project update exhibits - nrcperformance status -license application work - exhibit 2license...
TRANSCRIPT
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT
U.S. Department of EnergyOffice of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management
Project Update - Exhibits
Presented to:DOE/NRC Quarterly Management Meeting
Iucca Mountain Performance lndicatorsExhibit I
,� - , -,�; "- -'% -�' I 1'�l '- � , I - , 11-1--.1 .1 '1:11- I ".�. - 11 � 1 117'. -, -'? V� � :. ,., , ; , i I I ̀ , � � 1, :-. , , �, -, i " .., ;� I.. � - I - �; , . -;,.;,. ....... ;11 -, ;, , ". ''" ';. t'11117'1�'I- 1,1: Z- o". _'. -w, , , ; . I,- ", ',-v t-11; -- `9 ' d - , - ;.",, � �,;, --:ri�-,.k-l "4'. ;�
-
I
I
ISSC PresentationsNRC MMYMArthur_07/16/03.ppt 2of 3
Management Improvement InitiativesOpen ActnEx Sitatus
Exhibit 2Original Expected'Item Description orResponsible Sceue Completion
Number. Manager -ate Date
Table 3 DOE will issue new or revised procedures in compliance with Van Der Puy 11/02 11/30/03Item 3 OCRWM requirements using a phased approach. (start date)
Table 3 DOE personnel that will use the new or revised procedures will be Van Der Puy 11/02 11/30/03Item 4 traIned prior to implementing the procedures. (start date)
Table 3 BSC will issue new or revised procedures in compliance with Sorensen 11/02 11/15/03Item 3B OCRWM requirements using a phased approach. (start date)
Table 3 BSC personnel that will use the new or revised procedures will be Sorensen 11/02 1 1/30/03Item 48 trained prior to implementing the procedures. (start date)
Table 4 BSC will implement a single OCRWM Corrective Action Program Brown 2/03 9/30/03Item 3 consistent with nuclear industry practices, including tracking, (end date)
_________trending, reporting and closure verification processes. _ ___ __
Table 4 BSC will define and implement a self-assessment program, a Brown 3/03 9/30/03Item 4 lessons learned program, and a method to identify and correct (end date)
adverse conditions.
o - nnie,1 ! 'i-' ~~~~~ 'At S-? ~ ~i'Do -
Table 5 An externa wil sCe exper grou evaluate YMP-wide SOWE. Chu 7/03 10/31/03Item 10 OCW eqieetsuigahsdaprah (end date)
* As of July 8, 2003
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECTpt 3 of 3BSC PresentationsjNRC MMYMArthur_07/16/03.pj
U.S. Department of EnergyOffice of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management
Pr>gram Improvements, Metrics,and Efectiveness - ExhibitsPresented to:DOE/INRC Quarterly Management Meeting
Presented by:W. John Arthur IIIDeputy DirectorOffice of Repository Develo prnedWn..U.S. Department o negd~~
May 29 DOE Letter to the NuclearRegulatry Com issio
Exhibit I
*Recognized need to change focus and improve processes
oCited recent DOE actions to establish conditions in whichobjectives can be achieved
* Described actions being taken and made commitments in5 areas to ensure License Application (LA) and programbehavior meet NRC expectations:
- License application- Procedural compliance- Corrective action program- Safety-conscious work environment- Accountability
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PR JECTBSC PresentationsNRC MM_YMArthurMitchelk 07/16/03.ppt 2 of 15
Performance Status - License Application Work - Exhibit 2
License Application Work Areas
License |
Lcnsing~l Inerto aet AnalysesiIntegration (G) (R)
License Appiication ) tsuace Faclie ( 4
NRC lnteractIons~ (G) IUnsaturated Zone Flow and (YE IGs .1~ ~ IR) IY nalneiv ( II|GTranseort
~~~~~ ~~~~Saturated Zone Flow and Rpstry- Facilities
i afi mbtR R Waste Package6. Degradation M
Waste Form Degradation .m)
j 1~~ ~steftv~~e ~ (RI
DisruptivEvent M
Bosphere ()
{~~~~~~~~~~RIPostclosure Safety Test
Coordination M
Pedbirmance Conflran {G)
ITechnical DataManagement rn
}:- ,Yucca Mou ts!n Slb ~' .
