project proposal for public private partnership in …...biotic and abiotic stresses in the future....
TRANSCRIPT
Project proposal for Public Private Partnership in pre-breeding:
Combining Knowledge from Field and from Laboratory for Pre-
breeding in Barley II
Project proposal
Summary
The main goal for the project ”Combining Knowledge from Field and from Laboratory for Pre-
breeding in Barley II” is to lay the foundation for effective cereal breeding for disease resistance and
harvest stability in changing climate conditions capable to meet current and future challenges in the
Nordic region. The first part of the project has resulted in the identification of several markers
associated with nematode resistance, powdery mildew resistance, scald resistance, plant height,
earliness, straw length etc. However, three years is too short time for long term pre-breeding
activities. Based on the results of the ongoing PPP project we have obtained a detailed and valuable
knowledge of the genetic pool available in the Nordic material right now. In order to prepare for the
future environmental challenges it is necessary to introduce a larger variability of genes for abiotic
and biotic stresses with stronger emphasis on long term goals. Preparations for the next phase of the
PPP-project have been made in the first PPP project period in ‘WP Preparing for the future’ by
initiating the development of multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) populations.
The objectives with the next phase of the PPP-project is to develop a new generation of mapping
populations, such as MAGIC that should overcome the limitations of traditional bi-parental and
association mapping populations. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) will be conducted on
these populations to provide the DNA markers linked to diseases resistance as well as to agronomic
traits. The MAGIC populations will possess combined resistance to different diseases in a single line.
All information regarding the original sources of resistance, DNA markers linked to resistance genes
as well as lines with combined resistance genes will be available for all project partners. The crossing
populations can then be incorporated in their breeding programs and used for e.g. marker assisted
backcrossing (MAB).
PPP-Proposal: Combining knowledge of field and laboratory for PPP in barley II
2
Time frame
1st of January 2015 to the 31st of December 2017
Sum requested and total budget
DKK 15.417.814 in total
DKK 7.624.864 requested and DKK 7.792.950 contributed by the breeding institutions
Project coordination (CV attached)
Ahmed Jahoor Nordic Seed Højbygårdvej 14 DK-4960 Holeby Denmark Phone: +45 2913 4757
Email: [email protected]
Scientific output from the first barley PPP including the one year extension period.
Therese Bengtsson et al. Genetic diversity and population structure in Nordic spring barley. In preparation. Therese Bengtsson et al. Identification and mapping of Powdery mildew resistance loci on chromosome 6H. In preparation.
PPP-Proposal: Combining knowledge of field and laboratory for PPP in barley II
3
Project participants with addresses and contact information
Participant Contact person
Nordic Seed Højbygårdvej 14 DK-4960 Holeby Denmark www.nordicseed.com
Ahmed Jahoor +45 29134757 [email protected]
Sejet Planteforædling I/S Nørremarksvej 67, Sejet DK-8700 Horsens Denmark www.sejet.com
Birger Eriksen +45 75682177 [email protected]
Graminor Breeding AS Hommelstadvegen 60 N-2322 Ridabu Norway www.graminor.no
Lars Reitan +47 48041300 [email protected]
Boreal Plant Breeding Myllytie 10 FI-31600 Jokioinen Finland www.boreal.fi
Outi Manninen +358 407785673 [email protected]
LUKE Natural Resources Institute Finland Tietotie 4 FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland www.luke.fi
Marja Jalli +358 295317261 [email protected]
Agricultural University of Iceland (LBHI) Faculty of Land and Animal Resources Keldnaholt IS-112 Reykjavik Iceland www.lbhi.is
Áslaug Helgadóttir +354 4335255 [email protected]
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) Department of Plant Breeding Sundsvägen 10 SE-230 53 ALNARP Sweden www.slu.se
Inger Åhman +46 040415240 [email protected]
PPP-Proposal: Combining knowledge of field and laboratory for PPP in barley II
4
Introduction
Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) is one of the most important crops in the Nordic regions of Europe
(Denmark, Finland, Norway, Iceland and Sweden) where it covered a total area of 1.73 million ha in
2013 excluding Iceland (http://faostat.fao.org). It is mainly used for malting, feed and food.
Nordic barley breeding began more than 100 years ago, starting from utilization of the variation in
the landrace gene pool to cultivation of modern elite varieties. The commercial breeding programs
within the Nordic countries have a long term focus on the current main diseases of barley and the
search for new sources of resistance remains an important factor when breeding for resistance.
Plant pathogens are a constant threat in cereal production in Northern Europe. By reducing crop
quality and yield they not only threaten food safety but cause economic losses as well as an
environmental burden. Today the disease control in barley mainly relies on moderately resistant to
resistant cultivars and the use of fungicides. The implementation of the EU legislation that will
restrict the use of fungicides and the wish to increase organic production, further highlights the
importance of finding new sources of resistance for disease control. Disease resistance based on
genetic resistance is an environmentally sound and economical alternative for plant disease control.
The Nordic region exhibits a large variation in climate and soil, where the eastern part of Finland and
inland Sweden has an inland climate, the southern part has a mild maritime climate and coastal
Norway and Iceland has a cool maritime climate. The climate change is predicted to cause more
extreme weather conditions such as prolonged periods of drought and severe cloud bursts in the
Nordic countries (http://www.dmi.dk/dmi/index/klima/). Diseases such as Spot blotch (Bipolaris
sorokiniana), Ramularia leaf spot (Ramularia colly-cygni) and Fusarium head blight (Fusarium
graminearum) are examples of new and emerging barley diseases related to climate change in the
Nordic region. In addition to emerging diseases an anticipated increased temperature with retained
photoperiod is expected to alter the growth habit (Bragason, 1985). In the first phase of the project
a variation was seen between locations for maturity due to differences in the length of growth
season and temperature. Therefore, it is important to increase the variability and diversify the
source of desired genes/traits that has a low genotype by environment interaction to sustain both
biotic and abiotic stresses in the future.
Understanding which genes are affecting important traits such as yield, quality, disease resistance
and environmental adaptation is a fundamental part in modern plant breeding. Most plant traits
show complex genetic inheritance, with phenotypic expression under polygenic control at
quantitative trait loci (QTL). Although the identification of simply inherited traits has been successful,
the discovery of genes for more complex traits has been restricted by the absence of proper genetic
resources, both in terms of genotyping methods and in terms of breeder-relevant germplasm
(Cavanagh et al. 2008). However, thanks to recent advances in genotyping capabilities, genetic
marker density no longer restricts QTL discovery in plants. Rather the concern in QTL discovery now
is the limitations of the type of mapping population used and the bottle neck of phenotyping.
Typically F2, backcross (BC), double haploid or recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations derived
from two parents have been used for QTL mapping. The problem with using bi-parental populations
is that only two alleles are analyzed (in diploid species) and that the resolution for QTL detection is
restricted due to limited gene recombination (Li et al. 2010; Rakshit et al. 2012).
PPP-Proposal: Combining knowledge of field and laboratory for PPP in barley II
5
Barley has been a model species for the development of QTL mapping based on bi-parental
populations but due to the development of high density genotyping platforms, there has been a shift
from traditional QTL mapping to genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in barley (Waugh et al.
