psychometric report coping skills test - revisedhr.psychtests.com/archprofile/stats/coping_r.pdf ·...

PsychTests.com advancing psychology and technology

tel 514.745.8272 fax 514.745.6242 CP Normandie PO Box 26067 l Montreal, Quebec l H3M 3E8 [email protected]

PPssyycchhoommeettrriicc RReeppoorrtt

CCooppiinngg SSkkiillllss TTeesstt -- RReevviisseedd

Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 2

Description:

A 45-item test assessing coping skills. Low scores indicate poor coping skills; high scores indicate good coping skills. The test yields seven sub-scores:

1. Ability to assess situation: measures the ability to evaluate situations, and the ability to trust one’s own judgment to find the best possible solution. Low scores indicate a poor ability to assess situations; high scores indicate a good ability.

2. Adaptability and fl exibility: measures whether individuals are flexible and have the ability to adapt to change. Low scores indicate low adaptability and flexibility, while high score indicate high adaptability and flexibility.

3. Adaptive reaction to stress: measures whether individuals react to stress in a way that is positive or negative for their well-being. Low scores indicate poor reaction to stress, while high scores indicate adaptive reactions to stress.

4. Resourcefulness: measures the ability to come up with inventive ways to solve problems, and the ability to use the resources at hand to solve uncommon or unforeseen problems. Low scores indicate low resourcefulness, while high scores indicate high resourcefulness.

5. Self-reliance: measures the ability to rely upon oneself to deal with problems. Low scores indicate low self-reliance, while high scores indicate high self-reliance.

6. Proactive attitude: measures the ability to take charge, make decisions and assert oneself. Low scores indicate a passive attitude, while high scores indicate a proactive attitude.

7. Ability to relax: measures the ability to relax, a skill that is useful in reducing overall stress level. Low scores indicate a low ability to relax, while high scores indicate a high ability to relax.

Reference: Jerabek, I. (2000), Coping Skills Test- 1st Revision. Queendom.com Sample Size: 58238 Sample Description: The sample used in this study was randomly selected from a pool of nearly one hundred and fifty thousand participants. It includes men and women, aged 10 to 80, who took the test on Queendom.com website. Number of questions : 45


Descriptive Statistics See Annex 1 for Descriptive statistics


Distribution for the Coping Skills Test The distribution of the scores is shown in red; the normal curve is represented by the black line plotted over it. The scores are displayed on the x-axis. The y-axis corresponds to the number of respondents who fall into the relevant score range.

Ability to Assess Situation

100.090.0

80.070.0

60.050.0

40.030.0

20.010.0

0.0


Freq

uenc

y

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0

Std. Dev = 13.64

Mean = 63.8

N = 58238.00

Overall Score

100.090.0

80.070.0

60.050.0

40.030.0

20.010.0

0.0

Overall Score

Freq

uenc

y

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0

Std. Dev = 12.82

Mean = 63.9

N = 58238.00


Adaptability and Flexability

100.090.0

80.070.0

60.050.0

40.030.0

20.010.0

0.0

Adaptability and Flexability

Freq

uenc

y

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0

Std. Dev = 12.90

Mean = 64.1

N = 58238.00

Adaptive Reaction to Stress

100.0

90.0

80.0

70.0

60.0

50.0

40.0

30.0

20.0

10.0

0.0


Freq

uenc

y

20000

10000

0

Std. Dev = 15.79

Mean = 57.9

N = 58238.00


Resourcefulness

80.0

75.0

70.0

65.0

60.0

55.0

50.0

45.0

40.0

35.0

30.0

25.0

20.0

15.0

10.0

5.0

0.0

Resourcefulness

Freq

uenc

y

12000

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0

Std. Dev = 11.56

Mean = 51.4

N = 58238.00

Self-Reliance

100.0

90.0

80.0

70.0

60.0

50.0

40.0

30.0

20.0

10.0

0.0

Self-Reliance

Freq

uenc

y

14000

12000

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0

Std. Dev = 16.78

Mean = 66.1

N = 58238.00


Proactive Attitude

100.0

90.0

80.0

70.0

60.0

50.0

40.0

30.0

20.0

10.0

0.0

Proactive Attitude

Freq

uenc

y

14000

12000

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0

Std. Dev = 15.88

Mean = 66.0

N = 58238.00

Ability to Relax

100.0

90.0

80.0

70.0

60.0

50.0

40.0

30.0

20.0

10.0

0.0

Ability to Relax

Freq

uenc

y

20000

10000

0

Std. Dev = 16.85

Mean = 66.2

N = 58238.00


Reliability and Internal Consistency Overall Score:

Inter-Item Consistency Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha: 0.9276 Split-Half Reliability Correlation between forms: 0.8656 Spearman-Brown formula : 0.9280 Guttman’s formula: 0.9279

Subscales:

Ability to assess situation:


Adaptability and flexibility:

Inter-Item Consistency Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha: 0. 8011 Split-Half Reliability Correlation between forms: 0.6793 Spearman-Brown formula : 0.8096 Guttman’s formula: 0.8076

Adaptive reaction to stress:



Resourcefulness:


Self-reliance:


Proactive attitude:


Ability to relax:



Criterion and Construct Validity 1. Relationship between age and coping skills:

Question #1: What is your age? Under 12 13-18 19-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-60 61+

a) General Score: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects with different ages. Older groups had better coping skills. The effects are robust. See Annex 2 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,38700) = 62.298 p < 0.0001

OVERALL COPING SKILLS SCORE AS A FUNCTION OF AGE

Age

61+

51-60

46-50

41-45

36-40

31-35

26-30

19-25

13-18

Under 12

Mea

n of

OV

ER

ALL

68

66

64

62

60


b) Ability to Assess Situation: Significant differences in scores on ability to assess situations were found among groups of subjects of various ages. Older subjects were better at assessing situations. The effects are robust. See Annex 2 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,38700) = 83.323 p < 0.0001

