public hearing excel 070611application.wedrawthelines.ca.gov/downloads/meeting_handouts... ·...

Public Input Hearing Spreadsheet

Speaker # Spoke at Hearing (H) and/or Provided Supplemental Hardcopy Materials (S)

Speaker Background

Organizational Affiliation?

Description of Organizational Affiliation

City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?

Summary of Geographic Comment

Geographic Comment: Counties

40911001 H no Davis Yolo yes Davis and nearby communities of winters and woodland - make up economic interest; COI is land between two rivers (Cache and Putah Creeks); 3 AD 2 SD 3 CD - so do not get adequate representation.

keep Yolo county intact; COI between rivers is 12mile wide NS 25mi wide EW; gave pop stats from ReDrawCA.org

40911002 H ran as Dem for CD 2

no Shasta yes 2nd CD (biggest geo CD in state) cuts up Butte and Yolo Cos. 1)draw lines around entire counties 2) proposes CD from coast to Nev draw line at bottom of Humboldt county Glenn Butte Plumas (11 cos); Sent email recently with this proposal had copies.

In CD 2 Butte and Yolo carved up; keep Del Norte and put Humboldt in 2nd district; exclude southern end of district Sutter Yuba Colusa north Yolo to be with Sacramento-based districts; those in Sacramento media market

40911003 H no Shasta yes counties split by CD line Siskiyou Shasta Mendo Lake Humboldt Del Norte Trinity

40911004 H no Shasta yes boundary from Crescent City to Nevada border then bring down

Del Norte Siskiyou Modoc Humboldt Trinity Shasta Lassen as starting point - all mountainous and all rural but nothing in common with Yolo


Speaker #

40911001

40911002

40911003

40911004

Geographic Comment: Cities

Geographic Comment: Streets/Rivers/Other Dividers

Neighborhood Comment?

Community of Interest?

COI: Social Interest(s) COI: Economic Interest(s)

Davis Winters Woodland rivers bound COI no yes 140000 people unique water community - two rivers - land between rely on (cache creek putah creek) - flow to central valley managed by local irrigation district

those water wayssame major employer - UCD same agr tomatoes alfalfa almonds and walnuts unique water community

most of Butte in CD 2 but Oroville (county seat of Butte) is carved out and put in CD 1 far northern Yolo (carved around Woodland) in CD 2 - both are problem for campaigning by county (because voter pamphlet goes out by co)

bottom of Butte to Plumas to be district (formally 2nd)

no yes 2 separate media areas - Chico Redding; Yuba and Sutter Cos (Marysville Yuba city) in another media market so candidate needs to spend in both - draw district around single media area; eureka is not in CD2 but part of ReddingChico media area

Because Eureka in media market with Redding and Chico best to include Humboldt and DN counties in CD 2; COI for him is media market - cause hes candidate

no yes these counties share recreation biz and recreation suffering because of gas prices; also poverty and unemployment similar across the counties (according to demographics)

no yes logging or mining; water shed Klamath and Trinity River - tribe vs potato farmers - need one rep for both areas to resolve H2O wars mediate between two sides (as work to get votes from both) come up with more moderate solution


Speaker #

40911001

40911002

40911003

40911004

COI: Why keep together VRA Sec. 2 Comment

VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County

Summary of Sec. 5 Comment

Non-COI-based Comment

Comment on Commission Process

Speaker Submitted Materials?

Description of Submitted Materials

Exhibit #

because split up in AD SD and CD has to fight to get any help with water issues

no yes written testimony memo to CRC same essentially as spoken testimony; map of Yolo County with community of interest marked in yellow

04.09.11.E 04.09.11.F

counties cut up between CDs - hard to campaign - voters pamphlet goes out county by county so candidate pays for it to go to parts of county that cant vote for candidate; also better chance ag incumbent if only have to buy in one media market vs 2.

no yes email that speaker sent to Commission prior to meeting with his proposal

04.09.11.D

more political representation for counties depend on recreation biz.

no

not natural community to have northern ruralmountainous counties with Sac suburbs

no voted for commission as redraw should eliminate safe seats



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



40911005 H no Bayside - on coast

Humboldt yes make rural districts smaller fewer counties; consider creating AD by county rather than by pop

wants AD 1 Humboldt Del Norte Mendocino counties (as used to be before added more counties because these didnt grow)

40911006 H no Montgomery Creek

Shasta yes stick to county boundaries-counties have common interests

40911007 H no Shasta 23 yrs (and lived all over and knows upstate CA)

yes proposed CD SD and 2 AD s - pop totals very close to target pop that he got off website (see his notes - target pops are different); agrees to keep counties intact

proposed distrs CD (12 cos) Del Norte Siski Modoc Humb Trinity Shasta Lassen Plumas Mendo Tehama Glenn Lake; North AD first 8 of CD district; South AD last 4 of CD plus Butte; SD CD plus Butte

40911008 H no Shasta yes crazy to have district boundaries go from Oregon to Sac; consolidate counties in Northern part

40911009 H no Eureka Humboldt yes how drawn districts makes sense to him except should include Del Norte Co with other coast co; coast district should run from Oregon border down to Santa Rosa (not including Santa Rosa - down to Windsor as is now is good)

Del Norte Humboldt Mendo Sonoma


Speaker #

4091100140911005

40911006

40911007

40911008

40911009






no yes more than 21 tribes in AD 1 and not represented here

rural coastal district has pristine oceans timber lands dairy products grass-fed beef poster child ecological way of life but current policies (CAL EPA cap and tax-AB 32) hurt that way of life; they are being regulated off their land.

no no

Rivers Long Pit River in NE Short Smith River in NW headwaters of Russian to mighty Sacramento National Forests Six Rivers Klamath Modoc Shasta Trinity Lassen and Mendocino

no yes coast inland exchange recreation (we go coast 2 surf they come here 2 ski) visit each other on single transport network that connects community (his proposed CD 2 CalTrans districts - impt link of federal transport to state admin of highways)

quote water a lot more geog of water makes us a community - rivers mountains with snow pack that feeds rivers and hold timber that is historical basis of economy (see Rivers and Forests listed under streets); recreationtourism impt to new economy

no no

Oregon border to Windsor is good as is

no yes north coast rural folks have same basic concept in their soul but divided by mountains and roads; coast counties share redwoods depend on 101 highway (299 highway just not the same)


Speaker #

4091100140911005

40911006

40911007

40911008

40911009


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

preserve rural coastal district which is geographically and politically isolated; make rural districts smaller - like one or two counties - now North rural pops have no voicevoice diluted or marginalized

no ran for 1st Ass Dist - drove across 55K miles in 7 month period saw first-hand the diversity and similarity of district - campaign talked to 50-60K homes

Commission should have 2-3 rural hearings - hold meeting in smaller towns like Eureka Ukiah or Quincy - Redding is a big city for them

no

no yes handwritten numbers adding up pops of counties proposed for CD SD and 2 AD s in Nor CA.

04.09.11.A

no

coastal issues redwood forests 101 highway

no Rest of rural areas need a meeting; Commission should visit Eureka



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



40911010 H family in CA since late 1700s early 1800s

no Shingletown 25 yrs - worked for CA department of forestry - Cal Fire now

Shasta yes Eastern Shasta Plumas Lassen Modoc - all rural mountain foothill communities

40911011 H no Shasta since 1973

yes keep cities and counties in tact but doesnt matter which counties together - in fact linking by commonalities is problem today with Sacramento politics

40911012 H no no

40911015 H (see handout); managed multi-county management - girl scouts camps United Way heavy equipment etc - coast did not share with inland

no Eureka for 10 yrs

Humboldt yes transport eastwest much harder than northsouth

coast (Del Norte Humboldt Mendo)


Speaker #

4091100140911010

40911011

40911012

40911015






Shingletown is community 20 miles on highway 44 few miles wide

no yes commonalities of rural mount foothill communities pop demographics needs wrt highways water fire protection energy transmiss educ social services all different from needs of southern part of district (Sac area); go to Redding for HC or groceries

ranch land and timber land; retired people and working families that commute to Redding. timber mountain issues - no ties to Yolo Co farm for example.

no yes do not use commonalities to lump people together - thats the problem

Redding Shasta no yes unique issues that do not share with southern citiesareas

many resources water forest recreation

101 corridor vs I-5 corridor - territorial

no yes territorial thing going on - 3 corridors people just do not travel across much

districts should be ag-based economy-based lifestyle-based consider realistic travel patterns for units of service


Speaker #

4091100140911010

40911011

40911012

40911015


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no draw squares-grid based on pop - quote life aint fair so draw squares

common unique issues no Nor CA needs more representation;not much in common with people who voter for Feinstein Boxer

no yes written testimony memo to CRC same essentially as spoken testimony

04.09.11.C



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



40911016 H no no40911017 H no yes keep different uses of water

together in district to begin to work out problems

40911018 H Native American; former field rep for Senator

no yes in winter cant get from coast to Trinity Mountriver

40911018 H former senate staffer returns

no no problem is travel budget for Leg

40911019 H no Shasta (recently) - from Solano Sonoma

yes group NorCA together and coast

Colusa does not have same apprec for mountains as ShastaTrinity

40911020 H yes Senior Congress Siskiyou yes agree keep north tier together; redistrict so not dominate by Sac interests

Siskiyou is big - five North East Counties need more representation (as in health care opps)

40911021 H formerly in construction in North state

yes Citizens for Responsible Government

yes east-west block across state would give us some representation - do not keep it to north-south corridors

40911022 H retired fire captain from Cal Fire - been all over state.

no Tehama yes Tehama should be with Sisk Modoc Lassen Shasta Glenn

40911023 H - end numbered speakers

no yes Shasta and northern counties different from Sac

If use I-5 that leaves the district how it is


Speaker #

409110014091101640911017

40911018

40911018

40911019

40911020

40911021

40911022

40911023






no nono yes water media markets (impt for

running for office - ability to afford running for office)

mountain ranges no yes highways do not run water shed wide

no no

no yes way feel about land and protecting it

lack of jobs in Shasta

no yes health care needed in north often travel to other states; transp probs - no alternative transp in Siskiyou (one bus no Amtrak anymore) Modoc by itself has good transit system but need one for whole area

highway 36 299 - break down along district lines

no yes highway 36 299 - break down along district lines so highways are not well developedvary in quality.

I-5 corridor no yes we are rednecks - lots in common

do not lump with Sacramento no no


Speaker #

409110014091101640911017

40911018

40911018

40911019

40911020

40911021

40911022

40911023


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

nono

keep it to counties and cities but look at geography - use topo map.

no

no

no

redistrict so have real voice in Sac

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41011001 H worked for DOForestry - traveled particularly Nor CA

no 67 years (life) in CA

yes CD2 is example - he generally favors NS districts as has been historically over EW districts; stick with NS split but keep Sutter and Yuba together and dont split up Butte County (as is now into two different CD)

Sutter and Yuba in separate AD not good - make up of two counties very similar so keep together as much as possible; Butte County itself should not be split up like it is now

41011002 H no south of Marysville

Yuba ( 30 yrs)

yes dont do Nev to coast because bring in more democratsliberals and upset balance of Ass and Sen; NS at least in the valley area there (not sure about north in mountains) makes the most sense

Sutter and Yuba should be together- communities very similar - same hazards agr interests and way they interact; Nevada Co is almost all in mountains and different

41011003 H no yes NS is good agree with other two

Sutter and Yuba should be one county -

41011004 H no yes Redist should promote controlled growth

Sutter Yuba Colusa Glenn

41011005 H no Yuba yes keep Yuba and Nevada together take off Lassen make up pop growing toward Lincoln

Yuba remain together

41011006 H no Yuba no


Speaker #

4091100141011001

41011002

41011003

41011004

41011005

41011006






disagrees with I-5 as break off point for EW district because I-5 not good for EW travel

no yes coast and inland different personalities; wants to be grouped with same personalities interests

coast is in past lumber made coast and inland more similar now coast is tourist vacation econ with some ag but its different type of farming from inland (wine grapes vs ricecattle) - this distinction drives social makeup

no yes because share agr issues if cross mountains at clear lake and go west to coast its a very different world just as going east to Nev Co is also a different world; Sutter and Yuba have similar hazards (like river flood) and way interact is similar.

agricultural area shares issues needs such as water

no yes two counties (joint clubs etc)are so similar should be one county and

no yes small biz franchise make jobs

no yes difference between Yuba (small town and mt) and Sutter (farming)

Yuba and Nevada share water shedboth had Chinese pop

no yes Yuba is small town has few farms unlike Sutter which has farms


Speaker #

4091100141011001

41011002

41011003

41011004

41011005

41011006


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

why doesnt want EW districts no

no

no

no

no

no want competitive district



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41011007 H yes Sutter County Auditor-Controller

Sutter no Sutter

41011008 H no yes keep I-5 corridor; keep Yuba and Sutter together and add Butte

41011009 H no yes keep Yuba -Sutter together

41011010 H no West Plainfield

Yolo yes keep Yolo county together - share air and transp corridor with Solano Co.

41011011 H no yes supports NS - Yuba Sutter Glenn

keep Yuba and Sutter together

41011012 H no Butte yes ag. West - East keep NS (Butte with Yuba and Sutter)

41011013 H no yes Sutter and Yuba very different - ok to share things and be in different district

41011014 H cattle ranch no Brownsville - foothills

Yuba yes Sutter Yuba Butte all joined at hip - keep together

41011015 H no yes NS basis is good keep Sutter Yuba and Butte together

41011016 H no no


Speaker #

4091100141011007

41011008

41011009

41011010

41011011

41011012

41011013

41011014

41011015

41011016






no yes Sutter is rural but since close to Sac swallowed up into regional context; large develop plan in south Sutter county -split in county of rural and urban interests

no yes work together - i.e. passing sand-bag

99-70 highways start with YubaSutter

no yes share social and economic clubs

no yes minority pops in west sac and woodland

water and air quality issues volunteer fire district? Another econjob issue

no yes transportation issues - third river crossing very joined Marysville metro area includes whole area water issues

military base in Sutter?

no no

no yes Sutter is all flat and all agr. At certain pt east in Yuba is all mountains

no yes live in foothills kids go to HS in Marysville

no no

no yes unity is NS diversity is westeast


Speaker #

4091100141011007

41011008

41011009

41011010

41011011

41011012

41011013

41011014

41011015

41011016


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no transparency and accountability - cant get accountability unless get districts right

no solve govt problems - problem with representation is concentration of pop

no

no

no

no Butte has five repsdont want to be so split up

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41011017 H no no

41011018 H - after break . no yes keep Yuba Sutter and Butte together

41011019 H no off highway 70

yes dont split Yuba and SutterI thought it was same county for long time

41011019 H no yes keep Yuba Sutter Butte together

41011020 H no Oroville - since 1963 - south fork of Oroville lake

Butte yes keep Yuba Sutter and Butte together

and perhaps add Colusa

41011020 H no Yuba no

41011021 H no yes reference to I-5 corridor but 99 corridor is the tri-county area

41011022 H yes Sutter County Clerk-Recorder

Sutter yes keep Yuba and Sutter together (counterpart in Yuba agrees - they share services.

41011023 H no no


Speaker #

4091100141011017

41011018

41011019

41011019

41011020

41011020

41011021

41011022

41011023






3-4 small towns for each supervisoral distone in mountains

no no

no yes Sutter not all flat..has Sutter-Butte mountains - 2500 ft high

no yes loves agr area not like people in mountains or like main part of Marysville - lives in rural area cause love it.

no yes Yuba-Sutter connected - share co agencies non-profit services causes

no yes peaches almonds rice

Marysville Yuba city area no yes 2 cities have lots in common. draw lines around population centers - cities in Yuba make up most of it

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100141011017

41011018

41011019

41011019

41011020

41011020

41011021

41011022

41011023


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no spend time here talking to people learning about them

no

no

no

no

no delay re video and transcript and transcript should be searchable - Chair said its a cost issue



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41011024 H no no Sutter

41011025 H no no

41011025 H co-owns bookstore with Comm. Forbes

no Davis - over 30 yrs

Yolo yes re-align Davis with Sac and separate from rest of Yolo

41311001 H work for labor coalition - SB SLO Ventura

yes a labor coalition for SB SLO and Ventura Co

SB SLO yes county boundaries are 1 COI because its political subdivision; keep SB SLO whole understand Ventura needs to be divided

41311002 H no yes county boundaries important because county is key administrative subdivision social services social safety net (most vulnerable populations) justice system elections - county govt needs representation

SLO Santa Barbara need to be cohesive

41311003 H no SLO SLO yes SLO needs to be cohesive SB too


Speaker #

4091100141011024

41011025

41011025

41311001

41311002

41311003






no yes Sutter has Sikh community (over 10000) - they are politically active - should be here

no no

no yes Davis more in common with Sac than with ruralagr Woodlands Winters

no yes mostly undeveloped - key point - not a metropolis

1 sector of economy is agriculture - very specific products 5Bill industry

no yes county admin structure

no yes higher education both counties higher education in addition to agr.


Speaker #

4091100141011024

41011025

41011025

41311001

41311002

41311003


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no Commissioner Q lang prob again? Speaker no prob didnt get word - leaders dont have lang issue

no ques re coming back here for mtgs? Auburn on May 19

no excited about commission

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41311004 H no native SLO Co planning commissioner

yes concern with two CDs as they stand now

41311005 H son is state senator

no no

41311006 H former assembly man for 35th Assembly

no yes keep SB Co within AD - not like current 35th district

41311007 H no yes keep atascadero SLO together if have to divide use cuesta grade - people consider themselve north SLO and south SLO based on this

SLO

41311008 H no atascadero SLO yes keep Atas SLO intact41311009 H no atascadero SLO (since

early 70s)yes keep SLO county intact and

cities as much as possible - Atasc is geographically large but mostly retired people; leave county alone to maintain competitiveness that now exists


Speaker #

4091100141311004

41311005

41311006

41311007

4131100841311009






no yes agr - types - what SLO and SB grows (and Monterey) is very different from Fresno Kings Kern - heat sensitive crops- wine grapes; also some manufacturing hidden away; and higher ed binds us together

no yes concern with art community

no no

atascadero if have to divide SLO ns division at mt range - cuesta grade

no no SLO has broad range of political viewpoints compared to SB Ventura etc

no yes ?no yes Atas has mostly retired people


Speaker #

4091100141311004

41311005

41311006

41311007

4131100841311009


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

if counties united can continue art programs school cant do - if divided fundraising is difficult

no

no SB Co voters support Prop 11

yes letter from him and another elected official

no

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41311010 H city council man works at Diablo

yes City Council of Atascadero

atascadero SLO yes keep SLO county whole

41311011 pass no no41311012 H no SLO yes SLO county split in three

directions with AD SD CD - need to be kept together - coastal district ok but not narrow strip three counties M SLO SB make perfect CD (check this??)

41311013 H no Atas? no

41311014 H no SLO yes literally disenfranchised because of districts - SLO Co kept together

41311015 H no oxnard born and raised; Grover beach and other small communities (has small biz in one)

SLO county 20 yrs

yes keep SLO as a whole if have to attach - attach to Northern SB Co. or north to Salinas Valley.

41311016 pass no no41311017 pass no no41311018 H no yes SLO county unique SLO


Speaker #

4091100141311010

4131101141311012

41311013

41311014

41311015

413110164131101741311018






no yes economic downturn affecting county - need adequate representation and need everyone in county to work together to deal with economic issues

no nono no

no no

no yes uniqueness of SLO Co highest of veteran of any county very patriotic and 50s- like

no yes small and special not affluent tourism agr - labor force is farm service in hotelsrestaurants govt; small counties without big tax base

no yesno nono yes materials on county economics


Speaker #

4091100141311010

4131101141311012

41311013

41311014

41311015

413110164131101741311018


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nono

no voters pick rep vs reps pick voters

no

no

nonono yes map with colors stats

etc



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41311019 H no SLO co yes economic political boundaries need to be maintained in SLO co; districts have not respected SLO co.; put Montery with SLO or SLO and SB instead of 5 counties

SLO

41311020 H no SLO - yes stick with county boundaries add southern montery or norther SB to SLO

SLO

41311021 H no templeton (since 1987)

SLO no

41311022 H no SLO city SLO - life long - grew up in North now in south

yes to make AD go north if use cuesta grade go south for CD

41311023 H no ojai ventura yes ojai and valley around it; if have to put with west Ventura and part of SB - tourism in common

41311024 H no yes keep SLO SB Ventura in tact - 3 counties together or each county alone?

41311025 H no cambria SLO yes keep SLO as heart of districts because of unique wine industry

41311026 H no SLO SLO yes keep SLO in tact (check ?)

41311027 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100141311019

41311020

41311021

41311022

41311023

41311024

41311025

41311026

41311027






lives near SLO city and is in CD with Bakersfield

no yes ground to cover by candidates

no yes expense by candidates (agrees with previous)

look at economic vitality of counties when drawing districts

no yes templeton considered mayberry - different from down below; right now politically divided - if have to divide use grade.

no yes tied by 101 to Monterey highway 46 to 41 to Fresno; higher ed

education wine

Ojai several other cities (oxnard is one)

no yes natural beauty social events mutual interests

tourism

no yes college students - share socially recreationally academically share - face same struggles

edna valley no yes wine industry is really unique

no yes education wine industry tourism

no no


Speaker #

4091100141311019

41311020

41311021

41311022

41311023

41311024

41311025

41311026

41311027


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

if split will silence student communities foster lack of civic engagement among students

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41311028 pass no no41311029 pass no no41311030 H no Los Osos SLO yes SLO and SB interests are

closer than SLO with Monterey

41311031 H after break minister no oxnard - 33 years before that Port Huerleme

ventura co redistricting team

yes keep P H and Oxnard together and not with LA; west Ventura with SB Co

41311032 H no yes

41311033 H no oxnard 15 yrs

ventura yes divides Ventura into 3 pieces - gave map - mountains divide - rural suburban and urban - put east county with LA

41311034 H yes CAUSE yes cracked into many districts - should be fewer based on pop; keep SB and Western Ventura together; dont exclude people of color like now in 19th

Cause counties

41311035 H no SLO yes four subareas of SLO Co - questa grade is best divider


Speaker #

40911001413110284131102941311030

41311031

41311032

41311033

41311034

41311035






no nono nono yes keep students in mind

environmental concernsmore in common with SB than with Montery

student

Port Huememe and Oxnard no yes environmental justice - Superfund site; youth violence prevention; faith - churches connected across Ventura SB and SLO

Port Huememe and Oxnard El Rio Camarillo and __ acres keep together

no yes high latino pop 1st lang is Spanish concern with public transport (buses all over both cities) and environmental justice (toxic sites almond beach - bird wetlands - need to be preserved.

elementary schools and HS very connected between two towns

Oxnard area PH Oxnard El Rio - Oxnard plain

no yes multi-cultural latino - non-english speakers; affordable housing public education environmental justice (lng terminals fought off?)

were world largest exporter of strawberries large middle class pop - employed at naval base

no yes low-income communities and people of color - committed

high

coastal communities lost pop pismo beach etc.

no yes big retired community - right inbetween SF and LA

tourism has surpassed wine - but connected


Speaker #

40911001413110284131102941311030

41311031

41311032

41311033

41311034

41311035


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

nonono

no

no

no yes map 04.13.11.C

no yes PPT with lots of stats and handout with rec for dist

04.13.11.E 04.13.11.F 04.13.11.G 04.13.11.H

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41311036 H no santa maria SB yes keep 3 cities together keep SB and V Co together if need SLO co take only towns of ____

41311037 H no santa maria SB yes same 3 cities together SB and V cos together; SB based districts

41311038 H no filmore - santa clara valley

ventura yes keeo these communities together with Ventura and Oxnard; cuneo grade if must divide

Ventura

41311039 H no oxnard - since 1973

ventura yes been gerrymandered into some strange distr - keep west county together and with SB east with LA

Ventura

41311040 H no santa maria valley -orcutt

SB Co yes very split up and not cohesive representation - made whole into 1 AD SD CD - put SB and most of Ventura together - that would work

41311041 H no 20 yr - city of ventura - works with CAUSE

Ventura yes keep west Ventura Co whole ( city of Ventura) and with SB city? Santa clara valley - similarilities between Ventur and SB - eco friendly communities

41311042 H no yes look at maps CAUSE produced - important re ethnic communities


Speaker #

4091100141311036

41311037

41311038

41311039

41311040

41311041

41311042






santa maria guadalupe lompoc no yes lists clubs schools; concern re jobs affordable housing

vandenburg air force base 15 unemployement

no yes biggest pop of SB Co (as said previous person)

socially low economic status

Fillmore pyru __ and ___ highway 126 is critical no yes 78 hispanic people from these towns go to Ventura and Oxnard to shop etc..NOT LA

agricultural

no yes west county - agr (coastal environmental concerns) vs east county (more in common with LA Co)

orcutt?... no yes manufactured home owners COI over 55 fixed income concerned with affordable housing - splintered now in all three juris

Ventura no yes 32 Latino rest primarily white environmentally friendly and socially conscious keep out Walmart and maintain green belts

no yes oil spill - still affects beach - concern with coastal environ wine industry tourism - big


Speaker #

4091100141311036

41311037

41311038

41311039

41311040

41311041

41311042


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes testimony with map 04.13.11.A 04.13.11.B

no

no yes testimony 04.13.11.D

no

nothing like Simi Valley (they earn living in LA)..we learn living in central coast

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41311043 H in Spanish - translation summary after

yes committee el pueblo

santa maria yes santa maria

41311044 H caregiver no santa maria yes ventura and SB and oxnard

41311045 H no oxnard ventura yes support CAUSE recommendations

41311046 H no yes ventura and SB counties kept together and west Ventur Co kept whole as COI

Ventura

41311047 H no filmore ventura yes concerned with representation of Filmore community keep santa clara valley together and Ven Co-based districts


Speaker #

4091100141311043

41311044

41311045

41311046

41311047






santa maria no yes culture similar between us and SB co?

concern re ag workers - lack of work and feasible work for hard working people work conditions shortage of child care latino pop

santa maria no yes threats of loss of senior health care - out of work as caregiver seniors have HC needs - alzheimer dying; performing arts

oxnard no yes environment pesticides beaches threatened by developers transport; many racial health disparities want to be together so can elect reps that look like them have same passions etc

blue collar community of color median 56 iK in income residents work in secondary job market 67 commute out of Oxnard

Santa Paula Santa Paula no yes reservoirs in Santa Clara Valley watershed many historical sites. Its in a natural state; DOJ lawsuit in Santa Paula in 2001 stipulated facts that voting rac. Polarized diluting hispanic vote.

river is a geographical connection important to econag interests many farmworkers most born in Mexico and earning less than 15Kyear. Minoritieswoman in lower econ ladder

Filmore no yes school district 86 latino agr - orchard avacado; poverty level


Speaker #

4091100141311043

41311044

41311045

41311046

41311047


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

venturaSB Oxnard have same culture art respect for hispanic in community who need help

no

no

no

no my duty to speak to you because of how felt becoming citizen



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41311048 H no santa paula (family since 1880s)

ventura yes if do not keep V county whole makes sense to bifurcate it and keep west with SB county

Ventura

41311049 H no El Rio ventura yes worked in east and west county - cueno grade is the divide Dont combine with LA or Kern? keep a bunch of cities together (whole list - oxnard port hueneme etc..)

