proposed telecommunications facility at sandfly creek · otherwise users experience interference...

Proposed Telecommunications Facility at Sandfly Creek

Date

megana

Received (Auto Date)

2

Table of contents Executive Summary 3

1 Introduction 4

2 Proposal 5

3 Site Characteristics 9

4 Relevant Federal Legislation 12

5 State Planning Assessment 13

6 Planning Scheme 16

7 Environmental Impacts 21

8 Conclusion 23

Appendix A Site Plans

Appendix B EME Report

Appendix C Codes

3

Executive Summary

Site and Proposal Details

Address of Site 10 Industrial Street, Mackay QLD 4740

Real Property Description Lot 6 on RP741485

Site Area 3419m2

Local Authority Mackay Regional Council

Planning Scheme Mackay City Planning Scheme 2006

Zone CS - Commercial (Services)

Purpose of Proposal under the Planning Scheme Telecommunications Facility

Owner Carlisle Properties Pty Ltd

Application Details

Type of Development

Preliminary Approval Development Permit

Material Change of Use - Code Assessment

Building Works Code Assessment -

Applicant Details

Applicant Telstra Corporation Ltd

C/- Urbis Pty Ltd

GPO Box 3205

BRISBANE QLD 4001

Contact Person Matthew Brown / Desmond Leong Ph: (07) 3007 3800

Our Reference BA2837

4

1 Introduction Urbis Pty Ltd has been commissioned by Telstra Corporation Ltd to prepare a development application for a proposed telecommunications facility at 10 Industrial Street, Mackay. The site is formally described as Lot 6 on RP741485.

This town planning report addresses the merits of the development with regard to the provisions of the Mackay City Planning Scheme 2006 and the relevant sections of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009. For the purpose of this report, the Mackay City Planning Scheme 2006 will be referred to as the „Planning Scheme‟ and the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 will be referred to as the „SPA‟.

As outlined in the Executive Summary, the application is for a Development Permit for a Material Change of Use and a Preliminary Approval to Carry out Building Work, and is subject to Code Assessment.

It is considered that the development is appropriate and justified; therefore, Council‟s approval of the application is sought, subject to reasonable and relevant conditions.

5

2 Proposal

2.1 Proposal Details

The proposal involves a Material Change of Use application (Code Assessment) to install a telecommunications facility over part of Lot 6 on RP741485, located at 10 Industrial Street, Mackay. The proposed facility will be referred to by Telstra as the „Sandfly Creek‟ facility.

The development will comprise:

30 metre high (nominal) monopole;

Three (3) Telstra Panel antennas (2.63m long) attached to the top of the monopole via a triangular headframe (with provisions for up to twelve antennas if required);

One (1) low impact equipment hut adjacent to the pole, with dimensions 3.2 metres x 2.28 metres x 3.0 metres (l x w x h); and

Concealed conduits for feeder cables.

Access to the proposed facility for maintenance will be via existing site access off Industrial Street. The proposed site layout and elevation plans are included in Appendix A.

2.2 Construction and Maintenance Activity

The proposed telecommunications facility will be installed over a period of approximately 5 weeks. The following construction activities will occur at the site:

Site set out;

Truck delivery of materials;

Pouring Concrete Foundations; and

Installation of telecommunications equipment (antennas).

The proposed development will be „unmanned‟ once constructed, with routine maintenance conducted infrequently.

2.3 Investigations of Co-location

2.3.1 Identification of the Requirement for the Facility

The cellular mobile phone network is based on the use of small low powered intelligent two way radio transmitters (mobile phones) that are interconnected over radio channels to the telephone network via a series of mobile base stations.

The nature of the base stations is such that reliable communication is limited mainly to “line of sight” of the mobile. Whilst some buildings and foliage can be penetrated, radio signals cannot penetrate more substantial objects, such as hills. As a general rule, the higher a base station is elevated and the taller a base station structure is, the greater its range of coverage.

Due to the need to re-use the frequencies within the network to support traffic from a large number of users, the signals from the base stations must be restricted from travelling too far into the coverage area of adjacent base stations. Otherwise users experience interference and poor call performance, and potentially call drop-outs.

Telstra use a number of methods to identify those parts of the network that require improved coverage, capacity and call performance. These methods include drive surveys, statistical measures, computer modelling of coverage and the evaluation of customer complaints. When an area within the network is identified as providing poor service and performance, investigations are undertaken to determine the measures required to rectify these service and performance deficiencies.

6

The first stage of the process is to consider if the deficiency can be improved through optimisation of the existing network hardware, to avoid the deployment of additional infrastructure. This involves a review of the antenna configurations at existing sites in the subject area, adjustments to software parameters and other similar changes to the existing network configuration. In many instances, network optimisation offers sufficient improvements and means that capital works or the construction of new facilities are not required to remedy the situation.

However, if optimisation cannot deliver a satisfactory outcome, the deployment of a new site is considered. The initial research undertaken is used to define the scope of the network deficiency and the performance objective of the proposed new facility.

2.3.2 The Need for the Telstra Sandfly Creek Facility

A site is required within Mackay to improve telecommunications coverage in an area of noted deficiency. The proposed facility needs to be able to absorb additional traffic and provide improved depth of coverage in the area.

The performance objective for the proposed facility is to provide a successful relocation through continued call quality and performance in the target area. The facility will provide matching depth of coverage to Mackay and surrounding areas.

2.3.3 Investigations of Opportunities for Optimisation of Existing Telstra Sites

The opportunity for facility co-location was thoroughly explored as part of this proposal. No suitable alternatives for co-location, to achieve the desired coverage performance, were identified. Therefore, a new site in the area was required to be considered.

2.3.4 Process of Site Selection

Considering the inability to co-locate the proposed telecommunications facility with an existing facility, selection of a suitable alternative site was required. The process of site selection involves identification of sites that are capable of meeting the required service and performance requirements. Telstra apply and evaluate a range of criteria as part of the site selection process.

Telstra identifies potential sites that meet coverage requirements through the use of computer modelling tools that produce the coverage that may be expected from different sites.

There are also a number of other criteria that are used to assess options and select sites that may be suitable for the facility. These take into account factors other than the radio performance of the site, and include:

The potential of obtaining tenure at the site, as Telstra is unable to lodge a development application without the consent of the land owner;

Visual impact and the potential of obtaining relevant town planning approvals;

Proximity to sensitive uses and/or areas of environmental heritage; and

The cost of developing the site and the provision of utilities.

2.3.5 Why was the selected site chosen?

The alternative target sites were based on coverage outcomes and visual appropriateness of the location. Telstra identified five (5) alternative sites for the proposed facility, detailed below (refer to Figure 1):

Candidate A: 10 Industrial Street, Mackay

Candidate B: 14 Industrial Street, Mackay

Candidate C: 16 Industrial Street, Mackay

Candidate D: 17 Chain Street East, Mackay

Candidate E: 48 Shakespeare Street, Mackay

7

Figure 1 –Locality Map of Candidates

(Source: Google Maps 2012)

Following analysis of the study area, Candidate A (10 Industrial Street) emerged as the most suitable solution for the following reasons:

The site is zoned for commercial purposes, where it is envisaged that public utilities/telecommunications facility are located to limit impact on more sensitive use (residential areas).

The proposal is located in an unused part of the property and is compatible with the sites existing light industrial/commercial services use.

Access is easily achieved via the site‟s existing access off Industrial Street.

The overall coverage (radio frequency) achievement is equivalent or greater than that of the alternate

options in the search ring.

The remaining candidates were not chosen due to the following reasons:

The potential of obtaining tenure and owner‟s consent from Candidate B was problematic given that the landowner was undecided following several discussions. In addition, radio frequency design was not considered optimal from a cluster network perspective given the difficulties in balancing traffic across three (3) sectors.

Similar to Candidate B, the potential of obtaining tenure and owner‟s consent from Candidate C was problematic given that the land owner is seeking to redevelop the site in the next two (2) years. In addition, the predicted radio frequency from the site did not meet the minimum requirements.

8

Candidate D was considered appropriate in addressing the required radio frequency coverage, however

the selling agent representing the landowner advised that the landowner was not interested in negotiating tenure for the proposed telecommunications facility.

Candidate E was not considered appropriate given the sites proximity to an existing school.

2.3.6 Why was the proposed site design chosen?

In the case of the Sandfly Creek facility, Telstra has decided to utilise a 30 metre high monopole with antennas attached to the top via a headframe. A headframe is larger than some of the alternative mounting arrangements; however it is needed to provide for future upgrades to the network.

Telstra‟s mobile network, known as Next G, is a 3G network which enables users to access high speed data and wireless broadband services in addition to standard voice services. The uptake of data and broadband services in Australia since the launch of Telstra‟s network has been substantial and has resulted in a significant number of sites needing to be upgraded to provide the capacity to meet this demand. This capacity is provided by increasing the number of antennas which are installed on the facilities.

As shown on the proposed elevation plans (see Appendix A) for the facility it is proposed to install three (3) antennas initially, with reservation being made for a further nine (9) antennas if/when required. It is not practically possible to install more than six (6) antennas using a turret mount and therefore a headframe is required to ensure future capacity needs are met.

9

3 Site Characteristics

3.1 Location

The site is located at 10 Industrial Street, Mackay and is formally described as Lot 6 on RP741485; comprising a total area of approximately 3419m

2 (refer to Figure 2 below). The site is located within the

boundaries of the Mackay Regional Council, within the suburb of Mackay.

The site is located approximately 1.5km north east of the Mackay Town Centre and approximately 0.5km south of the Pioneer River. Sandfly Creek is an inlet stemming from the Pioneer River, located to the east of the site. The site is situated within an enclave of light industrial and service activities.

Figure 2 – Locality Map

(Source: Google Maps 2012)

3.2 Site Description, Topography and Vegetation

The site comprises one regular shaped allotment, with primary frontage to Industrial Street (refer to Figure 3). Access to the site will be obtained via Industrial Street. The site currently comprises of one shed and an ancillary Carparking area (refer to Figure 4). The site is considered to be relatively flat and there is no existing vegetation on the site.

10

Figure 3 – Aerial Photograph

(Source: Google Maps, 2012)

Figure 4 - Site Photographs

Picture 1 – Site Front Picture 2 – Proposed Lease Area

Picture 3 – Existing Site Access Picture 4 – Western boundary

11

3.3 Surrounding Land Uses and Built Form

The site is located within an established urban area. Adjoining land uses can be described as follows (refer to Figure 5):

North – directly to the north of the site along Victoria Street are similar light industrial and service activities such as a Locksmith and Mac‟s Engineering. Further north is the Pioneer River.

East – land immediately east of the site comprises predominately light industrial and service activities including businesses such as 3D Paint and Colour, Mackay Car and Truck Rentals and Geoff Walsh Engine Parts. Further to the east of the site is the Sandfly Creek Environmental Reserve.

South – land immediately to the south of the site accommodates further light industrial and service activities, located along Industrial Street. Land beyond comprises low density residential development. Queen‟s Park is also located to the south of the subject site.

West – land immediately west of the site is comprised of predominately light industrial and service activities. Land beyond is primarily commercial and retail uses, moving towards the Mackay City Centre.

Figure 5 – Surrounding Land Uses

Picture 5 – North – Light Industrial and Service Activities Picture 6 – West – Predominantly Light Industrial

Picture 7 – East – Similar Light Industrial and Service Activities Picture 8 – South – Service Activities

12

4 Relevant Federal Legislation The following information provides a summary of the Federal legislation relevant to telecommunications development proposals.

4.1 Telecommunications Act 1997

The Telecommunications Act 1997 (the Act) came into operation on 1 July 1997. The Act provides a system for regulating telecommunications and the activities of carriers and service providers.

Under the Act, telecommunications carriers are no longer exempt from State and Territory planning laws except in three limited instances:

1. There are exemptions for inspection of land, maintenance of facilities, installation of “low impact facilities”, subscriber connections and temporary defence facilities. These exemptions are detailed in the Telecommunications (Low-impact Facilities) Determination 1997 and the Amendment No. 1 of 1999 and these exceptions are subject to the Telecommunications Code of Practice 1997;

2. A limited case-by-case appeals process exists to cover installation of facilities in situations of national significance; and

3. There are some specific powers and immunities from the previous Telecommunications Act 1991.

The proposal is for a freestanding monopole, associated antennas and equipment. Therefore the facility cannot be considered low impact, as defined by the Telecommunications (Low-impact Facilities) Determination and thus the proposal is not exempt from State planning laws in this instance.

4.2 Telecommunications Code of Practice 1997

The Telecommunications Code of Practice 1997 (The Code) authorises a carrier to enter land, inspect land and install and maintain a facility. The Code emphasises “best practice” design, planning and installation of facilities, compliance with industry standards and minimisation of adverse impacts as much as practicable, particularly in terms of degradation of the environment and visual impact. It is considered that the subject proposal is “best practice” given that the proposal will:

Provide improved telecommunications and wireless internet coverage in the Mackay area;

Be located on a non-residential site within the local area;

Comprise the smallest scale configuration possible for the site to reduce the visual impact of the proposal.

4.3 Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999

The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act commenced on 16 July 2000 and introduced a new role for the Commonwealth Government in the assessment and approval of development proposals where those proposals involve actions that have a significant impact on matters of National Environmental Significance, the environment of Commonwealth owned land and actions carried out by the Commonwealth Government.

The proposal is not of National Environmental Significance, as it will not impact on:

World Heritage Areas;

Wetlands protected by International Treaty (The RAMSAR Convention)

Nationally listed threatened species, communities and migratory species;

All nuclear actions; and

The environment of Commonwealth Marine area.

13

5 State Planning Assessment

5.1 Sustainable Planning Act 2009

The purpose of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA) is to achieve ecological sustainability by coordinating planning at all levels of government and by managing the development process as well as the impact of the development.

The subject application is for a „Material Change of Use‟ and is assessable development. A Development Permit is to be obtained prior to the commencement of the development. Assessment against the Planning Scheme indicates that the proposed use is subject to Code Assessment, in accordance with Section 313 of the SPA.

5.2 State Planning Policies

State Planning Policies („SPPs‟) are a mechanism for the State Government to express its interests in those developments related economic, social, or environmental issues that can be implemented through planning schemes and development assessments. SPPs are required to be integrated into local government planning schemes, and where this has not occurred, the SPPs are to be considered when assessing development applications, if relevant.

5.2.1 State Planning Policy 1/92

SPP 1/92 - “Development and the Conservation of Agricultural Land” provides a framework within which land identified as Good Quality Agricultural Land (GQAL) can be protected from development which leads to its alienation or diminished productivity. The site is not identified on the Good Quality Agricultural Land Overlay in the Mackay City Planning Scheme. The SPP is therefore of no relevance to the application.


SPP 1/02 - “Development in the Vicinity of Certain Airports and Aviation Facilities”, requires local governments to take into account current and future aircraft operational requirements when considering development applications in the vicinity of such facilities. State Planning Policy 1/02 is identified as being appropriately reflected in the Mackay City Planning Scheme. The site is located within the Obstacle Limitation Surface of the Mackay Airport. As a result, the development will require assessment against the Development in the Vicinity of Mackay Airport Overlay Code (see Section 6.6.2 and Appendix B).


