public disclosure authorized irp-42 - world bank · 2017. 2. 27. · site betoi-c implementation....

m IRP-42VOL. 4

National Highways Authority of India

NH2 Varanasi - Aurangabad4-laning and StrengtheningProject

Resettlement and Rehabilitation action Plan

Construction Package B & Package D

March 2000

Report nio RAP I

Issue no 0

Date ot IssUe 03 March. 2000

Prepared P K Sen COWI-SPAN JVClhecked S B Josthi

Approved J Anlderseln

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

National Highways Authority of India

NH2 Varanasi - Aurangabad4-laning and StrengtheningProject

Resettlement and Rehabilitation action Plan

Construction Package B & Package D

March 2000

COWI-SPAN JV

NH2 Varanasi - Aurangabad 4 Laning & Strengthening 1roject (AtF)

LIST OF CONTENTS

Chapter No. Description Page No.

I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 - 9

LI Project Road I

1.2 Corridor of Impact I

1.3 Methodology 2

1.4 Project Area 2

1.5 Minimising Negative Social Impact 2

1.6 People Affected by the Project 3

1.7 Land Required 6

1.8 Resettlement Sites 6

1.9 Common Property Affected 7

1.10 Income Restoration 7

1.11 Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R & R) Policy 8

1.12 Participation of Stakeholders 8

1.13 Institutional Arrangement 8

1.14 Implementation Arrangement and Schedule 9

1.15 Budget 9

1.16 Monitoring and Evaluation 9

2 METHODOLOGY 10 -11

2.1 Reconnaissance 10

2.2 Consultation of Secondary Sources 10

2.3 Verification Exercise 10

2.4 Census Survey 10

2.5 Bascline Socio-Economic Survey 11

2.6 Consultationls I I

3 NUNIMISIN(G NEGATIVE SOCIAI. IMPAC'I' -12 - 13

3.1 IntroduCtion 12

3.2 Minimising Nc2ativc Social Impact 12

3.3 Conccitric \Videnin2 and Raiscd Carrii-ucways 1_

3.4 Onc sidc Expansionl _

3.5 Pzackaigc Spccific Mitigation EFloi-ts 13

4 SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE, ()l PROJE'CT 15-20A _ ___A

iii" v aaiwml - iAuadiigauau 4 Laning & wtrengtnening Project (RAP)

4.1 Profile of the Area 15

4.2 Analysis of Census Survey 19

4.3 Details of the affected and displaced family 20

5 RESETTLEMENT POLICIES AND LEGAL 22 - 23FRAME WVORK

5.1 Introduction 22

5.2 Summary Entitlement Matrix ] 235.3 Detailed Project Entitlements 23

6 PARTICIPATION AND CONSULTATION 24-30

6.1 Local Level Consultation 24

6.2 District level public consultation 27

6.3 State level consultation. Bihar stae 29

7 LAND ACQUISITION AND ASSETS 31-32REQUIRED

7.1 Requirement of Land 31

7.2 Land Estimates 31

7.3 Community Resources 32

8 RESETTLEMENT SITES 33-36

8. 1 Introduction 33

8.2 Displace families 33

8.3 Options preferred by the displaced 34

8.4 Resettlement sites 34

8.5 Host Community I 35

S.6 Information checklist for host community survey 36

9 INCONIE RESTORATION I 37-39

9. 1 I ntrodLIction 37

9.2 Livelihood of aftccted families 37

9.3 Livelihood of dif'l'erent categories ol' affccied f'amilies 37

'.4 Eligible fami lics income restora-ttion 3 8

9.5 Income restor-ationi schemes 39

111 IMPLEMENTATlON MECI-IANISM & 40-43

i 1 1 I IMPLEI'MENTATION ARRANGEIMENT& 44-48SCHE'DULE

- -- II 1. 1- Thc Imiiplcinnt.ltion l'lPocesurI I 44

| 11 .2j Gencrall Activilies 44

NH2 Varanasi - Aurangabad 4 Laning & Strengthening Project (RAP)

11.3 Land Acquisition 44

11.4 Relocation 45

11.5 Rehabilitation 46

12 BUDGET 49-51

12.1 Introduction 49

12.2 Value of Land 49

12.3 Disbursement of assistance 51

12.4 Compensation 51

13 GRIVANCE REDRESSAL SYATEM 52-53

13.1 Need for Grievance Redressal 52

13.2 Grievance Redressal Mechanism 52

13.3 Response Time 52

14 MONITORING AND EVALUATION 54-57

14.1 Introduction 54

14.2 Monitoring Project Input and Output 54

14.3 Monitoring Project Objectives 57

. .


LIST OF TABLES

Table No. Description Page No.

I Width of the Corridor of Impact 2

2 Project Area 2

3 Minimising Negative Social Impact 3

4 Distribution of Affected Population 3

5a Affected Families - Titleholder 3

5b Affected Families - Non-titleholder 4

5c Affected Families - Vulnerable 4

6a Displaced Families - Titleholder 4

6b Displaced Families - Nontitleholder 5

6c Displaced Families - Vulnerable 5

7a Livelihood of Affected families 5

7b Livelihood of Vulnerable families affected 6

8a Land Required for widening and Upgrading the Road 6

8b Land Required for Specific purpose 6

9a Resettlement Sites 7

10 Common property to be affected 7

11 Eiigible families for income restoration 8

12 Summary of the Budget in Crore Rupees 9

13 Minimising Negative Social Impact 12

14a Demographic Profile 14

14b Population Growth 15

14c Rulal-Urban share of population, their percentage and the 15density of Population

14d Religious composition 16

14f Percentage of Literacy for Rul-al and Urban Area, 1991 16

14g Worlk participation Rate 17

_4h Distribution of Afl'ected Population IS

14i Social Composition ol' PAPs 1S

14 Liter-acy among PAPs iS

14k Employment patter-n of'project af'f'ected families 19

.5a Broaid Entitlemenit Framic worik 21

I Sb Detailed Entitlement Matrix

iv


16a Land required for specific purpose 32

16b Land required for the p[roject 33

17 Common property to be affected 33

18 Resettlement Action Plan Budget by Construction 48Contract

NH2 Varaniasi - Aurangabad 4 Laning & Strengthening Project (RAP)

LIST OF ANNEXURES

Annexurc No. Description

I Width of Corridor of Impact

3.1 Minimising Negative Social Impact

4.1 Project Affected Farnilies - Agriculture

4.2 Project Affected Families - Residential

4.3 Project Affected Families - Commercial

4.4 Project Affected Families - Residential cum Commercial

4.5 Project Displaced Families - Agriculture

4.6 Project Displaced Families - Residential

4.7 Project Displaced Families - Commercial

4.8 Project Displaced Families - Residential cum Commercial

5-1 Broad Entitlement Framework

5-2 Suggested Format of Detailed Entitlement Matrix

7 Common Property and Public Property Affected by the Project

8.1 Eligible Families for Agricultural Residential &Commercial Plots

9 Eligible Famnilies for Income Restoration

vi


LIST OF APPENDICE

Appendix No. Description

9.1 Government Schemes and Possibilities

10-1 NGO Consultancy to Assistance with Implementation of RAP

10-2 NGO Profile

10-3 Entitlement Photo Identity Card

11.1 Implementation Schedule

12.1 Resettlement Action plan Budget unit plan

12.2 Resettlement Action Plan Budget by Construction Contract

15-Al Indicators for Monitoring the Implementation of R&R programs

15-All Summary of Objectives & Related Indicators for M&E

15-B1 Reporting on Project Input & Output Indicators

15-BII Reporting on Impact Indicators

15 III Tentative Time Schedule for Monitoring & Evaluation (Packages B&D)

Xii

NH-2 Varanasi Aurangabad 4 Laning & Strengthening Project (RAP)

CHAPTER 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 PROJECT ROAD

National Highways Authority of India on behalf of the Government of Inclia is preparingthe Third Highway Project. The aim of the project is to upgrade and widen the existing twolanes to four lanes of Agra-Dhanbad Section of National Highway 2.

The entire section from Agra to Dhanbad has been divided into five F'ackages. Eachcovering approximately 200 km. Pacakge IV begins from Varanasi to Aurangabad. Itextends from km 317 in Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh to km 180 in Aurangabad district ofBihar. The total length of Package IV is 193 Km. Out of which 58 km lies in Uttar Pradeshand the remaining 135 Km in Bihar. Further package IV has been divided into four contractpackages viz:

* Contract package A from km 317 to kn 65 which is approximately 75 Km* Contract package B from km 65 to km 110 which is approximately 45 Km* Contract package C from km 110 to km 140 which is approximately 33 Km* Contract package D from km 140 to km 180 which is approximately 40 Klm

The Resettlement Action Plan has been prepared for contract packages B and D. whichcovers a length of 85 km. The remaining two contract packages, namely A & C will be partof project NH IV.

The primary purpose for preparing Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) is to assess the socio-economic conditions of the Project affected persons (PAPs) in order to minimise andprovide mitigative measures. If the displacement is indispensable, rehabilitation should bedone in such a manner: so that the standard of living of PAP will be restored. The specialattention is paid to the vulner-able giroups. RAP has provisions to ensure that PAPs arecompensated at replacement value for the assets lost and to enable them to re_ain orimpr-ove their socio-economic conditions enjoyed prior to the project. The RAP is a livinodocumnents and will be updated as and when necessary. The RAP data are to be verified atsite betoi-c implementation. Implementation of the RAP will lbe done on data so modit'iecd.

1.2 COItIDORt OF INIIACT'I'

The imprpovemiientls p)roposed rIIc mailily along the existine roads and most of the \\ork willbe coiti'ined to thc cxistinC Riolht 01' Waty (ROW). However, therc will be several placeswhere additional land will be reCquil-cd l'or vwidening, the road to louL laneC w\hich \\ ill le theCoiT'idor- of Impact (COI). The approach of the project is to limit the disp'lacemnc-it to theCOI. This implies that peoplc can remrain within thc ROW wherever feasible anlid not bedisturbed by the widening ol' the pro'ject.