41311050 H in Spanish - translation summary after

field worker single mom active with community org

no santa paula ventura yes need voice in Sacramento for communities (list) with field labor - not with Simi Valley and NorPark; santa paula filmore ___ and ___ together - all in V and nothing in LA

41311051 H no yes parkfield (Mont) pas robles san miguel (north SLO Co) - keep northern SLO together (with south Mont?)

south monterey north SLO Co

41311052 H no yes 33rd AD is well designed not well designed is 250 long along coast SD should be ? CD should be

41311053 H no SLO yes keep SLO Co together


Speaker #

4091100141311048

41311049

41311050

41311051

41311052

41311053






santa paula no yes 80 latino low-income farm workers

El Rio - sphere of influence of city of oxnard

no yes mix of rural ag and urban life over 80 latino low educational attainment

high unemployment - food shelter and clothing education HC access immigrant rights transportation are concerns

no yes field workers rents go higher each year

no yes school districts shopping etc share this area between two counties

no yes oil on beach - naturally occuring - not from spill - need to drill to take pressure off and provide jobs

no yes keep agricultural areas together; irrigation issue is big now


Speaker #

4091100141311048

41311049

41311050

41311051

41311052

41311053


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no yes testimony 04.13.11.I

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41311054 H no SLO County yes distribution of ways of life shown to be north and south - also east ranches very different from coastal communities - please consider Vertical distribution

41311055 H vice major of SLO city

yes SLO City SLO City SLO county yes dont divide SLO city - dont consider cuesta grade as boundary Get water from ___ lake (controlled by Mont co tho in SLO Co) now creates need for representative for both Monterey and SLO

41311056 pass no no41311057 pass no no41311058 H no Ventura yes santa clara valley - fillmore

santa paula together with El Rio and Oxnard not with Lancasterantelope valley - being with them now has reduced representation

41311059 pass no no41311060 pass no no41311061 H port huemene

council member and work for city of Ventura

yes Cities of Port Huneme and Ventura

port humeme

Ventura yes heritage valley - connects morpork pyru simi valley; west county - PH Oxnard etc - Keep Ventura together but if have to divide divide at Thousand Oaks and put west with SB co which shares similiarities


Speaker #

4091100141311054

41311055

413110564131105741311058

413110594131106041311061






no yes engineering report showed way of living that followed geography

no yes quaga mussel problems with water supply

no nono nono yes news shopping health care go to

ventura oxnardmigrant worker camps also connects these areas

no nono nono no


Speaker #

4091100141311054

41311055

413110564131105741311058

413110594131106041311061


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

nonono

nonono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41311062 H no oxnard Ventura yes keep Ventura Co together - have good representatives now but luckydont want to rely on luck. If have to put LA in put with East V Co. Or put V Co with south SB county

41311063 H judge no SLO city SLO yes dividing line is cuesta grade and coastal range - looked at CD 23 proposed (Cook maps?) - proposed makes sense?? - current 23 is bad (so narrow u can walk across it EWwants nesting to avoid this problem

41311064 H no yes so as look at combining and splitting pops please look at ethnicity - so latinos not marginalized

41311065 H no yes proposes SD AD CD - keep SLO together if can - but go north to south - not east to westbut ok to take Kern for more people

41311066 H no yes natural dividing line for CA between Nor and So - just above SLO; proposal?


Speaker #

4091100141311062

41311063

41311064

41311065

41311066






no yes power plants on coast - 2 in oxnard super fund site low educ attainment youth crime youth despair

immigrant issue language issues

no no

no yes farm workers hotelmotel restaurant service workers - many farm workers drive over mountains from Cambria to get cheaper gas and health care

5 city area pismo beach los berros arroyo grande

no yes environmental issues threat to water - SB oil spill birds with crossed beaks

no yes


Speaker #

4091100141311062

41311063

41311064

41311065

41311066


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

dont define COI as one thing -wont apply statewide

no

no

came back after and noted that big of Pismo Beach residents (home owners?) dont actually live therelive in hotter areas and come to beach house for cooler weather.

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41311067 H no Morro Bay SLO yes the way we think around here is NS

41311068 H no SLO yes keep SLO co whole if need to connect with SB in south?

41311069 H no SLO city SLO yes keep SLO co whole as much as possible - doesnt like current coastal district because of acrimony between coast and inland

41411001 H intimately involved in R in this area for awhile served in Assem..R out of office (81 or 91?);

yes Kern Co Latino R Task Force

no Kern

41411002 H with grouporg yes grouporg name? Bakers Kern no


Speaker #

4091100141311067

41311068

41311069

41411001

41411002






no yes fisherman and marine interests important COI - spend life in coast though dont live there

no yes

no yes cautions that keeping environmental interests together (as has been called for) sets up war between these people

no no 47 Latino Kern Co none of Sups are Latino till his task force also won in assem and senate for Kern - because proposed districts and CA Supreme Ct adopted them and still in effect today

no yes Basque restaurants are unique (said as a side note)


Speaker #

4091100141311067

41311068

41311069

41411001

41411002


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no want americans to have representation by like-minded people - shes concerned about productive people getting what they deserve

no

no yes submitted statement in writing

no yes yes submitted from group



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41411003 H no ridgecrest no Edwards and China Lake need to be together in CD; in same congressional district now and want to stay that way - 22 CD; asked later about being lumped with East Kern and Antelope Valley - she was ambivalent

41411004 H no Greater Bakers Metro Area

no

41411005 H represents other guy no group - makes point about lots of people without groups not a special interest or minority group

no Tehachapee

yes not happy with current districts; rather see blocks

41411006 H no Weedpatch no


Speaker #

4091100141411003

41411004

41411005

41411006






highways 395 178 no yes Ridgecrest -linked with Kern Co; share with Bakers

US Naval Warfare Center Edwards AFB

Greater Baker Metro Area; oildale rosedale map of HS district

no yes geographic and economic reasons share great natural water resource typically community - families trying to get by - 5 major religions all here

hit hard by 2008 Ressession

no no

no yes rundown community dirty streets polluted air and water one tiny store; depend on Arvin and Lamont kids go to HS in Arvin

all farm workers only one white family


Speaker #

4091100141411003

41411004

41411005

41411006


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41411007 H no Weedpatch yes keep Weedpatch with Lamont and Arvin? Yes

41411008 H no Lamont no

41411009 H no Arvin no

41411010 H no Arvin no

41411011 H no Weedpatch no


Speaker #

4091100141411007

41411008

41411009

41411010

41411011






Weedpatch Lamont Arvin East Bakersfield

no yes Community similar to Lamont and Arvin lacks infrastructure streets sidewalks public transportation go to pharmacy in Lamont food and movies in East Bakersfield

Lamont no yes majority are spanish-speaking and immigrants migratory - dont get servs; diseases due to use of pesticides also fields are contaminated with pesticides people have no insurance and only one clinic wait all day for appt have to go to ER in Bakerfield

no permanent or stable job there

Arvin no yes Police Fire Arvin HS services Weedpatch and Lamont no movie theatres cultural centers family activities need better public trans bad water and air

10K before and grew to 1617K residents majority are Latino note our map on screen shows over 19K

Arvin Lamont Weedpatch Greenfield

no no community services but not much

72 agr 60 Latino; small and medium size industries

no no sheriff office ct house mail facilties but lacks a lot of infrastructure lack sidewalks and public lighting many econ and health needs

majority work in Agr - lots of illness and medical care non-existant and most no insurance need more school Need HS and community classes?


Speaker #

4091100141411007

41411008

41411009

41411010

41411011


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41411012 H no east bakersfield

no not sure if East Bakers should be with Alvin Lamont Weedpatch because those have worse infrastructure but have a lot in common with those communities;

41411013 H united neighbors orgs been hearing from

yes Dolores Huerta Foundation

no southwest bakersfield (west of 99 south of Truxton extension) doesnt share much with Lamont Arvin East Bakersfield; CD is 340 miles from Stockton to here; going east of Lamont Arvin is also very different - Tehachapee for ex; we prefer distrs now

41411014 H later (also a Greenlining Institute fellow mentions Health City mapping)

yes Dolores Huerta Foundation Greenlining Institute fellow

Kern no provided map - combine farm worker communities - need a representative; (later) bases in East Kern have employees from Sbern and ? not as much in common with farm workers communities; comment re representatives - actually portegese and represent growers

more than workers; east bakersfield would be not well represented if ___; many prisons built - people of color are most of prison pop only one college - her comment re prisons - more in common with where came from?

41411015 H no foothills above springville kids in school of porterville

Tulare no lumped with Sbern Co now (very gerrymandered) and have nothing in common - and would have more in common with areas around it


Speaker #

4091100141411012

41411013

41411014

41411015






college and niles streets (west boundary?)

no yes my community many go to church - on specific holiday? Schools get fogdays when no fog bec fog on west side of city

Lamont and Arvin - prefer districts as are now- if put all disadvant communities together would be less well served

58 184 highways no yes need infrastructure improvements (as have heard) go to cathloic church celebrate holidays group from Yuhaqua

19k-25k incomes work in fields and packing plants 75 speak other than English at home

no no farm worker communities in towns been talking about - lots in common with east bakersfield - not with Ridgecrest not with other parts of Bakers

farmworkers need own district - these communities are in bad shape because dont have representation

springville and porterville no yes depend on agr - ranching and farming - most people are farm workers


Speaker #

4091100141411012

41411013

41411014

41411015


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41411016 H no bakersfield - recently in southwest area; lives off Stockdale highway

no urge to use lines to fairly represent people - understand need to break up Bakers (but wants to be together?)

41411017 H family originally from and evicted from _____ Indian Reservation relocated to SouthEast Bakers

no no dont cut out people at end of Kern- southern point (exactly where?) - dont consider self part of Ventura or LA counties

41411018 H work with Kern Co homeless community - biggest concentration SE bakers (for whole county)

no no

41411019 H teaching in arvin HS since 1966

no arvin no Kern Co should be CD - campaign for current CD and didnt get to Nor boundary campaigned in Arvin (and lamont?)

Kern


Speaker #

4091100141411016

41411017

41411018

41411019






no no demographic changes seen in SW Bakers- more younger working families now

99 west boundary north to Kern River Columbus 178 to comanche road boundary south to Tehachapee mtns comanche and 58 to east Tehachappe mts

no yes high teen pregnancy HS drop out rates;

farm workers support rich agr oil production but low-income and unemployment - turn to crime drug grade medium manufacturing - mixed-use zoning creates pollution and unsafe neighborhoods

east of 99 freeway north to Kern River south east to include Arvin and Lamont

no no 14001500 homeless census in Co (this ? doesnt include doubled up or couch-surfing?); very diverse - not all men also women and kids veterans need jobs transport substance abuse services

poverty is same as was in Grapes of Wrath

no no


Speaker #

4091100141411016

41411017

41411018

41411019


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41411020 H yes works at university of laverne - Bakersfield campus

no believes her representation is fair and effective - young women in SW

41411021 H yes center for race poverty and environment - work in Kern and Tulare

delano no need adjustments in lines - some work some need improvement; may have to cut up counties - will submit a map (chair suggestion)

north? tulare area has something in common with towns heard about in Kern -Arvin Lamont etc

41411022 H used to work with greater Bakersf central assistance - why uses census tracts

no no East Kern Co just west of 14 is west border; tehachape-kern valley gave Census Tract s;

41411023 H no northcentral bakersf

no need voice for LBGT - would like to be one voice; re CD - repr doesnt visit his area - has maps about being doughnut holed

41411024 H no kern since 1989

no 20th CD - most of talk of tonigh but they do have a voice. - represent county of Kern in solid fashion (kern co is more cohesive than would think - people are from Kern not mountain people vs. __ people

41411025 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100141411020

41411021

41411022

41411023

41411024

41411025






no no

delano no no changing demographics - Latino - 60?

changes

metro Bakers is a COI East Kern is COI? Tehachepe-Kern Valley is another one?; weedpatch arvine lamont is another; 4-5K prisoners in Tehachape 10 of CA inmates in Kern Co

no yes

no no LGBT community; relocations of services career center for retraining hot food for homeless veteran housing; 49.5 Latino African over 50 (new majority) - not being represented;

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100141411020

41411021

41411022

41411023

41411024

41411025


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41411026 H yes San Joaquin Valley Black advocacy group - advocates for people of color - work on high speed rail

yes group income etc for districts; use Census tract income and ethnicity to group people together

41411027 H no Wasco? Kern no Kern County binds people - she does not feel like same as people of 20th district

41411028 H no no problem is not division but represenation - changing districts is probably not solution - solution is to have good county representation

41411029 H prof at CSUB yes CSUB no problem is system of represent kidnapped by colusion of 2 parties; dont break up Bakersfield - keep separate coast on west and mounts on east

Southern San Joaquin Valley is his COI

41411030 H no no rivers are natural borders in several ways


Speaker #

4091100141411026

41411027

41411028

41411029

41411030






yes no income

no no not all hispanic but in this area Arvin etc

no no

no yes cultural zone in southern SJ Valley - uinified cultural and economic zone

poorest area of CA

Kern River is key in Bakers no yes central bakersfield has needs - use Kern River as border - see real difference on sides of borders

hes a product of Antelope Valley College but left that area for Bakersf (?)


Speaker #

4091100141411026

41411027

41411028

41411029

41411030


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

use this criterion - with term limits have opp for more people to get elected and need people of color

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41411031 H chevron petrol engineer generation-wide young tech professional group - lots of people of color college educated have young children

no Bakersfield - 6 yrs - in green housing zone

no southwest Bakers boundaries north to kern river new 58 extension going up to 99 south to ___; keep community together - current districts not representative because white with radical ideology?

later just now got latino elected; CD should be mix of NS??; not well represented now by current legislators; house prisoners but dont go to school with us etc -keep in mind; lots of Edwards workers live in Lancaster

41411032 H no no Kern Co has a divide for long time - do disservice if create District out of whole Kern Co.; have population to have more districts.keep as is (?)mountains separate west east?

41411033 H no Lamont no change districts is probably not solution - need fair represenation; need better teachers better food for kids in schools

41411034 H no no


Speaker #

4091100141411031

41411032

41411033

41411034






no yes 2nd worst air quality lots of jobs lost just oil ag and prison

no no

Lamont no yes problems valley fever cancer children have cancer and have so many needs 110 adults with cancer - probably bad water with arsnic bad sewer systems sts with no names utlity bills so high and no water unemployed inNov Dec and high utlity bills;

parks (or parts?) without lights - been two accidents; valley fever is sporefungus that come into area gets into lungs and causes chronic illness - have hotspots of it - now one in prison in Delano

no no


Speaker #

4091100141411031

41411032

41411033

41411034


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41411035 H assembly staffer

yes California State Assembly

no keep cities county and coi togetherrepresent Ridgecrest and represent it well

41411036 H - last speakers no Arvin - and work in Bakers

no keep Kern Co together

41411037 H no no prisons in kern 8K in 2 prisons in Delano - on cecil road and other cities

41411038 H no no two military bases (china lake edwards) - 1617K jobs; active duty at Edwards; china lake more research few live on base; ridgecrest wouldnt exist without china lake

41511001 H no Tulare yes 34th AD - rep need pilots license to get around - he describes the whole district - needs to be more compact and not so spread out - try to make district out of communities?

East side of Sierra in an AD and that into Needles ok better if Tulares district went into Kern - keep in valley - agr counties -Tulare Kern Fresno together; CD is good (well represented)

41511002 H no Stockton San Joaquin yes keep SJ county whole; none of reps of SJ county dont live in SJ County - currently split 4 AD 2 SD 2 CD; can pick up enough residents for AD in county can pick up nearby counties for SD and CD rather than go to Yolo as is now

keep cities in co together just a few pop centers to pick up pop go south into Stanislaus or north into Sac Co to Galt.


Speaker #

4091100141411035

41411036

41411037

41411038

41511001

41511002






no no

no no

no no

no no

no no

Lodi Stockton Manteca Tracy ..brook?

no no


Speaker #

4091100141411035

41411036

41411037

41411038

41511001

41511002


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41511003 H work for org that provides child care

yes born in Huron works all over Fresno and SJ valley

Fresno yes 20th CD rural Westside Fresno Co - small ag communities should be a COI

41511004 H yes APALC - CAPAFR; CAPAFR Fresno

native of Fresno

yes CAPAFR Fresno finalizing maps for Fresno area VRA district in southern Fresno- will submit shapefile with boundaries

41511005 H yes CAPAFR Fresno yes VRA district - Latino and Hmong

41511006 H yes Southeast Asian Education Council - students and community leaders - further education for students

yes provided map of Fresno - SE

41511007 H community activist and real estate broker

no Fresno - this SE Asian area

Fresno yes please do not divide our community - do not dilute our representation

41511008 H no APALC - CAPAFR

Fresno Co no


Speaker #

4091100141511003

41511004

41511005

41511006

41511007

41511008






firebock Mendota along I-5 - poorest areas no yes poverty child poverty hunger capitol

unemployment rates high 98 Latino in these areas

no yes

no yes 30K Hmong 8K Laotian

gave exact streets - gateway to southeast Asian community in Fresno

no yes Hmong farmers cultural events richness of diversity - 60 of 30k Hmong reside in this area

Temperance Avenue no yes new homes being built east to Temperance

Hmong farmers in this area too

no yes stats on API in Fresno County - several tables LEP low educational attainment - API and Latino in Fresno share these characteristics

In tables of each ethnic group in poverty unemployed


Speaker #

4091100141511003

41511004

41511005

41511006

41511007

41511008


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes statement Google map 2 11x17 maps

VRA district in South Fresno - Hmong

yes yes written statement

VRA district in South Fresno

yes

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41511009 H just ran 14th SD - cost 8K to pay for ballot statements in all the counties

no yes Recommendation Do not have doughnut holes parts of all kinds of cities; start in center of state use rivers as guides dont break up Hmong community just heard about

41511010 H yes El Concilio de Fresno

Fresno Fresno yes provided handout written and map of COI ; if had to expand? Go east - miniwawa Clovis kings canyon avenue - similar area ; his point was to keep whole

41511011 H no Selma Fresno County

yes keep Fresno Co one district; Q this would be SD how would you split for AD? Split into West side and East side - northsouth split - 99 corridor

41511012 H farm in Tulare county

no Reedley - near Tulare Co border

Fresno County

yes Keep Fr Co whole but if split go down into Tulare

41511013 H no Fresno Fresno yes provided community map - content with AD not CD or SD his area shares similarities with Southeast Fresno


Speaker #

4091100141511009

41511010

41511011

41511012

41511013






no no

southeast Fresno - his COI is 240K pop

western boundary - Marx ave eastern boundary North boundary

no yes recession changing demographics impact

low middle class some pockets of upper class education needs health care needs (travel to __ for care)

no yes 934000 pop of county - make own district. East co water comes from a dam - Kings River vs. canal.

German farmers Japanese American farmers now Hmong farmers; west co agr has different needs from east co agr - west side dependent on h20 from delta canal east side not dep on canal - lack of ag jobs NOT bec of h2o.

Reedley to Sangor no yes east co water based on snow melt and loosing lots of it now cause Kings River so full

south of Shaw and west of 99 (see map)

no yes quasi-rural - where city meets county


Speaker #

4091100141511009

41511010

41511011

41511012

41511013


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes statement google map (with correction)

no

no

no yes statement google map



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41511014 H no Fresno Fresno yes gave out testimony - had one correction re boundary (see street field)

41511016 H life-long SJ Valley resident with group

yes group name? Fresno Fresno yes disagrees with keep Fresno Co whole

41511017 H with same group as 16

yes group name? Fresno Fresno yes individual communities stay whole and district allow fair representation

41511018 H yes volunteer - DH Foundation - promote voting - work in Dairy Industry primarily

Hanford Kings yes Re dairy area in Kings? - a different CA tho part of CA

41511022 H farmer here in Kings

no yes proposes CD and SD groupings for SJ Valley CD 20 is a disaster - huge geographically and poorest areabecause of relationship to water policy - very underrepresented

Tulare Kings and northern Kern have a lot in common - share same problems

41511025 H family in Valley for 113yrs

no Reedley Fresno no


Speaker #

4091100141511014

41511016

41511017

41511018

41511022

41511025






south of Shaw west of Clovis Mayfair district - correct 99 to east side of Hayes or Haste - to include black community

no yes low education diverse few grocery stores few parks homeless

The Valley could be a whole economy; but poverty rate is very high and gotten worse

no no

no yes 50K live in disadvantaged areas of Fresno Co; gave long list of problems in these communities

no yes more on working conditions no water workers get sick

major milk producer for country; at dairies - poor working conditions modern form of slavery families dissolve divorce shifts change daily - over worked no breaks

Fresno Stockton Modesto Turlock

yes yes water issues - west (delta restricted not much ground water) vs east

Fresno Chinatown is very diverse (she lists all different ethnicities) 17 block area of concentration of ethnic minorities because forced to live there.

if use 99 as divider - there is history of that already cause 99 put where people wouldnt fight it

no yes API community; history of lawspolicies that have eroded families

agr holds community together -


Speaker #

4091100141511014

41511016

41511017

41511018

41511022

41511025


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes color map of valley with pollution sites mapped

no yes statement

no yes handwritten presentation and page with stats

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41511027 H no Hanford Kings yes keep Kings county together - if make Fresno its own please dont put us with Kern Fresno is closer in socioeconomic interest to ours

343 miles - length of AD; Q any shared interests with other counties touching such as SLO? No more in common with Kern than SLO

41511029 H yes Latin American league of ___

no

41511030 H no Tulare yes COI of Tulare Kern Kings Fresno Counties not S Bernmountain area; good CD districtrepresentation for county split for AD SD - please keep Tulare Co together in one dist

41611001 H physician; farmer

no tracy san joaquin yes SJ County split up into CDs - please make it one district- keep it whole; Q what part take for CD or how to split for AD?; more in common with east of stockton than with west of county (over Altamont pass)

San Joaquin County


Speaker #

4091100141511027

41511029

41511030

41611001






no yes 153K - we realize its small; later (answers re prisons - adds to our small pop)

no yes

no yes by joining forces with other three counties able to have more access to water; Q- share interests with county on east? No they are more forestry

no yes use same HC facilities agriculture


Speaker #

4091100141511027

41511029

41511030

41611001


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

give VRA - criterion 2 - great weight as look at Central Valley

yes

no

current representation (SJ and Stockton split up) is not good for farmers

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41611002 H work in Lodi Manteca Galt - works in medicine - patients from those three cities go to hospital in Stockton

no northeast Stockton; 4 ADs if drive around 7 miles SD and CD split up too.

san joaquin yes keep Stockton and SJ County whole; Q have to split SJ Co into 2 AD how? Keep Stockton in one AD and add Lodi Manteca Galt; Q Does Galt have more in common with those areas than the rest of SJ County? A Yes

SJ County Sacramento Co

41611003 H S works in medicine

no Stockton - 50 yrs; CD 18 cuts into CD 11th - Stockton finger

SJ yes keep Stockton and SJ County whole; submitted maps - based on where hospitals are

SJ County

41611004 H S work in lathrop no morada SJ yes keep Stockton and SJ County whole; keep Stockton with Lodi provided map of Manteca Unified School District in 11th and 18th CD - use school district lines to make it easier for schools Q Since have to divide county where should it be? A cant answer

SJ County


Speaker #

4091100141611002

41611003

41611004






Stockton Manteca Lodi Galt (Sac County)

no yes in health care patients from Manteca Lodi Galt go to hospital in Stockton

Stockton and other cities in Co.

no yes use four hospitals (and emergency dispatches to) that offer services that complement each other (neonatal cancer heart specialties etc)

Stockton Lodi no yes school districts HS athletic conference health care systems (eg. Dads retirement home and hospital that administers it in different CDs)

ag-based


Speaker #

4091100141611002

41611003

41611004


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

Stockton needs representation for its hospital that serves other three cities

no

Stockton and Co kept whole in districts because of shared hospital health care region

no yes three google maps (one with just pushpins at 4 hospitals one with blue CD 11 and pushpins at 4 hospitals one with red SD 5 pink SD 14 and pushpins at 4 hospitals

04.16.11.A

school districts and high school athletic conference shouldnt intersect CD lines

no yes three google maps (one with blue CD 11 and red Manteca Unified School District one with blue Manteca Unified School District one with points showing locations of schools in Manteca Unified School District)

04.16.11.B



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41611005 H dental student at branch of UOP

no grew up in morada

SJ yes keep SJ County whole and if have to split go east rather than west - more in common with Galt than anything on the west

SJ County

41611006 H rep various orgs from SJ County - spoke in Hanford too

yes represents various orgs in SJ County that will be submitting maps; one org is Community Partnership for Families

yes keep SJ Co whole - run NS rather than west over Altamonte pass; south to Stanislaus or east to Calavares or north to southern part of Sac Co.; Q where cut off Sac County? A dont know road just pull in pop without impacting Sac Co.