ABILITY TO ASSESS SITUATIONS AS A FUNCTION OF AGE

AGE

61+

51-60

46-50

41-45

36-40

31-35

26-30

19-25

13-18

Under 12

Mea

n of

Abi

lity

to A

sses

s S

ituat

ion

70

68

66

64

62

60

58

56


c) Adaptability and Flexibility: Significant differences in adaptability and flexibility were found among groups of subjects of various ages. Older groups had higher scores on adaptability and flexibility. The effects are robust. See Annex 2 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,38700) = 66.401 p < 0.0001

ADAPTABILITY AND FLEXIBILITY SCORE AS A FUNCTION OF AGE

AGE

61+

51-60

46-50

41-45

36-40

31-35

26-30

19-25

13-18

Under 12

Mea

n of

Ada

ptab

ility

and

Fle

xabi

lity

68

66

64

62

60

58


d) Adaptive Reaction to Stress: Significant differences on adaptive reactions to stress were found among groups of subjects of various ages. Older subjects tended to have more adaptive reactions to stress. The effects are robust. See Annex 2 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,38700) = 52.923 p < 0.0001

ADAPTIVE REACTIONS TO STRESS AS A FUNCTION OF AGE

AGE

61+

51-60

46-50

41-45

36-40

31-35

26-30

19-25

13-18

Under 12

Mea

n of

Ada

ptiv

e R

eact

ion

to S

tres

s

64

62

60

58

56

54

52


e) Resourcefulness: Significant differences in resourcefulness scores were detected among groups of subjects of various ages. Older subjects tended to be more resourceful. The effects are robust. See Annex 2 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,38,700) = 96.271 p > 0.0001

RESOURCEFULNESS AS A FUNCTION OF AGE

AGE

61+

51-60

46-50

41-45

36-40

31-35

26-30

19-25

13-18

Under 12

Mea

n of

Res

ourc

eful

ness

56

55

54

53

52

51

50

49

48


f) Self-Reliance: Significant differences in self-reliance scores were found among groups of subjects of various ages. Older groups were more self-reliant. The effects are robust. See Annex 2 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,38700) = 90.607 p < 0.0001

SELF-RELIANCE AS A FUNCTION OF AGE

AGE

61+

51-60

46-50

41-45

36-40

31-35

26-30

19-25

13-18

Under 12

Mea

n of

Sel

f-R

elia

nce

74

72

70

68

66

64

62

60


g) Proactive Attitude: Significant differences in proactive attitude were found among groups of subjects of various ages. Older subjects tended to have more proactive attitudes. The effects are robust. See Annex 2 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,58700) = 72.673 p < 0.0001

PROACTIVE ATTITUDE AS A FUNCTION OF AGE

AGE

61+

51-60

46-50

41-45

36-40

31-35

26-30

19-25

13-18

Under 12

Mea

n of

Pro

activ

e A

ttitu

de

72

70

68

66

64

62


g) Ability to Relax: Significant differences in the ability to relax were found among groups of subjects of various ages. People in their early adulthood and in mid-life seemed to have more trouble relaxing than children, adolescents, older adults, and retired people. This is likely a result of the responsibilities of having a family and career to take care of. The effects are robust. See Annex 2 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,58700) = 28.932 p < 0.0001

ABILITY TO RELAX AS A FUNCTION OF AGE

AGE

61+

51-60

46-50

41-45

36-40

31-35

26-30

19-25

13-18

Under 12

Mea

n of

Abi

lity

to R

elax

69

68

67

66

65

64


2. Relationship between having to take time off work/school and coping skills:

Question #2: What is the longest period of time you've taken off work/school as a result of stress? None A day Less than a week Less than two weeks Less than a month More than a month

a) General Score: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects who took various amount of time off work as a result of stress. Those who took more time off had worse coping skills. The effects are robust. See Annex 3 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,35,919) = 414.819 p < 0.0001

COPING SKILLS AS A FUNCTION OF TAKING TIME OFF BECAUSE OF STRESS

Longest period of time taken off work/school as a result of stress

More than a month

Less than a month

Less than two weeks

Less than a week

A day

None

Mea

n of

Ove

rall

scor

e

68

66

64

62

60

58

56


b) Ability to Assess Situation: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects who took various amount of time off work as a result of stress. Those who took more time off had a worse ability to assess situations. The effects are robust. See Annex 3 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,35919) = 414.819 p < 0.0001

ABILITY TO ASSESS SITUATION AS A FUNCTION OF HAVING TO TAKE TIME OFF WORK BECAUSE OF STRESS

Longest period of time taken off from work/school as a result of stress

More than a month

Less than a month

Less than two weeks

Less than a week

A day

None

Mea

n of

Abi

lity

to R

elax

70

68

66

64

62

60

58


c) Adaptability and Flexibility: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects who took various amount of time off work as a result of stress. Those who took more time off were less adaptable and flexible. The effects are robust. See Annex 3 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,35919) = 288.57 p < 0.0001

ADAPTABILITY AND FLEXIBILITY AS A FUNCTION OF HAVING TO TAKE TIME OFF WORK BECAUSE OF STRESS


More than a month

Less than a month

Less than two weeks

Less than a week

A day

None

Mea

n of

Ada

ptab

ility

and

Fle

xabi

lity

68

66

64

62

60

58


d) Adaptive Reaction to Stress: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects who took various amount of time off work as a result of stress. Those who took more time off had less adaptive reactions to stress. The effects are robust. See Annex 3 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,35,919) = 602.259 p < 0.0001

ADAPTIVE REACTION TO STRESS AS A FUNCTION OF HAVING TO TAKE TIME OFF WORK BECAUSE OF STRESS


More than a month

Less than a month

Less than two weeks

Less than a week

A day

None

Mea

n of

Ada

ptiv

e R

eact

ion

to S

tres

s

64

62

60

58

56

54

52

50

48

46


e) Resourcefulness: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects who took various amount of time off work as a result of stress. Those who took more time off were less resourceful. The effects are robust. See Annex 3 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,35,919) = 312.943 p < 0.0001