1 n) 2\n h.aptKsi28(O2\ rap-nd c COWI-SIPAN JV

'H-2 Varanasi Aurangabad 4 Laning & Strengthening Project (RAP)

Table I given below indicates that the minimum and maximum COI in package B is 25.00mtrs and 67.71 mtrs whereas it is 25.00 mtrs and 67.13 mtrs in case of package D

Table 1 - Width of the Conridor of Impact

Packages Minimum mtrs Maximum mtrs

Contract Package B 25.00 67.71

Contract Package D 25.00 67.13

Moreover, it becomes clear from Annex I that the availability of the area is enough forboth the packages except at few places for which small quantity of land to be acquired iscoming into picture. Furthermore, land required for road widening is marginal as sufficientROW is available throughout the stretch except at locations (401500-404900, 406200-406900, 407500-409800, 414900-415600, 429600-434100 and 436800-439400) whereROW is limited. In the stretches mentioned here most of the land acquisition is likely to bereduced is by providing retaining walls and underpasses will be provided for accessibility.4

1.3 METHODOLOGY

The action plan is based on the primary and secondary data and in extensive consultationwith the stakeholders. To collect the primary data, two sets of questionnaires were preparedone for collecting information on the resource base of the affected population and the otherto develop the socio-economic database for monitoring and evaluation. The consultationprocesses were organised to address the needs of different social groups.

1.4 PROJECT AREA

The road passes through three districts namely, Bhabhua (Kaimur), Rohatas (Contract B)& Aurangabad (Contract D). Table 2 indicates that the road will mostly affect the ruralareas, which covers 65 villages.

Table 2 - Project Area! Packages No. of Districts No. of Cities No. of Towns No. of Villagesl______________________ affecte(I affected affected affccted I

( olniact Package B1 2 10 2 44

('1onLract Palc kagc D 1 I (1 21I ____ . -____ _ _ _ ___ _ _-T otal 3 1 265

1.5 MINIMISING NE'GATIVEl' SOCIAL IMPACTI'

Ihc intcrtei ;ion ol social analysis alone, will ( tle dcsi en and environmental issues made itfeasible to rcductlC thCe,1itiVe SC1ial impact on thc afflcted people. It may be noted fl-omnTablec -3 that the numbLerc1- of IA Ps has comc do'lown by 76.8'il in case ol package B and54.0%X, in package D. Tlec avaidal. RPOW is sufficient to meet all the aspects of the projectexcept at Icw ptlaces lor which LwJi :ilonal l nd ol 3.045 Ha will he acquirc( as total in boththe packaciges. IUrthlerl1orc. thlc Oi. f structurILes (!Csid.ecntial anld ct mrnercial) wasCedluced subst.antially

!1i'\i1 i;alLS28X2\ralp 11dilc (L0NVv-SI5!\ a 'IN/


Table 3 - Minimising Negative Social ImpactPackages No of PAP No. of PDP Agriculture No. of Structures

Affected Land affected Residential Commercial(ha) affected Affected

Before After Before After Betore After Before After Before AfterContract 1550 359 320 180 3.0 2.02 167 15 48 13Package B _

Contract 1235 568 860 465 12.3 1.065 35 20 99 53Package D _ _

Total 2785 927 1180 645 15.3 3.085 202 35 147 66

1.6 PEOPLE AFFECTED BY THE PROJECT

Despite the efforts to minimise the negative social impact there will be some who will beaffected and displaced by the project. According to Table 4 it is clear the nurnber of peopleaffected is marginal considering the total length of 85 km. The average number of affectedpopulation per km works out to approximately 11 persons and the displaced people areapproximately 8 per km.

Table 4 - Distribution of Affected Population

Packages No. of PAPs* No. of PAFs No. of PDPs* No. of PDFs

Contract Package B 359 93 180 37

Contract Package D 568 146 465 103

Total 927 239 645 140

* This does not include people affected by land required for bus-stops &laybyes which is 2.165 ha.

1.6.1 Details of Affected - From the tables 5a and Sb one can clearly say that the affectedtitle holder families are 27.19% and the affected nontitleholder families are 72.8%.Moreover, the vulnerable families constitute nearly 57.7% of the total families affected.

(a) TitleholderThe Table 5a it is clear that about 40 families will be loosing residential structures out oftotal number of 65 families.

Table 5a - Affected families- TitleholderP'ackages No. of No. of No. of No. of T'otal

families families families familiesloosing loosing loosing loosing

agricultur residence commercial residentialal land structure cuni

commercialstructure

Contract 1 33 8 2 44Packages 13

Contract 4 7 9 1 21Packages I)

'Vot.l _5 4(0 17 3 65

pw xl\iih2\l;ap I.iict.t )2\ a;tpJI.tU ele3 COWI-SPAN J\'%


(b) Non-titleholderA total of 174 families will be affected which is 72.8% of the total affected number offamilies i.e. 239. Once again the maximum impact is on the commercial structures.

Table Sb - Affected families- Non-titleholder

Package B Packae D TOTALEncroacher Squatter Tenant Encroacher Squatter Tenant

Agriculture 3 0 0 29 1 0 33Residential 14 19 0 5 20 0 58Commercial 4 5 0 0 62 0 71Resi cum 1 3 0 7 1 0 12CommercialOthers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 22 27 0 41 84 0 174

(c) VulnerableAs given in table 5c the total number of vulnerable families is 138. Out of the total number239 (table 4) affected families of the vulnerable families consist of 57.74%. The number ofwomen headed household is marginal and only 4 families will be affected. Again it is clearthat the impact on residential and commercial structures is quite high.

Table Sc - Affected families- VulnerablePacka-e__ PackageD TOTALWHH SC ST BPL WHH SC ST BPL

Agriculture 0 4 0 0 0 0 7 18 29Residential 4 3 0 23 0 .2 0 19 51Comntercial 0 3 _0 4 T° !0 lo 35 52Resi cum 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 6ComnmercialOthers 0 0 0 0 0 0 iO 0TOTAL 4 10 0 _ 28 0 13 7 76 138

1.6.2 Details of Displaced - The families displaced mainly depend on commercialactivities as indicated in tables 6a and 6b. However, approximately 51.42% of the displacedfamilies belong to thc VLtlnerable category.(a) 'I'itleholderThe Table 6a indicaltes that only 32 families will be displaced with majoi-ity loosing theirI-CSi(ClCi.6l1 SH-ICtUrlCS.

Tahle 6U - Displaced Famililies - Titlehiolder| I';ac ksages 5 No. of No. of' No. of families No. of families Others* Total

Ianilies faamilies loosing comnmercial loosinglooSilng loosing strructure residential cum

agricultural resi(lence commercialil land _ structure

(oltlact I I I 0 13Pick,c.s13 _

(-1llil-;\t 1 4 1 7 7 1 0 19

I otal ,1) 1 10 2 0 32

' \ril 2\I i) 1;iic'>l. S2). \ SI '! c I} tItit4 COWI-SPAN JV


(b) Non-titleholderThe Table 6b reveals that a total of 108 families will be displaced. Approxirnately 77.14%of the displaced families are non-titleholder and again most of them are loosing theircommercial structures.

Table 6b - Dis laced families- Non-titleholder-F_Package s Package D TOTAL

Encroacher Squatter Tenant Encroache Squatter Tenantr

Agriculture 0 0 I 1 0 1Residential 16 0 - I 20 0 36Commercial 5 0 62 0 67Resi cum 3 0 I 0 4CommercialOthers _0 0 o 0 0 0TOTAL - 24 0 84 0 10

(c) VulnerableThe Table 6c indicates that 72families will be displaced and most of them will lose theircommercial structures. They constitute about 51.42 % of the displaced families i.e. 140.

Table 6c - Displaced families- VulnerablePackage B Package D _TOTAL

_WHH SC ST BPL WIAH SC ST BPLAgriculture 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2Residential 1 1 0 9 0 1 0 17 29Commercial 0 2 0 3 0 1 o 33 39Resi cum 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2Commercial_Others 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C_TOTAL 1 4 I0 13 0 3 1 50 72

(d) Livelihood - The primary survey indicates that the nature of development along theroad is linear and most of the people are engaged i't some forin of commercial activit\. Thewidening of the road wvill have consideraLble impact on the bIusiness activities. The Tabtle 7areveals that there will be impact onl the livelihood of 141 families. Of which about 26.% 95%ol'the families are dependent on agciculture.

Table 7a - Livelilhood of affected familicsPa;c'kagslt ALhclrtlLffldi Oss Comlimurcial l)S otai)

('ontrat Pack;a-e B _ 4 23 27( onltracl Pa;ckalge 1 ) 34l__( 1 14

T 'otal 38 _ M) 141' Residential & Commercial families are inclueld with CX'VmmcerCial lamilies.

(a) Vulnerable -More than 36.4%7 of the families belong to thc vulnerable category. It isclear from Table 7b that it is the vulnerable people who in search of livelihood settle alonothle roads.

)i\,,I, paicst28)0\ rapm .doc 5 COWI-SI'AN P/


Table 7h - Ivielilhood of'\i LIhicrah lii iilies affeted ___- Catecories Packaue B Packa;e D T1Iotall! ____________________________________ A uri. Com m .: A i ni. Com m .z ,,I iS(

SC 4 3 0 1 1 4 14

ST 0 0 7 0 _ 7 0

WHH 0 0 0 0 0 0BPL 0 5 18 39 is_ 18 44Total 4 8 25 50 __ 29 58*Residential & Commercial families are included with Commercial families.

1.7 LAND REQUIRED

The project entails widening for which additional land will be required. The table Saindicates that the acquisition will be marginal for the upgrading a stretchof 85 km. Approximately 0.47 hectare (ha) of land will be acquir-ed fi-om private

ownership.

Table 8a - Land required for widening and upgrading the roadCategory Package B (ha) Package D (ha) Total (ha)Private land (agri + 2.02 1.065 3.085homestead)Govt. land (specify)Forest landInstitutional landTotal 2.02 1.065 3.085

(a) Use of acquired land - The total area of 2.635 ha of landl will be usecd lor widenin2and providing bus stops and tr-uck lay-byes. For earthworks borrow areas will be taken onlease and not acquired.

Table 8b - Land required for specific purposePurpose Packa-e B (ha) Package D (ha) Total (ha)

Acquire Transfer Lease Acquire Transler Lcase T Acquire Transfer Leasc

Widening the road 0.02 0.45 0.47Bus stops and 2.0 0.0 15 1'151truck lay byesToll plaza NA NA INABorrow areas 67.25 _ _ 118.91 | | 186.15Other (specify) | | - I -l-oltal 2.02 1 _iNA - Not applicable

1.8 RESETTLEMENT SITES - Though displacement is niarliinal to 140 fa.milies.resettlement sites \ill be provided. Talble 9a indlicattes that imlost ol! thcm11 \\ill losc theircommercial structures.

