public comment no. 40-nfpa 85-2013 [ section no. 3.3.2.4 ......public comment no. 85-nfpa 85-2013 [...

102
3/27/2014 TerraView™ http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 1/102 Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ] 3.3.2.4 * Excess Air. Air supplied for combustion in excess of the stoichiometric mixture of air and theoretical amount of air required for complete combustion of a given quantity of a specific fuel. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment Dictionary defines stoichiometry as "the quantitative relationship between two or more substances especially in processes involving physical or chemical change." Combining old definition of theoretical air gives a more understandable definition. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Allan Zadiraka Organization: AJ Zadiraka LLC Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Mon Nov 11 14:18:56 EST 2013 Committee Statement Committee Action: Rejected but see related SR Resolution: SR-1-NFPA 85-2013 Statement: The committee reinstated the previous definition of excess air and moved the previous definition of theoretical air to the annex (SR-2). The dictionary definition does not adequately describe the term "stoichiometry" as used in the context of the First Revision.

Upload: others

Post on 18-Aug-2021

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 1/102

Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ]

3.3.2.4 * Excess Air.

Air supplied for combustion in excess of the

stoichiometric mixture of air andtheoretical

amount of air required for complete combustion of a given quantity of a specific

fuel.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Dictionary defines stoichiometry as "the quantitative relationship between two ormore substances especially in processes involving physical or chemical change."Combining old definition of theoretical air gives a more understandable definition.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Allan Zadiraka

Organization: AJ Zadiraka LLC

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Nov 11 14:18:56 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-1-NFPA 85-2013

Statement: The committee reinstated the previous definition of excess air and moved the previous definitionof theoretical air to the annex (SR-2). The dictionary definition does not adequately describe theterm "stoichiometry" as used in the context of the First Revision.

Page 2: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 2/102

Public Comment No. 21-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.6 ]

3.3.6 Alarm.

An audible or visible signal indicating an off-standard or abnormal condition A warning of danger .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

I am a member of the Glossary of Terms Task Group (GOT). The proposed definition is used by many standards. The original definition can be used for non alarm conditons also. Alarm is a higher level of alert.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Jack McNamara

Organization: Bosch Security Systems

Affilliation: GOT

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Oct 27 12:22:21 EDT 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The definition proposed is not appropriate because not all alarms in the context of NFPA 85are indications of danger.

Page 3: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 3/102

Public Comment No. 22-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.8 ]

3.3.8 Annunciator.

A device indicating an off-standard or abnormal condition by both visual and audible signals unitcontaining one or more indicator lamps, alphanumeric displays, computer monitor, or other equivalentmeans on which each indication provides status information about a circuit, condition, system, orlocation .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

I am a member of the Glossary of Terms Task Group (GOT). The proposed definition is used by many other standards. The new definiton better describes the term.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Jack McNamara

Organization: Bosch Security Systems

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Oct 27 12:25:50 EDT 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The proposed definition does not reflect current practice in the boiler industry. In addition, theproposed definition does not recognize audible annunciation. Finally, the proposed definitiondoesn't reflect that the context of NFPA 85 is annunciation of abnormal or off-standardconditions, not general status.

Page 4: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 4/102

Public Comment No. 10-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.25.2 ]

3.3.25.2 Automatic Burner Management System — Recycling.

A burner management system by which a furnace is purged and a burner is started, ignited, andstopped automatically and recycles on a preset pressure range.

3.3.25.3 Manual Burner Management System.

A burner management system by which a furnace is purged and a burner is started, ignited, andstopped manually.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

In the first draft of Chapter 5 the Single Burner Boiler Technical Committee now uses this term and has requested that the definition be re-instated in Chapter 3.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Dale Evely

Organization: Southern Company Services, Inc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Sep 20 09:03:23 EDT 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The SBB committee requested reinstatement of the definition for Manual Supervised BurnerManagement System. The term manual Burner Management System is not used in themandatory text.

Page 5: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 5/102

Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ]

3.3.26 Bypass Stack.

A stack applied in addition to and separate from the normal HRSG exhaust stack that allowscombustion turbine exhaust gas to flow independently to the atmosphere.

***See First Revision No. 64 for deleted text of 3.3.26.4***

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

CC NOTE: The following CC Notes No. 5 appeared in the First Draft Report as First Revision No. 64.

The Fundamentals Committee should restore the definition for Manual, Supervised Burner Management system based on the usage of the term in chapter 5.

Related Item

First Revision No. 64-NFPA 85-2013 [Sections 3.3.26.3, 3.3.26.4]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:CC on BCS-AAC

Organization: CC on Boiler Combustion Hazards

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Nov 19 14:49:58 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-3-NFPA 85-2013

Statement: The definition is reinstated because the term is now used in the single burner boilerchapter.

Page 6: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 6/102

Public Comment No. 41-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.43 ]

3.3.43 Direct-Fired System.

A system in which the fuel is pulverized and delivered in suspension directly to the burner(s).

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

"3.3.43 Direct‐ Fired" should use either a "‐" or a space, not both.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Allan Zadiraka

Organization: AJ Zadiraka LLC

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Nov 11 14:25:06 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-4-NFPA 85-2013

Statement: The definition is updated to use a hyphen between "direct" and "fired" to be consistent withusage in the subject chapter.

Page 7: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 7/102

Public Comment No. 20-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.52.4 ]

3.3.52.4 Induced Draft (ID) Fan.

A fan downstream of the combustion process used to remove the products of combustion from theboiler, HRSG, or flue gas ductwork.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The text was missing a space between ",HRSG".

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Steven Graf

Organization: Emerson Process Management

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Oct 25 10:24:46 EDT 2013

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Accepted

Resolution: SR-5-NFPA 85-2013

Statement: The text was missing a space between ",HRSG".

Page 8: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 8/102

Public Comment No. 23-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.56 [Excluding any Sub-

Sections] ]

A device that senses the presence or absence of flame and provides a usable signal radiant energy–sensing fire detector that detects the radiant energy emitted by a flame .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

I am a member of the Glossary of Terms Task Group (GOT). The proposed definition is used by many standards including NFPA 1 and NFPA 72. Commonality in definitions across standards makes all code clearer.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Jack McNamara

Organization: Bosch Security Systems

Affilliation: GOT

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Oct 27 12:29:04 EDT 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: Not all flame detectors acceptable within the scope of NFPA 85 use radiant energy as theirdetection mechanism, therefore the proposed definition is not appropriate for inclusion in NFPA85. Examples of such flame detectors are flame ionization rods and differential pressuresensors.

Page 9: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 9/102

Public Comment No. 49-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.70 ]

3.3.70 Hardwired.

The method of interconnecting signals or interlocks to a logic system or between logic systemsusing a dedicated interconnection for each individual continuous rather than sampled signal. Whenthe term hardwired is applied to the logic system itself, it refers to the method of using individualdevices and interconnecting wiring to program and perform the logic functions without the use ofsoftware-based logic solvers.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

To clarify the definition by adding digital signal processing terminology.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Allan Zadiraka

Organization: [ Not Specified ]

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Nov 11 16:10:36 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The comment is rejected because the additional text does not provide additional clarification.The submitter is encouraged to resubmit on this general subject with additional substantiationexplaining the different sampling methods and how they are used in digital signal processing.

Page 10: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 10/102

Public Comment No. 24-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.74 ]

3.3.74 Inert Gas.

Any gas that is nonflammable, chemically inactive, noncontaminating for the use intended, andoxygen deficient to the extent required A nonreactive, nonflammable, noncorrosive gas such asargon, helium, krypton, neon, nitrogen, and xenon .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

I am a member of the Glossary of Terms Task Group (GOT). The proposed definition is used by many standards. Common definitions are the goal of the GOT.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Jack McNamara

Organization: Bosch Security Systems

Affilliation: GOT

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Oct 27 12:32:50 EDT 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The proposed definition is not appropriate because flue gas contains some oxygen and iscorrosive, but for some purposes in the context of NFPA 85, can be considered inert.

Public Comment No. 69-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.76 ]

3.3.76 Interlock.

A device, or an arrangement of devices, in which the operation of one part or one mechanism of thedevice or arrangement controls the operation of another part of another mechanism.

3.3.76.1 Normal Shutdown, High Steam Pressure Interlock.

A pressure-actuated device that is arranged to effect a normal burner shutdown when the steampressure exceeds a preset pressure.

3.3.76.2 Normal Shutdown, High Water Temperature Interlock.

A temperature-actuated device that is arranged to effect a normal burner shutdown when the watertemperature exceeds a preset temperature.

3.3.76.3 Process Monitoring, High Oil Temperature Interlock.

A temperature-actuated device that initiates a signal when oil temperature rises above the limits thatare required to maintain the viscosity range recommended by the burner manufacturer.

Page 11: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 11/102

3.3.76.4 Process Monitoring, Low Oil Temperature Interlock.

A temperature-actuated device that initiates a signal when the oil temperature falls below the limitsthat are required to maintain the viscosity range recommended by the burner manufacturer.

3.3.76.5 Proof of Closure Interlock.

A device that provides feedback that a piece of equipment is in the closed position.

3.3.76.6 Safety Shutdown, Excessive Steam Pressure Interlock.

A pressure-actuated device that is arranged to effect a safety shutdown of the burner when the steampressure exceeds a preset pressure.

3.3.76.7 Safety Shutdown, Excessive Water Temperature Interlock.

A temperature-actuated device that is arranged to effect a safety shutdown of the burner when thewater temperature exceeds a preset temperature.

3.3.76.8 Safety Shutdown, High Gas Pressure Interlock.

A pressure-actuated device that is arranged to effect a safety shutdown or to prevent starting whenthe gas pressure exceeds the preset value.

3.3.76.9 Safety Shutdown, Low Gas Pressure Interlock.

A pressure-actuated device that is arranged to effect a safety shutdown or to prevent starting whenthe gas pressure falls below the preset value.

3.3.76.10 Safety Shutdown, Low Oil Pressure Interlock.

A pressure-actuated device that is arranged to effect a safety shutdown or to prevent starting whenthe oil pressure falls below the preset value.

3.3.76.11 Safety Shutdown, Low Water Cutout Auxiliary Interlock.

On single burner boilers, a device that is arranged to effect a safety shutdown of the burner when thewater level in the boiler falls to a predetermined low level.

3.3.76.12 Safety Shutdown, Low Water Cutout Interlock.

A device that is arranged to effect a safety shutdown or master fuel trip when the water level in theboiler or HRSG falls to a predetermined low level.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

CC NOTE: The following CC Note No. 4 appeared in the First Draft Report as First Revision No. 147.

The Fundamentals committee should consider deleting 3.3.76.1 through 3.3.76.12 as suggested by Mr. Zadiraka in his ballot comment. The Single Burner Boilers committee should review any actions taken by Fundamentals and determine if any action is required in chapter 5 to retain these definitions.

Related Item

First Revision No. 147-NFPA 85-2013 [Sections 3.3.159.1, 3.3.159.2, 3.3.159.3, 3.3.159.4,3.3.15...]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:CC on BCS-AAC

Organization: CC on Boiler Combustion System Hazards

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Nov 13 13:34:25 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-6-NFPA 85-2013

Page 12: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 12/102

Statement: Revised items 3.3.76.1 through 3.3.76.12 are a list of interlocks required by SBB in Chapter 5,

not definitions. The text in the subject chapter adequately describes what they are in thecontext of the code.

Public Comment No. 43-NFPA 85-2013 [ Sections 3.3.76.1, 3.3.76.2, 3.3.76.3,

3.3.76.4, 3.3.76.5, ... ]

Sections3.3.76.1, 3.3.76.2, 3.3.76.3, 3.3.76.4, 3.3.76.5, 3.3.76.6, 3.3.76.7, 3.3.76.8, 3.3.76.9, 3.3.76.10, 3.3.76.11, 3.3.76.12

3.3.76.1 Normal Shutdown, High Steam Pressure Interlock.

A pressure-actuated device that is arranged to effect a normal burner shutdown when the steampressure exceeds a preset pressure.

3.3.76.2 Normal Shutdown, High Water Temperature Interlock.

A temperature-actuated device that is arranged to effect a normal burner shutdown when the watertemperature exceeds a preset temperature.

3.3.76.3 Process Monitoring, High Oil Temperature Interlock.

A temperature-actuated device that initiates a signal when oil temperature rises above the limits thatare required to maintain the viscosity range recommended by the burner manufacturer.

3.3.76.4 Process Monitoring, Low Oil Temperature Interlock.

A temperature-actuated device that initiates a signal when the oil temperature falls below the limitsthat are required to maintain the viscosity range recommended by the burner manufacturer.

3.3.76.5 Proof of Closure Interlock.

A device that provides feedback that a piece of equipment is in the closed position.

3.3.76.6 Safety Shutdown, Excessive Steam Pressure Interlock.

A pressure-actuated device that is arranged to effect a safety shutdown of the burner when the steampressure exceeds a preset pressure.

3.3.76.7 Safety Shutdown, Excessive Water Temperature Interlock.

A temperature-actuated device that is arranged to effect a safety shutdown of the burner when thewater temperature exceeds a preset temperature.

3.3.76.8 Safety Shutdown, High Gas Pressure Interlock.

A pressure-actuated device that is arranged to effect a safety shutdown or to prevent starting whenthe gas pressure exceeds the preset value.

3.3.76.9 Safety Shutdown, Low Gas Pressure Interlock.

A pressure-actuated device that is arranged to effect a safety shutdown or to prevent starting whenthe gas pressure falls below the preset value.

3.3.76.10 Safety Shutdown, Low Oil Pressure Interlock.

A pressure-actuated device that is arranged to effect a safety shutdown or to prevent starting whenthe oil pressure falls below the preset value.

3.3.76.11 Safety Shutdown, Low Water Cutout Auxiliary Interlock.

On single burner boilers, a device that is arranged to effect a safety shutdown of the burner when thewater level in the boiler falls to a predetermined low level.

3.3.76.12 Safety Shutdown, Low Water Cutout Interlock.

A device that is arranged to effect a safety shutdown or master fuel trip when the water level in theboiler or HRSG falls to a predetermined low level.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

New items 3.3.76.1 through 3.3.76.12 are a list of interlocks required by SBB inChapter 5, not definitions. The same applies to original items 3.3.156.1 through

Page 13: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 13/102

3.3.156.12.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Allan Zadiraka

Organization: AJ Zadiraka LLC

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Nov 11 14:30:38 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-6-NFPA 85-2013

Statement: Revised items 3.3.76.1 through 3.3.76.12 are a list of interlocks required by SBB in Chapter 5,not definitions. The text in the subject chapter adequately describes what they are in thecontext of the code.

Page 14: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 14/102

Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.124 ]

3.3.124 Test Block Capability.

The point on the fan head versus flow characteristic curve at which the fan is selected. This is thecalculated operating point associated with the maximum continuous rating of the boiler or HRSG,plus the head and flow margins A fan’s highest volumetric flow and static pressure rise capabilities forthat fan’s system resistance and inlet gas density .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The current definition of Test Block Capability for fans does not provide a specific enough definition for the average user. This proposed new definition is meant to provide clarity to the users of the Code.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Dale Evely

Organization: Southern Company Services, Inc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Sep 30 14:27:36 EDT 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-7-NFPA 85-2013

Statement: The committee deleted the second sentence of the definition because it addressed only theboilers and HRSGs. The committee created new annex material to clarify the intent of the termin the context of NFPA 85.

Page 15: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 15/102

Public Comment No. 57-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.124 ]

3.3.124 Test Block Capability.

The point on the fan head versus flow characteristic curve at which the fan is selected. This is thecalculated operating point associated with the maximum continuous rating of the boiler or HRSG,plus the head and flow margins.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

CC NOTE: The following CC Note No. 6 appeared in the First Draft Report as First Revision No. 77.

The Fundamentals committee should reconsider the definition for Test Block Capability. The first sentence should be reviewed in the context of chapters 6 and 7, specifically casing design pressures (positive and negative transient design pressures). The second sentence appears to restrict the definition to boilers and HRSGs, therefore excluding the pulverizer supply air fan. In addition, the second sentence could be interpreted as a requirement.

Related Item

First Revision No. 77-NFPA 85-2013 [Section No. 3.3.62]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:CC on BCS-AAC

Organization: CC on Boiler Combustion System Hazards

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Nov 13 13:06:26 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The committee modified the definition and added new annex text in SR-7. The Fundamentalscommittee retained the first sentence intact because it adequately describes the usage inchapters 6 and 9. The term does not appear in chapter 7.

Page 16: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 16/102

Public Comment No. 82-NFPA 85-2013 [ New Section after 4.1.4 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT: 4.1.4.1

Single burner boilers listed and approved for unattended operation shall not require a process hazardanalysis.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Single burner boilers desinged and listed for unattended operation have been proven by operating history to have sufficient controls and safety interlocks to prevent unsafe operation that result in fires or explosions. When such boilers are acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction, a PHA should not have too be performed before such a boiler is installed abd operated.

The submitter would have ideally liked to have added this paragraph in Chapter 5 for single burner boiles, but could not find an acceptable spot within that chapter and therefore elected to place it after the paragraph in Chapter 4 that requires a PHA for unattended boilers.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Michael Polagye

Organization: FM Global

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Nov 15 16:09:20 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The exception for single burner boilers is not appropriate in chapter 4 because application-specific requirements should be in the subject chapters. The Fundamentals committeeencourages the Single Burner Boilers committee to consider changes to chapter 5 to permitunattended operation of listed single burner boilers without a PHA on record. TheFundamentals committee also encourages the Single Burner Boilers committee to review thedefinition of unattended operation (3.3.164 in the 2011 edition).

Page 17: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 17/102

Public Comment No. 58-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 4.1.4 ]

4.1.4* Unattended and Off-Site Operation.

Unattended operation, no operator at the operating location(s), or operation of the plant from an off-site operating location shall be approved and shall require a process hazard analysis (PHA).

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

CC NOTE: The following CC Note No. 7 appeared in the First Draft Report as First Revision No. 85 and 86 and also related Public Input No. 136 and 76.

The Fundamentals committee should reconsider moving this requirement from chapter 6 to chapter 4 because of the broad implications. For example, a common application of single burner boilers is unattended operation. Members of the subject committees for chapters 5 through 10 should specifically review this item to provide public comments to the Fundamentals or subject chapter as appropriate.

Related Item

First Revision No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [New Section after 4.1.4]

First Revision No. 86-NFPA 85-2013 [Section No. 4.1.4]

Public Input No. 136-NFPA 85-2013 [Section No. 4.1.4]

Public Input No. 76-NFPA 85-2012 [Section No. 4.1.4]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:CC on BCS-AAC

Organization: CC on Boiler Combustion System Hazards

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Nov 13 13:09:08 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The Fundamentals committee notes that no other technical committees created First Revisionsin response to this item. The Fundamentals committee encourages all committees, especiallythe Single Burner Boilers committee to further review this action and PC 82.

Page 18: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 18/102

Public Comment No. 44-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 4.5.4 ]

4.5.4

The design shall not require any deliberate manual defeating of an interlock to start or operateequipment.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Logic systems automatically bypass interlocks during startup and shutdown.Suggest adding "manual" to clarify meaning of the requirements and match 4.15.9& 4.15.10. 4.5.4 The design shall not require

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Allan Zadiraka

Organization: [ Not Specified ]

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Nov 11 14:35:17 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-8-NFPA 85-2013

Statement: The committee recognizes that conditioning of interlocks is typically required for normal start-up and operation. The committee created annex text to advise users that such conditioning isnot prohibited by the new 4.5.4 requirement.

Page 19: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 19/102

Public Comment No. 45-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 4.8.1 ]

4.8.1

Where multiple boilers or HRSGs are supplied from the same fuel supply source, there shall be ameans of manual isolation for each individual boiler and HRSG fuel supply .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The intend is to isolate the fuel supply to individual units which is not clear in original text.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Allan Zadiraka

Organization: [ Not Specified ]

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Nov 11 14:38:36 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-9-NFPA 85-2013

Statement: The intent is to isolate the fuel supply to individual boilers or HRSGs, which is not clear inoriginal text. The requirement is updated to reflect the newly-defined term equipment isolationvalve.

Public Comment No. 84-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 4.9.2 ]

Page 20: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 20/102

Revise wording on table 4.9.2 that if the fuel line size is ½” the vent line size is also ½”.

4.9.2

Vent line sizes and vent valve port diameters shall not be less than the values shown in Table 4.9.2.

Table 4.9.2 Vent Sizes

Fuel Line Size Minimum Vent Line Size

DN(mm)

NPS (in.) DN (mm) NPS (in.)

≤40 ≤1 1 ⁄ 2 20 3 ⁄ 4

50 2 25 1

65 to 80 2 1 ⁄ 2 to3

32 1 1 ⁄ 4

90 3 1 ⁄ 2 40 1 1 ⁄ 2

100 to125

4 to 5 50 2

150 6 65 2 1 ⁄ 2

175 7 80 3

200 8 90 3 1 ⁄ 2

>200 >8Vent internal cross-sectional area ≥15% of the fuel line internal cross-sectional area

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

I would like the NFPA 85 committee to consider a code change on table 4.9.2 that if the fuel line size is ½” that the vent line size be ½”. Having a vent line size larger than the fuel line size is not consistent with the other vent sizing requirements listed in the table.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Melissa Wadkinson

Organization: Fulton Thermal Corporation

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Nov 18 12:36:00 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The committee rejected the comment because it is new material that needs further analysis.The submitter did not supply sufficient substantiation, for example, on the ratio of wetted areato cross-sectional area of small pipe to ensure adequate vent capability. In addition, there areconcerns that a small vent line could be easily compromised. The submitter is reminded thatthe equivalency clause allows a safety analysis to be performed for a specific application if anequivalent level of safety can be provided by a smaller vent line.