RESOURCEFULNESS AS A FUNCTION OF HAVING TO TAKE TIME OFF WORK BECAUSE OF STRESS


More than a month

Less than a month

Less than two weeks

Less than a week

A day

None

Mea

n of

Res

ourc

eful

ness

54

52

50

48

46

44


f) Self-Reliance: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects who took various amount of time off work as a result of stress. Those who took more time off were less self-reliant. The effects are robust. See Annex 3 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,35,919) = 432.165 p < 0.0001 SELF-RELIANCE AS A FUNCTION OF HAVING TO TAKE TIME OFF WORK BECAUSE OF STRESS


More than a month

Less than a month

Less than two weeks

Less than a week

A day

None

Mea

n of

Sel

f-R

elia

nce

72

70

68

66

64

62

60

58

56


g) Proactive Attitude: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects who took various amount of time off work as a result of stress. Those who took more time off generally had a less proactive attitude. The effects are robust. See Annex 3 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,35,919) = 376.731 p < 0.0001

PROACTIVE ATTITUDE AS A FUNCTION OF HAVING TO TAKE TIME OFF WORK BECAUSE OF STRESS


More than a month

Less than a month

Less than two weeks

Less than a week

A day

None

Mea

n of

Pro

activ

e A

ttitu

de

70

68

66

64

62

60

58

56


h) Ability to Relax: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects who took various amount of time off work as a result of stress. Those who took more time off were less able to relax. The effects are robust. See Annex 3 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,35,919) = 207.002 p < 0.0001

ABILITY TO RELAX AS A FUNCTION OF HAVING TO TAKE TIME OFF WORK BECAUSE OF STRESS


More than a month

Less than a month

Less than two weeks

Less than a week

A day

None

Mea

n of

Abi

lity

to R

elax

70

68

66

64

62

60

58


3. Relationship between being told by physician to try to reduce stress levels and coping skills: Question #3: Has your physician ever suggested you try to reduce your level of stress? Yes, Regularly Occasionally No, never a) General Score: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects who had been told that they should reduce stress levels and those who hadn’t. Those who had been told regularly to reduce stress levels had lower scores in coping skills. The effects are robust. See Annex 4 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,35274) = 1005.81 p < 0.0001

OVERALL COPING SCORE AS A FUNCTION OF BEING TOLD BY A DOCTOR TO ATTEMPT TO

REDUCE STRESS LEVELS

Has a doctor suggested that you reduce stress levels?

No, neverOccasionallyYes, Regularly

Mea

n of

Ove

rall

Sco

re

68

66

64

62

60

58

56


b) Ability to Assess Situations: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects who had been told that they should reduce stress levels and those who hadn’t. Those who had been told regularly to reduce stress levels had lower scores in ability to assess situations. The effects are robust. See Annex 4 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,35274) = 579.489 p < 0.0001 ABILITY TO ASSESS SITUATIONS AS A FUNCTION OF BEING TOLD BY A DOCTOR TO ATTEMPT

TO REDUCE STRESS LEVELS

Has a doctor suggested that you reduce stress levels?


Mea

n of

Abi

lity

to A

sses

s S

ituat

ion

68

66

64

62

60

58

56


c) Adaptability and Flexibility: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects who had been told that they should reduce stress levels and those who hadn’t. Those who had been told regularly to reduce stress levels had lower scores in adaptively and flexibility. The effects are robust. See Annex 4 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,35274) = 606.969 p < 0.0001 ADAPTABILITY AND FLEXIBILITY AS A FUNCTION OF BEING TOLD BY A DOCTOR TO ATTEMPT


Has your doctor ever suggested that you try to reduce stress levels?


Mea

n of

Ada

ptab

ility

and

Flex

abilit

y

68

66

64

62

60

58

56


d) Adaptive Reaction to Stress: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects who had been told that they should reduce stress levels and those who hadn’t. Those who had been told regularly to reduce stress levels had less adaptive reactions to stress. The effects are robust. See Annex 4 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,35274) = 1417.550 p < 0.0001 ADAPTIVE REACTION TO STRESS AS A FUNCTION OF BEING TOLD BY A DOCTOR TO ATTEMPT




Mea

n of

Ada

ptiv

e R

eact

ion

to S

tress

62

60

58

56

54

52

50

48

46


e) Resourcefulness: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects who had been told that they should reduce stress levels and those who hadn’t. Those who had been told regularly to reduce stress levels were less resourceful. The effects are robust. See Annex 4 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,35274) = 610.720 p < 0.0001 RESOURCEFULNESS AS A FUNCTION OF BEING TOLD BY A DOCTOR TO ATTEMPT TO REDUCE

STRESS LEVELS



Mea

n of

Res

ourc

eful

ness

54

52

50

48

46

44


f) Self-Reliance: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects who had been told that they should reduce stress levels and those who hadn’t. Those who had been told regularly to reduce stress levels had lower scores on self-reliance. The effects are robust. See Annex 4 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,35274) = 760.005 p < 0.0001

SELF-RELIANCE AS A FUNCTION OF BEING TOLD BY A DOCTOR TO ATTEMPT TO REDUCE STRESS LEVELS

Has your doctor ever suggested you try to reduce your level of stress?


Mea

n of

Sel

f-Rel

ianc

e

70

68

66

64

62

60

58

56


a) Proactive attitude: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects who had been told that they should reduce stress levels and those who hadn’t. Those who had been told regularly to reduce stress levels had less proactive attitudes. The effects are robust. See Annex 4 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,35274) = 676.831 p < 0.0001

PROACTIVE ATTITUDE AS A FUNCTION OF BEING TOLD BY A DOCTOR TO ATTEMPT TO REDUCE STRESS LEVELS

Has your doctor ever suggested you try to reduce your level of stress?


Mea

n of

Pro

activ

e A

ttitu

de

70

68

66

64

62

60

58

56


g) Ability to Relax: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects who had been told that they should reduce stress levels and those who hadn’t. Those who had been told regularly to reduce stress levels were better able to relax (lower scores in ability to relax). The effects are robust. See Annex 4 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,35274) = 1298.904 p < 0.0001

ABILITY TO RELAX AS A FUNCTION OF BEING TOLD BY A DOCTOR TO ATTEMPT TO REDUCE STRESS LEVELS

Has your doctor ever suggested you try to reduce your stress levels?