\\projdata\nh2\nh2\reportsuap\mmodified r:ap\rnincshi \uip - s( 2'. r:ip 1.d.c 6 C(O W-S1-1.\ N ,'IN


Table 9a - Resettlement SitesPackages Total area required Total area identified Area to be identified (ha) Location *

(ha) (ha)

Agr Res Com A2r Res Com Agr Res ComrContract 0.1 0.02 0.0075 0.1 0.02 0.0075Package

Contract 0.014 0.03 0.048 0.014 0.03 0.048Package _

a - agriculturalr - residentialc- commercial* Location for Resettlement Sites to be identified.

1.9 COMMON PROPERTY AFFECTED

The habitation along the road is invariably linked with the growth of infrastructurefacilities for peoples' day to day needs. As indicated in Table 10 it is found that thegovernment institutions have also encroached upon the ROW. Efforts were made tominimize the impact on religious places however, there are 10 such structures which willbe relocated in consultation with the local community.

Table 10 - Common propert to be affectedCategory Package B Package'DHandpumps/well 64 26

Temple/Mosque 8 2School -- _--

Police station __

Water tanks 5

Post office/office buildings 2Village gate -- 5Yatri shied 4

Platform around tree I

Statue with raised platform IOthers --

Incomplete structur-e. boundary wall, abandoned room. etc.

1.10 INCOME RESTORATION

As per tahlc 11 majority of the people whose livelihood will be aftfected is dLIe to theimpact on commercial activities. The af'f'ccted families will receivc sUl)polt to which theyarc entitled hecause of loss of livelihood durinig, proiect implementation and will he enabledto improve their- economic status and standards. In addition to this econiomic rehabilitation-rant wvill be extended to vulnerable families to uplift their status.

, 2 .a .p kticst2802\ r;qa,n.d. 7 COWI-SPAN.IV

NIH-2 Varanasi Aurangabad 4 Laning & Strengthening Project (RAP)

Table I I - Eligible families for income restoration

Catcgorv Packa c B Package D TotalL E s T L E S T L E S T

Agricultural plot I 0 0 0 4 0 I 0 5 0 I 0(displaced)Plot for residence 8 0 16 0 7 0 20 0 15 0 36 0

Plot for shop 4 0 8 0 8 0 63 0 12 0 71 0(displaced)Productive asset I 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0grant agriculture I IProductive asset 4 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 12 0 0 0grant commercialHouse construction 8 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 15 0 0 0grant _

Assistance for 0 5 19 0 0 2 20 0 0 7 39 0residence(Encroacher &Squatter)Assistance for 0 1 8 0 0 5 63 0 0 6 71 0commercial(Encroacher &Squatter)

Transitional 9 0 24 0 2 0 84 0 11 0 108 OallowanceEconomic 24 9 8 0 18 26 42 0 42 35 50 0rehabilitation grant(vulnerable) _

L - Legal holder S - SquatterT - Tenant E - Encroacher

1.11 RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION (R & R) POLICY

The NHAI has prepared the R & R policy for the people who will be affected by the projectNH III. The policy describes the principle and appr-oach to minimize and mitigate thenegative social and economic impacts caused by the project. It also provides assistance forrestoi-in the livelihood of the people enjoyed prior to the project. Additional suppoltthrough economic rehabilitationi -l-ant will be extended to the vulnerable LroupS.

1.12 I'ARTICII'A'FION OF STAKEllOLDERS

The policy and the action plan has been prepared th1roulgh participatory process speciallyfocusing on the vulnerable gr-oups. The consullation organise at village and the distr-ictlevels provided key inputs to finalise the design and measures for developing the mitigativeplan.

p:\il2\rp Iatc'i 28(2\ tlo) ,

NH-2 Varanasi Aurangpbad 4 Laning & Strengthening Project (RAP)

1.13 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT

The action plan provides a detailed mechanism for the appropriate organisation for theimplementation of the plan. The NHAI will have a social cell, which will be responsible forthe implementation of the action plan. There will be an R & R officer and a landacquisition officer at the corporate office. which will be supporled by R. & R manager(Executive Engineer) and non-government in Delhi organisations for each contractpackage. The district level committees will be set up to facilitate the finalisation ofreplacement value and all grievances of the people.

1.14 IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENT AND SCHEDULE

It is envisaged that the land acquisition and the R & R activities will be completed withinthree years of the project commencement before initiating the civil works.

1.15 BUDGET

The estimated budoet comprises of land and asset acquisition and supports in re-establishing the livelihood and shelter of the project affected people. Moreover, it alsoprovides for training and the staff required for implementation. Furthermore, monitoringand evaluation being an integral part of the project has been budgeted for.

Table 12 Sumnmar of the bud et in Crore Ru ees.Contract B Contract D Total

NHAI World NHAI World Total Total WBBank Bank NHAI

Compensation 0.1749 _ _ 0.0991 0.274Assistance 0.0978 | 0.1505 0.0856 0.2812 0.1834 0.4317Training of staff& project 0.0484 0.0531 0.1015affected FamiliesSupport for 0.0543 0.0596 0.1139implementation of RAPNI & E consultMnt 0.0037 0.0058 _ 0.0095TOTAI 0.2727 01.2569 10.1847 0.3997 0.4574 0.6566GRANI) TOTAL 1.114.

1.16 MONITO1RING AND EVALUATION

The actioni plan cstablishes the provisions l-ot- M & E. The monitoring proLiress will heundortaken b\ the social cell and externial agency will be hi-red fol al1nnual eValIuaLlin ol thep 1as CC'l i

1)\nh12\r:ipl I;taL8st2 S t\ r.Ip nl doc 9' CO'v'I-SPA,N .JV

NHt-2 Varanasi Aurangahad 4 Laning & Strengthening Project (RAP)

CHAPTER 2

METHODOLOGY

Both primary and secondary methods of study were adopted for the preparation of thisreport. Various stages at which study were conducted are as follows

2.1 RECONNAISSANCE

A reconnaissance of the entire stretch was undertaken together wvith engineering andenvironmental teams. The purpose of the reconnaissance was to have an overview of thelikely extent of impact on people because of the impending development work of thehighway.

2.2 CONSULTATION OF SECONDARY SOURCES

Secondary sources such as District Census Handbook and District Gazeteer of the projectdistricts were reviewed to understand the physical, social, economic and cultural setup inthe project area before undertaking actual field work.

2.3 VERIFICATION EXERCISE

Strip plan of the project road was collected from NHAI indicating details of ROW. Asimple format was used to record the relevant information on squatters and encroachers.Two teams comprising of one civil engineer and and two socio/economic investigatorseach were employed to verify all the encroachers and squatters within ROW. Theverification included collection of information on owner/occupant of the structure, its typeand use and approximate dimensions and portion within ROW. Similarly, agricultul-alencroachments were also recorded. The information collected was used to update the stripmaps\establish the legal boundaries of the ROW and also formed the basis for identifyin_lhe PAPs within the COI who were to be included for further surveys.

2.4 CENSUS SURVEY

A pircrequisite for census of the PAPs is the corr-ect delineation of the project COl as it hasimportant implications f'or- any road project. Removing all squatter-s and encroachel-s withinthc ROW would require hutgc amount of money in the form of val-ious types of assistance.Also thcre is no guarantee that the ROW would not be reoccupied after the project worlkwvas over. Thus it was decided by the author-ity to limit the removal to the COl which iscssential for the project w ork.

Ilhe census hased survey ot the PAPs was carried out by four teams of socio\economicinvestigators lrecr-uited flom BlIUl of two members each. The investigators were first-ivcn briefings about the project. After briefing a training session for three days wasoran-ised whiclh included both ciaIss room trainiing as well as field trainino. The fieldtraining was cairied oult with interviev schedule which also served the purpose of a pilotSUrvCy. One supervisor for two tea.ms was employed to supervise the investigators and help

'x ;ll- Nap .a?:ts0~2\ :;,I) ,< do', 1 0 COWl-Sl'AN, JV

NH-2 Varanasi Aurangabad 4 Laning & Strengthelning Project (RAP)

in smooth conduct of the survey. The entire team of investigators and supervisors workedunder the overall supervision of Resettlement and Rehabilitation expert.

2.5 BASELINE SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEY

A baseline socio\economic survey of 25 percent of the PAPs was conducted in order toestablish the monitoring and evaluation parameters.

Two teams, each of two investigators were engaged for the survey. A proper format wasused for collecting the required information.

2.6 CONSULTATIONS

Consultations were held at various places by the social team. On an average 10 out of 12persons participated in each consultation. People from all walks of life such as lawyers,professors, wage earners, businessman, government functionaries, farmers, etc. participatedin the entire process. People were requested to assemble at a particular location on a fixeddate and time. One researcher was assigned the job of organising such consultation session.Besides local people social team including R and R expert were present for the conductingand recording the outcome of the discussion. It was ensured that the discussion remainedfocussed to project related aspects in general and displacement in particular.

The District level consultations were organised by district magistrates of concerneddistricts by issuing notice. Minutes of the same were recorded finally issued by districtmagistrates.

p \,,h2\, ,p i t.:i2X0)2\ rap ,, .,, 1n1 COWI-SPAN JV

NH -2 Varanasi Aurangabad 4 Laning & Strengthening Project (RAP)

CHAPTER 3

MINIMISING RESETTLEMENT

3.1 INTRODUCTION

The success of a project depends to a large extent on the improvement that it brings aboutin the living standards of the people, both in the short term or in the long run. Whilepreparing the design the prime consideration has been to minimise the social negativeimpacts within the limitations of technical requirement and cost effectiveness. As thisproject deals with the expansion of the highways, despite the best efforts to minimise thenegative impact it is unavoidable.

3.2 MINIMISING NEGATIVE SOCIAL IMPACT

The table 13 given below indicates that after integrating the social analysis there has beenconsiderable minimisation in the negative social impact.

Table no. 13 Minimizing Negative social impactPackages No. PAP No. of PDP No. of Structures

Residential **CommercialBefore* After# Before* After# Before* After# Before* After#

Contract 1550 359 320 180 167 15 48 13Package IV-BContract 1235 568 860 465 35 20 99 53Package IV-D

T fI'otal 2785 927 1180 645 202 35 147 66

: Becfor-e integratingz social aspects# After integrl-alin social aspects

Resi. Cum commercial struclu-res are included in the commei-cial structuL-e.

Analvsis oi tlie alternativesThe project arer may be divided into two broad categories: Fhcy arc* Congested areas with denise settlemcnlts having sqLuatter s. encrc-oaclher-s and lcgal

tit lcholders of pei-manient and temporary str-UCtures .* RLurl aeas \S itlih a0riCltUIal 1 land.

