promoters of two anther-specific genes confer organ-specific gene expression in a stage-specific...
TRANSCRIPT
CELL BIOLOGY AND MORPHOGENESIS
Promoters of two anther-specific genes confer organ-specificgene expression in a stage-specific manner in transgenic systems
Vikrant Gupta Æ Reema Khurana Æ Akhilesh K. Tyagi
Received: 17 May 2007 / Revised: 4 July 2007 / Accepted: 8 July 2007 / Published online: 28 July 2007
� Springer-Verlag 2007
Abstract Differential screening of a stage-specific cDNA
library of Indica rice has been used to identify two genes
expressed in pre-pollination stage panicles, namely OSIPA
and OSIPK coding for proteins similar to expansins/pollen
allergens and calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPK),
respectively. Northern analysis and in situ hybridizations
indicate that OSIPA expresses exclusively in pollen while
OSIPK expresses in pollen as well as anther wall. Pro-
moters of these two anther-specific genes show the pres-
ence of various cis-acting elements (GTGA and AGAAA)
known to confer anther/pollen-specific gene expression.
Organ/tissue-specific activity and strength of their regula-
tory regions have been determined in transgenic systems,
i.e., tobacco and Arabidopsis. A unique temporal activity
of these two promoters was observed during various
developmental stages of anther/pollen. Promoter of OSIPA
is active during the late stages of pollen development and
remains active till the anthesis, whereas, OSIPK promoter
is active to a low level in developing anther till the pollen
matures. OSIPK promoter activity diminishes before
anthesis. Both promoters show a potential to target
expression of the gene of interest in developmental stage-
specific manner and can help engineer pollen-specific traits
like male-sterility in plants.
Keywords Calcium-dependent protein kinase �Expansin � Indica rice � Pollen allergen � Promoter �Transgenics
Abbreviations
CDPK Calcium-dependent protein kinase
GUS b-glucuronidase gene
OSIPA Oryza sativa Indica pollen allergen/expansin
gene
OSIPK Oryza sativa Indica calcium-dependent protein
kinase gene
PF Post-fertilization
PP Pre-pollination
Introduction
In flowering plants, life cycle alternates between the dip-
loid sporophytic and haploid gametophytic generations.
Stamen in angiosperms is associated with male reproduc-
tive processes. Microsporogenesis occurs in anther result-
ing in the production of pollen. Anther contains diploid cell
(microspore mother cell), which undergoes meiosis to
produce microspores in tetrads. These microspores separate
and their nuclei undergo an asymmetric mitosis resulting in
bicellular pollen. The tapetal cells of anther wall produce
proteins, lipids and flavonoids, which are deposited on the
Communicated by P. Kumar.
Accessions: OSIPA cDNA, AF220610; OSIPK cDNA, AF312920;
OSIPA partial gene and upstream promoter region, AY166659;
OSIPK gene-specific and upstream sequence, AY168440.
Electronic supplementary material The online version ofthis article (doi:10.1007/s00299-007-0414-8) containssupplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
V. Gupta � R. Khurana � A. K. Tyagi (&)
Interdisciplinary Centre for Plant Genomics
and Department of Plant Molecular Biology,
University of Delhi South Campus,
New Delhi 110021, India
e-mail: [email protected]
123
Plant Cell Rep (2007) 26:1919–1931
DOI 10.1007/s00299-007-0414-8
microspores and comprise outer layer, the exine, and try-
phine layers of pollen (McCormick 1993; Raghavan 1997).
All these processes are temporally and spatially regulated
and involve complex interplay of several hundred genes.
Many genes involved in anther development have been
identified (Endo et al. 2004; Lan et al. 2004; Ma 2005;
Wang et al. 2005). By following various approaches of
expression profiling, transposon tagging and functional
analysis, some genes acting in various stages of anther
development have been investigated. Certain genes show
state-specific expression within anther and have been
associated with anther cell division and differentiation
(Nonomura et al. 2003), tapetum (Jung et al. 2005; Luo
et al. 2006; Xu et al. 2006), male meiosis (Yang et al. 2003;
Kapoor and Takatsuji 2006), pollen maturation (Park et al.
2005, 2006; Zhao et al. 2006), generative cell (Durbarry
et al. 2005) and anther dehiscence (Zhu et al. 2004). Other
gene products accumulate abundantly in pollen grains
and are involved in germination or pollen tube growth
(Golovkin and Reddy 2003; Kaothien et al. 2005). A late
pollen gene, ZmMADS2 from maize, encodes a transcrip-
tion factor, which is required for anther dehiscence and
pollen maturation (Schreiber et al. 2004).
Certain genes for calcium-dependent protein kinases
(CDPK) from maize and petunia have been shown to be
having pollen-specific activity (Estruch et al. 1994; Yoon
et al. 2006). Pollen allergen-like protein encoding genes
have been characterized at the genome-wide level in rice
(Jiang et al. 2005). They include beta expansins, repre-
sented by group I pollen allergen of grasses, and may have
wall loosening activity which is characteristic to expansins
and suggested that these proteins loosen the cell walls
of the stigma and style to aid pollen tube penetration
(Cosgrove et al. 1997).
Regulation of expression of genes during the develop-
ment of anther and pollen occurs at transcriptional as well
as post-transcriptional levels. In addition to 50 upstream
regions of genes, role of 50-UTR sequences has also
emerged (Hulzink et al. 2003). Genes that express in
anther/pollen-specific manner can provide stage-specific
promoters and regulatory elements to target expression of
desirable genes in specific stages of male gametophyte
development. Various anther/pollen-specific promoters of
different plant species have been studied in transgenic
systems (van Tunen et al. 1990; Twell et al. 1991; Eyal
et al. 1995; Rogers et al. 2001; Gomez et al. 2004). A very
few anther/pollen-specific gene promoters from crops such
as rice, maize and cotton have been analyzed (Guerrero
et al. 1990; John and Petersen 1994; Tsuchiya et al. 1994;
Hamilton et al. 1998). Promoters conferring expression
specific to specialized cells of anther/pollen provide insight
into the transcriptional regulation of genes involved in
different developmental stages of male gametic cells
(Singh et al. 2003; Okada et al. 2005; Yamaji and Kyo
2006). Anther-specific promoters/regulatory elements have
biotechnological application such as induction of male-
sterility in plants. A tapetum-specific promoter has been
exploited to induce male-sterility in tobacco (Mariani et al.
1990) and cabbage (Lee et al. 2003). The promoter of an
anther-specific PsEND1 gene that expresses in epidermis,
connective, endothecium and middle layer has also been
used to produce male sterile plants in Solanaceae and
Brassicaceae (Roque et al. 2007). Recently created data-
bases of eukaryotic promoters (EPD) and plant promoter
sequences (PlantProm), as well as computational approa-
ches, aid the promoter research and analysis significantly
(Praz et al. 2002; Shahmuradov et al. 2003; Rombauts et al.
2003).
In this study, we report characterization of the regula-
tory/promoter regions of two genes OSIPA and OSIPK,
from Indica rice, found to be expressing in anther-specific
manner. OSIPA codes for a protein similar to an expansin/
pollen allergen and OSIPK shows similarity to calcium-
dependent protein kinases. Functional analysis of their
promoters in transgenic systems revealed their activity
during different stages of anther/pollen development.
These genes provide two potential promoters for targeting
expression in different stages of anther/pollen
development.
Materials and methods
Plant materials
Rice plants (Oryza sativa L. ssp. Indica cultivar Pusa
Basmati-1) were grown at standard green house conditions.
Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum var. xanthi) and Arabidopsis
thaliana ecotype Columbia were used for transformation
studies. Tobacco plants were grown in culture room con-
ditions (25 ± 1�C under 16 h/8 h light/dark cycle) and
illuminated at 50–100 lmol quanta m�2s�1. Arabidopsis
plants were grown in cabinets in a culture room maintained
at 22�C under long day (16 h light) condition and illumi-
nated at 80 lmol quanta m�2 s�1.
Screening of cDNA/genomic libraries and sequencing
A cDNA library from pre-pollination stage panicles of rice
(Oryza sativa L. ssp. Indica cv. Pusa Basmati-1) made in
Lambda ZAP ExpressTM vector (Stratagene Cloning Sys-
tems, USA) was used. The cDNA library (5 · 104 plaques)
was differentially screened with [a�32P] dCTP labeled
cDNAs prepared from mRNAs of pre-pollinated and post-
fertilized panicles as well as from roots of 7-day-old rice
1920 Plant Cell Rep (2007) 26:1919–1931
123
seedlings according to Sambrook et al. (1989). Putative
pre-pollination stage panicle-specific clones were selected
after three rounds of differential screening. Positive clones
were used for single clone excision to obtain recombinant
pBK-CMV phagemid vector as per manufacturer’s
instruction (Stratagene, USA). OSIPA and OSIPK cDNAs
were isolated by above screening. For the isolation of
genomic clones of OSIPA and OSIPK, a genomic library
(2 · 105 plaques) of Oryza sativa L. ssp. Indica cultivar
Pusa Basmati-1, prepared in Lambda DASHTM II vector
(Stratagene Cloning Systems, USA), was screened as
described by Sambrook et al. (1989). The respective
cDNAs were radiolabeled using the Megaprime Random
Labeling Kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, UK) and
a�32P dATP (BRIT, India) and used separately for library
screening. OSIPA and OSIPK cDNAs were sequenced
completely by vector-specific standard primers (T3 and T7)
and by primer walking. The gene-specific regions and
upstream regulatory regions of OSIPA and OSIPK were
sequenced by primer walking using their corresponding
genomic clones.
Southern hybridization
Fresh leaves of dark grown rice seedlings were used to
isolate total genomic DNA according to method described
by Dellaporta et al. (1983) and quantified spectrophoto-
metrically. For Southern blot hybridization, 10 lg of
genomic DNA was digested with BamHI, EcoRI, HindIII,
SacI, SalI and XbaI (Roche Molecular Biochemicals,
Germany) as per supplier’s instruction. Digested fragments
were size-separated in a 0.8% (w/v) agarose gel and
immobilized to Hybond N membrane by capillary transfer
procedure. Southern hybridization was carried out using
methods described by Sambrook et al. (1989).
Isolation of total RNA and northern hybridization
Total RNA from the plant tissue was isolated by using the
protocol described by Logemann et al. (1987) and quanti-
fied spectrophotometrically by recording OD260 using U-
2001 spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Japan). For northern
hybridization, 20 lg of total RNA was electrophoresed in
1.2% (w/v) formaldehyde-agarose gels and transferred to
Hybond N membrane (Amersham Biosciences, Piscata-
way) by capillary transfer method (Sambrook et al. 1989).
The northern hybridizations were done using OSIPA and
OSIPK cDNAs as radiolabeled probes. The cDNA frag-
ments used as probe were radiolabeled as described earlier.
Prehybridization/hybridization, washings and autoradiog-
raphy were done as described by Sambrook et al. (1989).
In situ RNA hybridization
RNA in situ hybridization was performed mainly as
described by Duck (1994). Panicles that had just emerged
from the boot leaf were excised from rice plants and a
small cut was made at the upper part to allow the fixative to
enter inside the spikelet. Rice spikelets were fixed in
paraformaldehyde fixative (100 mM phosphate buffer, pH
7.0 containing 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.25% glutaral-
dehyde). Fixed material was subjected to dehydration fol-
lowed by graded tert-butanol series to 100% tertiary
butanol. Samples were then embedded in paraffin (Sigma
Aldrich). Embedded tissue was sliced to 8 lm sections
which were mounted on to poly-L-lysine-coated slides and
incubated at 42�C for 1 h. De-waxation of the section was
done by treating the slides with xylene. Sections were then
hydrated in descending series of ethanol (90, 70, 50, and
30%). These sections were washed 4 times with DEPC-
treated MQ water. Sections were treated with proteinase K
(2 lg/ml in 100 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5; 50 mM EDTA;
37�C for 30 min) followed by two washes with phosphate
buffered saline (PBS). Sections were again dehydrated in
ascending series of ethanol for 2 min each. One microgram
of linearized plasmid was used to prepare sense or anti-
sense probe, using DIG-UTP RNA labeling mix and SP6 or
T7 RNA polymerase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals,
Germany) at 37�C for 2 h. After labeling reaction was
complete, DNase I treatment was given to remove the
plasmid DNA. Finally, riboprobe was precipitated, dried
and dissolved in DEPC treated water. Hybridization was
carried out as described by Duck (1994). After hybridiza-
tion, sections were washed thrice in 0.1· SSC at 60�C.
Detection of hybridization was performed using the
Digoxigenin Nucleic Acid Detection Kit (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s
instructions at 30�C overnight in the dark. Sections were
dehydrated as described earlier, mounted using DPX mount
and photographed.
Cloning for promoter constructs
Regulatory regions of 1,887 and 1,547 bp upstream to the
translation initiation site of OSIPA and OSIPK, respec-
tively, were PCR amplified from cloned genomic DNA
representing these genes. Oligonucleotide primer pairs,
50-ATACCGTCGACCTCGGCATC-30 and 50-GATCCC
GGGGTCGCTTTTATTTG-30 were used for the amplifi-
cation of OSIPA promoter region while 50-ATAGTCGAC
CACCTTAGGTGTGTATTGGAGG-30 and 50-ATACCC
GGGTCTTCTTCTTCTTCACCGCC-30 were used for
amplifying OSIPK regulatory region. The underlined
region in the primers denotes SalI and SmaI sites which
Plant Cell Rep (2007) 26:1919–1931 1921
123
were added to facilitate directional cloning of the amplified
fragment. The PCR reaction for amplifying OSIPA pro-
moter region was performed under the conditions: 94�C
(5 min)/[94�C (30 s)/40�C (30 s)/72�C (1 min)] · 3
cycles/[94�C (30 s)/58�C (30 s)/72�C (1 min)] · 25
cycles/72�C (7 min)/4�C (?). The PCR reaction to
amplify the OSIPK regulatory region was performed under
the conditions: 94�C (5 min)/[94�C (30 s)/60�C (30 s)/
72�C (1 min)] · 25 cycles/72�C (7 min)/4�C (?). The
corresponding amplified products were digested with SalI
and SmaI restriction enzymes and ligated to the binary
vector pBI101 (Jefferson et al. 1987), linearized with the
same enzymes (SalI and SmaI), upstream to the promoter-
less b-glucuronidase (GUS) gene.
Plant transformation
The binary vector constructs were introduced into tobacco
and Arabidopsis plants by Agrobacterium tumefaciens
(AGL1)-mediated gene transfer. Tobacco leaf discs were
used as an explant for transformation by a method descri-
bed by Jani et al. (2004). Transformation of Arabidopsis
was done by floral dip method (Clough and Bent 1998).
