proposed proposed relocation of locationfor … proposed relocation of locationfor douglass rd....

6
Proposed Proposed Proposed Relocation of Location for Douglass Rd. Generation FIGURE 5- RELOCATION OF DOUGLASS BLVD. A i l Approximat tely SITE SUITABILITY/ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION FOR Facilities GENERATION FACILITIES 6000 LF OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA Exhibit 6 - Relocation of Douglas Rd. for Alternative 1

Upload: duongtuyen

Post on 30-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

       

      

  

Proposed Proposed Proposed Relocation of Location for Douglass Rd. Generation FIGURE 5- RELOCATION OF DOUGLASS BLVD. A i lApproximattely SITE SUITABILITY/ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION FOR Facilities GENERATION FACILITIES 6000 LF OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA

Exhibit 6 - Relocation of Douglas Rd. for Alternative 1

 

         

Generation Facilities

FIGURE 4- FUTURE PLANNED FACILITIES SITE SUITABILITY/ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION FOR

GENERATION FACILITIES OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA

Location of High Pressure Gas Line

Exhibit 7 - Future Planned Facilities

Exhibit 8 - Proposed Action/Alternative No. 1 Cost Comparison Table

Element Proposed Action Alternative No. 1

Site Excavation $100,000 $50,000

Paving and Grading $500,000 $350,000

Electrical Duct Bank $400,000 $330,000

High Pressure Gas Line $70,000 $100,000

Relocation of Douglas Blvd $0 $1,350,000

Total: $1,070,000 $2,150,000

Notes:

(1) Costs do not include engineering and administration costs

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

! !

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! ! !

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

! !

! ! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

D D D

D

D

D

D

D D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D D

D

D D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D D D D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D D D

D

D

D D

D

D D

D

D D

D

D

D D

D D

D D

D

D D

D

D D D D D

D

D D D D D D D D D D D D D

D

D

D

D D

D

D

D

D

D

D D

D D

D

D

D D

D D

D

D

D D

D D

D

D D

D

D

D D D

D

D

D

D D D

D

D

D D D D

D

D

D

D

D D D

D

D

D

D

D D D D D

D D

D

D

D

D D D D

D

D D

D

D

D D D

D

D

D

D D

D

D D D

D

D

D D

D

D

D

D

D

D D D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D D

D

D

D D

D

D

D

D

D D D D

D

D

D D

D

D

D

D D

D D D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D D D D D D D D

D D D D D

D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D D D D

D D

D D

D

D D D

D D

D D

D

D

D

D D

D

D

D

D

D

D D

D

D

D D

D

D

D

D

D

D D

D D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D D

D

D D D

D

D D

D

D

D

D D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D D

D D

D

D D

D

D

D

D

D

D D

D

D

D D D

D D

D

D

DD D D

D D

D

D

D

D

D

D D D

D D D

D

D

D D

D

D

D

D

D D D

D

D

D D D D D

D

D

D D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D D D

D

D

D

D

D

D D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D D

D

D D D D

D

D

D D D D D

DD D D

D

D

D D DD D

D D

D

D

D

D D D D D D D D D D

D D D D

D

D D D D

D

D

D D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D D

D D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

OK

LA

HO

MA G

EOLOGICAL SUR

VE

Y

1908 CENTENNIAL 20

08

MA

GN

ET

IC N

OR

TH

TR

UE

NO

RT

H

Exhibit 9 - Geologic Map of the Franklin Quadrangle Oklahoma Geologic Quadrangle OGQ-26

Geologic Map of the Franklin OKLAHOMA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

7.5 Quadrangle Charles J. Mankin, Director (previously Open-File Report OF8-2001)

CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS PgrQal

Pgr Pgr

Qal

PE

RM

IAN

Q

UA

TE

RN

AR

Y

Pgr

HO

LOC

ENEPgr

Qal Qal

UNCONFORMITY

Phy

LEO

NA

RD

IAN

Pgr

DESCRIPTION OF UNITS Pgr

ALLUVIUM (Holocene) Clay, silt, sand, and gravel in channels and on flood plains of modern– streams. Includes terrace deposits of similar composition located directly above and adjacent to modern channels and flood plains. Thickness: 0 to about 30 ft

HENNESSEY FORMATION (Permian) Shale and siltstone, poorly exposed, mostly moderate– Pgr

reddish brown (10R4/6), moderate red (5R4/6), to moderate reddish orange (10R6/6) with conspicuous light greenish gray (5GY8/1) iron-reduction spots. The lower 20 - 30 ft is predominantly a blocky-weathering, silty shale and clayshale that exhibits good paleosol development; locally with