-lo mini mise thc resettlemicnit acltivities various Cflorts were madce. The hasic -uidinoprinciple has been to select scctions wherc ROW is available and is fice lfromilencroachment anzd denisity of the population. Application of' alternate alignmentthroui!hout the stretclh has rCduLced thc resettlement activities in the project area.

J):\11112Val; 11C1; .'.tS0)2\ lap 1,d(W 12 C0(W1-SlI'AN,IV

NH-2 Vamanasi Aurangabad 4 Laning & Strengthening Project (RAP)

3.3 CONCENTRIC WIDENING AND RAISED CARRIAGE WAYSo

* Concentric widening of the alignment considered within the existing COI as far aspossible so that minimum or no land acquisition is required.

* RCW's minimises the demolition of structures as it is possible to build it within theexisting building lines.

* Where it was not possible, demolition andlor land acquisition has been proposed on theside which will be have least impact.

* To segregate the local slow moving traffic from the long distance fast moving trafficand minimising accidents expansion on the side which will have least negative impacthas been integrated in the design.

* Underpasses have been provided to facilitate the people living on either side of the roadto have access to facilities and to avoid disruption of social relations and networks.

3.4 ONE SIDE EXPANSION

Expansion within the existing COI along the road was preferred where suffiicient land wasavailable with out

3.5 PACKAGE SPECIFIC MITIGATION EFFORTS

The analysis of the Annexure 3.1 indicates the following:Package B

In this package B, there are 5 locations namely Mohania(Station 200000-210000),Mutani (Station 210000-220000), Kudra, Shakri (Station 220000-230000),Sari yam,Bamhaur(Station 230000-240000), Shiv sagar(Station 240000-250000) where the impacton the families was foreseen to be high. To minimise the impacty following efforts havebeen made:

(a) Mohania (Station 200000-210000): In this stretch Centreline followed centralxwidening to save structures on both sides due to which the no. of PAF has beenreduced to 46 from 198.

(b) Mutani (Station 210000-220000): In this stretch Centrcline followed centralwidening to save structures on both sides due to which the no. of PAF has beenreduced to 3 f rom 12.

(c) Kudra, Shakri (Station 220000-230000): In this centre line wvas shifted whereverfeasible to save structur-es and the police station by which the PAF has been reduced to29 from 123.

(d) Sariyam, Bamhaur(Station 230000-240000): In this the road alig,nment has beenshifted to souLth to save the village and the mosque by which the PAF has been redLucedto 7 from 31.

p:\nlhl2\t,p 1atcst2802\ ra1 n.doc 13 COWI-SPAN JV


(e) Shiv sagar(Station 240000-250000): In this stretch by filling the pond partially theroad alignment has been adjusted to save 3 Temples and one Mazar on the south aswell as two temples on the north. The no. of PAF has been reduced to 6 from 26.

Package D

In this package D. there are 4 locations namely Noorganij. Bigha, Duriva (Station 400000-410000). Preetumpur (Station 410000-420000), Maniurahi(Station 4'0000-430000).Shivganj (Station 430000-440000) where the impact on the families was foreseen to be high. Tominimise the impacty following efforts have been made

(a) Noorganj, Bigha, Duriya (Station 400000-410000): In this stretch enough ROW isavailable thus alignment has been shifted to both north and south keeping in mind tosave the maximum number of structures due to which the no. of PAF has been reducedto 18 from 41.

(b) Preetumpur (Station 410000-420000): In this approch road has been shifted to theadjacent "Gomaur" bridge on Natane river to save the Temple due to which the no. ofPAF has been reduced to 16 from 35.

(c) Maniurahi(Station 420000-430000): In this provision of Fly over has been made toreduce traffic congestion. Other engineering options were not feasible to reduce theaffected population. The no of PAF has been reduced to 69 from 150.

(d) Shiv ganj (Station 430000-440000): In this two temples and one grave yard havebeen saved by applying suitable design techniques. The no of PAF has been reduced to43 from 94.

,5Il?\1;:p. i:Et2.X'IIl'\l;l1 14 (.)\\ I-SlPAN .I1

H-2 Varanasi Aurangabad 4 Laning & Strengthening Project (RAP)

CHAPTER 4

SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF THE PROJECT AREA,

In order to determine project impacts at the more macro level, district socio-economicprofiles were prepared. The geographical area, population distribution, growth, and densityare all essential parameters in understanding the social environment in the districts. Theseparameters reflect the importance of the location, employment base, and demand oninfrastructure and other associated problems of development. The higher the density of thedistricts traversed by the project roads, the higher the growth potential and therefore thegreater the level of impact on the social environment.

The sex ratio is an important indicator of migration and gender equity (in a developingcountry context) since it helps to point out the employment opportunity in a given district.Literacy rate is a significant indicator of any district or states economic as we'll as socialdevelopment status. The higher the literacy rate the higher the development and vice versa.

4.1 PROFILE OF THE AREA

The contract packages B and D traverses through the State of Bihar. It is the eighth largeststate in terms of geographical area encompassing 173.8 thousand sq. km comprising 42districts, 591 Blocks, 271 towns/cities and 67,513 inhabited villages (1991 census). Thegeographical area of the state is 5.49 per cent of the country's total area and is the secondmost populous state with 10.20% of the country's total population. The project districtsnamely, Rohtas (it includes Bhabua) and Aurangabad are spread over 10518 sq. km wvith apopulation of 4490 thousand, thus accounting for 6.04 per cent and 5.14 per cent of theState's total area and population respectively.

4.1.1 Demography4.1. 1(i) (a) The demographic features of the State as well as that of project districts areprovided in Table 14(a). The total population is 86.37 million out of wlich the ruralpopulation is 86.85%7. The female population constitutes 47.67% of the total population,which is nearly the same as the observed in the two project districts. The male female ratiois 911 per thousand male.

Table 14(a)-Denmographic profile[ statc/ Population (in Thousand) Percentage of l'opulation Female per

Districts thousanidmales

Male Female Total Male FemaleB3ihar 45202 41172 86374 52.13 47.67 9113hlblahhu -- -- 983 -- -- --

Rohlas 15314 1367 1917 52.89 47.11 89tAumLaninabhad 804 736 1540 52.21 47.79 915

lh 13ahaua district was created after 1991 census and was a part of district Rohtas and data is notavail.ible..otilucc: P'rofile ofStates 1991

1p \nli\n-p 1p tcst2 502\ rap n doc 15 COWI-SPAN JV

NH-2 Varanasi Aurangabad 4 Laning & Strcngthening P'rojcct (RAP)

(b) Table 14(b) indicates that the change in population in the past two decades. One caneasily decipher that at sate level the percentage has decreased marginally during 1981-91. Itis likely that the lack of development, which is directly linked, with lack of economicopportun,ities has resulted in increase in migration from the state. However, in both thedistricts there is a substantial increase. This is perhaps because of the natural growth.

Table 14(b)-Population growth rate

State/ 1961-1971 1971-1981 1981-1991Districts

Bihar 21.33 24.06 23.54Bhabhua* -- -- --Rohtas 21.73 23.58Aurangabad 21.75 24.49

* Bhabua district was created after 1991 census and was a part of district Rohtas and data isnot available.Source: Profile of States 1991

(c) As stated in Table 14(c) the population density at 497 persons per sq. km in the State ishigher than the national figure of 267 persons per sq. km. In comparison with the projectdistricts the population density is also higher. The urbanisation in the State is 13.14%which is lower than the national average of 25.7 per cent. The urban population at 9.27% inthe project districts is lower than the State. It is likely that the growth of urban centresperhaps could be due to slow development in the state. In total there are 12 towns andurban centres and there are no Class I towns in project districts. This could probably be dueto opportunities available to diversify from primary to secondary sectors are perhapslimited.

Table 14(c) RuL-al - Urban share of population, their percentage and the density ofpopulation.

State/ Population (in Thousand) Rural/Trban Density perDistricts l ratio sq. km.

RLIrl Il Urban Totil t3ilh;a, ' 75021 11353 86374 86.86:13.14 49713lahihua;l 1 956 27 983 97.21:2.79 292!l )_ 1650 2 67 1917 86.07:13.93 498Aj 1rnj.,lhad 1422 [ 118 1540 i 92.34:7.66 466

(c') As oiven below in Tabl l 14(d) tlhe 1-lindus ale in majority in the state as well as in theplRro ct distIricts. In Talblc 14(d) it is indicatted that the population of Schedule caste is muchhi lcher thani the state avera-.c aind thc THI als are in miloritv.

1p .idi'\i.,p I;:,1ti2OO ii .;,ll ,,.i,s 16 COWI-Sl'AN JV


Table 14(d) -Religious CompositionStatel / Religion _ X |Districts Hindu (in % Muslim (in Swarna % Others* %

'000) - '000) (in '000) _ (in '000)Bihar 71193 82.42 12787 14.81 1417 1.64 944 1.10Bhabhua IRohtas 2625 90.53 270 9.34 _ 3.5 0.12Aurangabad 1393 90.48 146 9.48 _ 0.64 0.03

* Others include Christian, Sikh, Jain and Buddhist.

Table 14 (e)-Po ulation of SC and ST and their percentage to Total Population, 1991 CensusState/ SC (in '000) ST (in '000) Percentage of Percentage ofDistricts SC to total ST to total

population population

Bihar 12572 6570 6002 6617 3358 3259 14.55 7.66BhabhuaRohtas 546 290 256 47 25 22 18.81 1.62Aurangabad 358 188 170 23.26 0.03

4.1.2 LiteracyThe literacy rate at state level is 38.5% which is much less than the National rate. However,it is interesting to note that it is much higher and above 45% in project districts. As in otherparts of the country the womens' literacy is much less in comparison with men at state aswell as in the project districts (see Table 14(f))

Table 14(f)-Percentage of Literacy for Rural and Urban Area, 1991 Census

State/ Total/RuraVUrban Percentage of LiteracyDistricts

Persons Males FemalesBihar Total 38.5 52.5 22.9

Rural 33.S 48.3 17.9Urban 67.9 77.7 55.9

Bhabhua Total

RuralUrban

Rohtas Total 45.4 61.5 27.0Rural 4 3.2 59.8 24.3

__________________ Urban 64.5 75.8 51.2.-\urangabad Total 45. 1 61.8 26.7

_____________________ Rural 4 .5 60.5 24.8l _________________ _ Utrban 64.7 77.4 50.0

4.1.3 Employment PlatternThe Table 14(g)clearly illustrates that the worlk participation rate [percenitagc ot totalworkers (main workers + marginal workers) to total population] in the State is 32.2 percent as against the national average of 37.5 per cent. The percentage of marginal workcrs is2.5 per cent while non-workers account for 67.8 per cent.