SJ Co south Sac County Stanislaus Calaveras

41611007 H S law student at berkeley

no yes keep SJ County whole shows how school district maps in SJ Co cut up by CDs keep school districts in one legislative district

41611008 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100141611005

41611006

41611007

41611008






Lodi Stockton Morada Galt (Sac Co)

no yes cities are very similar (especially StocktonLodi Morada); UOP is good for community holds health fairs etc.

no yes media markets run NorthSouth; general services (trash etc) done on county-wide basis; COI of SJ Co with South Sac Co.

yes yes proposed today for lines school districts hospital service areas agricultural neighborhoods transport corridors; shows map of school districts and how overlaps with CDs; also Galt USD comes down into SJ Co.

agricultural areas

no no


Speaker #

4091100141611005

41611006

41611007

41611008


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

media market so elected rep can community with constituents

no

keep SJ County separate from non-ag areas like those over Altamont pass; keep school districts in one legislative district

no yes 1 Goog map (showing blue CD 11 dividing Manteca Stockton Lodi School Districts 3 maps from SJ County website (School Districts Enterprise Zone 2008 and Impt Farmland 2006); SJ Co Gen Plan(412-76) - copy UCB IGS library - describes region of Co.

04.16.11.C 04.16.11.D

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41611009 H S labor rep yes union rep SJ Co yes Stanislaus County has 3 AD 2 SD 2 CD; SJ Co also split up - no legislators live in SJ County; to get more pop go a little north or a little south

Stanislaus and SJ Counties

41611010 H no no

41611011 H SJ Co sup no Linden SJ County yes Sups resolu to keep SJ Co in 1 CD 1 SD not than 2 AD; 3 diff propsls (doesnt advoc any) for AD split Calaver Riv thru Stock to East border of Co; Stock metro area cities in one ag areas in one ; Calaver Riv thru Stock down 99 to S co border

SJ Co Calaveras Amador south Sac Co


Speaker #

4091100141611009

41611010

41611011






use natural boundaries like rivers and highways

no yes CD 11 has wide range of incomes because has Bay Area and Valley

no no

grantline road galt agricultural areas

no yes viable ag biz in SJ Co is a COI in common with ag of Galt (so Sac Co); ag can be put in one area but cant divorce ag from residential totally; agr connects with south Sac Co; east county ag (vineyards) in common with Calaver Amador foothills ag


Speaker #

4091100141611009

41611010

41611011


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes pg of 6 bullet pts ( layout of distr in SJ Stan Co) 2 maps (one of SJ Co and one of a district drawn around Merced with some of Stan Co some of Madera and some of Fresno that would meet fed requirments (Sec 5??) and allow SJ Co to stay whole

04.16.11.E

no re legal counsel - still using GDC when doesnt meet law

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41611012 H former candidate for Assembly

no Merced County

yes slice of southern stan co with westeast Merced; or east Merced Co with areas to east to Mariposa; or add Madera instead - south or east is good dont go north to SJ Co; Q why not Fresno? A just trying to keep counties whole

41611013 H no Merced yes also agrees that go south or east from merced rather than north to Stockton; only go north to highway 120; also change SD from going to coastal county (monterey)

Merced Fresno

41611014 pass no no41611015 H S sub teacher at

Mariposa HSno bootjack mariposa

Countyyes foothillsmountain areas in SJ

Valley form COI - see map - El Dorado down to nor Tulare Co; to build go to northern foothills via highway 49. Not Mono and Inyo bec cant get there (only road to Mono is thru Yosemite) and MonoInyo ID more with San Bern

proposed 6 whole counties (alpine El Dor Marip Tuol Calav Amador) plus eastern parts of Madera Fresno - added up 2010 county pops

41611016 H poll worker in CD 9

no Atwater Merced Co yes draw straight lines Q where? cut off Stockton part of district from us

41611017 pass no no41611018 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100141611012

41611013

4161101441611015

41611016

4161101741611018






no yes Merced County people are tight knitlong time residents different concerns from StocktonTracy - eg. Merced wants canal and north does not

highways 99 120 no yes where get medianews is important to relate to districts; now districts connecting to coast (Monterey) and there is no reason for that

Stockton more industrial and urban than Merced

no nosmall towns in foothills Highway 49 corridor no yes foothill communities sparsely

populated snow and not much ag ag wants our water - commonality between mountain areas of El Dorado Co down. If had to build senate then go up to Placer Nevada counties; share political interests

no no

no nono no


Speaker #

4091100141611012

41611013

4161101441611015

41611016

4161101741611018


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

want news for district (from reps) to be the same

no

noCOI of foothill towns from El Dorado down to top of Tulare Co; need to be together cause usually just added to districts

no yes two maps One of proposed foothill district within state with pops added (6 whole counites eastern part of Madera Fresno) one of highway 49 corridor to east of state

04.16.11.F 04.16.11.G

no make straight lines and keep politics out

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41611019 H small biz owner

no Madera no disagrees with madera mariposa foothillmountain community want to keep Madera whole - add Merced and mariposa; Q go south to Fresno? A better to go north than go South

Madera Mariposa Merced Not Fresno

41611020 H went to LWV workshop in this area

yes LWV merced merced no has no map - just wants them to follow criteria and be able to answer yes to following each one

41611021 H merced council member

yes City Council of Merced

merced merced yes keep merced co whole; Q which counties feel affinity with? Co to Nor So but with high speed rail North especially; Q how about gateway to yosem and go up to Mariposa? A diff is they dont have air pollu like we do but do have some similar interests

41611022 H no SJ County yes Keep SJ Co whole (now no reps live in co) - to make CD add Gault (similar to Lodi); SJ Co close to having its own SD to make AD s - keep Stockt whole add cities to south (tracymanteca) put Lodi with motherload area; if split Stock use Calav Riv.


Speaker #

4091100141611019

41611020

41611021

41611022






no yes sparcely populated better way of life;wants to unify flat landers and hill billies

agricultural community tourism fossil beds Yosemite and Sierra

no no

no yes southeast asian - lang barrier - diverse community that needs to be kept together

agricultural interests

no yes Motherlode relates more to Valley than Valley relates to Bay Area


Speaker #

4091100141611019

41611020

41611021

41611022


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

bonds Madera with Merced and Mariposa and NOT with Fresno

no

especially important criterion

no follow criteria you are suppose to follow in priority

no

no SJ Co is picture of Gerrymandering with 4 CD



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41611023 H food supply advocate

no Merced Merced yes would like to see Merced and Stanislaus counties together; be careful of splitting hills and valleys

41611024 H student at UCMerced

no Merced Merced yes Merced will be kept whole (because of VRA) to add go 1)north into Stanis (Modesto) 2)south to city of Madera - Not East or West; keep SJ Co whole

41611025 H no madera yes Madera Co- 2 AD 2 SD now - get locked out of decisions no Madera Co resident elected; make Madera Co whole - agrees Merced Madera Mariposa make nice group; everyone wants to go north - we get along great with people in mt on eastno prob going east

41611026 H no merced yes keep merced whole even tho trying to bail out of VRA add part of Stan Co to get s


Speaker #

4091100141611023

41611024

41611025

41611026






no no environ issues 3 irrigation districts that supply farmers generate own electricity; conflicting interests with foothills mountains hillbillies (they are concerned with water and national parks)- different personality valley vs mountain

agr producers in valley famous coop between agr and environmental concerns

highway 99 no no city local govt redev issues in common in small and medium cities. sports leagues schools similarities along 99 NorthSouth; cities more in common than unicorp areas if go EastWest see more differences

no no

I-5 and 99 no yes consider transportation corridors - I-5 99

agrarian communities - commonalities with rest of valley (north south) vs with mountain or urban areas


Speaker #

4091100141611023

41611024

41611025

41611026


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41611027 H represent small biz community

yes small biz community

modesto stan co yes keep stan co whole; to expand go nor or so - similar interest in so especially merced (more than with SJ Co); specifically re SD -one goes to coast - needs to be north south to pick up ag areas Q which cities identify with more? A Merced city and co.

41611028 H health care interpreter speaking on behalf of punjabi Sikh community in Merced

yes represents Sikh community

Merced yes keep Sikh community in one district

41611029 H - 29 - last given till 30 came back in

was at Hanford mtg represents API community in Valley

yes API community in valley

reedley Fresno no Fresno


Speaker #

4091100141611027

41611028

41611029






no yes keep in mind economic drivers - Stan Co is ag area primarily

livingston (2 temples) atwater winton and a temple in Merced

no yes keep Sikh population together mostly in Livingston also atwater and winton; about 3500 Sikh in Merced Co. Punjabi speaking; get together from all of these communities to do festivals

Kerman no yes prison pop affect on hospital services pollution; environment of desert shared; Punjabi history to preserve; API have been in cities and have moved out for agr; need to represent API


Speaker #

4091100141611027

41611028

41611029


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41611030 H S - 30 - last given no madera madera yes Madera Co valley comm foothillmountain community; Madera valley area should go with Merced Co Fresno Co valley areas; Madera foothillmt with foothillmt of Fres Marip Tuol Calav; doesnt like SD now that goes to Monterey Co; also wants nesting

41611031 H -no issued no Merced yes endorse Merced connected to stanislaus and mariposa counties

Merced Stanislaus Mariposa

42711001 H engagement in political organizations

yes Long Beach - epicenter

Los Angeles yes lets keep one Long Beach

42711002 H no Long Beach - 9th District

Los Angeles yes please allow current district lines as they are now; put North LB in district with Compton Carson (and a few other towns)


Speaker #

4091100141611030

41611031

42711001

42711002






no yes valley different econ interest (mostly agr) from foothills (tourismhospitality)

Modesto no yes economic corridor between merced and madera; Fresno State and Stanislaus State go shopping in Modesto

communities of Long Beach no yes communities of Long Beach (lists several - West East South Naples)

Long Beach no yes African-American community in North LB


Speaker #

4091100141611030

41611031

42711001

42711002


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

get more political participation if group valley with valley and foothills with foothill; stop being connected to coast counties

no yes written testimony memo to CRC same essentially as spoken testimony

04.16.11.H

no

consider Section 2 - must keep people together - like rainbow that is LB

no

must comply to make sure various groups (lists African-American Latino API) have opp to election of their choice

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42711003 H yes North Pedro neighborhood council

Long Beach - North Pedro Neighborhood

Los Angeles yes need Ass member to hold LAUSD accountable-use LAUSD district 7 to draw AD (?); Neighborhood councils want to stay together

42711004 H no Carson Los Angeles yes likes current representation

42711005 H no Long Beach Los Angeles yes 37thCD is good; to add (its under) extend it into Port

42711006 H yes LB Board of Water Commission

Long Beach Los Angeles yes keep representation in tact; what add? Rest of Long Beach

42711007 H no Long Beach Los Angeles yes add Signal Hill and Lakewood


Speaker #

4091100142711003

42711004

42711005

42711006

42711007






yes no

no yes nearly 50 carson signal hill watts willowbrook have english as second language; shared shopping between carson compton north LB?

no yes 37th CD is a COI by virtue of its similarities

Compton Carson Signal Watts Willowbrook most of LB

no yes strong ties that bind communities in 37thCD racial diversity family composition medium incomes background .

no yes love city parks educational system college system symphony theatres beach historic ranches hospitals - a complete city and large; also diverse feel affinity to LA tho border with Orange Co.


Speaker #

4091100142711003

42711004

42711005

42711006

42711007


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes AD proposal - info and map

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42711008 H no Palos Verdes Estates

Los Angeles yes Palos Verdes Estates - keep with list of other cities (Torrance Redono B Lawndale Alondo park Rolling Hills Estates Rollings Hills) entire Palos Verdes penisula; what add to make up numbers? ____ Manhattan B Hermosa B? I stopped at Redond cause s

spend most time there

42711009 H no Long Beach - bixbybee area? In 37 CD

Los Angeles yes like current maps -allow representation against LB-Centered model (would affect good diverse representation)

42711010 H no Palos Verdes

Los Angeles yes Palos Verdes with Northern coastal cities

42711011 H no Long Beach - in 37 CD

Los Angeles yes add port of LB into 37 CD area; port not represented?

42711012 H yes city council - sent letter

Palos Verdes - 42K pop

Los Angeles yes PV Penisula is very gerrymandered - lists all the different places it is linked to in districts; recommends going north to Westchester - rather than going east into Long Beach

42711013 H no Norwalk Los Angeles yes cluster of cities with norwalk - north and east


Speaker #

4091100142711008

42711009

42711010

42711011

42711012

42711013






no yes diverse many language frequent same read same paper Daily Breeze and ____

no no

no no

no no

no no

no yes language faith culture school districts


Speaker #

4091100142711008

42711009

42711010

42711011

42711012

42711013


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no problem with Census collection management ( he was a staffer)

no yes letter from city council

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42711014 H no Paramount (just north of LB)

Los Angeles yes Lakewood Compton Willowbrook all form community with LB - keep the larger community together

42711015 H no Huntington Park - incl Verna Commerce Maywood walnut park South Gate

Los Angeles yes do not separate these neighborhoods

42711016 H second generation resident of Redondo Beach

no Redondo Beach

Los Angeles yes could go north - follow traffic which goes from Redondo north and back

42711017 H no Rigley neighborhood of Long Beach 37th CD

Los Angeles no

42711018 H no Long Beach (used to list Palos Verdes) - in 37thCD

Los Angeles yes include port to build 37th CD


Speaker #

4091100142711014

42711015

42711016

42711017

42711018






no yes YMCA LB hospital is crucial HC provider for area Plaze Shopping center entertainment

Boeing

no yes working people come from different countries speak spanish

work in industry here and live here too

Redondo Beach no yes sandy bottom beach unites community - environmental community of interest with whole bay common movement see in congestion and traffic on street; airport connects communities rather than separates

yes yes 37th CD shares a lot

no no


Speaker #

4091100142711014

42711015

42711016

42711017

42711018


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

look at Section 2

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42711019 H no Long Beach Los Angeles yes 3SD CD AD - not necessarily a bad thing; 54 AD is considered the Long Beach district but its carved out minority groups; disagrees with call for one LB - keep current basically

42711020 H no Carson Los Angeles yes leave 37th CD alone - leave it like it is - if change it (expand it?) somewhere there will be lack of services for some people - rep does good job

42711021 H yes historical society of LB - not talking on its behalf- but it informs her thoughts

yes LB has more in common with LA County than Orange County please keep with LA vs Orange

42711022 pass no no42711023 H independent

filmmakerno Los Feliz Los Angeles yes going west Studio City to

Sherman Oaks - film-making COI

42711024 H no yes keep 37th CD and ADD Port please traffic from port comes through his neighborhood and he has no control of that.

42711025 H no East Rancho Dominguez

Los Angeles yes keep us in 37 CD - share same concerns with Compton Lynwood other towns in 37th CD; ie leave 37 how is and add Port


Speaker #

4091100142711019

42711020

42711021

4271102242711023

42711024

42711025






no no

no no

no yes LB history shows likes rings on a treegrowth of aerospace; share transportation news agencies

no nono yes film-making COI

yes no

no no


Speaker #

4091100142711019

42711020

42711021

4271102242711023

42711024

42711025


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

nono

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42711026 H no East Rancho Dominguez

Los Angeles yes 37CD is a COI - are able to get help need from representative

42711027 H no Long Beach - Cambodia town

Los Angeles no

42711028 H no Long Beach- 37 CD 55 AD

Los Angeles yes keep 37 CD in current form so south to add port and Lomita; fix AD

42711029 H no Carson Los Angeles yes keep 37CD same and add by going south to San Pedro Willimington and possibly Lomita; those areas have most in common with current district

42711030 H no Long Beach Los Angeles yes look at LB along hydrological lines

42711031 H no lives in Torrance also mentioned Palos Verdes Estates?

Los Angeles yes 36 and 46th CD; PVE should be split by two zipcodes (90274 90275)



Speaker #

4091100142711026

42711027

42711028

42711029

42711030

42711031

4271103242711033






no yes medium income homeownership etc similar

Anaheim St between ___ Atlanta ; west boundary is 710 freeway

no yes Cambodian community

no yes port is big polutter and affect us who live close to itneed to have representation with port LB is a wonderful diverse community

no no

no yes all is related to water divide by water lines then

no no

no nono no


Speaker #

4091100142711026

42711027

42711028

42711029

42711030

42711031

4271103242711033


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no wanted to be a part of process

no

no

no

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42711034 H 40 yrs in education field

yes Compton City Council

Compton Los Angeles yes maintain 37 CD intact as

42711035 H no Long Beach Los Angeles yes keep 37th CD intact and add Port

42711036 H no yes East Long Beach - not part of Orange Co so go North rather than east to OC district now grabs whole coast - an abomination. Need to be with LA County

42711037 H no North Long Beach

Los Angeles yes dont want to be confined to one rep; northwest central LB need to be with similar communities of Compton etc

42711038 H pacific islander community - 40 different ethnicities

no yes maintain existing boundaries and go south to ocean

42711039 pass no no42711040 H CLU in

Thousand Oaks

no yes keep East Ventura County together identifies with Ventura Co not LA


Speaker #

4091100142711034

42711035

42711036

42711037

42711038

4271103942711040






no yes extensive transportation network in district and environmental issues that flow from that; communities collaborate; LA? River goes through; celebrations (MLK Day Cinco de Mayo Cambodian New Year )

no yes very diverse but love each other; airquality is horrific - need help

asked border of East LB and he gave Council district s to describe

no yes we are Angelenos

no no

no yes Pacific Islanders - biggest community outside Hawaii

no nosimi valley thousand oaks camarillo moorpark newbury park

no yes these towns share a lot; Qshare more with West Ventura Co or LA? A West Ventura Co


Speaker #

4091100142711034

42711035

42711036

42711037

42711038

4271103942711040


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42711041 H school at CLU too (like 40) and saysanswers the same basically

no yes identifies with Ventura Co not LA

42711042 pass no no42711043 pass no no42711044 H no yes re 46CD - connected by

Ocean Blvd. - put strand back

42711045 H no Carson Los Angeles yes 37 CD - dont add Orange County. Add willmington parts of San Pedro- submitted map

42711046 H Board of Education

yes Board of Ed Rigley area and 37th CD

Los Angeles yes school district includes 4 cities (avalonsignal hilllongbeach and ?) that are a COI - one of top 20 Sch Dist in world; keep CD 37 add south toward port

42711047 H yes LB USD - third largest SD in CA - largest employer in LB - leader in education

yes LB USD entirely in LA County - want whole representation in LA county not split and put with OC - primarily concerned with CD

42711048 H no Rigley district of Long Beach

Los Angeles yes concerned with AD and SD; port included in 37th CD - cant deal with port issues cause in another CD now.and get pushed off by rep


Speaker #

4091100142711041

427110424271104342711044

42711045

42711046

42711047

42711048






no no

no nono nono no

no no

no yes great school district - need to have good representation

no yes LB USD LB USD biggest employter in LB

no yes diverse census district


Speaker #

4091100142711041

427110424271104342711044

42711045

42711046

42711047

42711048


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nonono

no yes color map of proposed CD 37

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42711049 H no Long Beach Los Angeles yes keep 37th CD intact

42711050 H yes LB NAACP President

no

42711051 H no Carson Los Angeles yes support existing maps for state and federal representation

42711052 H yes works for council woman - describes district 50K

Long Beach Los Angeles yes likes having 3 AD 3 CD 3 SD representing LB

42711053 H no Torrance Los Angeles yes alondrao park lawndale lomita RPV PVE? torrance keep together

42711054 H yes CSU Long Beach professor

no

42711055 H no Long Beach - 3rd Council District

Los Angeles yes agree dont put LB with OC

42711056 H yes mayor of compton

compton Los Angeles yes keep 37th CD intact as much as possible; add wilmington and port area - if not that then add Lynwood; separate LB with Lakewood Xeminal Juanipero (streets); agrees that E LB diff from W LB should go north in LA county but not put with 37th CD.


Speaker #

4091100142711049

42711050

42711051

42711052

42711053

42711054

42711055

42711056






North West and Central LB in same AD SD CD with rest of 37thCD??

no yes diverse community that cooperates; port extension air quality are big issues;

no yes MLK hospital closure is big issue in 37th CD

no yes rail system that goes through towns 48 high school grads?

no no

no yes beach toyota big employer

no yes K12 pop that will be voting age in next decade; 54? Latino please be aware of this in decisionmaking

Long Beach no yes governance family then city governance

separate LB with Lakewood Xeminal Juanipero

no yes highways impact communities health issues related - 710Alameda corridor; route 47 - as go north turns in Alameda Stthis has become truck route; wind usually blows W-E and bad air will affect LB and Signal Hill; hard to get help on air quality because

(cont from social interest field) of being with OC - 46th AD?


Speaker #

4091100142711049

42711050

42711051

42711052

42711053

42711054

42711055

42711056


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no

no talk about governance

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42711057 H no yes keep 37th CD as is and add WilmingtonPort area. Will enhance voice - speaking on behalf of homeless and those who dont have a voice; keep 55AD 54 AD keep us in LA keep Carson intact and youll have no trouble; 105 and 710 are natural boundaries.

42711058 H no Manhattan Beach

Los Angeles yes provides packet to CRC; 37th CD should end with LB and not go into OC; 53th AD along coast - packet has suggestions on how to change it - get addition population (add rest of playa del rey and westchester all up to 405 take off tip that goes above 10.

42711059 pass no no42711060 H no PV penisula

Palos Verdes

Los Angeles yes PV most in common with south bay beaches area; 46th CD sliver connects us with OC - makes no sense; dont split penisula keep cities together include cities listed below; no idea what to do with SD25 - a mess.

42711061 H no Rancho Palos Verdes

Los Angeles yes agrees with last speaker (60); makes sense to make continuous all cities along Santa Monica Bay


Speaker #

4091100142711057

42711058

4271105942711060

42711061






no yes respirtory issues ports are economic engine

no yes AD 53 joined by environment (air land water) unified by need protect AD53 environ - it affects all LA CO. Also diverse comm socio-economically (homelessSec8 among 1M homes) loss of employ at all levelforeclosures all relig all ethnic 45 lang

no noPalos Verdes Torrance Rodando Hermosa

gives highways to draw CD boundary (LAX on north 405 on east then 110 down to shore)

no no

no yes share aerospace and defense industries


Speaker #

4091100142711057

42711058

4271105942711060

42711061


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes 3 page testimony w proposalCOI

nono

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42711062 H no Inglewood Los Angeles no

42711063 pass no no42711064 H retired

aerospace engineer

no rolling hills estates

Los Angeles yes peninsula cities together is opportunity for CD SD composition

42711065 pass no no42711066 pass no no42711067 pass no no42711068 H CAPAFR yes APCON (Asian

Pacific Policy Planning Council) of LA Co- lead CAPAFR org for LA South Bay

yes will submit mapping proposals on may 26

42711069 H CAPAFR yes affliated with several Pac Islander and specially Hawaiian org; lists nine types of Pac Isl (see testimony)

yes Keep Carson whole; speaking about Pac Islander (community faith-based culture) - unique ; Keep together Inglewood Hawthorne and Lennox large Tongon area Tongans in this area share socio-econ status with other minorities in area


Speaker #

4091100142711062

4271106342711064

42711065427110664271106742711068

42711069






no no

no noRodondo Torrance Rolling Hills RPV peninsula cities into El Segundo

hawthorne blvd is major arterial

no yes beach aerospace industry dominates penisula cities my friends and co-workers all live in area

no nono nono nono yes API

in ppt and testimony no yes Carson-Torrance area Pac Isl share church school medical housing. InglewoodHawthorneLennox Tongons share struggles with other minorities.


Speaker #

4091100142711062

4271106342711064

42711065427110664271106742711068

42711069


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no current system has failed - rely on impartial lines that GIS will provide (has become more sophisticated)

nono

nonono

VRA important

no yes ppt and handout with 6 statements (see below)

Tongons in three areas to be able to work as community and in solidarity with other minorities - unified voice of representation

no yes statement



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42711070 H CAPAFR - author of Filipinos in Carson and South Bay

yes Filipino and Carson orgs

carson Los Angeles yes Keep Filipino community (COI) of Carson together in one district

42711071 H CAPAFR -LA South Bay re cambodian community of LB

yes Khmer Girls in Action Director

Long Beach Los Angeles yes gives borders of Cambodian area of LB - dont divide the 2 cambodian neighborhoods; map in ppt of cambodian neighborhoods and she gives streets - keep Cambodian community together

42711072 H former LAUSD teacher

yes Japanese historical society of Southern CA and others

yes Keep Torrance and Gardena together to maintain historical cultural economic and social integrity of Japanese American Community

42711073 H CAPAFR-APALC demographer

no yes shows tables with demographics for southbay cities and growing API community in Torrance etc particularly Cambodian in Long Beach


Speaker #

4091100142711070

42711071

42711072

42711073






no yes Carson Filpino Community - largest API group in Carson - Carson should remain intact - promote cultural heritage and history.

LB gives borders of 2 neighborhoods in 2 maps (part of ppt)

yes yes low educ income and LEP

Torrance Gardina no yes Japanese community - lives go back forth between two cities; Japanese history in two cities goes back early 1990. estab. cultural institutions places of worship and businesses (eg nursing home for J-Am elderly Japan. Cultural Institute)

Torrance Gardena Carson LB; Hawthorne Lennox Inglewood

no yes foreign-born pop LEP; talks about LB cambodian pop Tongon pop in North Bay cities and other two just spoken about


Speaker #

4091100142711070

42711071

42711072

42711073


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

interests better served when united

no yes statement

no yes statement

no yes statement

no yes statement



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42711074 H no Rancho Palos Verdes - 46 CD - which goes into OC

Los Angeles yes put cities of penisula in 36 CD keep Rancho Palos Verdes in it

42711075 H born in Culver City lived all over pensiula

no Palos Verdes

Los Angeles yes common community has evolved over time - hes seen it - use that for form AD and SD

42711076 H no Long Beach - bad part

Los Angeles no

42711077 H Dr educator commissioner in Carson

no yes keep current CD and add port of LB willmington San Pedro

42711078 H Samoan Community

no yes carson - maintain city boundaries respect all city boundaries look at school district boundaries - help them have one voice

42711079 H Indian Community

no Cerritos Los Angeles yes cerritos artesia La Palma Cypress Buena Park remain together even though some in LA County and some in OC


Speaker #

4091100142711074

42711075

42711076

42711077

42711078

42711079






no yes these cities work together in disaster prep

list of cities in community - coastal cities mostly (marina del ray to gardenahawthorne; go south to san pedro Palos verdes

no no

no yes Latino community - CRC should concern self with Latino leaders that can represent; children going wrong way - hes very concerned

no yes educational system - working hard to improve - help us work collaboratively and let us improve the acad perform of these students

no yes school districts

La Palma Buena Park Cypress Cerritos Artesia is COI of Indian-Americans

no yes Indian community restuarants religion edu system art center library


Speaker #

4091100142711074

42711075

42711076

42711077

42711078

42711079


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42711080 H no Cerritos Los Angeles yes freeways form boundary of _______?