Page 21: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 21/102

Public Comment No. 73-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 4.10.3.1 ]

4.10.3.1 *

The requirements in Section 4.10.3 shall apply to flue gas path auxiliary systems that inject fuel,oxidizer, or combustible reagent into the boiler enclosure or flue gas path when in operation.

A.4.10.3.1

Flue gas path auxiliary systems shall be that inject fuel, oxidizer, or combustible reagent into aboiler enclosure or flue gas path can include but are not limited to sulfur burner systems, ammoniainjection systems, activated carbon injection systems, soot blowing or soot cleaning systems, andfired reheater systems.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Having a requirement that defines, and limits, what a flue gas path auxiliary system is doesn't make sense. And in the case of soot blowing system, many/most don't use fuel, oxidizer, or combustible reagent and these requirements don't apply. The existing wording could create confusion as to whether or not that is the case. Also, if there are or will be other systems that should meet the requirements of this section that are not in the "list", that could be construed as the requirements not applying to them. The proposed revised wording and Annex material addresses these concerns.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Michael Polagye

Organization: FM Global

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Nov 14 16:55:29 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-10-NFPA 85-2013

Statement: The mandatory text is revised to be a more general description of flue gas path auxiliarysystems and the list of examples is moved to the annex. There could be other systems thatshould meet the requirements of this section that are not in the list, that could be construed asthe requirements not applying to them. The proposed revised wording and Annex materialaddresses these concerns.

Page 22: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 22/102

Public Comment No. 8-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 4.11.1.1 ]

4.11.1.1

The basic requirement of an interlock system for a unit boiler or combustion system shallaccomplish the following:

(1) Protect personnel from injury

(2) Protect equipment from damage

(3) Protect boiler operation by limiting actions to a prescribed operating sequence or by initiatingtrip devices when approaching an out-of-range or unstable operating condition

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The term "unit" has a definition that would inappropriately limit the application of this requirement. The term "boiler or HRSG" would not include pulverized fuel systems. The term "boiler or combustion system" should define the intended scope more appropriately. The term "boiler" was removed from the last line for the same reason.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Dale Evely

Organization: Southern Company Services, Inc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Sep 19 13:30:15 EDT 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-11-NFPA 85-2013

Statement: The term "unit" has a definition that would inappropriately limit the application of thisrequirement. The term "boiler or HRSG" would not include pulverized fuel systems. The term"boiler or combustion system" should define the intended scope more appropriately. The term"boiler" was removed from the last line for the same reason.

Page 23: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 23/102

Public Comment No. 18-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 4.12.3.5.7 ]

4.12.3.5.7

The response time from flame failure to the de-energization initiation of the close signal to the fuelsafety shutoff devices shall not exceed 4 seconds, including any time delay associated with theflame detector.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The text was revised to address that not all fuel shutoff devices are de-energized to close. For example Coal Line Shutoff Valves are typically energize to open and energize to close. On new installations, some Boiler OEMs are providing dual coil solenoid and motor operated valves for Gas and Oil igniters.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Steven Graf

Organization: Emerson Process Management

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Oct 25 09:13:35 EDT 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-12-NFPA 85-2013

Statement: The text was revised to reflect that not all fuel shutoff devices are de-energized to close. Forexample Coal Line Shutoff Valves can be "energize to open" and "energize to close." On newinstallations, some Boiler OEMs are providing dual coil solenoid and motor operated valves forGas and Oil igniters.

Public Comment No. 19-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 5.3.6.1 ]

Page 24: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 24/102

5.3.6.1

For single burner boilers, the boiler control system shall be permitted to be combined with the burnermanagement system under one of the following conditions:

(1)

(2) If the combined boiler control and burner management system is specifically listed or labeled forthe application

(3)

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Removed the term "Programmable Logic Contrller (PLC)" because it limits the user to a specific technology. Other technologies such as "Distributed Control Systems" can also meet the technical requirements of this paragraph and should be allowed.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Steven Graf

Organization: Emerson Process Management

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Oct 25 09:47:13 EDT 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-41-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: The committee modified the SIL level from a 2 to a 3 because a SIL level 3 requiresindependent certification in accordance with IEC 61508. It was always the intent of thecommittee to require independent certification, and a SIL 2 would not guarantee suchcertification.

Paragraph 5.3.6.1(3) was modified to refer to the programmable logic system because a"programmable logic controller" is a specific technology. Other technologies, such as"distributed control systems" can also meet the technical requirements and should bepermitted.

In addition, other editorial changes were made to improve the readability of the paragraph andremind users that 4.11 still applies.

Public Comment No. 83-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 5.3.6.1 ]

* If the fuel-air ratio is controlled externally from the boiler control system

* A single safety-rated programmable logic controller (PLC) system shall be permitted to beused to implement both burner management system safety and process logic, if the processorand input/output (I/O) modules are approved or certified by a notified body to be at least SIL 2capable according to IEC 61508, Functional Safety of Electrical/Electronic/ProgrammableElectronic Safety-Related Systems, when the burner management system logic is isolated fromother logic and when the related data of the burner management system program are protectedfrom being unintentionally affected by data of other user programs.

Page 25: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 25/102

5.3.6.1

For single burner boilers, the boiler control system shall be permitted to be combined with the burnermanagement system under one of the following conditions:

(1)

(2) If the combined boiler control and burner management system is specifically listed or labeled forthe application

(3)

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Paragraph 5.3.6.1(3) is new text from the 2011 Edition. As stated in the First Draft, the requirements for this configuration are limited to the PLC itself with no apparent regard to how that is implemented within the BMS, nor whether the overall PFD is adequate for the hazard scenarios applicable to the particular unit design and installation. Implementation of the IEC standards involves evaluation and demonstration of adequate protection including evaluation of the safety function (all components), not just the PLC itself. In addition, the ability of users to comply with IEC 61511 should also be considered. The basic problem is delving into IEC standards to allow use of a specific device in this manner without consideration of the rest of the IEC requirements and methodology once that door is opened. Some level of additional qualification is needed if this allowance is granted. This revised wording is an attempt to get at that qualification should this remain in the document.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:John deRuyter

Organization: The DuPont Company, Inc.

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Nov 15 16:26:56 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-41-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: The committee modified the SIL level from a 2 to a 3 because a SIL level 3 requiresindependent certification in accordance with IEC 61508. It was always the intent of thecommittee to require independent certification, and a SIL 2 would not guarantee suchcertification.

Paragraph 5.3.6.1(3) was modified to refer to the programmable logic system because a"programmable logic controller" is a specific technology. Other technologies, such as"distributed control systems" can also meet the technical requirements and should be

* If the fuel-air ratio is controlled externally from the boiler control system

* A single safety-rated programmable logic controller (PLC) shall be permitted to be used toimplement both burner management system safety and process logic, if the processor andinput/output (I/O) modules are approved or certified by a notified body to be at least SIL 2capable according to IEC 61508, Functional Safety of Electrical/Electronic/ProgrammableElectronic Safety-Related Systems, when the burner management system logic is isolated andI/O are isolated from other logic and boiler controls, and when the related data of the burnermanagement system program are protected from being unintentionally affected by data of otheruser programs. Overall determination of adequacy of this configuration must include evaluationof all components of the full safety function and the ability of users to ensure continued longterm capability and functions relative to IEC 61511 .

Page 26: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 26/102

permitted.

In addition, other editorial changes were made to improve the readability of the paragraph andremind users that 4.11 still applies.

Public Comment No. 28-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 6.4.1.1.14 ]

6.4.1.1.14

The mandatory master fuel trip–sensing elements and circuits shall be independent of all othercontrol elements and circuits.

Exception No. 1: Individual burner flame detectors also shall be permitted to be used for initiatingmaster fuel trip systems.

Exception No. 2: Airflow measurement, auctioneered furnace draft, drum water level, and feedwaterflow signals or equivalent signals specified by boiler manufacturer, from the boiler control systemshall be permitted to be used for a master fuel trip, provided all the following conditions are met:

(1) These interlocks are hardwired into the burner management system.

(2) Tripping set points are protected from unauthorized changes.

(3) Any single component failure of these sensing elements and circuits does not prevent amandatory master fuel trip.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

To accommodate for various types of once-through boiler designs and different operating conditions, recommend leaving the method of meeting the intent of Feedwater Flow Low trip to boiler manufacturer. Some existing methods of detecting Feedwater Flow issues are:1) Loss of all Boiler Feedwater Pumps (BFP);2) Waterwall Outlet Pressure High (possible blockage downstream);3) Waterwall Outlet Pressure Low (possible tube leak downstream);4) Waterwall Outlet Temperature High (Feedwater Flow Low relative to Fuel Flow).5) Pressure differential low between Waterwall Outlet Pressure and Throttle Pressure headers.Alternative parameters such as P, T, dP, and equipment status can be used to detect Feedwater Flow Low as specified by boiler manufacturer.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:SINMING KWONG

Organization: EMERSON PROCESS MANAGEMENT PWS

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Nov 04 21:52:23 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-44-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: The committee revised the paragraph because the requirements for the signals to be hardwired,

Page 27: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 27/102

to be protected from unauthorized changes, and provide redundancy provides an equivalentlevel of safety to the requirement for independence in chapter 4. Therefore, as long as theseconditions are met, signals can be permitted to originate in the boiler control system and behardwired to the burner management system. The committee created new annex text to clarifythe intent of the revision.

Public Comment No. 50-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 6.4.1.2.1 ]

6.4.1.2.1 * Interlock System.

Figure 6.4.1.2.1 and Table 6.4.1.2.1(a) through Table 6.4.1.2.1(c) show the minimum requiredsystem of interlocks that shall be provided for basic furnace protection for a multiple burner boileroperated in accordance with this code.

Figure 6.4.1.2.1 Interlock System for Multiple Burner Boiler.

Table 6.4.1.2.1(a) Interlock System for Multiple Burner Boiler

BlockNumber

Action

Block 1

Loss of an individual igniter flame shall cause the following actions:

(1) Close the individual igniter safety shutoff valve(s) and de-energize the spark(s).

(2) Open the vent valve (fuel gas ignition only).

(3) Signal the main flame protection system that the igniter flame has been lost.

Block 2a1High or low igniter fuel gas header pressure shall be interlocked to initiate the trippingof the igniter header and individual igniter safety shutoff valves and de-energizesparks.

Block 2a2Low igniter fuel oil header pressure shall be interlocked to initiate the tripping of theigniter header and individual igniter safety shutoff valves and de-energize sparks.

Where fuel oil is used for ignition fuel with air or steam atomization, atomizing air orsteam pressure out of range shall trip the igniter header and individual igniter safetyshutoff valves and de-energize sparks.

Page 28: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 28/102

Block 2b

 Where direct electric igniters are used, blocks 1 and 2 shall not apply. However,the master fuel trip system shall de-energize sparks and prevent re-energizing until allconditions for light-off have been re-established.

Blocks 3through 13

These blocks represent conditions that initiate the tripping of all main and ignition fuelsupplies through a master fuel trip relay contact(s). The master fuel trip relay(s) shallbe of the type that stays tripped until the unit purge system interlock permits it to bereset. Whenever the master fuel trip relay(s) is operated, it shall trip all fuel header,burner, and igniter safety shutoff valves and de-energize all sparks and all ignitiondevices within the unit and flue gas path through master fuel trip relay contact(s).

 Master fuel trip relay contacts shall also trip the fuel oil system circulating andrecirculating valves. If the design of the fuel oil supply system is such that backflow offuel oil through the recirculating valve is inherently impossible or positively prevented,this valve shall be permitted to be manually operated and shall not be required to beinterlocked to close automatically on a master fuel trip.

 The master fuel trip relay contacts shall also trip primary air fans or exhausters,coal feeders, pulverizers, and coal burner line shutoff valves, or take equivalentfunctional action to stop coal delivery to burners.  The master fuel trip logic shall tripall fuel gas path auxiliary systems that introduce hazards through the addition of fuel,oxidizing agents, or ignition sources.

Block 3 The loss of all induced draft fans shall activate the master fuel trip relay.

Block 4 The loss of all forced draft fans shall activate the master fuel trip relay.

Block 5Low combustion airflow below the permitted limits shall activate the master fuel triprelay.

Block 6 (SeeA.6.4.1.2.1.)

High positive furnace pressure shall activate the master fuel trip relay. High negativefurnace pressure shall activate the master fuel trip relay.

Block 7 Loss of all flame in the furnace shall activate the master fuel trip relay.

Block 8 (SeeA.6.4.1.2.1 .)

A partial loss of flame that results in a hazardous condition shall activate the masterfuel trip relay.

Block 9 (SeeA.6.4.1.2.1 .)

When all fuel inputs to the furnace are shut off following a shutdown of the boiler forany reason, the master fuel trip relay shall be activated in accordance with Table6.4.1.2.1(b) or Table 6.4.1.2.1(c).

Block 10a(SeeA.6.4.1.2.1 .)

For drum-type boilers, a low drum water level shall activate the master fuel trip relay.

Block 10b(SeeA.6.4.1.2.1. )

For once-through boilers, water flow or equivalent signals below the minimumspecified by the manufacturer shall activate the master fuel trip relay.

Block 11A manual switch that actuates the master fuel trip relay directly shall be provided foruse by the operator in an emergency.

Block 12The igniter fuel trip shall activate the master fuel trip relay in accordance with Table6.4.1.2.1(b) or Table 6.4.1.2.1(c), if igniter fuel is the only fuel in service or if it is beingused to stabilize a main fuel.

Block 13aWhen the fuel gas burner header fuel pressure is above the maximum or below theminimum for a stable flame, that fuel shall be tripped. If fuel gas is the only fuel inservice, the master fuel trip relay shall be actuated.

Block 13bWhen the fuel oil burner header fuel pressure is below the minimum for a stable flame,that fuel shall be tripped. If fuel oil is the only fuel in service, the master fuel trip relayshall be actuated.

Block 13cThis block represents operation of the fuel oil trip to prevent operation when atomizingair or steam pressure is out of range. If fuel oil is the only fuel in service, the masterfuel trip relay shall be actuated.

This block represents the tripping/shutdown of coal-firing equipment that will cause a

Page 29: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 29/102

Block 13d coal fuel trip. If coal is the only fuel in service, the master fuel trip relay shall beactuated.

Block 14a

Loss of flame at an individual fuel gas or fuel oil burner with one or more additionalburners operating with stable flames that does not introduce a serious enoughcondition to warrant a master fuel trip as called for in block 8 shall close the individualburner safety shutoff valve(s) and associated igniter safety shutoff valve(s) and de-energize the associated igniter spark. For gang-operated burner valves, therequirements of 6.6.5.2.1.3(B)(19) and 6.7.5.2.1.3(B)(19) shall be met.

Block 14b On loss of main coal burner flame, the tripping strategies of 6.8.4 shall be followed.

Table 6.4.1.2.1(b) Fuel Inputs Shutoff When Class 1 Igniters Are Used

Condition Action Required

(1) First Class 1 igniter(s) fails to light aftersuccessful unit purge. [See 6.6.5.2.1.3(B)(9) ,6.6.5.2.1.3(B)(10) , and 6.8.5.2.1.3(B)(7) .]

(1) Igniter valve(s) shall be closed immediately.Master fuel trip not required, but a 1-minute delayshall be required before retrial of that or any otherigniter.

(2) Any igniters proven on, all other fuel sourcesoff, all igniter valves subsequently closed.

(2) Master fuel trip shall be actuated.

(3) Any Class 1 igniter(s) proven on, any burnervalve leaves closed limit, all burner valvessubsequently closed, no other main fuel inservice, igniter(s) remain proven.

(3) Associated main fuel gas trip valve and/or fueloil trip valve shall be closed (fuel gas trip and/orfuel oil trip), proven igniters shall be permitted toremain in service.

(4) Any Class 1 igniter(s) proven on, anypulverizer startup initiated, all pulverizerssubsequently stopped, no other main fuel inservice, igniter(s) remain proven.

(4) Proven igniters shall be permitted to remain inservice.

(5) All igniter and burner valves closed and allfeeders or pulverizers stopped.

(5) Master fuel trip shall be actuated.

Table 6.4.1.2.1(c) Fuel Inputs Shutoff When Class 2 or Class 3 Igniters Are Used

Condition Action Required

(1) First Class 2 or 3 igniter(s) fails tolight after successful unit purge. [See6.6.5.2.1.3(B)(9) , 6.6.5.2.1.3(B)(10) ,and 6.8.5.2.1.3(B)(7) .]

(1) Igniter valve(s) shall be closed immediately. Master fueltrip not required, but a 1-minute delay shall be requiredbefore retrial of that or any other igniter.

(2) Any igniters proven on, all other fuelsources off, all igniter valvessubsequently closed.

(2) Master fuel trip shall be actuated.

(3a.1) Class 2 igniter(s) proven on, firstmain burner trial for ignition fails.

(3a.1) Master fuel trip shall be actuated.

(3a.2) Class 2 igniter(s) proven on, lastmain burner is taken out of service in anormal shutdown.

(3a.2) Associated main fuel gas trip valve and/or fuel oil tripvalve shall be closed (fuel gas trip and/or fuel oil trip),proven igniters shall be permitted to remain in service.

(3a.3) Class 2 igniter(s) proven on, lastmain burner is taken out of service in anabnormal shutdown.

(3a.3) Master fuel trip shall be actuated.

(3b.1) Class 3 igniters proven on, firstmain burner trial for ignition fails.

(3b.1) Master fuel trip shall be actuated.

(3b.2) Class 3 igniter(s) proven on, lastmain burner is taken out of service in anormal shutdown.

(3b.2) Master fuel trip shall be actuated.

(3b.3) Class 3 igniter(s) proven on, lastmain burner is taken out of service in anabnormal shutdown.

(3b.3) Master fuel trip shall be actuated.

Page 30: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 30/102

(4) Any Class 2 igniter(s) proven on, anypulverizer startup initiated, all pulverizerssubsequently stopped, no other mainfuel in service, igniter(s) remain proven.

(4) (a) If first pulverizer fails to ignite as described in6.8.5.2.1.3(B)(12) , master fuel trip shall be actuated.

(b) If last pulverizer in service is tripped, master fuel tripshall be actuated. (c) If last pulverizer in service is takenout of service in a normal shutdown sequence by anoperator, proven igniters shall be permitted to remain inservice.

(5) All igniter and burner valves closedand all feeders or pulverizers stopped.

(5) Master fuel trip shall be actuated.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Referring to Block 10b, to accommodate for various types of once-through boiler designs and different operating conditions, recommend leaving the method of meeting the intent of Feedwater Flow Low trip to boiler manufacturer. Some existing methods of detecting Feedwater Flow issues are:1) Loss of all Boiler Feedwater Pumps;2) Waterwall Outlet Pressure High (possible blockage downstream);3) Waterwall Outlet Pressure Low (possible tube leaks downstream);4) Waterwall Outlet Temperature High (Feedwater Flow low relative to Fuel Flow);5) dP Low between Waterwall Outlet and Throttle Pressure headers.Alternative parameters such as P, T, dP, and equipment status can be used to detect Feedwater Flow Low as specified by boiler manufacturer.

Related Public Comments for This Document

Related Comment Relationship

Public Comment No. 51-NFPA 85-2013 [Section No. A.6.4.1.2.1]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:SINMING KWONG

Organization: EMERSON PROCESS MANAGEMENT PWS

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Nov 11 16:13:34 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-45-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: The committee added other waterwall protection signals to block 10b because some designsutilize signals other than feedwater flow to protect waterwalls.

Public Comment No. 71-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 6.4.1.2.1 ]

6.4.1.2.1 * Interlock System.

Page 31: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 31/102

Figure 6.4.1.2.1 and Table 6.4.1.2.1(a) through Table 6.4.1.2.1(c) show the minimum requiredsystem of interlocks that shall be provided for basic furnace protection for a multiple burner boileroperated in accordance with this code.

Figure 6.4.1.2.1 Interlock System for Multiple Burner Boiler.

Table 6.4.1.2.1(a) Interlock System for Multiple Burner Boiler

BlockNumber

Action

Block 1

Loss of an individual igniter flame shall cause the following actions:

(1) Close the individual igniter safety shutoff valve(s) and de-energize the spark(s).

(2) Open the vent valve (fuel gas ignition only).

(3) Signal the main flame protection system that the igniter flame has been lost.

Block 2a1High or low igniter fuel gas header pressure shall be interlocked to initiate the trippingof the igniter header and individual igniter safety shutoff valves and de-energizesparks.

Block 2a2Low igniter fuel oil header pressure shall be interlocked to initiate the tripping of theigniter header and individual igniter safety shutoff valves and de-energize sparks.

Block 2b

Where fuel oil is used for ignition fuel with air or steam atomization, atomizing air orsteam pressure out of range shall trip the igniter header and individual igniter safetyshutoff valves and de-energize sparks.