SPP 2/02 – “Planning and Managing Development involving Acid Sulfate Soils” seeks to ensure that development involving acid sulfate soils is planned and managed to avoid potential adverse effects on the natural and built environment. The site is not located within an area of acid sulfate soils and therefore is not subject to acid sulfate soils constraints.


SPP 1/03 – “Mitigating the Adverse Impacts of Flood, Bushfire and Landslide” seeks to minimise the potential adverse impacts of flood, bushfire and landslide on people, property, economic activity and the environment. The Mackay City Planning Scheme indicates that SPP 1/03 “Mitigating the Adverse Impacts of Flood, Bushfire and Landslide” has been appropriately reflected in the planning scheme. It is noted that the Mackay City Planning Scheme Overlays indicate that the site is situated within a „Riverine Inundation Area‟. The relevance of this overlay to the proposed development is addressed in Section 6.6.1and Appendix B of this report.


SPP 1/07 – “Housing and Residential Development” seeks to ensure that large, higher growth local governments identify their community‟s housing needs and analyse, and modify if necessary, their planning schemes to remove barriers and provide opportunities for housing options that respond to identified needs.

14

The SPP has no effect when development applications are assessed and is therefore of no relevance to the consideration of this proposal.


SPP 2/07 – “Protection of Extractive Resources” identifies those extractive resources of State or regional significance where extractive industry development is appropriate in principle, and aims to protect those resources from developments that might prevent or severely constrain current or future extraction when the need for utilisation of the resource arises. The proposed development is not located in an identified Key Resource Area nor is it within a designated Separation Area; accordingly this SPP is of no relevance to the proposed development.


State Planning Policy 3/10 – “Acceleration of Compliance Assessment” applies for assessing requests for compliance assessment for development for reconfiguring a lot that require compliance assessment under schedule 18 of the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009 (the Regulation). This Policy is therefore not relevant to the application.


State Planning Policy 4/11 – “Protecting Wetlands of High Ecological Significance in Great Barrier Reef Catchments” seeks to ensure development in or adjacent to wetlands of high ecological significance in Great Barrier Reef catchments is planned, designed, constructed and operated to minimise or prevent the loss or degradation of the wetlands and their values, or enhances these values. The site is not located within this area and therefore this policy is not relevant to the application.


State Planning Policy 2/10 – “Koala Conservation in South East Queensland” aims to ensure that koala habitat conservation is taken into account in planning processes within the South East Queensland Koala Protection Area. The State Planning Policy does not contain any specific requirements for development and instead specifies requirements for Council‟s when undertaking strategic planning and making land use decisions. The policy is not relevant to this application.


State Planning Policy 5/10 – “Air Noise and Hazardous Materials” seeks to strategically plan and manage the interface between land zoned for industry and land zoned for sensitive land uses to support and protect industrial land uses in appropriate locations. The site is not located within proximity to any major industry zoned land. This policy is therefore not applicable to the assessment of the proposed development.


SPP 4/10 – “Healthy Waters” aims to mitigate risks to water quality and waterway health from urban stormwater, waste water and non-tidal artificial waterways when making decision about new development. Until such time as the SPP is appropriately reflected in local planning instruments, the SPP is applicable to development applications in the following circumstances: For stormwater management and management of new or expanded non-tidal artificial waterways, the policy applies to development that is:

a. material change of use for urban purposes that involves

i. greater than 2,500m2 of land; or

ii. 6 or more additional dwellings; or

b. reconfiguring a lot for urban purposes that

i. would result in 6 or more residential allotments or that provides for 6 or more dwellings; or

ii. involves greater than 2,500m2 of land and results in an increased number of lots; or

15

iii. is associated with operational work disturbing greater than 2,500m2 of land; or

c. operational work for urban purposes that involves

i. disturbing greater than 2,500m2 of land.

For waste water management (other than contaminated stormwater and sewage), the policy applies to development that is industrial or commercial development that is:

a. material change of use for urban purposes involving waste water discharge; or

b. reconfiguring a lot for urban purposes involving waste water discharge; or

c. operational works for urban purposes involving waste water discharge.

The proposal involves a material change of use for urban purposes on land less than 2,500m2 and as such

this SPP is not applicable.


SPP1/12 – “Protection of Queensland‟s Strategic Cropping Land” seeks to protect Strategic Cropping Land (SCL) by ensuring that:

Development impacts on SCL or potential SCL are managed to development impacts on SCL or potential SCL are managed to preserve the productive capacity of the land for future generations

Development impacts on SCL or potential SCL are managed through assessment under this SPP and through imposing conditions on the development

To the extent that SCL or potential SCL in a protection area will be permanently impacted upon by a development with a footprint greater than 3000 square metres (m²), the development must not proceed except in exceptional circumstances, and where the development is an exceptional circumstance, mitigation is provided for the permanently impacted land

To the extent that SCL or potential SCL in the management area will be permanently impacted upon by a development with a footprint greater than 3000 m², mitigation is provided for the impacted land.

The site is not identified as SCL or potential SCL. The SPP is therefore considered not relevant for this application.

5.2.13 Temporary State Planning Policy 2/12

Temporary SPP 2/12 – “Planning for Prosperity” seeks to ensure that that economic growth is facilitated by local and state plans, and is not adversely impacted by planning processes. This Temporary SPP also outlines the State‟s interest in economic growth including: promoting agriculture, tourism, mineral and extractive resources, and construction activities.

This Temporary SPP is to be applied in the resolution of competing or conflicting outcomes between the various policies. The proposed development consists of an area of approximately 60m

2 and therefore

considered minor in nature and will not undermine the nature of the existing light industrial / commercial services use on the site. This policy is therefore not relevant to this application.

5.3 Referral Agencies

A review of the referral triggers outlined in Schedule 7 of the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009 has been undertaken, which has identified that no referrals are required for this application.

16

6 Planning Scheme

6.1 Mackay City Planning Scheme

As highlighted earlier in this report, the planning scheme applicable to the proposed development is the Mackay City Planning Scheme 2006 (the „Planning Scheme‟).

6.2 Definition

Under the Planning Scheme, the proposal is identified as a Telecommunications Facility. A Telecommunications Facility is defined under the Planning Scheme as:

“Any premises used for the purpose of providing telecommunications services, which does not fall within the Schedule of Facilities and Areas under the Telecommunications Act 1997, Telecommunications (Low Impact Facilities) Determination 1997 as amended. The term may include, but is not limited to:

(i) a telecommunications tower more than 5m in height; and

(ii) an equipment shelter of more than 7.5m2 in area and 3m in height”.

The proposal includes the installation of a telecommunications facility that is 30m in height. As such the proposal is in line with the defined use and will require assessment against the relevant provisions outlined within the Mackay City Planning Scheme 2006.

6.3 Zoning

Under the provisions of the Planning Scheme, the site is located in the City Centre Locality and the East Side Precinct of this Locality. The land use zoning for the site is identified as Commercial Services. Refer to Figure 6. Figure 6 – Zoning Map

(Source: Mackay Planning Scheme, 2006)

SITE

17

The overall key outcomes for the Commercial Services Zone are identified as follows:

a) “A mix of storage, light and service industrial activities are located in the zone to be compatible with the amenity in adjacent zones such as the Mixed Use Zone, the Commercial Main Street Zone, the Commercial Zone and the Higher Density Residential zone.

b) Consistent with (a) above, a range of light and service industrial activities including car repair workshops, landscape supplies, transport depots and warehouses, are located in the zone.

c) Development in the Service Precinct is designed to mitigate any potential impacts on nearby

residential amenity (on existing and future residential sites) resulting from the interface with adjacent Higher Residential zoned land.

d) Residential or commercial uses are consistent with the overall outcomes of the zone only to the

extent that they are compatible in close proximity to a range of service industry and light industry.” It is considered that the proposed facility generally complies with the overall outcomes for the Commercial Services Zone within the City Centre Locality. The proposal does not impede any existing „light and service industrial activities‟, and will not impact on nearby residential uses given its modest lease area of approximately 60m

2. In addition, telecommunication facilities are envisaged and considered a compatible

development within industrial/services clusters in order to limit impact on residential areas. It should be noted that the proposed development will provide improved depth of coverage and network performance to benefit existing and future „light and service industrial activities‟ within the area.

6.4 Level of Assessment

The proposed development is for a Material Change of Use involving the construction of a Telecommunications Facility within the Commercial Services Zone. A development application for a Telecommunications Facility within the Commercial Services Zone is classified as Code Assessment under the Planning Scheme.

6.5 Codes

Pursuant to Section 313 of SPA, where an application is identified as requiring Code Assessment, the Assessment Manager must assess the application only against the applicable codes and common materials as defined in the Act. The application requires assessment against the following Primary Codes:

Mackay City Centre Locality Code;

Commercial Services Zone Code;

Telecommunications Facilities Code; and

Environment & Infrastructure Code.

6.6 Overlays

The following Overlay Codes from the Planning Scheme have also been identified as being applicable to the application:

Flood and Inundation Management Overlay Code; and

Development in the Vicinity of Mackay Airport Overlay Code.

18

6.6.1 Flood and Inundation Management Overlay

The entirety of the site is identified as subject to flooding (Riverine Inundation Limits) according to the Flood and Inundation Management Overlay, refer to Figure 7. As a result, the application is subject to assessment against the Flood and Inundation Management Overlay Code.

Figure 7 – Flood and Inundation Management Overlay

(Source: Mackay Regional Council, 2009)

The overall outcomes sought for the Flood and Inundation Management Overlay Code are to ensure that development:

a) protects the safety of people and property from unreasonable risk from flooding and inundation hazard;

b) minimises damage and loss of property due to flooding and inundation;

c) restricts development encroaching into the flood plain;

d) provides a clear corridor for the conveyance of floodwaters;

e) storage of hazardous substances is undertaken having regard to public safety; and

f) protects the ecological functions of watercourses in the City.

The proposed telecommunications facility will be sufficiently elevated from the ground and appropriate mitigation works will also be undertaken to ensure any associated potential flood risk to the facility as well as the impact on the public is minimised. It should be noted that the proposed telecommunications including the ancillary equipment shelter will not involve the storage of any hazardous substance that may pose a risk to public safety. A more detailed assessment against the Flood and Inundation Management Overlay Code is provided in Appendix B.

Site

19

6.6.2 Development in the Vicinity of Mackay Airport Overlay

The site is identified as being subject to the obstacle limitation surface in accordance with the Development in the Vicinity of Mackay Airport Overlay (refer to Figure 8) and therefore is subject to assessment against the Development in the Vicinity of Mackay Airport Overlay Code.

Figure 8 - Obstacle Limitation Surface Map

(Source: Mackay Regional Council, 2009)

The overall outcomes sought for the Development in the Vicinity of Mackay Airport Overlay Code ensure that:

a) land uses within the surrounds of the airport are compatible with the airport operations, specifically from the impact of aviation noise;

b) land uses within the vicinity of aviation facilities are compatible with the safe functioning of those facilities;

c) the safe and efficient operation of the Mackay Airport as a major transport facility for the region is maintained by:

(i) preventing intrusion of buildings, structures or any other objects into the airport’s prescribed airspace;

(ii) excluding uses from the vicinity of the airport that generate stack emissions that have an impact on prescribed airspace by way of high velocity, depleted oxygen content, high temperature, high particulate content or visibility impact;

(iii) avoiding lighting and illumination near an airport that may cause air traffic confusion, distraction or glare because of its colour, pattern or intensity of light emission or because of the configuration pattern of a series of lights;

(iv) excluding any structures, objects, trees or broadcasting or telecommunications facilities which may interfere with air traffic communications or navigation; and

(v) avoiding development which could attract bats or birds.

Site

20

The proposed telecommunication facility is located within the 40m obstacle limitation surface as identified in Figure 8. It should be noted that the proposed telecommunications facility is not located within the prescribed air space / flight path and as a result will not pose a safety risk for the functioning of air services. In addition, the proposed telecommunication facility is 30m in height and is therefore below the obstacle limitation surface indicated for the site.

Furthermore, the proposed telecommunication facility is to be unmanned and does not include any activity that may result in any noise, air or light emissions that may cause air traffic confusion and safety risks to the public. In addition, the proposed slender pole design on telecommunication facility does not allow for potential nesting spots or food creating activity that could attract bats or birds which may pose a safety risk for aviation services. A more detailed assessment against the Development in the Vicinity of Mackay Airport Overlay Code is provided in Appendix B.

21

7 Environmental Impacts

7.1 Environmental Values

7.1.1 State and Local Values

The site does not contain any values of local or state significance.

7.1.2 Vegetation Communities

The site is currently devoid of any vegetation. Therefore no impact on vegetation will result as part of the construction of the facility.

7.1.3 Topography and Scenic Amenity

The site‟s topography is relatively flat. Views of the facility from the surrounding area will be possible; however given the narrow profile of the proposed facility and the disbursed nature of surrounding dwellings, adverse impacts on scenic amenity will be limited.

7.1.4 Soil

The site is not located in an erosion prone area and no significant ground disturbance will result as part of the installation.

7.1.5 Waterways & Water bodies

There are no waterways or water bodies located on the site and no significant ground disturbance will result as part of the installation. It is noted that the site is in close proximity to Sandfly Creek and Pioneer River and is subject to potential riverine inundation. A detailed analysis of the potential flooding and proposed mitigation are discussed in Section 6.6.1 and Appendix B.

7.1.6 Declared Pests & Environmental Weeds

There are no known pests or environmental weeds on site.

7.2 Public Safety

Public safety will not be jeopardised as the facility will be secure from public access and warning signs will be placed at appropriate locations.

The Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) have set limits for electromagnetic radiation exposure from mobile phone base stations. All licensed carriers must comply with the ARPANSA limits. The ARPANSA limits are consistent with the guidelines of the World Health Organisation. Please refer to the EME report in Appendix C.

7.3 Visual Impact

To ensure there are no „dead spots‟ or „drop outs‟ within the coverage perimeter and in order to achieve its desired coverage in the area, Telstra needs to sufficiently elevate its antennas above physical obstructions, such as built form and vegetation.

While the proposed antennas will adequately meet the required Telstra coverage objectives, due care was taken in the design and positioning of the facility so as to minimise impact on the surrounding areas. As a result, Telstra has chosen to install a 30 metre pole with antennas. The height of the facility is required to provide continued mobile and wireless broadband services to Mackay. The visual impacts of the proposal on the area are considered to be appropriate and reasonable. In this regard:

22

Visual impact of the facility will be minimised by the slimline pole design and appropriate finishing treatments (neutral colour finish);

The size and configuration of the installation represents the lowest impact option available for the site, whilst ensuring appropriate coverage objectives in the area; and

The existing and future use of the site will continue unhindered by the proposed facility.

