promoting a recovery oriented system of care arthur c. evans, ph.d. director city of philadelphia...
TRANSCRIPT
Promoting A Recovery Oriented System of Care
Arthur C. Evans, Ph.D.Director
City of Philadelphia
Division of Social Services
Office of Behavioral Health/Mental Retardation Services
4
Overview
Historical context and Background Various Viewpoints on Recovery Principles, Core Values of Definition Program and Practice Models Implications for the System System Change Strategies and Next Steps
5
Philadelphia Office of Behavioral Health/Mental Retardation Services
Arthur Evans, Ph.D. Director
Office of Mental Health
Coordinating Office of Drug and
Alcohol Abuse Programs
Community Behavioral
Health
Mental Retardation
Services
Michael J Covone Deputy Director
Margaret Minehart, M.D. Medical Director
6
Division of Social Services
Division of Social Services
Julia Danzy
Department of Health
Prisons Department
Department of Human Services
Behavioral Health and Mental Retardation
Recreation Department
Office of Adult Services
Mayor’s Office of Comm. Service
7
CAVEATS
• Recovery is not throwing the baby out with the bath water. [Reorientation]
• Recovery is not panacea – it will not solve larger societal problems (i.e. inadequate housing, poverty, stigma, budget problems, etc.)
• Reorientation is a process. It is not something that will happen overnight.
• Public Sector Challenges are Real• It takes a consensus process to move the system in
the direction of recovery.
9
Factors Influencing the New Recovery Movement
• Recovery-Oriented Providers• Addiction self-help movement• Mental Health consumer/survivor movement• Family movement - NAMI• Advances in treatment approaches• Recovery oriented research• Mental health and addiction advocates
10
What has Been our Orientation?
• Focus primarily on symptom reduction or sobriety
• “Client” viewed passively as recipient of services
• Focus on “fitting into a program”
• Focus on client pathology and deficits
• Minimal individual and family voice or input in system
• Responsibility for change and control largely owned by programs
• Person’s growth and sense of self is “constrained by “illness”
11
Relevant Mental Health Research
• Vermont Psychiatric Hospital Study– Studied outcomes for 269 severely disabled patients
discharged in mid-1950’s
– 34% had achieved full recovery
– additional 34% had improved significantly in social functioning and psychiatric status
– findings replicated in WHO study where 45-65% of person w/ schizophrenia recovered and only 20-25% showed classical deteriorating course
12
Preliminary Outcomes from a Peer Outreach Program
Table 4. Inpatient and Outpatient Service Utilization for Engage vs. Standard Care Only
Condition
Mean Inpatient Service Use Mean Outpatient Participation after 3 Months
1 Year Prior after 3 Months
Group Treatment
Self-Help Groups
Engage + Standard Care
.54 admissions
3.3 days inpatient
.5 admissions4.4 days inpatient
44 hours .78
Standard Care Only
.33 admissions
4.4 days inpatient
.75 admissions
5.2 days inpatient
10 hours .30
13
Relevant Substance Abuse Research
• National Treatment Improvement Evaluation Study– 5 year study of treatment effectiveness of almost 4500 addiction clients
nationwide– reduced substance use by 50%– reduced criminal activity up to 80%– increased employment and reduced homelessness– improved physical and mental health
• New research concludes that the longer a person is in treatment for addiction, the better the odds that the patient will cut down on drug use
(The study, entitled "Does Retention Matter? Treatment Duration and Improvement in Drug Use," is being published in the May 2003 issue of the journal Addiction. )
• Researcher Bill White has documented spontaneous recovery of individuals who do not come into the formal Tx System
14
What Hinders:Mental Health Recovery Research
by Steve Onken and Colleagues
The lack of helping factors and the resulting conditions e.g., poverty, apathy, isolation and hopelessness;
Stigma (internalized and external); Discrimination; Situations and structures which deny persons’
choices and control over their life; Tenaciousness of the disorder itself; Abuse and trauma.