 Where direct electric igniters are used, blocks 1 and 2 shall not apply. However,the master fuel trip system shall de-energize sparks and prevent re-energizing until allconditions for light-off have been re-established.

Blocks 3

These blocks represent conditions that initiate the tripping of all main and ignition fuelsupplies through a master fuel trip relay contact(s). The master fuel trip relay(s) shallbe of the type that stays tripped until the unit purge system interlock permits it to bereset. Whenever the master fuel trip relay(s) is operated, it shall trip all fuel header,burner, and igniter safety shutoff valves and de-energize all sparks and all ignitiondevices within the unit and flue gas path through master fuel trip relay contact(s).

 Master fuel trip relay contacts shall also trip the fuel oil system circulating andrecirculating valves. If the design of the fuel oil supply system is such that backflow offuel oil through the recirculating valve is inherently impossible or positively prevented,

Page 32: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 32/102

through 13 this valve shall be permitted to be manually operated and shall not be required to beinterlocked to close automatically on a master fuel trip.

 The master fuel trip relay contacts shall also trip primary air fans or exhausters,coal feeders, pulverizers, and coal burner line shutoff valves, or take equivalentfunctional action to stop coal delivery to burners.  The master fuel trip logic shall tripall fuel gas path auxiliary systems that introduce hazards through the addition of fuel,oxidizing agents, or ignition sources.

Block 3 The loss of all induced draft fans shall activate the master fuel trip relay.

Block 4 The loss of all forced draft fans shall activate the master fuel trip relay.

Block 5Low combustion airflow below the permitted limits shall activate the master fuel triprelay.

Block 6 (SeeA.6.4.1.2.1.)

High positive furnace pressure shall activate the master fuel trip relay. High negativefurnace pressure shall activate the master fuel trip relay.

Block 7 Loss of all flame in the furnace shall activate the master fuel trip relay.

Block 8 (SeeA.6.4.1.2.1 .)

A partial loss of flame that results in a hazardous condition shall activate the masterfuel trip relay.

Block 9 (SeeA.6.4.1.2.1 .)

When all fuel inputs to the furnace are shut off following a shutdown of the boiler forany reason, the master fuel trip relay shall be activated in accordance with Table6.4.1.2.1(b) or Table 6.4.1.2.1(c).

Block 10a(SeeA.6.4.1.2.1 .)

For drum-type boilers, a low drum water level or related condition (ex. low differentialpressure of boiler circulation pumps in case of forced recirculation type boiler) shallactivate the master fuel trip relay.

Block 10b(SeeA.6.4.1.2.1. )

For once-through boilers, water flow below the minimum specified by the manufacturershall activate the master fuel trip relay.

Block 11A manual switch that actuates the master fuel trip relay directly shall be provided foruse by the operator in an emergency.

Block 12The igniter fuel trip shall activate the master fuel trip relay in accordance with Table6.4.1.2.1(b) or Table 6.4.1.2.1(c), if igniter fuel is the only fuel in service or if it is beingused to stabilize a main fuel.

Block 13aWhen the fuel gas burner header fuel pressure is above the maximum or below theminimum for a stable flame, that fuel shall be tripped. If fuel gas is the only fuel inservice, the master fuel trip relay shall be actuated.

Block 13bWhen the fuel oil burner header fuel pressure is below the minimum for a stable flame,that fuel shall be tripped. If fuel oil is the only fuel in service, the master fuel trip relayshall be actuated.

Block 13cThis block represents operation of the fuel oil trip to prevent operation when atomizingair or steam pressure is out of range. If fuel oil is the only fuel in service, the masterfuel trip relay shall be actuated.

Block 13dThis block represents the tripping/shutdown of coal-firing equipment that will cause acoal fuel trip. If coal is the only fuel in service, the master fuel trip relay shall beactuated.

Block 14a

Loss of flame at an individual fuel gas or fuel oil burner with one or more additionalburners operating with stable flames that does not introduce a serious enoughcondition to warrant a master fuel trip as called for in block 8 shall close the individualburner safety shutoff valve(s) and associated igniter safety shutoff valve(s) and de-energize the associated igniter spark. For gang-operated burner valves, therequirements of 6.6.5.2.1.3(B)(19) and 6.7.5.2.1.3(B)(19) shall be met.

Block 14b On loss of main coal burner flame, the tripping strategies of 6.8.4 shall be followed.

Table 6.4.1.2.1(b) Fuel Inputs Shutoff When Class 1 Igniters Are Used

Page 33: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 33/102

Condition Action Required

(1) First Class 1 igniter(s) fails to light aftersuccessful unit purge. [See 6.6.5.2.1.3(B)(9) ,6.6.5.2.1.3(B)(10) , and 6.8.5.2.1.3(B)(7) .]

(1) Igniter valve(s) shall be closed immediately.Master fuel trip not required, but a 1-minute delayshall be required before retrial of that or any otherigniter.

(2) Any igniters proven on, all other fuel sourcesoff, all igniter valves subsequently closed.

(2) Master fuel trip shall be actuated.

(3) Any Class 1 igniter(s) proven on, any burnervalve leaves closed limit, all burner valvessubsequently closed, no other main fuel inservice, igniter(s) remain proven.

(3) Associated main fuel gas trip valve and/or fueloil trip valve shall be closed (fuel gas trip and/orfuel oil trip), proven igniters shall be permitted toremain in service.

(4) Any Class 1 igniter(s) proven on, anypulverizer startup initiated, all pulverizerssubsequently stopped, no other main fuel inservice, igniter(s) remain proven.

(4) Proven igniters shall be permitted to remain inservice.

(5) All igniter and burner valves closed and allfeeders or pulverizers stopped.

(5) Master fuel trip shall be actuated.

Table 6.4.1.2.1(c) Fuel Inputs Shutoff When Class 2 or Class 3 Igniters Are Used

Condition Action Required

(1) First Class 2 or 3 igniter(s) fails tolight after successful unit purge. [See6.6.5.2.1.3(B)(9) , 6.6.5.2.1.3(B)(10) ,and 6.8.5.2.1.3(B)(7) .]

(1) Igniter valve(s) shall be closed immediately. Master fueltrip not required, but a 1-minute delay shall be requiredbefore retrial of that or any other igniter.

(2) Any igniters proven on, all other fuelsources off, all igniter valvessubsequently closed.

(2) Master fuel trip shall be actuated.

(3a.1) Class 2 igniter(s) proven on, firstmain burner trial for ignition fails.

(3a.1) Master fuel trip shall be actuated.

(3a.2) Class 2 igniter(s) proven on, lastmain burner is taken out of service in anormal shutdown.

(3a.2) Associated main fuel gas trip valve and/or fuel oil tripvalve shall be closed (fuel gas trip and/or fuel oil trip),proven igniters shall be permitted to remain in service.

(3a.3) Class 2 igniter(s) proven on, lastmain burner is taken out of service in anabnormal shutdown.

(3a.3) Master fuel trip shall be actuated.

(3b.1) Class 3 igniters proven on, firstmain burner trial for ignition fails.

(3b.1) Master fuel trip shall be actuated.

(3b.2) Class 3 igniter(s) proven on, lastmain burner is taken out of service in anormal shutdown.

(3b.2) Master fuel trip shall be actuated.

(3b.3) Class 3 igniter(s) proven on, lastmain burner is taken out of service in anabnormal shutdown.

(3b.3) Master fuel trip shall be actuated.

(4) Any Class 2 igniter(s) proven on, anypulverizer startup initiated, all pulverizerssubsequently stopped, no other mainfuel in service, igniter(s) remain proven.

(4) (a) If first pulverizer fails to ignite as described in6.8.5.2.1.3(B)(12) , master fuel trip shall be actuated.

(b) If last pulverizer in service is tripped, master fuel tripshall be actuated. (c) If last pulverizer in service is takenout of service in a normal shutdown sequence by anoperator, proven igniters shall be permitted to remain inservice.

(5) All igniter and burner valves closedand all feeders or pulverizers stopped.

(5) Master fuel trip shall be actuated.

Page 34: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 34/102

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

It would not be sufficient to mention the "low drum water level" only as interlock condition for drum type boiler in consideration of the two types of Drum Boilers.One type is the natural circulation type and another is forced circulation type which is equipped with boiler circulation pumps (BCP).For the forced circulation type boiler, a low differential pressure of BCP is usually applied as interlock condition to initiate the master fuel trip relay instead of low drum water level condition.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:masahiko mishiro

Organization: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries,ltd.

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Nov 14 00:07:12 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: Boiler manufacturers may require additional master fuel trips that don't appear in the code. Thesubmitter's substantiation does not provide rationale for requiring this master fuel trip for alldrum-type boilers. The trip condition specified in the comment is not a combustion-relatedhazard. The committee also disagrees that this would be an alternate shutdown to low drumwater level. It could be in addition to the low drum water level master fuel trip.

Page 35: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 35/102

Public Comment No. 46-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 6.4.1.2.6.4(B) ]

(B) *

A time delay before of not grester than 3 seconds before tripping of FD fan(s) shall be permittedwhere the duration is determined by a transient pressure analysis.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The furnace and downstream components on a balanced draft unit are not designed to withstand the pressure that the FD fans can provide.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Allan Zadiraka

Organization: [ Not Specified ]

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Nov 11 15:19:05 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The duration should be determined by the transient pressure analysis, therefore no maximumduration is needed in the code text. The designer is responsible for properly validating andinterpreting the results of the transient pressure analysis.

Page 36: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 36/102

Public Comment No. 75-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 6.4.1.2.7.6 ]

6.4.1.2.7.6 *

Before main fuel firing and following a 5-minute period after a following a master fuel trip (furnacepostpurge) , FD fans shall be tripped if the furnace pressure exceeds the maximum pressure valuerecommended by the manufacturer.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

1. Comparing with 6.4.1.2.6.5 and 6.4.1.2.7.6, there is some possibility to invite misunderstanding, which is "post purge shall have more priority even in the condition that furnace pressure exceeds the maximum furnace design pressure".2. ID fan and FD fan shall be tripped before the main fuel firing and following a master fuel trip, when the furnace pressure exceeds the maximum furnace design pressure. 3. Since a natural post purge (15min.) is required as mentioned in 6.4.1.2.4.3 (C) in case of all fans trip condition, therefore there is no necessary to mention that post purge has more priority. 4. What We have to mention in this code is " When the FD fan stopped in the period of post purge incompleted condition, it is important to avoid to supply air suddenly, positively by starting FD fan".

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:masahiko mishiro

Organization: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, ltd.

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Nov 15 00:28:32 EST 2013

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Rejected but held

Resolution: This is new material that should receive full public review.

Page 37: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 37/102

Public Comment No. 52-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 6.4.1.2.8 ]

6.4.1.2.8 Multiple and Variable-Speed Fan Interlocks.

On start of the second fan and subsequent fan(s), whether the FD or ID type, the fan shall be capableof delivering airflow before airflow after opening its damper(s).

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

It is not possible to generate airflow through the fan with dampers closed. To generate airflow through the starting fan, its dampers need to be opened; and its fan speed develops sufficient head to overcome the discharge pressure of the parallel running fan.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:SINMING KWONG

Organization: EMERSON PROCESS MANAGEMENT PWS

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Nov 12 09:42:20 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The intent of the paragraph is to ensure that the fan is capable before allowing the damper toopen. It is not requiring that the fan delivers airflow with the dampers closed.

Page 38: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 38/102

Public Comment No. 9-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 6.4.2.1.27 ]

6.4.2.1.27 Axial Flow Fan Nearing Stall Line.

This condition shall be sensed and alarmed in accordance with the manufactuer manufacturer 'srecommendations.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The word was not spelled correctly.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Dale Evely

Organization: Southern Company Services, Inc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Sep 20 07:25:16 EDT 2013

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Accepted

Resolution: SR-47-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: The word was not spelled correctly.

Page 39: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 39/102

Public Comment No. 47-NFPA 85-2013 [ New Section after 6.5.2.1 ]

6.5.2.1.2

High positive furnace pressure trip interlock shall be selected based on the positive design pressureof the furnace.

6.5.2.1.3

High negative furnace pressure trip interlock shall be selected such that the trip value and theresulting negative furnace pressure transient does not exceed the furnace negative transient designpressure.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The addition of the high negative furnace pressure trip requirement to the code requires that additional guidance be provided on setting the high negative pressure trip set point.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Allan Zadiraka

Organization: [ Not Specified ]

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Nov 11 15:39:03 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-48-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: The addition of the high negative furnace pressure trip requirement to the code requires thatadditional guidance be provided on setting the high negative pressure trip set point.

Page 40: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 40/102

Public Comment No. 48-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 6.5.2.1 ]

6.5.2.1 Functional Requirements.

6.5.2.1.1 The furnace pressure control system shall control the furnace pressure at the set point inthe combustion chamber.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Revise numbering to match proposed addition.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Allan Zadiraka

Organization: [ Not Specified ]

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Nov 11 15:54:36 EST 2013

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Accepted

Resolution: SR-49-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: Revise numbering to match proposed addition.

Page 41: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 41/102

Public Comment No. 53-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 6.5.2.3 ]

6.5.2.3 Component Requirements.

The furnace pressure control element(s) [(H) in Figure 6.5.2.2.1] (fan inlet damper blade pitch control,speed control) shall meet the following criteria:

(1)

(2) The operating speed The response of the furnace pressure control equipment shall not be lessthan that of the airflow control equipment.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

To avoid confusion, it is best to change "speed" to "response". Otherwise, Reader can mis-interpret the statement such that ID Fan motor speed must be equal or greater than FD Fan motor speed.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:SINMING KWONG

Organization: EMERSON PROCESS MANAGEMENT PWS

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Nov 12 10:16:49 EST 2013

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Rejected but held

Resolution: This is new material that has not had the benefit of public review.

* The operating speed shall not exceed the control system's sensing and positioningcapabilities.

Page 42: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 42/102

Public Comment No. 81-NFPA 85-2013 [ New Section after 6.5.3.2.2 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

6.5.3.2.3 Where the system design does not permit the use of fully open air paths, the minimum open area airpaths shall be not less than that required for purge airflow requirements with fans in operation.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

FR 162 asked for a new sectoni 6.5.3.2.2 which was inserted correctly. FR 162 stated that subsequent paragraphs should be renumbered. However, it appears that the old section 6.5.3.2.2 was deleted. Committee needs to confirm if the old section 6.5.3.2.2. is to be deleted or to be retained

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Daniel Lee

Organization: ABB Incorporated

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Nov 15 09:45:42 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-52-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: The paragraph is reinstated because it appears to have been improperly deleted during theediting process.

Page 43: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 43/102

Public Comment No. 60-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 6.6.3.1.11 ]

6.6.3.1.11 Valve Leak Testing.

6.6.3.1.11.1

Tightness tests of the main safety shutoff valves, individual burner safety shutoff valves, andassociated vent valves shall be performed.

6.6.3.1.11.2

Permanent provisions shall be made in the fuel gas piping to allow for making leak tests andsubsequent repairs.

6.6.3.1.11.3

Valves added in vent lines for leak testing shall be either continuously monitored and alarmed whenin the incorrect position or locked in the open position except when leak testing is being performed.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

CC NOTE: The following CC Note No. 26 appeared in the First Draft Report.

The MBB committee should add a time frame to this requirement, such as "at least annually or in accordance with 4.4.1.1."

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:CC on BCS-AAC

Organization: CC on Boiler Combustion System Hazards

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Nov 13 13:12:05 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The comment is rejected because no specific action was provided. However, SR 53 addressesthis issue and includes a time frame for performing this test.

Page 44: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 44/102

Public Comment No. 32-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 6.6.3.1.11.1 ]

6.6.3.1.11.1

Tightness tests of the main safety shutoff valves, individual burner safety shutoff valves, andassociated vent valves shall be performed at least annually or, for units firing a single fuel, at the firstopportunity that the unit is down since the last tightness test .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

"Shall be performed" it is not enforceable. The added text defines the minimum requirement.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Celso Schmidt

Organization: UTC/Forney Corporation

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Nov 10 15:32:05 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-53-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: The revised text provides a specific time frame for performing the leak test. In addition, therevision addresses testing on units that are continuously fired. The intention is to not require ashutdown of a continuously-fired unit just for the purpose of this test. The revised text allowsusers to perform the test at the first unit shutdown.

Page 45: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 45/102

Public Comment No. 35-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 6.6.5.1.3.2 ]

6.6.5.1.3.2 *

Successful completion of the leak test shall be done before the main gas supply header isbe conducted, at least annually, before the safety shutoff header valve is placed into operation.

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

A.6.6.5.1.3.2.docx Annex material for 6.6.5.1.3.2

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

1- Unless when an automatic gas header leak test is provided, the NFPA 85 community does not follow the requirement to perform a gas header leak test every time the Main Gas Header Shutoff Valve is closed. An annual gas leak test should be a minimum requirement.2- If automatic gas leak test is provided in the BMS logic, a Leak Test Credit of an 8-day period should be allowed to avoid the leak test to be repeated several times during a boiler start-up, wham multiple trips are expected. 3- Section 6.6.5.1.3 could be consolidated with section 6.6.3.1.11.4-Revised Anex material was suggested for this section.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Celso Schmidt

Organization: UTC/Forney Corporation

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Nov 10 16:25:51 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The test specified in 6.6.5.1.3 is intended to be an operational test performed every timethe unit is started up.

Public Comment No. 37-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 6.6.5.2.1.3(B) ]

(B)

The starting sequence shall be performed in the following order:

(1) An open flow path from the inlets of the FD fans through the stack shall be verified.

(2) An ID fan, if provided, shall be started; an FD fan then shall be started. Additional ID fans or FD

Page 46: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 46/102

fans shall be started in accordance with 6.5.3, as necessary, to achieve purge flow rate.

(3) Dampers and burner registers shall be opened to the purge position in accordance with theopen register purge method objectives outlined in 6.6.5.1.5.7.

(4) The airflow shall be adjusted to purge airflow rate, and a unit purge shall be performed. Specialprovisions shall be utilized as necessary to prevent the hazardous accumulation of volatilevapors that are heavier than air or to detect and purge accumulations in the furnace bottom.

(5) The main fuel control valve shall be closed and be positioned at lightoff firing rate (or closed if abypass regulator is being provided) and the main safety shutoff valve(s) shall be opened, butonly after the requirements of 6.6.5.1.3 for leak test requirements and 6.4.1.2.4 for permissiveconditions in the unit purge system have been satisfied.

(6) It shall be determined that the main fuel control valve is closed, and the following proceduresshall be performed:

(a) The main fuel bypass control valve, if provided, shall be set to maintain the necessaryburner header fuel pressure for light-off.

(b) The burner headers shall be vented in order to be filled with fuel gas and to provide a flow (ifnecessary) so that the main fuel and bypass fuel control valves function to regulate andmaintain the correct pressure for burner light-off.

(c) The main fuel control valve shall be opened when necessary.

(d) The time needed to vent for control of header pressure after header charging shall beevaluated and minimized.

(7) The igniter safety shutoff valve shall be opened, and the following shall be performed:

(a) It shall be confirmed that the igniter fuel control valve is holding the manufacturer'srecommended fuel pressure necessary for the igniter to operate at design capacity.

(b) The igniter headers shall be vented in order to be filled with fuel gas and to provide a flow (ifnecessary) so that the igniter fuel control valve functions to regulate and maintain thepressure within design limits specified by the manufacturer for lighting the igniters.

(c) The time needed to vent for control of header pressure after header charging shall beevaluated and minimized.

(8) The air register or damper on the burner selected for light-off shall be adjusted to the positionrecommended by the manufacturer or the established operating procedure, in accordance with6.6.5.1.5.7(C) through 6.6.5.1.5.7(F).

(9) The spark or other source of ignition for the igniter(s) on the burner(s) to be lit shall be initiated,and the procedure shall continue as follows:

(a) The individual igniter safety shutoff valve(s) shall be opened, and all igniter systematmospheric vent valves shall be closed.

(b) If flame on the first igniter(s) is not established within 10 seconds, the individual ignitersafety shutoff valve(s) shall be closed and the cause of failure to ignite shall be determinedand corrected.

(c) With airflow maintained at purge rate, repurge shall not be required, but at least 1 minuteshall elapse before a retrial of this or any other igniter is attempted.

(d) Repeated retrials of igniters without investigating and correcting the cause of themalfunction shall be prohibited.

(10) Where Class 3 special electric igniters are used, the procedures described in 6.6.5.2.1.3(B) (1)through 6.6.5.2.1.3(B) (6), 6.6.5.2.1.3(B) (8), and 6.6.5.2.1.3(B) (11) through 6.6.5.2.1.3(B)(14) shall be used, consistent with the the requirements for individual main burner flamesupervision.

(11) After making certain that the igniter(s) is established and is providing the required level ofignition energy for the main burner(s), the following shall be performed:

Page 47: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 47/102

(a) The individual burner safety shutoff valve(s) shall be opened and the individual burneratmospheric vent valves shall be closed.

(b) Except where associated Class 1 igniters are in service, a master fuel trip shall beinitiated when the flame detection system(s) indicates that ignition has not been obtainedwithin 5 seconds of the time the main fuel actually begins to enter the furnace.