Mea

n of

Abi

lity

to R

elax

72

70

68

66

64

62

60

58

56

54


4. Relationship between how long it has been since last vacation and coping-skills.

Question #4: How long ago did you take your last vacation? Less than 6 months ago 6-12 months ago 1-1.5 years ago 1.6-2 years ago 2-3 years ago More than 3 years ago

General Note: For this question, the negative relationship between time since last vacation and coping score could be attributable to two factors. First, perhaps people who had taken a recent vacation scored higher because the vacation improved their ability to deal with stress. Another possibility is that people with better coping skills realize the necessity to take time off and relax on a regular basis. a) General Score: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects depending on when they took their last vacation. Those who had taken recent vacations had better overall coping skills. The effects are robust. See Annex 5 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (5,35778) = 312.606 p < 0.0001

COPING SKILLS AS A FUNCTION OF DURATION SINCE LAST VACATION

How long ago did you take your last vacation (go on a trip, relax etc.)?

3 years ago or more

2-3 years ago

1.6-2 years ag

1-1.5 years ago

6-12 months ago

6 months ago or less

Mea

n of

OV

ER

ALL

68

66

64

62

60

58


b) Ability to Assess Situation: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects depending on when they took their last vacation. Those who had taken recent vacations were better at assessing situations. The effects are robust. See Annex 5 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (5,35778) = 166.908 p < 0.0001

ABILITY TO ASSESS SITUATION AS A FUNCTION OF DURATION SINCE LAST VACATION


3 years ago or more

2-3 years ago

1.6-2 years ag

1-1.5 years ago

6-12 months ago


Mea

n of

Abi

lity

to A

sses

s S

ituat

ion

67

66

65

64

63

62

61

60

59


c) Adaptability and Flexibility: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects depending on when they took their last vacation. Those who had taken recent vacations had higher scores in adaptability and flexibility. The effects are robust. See Annex 5 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (5,35778) = 163.511 p < 0.0001

ADAPTABILITY AND FLEXIBILITY AS A FUNCTION OF DURATION SINCE LAST VACATION


3 years ago or more

2-3 years ago

1.6-2 years ag

1-1.5 years ago

6-12 months ago

6 months ago or more

Mea

n of

Ada

ptab

ility

and

Fle

xabi

lity

67

66

65

64

63

62

61

60


d) Adaptive Reaction to Stress: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects depending on when they took their last vacation. Those who had taken recent vacations had more adaptive reactions to stress. The effects are robust. See Annex 5 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (5,35778) = 208.917 p < 0.0001

ADAPTIVE REACTION TO STRESS AS A FUNCTION OF DURATION SINCE LAST VACATION


3 years ago or more

2-3 years ago

1.6-2 years ag

1-1.5 years ago

6-12 months ago


Mea

n of

Ada

ptiv

e R

eact

ion

to S

tress

62

60

58

56

54

52


e) Resourcefulness: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects depending on when they took their last vacation. Those who had taken recent vacations were more resourceful. The effects are robust. See Annex 5 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (5,35778) = 258.233 p < 0.0001

RESOURCEFULNESS AS A FUNCTION OF DURATION SINCE LAST VACATION


3 years ago or more

2-3 years ago

1.6-2 years ag

1-1.5 years ago

6-12 months ago


Mea

n of

Res

ourc

eful

ness

54

53

52

51

50

49

48

47

46


f) Self-Reliance: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects depending on when they took their last vacation. Those who had taken recent vacations were more self-reliant. The effects are robust. See Annex 5 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (5,35778) = 160.012 p < 0.0001

SELF-RELIANCE AS A FUNCTION OF HOW LONG IT HAS BEEN SINCE LAST VACATION


3 years ago or more

2-3 years ago

1.6-2 years ag

1-1.5 years ago

6-12 months ago


Mea

n of

Sel

f-Rel

ianc

e

70

68

66

64

62

60


g) Proactive Attitude: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects depending on when they took their last vacation. Those who had taken recent vacations had more proactive attitudes. The effects are robust. See Annex 5 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (5,35778) = 209.117 p < 0.0001

PROACTIVE ATTITUDE AS A FUNCTION OF DURATION SINCE LAST VACATION

How long ago did you take your last vacation (go on a trip, relax etc.?)

3 years ago or more

2-3 years ago

1.6-2 years ag

1-1.5 years ago

6-12 months ago


Mea

n of

Pro

activ

e A

ttitu

de

70

68

66

64

62

60


h) Ability to Relax: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects depending on when they took their last vacation. Those who had taken recent vacations were more able to relax. The effects are robust. See Annex 5 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (5,35778) = 312.606 p < 0.0001

ABILITY TO RELAX AS A FUNCTION OF DURATION SINCE LAST VACATION


3 years ago or more

2-3 years ago

1.6-2 years ag

1-1.5 years ago

6-12 months ago


Mea

n of

Abi

lity

to R

elax

72

70

68

66

64

62

60

58

56


5. Consulting a professional for stress-related problems Statistically significant differences were identified between those who had sought help for stress-related problems and those who had not done so. a) General Score: Significant differences were found in the general score between those individuals who had sought help from a professional for stress-related problems and those who had not. t(35770) = -27.2 p < 0.0001 b) Ability to Assess Situation: Significant differences were found in this subscale between those individuals who had sought help from a professional for stress-related problems and those who had not. t(35770) = -22.7 p < 0.0001 c) Adaptability and flexibility: Significant differences were found in this subscale between those individuals who had sought help from a professional for stress-related problems and those who had not. t(35770) = -22.0 p < 0.0001 d) Adaptive Reaction to Stress: Significant differences were found in this subscale between those individuals who had sought help from a professional for stress-related problems and those who had not. t(35770) = -38.6 p < 0.0001 e) Resourcefulness: Significant differences were found in this subscale between those individuals who had sought help from a professional for stress-related problems and those who had not. t(35770) = -19.2 p < 0.0001 f) Self-reliance: Significant differences were found in this subscale between those individuals who had sought help from a professional for stress-related problems and those who had not. t(35770) = -27.3 p < 0.0001 g) Proactive Attitude: Significant differences were found in this subscale between those individuals who had sought help from a professional for stress-related problems and those who had not. t(35770) = -25.1 p < 0.0001 h) Ability to Relax: Significant differences were found in this subscale between those individuals who had sought help from a professional for stress-related problems and those who had not. t (35770) = -29.1 p < 0.0001


Consulting a professional for stress-related problems (Continued) Group Statistics

Have you ever consulted a professional

about a stress-related problem?