Analysis of GUS activity in transgenic tobacco
and Arabidopsis plants
Histochemical and fluorometric assays of GUS gene
expression in different organs of transgenic tobacco and
Arabidopsis plants were carried out according to Jefferson
(1987). Buds of various lengths (6 ± 2, 11 ± 2, 14 ± 2,
17 ± 2, 25 ± 2, 34 ± 2 and 38 ± 2 mm/open flower), hav-
ing anthers at different developmental stages (Koltunow
et al. 1990), from transgenic as well as wild type tobacco
plants were plucked carefully and anther, gynoecium, petal
and sepal were dissected. Root, stem, leaf, flower without
anthers, anthers and silique from transgenic and wild type
Arabidopsis plants were also dissected. Fluorometric GUS
assay was done for 6 lg protein, after 15 h of incubation
with the substrate (4-methylumbelliferyl b-D-glucuronide)
in dark, using a DyNA QuantTM 200 fluorometer (Hoefer
Pharmacia Biotech Inc., California, USA).
Results
Expression pattern of anther-specific OSIPA
and OSIPK
To identify genes and their promoters for anther-specific
expression, several putative pre-pollination stage panicle-
specific cDNAs from Indica rice were isolated initially by
performing differential screening of a cDNA library. All
cDNAs were tested for organ-specificity by performing
northern analysis using total RNA from different organs, e.
g. root, stem, leaf, pre-pollination (PP) and post-fertilization
(PF) stage panicle, and rachis of mature rice plant, as well as
root and shoot of young rice seedlings. Two cDNAs showing
pre-pollination stage panicle-specific expression (Fig. 1a)
were sequenced and designated as OSIPA (1,106 bp) and
OSIPK (2,138 bp) based on the similarity (up to 90%) to
other genes encoding expansins/pollen allergen proteins and
OSIPA
Mat
ure
stem
Youn
gle
afM
atur
ele
afR
achi
s
PPpa
nicl
e
Youn
gro
otM
atur
ero
ot
PFpa
ncile
OSIPK
rRNA
Sense Antisense
OSIPA
OSIPK
po
aw
po
aw
po
aw
po
aw
A B
C D
(B)
(A)
Fig. 1 a Panicle-specific expression of OSIPA and OSIPK. RNA was
isolated from leaves and roots of young 7-day-old seedlings as well as
from mature leaves, stem and mature roots of 3-month-old field
grown plants. Rachis, pre-pollination (PP) and post-fertilization (PF)
stage panicles were taken from flowering rice plants. Twenty
microgram of RNA was blotted and probed with radiolabeled OSIPAor OSIPK cDNA. Lower panel shows ethidium bromide-stained
rRNA indicating equivalent loading and quality of RNA. b Anther/
pollen-specific expression of OSIPA and OSIPK. In situ hybridization
of transverse sections of fixed rice spikelet with OSIPA or OSIPKin vitro transcribed RNA as probe was done. The spikelets were
sampled from panicles that had just emerged from the boot leaf. Blue
colour was observed exclusively in pollen in the sections of rice
spikelet, probed with antisense OSIPA RNA. OSIPK expression was
observed in pollen as well as anther wall in the sections of rice
spikelet, when probed with antisense OSIPK RNA. No signal was
observed in sections probed with any of the two sense RNAs. awAnther wall, po pollen. Scale bars 200 lm
1922 Plant Cell Rep (2007) 26:1919–1931
123
calcium-dependent protein kinases, respectively. To further
confirm the organ/cell specificity of OSIPA and OSIPK
expression within the rice floret, in situ hybridization was
performed using DIG (Digoxigenin) labeled antisense RNA
as a probe. Transverse section of pre-pollination stage rice
spikelets were made from the panicle that had just emerged
from the boot leaf. OSIPA antisense probe produced a strong
hybridization signal exclusively and specifically in pollen,
while OSIPK antisense probe showed strong hybridization
signal in pollen and weak expression in anther wall (Fig. 1
b). The sections probed with labeled OSIPA and OSIPK
sense RNA did not show any hybridization signal above the
background levels (Fig. 1b).
Regulatory regions of OSIPA and OSIPK
Southern hybridizations of genomic DNA with cDNA,
carried out under stringent conditions, indicate that both
OSIPA as well as OSIPK are single copy genes in the rice
genome. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 1, the genomic
DNA digested with restriction enzyme with no site within
cDNA gave single band and those with one site inside
cDNA gave two bands. Analysis of anther/pollen-speci-
ficity of OSIPA and OSIPK entails functional character-
ization of their promoters. To isolate regulatory regions of
OSIPA and OSIPK, a rice genomic library prepared in
Lambda DASHTM II was screened and DNA from positive
clones was analyzed by Southern hybridization, with
cDNA as probe. A 2.4 kb (SalI–EcoRI) DNA fragment
that hybridized to OSIPA cDNA probe was sequenced and
found to contain partial gene and upstream promoter
region. On the other hand, two DNA fragments (XbaI) of
3.6 and 8.0 kb hybridized to labeled OSIPK cDNA. The
3.6 kb XbaI genomic fragment contained partial gene-
specific region as well as upstream regulatory region while
8.0 kb fragment contained remaining gene-specific 30-end
region of OSIPK. The promoter-containing fragment
(3.6 kb) of OSIPK was completely sequenced while only
gene-specific region of 8.0-kb fragment was sequenced.
All the sequences were assembled to 5,207 bp in length.
The transcription start sites of these two cDNAs were also
mapped in order to demarcate the promoter region (data
not shown). The promoter region and 50 UTR along with
ATG initiation codon for OSIPA and OSIPK are shown in
Fig. 2.
The sequenced region of OSIPA and OSIPK included
1,823 and 1,372 bp regions upstream to transcription start
sites, respectively (Fig. 2). A putative TATA box is present
32 bp upstream to the transcription start site for OSIPA
(Fig. 2a). Upstream regions were used to search for the
presence of regulatory motifs using PlantCARE and
PLACE (Lescot et al. 2002; Higo et al. 1999). Various cis-
acting regulatory elements that are known to be involved in
(A) (B)
Fig. 2 Nucleotide sequence of promoter region and 50 UTR of
OSIPA a and OSIPK b gene. ATG at the end of both sequences
represents initiation codon. A putative TATA box is boxed in a. The
extension of cDNA by primer extension is indicated in italicized
capital letters. The first base of transcript (+1) and binding sites for
primers used for amplification of promoter regions are underlined.
The GTGA and AGAAA sequences in the regulatory region, which
are similar to the conserved sequence motifs in the promoter regions
of some other anther/pollen-specific genes, are indicated in bold and
italicized lower case letters
Plant Cell Rep (2007) 26:1919–1931 1923
123
anther/pollen-specific expression were detected in the
promoter region of both the genes (Fig. 2). Two such
motifs, GTGANTG10 (GTGA) and POLLEN1LeLAT52
(AGAAA), are present in multiple in each promoter.