ecrease in performance Descrion (0)
etter performance from , A) r_(RYUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT
BSC PresentationsNRCMMYMArthurMtchell07I16/03.ppt 3 of 15
D
lMaagement Assessment of Progress
Exhibit 3
COMPONENT % COMPLETE WEIGHT
KTI Agreement Closure 42* 10
LA Document 5
Preclosure Safety Assessment 14
TS PA-LA 35
20
10
30
30
100
Design 25
TOTAL % COMPLETE 25* Based on assumption that at least 65% of 293 (190) agreements will be considered
complete by NRC before LA submittal
All agreements will be addressed with NRC by LA submittalNRC has identified 41 high risk-significance agreements (4 complete) and.92 medium risk-significance agreements (20 complete)
MMURNM44M -- EYUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECTBSC PresentationsNRCMMYM~rhur~._MftcheIL07/16/03.ppt 4 of 15
I
status of License Application Data,Codes, and llModels'
Data (Estimate) Exhibit 4 Codes (Estimate)
0 418i0]251 680
1 306E 39
I 287
m1001
Total Dataset: 1,385Qualified: 680 (49%)Submitted for TBV: 418 (30%)Under development: 287 (21%)*
Total Codes: 380E Qualified & completed IV&V: 39 (10%)01 Submitted for IV&V: 10 (3%)E Qualified, need re-testing
(Legacy software): 306 (80%) estimatedo Under development = 25 ( 7%)
Models2*Estimated number of additionalDTNs that will be identified asAMRs approach completion
0 Incomplete
M Complete
X 16
Does not address ongoing resolutionof conditions adverse to quality
2 Model Reports may contain multiplemodelsLii 49
Total Model ReportsTotal Model Reports
Directly SupportiCompleted = 16 (
rig LA = 6525%)._
_ YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECTBSC PresentationgNRC_MM_YMArthuri.MftchelO07/16/03.ppt 5 of 15
Prfuormance MeasuresExhibit 5
May 1, 2002 - May 8, 2003 Causal Distribution forConditions Adverse to Quality (CAQ) Results
Major Contributors Major Contributing Root Cause for Majorto CAQ Factors for Major Contributing Factors
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _C ontributors_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Management Management Methods Management policyProblem (35%) LTA (62%) guidance/expectations not
well-defined, understoodor enforced (73%)
Human Performance Skill Based Error (51%) Check of work LTA (48%)LTA (34%)
Communications LTA Written Communication Ambiguous(21%) Content LTA (83%) instructions/requirements
(39%)
LTA = Less than adequate
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECTBSC PresentationsNRC MM YMArthur Mitchell 07/16/03.ppt 6 of 15
&istribution of
Condition ,ll%,contrbutors t
"e o ualit_ _n Eowi b it 6
3% CCh ib it 6May i, 2002 to &Way 8,2003
(AmLeveI)
2%
5%
II L-t-- _
i
IIII
I
7of i
LContributing Factors - Management ProblemsExhibit 6
(Continued)
8%
E Management MethodsLess Than Adequate(LTA)Resource ManagementLTA
LI Work Organization &Planning LTA
E] Supervisory MethodsLTA
e Change ManagementLTA
11
62%
Wwww"M' YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECTBSC Presentations_NRC_MM_YMAIthur._MitcheILO7lSI03.ppt 8 of 15
Than Adeuate m Exhibit 6(Continued)
3%
00% E3 Management~~~' policy guidance/expectations not
* ~~~~~~well-defined, understood or enforced
~~~ ~~Job performance standards not adequately130% ~ ~defined
,~~~ 0 ~~1Personnel exhibited insufficient awareness ofImpact of actions on safety/reliability
~~ ~~K ~~~ ~ c anagement follow-up or monitoring of~~~~~~ ~~~~activities did not identify problems
*~~~~~i ~~~~~~~ ~anagement assessment did not determinecause of previous event or known problem
Responsibility of personnel not well-defined or~~ '~~ ~ 5. ~~~ personnel not held accountable
73% Corcieaction for previously identified~~~~~~ ~~~~problem or event was not adequate to prevent
~~~~~~ ~~~~~recurrence
YU~c MONTAI PRJECBSC Presentations NRC~ MM YIVArthur~ MitchelL 0711 6010piat 9 of 15
Days to Obtain Acceptable DeficiencyReport Rsos xii
120
100
80
Co>btMT 60
40
20
0
Goal 90%in 30 Days
'N N N K, N ,5% "V & 5~ S 9 Irof SP 0"b 5 p 0 0 5
Monthly Average
YUccA MUNTAIN PROJECT650 PresentatIonsNRCMMYMArthur~_Mitchen_07116/03.ppt 10oct15
ay~s to Obtain Acceptable Corrective ActionRepor Response -Exhibit 7
(Continued)400