2009). Association mapping relies on linkage disequilibrium (LD) to exploit the correlation between
phenotype and genotype in populations of unrelated individuals, hence it has the advantage of many
more generations of recombination resulting in high-resolution mapping (Myles et al. 2009).
However, one concern in association mapping is the false positive associations caused by a strong
population structure (Pritchard et al. 2000). In cultivated barley strong population structure is often
associated with spike row number and the growth habit (e.g. spring vs. winter barley) (Hamblin et al.
2010), thus GWAS need to correct for the population structure stratification. For controlling
population structure and relatedness within GWAS, mixed linear models (MLM) have been useful,
but they can still be computationally challenging for large datasets (Zhang et al. 2010). Recent
development of statistical methods such as the unified mixed model, efficient mixed model
association (EMMA), the compressed MLM, and population parameters previously determined
(P3D), have reduced computing time and improved the statistical power by clustering individuals
into groups (Zhang et al. 2010). Association mapping was usefully employed in the first phase of
project and several DNA markers were identified and validated in the breeding material by each
company.
To overcome these limitations caused by bi-parental populations and association mapping
populations due to presence of rare alleles, next-generation mapping populations have been
developed and started to be utilized (Morrell et al. 2012). Some of the identified markers from the
first PPP project, e.g., for earliness and straw length, were associated with rare alleles in the Nordic
barley population and in such cases GWAS is an unsuitable method. Hence, a way to overcome this
problem is to develop segregating populations that will increase the frequency of the rare alleles
thus enable GWAS. The multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) is one example of
these new mapping resources, in this case created by several generations of inter-crossing among
multiple founder lines. The MAGIC population contributes to a higher allelic diversity than a bi-
parental population and gives greater opportunities for recombination and, hence greater precision
in QTL location (Cavanagh et al. 2008). In addition, MAGIC populations allow the use of both linkage
and association analysis without the restrictions encountered with highly structured populations
(Rakshit et al. 2012). So far, MAGIC and MAGIC-like populations have been developed in a few crop
species including rice (Bandillo et al. 2013), barley (Sannemann, 2013), spring wheat (Huang et al.
2012) and winter wheat (Mackay et al. 2014). In crop plants MAGIC population can provide not only
sources of novel trait QTL combinations for breeding but also can provide training population for
genomic selection.
Educating the next generation of plant breeders
There is a need for strengthened research education in plant breeding in the Nordic region,
combining more traditional methods and quantitative genetics with different aspects of plant
biotechnology (Nilsson and von Bothmer, 2010). Only few candidates have this general
agricultural/horticultural profile including necessary aspects on practical breeding and genetics.
Candidates with a background in plant biotech normally lack these skills in their training. In the first
phase of the Barley-PPP (2012 – 2014) one PhD student and two Post-Docs was assigned to the
PPP-Proposal: Combining knowledge of field and laboratory for PPP in barley II
6
project. By continuing the educational aspect in phase two, the next generation of plant breeders
will be trained.
Underlying idea with the second phase
In the first phase of the Barley-PPP project (2012-2014) we have obtained a detailed and valuable
knowledge of the genetic pool available in the Nordic material right now. Several markers have been
identified such as markers associated with nematode resistance, powdery mildew resistance, scald
resistance, plant height, earliness, straw length etc. In some cases easy-to-use-markers have been
developed for the companies to use in their screening of breeding materials. However, three years is
too short time for long term pre-breeding activities. One of the objectives of the second phase is to
introduce a larger variability of genes for abiotic and biotic stresses with emphasis on various
climatic conditions and on long term goals. This project will:
a) Develop pre-competitive multi-parent advanced generation intercross (MAGIC) populations
for mapping of novel disease and agronomic traits (The development of MAGIC populations
was already initiated in spring 2014 and a second round of crosses was conducted in autumn
2014). WP1
b) Produce homozygous segregating plant lines from each MAGIC population that will be
screened for a broad selection of diseases and agronomic traits at different locations in the
Nordic countries. WP2
c) Provide the preliminary molecular knowledge and tools for current and future
implementation of high-throughput marker system in Nordic barley cultivar
development.WP3, WP6
d) Provide knowledge of disease resistance genetics and screening tools for current and future
important disease evaluation. WP3, WP4, WP6
e) Provide physiological knowledge and screening tools for harvest stability traits that are
linked to climate.WP5, WP6
f) Incorporate the new sources in breeding programs. WP7
A GANTT diagram at the end of this application, shows the workload in different WP over the project
period. Shaded in gray are the activities which should continue beyond the project period to get the
full benefit of the work done in this project (Combining Knowledge from Field and from Laboratory
for Pre-breeding in Barley II).
PPP-Proposal: Combining knowledge of field and laboratory for PPP in barley II
7
References
Bandillo et al. 2013. Multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) populations in
rice: progress and potential for genetics research and breeding. Rice 6:11.
Bragason Á. 1985. Sammenligning af vårbygpopulationer i Danmark og Island. Den kgl.
Veterinær- og Landbohøjskole, Afdelingen for Landbrugets Plantekultur, Copenhagen,
Denmark.
Cavanagh et al. 2008. From mutations to MAGIC: resources for gene discovery, validation
and delivery in crop plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol 11:215–221.
Hamblin et al. 2010. Population Structure and Linkage Disequilibrium in U.S. Barley
Germplasm: Implications for Association Mapping. Crop Sci 50:556-566.
Huang et al. 2012. A multiparent advanced generation inter-cross population for genetic
analysis in wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J 10:826–839.
Li et al. 2010. Statistical properties of QTL linkage mapping in biparental genetic populations.
Heredity 105:257-267.
Lipka et al. 2012. GAPIT: Genome Association and Prediction Integrated Tool. Bioinformatics,
2012, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts444.
Mackay et al. 2014. An Eight-Parent Multiparent Advanced Generation Inter-Cross
Population for Winter-Sown Wheat: Creation, Properties and Validation. G3 4:1603-1609.
Morrell et al. 2012. Crop genomics: advances and applications. Nature Rev Genet 13:85–96.
Myles et al. 2009. Association Mapping: Critical Considerations Shift from Genotyping to
Experimental Design. Plant Cell 21:2194-2202.
Nilsson and von Bothmer. 2010. Measures to promote Nordic plant breeding. TemaNord
2010:518. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen.
Pritchard et al. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.
Genetics 155: 945–959.
Rakshit et al. 2012. Multiparent intercross populations in analysis of quantitative traits. J
Genet 91:111-117.
Sannemann, 2013. Marker-trait-sensor association in a multi-parent advanced generation
intercross (MAGIC) population in barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare). Doctoral
thesis."Institut für Nutzpflanzenwissenschaften und Ressourcenschutz Professur für
Pflanzenzüchtung Prof. Dr. J. Léon."
Waugh et al. 2009. The emergence of whole genome association scans in barley. Curr Opin
Plant Biol 12:218-222.