Phy lenticular beds of sandstone and siltstone-pebble conglomerate and fine- to very fine grained sandstone. Shale typically unstratified and highly fractured; rarely with small-scale slickensides that are evidence of paleosol development. Above the lower part, thin-bedded to laminated, stratified to

Pgr well stratified siltstones and very fine grained sandstones are more common. Siltstone moderately to well stratified. Sandstone locally cross-stratified on large and small scale, uncommonly trough-cross-

Qal stratified and/or ripple marked. Trace fossils and shale rip-up clasts very rare. Sandstone rarely forms channelform deposits. Shale outcrops locally weather to blocky, very fractured, or “hackly” appearance; form bare, rounded outcrops and/or “badlands”-type topography. In other places, shale weathers to muddy soil with abundant small calcareous nodules. Calcite veinlets uncommon. Interbedded siltstone and shale weather to bench-and-slope topography. Siltstone and sandstone exhibit platy to flaggy weathering. Siltstone and sandstone beds with small-scale cross-stratification and ripples. Moderately indurated, occur as resistant beds capping tops of hills and ridges. Overall, unit is expressed as highly weathered, muddy soil. Thickness: 0 - 20 ft, top not exposed

GARBER FORMATION (Permian) Sandstone, mostly fine-grained to less commonly very fine to– medium-fine-grained; appears to be very fine grained near base; moderate reddish brown (10R4/6), moderate reddish orange (10R6/6), moderate red (5R5/4), light brown (5YR5/6), and dark yellowish orange (10YR6/6); minor siltstone, shale, siltstone-pebble conglomerate. Sandstone typically porous and friable. Commonly weathers to smooth, rounded outcrops; locally with platy to flaggy to rarely slabby appearance. Locally weathers to hard, dark-colored (grayish black [N2]) beds completely cemented with hematite, calcite, and/or silica. Dark-colored sandstone blocks locally

Pgr

Qal form lag deposit over weathered outcrops. Large- and small-scale crossbeds, trough crossbeds common; many outcrops characterized by inclined beds and channelform deposits, although plane-parallel stratification also present. Shale and/or siltstone rip-up clasts uncommon; burrow extremely rare. Sandstone locally color-banded (e.g., moderate reddish brown (10R4/6), grayish red purple (5RP4/2), and grayish yellow green (5GY7/2)) or with mottled appearance. Small calcareous and iron-oxide spheres occur locally on weathered surfaces. Circular iron-reduction spots very rare. Siltstone and shale sandy, color-banded (e.g., moderate reddish brown (10R4/6) and yellowish gray (5Y7/2)), stratified to unstratified, and with uncommon iron-reduction spots as large as 2 in. in diameter. Typically soft, weather to “badlands”-type topography. Siltstone and shale common near

Pgr

the base and top of formation. In places, siltstone and shale contain evidence of paleosol development such as blocky weathering, fractures with fracture surfaces marked by small slickensides, through-going curved fractures, and calcareous concretions. Barite roses (Oklahoma rose rock) common south of Lake Stanley Draper. Thickness: about 950 ft; however, base not exposed

D''''D''' Pgr

Pgr SYMBOLS

Unit contact; dashed where approximate

Mappable bed of conglomeratePgr

Qal Mappable concentration of barite roses or crystals

D Outcrop, geologic observation Qal

! Petroleum well. Includes oil, gas, oil and gas, dry service (water supply or injection), junked and abandoned, unknown. Modified

from Natural Resources Information System database

97°45’ 97°07’30’’ 35°45’ 35°45’

A A’ A’’ A’’’ A’’’’ A’’’’’

B’’’ B’’’’B B’ B’’ B’’’’’

QalPgr

Pgr Choctaw

City

Pgr Del City

C C’ C’’ C’’’ C’’’’ C’’’’’ Qal

D D’

D’’ Moore D’’’ D’’’’ D’’’’’

E E’ E’’

E’’’ E’’’’ E’’’’’

35°07’30”

97°45’

35°07’30”

97°07’30”Pgr EXPLANATION

Current Map

Qal Mapped Quadrangles

Major Cities

Expanding Suburbs and Communities

Pgr North

5 Miles

Pgr Base Map CreditsPgr

The base map was compiled by the U.S. Geological Survey from aerial photographsQal and photogrammetric methods. Aerial photographs taken 1954. Field checked 1956. Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection.1927 NorthAmerican Datum. 10,000­

Phy foot grid ticks based on Oklahoma coordinate system, south zone. 1,000-meter UTM grid, zone 14.

