project duration: completion date -...
TRANSCRIPT
2
The sole responsibility for the content of this brochure lies with the authors. It does not necessari-ly reflect the opinion of the European Communities. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.
European Commission, Intelligent Energy – Europe ProgrammeContract no. EIE/06/244/SI2.44953
Project duration: 29 months
Starting date: 1 January 2007
Completion date: 31 May 2009
3
CARAMCODEC is a project funded by the
European Commission which aims to establish
the conditions for a significant and lasting
improvement in the energy supply for the town
of Mahajanga and, subsequently, all the towns
in Madagascar, in the context of a national
domestic energy strategy.
The project comes within the process of
decentralization of forestry management from
the state to local community level (the VOI),
in partnership with the eleven municipalities
within the area supplying the town of
Mahajanga, in Boeny Region.
In Boeny Region the CARAMCODEC project
has resulted in various training initiatives
for the players appointed by the state to
manage resources in their areas: charcoal
makers, on the one hand, and local and state
authorities on the other (Forestry Service,
police forces, etc.). The big issue is facilitating
the integration of charcoal makers into the
formal sector by improving the carbonization
methods they use. Improving the various
players’ capabilities and putting them on a
professional footing is expected to facilitate
the sustainable management of wood energy
in the areas concerned.
In the eleven rural municipalities within Boeny
Region, the CARAMCODEC project has improved
the decentralized control of wood energy
flows. This system is self-financing through an
appropriate taxation mechanism involving the
rural municipalities and the Forestry.
Lastly, on the basis of achievements
in Boeny Region, the CARAMCODEC
project has underpinned the reform of the
regulatory framework governing charcoal
production, processing and marketing. This
framework prefigures the establishment of a
national domestic energy supply policy for
Madagascar’s towns and cities.
The CARAMCODeC PROjeCT
The PROjeCT hAS TwO MAin ThRuSTS:
1. developing the capacities of players in decentralized wood energy management2. developing a fiscal, economic and political framework for urban domestic
energy supply.
These two aims have been translated into initiatives at local level, regional level (centred in Boeny Region) and national level.
The CARAMCODEC project is coordinated by CIRAD (France) and is being carried out in cooperation with FOFIFA (Madagascar), the
PARTAGE NGO (Madagascar) and CRA-W (Belgium).
The vast majority of Madagascar’s domestic
energy requirements are covered by wood.
This is grown in natural forests and managed
plantations or harvested on fallow land. Why
wood? Local people cannot afford to buy
gas or oil. Large-scale importing of such
fossil fuels would, among other things, mean
foreign currency expenses which the country
could not meet.
Wood is either used straight for domestic
cooking or processed first into charcoal. As
the latter fuel is easy to transport, store and
use, the use of charcoal is widespread in
Madagascar, especially in towns. Between
80 and 90% of domestic energy requirements
are thus met by these wood-derived fuels
obtained from various plant formations. One
Madagascan family consumes about 100 kg
of charcoal per month.
This wood consumption puts considerable
pressure on forestry formations which are
threatened with overexploitation, especially
around the big towns which create huge
demand for domestic energy and therefore
for wood-derived fuels.
As elsewhere in the country, the natural forests
in Boeny Region (in the west of Madagascar)
are tending to shrink due to rising demand
for wood for fuel coupled with a lack of a
managed wood energy supply compatible
with regeneration of natural formations. The
plantations (some three hundred hectares) are
not sufficient for a sustainable supply of wood
and/or charcoal for the town of Mahajanga,
the region’s main town. The town’s charcoal
consumption has risen from 15,000 tonnes in
1999 to nearly 20,000 tonnes today.
Charcoal production is not the only cause of
deforestation in Madagascar, though. Clearing
of land for agriculture (slash and burn culture)
and firing bricks for building also play their
part in the extensive damage to Madagascar’s
forests. Several tens of thousands of hectares
are cleared of trees in the country every year.
What is the conclusion? Wood remains
the cheapest energy source for town and
city dwellers, compared with fossil fuels.
It is essential for the survival of the urban
population. Charcoal may therefore be
regarded as a staple, like oil or rice. It is difficult
to restrict its use and thus impossible to ban
forest exploitation for charcoal making.
So, a sustainable solution to this situation would be to increase the efficiency of the energy supply:
• by improving forestry management methods in order to create a better balance between wood cutting and the pace of natural regeneration and planting of Madagascar’s forest formations
• by improving carbonization methods in order to reduce the quantity of wood needed to produce charcoal.