Activity of OSIPA and OSIPK promoters in transgenic
plants
The 1,887 bp regulatory region of OSIPA, from �1,823 to
+64 bp, and 1,547 bp promoter region of OSIPK, from
�1,328 to +219 bp, were cloned in pBI101 to create
P-OSIPA-pBI101 and P-OSIPK-pBI101, recombinant plant
transformation binary vectors (Fig. 3a, b). P-OSIPA-pBI101
and P-OSIPK-pBI101 constructs would drive b-glucuroni-
dase (GUS) gene expression under the control of OSIPA and
OSIPK promoters, respectively, in transformed plants. The
promoter-GUS constructs, P-OSIPA-pBI101 and P-OSIPK-
pBI101, were mobilized into A. tumefaciens strain AGL1,
separately and used to perform genetic transformation of
tobacco and Arabidopsis plants via leaf disc and floral dip
methods, respectively. Out of several transgenic tobacco
plants obtained, lines PA8-1, PA10-1, PA18-1 and PA44-1
of P-OSIPA-pBI101, and lines PK2-1, PK12-1, PK19-1,
PK22-1 and PK24-1 of P-OSIPK-pBI101 transformants
were analyzed for specific promoter activity by fluorometric
Wild type plant Transgenic plants harboring
Petal
Sepal
Gynoecium
DissectedAnther
Pollen
pBI101 P-OSIPK-P-OSIPA- pBI101
O
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
poaw
aw
aw
po
po
po po
gusAnptII
caS
Io c
EI
RtsP
I
RB LBpnos
GT
A
laS
I am
SI
tsP
Ini
HI II
d
n iH
IId c a
SI I
niH
IId
P-OSIPA
1887 bp
P-OSIPA-pBI101
ret
ocE
IR o c
EI
R
gusAnptII
caS
Ioc
EI
RtsP
I
RB LBpnos
GT
A
l aS
I am
SI
t sP
Ini
HIII
dP-OSIPK
1547 bp
P-OSIPK-pBI101
ret
(A)
(B)
(C)
Fig. 3 Schematic diagrams of
P-OSIPA-pBI101 a and P-OSIPK-pBI101 b constructs
used for analysis of promoter
(regulatory region) from OSIPAand OSIPK genes, respectively.
The upstream regulatory regions
were PCR amplified using
respective primer pairs
containing SalI and SmaI
restriction sites in forward and
reverse primers, respectively, to
facilitate directional cloning.
The amplified products were
cloned separately in binary
vector pBI101 at the same sites
(SalI and SmaI). RB and LB
indicate right and left borders of
T-DNA, respectively. c Shows
specificity of OSIPA and OSIPKpromoter driven GUS activity in
different floral organs of wild
type and transgenic tobacco
plants. OSIPA promoter showed
pollen-specific while OSIPKpromoter showed anther-
specific activity in transgenic
tobacco plants. No GUS
expression was observed in any
organ of wild type plant. awAnther wall, po pollen. Scalebars in E, J and O 200 lm
1924 Plant Cell Rep (2007) 26:1919–1931
123
analysis. Several transgenic lines from tobacco as well as
Arabidopsis for P-OSIPA-pBI101 and P-OSIPK-pBI101
constructs were also analyzed for GUS expression by his-
tochemical assay.
Histochemical analysis
All the P-OSIPA-pBI101 transgenic tobacco plants ana-
lyzed showed GUS activity exclusively in pollen (line
PA10-1, Fig. 3). Expression was not seen in petal, sepal,
gynoecium and anther wall. All the P-OSIPK-pBI101
transgenic tobacco plants showed GUS activity in anthers
(line PK12-1, Fig. 3), the whole anther including the
developing pollen stained blue in histochemical assay.
Within the flower, no expression was seen in petal, sepal,
and gynoecium (Fig. 3). GUS activity was not visible in
vegetative organs of transgenic plants (data not shown).
The untransformed wild type plant did not show GUS
activity in any of the organs tested (Fig. 3). Furthermore, a
detailed analysis of temporal GUS expression during dif-
ferent developmental stages of pollen was done. Activity
was evaluated in pollen grains of developing buds of dif-
ferent sizes, i.e., 6 ± 2, 11 ± 2, 14 ± 2, 17 ± 2, 25 ± 2,
34 ± 2 and 38 ± 2 mm to open flower. These buds/flowers
and their anthers/pollen are at different developmental
states representing stage �4 to 1, stage 2, stage 3, stage 4,
stage 6 to 7, stage 8 and stage 12, respectively, as defined
by Koltunow et al. (1990). The expression of GUS in P-
OSIPA-pBI101 harboring tobacco plants became visible in
pollen of the anthers of 14 ± 2 to 17 ± 2 mm bud (stage 3–
stage 4) and continued in pollen even after the dehiscence
of the anther (38 ± 2 mm bud to open flower, i.e., stage
12). The expression of GUS in pollen increases as the
flower matures and maximum expression is seen in the
pollen of dehisced anther (Fig. 4). In the same way, the
activity was monitored in pollen from anthers at different
developmental stages of transgenic tobacco plants harbor-
ing P-OSIPK-pBI101. In all P-OSIPK-pBI101 transgenic
tobacco plants analyzed, the expression became evident in
the anthers of 11 ± 2 to 14 ± 2 mm bud (stage 2–stage 3)
and continues till 25 ± 2 to 34 ± 2 mm flower/bud (stage
6–stage 8). The GUS activity was seen till the pollen
matures and no expression was observed in pollen col-
lected after the dehiscence of the anther (Fig. 4). Lack of
expression of GUS in the pollen of dissected anthers of
various stages from a wild type plant is also shown in
Fig. 4. Similar organ-specific histochemical expression
patterns of GUS for both the promoter constructs were also
observed in all the lines (T1 plants) of transgenic Arabid-
opsis plants (Fig. 5). It may be noted that intensity of GUS-
specific blue color was low in Arabidopsis as compared to
tobacco.
Fluorometric analysis
GUS fluorometric assays were performed to determine the
strength of OSIPA and OSIPK promoters by measuring the
specific GUS activity in tobacco. T1 generation tobacco
plants containing OSIPA or OSIPK promoter constructs
were raised and maintained till flowering. The floral buds/
flowers of different stages were dissected and anther,
gynoecium, petal and sepal were separated. Protein was
extracted from the dissected organs and assayed for
enzyme (GUS) specific activity. Three T1 plants for each
transgenic line of tobacco, transformed with each promoter
construct, were used for fluorometric assays. Anthers of all
6±2 mm
11±2 mm
14±2 mm
17± 2 mm
25±2 mm
34 ±2 mm
38±2 mm/ open flower
Pollen of wild type plant
Pollen of transgenic tobacco plants
Flower/bud size
P-OSIPA- pBI101 P-OSIPK-pBI101
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
Fig. 4 Evaluation of OSIPA and OSIPK promoter driven GUS
activity in different stages of pollen development. GUS expression
was evaluated in the pollen of developing buds/flowers of different
sizes sampled from transgenic and wild type tobacco plants. OSIPApromoter was found to be active in late stages of pollen development
while OSIPK promoter was active in early stages of pollen
development. Scale bar 200 lm
Plant Cell Rep (2007) 26:1919–1931 1925
123
four lines of tobacco (PA8-1, PA10-1, PA18-1 and PA44-
1) transformed with P-OSIPA-pBI101 showed increasing
trend of GUS activity and very high specific activity was
seen in anthers with mature pollen (Fig. 6). The expression
of GUS became evident from anthers at 14 ± 2 to
17 ± 2 mm bud length (stage 3–stage 4) and maximum
expression observed in dehisced anthers, which agreed
with the qualitative histochemical analysis (Fig. 6).
Transgenic (T1) tobacco plants of all lines harboring
OSIPK promoter construct (P-OSIPK-pBI101) showed
specific GUS activity in developing anthers until pollen
matures (up to 34 ± 2 mm bud i.e., stage 8). At first, the
activity increases and shows a decline subsequently.
During the late stages of development, the promoter
becomes inactive. The activity at any stage was low (>10
folds) when compared to plants transformed with P-OSI-
PA-pBI101 indicating that this promoter is not as strong as
OSIPA promoter in heterologous dicot system (Fig. 7).