N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Yes 11830 61.5061 13.3456 .1227OVERALL No 23942 65.4844 12.2622 7.925E-02

Yes 11830 62.6246 17.3288 .1593Ability to Relax No 23942 68.1925 16.3605 .1057

Yes 11830 63.2090 16.5462 .1521Proactive Attitude No 23942 67.7578 15.2898 9.881E-02

Yes 11830 62.3015 13.3202 .1225Adaptability and Flexibility No 23942 65.5194 12.4185 8.026E-02

Yes 11830 62.8092 17.6383 .1622Self-Reliance No 23942 68.0443 15.9383 .1030

Yes 11830 49.8688 11.9975 .1103Resourcefulness No 23942 52.3964 11.1648 7.216E-02

Yes 11830 61.8382 14.2436 .1310Ability to Assess Situation No 23942 65.2848 13.0939 8.462E-02

Yes 11830 53.4587 16.0589 .1476Adaptive Reaction to

Stress No 23942 60.2978 15.1995 9.823E-02


Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality

of Variances

t-test for

Equality of

Means F Sig. t

df

Sig. (2-

tailed)

Mean

Difference

Std. Error Difference

95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Lower UpperOVERALL Equal

variances assumed

148.950 .000 -28.027 35770 .000 -3.9783 .1419 -4.2566 -3.7001

Equal variances not

assumed

-27.236 21875.447 .000 -3.9783 .1461 -4.2646 -3.6920

Ability to Relax

Equal variances assumed

57.236.000 -29.691 35770 .000 -5.5680 .1875 -5.9355 -5.2004

Equal variances not

assumed

-29.119 22396.809 .000 -5.5680 .1912 -5.9427 -5.1932

Proactive Attitude


111.508 .000 -25.754 35770 .000 -4.5489 .1766 -4.8951 -4.2027

Equal variances not

assumed

-25.076 21983.054 .000 -4.5489 .1814 -4.9044 -4.1933

Adaptability and

Flexibility


87.894.000 -22.504 35770 .000 -3.2179 .1430 -3.4981 -2.9376

Equal variances not

assumed

-21.977 22152.690 .000 -3.2179 .1464 -3.5049 -2.9309

Self-Reliance


190.033 .000 -28.198 35770 .000 -5.2351 .1857 -5.5990 -4.8712

Equal variances not

assumed

-27.250 21564.998 .000 -5.2351 .1921 -5.6117 -4.8585

Resourcefulness


94.782.000 -19.648 35770 .000 -2.5276 .1286 -2.7797 -2.2754

Equal variances not

assumed

-19.176 22117.351 .000 -2.5276 .1318 -2.7859 -2.2692

Ability to Assess

Situation


132.238 .000 -22.742 35770 .000 -3.4466 .1515 -3.7436 -3.1495

Equal variances not

assumed

-22.105 21884.888 .000 -3.4466 .1559 -3.7522 -3.1410

Adaptive Reaction to

Stress


76.369.000 -39.289 35770 .000 -6.8391 .1741 -7.1803 -6.4979

Equal variances not

assumed

-38.565 22445.725 .000 -6.8391 .1773 -7.1867 -6.4915


6. Have you been diagnosed with a stress-related health problem? Several statistically significant differences were identified between those who had been diagnosed with a stress-related health problem and those who had not. a) General Score: Significant differences were found in the general score between those individuals who had been diagnosed with a stress-related health problem and those who had not. t (35447) = -35.6 p < 0.0001 b) Ability to Assess Situation: Significant differences were found in this subscale between those individuals who been diagnosed with a stress-related health problem and those who had not. t (35447) = -28.8 p < 0.0001 c) Adaptability and flexibility: Significant differences were found in this subscale between those individuals who had been diagnosed with a stress-related health problem and those who had not. t (35447) = -29.0 p < 0.0001 d) Adaptive Reaction to Stress: Significant differences were found in this subscale between those individuals who had been diagnosed with a stress-related health problem and those who had not. t (35447) = -44.1 p < 0.0001 e) Resourcefulness: Significant differences were found in this subscale between those individuals who had been diagnosed with a stress-related health problem and those who had not. t (35,770) = -28.4 p < 0.0001 f) Self-reliance: Significant differences were found in this subscale between those individuals who had been diagnosed with a stress-related health problem and those who had not. t(35447) = -33.0 p < 0.0001 g) Proactive Attitude: Significant differences were found in this subscale between those individuals who had been diagnosed with a stress-related health problem and those who had not. t (35447) = -31.6 p < 0.0001 h) Ability to Relax: Significant differences were found in this subscale between those individuals who been diagnosed with a stress-related health problem and those who had not. t(35447) = -35.1 p < 0.0001


Have you been diagnosed with a stress-related health problem? (Continued) Group Statistics

Have you been diagnosed with a

stress-related health problem?