Data Date - 713/03
350-
300-
250 - w
(5200 -
150-
100 I *151
50 Goal 90%..,T- rNPI4.191 i 7 1 in 30 Days
0BSC-01-C-001 Issued
5/3/01BSC-01-C-002 Issued BSC-02-C-001 Issued BSC-02-C-090 Issued BSC(B)-02-C-129 Issued
6/12/01 11/27/01 4/3/02 7/19/02
Individual CAR by issue date_YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT
BSC PresentationsNRCMMYMArthurMitcheN07/16/03.ppt 11 of 15A_
Average Days Oipen x Deficiency RepottsExhibit 8
120
100
e)>I 80(a0
80'xx 60
m4
Z 40
Goal60 DaysonAverage
20
0
@K5\oN ,Ve~ 4P\ /o /~o /rg'lb lb 'lb lb lb lb If,.5I I I I I I I I I I10P 14P ftIP b 6' e 54F, . 1",
NIP 11P e I a P0 NS t g, � Np a 0' " tP A %P A,�q4 , P 4 " 0 q\ 4' 40 4� % 41 41 � 40
Wei
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECTBSC PresentationsNRCQMMjYMArthur_Mtchell_07/16/03.ppt 12 of 15
____;Ka I-
I I
Average Days Open - Corrective ActionRepots - Exhibit 9
450
400
350
en>%300
4-o 250N-a,
~0200E~c
z150
100
50
0
Goal100 DaysonAverage
Week m_
_SC PeettoNCMYMruMfcel0 p1YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECTBSC Presentations NRC MMYMArthur_Mitchell_07116103.ppt 13 of 15
MMMIMMORNMETINIM
0~afe ty^onscious W~ork IEnvironmentSu m r urvey Results - Exhibit 10Positive Indicators Negative Indicators
Employees understand the Employees fear retaliation for raising.importance of SCWE (90%) concerns (55%)
Employees understand that Employees don't believe a culturethey are responsible for exists that is conducive to raisingidentifying problems and concerns (55%)adverse conditions (85%) ________________Employees said management's Employees don't believe thatexpectations regarding SCWE resolution of safety and qualityhave been clearly issues through the CAP is effectivecommunicated (80%) (60%)
Employees said managementexpectations are not reflected inperformance reviews, rewards, or.discipline (55%)
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECTBSC PresentationsNRCMM .YMArthur_Mitchell 07/16/03.ppt 14 of 15
Four PEars Of A Sahibety Conscious
MANAGEMENTSUPPORT
IE
WITHOUT~ FEAROF
RETALIATION
EFFECTIVENORMAL
POLEMRES., TION
CorrectiveActionProcess
EFFECTIVEALTERNATE
'PROB),LEM:
PRO USES
Employee ConcernProcess
I - au a a a a
EFFECTIVEMETHODS TODETE.i~D
REGr~r~IONC,.W
SCWE
== �=1* -
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECTBSC PresentationsNRC_MMYMArthur MitcheIL07/16/03.ppt 15 of 15
I I
|HEREMM jIYUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECTVf~tlJ o u~. Dpartment of Energy
Of fice of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management
E `E's Approach to 0 RXesolution ofKeyr Technical Issue AgreementsPresented to:DOE/NRC Quarterly Management Meeting
Presented by:
Lessons LearnedBetter understanding of information needed as a result ofcommunications with NRC staff
- Developing responses to original Key Technical Issue (KTI)Agreements
- Receipt of Additional Information Needs from NRC staff
- Clarification of NRC staff expectations
- Discussions at technical exchanges
Revisions to resolution strategy were needed- Program replanning due to Continuing Resolution- Behind schedule in delivery of KTI Agreement responses
- Availability of Yucca Mountain Review Plan (YMRP) (Draft Final)
Previous approach focused primarily on responses toindividual KTI Agreements
- Not as effective as an integrated approachYUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT
BSC Presentations.NRCQA YMZiegler07/16103.ppt 2 of 10
ApporoachS
* DOE still plans to address each KTI Agreement- An integrated approach will be used to address groups of
KTI Agreements within the context of their relationship tothe repository system
- Some KTI Agreements will be handled individually
- Goal is effective resolution of KTI Agreements
- Revised schedule for responses has been provided to NRC
* Coordination with NRC staff- Regulatory interactions will be held to assist NRC's review
- Current schedule of interactions will be updated as neededto reflect this approach
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECTBSC Presentations_NRC_QA YMZiegker_07116/03.ppt 3 of 10
4Jan-03
Feb-03 LoMar-.03
Apr-03
May-03
Jun-03
Jul-03
Aug-03