Other floral organs such as gynoecium, petal and sepal of
transgenic tobacco plants containing P-OSIPA-pBI101 and
P-OSIPK-pBI101 constructs, did not show GUS activity
above the levels detected in same tissues of control plants
(Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3). Activity levels in vegetative
tissues (root and leaves) of transgenic tobacco were also
measured and were not significantly above the values
obtained from the same tissues of wild type plants (Sup-
plementary Figs. 2 and 3).
Discussion
Development of reproductive organs in grasses is an
important and challenging area of research (Bommert et al.
2005). Genes expressing in stage-specific manner and their
promoters are primary targets for such analysis. In an effort
to gain insight into gene activity during the development of
anthers in monocots, activity of the promoters of two
anther/pollen-specific genes identified from Indica rice has
been assessed in transgenic systems.
OSIPA and OSIPK express in anther/pollen of rice
Anther- and pollen-specific expression of OSIPA and
OSIPK, respectively, in rice is evident from northern as
well as in situ hybridizations. Group I pollen allergens
comprise major allergens from grasses that are structurally
related to expansins of plant cell wall (Cosgrove et al.
1997). OSIPA shows similarity to beta expansins or group I
pollen allergens. Beta-expansins (ZEA M 1 isoforms) from
maize pollen induced extension of a variety of grass cell
walls (Li et al. 2003). Calcium-dependent protein kinases
from plants have been found to participate in several plant
processes (Ludwig et al. 2004). Estruch et al. (1994) were
first to clone a calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK)
gene from maize specifically expressing in mature pollen.
Anther-specific OSIPK, isolated in this report, showed
significant similarity to several CDPKs at the protein level.
Thus, single copy genes OSIPA and OSIPK isolated in this
study are members of multi-gene families (Asano et al.
2005; Jiang et al. 2005). The transcription of OSIPK starts
at A, 243 bp upstream of ATG, but no perfect TATA box
was found to be located upstream of the transcription start
site of OSIPK. This gene may belong to the category of
many animal and plant genes known to be TATA-less
(Padbury et al. 1995; Carrari et al. 2001).
A
B
C
D
E
G
H
F
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
Gynoecium
Silique
Anther
Stem
Leaf
Root
Wild type plant
Transgenic plants harboring
P-OSIPA-pBI101 P-OSIPK-pBI101
po
awpo
aw
po
aw
Fig. 5 Evaluation of OSIPA and OSIPK promoter activity in
transgenic Arabidopsis plants. The activity of GUS in different
organs of wild type and transgenic Arabidopsis plants transformed
with P-OSIPA-pBI101 or P-OSIPK-pBI101 is shown. OSIPA pro-
moter showed pollen-specific while OSIPK regulatory region showed
anther-specific activity. Control plant did not show histochemical
GUS staining in any of the organ tested. aw Anther wall, po pollen
1926 Plant Cell Rep (2007) 26:1919–1931
123
OSIPA and OSIPK promoters show known
pollen-specific regulatory elements
Search of sequences upstream to the transcription start site
(+1) of OSIPA and OSIPK for conserved cis-acting regu-
latory elements showed prevalence of two pollen-specific
elements, GTGA and AGAAA. In the pollen-specific
LAT56 and LAT59 promoters, a common cis-acting regu-
latory element (LAT 56/59 box) was identified at the
similar relative positions (�103 to �94 bp in LAT56 and
�114 to �105 in LAT59) having a core sequence of GTGA
(Twell et al. 1991). The late pollen gene G10 (LAT56
homologue) of tobacco possesses five GTGA motifs. Out
of these five, the one present at �96 bp position is at the
same relative position as the GTGA present in LAT56 and
LAT59 promoters (Rogers et al. 2001). Any mutation in
this box reduces pollen-specific promoter activity. In
OSIPA promoter, the GTGA core sequences are located at
-10.00
10.00
30.00
50.00
70.00
90.00
110.00
130.00
150.00
170.00
190.00
210.00
230.00
250.00
270.00
290.00
310.00
330.00
350.00
)re
htn
A(d
ub
mm
2±
6
)re
htn
A(d
ub
mm
2±
11
)re
htn
A(d
ub
mm
2±
41
)re
htn
A(d
ub
mm
2±
71
)re
htn
A(d
ub
mm
2±
52
)re
htn
A(d
ub
mm
2±
43
)re
htn
A(d
ub
mm
2±
83
Size of floral bud/flower
)rh/
nietor
pg
m/U
M4fol
om
n(ytivitca
cificeps
SU
G
PA8-1
PA10-1
PA18-1
PA44-1
Fig. 6 GUS fluorometric assay
for evaluation of OSIPApromoter strength in four
transgenic tobacco plants. The
anthers of developing floral
buds/flowers of different sizes
were dissected and protein
extracted. Six-microgram
protein from each was used for
enzyme assay. Mean of the
specific GUS activity (in nmol
of 4 MU/mg protein/h) for each
dissected anther of three plants
of four independent transgenic
lines is shown. Standard errorbars are also shown. The value
was depicted after subtracting
any background specific GUS
activity observed in dissected
anthers of wild type tobacco
from the activity observed in
anthers of transgenic tobacco
plants
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
)rehtnA(
d ubm
m2±6
) rehtnA(
dubm
m2±11
)r ehtnA(
dubm
m2 ±41
)reh tnA(
du bm
m2±71
) rehtnA(
dubm
m2 ±52
)rehtnA(
dubm
m2 ±43
)rehtnA (
du bm
m2 ±83
Size of floral bud/flower
)rh/
nietor
pg
m/U
M4f
olo
mn(
yt ivitcacif ic e
psS
UG
PK2-1
PK12-1
PK19-1
PK22-1
PK24-1
Fig. 7 Quantitative
(fluorometric) GUS assay for
evaluation of OSIPK promoter
strength in five transgenic
tobacco plants. Other details are
similar to Fig. 6
Plant Cell Rep (2007) 26:1919–1931 1927
123
�661, �668, �1,317 and �1,376 bp. The pollen-specific
LAT52 promoter consists of three independent activator
domains (A, B and C). Each domain is capable of acti-
vating a minimal promoter in a pollen-specific manner.
Within the domain C, the activity was dependent on two
regulatory elements, AGAAA and TCCACCATA (Bate
and Twell 1998). OSIPA promoter has AGAAA sequence
at �424 and �1,425 bp positions and these may have an
important role in imparting the pollen-specificity to OSIPA
promoter. In OSIPK promoter, a consensus GTGA core
sequence was present at �115, �548, �738, �778, �808,
�837 and �1,220 bp positions. Another pollen-specific
regulatory element AGAAA was present at �267, �585
and �1,128 bp positions. Thus, promoters of both the
anther/pollen-specific genes reported here contain some of
the known cis-regulatory elements required for pollen-
specific expression. However, functionality of these
elements and the presence of novel elements can be
determined only by mutation and gain-of-function analysis.
Activity of OSIPA and OSIPK promoters
is anther/pollen-specific
Pollen-specific promoters fused to a reporter gene have
been used to elucidate regulatory elements (Twell et al.
1991; Twell 1992; John and Petersen 1994; Tsuchiya et al.
1994; Hamilton et al. 1998; Rogers et al. 2001). By mon-
itoring the localization of GUS reporter gene activity, the
developmental regulation of a gene can also be studied.
Transgenic Arabidopsis plant containing 50 flanking
sequences (533 bp) of a tubulin (TUA1) fused to b-glucu-
ronidase (GUS) coding region showed the localization of
GUS in post-mitotic pollen grains (Carpenter et al. 1992).