BACkgROunD
4
Wood as an energy source is a staple in
Madagascar. The high price of fossil fuels
forces urban and rural dwellers to remain
mainly dependent on wood energy and they
will continue to do so for several decades.
This being so, Madagascar is obliged to
manage and exploit its forestry resources
in a sustainable way if it is to meet this
irreducible demand for fuel.
Madagascar’s forestry resources are limited
yet sufficient to meet consumer demand
on a sustainable basis; it only needs the
management of those resources to be
organized and planned.
The demand for wood and charcoal has
increased in pace with demographic growth.
Exploitation, processing and marketing
sectors have grown up in each of the major
towns, providing a regular supply at a low
cost but often in environmental conditions that
destroy the delicate natural formations. One
notable example is the town of Toliara in the
Atsimo-Andrafana Region in south-western
Madagascar. Elsewhere, the consequences
of the supply industry are less negative due
to the sizeable plantations established, for
instance in Manjakandriana to supply the
capital, Antananarivo, or where there are
natural formations with a big regenerative
capacity, such as the Boeny Region supplying
the town of Mahajanga.
A BiT Of hiSTORy…
From 1920 to 1990, Madagascar’s forestry
policy remained centralized. The colonial
state equipped itself with a whole battery of
regulations and legislation in keeping with
the vision of the day of forest ecosystem
conservation and development issues.
From 1960 on, once Madagascar had become
independent, the Forestry Service had
considerable problems complying with the legal
directions for which it had been established.
Hampered by a serious lack of material and
financial resources to carry out its duties, its
efforts were in vain and the country’s forestry
resources gradually deteriorated. The situation
was aggravated by other factors, such as rural
population growth, land clearance, removal of
wood for energy, etc.
From the 1990s, considering the
ineffectiveness of the legislation in force and
this centralized resource management policy,
Madagascar revised its environmental and
forestry policy with the aim of making local
people responsible for the management of
their ecosystems. The authorities’ inability to
control the use of resources effectively in fact
resulted in a situation of free access and rapid
decline of natural resources.
In 1990, Madagascar’s Environmental
Charter at last established a legal framework
for management of natural resources. The
change was brought about mainly by means
of two laws: the Secure Local Management
Act no. 96-025 (in French, “GEstion LOcale
SEcurisée”, or GELOSE for short), and the
Forestry Act no. 97-017. These laws specific to
the environmental sector also formed part of the
process of decentralization of Madagascar’s
administration, leading to the creation of the
municipalities and regions.
DeCenTRAlizeD fOReSTRy MAnAgeMenT in MADAgASCAR
5
The underlying aims
are decentralized
management of
forestry initiatives
at regional level and
participative local
management of forestry
resources within the
framework of transfer
of management
of forestry resources to local people
living nearby and giving responsibility to
decentralized local organisations.
This reform was to affect the entire economy of
forestry products. More than ten years later, the
state and its partners are continuing to develop
these initiatives, notably on the basis of the
Madagascar Action Plan (MAP) passed in 2006.
MAhAjAngA’S SuPPly SeCTORS AnD SuSTAinABle MAnAgeMenT Of The nATuRAl jujuBe TRee SAvAnnAh
Removal of wood and charcoal making in
Boeny Region are heavily concentrated in the
immediate periphery of the town of Mahajanga.
The municipalities of Belobaka Boanamary and
Ambalakida, less than 50 km away, produce
two-thirds of Mahajanga’s charcoal supplies.
The balance comes from the municipalities of
Andranofantsika and Ambondromamy, near
the Ankarafantsika protected area, 150 km
from Mahajanga. The growing pace of wood
removal in this fragile area has put the spotlight
on the wood energy sector management
constraints in Boeny: how can sustainable
forestry exploitation to satisfy increasing urban
demand for charcoal be reconciled with the
pressing need to protect the area in question?
Against this background, between 1999 and
2002, the authorities in charge of energy and
the forests drew up the Urban Wood Energy
Supply Plan for Mahajanga, called SDAUBE
for short. This concerted regional planning tool
enabled priority zones to be established for the
putting in place of wood energy management
transfer contracts, from the state to the
village communities, in accordance with
the Gelose Act, with the aim of providing a
sustainable supply for greater Mahajanga.