N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

OVERALL Yes 7771 59.6302 13.3179 .1511 No 27678 65.6194 12.2332 7.353E-02

Ability to Relax Yes 7771 60.3693 17.6369 .2001 No 27678 68.1874 16.1778 9.724E-02

Proactive Attitude

Yes 7771 61.2455 16.6670 .1891

No 27678 67.8842 15.2402 9.161E-02Adaptability and

Flexibility Yes 7771 60.7424 13.3940 .1519

No 27678 65.6582 12.3990 7.453E-02Self-Reliance Yes 7771 60.7348 17.7020 .2008

No 27678 68.0825 15.9763 9.603E-02Resourcefulness Yes 7771 48.3150 12.0043 .1362

No 27678 52.6274 11.1328 6.692E-02Ability to Assess

Situation Yes 7771 60.2267 14.2687 .1619

No 27678 65.4179 13.1099 7.880E-02Adaptive

Reaction to Stress

Yes 7771 51.1933 16.0703 .1823

No 27678 60.1793 15.1193 9.088E-02


Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for

Equality of Variances

t-test for Equality of

Means

F Sig. t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean

Difference

Std. Error Difference

95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference

Lower UpperOVERALL Equal

variances assumed

105.127 .000 -37.385 35447 .000 -5.9893 .1602 -6.3033 -5.6753

Equal variances not

assumed

-35.646 11703.016 .000 -5.9893 .1680 -6.3186 -5.6599

Ability to Relax


94.116 .000 -36.889 35447 .000 -7.8181 .2119 -8.2335 -7.4027

Equal variances not

assumed

-35.145 11691.494 .000 -7.8181 .2225 -8.2542 -7.3821

Proactive Attitude


94.632 .000 -33.225 35447 .000 -6.6387 .1998 -7.0303 -6.2470

Equal variances not

assumed

-31.599 11665.722 .000 -6.6387 .2101 -7.0505 -6.2269

Adaptability and

Flexibility


62.199 .000 -30.333 35447 .000 -4.9159 .1621 -5.2335 -4.5982

Equal variances not

assumed

-29.048 11767.471 .000 -4.9159 .1692 -5.2476 -4.5841

Self-Reliance


146.850 .000 -34.963 35447 .000 -7.3477 .2102 -7.7596 -6.9358

Equal variances not

assumed

-33.010 11560.500 .000 -7.3477 .2226 -7.7840 -6.9114

Resourcefulness


71.693 .000 -29.649 35447 .000 -4.3124 .1454 -4.5975 -4.0273

Equal variances not

assumed

-28.422 11782.761 .000 -4.3124 .1517 -4.6098 -4.0150

Ability to Assess

Situation


81.571 .000 -30.238 35447 .000 -5.1912 .1717 -5.5277 -4.8547

Equal variances not

assumed

-28.836 11705.052 .000 -5.1912 .1800 -5.5441 -4.8383


Stress


76.760 .000 -45.651 35447 .000 -8.9860 .1968 -9.3718 -8.6002

Equal variances not

assumed

-44.115 11905.409 .000 -8.9860 .2037 -9.3853 -8.5868


Correlations: - Age was weakly positively correlated with each of the subscores and the main score. - All of the subscales were strongly and positively correlated with one another and the general score.

AgeOverall Score Pearson Correlation .115

Sig. (2-tailed) .000N 38709

Ability to Relax Pearson Correlation -.048Sig. (2-tailed) .000

N 38709Proactive Attitude Pearson Correlation .126

Sig. (2-tailed) .000N 38709

Adaptability and Flexibility

Pearson Correlation .105

Sig. (2-tailed) .000N 38709

Self-Reliance Pearson Correlation .143Sig. (2-tailed) .000

N 38709Resourcefulness Pearson Correlation .139

Sig. (2-tailed) .000N 38709



Sig. (2-tailed) .000N 38709


Stress


Sig. (2-tailed) .000N 38709

** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).


Correlations Overall score

Ability to

Relax

Proactive Attitude

Adaptability and

Flexibility

Self-Reliance

Resource-fulness

Ability to Assess

Situation


OVERALL Pearson Correlation

1.000 .703 .926 .895 .908 .947

.922 .879

Sig. (2-tailed)

. .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238Ability to Relax Pearson

Correlation.703 1.000 .595 .529 .535 .589 .515 .524

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000 . .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238Proactive

AttitudePearson

Correlation.926 .595 1.000 .850 .867 .899 .885 .824

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000 .000 . .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238Adaptability and

FlexibilityPearson

Correlation.895 .529 .850 1.000 .775 .838 .903 .866

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000 .000 .000 . .000 .000 .000 .000

N 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238Self-Reliance Pearson

Correlation.908 .535 .867 .775 1.000 .843 .873 .808

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000 .000 .000 .000 . .000 .000 .000

N 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238Resourcefulness Pearson

Correlation.947 .589 .899 .838 .843 1.000 .853 .782

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 . .000 .000

N 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238Ability to Assess

SituationPearson

Correlation.922 .515 .885 .903 .873 .853 1.000 .856

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 . .000

N 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238Adaptive

Reaction to Stress

Pearson Correlation

.879 .524 .824 .866 .808 .782 .856 1.000

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .

N 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).


ANNEX 1 – Descriptive Statistics

Overall Score

Ability to Relax

Proactive Attitude

Adaptability and

Flexibility

Self-Reliance

Resourcefulness Ability to Assess

Situation


Stress N Valid 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238 58238

Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mean 63.9453 66.2453 65.9607 64.0724 66.0593 51.3988 63.8309 57.9219

Std. Error of Mean

5.311E-02 6.982E-02 6.581E-02 5.344E-02 6.952E-02 4.789E-02 5.651E-02 6.544E-02

Median 65.0000 66.0000 68.0000 65.0000 68.0000 52.0000 64.0000 58.0000 Mode 65.00 70.00 70.00 63.00 68.00 55.00 65.00 60.00

Std. Deviation

12.8158 16.8501 15.8823 12.8956 16.7774 11.5562 13.6365 15.7935

Variance 164.2443 283.9275 252.2482 166.2967 281.4811 133.5457 185.9538 249.4355 Skewness -.401 -.554 -.417 -.283 -.454 -.398 -.318 -.238 Std. Error

of Skewness

.010 .010 .010 .010 .010 .010 .010 .010

Kurtosis .424 .251 .166 .383 .129 .265 .299 .030 Std. Error

of Kurtosis.020 .020 .020 .020 .020 .020 .020 .020

Range 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 80.00 100.00 100.00 Minimum .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00

Maximum 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 80.00 100.00 100.00 Sum 3724044.00 3857991.00 3841419.00 3731446.00 3847163.00 2993361.00 3717384.00 3373258.00

Percentiles 1 31.0000 20.0000 25.0000 31.0000 22.0000 22.0000 29.0000 18.0000 5 42.0000 37.0000 38.0000 43.0000 36.0000 31.0000 40.0000 31.0000