23

8 Conclusion The proposed telecommunications facility at Sandfly Creek, Mackay will form an integral component in the enhancement of mobile telecommunications network for Telstra Corporation Limited. Importantly, the proposed facility will provide enhanced mobile phone coverage to the surrounding area, to ensure quality of coverage for users. Telstra, together with Urbis Pty Ltd, has undertaken an assessment of the relevant matters as required by the Telecommunications Act 1997, Environment Protection, Biodiversity and Conservation Act 2000 and the Sustainable Planning Act 2009. The proposal is considered appropriate in light of the relevant legislative, environmental, technical, radio coverage and public safety requirements. This assessment of the site at Sandfly Creek for the development of a Telecommunications Facility indicates that the proposal is a suitable form of development on the site. The proposed facility is considered suitable for this location for the following reasons:

No clearing of vegetation at the site will be necessary;

The size and configuration of the installation represents the lowest impact option available for the site;

The proposed facility provides a structure on which other telecommunications carriers can co-locate in the future if required; and

The installation will address a number of customer complaints relating to mobile telephone coverage, capacity and the quality of mobile telephone calls in the Mackay Township.

This proposal represents sound planning, and will not result in any potential significant adverse impacts on the amenity of the site or the surrounding environment. On the basis of the assessment contained within this report, Mackay Regional Council is requested to favourably consider the development proposal, subject to reasonable and relevant conditions.

Candidate A

24

Appendix A – Site Plans

INDUSTRIAL STREET

VICTORIA STREET

ENDE

AVOU

RST

REET

CHAI

N ST

REET

2RP893617E

The copyright and ownership of the drawings is to be assigned to Telstra

Telst

ra W

ireles

s Ope

ratio

ns T

empla

te - 0

1786

6P02

issu

ed F

eb 20

09

PART OF LOT 6 ON RP741485PARISH OF HOWARDCOUNTY OF CARLISLE

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

RFNSA SITE No. 4740053

SITE LAYOUTSCALE 1:2000

NOTES:1. ALL FEEDER ACCESS POINTS ON THE STRUCTURE MUST BE BIRDPROOFED AS PER EXTERNAL PLANT POLICY 003615.2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETRES UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE.3. THIS DRAWING SET IS A PRELIMINARY DRAWING ONLY AND IS ISSUED FORCOMMENT. IT IS NOT A DETAILED SURVEY / STRUCTURAL DRAWING ANDTHEREFORE COULD BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. PROPOSED TELSTRA LEASE AREA

DO NOTSCALE

F

1

E

D

2 3

C

B

A

1 2 3

C Telstra Corporation Limited ABN 33 051 775 556 All rights reserved.

4 5

DWGNO.

6NO.SHT

A3

F

E

D

4 5

C

B

6

A

MOBILE NETWORK SITE 286917SANDFLY CREEK

Q110932 S1INDEX

SITE LAYOUT AND ACCESS10 INDUSTRIAL STREET, MACKAY, QLD 4740

SITE STRUCTURE CO-ORDINATESHAND HELD GPS READING ± 10m,

CENTRE OF POLEGDA 94

-21.14313GDA 94

149.19574

LOCALITY PLANNOT TO SCALE

PRELIMINARY NOTE: THIS DRAWING TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH SHEET S1-1

0 100m20m 20m 40m 60m 80m

COPYRIGHT C WHEREIS REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF SENSIS PTY LTD.R

SITE ACCESS VIADRIVEWAY & CAR LOT

EXISTING INDUSRIALBUILDINGS (TYP.)

EXISTINGTREES(TYP)

PROPOSED TELSTRASITE REFER SHEETS1-1 FOR DETAILS.LOT 6

RP741485LOT 8

M91160

LOT 9M91213

LOT 3SP112953

LOT 1BUP71123 LOT

370CI4369

LOT 1CI4344

LOT 2CI4344

LOT 1RP708989

LOT 2RP725444 LOT 506

CI3610

BURNS STREET

LOT 5M91161

LOT 22M91181

LOT 4M91181

LOT 3M91181

LOT 1C14461

EXISTING POWERPOLE NUMBER 2049926


Telst

ra W

ireles

s Ope

ratio

ns T

empla

te - 0

1786

6P02

issu

ed F

eb 20

09

SITE SETOUTSCALE 1:100


DO NOTSCALE

F

1

E

D

2 3

C

B

A

1 2 3


4 5

DWGNO.

6NO.SHT

A3

F

E

D

4 5

C

B

6

A


Q110932 S1-1INDEX

SITE SETOUT10 INDUSTRIAL STREET, MACKAY, QLD 4740

PRELIMINARY NOTE: THIS DRAWING TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH SHEET S1

0 1m 2m 3m 4m 5m1m

EXISTING MSB & METERS

EXISTINGRAMP

PROPOSED TELSTRA450W CABLE LADDER. A1

A2

A5

A6

A8A9

A10

A11

PROPOSED INDICATIVE TELSTRAPOWER AND FIBRE LINK ROUTE TORUN INSIDE SHED. EXACT SOURCEAND ROUTE TO BE CONFIRMED ATDETAILED DESIGN.

0 2500500

ANTENNA LAYOUTSCALE 1:50

HEAD

FRAM

EOR

IENT

ATION 25°TN

10000 (LEASE AREA) FUTURE TELSTRA RRUS(9 OFF R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7,R8 & R9) REFER S3 FOR DETAILS

28102810

3280SHELTER

1100PROPOSED TELSTRACOMPOUND SECURITY FENCEWITH DOUBLE ACCESS GATES

FUTURE TELSTRA PANELANTENNAS (9 OFF A4, A5, A6,A7, A8, A9, A10, A11 & A12)

PROPOSED TELSTRA PANEL ANTENNAS(3 OFF A1, A2 & A3) MOUNTED ONPROPOSED HEADFRAME. REFER TOSHEET S3 & S3-1 FOR DETAILS.PROPOSED TELSTRA 25m

MONOPOLE AND HEADFRAME.

MONOPOLE

5850

(LEA

SE A

REA)

=MO

NOPO

LE

PROPOSED TELSTRA EQUIPMENTSHELTER TYPE ICS Mk 3.2 (REGION C)(3280L x 2280W x 2995H).

=PROP

ERTY

BOU

NDAR

Y

EXISTING SHED

1

2

3

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

PROPERTY BOUNDARY

EXISTINGROLLERDOOR

EXISTING MANPROOFFENCE TO REMAIN

DO NOT

1

SCALE

IN

2

E

D


3 4

DWGNO.

5NO.SHT

A3V6

F

E

D

C

B

A

1 2

C

B

3 4 5

A

6


Q110932 S3INDEX

SITE ELEVATION10 INDUSTRIAL STREET, MACKAY, QLD 4740

C/L FUTURE TELSTRA PANEL ANTENNAS(9 OFF A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9, A10, A11 & A12))

NOTES:1. ALL FEEDER ACCESS POINTS ON THE STRUCTURE MUST BE BIRD PROOFED AS PER EXTERNALPLANT POLICY 003615.2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETRES UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE.3. THIS DRAWING SET IS A PRELIMINARY DRAWING ONLY AND IS ISSUED FOR COMMENT. IT IS NOTA DETAILED SURVEY / STRUCTURAL DRAWING AND THEREFORE COULD BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE.4. FOR EME SIGNS NOTED THUS #X REFER TO 005486 FOR DETAILS.


Telst

ra W

ireles

s Ope

ratio

ns T

empla

te - 0

1786

6P02

issu

ed F

eb 20

09 NOTE: THIS DRAWING TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH SHEET S3-1

NORTH ELEVATIONSCALE 1:125

PRELIMINARY

0 5m2m

C/L PROPOSED TELSTRA PANEL ANTENNAS (3 OFF A1, A2 & A3)

C/L PROPOSED TELSTRA RRU'S (6 OFF)


# 2BEHIND EACHPANEL ANTENNA

# 65.0m AGL

PROPOSED TELSTRA HEADFRAME.

PROPOSED TELSTRA MONOPOLE.

PROPOSED TELSTRA FEEDERSTO BE RUN INSIDE MONOPOLE.

PROPOSED FOUNDATIONS SHOWNINDICATIVELY TO BE CONFIRMEDAT DETAILED DESIGN STAGE

PROPOSED TELSTRA CABLE LADDER.

PROPOSED TELSTRAEQUIPMENT SHELTER.

EXISTING SHED

EXISTING RAMP

EXISTINGMANPROOFFENCE

DO NOT

1

SCALE

IN

2

E

D


3 4

DWGNO.

5NO.SHT

A3V6

F

E

D

C

B

A

1 2

C

B

3 4 5

A

6


Q110932 S3-1INDEX

ANTENNA CONFIGURATION TABLE10 INDUSTRIAL STREET, MACKAY, QLD 4740


Telst

ra W

ireles

s Ope

ratio

ns T

empla

te - 0

1786

6P02

issu

ed F

eb 20

09 NOTE: THIS DRAWING TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH SHEET S3 PRELIMINARY

ANTENNANo

ANTENNA TYPE &SIZE H x W x D

ANTENNAHEIGHT

C/L A.G.L.

ANTENNASTATUS

SECTOR NO.& SYSTEM

PHYSICALANTENNABEARING (°T)

A1 30.00m 25°ARGUS CVVPX310B2 PANEL2495 x 354 x 210 PROPOSED

S1: WCDMA850S1: WCDMA850

SPARESPARESPARE

A2 145°PROPOSED


SPARESPARESPARE

A3 265°PROPOSED


SPARESPARESPARE

A4 FUTURESPARESPARESPARESPARE

A5SPARESPARESPARESPARE


FUTURE

FUTURE

SPARESPARE

SPARESPARE

SPARESPARE

ARGUS CVVPX310B2 PANEL2495 x 354 x 210





A7 30.00m 25°FUTUREARGUS VVPX310B1 PANEL1328 x 290 x 103 SPARE

SPARE

SPARESPARE

A8 145°FUTUREARGUS VVPX310B1 PANEL1328 x 290 x 103 SPARE

SPARE

SPARESPARE


SPARE

SPARESPARE

A10 FUTUREARGUS VVPX310B1 PANEL1328 x 290 x 103 SPARE

SPARE

SPARESPARE


SPARE

SPARESPARE


SPARE

SPARESPARE

30.00m

30.00m

30.00m

30.00m

30.00m

30.00m

30.00m

30.00m

30.00m

30.00m

25°

145°

265°

25°

145°

265°

SPARE

SPARE

SPARE

NOTE:3RD CARRIER CONFIGURED ON SAME PORTS AS 1ST CARRIER.

REFER NOTE*

REFER NOTE*

REFER NOTE*

i

Appendix B – Codes

A.1 Mackay City Centre Locality Code

Specific Outcomes Acceptable/Probable Solutions Assessment of Proposal

P1 Commercial and retail activities in the City Centre maximise and support its central and high order role in the network of centres and contribute to its revitalisation as a vibrant and functioning centre for City life.

S1 No solution specified. Not applicable:

The proposal is not for a commercial or retail activity.

P2 New development in proximity to the river respects its unique role in providing a public realm for residential, recreational, and entertainment activities.

S2 No solution specified. Complies with P2:

The proposal is located within an existing industrial/commercial services precinct. It should be noted that industrial and commercial developments currently dominate the streetscape of the immediate area. As a result it is expected that the proposed telecommunications facility will not impact on the river‟s unique role in providing a public realm for residential, recreational and entertainment activities.

P3 Tourist development sites exhibit a number of the following characteristics:

(i) proximity to infrastructure and services adequate to meet the day-to-day needs of the tourist population likely to be generated by development on the site; and

(ii) proximity to a natural attraction without the potential for adverse effects upon the attributes or values which give rise to the attractiveness of the site; or

(iii) an area of land sufficient to contain fully the extent of the proposed development and the potential impacts likely to flow from it; or

(iv) land suitable in its physical characteristics to accommodate the form, scale and intensity of development proposed without imposing unnecessary or unacceptable impacts upon the surrounding area.


The proposal is not for a tourist development.

P4 Built form and uses are consistent with overall outcomes for the City Centre locality, the relevant precinct and the applicable zoning.


The proposal is consistent with the overall outcomes for the City Centre locality, the relevant precinct and the applicable zoning.

More specifically, the proposed

ii


telecommunications facility is located within an existing industrial/commercial services precinct and is a compatible use within the Eastside Precinct.

P5 New development respects the identified character of the locality and its precincts by achieving:

(i) visual links between the City and the river, particularly within the Riverside and Wharf precincts;

(ii) a form sympathetic to the traditional harbour character of timber wharves and docks and associated commercial buildings in the Wharf precinct;

(iii) continuity of the existing streetscape comprising masonry buildings, with decorative parapets in the Commercial Centre and Commercial Main Street zones; and

(iv) contemporary architectural design which is sympathetic and complementary to the identified character but which does not rely solely upon replication of building elements; and

(v) building design respects the scale of nearby buildings when viewed from street level.


The proposed telecommunications facility is located within an existing industrial/commercial services precinct and is a compatible use within the Eastside Precinct. As a result, the development will not compromise the identified character of the City Centre locality and its more sensitive precincts.

P6 Existing identified character buildings and buildings with character elements are retained, enhanced and re-used for compatible purposes.


No character buildings or buildings with character elements are identified on the subject site.

P7 Residential development is primarily high density and is concentrated in the Wharf and Riverside Precincts to take advantage of and support facilities provided by the City Centre. Urban design features emphasise the climate and the vernacular character of the City Centre and relevant precincts.


The proposal is not for a residential development.

P8 A high standard of residential amenity is provided in new development.

S8 A high standard of residential amenity is provided by ensuring:-

(i) Direct overlooking of main internal living areas of dwelling units and room units is minimised through appropriate building layout, location and design of windows and balconies, screening devices and landscaping.

(ii) Front fences and walls enable surveillance, highlight entrances and are compatible with the streetscape.

(iii) Residential premises meet the

Not applicable:


iii


needs of disabled persons by incorporating appropriate design measures.

(iv) Landscaping is consistent with the scale and location of the development.

(v) Garbage storage is sited away from public view.

(vi) Separate storage space is provided for each dwelling unit.

P9 Sustainability principles are incorporated into new residential and mixed use development through north-south orientation of residential accommodation, shielding from summer solar insulation, and layout that maximises natural ventilation.

S9 Sustainability principles are incorporated in new residential and mixed use development as follows:

(i) Dwelling units and rooming units are oriented north-south, and capture the prevailing breezes.

(ii) Windows primarily face north and east, and are suitably shielded to exclude summer heat while permitting entry of winter sun.

(iii) Windows to the west are minimised. (iv) Air-conditioning units are positioned

away from the street and away from outdoor living areas such as balconies and veranda‟s. Where feasible collective air-conditioning facilities are provided.

Not applicable:


P10 Short stay residential premises meet the mobility requirements of all users.


The proposal is not for short stay residential premises.

P11 Adequate parking is provided in all new developments by application of Schedule 2.


The proposed facility will be unmanned during operation and require infrequent access for maintenance. Therefore no formalised vehicle parking is required as part of the proposal. Parking for intermittent short term parking for maintenance purposes can readily occur given adequate informal space on the site.

P12 Open space areas are protected from potential impacts of development through:

(i) limiting development within open space areas to low impact activities, facilities and works that maintain the values of the area;

(ii) locating development on adjoining land in parts of the site less likely to have adverse effects;

(iii) providing buffers to open space areas of sufficient width to mitigate any adverse effects; and

(iv) adopting impact mitigation and management measures for


The proposed development is not located on or adjacent to an open space area.

iv


development likely to cause adverse effects.

P13 Appropriate sight distances are provided and pedestrian movement facilitated at intersections.