(c) Purging shall be repeated, and the conditions that caused the failure to ignite shall becorrected before another light-off attempt is made.

(d) For the following burner and all subsequent burners placed in operation, failure to ignite orloss of ignition for any reason on any burner(s) shall cause fuel flow to that burner(s) tostop.

(e) All conditions required by the manufacturer or by established operating procedures forlight-off shall exist before restarting the burner(s).

(12) After stable flame is established, the air register(s) or damper(s) shall be adjusted slowly to itsoperating position, making certain that ignition is not lost in the process. With automatic burnermanagement systems, the air register shall be permitted to be opened simultaneously with theburner safety shutoff valve.

(13) Class 3 igniters shall be shut off at the end of the time trial for proving the main flame, and thefollowing shall be verified:

(a) The stable flame continues on the main burners after the igniters are shut off.

(b) The systems that allow the igniters to remain in service on either an intermittent or acontinuous basis have been tested to meet all the requirements of Class 1 igniters orClass 2 igniters with associated interlocks in service.

(14) After stable burner header pressure control has been established, the burner headeratmospheric vent valve shall be closed.

(15)

(16)

(17)

(18)

(19)

(20)

(21)

(22)

(23) The maximum number of burners shall be placed in service consistent with the anticipatedcontinuous load and the operating range of fuel header pressures.

(24) The on-line metering combustion control (unless designed specifically for start-up procedures)shall not be placed into service until the following have occurred:

* The sequence shall continue as follows:

The procedures in 6.6.5.2.1.3(B) (8) through 6.6.5.2.1.3(B) (13) shall be followed forplacing additional burners with open registers in service, as necessary, to raise steampressure or to carry additional load.

If used, automatic control of burner fuel flow and burner airflow during the lighting andstart-up sequence shall be in accordance with the requirements of 6.6.5.2.1.3(B) (17).

The fuel flow to each burner (as measured by the burner fuel header pressure) shall bemaintained at a controlled value that is compatible with the established airflow through thecorresponding burner.

The established airflow through each open register shall be permitted to be maintained bycontrolling the windbox-to-furnace differential.

Total furnace airflow shall not be reduced below purge rate airflow and shall be at leastthat which is necessary for complete combustion in the furnace.

If it is necessary to vary fuel header pressure to eliminate a problem of having excessivelighting off and shutting down of burners, such variations shall be limited to apredetermined range.

This range shall be a function of the incremental fuel input that is added by the lighting ofa single burner or gang of burners.

Page 48: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 48/102

(a) A predetermined minimum main fuel input has been attained.

(b) All registers on nonoperating burners are closed unless compensation is provided for bythe control system.

(c) The burner fuel and airflow are adjusted as necessary.

(d) Stable flame and specified furnace conditions have been established.

(25) It shall be permitted to place a multiple number of igniters in service that are servedsimultaneously from a single igniter safety shutoff valve, provided that the igniters are reliablysupervised, so that failure of one of the group to light causes the fuel to all igniters in the groupto shut off.

(26) It also shall be permitted to place in service simultaneously a multiple number of burners servedby their corresponding multiple igniters from a single burner safety shutoff valve, provided thatthe burners are reliably supervised, so that failure of one of the group to light causes the fuel toall burners in the group to shut off.

(27) On units with an overfire air system, the overfire air control damper positions shall be permittedto be changed only when repositioning of all burner air registers or burner air dampers ispermitted.

(28) On units with an overfire air system, the boiler shall be operating in a stable manner before theoverfire air is introduced. The introduction of the overfire air shall not adversely affect boileroperation.

(29) On units with an overfire air system and a reburn system, the overfire air shall be placed inoperation before the reburn fuel sequence is started.

(30) A reburn system shall be placed in service only after the following have occurred:

(a) The boiler shall be operating at a load that ensures the introduction of the reburn fuel willnot adversely affect continued boiler operation.

(b) The temperature in the reburn zone shall be maintained in accordance with 6.6.3.5.2.

(c) The boiler shall be operating in a stable manner before the reburn start-up sequence isinitiated.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

If a bypass regulator for burner lightoff is not provided, as usual, the valve needs to be proven at lightoff firing rate (minimum position).

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Celso Schmidt

Organization: UTC/Forney Corporation

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Nov 10 17:56:53 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-54-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: If a bypass regulator for burner lightoff is not provided, the valve needs to be proven at lightoff

Page 49: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 49/102

firing rate (minimum position).

Public Comment No. 80-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 6.6.5.2.3.10 ]

6.6.5.2.3.10 *

After shutting down the forced and induced draft fans, dampers in the flue gas path shall and airpath shall be permitted to be closed.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The original text stated that closing the burner air registers was allowed but the FR text only allows the closing of the boiler flue gas path. I understand that the first report was modified for two purposes 1) to address multiple boilers with a common flue gas path and to allow boiler bottle-up. The closing of the flue gas path is a requirement for multiple boilers but, closing the flue gas path is not necessary the only means to bottle up the boilers. I understand that some user bottle up the boiler with both the air gas path and flue gas path. The proposed comment is consistent with the original requirement and the current industry practice of bottling up the boiler.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Daniel Lee

Organization: ABB Incorporated

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Nov 15 09:30:15 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-55-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: The revision is consistent with the 2011 edition requirement and the current industrypractice of "bottling up" the boiler.

Page 50: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 50/102

Public Comment No. 14-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 6.7.3.1.2.2 ]

6.7.3.1.2.2 *

Relief valve discharge passages, vents, and telltales shall be provided with suitable piping to allowdischarge of fuel oil, vapors, or toxic fumes in accordance with the requirements of 4.9.1. away fromsources of ignition, combustion air intakes, building ventilation systems, or windows of a boiler orHSRG room or adjacent buildings and shall be designed for the expected range of externaltemperatures and protected against mechanical damage.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The First Draft text references section 4.9.1 which is for Gaseous Vents.

The proposed text is similar to the First Draft wording added to for HRSG liquid fuels (8.4.3.2.3.5).

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Steven Graf

Organization: Emerson Process Management

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Oct 25 08:30:49 EDT 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-59-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: The First Draft text referenced section 4.9.1 which is for Gaseous Vents. The paragraph isrevised because vents, drains, and telltales are not generally piped away from their location.The flow only occurs when personnel are in attendance. Relief valves are automatic devices andcan operate at any time, and are generally provided with fixed discharge piping. Therefore, therequirement is limited to relief valve discharge piping and guidance is added to the annex toadvise users on discharge from vents, drains, and telltales.

Page 51: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 51/102

Public Comment No. 30-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 6.7.3.1.11.1 ]

6.7.3.1.11.1

Tightness tests of the main safety shutoff valves and individual burner safety shutoff valves shall beperformed at least annually or, for units firing a single fuel, at the first opportunity that the unit isdown after one year since the last tightness test .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

'Shall be provided" it is not enforceable. The added text defines the minimum requirement.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Celso Schmidt

Organization: UTC/Forney Corporation

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Nov 10 15:05:56 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-61-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: The text is revised to provide a time frame for the tightness test. In addition. language is addedto address continuously-fired unit. It is not the intent to require continuously-fired units to beshut down just for the purpose of this test. The revised language allows these units to be testedat the first shutdown opportunity.

Page 52: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 52/102

Public Comment No. 55-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 6.7.5.1.2.1 ]

6.7.5.1.2.1

Cleaning devicesshall devices shall be operated only where heat input to the furnace is at a ratehigh enough to prevent a flameout during the sootblower operation cleaning device operation .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

In the revised First Revision text, the term "sootblower" has been revised to a generic term of "cleaning devices". The change was made to the first reference to "sootblower" at the beginning of the section but also applies to the second reference to “sootblower” at the end of the section. This also provides consistency with the FR text in section 6.6.5.1.2.1.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:John O'Rourke

Organization: ALSTOM Power Inc.

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Nov 13 11:33:29 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-64-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: In the revised First Revision text, the term "sootblower" has been revised to a generic term of"cleaning devices". However, in the First Revision, only the first occurrence was modified. TheSecond Revision makes the paragraph consistent with the new terminology throughout.

Page 53: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 53/102

Public Comment No. 59-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 6.7.5.1.2.3 ]

6.7.5.1.2.3

The use of waterwall cleaning devices and high temperature superheater and reheater sootblowersshall reheater cleaning devices shall be permitted for cleaning during periods of unit outage if a unitpurge has been completed and purge rate airflow is maintained.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

In the revised First Revision text, the term "sootblower" has been revised to a generic term of "cleaning devices". The change was made to the first reference to "sootblower" at the beginning of the section but also applies to the second reference to “sootblower” at the end of the section. The term “superheater and reheater sootblowers" should be replaced with "superheater and reheater cleaning devices". The original text referenced “wall sootblowers” and “superheater and reheater sootblowers”. In the First Revision text, the term "wall sootblowers" was deleted and was replaced with "Cleaning Devices". The term “wall” should be added to the FR text. Assuming that the above comment is accepted, The revised would otherwise read, “6.7.5.1.2.3 The use of cleaning devices and high temperature superheater and reheater cleaning devices shall be permitted…The above comments provide consistency with the FR text in section 6.6.5.1.2.3.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:John O'Rourke

Organization: ALSTOM Power Inc.

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Nov 13 13:09:34 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-65-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: "Sootblower" is replaed by the general term "cleaning devices" to be consistent with otherchanges in the code.

Page 54: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 54/102

Public Comment No. 36-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 6.7.5.1.3 ]

6.7.5.1.3 * Operational Leak Test.

An operational leak test shall be performed in accordance with established procedures whilemaintaining , at a minimum least annually , while maintaining purge rate airflow before , before theoil supply safety shutoff header is valve is placed in service operation .

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

A.6.7.5.1.3.docx Annex material for 6.7.5.1.3

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

1- Unless when an automatic oil header leak test is provided, the NFPA 85 community does not follow the requirement to perform an oil header leak test every time the Main Oil Header Shutoff Valve is closed. An annual oil leak test should be a minimum requirement.2- If automatic oil leak test is provided in the BMS logic, an Oil Leak Test Credit of an 8-day period should be allowed to avoid the leak test to be repeated several times during a boiler start-up, when multiple trips are expected. 3- Section 6.7.5.1.3 could be consolidated with section 6.7.3.1.11.4-Revised Anex material was suggested for this section.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Celso Schmidt

Organization: UTC/Forney Corporation

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Nov 10 17:28:51 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The leak test in this paragraph is intended to be an operational test performed every timethe unit is started up.

Page 55: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 55/102

Public Comment No. 79-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 6.7.5.2.3.11 ]

6.7.5.2.3.11 *

After shutting down the forced and induced draft fans, dampers in the flue gas path and air path shallbe permitted to be closed.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The original text stated that closing the burner air registers was allowed but the FR text only allows the closing of the boiler flue gas path. I understand that the first report was modified for two purposes 1) to address multiple boilers with a common flue gas path and to allow boiler bottle-up. The closing of the flue gas path is a requirement for multiple boilers but, closing the flue gas path is not necessary the only means to bottle up the boilers. I understand that some user bottle up the boiler with both the air gas path and flue gas path. The proposed comment is consistent with the original requirement and the current industry practice of bottling up the boiler.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Daniel Lee

Organization: ABB Incorporated

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Nov 15 09:27:00 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-56-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: The revision is consistent with the 2011 edition requirement and the current industrypractice of "bottling up" the boiler.

Page 56: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 56/102

Public Comment No. 78-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 6.8.5.2.3.7 ]

6.8.5.2.3.7 *

After shutting down the forced and induced draft fans, dampers in the flue gas path and air gas pathshall be permitted to be closed.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The original text stated that closing the burner air registers was allowed but the FR text only allows the closing of the boiler flue gas path. I understand that the first report was modified for two purposes 1) to address multiple boilers with a common flue gas path and to allow boiler bottle-up. The closing of the flue gas path is a requirement for multiple boilers but, closing the flue gas path is not necessary the only means to bottle up the boilers. I understand that some user bottle up the boiler with both the air gas path and flue gas path. The proposed comment is consistent with the original requirement and the current industry practice of bottling up the boiler.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Daniel Lee

Organization: ABB Incorporated

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Nov 15 09:21:13 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-57-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: The revision is consistent with the 2011 edition requirement and the current industrypractice of "bottling up" the boiler.

Page 57: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 57/102

Public Comment No. 61-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 7.4.3.1.11 ]

7.4.3.1.11 Leak Testing.

7.4.3.1.11.1

Provisions shall be made in the gas piping to allow testing for leakage and subsequent repair.

7.4.3.1.11.2

Provisions shall include a permanent means for making accurate tightness tests of the headersafety shutoff valves and individual safety shutoff valves.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

CC NOTE: The following CC Note No. 27 appeared in the First Draft Report.

The FBB committee should add a time frame to this requirement, such as "at least annually or in accordance with 4.4.1.1." The comm

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:CC on BCS-AAC

Organization: CC on Boiler Combustion System Hazards

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Nov 13 13:15:54 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-72-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: The committee provided a positive requirement for performing tightness tests on fuel gas supplyshutoff valves, including a specific time-frame for performing the test. The committee mirroredrequirements added to chapter 6.

Page 58: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 58/102

Public Comment No. 33-NFPA 85-2013 [ New Section after 7.4.3.1.11.2 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

7.4.3.1.11.3 The gas leak test shall be conducted at least annually

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The existing text it is not enforceable. The added section defines the minimum requuirements.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Celso Schmidt

Organization: UTC/Forney Corporation

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Nov 10 15:49:03 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-72-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: The committee provided a positive requirement for performing tightness tests on fuel gas supplyshutoff valves, including a specific time-frame for performing the test. The committee mirroredrequirements added to chapter 6.

Page 59: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 59/102

Public Comment No. 34-NFPA 85-2013 [ New Section after 7.4.3.2.15 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

7.4.3.2.15.3 The oil leak test shall be performed at least annually.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The existing text it is not enforceable. Added new section to define minimum requirements.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Celso Schmidt

Organization: UTC/Forney Corporation

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Nov 10 15:59:00 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-73-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: The committee added a positive requirement for performing tightness tests of the oil supplyshutoff valves, including a time frame for performing these tests. The requirement mirrorslanguage that was added to chapter 6.

Page 60: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 60/102

Public Comment No. 62-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 7.10.2.2.7 ]

7.10.2.2.7

Burner Discharge Temperature (High). The discharge temperature from a burner, such as a ductburner, that is designed to maintain a desired discharge temperature shall be monitored and shall bealarmed when the temperature exceeds the maximum operating temperature.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

CC NOTE: The following CC Note No. 19 appeared in the First Draft Report.

The Fluidized Bed Boilers technical committee should review 7.10.2.2.7 and 7.10.2.3.9 for intent. 7.10.2.2.7 is labeled a burner alarm, and 7.10.2.3.9 is labeled a duct burner alarm, but both are followed by identical text. In addition, both paragraphs use the term "desired," which is unenforceable.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:CC on BCS-AAC

Organization: CC on Boiler Combustion System Hazards

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Nov 13 13:17:56 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The use of the modifier "desired" is to delineate the design setpoint from the maximumoperating temperature. Therefore, the enforceability of the desired discharge temperature ismoot.

Page 61: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 61/102

Public Comment No. 63-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 8.4.3.2.1.10 ]

8.4.3.2.1.10 Tightness Test.

(A)

Tests of the main safety shutoff valves and the individual burner safety shutoff valves shall beperformed.

(B)

Permanent provisions shall be included in the fuel piping to allow testing for leakage.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

CC NOTE: The following CC Note No. 28 appeared in the First Draft Report.

The HRS committee should add a time frame to this requirement, such as "at least annually or in accordance with 4.4.1.1."

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:CC on BCS-AAC

Organization: CC on Boiler Combustion System Hazards

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Nov 13 13:19:56 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The public comment is rejected because no specific action was requested. However, thecommittee modified the paragraph in SR 66.

Page 62: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 62/102

Public Comment No. 39-NFPA 85-2013 [ New Section after 8.4.3.2.2.4 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

8.4.3.2.2.5 When Combustion Turbine Purge Credit is required, the Duct Burner shall be validated forgas leak tightness simultaneously with the Combustion Turbine, via a valve proving system consistentwith 8.8.4.6.1.

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

Duct_Burner_Purge_Credit.docx A.8.4.3.2.2.5 Duct Burner Purge Credit

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

This section brings more clarity to the Turbine Purge Credit requirements and mention that the Valve Proving System shall be consistent and not alike section 8.8.4.6.1. The volume from the middle block valve up to the burner element valves is much larger than a piece of pipe in the Gas Turbine valve rack. This section was also created to attach annex material to suggest a test method.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Celso Schmidt

Organization: UTC/Forney Corporation

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Nov 10 20:14:32 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The committee does not agree that a valve-proving system is required by current code, norshould it be required. In addition, the proposed annex text is overly prescriptive in thedescription of the test method. The proposed text could be interpreted to invalidate thepressurized pipe section method for establishing purge credit. Finally, the proposed textindicates that the duct burner and combustion turbine must be proven leak tightsimultaneously, which is not necessary.

Public Comment No. 64-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 8.8.4.6 ]

8.8.4.6* Combustion Turbine Purge Credit for Gaseous Fuel Systems.

Page 63: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 63/102

Following a normal shutdown, combustion turbine purge credit shall be permitted to be establishedfor the next start-up event provided that the following requirements are met for each combustionturbine and duct burner fuel system.

8.8.4.6.1*

Combustion turbine and duct burner manufacturer's valve-proving requirements, fuel supply systemrequirements, and safety control system requirements shall be met.

8.8.4.6.2

A positive means to prevent leakage of ammonia into the idle HRSG or other combustion turbineexhaust system shall be provided in accordance with 4.10.3.

8.8.4.6.3

A triple block and double vent valve arrangement is installed on the combustion turbine inaccordance with 8.4.2.1.2.2 and is installed on the HRSG fuel burning system (if provided) inaccordance with 8.4.3.2.2.3.

8.8.4.6.4

One of the following shall be used to establish the purge credit.

(A)* Valve Proving Method.

(1) Where provided, duct burner normal shutdown shall be accomplished.

(2)

(3) The vent valves shall remain in the fully open position as long as purge credit is established.

(4) Fuel gas block and vent valve positions shall be continuously monitored. If continuousmonitoring is lost or any valve deviates from its assigned position, purge credit is lost, andsubsequent start of the combustion turbine requires a combustion turbine purge prior to light-off, in accordance with 8.8.4.2.

(5) Pressures in the two double block and vent pipe sections shall be continuously monitored. Ifcontinuous monitoring is lost or either pressure indicates leakage, purge credit is lost, andsubsequent start of the combustion turbine requires a combustion turbine purge prior to light-off, in accordance with 8.8.4.2.

(6) Prior to each start-up and following each normal shutdown, block valves shall be validated forgas leak tightness via a valve-proving system. As a minimum, the most downstream blockvalve shall be valve proved during the start-up sequence, and the middle block valve shall bevalve proved during the shutdown sequence. The most downstream block valve shall be testedonly when airflow is passing through the combustion turbine.

(7) The combustion turbine purge credit period shall not exceed 8 days (192 hours). If acombustion turbine purge in accordance with 8.8.4.2 is performed during the 8-day period, thecombustion turbine purge credit is reinitiated for an 8-day period.

(B)* Pressurized Pipe Section Method.

* Combustion turbine normal shutdown shall be accomplished.

Page 64: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 64/102

(B)* Pressurized Pipe Section Method.

(1) Where provided, duct burner normal shutdown shall be accomplished.

(2)

(3) The upstream vent valve shall remain in the fully open position, and the downstream vent valveshall remain in the fully closed position as long as purge credit is established.

(4) Air or inert gas shall be introduced to create and maintain a pressurized pipe section betweenthe middle and most downstream block valves.

(5) Fuel gas block and vent valve positions shall be continuously monitored. If continuousmonitoring is lost or any valve deviates from its assigned position, purge credit is lost andsubsequent start-up of the combustion turbine requires a combustion turbine purge prior tolight-off, in accordance with 8.8.4.2.

(6) Pressures in the two double block and vent pipe sections shall be continuously monitored. Ifcontinuous monitoring is lost or the pressure downstream of the middle block valve decreasesto less than 20.7 kPa (3 psid) above the upstream pressure, purge credit is lost andsubsequent start-up of the combustion turbine requires a combustion turbine purge prior tolight-off, in accordance with 8.8.4.2.

(7) The combustion turbine purge credit period shall shall be considered to be maintained as longas the conditions in 8.8.4.6.4(B)(4), (5), and (6) are met.

(8) Provisions shall be made to ensure that fuel cannot enter the air or inert gas supply line at anytime.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

CC NOTE: The following CC Note No. 23 appeared in the First Draft Report as First Revision No. 30 and 37 and also related to Public Input 129, 182, 134, and 180.

The HRS committee should formally respond to the issues raised in Mr. Pyros's ballot comment regarding the new liquid level monitoring method.

Related Item

First Revision No. 30-NFPA 85-2013 [Section No. 8.8.4.6]

First Revision No. 37-NFPA 85-2013 [Section No. 8.8.4.6]

Public Input No. 129-NFPA 85-2012 [New Section after 8.8.4.6.3.1]

Public Input No. 182-NFPA 85-2013 [Section No. 8.8.4.6]

Public Input No. 134-NFPA 85-2013 [Section No. 8.8.4.6.1]

Public Input No. 180-NFPA 85-2013 [Section No. 8.8.4.6.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:CC on BCS-AAC

Organization: CC on Boiler Combustion System Hazards Code

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Nov 13 13:21:55 EST 2013

Committee Statement

Committee Rejected

* Combustion turbine normal shutdown shall be accomplished.

