public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

28
www.hertsdirect .org Public Health and the Commissioning Cycle: Getting benefit from getting together Jim McManus Director of Public Health

Upload: jim-mcmanus

Post on 29-Nov-2014

641 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Presentation and discussion exercise from a workshop articulating how commissioners and public health can work together

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

Public Health and the Commissioning Cycle: Getting benefit from getting together

Jim McManus

Director of Public Health

Page 2: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

Mary knew she wanted an equity audit but still thought the public health team could be a bit more accessible

Page 3: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

Starting Points• Commissioners are – or ought to be – big customers of Public

Health

• PH ought to see commissioners as a major constituency to influence

– Sometimes PH does too much “commissioning of its own”

– Sometimes PH becomes detached from commissioning

– Sometimes PH Depts are like Mini PCTs

• Things which prevent this are

– Not knowing what public health “do”

– Public Health not being clear of its role in commissioning

– Style issues

Page 4: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

What is Public Health?

• A team which brings together within ten key competencies for public health practice people who practice the art and science of supporting the improvement of the health of the population.

• Public Health Specialists have:

– A Population perspective – look to the population and see not just the whole but the nooks and crannies

– A Prospective perspective – look to the future

– A Preventive perspective – reduce ill health, promote good health

– A Prospective perspective – looking to the future of the area informed by the past (e.g. mortality trends)

Page 5: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

A “Typical” Public Health Dept

• Sometimes called Health Improvement Depts

• Director of Public Health

• Consultants in public health/ consultants in public health medicine – 8c or 8d – practice all ten competencies to the level of specialist registration. Higher specialist training usually including MFPH (www.fph.org.uk) May be medic or non-medic. May also be Assistant or Associate Directors

• Specialists – Band 8 usually have a Masters

• Advanced Practitioners Band 7s – may be doing an M.Sc

The technical workhorses of the dept

Page 6: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

Meet the Public Health Senior Team

Page 7: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

A Very Odd Mix of stuff

• May be working on equity audit of access to care at the same time as being responsible for emergency planning, business continuity, pandemic flu planning, immunisation uptake, commenting on pollution licence applications and other nerdy stuff that is sexy to people in public health but mightily P***** commissioners off when it derails a tightly scheduled project

• This is usually a symptom that the PH Dept’s own ability to keep continuity of core business during an emergency needs looking at

Page 8: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

Part of the Public Health day Job at present….• Chief Medical Officer Alerts – 24 – 48 hours

• Major Incidents, Pandemic Flu, CBRN……..

• Port Health Alerts – immigrants with TB etc

• IPPC (Pollution Control Licences) – we have 28 days to respond

• Controlled Drugs

• Child Death Panels

• Mortality Files, Suicide Audits, SUIS involving deaths

• Investigations

• Outbreaks (though managed by HPA pct has a role)

• Planning for major accident hazards/emergencies

Page 9: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

From 2013

• Healthcare Public Health Support to NHS CCGs (Mandatory)

• Needs Assessment (Mandatory)

• Commissioning some functions (Mandatory)

• Use of evidence and PH skills to support commissioners across the system (the big opportunity)

• Work with all sides of system

Page 10: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

Perceptions of PH by Commissioners• PH Needs to up its game

• Library dwellers!

• Don’t know how to access them

• Boundaries of when to involve and when not to

• Not sure they add anything

• Keep saying they’re too busy or don’t have skills

• Obsessed with their professional status

• Bit of a closed shop

• Prodigious amounts of data in the annual public health report, produced in almost untintelligble density

• Needs Assessments – never mind the message, look how pseudo-academic the document is!

• All you need is a sneeze in southwark and you can kiss goodbye to them

Page 11: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

Perceptions of Commissioners by PH

• Haven’t a clue what the population needs (but did we bother telling them?)Disregard the evidence (did we tell them what it is?)

• Contracting historically, not what’s needed

• Glorified

• Why won’t they read our stuff?

• Why don’t they love us?

Page 12: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

The Diagnosis

• This is usually the symptom of both sides not understanding what the other can offer, and not engaging with the other side.