ACT1 gene is most strongly expressed in pollen. Its pro-
moter drove the reporter gene expression in pollen and
ovules of transgenic tobacco and rice, strongly (Vitale et al.
2003). Singh et al. (2003) studied the 0.8 kb promoter
sequence of a generative cell-specific gene, LGC1 and
found it to be sufficient to regulate the expression of
reporter gene in a cell-specific manner. Transgenic tobacco
plants carrying LGC1-DT/A (LGC1 promoter-diptheria
toxin A chain) construct showed sterile and aborted pollen
(Singh et al. 2003). The specificity and strength of OSIPA
and OSIPK promoters were evaluated in heterologous plant
systems, i.e., tobacco and Arabidopsis, by raising
transgenics.
To characterize the activity of OSIPA promoter, the
region between �1,823 to + 64 bp was cloned upstream to
GUS, and the resulting construct was transformed into
tobacco and Arabidopsis. Transgenic plants of tobacco and
Arabidopsis showed pollen-specific GUS activity as
revealed by both histochemical and fluorometric assays.
The development of anther/pollen is tightly regulated with
respect to time and correlates with floral bud size (Koltu-
now et al. 1990). Transgenic tobacco lines analyzed in
detail were found to show GUS expression starting from
stage 3/4 of pollen development in 14 ± 2 to 17 ± 2 mm
floral bud and it continued even after the anthesis. As the
flower matures, the expression keeps on increasing and
maximum expression is observed in pollen after the
dehiscence of flower. During stage 3 to stage 4 of floral
bud, microspores have already separated, tapetum shrunken
and the pollen grains begin to form (Koltunow et al. 1990).
The activity of OSIPA promoter indicates a role of this
gene in late stages of pollen development. OSIPA gene, as
indicated by its promoter activity, is a late expressing gene,
and its product may have significant role in the extension or
growth of pollen wall or pollen tube. A pollen-specific gene
LLP-PG from lily, related to pollen allergens, is expressed
in mature pollen (Chiang et al. 2006). Other late genes
analyzed from anther/pollen include tomato LAT56 and
LAT59 encoding pectate lyases involved in pollen tube
growth (Wing et al. 1990), ZM13 involved in the pollen
tube growth (Hamilton et al. 1989; Hanson et al. 1989) and
a pollen-specific gene PEX1 of maize containing extensin-
like domain and a putative globular domain at the N-ter-
minus (Rubinstein et al. 1995). The tobacco G10 gene
(homolog of tomato LAT56) encodes pectate lyases and is
maximally expressed in mature pollen. The 1,190 bp pro-
moter region fused to GUS preferentially expressed in
developing anthers and mature pollen (Rogers et al. 2001).
Another late pollen gene, ZmMADS2 from maize, encodes
a transcription factor responsible for the dehiscence of the
anther and pollen maturation. It is expressed in endothe-
cium and connective tissue of anther, a day before dehis-
cence and mature pollen, just after the dehiscence
(Schreiber et al. 2004). We speculate that OSIPA gene
product accumulates in the maturing pollen and has simi-
larity to expansins, which might have specialized role
during pollen germination and pollen tube growth.
The promoter-GUS construct of OSIPK (containing a
region from �1,328 to +219 bp) showed anther-specific
expression in transgenic tobacco and Arabidopsis plants.
The extensive study of OSIPK promoter-GUS construct in
transgenic tobacco lines revealed that the expression of
GUS reporter gene started in the anthers (including pollen)
of 11 ± 2 to 14 ± 2 mm floral bud (stage 2–stage 3) and
continued till the maturity of the flower. At the stage 2 of
flower development, microspores in the developing anthers
separate (Koltunow et al. 1990). As the flower opened and
anthers dehisced, no activity was seen in anthers (pollen as
well as other anther tissues). The anther-specific activity of
the OSIPK promoter indicates a probable role of this cal-
cium-dependent protein kinase in early development of
anther/pollen. Several dicot and monocot genes have been
1928 Plant Cell Rep (2007) 26:1919–1931
123
predicted to be involved in early development and function
of anther/pollen grains. The APG gene from Arabidopsis
expresses in the tapetum, between microspore release and
tapetal dissolution stages, in anther wall and stomium
(Roberts et al. 1993). Similarly, the BP4 gene family in
Brassica is activated in anther during early development of
microspores (Albani et al. 1990). BP10 of Brassica napus
comprises a small pollen-specific gene family that is
maximally expressed in early binucleate microspores. A
396 bp fragment of BP10 promoter is sufficient to direct a
strong and correct temporal and spatial expression of GUS
in the pollen of transgenic tobacco plants (Albani et al.
1992). A MYB-related gene from tobacco expresses in
tapetum, stomium of anther wall and pollen grains (Yang
et al. 2001). Estruch et al. (1994) cloned a calcium-
dependent protein kinase (CDPK) from mature maize
pollen, which is specific to a particular cell type. PiCDPK1
and PiCDPK2 from petunia have distinct functions in
regulating pollen tube polarity and growth (Yoon et al.
2006). BRA R1 codes for a Ca+2 binding protein specifi-
cally expressed in anthers of Brassica rapa. The promoter–
reporter gene fusion revealed the male gametophyte-spe-
cific promoter activity in tobacco, Arabidopsis and Bras-
sica napus (Okada et al. 2000). Since CDPKs have an
important role in various physiological and developmental
processes, OSIPK is a candidate gene to study such pro-
cesses responsible for the anther/pollen development.
In conclusion, we have reported the anther/pollen-spe-
cific promoter activities of two Indica rice genes encoding
an expansin/allergen and a calcium-dependent protein
kinase. Both these genes show anther/pollen-specific
expression in rice and further work would unravel their
specific function. The upstream regulatory sequences have
been found to possess some basic features controlling gene
expression in male reproductive tissue. The redundancy in
distribution of anther/pollen-specific elements in these
promoters entails further investigation to specify the role of
individual element. This study identifies two promoters that
confer anther-specific gene expression in a developmental
stage-specific manner. These rice gene promoters are
important tools for controlling gene expression in anthers
of different plants and for biotechnological application.
Genes such as OSIPA and OSIPK, expressing specifically
in tissues of sexual organs (anthers or ovules) are of par-
ticular interest in breeding programs for developing hybrid
seeds and parthenocarpic seedless fruits. Their promoters
in combination with cytotoxic genes can be exploited to
engineer traits like male sterility in plants and help in cell/
tissue-specific ablation for investigating functions at cel-
lular level.
Acknowledgments We would like to thank Dr Promila Gupta for
her help during in situ localization experiments. We are also grateful
to Dr Ambika Gupta for helping and assisting in fluorometric assays.
This work was supported by Department of Biotechnology and Uni-
versity Grants Commission, Government of India.
References
Albani D, Robert LS, Donaldson PA, Altosaar I, Arnison PG,
Fabijanski SF (1990) Characterization of a pollen-specific gene
family from Brassica napus which is activated during early
microspore development. Plant Mol Biol 15:605–622
Albani D, Sardana R, Robert LS, Altosaar I, Arnison PG, Fabijanski
SF (1992) A Brassica napus gene family which shows sequence
similarity to ascorbate oxidase is expressed in developing pollen.