PPP-Proposal: Combining knowledge of field and laboratory for PPP in barley II
8
Work package 1: Development of Multiparent Advanced Generation
InterCross (MAGIC) populations
Leader: Jens Due Jensen; Nordic Seed – Denmark
1.1 INTRODUCTION
The main goal of WP1 is the development of pre-competitive Multi-parent Advanced Generation
InterCross (MAGIC) populations for mapping of novel disease resistance and agronomic traits. From
these populations, breeders will be able to incorporate the mapped novel traits in their elite
material using marker assisted backcrossing (MAB). The development of a new generation of
mapping populations, such as MAGIC, should overcome the limitations of traditional bi-parental and
association mapping populations. Some of the advantages of these new populations, including
MAGIC populations, are the following: 1) increased rate of effective recombination per generation,
2) higher level of genetic variability, 3) higher resolution, 4) effective sampling of rare alleles, 5)
elimination of population structure issues, 6) good estimations of allelic effects.
Figure 1.1: Schematic on 8 parent Multiparent Advanced Generation InterCross (MAGIC) population
For the development of MAGIC populations, multiple parents, in our case 8 parents, are used per
populations (Figure 1). The parents in such population consists of 4 elite lines from the Nordic region
combined with 4 lines either coming from intensive screening of the 180 lines from the first barley
PPP project (2012-2014) or from the MAGIC donor screening, conducted in the extension year
(2014) of the first barley PPP project. The development of the MAGIC populations was already
initiated in spring 2014 and a second round of crosses was conducted in autumn 2014. We are
aiming at getting 5 populations, four in which we focus on disease resistance and one where the
focus is earliness. The elite lines and donors have been selected based on their resistance to Leaf
PPP-Proposal: Combining knowledge of field and laboratory for PPP in barley II
9
rust (rph7, rph16 and MBR1012), Scald (new resistance), Fusarium head blight, Bipolaris spot blotch,
Net blotch (net and spot type) and earliness. This was done in the extension of the first barley PPP
project in order to be prepared for a future PPP project but also because all Nordic breeding
companies saw the development of pre-competitive MAGIC populations as a crucial tool in a very
competitive market where the relative small breeding companies in Nordic region are under press
from big multi-national companies. New MAGIC populations will also be developed in the new
project. The principle for them will be the same as those that are already being developed. New
donors will come from the intensive screening of donors done in WP3, described later in this
application.
1.2 TASKS
Task 1.1 Last rounds of crosses in the development of the first set of MAGIC population:
Description: Coordination of the third (last) round of crosses for the already initiated MAGIC
populations during spring 2015, five crosses in total.
Time: Month 2-4.
Deliverables: 20 F1 seed per cross (population) for development of homozygous lines in WP2.
Task 1.2 First rounds of crosses in the second set of MAGIC population:
Description: Initiation and coordination of the development of five new MAGIC populations. Four
populations for mapping of diseases resistance and one for agronomic traits, 20 crosses in the first
round, 10 crosses in the second round and 5 in last round.
Time: Month 14-16 first round of crosses, month 22-24 second round crosses and month 26-28 third
round of crosses.
Deliverables: 20 F1 seed per cross (population) for development of homozygous lines in WP2.
1.3 PARTNERS
Main crossing sites will be Sejet and Nordic seed in Denmark. The coordination and accomplishment
of the crosses is more successful when there is a small physical distance between the two companies
which allows easy exchange of seed and plant material. In special cases other project partners will
be included in carrying out the crosses.
Each partner will have a member in the WP1 MAGIC working group, which will discuss and decide
which parental lines and donors should be crossed.
PPP-Proposal: Combining knowledge of field and laboratory for PPP in barley II
10
Work package 2: Development of homozygous lines from Magic populations
Leader: Lene Krusell; Sejet Planteforædling – Denmark
2.1 INTRODUCTION
One of the main goals of the second PPP project is to introduce a larger variability of genes involved
in disease resistance and important agronomical traits with emphasis on various climatic conditions.
A collection of new sources for resistances and agronomic traits has been identified during the
ongoing PPP project and by comprehensive searching of relevant literature. These sources will be
utilized during the future PPP project, creating MAGIC populations combining a large proportion of
the genetic variation contained in the collection. This gives the opportunity of pyramiding sources
for specific traits or combining several desirable traits in one background. Based on the results of the
ongoing PPP project, we have obtained a detailed and valuable knowledge of the genetic pool
available in the Nordic material right now. In order for us to prepare for the future environmental
challenges it is necessary to introduce new sources thereby increasing the variability of the genetic
pool.
2.2 TASKS
Task 2.1 Techniques for development of homozygous MAGIC population:
Description: Work package 2 deals with the production of homozygous segregating plant lines from
each MAGIC population. These populations will be screened for a broad selection of diseases and
agronomic traits at different locations in the Nordic countries (see WP4 and 5). This requires that
each line is genetically stable, ensuring that it is the exact same genetic pool being screened at the
different locations under various environmental conditions.
Several techniques such as Single Seed Descent (SSD) and Double Haploid (DH) are available for
production of homozygous lines. SSD is a relative uncomplicated method in which conventional
inbreeding involves descending of one seed per plant in each generation. Using this method a
genetically stable (homozygous) population requires 6-7 generations to be reached. Based on the
short timeframe of the PPP project (2015-17) the high number of generations is a critical issue and in
this respect a technique such as Double Haploids would be more suitable. This technique represents
a fast way of creating homozygous lines within one generation, based on androgenizes (anther or
microspore cultures). The DH procedure is a highly specialized technique that requires optimal tissue
culture and growth facilities. Within the PPP group there is a high degree of expertise in the private
breeding companies and the technique is utilized by the companies as an important procedure to
optimize and accelerate the breeding programs.
Time: Month 8-16 (first round of MAGIC populations), month 32-40 (second round of MAGIC
populations).
Deliverables: 250 DH lines from each MAGIC population.
Task 2.2 Multiplication of homozygous MAGIC populations for screening in the field:
PPP-Proposal: Combining knowledge of field and laboratory for PPP in barley II
11
Description: Each DH line will be multiplied in the field in order to produce enough material to
distribute between the partners for screening of selected diseases and agronomic traits. Each single
DH plant will be harvested and the seeds sown in approximately 4-6 one meter rows for
multiplication (SeedMatic format). This will, at a minimum, produce 500 g of seeds for distribution.
Time: Month 16-20 (first round of MAGIC populations), month 40-44 (second round of MAGIC
populations).
Deliverables: Multiplication of seed from each individual DH line. Approximately 0,5 kg of each line.
2.3 PARTNERS
The production of DH lines will be divided between Nordic Seed, Sejet Planteforædling and Boreal
each of these companies has the technique actively running in the laboratory.
Each company will be responsible for the production of 250 DH lines from 1-2 MAGIC populations.
This will be followed by multiplication of each individual line, producing material enough for field
screening in multiple locations. The selection of, Finland and Denmark for multiplication is coupled
to the environmental conditions, thereby selecting locations in which all lines will reach full maturity
before harvest.