Page 65: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 65/102

Action:

Resolution: The committee reviewed 8.8.4.7(C) and the ballot comments provided by Mr. Pyros. Thesubmitter agrees with the committee that the annex text on the liquid level monitoring methodaddresses the concerns set forth in the ballot.

Public Comment No. 16-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 8.8.4.7.4(B) ]

(B) * Pressurized Pipe Section Method.

(1) Where provided, duct burner normal shutdown shall be accomplished.

(2)

(3) Air or inert gas shall be introduced to create and maintain a pressurized pipe section betweenthe middle and most downstream block valves.

(4) An inert liquid shall be permitted to be used in lieu of inert gas if acceptable to the originalequipment manufacturer.

(5) The upstream drain valve shall remain in the fully open position, and the downstream drain valveshall remain in the fully closed position as long as purge credit is established.

(6) The liquid fuel block and drain valve positions shall be continuously monitored. If continuousmonitoring is lost or any valve deviates from its assigned position, purge credit is lost andsubsequent start of the combustion turbine requires a combustion turbine purge prior to lightoff,in accordance with 8.8.4.2.

(7) Pressures in the two double block and drain pipe sections shall be continuously monitored. Ifthe continuous monitoring is lost or the pressure downstream of the middle block valvedecreases to less than 20.7 kPa (3 psid) above the upstream pressure, purge credit is lost andsubsequent start-up of the combustion turbine requires a combustion turbine purge prior to light-off, in accordance with 8.8.4.2.

(8) The combustion turbine purge credit period is maintained as long as the conditions in8.8.4.7.4(B)(4), 8.8.4.7.4(B)(5), and 8.8.4.7.4(B)(6)are met.

(9) Provisions shall be made to ensure that fuel cannot enter the air, inert gas or inert gas supplyliquid supply line at any time.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Utililizing an inert liquid in lieu of an inert gas would only apply to the Pressurized Pipe Section" method. Therefore I am proposing eleiminating 8.8.4.7.5 and moving it to 8.8.4.7.4(B). Wording should also be added to ensure liquid fuel does not conatiminate the inert liquid supply.

A separate Public Comment (PC-17) was submitted to eleiminate 8.8.4.7.5.

Related Public Comments for This Document

Related Comment Relationship

Public Comment No. 17-NFPA 85-2013 [Section No. 8.8.4.7.5]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Steven Graf

Organization: Emerson Process Management

* Combustion turbine normal shutdown shall be accomplished.

Page 66: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 66/102

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Oct 25 08:47:07 EDT 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-67-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: Paragraph 8.8.4.7.5 is relocated to 8.8.4.7.4(B) because it is only relevant to the pressurizedpipe section method for liquid fuel systems. A reference to inert liquid is added to (9) to beconsistent with the addition of the new 8.8.4.7.4(B)(4). The related paragraph is deleted from itscurrent location in SR 68.

Public Comment No. 17-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 8.8.4.7.5 ]

8.8.4.7.5

An inert liquid shall be permitted to be used in lieu of inert gas if acceptable to the original equipmentmanufacturer.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

I am proposing to delete 8.8.4.7.5 and move the text to 8.8.4.7.4(B) per Public Comment 16.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Steven Graf

Organization: Emerson Process Management

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Oct 25 08:55:15 EDT 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-68-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: Paragraph 8.8.4.7.5 is relocated to 8.8.4.7.4(B) because it is only relevant to the pressurizedpipe section method for liquid fuel systems.

Public Comment No. 65-NFPA 85-2013 [ Chapter 9 ]

Page 67: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 67/102

Chapter 9 Pulverized Fuel Systems

9.1 Application.

9.1.1*

This chapter shall cover only those fuels with a volatile content of 8 percent or greater on a moisture-free basis.

9.1.2

This chapter shall exclude those systems that have an oxygen content greater than 21 percent,which require special attention.

9.2 Purpose.

9.2.1

The purpose of this chapter shall be to establish minimum requirements for design, installation,operation, and maintenance of pulverized fuel systems.

9.2.2

This chapter shall apply to any retrofit that involves replacement of the entire pulverized fuel systemas defined in 9.4.1.1 and 9.5.1.1.

9.2.3

For less than total system replacement, components shall meet the requirements of this chapter orthe original code or standard of construction.

9.3 General.

9.3.1* Functional Requirements.

9.3.1.1

Because fires and explosions are most likely to occur during start-up or shutdown or after anemergency trip, pulverized fuel systems and their components shall be designed for and capable ofcontinuous operation.

9.3.1.2

Interruptions of pulverized fuel systems shall be kept to an absolute minimum because of thecombustible and explosive nature of the pulverized fuels.

9.3.1.3

The pulverized fuel system shall be designed to meet the demands of the system that it serves overthe required range of operation.

9.3.1.4

The pulverized fuel system shall be designed and operated to enable the safe removal of foreignmaterial.

9.3.2* Hazards in Pulverized Fuel Systems.

Design, operation, control, and maintenance of a pulverized fuel system shall address inherenthazards. The prevention of such conditions shall include but not be restricted to the necessarycontrol of the following:

(1) Feeding of raw fuel into the pulverizer

(2) Influx of hot air or flue gas into the pulverizer

(3) Influx of tempering air into the pulverizer

(4) Influx of vent air into the pulverizer

(5)

9.3.3

The system arrangement shall be such that it provides only one possible direction of flow (i.e., fromthe points of entrance of fuel and air to the point of discharge), which can be either a furnace or atransport and collection system.

9.3.4

The system shall include indicators and annunciators that provide the operator with all necessaryinformation about significant operating conditions, both normal and abnormal, throughout thesystem.

9.3.5 Construction Materials for Pressure Containment.

* Influx of ambient air into negative-pressure indirect-fired systems

Page 68: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 68/102

9.3.5.1

Materials that are used to meet strength requirements shall be ferrous materials and shall satisfythe strength requirements at design operating temperatures.

9.3.5.2

If made of steel or other ductile metals, the allowable stress values shall be determined as specifiedin 9.3.5.2.1 through 9.3.5.2.5.

9.3.5.2.1 Tension.

The maximum allowable direct (i.e., membrane) stress shall not exceed the lesser of 1⁄4 the ultimatestrength or 5⁄8 the yield strength of the material.

9.3.5.2.2 Combined Bending and Membrane Stress (Where Bending Stresses Are Not Self-Limiting).

The maximum allowable value of combined bending and membrane stress shall not exceed thelesser of the yield strength or 1⁄2 the ultimate strength of the material.

9.3.5.2.3 Combined Bending and Membrane Stress (Where Bending Stresses Are Self-Limiting).

The maximum allowable values of combined self-limiting and non-self-limiting bending stresses plusmembrane stress shall not exceed the ultimate strength of the material.

9.3.5.2.4 Compressive Stress.

For components in which compressive stresses occur, in addition to the requirements of 9.3.5.2.1through 9.3.5.2.3, the critical buckling stress shall be taken into account.

9.3.5.2.5 Fatigue Analysis.

On components subject to cyclic loading, fatigue analysis shall be made to guard against possiblefatigue failures. Both mechanical and thermal loading shall be analyzed.

9.3.5.3

If made of cast iron or other nonductile material, the allowable stress shall not exceed 1⁄4 theultimate strength of the material for all parts.

9.3.5.3.1

When cast iron or other nonductile material is used for flat areas exceeding 0.0929 m2 (1 ft2), thesurface shall be strengthened by ribbing or other means.

9.3.5.3.2

An evaluation of the possibility of buckling and fatigue failures shall be made.

9.3.5.4

To ensure casting quality, nondestructive examination shall be made to detect significant defects atlocations of high stress, at abrupt changes of section, and at sharp angles.

9.3.5.4.1

The choice of such a quality assurance program shall be the responsibility of the designer.

9.3.5.5

The justification of new materials or improved analytical methods shall be the responsibility of thedesigner.

9.3.5.5.1

If such materials and methods are used for the design of pulverized fuel system components, theyshall meet the strength requirements.

9.3.5.5.2

The materials that are used shall be capable of withstanding the conditions that could occur duringabnormal incidents, such as pulverized fuel fires.

9.3.6 Rotary Valves.

Where used as a means for deflagration isolation, rotary valves (material chokes) shall be installedand maintained in accordance with NFPA 69,Standard on Explosion Prevention Systems.

9.3.7 Electrical Equipment.

9.3.7.1

All electrical equipment and wiring shall conform to NFPA 70, National Electrical Code.

Page 69: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 69/102

9.3.7.2

Locations where completely dusttight pulverized fuel systems are installed in compliance with thiscode shall not be considered a hazardous location for electrical equipment as defined in NFPA 70,National Electrical Code.

9.4 Direct-Fired Pulverized Fuel Systems.

9.4.1 Introduction.

General requirements for direct-fired pulverized fuel systems shall be covered by this section, andspecific requirements for only the more commonly used direct-fired unit systems shall be covered indetail. (For other types of systems, see Section 9.7.)

9.4.1.1

The usual direct-fired pulverized fuel system shall be permitted to comprise the followingcomponents:

(1) Raw fuel bunker

(2) Raw fuel feed system

(3) Air and gas system

(4) Air-swept pulverizer

(5) Firing system

(6) Emergency inerting system

(7) Fire extinguishing system

(8) Safety interlocks and alarms

9.4.2 Raw Fuel Bunker.

9.4.2.1

The raw fuel bunker structural material shall be made of noncombustible material and shall bedesigned to provide the following mass flow and self-cleaning flow characteristics:

(1) An uninterrupted flow of fuel being handled at a controlled rate

(2) A flow pattern in which arching and ratholing (piping) are avoided

9.4.2.1.1

The bunker outlet feeder(s) shall be coordinated with the bunker to avoid the probability thatincorrect feeder selection will result in altering the bunker flow characteristics as specified in9.4.2.1(1) or 9.4.2.1(2).

9.4.2.1.2

Provisions shall be made to prevent the accumulation of flammable mixtures of air, fuel dust, andcombustible gases within the bunker.

9.4.2.2

Procedures shall be established for emergency emptying of raw fuel bunkers.

9.4.2.3*

Water shall not be used to extinguish fires in the raw fuel bunker.

9.4.3 Raw Fuel Feeder System.

9.4.3.1

Means shall be provided to resist the passage of air or gas from the pulverizer through the feederinto the bunker.

9.4.3.1.1*

Where used as the means to resist passage of air or gas from the pulverizer, a vertical column offuel shall be sized to withstand pulverizer operating pressures, but it shall be no less than three pipediameters or hydraulic diameters for noncircular pipe.

9.4.3.2 Strength of Equipment.

Page 70: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 70/102

9.4.3.2.1

The raw fuel feeder system, including but not limited to raw fuel feeding devices, discharge hoppers,and feed pipes to the pulverizer for a direct-fired system shall begin at a point that includes aminimum coal column of 0.61 m (2 ft) and shall end at the pulverizer inlet.

9.4.3.2.2

All components of the raw fuel feeder system shall be designed to withstand an internal explosionwithout rupture.

9.4.3.2.2.1*

All components of the raw fuel feeder system that are designed to be operated at no more thangauge pressure of 13.8 kPa (2 psi) with a design coal having P max of 10 bar-g or less shall be

designed for a maximum allowable working pressure of 344 kPa (50 psi) for containment of possibleexplosion pressures.

9.4.3.2.2.2

For operating gauge pressures in excess of 13.8 kPa (2 psi) and design coal P max of 10 bar-g or

less, the raw fuel feeder system shall be designed for a maximum allowable working pressure 3.4times the absolute operating pressure.

9.4.3.2.2.3

Where the design coal Pmax is greater than 10 bar-g, the raw fuel feeder system shall be designed

to withstand internal explosion pressures calculated in accordance with NFPA 68, Standard onExplosion Protection by Deflagration Venting, or NFPA 69,Standard on Explosion PreventionSystems. In these calculations, normal unobstructed openings shall be permitted to be consideredin the calculation as mitigation of explosion pressures.

9.4.3.2.3

Equipment design strength shall incorporate the combined stresses from mechanical loading,operating, and explosion and implosion pressures plus an allowance for wear, which shall bedetermined by agreement between the manufacturer and the purchaser.

9.4.3.2.4*

Shock wave pressures shall be included in the design, based on their locations in the system.

9.4.3.2.5

The mechanical components, including but not limited to seals, gears, bearings, shafts, and drives,shall not be required to meet these requirements.

9.4.3.2.6

Explosion vents shall not be used on any component of the raw fuel feeder system.

9.4.3.2.7 Valves.

9.4.3.2.7.1

All valves in the raw fuel feeder system from a point that includes a minimum coal column of 0.61 m(2 ft) to the point of consumption of the pulverized fuel shall have construction that is capable ofwithstanding pressures as defined in 9.4.3.2.2 or 9.4.3.2.7.3, depending on the application.

9.4.3.2.7.2

These components shall include the following and any other raw fuel feeder system valves:

(1) Barrier valve

(2) Dusttight valve

(3) Check valve

(4) Pressure/air lock

(5) Raw fuel gate

9.4.3.2.7.3 Interconnections.

Valves at points of interconnection between pulverized fuel system components requiring differentdesign pressures shall comply with the strength requirements of the lower pressure of the two.

9.4.4 Air and Gas System.

Page 71: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 71/102

9.4.4.1

The fan shall be permitted to be located upstream (primary air fan) or downstream (exhauster) of thepulverizer.

9.4.4.2

The primary air or flue gas supply shall be taken from a source with a pressure that is equal to orhigher than that against which fuel will be discharged from the system.

9.4.4.3

If auxiliary air is used, a damper shall be placed in the auxiliary air line.

9.4.4.4 Air Supply Isolation Requirements.

9.4.4.4.1

For pressurized pulverizers and suction pulverizers with pressurized air supply installations, thereshall be a means for tight shutoff of the hot air supply and a means for shutting off the primary airsupply to each pulverizer.

9.4.4.4.2

For suction pulverizer installations with an atmospheric tempering air supply, there shall be ameans for shutting off the hot air supply.

9.4.4.5*

All ductwork, from the hot and tempering air supply ducts to individual pulverizers, including damperframes, expansion joints, supports, and hot primary air fans, shall be designed to contain the testblock capability of the pulverizer air supply fan.

9.4.5 Air Swept Pulverizer System.

9.4.5.1 Strength of Equipment

9.4.5.1.1

The pulverizer system components, including the pulverizer, the foreign-material collecting hopper,exhauster, and the external classifier, that are required for containment of internal pressure, shall bein accordance with 9.4.5.1.

9.4.5.1.2

All components of the pulverizer system shall be designed to withstand an internal explosionwithout rupture.

9.4.5.1.2.1

These components shall begin at a point that includes a minimum coal column of 0.61 m (2 ft) atthe point of connection of ductwork to the pulverizer, and at the seal air connections to thepulverizer system, and they shall end at the discharge of the pulverizer, external classifier, orexhauster.

9.4.5.1.2.2*

All components of the pulverizer system that are designed to be operated at no more than gaugepressure of 13.8 kPa (2 psi) with a design coal having Pmax of 10 bar-g or less shall be designed

for a maximum allowable working pressure of 344 kPa (50 psi) for containment of possibleexplosion pressures.

9.4.5.1.2.3

For operating gauge pressures in excess of 13.8 kPa (2 psi) and design coal Pmax of 10 bar-g or

less, the pulverizer system shall be designed for a maximum allowable working pressure 3.4 timesthe absolute operating pressure.

9.4.5.1.2.4

Where the design coal Pmax is greater than 10 bar-g, the raw fuel feeder system shall be designed

to withstand internal explosion pressures calculated in accordance with NFPA 68, Standard onExplosion Protection by Deflagration Venting, or NFPA 69, Standard on Explosion PreventionSystems. In these calculations, normal unobstructed openings shall be permitted to be consideredin the calculation as mitigation of explosion pressures.

9.4.5.1.3

Equipment design strength shall incorporate the combined stresses from mechanical loading,operating, and explosion and implosion pressures plus an allowance for wear, which shall bedetermined by agreement between the manufacturer and the purchaser.

9.4.5.1.4*

Page 72: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 72/102

9.4.5.1.4*

Shock wave pressures shall be included in the design, based on their locations in the system.

9.4.5.1.5

Explosion vents shall not be used on the components of the air-swept pulverizer system.

9.4.5.1.6 Valves.

9.4.5.1.6.1

All valves in the pulverizer system from a point that includes a minimum coal column of 0.61 m (2 ft)to the point of consumption of the pulverized fuel shall have construction that is capable ofwithstanding pressures as defined in 9.4.5.1.2 or 9.4.5.1.6.3, depending on the application.

9.4.5.1.6.2

These components shall include the following and any other pulverized fuel system valves:

(1) Barrier valve

(2) Dusttight valve

(3) Check valve

(4) Pressure/air lock

(5) Raw fuel gate

9.4.5.1.6.3 Interconnections.

Valves at points of interconnection between pulverizer system components requiring different designpressures shall comply with the strength requirements of the lower pressure of the two.

9.4.6 Firing System.

9.4.6.1 Piping Arrangement.

9.4.6.1.1

Process ductwork and piping for pneumatic transportation of fuel shall be arranged to preventhazardous accumulation of fuel.

9.4.6.1.2

Where the air-fuel stream is directed into multiple pipes, the system shall divide the air-fuel mixtureinto design ratio among various pipes.

9.4.6.2 Pipe Velocities.

9.4.6.2.1

Positive means shall be provided to ensure that all pipe velocities are equal to or above theminimum velocity required for pneumatic fuel transport and to prevent the hazardous accumulationof fuel, and flashback from the burners.

9.4.6.2.2

Testing during initial start-up and retesting as appropriate shall be performed by the owner/operatoror the owner’s/operator’s designated representative to verify that individual pipe velocities areadequate.

9.4.6.3

All piping system components shall be capable of being cleared of pulverized fuel using transportair.

9.4.6.4*

The pulverized fuel piping from the outlet of the pulverizer system to the pulverized fuel burner shallcomply with 9.4.5.1.

9.4.6.5 Bend Radii.

9.4.6.5.1

Pulverized fuel piping shall provide smooth flow and have bend radii not less than one pipe diameter.

9.4.6.5.2

Wherever possible, radii in excess of one pipe diameter shall be used.

9.4.6.6

Flexible joints and split clamp couplings shall conform to 9.4.6.1 through 9.4.6.5 except that thejunction of two sections shall be permitted to be sealed with flexible material.

Page 73: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 73/102

9.4.6.6.1

There shall be no separation of the pipe joint in case of failure of the flexible material.

9.4.6.6.2

Positive mechanical connections shall be provided between the two sections to prevent seriousmisalignment or separation.

9.4.6.7

At operating temperatures encountered in the service of the equipment, piping materials shallsatisfy the strength requirements of 9.4.5.1 and shall comply with 9.3.5.2 for allowable stresses.

9.4.6.8

Brittle materials having a plastic elongation of less than 8 percent prior to tensile rupture shall notbe used for piping except as abrasion-resistant linings and where no credit is taken for thestructural strength of the lining.

9.4.6.9

Piping support systems shall be designed and installed in accordance with Chapter 2, Part 5, ofASME B31.1, Power Piping, so that combined stresses will not be in excess of those specified in9.3.5.2.

9.4.6.10

Pipe that is lined with abrasion-resistant material shall have casing thickness and flange size that isdesigned for the strength requirements in 9.4.5.1 with no required allowance for wear.

9.4.6.11

Prior to initial operation or after piping system renovation, an in-service leak test shall be performedby the owner/operator or the owner’s/operator’s designated representative in accordance with thefollowing procedure:

(1) The system shall be gradually brought up to operating pressure and temperature.

(2) The system shall be held continuously at the conditions described in 9.4.6.11 (1) for 10minutes.

(3) All joints and connections shall be examined for leakage.

(4) The system shall show no visual evidence of weeping or leakage.

9.4.6.12 Valve Requirements.

9.4.6.12.1

For a suction furnace that can be fired by other main fuels or that is connected to two or morepulverizers or exhausters, valves, as shown in Figure 9.4.6.12.1 details (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), and(i), shall be installed to isolate all burner lines.

Figure 9.4.6.12.1 Direct-Fired Pulverized Fuel System's Valve Requirements in BurnerPiping.

Page 74: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 74/102

9.4.6.12.1.1

This requirement shall be permitted to be met with one dusttight and one barrier valve or with twodusttight valves.

9.4.6.12.1.2

A dusttight valve shall be installed in the burner pipe close to the furnace.

9.4.6.12.1.3

The second valve shall be installed close to the pulverizer.

9.4.6.12.1.4

The valves shall be closed prior to entering a pulverizer, exhauster, or fuel piping.

9.4.6.12.2

For a pressure furnace that can be fired by other main fuels or that is connected to two or morepulverizers or exhausters, a dusttight valve, as shown in Figure 9.4.6.12.1, details (j), (k), and (l),shall be installed to isolate all burner lines.

9.4.6.12.2.1

In addition, a second dusttight valve shall be installed close to the furnace.