42711081 H no Long Beach Los Angeles yes wants more leadership by Latinos more representation of LB keep together as much as possible

42711082 H yes Compton City govt previously (elected city clerk) now on board of Compton Comm College

Compton Los Angeles yes pick up 54K need for 37thCD in port area to get port rep at table - (Q what issues? A Fed issues like Transportation); for AD52 expand to Lynwood area rosencrantz central 91 110 on west

42711083 H cambodian no yes keep 37th CD how it is concerned with local level

42711084 H part of the Spanish pop that is 40 of city of LB

no Long Beach Los Angeles no



Speaker #

4091100142711080

42711081

42711082

42711083

42711084

4271108542711086






boundaries of highways 605 on west 405 to 22 south 91 north 5 east

no yes Cerritos is diverse share cultural and economic advanatages - draws traffic from certain cities; speaker discusses shared comm org with other cities and discusses history of the communities and how changed and what has emerged

no yes impt of economic growth and educ opportunity for Latinos

no yes cities worked together got underground rail below Compton Carson(or Lynwood?) LB - that was an achievement to get it undergrand

gave boundaries of Cambodia town (says concentrated in this area) 50 K concentrated in half mile between 10th and Atlantic

no yes Cambodian town - in 4 city council districts needs to be kept together

no yes hispanic pop wants to work with you

no nono no


Speaker #

4091100142711080

42711081

42711082

42711083

42711084

4271108542711086


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no help us improve LB USD safety of streets future for kids

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42711087 pass no no42711088 H no Cerritos Los Angeles yes see handout for proposal

Cerritos with La Palma Cypress and Buena Park

42711089 pass no no42711090 H no La Palma Los Angeles yes supports proposal of last

speaker - 4 cities together in AD; go across county boundaries

42711091 H no Long Beach Los Angeles yes please respect city lines first rather than keeping things together for a specific reason. I am Long beach but not like all Latinos; dont use COI - dont do COI gerrymandering

42711092 H no East Long Beach

Los Angeles yes Keep city together East Long Beach can move north into Lakewood (cant tell difference) or south into harbor; dont go into OC; pull lower income in with higher income - hes seen this intergration of incomes in East LB


Speaker #

409110014271108742711088

4271108942711090

42711091

42711092






no noVietnamese in Westminister and Garden Grove

provided street boundaries and on handout too - included artesia was oversight on map; Latino pop is north of 91 and asian pop is south of 91

yes yes talks about various ethnic pops and neighborhood devel group (West Anaheim Dev..); share shopping senior events social activities newspaper coverage crime prevention library usage park usage and medical care (list taken from handout)

no nono no

no no

no no


Speaker #

409110014271108742711088

4271108942711090

42711091

42711092


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

nono yes COI attributes and

Current and Proposed district

nono

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42711093 H ran for 37th CD in 2008 2010

no Long Beach Los Angeles yes keep city LB together and for CD can add carson compton etc and port of LB not port of LA (that can go in another CD)

42711094 pass no no42711095 H lawyer in LA -

40 yrsno Malibu 37

yrsLos Angeles yes describes COI for Malibu - all

of Malibu in one district go south into El Segundo or North into Santa Monica Mts; Malibu and Santa Monica in same district (share school districts?) as much as possible

42711096 pass no no42711097 pass no no42711098 pass no no42711099 H engineer no Cerritos (20

yrs)Los Angeles yes 27th SD has part of LB and LB

should have own SD and it doesnt help Cerritos to have part of LB; Downey would be good addition; doesnt agree with being with OC cities; she had an OC rep in the past and has better rep now. Q gd fit w Norwalk? Ano

42711100 pass no no42711101 H no Buena Park Orange yes Buena Park cut by 3 cds; only

OC city in districts with LA Co citieswant to be with other OC cities


Speaker #

4091100142711093

4271109442711095

42711096427110974271109842711099

4271110042711101






no no

no noMalibu no yes Malibu shares ______?

no nono nono nono yes cerritos - 58 asian; schools

districts together in same AD SD CD

no nono no


Speaker #

4091100142711093

4271109442711095

42711096427110974271109842711099

4271110042711101


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no prob is status quo isnt working -

yes biz card

nono yes testimony and 3

exhibits

nononono

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42711102 H no Long Beach - North - little triangle area to right of freeway or river? Has to have flood insurance

Los Angeles yes agrees 37 CD should come straight down 52 AD should follow highway 91 and be bordered by 710? Freeway; 3 Senators 3 Assemblymembers is good for LB They are diverse and part of VRA idea is to run own people and thats done.

42711103 pass no no42711104 H no yes keep 37th CD intact to add use

corridor and look at adding LB zip code 90802 (she believes not in 37 CD)

42711105 H no simi valley Ventura yes East Ventura County is interconnected people lives keep them crossing city lines keep east V Co. together.

42711106 H no simi valley Ventura yes east ventura county connected

42711107 pass no no42711108 pass no no42711109 pass no no42711110 pass no no42711111 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100142711102

4271110342711104

42711105

42711106

4271110742711108427111094271111042711111






no no

no nono yes LB has enjoyed shared

community interests among communitiescities in 37 CD ( Carson Compton)

airport impt

no yes share shopping local media (Acorn V Co. Star) Q share more with LA or SB? A LA do not identify with north

Camarillo Moorpark SimiValley Thous Oaks

no yes common geography highways watershed issues local water districts etc.lots of shared interests

no nono nono nono nono no


Speaker #

4091100142711102

4271110342711104

42711105

42711106

4271110742711108427111094271111042711111


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

VRA says to run people of community for office and thats achieved by having 3 senators 3 congressmembers

no

nono

no

no

nonononono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42711112 H no Long Beach Los Angeles yes proposes Long Beach Lakewood Signal Hill Bellflower in one district make LB whole again and do it by adding those to district. LA Port to Carson side so Ports divided. Notes that 37th CD rep held rally that generated these comments

42711113 pass no no42711114 pass no no42711115 H no yes kept core of __D around LB

then it would represent itself42711116 pass no no42711117 pass no no42711118 pass no no42711119 H yes san pedro

neighborhood council

Long Beach?

yes LB should be one community and connected with LA Co. area north and east; beach cities belong together; LA USD needs to be looked at - impt constituent; communities governed under neighborhood council system should be together

42711120 H no Signal Hill council member

Los Angeles yes 37th CD - like it and like diversity; know need s - dont care where add - wilmington ok.



Speaker #

4091100142711112

427111134271111442711115

42711116427111174271111842711119

42711120

4271112142711122






no no

no nono nono yes LB USD with Lakewood

no nono nono noyes no

no no

no nono no


Speaker #

4091100142711112

427111134271111442711115

42711116427111174271111842711119

42711120

4271112142711122


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nonono

nononono

no yes biz card

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42711123 pass no no42711124 pass no no42711125 pass no no42711126 pass no no42711127 H founded

several non-profits in LB one is LB ICO? Has worked on Census (2000 2010) - Census undercounts Cambodians

no central Long Beach

Los Angeles yes 37th CD is good if go south to harbor heard that makes CD 14? Asian which would help Cambodians

42711128 pass no no42711129 pass no no42711130 pass no no42711131 H yes mayor of Signal

HillSignal Hill Los Angeles yes likes all districts - include Port

of LB; LA River end in LB Portneed this politically (gave some reasons)

42711132 pass no no42711133 pass no no42711134 pass no no42711135 pass no no42711136 pass no no42711137 pass no no42711138 pass no no42711139 pass no no42711140 pass no no42711141 pass no no42711142 pass no no


Speaker #

409110014271112342711124427111254271112642711127

42711128427111294271113042711131

4271113242711133427111344271113542711136427111374271113842711139427111404271114142711142






no nono nono nono nono yes Cambodian community bonded

because of genocide health care

no nono nono nono no

no nono nono nono nono nono nono nono nono nono nono no


Speaker #

409110014271112342711124427111254271112642711127

42711128427111294271113042711131

4271113242711133427111344271113542711136427111374271113842711139427111404271114142711142


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

nonononono

nononono

nonononononononononono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42711143 H yes Watts Labor Community Action Committee president CEO

Watts Los Angeles yes likes having 3 fed reps in 1 mile sq - its help us in hotbed COI; if 37th CD has to shrink (for compactness) then Watts can come off (its an appendage) but likes rep for 37th CD bec comfortable walking thru watts; OC rep wouldnt be good; dist go N

42711144 pass no no42711145 pass no no42711146 pass no no42711147 pass no no42711148 H no Orange yes re OC explains

geographytopography problems with 42 46 CD; use highways this is understandable to (SoCA) people (more than COI); Q re CD 42? A dont start with 42CD

42711149 H no Bellflower Los Angeles yes CD 34 has bellflower downy and goes up to LA; put bellflower with lakewood cerritos and east LB (?) would be better bellflower not like Cudahy southgate walnut lynwood.



Speaker #

4091100142711143

4271114442711145427111464271114742711148

42711149

4271115042711151






no yes environmental impact shared by those on highway corridor; they deserve to benefit from mitigation (trust fund for clean up)


divide OC down the 55 - makes lots of sense

no yes Hispanic (mostly CD 47) Asian (esp Viet) in CD 40 wealthier and more rural are east of I-55

no yes bellflower low income like cudahy southgate lynwood but housing prices higher; and bellflower is safer

no nono no


Speaker #

4091100142711143

4271114442711145427111464271114742711148

42711149

4271115042711151


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes map - shows how increase in number of reps has resulted in better representation

nonononono yes discuss city and county

borders in OC and stats on ethnicity of 6 CDs

no

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42711152 H no San Pedro - leash connecting to LA in city of LA?

Los Angeles yes get rid of this lease (city boundary) connecting San Pedro to LA San Pedro is more conservative than LA and needs(?) smaller regions of representation (?)

42711153 pass no no42711154 H no Whittier Los Angeles yes to keep Whittier area as one

AD SD CD (currently split up)

42811001 H armeniam-american

no Sherman Oaks

Ventura yes keep communities together (provided list)

42811002 H 40 year resident of LA

no USC area Los Angeles yes include USC campus please with USC campus area North University Park Adams and Exposition Park (to the south) Fairmount and Figueroa (to the east)

42811003 H student at LA Trade Tech also CSU Dominiguez

no Compton Los Angeles no

42811004 H in Spanish no yes keep communities together (see list)


Speaker #

4091100142711152

4271115342711154

42811001

42811002

42811003

42811004






no no

no nono yes schools shopping cultural COI

Armenian pop Hollywood Hollywood Hills Sherman Oaks (northeast) Valley Studio City Los Feliz Park Le Brea Westwood (as the southwest border) .. (will give us list)

no yes Armenian culture diversity religion work area Armenian church Armenian businesses Armenian schools

Armenian businesses and home to industries where the community works

yes yes Good neighbors schools medical facilities

Working people 32nd Street magnet school elementary school medical facilities

Willowbrook (East and West) Rancho Dominguez Compton

no yes Shares streets after school programs education shopping mall

Culver City Los Angeles Line(?) Navera Hills or Madera Hills? Winstor Hills

no yes Share same parks and beaches schools public transportation (metro blue and green lines) can communicate different races (Latino African American)


Speaker #

4091100142711152

4271115342711154

42811001

42811002

42811003

42811004


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nono

Preserve the social and economic community that has developed

no yes List of cities

The present districts work they way they are

no Likes CD 33 current lines

no

no Likes current districts the way they are



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811005 H no South Los Angeles

Los Angeles yes keep these areas together

42811006 H advocates for Watts community

no yes keep watts in one district

42811007 H 4th generation angelino

yes founder Ebony Reperatory Theatre

Los Angeles

Los Angeles yes keep community in AD47 together especially arts community

42811008 H student at Tray Tech College

no Compton Los Angeles yes Compton Lakewood Long Beach Rancho Dominguez Paramount

42811009 H in spanish 12 year resident

no yes keep Hollywood Hollywood Hills West Hollywood and Hancock Park

42811010 H born and raised in LA

yes Wall Las Memorial - AIDS?

NE LA Los Angeles yes dont split up SD 22 (North-East LA Highland Park Pico Union)


Speaker #

4091100142811005

42811006

42811007

42811008

42811009

42811010






Watts South Los Angeles West Adams Harbour (?) Heights

no yes Churches parks kids YMCA Expedition Park Figueroa Corridor transportation USC many social needs served by churches homelessness adult care

Watts no yes Shared history of industry culture arts institutions arts education

Art community promotes artists and musicians; Watts Towers

no yes Arts community historical arts center

no yes Transportation Renaissance entertainment hospital shopping schools after school progerams

Shopping transportation

no yes Take families to enjoy Walk of the Stars people have similar work lives; all classes working and living together

Working community of different races and backgroups whoc ontribute to the community. Work in maintenances of hotels restaurants theatres car washes

no yes Gay community and culture


Speaker #

4091100142811005

42811006

42811007

42811008

42811009

42811010


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

CD 35 37 and 39 that is how currently divided; comfortable with districts the way they are

no Watts is about 40000 people (70 Latino 30 African American)

Losing arts places need retention of current districts (SD 10 and AD 47)

no

Likes community the way it is; Young daughter testified please dont split up our community I love it the way it is.

no

no

Gay community and culture needs representation

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811011 H born and raised in LA 3rd generation Californian part of generation that brought about VRA

yes Community Coalition

West 92nd St.

Los Angeles yes Below 10 freeway to Long Beach

42811012 H applied for commission

yes Board of Neighborhood Commissioners

San Fernando Valley

Los Angeles yes San Fernando Valley as whole CD; West Hollywood Beverly Hills and Santa Monica should be kept APART from Tarzana. Keep Tarzana with West San Fernando West Valley to 101 or Thousand Oaks

42811013 H speaking on behalf of Watts community

no no Watts with South LA areas would be a problem for Watts because of the Watts undercount

42811014 H thai community

yes Thai Community (flanked by Thai Community Leaders

yes Hollywood Blvd. Normandy to Western Ave.; COI is below Hollywood Hills bounded by 10 and 110 including KoreaTown and Historic Filipino Town

42811015 H no yes Glassell Park Eco Park Arwada Village Cypress Park Highland Park


Speaker #

4091100142811011

42811012

42811013

42811014

42811015






no yes Strong tradition of activitism center of immigrant rights movement large union membership working class high density of senior citizens

Tarzana no yes mountain range cultural community

no yes Central Ave. Corridor improvenent housing project revitalization

Watts no yes 30000 Thai are living in the community lots of Thai businesses hardworking not familiar with political arena

no yes Children with special needs school has 99 Latino kids needs basic transporation

Children with special needs school has 99 Latino kids needs basic transporation


Speaker #

4091100142811011

42811012

42811013

42811014

42811015


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no Concern that VRA might call for reduction of numbers of African Americans

no

undercount in census of African Americans and Latinos (rumor that one district standing would be eliminated due to shrinkage in the population)

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811016 H no Long Beach Los Angeles no

42811017 H yes works for El Centro de Pueblo w of la river in downtown. They are a comm service org that serves latinos.

Eco Park Silverlake

Los Angeles yes Want to keep together win LA. likes what have now (after asked)

42811018 H armenian-american

no Burbank Los Angeles yes Wants Burbank included in eastern san Fernando valley; Glendale Burbank Sunland Tujunga and part of the valley.

42811019 H was born and went to school in LA; Elected city council member for hawthorne.

no Hawthorne Los Angeles yes boundaries are LAX 105 405 110


Speaker #

4091100142811016

42811017

42811018

42811019






Long Beach no yes Hospital college students safety issues gang problem treatment facilities for addiction

no yes

no yes diverse highly Latino and Armenian - work well together; Also environmental issues most of us need to use the metrolink for transportation. Pollution from 5 fwy gets stuck in Burbank causing environmental problem.

no yes Transportation churches parks work opportunities mutual aid schools (5 charter schools) and diversity.


Speaker #

4091100142811016

42811017

42811018

42811019


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

Pop was split into many districts in order to increase latino reps but want to have together. Keep city of LA intact and the communities win it. Currently 4 ADs 3 SDs and 4 Council districts.

no

no

Currently have limited resources. Representatives have worked really hard to establish relationships. To start over would be bad so want to keep the same.

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811020 H student at USC

no yes University Parketc - please keep together - mutual reliance on USC in surrounding area; Keep university park harbor heights down to watts and down to mid Wilshire on the transit line connection.

42811021 H yes works for non-profit service agencies

yes 35 CD needs to be maintained

42811022 H Past 30 years been working on census. Was former regional director of census in 199091.

yes Chairman Congress of Racial.Equality of CA sponsors annual MLK parade worked on Census; sponsor annual MLK parade. Also emancipation day of Juneteenth.

works in SouthCentral area

Los Angeles yes 33 35 37 CD - multi-ethnic competitive COI; Three ethnicities African-American Hispanic nonHispanic white and also asian and others; please hold them together. Airport to coliseum watts tower inglewood lawndale. Hollywood down to the beach.


Speaker #

4091100142811020

42811021

42811022






no yes Students use local businesses many dont have cars so take public transport. Live shop and use services locally. Surrounding community aso depends on usc for employment theater programs football games income goes back to community.

Students use local businesses many dont have cars so take public transport. Live shop and use services locally. Surrounding community aso depends on usc for employment theater programs football games income goes back to community.

no yes Have after school programs that help kids and avoid gangs. They are working to have a better community.

no no


Speaker #

4091100142811020

42811021

42811022


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

If restructure everything will cause problems cuz ids will have to learn to work with new people. Have been helping teachers etc.

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811023 H yes City Lights - founder - routed in CD 35; Work with obesity and kids at risk. Partner with community to make a positive impact and overcome the things that can happen.

no

42811024 H former gang member now grad of USC

yes Executive Director of Unity One gang prevention or intervention?

yes CDs 8 10 48 52 33 37 35

42811025 H no Upland San Bernardino

yes 26 CD - carve out smaller CD for Upland Rancho cucamunga Claremont Montclair San Antonio heights.


Speaker #

4091100142811023

42811024

42811025






Have started inner city marathon south central Inglewood watts etc. have screening of kids becoming the largest in the city of LA in terms of inner city marathon. Inglewood has partnered with them.

no no

no yes Improvements in crime decreased murder rate significantly.

no yes Transit (10 210 57 hwy) hope for expansion of gold line and improve mass transit local economy in common.


Speaker #

4091100142811023

42811024

42811025


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

County line runs between some of the cities but the county line is arbitrary. Local education (Claremont college comm college) and transit makes the co line not make sense.

no also could add Ontario to add pop



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811026 H a redistricting expert and he wrote a book about it ; wrote book on Gerrymandering; Been working against gerrymandering for significant part of life consulting in Az and other places.

no no

42811027 H in Spanish no yes Huntington Park Maywood Commerce and Vernon - keep them together


Speaker #

4091100142811026

42811027






no no

no yes Immigrant comm that works very hard to get what didnt have in home countries spanish language very important for comm. Kids go to LASD schools.

Provide many jobs for comm industrial area. Please dont separate. Provide a lot of work to communities and working families.


Speaker #

4091100142811026

42811027


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

Wants to talk about VRA was intended to put end to racial Gerrymanering que keep blacks from electing rep of choice. But the pendulum swung too far requiring racial gerrymandering to maximize representation corrected by SCt. In shaw and Johnson.

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811028 H has been congressional candidate and hopes to do it again in 2012. CD 33

no yes 33rd CD - concerned with gerrymandering; Everything south of 10 is intact community but north everthing broken up. Hollywood has two or three cong reps but should have only one. Need communities to north to be whole.

42811029 H ran 33 ran for congress in CD 33 and bd of sups 7th

no yes 48 42 AD uneven width here for AD 47 and 48. They are uneven in terms of width

42811030 H yes LA county in the west side; Santa monica mountains to LAX from beach to downtown LA.

Santa Monica?

Los Angeles yes 4 mile walk - gave out handout

42811031 H no CD 36 Los Angeles yes west side one district and separate from South Bay; CD 36 small spike goes into W LA. Shes so far west that shes close to santa monica.


Speaker #

4091100142811028

42811029

42811030

42811031






no no

no yes

yes yes Many districts in this area political Yugoslavia. He goes through all the districts that touch here. Let me vote with my neighbors not citizens in far flung area

no yes


Speaker #

4091100142811028

42811029

42811030

42811031


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no Thinks should start w blank slate.

We hope when you draw lines youll keep us intact. Esp the 33 35 37 heavily black and latino need these districts to keep representation for ethnicities.

no

no

Thinks south bay and west side are very different businesses families etc. her reps think about south bay since 90 of district is there.

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811032 H yes la brother crusade org in south la; serve families work on youth services health etc.; Q service area? A central ave (E) Crenshaw (W) adams (N) century blvd (S).

yes Leave districts intact of reps not decrease reps be representative

42811033 pass no no42811034 H Works on

environmental issues with these communities.

no Burbank Los Angeles yes Griffith Park neighborh Hollywood Hills Los Feliz Silverlake Atwater Village Burbank incl equestrian district that also abutts Griffith park several neighborhoods win (Hollywood Knoll Coanga Terrace Beachwood Canyon Hollywood Land the Oaks)

42811035 H yes Academia Avance - charter school in Highland Park

Highland Park

Los Angeles no Please keep highland park with city of la; Keep NE LA communities w LA. COI highland park glassell park cypress park Mount Washington ____ and Lincoln heights

42811036 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100142811032

4281103342811034

42811035

42811036






no yes families serve are united by struggles poverty lack of ed and skills housing but still are engaged in search for long term viable alternatives. Want to expan opportunities for kids. They are active stakeholders.

no noyes yes Similar intersts traffic issues

funding for parks if split neighborhoods makes it harder to get funding.

no yes Academia avance (charter school in hiland park); gold line connection to LA the river and its parks which are new investments.

no no


Speaker #

4091100142811032

4281103342811034

42811035

42811036


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

Need rep to represent their needs; Leave district intact number of reps not decrease and reps be representative.

Census numbers are skewed

no

noPlease dont start w blank slate because weve built comms and want to see that respectect.

no

Currently split in SD 22 24 26; Common solutions at fed and state level that are helped by keeping us together wLA dont toss us to the side

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811037 H Working past 15 years to bring movie theater to watts; Also ed and training center conf center small bus dev and job creation. Working with reps of 35 37 39 and AD and SD.

yes representing Watts community

Watts community

Los Angeles yes needs CDs intact to implement what been working on 15 years dont break us apart

42811038 H no Latino Coalition yes AD 464748; SD 2226; Areas need together a)Downtown LA live staples center b)USCFigueroa corridor c)Harvard heights mid city university park N parts of South LA up 2 Century pico union eco park highland park eagle rock cypress boyle heights


Speaker #

4091100142811037

42811038






no yes

also Korea Town; in current district tied to and nothing in common w Alhambra; need to merge communities eg. need to tie Boyle Heights to certain portions of South LA need representation.

no yes Latino coalition Mexican maya Aztec sal and guatamaltecos

Imm comm w similarities and common interest in economics; We have the same issues both bad and good kids go to same schools shop at same stores we know each other.


Speaker #

4091100142811037

42811038


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

Gong to break ground in next 4 months Need current reps to service over 1 mill people in 5 mmil radius; Several schools three housing projects.Please dont break us apart

no

Currently broken up into various districts want to keep them together in same district. African American Korean latino brothers or sisters are all in this area together.

no Dont care who represents but want to be good at representing the community. Would help their work if they were represented by same person. many supporters in audience stood up



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811039 H no Altadena Los Angeles yes pasadena altadena So Pasadena La Canada sierra madre san marino arcadia Monrovia duarte bradbury; incl Glendale Burbank for CD - share the airport. 710 fwy issue So Pasadena Alhambra involv -dont put them together they are bitter enemies.

42811040 H no Pico Union Los Angeles yes Boyle Heights Cypress Highland park eagle rock eco park west lake pico union downtown koreatown (majority latino)northern part of south la harvard heights mid city university park

42811041 H yes central American federation of LA; founded el salvador community corridor

yes Pico union has a lot of central americans. Wilshire district Harvard heights mid-city universal city northern portion of south LA korea town (70 Latino). Keep all these in same districts AD 46 47 SD 22 27

42811042 H yes Latino Coalition of LA

yes COI South LA 48th Dist southern should be cut off at 80th street and be connected to 47th

42811043 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100142811039

42811040

42811041

42811042

42811043






Mt Wilson area include w us cause had station fire and cause Pasadena residents like to recreate there

no yes first set of cities all involved in rose parade have Metro gold line 210 foothill fwy unites

no yes SES school demog social econ development historical relations; Have latino black Korean population. Want to stay together. Share celebrations central American parade. Shop at same places. USC is our community. Comm has to struggle a lot.

no yes Numbers have gotten high so want to be represented by people who care about their community. Central American parade is largest parade in LA.

Pico Union Westlake no yes More central American Needs access to services common community

no no


Speaker #

4091100142811039

42811040

42811041

42811042

42811043


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

we rely on whole community to serve our needs dont cut us up

no

no MB what do you think about CD? Keep with 31

More central American no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811044 H ran for US Congress in CD 31 this last November

no yes CD 31 iurrounded by CD 29odd should push forward and take a little of downtown and cut off some of the area south of downtown; should include Silverlake

42811045 H no no

42811046 H no Eagle Rock Los Angeles yes Western San Gabriel Valley surrounded by San Gabriel mountains LA to west San Bernardino county to the east; COI extends along foothill all the way to San Bernardino County

42811047 H yes Treasurer of Salvadorian Community Corridor (talked most about how this group serves the community)

yes Keep 46th district the way it is. We are a community.

42811048 H no no


Speaker #

4091100142811044

42811045

42811046

42811047

42811048






la sale park and eaglerock no no

no no

no yes Access to 5 134 210 101 and 110; hospitals; all religions represented; suburbs of valley should be kept together; diversity; influx of young families; all languages; melting pot of area

Keep resources we have; economic situation is different from eastern valley and cultural differences also; newspapers are different

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100142811044

42811045

42811046

42811047

42811048


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no CD 31 is confusing

no CD 31 is gerrymanderedpeople dont know what district they are in. Wants geographical redistricting. Thinks we have to put being American first instead of ethnic.