PPP-Proposal: Combining knowledge of field and laboratory for PPP in barley II
12
Work package 3: Searching for and screening of new sources
Leader: Outi Manninen; Boreal – Finland
3.1 INTRODUCTION
Screening for new sources of resistance is a continuous process. Pathogen populations are prone to
evolve and break the resistances in varieties. It is not wise to rely on only a few resistance sources in
varieties since this poses a strong selection pressure on the pathogen populations. Durability of
resistance may be enhanced by pyramiding several resistance genes into a variety. Climate change
may also cause quick changes in the pathogen populations and breeding has to be ready to meet
new challenges. We will continue searching new resistance sources and incorporating them to
adapted breeding material. It is important to work on several putative resistance sources since some
resistance genes may affect yield or other agronomic traits negatively and thus are not useful in
breeding programs. The ‘dynamic gene pool of barley’ preserved at the NordGen will also serve as
potential source of donors.
3.2 TASKS (TABLE 3.1)
Task 3.1 Collection of information on resistance sources:
Description: Collecting new publicly available information on resistance sources and making this
information available to the project participants in the form of a content management system
(CMS).
Time: Months 1-3, updates during months 13 and 25.
Deliverables: Information on new putative resistance sources stored at CMS.
Task 3.2 Collection and multiplication of seed:
Description: Ordering and multiplication of seed for potential resistance sources. Distribution of seed
to project participants for screening and crossing.
Time: Months 4-6, and when needed.
Deliverables: Seed lots from potential resistance sources available for project partners.
Task 3.3 Screening:
Description: Screening for new resistance sources. Screening for new resistance sources will first be
done in field conditions and interesting sources will continue to further greenhouse/field tests (Task
4). We will specifically look for new resistance to Ramularia and Fusarium. In addition, based on the
results in the first PPP Barley project we still need to put emphasis on finding resistance to net
blotch and Bipolaris.
Time: Summer 2015, 2016 and 2017.
Deliverables: Preliminary information on the resistance reactions towards Nordic pathogen
populations. Preliminary information of adaptation to the Nordic conditions.
PPP-Proposal: Combining knowledge of field and laboratory for PPP in barley II
13
Task 3.4 Verification:
Description: Verification of resistance sources. We will verify all resistance sources used in current
or new mapping populations with greenhouse and/or field testing in several locations. We have
three types of material: a) parents of the first MAGIC populations, b) potential new resistance
sources (from Task 1 and 2) and c) the parents of the ‘Dynamic Gene Pool’.
a) In the first MAGIC populations under development there are new or unmapped genes for
resistance to leaf rust, scald, Fusarium head blight, Bipolaris spot blotch and net blotch (net
and spot type). These resistance sources were selected based on literature and results of
previous research. The resistance of these sources was tested during 2014 and will be
verified in a second year experiment.
Time: during 2015.
Deliverables: Information on the resistance reactions towards Nordic pathogen populations.
b) New potential resistance sources from the screens will be further tested for resistance in
greenhouse and at several field locations. Best ones will be selected to be parents of the
new mapping crosses (MAGIC, BC or pairwise crosses).
Time: 2016 and 2017.
Deliverables: Information on the resistance reactions towards Nordic pathogen populations.
New sources of resistance to several diseases. New parents for MAGIC or other type of
mapping populations.
c) Dynamic Gene Pool. This collection was produced about 20 years ago with a scheme:
pairwise crosses, diallel, pairwise crosses for 3 generations, diallel. The final material of 276
families provides an interesting population were the genomes of 40 progenitors have been
recombined with six rounds of crosses. Starting material was partly lines and varieties
adapted to Nordic conditions, and partly exotic material. All parents were selected for one
or more resistances to mildew, Bipolaris, rust, net blotch (net or spot type), scald, smut,
stripe or nematodes. The last generation of this material will be multiplied at NordGen
during 2015.
Time: Greenhouse testing during winter 2015/2016, field tests 2016.
Deliverables: Information of the usability of the Dynamic Gene Pool as new Donors for MAGIC
population for mapping resistance genes.
Table 3.1 Participant involvement in tasks in WP3
Boreal Graminor LBHI LUKE Nordic Seed Sejet SLU
Task 3.1 X X X
Task 3.2 X X
Task 3.3 X X X X X
Task 3.4 X X X X X
PPP-Proposal: Combining knowledge of field and laboratory for PPP in barley II
14
Work package 4: Screening of segregation populations for diseases resistance
Leader: Lars Reitan; Graminor - Norway
4.1 INTRODUCTION
The initial project period of three years is too short time for long term pre-breeding activities. The
parties of the project are agreeing to continue the work in a second phase with stronger emphasis
on long term goals. Examples of future perspectives that have been raised are an increased focus on
new and emerging diseases related to climatic change.
To prepare for a next stage of PPP, new sources of resistance was started in the first PPP project
period in ‘WP Preparing for the future’ crosses are initiated and segregating progenies will be
developed .This work will continue by searching in literature, trying new sources and developing
new crosses for testing. All breeding companies participating in this project were involved in the
NordForsk project “Sustainable primary production in a changing climate”, co-ordinated by Rikke
Bagger Jørgensen (RISØ-DTU) and knowledge from this project will likewise be further utilized in the
next stage of PPP, particularly resistance material will be selected and used in crossing for the
development of segregating progenies.
Spot blotch (Bipolaris sorokiniana) is a disease which has increased in the Nordic countries during
the past years, especially in Finland where the pathogen is present in almost all fields. Ramularia leaf
spot caused by Ramularia collo-cygni is another disease on the rise, causing economic losses in
barley in an increasing number of countries. A third disease is Fusarium head blight, also causing
losses due to toxin problems and reduced yields. For these pathogens, more knowledge about the
virulence structure in Northern Europe is needed, but even more important from the breeder’s point
of view are the identification of new sources for resistance and the development of efficient tools
for selection. Access to user-friendly markers would improve the possibilities for successful
pyramiding of different resistance genes to achieve a sustainable resistance. Another example will
be to further elucidate the linkage between Ramularia susceptibility and mlo resistance and
subsequently break this linkage. Our information about the present advanced breeding material
among the Nordic participants paves the way for the next step: to increase the variability and
amount of genes for disease resistance in a longer perspective and under different climatic regime.
4.2 TASKS
Task 4.1 Disease screening of MAGIC populations and Donor lines:
Description: Different diseases have different impact on barley production in different parts of the
Nordic countries, and priority will vary between countries. Some diseases have been investigated for
a long time (e.g. net blotch and scald), while others are ‘new’ and evolving in the field (e.g.
Ramularia, Bipolaris, Fusarium). Our goal is to include diseases with severe impact on crop yields
under current and future climate conditions, and to search for new resistance sources. Based on the
output of the first PPP project and priorities in the initial PPP (‘WP Future’) and the prolongation
year and the creation of MAGIC population the task includes the following diseases:
PPP-Proposal: Combining knowledge of field and laboratory for PPP in barley II
15
1. Scald (Rhynchosporium secalis),
2. Net blotch (Drechlera teres),
3. Ramularia leaf spot (Ramularia collo-cygni),
4. Spot blotch or Bipolaris (Bipolaris sorokiniana),
5. Fusarium head blight (Fusarium spp.)
6. Leaf Rust (Puccinia hordei Otth.)
A brief description of the different disease resistance testing sites and activities (table 4.1):
Scald will be tested for in at least two different environments; in Boreal/LUKE (Fin) and in NOS (DK)
in field conditions with artificial inoculation, each of different local strains. The potential new
resistance sources implemented in the crossings are essential in the testing regime. (In addition,
when possible a natural scald attack on material to be tested for agronomic traits in Iceland, a
registration on scald severity should be done).