9.4.6.12.2.2

Both valves shall be closed prior to entering a pulverizer, exhauster, or fuel piping.

9.4.6.12.3

One of the valves in 9.4.6.12.1 and 9.4.6.12.2 shall be quick closing.

9.4.6.12.4

If one valve is used to isolate more than one burner line, means shall be provided to preventcirculation between those lines or burners.

9.4.6.12.5

Two dusttight valves or one dusttight valve and one barrier valve, as shown in Figure 9.4.6.12.1,details (g) and (h), shall be provided in each burner pipe if one or more pulverizers are connected tomore than one suction furnace at a time.

9.4.6.12.6

Where one or more pulverizers, as shown in Figure 9.4.6.12.1, detail (l), are connected to two ormore pressure furnace(s) at the same time, the valve requirements in 9.4.6.12.2 shall apply.

9.4.6.12.7

Two dusttight valves or one dusttight valve and one barrier valve, as shown in Figure 9.4.6.12.1,detail (i), shall be installed in the burner piping where the discharge pipes from separate exhaustersor pulverizers are connected to the same burner nozzle of a suction furnace.

9.4.6.12.8

Two dusttight valves, as shown in Figure 9.4.6.12.1, detail (k), shall be installed in the burner pipingwhere the discharge pipes from separate exhausters or pulverizers are connected to the sameburner nozzle of a pressure furnace.

9.4.6.12.9

The valve that is located nearest the pulverizer shall be positioned so that pulverized fuelaccumulations above the valve will drain into the exhauster or pulverizer when the valve is opened.Other valves shall be located so as to prevent accumulation of pulverized fuel.

9.4.6.12.10

Unless required by the inerting system, valves shall not be required between the pulverizer and theburners for a single pulverizer or exhauster connected to one or more burners in a furnace thatcannot be fired by any other main fuel, provided that the combustion air to individual burners cannotbe shut off [see Figure 9.4.6.12.1, details (a) and (b)]; if combustion air can be shut off to individualburners, 9.4.6.12.1 and 9.4.6.12.2 shall apply.

9.4.6.13 Valves.

9.4.6.13.1

All valves in the firing system from a point that includes a minimum coal column of 0.61 m (2 ft) tothe point of consumption of the pulverized fuel shall have construction that is capable ofwithstanding pressures as defined in 9.4.5.1.2 or 9.4.6.13.3, depending on the application.

Page 75: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 75/102

9.4.6.13.2

These components shall include the following and any other pulverized fuel system valves:

(1) Barrier valve

(2) Dusttight valve

(3) Check valve

(4) Pressure/air lock

(5) Raw fuel gate

9.4.6.13.3 Interconnections.

Valves at points of interconnection between firing system components requiring different designpressures shall comply with the strength requirements of the lower pressure of the two.

9.4.7 Auxiliary Systems.

9.4.7.1 Emergency Inerting Systems.

9.4.7.1.1

Pulverizer systems shall be equipped with an inerting system that is capable of maintaining an inertatmosphere as required to meet the provisions of 9.6.4.2.1. (See also NFPA 69, Standard onExplosion Prevention Systems.)

9.4.7.1.2

Provisions shall be made for verification of flow of inerting media when the system is activated.

9.4.7.1.3

Where an inerting system is required , it shall be permanently installed and equipped withconnections, which shall be a minimum of 25 mm (1 in.) in diameter.

9.4.7.1.4

Injection shall be controlled by readily operable valves or dampers. (See NFPA 69, Standard onExplosion Prevention Systems, )

9.4.7.1.4.1

Operation of these valves shall be accomplished at a location that is remote from the pulverized fuelsystem.

9.4.7.1.4.2

Where these valves are manually operated, they shall be readily accessible.

9.4.7.1.4.3

Where these valves are manually operated, they shall be identified by a sign in block letters of notless than 51 mm (2 in.) in height on a background of contrasting color to the letters.

9.4.7.2 Fire-Extinguishing System.

9.4.7.2.1 Connections.

9.4.7.2.1.1

Pulverizer systems shall be equipped with connections for fire extinguishing.

9.4.7.2.1.2

These connections shall be at least 25 mm (1 in.) in diameter and shall be adequate to pass theamount of required extinguishing material.

9.4.7.2.2

Provisions shall be made for verification of flow of fire-extinguishing media when the system isactivated.

9.4.7.3 Safety Interlock Systems.

9.4.7.3.1

The safety interlocks required in this section shall be coordinated with the boiler, furnace, or otherrelated devices to which the pulverized fuel system is connected.

9.4.7.3.2 Permissive Sequential-Starting Interlocks.

Page 76: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 76/102

9.4.7.3.2.1

Permissive sequential-starting interlocks for direct-fired systems shall be arranged so that, afterfurnace or other connected apparatus interlocks have been satisfied, the pulverizer can be startedonly in the following sequence:

(1) Start ignition system in accordance with Chapter 6.

(2) Start primary air fan or exhauster.

(3) Establish minimum airflow.

(4) Start pulverizer.

(5) Start raw fuel feeder.

9.4.7.3.2.2

The actions of 9.4.7.3.2.1 (2) and 9.4.7.3.2.1 (4) shall be permitted to be simultaneous.

9.4.7.3.3 Trip Sequence of Interlocks.

9.4.7.3.3.1

Interlocks for direct-fired pulverized fuel systems shall be arranged to trip in the following sequence:

(1) Failure of primary airflow to below manufacturer's minimum shall trip the pulverizer and burnershutoff valve or equivalent and the feeder. The manufacturer's requirements regarding theburner's shutoff valve operation shall be followed.

(2) Failure of pulverizer shall trip the feeder and primary airflow.

(3) Closure of all fuel line valves shall trip the pulverizer, primary airflow, and raw fuel feed.

(4) Failure of the feeder shall initiate an alarm; restarting of the feeder shall be blocked until feederstart-up conditions are re-established.

9.4.7.3.3.2

Means to indicate loss of fuel feed to the pulverizer or fuel input to the furnace shall be installed.

9.5 Indirect-Fired Pulverized Fuel Systems.

9.5.1 Introduction.

General requirements for indirect-fired pulverized fuel systems shall be covered by this section, andspecific requirements for only the more commonly used indirect-fired unit systems shall be coveredin detail.

9.5.1.1

In addition to the components of a direct-fired system as listed in 9.4.1.1 a typical indirect-firedsystem shall include some or all of the following special equipment:

(1) Pulverized Fuel-air separation

(2) Pulverized fuel transport system

(3) Pulverized fuel storage

(4) Separated air

9.5.2 Raw Fuel Bunker.

9.5.2.1

The raw fuel bunker structural material shall be made of noncombustible material and shall bedesigned to provide the following mass flow and self-cleaning flow characteristics:

(1) An uninterrupted flow of fuel being handled at a controlled rate

(2) A flow pattern in which arching and ratholing (piping) are avoided

9.5.2.2

The bunker outlet feeder(s) shall be coordinated with the bunker to avoid the probability thatincorrect feeder selection will result in altering the bunker flow characteristics as specified in9.5.2.1(1) or 9.5.2.1(2).

Page 77: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 77/102

9.5.2.3

Provisions shall be made to prevent the accumulation of flammable mixtures of air, fuel dust, andcombustible gases within the bunker.

9.5.2.4

Procedures shall be established for emergency emptying of raw fuel bunkers.

9.5.2.5*

Water shall not be used to extinguish fires in the raw fuel bunker.

9.5.3 Raw Fuel Feeder System.

9.5.3.1

Means shall be provided to resist the passage of air or gas from the pulverizer through the feederinto the bunker.

9.5.3.1.1

Where used as the means to resist passage of air or gas from the pulverizer, a vertical column offuel shall be sized to withstand pulverizer operating pressures, but it shall be no less than threepipe diameters or hydraulic diameters for noncircular pipe.

9.5.3.2 Strength of Equipment.

9.5.3.2.1

The raw fuel feeder system, including but not limited to raw fuel feeding devices, discharge hoppers,and feed pipes to the pulverizer for an indirect-fired system, shall begin at a point that includes aminimum coal column of 0.61 m (2 ft), and shall end at the pulverizer inlet.

9.5.3.2.2

All components of the raw fuel feeder system shall be designed to withstand an internal explosionwithout rupture.

9.5.3.2.2.1*

All components of the raw fuel feeder system that are designed to be operated at no more thangauge pressure of 13.8 kPa (2 psi) with a design coal having Pmax of 10 bar-g or less shall be

designed for a maximum allowable working pressure of 344 kPa (50 psi) for containment of possibleexplosion pressures.

9.5.3.2.2.2

For operating gauge pressures in excess of 13.8 kPa (2 psi) and design coal Pmax of 10 bar-g or

less, the raw fuel feeder system shall be designed for a maximum allowable working pressure 3.4times the absolute operating pressure.

9.5.3.2.2.3

Where the design coal Pmax is greater than 10 bar-g, the raw fuel feeder system shall be designed

to withstand internal explosion pressures calculated in accordance with NFPA 68, Standard onExplosion Protection by Deflagration Venting, or NFPA 69, Standard on Explosion PreventionSystems. In these calculations, normal unobstructed openings shall be permitted to be consideredin the calculation as mitigation of explosion pressures.

9.5.3.2.3

Equipment design strength shall incorporate the combined stresses from mechanical loading,operating, and explosion and implosion pressures plus an allowance for wear, which shall bedetermined by agreement between the manufacturer and the purchaser.

9.5.3.2.4*

Shock wave pressures shall be included in the design, based on their locations in the system.

9.5.3.2.5

The mechanical components, including but not limited to seals, gears, bearings, shafts, and drives,shall not be required to meet these requirements.

9.5.3.2.6

Explosion vents shall not be used on the components of the raw fuel feeder system.

9.5.3.2.7 Valves.

9.5.3.2.7.1

All valves in the raw fuel feeder system from a point that includes a minimum coal column of 0.61 m(2 ft) to the point of consumption of the pulverized fuel shall have construction that is capable ofwithstanding pressures as defined in 9.5.3.2.2 or 9.5.3.2.7.3, depending on the application.

Page 78: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 78/102

9.5.3.2.7.2

These components shall include the following and any other pulverized fuel system valves:

(1) Barrier valve

(2) Dusttight valve

(3) Check valve

(4) Pressure/air lock

(5) Raw fuel gate

9.5.3.2.7.3 Interconnections.

Valves at points of interconnection between pulverized fuel system components requiring differentdesign pressures shall comply with the strength requirements of the lower pressure of the two.

9.5.4 Air and Gas System.

9.5.4.1

The fan for the pulverizer system shall be permitted to be located upstream (pulverizer fan) ordownstream (exhauster) of the pulverizer.

9.5.4.2 Air Supply Isolation Requirements.

9.5.4.2.1

For pressurized pulverizers and suction pulverizers with pressurized air supply installations, thereshall be a means for tight shutoff of the hot air supply and a means for shutting off the primary airsupply to each pulverizer.

9.5.4.2.2

For suction pulverizer installations with an atmospheric tempering air supply, there shall be ameans for shutting off the hot air supply.

9.5.4.3*

All ductwork, from the hot and tempering air supply ducts to individual pulverizers, including damperframes, expansion joints, supports, and hot primary air fans, shall be designed to contain the testblock capability of the pulverizer air supply fan.

9.5.5 Air-Swept Pulverizer System.

9.5.5.1 Strength of Equipment.

9.5.5.1.1

The pulverizer system components, including the pulverizer, foreign-material collecting hopper,exhauster, and the external classifier, that are required for containment of internal pressure, shall bein accordance with 9.5.5.1.

9.5.5.1.2

These components shall begin at a point that includes a minimum coal column of 0.61 m (2 ft), atthe point of connection of ductwork to the pulverizer, and at the seal air connections to thepulverizer system, and they shall end at the discharge of the pulverizer, external classifier, orexhauster.

9.5.5.1.3

All components of the pulverizer system shall be designed to withstand an internal explosionwithout rupture.

9.5.5.1.3.1

All components of the pulverizer system that are designed to be operated at no more than gaugepressure of 13.8 kPa (2 psi) with a design coal having Pmax of 10 bar-g or less shall be designed

for a maximum allowable working pressure of 344 kPa (50 psi) for containment of possibleexplosion pressures.

9.5.5.1.3.2

For operating gauge pressures in excess of 13.8 kPa (2 psi) and design coal Pmax of 10 bar-g or

less, the pulverizer system shall be designed to withstand an internal explosion pressure 3.4 timesthe absolute operating pressure.

Page 79: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 79/102

9.5.5.1.3.3

Where the design coal Pmax is greater than 10 bar-g, the raw fuel feeder system shall be designed

to withstand internal explosion pressures calculated in accordance with NFPA 68, Standard onExplosion Protection by Deflagration Venting, or NFPA 69, Standard on Explosion PreventionSystems. In these calculations, normal unobstructed openings shall be permitted to be consideredin the calculation as mitigation of explosion pressures.

9.5.5.1.4

Equipment design strength shall incorporate the combined stresses from mechanical loading,operating, and explosion and implosion pressures plus an allowance for wear, which shall bedetermined by agreement between the manufacturer and the purchaser.

9.5.5.1.5*

Shock wave pressures shall be included in the design, based on their locations in the system.

9.5.5.1.6

Explosion vents shall not be used on the components of the air-swept pulverizer system.

9.5.5.1.7 Valves.

9.5.5.1.7.1

All valves in the pulverizer system from a point that includes a minimum coal column of 0.61 m (2 ft)to the point of consumption of the pulverized fuel shall have construction that is capable ofwithstanding pressures as defined in 9.5.5.1.3 or 9.5.5.1.6.3, depending on the application.

9.5.5.1.7.2

These components shall include the following and any other pulverized fuel system valves:

(1) Barrier valve

(2) Dusttight valve

(3) Check valve

(4) Pressure/air lock

(5) Raw fuel gate

9.5.5.1.7.3 Interconnections.

Valves at points of interconnection between pulverized fuel system components requiring differentdesign pressures shall comply with the strength requirements of the lower pressure of the two.

9.5.6 Firing System.

9.5.6.1 Piping Arrangement.

9.5.6.1.1

Piping shall be arranged to prevent hazardous accumulation of fuel.

9.5.6.1.2

Where the air-fuel stream is directed into multiple pipes, the system shall divide the air-fuel mixtureinto design ratio among various pipes.

9.5.6.2 Pipe Velocities.

9.5.6.2.1

Positive means shall be provided to ensure that all pipe velocities are equal to or above theminimum velocity required for fuel transport and to prevent flashback from the burners.

9.5.6.2.2

Testing during initial start-up and retesting as appropriate shall be performed to verify that individualpipe velocities are adequate.

9.5.6.3

All piping system components shall be capable of being cleared of pulverized fuel using transportair.

9.5.6.4

The pulverized fuel piping from the outlet of the pulverizer system to the storage bin shall complywith 9.5.4.1.3.

9.5.6.5 Bend Radii.

Page 80: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 80/102

9.5.6.5.1

Pulverized fuel piping shall provide smooth flow and have bend radii not less than one pipe diameter.

9.5.6.5.2

Wherever possible, radii in excess of one pipe diameter shall be used.

9.5.6.6

Flexible joints and split clamp couplings shall conform to 9.5.6.1 through 9.5.6.5 except that thejunction of two sections shall be permitted to be sealed with flexible material.

9.5.6.6.1

There shall be no separation of the pipe joint in case of failure of the flexible material.

9.5.6.6.2

Positive mechanical connections shall be provided between the two sections to prevent seriousmisalignment or separation.

9.5.6.7

At operating temperatures encountered in the service of the equipment, piping materials shallsatisfy the strength requirements of 9.5.5.1.3 and shall comply with 9.3.5.2 for allowable stresses.

9.5.6.8

Brittle materials having a plastic elongation of less than 8 percent prior to tensile rupture shall notbe used for piping except as abrasion-resistant linings and where no credit is taken for thestructural strength of the lining.

9.5.6.9

Piping support systems shall be designed and installed in accordance with Chapter 2, Part 5, ofASME B31.1, Power Piping, so that combined stresses will not be in excess of those specified in9.3.5.2.

9.5.6.10

Pipe that is lined with abrasion-resistant material shall have casing thickness and flange size that isdesigned for the strength requirements in 9.5.5.1.3 with no required allowance for wear.

9.5.6.11

Prior to initial operation or after piping system renovation, an in-service leak test shall be performedin accordance with the following procedure:

(1) The system shall be gradually brought up to operating pressure and temperature.

(2) The system shall be held continuously at the conditions described in 9.5.5.11(1) for 10minutes.

(3) All joints and connections shall be examined for leakage.

(4) The system shall show no visual evidence of weeping or leakage.

9.5.6.12 Valves

9.5.6.12.1

Barrier valves shall be provided in the piping between the pulverized fuel feeders and the burners ofan indirect-fired system that is connected to one or more burners of a suction furnace.

9.5.6.12.2

A dusttight valve shall be installed in each burner pipe between the pulverized fuel feeder and theburner for an indirect-fired system that is connected to one or more burners of a pressure furnace.These valves shall not be opened until the primary air pressure is established.

9.5.6.12.3

All valves in the firing system from a point that includes a minimum coal column of 0.61 m (2 ft) tothe point of consumption of the pulverized fuel shall have construction that is capable ofwithstanding pressures as defined in 9.5.5.1.3 or 9.5.6.12.3, depending on the application.

Page 81: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 81/102

9.5.6.12.4

These components shall include the following and any other pulverized fuel system valves:

(1) Barrier valve

(2) Dusttight valve

(3) Check valve

(4) Pressure/air lock

(5) Raw fuel gate

9.5.6.12.5 Interconnections.

Valves at points of interconnection between pulverized fuel system components requiring differentdesign pressures shall comply with the strength requirements of the lower pressure of the two.

9.5.6.13 Primary Air Connections of Pressure Furnace Firing.

9.5.6.13.1

For pressure furnace firing, a dusttight valve shall be installed between the forced draft system andthe inlet for the primary air fan.

9.5.6.13.2

A minimum stop shall be provided on the primary air control damper to prevent its being completelyclosed unless the shutoff dampers in the burner pipes are closed.

9.5.7 Pulverized Fuel-Air Separation.

9.5.7.1

Cyclones and dust collectors shall meet the requirements of 9.5.5.1 or shall be equipped withsuitable vents in accordance with NFPA 68, Standard on Explosion Protection by DeflagrationVenting.

9.5.7.2

The separated fuel shall be transported to storage bins for subsequent supply to the burners.

9.5.7.3*

All interconnected equipment in which a deflagration in one component could initiate a secondarydeflagration in a connected component shall be equipped with explosion isolation or another methodto prevent flame front propagation in accordance with NFPA 69,Standard on Explosion PreventionSystems.

9.5.8 Pulverized Fuel Transport System.

9.5.8.1

Piping and ducts used to transport pulverized fuel shall meet the requirements of 9.5.5.1 or shall beequipped with suitable vents in accordance with NFPA 68, Standard on Explosion Protection byDeflagration Venting.

9.5.8.2

A pressure lock shall be installed at each cyclone outlet if more than one cyclone is connected to asingle pulverized fuel pump or if the cyclone is arranged for direct gravity discharge into thepulverized fuel bin. A pressure lock shall not be required at the cyclone outlet if only one cyclone isconnected to the pulverized fuel pump.

9.5.8.3

Pulverized fuel lock hoppers shall be designed for 3.4 times the absolute operating pressure.

9.5.8.3.1

Pulverized fuel lock hoppers shall be designed to permit fuel discharge at an uninterrupted,controlled rate.

9.5.8.3.2

Internal construction shall minimize accumulations.

9.5.8.4

Lock hoppers shall be equipped with high and low level fuel detectors.

9.5.9 Pulverized Fuel Storage.

Page 82: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 82/102

9.5.9.1

A pressure lock shall be installed at each fuel outlet of a pulverized fuel bin (if required) that isconnected to a pressure furnace, to permit feeding of fuel into the burner lines at a higher pressureand to prevent the flow of primary air into the bin.

9.5.9.2

A pulverized fuel storage bin shall meet the requirements of 9.5.5.1 or shall be equipped withsuitable vents in accordance with NFPA 68, Standard on Explosion Protection by DeflagrationVenting.

9.5.9.3

Pulverized fuel bins shall conform to strength requirements as specified in 9.5.5.1 with exceptionsas outlined in 9.5.11.

9.5.9.3.1

These bins shall be designed to permit fuel discharge at an uninterrupted, controlled rate.

9.5.9.3.2

Internal construction shall minimize stagnant deposits.

9.5.9.3.3

Open-top bins shall not be used.

9.5.9.3.4

Provisions shall be made to prevent accumulation of flammable mixtures of air, fuel dust, andcombustible gases within the bin.

9.5.9.3.5

Bins shall be equipped with high and low level fuel detectors.

9.5.9.4

Pulverized fuel lock hoppers shall be designed for 3.4 times the absolute operating pressure.

9.5.9.4.1

Pulverized fuel lock hoppers shall be designed to permit fuel discharge at an uninterrupted,controlled rate.

9.5.9.4.2

Internal construction shall minimize accumulations.

9.5.9.5

Lock hoppers shall be equipped with high and low level fuel detectors.