S13 Building truncations are provided as road reserve at all intersections, which is triangular in shape and extends 4m on each boundary line, and the provision of unrestricted public access across the area of land which is subject to the truncation.

Not applicable:

The proposal does not involve the construction of a new building at an intersection.

P14 New development provides infrastructure to a standard and capacity that meets the demands of the development.


The proposed telecommunication facility is to be unmanned and therefore does not require extensive infrastructure such as sewerage, water or gas. It should be noted however that the proposed telecommunication facility is to be connected to reticulated electricity.

It is important to note that the Sandfly Creek facility is an integral telecommunications infrastructure for the area which will result in improved telecommunications coverage in an area of noted deficiency.

P15 New development provides high levels of public safety and amenity in publicly accessible spaces and premises.

S15 New development complies with the requirements of CPTED.

Not applicable:

The development is not within a publicly accessible space or premises.

P16 New development complements the streetscape by adopting appropriate frontages and landscaping.

S16 Frontages and landscaping is consistent with the scale and location of the development.

Not applicable:

The development does not involve the construction of a new building.

P17 New development is consistent with the intended character of the precinct in which it is located.

S17 New development addresses relevant precinct outcomes set out in Division 6 of the Locality Code.

Complies with S17:

The proposed telecommunication facility is located within the Eastside Precinct. In accordance with Division 6 of the Locality Code, the primary focus of this precinct is to provide business support services including uses such as wholesale outlets, equipment hire, and retailers of bulky goods.

The Eastside Precinct currently consists of numerous industrial and commercial services warehouses that provide business support services for the area.

The proposed telecommunications facility has been designed and located to integrate with surrounding industrial/services land uses in order to limit potential impacts to residential areas.

v

A.2 Commercial Services Zone Code


P1 Development on land in the Service Precinct identified on Information Map – Land Subject to Interface, is designed to mitigate any potential impacts on nearby residential amenity (on existing and future residential sites).

S1 For sites fronting land in another zone across a street or rear boundary (e.g. Industrial Street / East Gordon Street) identified on Information Map – Land Subject to Interface:

(i) buildings are set back from the street frontage or frontage to public open space at least 6m;

(ii) at least 3m of the setback to the street frontage or frontage to public open space is used for landscaping with screening trees and shrubs;

(iii) buildings do not include reflective materials or finishes in their facades or roofs; and

(iv) advertising devices are not illuminated and security lighting is not directed so that light spills into adjacent residential uses.

Complies with S1:

The proposed facility is located towards the rear of the site and is not located on the street frontage or public open space. Please see Appendix A for the proposed plans of the telecommunications facility.

The subject site is located on Industrial Street. Potential impacts on existing and future residential sites including visual impact of the proposed facility will be minimised by the slimline pole design and appropriate finishing treatments (neutral colour finish).

In addition, no advertising devices are proposed as part this application.

P2 Building facades are articulated and incorporate openings, awning and other design treatments to reduce building bulk and create a pleasant streetscape environment.

S2

(1) On sites located east of Brisbane Street, buildings: (i) do not exceed two storeys

when located within 8m of the street frontage;

(ii) do not exceed three storeys when located 8m or more from the street frontage; and

(iii) have a maximum building height of 12m.

(2) For buildings on sites located west of Gregory Street: (i) the podium does not exceed

more than 12m in height; (ii) the maximum building height

does not exceed 22 m. (iii) site cover of any of the floors

above the height of 12m does not exceed 40%;

(iv) the podium has a zero setback to the street frontage; and

(v) the setback above the height of 12m is not less than 4 metres to the street frontage and not less than 3 metres to the side and rear boundaries.

(3) Pedestrian safety and shelter is accommodated by: (i) providing pedestrian shelter,

in the form of awnings or free-standing shade structures at least 3.0m wide, is provided to each street frontage; and

(ii) minimising vehicle access points to buildings across the footpath.

Not applicable:

The proposal does not involve the construction of a new building on Brisbane or Gregory Streets. Notwithstanding, the visual impact of the proposed facility will be minimised by the slimline pole design and appropriate finishing treatments (neutral colour finish).

vi


P3 New residential or commercial development occurs only where the proposed use is compatible with existing service industry or low impact industrial uses adjoining, or in close proximity to the proposed use.


The proposal is not for a new residential or commercial development.

vii

A.3 Telecommunications Facility Code

Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Assessment of Proposal

Visual Impact

S1 - Telecommunication facilities are to be designed and located to minimise their visual impact by:

providing finishes on structures compatible with the surrounding environment;

providing facilities in residential areas whose bulk, scale and height is consistent with the bulk, scale and height of the surrounding buildings and structures; and

providing facilities in areas included in the character/ heritage overlay code that is compatible with the overall and specific outcomes of that code.

A1 - No solution specified. Complies with S1:

The proposed telecommunications facility has been designed and located to integrate with surrounding industrial/services land uses. The finish of the structure can be selected to meet requirements of Council (it is suggested that a dull grey would be the most appropriate).

Environmental Impact

S1 - Premises are installed and operated to minimise the adverse impacts on the natural environment by:

avoiding impacts on locations containing remnant vegetation, fauna habitat, watercourses or sites of natural or cultural heritage;

minimising the need for earthworks through careful siting and design of facilities;

noise and dust emissions during construction and operations of the facility are minimised;

ensuring vegetation clearing associated with establishment of the facility does not extend beyond the installation site, associated power links and associated parking and access areas;

minimising vegetation loss on steep land;

minimising alterations to key landforms or landscape character to avoid the facility dominating the landform and landscape character;

being designed to be architecturally integrated with buildings on which the facility is mounted; and

being positioned and designed to minimise visibility to pedestrians.

A1 - No solution specified. Complies with S1 :

The proposed Telecommunications Facility has been designed and located to:

be significantly removed from sensitive environmental areas.

minimise earthworks, as only minor earthworks will be required during construction.

control noise and dust emissions during the construction of the facility.

ensure no vegetation removal is required on the site.

utilise a slimline monopole design to minimise visual dominance and impact on surrounding landscape character.

S2 - Landscaping is low maintenance and semi-mature upon establishment.


The proposed telecommunications is located in the rear of the site away from the Industrial Road frontage. Landscaping is therefore not considered necessary given

viii


that the base of the proposed telecommunication facility and the equipment hut will be sufficiently screened from the public. Notwithstanding, reasonable landscaping measures can be provided if required by Council.

Development Abutting Residential Uses

S1 Appropriate setbacks and buffering are provided between telecommunication facilities and any adjoining residential development or any residential area or land included within the Open Space Zone to maintain the amenity of adjoining residential properties in terms of:

visual impact;

acoustic privacy; and

access to sunlight.

A1.1 - The facility is setback at least 50m from any dwelling unit or rooming unit.

A1.2 - A landscaped buffer strip 2m in width and including screen fencing is provided and maintained adjacent to any free-standing structures.

A1.3 - All potential noise sources (such as air-conditioning and other mechanical plant) are oriented away from any dwelling unit or rooming unit.

A1.4 - Residential open space areas or living areas are not overshadowed at any time.

A1.5 - Overshadowing of open space or activity areas associated with childcare centres, public areas, local parks and schools is limited to 3 hours on any day.

Complies with S1:

The subject site is surrounded by predominately light industrial and service activities.

Complies with A1.2:

The proposed facility will be appropriately fenced for security purposes.

The proposed telecommunications is located in the rear of the site away from the Industrial Road frontage. Landscaping is therefore not considered necessary given that the base of the proposed telecommunication facility and the equipment hut will be sufficiently screened from the public. Notwithstanding, reasonable landscaping measures can be provided if required by Council.

Complies with A1.3:

The proposed facility is not anticipated to generate any noise impacts.

Complies with A1.4:

The proposed facility will not result in any overshadowing on residential open space or living areas.

Complies with A1.5:

The proposed facility will not result in any overshadowing of open space or activity areas associated with childcare centres, public area, local parks and/or schools.

Co-Location

S1 - Premises are co-located with other telecommunications facilities or on buildings or other structures wherever feasible on the basis there is no existing adverse environmental

A1 Facilities are located on a new site only where co-location options are exhausted and proven not to meet Specific Outcome 1 and 2.

Complies with A1:

The proposed telecommunications facility is located on a new site, as there were no opportunities to co-locate, whilst still achieving the

ix


or public health and safety impact.

P2 - Co-location will reduce cumulative visual impacts associated with the establishment of telecommunications facilities.

desired levels of coverage. Please refer to Section 2.3 of this report for further information.

x

A.4 Environment & Infrastructure Code


Assessable Development

Infrastructure Provision

S1 - Adequate infrastructure is provided in time to meet the needs of the development.

A1 - The timing for provision of infrastructure for development complies with the standards and contribution requirements detailed in the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy

Complies with A1:

The proposal can be serviced by the existing services and infrastructure currently available to the site. No additional services are required. The development will also meet the requirements of the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy, as relevant.

S2 - Premises are provided with appropriate areas of private and public open space.

Note: Guidance in regards to the design and provision of open space is provided in the Open Space Planning Scheme Policy and the Contributions Planning Scheme Policy.

A2 - The provision of open space complies with the standards and requirements detailed in the Open Space Planning Scheme Policy and the Contributions Planning Scheme Policy.

Not applicable:

The proposal is for supportive infrastructure (telecommunications facility); therefore, the proposal does not necessitate the provision of public open space. The facility compound will be accessible to authorised personnel only.

S3 - Premises have

(i) an adequate, safe and reliable supply of water, including potable water, and is connected, where possible, to an existing reticulated water supply.

(ii) the planning and design of potable water infrastructure considers Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) such as water conservation initiatives.

A3.1 - Premises are connected to Council‟s reticulated water supply system.

A3.2 - If connection to Council‟s reticulated water supply system is not possible, a potable water supply is provided in accordance with the standards detailed in the Engineering Design guidelines Planning Scheme Policy).

Not applicable:

The proposal is for a telecommunications facility and will be unmanned during operation. No water supply is required to support the development.

S4 - Treatment and disposal of waste water ensures:

(i) no adverse ecological impacts on the environment, particularly nearby receiving environments including surface waters and ground water; and

(ii) the cumulative impacts of on site waste water treatment will not cause deterioration of environmental conditions;

(iii) the planning and design of wastewater infrastructure considers Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) such as wastewater management measures.

A4.1 - Connection to Council‟s reticulated sewerage treatment system; or

A4.2 - Where connection to Council reticulated sewerage system is not possible, and where 20 people or less, Council will refer to the requirements of the Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 1997 and the On Site Sewerage Code (NR&M July 2002) and AS 1547. to ensure the premises are suitable for effluent disposal.

A4.3 - Where more than 20 people, no solution specified.

Not applicable:

The proposal is for a telecommunications facility which will be unmanned during operation and require infrequent maintenance by authorised personnel. The site is not intended to be accessible to the public. No ablution facilities are required to support the development.

xi


Stormwater Management

S5 - Drainage works are planned for and designed to ensure that adjoining land and the existing upstream and downstream drainage systems are not adversely affected by development, taking into account:

(i) Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) principles such as: - protect natural systems; - enhance natural waterway

systems within urban development using natural channel design principles;

- detention of stormwater instead of rapid conveyance;

- minimise impervious areas; - utilisation of stormwater to

conserve potable water; - integrate stormwater treatment

into the landscape; - water efficient landscaping; and - protection of water related

environmental values . (ii) need for a stormwater system that

can be economically maintained; (iii) safety of pedestrians and

vehicles; (iv) location of discharge; (v) construction of buildings,

structures or paving up to site boundaries which avoid blocking or concentrating natural flow paths2.

(vi) fauna movement is provided for through bridges and culverts.

A5 - Drainage works complies with the requirements of the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy

Not applicable:

The proposed development will not result in any significant increase in impervious surfaces on site. The new facility location is incorporated into the car parking area of the site. Accordingly there will be no change to existing drainage on site and no stormwater collection. Therefore, no new drainage works are considered necessary.

External Works

S6 - Kerb and channelling is provided to a satisfactory standard and constructed to:

(i) prevent edge fretting; (ii) perform required drainage

functions; (iii) provide the appropriate level of

control for vehicle movement; (iv) allow ready access to abutting

properties at suitable locations; and

(v) contribute to the desired streetscape character of the locality.

A6 - Premises are provided with kerb and channel in accordance with the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy.

Not applicable:

No changes to the existing road network are proposed, and primary access to the facility will be via Industrial Street. Therefore no new kerb and channelling is required as part of this application.

Roads

S7 - All proposed road pavement surfaces:

(i) are of a quality and durability suitable to the intended traffic volumes and loads;

(ii) provide all-weather access; (iii) allow the discharge of rainfall; (iv) provide the safe passage of

vehicles and pedestrians; and

A7 - Roads are provided in accordance with the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy

Not applicable:

No additional roads are proposed as part of the development.

xii


(v) provide a reasonable, comfortable riding quality.

Drainage networks

S8 - In urban areas, the major drainage network is designed and constructed with the capacity to control stormwater flows under normal and minor system blockage conditions for the DFE applicable to drainage so that:

(i) floodways are restricted to areas where there is no damage to property or hazards for motorists, and

(ii) runoff is directed to a lawful point of discharge through competently designed and constructed outlet works.

A8 - Design requirements of the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy.

Not applicable:

The proposed development will not result in any significant increase in impervious surfaces on site. Accordingly there will be no change to existing drainage on site and no stormwater collection. Therefore, no new drainage works are considered necessary.

Public Utilities

S9 - Street lighting and signs are provided to ensure the safety of both vehicles and pedestrians, and to facilitate access and movement.

A9 - Street lighting and signage comply with the requirements of the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy.

Not applicable:

Street lighting or signage is not proposed as part of the development.

Infrastructure Payments

S10 - The costs of providing infrastructure is funded by the development giving rise to the need for the infrastructure.

A10 - The funding of infrastructure complies with the requirements of the Contributions Planning Scheme Policy.

Not applicable:

The development will not increase the demand for infrastructure.

Car Parking and Access

S11 Premises are provided with:

(i) adequate vehicle parking spaces to satisfy the anticipated requirements of the activity;

(ii) safe and efficient access and manoeuvring areas to meet the anticipated volume and type of traffic;

(iii) large vehicles are able to enter and leave the site without prejudicing the safety and efficiency of the road;

(iv) access driveways are located and designed to minimise conflicts with traffic and pedestrians; and

(v) vehicle crossings from the carriageway to the frontage of the site are constructed and finished to appropriate standards for the expected volume and type of traffic generated by activities on the site.

A11.1 - Vehicle parking on the site is in accordance with the rates specified in Schedule 2.

A11.2 - Vehicles are able to enter and exit the site (with the exception of dwelling house and duplex) in a forward gear.

A11.3 - The design of car parking and access complies with the requirements detailed in the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy.

Not applicable:

The proposed facility will be unmanned during operation and require infrequent access for maintenance. Therefore no formalised vehicle parking is required as part of the proposal. Parking for intermittent short term parking by a maintenance vehicle can readily occur in an informal manner.

xiii

Environmental Amenity



Lighting Management

S1 - Outdoor lighting does not cause a loss of amenity to adjacent premises or adversely impact on native fauna as a result of the light it emits either directly or by reflection.

Note: Council will refer to the provisions of AS4282 – Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting

A1 - No solution specified. Not applicable:

As the site will not be accessible to the public, no outdoor lighting is proposed.