Net blotch will be tested in field conditions and artificial inoculated with virulent strains of the two
net blotch fungi Drechlera teres var. teres (D.t.t)/maculate D.t.m). Screening for the disease will be
done at least twice in the season. Greenhouse testing is relevant, although the small- plant
resistance is different from adult plant resistance and should be handled by caution. At least two
sites will be included for testing: at Boreal/LUKE(Fin) (both D.t.t and D.t.m) and at Graminor(N)
(D.t.t).
Ramularia leaf spot will be tested under natural infection in two to three locations; at Graminor
(GN) and in Sejet (DK). Scoring the disease will be done at least two times in the season.
Spot blotch or Bipolaris will be carried out in Boreal/LUKE in both field and greenhouse conditions
with artificial inoculation, and scored according to known practice at the station.
Fusarium head blight will be tested in two locations: in Graminor (N) on artificial Fusarium
graminearum inoculated, mist irrigated field and FHB, yield impact and DON values will be recorded.
At Boreal/LUKE (Fin), a similar setup will be done on F. culmorum.
Leaf Rust will be carried out in two environments (Sejet and Nordic Seed) in Denmark on non-
inoculated fields.
PPP-Proposal: Combining knowledge of field and laboratory for PPP in barley II
16
Table 4.1: Summing up diseases and testing sites
BOREAL* LUKE GRAMINOR NORDIC SEED SEJET LBHI
1. Scald
(Rhynchosporium secalis),
X
X
X
2.Net blotch
(Drechlera teres),
X
X
3.Ramularia leaf spot
(Ramularia collo-cygni),
X
X
4.Spot blotch or Bipolaris
(Bipolaris sorokiniana),
X
5.Fusarium head blight
(Fusarium spp.)
X
X
6. Leaf Rust
(Puccinia spp.)
X X
*Disease screening is done in a coordinated collaboration with LUKE
Preferably 250 lines will be screened pr. MAGIC population. Screening of the DH lines should be
tested in standard setup for the participant, and even hillplot or ‘headrow’ plots might be relevant
for certain diseases, but it is a big advantage to have bigger plots in order to avoid border effects.
Both field conditions with natural/artificial inoculation, and/or greenhouse small-/adult plants might
be relevant depending on conditions and disease. Even controlled conditions with attached leaves
etc. might be relevant.
In the first year of seed multiplication and pre-screening 500-1000 g of seed should be harvested for
screening in the following season.
Each participant is responsible for the scientific work necessary for the screening of the segregating
material and donors. The work package leader might visit the different experiments and encourage a
good setup.
Donor lines was tested for a set of diseases in previous project, but the seed amount was scarce and
the germplasm hardly had repetitions in the tests. It is of big impact to repeat these tests in time
and space, and adding new potential donors to the list. Also some ordinary cultivars should be
included as controls. Testing of donor lines should be done at least two years in the new project.
The donor lines should be tested in the best possible setup to create as good data as possible, and
perhaps it is necessary to choose bigger plots and more replicates than for the offspring testing in
order to achieve this.
Deliverables: Phenotypic data from disease screenings. All data will be controlled and handed over
to SLU for central computation and will be used for the association mapping in WP 7 (Therese
Bengtsson). External expertise might also be consulted when necessary, and the budget should
cover this.
Time: Summer 2015, 2016 and 2017
PPP-Proposal: Combining knowledge of field and laboratory for PPP in barley II
17
Some of the crosses connected to the Magic population development are already done, and others
are already planned in detail and will be carried out during 2014 and beginning of 2015. In autumn
2015 and spring 2016 Double Haploid (DH) offspring from the MAGIC crosses will be produced and
the first pre-screening and multiplication of the offspring will be done in 2016. During autumn 2016
and spring 2017 the material will be genotyped by SNP chip, and a full scale field screening of the DH
offspring will take place in the summer season of 2017. Parallel to this a full set of Donor Screening
will take place in all summers 2015-2017 in all sites.
Donors will screened in 2015, 2016 and 2017
4.3 PARTNERS
The different project partners dealing with testing of segregating material are the following:
BOREAL/LUKE (Fin), GRAMINOR (N), NORDIC SEED (DK), SEJET (DK) LBHI (I)
Apart from these partners also SLU are important participant in doing the calculations on the results
of the testing related to marker association etc. (WP6)
PPP-Proposal: Combining knowledge of field and laboratory for PPP in barley II
18
Work package 5: Screening of segregating populations for agronomic traits
Leader: Sæmundur Sveinsson; LBHI - Iceland
5.1 INTRODUCTION
The Nordic region spans over diverse climatic conditions caused by a multitude of latitudinal,
altitudinal and climatic (maritime/continental) interactions.
Heat sum over the growth season varies both between locations and years, as well as the length of
the growth season and the precipitation pattern. This yearly variation is expected to increase, and be
less predictable in the future climate (IPCC, 2014). In addition, the number of extreme weather
events is predicted to increase. It is vital to address the upcoming challenges and accelerate the pace
in which we are base broadening our Nordic barley gene pool to sustain both biotic and abiotic
stresses, if we want to maintain a sustainable crop production and resilient bio economy in the
Nordic region.
We need to breed varieties that are robust and have wide tolerance for climatic variations, e.g. a low
genotype by environment interaction for agronomic characters such as height and straw strength. In
order to identify such material, multi-location and year trials are essential. In addition to abiotic
stresses, susceptibility to diseases has effects on certain agronomic traits, e.g. lodging.
Furthermore, it will be essential to fine tune the time of flowering and maturity in order to optimally
utilize the growth season in each location. In previous screenings for heading day in Phase 1 of the
PPP project (17 trials, 2012 – 1014) low environmental effect was seen, with a strong Pearson
correlation between trials (R-values ranging 0.72 – 0.93). For maturity, however, variation was
greater between locations as heat sum requirements for maturity are higher. Length of growth
season and temperature varies greatly in the Nordic region (table 5.1). This calls for locally adapted
cultivars that are adjusted to the local day length and temperature regimes for completing maturity.
Table 5.1: Length of growth season and heat sums of selected locations in the ongoing PPP-project.
Location Year Days from sowing to maturity of
latest line in PPP-set
Heat sum
(Day degrees, >0°C)
Korpa, Iceland 2012 143 1407
2013 Did not reach maturity 12691
Sejet, Denmark 2012 133 1731
2013 111 1756
Staur, Norway 2012 104 1786
2013 112 1964
2014 85 1715 1From sowing to harvesting (142 days)
MAGIC population
In the initial phase of the PPP (2012 – 2014), we identified several markers which were associated
with alleles for earliness and straw length. Some of the identified alleles were rare in the Nordic
barley population. In the case where rare alleles gives only a few lines of contrasting phenotype,
GWAS is an unsuitable method as the statistical power in the model requires at least 10% frequency
PPP-Proposal: Combining knowledge of field and laboratory for PPP in barley II
19
of each phenotype in the population. Hence, a way to further study the role of rare alleles is to
develop segregating populations based on two or more parental lines, or MAGIC populations . This
will increase the frequency of the rare alleles in the study population which in turn enables GWAS as
a tool for QTL-mapping.