Molecular characterization and analysis of promoter activity in
transgenic tobacco plants. Plant J 2:331–342
Asano T, Tanaka N, Yang G, Hayashi N, Komatsu S (2005) Genome-
wide identification of the rice calcium-dependent protein kinase
and its closely related kinase gene families: comprehensive
analysis of the CDPKs gene family in rice. Plant Cell Physiol
46:356–366
Bate N, Twell D (1998) Functional architecture of a late pollen
promoter: pollen-specific transcription is developmentally regu-
lated by multiple stage-specific and co-dependent activator
elements. Plant Mol Biol 37:859–869
Bommert P, Satoh-Nagasawa N, Jackson D, Hirano H-Y (2005)
Genetics and evolution of inflorescence and flower development
in grasses. Plant Cell Physiol 46:69–78
Carpenter JL, Ploense SE, Snustad DP, Silflow CD (1992) Preferen-
tial expression of an a-tubulin gene of Arabidopsis in pollen.
Plant Cell 4:557–571
Carrari F, Frankel N, Lijavetzky D, Benech-Arnold R, Sanchez R,
Iusem ND (2001) The TATA-less promoter of VP1, a plant gene
controlling seed germination. DNA Seq 12:107–114
Chiang JY, Balic N, Hsu SW, Yang CY, Ko CW, Hsu YF, Swoboda I,
Wang CS (2006) A pollen-specific polygalacturonase from lily is
related to major grass pollen allergens. Plant Physiol Biochem
44:743–751
Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thali-ana. Plant J 16:735–743
Cosgrove DJ, Bedinger P, Durachko DM (1997) Group I allergens of
grass pollen as cell wall-loosening agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA 94:6559–6564
Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983) A plant DNA miniprepa-
ration: version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1:19–21
Duck NB (1994) RNA in situ hybridization in plants. In: Gelvin SB,
Schilperoort RA (eds) Plant molecular biology manual, vol G1.
Kluwer, Belgium, pp 1–13
Durbarry A, Vizir I, Twell D (2005) Male germ line development
in Arabidopsis. duo pollen mutants reveal gametophytic
regulators of generative cell cycle progression. Plant Physiol
137:297–307
Endo M, Tsuchiya T, Saito H, Matsubara H, Hakozaki H, Masuko H,
Kamada M, Higashitani A, Takahashi H, Fukuda H, Demura T,
Watanabe M (2004) Identification and molecular characteriza-
tion of novel anther-specific genes in Oryza sativa L. by using
cDNA microarray. Genes Genet Syst 79:213–226
Estruch JJ, Kadwell S, Merlin E, Crossland L (1994) Cloning and
characterization of a maize pollen-specific calcium-dependent
calmodulin-independent protein kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:8837–8841
Eyal Y, Curie C, McCormick S (1995) Pollen specificity elements
reside in 30 bp of the proximal promoters of two pollen-
expressed genes. Plant Cell 7:373–384
Plant Cell Rep (2007) 26:1919–1931 1929
123
Golovkin M, Reddy ASN (2003) A calmodulin-binding protein from
Arabidopsis has an essential role in pollen germination. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 100:10558–10563
Gomez MD, Beltran J-P, Canas LA (2004) The pea END1 promoter
drives anther-specific gene expression in different plant species.
Planta 219:967–981
Guerrero FD, Crossland L, Smutzer GS, Hamilton DA, Mascarenhas
JP (1990) Promoter sequences from a maize pollen-specific gene
direct tissue-specific transcription in tobacco. Mol Gen Genet
224:161–168
Hamilton DA, Bashe DM, Stinson JR, Mascarenhas JP (1989)
Characterization of a pollen-specific genomic clone from maize.
Sex Plant Reprod 2:208–212
Hamilton DA, Schwarz YH, Mascarenhas JP (1998) A monocot
pollen-specific promoter contains separable pollen-specific and
quantitative elements. Plant Mol Biol 38:663–669
Hanson DD, Hamilton DA, Travis JL, Bashe DM, Mascarenhas JP
(1989) Characterization of a pollen-specific cDNA clone from
Zea mays and its expression. Plant Cell 1:173–179
Higo K, Ugawa Y, Iwamoto M, Korenaga T (1999) Plant cis-acting
regulatory DNA elements (PLACE) database: 1999. Nucleic
Acids Res 27:297–300
Hulzink RJM, Weerdesteyn H, Croes AF, Gerats T, van Herpen
MMA, van Helden J (2003) In silico identification of putative
regulatory sequence elements in the 50-untranslated region of
genes that are expressed during male gametogenesis. Plant
Physiol 132:75–83
Jani D, Singh NK, Bhattacharya S, Meena LS, Singh Y, Upadhyay
SN, Sharma AK, Tyagi AK (2004) Studies on the immunogenic
potential of plant-expressed cholera toxin B subunit. Plant Cell
Rep 22:471–477
Jefferson RA (1987) Assaying chimeric genes in plants: the GUS
gene fusion system. Plant Mol Biol Rep 5:387–405
Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW (1987) GUS fusion: b-
glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in
higher plants. EMBO J 6:3901–3907
Jiang S-Y, Jasmin PXH, Ting YY, Ramachandran S (2005) Genome-
wide identification and molecular characterization of Ole-e-I,
Allerg-1 and Allerg-2 domain-containing pollen-allergen-like
genes in Oryza sativa. DNA Res 12:167–179
John ME, Petersen MW (1994) Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)
pollen-specific polygalacturonase mRNA: tissue and temporal
specificity of its promoter in transgenic tobacco. Plant Mol Biol
26:1989–1993
Jung K-H, Han M-J, Lee Y-S, Kim Y-W, Hwang I, Kim M-J, Kim Y-
K, Nahm BH, An G (2005) Rice Undeveloped Tapetum 1 is a
major regulator of early tapetum development. Plant Cell
17:2705–2722
Kaothien P, Ok SH, Shuai B, Wengier D, Cotter R, Kelley D,
Kiriakopolos S, Muschietti J, McCormick S (2005) Kinase
partner protein interacts with the LePRK1 and LePRK2 receptor
kinases and plays a role in polarized pollen tube growth. Plant J
42:492–503
Kapoor S, Takatsuji H (2006) Silencing of an anther-specific zinc-
finger gene, MEZ1, causes aberrant meiosis and pollen abortion
in petunia. Plant Mol Biol 61:415–430
Koltunow AM, Truettner J, Cox KH, Wallroth M, Goldberg RB
(1990) Different temporal and spatial gene expression patterns
occur during anther development. Plant Cell 2:1201–1224
Lan LF, Chen W, Lai Y, Suo J, Kong Z, Li C, Lu Y, Zhang Y, Zhao
X, Zhang X, Han B, Cheng J, Xue YB (2004) Monitoring of
gene expression profiles and isolation of candidate genes
involved in pollination and fertilization in rice (Oryza sativaL.) with a 10 K cDNA microarray. Plant Mol Biol 54:471–487
Lee Y-H, Chung K-H, Kim H-U, Jin Y-M, Kim H-I, Park B-S (2003)
Induction of male sterile cabbage using a tapetum-specific
promoter from Brassica campestris L. ssp. pekinensis. Plant Cell
Rep 22:268–273
Lescot M, Dehais P, Thijs G, Marchal K, Moreau Y, Van de Peer Y,
Rouze P, Rombauts S (2002) PlantCARE, a database of plant
cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico
analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 30:325–327
Li L-C, Bedinger PA, Volk C, Jones AD, Cosgrove DJ (2003)
Purification and characterization of four b-expansins (Zea m 1
isoforms) from maize pollen. Plant Physiol 132:2073–2085
Logemann J, Schell J, Willmitzer L (1987) Improved method for the