Overshadowing

S2 - The amenity of adjacent residential land is not adversely affected by shadows cast by adjoining building or structures.

A2 - Buildings do not cast a shadow over more than 30% of an adjoining residential lot at any time between the hours of 9am and 3pm on 22 June.

Complies with A2:

No habitable buildings are proposed for the site as part of this application. The telecommunication facility and associated equipment hut will not cast a shadow over more than 30% of any neighbouring residential land uses. Furthermore, the slimline monopole design of the proposal is considered to minimise any potential impact of shadowing.

Building Setbacks

S3 - Residential buildings are sited to minimise loss of amenity for residents‟ adjacent to cane tram lines.

A3 - Residential buildings are set back a minimum of:

(i) 50m from cane tram lines; and (ii) 100m from cane tram line level

crossings and sidings.

Not applicable:

No residential buildings are proposed as part of the development.

S4 - Buildings are set back from a road frontage to:

(i) complement the existing built form; and

(ii) preserve the safety of vehicle movement along adjoining roads.


No habitable buildings are proposed for the site.

Noise and Vibration Management



S1 - Premises used for purposes likely to generate emissions such as air pollutants, heat and odours incorporate:

(i) physical measures for removing pollutants from emissions prior to discharge to the atmosphere;


The proposed telecommunication facility will not generate emissions or other pollutants.

xiv


(ii) physical measures for reducing the temperature gradient between emissions and the atmosphere prior to discharge; and

(iii) operational systems, including monitoring systems for major industry and major infrastructure, which maintain emissions within ANZECC guideline standards.

S2 - Premises accommodating uses which are likely to generate noise are designed and constructed with noise attenuation measures to avoid noise nuisance to nearby uses.

A2 - No solution specified Not applicable:

The proposed telecommunication facility will not generate noise or nuisance.

S3 - Noise sensitive uses locating adjacent to State controlled transport infrastructure incorporate attenuation, building design and orientation measures.

A3 - No solution specified Not applicable:

The proposed development does not involve any noise sensitive uses.

Air Quality



S1 Premises used for purposes likely to generate emissions such as air pollutants, heat and odours incorporate:

(i) physical measures for removing pollutants from emissions prior to discharge to the atmosphere;

(ii) physical measures for reducing the temperature gradient between emissions and the atmosphere prior to discharge; and

(iii) operational systems, including monitoring systems for major industry and major infrastructure, which maintain emissions within ANZECC guideline standards.


The proposed telecommunications facility is not likely to generate emissions such as air pollutants, heat and odours.

xv

Flooding



S1 - Premises subject to risk of inundation or damage through flood are provided with immunity to that risk in order to reduce potential property damage and to ensure public safety.

A1.1 - Development is sited on land that would not be subject to flooding during a DFE; or

A1.2 - For development comprising a residential element, the floors of all habitable rooms are located 300mm above the DFE; or

A1.3 - For non-residential development or development involving temporary or moveable residential structures (e.g. caravan parks):

(i) buildings are located and designed so that floor levels (except areas used for car parking) are 300mm above the DFE; or

(ii) there is at least one evacuation route that remains passable for emergency evacuations during all floods up to and including the DFE.

Complies with A1.1:

The entirety of the site is contained within the Flood and Inundation Management Area. The proposed facility will be unmanned during operation and restrict unauthorised access. The proposed telecommunications facility will be built in accordance with appropriate building standards to ensure public safety from potential property damage.

Not applicable A1.2:

The proposal does not comprise a residential element.

Not applicable A1.3:

No additional habitable buildings are proposed as part of the development. The proposed equipment hut is to be unmanned and accessed infrequently for maintenance purposes.

S2 - There is no increase in the number of people living or working on a flood prone site, except where the premises are occupied on a short term or intermittent basis.


While the entirety of the site is contained within the Flood and Inundation Management Area, the proposed facility will be unmanned during operation with restricted access. The proposal will not generate an increase in the number of people living or working on the site.

S3 - Development does not result in adverse impacts for the safety of people or the capacity to use land within a floodplain and does not involve:

(i) Any physical alteration to a watercourse; or

(ii) Net filling of 50 cubic metres; or (iii) The proposed works either:

(A) avoid any reductions of on-site flood storage capacity and contain within the subject site any changes in depth/duration/velocity in flood waters of all floods up to and including the DFE; or

(B) do not change the flood characteristics at the DFE

A3 - No solution specified. Complies withS3:

The proposed telecommunication facility is modest in size at approximately 60m

2. It should be

noted that the proposed facility will not:

physically alter the existing watercourse;

require filling of 50 cubic metres; and

change the flood characteristics at the DFE in ways resulting in loss of flood storage, changes to flow paths, acceleration or retardation of flows or any reduction of flood

xvi


outside the subject site in ways that result in:

- loss of flood storage;

- loss of / changes to flow paths;

- acceleration or retardation of flows; or

- any reduction of flood warning times elsewhere on the floodplain.

warning times elsewhere on the floodplain.

As a result, the proposal will not result in adverse impacts for the safety of people or the capacity to use land within a floodplain.

S4 - Storage and handling of hazardous substances on sites that are subject to risk of inundation or damage through flood, ensures that persons and property are not placed at unreasonable risk.

A4 - Storage or handling of substances that may be a hazard to the environment or human safety by the risk of contamination due to flooding:

(i) is undertaken in accordance with a risk assessment; and

(ii) provides for the storage of any hazardous substances above or securely isolated from the DFE level.

Not applicable:

The proposal does not involve the storage or handling of substances that may be a hazard to the environment of human safety.

S5 - The use is designed to minimise the impact of Cyclonic Hazards

A5 - No solution specified Complies with S5:

The proposal is designed with regard to Cyclonic Hazards and will meet relevant construction standards.

Undefined Flood and Inundation Areas

S6 - Where flood limits are not identified, development is undertaken such that there is no adverse effects on flood levels or flows on the site or up-stream and down-stream of the site


The proposed telecommunications facility will not adversely impact flood levels, flows on the site, or up-stream and down-stream flood levels.

Water Quality



S1 - Development does not detract from the maintenance of water quality in the City‟s watercourses and bulk water storages, in particular its:

(i) environmental values; and (ii) where applicable, potability of the

water supply.


The development will not impact on water quality and will not increase run off from the site due to its modes size of 60m

2. Importantly,

the impervious surface area is not expected to dramatically increase following the completion of the facility. Accordingly, the proposal will not adversely impact the environmental values or the portability of water supply.

S2 - Premises incorporate:

(i) physical measures for intercepting and treating surface water drainage and spilled substances prior to their release to the watercourses; and

(ii) bunding of sites or areas within sites or integrated drainage

A2 - No solution specified Complies with S2:

The proposal does not seek to alter the land or provide any additional habitable buildings. The footprint of the proposal is minimal. As such, water treatment is not considered necessary.

xvii


systems which include waste water treatment measures, where chemicals, fuels, lubricants or other soluble pollutants are being handled or stored.

Note: Council will refer to the Environmental Protection Policy (Water) 1997

S3 - The City‟s groundwater resources and surface waters are maintained by:

(i) providing a stormwater system that manages stormwater quantity and quality prior to discharging into receiving waters;

(ii) providing non-structural source control measures;

(iii) providing structural source control measures;

(iv) retaining or rehabilitating natural waterway corridors such as natural channels, wetlands and riparian vegetation;

(v) providing storage of waste water in secure and sealed storage facilities;

(vi) ensuring efficient disposal areas and ground and surface water retrieval areas are buffered from each other;

(vii) ensuring that contaminants do not enter the groundwater resources; and

(viii) with reuse of reclaimed water, ensuring safe treatment and disposal of contaminated water.


The proposal does not seek to alter the land or provide any additional habitable buildings. The footprint of the proposal is minimal. There will not be any tangible increase to stormwater runoff as a result of the proposal and the proposal will not result in the treatment of any stormwater. Additional stormwater treatment beyond what currently exist on the site is not considered necessary to support the development.

S4 - The biodiversity and habitat values of coastal areas and associated estuarine systems are protected from:

(i) increased nutrient or sediment levels; or

(ii) changed flow, inhibited passage, or hydrologic regimes of the natural coastal and marine margins, which may result from development.


As the proposal will not result in any tangible increase in runoff from the site, an increase in sediment and nutrient loadings in surrounding watercourses is not expected. In addition, given the modest size of the proposed development, no changes to the coastal area associated with the estuarine system is expexted.

S5 - Sediment and nutrient loadings into a watercourse are minimised through:

(i) treated on-site effluent; (ii) adequate stormwater run-off

controls; and (iii) on-site and off-site erosion and

sediment controls


As the proposal will not result in any tangible increase in runoff from the site, an increase in sediment and nutrient loadings in surrounding watercourses is not expected.

xviii

Erosion and Sediment Control



S1 - Minimisation of the risk of erosion and sedimentation either on-site or elsewhere, by a comprehensive approach to soil erosion control and sedimentation management, including:

(i) the minimisation of: (ii) earthworks;

(a) clearing of land; (b) long term stockpiling of

excavated materials; (iii) use of appropriate construction

management techniques; (iv) diverting surface water drainage

around disturbed areas; and (v) treating and removing sediments

from stormwater over disturbed areas prior to release from the site.

A1 - The control of Erosion and Sedimentation complies with Planning Scheme Policy 15.07 - Engineering Design Guideline D7 Soil and Water Quality Management.

Complies with A1:

Erosion and sediment control will be managed and minimised throughout construction in accordance with the requirements of the Planning Scheme, particularly Planning Scheme Policy 15.07 – Engineering Design Guideline D7 Soil and Water Quality Management.

These will be further addressed in the building approval stage.

S2 - Progressive rehabilitation of disturbed areas occurs within the site through a comprehensive rehabilitation program including:

(i) the grading and reshaping of the disturbed areas to provide controlled and stable drainage flow paths;

(ii) the construction of drainage paths which divert high velocity flows away from disturbed areas;

(iii) the re-spreading of stored top soil stripped from the site; and

(iv) the planting of the disturbed area with native species of grasses, ground covers and trees.


The proposed development involves minimal earthworks associated with construction and therefore, there will be no areas left disturbed following construction.

Coastal Management



S1 -

(i) there is no net loss of public access to the foreshore, or of public useability of coastal waters;

(ii) appropriate location and design is achieved with respect to sensitive coastal resources and their values;

(iii) roads that run parallel to the coast, are set back from erosion prone areas and significant coastal resources, with only smaller access roads running to the coast; and

(iv) minor spur roads to the foreshore and associated car parks provide

A1 - The control of Erosion and Sedimentation complies with Planning Scheme Policy 15.07 - Engineering Design Guideline D7 Soil and Water Quality Management.

Complies A1:

During the construction stage of the proposed telecommunication facility, the control of Erosion and Sedimentation will comply with Planning Scheme Policy 15.07 – Engineering Design, Guideline D7 Soil and Water Quality Management.

Following the construction of the telecommunications facility, appropriate works will be implemented to minimise any potential Erosion and Sedimentation.

xix


access to the foreshore at locations that are convenient to the public, have low environmental sensitivity, and avoid locations that may increase storm tide hazard.

S2 - Progressive rehabilitation of disturbed areas occurs within the site through a comprehensive rehabilitation program including:

(i) the grading and reshaping of the disturbed areas to provide controlled and stable drainage flow paths;

(ii) the construction of drainage paths which divert high velocity flows away from disturbed areas;

(iii) the re-spreading of stored top soil stripped from the site; and

(iv) the planting of the disturbed area with native species of grasses, ground covers and trees.


The proposed development involves minimal earthworks associated with construction and therefore, there will be no areas left disturbed following construction.

Erosion Prone Areas

S1 - Development and permanent buildings are minimised in erosion-prone areas as defined in this code (apart from temporary or relocatable structures required for safety and recreational purposes).

A1.1 - Reconfiguring a lot within erosion prone areas incorporates erosion prone land as undeveloped open space.

A1.2 - Relocatable structures such as picnic tables, barbecues, coastal trails, bikeways, demountable structures, equipment sheds, lookouts, elevated decks, shelter sheds etc are located within erosion prone areas only where they remain relocatable.

A1.3 - All other development is;

(i) located outside of the erosion prone area; or

(ii) as far landward as practical within the lot ; and

(iii) is coastal dependent development (as defined in this code).

A1.4 - All building works (excluding demolition), including extension to existing buildings, on lots wholly or partly within the erosion prone area are:

(i) For rural areas and undeveloped urban areas, located landward of the erosion prone area to minimise the extent of permanent building inside the erosion prone area; and

(ii) For urban areas, located wholly landward of the alignment of existing

Not applicable:

The site is not identified as an erosion prone area.

xx


neighbouring buildings and of a scale and intensity similar to that of the surrounding development.

S2 - Where there is existing development within an erosion-prone area, redevelopment and extensions do not (as defined in this code):-

(i) extend the intensity of the existing level; or

(ii) compromise coastal management outcomes and principles

Note: Supporting information required in order to demonstrate compliance is set out in the Erosion Prone Area Planning Scheme Policy.


The site is not identified as an erosion prone area.

High Impact Activity Areas


S1 - Land uses adjoining high impact activity activities, including activities as indicated on Figure 9-8.1; and Figure 9-8.2 “High Impact Activities” and Information Map “High Impact Activities”, are designed and sited to manage adverse effects on site users by providing:

(i) noise attenuation measures; (ii) buffers between sensitive uses

and the high activity areas; (iii) landscaping including bunding

between sensitive use areas and high impact activity areas; and

(iv) any other measures required to ensure that a nuisance is minimised.

A1 - Land uses adjoining high impact activity areas are set back from those areas in accordance with Table 9-8.3.

Table 9-8.3 Setbacks (measured from the boundary of the actual activity including ancillary site area for supporting activities or planned future expansion)

High Impact Activity

Buffer Distance

Sewerage Treatment Plants (in general)

50,000 EP plant 1.475 km

20,000 EP plant 500m

3,500 EP plant or less

500m

University 200m

Key Resource Areas (KRAs) (See

Figs 9-8.1 and 9-8.2)

The Cedars – KRA23

Separation Area identified in Figure 9-8.2.

The Cedars Haul Route

100m

Farleigh – KRA24 Separation Area identified in Figure 9-8.1.

Farleigh Haul Route

100m

Activities Producing Spray Drift, Noise, Smoke or Odour

Min. Default Distance (m)

Min. Design distance with Buffer (m)

Agricultural chemical spray drift

300m open space

40m vegetated buffer

Not applicable:

The site is not identified as adjoining a high impact activity area. Further, the proposed development is not for a sensitive use.

xxi


Intermittent odour (>88 hrs/yr)

500m 500m

Intermittent noise as defined in planning

guidelines

60m day / 1000 night

15m day / 250 m night

Long term noise (< 50 hours /year)

500m day / 1000m night

120m day / 1000m night

A2 - Land uses other than Industry (High Impact) uses, adjoining high impact activity areas are set back from those areas in accordance with Table 9-8.4.


Extractive

Industry (other than KRAs)

1000m

Slaughter Yard 1000m

Sugar Mill 1000m

Meatworks 1000m

A3 - Land uses other than Industry (High Impact) uses, adjoining high impact activity areas are set back from those areas in accordance with Table 9-8.5.