\IiAnh2l. .tp Lttcst2X02\ rap_n.dtv 1 7 COWI.1SPAN JV

NH-2 Varanasi Aurangabad 4 Laning & Strengthening Project (RAP,

Nearly 81 per cent of main woorker-s arc engaged in agriculture sector of which. 43.6 percent as cultivators and 37.1 per cent as agricultural laborers. In addition, 0.4 per cent of thework force are engaged in allied activities such as livestock, forestry. fishing, hunting andplantations, etc. Manufacturing, both household and non-household industries account for 4per cent of the work force.

Table 14(g)-Work Participation RateState! Main Workers Marginal Workers Non WorkersDistricts P F P M F

BiharTotal 29.7 47.6 10.0 2.5 0.3 4.9 67.8 52.1 85.1Rural 30.4 48.5 10.8 2.8 0.3 5.5 66.8 51.1 83.7Urban 24.6 41.7 4.3 j 0.5 0.2 0.8 74.9 58.1 94.7BhabhuaTotal - -- - -Rural - - --Urban I-Rohtas !Total 27.8 45.7 7.6 1.7 1 0.3 3.3 70.5 54.0 89.1Rural 28.3 46.3 8.2 1.9 0.3 3.6 69.8 53.4 88.2Urban 22.6 40.1 2.6 0.4 0.2 0.5 77.0 59.7 96.9

Auran-abadTotal 28.0 | 45.3 9.1 1.5 0.2 | 2.9 70.5 54.5 | 88.0Rural 28.4 45.8 9.5 1.6 0.2 3.0 70.0 52.6 87.5Urban 23.1 39.8 4.2 0.7 0.1 | 1.3 76.2 60.1 94.5

Total Mail? Wiorker-s: are cultivators, agricilitiur-a labourers, livestock, forestry, fishling, IIuitinig a!plantations, orchards anid allicrd activ ities, Alining and quarrYing, Manufacturiig, Processilng servicing airepairs (Houselhold lnrchistryv and Other- than Houisehlold Industry), Constiriction, Trade and Comm,nerctTransport, srorage anidi Comnumiications aneld Orheir services.

Non workers: arle those who re enig,oged in houe holdl activiries, Stiudlents. Depedanrts, Retired person,rentiers, Beggars mid( liag rans. Inimiates of histitutions rii a Othels

The work participation ralc in the project districts is 29.5 per cent which is less-than t0-statc average ol' 32.2 per cent. A-riCultLuI-c is the major- economic activity wvhich accouLI

f'or above S3 peI cent of Itle worik force. ManufactuLrino accounts for about 2.7 per centthe work forcc.

It may be obserIved that main workers comprise albovc 27 per cent of' the total populatit

which is close to the peiccntagc ol' the total worker-s in the disti-ict. implying thcreby 0i

participation ol' the people in economically pr-odLIctivC work in the district is on a flll-tiP

basis. The Contli htition of' marginal \\orkers to total wxorking population is not si eniflic;:

being only above 1.5 per cent. The saimle trcnd ma!y he observed in both the rural and tiiatreals of the StLate anid the project distrlicts.

I)A11112\1 I: kCS2XI i2\ll. 1ill. I 18 COWI-SI'AN JV


4.2 ANALYSIS OF CENSUS SURVEYThe cut-off date for those who have legal titles is date of notification of section 3a NH actand 4(1) of LA act. The census and socio economic survey establishes the cut-off date forPAPs who do not have legal titles. Those non-titleholders who have moved in the COI afterthe cut-off date(4.01.1999) will not be considered as the PAP.

It is recognised that there will be margin of error in the census, and any person who wasnot enumerated but has documentation or evidence that they have reside befor the cut-offdate. They will be dealt by the Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) anc[ support will beextended accordingly.

4.2.1 Project Affected PeopleThe Table 14(h) given below indicates that the total numbers of people affected by theproject are 927. The average no. of people in the family is 4 in Contract Package B & 5 inContract Package B

Table 14(h) - Distribution of Affected PopulationPackages No. of PAPs No. of PAFs No. of PDPs No. of PDFs

Contract Package B 359 93 180 37

Contract Package D 568 146 465 103

Total 927 239 645 140

4.2.1(a) Profile of the Project Affected PeopleBased on the census survey the Table 14(i) indicates that there are 2281 project affectedpeople. The Hindus (764) Hindus constitute the majority and the Muslims (167) are inminority. Among the Hindus Other Backward Caste form 55% of the affected, followed byUpper- castes and scheduled caste. There are very few scheduled tribe who will be affectedand limits to Contract D

Table 14(i)-Social Composition of PAPsCointract PAPs/PAFsPackages Hindu Hindu Muslim Grand

OBC SC ST Upper Total TotalCaste

13 136 78 0 65 279 80 3591) 332 64 21 113 530 38 568T otal __ 468 142 21 178 809 118 927

4.2.2 Literacy of the affectedAs oi\en in Table 14(j) the illiteracy among the affected is more than 60%'/o. Among literate,tIhelC ac albou.t 17'k and 15%1c of PAPs who have primary education and 21.53%Je and15.44('9 are higlh school in contract B and package D respectively.

p \rih2\p ;11,S10StI2\ ,il. liIO1C 19 COWI-SPAN JV

IN l1l-2 varahliI AurangaiMd 4 Lining & Strengthening Project (RAP)

Table 14(j)-Literacy Among PAPs

Level of Education Contract Packages Total_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~~~~~~~B D

Illiterate 351 (62.45) 231 (62.30) 582 (62.51)Upto 5 th. Class 94 (16.72) 53 (14.36) 147 (15.78)Upto 10 th. Clzass 121 (21.53) 57 (15.44) 178 (19.11)Inter 14 (2.49) 12 (3.25) 26 (2.79)Graduate 26 (4.62) 9 (2.43) 35 (3.75)Post Graduate 1 (0.17) 7 (1.89) 8 (0.85)Doctors 3 (0.53) 0 3 (0.32)ITI 1 (0.17) 0 1 (0.10)Total 562 (100.00) 369 (100.00) 931 (100.00)

4.2.3 Employment Pattern of the affected

The employment pattern of the project affected families as ascertained through the Censussurvey reveals that most of the families are employed in commercial activities along theroad. Petty business activities (Pan and Bidi/Cigarette shops, tea stall, etc.) have been thesource of livelihood for most of the PAFs along the road.

Table 14 (k) Occupational Structure of Affected People

S.No Category Package B (%) Package D (%) Total (%)I Main Worker 138 (38.44) 121(21.3) 259(27.93)2 Marginal Worker 146 (40.66) 257(45.24) 403(43.47)3 Non Worker 75 (20.89) 190(33.45) 265(28.58)4 Total 359 568 927

4.3 Details of the affected and the displaced familiesThe average number of affected population per km works out to approximately 11 personsand the displaced people are approximately 8 per km.

Annex 4-1 to 4-8 gives information on the losses faced by individual families and theirstatus in the project area.

4.3.1 A-ricultureThe Project af'l'ccted tfamilies in agriculture is 5%c of the total affected families i.e. 93 inlPackagc B. where as in Packa-e D it is 23%( of the total affected f'amilies i.e. 146 and theli-ojec displaced families in agricultul-C is 3%c of the total displaced families i.e. 37 inPaickagc B. where as in Package D it is 4%Yc of the displaced families i.e. 103.

4.3.2 Resi(lentialTh-lie Project affelccted fa;imilies in Residential is 71% of the total affected families i.e. 93 inPlacka-c B, wherc as in Package D it is 22%N, of the total affected i'amilies i.e. 146 and thePlroject displaced lfaimilies in Residential is 65V' of' the total displaced families i.e. 37 inPaiickagle 13. whelre as in Packagc D it is 27% ol' thc displaced families i.e. 103.

:- .q I.iIc.I25I) 2\ .y - 20 COWI-SPAN JV


4.3.3 CommercialThe Project affected families in commercial is 18% of the total affected families i.e. 93 inPackage B, where as in Package D it is 48% of the total affected families i.e. 146 and theProject displaced families in commercial is 22% of the total displaced families i.e. 37 inPackage B, where as in Package D it is 67% of the displaced families i.e. 103.

4.3.4 Residential cum CommercialThe Project affected families in Residential 'and commercial is 6% of the total affectedfamilies i.e. 93 in Package B, where as in Package D it is 67% of the total affected familiesi.e. 146 and the Project displaced families in Residential and commercial is 10% of thet6fa`fdissplaced families i.e. 37 in Package B, where as in Package D it is 2% of thedisplaced families i.e. 103.

p:Anh2\i ip I.Lites I28Q2\ rap_nAdt 21 COWI-SPAN JV

Ni1-2 V avanasi Aurangabad 4 Uining & Strengthening Pfoject (RAP)

CHAPTER 5

RESETTLEMENT POLICIES & LEGAL FRAMEWORK

5.1 INTRODUCTION

The resettlement policy for the project has been prepared by the NHAI in accordance withthe principles laid down in the operational directive (O.D. 4.30) of the World Bank. Theaction plan has been prepared on the basis of the broad outlines laid down in the policy.

The principle of the R & R policy is the guiding philosophy to provide a developmentalapproach to resettle and rehabilitate the people affected by the project. In particular

* Wherever possible displacement will be reduced or avoided altogether by sensitivedesign of civil works (e.g. altemative designs or modifications to the design).

* Where displacement is unavoidable, those displaced will have their living standardsimproved.

* They will be located as a single unit among the peer groups or will be assisted tointegrate into their new community. Particular attention will be paid to the needs of themost vulnerable groups to be resettled.

* PAPs will be compensated, at replacement cost for assests lost. Adequate social andphysical infrastructure will be provided.

* PAPS and the host communities will be encouraged to participate in the design and theimplementation of RAP.

The RAP delivers a comprehensive package of compensation and assistance to entitledpersons. families, and groups suffering losses as a result of the project. It providesmitigation for:

* Loss of assets, including land and house or-work place* Loss of livelihood of income opportunities and* Collective impacts on groups, such as loss of community assets, common property

l'CSOUlYCS anlld others.