Keep resources we have; economic situation is different from eastern valley and cultural differences also; newspapers are different

no

no

no Latino community trying to live the American dream



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811049 pass no no42811050 H yes Thai CDC (and

lots of other API groups)

yes Do not separate Thai Town from East Hollywood Business district

42811051 H yes Exec director of Little Toyko Business Center (LTSC)

yes Little Tokyo (Temple northern boundary submitted map)

42811052 H yes Filipino Workers Center

yes Historic Filipino Town Hoover on west 101 on north Beverly on South and Glendale or Lucas on Eastthink it should extend to 3rd street on South

42811053 H yes Chinese American Service Center

yes Chinatown


Speaker #

409110014281104942811050

42811051

42811052

42811053






no nono yes Thai Town revitalize east

Hollywood section; common economic and cultural activities

yes yes Ethnic neighborhood magnet to encourage businesses repeat tourism historic community business redevelopment area cultural community churches transit issues gentrification

Ethnic neighborhood magnet to encourage businesses repeat tourism historic community business redevelopment area cultural community churches transit issues gentrification

no yes Serves Filipino and Latino communities Filipino cultural institutions gateway community for Filipino American community since first half of 20th century; businesses are Filipino-owned and cater to Filipino community housing projects

Filipino cultural institutions gateway community for Filipino American community since first half of 20th century; businesses are Filipino-owned and cater to Filipino community housing projects

no yes Limited English speaking low income avails of health services at Center

Limited English speaking low income avails of health services at Center


Speaker #

409110014281104942811050

42811051

42811052

42811053


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

nono

no yes Map

no yes Map

Established in 1930s; grandfather and father lived there; concentrated community needs special services and social supports family associations resources to acculturate

no yes Map



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811054 H yes Exec director Korean American Coalition

yes Korea Town Boundaries of LA Police Olympic Station (larger than current Preserve America boundaries of melrose to north hoover to east 10 fwy to south and polymouth-krenshaw to west)

42811055 H yes Asian Pacific American Legal Center

no

42811056 H Thelesian High School football coach

no yes Would like to see Downy become a part of Southgates district

42811057 H no yes Edge of Korea Town historic Filipino Town Macarthur park and Lafayette park


Speaker #

4091100142811054

42811055

42811056

42811057






no yes Limited English proficiency split by 5 ADs needs for afterschool services

no no

Southgate no yes Play together party together with Cutahay Downy and Linwood. Medical needs met by Downy and Linwood.

Would like to see Downy become a part of Southgates district because they get a lot of funding. Wants schools to benefit from Downy and Linwood. Shopping in all these areas; all within walking or bus distance

yes yes Not far from downtown arenas parks young families immigrant rights multilingual education is important to community;

Upwardly mobile all age groups and nationalities and languages; diversity is cornerstone of community; shared shopping walking and dining; thriving small business base


Speaker #

4091100142811054

42811055

42811056

42811057


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

Limited English proficiency split by 5 ADs needs for afterschool services

no yes Map

no yes Submitting testimony in writing since shes limited as an org member

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811058 H Armenian difficult English lived in LA 45 years; Owner of a foundation nonprofit; 90 years old

no yes Little Armenia in Hollywood(?) center; do not divide Los Angeles; Keep East Hollywood unified

42811059 H Family creates and runs businesses and nonprofits

no yes Unify downtown LA; AD with Dodgers Stadium separate from Staples Center LA Live is bad; needs to be unified; Include Dodgers Stadium northward downtown LA southward to USC artsentertainment community

42811060 H Associated with 58 (who wanted to tell the Commissioners he sponsored churches); Helps people out; musician

no no


Speaker #

4091100142811058

42811059

42811060






no yes Speaking Armenian Armenian community; hungry people Section 8 helped by his foundation; translator hes done a lot of work for the East Hollywood community through his foundation not only the Armenian community

no yes Unique area of LA heart of LA diversity residential and business industries; local government transit retailwholesale

Unique area of LA heart of LA diversity residential and business industries; local government transit retailwholesale

no no


Speaker #

4091100142811058

42811059

42811060


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811061 H no East Hollywood

Los Angeles yes East Hollywood (Thai Town Boyle Heights Silverlake) together; Other communities that are similar Little Armenia Silverlake Boyle Heights Highland Park

42811062 H Cook at Universal Studios

no North Hollywood

Los Angeles yes COI Sun Valley Latuna North Hollywood and Burank

42811063 pass no no42811064 H yes ReDrawCA no

42811065 H no yes Westchester Playa Del Rey (holds airport); 65000 people keep us together. One side of 405 fwy to Ocean to north around Jefferson and south border is LAX;

42811066 H yes Community Outreach Director at Korean American Coalition

yes Greater Korea Town area into one AD (LAPDs Olympic Stadium boundaries)


Speaker #

4091100142811061

42811062

4281106342811064

42811065

42811066






no yes Worries about the funding of the nonprofits in the area if they are broken up and the funding of the HUDSection 8 housing and the jails; family services

no yes Tourist destinations jobs available metro red line common transit hub linked by 134 and 170 freeway businesses and shopping new car saleslots large number of public parks

no noLA City has already drawn boundaries so look at those boundaries

no no

Include with south but either would work (go northsouth not eastwest); thoroughfare for traffic going northsouth; grocery stores jobsvery few people go eastwest

yes yes

no yes Arts and recreation task force lots of Korean community orgs Korea Town is a center for Korean community


Speaker #

4091100142811061

42811062

4281106342811064

42811065

42811066


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

In Little Armenia there is a minimum security halfway house for nonviolent drug offenders and another on 11th st and 12th ave; they may not get enough funding if they are separated

no

Burbank North Hollywood have similar interests

no

nono Can submit boundary

files to staff for neighborhoods

Problem only elected official consistent across small community is a council member. 2 AD 2 CD 2SD etc.

no Neighborhood councils were designed for COIs and we defined our neighborhoods and they are available at laneighborhoods.org

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811067 H yes Outreach Director Korean American Coalition

yes Greater Korea Town needs to be represented by one not five members

42811068 H no yes Korea Town; K Town since were not considering race; Boundaries 101 10 Krenshaw and Hoover; Population 250000 (previous speaker answered at the mic)

42811069 H senior pastor no yes Greater South LA community (CD 33 35 37; SD 25 26; AD 48 51 52); Keep the districts the way they are

42811070 pass no no42811071 pass no no42811072 H no yes North-East of LA Highland

Park Gisel Park Lincoln Heights


Speaker #

4091100142811067

42811068

42811069

428110704281107142811072






no yes Greater Korea Town has specific needs and needs to be kept whole

no yes Korean businesses and residences Highrise and midrise rental housing; overcrowded units with up to 10 people in one bedrooms; transit traffic and parking issues residential density commercial activity insufficient infrastructure

Shared social and economic interests office and retail restaurants work shop eat

no no

no nono nono yes urban suburbs live-in

communities little businesses service them; people stay 2-3 generations in same house people want to be around the people who are around where they live; dont connect people across the freeways; respect natural boundaries


Speaker #

4091100142811067

42811068

42811069

428110704281107142811072


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

Problem with current representation; tutorial centers had problems; LAPD Olympic Stadium area is divided into 5 AD and 2 SD

no

Dismembered unempowered not represented split; Has enough people to be own district;

no

VRA came out of the church; 501 would reduce our representation

no

nonono yes List of cities in her COI



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811073 H Speaker 93 last nightran out of time

no Long Beach Los Angeles yes Long Beach is 500000; East San Gabriel River border with LA south ocean west LA River

42811074 H no yes El Serino community boyle heights downtown eagle rock glasel park..; Use city of LA boundaries

42811075 pass no no42811076 H no Del Rey

(between Marina del Rey and Culver City)

Los Angeles yes Malibu down to El Segundo and parts of Culver City

42811077 H no Not part of an org; working parent

yes Oil Heights El Sereno Lincoln Heights Artistic District Echo Park Highland Park Silverlake others (left list)

42811078 pass no no42811079 pass no no42811080 H lived here 3

years.no yes park la brea mid city area;

Westwood to bev hills park la brea los feliz Hollywood Hollywood hills

42811081 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100142811073

42811074

4281107542811076

42811077

428110784281107942811080

42811081






no yes

no yes

no nono no

no yes Affecting classrooms; son sat on classroom on floor

no nono nono yes Work in film industry. Several

universities have internships out here. Tvfilm also Sherman oaks studio city.

no no


Speaker #

4091100142811073

42811074

4281107542811076

42811077

428110784281107942811080

42811081


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

Convoluted districts; over 19 languages spoken in LA Unified School District; Do not draw boundaries based on ethnicity

no

Currently they are with the San Gabriel valley and have no bonds or municipal services or socioeconomic interests in common

no

nono Lines should be drawn

based on parties or interest groups; recommends book Gaming the Vote Why Elections Arent Fair and What We Can Do About It

Community comes together supports each other

no yes List of Cities

nonono

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811082 H ran for CD33 primary in 610; wants CRC to forget what everyone has said today. Responsibility is to protect democracy as we know it.

no no

42811083 H no no



Speaker #

4091100142811082

42811083

4281108442811085428110864281108742811088






no no

no no



Speaker #

4091100142811082

42811083

4281108442811085428110864281108742811088


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no Responsibility is to protect democracy as we know it. Unfair districts with up to 85 reg of one party and thats really bad. Imagine whether the person would be reelected while sitting in a prison that would not be a district not to draw.

all these people have gotten up today saying I want I want I want well I dont give a damn what they want; basically wants competitive districts

no Thinks those wanting less gridlock would be a COI so you could use the DVC score.

presents idea of density-variationcompactness measure. Only based on census data and geography. The findings were high scores equal higher elections. Higher scores equal less partisan bias

yes has a ppt presentation

nonononono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811089 H minister comm activist former resident of Inglewood.

no no

42811090 H no yes 10 to imperial over to Figueroa corridor little toward westerner?

42811091 H yes Northeast business association

yes NE area is highland park etc

42811092 pass no no42811093 H community

activistno yes Recommend Inglewood lenox

del aire west carson and marina del rey


Speaker #

4091100142811089

42811090

42811091

4281109242811093






Inglewood; Dont divide the city.

no yes Good housing stock. Religious groups block clubs small businesses bond comm together. Has LAX econ engine for the city. 110 405 freeway. Residents work in hotels. Have businesses. Cutting this area would be dentrimental.

no yes Also active in local churches. Local churches have a lot of activities in the communities especially around holidays. Reach out to kids w incarcerated parents.

Promote education many kids from comm did attend USC and encouraged to move on to law school.

no yes

no noyes yes Ymca is a center of community;

Also does voter ed. Parks are important Churches are in the comm.


Speaker #

4091100142811089

42811090

42811091

4281109242811093


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

win CD35 now rumor that its 40K short according to Census but historically has been undercount

no

no

Want to keep the district the same. If change have to reinvent the wheel. Satisfied how they are because have friendship with reps in their area.

no

noShe did not fill out a census form so she is part of the undercount in her area.

dont want to give up one office. is my right to have someone who looks like me represent me

no FW can you tell me COI that ties Inglewood to Marina del rey? A ymca HS in gardena. Her current districts. The Airport ties them together. Neighborhood block. Polling inspector



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811094 pass no no42811095 H quechua

native american

no yes Lincoln heights; SD24. Recommend combine Lincoln heights with SD22 that represents the rest of LA. He doesnt have common interest w eastern portion of current district.

42811096 pass no no42811097 pass no no42811098 pass no no42811099 pass no no42811100 H no yes Topanga canyon

42811101 H no Topanga resident 1977

Los Angeles yes Malibu Calabasas pacific palisades also have some common interests

42811102 pass no no42811103 pass no no42811104 pass no no42811105 pass no no42811106 pass no no42811107 pass no no


Speaker #

409110014281109442811095

4281109642811097428110984281109942811100

42811101

428111024281110342811104428111054281110642811107






no nono no

no nono nono nono nono yes Is a state of mind a way of

life.Geographically mentally SM mountains parks beachesCommunity club womens club chamber of commerse historical society (and several other)

Own news paper and own elementary school post office and zip code. Shopping cneters coffee shops interested in land use preservation of open space water management. 65 adult pop has college degree.

no yes Malibu Calabasas pacific palisades also have some common interests Yoga classes for senior citizens and prescool. Theater groups.

12K school kids from LA come to do theater classes. Public and private schools. Also public universities comm colleges high schools and middle schools in nearby communities.

no nono nono nono nono nono no


Speaker #

409110014281109442811095

4281109642811097428110984281109942811100

42811101

428111024281110342811104428111054281110642811107


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

nono

nonononono

no

nononononono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811108 H no yes conservation foundation of santa monica mountains; SM mountains in LA and Ventura county w watersheds as well as Simi Mils and uppoer LA river systems be kept together. Greater SM mountains COI.

42811109 pass no no42811110 H Crenshaw;

Lived there all his life. Hes a letter carrier

no Crenshaw whole life

Los Angeles yes Crenshaw lamer park hyde park exposition and baldwin hills. Hope keep CD35 together Crenshaw

42811111 H no yes unincorprated area bw la and Compton called willowbrook. Also lived in hawthorn Compton (?); want to keep 37 together.

42811112 H yes watts labor comm action committee exist as result of disparities prior to the 1965 revolt

yes


Speaker #

4091100142811108

4281110942811110

42811111

42811112






no yes Watersheds water quality wildfire transporation corridors scenicrec opps wildlife. For included cities see his written testimony.

no nono yes Comm concerns jobs. Schools

heath care econ security for family.

no yes Most important thing in comm is health. Sufer from diabetes high BP pediatric illness. MLK hospital is a MAC provides many services going to be a major hospital. Ward commission post riot was lack of major health care center.

no yes Watts is hypercenter of highest infant mortality in the US. Now starting to move people from dependency on social services. High incarceration and unemployment poorest education make it difficult to move people off social services.


Speaker #

4091100142811108

4281110942811110

42811111

42811112


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes Written testimony

nono

no

Thinks Watts benefits from having two districts.

no Noted that one of the Commissioners has racially profiled people wo any resistance from rest of commission by asking certain people about if they had attended a particular rally. And you should not let that happen.



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811113 H no yes Proposed creation of central American cultural district. bw 6th and 3rd there are 5K people

42811114 pass no no42811115 pass no no42811116 pass no no42811117 H no yes Echo park; silverlade Filipino

town also boyle heights are linked via schools to echo park area.

42811118 H no yes Pasadena UCLA work on west side. Main concern with NE part of city. Lots fo districts that dip into east la and into san Gabriel valley. Eagle rock shouldnot be in Pasadena district.

42811119 pass no yes42811120 pass no no42811121 H no yes historic Filipino town. Temple

st used to be corridor until freeway came.



Speaker #

4091100142811113

42811114428111154281111642811117

42811118

428111194281112042811121

4281112242811123






no no

no nono nono nono yes Is the most diverse little hamlet

in LA. Have everything there there. State highway 22 cuts comm in half. This is a problem because no govt entity will take responsibility for it.

Sothern tahanga belongs with Burbankglendale not Lancaster or Simi Valley; Westside shouldnt go to Oxnard either. Monterey park Alhambra

no no

no nono nono yes Need everything under one roof

to make it a new cultural tourism area. CD33 has Bangladeshi community.

no nono no


Speaker #

4091100142811113

42811114428111154281111642811117

42811118

428111194281112042811121

4281112242811123


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nonono

Divided bw several districts. Makes it hard for provision of funding and services;

no

no

nono

Concerned about gerrymandering in CD31 in the past. Look at other boundaries in the city and can make it a lot easier.

no

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811124 H Pomona works at superior court

no Pomona yes Foothill blv 57 city southern border are where san Bern and LA county meet. Want to be lump w montcliar and Ontario. Concerned that if lumped w Claremont will lose funding they need for infrastructure.

42811125 pass no no42811126 pass no no42811127 pass no no42811128 pass no no42811129 H on

Neighborhood council neighborhood watch captain and more community stuff that she does.

no LA born and raised

Los Angeles yes Glaso park area; Atwater echo park glaso park cypress park and ???

42811130 H no yes keep culver city Baldwin vilaage Windsor hills and ??; probably go east to Figueroa and west to marina del rey.


Speaker #

4091100142811124

4281112542811126428111274281112842811129

42811130






no yes Largely working and latino county. Large parole population and transient population. Low income many with cirmnal records.

Concerned to be with diamond bar walnut or Claremont because they are different SES. Claremont is upper class white. Pomona hopstial college city hall FD PD and court.

no nono nono nono noyes yes Shes seen it look really pretty

and look really ugly and now want to make better. She doesnt know who to contact for help because of cutting.

no yes all small comms surrounded by LA on all sides. Suburban win city. Higher than av income and lower crime rates than surrounding areas.

Was created for people of color who were coming out of poverty but were prevented from living in other mid class areas.


Speaker #

4091100142811124

4281112542811126428111274281112842811129

42811130


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

it helps in representation because if lumped in w someplace rich may look at average income and not see that pamona is not well off.

no

nononono

Being united will benefit comm. no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42811131 H downtown la neighborhood council for 5 years

no yes Common boundaries Chinatown olvera city west little Tokyo southern boundary is Washington blvd; Historic council neighborhood council. Only about 50K residents. Normal COI are transport corridors esp Figueroa corridor.

42811132 H yes comm legal resource center exec dir.

yes Talk about crime in LA. Agencies that cover the city and county Gardena Inglewood long beach Rosecranz and central they meet to study crime. Noticed that sherriff not being proactive in giving them data.

42911001 H no Eaglerock Los Angeles

yes inclusion of federal public lands in CDusually added on at end to make continiguous; not good for those concerned with of lands; eg San Gabriel Mountains Angeles National Forest San Bernardino Mts - get water - COI is those concerned with lands


Speaker #

4091100142811131

42811132

42911001






yes yes Echo park east Hollywood also areas of common interest that should be intact. Instead of transport being boundaries they area actualy the centers of the comms rather than the edges esp Figueroa blvd.

Notice CD37 and how they can better serve in areas other than Compton. Fewer crimes solved in Compton.

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100142811131

42811132

42911001


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42911002 H born in pasadena freq visitor to angeles forest

no yes pasadena glendale and La Pinada have a COI based on connection to SG mountains so put these in same district as mountains - water environment recreation fire hazard

42911003 H RN no Alhambra yes communities of SG valley form a COI and need representation

42911004 H - in Spanish no East LA no

42911005 H no no

42911006 H no yes keep LA foothills from La Canada to ____La Verne? Together

42911007 H no La Puente yes keep La Puente with Covina West Covina

42911008 H no Linda____? no


Speaker #

4091100142911002

42911003

42911004

42911005

42911006

42911007

42911008






no no

no yes great school system health system (hospitals clinics) senior citizens centers want water district shared and kept as one

East LA Lincoln Heights .etc no yes bind by celebration of Indendence Mexican Day Gold Line (bus?) highways intersect at E LA two hospitals (need the services of these hospitals - they offer services for un-insured) go to ___ for shopping and special needs

working class

Pasadena Altadena no yes hard to tell Pasadena and Altadena apart

starting to see loss of services rely on private groups - concerned

no yes recreation environmental issues (water and air) freeway 210

Covina West Covina provide services entertainment shopping to La Puente

no yes tied to Covina and West Covina lower class

no yes cultural links JPL is jewel north of 210 freeway


Speaker #

4091100142911002

42911003

42911004

42911005

42911006

42911007

42911008


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

need representation to support those interestsservices

no

no

no

need own district to allow voices to be heard and not drowned out by areas to south

no

want to stay together to have voice

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42911009 H no Pasadena yes keep west san Gabriel valley communities together as much as possible - bordered by SG mtns and Puente Hills

42911010 H yes LCV Environmental Fund

yes environmental COI in San Gabriel Basin look at this vis--vis your mapping

42911011 H yes Chinese American Citizens Alliance

yes see handout

42911012 H retired fac - UC SD

yes letter from Mayor of Monterey Park

Monterey Park - highest concentration of Asian-American

yes support Chinese-American citizens alliance proposal; draw boundaries to include communities around us that share similar needs

42911013 H no yes supports Chinese-american citizens alliance proposals - need district that doesnt dilute representation of Chinese community


Speaker #

4091100142911009

42911010

42911011

42911012

42911013






no yes geography and diversity (linguistically esp)

diverse economically

foothills of SG valley and SG Valley itself - has a COI; foothills along I-210 corridor

no yes San Gabriel Valley Contamination - shows map; highest amount of superfund sites in any area

no no

Monterey Park no no

Monterey Park no no


Speaker #

4091100142911009

42911010

42911011

42911012

42911013


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

Q better to have more reps or one rep? A one rep because otherwise reps spread too thin

yes in Answerwhat did he say?

no yes ppt

no yes several pages

yes - need this district to comply Q have asians ran that couldnt win? A; Yes and gave two examples (Mike Tin from South Pasadena..will send other one)

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42911014 H no yes unite public land in SG mts with communities that use them the most

42911015 H works at big hospital

no LA (North West) - mount washington

yes keep these communties together for more effective representation

42911016 H works on protection of SG mts

no Highland Park

yes unification of COI along SG River and mts use for recreation river follows 605 freeway

42911017 pass no no42911018 pass no no42911019 pass no no42911020 H no diamond

bar walnut (where live?)

yes Walnut currently split; APA population high here; need rep to fight for change and improve schools

north OC and LA Co border

42911021 H no walnut yes COI out of the cities below - enough for AD Q what about mountain range between brea and chino hills? A; doesnt reduce strength of COI

42911022 H yes Commissioner Rowland Heights

Rowland Heights

yes SG Valley has economic and social sphere of influence along 57 and I10; doesnt connect o SG area of influence


Speaker #

4091100142911014

42911015

42911016

42911017429110184291101942911020

42911021

42911022






Bellmonte . South alonte no yes San Gabriel River - great rec opportunity for communities below and they have no say in how land is managed

Boyle Heights lincoln heights echo park (will forward list)

ceasar chavez st no yes health access pollution

West Covina Covina La Puente

no yes

no nono nono no

rowland heights diamond bar walnut

no yes unique educational COI showing API measurement (?) API or APA? community needs to improve school performance

walnut Diamond Bar Chino Hills City of Industry Brea Rowland Heights

no yes share shopping religious worship live and dine together

no yes universities hospitals etc. ; chinese-american community


Speaker #

4091100142911014

42911015

42911016

42911017429110184291101942911020

42911021

42911022


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

if communities united with mountains they use then will have a say in its management

no

no

if with land in districts can have a say in how the mt range is managed and use and about its environmental protection.

no

nononono yes maps w schools

indicated

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42911023 H no Walnut?? yes keep Korean communities in tact in districts

42911024 H yes represents chinese-american association

yes keep communities together in East SG area - Q; like how is now? A together now and like representation

42911025 H no San Gabriel Valley

yes SG Valley - the way the district is drawn now is good.

42911026 H no chino hills yes chino hills brea walnut heights diamond bar form COI

42911027 H yes rowland Hills chinese-american association

rowland heights

yes stay in district together

42911028 H yes korean community of Inland Empire

yes Korea Town in LA is split up into districts - dont do this in Inland Empire

42911029 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100142911023

42911024

42911025

42911026

42911027

42911028

42911029






fullerton brea diamond bar should be walnut? chino hills rowland heights

no yes Korean Community

chino chino hills diamond bar rowland heights walnut

no yes chinese american community shares across these cities

brea CofIndustray rowland heights Chino Hills

no no

Fullerton Brea Rowland Heights Diamond Bar Chino Hills Walnut

no yes he works eats shops kids to school in these communities

Rowland Heights diamond bar walnut hacienda heights

no yes services work of association

walnut diamond bar chino hills rowland heights Brea Fullerton (not as much Chinese but many Korean in Fullerton)

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100142911023

42911024

42911025

42911026

42911027

42911028

42911029


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes map proposal

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42911030 H no no

42911031 H corporate lawyer

no yes SG Valley has largest chinese-american community

42911032 H yes American Charities Business Association

yes keep AD as one district

42911033 H no Alhambra yes 49 AD is perfect SD is a nightmare - 49 58 AD would make perfect SD; use Alhambra other? school district boundaries; if 32 CD represent SG valley area would be great

42911034 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100142911030

42911031

42911032

42911033

42911034






Azuza- Latino Sect 2? Temple City Monterey Park San Merino Arcadia - chinese Sect 2?

no no

no yes education system after school programs are good

this area draws businesses lowers unemployment rate

no no

no yes 49 AD cities - all belong to YMCA serve on its board

no no


Speaker #

4091100142911030

42911031

42911032

42911033

42911034


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

Section 2 districts - mentioned about certain districts - Azuza has potential Sec 2 violation also in SG Valley have chinese-american district

no

no

no

no yes school districts

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42911035 H yes Diamond Bar City Council 16 years current former President Chair Vice Chair of whole list of govt organizations (League of Cities etc)

Diamond Bar

yes Diamond Bar is a main intersection and shares lot w nearby cities in LA SB OC Riverside Counties (Four Corners region where 4 counties come together); 2 major hwys intersect city constantly working with these cities and counties to reach solutions.