Waste Facilities6 1000m

Transfer Stations7 300m

Greenwaste Facilities8 300m

S2 - Specific Sewerage Treatment Plants meet the following criteria:

PLANT BUFFER

DISTANCE

Mackay Southern Water recycling Facility 97,000 EP

1.0km

S2 - No solution specified. Not applicable:

The proposal is not for a Sewerage Treatment Plant.

xxii

Landscaping and Fencing



S1 - Development is provided with adequate and suitable landscaping and screening on the site which ensures:

(i) an attractive streetscape appearance; and

(ii) the privacy and amenity of any adjoining residences.

A1 - Landscaping is provided in accordance with the Landscaping Planning Scheme Policy

Not applicable:

The proposed telecommunications is located in the rear of the site away from the Industrial Road frontage. Landscaping is therefore not considered necessary given that the base of the proposed telecommunication facility and the equipment hut will be sufficiently screened from the public. Notwithstanding, reasonable landscaping measures can be provided if required by Council.

S2 - Landscaping is designed to prevent encroachment upon electricity infrastructure.

A2.1 - Landscaping near electricity lines or substations, are designed and developed so that any vegetation at maturity or landscaping structures or works will not exceed 4.0m in height on land:

(i) in an electric line shadow9; or (ii) within 5m of an electric line shadow; or (iii) within 5m of a substation boundary. A2.2 - Elsewhere, vegetation is planted in a position that is further from the nearest edge of an electric line shadow or substation boundary than the expected maximum height at maturity of vegetation.

A2.3 - On land adjoining an electricity substation boundary, the vegetation foliage at maturity will not be within 3m of the substation boundary. However, where a substation has a solid wall along any part of its boundary, foliage may extend to, but not above or beyond, that solid wall.

Not applicable:

No landscaping is proposed; however, landscaping can be provided in accordance with Council requirements if required.

S3 - Landscaping provides a 2m wide landscaped strip adjacent to the road frontage incorporating existing vegetation wherever possible.



S4 - A landscape strip is provided comprising either a 1.8m high solid fence or 2m wide planted screen adjacent to all side and rear boundaries of a site which adjoins any residential area.



S5 - Landscaping around buildings is designed to maximise shade and redirect cooling breezes in summer and to provide a windbreak in winter.


The proposal seeks approval for an unmanned facility with no unauthorised access.

xxiii


S6 - Landscaping incorporates planting for shading summer sun, including:

(i) tall shade trees to the west and east of the building; and

(ii) trellises or pergolas adjacent to windows to the north of the building.



S7 - Landscaping is designed to maximise the outdoor shade areas and minimise use of hard reflective surfaces around the building.

A7 - No solution specified. Not Applicable:


Landscaping for Outdoor Vehicle Parking Areas

S8 - Landscaping for outdoor vehicle parking areas, where development is for the purposes of Accommodation units, multiple dwelling units, Sport and recreation, indoor entertainment, outdoor entertainment, child care centre, service station, motel, Industrial uses and retail or commercial uses, will:

(i) visually enhance the area along any road frontage;

(ii) screen the area from any adjoining residential or other sensitive uses;

(iii) provide visual relief and shade throughout the area; and

(iv) be compatible with local native species.

A8.1 - Landscaping of outdoor vehicle parking areas provides planting of trees and shrubs:

(i) in a strip 2m wide along any primary road frontage at a density and a scale appropriate to the size of the vehicle parking area and the function of the adjoining road; and

(ii) in median areas throughout the vehicle parking area at a rate of 1 shade tree for every 6 parking spaces.

A8.2 - Provide a wall, fence or continuous screen planting, to a height of at least 1.8m along any boundary to land used or likely to be used for residential or other sensitive use.

Not applicable:

No outdoor vehicle parking areas form part of this proposal.

Landscaping - General Requirements

S9 - Landscaping is designed and established to:

(i) an appropriate scale relative to both the street reserve width and to the size and nature of the development;

(ii) incorporate remnant vegetation, where possible;

(iii) provide summer shade and shelter for pedestrian comfort and energy efficiency of buildings;

(iv) maximise areas suitable for on-site infiltration of stormwater;

(v) allow for pedestrian and vehicle safety;

(vi) generate a cohesive and distinct visual character for the streetscape and locality;

(vii) be suitable to the tropical climate;

(viii) provides planting, paving and other landscape treatment according to a Landscaping Plan; and

(ix) minimise irrigation requirements through appropriate plant



xxiv


selection, mulching and water efficient irrigation systems.

Note: The Landscape Planning Scheme Policy should be referred to for information that may be required by Council to assist in assessment of an application.

Vegetation Management

S10 - Natural vegetation is maintained wherever possible.

Note: Assessable development being operational work that is clearing of native vegetation of freehold land consistent with Schedule 8, Part 1, 3A of IPA will be assessed under the provisions of the Vegetation Management Act 1999 and the State code for clearing of vegetation on freehold land.


No vegetation will be removed as part of the proposal.

Community Safety Design Principles


Surveillance and Sightlines

S1 - Premises provide opportunities for informal surveillance from surrounding buildings and land uses.

Note: Ways of showing compliance are as follows:

(i) Windows in buildings overlook pedestrian routes, open space areas and car parks.

(ii) No blank building facade is presented to any street frontage.

(iii) Street level windows are provided in buildings fronting onto public spaces and movement routes.


The new facility will allow for safety and surveillance and will not result in any hidden areas. Additionally, the site will not be accessible by the public. The facility will comprise appropriate security fencing for community safety.

S2 - Where located adjacent to public areas, premises are designed to permit surveillance of public areas.


The site is not located adjacent to any public areas.

S3 - Buildings and street addresses in urban areas are easily identified.


The site is not open to the public. The proposed facility will be accessible by authorised personnel only for maintenance and servicing.

S4 - Premises for uses other than dwelling houses and dual occupancy, are illuminated at night to:

(i) maximise personal safety of site users; and

(ii) minimise opportunities for attack by hidden persons.

(iii) provide lighting along access routes, in building entrances, site entries, car parking areas and


The proposal seeks to maximise personal safety on the site. The facility is securely fenced to restrict unauthorised access. In addition, appropriate non-illuminated signage will be placed around the site.

xxv


other movement areas used after dark.

S5 - Visibility is provided into stairwells, elevators, car parks, lobby entrances and bicycle parking facilities


The site does not incorporate stairwells, elevators, car parks, lobby entrance or bicycle facilities.

S6 - Premises and their surrounds do not include:

(i) „blind‟ corners (including on stairs, in corridors or other situations where movement can be predicted);

(ii) sudden changes of grade on pathways which reduces sightlines;

(iii) concealment spots (unless they can be secured after hours); and

(iv) pedestrian tunnels, excepting that where unimpeded sightlines or the absence of concealment points cannot be reasonably achieved, equipment (such as security mirrors) and good lighting is provided to enhance visibility.

(v) Potential concealment areas (i.e. dead-end alleys) are restricted or locked after hours.

(vi) Where a concealment spot is unavoidable, there are aids to visibility such as convex


The site will not incorporate any blind corners, sudden changes of grade on pathways, concealment spots or pedestrian tunnels.

S7 - Building entrances:

(i) are clearly defined; (ii) are well lit and face the street; (iii) do not create concealment spots; (iv) provide clear sightlines from the

building foyer so that occupants can see outside before leaving the building;

(v) have lobbies visible from the exterior; and

(vi) have staff entrances, if separate, which are well lit and maximise opportunities for informal surveillance and for clear sightlines.


No additional buildings on site are designed for public access.

S8 - Landscaping is designed and maintained to provide informal surveillance and clear sight lines on access ways and to other public spaces.

A8 - “Vulnerable premises” provide landscaping designed to promote safety including:

(i) planting which does not obscure doors and windows overlooking public spaces and isolated areas;

(ii) shrubbery and low-level planting associated with footpaths which does not exceed 0.5m in height where abutting pavements;

(iii) trees in vulnerable settings which do not have branches below 1.5m; and

(iv) hard landscaping elements such

Not applicable:

The site will not be accessible to the public. Additional landscaping does not form part of the proposal, if required by Council, landscaping will be designed to meet the requirements of A8.

xxvi


as low fencing and walls (below 1.2m) which guide pedestrians and vehicles along designated paths.

Safe Movement and Access

S9 - The design of premises provides for unimpeded sightlines, particularly along pedestrian and bicycle routes.

A9 - All barriers (including landscaping features) along bicycle and pedestrian routes are visually permeable (i.e. can be easily seen through to reduce concealment points).

Not applicable:

The site will not be accessible to the public.

S10 - Car parking areas are:

(i) designed to optimise informal surveillance and illumination, and to minimise unlawful access;

(ii) well lit to enable visibility of all external edges and routes providing access to the car park;

(iii) designed to minimise instances of large numbers of cars being co-located (over 100 cars in a single block). If more than 100 cars, more than one entry / exit point is provided so that the car park does not become an entrapment area.


No formal car parking areas are proposed. The site is to be infrequently accessed by authorised personnel only during daytime hours.

S11 - Underpasses and overpasses are designed and located to reduce opportunities for crime, so that:

(i) pedestrians are able to see what is in an underpass or tunnel and at the end of it before entering; and

(ii) signs at each end of an underpass indicate where it leads and an alternative route to use at night.


The proposal does not include any underpasses or overpasses.

S12 - Underpasses are wide enough to accommodate both pedestrian and cycle traffic, (Note: Council will refer to the provisions of AUSTROADS Guide to Traffic Engineering Practice Part 14- Bicycles). ]


The proposal does not include any underpasses.

S13 - The design and location of laneways and alleyways promotes community safety.

A13.1 - Laneways are straight and have more than one entrance.

A13.2 - Unnecessary access to buildings from laneways is avoided.

Not applicable:

The proposal does not include any laneways or alleyways.

Building Design and Lighting

S14 - Buildings contribute positively to the enhancement of public safety and security.

A14.1 - Ramps and elevator entrances are located in areas which are not isolated.

A14.2 - Lifts are located within a secure entrance, and incorporate graffiti and vandal-resistant measures (i.e. a fully glazed and

Not applicable:

No new buildings are proposed and the proposed facility will not be accessible to the public.

xxvii


enclosed vestibule area at the exit to the lifts).

A14.3 - Loading and storage areas are well lit or can be locked after hours.

A14.4 - Parking spaces are allocated near the building entry for employees working after hours.

A14.5 - Enclosed or underground car parks can only be accessed from inside the building or through a security system.

A14.6 - All windows, particular those at street level are secure, without creating a „fortress-like‟ appearance (i.e. avoid solid roller shutters).

S15 - Lighting is provided which:

(i) increases safety and security in and around the premises;

(ii) considers vegetation, in both its existing and mature forms, or other elements that may have the potential to block out light;

(iii) illuminates inset spaces, access/egress routes car parking areas and signage; and

(iv) supports visibility for pedestrians, as well as road users.

A15 - No specific solution.

Note: Council will refer to the following as guidance in assessment of compliance:

Security lighting is consistent with Australian Standard S 4282 (1997) (The Control of Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.

Lighting of pedestrian and bicycle movement routes, public spaces and outdoor signage in public spaces is to the minimum Australian Standard of AS1158 (Public Lighting Code).

Not applicable:

As the site will not be accessible to the public, no additional lighting is proposed.

Constructed Lakes


S1 - Natural design concepts are a primary consideration for a constructed lake.


The proposal does not include a constructed lake.

S2 - Constructed lakes are designed to be: (i) consistent with the area‟s social

and recreational masterplans; (ii) sustainable; (iii) appropriately managed; and (iv) have minimal adverse impacts on

surrounding environments.

A2.1 - Lake depth is ≤3 m. A2.2 - The design of a constructed lake complies with the Engineering Design Guideline Planning Scheme Policy.

Not applicable:


S3 - Constructed lakes are to operate under a financially sustainable management regime.

A3 - Lakes are provided under private ownership.

Not applicable:


xxviii

xxix

A.4 Flood and Inundation Management Overlay Code Building and Access


P1 - Development maintains the safety of people on premises from all floods up to and including the DFE, or the defined “Minimum Level”, whichever is the greater.

S1.1 - Development is located on land above the level of flooding during the DFE, or the defined “Minimum Level”, whichever is the greater; or

S1.2 - Where development is located on land below the level of flooding during the DFE, or the defined “Minimum Level”:

(a) there is no increase in the number of people living or working on the site except on a short-term or intermittent basis (e.g. by construction workers, seasonal agricultural and forestry workers); and

(b) for all premises listed in Table 8-11, the minimum building floor level is the greater of: i. at least 300mm above

the DFE; or ii. the defined „Minimum

Level‟ for the location of the site.

(c) in addition to the above requirements, the building floor level shall be a minimum of 225mm above natural ground level and will be sufficient to allow for relevant plumbing fixtures and minimum floor levels noted above.

(d) in addition to the above requirements, the building floor level shall be a minimum of 300mm above the top of the kerb level or crown of the adjacent bitumen road, whichever is greater.

(e) in addition to the above requirements, an allowance of an additional 600mm is made for higher wave effects and run up in the foreshore area. The foreshore area shall be taken as extending inland for a minimum of 100 metres from the toe of the frontal dune or HAT whichever is the highest.

(f) buildings are located and

Not Applicable:

Development is located below the DFE or the defined minimum level.

Complies with S1.2:

(a) The proposed development involves a telecommunication tower, an ancillary equipment hut as well as necessary feeders and cables. It should be noted that the proposed facility will be unmanned and therefore no increase in the number of people living or working on the site is expected.

(b) The use is not listed in Table 8-11 and therefore the proposed development is exempt from the minimum floor levels.

(c) Additional requirements are not required for the proposed development as the use is not listed in Table 8-11.

(d) Additional requirements are not required for the proposed development as the use is not listed in Table 8-11.

(e) Additional requirements are not required for the proposed development as the use is not listed in Table 8-11.

(f) Additional requirements are not required for the proposed

xxx


designed so that there is at least one evacuation route that remains passable for emergency evacuations during all floods up to and including the DFE.

S1.3 - Where new residential premises are proposed to be located on land in an existing area that is below the level of flooding, during the DFE, or the defined “Minimum Level”, the minimum building floor level is the greater of:

(a) at least 300mm above the DFE; or

(b) the defined “Minimum Level” for the location of the site.

S1.4 - Where existing residential premises, located on land below the level of flooding during the DFE, or the defined “Minimum Level”, are proposed to be extended by the addition of a Habitable Room (or rooms), the minimum building floor level of the new “Habitable Room” (or rooms) is the greater of:

(a) at least 300mm above the DFE; or

(b) the defined “Minimum Level” for the location of the site.

S1.5 - Where filling of more than 400mm above natural ground level is required to achieve the minimum floor levels, forms of construction other than “slab on ground” are provided.

development as the use is not listed in Table 8-11.

Not Applicable:

The proposed development is not for a residential purpose.

Not Applicable:


Not Applicable:

The proposed telecommunications facility will not require fill of more than 400mm.

xxxi

Ground Levels, Operation Works and Hazardous Materials


Ground Levels for Lots

P1 - Reconfiguring a lot where located in an area identified in the Flood and Inundation Management Overlay Map, provides that each lot created has a ground level which has flood immunity such that persons and property are not placed at unreasonable risk of injury or damage caused by flooding or inundation.