This supply strategy was based on planned
exploitation and reorientation of exploitation
towards areas with sufficient forestry potential
that could be exploited and managed in a
sustainable way, i.e. the wooded savannah
covered with Ziziphus mauritiana. The SDAUBE
plan included the development of wood energy
management transfer contracts in such areas,
while taking account of decentralization and
creation of the municipalities.
MAnAgeMenT TRAnSfeR COnTRACTS
The aim of the transfer contracts is to enable
local people to become involved in actively
conserving their renewable resources (in this
case, wood energy) with the added benefit of
the possibility of making a sizeable income
from supplying the towns. Article 54 of Law no.
96-025 permits the use of economic incentives.
6
• A regulatory instrument: the quota. The established standard is a 15 kg bag of charcoal and the quota is expressed in numbers
of bags marketed. This quota is a flow management instrument. It is designed to influence the
players’ behaviour directly. The quota concept enables a single tool, which is understandable
and applicable by all the players, to be defined from an assessment of the resource and the
production capacity. It may relate to both the area to be exploited and the maximum quantity
that may be produced. Each village community that signs up to the contract is allocated an
annual quota according to the potential forestry resources.
• An economic instrument: taxation. Tax collection is accompanied by decentralized forestry control involving both the Forestry
Service and the municipalities and local communities. This tax incentive mechanism with
deduction at source finances the operation of the control system.
7
There are two principal instruments for this:
Under each management transfer contract,
or “Gelose” contract, two associations are
created: the local community (in French,
communauté locale de base, or CLB) or VOI
(Vondron’Olona Ifotony) and the Charcoal
Burners’ Association (the members of which
may also be members of the VOI). Whereas the
VOI is responsible for managing the area as a
whole and is answerable to the Forestry Service,
the Charcoal Burners’ Association is in charge
of organizing exploitation in the carbonization
area and is answerable to the VOI.
The management transfer contracts give the
contracting local community responsibility
for access management, conservation,
exploitation and development of forestry
resources. They link together the VOI, the
municipality and the Forestry Service. They
include a set of technical rules of exploitation
which are detailed in a specification:
compliance with zoning, permitted tree
species for carbonization, the rules of
operation, the annual production quota, the
improved carbonization method, etc.
Boeny Region lies in the north-west of Madagascar.
The chief town in Boeny Region is Mahajanga, the country’s fourth-largest town with
a population of approximately 170,000.
fiRST MAnAgeMenT TRAnSfeR COnTRACTS in BOeny RegiOn
The first wood energy contracts, covering a three
year period, were put in place in Boeny Region
in 2001, in eleven municipalities including
Ambondromamy (150 km east of Mahajanga)
and Ambalakida (30 km to the north). Despite
the problems arising, the establishment of
these first contracts significantly reduced the
number of infringements (fires, especially) in
the transferred areas and ensured compliance
with certain management rules, notably zoning,
even with virtually no internal monitoring.
An initial tax collection scheme was introduced
at the same time. This lays down the conditions
of collection and transfer of the tax revenue
from the sale of charcoal between the various
players in decentralized management: the VOI
and the Charcoal Burners’ Association, the
Environment and Forestry Cantonnement (CEF)
and the municipality. This tax scheme takes
account in particular of forestry control of flows.
The putting in place of these first management
transfer contracts was not without its problems,
however. These mainly concerned failure
to comply with the terms of the contracts
and specifications. Moreover, continuing
illegal exploitation outside the framework of
the management transfer contracts creates
a situation of unfair competition insofar as
it evades the local tax which is essential if
sustainable management is to succeed. The
only way to remove this constraint appears
to be to extend the geographical area of the
zones under transferred management.
Thus, from 1999 with the support of
the Mahajanga Integrated Pilot Project
(PPIM) to 2002, with the support of the
Mahajanga Domestic Energy Project (PEDM),
Madagascar’s Forestry Service developed
an innovative system for managing the
town’s charcoal supply. The distinguishing
features of the system were the creation of
20 management transfer contracts and the
introduction of an innovative flow control
system along with a local tax incentive scheme.
From 2004 to 2006 this system was supported
by the Decentralized Management of Natural
Resources project (GDRN) run by the Priority
Solidarity Fund (FSP) within the framework
of French aid to developing countries. The
contracts were assessed before being renewed
(the Gelose Act requires this process to be
carried out after three years).
Whereas the effects of the management
transfer contracts on the reduction in bush
fires and appropriation of land for charcoal
making appear positive, it has also been found
that the forestry control system needed to be
strengthened by introducing an intermediate
level between the VOI (local controllers) and the
Forestry Service (CEF).