42911036 pass no no42911037 H yes mayor of

Diamond Bar and on other govt councilsauthorities

yes county lines are good BUT drawn 1889 - his COI crosses (blends into) co lines (SE most corner of LA Co - edge of S Ber Co OC ; see city list; Q where go to build SDCD? A use transp corrids

4 counties (LA SB OC Riversdie) area - 4 corners transportation advisorysupported by SCAG 18 yrs)

42911038 H no Whittier yes Currently Whittier is 3 AD 3 CD 1 SD - would like Whittier to not be divided; Whittier w other LA Co cities of La Mirada La Habra Heights Hacienda Heights Diamond Bar; keep cities and counties in tact


Speaker #

4091100142911035

4291103642911037

42911038






chino hills walnut Rowland Hts Brea with Diamond Bar in same district so have reps who live there and experience things and represent better; open space is tres hermanos shell oil and boy scout areas

no yes share hwys -4 corners transportation policy committee works w SCAG; D Bar shares socialeconomic interests with cities in different counties; wildlife corridor conservation JPA

no nodiamond bar shares probs w chino hills (SB Co) Brea Yorba Linda (both in Orange County) Brea is essent downtown of D Bar; also put in district w rowland heights la habra la habra heights whittier hacienda heights

5760 interchange - big fix - need to correct transportation error

yes yes trucks Port to IE warehouses go up I-710 605 to 6010 have to fight for transport funds (get short-changed) in Four Corners Transp Area; transportation neighborhood educ economic issues cross county lines need rep to fight across co lines

no no


Speaker #

4091100142911035

4291103642911037

42911038


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

cities in 4 corners area freq left out of meaningful planning such as planning for hwy 5760 interchange (most congested in nation)

no

nono

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42911039 H yes whittier city council member; speaking as private citizen this evening

whittier yes Whittier split 3 CDAD; whittier should be together - have one HS district; add Santa Fe Springs La Mirada Le Habra Heights even though runs into OCfollow Wildlife Corridor and get AD from 70s 80s

42911040 H - 206 on tape no Sierra Madre

yes link Sierra madre with pasadena altadena

42911041 H no vice mayor of San Gabriel

yes AD 49 is good now. SD 21 doesnt represent West San Gabriel Valley two Senators representing West San Gabriel Valley; CD goes into Burbank and Glendale - not part of West San Gabriel Valley in his viewget map of what the valley is generally

42911042 H no whittier kids went to Le Habra for school

no


Speaker #

4091100142911039

42911040

42911041

42911042






Whittier with Santa Fe Springs La Mirada Le Habra Heights Brea (OC)

605 freeway on west all the way to 57 then southeast all the way to Orange Co into 91 fwy - significant wildlife corridor

no yes Whittier is COI same newspaper high school district fire depart etc shared; also COI of chino hillspuente hills wildlife corridor

no yes frequent these cities for shopping restaurants and all hike in mts around there share transport line - Gold line and 210 freeway

support each other socially culutrally economically

no no

whittier with Le Habra and le Habra Heights

no yes police force for area very similar


Speaker #

4091100142911039

42911040

42911041

42911042


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42911043 H yes promotes Redistricting CA

no

42911044 H no North OC yes his community crosses county lines (see cities below) - keep them together (thinks thats way it is now)

42911045 H - in Spanish no Van Nuys yes keep these communities together. Q; together now? A yes

42911046 H - in Spanish no Boyle Heights

yes keep areas together

42911047 H professor Cal Poly Pomona

no Pomona yes Pomona with Montcliar Ontario Chino ; notes that only one person mentioned Pomona

42911048 H no diamond bar

yes 58 60 AD splits up city of Whittier; concerned with representation of SG Valley - its a big economy and doesnt have representation

42911049 H no La Cresenta

yes he has proposals for AD SD CD display with three sheets

42911050 H no El Monte SG Valley 85 yrs

yes keep El Monte and South El Monte together


Speaker #

4091100142911043

42911044

42911045

42911046

42911047

42911048

42911049

42911050






no no

La Palma Buena Park Artesia Cerritos fullerton anaheim Cypress

no no

Van nuys Panama city Northridge Valley Glenn Lake Balboa .

I-5 101 118 highways no yes share university (CSU Northridge) shopping ed system

list? no yes lots given - things share

no yes university youth sports etc

no yes education transportation traffic congestion

no no

no yes do things together in geography schools education .


Speaker #

4091100142911043

42911044

42911045

42911046

42911047

42911048

42911049

42911050


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no concerned with special districts - our constituency rights at that levelwants junior commission to look at them

no

no

no

no

need voice on issues above by SG Valley

no

no yes brought board with three pages and asked to leave it

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42911051 H city council member Ponoma though speaking as private citizen

no Ponoma yes Ponoma with Chino Montclair ontario - ok to cross counties; Q what add? A Claremont though they may not want it

42911052 H yes soccor league - region ___ volunteer coordinator

Montclair yes keep together 4 cities

42911053 H yes Boyscounts of America (BSA) - which has been drawing lines for years of councils

La Canada-Flintridge

no

42911054 H no yes doesnt like idea of foothill district cause not politically competitive draw districts that go NS

42911055 H no West Hollywood

yes keep two cities together; Q add numbers? A go west

42911056 H yes Los Angeles Chinese-American association - San Gabriel Valley area.

yes keep AD 60(?) as is


Speaker #

4091100142911051

42911052

42911053

42911054

42911055

42911056






no no

Pomona Ontario Chino Montclair

no yes sees bond in soccor leaque

no no

Altadena South Pasadena Pasadena; Q Alhambra? A no not like South Pasadena

no yes strong historical connectioncommon interests rivers through lake

Beverly Hills and West Hollywood has a bustling commonality

no yes Iranian ___ LBGT entertainment industries - performing arts visual arts; tourism restaur hotels small biz

no no


Speaker #

4091100142911051

42911052

42911053

42911054

42911055

42911056


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42911057 H Eugene Lee yes APALC CAPAFR yes 2 COIs presented tonight 1) Temple etc 2) Rowland Heights etc;

42911058 H veteran no no

42911059 H school board member?

no no

42911060 H reading testimony of employee from CSU Fullerton

yes CAPAFR yes COI in East SG Valley

42911061 H Dan Ichonose yes Demographer at APALC

yes two distinct COI West SG Valley COI and East SG Valley COI can each be districts tho cant be combined; one (or both?) is enough for an AD

42911062 pass no no42911063 pass no no42911064 H run vocational

college in Ponoma area

no Ponoma 32 yrs

yes Ponoma has little in common with Diamond Bar Walnut; please go east and not west east to include Montclair Ontario Chino; Q extend where?

42911065 pass no no42911066 pass no no42911067 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100142911057

42911058

42911059

42911060

42911061

429110624291106342911064

429110654291106642911067






no yes

Alham Mont Park Rosemean San Gabriel San Marino Temple City Arcadia

no yes gateway to immigrants LEP; common educational interestsneeds;

H Heights Rowland H Diamond Bar Walnut

no yes AAPI community similar education aspirations need representation

H Hts R Hts Diamond Bar Walnut

no yes list

no yes

no nono nono yes Ponoma - 70 Latino; large

homeless stepchild of LA because of geography doesnt fit in with LA or Inland Empire; share more with Montclair Ontarion Chino;

extend to working class areas primarly Latino

no nono nono no


Speaker #

4091100142911057

42911058

42911059

42911060

42911061

429110624291106342911064

429110654291106642911067


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

strive to keep these communities together to preserve the voice of asian-americans

Asian-American VRA district in West SG Valley

no working with African-American and Latino communties - partly why not proposing till May 26

yes supporting materials - maps will also present map proposal on May 26.

community kept in same AD SD CD

no

no yes handout with details

no

consider VRA for asian-americans in SG Valley

no yes demo stats

nonono

nonono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42911068 pass no no42911069 pass no no42911070 H newspaper

publisher attorney - serving african-american community

no Pasadena yes create district along 210 corridor to form a diverse multi-ethnic community

42911071 H mayor of Pasadena

no Pasadena yes Glendale Burbank and Pasadena in one district

42911072 H yes San Gabriel USD

San Gabriel yes make sure given School District is entirely within one AD SD CD; treat small school districts like ours as COI 4.5 miles square

42911073 H no yes keep SG Valley together and Not with Pasadena Glendale

42911074 H no Monetbello - oldest Armenian community in California (dates back to 1930s) - 1011K armenians

yes SD stretchs to Huntington Park - Montebello and Huntington Park do NOT share interests CD stretchs to Pomona (along Higway 65) and Montebello and Pomona dont share interests

42911075 pass no no


Speaker #

40911001429110684291106942911070

42911071

42911072

42911073

42911074

42911075






no nono no

Altadena no yes Altadena - __ African-Americans

no yes history of long connection share police fire airport

no no

no yes San Gabriel Valley has common concerns highway congestion rail traffic going through with imports from port stops road traffic.

Montebello Pico Rivera Whittier

no no

no no


Speaker #

40911001429110684291106942911070

42911071

42911072

42911073

42911074

42911075


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

nono

in Pasadena left out of represtation because clustered in AltadenaPasadena; chinese americans go to Pasadena City College.

no yes map and numbers as well

no yes

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42911076 pass no no42911077 pass no no42911078 pass no no42911079 H no Sierra

Madreyes Seirra Madre is added to add

11K you need to make a district and that hasnt served Sierra Madre well; would like an east-west divide

42911080 H student at CSU LA

no Montclair yes montclair claremont La Verne San Dimas together

42911081 H Mt Sac now CSU LA

no yes area around LA SB OC

42911082 H no Montclair yes list of communities together

42911085 H yes SG Valley Council of Governments

yes SG Valley has 20 of LA Co residents pasadena and pomona are book ends of community 40 of LA Cos incorporated areas also much of unincorporated area; gerrymandered should have 2.4 CDs and have 5 CDs

42911086 H mayor yes mayor of South Pasadena

yes put contiguous cities in one district (explains based on history of valley); his town gets lost with big cities good to be with small cities


Speaker #

4091100142911076429110774291107842911079

42911080

42911081

42911082

42911085

42911086






no nono nono nono yes share water with Pasadena and

Arcadia school system with pasadena transit defines area - transportation hub along I-210 where regional housing needs assessment - anticipated that growth will follow transportation

no yes cities share.

Brea Chino Hills rowland heights

no no

upland rancho C claremont etc no no

no no

list no yes Asian-american community has been ___diffused? Politically


Speaker #

4091100142911076429110774291107842911079

42911080

42911081

42911082

42911085

42911086


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

nononono

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42911087 H no Covina yes include Azuza Irwindale Baldwin Park; no reason to leave Azuza out

42911088 H yes pasaden USD board member

pasadena yes burbank glendale pasadena - bridge community; dont split us off with parts of LA that have nothing in common with

42911091 H yes council member? Arcadia

Arcadia yes Arcadia cut in half and under 100K pop please keep cities in tact especially if under 100K keep valley in tact

42911092 H no yes think about city of industry plus . For asian district also makes proposal for adding two Latino communities into CD.

42911093 H no Azusa yes keep bedroom communities along foothills __ corridor (arcadia to claremont) together

42911094 H no Glendora yes 210 corridor; critque of proposal about mts with communities near by

42911098 H yes CA Contract Cities former president

Duarte yes I-210 freeway is natural corridor - use it from La C Flintridge to Claremont; advocates for foothill district


Speaker #

4091100142911087

42911088

42911091

42911092

42911093

42911094

42911098






no yes hike in Monrovia Glendora enjoy foothills enjoy hiking shop in East lake in Covina

no yes three cities work effectively as group

no yes share resources police fire water

no no

Glendora Azusa Covina (more?)

no yes Glendor and Covina share three school districts; cities also share water

no no

no yes cities towns on these corridor shares interestsconcernsissues; balance between needsissues of communities and forming districts based on race;


Speaker #

4091100142911087

42911088

42911091

42911092

42911093

42911094

42911098


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42911102 H no Hacienda Heights - unincorporated township

yes combine H Hts with areas with common concernsinterests; take cross roads from 605 and 60 then take 650 south then East to 57; Puente Hills is part of it

42911105 H no yes five corners of states - use that with computer program; no ethnic districts

42911106 H no no

42911108 H no Claremont yes dont cross LASB Co border

42911109 H - testimony read by 108 no Claremont yes supports long rectangle - foothill district

42911110 H no burbank yes keep three cities together if have to add Griffith Park?

42911112 H no La Canada - Flintridge

yes La Cunata over to Claremont 210 corridor

42911115 H has a soccer school

no West Covina

yes keep pomona ontario montclair and chino together; well do our part to improve things if you give us this


Speaker #

4091100142911102

42911105

42911106

42911108

42911109

42911110

42911112

42911115






no yes share police fire school district hikingbeautiful hill area

no no

Artesia Cerritos La Palma Cypress (cross county boundaries)

no yes coyote problem Asian-Indians (little india)gives stats on other asian groups

no yes cultural divide with neighboring S Bern county Clarmont residents dont go there go to Pasadena

Claremon La Verne Pasadena no yes common interests - university at core of each city highway etc

Glendale Burbank Pasadena no yes same interests needs and have cooperated well for a long time

no yes share suburbs trail system highway 210 hazards; 13 wildlife conservancies in area

no yes 90 hispanic want to improve parks


Speaker #

4091100142911102

42911105

42911106

42911108

42911109

42911110

42911112

42911115


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no use computer program to draw districts

no yes stats

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



42911118 H no La Cresenta

yes La Cresenta and La Canada in same district cut off from SG Valley by mountains

42911119 H no Pasadena yes gerrymandering in Pasadena explains screwy district boundary (La Canada Montrose swing over to Sbern crossing cos far away) take into consideration COI keep naturally connected cities together; want Pasadena with its neighbors Burbank Arcadia

42911123 H no South Pasadena

no

42911129 H asian identify as gay

no Arcadia Arcadia yes Arcadia with San Gabriel Alhambra; supports APALC proposals

42911130 H yes Greater LA AARP Chinatown chapter

Alhambra no

43011001 H no westllake village

in LA Co part westlake village is in Ventura county too

yes view conejo valley (see four cities below) - submitted map with proposed senate district; keep thousand oaksconejo valley with simi valley


Speaker #

4091100142911118

42911119

42911123

42911129

42911130

43011001






no yes share forest fire water

no no

no no

no yes Chinese Americans support working together and hopefully gay community as well

no yes translation transportation transcendence (for seniors)

calabas agora thous oaks westlake

no no


Speaker #

4091100142911118

42911119

42911123

42911129

42911130

43011001


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no compactness no slivers etc

no

no

no yes senate proposed map



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



43011002 H insurance agent

no tarzana yes SF Valley as 1CD 20-80K towns not incorp; west valley east valley - separated by 405 freeway; districts on his map handoutexhibits; 31 neighborhood councils in SF Valley - Q are they real neighborhoods?A yes; Dont chop up valley like 10 yrs ago;

43011003 H yes Glendale Unified SD - board member

yes Glendale Burbank La Crescenta La Canada Pasadena South Pasadena

43011004 H yes president of non-profit that promotes good gov of SF V

yes Ass members do not live in SF Valley; 1.8 mill people in Valley- make 2 SD and then 4 AD

43011005 H yes valley industry and commerce org - president

yes SF valley ; has handout with COI - wants them represented; part of SF Valley is LA Valley - bordered on east by mulhulland drive and mt on east

43011006 H lawyer no west SF V yes proposing same as 1991 maps; keep Ventura co together - make its own CD separate conejo valley and put with SF Valley - have similarities (he said people said); doesnt include Camarillo


Speaker #

4091100143011002

43011003

43011004

43011005

43011006






SF Valley yes no

no no

no no

no yes two univ. major airport etc; if valley was city would be 4th largest city in US

no no


Speaker #

4091100143011002

43011003

43011004

43011005

43011006


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

405 is dividing line no

no

no

no yes map

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



43011007 H yes Castaic Lake Water District

yes keep water district in one district

43011008 H no yes SF Valley is a COI (separated by 405); east Ventura linked to west SF valley; SF Valley once voted to be own city called the Valley; Q what r boundaries of SF V? A county line on west 405 on east

43011009 H no thousand oaks

yes thousand oaks area is a COI currently has two CDs..no reason for this; san___ mt preserve.

43011010 H yes husband was mayor

thousand oaks

yes dislikes current CD liked one before thatgoing east on 101more in common with LA County cities of Agoura Hills Calabasas not with Oxnard (mountains r inbetween them and Oxnard)

43011011 H writer at home - star trek martian child

no yes knows SF Valley 405 is natural dividing line for socialcultural COI; county line is west border should be enough for a district; each side needs its own representation

43011012 H former Ass member

no yes said in SLO keep SB separate from Ventura; SB was dominating and Oxnard is a big city


Speaker #

4091100143011007

43011008

43011009

43011010

43011011

43011012






Santa Clarita no no

no no

no no

no no

no yes social and cultural in West side of valley and one on East side of Valley

no no


Speaker #

4091100143011007

43011008

43011009

43011010

43011011

43011012


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes 2 pages

no yes Rosenberg memo

no

no

no yes submitted map of library districts

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



43011013 H yes Oxnard SD - trustee

Oxnard yes Oxnard El Rio Port Huememe must be together - very connected; Oxnard is always being cut up allow it to set its own destiny for once Keep Ventura Co whole and dont include SB Co.

43011014 H no Ventura yes district with Santa Clara Valley and Oxnard Port Huememe - a COI - dont cut it up

43011015 H no Santa Clarita Valley

yes Santa Clarita Valley feels like orphen; add part of Ventura Co.

43011016 H no roseda west SF Valley

yes connect with west LA county not with Simi Valley and Not with West LA (because requires going through 405Sepulvada Pass.

43011017 H no thousand oaks santa rosa valley (between Th O and Camirrlo)

Ventura Co many yrs before that SF Valley in LA Co

yes keep camarillo with East Ventura Co and include Santa Clarita Valley

43011018 H yes Valley Cultural Center - non-profit

tarzana yes west SF Valley in single district; not cut up like now


Speaker #

4091100143011013

43011014

43011015

43011016

43011017

43011018






Q is there a divide of Ventura Co.? A not a natural divide - feels connected to east V Co but if had too take Camarillo.

no no

no yes Oxnard has 4 HS own airport several big cultural events

Oxnard - economic driver for area ag around employment is hjigh

Piru Filmore (not Santa Paula which is more coastal)

126 corridor is going to grow no no same water shed same transportation corridor

same industries

Roseda agoura Hills Calabasas

no no

no no

woodland hills tarzana no yes west SF valley (gives borders) is its own community


Speaker #

4091100143011013

43011014

43011015

43011016

43011017

43011018


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



43011019 H did census outreach

no west SF valley used to live in east - talking about east

yes 405 is dividing line east valley north to ___ down 210 to east border where burbank begins south maybe to 101

43011020 H spoke night before re SG mountains and users of mts

no yes lower-income community in east SF Val with SG Mts (they are users )

43011021 H yes Valley Biz Commerce assoc

yes CD cuts up Valley but its a COI; west and east valley is a real distinction; if split dont go to Simi Valley -very diff valley

43011022 H no SF V yes doesnt know where 405 break comes from here before 405 when 405 built it destroyed .describes valley boundaries and cities from his view

43011023 H real estate no simi valley yes east ventura county should be its own district add Santa Clarita also ok to add westlake village calabassas agoura hills? from LA Co; add filmore and piru camarillo ok too


Speaker #

4091100143011019

43011020

43011021

43011022

43011023






no yes East Valley liguistically isolated lower income

no no

no no

Q how split for CD? ASherman Way and Balboa to split valley

no no

no yes when look at santa clarita valley like looking in mirror - in different co (LA) but similar economically etc

share industries etc


Speaker #

4091100143011019

43011020

43011021

43011022

43011023


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes SF V topography with white lines for CD borders

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



43011024 H formerly planning commissioner city council now water district

no Agoura Hills yes water district map - describes it and considers area serve as community and others as partners - going across to Ventura to Oak Park Simi Valley

43011025 H work in Ventura

no Agoura Hills yes tie communities together along 101 (cross into Ventura) - much more than like LA area

43011026 H no glendale yes keep three cities together - from management perspective would be best

43011027 H was in Long Beach hearing

no long beach yes need to improve geographic integrity of 37 CD - need to keep Long Beach together

43011028 H no west hills in SF V since 1997

yes keep SF V together - too split up; if you had to split then use 405; connect with places on 101 going west

43011029 H manufacturing firm manger

no yes keep West SF V together

43011030 H iranian-american community

no yes keep SFValley together


Speaker #

4091100143011024

43011025

43011026

43011027

43011028

43011029

43011030






no no

no no

Glendale burbank pasadena no yes share shopping share the airport (all part owners); environmental protection

no no

no no large persian community in West Valley

no yes persian community in W SF V beautiful mountain area

no no


Speaker #

4091100143011024

43011025

43011026

43011027

43011028

43011029

43011030


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



43011031 H no calabasasa part of W SF Valley

yes likes 1991 districts - office for CD rep in Woodland Hills near her now have to drive several hrs to get to rep.; go east west; Q where split W SF V? A by cities not streets if have to cut off Northridge ____ which are different from us

43011032 H no west hollywood

yes dont split up west hollywood

43011033 H no santa Clarita valley

yes AD SD cut up area castaic lake water service area impt would district along 118 corridor; Q CD? A current CD not horrible

43011034 H yes Walk of Hearts honors teachers throughout LAUSD

West SF Valley

yes keep valley together (we like East Valley residents) but if have to use 405 or possibly rosco blvd

43011035 H yes on neighborhood council - encino formerly woodland hills

W SF V - Encino

yes neigh council boundaries are impt - local form of govt lines drew with thoughtunderstood SF Valley when drew

43011036 H realtor in simi valley and SF V

no simi valley no


Speaker #

4091100143011031

43011032

43011033

43011034

43011035

43011036






lists cities in W SF Valley includes Hidden Hills agoura hills oak park encino . ;

no yes The Acorn - main news for W SF Valley

no no

santa clarita included - map on back of notes

no no

roscoe blvd possibly no no

yes no

east V co (incl camarillo and santa rosa valley) and ______ in SF V

no no


Speaker #

4091100143011031

43011032

43011033

43011034

43011035

43011036


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



43011037 H realtor no simi valley yes east ventura county very different from coastal area district with East Ventura santa Clarita valley Casaic (saw on nicoles map)

43011038 H armenian-american - works with non-profit that serves Armenian-American community worked on Census to reach out to Arm-Am community

no brubank formerly of Glendale

yes burbank Glendale pasadena together - for Armenian -Amer community

43011039 H yes org that serves NE SF V

yes NE SF V (she gave boundaries) is COI based on economic; now divided CDs should be one CD

43011040 H no north hills yes if divide SF V with 405 you divide North Hills keep Valley together

43011041 H no Ventura City

yes keep Ventura Co together if have to separate then can shave off Oak Park (part of which is in LA Co?)

43011042 H doctor iranian community

no canoga park

yes dont split SF Valley - because will split up iranian community - very important social network - doctors etc.


Speaker #

4091100143011037

43011038

43011039

43011040

43011041

43011042






no no

no no

no no

no no

no no

rosita encino rosita canoga park west hills Van nuys tarzana

no no


Speaker #

4091100143011037

43011038

43011039

43011040

43011041

43011042


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



43011043 H iranian community

no roseda yes Valley area is impt to allow iranians to talk share experiences be a community very active and involved group politically diverse; 405 west together

43011044 H no W SF Val northridge

yes west SF Valley in tact

43011045 pass skip no no43011046 pass skip no no43011047 H rec assistant

knows parksno yes N Holly Studio City Burbank

together because around Grittih Park - great park.

43011048 H no 31 yrs in region - east ventura and SF V

yes start at Camarillo and go east to santa Clarita valleynot sure but malibu is not connected with us

43011049 H no yes thousand oaks would like to stay in ventura county; agrees there is an east and west county identity; division is at camarillo below the 23? Grade

43011050 H yes elected school board member

santa clarita yes santa clarita city but also unincorp areas around it - might be enough for AD otherwise take grenada hills simi valley area (would take palmdale but heard people ag that)


Speaker #

4091100143011043

43011044

430110454301104643011047

43011048

43011049

43011050






no no

no no

no nono nono no

no no

no yes thousand oaks feel most in common with east Ventura County businesses etc; Vent Co is identity for TH Oaks do add Camarilo

no no


Speaker #

4091100143011043

43011044

430110454301104643011047

43011048

43011049

43011050


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

nonono

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



43011051 H yes speaking for City Council?

westlake valley 91361 split zip code between ventura and LA Co

yes keep conejo valley (crosses counties into calabasas) in same district

43011052 H yes homeowners association of santa Monica mts

yes support 1991 district ocean in south .

43011053 H c yes chamber of commerce santa clarita

santa clarita yes possibilites with Antelope Valley or south to Northeast san Fern Valley

43011054 H yes planning commissioner

thousand oaks

yes keep Ventura together except city of ventura should go with SB Co.; re Camarillo

43011055 H mayor of Camarillo

no camarillo yes joined with east Ventura Co - 1 mi to Th O 8 miles to Oxnard

43011056 H speaking for west H and Holly

no yes west holly holly taluka lake studio city beverly hills together

43011057 H yes work with neighbor councils in west valley also armenian national committee (in west valley branch)

grenada hills

yes describes West SF V west to Agoura Hills east to 405; describes why east and west valley are very different; keep west SF V together - dont split us up.


Speaker #

4091100143011051

43011052

43011053

43011054

43011055

43011056

43011057






gave list of cities no no

no no

no no

no no

no yes share water shed district police fire terrain

no yes recreational economic

listed cities to be together - grenada hills to encinoetc

yes yes social economic ties spoke after 58 on two types of Armenians others live east of 405 (sovient era ones)


Speaker #

4091100143011051

43011052

43011053

43011054

43011055

43011056

43011057


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no

no yes



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



43011058 H yes active in armenian community

grenada hills W SF V

yes keep W SF V intact; agrees with 405 divider do not? include santa clarita valley; like CD as is now

43011059 H yes mayor malibu malibiu no

43011060 pass no no43011061 pass no no43011062 pass no no43011063 H no Las Feliz

area of LAno

43011064 H yes mayor pro tem - santa clarita city

yes council request city and valley in only one district; realize need more pop for any district - pair us with Northern LA (Lancaster and Palmdale). East Ventura Co is good too water shed issues

43011065 H no santa clarita valley

yes SC Valley divided into several CD AD SD - please make it one

43011066 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100143011058

43011059

43011060430110614301106243011063

43011064

43011065

43011066






no no

no yes environmental issues come out of region up to calabassas all those other cities affect Santa Monica Bay water flows thru mailbu river

no nono nono no

Las Feliz West H Holly robertson sunset strip western northern boundary - Griffith Park southern boundary - Wilshire Blvd

no yes entertainment indust toursim

no no

ok to add East Vent Co simi valley etc. Talks about how Port Hueneme is deep water port thats products get shipped to Santa Clarita Valley - not sure if he include PH in COI or rec in district

160 118 5 going N no yes transport water shed open space

no no


Speaker #

4091100143011058

43011059

43011060430110614301106243011063

43011064

43011065

43011066


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

nonono

would hurt community to be split up

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



43011067 H yes castaic lake water agency board

yes board voted to request no split to Santa Clar valley specially Castaic Lake Water district - if have to grow move west with flow of water

43011068 pass no no43011069 H yes burbank vice

mayoryes keep burbank pasadena

glendale together43011070 H former mayor

glendale now with Airport.___?

no yes keep three cities together (for CD?) - see AD under cities


yes would like antelop valley but they have enough 126 corridor - with filmore piru 118 corridor is good too and one more proposal? (gave underlying commonalities for the proposals)

43011072 H no no43011073 H yes city of

calabassas Santa Mon Mt conservacy

calabassas yes La Virges area entirely with La Virges Water District school is within ____ district (not LAUSD) dont have fire dept (rely on LA Co for that) malibu river water shed; keep us together (4 cities below) Q connect with who? Santa Monica OR W SF V

43011074 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100143011067

4301106843011069

43011070

43011071

4301107243011073

43011074






no no

no nono yes many partnerships between 3

citiesfor AD glendaleburbank with los feliz atwater eaglerock

no yes gave list for 3 cities FAA

no no

no nowoodland hills calabassas agoura hills westlake village

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100143011067

4301106843011069

43011070

43011071

4301107243011073

43011074


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nono

no

no

nono

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



43011075 H yes leter from LA Co Sup

yes SD 23 is good likes the 1991 dist - it kept 3rd Sup district the same.