Educational part
In the first phase of the PPP, a PhD student was assigned to LBHI working with the agronomic traits.
The analyses are continuing in the first year of phase two, and are expected to be completed by the
end of 2015. In 2016, a new student will be assigned to LBHI within the framework of the PPP phase
two, to work with trials of the MAGIC earliness population.
5.2 Tasks
Task 5.1 Populations
Description: Screening of the developmental traits heading day, grain filling period, maturity and
height. Screenings should take place in two distinct climatic conditions:
1. Long and cool growth season (Iceland/coastal northern Norway)
2. Early sowing and warm growth season (Denmark/south of Sweden)
Time
A four-way MAGIC has been developed (2012 – 2014).
In 2015, crosses with four additional sources of earliness, semi-dwarfing and lodging resistance will
be initiated. The eight-way MAGIC will require three rounds of crosses which will be performed in
2015. Development of DH lines will take place in spring 2016, with the population ready for field
trials in 2017.
Deliverables
A four-way MAGIC earliness population is completed, to SSD5 (F6 generation). This population will
be screened in row sowings in 2015, and in plot screenings 2016.
An eight-way MAGIC earliness will be developed to further diversify the sources of earliness. This
population will be screened in field trials in 2017.
Task 5.2 Education
Deliverables: Education of one PhD student (2012 – 2015) completed. Education of a new student
(2016 - ) initiated.
5.3 Partners
Development of MAGIC populations: LBHI. Field trials taking place at LBHI and Sejet.
PPP-Proposal: Combining knowledge of field and laboratory for PPP in barley II
20
Work package 6: Data management and association mapping
Leader: Therese Bengtsson (SLU-Sweden)
6.1 INTRODUCTION
One of the main goals of the second PPP project is to identify markers linked to new, different and
effective disease resistance genes and agronomical traits such as maturity, earliness etc. that the
breeders can incorporate in their breeding programs. The use of MAGIC populations will allow the
use of both linkage and association analysis without the restrictions encountered with highly
structured populations. DNA will be extracted from the five MAGIC populations and sent to
TraitGenetics (Gatersleben, Germany) for SNP genotyping with the 9K Illumina Chip containing
approximately 6950 functional SNPs. Genome-Wide-Association-Analysis (GWAS) will then be
performed, linking the phenotyping data for diseases resistance and agronomic traits obtained for
the MAGIC population in WP3, WP4 and WP5 to the data obtained from high-throughput SNP
genotyping. The R package GAPIT (Genome Association and Prediction Integrated Tool) will be used,
that performs GWAS and genome prediction based on the state-of-the-art methods for statistical
genetics. One of the objectives for WP6 is to provide the partners with the phenotyping and
genotyping results as well as the outcome of the GWAS via the existing content management system
(CMS) from a server at SLU. Markers found in the GWAS will be transformed to easy-to-use PCR-
based markers such as Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR (KASP) and the sequences and protocols will
be made available to the partners via the CMS. The information about the linked markers will also be
used in WP7 for marker assisted backcrossing (MAB) and for genomic selection (GS).
6.2 TASKS
Task 6.1 Information on CMS:
Description: Making all information and results available for the partners via the internal CMS.
Time: Whole period
Deliverables: Maintenance and updating of the CMS.
Task 6.2 Genotyping:
Description: Collecting the material from the five MAGIC populations produced within the project
and isolate DNA for genotyping of high throughput Single Nucleotide Polymorphism.
Time: Autumn 2016 and autumn 2017.
Deliverables: SNP information of the five MAGIC populations available in CMS.
Task 6.3 GWAS:
Description: Association between the field data from WP3, WP4 and WP5 and the marker data with
Genome Wide Association Analysis (GWAS).
Time: Autumn 2016 and autumn 2017
PPP-Proposal: Combining knowledge of field and laboratory for PPP in barley II
21
Deliverables: Making the information obtained from the association analysis available to all partners
in the project via the CMS.
Task 6.4 User friendly DNA markers:
Description: Developing easy-to-use PCR-based markers (KASP markers) utilizing new genes
identified by the association analysis when this is necessary and possible.
Time: spring 2016 and spring 2017
Deliverables: Making the sequences and protocols available to all partners in the project via the
CMS.
Task 6.5 Publication:
Description: Making the results from the project available to the public through publication(s) in a
peer-reviewed paper upon agreement with all project partners and in accordance with the co-
operation agreement.
Time: 2017
Deliverables: Manuscript accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed paper.
6.3 PARTNERS
The different project partners contributing with field data for the association analysis are the
following:
Finland: BOREAL and LUKE; Norway: GRAMINOR; Denmark: NORDIC SEED and SEJET; Iceland: LBHI.
PPP-Proposal: Combining knowledge of field and laboratory for PPP in barley II
22
WP 7: Transfer of resistance genes in breeding program Leader: Ahmed Jahoor; Nordic Seed – Denmark 7.1 INTRODUCTION
Barley is attacked by several pathogens. In addition, due to climate changes, some diseases such as
Fusarium Head Blight, Ramularia and Bipolaris are becoming more prominent in Nordic countries. To
combat with diseases in barley, fungicides are often used. The fungicides can create environmental
concern and they are also problematic for human health. Therefore, breeding for diseases resistance
is the most environmental as well as human friendly methods to combat this problem in barley.
Therefore, many major race specific resistance gens controlled by very few genes for barley
important diseases e.g. powdery mildew, yellow brown rust, scald and net blotch have been
introduced in the recently released varieties. However, these major race specific resistance genes
are frequently overcome by newly developed pathogen races through mutations or recombination.
Therefore, it is extremely important to search for new sources of resistance. Since major race
specific resistance does not always provide durable resistance, we aim to identify new race specific
major gens as well race non-specific minor genes for diseases resistance in MAGIC populations. The
race non-specific resistance genes are mostly controlled by several genes with minor effect. While
the major race specific resistance genes provides complete resistance against a specific pathogen
race, race non-specific resistance controlled by minor genes provides wider spectrum of resistance
and slows down the occurrence of mutation in the pathogen populations. Due to these facts, it is
important to develop strategies for sustainable use and management of resistance genes in breeding
programs.
The sources of resistance for different diseases that have or are being used in the development of
MAGIC populations will be available for all project partners. The MAGIC population will provide the
DNA markers linked to diseases resistance as well as to agronomic traits. In addition, these
populations will possess combined resistance to different diseases in a single line. For each plant
breeding company involved in the project, the original sources of resistance, DNA markers linked to
resistance genes as well as lines with combined resistance genes will be available. Here, each
company will incorporate these sources of resistance in their breeding program. Each company will
select crossing parent on their own choice in order to incorporate these sources of resistance in their
breeding program with the aim to develop resistance varieties. Theses crossing parents will not be
disclosed to other partners. However, the applicability of the DNA markers and the effectiveness of
resistance resources should be shared.