8
9
Although benefiting from some of the tax
revenue, the municipality level was not
structured to play its part in controlling charcoal
flows. So, from 2006 on, municipality and
inter-municipality controllers were introduced
into Ambondromamy rural municipality. They
establish links between the stakeholders in
the transfer of management, notably the VOI,
the municipality (and also the municipalities
of Tsaramandroso and Sarobaratra, with a
view to linking municipalities) and the Forestry
Service. These controllers are funded entirely
by the municipalities concerned on the basis
of a negotiated inter-municipality agreement.
They now play a vital role in bringing the
various players together and disseminating
information about exploitation.
The development and renewal of management transfer contracts in Boeny have produced some very encouraging results. These decentralized forestry management contracts, which shift the focus from the state to the municipalities and the VOI, are organised along two main lines: zoning and clear planning of forested land exploitation and the putting in place of management and control systems that are local and self-financed at all levels of responsibility.
This management transfer system is still limited in terms of the country as a whole. It needs to be appropriately extended to the whole of Boeny Region and then to other parts of the country. Widespread development of such contracts would, however, mean the introduction of economic conditions (decentralized taxation providing an incentive) and regulations (controlling exploitation and quotas) that would be specific and appropriate to each region. Such a development could be based on the forestry taxation and decentralized forestry control mechanisms that have been tried out since 2000 in the 20 VOI of Boeny Region.
If forestry management transfer is to work effectively in the different regions of Madagascar, a national planning framework must be defined, along with a strategic policy for supplying towns with domestic energy. Such a strategy should be developed and validated by the various authorities in Madagascar involved with decentralized management of wood energy (Energy, Environment and Forests and Decentralization).
The municipality and inter-municipality controllers are new players in the forestry management transfer process and have not yet fulfilled all the expectations. More effective training for Forestry Service staff and police officers, coupled with overseeing of their work, would also markedly improve the functioning of management and forestry control within the areas transferred.
Charcoal is a wood-derived fuel with many
advantages, being easier to transport, store
(lower weight and smaller volume for the same
quantity of energy) and use (very little smoke)
than the wood from which it is made.
Charcoal is produced by heating wood in
a nearly airtight environment. This process
is called carbonization. There are various
carbonization processes, from traditional
methods to industrial technologies.
Peasant techniques account for more than
95% of world production. How are they
distinguished? By the type of kiln in which the
wood to be carbonized is placed. Pits, mound
kilns and metal kilns are the three basic types.
Charcoal production using mound kilns is
widespread throughout Sub-Saharan Africa
and Madagascar. In this method, the wood to
be carbonized is simply piled up on the ground
to form a heap varying in size from a few steres
to several tens of cubic metres. This is covered
first with branches and then with earth.
Mound kiln carbonization is very popular,
being easy to do and accessible to large
numbers of charcoal makers. However, the
production yields from mound kilns can be
quite low and are most often less than 10%,
i.e. 10 kg of charcoal produced per 100
kg of wood. All the same, the poor yields in
Boeny Region (Mahajanga) are primarily due
to incorrect mound kiln operating practices
within a poorly organised industry, rather than
any shortcoming of the methods themselves.
iMPROveD TeChniqueS AnD gOOD CARBOnizATiOn PRACTiCeS
Improved carbonization techniques have
been developed to increase mound kiln yields.
Whether these involve Casamance-type kilns,
which have a metal chimney, ovens of brick or
concrete construction or metal kilns, these new
techniques allow better control of the air flows
entering the carbonization process, which
takes place in an almost airless enclosure.
They have been successfully introduced in
many parts of the world and the carbonization
efficiency has been improved as a result.
However, these improved techniques require
investment in expensive equipment such as
metal components which are beyond the reach
of most of Madagascar’s charcoal makers.
10
ChARCOAl PRODuCTiOn in MADAgASCAR
Apart from these technical considerations, shortcomings in the running of micro-businesses
also hamper the development of charcoal making. The charcoal makers have to be instructed in
simplified management of the money flows resulting from the tax system, stock management, etc.
• people will readily use them, because they are familiar with the way they work;
• the investment requirement is nil;
• they allow mobile operation within the concessions, even though multiple carbonizations on
the same site are recommended;
• they adapt very well to the properties of the different woods;
• the quality of the charcoal they produce meets Madagascan consumers’ strict requirements.