43011076 pass no no43011077 H yes calabassas

mayor pro tempyes start at border and go into

county dont cross into Ventura Co more common interests with W SF V than W LA also have common interests with malibu had recommendation for drawing santa monica mts is a COI

43011078 H yes on commmission commission

calabasas 33 yr resident

yes link with cities on west of LA Co and move east to as far as can in W SF Valley - use 405 as benchmark

43011079 H no agoura hills yes westlake village area and west valley Conejo valley and west SF Valley along 101

43011080 H yes topanga town council

topanga yes communities of Santa Monica Mts - council asked for Top to be with all communities that border it

43011081 H army yes activist port Huemene

ventura yes east county is totally different from rest of Vent co; conejo valley has integrity with agoura hills

43011082 H cook at Marriot Hotel

no downtown LA

yes pico union westlake and downtown are one community


Speaker #

4091100143011075

4301107643011077

43011078

43011079

43011080

43011081

43011082






no yes list of commonalities

no nono no

no no

tarzana highway 101 no yes Santa Monica Mt Reserve Area 101

topanga malibu calabassas agoura hills.etc

no yes santa monica mts

no no

no yes discusses social issues -crime redevelopment going on


Speaker #

4091100143011075

4301107643011077

43011078

43011079

43011080

43011081

43011082


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes letter from Sup and ltr re Santa monica mts (101not staying)

nono

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



43011083 H retired fire chief Glendale FD

yes now with another agency which brings 3 cities together (radio?)

yes 3 cities partnerships create need to have one voice in representation - also because they are Independent Citiesie not part of LA. Q what about east along mt range? A thats layout of fire district - again its independent cities. Q re current ADSD

43011084 H police officer in Glendale

no yes powerful working relationship with Burbank and Pasadena need to be together to cont that

43011085 H no chatsworth yes doesnt want to be in CD with Bev Hills or West Holly - that has resulted in no representation for him; has recommendations (ana has)

43011086 H no yes small towns in LA portion of SF V (Van Nuysetc) - nothing like those parts of the city across the hills

43011087 pass no no43011088 H HS teacher no NE SF

Valleyyes advocating for NE SF Valley

(also called the east valley) - dont want to be gerrymandered again - detrimental to working class; disagrees that 405 is distinct divider of differ pop (used to be more)


Speaker #

4091100143011083

43011084

43011085

43011086

4301108743011088






Glendale Burbank Pasadena no no

no no

no no

no no

no nogave highway boundaries for better CD and had map

no no


Speaker #

4091100143011083

43011084

43011085

43011086

4301108743011088


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



43011089 H no yes agrees with 88 west of 405 is ok (405 not sacrosanct there has been a spill over); go north to 210 and down to burbank blvd into N Hollyword to get pop for CD

43011090 H yes involved with succession

SF Valley yes down 405 to Van Nuys to 44 on east; keep 39th in tact as much as possible. 2001 undid 1991 and disenfranchised latino community

43011091 H yes non-proft to improve life of Latinas in SF Valley

San Gabriel yes 39 AD stick with - agrees with speaker 88.

43011092 pass no no43011093 pass no no43011094 H no burbank yes burbank and north holly are

the real Holly now - keep them together

43011095 H no yes santa Suzanna mountains include communities to south (chattsworth __) - map with neighborhood council boundaries; use them ( and gave suggestions .)

43011096 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100143011089

43011090

43011091

430110924301109343011094

43011095

43011096






no no

no no

no yes educational attainment and____ income level

no nono nono yes equestrian areas; doesnt feel

same connect to pasadena that others talk about - they are wealthier

entertainment agency

yes no

no no


Speaker #

4091100143011089

43011090

43011091

430110924301109343011094

43011095

43011096


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

nonono

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



43011097 H no Pacoima yes 39 AD in tact SD maintain too - its a COI problem is 20 CD - move it up to area north of San Fernando City

43011098 H no Northridge yes stay in SF V and not be connected with mts like in current AD

43011099 H started santa clarita

no santa clarita yes shows map of LA Co - Santa Clarita off by itself.- pair it with north SF V if went to Ventura it would be primarily white and Rep

43011100 H no santa clarita yes incl entire S Clar valley in own AD CD SD; go south to add to N. SF V

43011101 H valley girl or valley-ite

no yes provided map; use neighborhood lines split valley north south if have to?

43011102 pass no no43011103 H teach UCLA yes coalition - santa

monica mtsyes 1991 23 SD recognized the

Santa Monica Mt COI (Ads were nested) ; went a little east of 405

43011104 pass no no43011105 pass no no43011106 H worked in

diversity for years

no SF V resident 55 yrs

yes holding SF V in tact

43011107 H pastor works for LA Co

no yes Santa Clarita area - go east if have to or maybe south to SF Valley not west (Casiac be off with others communities )


Speaker #

4091100143011097

43011098

43011099

43011100

43011101

4301110243011103

430111044301110543011106

43011107






no yes wealth in North East valley put in CD to protect an incumbantcorrect this please

405 on east rosco on south corbin on west north city line

no no

no no

no yes converg of highways environmental concerns.

yes no

no nono yes protect mts is 1 issue in area

traffic patterns - roads that link

no nono no

gave boundaries V Co line Muholl Santa Susanna mtg Angele mts

no yes knows valley well and diversity all over not clustered like people say

no no


Speaker #

4091100143011097

43011098

43011099

43011100

43011101

4301110243011103

430111044301110543011106

43011107


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

nono yes

nonono

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



43011108 pass no no43011109 H no yes SF V draw lines that reflect

barriers to travel choke points bounds of resistance (political?); distinguish between high and low priority boundaries.

43011110 H child advocate Glendale Board of Ed member

no yes keep 3 cities together; split up between so many reps and are of no interest to them because of that

43011111 H no chattsworth yes topanga wants to stay together; chattsworth

43011112 H mortgage broker

no yes neighborh councils are helpful; use 405 as divider of Valley north and south boundaries; to make CD add to West Valley Calabasa Agoura and Th Oaks


Speaker #

409110014301110843011109

43011110

43011111

43011112






no nono no

no yes partnerships (between Sch Dist) with Burank and Pasadena has helped students; cities work together as well; Q Altadena schools? A Part of Pasadena Sch Dist;

no yes ag zoning horses santa Susanna state park open space to protect; chattsworth affinity with winnetka - need to be protected

yes no


Speaker #

409110014301110843011109

43011110

43011111

43011112


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

nono

no

no

no yes neighborhood council maps



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



43011113 H no calabassas yes very little in common with east and Valley - we incorporated to avoid the valley; calabassas agoura hills south to beaches because of water issues with Malibu; area concerned with Santa Monica Mts which incl Topanga; not so Th Oks - more w SimiMorpark

43011114 H works in Downtown for 25 yrs

no LA Basin; strong background in Downtown LA

yes 405 south of Holly to LA River together - one big family

43011115 H yes calabassas founder past mayor also works on Santa Monica Mts Conservation

yes Santa Monic Mts Conservation District be kept together (also the Las Virges school district)

43011116 pass no no43011117 H spoke in

Claremontno yes northcoast culture keep DN

Hum Mendo and Lake Co together certain district go to sonoma; agrees re greater topanga area; Re Santa Barbar; re malibu


Speaker #

4091100143011113

43011114

43011115

4301111643011117






no no

no no

no yes water sheds roads follow water open space climate change roads that transport us or dont; include west SF V??

no nono no


Speaker #

4091100143011113

43011114

43011115

4301111643011117


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes water sheds map L V SD map and ___ map Calabasas booklet.

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



43011118 H yes Arleta Neigh Council president

yes not similar to north holly ____; put with San fernando (area north east of Arleta) ; AD 39 as basis for new CD

43011119 pass no no43011120 H taught in La

Canadano La

Cresentayes fragmented in representation -

please resolve

43011121 pass no no43011122 pass no no43011123 H works for the

reporter - news paper

yes emergency response services

sunland Tujunga

yes part of SF V though LA didnt realize till Neigh Councils came into existance; need land use and economics ties to form districts not _____ this area with us

43011124 pass no no43011125 H no Granada

Hillsyes city and valley are worlds

apart; SF V doesnt need anyone -big enough; too many reps; keep it to west of the 405 freeway keep W SF V to 1 sd cd 2 ad. Make it easier for businesses

43011126 pass no no43011127 H no irwindale

baldwin park el monte

yes keep those three communities together (food business etc )


Speaker #

4091100143011118

4301111943011120

430111214301112243011123

4301112443011125

4301112643011127






yes no

no nono yes homogeneous commLa

Cresenta La Canada and La Cresenta part of Glendale Sch D

no nono noyes no

no nono no

no nono no


Speaker #

4091100143011118

4301111943011120

430111214301112243011123

4301112443011125

4301112643011127


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes info on Arleta - profile

nono

nonono

nono

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



43011128 H Generation Y no yes burbank north Holly La Tuna Canyon - cluster these three communities please; Q how far down into N hollywood - Hanson Canyon??

43011129 H no yes Inland empire community

50111001 pass no no50111002 pass no no50111003 H yes association of

realtorsyes keep santa clarita valley

together with SF Valley antelope valley

50111004 H no Ridgecrest Kern yes CD with ridgecrest west to city of Baker south to county line; preserve Kern Co build distrcits around Kern Co and go from there (LOL)

50111005 H yes former sup of Ridgecrest Sch Dist

Ridgecrest Kern yes Indian Wells valley pop; naval air weapons station owns lands

50111006 H no Ridgecrest Kern yes remain integral with county seat - Bakersfrield dont let district divide us from Bakers


Speaker #

4091100143011128

43011129

501110015011100250111003

50111004

50111005

50111006






no yes artist community night life hiking and biking in La Tuna Canyon

redlands beaumont calimesa Yucaipa Mentone together - impt to be together; Q; more assoc with cities to east or west of redlands A Probably west

no yes education interests white and hispanic

no nono nono yes valley communities tied together

through services medical senior housing

realtors work to maintain private land ownership

no no

no no

no yes ridgecrest relys on Kern Co govt services


Speaker #

4091100143011128

43011129

501110015011100250111003

50111004

50111005

50111006


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

nonono

no

no yes her letter and sons letter

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50111007 H youth no antelope valley

Los Angeles yes one antelope high school district one college same cultures use same mall listen to unique radio stations unique culture - help us stay that way

50111008 H teacher yes santa clarita city council person

yes council request that city of Santa Clar be kept whole in one AD SD CD; share common boundary with unincorporated area of Santa Clar Valley which will GROW Subdivison to be built. Ok to go north south west. (to the various valleys)

50111009 H no santa clarita Los Angeles yes Concerned with Santa Clarita Valley and keeping it whole - we are growing; dont rec Antelope Valley (too big and will take overalso different and mts in between) rather go with Simi Valley Porta Ranch Fillmore In Ventura Co.


Los Angeles yes keep our valley together because demographics weve had there are same as moorpark thousand oaks - dont want to go north


Speaker #

4091100150111007

50111008

50111009

50111010






no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100150111007

50111008

50111009

50111010


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50111011 H no yes S Clar Valley described S Clar Castaic Agua Dulce Acton; keep whole in an AD now 2; communalitiy in this area with piru fillmore porter ranch in Ventura Co

50111012 H no S Clarita Valley

Los Angeles yes SC Valley includes Val Verde; commonalities with Simi Valley Filmore Piru


Los Angeles yes keep SC Valley together


Los Angeles yes watershed is Acton to Castaic; keep us with Castaic if have ok to go into Vent Co.

50111015 H no S Clarita Los Angeles yes invisible line going between acton and palmdale community goes west to santa paula in Vent co.- want oblong egg shape district

50111016 H yes trustee on S Clar college district board - representing them today - has resolution from them

S Clarita Valley

Los Angeles yes concerned with splitting valley and splitting comm college district - have two campuses; want 1 AD CD; combined with N SF Valley go west to east Vent Co or east to acton?


Speaker #

4091100150111011

50111012

50111013

50111014

50111015

50111016






no no

no yes share water etc with Ventur Co areas mentioned

no yes share churces etc water issues Santa Clarita River water shed

no no

no no

no yes growth will be along I-5


Speaker #

4091100150111011

50111012

50111013

50111014

50111015

50111016


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes map and notes

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50111017 H no S Clarita Los Angeles yes wants AD to include all of SC Valley; ok to include east Ventura (to Camarillo ) and south to Grandada Hills Chattsworth; SD with Simi Valley and Thousand Oaks; CD with Antelope Valley ; does not want to be with Burbank or Bakers


Los Angeles yes geographically separate surrounded by mountains historically geo separate areas politically separate; keep our valley together bec of geographic and demog; ok to put with east Ventur Co??

50111019 H no Ridgecrest Kern yes keep tied in with Bakers and rest of Kern Co

50111020 H no Ridgecrest Kern yes why same district as Bakersfield

50111021 H film commissioner

no Ridgecrest Kern yes keep districts way they are

50111022 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100150111017

50111018

50111019

50111020

50111021

50111022






santa clarita no no

no no

no yes light ag like rest of Kern and water reg regulation by fed govt

no yes arts council culture tourism connect on Bakers rest of Kern Count 178 corridor includes bakersfield museums and more; nothing in common with Antelope Valley

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100150111017

50111018

50111019

50111020

50111021

50111022


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50111023 H yes ant vally board of trade and brings letter from another org

yes gave map to NB arrow head space shows area makes it easy for you give boundaries

50111024 pass no yes50111025 pass no no50111026 H armenian

hiker environmentalist

no burbank Los Angeles yes puts together armenian communities; AD 44 ? and new AD one should run along foothills to laverne; has SD and CD proposal too gave map

50111027 H yes ridgecrest chamber of commerce

Ridgecrest Kern yes maintain status quo - maintain county line; 22 CD goes into SLO Co not a COI with Ridgecrest as much as rest of Kern

50111028 H in navy yes china lake alliance; one of largest navy base in world

Ridgecrest Kern yes status quo please

50111029 H no Ridgecrest Kern yes dont feel underrespresented Changing our inclusion with Kern Co would be devastating

50111030 H no Santa Clarita Valley

Los Angeles yes Valley acton to piru; keep it whole - dont split us up put us in dist based in Camarillo

50111031 pass no no50111032 H talk show host no Lancaster Los Angeles yes one high-desert senate district


Speaker #

4091100150111023

501110245011102550111026

50111027

50111028

50111029

50111030

5011103150111032






no no

no nono no

Lavern; also list of cities to include G

no yes share churches comm org schools roads communities

no yes major transportation corridors so business 396 14 58

no no

no yes edwards brings lots into Kern Co

no yes water

no noCal City Mojave Rosemong lancaster palmdate

no yes distinct media market


Speaker #

4091100150111023

501110245011102550111026

50111027

50111028

50111029

50111030

5011103150111032


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes brought topo map to show on back table

nonono

no

no

no

no

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50111033 H yes LULAC Antelope Valley

Los Angeles yes keep us together in Ant Valley (not with Victorville SB Co?)

50111034 H yes volunteers (or works?)with school district and other orgs

Lancaster Ant Valley

Los Angeles yes current rep of Lancaster doesnt no represent our min interest VRA Sect 2 no vote dilution

50111035 H no juniper hills Los Angeles yes current rep is on other side of mountain want community in one SD

50111036 pass no no50111037 H lockheed test

pilotno antelope

valley OR aerospace Valley

Los Angeles yes Edwards AirForce Base approx 13K work on base many live in Lancaster and Palmdale; keep us together as antelope valley or aerospace valley

50111038 H yes LA Co Farm Bureau President

yes support Ant Valley Board of Trade AD Proposal (as did one before - test pilot)

50111039 pass no no50111040 pass no no50111041 H yes represents

renewable engery companies

yes high desert - palmdate to ridgecrest - COI socand Economically

50111042 H yes Ant Valley hisp Chamber of Commerce

yes keep distr intact - COI is hispan in Ant Valley

50111043 H no Ant Valley Los Angeles yes current CD goes to Ridgecrest support Ant Valley Board of Trade SD and good overlay of CD?


Speaker #

4091100150111033

50111034

50111035

5011103650111037

50111038

501110395011104050111041

50111042

50111043






no no

no no

no no

no nono no

no yes ground water issues being taken away from them by LA City and Co

no nono nono yes military aerospace renewable

eneg leader

no no

no yes underserved in engineering education - have to travel away; even though we are aerospace valley

high tech aerospace - dependent enginerring


Speaker #

4091100150111033

50111034

50111035

5011103650111037

50111038

501110395011104050111041

50111042

50111043


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

yes no

no

nono

no

nonono

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50111044 H urban and rural planner

no Juniper Hills Town Council

Juniper Hills unincorporated areas of Ant Valley

Los Angeles yes use school districts comm college district; recommends use of five guidelines of Kevin Lynch

50111045 pass no no50111046 H no Quartz Hill

unicorporated area of LA County

Los Angeles yes keep Palmdale Lancaster and Santa Clariat intact; population ideal

50111047 H geographer no antelope valley

Los Angeles yes tehacapi mts as a natural divider then ridgecrest stays with Kern; ant valley is distinctly differ ; if need to add go east

50111048 H attorney no rosamond Kern yes agrees with Ant Valley to have dist go up to Ridgecrest; look at Ant Valley Comm College district cause includes rosemond and other comun in SE Kern

50111049 H yes ant valley conservancy pres

30 yrs in Ant Valley

Los Angeles yes keep water shed community in same district (Ridge crest not in it)

50111050 H no yes CD 22 25 splits Lancasterwants Lancaster totally in CD 25

50111051 H worked in testing Edwards

yes Ant Valley Board of Trade (past president)

yes 2 high dessert AD - got cut off before finished describing


Speaker #

4091100150111044

5011104550111046

50111047

50111048

50111049

50111050

50111051






no no

no nono yes need CSU campus 2nd up on list

for itunemployment high

no no

no no

no yes water shed community

no no

no yes education water distrib transportation (working on rapid rail and )

active in aerospace national defense (plant 42 edwards)


Speaker #

4091100150111044

5011104550111046

50111047

50111048

50111049

50111050

50111051


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nominority district - Latino

no

no

no

no yes written presentation from other that was going to read - re lakes?

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50111052 H no simi valley - 40 yr resident

Ventura yes doesnt want to be with SF Valley Nothing in common - all of our services provided by Co COI with nearby towns Simi Valley divided up - not good

50111053 H no says lives across the street from Ridgecrest

Kern yes wants to stay with Bakersfield not go with ant valley (tho nice to be wanted); BRAC was nerveracking - got through it by state and feder representation. Dont break us up from rest of Kern

50111054 H yes audobon society Ridgecrest kern yes keep bird watchers together - keep with rest of Kern county

50111055 H no Ridgecrest kern yes part of Kern Co not bedroom community like Palmdale and Santa Clarita Valley not part of Ant Valley dont care about LA Co care a lot about Kern Co.

50111056 H no Phelan - unincorporated S Bern Co

San Bernardino

yes submitted proposed dist


Speaker #

4091100150111052

50111053

50111054

50111055

50111056






no no

no no

no yes keep bird watchers together

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100150111052

50111053

50111054

50111055

50111056


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no yes proposed district map



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50111057 H no Phelan San Bernardino

yes previous speaker submitted map for Victor Valley in your packet; have too much representation now please consolidate AD s (want one rather than 4 AD s); Ant Valley can have AD Victor Valley have one.

50111058 H yes Ant Valley air quailty district manager

yes even tho in LA Co more in common with Kern and San Bern Co; separated from South Coast air quality district; high desert is own COI more impt than county boundaries

50111059 H retired school principal

yes mayor ridgecrest Ridgecrest Kern yes connected to Kern want to maintain relationships with Bakersfield;

50111060 H yes chairman planning commission city of Lancaster though speaking as private citizen

Ant Valley since 1968

Los Angeles yes re greater Ant Valley - supports Ant Valley Board of Trade proposal

50111061 H no Ridgecrest Kern yes support two current AD SD CD in Kern county - keep us as is


Speaker #

4091100150111057

50111058

50111059

50111060

50111061






Victorville Apple Valley Hesperia (support map of 56)

no no

no no

no yes Bakers makes sure get back to us

no no

no yes a city in LA Co (not in Ant Valley) tried to dump waste in Kern Co - without regard to military base missions - bec trash farm located in Calif City - created bird problem


Speaker #

4091100150111057

50111058

50111059

50111060

50111061


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes ltrs from residents of three towns in SB Co (see cities) that support 56 map

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50111062 H retired school admin chamber of commerce

no Rosamond Kern yes Rosemond always supported by kern county

50111063 pass no no50111064 pass no no50111065 H no Agua Dulce Los Angeles yes agua dolce and acton - first to

have community standards district; continuous with Santa Clarita; Santa Clara river serves us and north east Vent Co; need to be kept whole

50111066 pass no no50111067 H no Boron SE

corner of Kern (1 hr to go anywhere)

Kern yes rather be with someone from Ridgecrest than SB Co; draw squares

50111068 pass no no50111069 H no Ant Valley BOT

memberAnt Valley Los Angeles yes support AVBOT map;

centralized SD in high desert 2 AD if Ridgecrest wants to be with E Kern use 58 corridor put wAnt Valley; Q go east if cant go north? A has more in common with us than northkern


Speaker #

4091100150111062

501110635011106450111065

5011106650111067

5011106850111069






no yes water system operational - semi tropic rosemond water bank

no nono nono no

no nono no

no nono yes common high desert issues

(common water table common air issues infrastructure supports each other travel corridors tie us together)


Speaker #

4091100150111062

501110635011106450111065

5011106650111067

5011106850111069


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nonono

noVRA offers protected not privaleged

no

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50111070 H no Rosamond Kern yes Rosemond SE Kern are PART of Ant Valley (Ant Vall is chevron shape bordered on E by Mojave River co line goes thru it Kern Co diag split by Tehach Mts); Ridgecrest part of Indian Wells Valley can stay in w Bakersfield if want to

50111071 pass no no50111072 H no yes take in geography; wants Ant

Valley together including outlying unicorp areas (Little Rock Quartz Hill Pear Blossom); up to Rosamond if wants to be with us

50111073 H yes neighborhood council

Leona Valley

Los Angeles yes Leona Valley (near Palmdale) part of Ant Valley


Speaker #

4091100150111070

5011107150111072

50111073






no no

no nono no

Green Valley Lake Hughes Lake Elizabeth are sister communities

yes yes communities listed share the same rural life; no interests in common with Santa Clarita water issue with Santa Clarita (they water our water) and no influence with them?


Speaker #

4091100150111070

5011107150111072

50111073


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

noread quote about Sect 2 wants to take minorities into consideration

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50111074 H yes MALDEF yes MALDEF will suggest state-wide plans for AD SD CD; AD 8 section 2 districts now- should be 9; SD and CD both currently 5 Sect 2 should be 6 in all cases this is the at least - they are looking for more

50111075 H no Quartz Hill Ant Valley

Los Angeles no

50111076 pass no no50111077 pass no no50111078 H yes Santa Clarita

Valley Boys and Girls Club director - reads letter from Board of Directors

yes keep in one district with Ant Valley (COI with two valleys below)

50111079 H no yes palmdale and lancaster in same district; needs get overlooked as part of large co.



Speaker #

4091100150111074

50111075

501110765011107750111078

50111079

5011108050111081






no no

no yes great place to live in high desert dont have big city probs fight amonst selves but want to stay together.

no nono nono yes provide safe place for youth in

both communities fight for stable and clean water supplies

non-profits like YMCA economic development issues similar economy

no yes climate unique aerospace industry unique economic hub of Ant Valley - people from mojave come here not from LA

no nono no


Speaker #

4091100150111074

50111075

501110765011107750111078

50111079

5011108050111081


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

ligitation in 2001 re vote dilution in different specific jurisdictions - still a problem in those areas; Q pls review VRA guidelines A ok

no

no

nonono

no

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50111082 H works for multi-media firm

no thousand oaks

Ventura yes keep east Ventura county together

50111083 H no simi valley Ventura yes eastern vent county has three reps..this is good to pick up rep agrees that Santa Clarity Valley would be good.

50111084 H no santa clarita Los Angeles yes 14 corridor- drive up and down - kids sports

50111085 H city council palmdale

no Palmdale raised in Boron - Victor Valley

Los Angeles yes Ant and Victor Valley share impt of development

50111086 pass no no50111087 H no santa clarita

valleyLos Angeles yes keep santa Clar valley and

Castaic area intact with Agua Dulce Acton together for AD; to get enough for AD go west to filmore moorpark simi valley and to N SF Valley (Grenada Hills)

50111088 pass no no50111089 pass no no50111090 pass no no50111091 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100150111082

50111083

50111084

50111085

5011108650111087

50111088501110895011109050111091






no yes same economic interests as santa clarita valley - good to add them in this tough economic times

no no

no yes moms driving kids to sports events - across 14 corridor all the time (santa Clarita and Ant Valley); can bring in north SF Valley too - we go there for community involvements with kids

no no

no nono yes hunting fishing mt biking etc;

museums parks open spaces



Speaker #

4091100150111082

50111083

50111084

50111085

5011108650111087

50111088501110895011109050111091


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

nono yes written text and maps

nononono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50111092 pass no no50111093 pass no no50111094 pass no no50111095 pass no no50111096 pass no no50111097 pass no no50111098 pass no no50111099 H yes College District

Dem ClubAntelope Valley

Los Angeles yes CD 35 34 of valley in it half of Lancaster is not; 36 AD - demographics have changed paired with Victorville they are conservative - redraw to represent the silent Demographic majority

50111100 H no no

50111101 H yes sierra toyota dealer

yes business perspective - this area is represented up to Tehachapi down to Acton bordered on south by mts down into Santa Clarita down into northern Valley into eastern Ventura Co ; can look at how aligned on a business level.