10 47.0000 45.0000 45.0000 48.0000 43.0000 36.0000 46.0000 37.0000 15 51.0000 50.0000 50.0000 51.0000 50.0000 40.0000 50.0000 41.0000 20 53.0000 54.0000 52.0000 53.0000 52.0000 42.0000 53.0000 45.0000 25 56.0000 58.0000 56.0000 56.0000 56.0000 44.0000 56.0000 47.0000 30 58.0000 58.0000 59.0000 58.0000 59.0000 45.0000 57.0000 50.0000 35 60.0000 62.0000 61.0000 60.0000 61.0000 48.0000 59.0000 52.0000 40 62.0000 62.0000 63.0000 61.0000 63.0000 49.0000 60.0000 54.0000 45 63.0000 66.0000 65.0000 63.0000 65.0000 51.0000 62.0000 56.0000 50 65.0000 66.0000 68.0000 65.0000 68.0000 52.0000 64.0000 58.0000 55 66.0000 70.0000 70.0000 66.0000 70.0000 54.0000 67.0000 60.0000 60 68.0000 70.0000 70.0000 68.0000 72.0000 55.0000 68.0000 62.0000 65 70.0000 75.0000 72.0000 70.0000 75.0000 56.0000 70.0000 64.0000 70 71.0000 75.0000 75.0000 71.0000 77.0000 58.0000 71.0000 66.0000 75 73.0000 79.0000 77.0000 73.0000 79.0000 60.0000 73.0000 68.0000 80 75.0000 79.0000 79.0000 75.0000 81.0000 62.0000 76.0000 70.0000 85 77.0000 83.0000 81.0000 78.0000 84.0000 63.0000 78.0000 75.0000 90 80.0000 87.0000 86.0000 80.0000 88.0000 65.0000 81.0000 79.0000 95 83.0000 91.0000 90.0000 85.0000 93.0000 69.0000 85.0000 83.0000 97 86.0000 95.0000 93.0000 86.0000 95.0000 71.0000 89.0000 87.0000 99 91.0000 100.0000 97.0000 91.0000 97.0000 75.0000 93.0000 91.0000

a Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is shown


ANNEX 2– Homogeneous Subsets The following tables present the homogeneous subsets for all subscores with respect to age. OVERALL SCORE Tukey HSD

N Subset for alpha = .05

AGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 Under 12 301 60.6113

13-18 9640 62.0670 19-25 10759 63.9427 26-30 4912 64.3241 64.3241 31-35 3689 64.6883 64.6883 36-40 2997 65.0360 65.0360 65.0360 41-45 2472 65.8111 65.8111 65.8111 46-50 1972 66.6349 66.6349 66.6349

61+ 362 66.7431 66.7431 51-60 1606 67.5585

Sig. .146 .540 .125 .071 .751 .761 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 1159.556. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. ABILITY TO ASSESS SITUATION Tukey HSD

N Subset for alpha =

.05AGE 1 2 3 4 5 6

Under 12 301 58.196013-18 9640 61.448519-25 10759 63.898526-30 4912 64.6755 64.675531-35 3689 65.2906 65.2906 65.290636-40 2997 65.3630 65.3630 65.3630

61+ 362 65.9613 65.9613 65.961341-45 2472 66.0578 66.0578 66.057846-50 1972 66.8281 66.828151-60 1606 67.5735

Sig. 1.000 1.000 .204 .279 .151 .107Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 1159.556. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed.


ADAPTABILITY AND FLEXIBILITY Tukey HSD


.05AGE 1 2 3 4 5

Under 12 301 58.870413-18 9640 62.032919-25 10759 64.4327

61+ 362 64.701726-30 4912 65.0570 65.057036-40 2997 65.3907 65.3907 65.390731-35 3689 65.5533 65.5533 65.553341-45 2472 65.9345 65.9345 65.934546-50 1972 66.3960 66.396051-60 1606 66.8257

Sig. 1.000 1.000 .120 .247 .165Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 1159.556. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. ADAPTIVE REACTION TO STRESS Tukey HSD


.05AGE 1 2 3 4 5 6

Under 12 301 54.166113-18 9640 55.9227 55.922719-25 10759 57.5045 57.504526-30 4912 58.073931-35 3689 58.6178 58.617836-40 2997 59.3380 59.3380 59.338041-45 2472 60.1392 60.1392 60.139246-50 1972 61.0325 61.0325

61+ 362 62.002851-60 1606 62.0411

Sig. .174 .307 .130 .364 .215 .099Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 1159.556. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed.


RESOURCEFULNESS Tukey HSD


.05AGE 1 2 3 4 5 6

Under 12 301 48.435213-18 9640 49.077719-25 10759 51.295926-30 4912 52.0120 52.012031-35 3689 52.5291 52.5291 52.529136-40 2997 52.8151 52.8151 52.815141-45 2472 53.3439 53.3439 53.3439 53.3439

61+ 362 53.7210 53.7210 53.721046-50 1972 54.1719 54.171951-60 1606 54.7827

Sig. .939 .211 .129 .254 .112 .070Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 1159.556. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. SELF-RELIANCE Tukey HSD


.05AGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Under 12 301 62.089713-18 9640 63.3664 63.366419-25 10759 65.4787 65.478726-30 4912 66.2887 66.288731-35 3689 67.1857 67.1857 67.185736-40 2997 68.1104 68.110441-45 2472 69.2172 69.217246-50 1972 70.3859 70.3859

61+ 362 71.649251-60 1606 71.8786

Sig. .695 .064 .274 .191 .089 .793 .473Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 1159.556. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed.