Geologic Map Credits

Geology byThomas M. Stanley and Neil H. Suneson, 2000-2001. Research supported by the U.S. Geological Survey, National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, under AssistanceAward Number 00HQPA0002. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government. Originally published as Open-File Report OF8-2001. Map revised and published as OGQ-26. Cartography and layout prepared by G. Russell Standridge, 2002.

QalPgr

Pgr

Qal Pgr

Phy Pgr

8½ °

APPROXIMATE MEAN DECLINATION

Feet D''' FeetD'''' 1300 1300

1200 Qal 1200

Qal Qal Qal

Qal

Qal

1000 1000

800 800

Pgr Pgr

600

Ma

bo

1 H

en

ryP

roj. 6

20

0 f

t. f

rom

so

uth

Ca

rte

r 1

Sch

oo

l L

an

d M

oo

reP

roj. 5

60

0 f

t. f

rom

so

uth

Ge

od

yn

e 2

-36

Sta

teo

fO

kla

ho

ma

Pro

j. 8

90

0 f

t. f

rom

so

uth

Arr

ow

he

ad

36

-1 S

tate

Pro

j. 5

60

0 f

t. f

rom

so

uth

Ch

ap

ma

n &

Pa

rke

r 1

Zim

me

rma

nP

roj.

10

,20

0 f

t. f

rom

so

uth

Ch

ap

ma

n &

Pa

rke

r 1

Ma

uld

inP

roj. 9

65

0 f

t. f

rom

so

uth

400

He

rma

n B

row

n 1

Su

ble

ttP

roj. 6

30

0 f

t. f

rom

so

uth

Wellington Formation

Pa

rris

h &

Re

yn

old

s 1

Little

Pro

j. 3

00

ft.

fro

m n

ort

h

Pre

tro

leu

m 1

Lu

cu

sP

roj. 3

00

0 f

t. f

rom

so

uth

An

-So

n 1

Ow

en

be

yP

roj. 2

30

0 f

t. f

rom

no

rth

Da

vid

or

& D

avid

or

1 H

aye

sP

roj. 5

50

0 f

t. f

rom

no

rth

200

Sea Level Sea Level 10x vertical exaggeration. Formation contacts based on wireline-log interpretations by N.H. Suneson and surface mapping by the authors. Vertical lines show logs used in interpretations.

200

400

600

3465ael
Text Box
Approximate Proposed Action Location
3465ael
Line

97° 22'18''W

Exhibit 10- Soil Survey

Farmland Classification—Cleveland County, Oklahoma

97° 22'13''W

647990 648000 648010 648020 648030 648040 648050 648060 648070 648080 648090 648100 35° 19'44''N 35° 19'44''N

35° 19'39''N

3910600

3910610

3910620

3910630

3910640

3910650

3910660

3910670

3910680

3910690

3910700

3910710

3910720

3910730

3910740

3910750

3910600

3910610

3910620

3910630

3910640

3910650

3910660

3910670

3910680

3910690

3910700

3910710

3910720

3910730

3910740

3910750

97° 22' 13'' W

35° 19'39''N

647990 648000 648010 648020 648030 648040 648050 648060 648070 648080 648090 648100

MapScale:1:754 ifprintedonAportrait (8.5" x11") sheet. Meters

N 0 10 20 40 60Feet

0 35 70 140 210Mapprojection:Web Mercator Cornercoordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTMZone14NWGS84

Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/6/2015Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4

97° 22' 18'' W

Farmland Classification—Cleveland County, Oklahoma

Farmland Classification

Farmland Classification— Summary by Map Unit — Cleveland County, Oklahoma (OK027)

Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI

1 Stephenville-Darsil-Newalla complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes

All areas are prime farmland

0.7 28.5%

2 Harrah fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes

All areas are prime farmland

1.8 71.5%

Totals for Area of Interest 2.5 100.0%

Description

Farmland classification identifies map units as prime farmland, farmland of statewide importance, farmland of local importance, or unique farmland. It identifies the location and extent of the soils that are best suited to food, feed, fiber, forage, and oilseed crops. NRCS policy and procedures on prime and unique farmlands are published in the "Federal Register," Vol. 43, No. 21, January 31, 1978.

Rating Options

Aggregation Method: No Aggregation Necessary

Tie-break Rule: Lower

Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4

3/6/2015