COnCluSiOnS:
It would be unrealistic to promote the use of improved carbonization techniques such as Casamance mound kilns, earth pits or metal kilns in Madagascar as these require investment at levels beyond the reach of most charcoal makers.
A more useful approach in the Madagascan context would be to promote simple but largely practicable improvements to carbonization practices using traditional methods like the mound kiln. Such improvements are affordable for an industry without financial resources.
11
Moreover, mound kilns have many advantages in the Madagascan context compared with more
complex techniques, because:
Now, experience has shown that mound kilns
can be almost as efficient as the improved
techniques (ovens) if they are designed
and operated with great care. A mound kiln
operated by a skilled charcoal maker can
in fact produce very good yields of around
20% from raw wood (or 25 to 30% from
anhydrous wood), as against 10% with
casual or inexperienced charcoal makers.
This surprising fact shows how important the
charcoal maker’s know-how is for mound kiln
carbonization, as the yield can be doubled
simply by following good practices.
Doubling the carbonization yield would
halve the amount of wood needed to provide
the same quantity of charcoal.
12
The CARAMCODEC project has arranged a number of training sessions for the different players in the charcoal supply sector for the town of Mahajanga with the aim of improving their ability to perform the new tasks associated with decentralization. These training sessions were designed to be as sustainable as possible.
TRAining fOR ChARCOAl MAkeRS in BOeny RegiOn
> Training in improved carbonization techniques
The carbonization process is the main concern. Yields are very low (less than 10%) and the improved charcoal production techniques often promoted, such as metal chimneys, are beyond the financial reach of most of the producers. However, experienced charcoal makers can obtain very good carbonization yields if they use the mound kiln method carefully. Training charcoal makers therefore appears essential in order to improve yields, as well as being a windfall for the charcoal
makers themselves, who can thus increase their income without at the same time increasing their production costs.
The putting in place of the first management transfer contracts in Boeny in 2001 was accompanied by training for charcoal makers in the different villages. Unfortunately, subsequent assessment of the training sessions showed that due to their scattered nature, it was not possible to cover all aspects of improved mound kilns carbonization in detail. To make up for this, the CARAMCODEC project arranged for the provision and equipping of two permanent training facilities. These are located at Ambalakida and Ambondromamy, the municipalities where the first management transfer contracts were introduced. They provide a central point for all the CARAMCODEC trainings and, in particular, the training of the numerous charcoal makers operating in the eleven rural municipalities of Boeny Region targeted by the project.
During these training courses, the practices that improve the efficiency of mound kilns carbonization were explained to the charcoal makers and notably the cutting and drying of the wood, how to build the kiln, how to cover it, operation and removal of the charcoal from the kiln. The lessons were followed by practical work.
Prior to this, the CARAMCODEC project team trained some local consultants in order to ensure the sustainability of charcoal maker training. These consultants will continue to provide training after the end of the project, in the context of the rolling out of management transfer contracts.
STRengThening CAPACiTieS Of PlAyeRS in DeCenTRAlizeD wOOD eneRgy MAnAgeMenT
6 trainers have been trained. A total of 418 charcoal makers in the Ambalakida and Ambondromamy regions have been trained in improved carbonization techniques.
> Production of a carbonization handbook
To reach as many charcoal makers as possible and extend the area of impact of the CARAMCODEC project, an improved carbonization handbook has been produced in French and Malagasy. This straightforward, illustrated extension manual explains good practices in terms of preparing and operating mound kilns for increased yields.
> Training charcoal makers in micro-business management concepts
The CARAMCODEC project seeks not only to show charcoal makers how to improve their carbonization yields, but also to put their work on a professional footing. Within Boeny Region, charcoal is produced both by professional charcoal makers and also by migrant workers, often illegal, who do not follow sustainable working methods.
The players in the sector also have to get to grips with quotas and production flow management and to follow certain rules of operation. A basic training module in the running and management of micro-businesses (simplified accounting, flow and stock management, etc.) was provided for a number of players selected on the basis of their responsibilities within financial flow management flux.
An illustrated handbook of good carbonization practices has been produced in French and Malagasy.