isolation of RNA from plant tissues. Anal Biochem 163:16–20
Ludwig AA, Romeis T, Jones JDG (2004) CDPK-mediated signaling
pathways: specificity and cross-talk. J Exp Bot 55:181–188
Luo H, Lee J-Y, Hu Q, Nelson-Vasilchik K, Eitas TK, Lickwar C,
Kausch AP, Chandlee JM, Hodges TK (2006) RTS, a rice anther-
specific gene is required for male fertility and its promoter
sequence directs tissue-specific gene expression in different plant
species. Plant Mol Biol 62:397–408
Ma H (2005) Molecular genetic analyses of microsporogenesis and
microgametogenesis in flowering plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol
56:393–434
Mariani C, De Beuckeleer M, Truettner J, Leemans J, Goldberg RB
(1990) Induction of male sterility in plants by a chimaeric
ribonuclease gene. Nature 347:737–741
McCormick S (1993) Male gametophyte development. Plant Cell
5:1265–1275
Nonomura K-I, Miyoshi K, Eiguchi M, Suzuki T, Miyao A, Hirochika
H, Kurata N (2003) The MSP1 gene is necessary to restrict the
number of cells entering into male and female sporogenesis and
to initiate anther wall formation in rice. Plant Cell 15:1728–1739
Okada T, Sasaki Y, Ohta R, Onozuka N, Toriyama K (2000)
Expression of Bra r1 gene in transgenic tobacco and Bra r1promoter activity in pollen of various plant species. Plant Cell
Physiol 41:757–766
Okada T, Bhalla PL, Singh MB (2005) Transcriptional activity of
male gamete-specific histone gcH3 promoter in sperm cells of
Lilium longiflorum. Plant Cell Physiol 46:797–802
Padbury JF, Tseng Y-T, Waschek JA (1995) Transcription initiation
is localized to a TATA-less region in the ovine b1 adrenergic
receptor gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 211:254–261
Park BS, Kim JS, Kim SH, Park YD (2005) Characterization of a
pollen-preferential gene, BAN102, from Chinese cabbage. Plant
Cell Rep 24:663–670
Park J-I, Hakozaki H, Endo M, Takada Y, Ito H, Uchida M, Okabe T,
Watanabe M (2006) Molecular characterization of mature
pollen-specific genes encoding novel small cysteine-rich proteins
in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Rep 25:466–474
Praz V, Perier R, Bonnard C, Bucher P (2002) The eukaryotic
promoter database, EPD: new entry types and links to gene
expression data. Nucleic Acids Res 30:322–324
Raghavan V (1997) Molecular embryology of flowering plants.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Roberts MR, Foster GD, Blundell RP, Robinson SW, Kumar A,
Draper J, Scott R (1993) Gametophytic and sporophytic
expression of an anther-specific Arabidopsis thaliana gene.
Plant J 3:111–120
Rogers HJ, Bate N, Combe J, Sullivan J, Sweetman J, Swan C,
Lonsdale DM, Twell D (2001) Functional analysis of cis-
regulatory elements within the promoter of the tobacco late
pollen gene g10. Plant Mol Biol 45:577–585
Rombauts S, Florquin K, Lescot M, Marchal K, Rouze P, van de Peer
Y (2003) Computational approaches to identify promoters and
cis-regulatory elements in plant genomes. Plant Physiol
132:1162–1176
Roque E, Gomez MD, Ellul P, Wallbraun M, Madueno F, Beltran J-P,
Canas LA (2007) The PsEND1 promoter: a novel tool to produce
1930 Plant Cell Rep (2007) 26:1919–1931
123
genetically engineered male-sterile plants by early anther
ablation. Plant Cell Rep 26:313–325
Rubinstein AL, Broadwater AH, Lowrey KB, Bedinger PA (1995)
Pex1, a pollen-specific gene with an extensin-like domain. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 92:3086–3090
Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning. A
laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Press, Cold Spring Harbor
Schreiber DN, Bantin J, Dresselhaus T (2004) The MADS box
transcription factor ZmMADS2 is required for anther and pollen
maturation in maize and accumulates in apoptotic bodies during
anther dehiscence. Plant Physiol 134:1069–1079
Shahmuradov IA, Gammerman AJ, Hancock JM, Bramley PM,
Solovyev VV (2003) PlantProm: a database of plant promoter
sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 31:114–117
Singh M, Bhalla PL, Xu H, Singh MB (2003) Isolation and
characterization of a flowering plant male gametic cell-specific
promoter. FEBS Lett 542:47–52
Tsuchiya T, Toriyama K, Ejiri S, Hinata K (1994) Molecular
characterization of rice genes specifically expressed in the anther
tapetum. Plant Mol Biol 26:1737–1746
Twell D (1992) Use of a nuclear-targeted b-glucuronidase fusion
protein to demonstrate vegetative cell-specific gene expression
in developing pollen. Plant J 2:887–892
Twell D, Yamaguchi J, Wing RA, Ushiba J, McCormick S (1991)
Promoter analysis of genes that are coordinately expressed
during pollen development reveals pollen-specific enhancer
sequences and shared regulatory elements. Genes Dev 5:496–
507
van Tunen AJ, Mur LA, Brouns GS, Rienstra J-D, Koes RE, Mol
JNM (1990) Pollen- and anther-specific chi promoters from
petunia: tandem promoter regulation of the chiA gene. Plant Cell
2:393–401
Vitale A, Wu RJ, Cheng Z, Meagher RB (2003) Multiple conserved 50
elements are required for high-level pollen expression of the
Arabidopsis reproductive actin ACT1. Plant Mol Biol 52:1135–
1151
Wang Z, Liang Y, Li C, Xu Y, Lan L, Zhao D, Chen C, Xu Z, Xue Y,
Chong K (2005) Microarray analysis of gene expression
involved in anther development in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant
Mol Biol 58:721–737
Wing RA, Yamaguchi J, Larabell SK, Ursin VM, McCormick S
(1990) Molecular and genetic characterization of two pollen-
expressed genes that have sequence similarity to pectate lyases
of the plant pathogen Erwinia. Plant Mol Biol 14:17–28
Xu SX, Liu GS, Chen RD (2006) Characterization of an anther- and
tapetum-specific gene and its highly specific promoter isolated
from tomato. Plant Cell Rep 25:231–240
Yamaji N, Kyo M (2006) Two promoters conferring active gene
expression in vegetative nuclei of tobacco immature pollen
undergoing embryonic dedifferentiation. Plant Cell Rep 25:749–
757
Yang S, Sweetman JP, Amirsadeghi S, Barghchi M, Huttly AK,
Chung W-I, Twell D (2001) Novel anther-specific myb genes
from tobacco as putative regulators of phenylalanine ammonia-
lyase expression. Plant Physiol 126:1738–1753
Yang X, Makaroff CA, Ma H (2003) The Arabidopsis MALEMEIOCYTE DEATH1 gene encodes a PHD-finger protein that is
required for male meiosis. Plant Cell 15:1281–1295
Yoon GM, Dowd PE, Gilroy S, McCubbin AG (2006) Calcium-
dependent protein kinase isoforms in Petunia have distinct
functions in pollen tube growth, including regulating polarity.
Plant Cell 18:867–878
Zhao Y, Zhao Q, Ao G, Yu J (2006) Characterization and functional
analysis of a pollen-specific gene st901 in Solanum tuberosum.
Planta 224:405–412
Zhu Q-H, Ramm K, Shivakkumar R, Dennis ES, Upadhyaya NM
(2004) The ANTHER INDEHISCENCE1 gene encoding a single
MYB domain protein is involved in anther development in rice.
Plant Physiol 135:1514–1525
Plant Cell Rep (2007) 26:1919–1931 1931
123