S1.1 - The minimum finished ground level for lots in new areas is the greater of;

(i) at or above the DFE, or (ii) not less than 400mm below

the defined „Minimum Level‟ for the location of the site.

S1.2 - For lots in existing areas the existing ground level is not altered outside the existing building footprint23

S1.3 - For lots in new areas, filling levels ensure that there is no net loss of floodplain storage.

S1.4 - In the Rural and Rural Residential zone, lots are:

(i) immune from inundation by flooding during the DFE; or

(ii) include at least 1000m² within each lot above the DFE level and there is access to the elevated area constructed with a 50 year ARI trafficability.

Not Applicable:

The proposed development does not include a reconfiguration of a lot.

Operational Works (Earthworks)

P2 - Development does not result in adverse impacts on people‟s safety or the capacity to use land within the flood plain.

S2.1 - Development: (i) complies with any

applicable development criteria set out in a floodplain management plan; or

(ii) where a floodplain management plan does not exist, either:

a. minimises reductions of on-site flood storage capacity and contains within the subject site any changes to depth/duration/velocity of floodwaters of all floods up to and including the DFE; or

b. does not change the flood characteristics of the DFE outside

Complies P2:

The proposed telecommunication facility is modest in size at approximately 60m

2.

It should be noted that the proposed facility will not:

physically alter the existing watercourse;

change the flood characteristics at the DFE in ways resulting in loss of flood storage, changes to flow paths, acceleration or retardation of flows or any reduction of flood warning times elsewhere on the floodplain.

xxxii


the subject site in ways that result in: i. loss of flood

storage ii. loss of/change to

flow paths; iii. acceleration or

retardation flows; or

iv. reduction in flood warning times elsewhere on the floodplain.

S2.2 - In the Industry (High Impact) and Industry (Low Impact) Zones, hard-standing and outdoor storage areas are constructed to finished levels at least the height of an inundation or flood event with a 2% AEP (50 year ARI), provided that these works do not cause an increased risk of inundation in other parts of the City.

Not Applicable:

The site is not located in the Industry (High Impact) or Industry (Low Impact) Zones.

P3 - Where located on land identified in the Flood and Inundation Management Overlay Map, the existing ground level is not altered outside the footprint of a building by the excavation or filling of land.

S3 – No solutions specified. Complies P3:

The existing ground level will not be altered given that no excessive excavation or fill is required for the construction of the proposed telecommunication facility.

P4 - Public safety and stream flows in areas identified in the Flood and Inundation Management Overlay Map are maintained by limiting the extent and nature of development.

S4 – No solutions specified Complies with P4:

The proposed telecommunications facility is approximately 60m

2 in size and

will not significantly alter the extent and nature of development within the precinct.

P5 - Essential Services infrastructure, such as on-site electricity, gas, water supply, sewerage and telecommunications maintain their functions during a DFE.

S5.1 - Any components of infrastructure that are likely to fail to function or may result in contamination when inundated by flood waters (e.g. electrical switch gear and motors, water supply pipeline air valves) are:

(i) located above the DFE and/or

(ii) designed and constructed to exclude floodwater intrusion and infiltration

S5.2 - Infrastructure is designed and constructed to resist hydrostatic and hydrodynamic forces as a result of inundation by the DFE.

Complies with S5.1:

The proposed telecommunications facility is 30m in height. The proposed antennas will therefore be located above the DFE and clear of any potential flooding as a result of riverine inundation.

It should also be noted that the equipment stored within the ancillary equipment shelter is designed and constructed to exclude floodwater intrusion and infiltration.

Complies with S5.2

All necessary equipment and infrastructure as part of the proposed telecommunication facility are to be constructed to resist hydrostatic and hydrodynamic forces.

xxxiii


Hazardous Materials

P6 Public safety and the environment are not adversely affected by the detrimental impacts of floodwater on hazardous materials manufactured or stored in bulk on the site.

S6.1 - The manufacture of hazardous materials takes place above the DFE flood levels. S6.2 - Structures used for the manufacture or storage of hazardous materials in bulk are designed to prevent the intrusion of flood waters. S6.3 - The storage of hazardous materials is contained within a bunded area where the bund wall has a height of 300mm or more above the DFE, or the defined „Minimum Level‟ for the location of the site, whichever is the greater, provided that these works do not cause an increased risk for the inundation in other parts of the City.

Not Applicable:

No hazardous materials are to be manufactured or stored on the site as part of the proposed telecommunication facility.

Not Applicable:


Not Applicable:


Building Floor Levels

P7 - A Dwelling House is provided on a floor level which has flood immunity such that persons and property are not placed at unreasonable risk of injury or damage caused by flooding or inundation.

S7 - Building Floor Levels are provided in accordance with the minimum building floor levels as provided in Acceptable Solutions S1.1 to S1.5 of the Flood and Inundation Overlay Code.

Not Applicable:


xxxiv

A.5 Development in the vicinity of Mackay Airport Overlay Code Effects of Development on Airport Operations



Height Limitations

P1 - The height of any building, structure or trees that can reach a significant height located in the obstacle limitation surface (OLS) area of the airport is restricted so that the safe and efficient operations of the airport is protected.

S1- The maximum height of any building, structure or tree is below the height of the OLS height indicated for the particular site.

Complies with S1:

The proposed telecommunication facility site is identified within the 40m obstacle limitation surface limit. It should be noted that the proposed telecommunication tower is 30m in height and is therefore below the height of the obstacle limitation surface indicated for the site.


Intrusive Lighting

P2 - The fixing, operation, strength and direction of any lighting, including any external lighting fixed to a building or other structure within 6 km of an airport runway does not interfere with air navigation essential for the safe movement of aircraft at night.

S2.1 - The fixing of any external lighting, other bright light sources or straight parallel lines of lighting 500 m to 1000 m long, within 6 km of an airport runway are avoided; or

S2.2 - External lighting is designed so that it does not increase the risk of an aircraft incident and has regard to the CASA guideline “Lighting in the vicinity of aerodromes: Advice to lighting designers”.

Not Applicable:

The proposed telecommunication facility is to be unmanned and will not result in excessive light emissions.

Not Applicable:

The proposed telecommunication facility is to be unmanned and will not result in excessive light emissions

Gaseous Plumes

P3 - Development does not cause the emission into the OLS of any potentially hazardous gaseous plumes which create an air turbulence hazard.

S3 – Development does not cause the emission into the OLS of any gaseous plumes at a velocity exceeding 4.3 m per second.

Not Applicable:

The proposed telecommunication facility is to be unmanned and will not result in any emissions of gaseous plumes into the obstacle limitation area.

Airport Particulates

P4 - Development does not utilise practices which involve emission of airborne particulates (smoke, dust, ash or steam), that create a hazard for aircraft.

S4 – Development does not utilise practices which involve emission of airborne particulates (smoke, dust, ash or steam), such as:

(i) non-green harvesting of sugar cane; or

(ii) burning (rather than mulching) cleared vegetation.

Not Applicable:

The proposed telecommunication facility will not utilise any practices which will involve emissions of airborne particulates.

xxxv


Transit Aviation Activities

P5 - Development involving aviation activities, such as hot air ballooning, are not located beneath the OLS.

S5.1 – No Solution specified Not Applicable:

The proposed development is not for aviation activities.

Effects of Airport Operations on Surrounding Development


Self-Assessable and Assessable Development

Protection of Uses from Aircraft Noises

P1 - The effective and safe use of the site is not unduly affected by aircraft noise and the continued operation of the airport is not limited by the encroachment of uses which are sensitive to the effects of aircraft noise.

S1- Land uses proposed on premises avoid the following:

(i) intense residential use, other than a dwelling house, where located on land within the 20 ANEF contour;

(ii) long term residential use (occupation exceeding 4 months in a calendar year), or community use where located on land within the 25 ANEF contour or greater;

(iii) short term residential use (occupation 4 months or less in calendar year) where located on land within the 25 – 30 ANEF contour; and

(iv) commercial uses where located on land within the 35 ANEF contour.

Not Applicable:

The proposed development is not for residential purposes.


Air Safety Zones

P2 - New development is located to minimise the potential effects in the event of an aircraft crash resulting from takeoff and landing.

S2 - New development within the Airport Safety Zone does not introduce or intensify residential, community, commercial, industrial or other uses or result in the use of premises for the manufacture or bulk storage of hazardous (explosive or noxious) or flammable materials.

Complies with S2:

The proposed telecommunication facility site is identified within the 40m obstacle limitation surface limit. It should be noted that the proposed telecommunication tower is 30m in height and appropriately located away from the airport‟s prescribed airspace / flight path.

P3 - Any new development in the indicated Airport Safety Zone ensures there is no significant increase in the number of people living, working or congregating in the Airport Safety Zone.

S3 – No solution specified Not Applicable:

The proposed telecommunication facility site is not located in the Airport Safety Zone.

xxxvi

Bird or Bat Attracting Development



P1 - Uses involving the management of waste and food production do not locate within 3 km of an airport runway.

S1- The following uses are not located within 3 km or an airport runway:

(i) agriculture (only where involving fruit tree or turf production);

(ii) animal Husbandry (only where involving stock handling or slaughtering, pig production, or the keeping or protection of wild-life outside enclosures);

(iii) aquaculture; (iv) industries involving food

handling or food processing; and

(v) stable, riding schools or race tracks.

Complies with S1:

The proposed development is for a telecommunication facility and does not include any of the uses listed in S1.

P2 - Uses, if located between 3 km and 8 km of an airport runway, manage waste/food sources to minimise wildlife attraction.

S2. - The following uses located between 3 km and 8 km of an airport runway manage food and waste sources and otherwise control activities to minimise wildlife attraction;

(i) agriculture (only where involving fruit tree or turf production)

(ii) animal Husbandry (only where involving stock handling or slaughtering, pig production, or the keeping or protection of wildlife outside enclosures);

(iii) aquaculture; (iv) industries involving food

handling or food processing; and

(v) stables, riding schools or race tracks.

Complies with S2:

The proposed development is for a telecommunication facility and does not include any of the uses listed in S1.

P3 - Uses involving the disposal of putrescible waste do not occur within 13 km of an airport runway.

S3 – No solution specified Not Applicable:

The proposed development does not involve the disposal of putrescible waster.

xxxvii

Effects on Development on Aviation Facilities



P1 - The functioning of navigation, communication or surveillance facilities are protected from the following:

(i) „physical‟ line of sight obstructions;

(ii) significant electrical or electro-magnetic emissions;

(iii) structures containing a reflective service; and

(iv) significant radio frequency interference..

S1.1- For a NDB Facility:

(i) the area within 60m radius

of a NDB facility is free of all buildings, structures, trees and fences and other physical obstructions;

(ii) development within 150m radius of a NDB facility comprises small non metallic buildings less than 2.5m in any dimension; and

(iii) development comprising steel masts and towers within 500m radius ensure height is restricted to no more than 6m.

S1.2 - For a DME facility:

(i) the area within a 10m radius and within 1m below the base of the antenna of the DME facility is free of all buildings, structures, trees, fences and other physical obstructions; and

(ii) development within 10m to 1500m radius of the DME facility is free of buildings, trees, power and telephone lines and fences beneath the profile of a line beginning at a point 1m below the base of the antenna and graduating in height at an angle 0.5 degrees where it reaches a height of 12m above the base of the antenna at 1500m radius.

S1.3 - For a VHF and UHF communication facilities the area within a 500m radius of the VHF or UHF facility is free of all buildings, structures, trees, fences and other physical obstructions unless it is demonstrated that the structure does not reflect or attenuate signals from existing aeronautical facilities. S1.4 - For a VOR facility, the area within 1000m radius of a VOR facility is free of all buildings, structures, trees, fences and any other physical obstructions, other

Complies S1.1:

The proposed telecommunication tower is located approximately 5km away from the airport and will not have adverse impact on the functioning of navigation, communication or surveillance facilities of the airport. .

Complies S1.2:


Complies S1.3:


Complies S1.4:

The proposed telecommunication tower is located approximately 5km away from the airport and will not have adverse impact on the functioning of navigation, communication or surveillance facilities of the airport.

xxxviii


than: (i) between 60 m and 150 m

radius of a NDB facility, wire fences less than 1.2 m in any dimension are compatible;

(ii) between 150 m radius and 300 m radius, single trees and wire fences are compatible; and

(iii) between 300 m radius and 1000 m radius, structures, low tension power lines, groups of trees, telephone lines, taxiways, roads, railway lines and other obstructions are compatible when they remain below the following height (expressed as a vertical angle from the base of the VOR): 0.5 degree – fences 1.0 degree - overhead

lines 1.5 degrees - metallic

structures 2.0 degrees - trees

and open lattice towers

2.5 degrees - wooden structures"

xxxix

Appendix C – EME Report

Environmental EME report (v10.6) (2012 ARPANSA Format) Produced with RF-Map2 2.0 (Build 0.301)

Summary of Estimated RF EME Levels around the Proposed Wireless Base Station at 10 Industrial St, MACKAY QLD 4740

Introduction: Date 4/2/2013 NSA Site No (4740053)

This report summarises the estimated maximum cumulative radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic energy (EME) levels at ground level emitted from the existing wireless base station antennas at 10 Industrial St MACKAY QLD 4740 . Maximum EME

levels are estimated in 360 circular bands out to 500m from the base station. The procedures for making the estimates have been developed by the Australian Radiation Protection And Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA)1. These are documented in the ARPANSA Technical Report; “Radio Frequency EME Exposure Levels - Prediction Methodologies” which is available at http://www.arpansa.gov.au

EME Health Standard ARPANSA, an Australian Government agency in the Health and Ageing portfolio has established a Radiation Protection Standard2 specifying limits for continuous exposure of the general public to RF transmissions at frequencies used by wireless base stations. Further information can be gained from the ARPANSA web site. The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA)3 mandates exposure limits for continuous exposure of the general public to RF EME from wireless base stations. Further information can be found at the ACMA website http://emr.acma.gov.au

Existing Site Radio Systems There are currently no existing radio systems for this site.

Proposed Site Radio Systems

Telstra / WCDMA850 (proposed)

Table of Predicted EME Levels – Proposed

Distance from the antennas at 10 Industrial St

in 360 circular bands

Maximum Cumulative EME Level – All carriers at this site (% of ARPANSA exposure limits2)

Public exposure limit = 100% 0m to 50m

50m to 100m

100m to 200m

200m to 300m

300m to 400m

400m to 500m

0.017% 0.019% 0.17% 0.15%

0.073% 0.041%

Maximum EME level 169.041 m, from the antennas at 10 Industrial St

0.17%

Note: Estimation for the maximum level of RF EME at 1.5m above the ground from the existing and proposed antennas assuming level

ground. The estimated levels have been calculated on the maximum mobile phone call and data capacity anticipated for this site. This estimation does not include possible radio signal attenuation due to buildings and the general environment. The actual EME levels will generally be significantly less than predicted due to path losses and the base station automatically minimising transmitter power to only serve established phone calls and data transmissions5. Where applicable, particular locations of interest in the area surrounding the base station, including topographical variations, are assessed in Appendix A “Other areas of Interest” table on the last page.