9.5.10 Separated Air.

9.5.10.1

A check valve shall be installed in each vent pipe connecting the cyclone or dust collector of anindirect-fired system to the primary air fan or to any portion of the furnace or stack of a suctionfurnace.

9.5.10.2 Venting.

9.5.10.2.1

Partial venting shall be used to control humidity in the pulverized fuel system, to minimize quantityof vented air or gas, or to conserve heat.

9.5.10.2.2

Total venting shall be used where there is no further use for the transport air or gas.

9.5.10.2.3

Both vent systems shall have the common requirements of 9.5.10.2.3.1 through 9.5.10.2.3.6.

9.5.10.2.3.1

There shall be no venting to a pressure furnace.

9.5.10.2.3.2

Venting to a suction furnace shall be permitted when it is delivered to a zone where combustion isactive and injection line velocities are maintained at least 50 percent above the maximum flamepropagation rate of the fuel.

Page 83: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 83/102

9.5.10.2.3.3

Venting to a stack, flue, or breeching shall be permitted when it is done to a zone where thetemperature does not exceed two-thirds of the ignition temperature of the fuel and the design of theentire vent system is such that there will be no hazardous accumulation of combustible fuel dust.

9.5.10.2.3.4

Venting to the primary air fan shall be permitted when the primary air fan is operating and thefollowing conditions are met:

(1) A means is provided to prevent reverse flow.

(2) The primary air system can handle the total amount of air.

(3) The primary air fan is discharging to a zone of active combustion.

9.5.10.2.3.5

When venting to the atmosphere, the vented air or gas shall be sufficiently clean of combustiblematerial so as not to create fire or an explosion hazard. The vented air or gas shall not interfere withthe proper operation of other systems within the area.

9.5.10.2.3.6

Check valves, where required, shall be located near the source of possible reverse flow into thesystem.

9.5.10.2.4

When the vented air from the cyclone is discharged to the atmosphere, the vent shall discharge at aheight above the building roof to prevent accumulations on the roof.

9.5.10.2.5

When the vented air is discharged into the stack, flue, or breeching, the connection shall be madeat a point where the pressure is less than that of the room in which the pulverizer is located, andeach vent line shall have a check valve that opens in the direction of the flow.

9.5.10.2.6

Vent connections shall be located downstream of the recirculated gas inlet connection in such amanner that any combustible dust that is carried by the vented air cannot be entrained in therecirculated gas for possible introduction into a zone of high furnace temperature.

9.5.11 Inert Atmosphere.

9.5.11.1

If an indirect-fired system is started and operated with an inert atmosphere in all parts of the systemin accordance with NFPA 69, Standard on Explosion Prevention Systems, the strengthrequirements shall not apply.

9.5.11.2

Any component of the system that is started and operated with an inert atmosphere shall not berequired to comply with the strength requirements.

9.5.12 Auxilary Systems.

9.5.12.1 Emergency Inerting System.

9.5.12.1.1

Pulverizers and indirect-fired systems shall be equipped with an inerting system that is capable ofmaintaining an inert atmosphere as required to meet the provisions of 9.6.4.2.1. (See also NFPA69, Standard on Explosion Prevention Systems.)

9.5.12.1.2

Provisions shall be made for verification of flow of inerting media when the system is activated.

9.5.12.1.3

Where an inerting system is required, it shall be permanently installed and equipped withconnections, which shall be a minimum of 25 mm (1 in.) in diameter.

9.5.12.1.4

Injection shall be controlled by readily operable valves or dampers. (See NFPA 69, Standard onExplosion Prevention Systems.)

Page 84: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 84/102

9.5.12.1.4.1

Operation of these valves shall be accomplished at a location that is remote from the pulverized fuelsystem.

9.5.12.1.4.2

Where these valves are manually operated, they shall be readily accessible.

9.5.12.1.4.3

Where these valves are manually operated, they shall be identified by a sign in block letters of notless than 51 mm (2 in.) in height on a background of contrasting color to the letters.

9.5.12.2 Fire-Extinguishing System.

9.5.12.2.1 Connections.

9.5.12.2.1.1

Pulverizers and pulverized fuel–collecting systems shall be equipped with connections for fireextinguishing.

9.5.12.2.1.2

These connections shall be at least 25 mm (1 in.) in diameter and shall be adequate to pass theamount of required extinguishing material.

9.5.12.2.2

Provisions shall be made for verification of flow of fire-extinguishing media when the system isactivated.

9.5.12.3 Safety Interlock Systems.

9.5.12.3.1

The safety interlocks required in this section shall be coordinated with the boiler, furnace, or otherrelated devices to which the pulverized fuel system is connected.

9.5.12.3.2 Permissive Sequential-Starting Interlocks.

9.5.12.3.2.1

Permissive sequential-starting interlocks for pulverized fuel indirect-fired systems shall be arrangedso that the system components can be started only in the following sequence:

(1) Start pulverized fuel pump or conveyor.

(2) Start cyclone and dust collector pressure locks.

(3) Start vent fan.

(4) Start pulverizer exhauster or air fan.

(5) Start pulverizer.

(6) Start raw fuel feeder.

9.5.12.3.2.2

The actions of 9.5.12.3.2.1(4) and 9.5.12.3.2.1(5) shall be permitted to be simultaneous.

9.5.12.3.3

Interlocks for pulverizers of indirect-fired systems shall be arranged to trip as follows:

(1) The full pulverized fuel bin shall trip the fuel pump or conveyor and the raw fuel feeder.

(2) Failure of the fuel pump or conveyor shall trip the vent fan on the cyclone or dust collector andpressure locks upstream of the fuel pump or conveyor.

(3) Failure of the vent fan shall trip the pulverizer exhauster or air fan.

(4) Failure of the pulverizer exhauster or air fan shall trip the raw fuel feeder.

(5) Failure of the pulverizer shall trip the raw fuel feeder.

9.5.12.3.4

For pressure furnaces that are firing from indirect-fired or semi-direct-fired systems, the dusttightvalve in the burner pipe that is after the pulverized fuel feeder shall be interlocked so that it cannotbe opened unless the dusttight damper in the primary air supply is open.

9.6 Operation.

Page 85: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 85/102

9.6.1 Operation of All Pulverized Fuel Systems.

9.6.1.1 Preparation for Starting.

9.6.1.1.1

Preparation for every start-up shall include checks for the following conditions:

(1) The pulverizer system sealing air, if required, is in service.

(2) Energy is supplied to the control system and to the safety interlocks.

(3) All pulverizer system gates, valves, and dampers are in start-up positions.

9.6.1.1.2

After maintenance or outage, the following inspections and checks shall be made by theowner/operator or the owner’s/operator’s designated representative:

(1) Pulverizers, ducts, and fuel piping are in good repair and free from foreign material.

(2) Pulverizers, ducts, and fuel piping are evacuated by all personnel, all access and inspectiondoors are closed, and all personnel protection devices are reinstalled.

(3) All pulverizer air or flue gas dampers are operated through the full operating range.

(4) Pulverizers, feeders, controls, and associated equipment are in a condition ready for service.

(5) A complete functional check is made of all safety interlocks.

9.6.2 Operation of Direct-Fired Systems.

9.6.2.1* Starting Sequence.

The starting sequence shall consist of all of the following steps:

(1) Start all necessary light-off equipment in accordance with Chapter 6 requirements.

(2) Open the pulverizer tempering air damper.

(3) Start the primary air fan or exhauster, if driven separately from the pulverizer.

(4) Open the primary airflow control damper to a setting that provides a burner line transportvelocity greater than or equal to the established minimum.

(5) Open the pulverizer burner line valves.

(6) Start the pulverizer.

(7) Open the pulverizer hot air damper and maintain pulverizer outlet temperature within thespecified range (as dictated by the system designer or field tests).

(8) Start the raw fuel feeder.

(9) Place the pulverizer outlet temperature, primary airflow, and raw fuel feed controls onautomatic.

9.6.2.1.1

It shall be permitted to vary the sequence of the steps in 9.6.2.1 (2) through 9.6.2.1 (9) asrecommended by the system designer.

9.6.2.2* Normal Operation.

9.6.2.2.1

The output of the pulverizer shall be regulated by adjusting its fuel and air supplies in accordancewith the manufacturer's procedures or as determined by field tests.

9.6.2.2.2 Individual Burner Shutoff Valves.

9.6.2.2.2.1

Individual burner shutoff valves, if provided, shall be wide open or completely closed.

9.6.2.2.2.2

Individual burner shutoff valves shall not be placed at intermediate settings.

9.6.2.2.3*

Burner line transport velocities shall be maintained at or above minimum for all pulverizer loadingconditions.

Page 86: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 86/102

9.6.2.2.4

A pulverizer shall not be operated below its minimum air or fuel stop setting.

9.6.2.3* Normal Shutdown.

The pulverizer shutdown sequence shall consist of all of the following steps:

(1) Reduce pulverizer output and establish required combustion system conditions for shutdownas required in Chapter 6.

(2) Reduce the hot air and increase the cold air to cool the pulverizer to a predeterminedminimum outlet temperature as recommended by the system designer or as determined bytest.

(3) When the pulverizer is cooled, stop the feeder and continue operation of the pulverizer with theminimum established airflow to remove all fuel from the pulverizer and burner lines. Maintainminimum outlet temperature (typically requires shutoff of hot air supply when feeder isstopped).

(4) Shut the pulverizer down after a predetermined time as required to empty the pulverizer asdetermined by field tests.

(5) Position burner line shutoff valves in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

(6) Stop primary air flow.

9.6.2.3.1

It shall be permitted to vary the sequence of the steps in 9.6.2.3 (1) through 9.6.2.3 (6) asrecommended by the system designer.

9.6.3 Operation of Indirect-Fired Systems.

9.6.3.1 Operation of Fuel-Burning Equipment.

9.6.3.1.1 Starting Sequence.

The starting sequence shall be as follows:

(1) Coordinate the fuel-burning portion with the furnace in accordance with Chapter 6.

(2) Start the primary air fan(s).

(3) Open all burner and primary air shutoff valves for the burners to be started.

(4) Open the pulverized fuel gate and start the pulverized fuel feeder for these burners.

9.6.3.1.2 Normal Operation.

9.6.3.1.2.1 Individual Burner Valves.

(A)

Individual burner valves shall be wide open or completely closed.

(B)

Individual burner valves shall not be placed at intermediate settings.

9.6.3.1.2.2

Fuel flow shall be controlled by adjusting the pulverized fuel feeder speed.

9.6.3.1.2.3

Primary airflow shall be maintained at all times to prevent settling of coal dust in burner pipes.

9.6.3.1.3 Normal Shutdown.

The shutdown sequence shall be as follows and in accordance with Chapter 6:

(1) Establish the required combustion system conditions for shutdown.

(2) Stop the pulverized fuel feeder.

(3) When the burner flame is extinguished, close the burner and primary air shutoff valves, unlessprimary air valves supply air to all burners during operation.

(4) Stop the primary air fan after the last burner that is served by that fan is shut down.

9.6.3.2 Operation of Pulverizing Equipment of Indirect—Fired Systems.

9.6.3.2.1 Starting Sequence.

Page 87: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 87/102

9.6.3.2.1.1

The basic principle that shall be followed is that of starting equipment in sequence from the storagebin “upstream” toward the point of pulverizer air supply and then finally the raw fuel supply.

9.6.3.2.1.2

The starting sequence shall be as follows:

(1) Start the pulverized fuel pump or conveyor, if provided.

(2) Start the cyclone pressure lock, if provided.

(3) Start the cyclone or dust collector vent fan or exhauster and/or the primary air fan and openthe burner and primary air shutoff valves if used to convey the vent stream and burners are notin service, in accordance with 9.5.10.2.

(4) Start the pulverizer exhauster or fan and adjust the control dampers to obtain proper air flowand temperature.

(5) Start the pulverizer.

(6) Start the raw fuel feeder.

(7) Readjust the control damper(s) to obtain required pulverizer air-fuel outlet temperature andairflow.

9.6.3.2.2 Normal Shutdown.

The shutdown sequence shall be as follows:

(1) Close the hot air damper and open the cold air damper or flue gas damper to cool down thepulverizer.

(2) Stop the raw fuel feeder.

(3) Operate the pulverizer for a predetermined time as required to empty the pulverizer of fuel andmake it cool. Stop the pulverizer.

(4) Stop the pulverizer exhauster or fan.

(5) Stop the cyclone and dust collector vent fan or exhauster and/or the primary air fan if used toconvey the vent stream and all burners are shut down.

(6) Stop cyclone pressure lock.

(7) Stop pulverized fuel pump or conveyor.

9.6.4 Abnormal Pulverizer System Conditions.

9.6.4.1

When a fire is suspected in the pulverizer system or abnormal operating conditions areencountered, all personnel shall be cleared from the area near the pulverizer, primary air duct,burner pipes, burners and feeder, or other pulverized fuel system components before the operatingconditions are changed.

9.6.4.2 Pulverized Fuel SystemTripping.

9.6.4.2.1* Inerting.

9.6.4.2.1.1

A pulverizer in a direct-fired pulverized fuel system that is tripped under load shall be inerted andmaintained under an inert atmosphere until confirmation that no burning or smoldering fuel exists inthe pulverizer or the fuel is removed.

9.6.4.2.1.2

The following components in an indirect-fired pulverized fuel system that is tripped under load shallbe inerted in a pre-defined time as established by the system designer:

(1) Pulverizer

(2) External classifier

(3) Fuel-air separators [cyclone(s), bag house(s), or electrostatic precipitator(s)]

(4) Pulverized fuel bin(s)

Page 88: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 88/102

9.6.4.2.1.3 Inerting Procedure.

(A)

The inerting procedure shall be established by the pulverizer equipment manufacturer and thepurchaser.

(B)

The pulverizer equipment manufacturer and purchaser shall consider fuel characteristics, thepulverizer temperature and size, and arrangement of the pulverizer.

9.6.4.2.1.4

Inerting media shall be selected from, but not limited to, the following:

(1) Carbon dioxide

(2) Steam

(3) Nitrogen

9.6.4.2.2 Fuel-Clearing Procedures.

9.6.4.2.2.1

For pulverizers that are tripped and inerted while containing a charge of fuel in accordance with9.6.4.2.1.1, one of the following procedures shall be used to clear fuel from the pulverizers andsweep the transport lines clean as soon as possible after the trip and there is confirmation thatthere is no burning or smoldering fuel:

(1) Clear one pulverizer at a time under inert conditions into the furnace using the followingprocedure:

(a) Isolate from the furnace all shutdown or tripped pulverizers.

(b) Start up one pulverizer in accordance with the principles and sequences listed in 9.6.2.1(1) through 9.6.2.1 (9).

(c) Continue to operate the pulverizer until empty and in normal condition for shutdown.When the operating pulverizer is empty of fuel, proceed to another tripped and inertedpulverizer and repeat the procedure until all are cleared of fuel.

Exception: An exception to 9.6.4.2.2.1 (1)(c) is to restart the feeder and return thepulverizer to normal operation if furnace conditions allow such operation.

(2) Clear one pulverizer at a time under inert conditions through the pyrites removal system usingthe following procedure:

(a) Remove fuel through the pyrites removal system using operation of the pulverizer motoras necessary.

(b) Start the pulverizer with an inert medium, using the starting sequences in 9.6.2.1 (1)through 9.6.2.1 (9).

9.6.4.2.2.2 Burning Fuel in Out-of-Service Pulverizer.

(A)

In the event that there are indications of burning or smoldering fuel in an out-of-service pulverizer, thepulverizer shall not be restarted under the normal procedure.

(B)

Fire-extinguishing procedures shall be followed, or removal of residual fuel shall be accomplishedunder inert conditions by taking one of the following steps:

(1) Remove fuel through the pyrites removal system. When this procedure is followed, thepulverizer shall be opened and inspected by the owner/operator or the owner’s/operator’sdesignated representativeprior to restarting.

(2) Start the pulverizer with an inert medium, using the starting sequences in 9.6.2.1(1) through9.6.2.1(9).

Page 89: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 89/102

(C)

Due to the danger of an explosion when they are being opened and cleaned, pulverizers shall not becleaned manually until they and their contents have been cooled to ambient temperature.

(D)

The procedures of 9.6.4.3 shall be followed.

9.6.4.3 Fires in Pulverized Fuel Systems.

9.6.4.3.1

Indication of a fire in any part of a pulverized fuel system is a serious condition and shall be dealtwith promptly.

9.6.4.3.2

Extinguishing media shall be water or inert solids or shall be in accordance with 9.6.4.2.1.4.

9.6.4.3.3

The following procedures for fighting fires shall be used, with modifications for specific systems,specific locations of fire, or requirements of the equipment manufacturer:

(1) If sufficient flow capacity of inerting media is provided (at least 50 percent by volume of theminimum primary airflow for the system), inert the pulverizer air-fuel flow, shut off the fuel feed,empty the pulverizer of fuel, and shut down and isolate the pulverizer.

(2) Stop the primary airflow, trip the pulverizer and feeder, isolate the system, inert, and proceedas follows:

(a) Do not disturb any accumulation of dust in the pulverizing equipment.

(b) Do not open any access doors to the pulverizer until the fire is extinguished and alltemperatures have returned to ambient.

(c) After isolation of the pulverizer is verified, follow the procedures as outlined in 9.6.4.3.6and 9.6.4.3.7.

(3) Extinguish a fire that is detected in an operating low storage pulverizer by shutting off the hotair, increasing the raw fuel feed as much as possible without overloading the pulverizer, andcontinuing to operate with tempering air.

(4) Introduce water into the raw fuel or tempering air stream, or both, and proceed as follows:

(a) The water must be added in such quantities and at such locations as not to cause hang-up or interruption of raw fuel feed or to stir up any deposit of combustible material.

(b) When all evidence of fire has disappeared, shut off the water, trip the pulverizer, isolate,and inert.

9.6.4.3.4

When fires are detected in other parts of a direct-fired system, such as burner lines, the proceduresas outlined in 9.6.4.3.3 (1), (2), or (3) shall be followed.

9.6.4.3.5

When fires are detected in indirect-fired system components, including but not limited to cyclones,dust collectors, and pulverized fuel bins, the affected components shall be isolated and inerted.

9.6.4.3.6

If fire is detected in an out-of-service pulverizer, it shall be kept out of service and isolated.

9.6.4.3.6.1

All air supply to the pulverizer shall be shut off.

9.6.4.3.6.2

Access doors to a pulverizer shall not be opened until the fire is extinguished by water or otherextinguishing media and all temperatures have returned to ambient.

9.6.4.3.7

Pulverizing equipment shall be inspected internally by the owner/operator or the owner’s/operator’sdesignated representative following fires in pulverizing systems.

Page 90: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 90/102

9.6.4.3.7.1

All coke formations and other accumulations shall be removed to reduce the potential for futurefires.

9.6.4.3.7.2

If the pulverizer is wet, it shall be dried.

9.6.4.3.7.3

In no case shall a compressed air jet be used.

9.6.4.3.7.4

All components shall be inspected, and damaged items, including but not limited to gaskets, seals,lubricants, and liners, shall be replaced.

9.7 Special Systems.

9.7.1 Introduction.

Specific systems, as defined in this section, shall meet the specific requirements of this section.(For general design, operating, and safety requirements of these systems, see Sections 9.4 and9.6.)

9.7.2 Semi-Direct-Fired System.

9.7.2.1 Description.

This system, as shown in Figure 9.7.2.1(a) and Figure 9.7.2.1(b), shall consist of an air-sweptpulverizer located near the point of use.

Figure 9.7.2.1(a) Semi-Direct-Fired Pulverized Fuel System for a Suction Furnace.

Figure 9.7.2.1(b) Semi-Direct-Fired Pulverized Fuel System for a Pressurized Furnace.

9.7.2.1.1

The fuel shall be separated from the air in a cyclone or other type of dust collector.

Page 91: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 91/102

9.7.2.1.2

Fuel shall discharge from the cyclone through a rotary valve and shall be picked up by air from aprimary air fan and blown into the furnace.

9.7.2.1.3

The primary air fan shall take suction from the pulverizer air fan or from other sources.

9.7.2.1.4

If the primary air fan does not utilize all of the pulverizer air, a vent fan shall be required.

9.7.2.2 System Arrangement.

This system shall be permitted to include the following special equipment:

(1) Cyclone separator or other type of dust collector

(2) Pressure lock

(3) Primary air fan

(4) Vent fan and dust collector, if required

(5) Pulverized fuel pickup

9.7.2.3 Valve Requirements.

9.7.2.3.1

A barrier valve and a dusttight valve shall be installed between each fuel pickup point and the burnerfor a suction furnace that can be fired by other fuels.

9.7.2.3.2

Two dusttight valves shall be installed between the fuel pickup point and the burner for a pressurizedfurnace if the furnace can be fired by other fuels.

9.7.2.3.3

One of the valves described in 9.7.2.3.1 and 9.7.2.3.2 shall be quick closing.

9.7.2.3.4

Valves shall not be required between the pulverizer and the cyclone.

9.7.2.4 Isolation Requirements.

Isolation requirements shall be in accordance with 9.4.4.4.

9.7.2.5 Operation.

9.7.2.5.1 Starting Sequence.

The starting sequence shall be as follows:

(1) Start up all necessary combustion system auxiliaries in the proper sequence.

