prototype construction
TRANSCRIPT
8/2/2019 Prototype Construction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/prototype-construction 1/6
Prototype construction
After all the detailed analysis of the desired output of the project has been obtain
and after the design has been completed and analyzed based on the technical
specification of the different components to form the prototype, the proponents
bought all the required components, materials and supplies in Manila in able to start
the prototype construction.
First, the proponents start the layout for the power supply circuit, high powered
control circuit, low powered control circuit as well as the alarm circuit in the PCB.
After the layout, the etching follows with the use of the mixture of hydrogen peroxide
and muriatic acid. After the etching of the PCB, putting and soldering all electronic
components in the PCB follows. Checking the placement and proper soldering of the
components is needed in able for the circuit to function hence. Using different
electronic equipment such as multi-tester can also be used inable to test the circuit
functionality. After all the components have been placed and after all the components
are tested, all circuits are case in the fiber glass casing to make it more presentable.
After this, the construction f the miniature for two rooms is established by using
plywood and other constructing tools. Placing and wiring all circuit in order for the
system to function. After this, Adding LED, switch, 220V outlet and installing the
electronically controlled locked on the room miniature follows.
After all the components have been placed, and after all the necessary procedures
have been taken, the proponents interfaced the prototype to the PC where the program
is saved. Connecting the Barcode and Biometric in the PC to test the functionality of
the whole system follows. After the proponents tested and conclude that the prototype
is already functioning, Lastly, the testing and evaluation with corresponding surveys
and questionnaires have been done in the College of Engineering and Technical
8/2/2019 Prototype Construction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/prototype-construction 2/6
Department with the target respondents to determine the functionality of the
prototype.
Testing and Validation
After the prototype has been constructed, the proponents conducted series of testing
and trial to measure its performance and functionality.
First Trial
The proponents test the low and high powered circuitry to test its functionality by using
12Vdc power supply, but it didn’t function.
Solution
Re-soldering and placing each of the components are conducted so that it will function
as expected. Checking every component in the PCB is really necessary to assure its
functionality.
Second Trial
The proponents interfaced the PC Program to the control circuit using the RS232
interface, but it didn’t response.
Solution
Checking the wiring connection of the RS232 DB25 to DB9 and the proponents find
out that it has a misconnection, therefore re-wiring of the data interface was conducted
to assure its functionality.
Third Trial
At first, the proponents used only one power supply to the whole system, excluding the
computer unit, but the electronically controlled lock didn’t function.
8/2/2019 Prototype Construction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/prototype-construction 3/6
Solution
The proponents started checking the wiring connection but they conclude that the
connection was right. After this, they checked the supply voltage, they found out that
the power supply can’t provide the necessary voltage and current needed by the
electronically controlled lock so therefore the proponents design and construct another
two power supply for the lock.
The following trials were made but the researchers didn’t encounter any
problems or errors anymore.
8/2/2019 Prototype Construction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/prototype-construction 4/6
The proponents also conducted an evaluation for students to determine if the
study met its objectives .The proponents use five-point Likert scale to identify
respondent‘s level of agreement with criteria which will determine the over-all
performance of the prototype. The respondents evaluated the prototype from 5 =
Excellent, 4 = Very Satisfactory, 3 = Satisfactory, 2 = Unsatisfactory, 1 = Very
Unsatisfactory. Using the tables, the results of the evaluation were interpreted and
illustrated. In tabulating the data, the researchers used averages as well as the
weighted mean to determine the functionality of the prototype.
CRITERIA Specific prototype features 5 4 3 2 1
Performance Effectiveness
Able to perform all required tasks:
Control of the lights
Control of the outlet
Control of the door’s lock
Working Alarm System
Performance Efficiency
Fast respond time
Efficient Input
Efficient output
Ease of use
Satisfactory user interface
Helps menus available
Flexible interface
Adequate feedback
Flexibility
Options for input
Options for output
Table 4.3 Survey Questionnaire with Five-point Likert Scale
8/2/2019 Prototype Construction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/prototype-construction 5/6
The Table 4.3 show the sample survey with corresponding criteria and five-point
Lickert scale.
Respondents
Performance and
effectiveness
Performance
Efficiecy
Ease Of
Use
Flexibility
ControloftheLig
hts
ControlOfTheOu
tlet
ControlOftheDo
or's
WorkingAlarmSystem
FastRespondTim
e
Efficientinput
EfficientOutpu
t
SatisfactoryUse
r
HelpMenusAvailable
FlexibleInterfac
e
AdequateFeedba
ck
Optionsforinpu
t
Optionsforoutput
1 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 4
2 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 5
4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
6 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
7 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
9 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5
10 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5
11 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5
12 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
13 5 5 4 4 5 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 5
14 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 5 4 5
15 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4
8/2/2019 Prototype Construction
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/prototype-construction 6/6
16 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 4 4 5 4 5
17 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4
18 5 5 5 5 3 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 5
19 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
20 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 5 5
21 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
22 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 3 4
23 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 4
24 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
25 5 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5
Average
4.92 4.84 4.68 4.8 4.6 4.64 4.68 4.76 4.6 4.72 4.76 4.72 4.8
A
veragefor
eac
hCriterion
4.81 4.64 4.71 4.76
Remark
4.732308
Table 4.4: Survey on the Performance Effectiveness and Efficiency, Ease of Use and
Flexibility of the Prototype
The result was translated by computing the mean. There were twenty(25) respondents
that randomly selected male and female 3rd year to 4th year students which belongs to
of the College of Engineering and Technical Department.