PROACTIVE ATTITUDE Tukey HSD


.05AGE 1 2 3 4 5 6

Under 12 301 62.624613-18 9640 63.5547 63.554719-25 10759 65.6115 65.611526-30 4912 66.6635 66.663531-35 3689 67.2743 67.274336-40 2997 67.7297 67.729741-45 2472 68.6982 68.6982 68.6982

61+ 362 69.3536 69.353646-50 1972 69.7383 69.738351-60 1606 70.5062

Sig. .919 .051 .240 .056 .063 .145Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 1159.556. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. ABILITY TO RELAX Tukey HSD


.05AGE 1 2 3

31-35 3689 64.250536-40 2997 64.346741-45 2472 64.673926-30 4912 65.1107 65.110746-50 1972 65.5401 65.540151-60 1606 66.9969 66.996919-25 10759 67.1455 67.145513-18 9640 67.7807

Under 12 301 68.099761+ 362 68.2320Sig. .704 .101 .754

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 1159.556. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed.


ANNEX 3 – Homogeneous Subsets The following tables present the homogeneous subsets for all subscores with respect to the amount of work taken off due to stress. OVERALL Tukey HSD


What is the longest period of time

you've taken off work/school as a result of stress?

1 2 3 4 5

More than a month 3393 57.3171 Less than two

weeks 1768 60.3450

Less than a month 1053 60.6078 Less than a week 4902 62.3650

A day 9080 64.9226 None 15729 66.6616

Sig. 1.000 .970 1.000 1.000 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2742.594. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. Ability to Assess Situation Tukey HSD


What is the longest period of time you've taken off work/school as a result of stress?

1 2 3 4 5

More than a month 3393 57.8179 Less than two weeks 1768 60.7432


A day 9080 64.8180 None 15729 66.5020

Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2742.594. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed.


Adaptability and Flexibility Tukey HSD



1 2 3 4 5



A day 9080 65.0664 None 15729 66.6283

Sig. 1.000 .860 1.000 1.000 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2742.594. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. Adaptive Reaction to Stress Tukey HSD



1 2 3 4 5



A day 9080 58.2674 None 15729 62.1283

Sig. 1.000 .995 1.000 1.000 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2742.594. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed.


Resourcefulness Tukey HSD



1 2 3 4 5



A day 9080 52.2797 None 15729 53.4607

Sig. 1.000 .483 1.000 1.000 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2742.594. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. Self-Reliance Tukey HSD



1 2 3 4 5



A day 9080 67.0250 None 15729 69.7521

Sig. 1.000 .999 1.000 1.000 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2742.594. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed.


Proactive Attitude Tukey HSD



1 2 3 4 5



A day 9080 66.9066 None 15729 69.3389

Sig. 1.000 .807 1.000 1.000 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2742.594. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. Ability to Relax Tukey HSD


What is the longest period of time you've taken off

work/school as a result of stress?

1 2 3 4

More than a month 3393 59.6755 Less than a month 1053 61.7806

Less than two weeks 1768 62.6052 Less than a week 4902 64.8421

A day 9080 67.6083None 15729 68.3492

Sig. 1.000 .442 1.000 .565Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2742.594. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed.


ANNEX 4 – Homogeneous Subsets The following tables present the homogeneous subsets for all subscores with respect to how often they have been told to try to reduce their stress levels by their physicians. OVERALL Tukey HSD

N Subset for alpha = .05 Has your physician ever suggested

you try to reduce your level of stress?

1 2 3

Yes, Regularly 3653 56.5371 Occasionally 8339 63.0360

No, never23285 66.0841 Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6871.087. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. Ability to Assess Situation Tukey HSD


Has your physician ever suggested you try to reduce your level of

stress?

1 2 3

Yes, Regularly 3653 57.7638Occasionally 8339 63.5104

No, never23285 65.6750Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6871.087. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. Adaptability and Flexibility Tukey HSD


Has your physician ever suggested you

try to reduce your level of stress?

1 2 3


No, never 23285 65.9898Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000



Adaptive Reaction to Stress Tukey HSD




1 2 3


No, never 23285 60.9112Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6871.087. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. Resourcefulness Tukey HSD




1 2 3


No, never 23285 52.8793Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6871.087. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. Self-Reliance Tukey HSD




1 2 3


No, never 23285 68.4730Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000







1 2 3


No, never 23285 68.2213Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6871.087. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. Ability to Relax Tukey HSD




1 2 3


No, never 23285 69.2743Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000



ANNEX 5 – Homogeneous Subsets The following tables present the homogeneous subsets for all subscores with respect to duration since last vacation. Overall Score Tukey HSD


How long ago did you take your last vacation (to go on a trip, relax etc.)?

1 2 3 4 5

More than 3 years ago

3931 58.9880

2-3 years ago 2129 60.9051 1.6-2 years ago 1485 62.1091 1-1.5 years ago 3369 62.1820

6-12 months ago 7451 64.3369 Less than 6 months ago

17419 66.5023

Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3181.445. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. Ability to Assess Situation Tukey HSD



1 2 3 4 5


3931 60.1198


6-12 months ago 7451 64.2847Less than 6 months ago

17419 66.0129

Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3181.445. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed.


Adaptability and Flexibility Tukey HSD



1 2 3 4 5


3931 60.6868

2-3 years ago 2129 62.1099 1-1.5 years ago 3369 63.0632 1.6-2 years ago 1485 63.1239


17419 66.2232

Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3181.445. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. Adaptive Reaction to Stress Tukey HSD



1 2 3 4 5


3931 52.7817



17419 60.4303



Resourcefulness Tukey HSD



1 2 3 4 5


3931 47.2834



17419 53.4639

Sig. 1.000 1.000 .996 1.000 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3181.445. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. Self-Reliance Tukey HSD



1 2 3 4 5


3931 61.5663



17419 68.5057






1 2 3 4 5


3931 61.0784

2-3 years ago 2129 62.7116 1.6-2 years ag 1485 63.8256

1-1.5 years ago 3369 64.3918 6-12 months ago 7451 66.5013

Less than 6 months ago

17419 68.6642

Sig. 1.000 1.000 .695 1.000 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3181.445. b The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. Ability to Relax Tukey HSD



1 2 3 4 5


3931 58.1704

2-3 years ago 2129 61.2250 1.6-2 years ag 1485 62.9502

1-1.5 years ago 3369 62.9584 6-12 months ago 7451 66.2100

Less than 6 months ago

17419 69.9532


psychometric report coping skills test - revisedhr.psychtests.com/archprofile/stats/coping_r.pdf ·...

Documents