7.2 TASKS
Task 7.1 Marker assisted back crossing
Time: month 18-36
Deliverables: Providing linked DNA markers
PPP-Proposal: Combining knowledge of field and laboratory for PPP in barley II
23
Task 7.2 Pyramiding new sources of resistance
Time: month 18-36
Deliverable: Lines possessing combined resistance to several diseases originating from MAGIC
populations
7.3 PARTNERS
Finland: BOREAL; Norway: GRAMINOR; Denmark: NORDIC SEED and SEJET; Iceland: LBHI.
GANTT diagram "Combining Knowledge from Field and from Laboratory for Pre-breeding in Barley II”
Year / task 2015 Spring
2015 Summer
2015 Autumn
2016 Spring
2016 Summer
2016 Autumn
2017 Spring
2017 Summer
2017 Autumn
2018 Spring
2018 Summer
2018 Autumn
2019 Spring
2019 Summer
2019 Autumn
WP1 Task 1.1 crosses
WP1 Task 1.2 crosses
WP2 Task 2.1 DH production
WP2 Task 2.2 Multiplication
WP3 Task 3.1 Information on donors
WP3 Task 3.2 Collection of donors
WP3 Task 3.3 Screening
WP3 Task 3.4 Verification
WP4 Task 4.1 Screening
WP5 Task 5.1 Populations
WP5 Task 5.2 Education
WP6 Task 6.1 Information on CMS
WP6 Task 6.2 Genotyping
WP6 Task 6.3 GWAS
WP6 Task 6.4 DNA markers
WP6 Task 6.5 Publication
WP7 Task 7.1 Marker assisted backcrossing
WP7 Task 7.2 Pyramiding of resistance
Curriculum Vitae
Ahmed JahoorHome address
Solsortevej 21, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
Tel: (+45) 29 13 47 57
Work address
Nordic seed A/S – Lolland.
Højbygårdvej 14, 4960 Holeby
Tel: (+45) 79 21 23 24
e-mail: [email protected] http://www.nordicseed.com
EducationMSc, 1982, in Agronomy, University Prague, Czech RepublicPhD, 1987, in Plant breeding, TU München, Lehrstuhl für Pflanzenbau und Pflanzenzüchtung, Germany
Appointments2012- Adjunct professor for genetics and plant breeding at the Swedish Agricultural University2008- Breeding manager at Nordic Seed.2005-2008 Senior Research Scientist, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Department of agricultural Sciences
now, University Copenhagen, Faculty Science1997-2005 Senior Research Scientist at Risø National Laboratory, Plant Research Department.1995-1997 Wissenschaftlicher Oberassistent (C-2)1990-1995 Wissenschaftl. Assistent (C-1) at Lehrstuhl für Pflanzenbau und Pflanzenzüchtung , TU München1987-1990 Wissenschaftlicher Angestellter (BAT IIa) at Lehrstuhl für Pflanzenbau und Pflanzenzüchtung der TU München
Selected refereed articles 2004-2012Complete List of Publications: Peer reviewed publications. Total published papers: 67 (23.04.2014, web ofscience) Sum of the time cited: 2.281. Average citation per item: 34,04. H-index: 25
Nielsen NH, Backes G, Stougaard J, Andersen SU, Jahoor A (2014) Genetic Diversity andPopulation Structure Analysis of European Hexaploid Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Varieties.PLoS ONE 9(4): e94000. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094000
Jihad Orabi, Ahmed Jahoor and Gunter Backes. 2014. Changes in allelic frequency over time inEuropean bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties revealed using DArT and SSR markers.Euphytica. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-014-1080-x.
Zeratsion Abera Desta, Jihad Orabi, Ahmed Jahoor, Gunter Backes. 2014. Genetic diversity andstructure found in samples of Eritrean bread wheat. Plant Genetic Resources. 12,01: 151-155DOI:10.1017/S1479262113000324
Seeholzer S, Tsuchimatsu T, Jordan T, Bieri S, Pajonk S, Yang WX, Jahoor A, Shimizu KK, KellerB, Schulze-Lefert P (2010). Diversity at the Mla powdery mildew resistance locus from cultivatedbarley reveals sites of positive selection. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interaction, 23:497-509
Orabi J, Jahoor A, Backes B. 2009. Genetic diversity and population structure of wild and cultivatedbarley from West Asian and north Africa. Plant Breeding, 128:332-336
Lababidi S, Mejlhede N, Rasmussen SK, Backes G, Al-Said M, Baum M, Jahoor A (2009).Identification of barley mutants in the cultivar “Lux” at the Dhn loci through TILLING. PlantBreeding, 128:332-336
Backes G, Orabi J, Wolday A, YahyaouiA, Jahoor A 2009. High genetic diversity revealed in barleycollected from small-scale farmers fields in Eritrea. Genetic Resour Crop Evol, 56:85-97
Dayteg C, Rasmussen M, Tuvensson T, Merker A, Jahoor A 2008. Development of an ISSR-derivedPCR marker linked to nematode-resistance 8Ha2) in spring barley. Plant Breeding, 127:24-27
Vitamvas P, Saalbach G, Prasil IT, Capkova V, Opatrna J, Jahoor A (2007). WCS120 protein familyand proteins soluble upon boiling in cold-acclimated winther wheat. Journal of plant Physiology,164:1197-1207
Gahoonia TS, Ali R, Malhotra RS, Jahoor A, Rahman MM (3007). Variation in root morphologicaland physiological traits and nutrition uptake of chickpea genotypes. Journal of Plant Nutrition,30:829-841
Dayteg C, Tuvensson T, Merker A, Jahoor A, Kolodinska-Brantestam A (2007). Automation ofDNA marker analysis for molecular breeding in crops: practical experience of a plant breedingcompany. Plant Breeding, 126:410-415
Participant:
Grand total
Budget Item PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. % contrib.
Personal Cost 110.000kr. 70.000kr. 70.000kr. 250.000kr. -kr. 0% 250.000kr.
Consumable 40.000kr. 40.000kr. 80.000kr. -kr. 0% 80.000kr.
Travel 10.000kr. 10.000kr. 10.000kr. 30.000kr. -kr. 0% 30.000kr.
Overhead 30.000kr. -kr. 30.000kr. -kr. 30.000kr. -kr. 90.000kr. -kr. 0% 90.000kr.
sum 150.000kr. -kr. 150.000kr. -kr. 150.000kr. -kr. 450.000kr. -kr. 0% 450.000kr.
Participant:
Grand total
Budget Item PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. % contrib.
Personal Cost 75.000kr. 110.000kr. 75.000kr. 110.000kr. 75.000kr. 110.000kr. 225.000kr. 330.000kr. 59% 555.000kr.
Consumable 5.000kr. 5.000kr. 5.000kr. 15.000kr. -kr. 0% 15.000kr.
Travel 30.000kr. 30.000kr. 30.000kr. 90.000kr. -kr. 0% 90.000kr.