134 people representing the different categories of players in the sector have taken a basic training module in management, accounting and running micro-businesses:
• 75 VOI representatives: president, treasurer and, where applicable, secretary;• 22 municipality representatives: a representative of the Mayor, as the official
authorizing expenditure, and accounts secretary and treasurer as controller;• 12 administration representatives: heads of cantonnements, chief controller
at DREFT, municipality chief controllers and regional representative;• 25 producers’ representatives: municipality technicians, who could become
local technical assistants to the country people generally and the charcoal makers in particular, and representatives of the charcoal makers who are able to pass on the knowledge gained to other members of the association.
13
14
Transfer of forestry management from the state to the VOI and the municipalities means new management and control duties for these decentralized bodies. In particular, the posts of Polisin’Ala or “forest police” and municipality and inter-municipality controllers have been created.
50 controllers have undertaken a six-day training course at the two CARAMCODEC project facilities.
It was considered essential for the future managers of Madagascar’s forestry and environment sector to be fully informed on the issue of urban energy supplies in order to facilitate the dissemination of the methods developed in Boeny Region. To this end, a training module for students at the Antananarivo college of agriculture gave them an introduction to this energy management policy over two sessions each of four half-days in the classroom and one day in the field.
Training for 50 municipality and inter-municipality controllers in charge of flow management within the transferred areas has been provided at the two CARAMCODEC project facilities.
40 ESSA students, future managers in the forestry and environment sector, were given full information on the topic of domestic energy, in particular industry studies, improving carbonization techniques, managing the supply of wood energy, forest management for wood energy production, the legal framework and decentralized forestry control.
TRAining Of MuniCiPAliTy AnD inTeR-MuniCiPAliTy OffiCiAlS in ChARge Of flOw COnTROl in BOeny RegiOn
TRAining Of fuTuRe fOReSTRy SeRviCe exeCuTiveS
In Boeny Region the CARAMCODEC project has resulted in a reformed system for decentralized forestry control with respect to wood energy. This system follows on from the progress made by the Forestry Service in the region since 2001. It is self-financing through a tax collection scheme validated by the decentralized institutions (municipalities and region).
Controlling charcoal flows within the areas transferred to local people and also on sites that have not yet been transferred remains the keystone of sustainable wood energy management.
The exploitation and marketing of wood energy is controlled at three levels of responsibility in accordance with the management transfer contracts.
1. At grassroots level, i.e. the local communities (called VOI) who have concluded these contracts: outgoing charcoal flows are controlled by officers called Polisin’ala, or “forest police”, the equivalent of country policemen in Europe.
2. The Local Forestry Services control flows at regional level, the environment and forestry cantonnements (CEF) and flows entering towns.
3. Between these two levels a new tier of control has been introduced for the municipalities: municipality and inter-municipality controllers, recruited at the beginning of the CARAMCODEC project, are in charge of coordination between the various municipalities. As well as developing their capabilities, the project has enabled 50 municipality and inter-municipality controllers to be nominated. In particular, their role and conditions of deployment have been established as a result of the project.
DevelOPMenT Of A RefORMeD legAl AnD RegulATORy fRAMewORk fOR uRBAn DOMeSTiC eneRgy SuPPly
15
These control systems are self-financing through a forestry tax levied on charcoal flows. This tax revenue is distributed at the various levels of management according to a distribution scheme that takes account of the degree of responsibility within the monitoring system and the expenses of control.
The sequence is as follows:
1. the VOI levies and distributes the taxes (management expenses, rebates, levy);
2. the VOI pays the municipality’s share;
3. the VOI sends off the forestry tax by postal order;
4. the CEF draws up a tax statement for each remittance;
5. The municipality distributes the sum paid corresponding to the rebate;
6. The CEF recovers the control tax from the VOI. This forces the CEF to visit the transferred
sites and check that exploitation is taking place in accordance with the rules laid down in
the Development and Simplified Management Plan (in French, Plan d’Aménagement et de
Gestion Simplifié / PAGS).
The technical details of this breakdown scheme and a clearer definition of each player’s duties and responsibilities were established following consultation with the players in the charcoal supply sectors, notably the state departments with responsibility for the forests and for decentralization and regional and municipality representatives. These discussions took the form of consultation workshops held under the aegis of the CARAMCODEC project.
Under this system, an inter-municipality agreement coordinates control of charcoal flows between the different municipalities in the area supplying Mahajanga. It also lays down the conditions for collection of fines if charcoal is transported from unauthorized sites, most of which are illegal.
Apart from this regional system of regulation, the issue was to prepare for reform of the legal framework governing the production, processing and marketing of charcoal, hitherto based on a nearly 25-year-old law. Some sixty players at national or regional level met in Antananarivo in March 2008 to draft a bill at the instigation of the CARAMCODEC project. This bill was then submitted to the Department of the Environment and Forests for finalisation and approval.