Summary – Proposed Radio Systems

RF EME levels have been estimated from the existing and proposed antennas at 10 Industrial St MACKAY QLD 4740 . The maximum cumulative EME level at 1.5 m above ground level is estimated to be 0.17 % of the ARPANSA public exposure limits.


Issued by: Telstra, Data reference file – MACKAY QLD 4740 - 20130204112042

Reference Notes: 1. The Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) is a Federal Government agency incorporated under

the Health and Ageing portfolio. ARPANSA is charged with responsibility for protecting the health and safety of people, and the environment, from the harmful effects of radiation (ionising and non-ionising).

2. Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), 2002, „Radiation Protection Standard: Maximum Exposure

Levels to Radiofrequency Fields — 3 kHz to 300 GHz‟, Radiation Protection Series Publication No. 3, ARPANSA, Yallambie Australia. [Printed version: ISBN 0-642-79400-6 ISSN 1445-9760] [Web version: ISBN 0-642-79402-2 ISSN 1445-9760]

3. The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) is responsible for the regulation of broadcasting, radiocommunications, telecommunications and online content. Information on EME is available at http://emr.acma.gov.au/

4. The EME predictions in this report assume a near worst-case scenario including:

- wireless base station transmitters for mobile and broadband data operating at maximum power (no automatic power reduction) - simultaneous telephone calls and data transmission. - an unobstructed line of sight view to the antennas. In practice a worst-case scenario is rarely the case. There are often trees and buildings in the immediate vicinity, and cellular networks automatically adjust transmit power to suit the actual user traffic. The level of EME may also be affected where significant landscape features are present and predicted EME levels might not be the absolute maximum at all locations.

5. Further explanation of this report may be found in “Understanding the ARPANSA Environmental EME Report” and other documents

on the ARPANSA web site, http://www.arpansa.gov.au


Appendix A

Table of Other Areas of Interest

Additional Locations

Height / Scan

relative to location ground level

Maximum Cumulative EME Level All Carriers at this site

(% of ARPANSA exposure limits2)

Public exposure limit = 100% Victoria Park State School

0m to 3m

0.0069%

Note: Estimation for the maximum EME levels at selected areas of interest over a height range relative to the specific ground level at

the area of interest. This table includes any existing and proposed radio systems.

Estimation Notes / Assumptions – Other Areas of Interest Variable ground topography has been included in the assessment of the “Other Areas of Interest” as per ARPANSA methodology Insert other data / notes as required

INDUSTRIAL STREET

VICTORIA STREET

ENDE

AVOU

RST

REET

CHAI

N ST

REET

2RP893617E


Telst

ra W

ireles

s Ope

ratio

ns T

empla

te - 0

1786

6P02

issu

ed F

eb 20

09

PART OF LOT 6 ON RP741485PARISH OF HOWARDCOUNTY OF CARLISLE

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

RFNSA SITE No. 4740053

SITE LAYOUTSCALE 1:2000


DO NOTSCALE

F

1

E

D

2 3

C

B

A

1 2 3


4 5

DWGNO.

6NO.SHT

A3

F

E

D

4 5

C

B

6

A


Q110932 S1INDEX

SITE LAYOUT AND ACCESS10 INDUSTRIAL STREET, MACKAY, QLD 4740

SITE STRUCTURE CO-ORDINATESHAND HELD GPS READING ± 10m,

CENTRE OF POLEGDA 94

-21.14313GDA 94

149.19574

LOCALITY PLANNOT TO SCALE

PRELIMINARY NOTE: THIS DRAWING TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH SHEET S1-1

0 100m20m 20m 40m 60m 80m

COPYRIGHT C WHEREIS REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF SENSIS PTY LTD.R

SITE ACCESS VIADRIVEWAY & CAR LOT

EXISTING INDUSRIALBUILDINGS (TYP.)

EXISTINGTREES(TYP)

PROPOSED TELSTRASITE REFER SHEETS1-1 FOR DETAILS.LOT 6

RP741485LOT 8

M91160

LOT 9M91213

LOT 3SP112953

LOT 1BUP71123 LOT

370CI4369

LOT 1CI4344

LOT 2CI4344

LOT 1RP708989

LOT 2RP725444 LOT 506

CI3610

BURNS STREET

LOT 5M91161

LOT 22M91181

LOT 4M91181

LOT 3M91181

LOT 1C14461

EXISTING POWERPOLE NUMBER 2049926


Telst

ra W

ireles

s Ope

ratio

ns T

empla

te - 0

1786

6P02

issu

ed F

eb 20

09

SITE SETOUTSCALE 1:100


DO NOTSCALE

F

1

E

D

2 3

C

B

A

1 2 3


4 5

DWGNO.

6NO.SHT

A3

F

E

D

4 5

C

B

6

A


Q110932 S1-1INDEX

SITE SETOUT10 INDUSTRIAL STREET, MACKAY, QLD 4740

PRELIMINARY NOTE: THIS DRAWING TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH SHEET S1

0 1m 2m 3m 4m 5m1m

EXISTING MSB & METERS

EXISTINGRAMP

PROPOSED TELSTRA450W CABLE LADDER. A1

A2

A5

A6

A8A9

A10

A11

PROPOSED INDICATIVE TELSTRAPOWER AND FIBRE LINK ROUTE TORUN INSIDE SHED. EXACT SOURCEAND ROUTE TO BE CONFIRMED ATDETAILED DESIGN.

0 2500500

ANTENNA LAYOUTSCALE 1:50

HEAD

FRAM

EOR

IENT

ATION 25°TN

10000 (LEASE AREA) FUTURE TELSTRA RRUS(9 OFF R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7,R8 & R9) REFER S3 FOR DETAILS

28102810

3280SHELTER

1100PROPOSED TELSTRACOMPOUND SECURITY FENCEWITH DOUBLE ACCESS GATES

FUTURE TELSTRA PANELANTENNAS (9 OFF A4, A5, A6,A7, A8, A9, A10, A11 & A12)

PROPOSED TELSTRA PANEL ANTENNAS(3 OFF A1, A2 & A3) MOUNTED ONPROPOSED HEADFRAME. REFER TOSHEET S3 & S3-1 FOR DETAILS.PROPOSED TELSTRA 25m

MONOPOLE AND HEADFRAME.

MONOPOLE

5850

(LEA

SE A

REA)

=MO

NOPO

LE

PROPOSED TELSTRA EQUIPMENTSHELTER TYPE ICS Mk 3.2 (REGION C)(3280L x 2280W x 2995H).

=PROP

ERTY

BOU

NDAR

Y

EXISTING SHED

1

2

3

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

PROPERTY BOUNDARY

EXISTINGROLLERDOOR

EXISTING MANPROOFFENCE TO REMAIN

DO NOT

1

SCALE

IN

2

E

D


3 4

DWGNO.

5NO.SHT

A3V6

F

E

D

C

B

A

1 2

C

B

3 4 5

A

6


Q110932 S3INDEX

SITE ELEVATION10 INDUSTRIAL STREET, MACKAY, QLD 4740

C/L FUTURE TELSTRA PANEL ANTENNAS(9 OFF A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9, A10, A11 & A12))

NOTES:1. ALL FEEDER ACCESS POINTS ON THE STRUCTURE MUST BE BIRD PROOFED AS PER EXTERNALPLANT POLICY 003615.2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETRES UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE.3. THIS DRAWING SET IS A PRELIMINARY DRAWING ONLY AND IS ISSUED FOR COMMENT. IT IS NOTA DETAILED SURVEY / STRUCTURAL DRAWING AND THEREFORE COULD BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE.4. FOR EME SIGNS NOTED THUS #X REFER TO 005486 FOR DETAILS.


Telst

ra W

ireles

s Ope

ratio

ns T

empla

te - 0

1786

6P02

issu

ed F

eb 20

09 NOTE: THIS DRAWING TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH SHEET S3-1

NORTH ELEVATIONSCALE 1:125

PRELIMINARY

0 5m2m

C/L PROPOSED TELSTRA PANEL ANTENNAS (3 OFF A1, A2 & A3)



# 2BEHIND EACHPANEL ANTENNA

# 65.0m AGL

PROPOSED TELSTRA HEADFRAME.

PROPOSED TELSTRA MONOPOLE.

PROPOSED TELSTRA FEEDERSTO BE RUN INSIDE MONOPOLE.

PROPOSED FOUNDATIONS SHOWNINDICATIVELY TO BE CONFIRMEDAT DETAILED DESIGN STAGE

PROPOSED TELSTRA CABLE LADDER.

PROPOSED TELSTRAEQUIPMENT SHELTER.

EXISTING SHED

EXISTING RAMP

EXISTINGMANPROOFFENCE

DO NOT

1

SCALE

IN

2

E

D


3 4

DWGNO.

5NO.SHT

A3V6

F

E

D

C

B

A

1 2

C

B

3 4 5

A

6


Q110932 S3-1INDEX

ANTENNA CONFIGURATION TABLE10 INDUSTRIAL STREET, MACKAY, QLD 4740


Telst

ra W

ireles

s Ope

ratio

ns T

empla

te - 0

1786

6P02

issu

ed F

eb 20

09 NOTE: THIS DRAWING TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH SHEET S3 PRELIMINARY

ANTENNANo

ANTENNA TYPE &SIZE H x W x D

ANTENNAHEIGHT

C/L A.G.L.

ANTENNASTATUS

SECTOR NO.& SYSTEM

PHYSICALANTENNABEARING (°T)

A1 30.00m 25°ARGUS CVVPX310B2 PANEL2495 x 354 x 210 PROPOSED


SPARESPARESPARE

A2 145°PROPOSED


SPARESPARESPARE

A3 265°PROPOSED


SPARESPARESPARE

A4 FUTURESPARESPARESPARESPARE



FUTURE

FUTURE

SPARESPARE

SPARESPARE

SPARESPARE






A7 30.00m 25°FUTUREARGUS VVPX310B1 PANEL1328 x 290 x 103 SPARE

SPARE

SPARESPARE


SPARE

SPARESPARE


SPARE

SPARESPARE


SPARE

SPARESPARE


SPARE

SPARESPARE


SPARE

SPARESPARE

30.00m

30.00m

30.00m

30.00m

30.00m

30.00m

30.00m

30.00m

30.00m

30.00m

25°

145°

265°

25°

145°

265°

SPARE

SPARE

SPARE

NOTE:3RD CARRIER CONFIGURED ON SAME PORTS AS 1ST CARRIER.

REFER NOTE*

REFER NOTE*

REFER NOTE*


Summary of Estimated RF EME Levels around the Proposed Wireless Base Station at 10 Industrial St, MACKAY QLD 4740

Introduction: Date 4/2/2013 NSA Site No (4740053)

This report summarises the estimated maximum cumulative radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic energy (EME) levels at ground level emitted from the existing wireless base station antennas at 10 Industrial St MACKAY QLD 4740 . Maximum EME

levels are estimated in 360 circular bands out to 500m from the base station. The procedures for making the estimates have been developed by the Australian Radiation Protection And Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA)1. These are documented in the ARPANSA Technical Report; “Radio Frequency EME Exposure Levels - Prediction Methodologies” which is available at http://www.arpansa.gov.au

EME Health Standard ARPANSA, an Australian Government agency in the Health and Ageing portfolio has established a Radiation Protection Standard2 specifying limits for continuous exposure of the general public to RF transmissions at frequencies used by wireless base stations. Further information can be gained from the ARPANSA web site. The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA)3 mandates exposure limits for continuous exposure of the general public to RF EME from wireless base stations. Further information can be found at the ACMA website http://emr.acma.gov.au

Existing Site Radio Systems There are currently no existing radio systems for this site.

Proposed Site Radio Systems

Telstra / WCDMA850 (proposed)

Table of Predicted EME Levels – Proposed

Distance from the antennas at 10 Industrial St

in 360 circular bands

Maximum Cumulative EME Level – All carriers at this site (% of ARPANSA exposure limits2)

Public exposure limit = 100% 0m to 50m

50m to 100m

100m to 200m

200m to 300m

300m to 400m

400m to 500m

0.017% 0.019% 0.17% 0.15%

0.073% 0.041%

Maximum EME level 169.041 m, from the antennas at 10 Industrial St

0.17%

Note: Estimation for the maximum level of RF EME at 1.5m above the ground from the existing and proposed antennas assuming level

ground. The estimated levels have been calculated on the maximum mobile phone call and data capacity anticipated for this site. This estimation does not include possible radio signal attenuation due to buildings and the general environment. The actual EME levels will generally be significantly less than predicted due to path losses and the base station automatically minimising transmitter power to only serve established phone calls and data transmissions5. Where applicable, particular locations of interest in the area surrounding the base station, including topographical variations, are assessed in Appendix A “Other areas of Interest” table on the last page.

Summary – Proposed Radio Systems

RF EME levels have been estimated from the existing and proposed antennas at 10 Industrial St MACKAY QLD 4740 . The maximum cumulative EME level at 1.5 m above ground level is estimated to be 0.17 % of the ARPANSA public exposure limits.


Issued by: Telstra, Data reference file – MACKAY QLD 4740 - 20130204112042

Reference Notes: 1. The Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) is a Federal Government agency incorporated under

the Health and Ageing portfolio. ARPANSA is charged with responsibility for protecting the health and safety of people, and the environment, from the harmful effects of radiation (ionising and non-ionising).

2. Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), 2002, „Radiation Protection Standard: Maximum Exposure

Levels to Radiofrequency Fields — 3 kHz to 300 GHz‟, Radiation Protection Series Publication No. 3, ARPANSA, Yallambie Australia. [Printed version: ISBN 0-642-79400-6 ISSN 1445-9760] [Web version: ISBN 0-642-79402-2 ISSN 1445-9760]

3. The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) is responsible for the regulation of broadcasting, radiocommunications, telecommunications and online content. Information on EME is available at http://emr.acma.gov.au/

4. The EME predictions in this report assume a near worst-case scenario including:

- wireless base station transmitters for mobile and broadband data operating at maximum power (no automatic power reduction) - simultaneous telephone calls and data transmission. - an unobstructed line of sight view to the antennas. In practice a worst-case scenario is rarely the case. There are often trees and buildings in the immediate vicinity, and cellular networks automatically adjust transmit power to suit the actual user traffic. The level of EME may also be affected where significant landscape features are present and predicted EME levels might not be the absolute maximum at all locations.

5. Further explanation of this report may be found in “Understanding the ARPANSA Environmental EME Report” and other documents

on the ARPANSA web site, http://www.arpansa.gov.au


Appendix A

Table of Other Areas of Interest

Additional Locations

Height / Scan

relative to location ground level

Maximum Cumulative EME Level All Carriers at this site

(% of ARPANSA exposure limits2)

Public exposure limit = 100% Victoria Park State School

0m to 3m

0.0069%

Note: Estimation for the maximum EME levels at selected areas of interest over a height range relative to the specific ground level at

the area of interest. This table includes any existing and proposed radio systems.

Estimation Notes / Assumptions – Other Areas of Interest Variable ground topography has been included in the assessment of the “Other Areas of Interest” as per ARPANSA methodology Insert other data / notes as required

proposed telecommunications facility at sandfly creek · otherwise users experience interference...

Documents