- -† †† †

† 669-1337 2-1†† 141-0022 3-14-13

E-mail: †{rishimar,nagata}@kwansei.ac.jp, ††auditory.motor@gmail.com

2978 5

Psychological factors of choking under pressure among pianists

-What triggers memory slip?-

Reiko ISHIMARU†, Shinichi FURUYA††, and Noriko NAGATA†

† School of Science and Technology, Kwansei Gakuin University, Gakuen 2-1, Sanda, Hyogo, 669-1337 Japan†† Sony Computer Science Laboratories, 3-14-13, Higashigotanda, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 141-0022 Japan

E-mail: †{rishimar,nagata}@kwansei.ac.jp, ††auditory.motor@gmail.com

Abstract This study aimed at determining attributes of choking under pressure in musical performance amongpianists. Using questionnaires collected from 297 pianists, both factor analysis and structural equation modellingidentified 8 fundamental factors and their inter-relationship as well as some specific factors related to musiciansmemory slip. As a result of examination focusing on musicians memory slip from the obtained model, musiciansmemory slip may be caused by trying to control some event occurred during the performance. Furthermore, thosewho are easy to slip of memory have high neuroticism, public self-consciousness or lack of confidence.Key words choking under pressure, stage fright, psychological stress, factor analysis, covariance structure analysis

1.

Baumeister1984

choking under pressure [1]

3[2]

[3]

[4]

― 9 ―This article is a technical report without peer review, and its polished and/or extended version may be published elsewhere.

Copyright ©2018 by IEICE

一般社団法人　電子情報通信学会 信学技報 THE INSTITUTE OF ELECTRONICS,　 　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　IEICE Technical Report INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERS HIP2018-40 (2018-08)　

　　　　　　　

2012[5]

2 11 1800

2

2

(2012)[5]

9

2016[6]

[7]

2.2. 1

39 [5] [8]1

5

(2012)51 [5]

(2016)30

[6] e.g76

15

2976

332 64

2 982. 2

297 52245

1 239

258 40 21827.6 14 68 SD=11.1

2. 3Google Form

2. 464

Promax

Promax5

SPSS Statistics 24 IBMAmos 24 SPSS

3.3. 13. 1. 1

1 F12 F2 3 F3

4 5 F56 F6

7 F7 8 F88 1

8 378 57.0 2 8

― 10 ―

1

2

F1 F4 F7

F7 F1 F42 F7 F4

3. 1. 2.35 1

1

3

4

3

3. 1. 31 F1

2 F2 3 F34 5 F5

5 45 28

5 53 44

3. 2

8

30 2002RMSEA

.08 [] 1

1 8

― 11 ―

1

5

2 F7:

81

1 F7 F4F8

3. 3F7

5F8

/

F7F8

3. 4 F7:F7 297

F1: F4:F5: 2

F1 F4 F5F4

F5F1

4.

8 5

[1] Baumeister, Roy F, “Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillfulperformance,” Journal of personality and social psychology,vol.46, no.3, pp.610, Mar.1984

[2] Lang, Peter J, “The application of psychophysiologicalmethods to the study of psychotherapy and behavior modi-fication,” Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change,pp75-125, 1971

[3] Masters, Richard SW, “Knowledge, knerves and know-how:The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the break-down of a complex motor skill under pressure,” British jour-nal of psychology, vol.83, no.3, pp343-358, 1992

[4] Eysenck, Michael W and Calvo, Manuel G, “Anxiety andperformance: The processing efficiency theory, Cognition &Emotion”, vol.6, no.6, pp409-434, 1992

[5] “”vol.57 no.2 pp.595-611

Oct.2012[6] “ “ ”

”Journal of Music Perception and Cognitionvol.22 no.2 2016

[7] Cox, Wendy J and Kenardy, Justin, “Performance anxiety,social phobia, and setting effects in instrumental music stu-dents,” Journal of anxiety disorders, vol.7, no.1, pp.49-60,Feb.1993

[8] “”

vol.3 no.1 pp.9 Dec.2008[9] SPSS Amos :

2011[10] “ : ”

vol.29 no.2 pp135-137 Apr.2002

― 12 ―