Thc chiiblc families lor SUpport have been defined in the R & R policy, annlex 5.AccordinLg to it the following del'initionis are important

Ciut-offdate lorI titleholdels will be thec date of issue of the notice u/s 3a of NH Act orLi/s 4 ol Land AcquL1isition Act (1984). In case of non-titleholders it will be the date ofstart of the censuLs sLlu-vey, wlliclh is 4.01.99.

* All pcoplc above the age of 18 years has been defined as a separate family will beclisible for support il alfected by the project.

* h.' vulnerable grOUp will compri-ise of those who are below poverty line plus earning15>' ahove the poverty line. It also covers the disadvantaged persons belonging toS/SIl disabled. handicapped. orphans, women headed household and destitute.

\ 'W-\i:} I;2il'>t58( :\ .o 1,(i2)t 0 . 22 COWI-SPAN JV

N 11-2 Varnnasi Aurangabad 4 Laning & Strengthening Project (RAP)

All losses will be compensated and assistance will be provided at replacement value,irrespective of their legal standing in the project area. Special assistance will be extended tothe vulnerable to enhance their earning opportunities.

5.2 SUMMARY ENTITLEMENT MATRIX

5.2.1 The components of the RAP compensation and assistance package based oncompensation and assistance actions specified in the policy. These compensation andassistance actions are summarised in Annexure 5-1, which shows the entitlement matrixthat will be implemented in the RAP and indicates PAPs eligibility for associated support.

5.3 DETAILED PROJECT ENTITLEMENTS

Specific elements of the entitlements provided in the package of comrpensation andassistance that will be delivered by the project RAP are detailed in Annexure 5-2. Anyimpact not falling within any of the categories mentioned will be addressed within thegeneral spirit of the entitlement framework.

I, mh2\tlp la,,i Ž802\ii I dl0,' 23 COWI-SPAN JV


CHAPTER 6

PARTICIPATION AND CONSULTATION

Experience indicates that involuntary resettlement generally gives rise to problems for theaffected population. It has also been experienced that problems reduce when people areproperly infonred and consulted about the project and allowed to make meaningfulchoices. This not only reduces the insecurity among the PAPs but also avoids opposition tothe project which otherwise are likely to occur.

The project ensures and would continue to ensure that the affected population and otherstakeholders are informed, consulted and allowed to participate actively in the developmentprocess. This has been and would be done throughout the project at every stage of theproject i. e. during preparation, implementation and monitoring of the project.

A social assessment has been undertaken for the project at various levels to illicit the viewsof the PAPs and other stakeholders and has been incorporated wherever feasible so as toreduce the negative impacts of the project in both the packages.

On an average ten to twelve persons who are going to be affected because of the projecttook part in the above process at each locations initially. Besides PAPs other stakeholdersare participated in the in the consultation process. The number of participants increased asthe consultation progressed. The issues raised and solution of the problems suggested are asfollows:

6.1 LOCAL LEVEL CONSULTATION

Both individual and group level discussions were caLTied out with PAPs at followinMlocations:

Location MK. Change Issues raised and Outcome of the consultation|solutions suggested

Package BMohaniia 68.5-71 203500- Slifting the centr-e line Centre line followed cential

20600() to the r-ight so as to widenilln to sa\e Imlaximiumiil saVe striCcti.es on the numiber of struCtures on bothleft side. sides.Save "Mahaveer"templc on the left side. Temiple coUld not be saved. as itItlmpr-ovemiienit of is located ver-v close to tilejulction existilg cenitr-e line.

An unliderpass hals been providedat 20400(0) anid the jUnlCtiOnlimproved at 205901).

Kudra _____ 90-93 225000- Save Kudra police Police station has been saved.

t):\iIh2\1;.IiP~~ l ist2X(J2\l nap 24 COWI-S PAN JN'


Location | Km. Change Issues raised and Outcome of the consultationsolutions suggested

228000 station Maximum no. Of structures hasbeen saved.

Save structures on theright side between km.91.0-91.5 Followed the suggestion.

Shift Centre Linewherever possible toavoid demolitions

Sabrabad 99.7- 234700- Mazar must be saved It has been saved.100.2 235200 on the left side

Suggestion was made Suggestion has been taken intoto shift the road account.alignment moretowards the right i.e.south so as to save boththe village and themosque.

Shivsagar 105-106 240000- Two temples on the left Temples have been saved.241000 side need to be saved

Suggested to cover the Pond will be partially filled toexisting pond partially save the temples on south.as it is not much of useto local people andadjust new roadaccordingly to savereligious structures.

Saved.Three temples on thesouth must be savedand also one big Mazar.

P l.ackage 1)l13arlun 140.9- 400900- Provision of parking Enough space is available within

141.4 40140() place for trucks, as at ROW for parking.given point of timethere are at least 20trucks are parked.Suggestion was madefor a bigger parkingspace.

P'unpun river- 147.0 40700)() Suggestion was made Budget provision shall be madehriduhe to develop the separately to develop the same.

religious place on Also alignment has been shiftedPunpun river where to the right for development ofPind Dan is made to this place.

__________ _ I______ __________ departed souls.1Bhojjtpur/ 147.0- j407000- Concern was shown Road alignment has been

p.\nh2\,.1p 1atcs12C802\rap-n.doc 25 COWI-SPAN JV

NH-2 Varanasi Aurangabad 4 aning & Strengthening Project (RAP)

Location Km. Change Issues raised and Outcome of the consultationsolutions suggested

Sitish 148.4 408400 by the villagers about designed keeping in mind totheir structures being save maximrnumn number ofaffected. Instead of structures.compensation for theirstructures they prefertheir structures to besaved.

Sahar Nagar 155.0 415100 Village gate close to Village gate would be shifted asChandauli the existing road it was not feasible to save it.

should be saved.Saved. Suggestion considered.

Shiva temple withcemented statue ofabout 8 ft. near km.155.1 must be saved.Suggestion was madeto shift the approachroad to the adjacent"Gomaur" bridge onBetana river so thatthe temple could besaved.

Bus 161.3 421300 Bus crossing near bus Provision of flyover to reduceterminus terminus (on the the traffic jam has already beenAurangabad north) should be made.

developed to reducetraffic jam.

Ora Village 168.9- 428900- Villagers unanimously Central wvidening has been169.4 429400 requested to shift the provided keeping the

new alignment more engineering feasibility in mind.towards the right to Even though very less number- ofsave the entire village. structures are getting affected.

Kanbeheri 171.3- 431300- Save two temples and One temple could not be saved.\'illage 171.9 431900 one graveyard on the

left side i.e. on thenorth.

Saved.Also the Middleschool on the northi tobe saved. Not prioposcd keeping in milidSuggestion was maide the btidget as well as inadequatefor thc provisioll Of population residing in nearbysub-way keeping in areas.mind the sclhool goilg

. \~iIi2\Jaj tIc~[2~1~2 a.._ n ~i 26 COWSchlildrNn.

;\l,l,5\l,l. ell.tz.il\r.l,1lwl.,26 CO\\VI-SI9AN JV


6.2 DISTRICT LEVEL PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Following up on the District level focused group discussions, public consultations wererequired to involve other stakeholders. The suggestions made by them facilitated thepreparation of the RAP. Details are as follows:

Table -15 List of Issues at district and state level meetingsSI. Location Brief description of the issue raised at district/ Relevant road Concerned Outcome of the issuesNo. State level section, if specific individual / raised

organisationraising it

DISTRICT LEVEL PUBLIC CONSULTATION

1 Raja talab To provide safe passage at the start of VRM Raja talab Public Flyover provided in the(Varanasi Bypass. start of VRM Bypassdistrict)

Suggestion of sulab toilet at Urban areas. Public Provided under theproject if land is made

available by districtauthorities.

Suggestion of Underpass at Urban areas. Public In congested areasunderpass has been

provided.

To provide safety measures at Lanka-Chitaipur km 12_VRM Public Providedcrossing (before toll plaza) on VRM bypass.

Suggestion of shopping complex for project Public Efforts will be made aseffected persons. per R&R policy.

2 Chandauli Requested to widen the road in such away, so Jagdish sarai Public Village saved(Chandauli that their village may be saved.district)

Requested to provide proper drainage scheme. Chandauli market Public Proper drainage schemehas been proposed.

Requested for special attention on vulnerable Public Special attention will begroups while providing compensation (current Paicl to vulnerablemarket rate to be tollowed) for land acquisition. groups as per R&R

policy.

* Suggested for Bypass. to save large scale Saidraja Public Bypass proposed.dismantling, Big Mosque, and Shrine, Temple.

i Requested for Reestablishment of religious Public Existing religiousstrLctures coming into the corridor of impact structures coming in

I COI will be re-established.

3 Mohania Provision of proper crossing at high Public Provided(Kaimur embanikments at Urban areas (PD assured to

district) thing over it).

To provide proper draiitage scheme. Outlet of Mohania Public Provideddrainage should be in the drain situated at thecrossing of station road. Which is presentlyconnected to Durgawati river. _

1) \i1i2\ia, l,itsi2Xi02\ 'ip n d,v 27 COWI-SPAN JV

NiH-2 Varanasi Aurangabad 4 Laning & Strengthening Project (RAP)

SI. Location Brief description of the issue raised at district/ Relevant road Concerned Outcome of the issuesNo. State level section, if specific individual / raised

organisationraising it

To avoid accidents and damage to road itself, Public Efforts will be made.overloading of trucks to prevent.

Suggested for compensation should be based Public Compensation will beon current rates. paid as per R&R policy.

Requested for Reestablishment of religious Mohania Public Existing religious

structures coming into the corridor of impact. structures coming inThey requested to thing over the Hanuman COI will betemple situated at the chandani chowk. re-established.

Proposed to construct the new bridge on Durgawati Public Provided as suggested.Durgawati river towards the south side of theexisting bridge.

Suggested for southern widening at Baraj village Baraj village Public Village saved.(which is situated at some distance fromMohania).

Suggested for Yatri sheds at varies places along Public Efforts will be made.project road

Welcomes the proposal of taking soil from the Publicponds. Which will help in solving the waterproblem by increasing the depth of ponds.

Suggestion of sulab toilet at Urban areas. Public Provided under theproject if land is madeavailable by districtauthorities.

Welcomes the proposal of trees plantation Publicscheme.

Suggested for a committee, which includes Public Efforts will be made.Chairman of ADM, Project officer. other officersand representative from the peoples. No NGOscan solve their problems.

Requested for alternate arrangements for PAPs Publiclike

a) Granting of loans for shop construction. PAPs will be assistec as

per R&R policy.

b) Govt. services for project affected persons.

c) Distribution of Gas agency and Ration shopsetc.