Overhead 27.500kr. 27.500kr. 27.500kr. 27.500kr. 27.500kr. 27.500kr. 82.500kr. 82.500kr. 50% 165.000kr.
sum 137.500kr. 137.500kr. 137.500kr. 137.500kr. 137.500kr. 137.500kr. 412.500kr. 412.500kr. 50% 825.000kr.
Participant:
Grand total
Budget Item PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. % contrib.
Personal Cost 175.500kr. 380.000kr. 175.500kr. 390.000kr. 175.500kr. 380.000kr. 526.500kr. 1.150.000kr. 69% 1.676.500kr.
Consumable 40.000kr. 30.000kr. 40.000kr. 30.000kr. 40.000kr. 30.000kr. 120.000kr. 90.000kr. 43% 210.000kr.
Travel 10.000kr. 15.000kr. 10.000kr. 15.000kr. 10.000kr. 15.000kr. 30.000kr. 45.000kr. 60% 75.000kr.
Overhead 56.375kr. 106.250kr. 56.375kr. 108.750kr. 56.375kr. 106.250kr. 169.125kr. 321.250kr. 66% 490.375kr.
sum 281.875kr. 531.250kr. 281.875kr. 543.750kr. 281.875kr. 531.250kr. 845.625kr. 1.606.250kr. 66% 2.451.875kr.
Participant:
Grand total
Budget Item PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. % contrib.
Personal Cost 242.400kr. 477.600kr. 489.600kr. 1.209.600kr. -kr. 0% 1.209.600kr.
Consumable 68.000kr. 500.000kr. 68.000kr. 636.000kr. -kr. 0% 636.000kr.
Travel 36.000kr. 36.000kr. 36.000kr. 108.000kr. -kr. 0% 108.000kr.
Overhead 151.200kr. 297.600kr. 304.800kr. 753.600kr. -kr. 0% 753.600kr.
sum 497.600kr. -kr. 1.311.200kr. -kr. 898.400kr. -kr. 2.707.200kr. -kr. 0% 2.707.200kr.
SLU
2015 2016 2017 Sum
Sejet Plant Breeding
2015 2016 2017 Sum
LBHI (Breeding)
2015 2016 2017 Sum
LBHI (University)
2015 2016 2017 Sum
Participant: MTT Agrifood Research Finland (LUKE Natural Resources Institute Finland from 1.1.2015)
Grand total
Budget Item PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. % contrib.
Personal Cost 113.519kr. -kr. 113.519kr. -kr. 113.519kr. -kr. 340.558kr. -kr. 0% 340.558kr.
Consumable 14.888kr. -kr. 14.888kr. -kr. 14.888kr. -kr. 44.663kr. -kr. 0% 44.663kr.
Travel 14.888kr. -kr. 14.888kr. -kr. 14.888kr. -kr. 44.663kr. -kr. 0% 44.663kr.
Overhead -kr. 151.492kr. -kr. 151.492kr. -kr. 151.492kr. -kr. 454.475kr. 100% 454.475kr.
sum 143.295kr. 151.492kr. 143.295kr. 151.492kr. 143.295kr. 151.492kr. 429.885kr. 454.475kr. 51% 884.360kr.
Participant:
Grand total
Budget Item PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. % contrib.
Personal Cost 250.000kr. 680.000kr. 250.000kr. 690.000kr. 250.000kr. 680.000kr. 750.000kr. 2.050.000kr. 73% 2.800.000kr.
Consumable 75.000kr. 20.000kr. 75.000kr. 20.000kr. 75.000kr. 20.000kr. 225.000kr. 60.000kr. 21% 285.000kr.
Travel 50.000kr. 10.000kr. 50.000kr. 10.000kr. 50.000kr. 10.000kr. 150.000kr. 30.000kr. 17% 180.000kr.
Overhead 93.750kr. 177.500kr. 93.750kr. 180.000kr. 93.750kr. 177.500kr. 281.250kr. 535.000kr. 66% 816.250kr.
sum 468.750kr. 887.500kr. 468.750kr. 900.000kr. 468.750kr. 887.500kr. 1.406.250kr. 2.675.000kr. 66% 4.081.250kr.
Participant:
Grand total
Budget Item PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. % contrib.
Personal Cost 143.741kr. 290.000kr. 143.741kr. 295.000kr. 143.741kr. 290.000kr. 431.223kr. 875.000kr. 67% 1.306.223kr.
Consumable 1.500kr. 1.500kr. -kr. 1.500kr. 1.500kr. 50% 3.000kr.
Travel 22.000kr. 29.760kr. 22.000kr. 29.760kr. 22.000kr. 29.760kr. 66.000kr. 89.280kr. 57% 155.280kr.
Overhead 41.810kr. 80.315kr. 41.435kr. 81.190kr. 41.435kr. 79.940kr. 124.681kr. 241.445kr. 66% 366.126kr.
sum 209.051kr. 401.575kr. 207.176kr. 405.950kr. 207.176kr. 399.700kr. 623.404kr. 1.207.225kr. 66% 1.830.629kr.
Participant:
Grand total
Budget Item PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. % contrib.
Personal Cost 90.000kr. 330.000kr. 90.000kr. 340.000kr. 90.000kr. 330.000kr. 270.000kr. 1.000.000kr. 79% 1.270.000kr.
Consumable 70.000kr. 30.000kr. 70.000kr. 30.000kr. 70.000kr. 30.000kr. 210.000kr. 90.000kr. 30% 300.000kr.
Travel 40.000kr. 20.000kr. 40.000kr. 20.000kr. 40.000kr. 20.000kr. 120.000kr. 60.000kr. 33% 180.000kr.
Overhead 50.000kr. 95.000kr. 50.000kr. 97.500kr. 50.000kr. 95.000kr. 150.000kr. 287.500kr. 66% 437.500kr.
sum 250.000kr. 475.000kr. 250.000kr. 487.500kr. 250.000kr. 475.000kr. 750.000kr. 1.437.500kr. 66% 2.187.500kr.
Participant:
Grand total
Budget Item PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. PPP own contrib. % contrib.
Personal Cost 1.200.160kr. 1.790.000kr. 1.395.360kr. 1.825.000kr. 1.407.360kr. 1.790.000kr. 4.002.881kr. 5.405.000kr. 57% 9.407.881kr.
Consumable 274.388kr. 81.500kr. 744.888kr. 80.000kr. 312.888kr. 80.000kr. 1.332.163kr. 241.500kr. 15% 1.573.663kr.
Travel 212.888kr. 74.760kr. 212.888kr. 74.760kr. 212.888kr. 74.760kr. 638.663kr. 224.280kr. 26% 862.943kr.
Overhead 450.635kr. 638.057kr. 596.660kr. 646.432kr. 603.860kr. 637.682kr. 1.651.156kr. 1.922.170kr. 54% 3.573.326kr.
sum 2.138.071kr. 2.584.317kr. 2.949.796kr. 2.626.192kr. 2.536.996kr. 2.582.442kr. 7.624.864kr. 7.792.950kr. 51% 15.417.814kr.
All
2015 2016 2017
Boreal Plant Breeding Ltd.
2015 2016 2017
Sum
Graminor
2015 2016 2017 Sum
Sum
Nordic Seed
2015 2016 2017 Sum
2015 2016 2017 Sum