The passing of this bill by the Madagascan state will enable a National Domestic Energy Strategy to be developed with the aim of implementing realistic solutions for supplying towns with domestic energy. Such a strategy must be based in particular on flow control which is self-financed by a permanent financing scheme.
Distribution scheme:
The table below shows the breakdown scheme for a levy of 440 Ariary (0.18 euros) per bag:
16
TypES OF levy
REBATES
ManageMenT Fee
Tax
• The rebates enable the municipalities and the region to monitor decentralized control
• The management fees remain at VOI level to cover not only local control but also other expenses of charcoal exploitation, in particular control of the charcoal makers
• The forestry tax goes to the Forestry Service and is paid into the forestry fund
• The control expenses are borne by the various levels of control (VOI, municipality, region and Forestry Service).
COnTROl ExpEnSES
vOI CR Rg CEEF DIReeF
20 20
150
90
50 40
50 130
20 50
170 2070
This decentralized management framework for the supply of charcoal to the town of Mahajanga was established by the CARAMCODEC project between May 2007 and May 2008. It was then made official by a regional Order dated 20 September 2008. The tax system enabling decentralized, coordinated control of wood energy flows to be put in place was introduced in early September 2008.
17
VNA District level
vna (vaomieran’ny ala
or district controllers)
VOI Local communities level
VOI (Vondron’olona Ifotony),
for the « GElOSE » zones the
controllers called « polisin’ala »
Local Forestry Service level
Regional forestry control
Cantonnement : production zones and
sub-regional flows
Region : flows entring towns,
regional flows régional
The VOI or VnA collect the total amount of levy
(rebates and tax) and pay the Municipal and local
Forestry Service shares, issue the tax les receipts
and the transport coupons
Three levels of control
(In accordance with the regional
strategy on forestry control
established by Forestry Service)
Suported by a financing scheme
based on a taxation mechanism
involving all players
(tax incentive mechanism)
Checking by municipality authorities and the CEF
CiRAD (france – Madagascar)
CIRAD (French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development) is an agricultural research centre specialising in tropical and Mediterranean products. It has the status of a French public industrial and commercial institution (in French, EpIC) under the joint supervision of the Department of Higher Education and Research and the Department of Foreign and European Affairs. CIRAD works in the fields of life and earth sciences, social sciences and engineering sciences applied to agriculture, forestry and stock rearing, food, natural resources and rural areas.
fOfifA (Madagascar)
The national Centre for Applied Rural Development Research (Cenraderu) FOFIFA is a public industrial and commercial institution. Through its Forestry Research Department it provides support and technical assistance in connection with improving carbonization, plantations and sociological and economic approaches to the forestry sector. It has a staff of 336 researchers and assistants, including 13 researchers in the Forestry Research Department. Management, maintenance and scientific monitoring of forest tree seed orchards (mainly eucalyptus).In 2002, CIRAD and FOFIFA became founder partners with the University of Antananarivo of the Forest and Biodiversity Research partnership Unit. This unit undertakes research connected with management of natural resources and biological diversity in Madagascar.
PARTAge (Madagascar)
PaRTage (association for Participation in environmental Management) is a Madagascan association which aims to share experiences with a view to the sustainable development of the island. To this end, the association members take part in local initiatives aimed at improving the management of renewable natural resources and in local development initiatives that contribute to and promote preservation of the country’s environmental assets.
CRA-w (Belgium)
The Walloon Agricultural Research Centre is a state-approved organisation answerable to the Regional Government of Wallonia, in Belgium. CRA W first became involved in studies and activities to develop the biomass energy sectors in the early eighties. CRA W takes part in international bioenergy sector study and implementation projects in Europe, Asia, Africa and latin america.
18
European CommissionExecutive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation
Unit 1 - Renewable Energy
MADO 4/471049 Brussels
COnTACT:Maria LAGUNAProject Officer
Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation (EACI)Unit 1- Renewable Energy
Tel: +32 (0)2 2967403fAx: +32 (0)2 2981606
e-MAil: [email protected] : European Commission, MADO 4/51, B-1049 Brussels
OffiCe: Place Madou 1, Office 4/51, Brussels
http://ec.europa.eu/eacihttp://ec.europa.eu/energy/intelligent/index_en.html
19