4 Sasaram Disposal of water is one of the major problems Sasaram Shri Jadish Sasaram bypass has(Rohtas through town. Southern side bypass will be chandra been proposed ondistrict) cheaper compare to northern side. For southern agrawal Southern sidde of the

bypass, proper action has to be taken due to existing NH-2protected forest.

(Ex.Ch.airman

__. __________ __________ _ ________ ____________ Nagar palica) pa __r_a_

II \iluI2'\ilil [;st,iic.,i8(2\ r.ipl al ......t..... l, Z28 COWI-SIAN .1V


SI. Location Brief description of the issue raised at district/ Relevant road Concerned Outcome of the issues

No. State level section, if specific individual / raised

organisation

raising it

Due to frequent accidents and heavy air Sasaram Shri Rajesh

pollution along the existing road, bypass is the Kumar

only alternative.

(Advocate/Jo

urnalist)

It is not possible to disturb the religious Sasaram Shri Jahuri

structures at Sasaram. prasad _

Religious structures cannot be shifted at Sasaram Public

Sasaram.

* Sasaram bypass should be constructed. Sasaram Shri Dilip

kumar

Bypass is the best proposal at Sasaram. Sasaram Shri

Chandrama

singh

* Bypass is the only solution in order to prevent Sasaram D.M., Rohtas

accidents at Sasaram market.

5 Aurangabad * Suggested for the service road at Urbanised Public Proposed

(Aurangabad areas on Aurangabad bypass (Existing).

district)

* Suggested for the flyover/under pass at Daltan km 162 Public Proposed

ganj chowk on Aurangabad bypass (existing)

due to heavy traffic.

• Suggestion of sulab toilet at Urban areas. Public Provided under the

project if land is made

avai able by district

authorities.

' Requested for flyover at Barun railway crossing. km 143 Public Proposed

6.3 STATE LEVEL CONSULTATION, BIHAR STATE

lFollo\\ ing up on the state level focused gIoup discussions, public consultations were required toinvol c other stakcholders. The suogestions made by them facilitated the preparation of the RAP.

I)Details ate as 1ollow\%s

1 1 Mohania Suggested for proper care has to be taken of Shri Jadish Agreed upon the(Bihar state) existing road till the construction of Sasaram chandra proposal and road will

bypass agrawal be maintained till the

(Ex. construction of Sasaram

lChairman bypass.

l________________________________________ |Nagar palica)

1p \1l1 \r,- latesi2X)2\ rap n.doc 29 COWI-SPAN JV

NH- 2 Varanasi Aurangabad 4 Laning & Strengthening Project (RAP)

S Location Briet description of the issue raised at district/ Relevant road Concemed Outcome of the issues

No. State level section, if specific individual I raisedorganisationraising it

Due to Sasaram bypass, his land is divided into Shri Alignment of Sasaramtwo parts. It was requested that bypass should Mahender bypass has been

be taken from one side of the land. Pratap Singh finalised taking this into

(Suara account.village)

Suggested for parks etc along the road in order Shri Khanduja Agreed environmental

to improve the Environment. D.F.O., improvements will be

Sasaram done as per final

recommendation offorest authorities.

Suggested for proper drainage scheme at Shri Rajesh Provided

Mohania. Kumar Singh(C. O.,

L_ Mohania)

,,1i2\1;,l, 1:atv.t-'802\ i n.l]do 30 COWI-SIAN,IV

NIi-2 Varanasi Auirangahad 4 Laning & Strengthening Project (RAP)

CHAPTER 7

LAND ACQUISITION AND ASSETS REQUIRED

Land acquisition for the project is necessary for road widening and other improvements todesign cross sections better draina-e. Additional land is also required for minor alignmentadjustment for curve straightening, new bridge approaches, intersection redesign, railwayover bridge and other upgrades planned to improve engineering, user safety and trafficflow.

7.1 REQUIREMENT OF LAND

The project proposes to widen the existing two lane to four lane, provide facilities for trucklay byes as indicated in Table 16(a). The Railway over bridge has been proposed inPackage D near km. 142.00. An estimated area of 11.954 ha of agricultural land would berequired temporarily for diversion purpose to facilitate civil works.

Table (16)a -Land required for widening and ugradation of the ProjectPurpose P ckage B (ha) P ckage D (ha) Total (ha)

Acquire Transfer Lease Acquire Transfer Lease Acquire Transfer Lease

Widening the road 0.02 0.45 0.47Bus stops and 2.0 0.615 0.61';truck la) byes IRailway Over 11.954 11.954Brid.eToll plaza NA NA NABonroW areas 67.25 118.90 186.15Others (Specify) -

l'otal 2.02 1.065 3.085

In case laild is required fell tr-ce plantation. census sur\e\' will be undertaken and RAP will be updated

7.2 LANI) E'SIMATE'S

'I'lite t>tilhtc ol' land to bc aCqu1_ircd is given in Table 16(b), which indicates that onlyri .ale laknd will h, acqUired for the upgradation of the road. The acquisition is negligible

in Contract 1) in comparison \Nith Contiact B. However, the total amount to be acquired isalso imarinal IOr a streicih of 85 km. This implies that there is sufficient ROW available towIdcn11 tile road.

pl \nl.l. p I,h.42\ s X .,. ,. sc 31 COWI-SPA!N JV

NH-2 Varanasi Aurangabad 4 Laning & Strengthening Projcct (RAP)

Table 16(b) - Land requir-ed for wideninie and up radation of the projtct __Category [ Contract B (ha) Contract I) (ha) _lotalFPri% ate land (aLri + 2.I2)homestead)

Govt. land (specitv) -Forest landInstitutional land --Total 2.02 1.065 3.085

7.3 COMMUNITY RESOURCES

The habitation along the road is invariably linked with the gr-owtlh of infrastructut-efacilities for peoples' day to day needs. As indicated in Table 17 it is found that thegovernment institutions have also encroached upon the ROW. Elfoits vet-e made tominimise the impact on religious places however, there are 7 such strLictur-es which will berelocated in consultation with the local community.

Table 17 - ('ommon property t he affectedCategory 1'ackage B 13'ckage 1)Handpumps/well 64 26Temple/Mosque 8 2SchoolPolice station --'Water tanks 5P'ost ottice/otliIC Ilhlildinus -2Villacye gate --Yatri shed 4-Platform around tree I_Statue with raised plattorm IOthers

* Incomplete structure, boundary wall, abandoned room. etc

\\projdata\nh2\nh2\r.ports\rap\m 'ditied rap\rrnicsh%kvr\rap 28(02\r.ip.n.doc 32 COWI-SI'AN J V

N11-2 Varanasi Aurangabad 4 Laning & Strengthening Project (RAP)

CHAPTER 8

RESETTLEMENT SITES

8.1 INTRODUCTION

During the baseline survey, PAPs were superficially consulted about theirpreference for relocation. Displacement anticipated under the project is scatteredover the project length rather then concentrated in one location. The majority optedfor self- relocation. Nevertheless, effort was made to identify land for resettlement.There is shortage of quality land, in particular agriculture land, in the project-affected area. Additionally the project will facilitate the purchase of private landfrom willing seller.

8.2 DISPLACED FAMILIES:

Since the project is linear in nature displacement is minimal and is mostly atsettlements. The table- 18 indicates that out of 140 families 26% of the displacedare located in contract B. This is because there settlements are congested as well asthere are more squatters as indicated in table 6b.

Table no. 18 Distribution of Affected & Displaced Population

Packages No. of PDPs No. of PDFsContract 180 37

Package BContract 465 103

Package DtTotal 645 140

(a) Titleholder : Annlex 4.6 to 4.8 gives the details of all the 11 families who willdisplaced. According to it 7 residential plots and 4 commercial plots. Non of thesefamilies belong to the vulnerable category, hence they will have to bLuy land fortheir resettlement.

(b) Non-titlelholder: The annex 4.6 to 4.8 indicates that 129 will be displaced outor them only those who have pakka and semi-pukka and semi-pukka structure andhelong to vulnerable category will be entitled to altemate plots and theresettlements sites.

(c) Vulnerable: A total of 85 families will be displaces as indicated in annex 4.6 to4.8.

p \,nb?!\ ;,i l.h'.I2x(i2\ -;.I .dsws 33 COWl-SPXAN JY

NH -2 Varanasi Aurangabad 4 Laning & Strengthening Project (RAP)

8.3 OPTIONS PREFERRED BY THE DISPLACED

a)Agriculture land - the first preference was for alternative land for 'and lost'However, since agriculture land in the vicinity of the project area was not availableat one site people opted to purchase land individually.

b)Shop owners - preferred either alternatives shops next to the road or cash forself-relocation.

c)Residential Structures - Those likely to lose part of whole of their residentialstructures preferred house plots for resettlement.

8.4 RESETTLEMENT SITES:

The displace will lose agriculture land, residential and commercial structures. Tomeet the objectives of the policy the following sizes of plots will be provided:

* Agriculture - 2 hectares of un-irrigated or I hectare of irrigated.* House plots - 25 sq.m. per family* Shops - 15 sq.m. per family.

Based on the entitlement for each family effort was made to identify land. TheTable - 19 indicates that land for agriculture has not been located. The sites forresidence and commercial plots were identified in consultation with the PAPs. Thesuggestions were made during the formal group discussions. The wasteland belongs1o the Gram Sabha of respective settlements. Hence the location is in closeproximity to the arca from where the people are getting displaced.

:\n1il\allp ;ict'S(i.`o ti do,. 34 COWl-SilAN JV


Table 19 - Resettlement Sites

Packages Total area required Total area Area to be identified Location(ha) identified (ha)

(ha)a r c a r c a r c

Contract 0.1 0.02 0.0075 0.1 0.02 0.0075Package B _Contract 0.014 0.03 0.048 0.014 0.048 0.048Package D I I

a - agriculturalr - residentialc- commercial

8 Location for Resettlement Sites to be identified.** Though there are 72 families falling in the category of displaced vulnerable, as a matter

of fact they are not in sufficient number i.e. minimum 25 families. At th[e same time novulnerable family is interacted in getting resettlement site, so the provision of landrequirement have not been shown in the lable mentioned above. However if later thesefamilies became intended provision may be made.

8.5. HOST COMMUNITY

Although the large-scale displacement will not occur and resettlernent sites havebeen identifies within the same region the issue of intecrating with anothercommunity may not arise. However, if the site is far from the place if displacementthen a host community survey will be conducted during the project implementationperiod. The objectives of the survey is:

* To assess the likely impact on and needs of PAPs host* To help design appropriate income restoration programs for PAPs* Assist in identifying where they may be problems of integration between tow

communities.

