8200 10200 12200 14200

World Average

USA

Australia

UK

China

Russia

Brazil

India

Source-UNDP Human Dev. Indicators 2006

Per-Capita Energy Consumption in Kwh-

2003

India targets to have per capitaavailability of 1000 KWh by 2012

704 Kwh in

2007


6/41


7/41

7

Site Selection


8/41

8

Broad factors influencing selection of projectsite (s)

a) Availability of suitable and adequate land

b) Reliable Source of Water

c) Type and Source of fueld) Distance from Source of fuel

e) Port, rail and road access

f)

Availability of infrastructure facilitiesg) Siting Criteria of MOEF

h) Environmental aspects

Siting Criteria of Thermal Power Plant


9/41

9

Siting Criteria of Thermal Power Plant

Should be avoided within 25 kms ofthe outer peripheries of

Metropolitan cities

National Park and Wildlife

sanctuaries Ecologically sensitive areas like

tropical forests, biosphere reserves,National Parks & Sanctuaries,important lakes and coastal areasrich in coral formations.

500 m of HTL, a buffer zone of 500

mts should be kept free


10/41

10

Siting Criteria of Thermal Power Plant Chimney should not fall within the

approach funnel of the runway. 500 mts. Away from National

Highway, Railway and Flood Plains ofthe Riverine Systems

10 kms away from archaeological,historical, cultural, religious ortourist importance and defence

installations No forest or prime agricultural land

should be utilized for setting up ofTPS, or for ash disposal.

Should not be on coal bearing area.


11/41

11

Indicative Requirement of Basic Inputs forCoal based Projects

Capacity Range

LAND (acres)

Main Plant

Ash Disposal

Township

WATER

Makeup water(cusecs)

Sweetwater for

coastal Projects(cusecs)

FUEL (MilionTonne/Annum)

Indigenous raw coal

1000 MW 2000MW

650 - 800

500 1000

150 250

40 80

6 12

5.5 11


12/41

12

Indicative Requirement of Basic Inputs forGas Projects

Capacity rangeLAND (acres) Main Plant Township

WATER Cooling water

(Cusecs)FUEL (MCMD)

650 MW 1300 MW

200 300

75 80

18 35

2.9 5.8

(33 Tri.BTU) (66 Tri. BTU)


13/41

13

Preparation of FeasibilityReport


14/41

14

PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT

Site Specific Studies & Investigations

Topographical Survey

Soil Investigation

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)Study

Make-up Water Study

Seismic Study

Area Drainage Study

Geological Mapping Study Coal Transportation / Railway Siding

Study

Socio-Economic Study

Feasibility Report


15/41

15

Site Specific Studies/Investigations requiredfor a New Project Site

Preliminary Topographical Survey

Broad scope of services includes

Development of contours

Land use plan

Ownership details

Preliminary Geo-technical Investigation

Field as well as laboratory investigation,analysis and interpretation of data collectedand preparation of a Geo-technical report.


16/41

16

Site Specific Studies/Investigations

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)Study - Broad scope includes:

Field studies Impact assessment Preparation of the EIA document covering Land

Use, Water Use, Soils, Geology, Hydrology,

Sediments, Water Quality, Meteorology, AirQuality, Terrestrial Ecology, Aquatic Ecology,Noise, Risk Assessment, Ash Utilization andOccupational Health and Safety. Services(based on 12 months data).

EIA report covers the existing environmentalbaseline conditions, impacts due to operation ofthe power plant, Environmental ManagementPlan, post study-monitoring programme,

Occupation Safety & Health and RiskAssessment.


17/41

17


Seismic Study

Broad Scope includesGeological and seismotechtonic set-up ofthe site covering an area of not less than150Km radius around the project site.

Determination and presentation of designearthquake parametersArea Drainage StudyReview and analysis of rainfall informationto arrive at design storm scenariosPreparation of digital elevation model forthe study areaEstimation of flood hydrographsconsidering historical as well as design

rainfall for different return periods.


18/41

18

Site Specific Studies/InvestigationsSocio-economic StudyAssessing the number of Project Affected

Persons (PAPs), overall impact due to landacquisition and establishment of the project onthe affected villages and its populace in generaland the PAPs , whose livelihood is affected(directly or indirectly) in particular.

To establish base line condition, assess thesocial-economic impacts and to what extent,analyse the impoverishment risk to find out themost vulnerable section of the society and to

suggest the initiatives to address these issues.To establish social inventory of affected villagescovering the social, cultural, economic, historical,political and environmental aspects.