• Commissioners may have more difficulty engaging public health because of the “mystique” of what they do

Page 13: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

Overcoming These

• Meet together to explore (today)

• Jointly articulate a cycle of input (today)

• Involve on projects rather than just sitting on steering groups

• Use the “Commissioning Framework for Wellbeing” document

• Work through the commissioning cycle with some PH colleagues and have the PH key competencies to hand

Page 14: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

Scope of Commissioning Interest

• Commissioning

• Business Plan

• Corporate Plan

• Health and Wellbeing Strategy

• National Service Frameworks (yes they still exist)

• QIPP

• CQUIN

• Transformation

• NICE

• Public Health

• Well, exactly the same. Our concern is that we increase independence, reduce mortality and morbidity in the population and increase longevity, as well as addressing health inequalities, through commissioning activities

Page 15: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

A (very) Simplified Commissioning Cycle

Monitor

Plan

Review Need for Service and

Effectiveness of existing services

ContractThe Commissioning Cycle

This is used just to introduce the concepts of what PH can help you with.

Page 16: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

Articulation of PH input…various models

• World Health Organisation Planning Wheel

• Kellog Foundation Planning Cycle

• DH Commissioning Cycle

• Hybrid model based on what HCC seems to be using (for discussion)…..

Page 17: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

Monitor/ Evaluate

Plan

Review Need for Service and

Effectiveness of existing services

Public Health Input into the Commissioning Cycle. Can be throughout or can be on

specific areas playing to the PH strengths

Community Engagement

Support in establishing meaningful indicators of

delivery and outcome

Model whether need willBe met by proposed volume

Check whether plans equateTo evidence and need andTest for equity / inequity

Support and advise onEvaluation and conductBits of it if enough resource

Needs AssessmentsEquity AuditingEvidence of Effectiveness

Health Impact Assessment

Triangle of critical influence – where public health should be most visible

Contract/Deliver

Page 18: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

The Public Health Toolbox

• Assessing Population Need

• Identifying Equity

• Critical Appraisal of Evidence

• Assessing Impact on Health

• Modelling Population and effects of interventions

• Community Engagement

• Economic Modelling of Interventions

• Access to wider sources of expertise

• Being Internal Consultants

Page 19: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

Health Needs Assessment

•Age Structure

•Morbidity

•Mortality

•Socio-economic data – Census– Housing

•Public Health data set

•Indices of health – Jarman– Townsend

Page 20: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

Performance monitoring

•Service Level Agreements

– Activity/Finance

•Quality

– Waiting Times/Access

– Waiting Numbers

•Validation

Page 21: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

Ad hoc requests

•Critical Appraisals– Does this drug or procedure work?– Is it cost-effective?– Should we fund it? For whom?

•Service developments/business cases– heart failure

•Impact of investment – CHD secondary Prevention/MI’s

•Analysis of variances – emergencies (secondary View/Primary View)

Page 22: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

Modelling

Impact of policy/planning

- Payment by results

- Capacity planning

Page 23: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

I know

What we

Need for

Our

Population

I know

How to

make it

happen!

Both commissioning andPublic health can comeFrom either side of thisconversation

Page 24: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

1. Commission for the whole person’s lived experience (housing, volunteering, leisure, transport,)

2. See Potentials not Problems, assets as well as needs

3. Transformation of current system through staged redesign to preventive and early intervention

4. Subsidiarity and Access

5. Co-production

6. Behavioural Sciences

7. Pathwayed

Page 25: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

Discussion example: Chronic Pain

Page 26: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

Some outcome we should look for

• A public health approach in adult social care should bring the following benefits:

– Less people in residential care

– More people independent– Less costs to NHS and

Social Care– Fewer costs to GPs for those

with long term conditions and disabilities

– A way of monitoring the new market and micro-commissioning

• A public health approach for children should bring the following benefits:

– Fewer children with avoidable behavioural disorders

– Evidence assessed interventions for troubled families

– Children looked after are healthier physically, psychologically and socially

– Standards for physical, cognitive and emotional development and resilience across all services

Page 27: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org

Components of this model where we work together

• Population approach to – projecting need– Identifying risks – risk stratify– Identify priorities– Identify candidate interventions

• Intervention and outcome design

• Emphasise Prevention (science & art)

• Joining up (housing and social care, primary care and social care)

Page 28: Public health and the commissioning cycle nov 2012

www.hertsdirect.org28

Prediction

forecast / target services

Secondary Prevention

Pri

ma

ry P

reve

ntio

n

Un

ive

rsal

& W

ell-

be

ing

LOWMODERATE

SUBSTANTIAL CRITICAL

Reduce numbers of people coming into high-cost services and

moving along FACS banding

Intensive Home Support

Residential Care

Community Equipment Services

Telecare Service

Tertiary Prevention

How might Prevention look in Social Care?