15
What Helps:What Helps:Mental Health Recovery Research Mental Health Recovery Research
by Steve Onken and Colleaguesby Steve Onken and Colleagues Basic resources such as a livable income, affordable and safe housing
and reliable transportation; Positive attitudes, self-care and self advocacy where persons believe
that recovery is possible for everyone; A sense of meaning and purpose, for many hope or spiritual faith; Choice in whether and what treatment to use and life options in general; Relationships such as family and friends that sustain regular activities
including fun; Meaningful activities involving employment, education and/or
volunteer and advocacy work; Peer support in the form of groups, programs and role models; Access to formal mental health services oriented toward the whole
person where respectful staff partner with each person in achieving agreed upon goals
16
Implications of Research
• People can and do get better with the right supports, some of which are outside of formal treatment
• We need to understand and incorporate those other factors that are important in people’s recovery
18
Current Recovery Perspectives
• Recovery as Rehabilitation – (Deegan) recovery is the task of individual, rehab one aspect of recovery, extend rehab beyond treatment to all areas of life
• Recovery as Political Process – the gaining of civil rights, self-determination, dignity and respect
• Recovery as Something Gained – functions, external things, internal states, (Ragins), more than absence of symptoms
• Recovery Management– (White) permanent addictions recovery is possible, focus on solutions, open up natural pathways to recovery
• Recovery as Philosophy – state of mind, belief system,
20
Recovery Core Values
• Participation– Entry at any time– No wrong door– Choice is respected – Right to participate– Person defines goals
• Programming– Individually tailored care– Culturally competent care– Staff know resources
• Funding and Operations– Income is tied to Outcomes– Person selects provider– Protection from undue influence– Providers compete for business
Participation Funding-Operations
Programming
21
• Equal opportunity for wellness
• Recovery encompasses all phases of care
• Entire system supports recovery
• Input at every level• Recovery-based outcome
measures• New nomenclature • System wide training
culturally diverse, relevant and competent services
• Consumers review funding
• Commitment to Peer Support and to Consumer-Operated services
• Participation on Boards, Committees, and other decision-making bodies
• Financial support for consumer involvement
Recovery Core ValuesDirection
22
Objectives of a Recovery System of Care
To the extent possible, individuals should have responsibility and control over their personal recovery process
Increase individual/family participation in all aspects of service delivery
Expand recovery efforts to all aspects of individual’s lives- social, vocational, spiritual through direct services or linkage to natural helping networks
Promote highest degree of independent functioning and quality of life for all individuals receiving care in our system
23
Recovery Defined
“We endorse a broad vision of recovery that involves a process of restoring or developing a positive & meaningful sense of identity apart from one’s condition & a meaningful sense of belonging & then rebuilding a life despite or within the limitations imposed by that condition.”
25
Practice Guidelines: Prevention/Health Promotion
• Persons in recovery will:– be able to access information re health promotion
and treatment options– promote their own health and build Recovery Capital
(resources for recovery)
• Agencies will: – provide community and consumer education– Utilize a range of community-based interventions to
reduce risk factors and enhance resilience– encourage access to resources or info, conduct anti-
stigma campaigns
26
Practice Guidelines: Consumer Involvement
• Persons in recovery/Family– participate on Boards– participate in agency evaluations– participate in planning structures– know grievance procedures
• Agencies – offer peer-run services– hire peer staff– routinely evaluate consumer satisfaction and
solicit ideas on now to improve care
27
Practice Guidelines: Access and Engagement
• Persons in recovery– can access services through any door– are offered services where they live
• Agencies use:– a range of pre-engagement strategies– peer engagement specialists– specialized outreach strategies for difficult to engage
populations– specialized procedures to rapidly admit people who
relapse– admission criteria that don’t exclude people based on
prior treatment failure, etc.