To identify indicators for monitoring the

standards of living of PAPs in future.


19/41

19

Railway Siding Study

To examine the feasibility of alternativealignmentsIdentification of serving station on Indian

Railways and the requirement of trafficfacilities at these stations with reference tofacilities already existing.

Survey of the selected alignmentAssessment of land requirement

Hydrological StudySpecific information about the river water

levels, bed profile (river across-section),velocity of water (magnitude and direction)silt load and gradation etc. during variousperiods of the year

To locate and design rationally, intake-well

and other associated structures required forthe drawal of water.



20/41

20

CONTENTS OF FR Need and Justification of the Scheme.

Preliminary Analysis of Alternatives

Linkage/Availability of Various Inputs

Availability of Various Clearances.

Energy Absorption Plan

Energy Evacuation Plan

Financial and Executing Capabilities Plant Technical Features incl. Bill of Quantities

Environmental Aspects

Project Execution and Mgt. incl

Implementation Schedule Cost Estimates

Financial Package

Tariff Calculations.

Establishment Project Viability


21/41

21

Thermal Projects Tie ups /Clearances


22/41

22

INPUTS / LINKAGES TO BE TIED UP

Input Agency

Land Availability State GovernmentWater Availability State Irrigation

Dep't. CWC / MOWR

Coal Linkage Dept. of Coal (SLC)

Gas/Liquid Fuel

Availability

Ministry of

Petroleum & NaturalGas

Fuel Transportation Railways /

GAIL/Oil Companies


23/41

23

CLEARANCES REQUIRED

Clearance Agency

Clearance forChimney height

Airports Authorityof India

Defence Clearance Ministry of Defence

Public Hearing SPCB

EnvironmentClearance

MOEF

Forest Clearance State Forest

Department / MOEF

R&R of displaced

family

Concerned State

Govts


24/41

24

OTHER REQUIREMENTS

Item Agency

Power Evacuation Powergrid/CEA

Power Purchase

Agreement

Beneficiaries

Financing MOP/DEA

ICB Clearance MOP

Mega Certificate,wherever applicable

MOP

MEGA POWER PROJECTS REVISED POLICY


25/41

25

MEGA POWER PROJECTS: REVISED POLICY

GUIDELINES (Dec 2009)

The power projects with the following threshold

capacity shall be eligible for the benefit of megapower policy:

(i) The power projects with the following threshold capacity shall beeligible for the benefit of mega power policy:

(a) A thermal power plant of capacity 1000 MW or more; or (b) A thermal power plant of capacity of 700 MW or more located in the

States of J&K, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya,Manipur,Mizoram, Nagaland and Tripura or

(c) A hydel power plant of capacity of 500 MW or more (d) A hydel power plant of a capacity of 350 MW or more, located in the

States of J&K, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya,Manipur,

Mizoram, Nagaland and Tripura; (e) Government has decided to extend mega policy benefits to brownfield

(expansion) projects also. In case of brownfield (expansion) phase of theexisting mega project, size of the expansion unit(s) would not be not lessthan that provided in the earlier phase of the project granted mega powerproject certificate.

(ii) Mandatory condition of Inter-State sale of power for getting megapower status has been removed.


26/41

26


GUIDELINES (Dec 2009)

(iii) Goods required for setting up a mega power project, wouldqualify for the fiscal benefits after it is certified by an officer not

below the rank of a Joint Secretary to the Govt. of India in theMinistry of Power that (i) the power purchasing States haveconstituted the Regulatory Commissions with full powers to fix tariffsand (ii) power purchasing states shall undertake to carry outdistribution reforms as laid down by Ministry of Power.

(iv) Mega Power Projects would be required to tie up power supply to

the distribution companies/utilities through long term PPA(s) inaccordance with the National Electricity Policy 2005 and Tariff Policy2006, as amended from time to time, of Government of India.

(v) There shall be no further requirement of ICB for procurement ofequipment for mega projects if the requisite quantum of power hasbeen tied up or the project has been awarded through tariff based

competitive bidding as the requirements of ICB for the purpose ofavailing deemed export benefits under Chapter 8 of the ForeignTrade Policy would be presumed to have been satisfied. In all othercases, ICB for equipments shall be mandatory.