* Assess the canrying capacity of existing resouLrce and thc potential foridentification in receivingy settlemenits.

RAP goals includes at minimum the raising of PAPs living stanidlarids to above thepoverty lcecl. The host community sul-vey will also provide the insights to pirojectauthorities. on potential resentments of PAPs by members of the host commiiiuni tieswho may themselves live Below poverty level. Mitigation meaLsuLes may then beconsidered to overcollmC potential disparities anld promote lOCal acceptance otr esettled houscholds.

p\ WhN2plap 1:stm2S11,02\ -mp ii doc 35 C()WI-SPA.N ,V

NH-2 Varanasi Aurangabad 4 Laning & Strcngthening Projcct (RAI')

8.6. INFORMATION CHECKLIST FOR HOST COMMIUNITY SURVEY.

If the displaced PAPs need to be iesettled in new community, there are number ofconcerns that will be addressed in thc host community survey. The survey willexamine:* Census data of host population will rever-ence to total population. Sex, ethnic

composition, linguistic group, caste, occupation, education. etc.* Current land use pattern, tenure status and production systems* The inventory of existing social infrastructure (school, health centers, etc.)* Use of area by non-residents (grazing land, etc.) and usufruct rights attached* Carrying capacity of area and vulnerability to PAPs influx.

Existing survey information will be reviewed and considered before actions aretaken. Additional host community information will be collected using rapidappraisal methods. The host community will be included in community consultationexercise to allow them to voice concerns associated with the incoming-population.

If displaced PAPs are resettled in the host areas, pressure on existing infrastructurefacilities to accommodate the increased population. The host area should beprovided with all the facilities indicated in the R&R policy.

.i,i2\i;,l. Iaiw.t2802\ A,ap,,. 36 COWI-SPANJV


CHAPTER 9

INCOME RESTORATION

9.1 INTRODUCTION

The basic objective of RAP income restoration activities is that no project-affectedperson shall be worse off than he or she was before the prolect. Restoration for pre-project levels of income is an important part of rehabilitation individuals,

9.2 LIVELIHOOD OF AFFECTED FAMILIES

Data given in table -20 based on baseline survey is available on features of economicactivities of PAPs includes:

- Land-based economic activities* Non-land economic activities

The livelihood of 125 families will be affected, out of which 30.4%7o families willloose agricultural land and 69.60% families will lose their commercial structure(partial and total).

Table-20- Livelihood of affected families

Packages Agricultural loss Commercial loss* TotalContract Package B 4 23 27Contract Package D 34 80 114Total 38 103 141cResidential & Commercial families are included with Commercial families.

9.3 LIVELIHOOD OF D)IFFERENT CATEGORIES OF AFFECTED FAMILIES

9.3a Livelihood of Vulnerable families affected

Tnc abhle 21 indicaies that the vulncrable tamnilies toCethe1r account foi 66(29 + 37).

Table 21 - Livelihood of vulnerable families affected

Cat eg o. r i es Pack Lce 1B Pac LICe 1) 'Tal IAeri. ( in .! A001 A_ri. o('mm .

I St __ 4 3 ()lt 4 14ST . 0 () 7 7 0Will 0 __ 0 () 0B1'l1 0 ____ 5 18 1_ 30 _ 8 44ltotal;ll 4 8 25 _0 20 > _ '9 _ 58Residential & Con lmilelreiatl families are ineltided wihli (Coinmmerciala tfainilies.

lAn hN2\a pi I;atcs280)2\rap i n.oc 37 CoWI-Sl- AN JV

NH-2 Varanasi Aurangabad 4 Laning & Strengthening lProject (RAP)

9.4 ELIGIBLE FAMILIES INCOME REST'ORATION

The project-affected families identified by the baseline SuLvey wilil be entitles toagricultural plot, commercial plot. productive asset (which is the replacement value forthe asset affected). The vulnerable are entitles to receive the plots free cost and the non-vulnerable will purchase it. Both the categories will be further assisted in the form oftransitional allowance for the period of 9 months to restore the livelihood. Thevulnerable will receive additional support in the form of Economic Rehabilitation Grantto enable to increase their earning capacity.

The Annex 9 provided the information on each family eligible for agriculture andcommercial plot. The families who will lose less than 25% of their economic asset

'Hill not receive productive asset grant and transitional allowance.

The analysis of annex 9 of indicates the following:* More than 85% of the families are engaged in pretty business* It seems that the families do not have diversified skills* The families based on agriculture too lack other skills

Table 22 - Eligible families for income restoration

Category Packa e B Packa e D Total

L E S T L E S T L E S T

Agrictiltural plot I 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 5 0 I 0- (displaccd) _ I I

Plot for residence S 0 16 0 7 0 20 0 15 0 36 0

Plot for shop 4 0 8 0 8 0 63 0 12 0 7 1 0I (displaced) O 0 _

ProdUctiVC a.SCt I 0 0 0 4 O O 0 5 Ocrant a,ricUltuLr__Productivc asset 4 0 0 0 S 0 0 12 0 0 0Ulanlt coinmicl-cial __

IFl0UIC C,OftLI Lti1of1 S 0 0 0 7 0 . O 15 0 O

L'Assinl oinci 0 5 19 0 0 2 %2 0 0 7 )()

Sc tiatter)Assistance loi I S 0 ( 5 1 63 0 0 71 (

W lincroachier A.

Tllansillll '1 m ;, 11,.\\ ,,,.- I IIEconIomic;, 2 ~94 1 9 S• Ii - S 2 2 42 41 35 (1) 0)rel; it lt I ,

l \IililtctahlC.) __ _- __ l _ __l _ L _ _ _ __

1- -Leg.al lboldei- S - SqalEl1er''I - 'IT'enat il -1' - t Himachicr

;,,1h2\,.,l) p Ilrsr28Oj2\ up11) n (IL>a 38 CO WI-SIPAN JV


9.5 INCOME RESTORATION SCHEMES

The PAPs will participate in developing range of feasible long term IG options. Thelong term options to be developed during RAP inmplementation is project financedand government financed. Project officials will work with the NGOs and laisionwith the district administration to dovetail government's programs on IG activitiesThe micro plans prepared by the implementing authority will indicate the type ofscheme each family has opted for which will be based on informned choice. Theannex 10-I provide information on the various IG and development schemes.

The IG will be developed in consultantion with the project affected family and thegrants received will be used for the purchase of the assets. The PAFs will receivetraining to upgrade their existing skill for the activity selected by them.

1' \ p8l2\ L8 I;tc~t,2S802\ raplli tk.ilcu. 39 COWI-SPAN JV


CHAPTER 10

IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISM & SCHEDULE

Implementation of R & R component would be the responsibility of the NHAI's ProjectImplementation Unit. The responsibilities would include planning, implementation andmonitoring of land acquisition and R & R related progr-ammes.

Since land belongs to the state government on behalf of the NHAI will acquires land. Thestate level committee set-up to review the progress of land acquisition. The state districtadministration will acquire private land on behalf of the NHAI.

The NHAI will implement the R & R. The organisation has appointed CRROs for eachcontract package who will work in close co-ordination with the NGO appointed in eachdistrict to implement the RAP.

The work of developing the resettlement sites and markets will be undertaken by thecontractor appointed by the NHAI.

Institutional organisation within the NHAI is given below:

N'HAI Corporate Officel|Chief General manager cum Chief

{ n ~~~~~~Eneineer

R&R Officer

Co;tr' ct A - PIt Contiact C - IIUProj ct Directoi || iroicc:t Director

P ro ject Distriict le l X 1jecManager N(iO comilillittee D istricgt P atjCClas CRRO *(llaget zk)

I-evel ~~~~CRRO)committce SN(.

,,AnhNap.ll htcs.i280_ i ,y n.do 40 COWI-Sl'AN JV

N11-2 Varanasi Aurangabad 4 Laniiig & Strengthening Project (RAP)

Roles & Responsiblites of the Social Cell, NHAIImplementation Staff Roles and Responsibilities

Corporate office Chief Gnereal manager * Oversee the progress of land acquisition andCum Chief Engineer R & R activities

* Participate in the state level Committees tofacilitate land acquisition.

* Contracting NGOs for the implementationof the RAP (Terms of reference for NGO, isannex 10-1 and for screening criteria isannex 10-2)

R & R Officer * Coordinate the implementation of R & Ractivities with corporate and field staff.

* Consolidate the micro R & R plans preparedby the PIU on physical and financial needson monthly basis.

* Organising training for the PIU and NGOsfor capacity building to implement R & R

. Prepare monthly progress report.* Monitor the progress on R & R. and land

acquisition* Preparing terms of reference and facilitating

the appointment of external agency for M &E.

* Develop terms of reference for any studiesidentified to enhance the implementation ofR & R and facilitate the appointment of theconsultant and coordinate the studies.

Project Project Director . Overall responsible for land acquisition andimplementationL Unit R & R activities in the fie'd.Field Office * Make budgetary provisions for land(Contract Le\ el) acquisition and R & R activities.

* Liaison with district administration forsupport for land acquisition andimplementationl of R & R.

* Participate in the district level committeeP'rojcct Manager as * Co-ordinate x\ith district administr-ationi andCIRRO NGOs responsible for land acquisitioni and

R & R.* Translationi of R & R policy in local

language.* IPrepar-e pamplilets on the policy* IPrinting of the policy and Idetntity cards tor

the lPAPs (annex 10-3).* Ensurc that the conii-iacto r has paid the

m11Lutually agreed amountIt to the people forthe land takien over as borrow areas. Andenlsure that the land is ICtLI-mled to the owner\\'ithin the stipulated time as per theI.agreement and has not been made it_ iiiproductive.

p \,,h,'\,;,Ap I.iIcst2XU2\l:lln I d'-c 41 COWI-SP'AN JV

NH-2 Varanasi Aurangabad 4 Uning & Strengthening Project (RAP)

Implementation Staff Roles and Responsibilities

* Prepare land acquisition plans and submit tothe district administration for acquisition.

* Ensure the development of resettlement sitesand agricultural land, wherever required.

* Participate in the allotment of residential,commercial and agricultural plots.

* Liaison with district administration fordovetailing government's income generatingand developmental programs for the PAPs.

* Co-ordinate with the NGOs appointed forthe implementation of the R &am

public disclosure authorized irp-42 - world bank · 2017. 2. 27. · site betoi-c implementation....

Documents