28
Practice Guidelines: Continuity of Care
• Persons in recovery aren’t discharged just for being more symptomatic
• Agencies link people in recovery to:– appropriate aftercare services upon discharge– self-help resources or natural supports
• Agencies have mechanisms for: – follow-up post-discharge– people returning for services
29
Practice Guidelines: Individualized Recovery Planning
• Persons in recovery – actively participate in the development of their recovery
plans– sign all plans– attend all planning meetings– designate meeting participants– receive their plans
• Providers:– develop holistic plans that include wishes, interests,
goals, etc. – regularly review plans with multi-disciplinary team (e.g.,
treatment, housing, work, natural supports)
30
Practice Guidelines: Recovery Support Staff
• Providers:– offer people hope that recovery is “possible for me.” – work collaboratively to develop relapse-prevention
plans and advance directives – assist persons in recovery with self-management
strategies – help engage and maximize use of natural supports
such as friends, family, and neighbors– promote autonomy and Recovery Capital– aid in skill development as well as symptom
management and treatment
31
Practice Guidelines: Community Inclusion
• People in recovery can be assisted to connect to community resources
• Agencies:– identify and regularly update traditional and non-
traditional resource directories– integrate program activities into community life– utilize community social, recreational, educational,
vocational, faith resources
32
Practice Guidelines: Housing and Work
• Agencies:– link people in recovery to safe affordable housing– offer a range of work and educational
opportunities to all persons in recovery – eliminate work eligibility requirements – strengthen linkages to vocational and educational
providers
33
Practice Guidelines: Evidence-Based Practices
• People in recovery:– Provide information to help shape local adaptation
of EBPs– Participate in program evaluations– Help interpret data– Provide ideas about promising practices that need
more research
• Agencies implement and sustain recovery-oriented EBPs
34
Practice Guidelines: Cultural Competency
• Agencies:– evaluate data to ensure that members of diverse
cultural groups are receiving effective treatment – provide services and materials that are linguistically
and culturally appropriate – establish and utilize relationships with local community
institutions – identify and eliminate health disparities– conduct culturally competent assessments– maintain staff composition that reflects diversity of
population served
35
Practice Guidelines: Quality and Performance
• Agencies: – regularly administer opinion and satisfaction surveys – collect recovery-oriented performance measures – have a Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
process that seeks to eliminate barriers to recovery
• Persons in recovery – participate on CQI committees – inform service needs assessment– identify effective practices
37
Recovery Practice Guidelines
Recovery-Oriented Value- Driven
Practitioner(Clinical)
Program(Provider)
System(Policy)
Culturally competent
Fidelity to model
Convey Hope and Respect
Person-Centered
38
Phase 1: Determine Direction
• Develop Concepts & Design Model– Principles and core values– Recovery definition– Literature reviews, outside consultation
• Develop Consensus
– Consumers/people in recovery– Family members– Service providers– Advocates
• Spread the Word - Create Awareness
1
2
3
39
Create AwarenessCreate Awareness
And Increasing depth of content
Increasing numbers of people
Consumers, Families, Advocates
OBH Staff
Executive Directors
Medical Staff
General Public Program Directors
Boards of Directors
Line Staff
Legislators, Civic Leaders, Clergy
40
Phase 2: Initiate ChangeFocus on Quality Provider self-assessment Agency Recovery plansPlan approval and implementationPerformance guidelinesPerformance measures and monitoring
Workforce developmentIntensive skill-based training
Consultation for providers
Service system re-design: New funding and realignment of existing resources
1
2
3
4
5
41
Phase 3:Increase Depth and Complexity
• Provide Advanced Training
• Continue Evolving Recovery-Oriented Performance Measures
• Re-align fiscal resources– use contract language as change tool– use incentives
1
2
3
42
Upcoming Activities
• Community orientation sessions
• Reinvestment RFPs
• Release of Trilogy
• Provider technical assistance
• Building internal capacity
• System Transformation Groups
43
Benefits for the Community
Improved Recovery Outcomes
Improved treatment retention Increased consumer/person in recovery
satisfaction Broadened community supports Staff development through state-of-the-art
training
44
How Will This Affect Me?
A recovery orientation will impact:
• How we do our jobs
• Consumer/client outcomes
• Program models
• Career development opportunities
• Our communities
45
Future Challenges
• Shifting the Culture of the System
• Reconciling client rights and best practices
• Ethical rules
• Risk Management
• Resource Allocation
• Changes in Administrative Infrastructure, Particularly the Policy of other State Agencies
46
Increased use of peer
support and self help
Identification of best
practices
Increased consumer
participation
Greater Vocational
participation
Independent functioning
Increased consumer satisfactio
n
Meaningful social roles
Improved treatment retention
Measuring Success
Reduction in stigma
Improved quality of
life