(2) Start the forced draft fan (for the pressure furnace only).

(3) Start the primary air fan.

(4) Open all valves in lines to burners to be started, including barrier valves and dusttight valves.

(5) Adjust the primary airflow to the desired value, at least sufficient to provide minimum burnerline velocity.

(6) Start pressure locks.

(7) Start the pulverizer air fan.

(8) Start the pulverizer.

(9) Start the vent fan, if required.

(10) Start the raw fuel feeder.

(11) Adjust the dampers and controls as in 9.6.2.1 (9).

9.7.2.5.2 Normal Operation.

The procedures of 9.6.2.2 shall be followed.

Page 92: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 92/102

9.7.2.5.3 Normal Shutdown.

The normal shutdown procedure shall be as follows:

(1) Follow the procedures of 9.6.2.3.

(2) When the pulverizer is empty and cool, stop the pulverizer and the pulverizer air fan orexhauster.

(3) Stop the pressure locks.

(4) Stop the vent fan.

(5) Stop the primary air fan.

9.7.2.5.4 Interlocking.

Interlocking shall be as outlined in 9.4.7.3.

9.7.3 Pulverized Fuel System for Blast Furnace Injection.

9.7.3.1 Description.

This system, as shown in Figure 9.7.3.1, shall consist of an air-swept pulverizer.

Figure 9.7.3.1 Blast Furnace Pulverized Fuel Injection System.

9.7.3.1.1

The fuel shall be separated from the air in a cyclone or other type of dust collector.

9.7.3.1.2

Fuel shall discharge from the cyclone through a pressure lock valve and be collected, stored, andbatch-pressurized to a pressure that is higher than the blast furnace pressure.

9.7.3.1.3

The pressurized fuel shall then be transported and distributed to the furnace tuyeres.

9.7.3.1.4

This system shall have the following three major subsystems:

(1) Fuel grinding and collecting system

(2) Inert gas, pressurized fuel, storage, and feeding system

(3) Pulverized fuel transportation and distribution system

9.7.3.2 System Arrangement.

9.7.3.2.1

The pulverizer and pulverized fuel-collecting, fuel-pressurizing, and fuel-feeding equipment shall belocated remotely from the blast furnace unless other design requirements locate it close to thefurnace.

9.7.3.2.2

The distribution system shall be located close to the blast furnace.

Page 93: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 93/102

9.7.3.2.3

The pulverizer fan shall be located ahead of the air heater and the pulverizer, between the air heaterand the pulverizer, at the pulverizer outlet, or at the cyclone or dust collector vent.

9.7.3.2.4

This system shall include the following special equipment:

(1) Pulverizer air heater

(2) Cyclone separator or other type of dust collector

(3) Cyclone pressure lock

(4) Pulverized-fuel bin

(5) Pulverized-fuel feed tanks

(6) Pressuretight isolation valves

(7) Injection air system

(8) Inert gas system

(9) Fuel injection lances

(10) Flow control of air or flue gas

(11) Vent dust collector

9.7.3.3 Valve Requirements.

9.7.3.3.1

Pressure locks shall be installed at the pulverized fuel discharge of the cyclone separator or ventdust collector return lines.

9.7.3.3.2 Dusttight Valves.

9.7.3.3.2.1

Special dusttight valves shall be installed at each fuel outlet of the pulverized fuel bin, at the fueldischarge outlet of each feed tank, and at each fuel outlet of the pulverized fuel distributors.

9.7.3.3.2.2

These valves shall be tight at a pressure that is 1.5 times the required pressure in the feed tanks.

9.7.3.4 Isolation Requirements.

Isolation damper(s) shall be provided upstream of the pulverizer and at the discharge of the cycloneseparator to permit inerting in this system.

9.7.3.5 Operation.

9.7.3.5.1

Operating procedures for handling pulverized fuel being injected to the blast furnace shall beestablished to avoid fires and explosions in the pulverized fuel injection system.

9.7.3.5.2 Operation of Fuel Pulverizing Equipment.

The principles and procedures of 9.6.3 shall apply to this storage-grinding system.

9.7.3.5.3

Operation of fuel injection equipment shall be as follows:

(1) Ascertain that the blast furnace is in service before starting the pulverized fuel injectionsystem.

(2) Start the inert gas source.

(3) Start the injection air system blower or compressor and pressurize the injection line to thedistributor.

(4) Pressurize the filled pulverized fuel feed tank with inert gas.

(5) Open the dusttight valves in lines leaving the distributors.

(6) Establish transport airflow.

(7) Open the discharge dusttight valves from the pulverized fuel feed tank.

Page 94: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 94/102

9.7.3.5.4

Inert gas shall be used to fluidize and pressurize the feed tank system.

9.7.3.5.5

Pulverized fuel flow shall be controlled by regulating the pressure drop across the system.

9.7.3.6 Normal Shutdown.

9.7.3.6.1

The shutdown sequence shall be as follows:

(1) Empty the fuel bin and feed tanks of pulverized fuel.

(2) Purge the injection and distribution system.

(3) Close the distributor dusttight valves.

9.7.3.6.2

If all pulverized fuel cannot be removed from the system, inert gas shall be provided for the feedhoppers and pulverized fuel bin when the system is idle.

9.7.3.7 Interlocking.

In addition to the interlocking requirements of 9.4.9, the following shall be included:

(1) Failure of the pulverizer airflow trips the separately fired air heater.

(2) Failure of the cyclone separator or other type of dust collector pressure lock trips the raw coalfeeder.

(3) Power failure closes all valves that are required to isolate the system.

9.7.4 Direct-Fired System for Rotary Kilns.

This system is a form of direct firing as described in 9.4.8.1 and shown in Figure 9.7.4(a) andFigure 9.7.4(b). The only special equipment is an optional dust collector with a pressure lock forcleaning hot air or gas.

Figure 9.7.4(a) Direct-Fired Pulverized Fuel Systems for Rotary Kilns with PressurePulverizer.

Figure 9.7.4(b) Direct-Fired Pulverized Fuel Systems for Rotary Kilns with SuctionPulverizer.

9.7.4.1 Isolation Requirements.

9.7.4.1.1

When a bypass air system is used, a bypass control damper shall be installed.

Page 95: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 95/102

9.7.4.1.2

A tempering damper shall be installed near the kiln hood to protect the hot gas duct.

9.7.4.2 Operation.

9.7.4.2.1 Starting Sequence.

The starting sequence shall be as follows:

(1) Start the pressure lock.

(2) Start the primary air fan or exhauster.

(3) Start the air heaters, if furnished.

(4) Start the pulverizer.

(5) Start the raw fuel feeder.

(6) Adjust the primary air and fuel to the desired value.

9.7.4.2.2 Normal Operation.

Normal operation shall be as described in 9.6.2.2.

9.7.4.2.3 Normal Shutdown.

The normal shutdown procedure shall be as follows:

(1) Shut off the hot air.

(2) When the pulverizer is cool, stop the raw fuel feeder.

(3) When the pulverizer is empty, stop the pulverizer.

(4) Stop the primary air fan or exhauster.

(5) Stop the pressure lock.

9.7.4.3 Interlocking.

Interlocking shall be as described in 9.4.7.3.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

CC NOTE: The following CC Note No. 30 appeared in the First Draft Report as First Revision No. 150 and also related to Public Input 152,, 161, 162, 163, and 164.

The PFS committee should modify figure 9.4.5.1.2(c) to change “Divider” to “Distributor.” The PFS committee should review 9.4.7.1.1 and 9.4.7.1.3; and9.5.12.1.1 and 9.5.12.1.3 for consistency. 9.4.7.1.1 and 9.5.12.1.3 state that an inerting system shall be required, but 9.4.7.1.3 and 9.5.12.1.3 imply that the system is optional. The PFS committee should reconsider reference to NFPA 70 in 9.3.7 because the scope of NFPA 70 specifically excludes electric utility plants. The PFS committee should develop annex text to 9.3.1.4 to describe what is meant by “safe removal of foreign material.” The PFS committee should remove unenforceable language from 9.3.4, such that it would read as follows: “The system shall include indicators and annunciators that provide the operator with information about operating conditions, both normal and abnormal, throughout the system.” The PFS committee should review 9.5.2.2 and revise for clarity or develop annex material. The Correlating Committee found the existing paragraph confusing and unenforceable (i.e. “avoid the probability”).

Related Item

First Revision No. 150-NFPA 85-2013 [Chapter 9]

Public Input No. 152-NFPA 85-2013 [Section No. 9.4.6]

Public Input No. 161-NFPA 85-2013 [Section No. 9.4.6.2.9]

Public Input No. 162-NFPA 85-2013 [Section No. 9.5.1.1.2]

Public Input No. 163-NFPA 85-2013 [Section No. 9.5.4.2.2.2(B)]

Public Input No. 164-NFPA 85-2013 [Section No. 9.5.4.3.7 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]

Submitter Information Verification

Page 96: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 96/102

Submitter Full Name:CC on BCS-AAC

Organization: CC on Boiler Combustion System Hazards

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Nov 13 13:24:59 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The committee created second revisions 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21 in response to the correlatingcommittee notes. The committee did not revise 9.3.7 because chapter 9 applies to more thanelectric utility power plants, and has been incorporated by reference since at least the 1978edition of NFPA 85F.

Public Comment No. 74-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 9.3.6 ]

9.3.6 Rotary Valves.

Where used as a means for deflagration isolation, rotary valves (material chokes) shall valves shallbe installed and maintained in accordance with NFPA 69,Standard on Explosion PreventionSystems.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Use of the term "material chokes" does not add clarity to many/most users of the code.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Michael Polagye

Organization: FM Global

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Nov 14 22:00:31 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The term "material chokes" is used in NFPA 69, and is included here to clearly connectthe two documents.

Page 97: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 97/102

Public Comment No. 76-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 9.4.3.2.2.1 ]

9.4.3.2.2.1 *

All components of the raw fuel feeder system that are designed to be operated at no more thangauge pressure of 13.8 kPa (2 psi) with a design coal having P max of 10 bar-g or less shall be

designed for a maximum allowable working pressure of 344 kPa (50 psi) for containment of possibleexplosion pressures. P max is defined as the maximum pressure developed in a containeddeflagration for an optimum mixture, which was obtained from ASTM E 1226, Standard Test Methodfor Explosibility of Dust Clouds.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

1. P max is used the following sections, 9.4.3.2.2.1, 9.4.3.2.2.2, 9.4.3.2.2.3, 9.4.5.1.2.2, 9.4.5.1.2.3, 9.4.5.1.2.4.2. However, the definition of P max, and the measuring method is not mentioned in chapter 9.3. Though the definition is mentioned in Annex A, the definition shall be mentioned in main body.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:masahiko mishiro

Organization: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, ltd.

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Nov 15 01:06:28 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but held

Resolution: It is not appropriate to include a definition in the mandatory text of a subject chapter. Thecommittee holds the comment so that the Fundamentals committee can consider adding thedefinition to chapter 3 in the next revision cycle.

Public Comment No. 51-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. A.6.4.1.2.1 ]

Page 98: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 98/102

A.6.4.1.2.1

In block 6 of Table 6.4.1.2.1(a), high furnace pressure could be caused by tube rupture, damperfailure, or explosion.

In block 8 of Table 6.4.1.2.1(a), the partial loss of flame described is potentially more hazardous atlower load levels. The decision regarding specific requirements or implementation of this trip shouldbe a design decision based on furnace configuration, total number of burners, number of burnersaffected as a percentage of burners in service, arrangement of burners affected, interlock system,and load level. This trip is interlocked through flame supervisory equipment.

In block 9 of Table 6.4.1.2.1(a), the tables referenced describe the allowable differences in operatingprocedures based on the classification of igniter being used. The following descriptions of conditionsare typical for both Table 6.4.1.2.1(b) and Table 6.4.1.2.1(c).

(1) Condition 1: An event in which, after a successful boiler purge, an attempt(s) to place the firstigniter in service fails

(2) Condition 2: An event in which an igniter(s) has been proven in service and subsequently alligniters are shut down without the attempt ever having been made to place a burner or pulverizerin service

(3) Condition 3: An event in which gas and/or oil fuel burners were started or attempted to bestarted and all burner valves were subsequently closed while igniters remain proven in service

(4) Condition 4: An event in which a pulverizer system(s) was started up or attempted to be startedup and subsequently all pulverizer systems were shut down while igniters remain proven inservice

(5) Condition 5: An event in which any fuel has been placed in service and all fuel subsequentlyshut off

In the event that any main fuel is shut down while any other main fuel remains proven in service, theall-fuel-off master fuel trip requirements do not apply.

In block 10a of Table 6.4.1.2.1(a), low drum water level has been included as a master fuel trip.Although low drum water level is not a combustion-related hazard, this code is the primary resourcefor identifying BMS requirements, and not including a low drum level trip in Figure 6.4.1.2.1 hascreated confusion with users of this code. A master fuel trip based on low drum water level for drum-type boilers is commonly recognized good engineering practice.

In block 10b of Table 6.4.1.2.1(a), low feedwater flow is also not a combustion –related combustion–related hazard. The low feedwater flow threshold could be a fixed value or a function of the boiler loaddemand based on the boiler manufacturer’s recommendations. A time delay as specified by boilermanufacturer is allowed to accommodate transient operating conditions.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

In once-through units, both feedwater flow and steam flow (load) move together. Therefore, it is better to use load demand rather than load to determine the feedwater flow low setpoint. A time delay for the feedwater flow low trip may be required as determined by boiler manufacturer to accommodate transient operating conditions. For example, on loss of a boiler feedwater pump (BFP), feedwater flow can be lower than setpoint temporarily while unit load control is running back the load demand to a target that can be sustained by one BFP.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:SINMING KWONG

Organization: EMERSON PROCESS MANAGEMENT PWS

Street Address:

City:

State:

Page 99: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 99/102

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Nov 12 09:16:58 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The committee believes that a time delay to accommodate transient operating conditions isinherent in all interlocks, therefore mentioning it specifically in relation to block 10b wouldintroduce confusion. In addition, the committee disagrees that "demand" is the correctindicator, but that it could be boiler firing rate and/or steam flow.

Public Comment No. 66-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. A.6.6.5.1.3 ]

A.6.6.5.1.3

The objective of the leak test is to ensure that the individual burner safety shutoff valves are notleaking gas into the furnace. The test can be performed by proving the individual burner safetyshutoff valves are closed, then closing the main fuel header vent valve, opening the main safetyshutoff valve, thus pressurizing the header, then closing the main safety shutoff valve. If a chargingvalve is used, the test is performed by proving the main safety shutoff valve is closed and proving theindividual burner safety shutoff valves are closed, then closing the main fuel header valve, thenopening the charging valve to pressurize the header, then closing the charging valve. That pressuremust be held within predetermined limits for a predetermined amount of time for the test to besuccessful.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

CC NOTE: The following CC Note No. 29 appeared in the First Draft Report.

The MBB committee should review A.6.6.5.1.3, A.6.7.5.1.3, and A.7.7.5.2.1.2(A) and consider modifications to make the language consistent between these sections.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:CC on BCS-AAC

Organization: CC on Boiler Combustion System Hazards

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Nov 13 13:30:02 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The comment is rejected because no specific action is requested. In addition, the committeenotes that a task group has been established to review all items related to valve leak andtightness testing for the next revision cycle.

Page 100: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 100/102

Public Comment No. 38-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. A.8.4.3.2.2.4 ]

A.8.4.3.2.2.4

In general, three Three safety shutoff valves on the main header is the preferred practice , but insome situations, this might not be practical when burner element individual valves are not existing .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

This annex can be removed because it is inconsistent with the section 8.4.3.2.2.4. Section 8.4.3.2.1.11 requires the individual burner shutoff valves to be located close to the burner.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:Celso Schmidt

Organization: UTC/Forney Corporation

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Nov 10 18:39:40 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: SR-69-NFPA 85-2014

Statement: The committee expanded the annex text to better describe the intent of the mandatoryrequirement.

Public Comment No. 68-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. G.1 ]

G.1 Coals.

G.1.1 General.

Depending on the method of stoker firing, all ASTM classifications of coals can be burned. Theseinclude Class I, Anthracite; Class II, Bituminous; Class III, Sub-Bituminous; and Class IV, Lignite. Inchoosing an appropriate stoker type, there are several properties of coal that must be considered.These are, in part, the relationship between fixed carbon and volatile matter, the moisture content,the percent ash, the ash fusion temperature, and the free swelling index.

G.1.2 Classification.

Page 101: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 101/102

G.1.2.1

Class I, Anthracite Coal, is divided into the following three groups:

(1) Group 1, Meta-Anthracite, in which the fixed carbon on a dry and mineral-matter-free basis isequal to or greater than 98 percent

(2) Group 2, Anthracite, which has a range of fixed carbon limits on a dry and mineral-matter-freebasis of greater than 92 percent and less than 98.2 percent

(3) Group 3, Semi-Anthracite, which has a fixed carbon limit on a dry and mineral-matter-freebasis equal to or greater than 86 percent and less than 92.8 percent

G.1.2.2

Class II, Bituminous Coal, is subdivided into the following five groups:

(1) Group 1, Low Volatile Bituminous Coal, has fixed carbon limits greater than 78 percent butless than 86 percent.

(2) Group 2, Medium Volatile Bituminous Coal, has fixed carbon limits greater than 69 percent butless than 78 percent.

(3) Group 3, High Volatile “A” Bituminous Coal, has a fixed carbon quantity of less than 69percent and greater than 32.564 MJ/kg (14.0 kBtu/lb) calorific value on a moist mineral-matter-free basis.

(4) Group 4, High Volatile “B” Bituminous Coal, has a calorific value equal to or greater than30.238 MJ/kg (13.0 kBtu/lb) and less than 32.564 MJ/kg (14.0 kBtu/lb).

(5) Group 5, High Volatile “C” Bituminous Coal, has a calorific value equal to or greater than26.749 MJ/kg (11.5 kBtu/lb) and less than 30.238 MJ/kg (13.0 kBtu/lb) when it is commonlyagglomerating and a calorific value limit equal to or greater than 24.423 MJ/kg (10.5 kBtu/lb)but less than 26.749 MJ/kg (11.5 kBtu/lb) when it is always agglomerating.

G.1.2.2.1

All the bituminous coals in groups (1) through (4) are considered commonly agglomerating.

G.1.2.3

Class III, Sub-Bituminous Coal, is divided into the following three groups:

(1) Group 1, Sub-Bituminous “A” Coal, has a calorific value equal to or greater than 24.423 MJ/kg(10.5 kBtu/lb) but less than 26.749 MJ/kg (11.5 kBtu/lb).

(2) Group 2, Sub-Bituminous “B” Coal, has a calorific value limit equal to or greater than 22.097MJ/kg (9.5 kBtu/lb) but less than 24.423 MJ/kg (10.5 kBtu/lb).

(3) Group 3, Sub-Bituminous “C” Coal, has a calorific value equal to or greater than 19.3 MJ/kg(8.3 kBtu/lb) but less than 22.097 MJ/kg (9.5 kBtu/lb).

G.1.2.3.1

All three groups of the sub-bituminous coals are considered nonagglomerating.

G.1.2.4

Class IV, Lignite Coal, is divided into two groups:

(1) Group 1, Lignite A Coal, has a calorific value limit equal to or greater than 14.654 MJ/kg (6.3kBtu/lb) and less than 19.3 MJ/kg (8.3 kBtu/lb).

(2) Group 2, Lignite B Coal, has a calorific value less than 14.654 MJ/kg (6.3 kBtu/lb).

G.1.2.4.1

Both groups of lignite coals are considered nonagglomerating.

Page 102: Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.2.4 ......Public Comment No. 85-NFPA 85-2013 [ Section No. 3.3.26 ] 3.3.26 Bypass Stack. A stack applied in addition to and separate

3/27/2014 TerraView™

http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ViewerPage.jsp 102/102

G.1.3 Sizing.

Sizing characteristics vary with stoker type as outlined in ABMA 203, A Guide to Clean andEfficient Operation of Coal-Stoker-Fired Boilers. Different coals have varying tendencies to breakdown during mining processes and in handling. Western sub-bituminous coals are considered friableand are generally delivered to the boiler with high percentages of particles less than 6.35 mm ( 1⁄4 in.)in size. With the correct equipment, these coals can be burned satisfactorily.

For the best overall operation, each plant should carefully analyze the fuel characteristics andassociated handling and combustion problems. Anthracite is usually burned in finer sizes, generallyless than 7.94 mm ( 5⁄16 in.), to expose more surface of the very high fixed carbon fuel to the oxygenin the air.

Sizing in the hopper should be within the two limits as set forth in ABMA 203. Means should beprovided for the delivery of coal to the stoker hopper without size segregation.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

CC NOTE: The following CC Note No. 24 appeared in the First Draft Report as First Revision No. 242.

The Stokers technical committee should create a Second Revision to merge annexes G and H, similar to the method used to combine the Fluidized Bed annex material into a single annex (Annex E).

Related Item

First Revision No. 242-NFPA 85-2013 [New Section after G.1]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name:CC on BCS-AAC

Organization: CC on Boiler Combustion System Hazards

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Nov 13 13:31:53 EST 2013

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The comment is rejected because no specific action is provided. However, annexes G and Hare combined into a single annex in second revisions 70 and 71.