Sep-03Discovery-'
Oct-03
Nov-03 �n,CD
Dec-03
J n-04F:b-04
V) Mar-04Apr-04 co
W
May-04 00 Jun-04
Jul-04 13 M 0M 0) CO 0Aug-04 cr
COSep-04 0co
Oct-04
Nov-04AVA
Dec-04
Jan-05
Feb-05CC) Mar-05>
Apr-050 T;X Arch,
May-05
Jun-05
Jul-05 CAug-05
0
!z C.M
Key Technical Issue ScheduleNuclear Regulatory Cornm ission Risk Rankings
KTI Agreement Schedule by NRC Risk RankingsJune 23,2003
45
40
35
M 30
' 25a..0.a 20Ez 15
10
5
0M M M M M M M 4 IT v v v v v Ir v v v w w W) w U.) La w w w9 2 9 9 2 9 9 9 2 2 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 2 2 9 9 9 9C > 0 r_ .0 ;1..C 's tM ca. 6 > a C �Q >% C -3 cpM = cm CL 0 M w CL M CLa) 0 4) 4) (U = " :3 4) 0 (1) w a) M :3 " =
< U) 0 Z a " LL 2 < 2 -13, < CO 0 Z 0 " LL 2 < M " <
IMMSNE Psto_ il_ YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECTBSC PresentationsNRqQA _'MZegler._.07/16/03.ppt 5 of 10
Organization11of W~orlk
Develop the technical basis for licensing describingphysical processes and basis for repositoryperformance
Technical basis are consistent with abstractiongroups of the YMRP
* Address KTI Agreements within the context of thetechnical basis
* Assign dedicated staff whose only priority isdevelopment of high quality responses to KTIAgreements
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECTBSC Presentations_NRC_QA _YMZIegIer07/16/03.ppt 6 of 10
Adva ntages
* Integration of technical basis helps ensurecompleteness
* Context of integrated technical basis allows moretransparent discussion of bases for informationrequested
- Relevance generally is related to process, model,parameter, data or testing uncertainty
Early communication of licensing technical basis toNRC
- Expected to facilitate review of the License Application (LA)
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PRJECTBSC PresentationsjNRCQA )YMZiegIer_07/16/03.ppt 7 of 10
Integrated Technical Basis Key Technical Issue ResponseGroups (and Related Process Model Groups)
;ic M11. Water Sef jiefim
Vl. Wnstso k '-C Dnp~~~ s TAFcWi7,DO IYgpbIW _~1~ ,,'
*DpwS I -Sf e I~ F½ 1
Planned Format of Response Groups
o Technical basis descriptions for each of theresponse groups
* MWhere possible, individual KTI Agreements areexplicitly addressed within the technical basisdescriptions
- Otherwise, individual KTI Agreements are addressed inattachments to appropriate technical basis descriptions
* IKTI Agreements scheduled to be available after LAsubmittal are identified in our FY03-05 Plan
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECTBSC PresentationsNRCQA _YMZIegerl_07/16/03.ppt 9 of 10
Coonclusion
o DOE has recognized and responded to issues thatdelayed delivery of KTI Agreement responses
o Our current approach provides a more integratedtechnical product that meets our KTI Agreementswithin the context of how the Yucca MountainRepository is expected to perform
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECTBSC Presentatlons_NRC_QA _YMZIegler_07/16/03.ppt 10 of 10
YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT
U.S. Department of EnergyOffice of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Cv,
4w
0
UC-
LaJ
C =/NRLC QuLlarteeliyManagemnent 1M1eeting
AgendaDOE/NRC Quarterly Management Meeting
July 16, 200310:30 AM-3:45 PM (ET)7:30 AM - 12:45 PM (PT)
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionTwo White Flint North, Auditorium
11545 Rockville PikeRockville, MD
And via Videoconference to:
BSCRoom 915
9960 Covington CrossLas Vegas, Nevada
CNWRABldg. 189, Conference Room B232
6220 Culebra RoadSan Antonio, TX
INTERESTED PARTIES MAYPARTICIPATE VIAT ELECONBYCALLfNG 1-800-638-8081 or301-231-5539, Passcode 6481#
10:30 AM Opening Remarks AD
10:50 AM NRC Program Update NRC
11:20 AM DOE Program/Project Update* Program Update* Project Update
DOEChuArthur/Mitchell
11:40 AM Program Improvement, Metrics, and Effectiveness* License Application* Procedural Compliance* Corrective Action Program* Safety Conscious Work Environment* Accountability
Arthur/Mitchell
1:30 PM Lunch All
2:15 PM Key Technical Issue Agreements Ziegler
3:00 PM Break All
3:15 PM Action Item Status DOE/NRC
3:30 PM Closing Remarks
3:45 PM Adjourn
All
Enclosure 4