(vi) The present dispensation of 15% price preference available tothe domestic bidders in case of cost plus projects of PSUs wouldcontinue. However, the price preference will not apply to tariff basedcompetitively bid project/s of PSUs.



27/41

27


GUIDELINESFiscal concessions/benefits available :

Zero Customs Duty :In terms of the notificationof the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance(Department of Revenue) No.21/2002-Customs dated1st March, 2002 read together with No.49/2006-Customs dated 26th May, 2006, the import of capitalequipment would be free of customs duty for theseprojects.Deemed Export Benefits:Under Chapter 8(f) ofthe Foreign Trade Policy, Deemed Export Benefits isavailable to domestic bidders for projects both underpublic and private sector on following the stipulations

prescribed therein.Price preference to domestic PSUs bidders:Price preference of 15% may be given for theprojects under public sector to domestic bidders whoare allowed to quote in US Dollars or any other

foreign currency of their choice.

M B fit T i l 1000 MW TPP


28/41

28

Mega Benefits- Typical 1000 MW TPP

S.No

Description Cost

Mega

Cost

Non-mega

1 Civil Works 770 770

2 Equipment 3200 3200

Contingency 98 1103 Taxes & Duties 78 503

Customs duty 133 #

Excise Duty 1 302 #

CST 77 68

IDC, Proj. Mgt. 846 926

4 Total Project Cost 4992 5509

Rs. in Crs.# Considering 30% Imported component of BTG


29/41

29

Hydro Projects Tieups /Clearances


30/41


31/41

31

STUDIES FOR HYDRO POWER

PROJECTS

Topographical Study

Geological & Geotech Study

Hydrological Study

Meteorological Study

Seismic Study

Socio-Economic Study

EIA Study Construction Material Survey

Transportation Study

Disaster Management Studies


32/41

32

CLEARANCES REQUIRED FOR HYDRO

PROJECT

Land confirmation from StateGovernment

Water clearance from State

Government

Clearance from MOWR & CWCregarding water availability from

Inter-State / International Treatyangle.

Defence clearance, if applicable


33/41

33

CLEARANCES REQUIRED FOR HYDRO

PROJECT

Clearance from Ministry of SocialJustice and Tribal Affairs, if tribalpopulation is involved.

Environment Clearance from Ministryof Environment & Forests

Forest Clearance from MOE&F

TEC from CEA For Projects costing more than Rs 500Crs

(Allotted through MOU route)

For Projects costing more than Rs 2500 Crs

(Allotted through competitive biddingroute


34/41

34

CEAs TECHNO-ECONOMIC CLEARANCE

Appraisal is based on Technical Feasibility Comprehensiveness Tie-up of Inputs Availability of Clearances Consent from GSI on Geological

aspect Consent from CWC on Hydrology Cost Estimates Comparison with other Similar

Projects (Least Cost Solution) Power Evacuation Arrangement


35/41

35

Investment Approval

P j t d th h N t P


36/41

36

Projects approved through Navratna Powers

Under Navratna Powers NTPC Board

has approved approval for 17 projectswith estimated cost of about Rs 70000Crs

Project Capacity in MW

Talcher-II 2000

Ramagundam-III 500

Rihand-II 1000

Vindhyachal-III 1000

Unchahar-III 210

Kahalgaon-II Phase-I 1000

Kahalgaon-II Phase-II 500

F.G. Unchahar-III 210

P j t d th h N t P


37/41

37

Projects approved through Navratna Powers

Project Capacity in MW

Sipat-I 1980Sipat-II 1000

Barh 1980

Korba-III 500

Farakka-III 500

NCTPP-II 980

Simhadri-II 1000

Koldam 800Loharinag Pala 600

Tapovan Vishnugad 520

Further investment in 3 JV Projects of 3000 MW capacity

approved


38/41

38

JBIC Role in NTPC Projects


39/41

39

Japans Official Development Assistance

Outline of Japanese ODA Loan Procedure:

Project Preparation

Rolling Plan & Loan Request

Examination / appraisal and Ex-anteProject EvaluationFact finding mission

Exchange of Notes and Loan

Agreements Implementation (Procurement &

Disbursement)

Post Evaluation


40/41

40

JBIC Loan to NTPC Projects

Simhadri STPP

Loan Agreement in Year 2002

Amount 5684 Million Yen

North Karanpura STPP

Loan Agreement in Year 2004Amount 15916 Million Yen


41/41

project approval and interface 5 apr 2011

Documents