Speaker #

409110015011109250111093501110945011109550111096501110975011109850111099

50111100

50111101






no nono nono nono nono nono nono nono no

no no

no no


Speaker #

409110015011109250111093501110945011109550111096501110975011109850111099

50111100

50111101


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

nononononononono

no make playing field level - re parties; something about 1970s district.

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50511001 H mayor of chino hills

yes city of chino hills chino hills San Bernardino Co

yes chino hills and chino make up COI - keep together in same AD and SD (current split in AD and together in SD); keep us in SB Co not with LA Co except ok to be with Diamond Bar because share Asian pop.

50511002 H no Represents 5000 associates volunteers physicians from Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center - serve cities below; provide health care thru fed safety net program - serve Ponoma Valley; started by community 110 yrs as alt to going to LA for hospital

yes keep our community together; cities below; boundaries kellog hill to West 15 to East SG Mts to North 91 freeway to South


Speaker #

4091100150511001

50511002






no yes share same sch distr chamber of comm fire district library system water JPA sewer JPA purchase water from Metropolitan from same agency each have a shopping center across from each other regional planning agency for SB Co.

cont re social No interaction politically or socially with LA Co.

hospital serves pomona clarmont chino chino hills ontario montclair upland la verne San Dimas Ranco Cucamonga Alta Loma our community

no yes where we work (provide h care to P Valley residents- at hospital and often elsewhere in these cities)) nearly 75 live children to school play on sports teams belong to philanthropic orgs diverse ethnic religious cultural community


Speaker #

4091100150511001

50511002


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes testimony 05.05.11.A



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50511003 H teacher no pomona yes boundaries south of SG mountains san jose hwy 57 san antonio river; cities in Ponoma Valley from previous speakers; more in common across county lines; keep ponoma with cities to east (listed below)

50511004 H S (see extensive report) Eastvale Riverside County resident

no Eastvale Riverside Co yes keep Riverside Co intact; in 2001 county balkanized 6 AD 4 SD 4 CD (of which one one of each is within the county); carve out 4.702 AD 2.351 SD 3.115CD; make Riverside as a 5th pt of departure (after 4 Sec. 5 Counties)

River Co

50511005 H no Norco speaking on behalf of Pomona

yes defines Kellogg Hill (httpen.wikipedia.orgwikiFileKellogg_int_12252005.jpg - shows interchange of 57 10 and 71)

50511006 H no san bernardino lives in district 63 - very gerrymandered SB city divided into three AD 5963 and __

no keep SB city in one district add rialto (even tho lower income) and Fontana


Speaker #

4091100150511003

50511004

50511005

50511006






Pomona more in common across county line (cities to east ) into montclair chino chino hills ontario clairmont rather than to cities to west in LA Co (over Kellog Hill to Diamond Bar Walnut

no no unique traffic problem in Pomona because Pomona Valley monitors the same Air District

no yes In most districts share with other counties Riverside Co is a smaller portion of the population

Ponoma Norco are a COI across Kellogg Hill

no no in school days never concerned self beyond to kellog hill; went to Pomona - her community

SB Cty Rialto Fontana no no


Speaker #

4091100150511003

50511004

50511005

50511006


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes thick bound report with many maps

05.05.11.B

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50511007 H no yes wife of previous city of SB 310K - no reason to be cut up into 3 AD; keep SB Cty together

50511008 H CSU Northridge

no porter ranch - SF Valley life in Santa Clar SF Vallies - share a lot - also with Conejo Valley

no S Clar with SF Valley and Conejo Valley in one Senate part of SF valley for __ D

50511009 H no santa clarita Valley

no simivalley moorpark thousand oaks with Santa Clarita and porter ranch; keep east ventura San Clar Valley and north SF Valley together

50511010 H politically active attend city council mtgs in chino

no chino hills no supports mayors comment - keep chino and chino hills together - used to be togetherwhat happed? Q Connect with west (Diam Bar) or east (ontario montclair)? A east communs gel well w us but nothing wrong with Diam Bar its similar has Asian pop


Speaker #

4091100150511007

50511008

50511009

50511010






no yes SB Cty has majority-minority that needs to be kept together

no no share a lot (whole listhighways at end)

no yes share

no yes implied commonalities between chino and chino hillsnotthing specific see above re similar with towns to east west.


Speaker #

4091100150511007

50511008

50511009

50511010


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50511011 H no ontario no keep four cities in SB together (ontario chino montclair pomona) Q what about chino hills? A sure they r a little diff economically but do share sch dist

50511012 H no chino 100 yr old city (like pomona ontario)

no stay in 61_ D with Chino with Pomona Ontario Montclair can add RC or Upland

50511013 H no unincorp area outside temecula- French Valley

Riverside no __ CD goes way up (berman); temecula and marrieta and go outward in county FV with Tem Marr Mennefee; start in SW corner of co and get Tem and Marr grab FV Mennifee then ___ prob not Lake Elsinore; stay in co lines

50511014 H no health care org - talks about Ponoma Valley Hospital

no keep Pomona as cornerstone and with that Inland Empire;

50511015 H no city council mayor of hemet

no keep hemet and San Jaceno together; from there go menifee paris ___ neuvo winchester lists some places not similar.


Speaker #

4091100150511011

50511012

50511013

50511014

50511015






no yes same economic cultural interests in 4 cities - lots of back forth between cities (live in one work in other similar people)

no yes share school district with chino hills but resource dist not the same- she filed law suit ridiculed at CH city council; old cities share a lot has minority pop;

no no

no no all yuppies etc

hemet and san jaceno form community socially economically politically

no no sch district


Speaker #

4091100150511011

50511012

50511013

50511014

50511015


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50511016 H no simi valley ventura yes group simi valley with other similar towns; all Ven Co in one CD; Simi V Tho Oaks Moorpark Agoura Hills in one AD incl camarrilo to Porter Ranch

50511017 H no ventura no lots in common in east Vent Co not with LA?? Or adds west LA?

50511018 H citris farmer no city council mayor pro-tem for Riverside

Riverside no gives city boundaries (rivers); 2 sd 2 AD - no rep live in riverside. Please make city one 1 AD 1 SD

50511019 H no riverside (city council?)

no keep Riverside in one district; try to keep co in fewer as well; add corona?

50511020 H no works for (govt relations?) Chamber of Commerce riverside city

Riverside no keep city and county in tact as much as possible; dessert of Co with city; more in common with SD county (more than LA Co?) go west to rest of county (from city of R) to make AD; add corona get close to 450K; advocating against cross county lines

believes counties are COI because of service providers


Speaker #

4091100150511016

50511017

50511018

50511019

50511020






no yes tract homes raise family; not so much in common with west venturacoast cities

no no

Riverside many neighborhoods (Q pls describe? A diverse lists some and being carved up makes it harder for these neighborhoods. Q what add? A______

yes yes city is financially sound biz renisance

Riverside no no hwy interchange - hub of transp 4 colleges; health educ transpor safety - keys issues that need representation by one person

for SD CD go where? South and east.

91 freeway is their corridor no yes county because of service provisions


Speaker #

4091100150511016

50511017

50511018

50511019

50511020


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no yes ppt printed 05.05.11.C



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50511021 H no no agrees with 19

50511022 H no greater riverside chamber of commerce

no River Co should have no more than ___ of each Dist; keep intact Riverside county and cities of R Co.; not with SB Orange __ Counties

50511023 H no advocating for Pomona - home of LA Co fair great universities downtown rennovation

no dont fragment Pomona - its created problems not knowing rep etc

50511024 H no Pomona no keep Pomona how is now with Montclair Ontario?; keep working class communities together not with rich

50511025 H no no stay within county borders Inland Empire on some aspects (sportsweather) - most in common with SB not with SD LA OC

50511026 H no no use toastmasters district 12 (eq fault to .); division A - pomona valley Div B- ___ Div C____; division D - redlands to blythe;


Speaker #

4091100150511021

50511022

50511023

50511024

50511025

50511026






corona norco eastvale riverside for pop

no no norco used to be north corona eastvale got mail from corona - share a lot

eg of Co community cochella valley

no no

no no Pomona needs to be together for service provision

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100150511021

50511022

50511023

50511024

50511025

50511026


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50511027 H no riverside no Riverside with newly incorp areas uripa north paris valley to south ___ to east; currently not together

50511028 H no Lake Arrowhead

no San Bernardino Mt communities togethers ROW school dist divided between 2 Ads; closermore in common to cities in to south (redlands highland?) rather than in north

50511029 H no La Verne pomona valley for 30 yrs

no keep Ponoma Ont Chino Chino Hills Montclair together

50511030 H no moreno valley for long time

no support SB Co people; was fued with Riverside getting better but keep separate in districts;

50511031 H no moved from OC 25 yrs ago to Norco (I have copy of statement)

no interests in common with SB and rural Riv Co represent ok now NOT with OC


Speaker #

4091100150511027

50511028

50511029

50511030

50511031






Riverside Paris Marina Valley Uripa Valley

no no economics of 4 cities tied together and in competition with Ontariio etc

no no rim of world___ fireetc rim of world school dist

see above no no live in one city work in other

no no cochella valley dominates politics but not in same media area so dont get news get news from Chicago

no no rural ag life share


Speaker #

4091100150511027

50511028

50511029

50511030

50511031


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes maps of proposed districts

05.05.11.D

no

bec of demographics no

no

no yes testimony 05.05.11.E



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50511032 H no no current districts jump over mountains; proposes dist (long and narrow as seen on map); Q why left out some that would have lumped in? A didnt see them on my map; Q why so long? A cities at each end are connected county line rep can travel on 15

OC has didnt mind set

50511033 H no mayor Norco no enjoy good representation from state fed and county reps - he respects them; please represent city boundaries Riv Co boundary

50511034 H geographer GIS

no moreno valley

no agree county and city boundaries are impt; keep Morena Valley in one district

50511035 H no teach at Riverside City College - representing students

eastvale no keep riverside city together and then Moreno Valley is sphere of influence; put city of R and Moreno Valley together


Speaker #

4091100150511032

50511033

50511034

50511035






eastvale (used to be part of Miraloma) miraloma norco corona lake elsinore menifee temecula (Wildamar French Valley too - didnt see on map but would have incl)

no no

Norco Corona Eastvale share school district along hwy 15 corridorecon opport then cities to east of us

no no

no no

no yes colleges shopping by students from Riverside college in Moreno Valley


Speaker #

4091100150511032

50511033

50511034

50511035


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no start with 8 major metro areas (he lists) because have great pop and therefore more represent; will help avoid Packingcracking most COI will be taken care of

yes testimony 05.05.11.F

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50511036 H teacher no ontario yes chino pomona montclair ontario together; impt especially to keep ontario with ponoma because of leaders in ed system in Pomona.

50511037 H no rep family friends and Latino Board of ____ project?

Riverside City

no greater Riverside community (lists cities) get two Ads

50511038 H no R Latino Voter Reg Project

no River Metro area that previous speaker described; current AD to dessert is not good reps dont campaign here very little voting by Latino;

50511039 pass no no50511040 H no mayor of canyon

lake southwest River Co

no southwest R district

50511041 H no SB Co no dont cross into River Co if can because different; 2 AD in west SB Co (northern area fontana etc; other can include chino pomona (exception to not x county border); east AD _____; nest AD in SD; CD in west and east valley; (not chino hills right?)


Speaker #

4091100150511036

50511037

50511038

5051103950511040

50511041






no yes lives revolve across these 4 cities; ponoma teachers have been leaders for teachers in valley and advocate with legislators

Riverside city Morena Valley..(get list)

no yes lives across these cities

no no

no nocanyon lake lake elsinore ____ ____

no no listed these for the towns mentioned

no no


Speaker #

4091100150511036

50511037

50511038

5051103950511040

50511041


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes maps (same as 27- AGC presentation noted on maps) - thinks about 700K (for CD?)

05.05.11.G

no want fair redistricting

nono yes one page proposing

district with pop count and how comply with criteria

05.05.11.H

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50511042 H no westside action group - african-american redistricting coaltion for IE or SB

SB Co yes want 4 AD nested for Sen 3 CD; too many now wanting county in tact

50511043 H no temecula valley

no want reps on east side of mts in River and NOT with OC

50511044 H no river valley? Own map or map of other??

no agrees with 44?

50511045 H no moreno valley

no not with OC or SB Co that is not COIs; moreno valley split into 2-3 of each; use march joint? powers district

50511046 H no yes support 42

50511047 H no Riverside Board of Supervisors President

no resolution from Board - hope that wont have to cross county lines; given that AD is big - its simple - give reps chance to focus on issues and areas - use concentrated compact COI; finally giving voice to communities - great

50511048 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100150511042

50511043

50511044

50511045

50511046

50511047

50511048






Rialto and City of SB and .. AD no no

no no

peris no no

Riverside peris french valley? no no

SB Rialto ; go west into Fontana to get more pop

no yes school district - largest concentration of students outside LA Co and large concentra of minority student need to be together

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100150511042

50511043

50511044

50511045

50511046

50511047

50511048


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes will submit data

no

no

no

no

no need R reform at all level county state federal

yes Riverside Board of Sups resolution

05.05.11.I

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50511049 pass no no50511050 pass no no50511051 H no Riverside

City - 20 yrs before that Cochella V before that Moreno V

Riverside Co - 40 yrs

no moreno valley is divided current CD goes to OC county ; south edge of co banning area east to mts not cochella valley on other side of mts

50511052 H no chino R Co no mont ont chino together can add pomona

50511053 H no Riverside Cty since 2000 and 2 yrs in 80s

no provided maps; keep certain districts within Rivers Co. 2 AD in Riverside

50511054 pass no no

50511055 pass - left long handout no no

50511056 pass no no50511057 pass no no50511058 H no grass roots civic

organizationRiverside Riverside no dont want River Co chopped

up; like joining with Moreno Valley and March AFB not with Corona (not much in common with)


Speaker #

40911001505110495051105050511051

50511052

50511053

50511054

50511055

505110565051105750511058






no nono no

lists cities no yes community service needs biz

no yes hispanic montclair Ontario chino; if added chino hills then asians wont get representation; Ch Hills more in common with Diamond Bar etc

no no

no no

no no

no nono nono yes go to Moreno V for shopping etc

never with Coronashare March AFB three freeways with Moreno Valley; share freeway with Corona but thats a problem. When March AFB closed joint powers project formed.


Speaker #

40911001505110495051105050511051

50511052

50511053

50511054

50511055

505110565051105750511058


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

nonono yes testimony maps (same

maps as 27 and 37)05.05.11.J 05.05.11.K

no

adhere to VRA for Latino community

no yes testimony maps (same maps as 273751)

05.05.11.L 05.05.11.P

no yes LWV of Riverside Co memo with testimony

05.05.11.M

no yes testimony re COI many pages with maps and pops

05.05.11.N

nonono dont want funny

desribed districts - turtle turned upside down



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50511059 H no River River no impt of keeping all district within reasonable boundaries of River Cty and greater Riverside NOT OC (Madera Ranch - nothing in common with it)

50511060 H no jurupa valley

no eastvale is more like OC; we are rural types and have working class communities have golf course; please keep our city together in districts

50511061 H no disclosure riverside co republi central comm opened comm to run for state assem- so does have self interest admittedly though speaking as a citizen

Riverside Cty

no R with woodcrest jurupa valley etc another one in west (lake elsinore); central riverside county seat with moreno valley

50511062 pass no no50511063 H no jurupa

valleyno COI with moreno Valley

(hospital college traffic ct same traffic problems)

50511064 pass - left handwritten note

no no



Speaker #

4091100150511059

50511060

50511061

5051106250511063

50511064

5051106550511066






no no

incorporated a few towns to make city of jurupa valley eastvale was a yr ahead of us

gives borders of new city - jurupa valley highways and a river

no no

no yes socio-economic similarities in his proposals

no nono no

no no

no nono no


Speaker #

4091100150511059

50511060

50511061

5051106250511063

50511064

5051106550511066


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

nono

no yes wrote note on back of handout page re non-citizens

05.05.11.O

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50511067 pass no no50511068 H election

worker in rialto RC

no rancho cucamunga (lived in Ontario and Upland too)

no commonalities with ontario upland little bit of fontana (anything north of baseline or foothill she says later - was open area before); seen a lot of growth over years; keep 4 cities together; great area for children safer than LA;

50511069 pass no no50511070 pass no no50511071 pass no no50511072 pass no no50511073 H no River Comm

Colleg board of trustees - just left

Riverside since 1971

no River City shares similarities with Mareno Valley to be better served represented; Q which town split to get an AD? A dont want to answernot much over; Q what about each as own AD and combining for SD? A disimmilar if go south on River

50511074 H no Riverside since 1951 off and on also lived Imperial co Sonoma Co

no Riverside jurupa. Pedley; undecided about eastvale but connect it before corona; for moreno valley.?; for east R cohas lots in common with Imperial imperial has as much in common with R Co as SD Co.


Speaker #

409110015051106750511068

5051106950511070505110715051107250511073

50511074






no nono yes open area latino (fontana part

and RC)

no nono nono nono nono yes talks about a school dist; Latino

pop

little mt area divides us from _____

no no


Speaker #

409110015051106750511068

5051106950511070505110715051107250511073

50511074


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

nono

nonononono

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50611000 H city council member Santa Ana

no Santa Ana City no maps with proposed CD from ___ Cook; OC kept whole (with only exception at south end) Santa Ana kept whole (to allow to elect Latino)

OC is own COI break border once if have to on south end

50611001 H no OC Business Council works for

no

50611002 H no Orange City mayor

no OC little 3 million very dense geographically; Orange is ___ people; keep OC whole; Orange city now has 4 AD please reduce; north OC cities have a lot in common; agrees with Cook proposal that speaker 0 showed.

50611003 H no Laguna Beach

no provided map (Laguna Beach etc)

50611004 H no Water District of Orange County - provided to water to 6 counties hes elected to a district in water district with 4-5 ADSDCD each

no


Speaker #

4091100150611000

50611001

50611002

50611003

50611004






Santa Ana no yes county latino voting

no no

north cities (Placentia) no no

no no lifestyle and culture - tied to land and sea committed to nature working with biz; Q why? A used whole cities around open space

yorba linda le habra no no


Speaker #

4091100150611000

50611001

50611002

50611003

50611004


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes map 05.06.11.A

no want compact dist with clearly drawn boundaries.etc.

no

no yes testimony and 2 maps

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50611005 H no OC Asian Pacific Alliance - part of CAPAFR - has handout

no

50611006 H acct no CAPAFR with handout represent Korean Community

OC no

50611007 H former state Leg for parts of OC; frustrated with SF Bay Area getting more of state

no no LA should have 14 CD no more no less keep districts within counties

50611008 H no South Asian Network - CAPAFR with handout

no map of south asian communities in so LA Co and Nor OC

50611009 H no Vietnamese American Community of Southern CA CAPAFR - has handout

no see map of Little Saigon Garden Grove Westministier Fountain Valley parts of Santa Ana Midway City and Stanton


Speaker #

4091100150611005

50611006

50611007

50611008

50611009






no no API community - Korean Chinese

small biz - 63000? Asian-owned biz

lists cities with most Korean pop and adds cities to make up pop

no yes

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100150611005

50611006

50611007

50611008

50611009


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes CAPAFR handout text and map


no yes calculation of of districts for So CA counties





Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50611010 H (see org below)

yes Santa Ana LULAC President

yes retain Santa Ana in AD w S Anaheim SW Orange W Tustin; an AD anchored in flats of Anaheim plus portions of stanton and buena park with similar demogr; SD is a central OC district with these two AD nested in it; one CD must incl Anah Santa Ana

50611011 H no Vietnamese-American Community

no little saigon 9 sq mile highest concentr outside Vietnam;

50611012 H no OC yes want max of AD SD CD within OC; anaheim is now 5 AD; AD centered in anaheim and adds part of Stanton etcanother AD and nest into a SD; gave report

50611013 H no Le Habra 61K Latino? - 7 sq mile

le habra north OC yes 7 sq mi split up in ; wants La Habra in district with OC rather than LA Co and with other heavily Latino areas.

50611014 H no V ACOC - CAPAFR org - one page no map

yes keep little saigon together G Grove Westmist and surrounding areas

50611015 H no APALC - provide data to support previous CAPAFR speakers

no summary of CAPAFR requests ie keep Westminister G Grove Fountain Valley together


Speaker #

4091100150611010

50611011

50611012

50611013

50611014

50611015






Santa Ana flatlands of Anaheim SW Orange W Tustin parts of Stanton and Buena Park

Santa Ana River as boundary (west of river? In particular town?)

no yes COI in Central OC Santa Ana is heavily Latino and Span speak (75 of each) immigrants community working class families young population cultural festiv for Latino commun; higher propensity to vote by Latino youth; something re colleg district?;

social interest cont. Buena Park and Stanton is mixed pop of Latino Asian (13 Latino 13 Asian 13 white) we get along well; Anaheim and Santa Ana linked by blue collar immigr pop w high of Sp speakers young aver age common health concerns

chapman warner beach blvd ___ santa ana

no no

no yes working class committee

no yes Latino

no yes

no no


Speaker #

4091100150611010

50611011

50611012

50611013

50611014

50611015


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

Latinos need representative from community in congress bec now against immigrants; if split two cites for CD then working class in with affluent district and voice diluted

no yes Santa Ana LULAC testimony

no

no yes bound proposal stats and maps

no

no yes CAPAFR handout just text

no yes CAPAFR demographics supporting proposals



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50611016 pass - but CAPAFR left his testimony

no no

50611017 H no south coast chinese cultural association (SCCCA) - CAPAFR org with 2pg handout

Irvine no Dont divide Irvine Irvine with Tustin and North Tustin

50611018 H no santa ana no done well having Santa Ana and Anaheim together in CD?; keep that want nesting of 2 AD in SD

50611019 H no Inter Community Network

no ok to cross county border for Artesia and Cerritos to get Asian pop

50611020 H no mayor of westminister - vietnamese community - handout

yes VRA possible 2 Latino in OC __ Asian in OC; dont cut little saigon

50611021 H no westminister - vietnamese community

OC no dont cut up little saigon

50611022 H vietnamese refugee

no council member from city of palm valley? Or westminister? Represents Little Saigon

no keep Little Saigon together; Qwhat add? A go to Fairview in Santa Ana (viet-own biz there too)


Speaker #

4091100150611016

50611017

50611018

50611019

50611020

50611021

50611022






no no

no yes chinese community interests

no no largest minority pop in OC Santa Ana diverse and county seat

H Heights Rowland H Diamond Bar together as well; dont support GG and West together?

no yes Asian pop

no no

Westminster Fountain Valley no yes common school district

GGrove Westminster and Fountain Valley

no no joint biz district between 3 cities over 5000 vietnamese-owned biz


Speaker #

4091100150611016

50611017

50611018

50611019

50611020

50611021

50611022


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes CAPAFR handout just text


no

no

no yes flash drive with maps word docs excel file

no

no yes print out of 20 flash drive material



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50611023 H no Asian Peach Officers Association

no keep Little Saigon together (he defines it)

50611024 H no school board in westminister

no Keep Little Saigon together (definesincld Mid City inside Westminister)

50611025 H spoke in Long Beach ran for office but not speaking cause going to run again

no no keep Long Beach together

50611026 H no Neighbor Housing Service of OC

no support sensible comm-based district - current generally do this have them retain intact as much as possible

50611027 H actor previous marine corps

no NW corner of Santa Ana - on Homeowners Ass

no maintain santa ana and anaheim together for state separate for congress ( to make districts more competitve)

50611028 H no housing council 47th CD north orange co

no OC is 20 Latino but 13 to more Latino in individual cities

50611029 H no yorba linda 65K pop

no asian amercian community; keep North OC together;

50611030 H yes works in Garden Grove

no Korean Community Vietnamese Community mix well; dont separate two communities


Speaker #

4091100150611023

50611024

50611025

50611026

50611027

50611028

50611029

50611030






no yes splitting up would be like splitting up chinatown in SF; pop culture etc

G Grove Westminister no no

LA River to ___ River on east Ocean on south

no no

lists some no no

no no

no no transport pop economic social needs (have a synergy of all these)

chinese-amer concentration Irvine Tustin Newport Beach

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100150611023

50611024

50611025

50611026

50611027

50611028

50611029

50611030


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no draw fair and reasonable boundaries

yes

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50611031 H planning commission city of stanton in touch with working class comm in OC

no born and raised in santa ana last 7 yrs in Stanton

no keep Santa Ana and Anaheim together and include us in stanton - small city to be split up Go into the 47th

50611032 H no Garden Grove 16 yrs came to america in 95 (from vietnam)

no 2001 redist fragmented Vietname community - no voice in state leg or congress keep us together

50611033 H no no keep West and GG in same CD

50611034 H 1975 came to usa

no Little Saigon communt develop org - founded L S

no keep little saigon in CD?

50611035 pass no no50611036 H vietnamese

refugeeno no little saigon has grown; keep

GG West and surrounding Viet communities in same districts

50611037 H vietnamese community

no no dont divide GG and Westm.

50611038 H from mexican in 1980s

no santa ana yes keep Santa Ana and Anaheim together (no more borders for him please) - keep Latinos together to elect one of own


Speaker #

4091100150611031

50611032

50611033

50611034

5061103550611036

50611037

50611038






no no

no no

no yes demograph house size median income needs re lang and culture of Asian community voice for Asian community

GG West part of Santa Ana no no

no nono no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100150611031

50611032

50611033

50611034

5061103550611036

50611037

50611038


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no yes AFF map of vietnamese born pop

nono

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50611039 H no Lake Forest - 27 yrs

no

50611040 H no huntington beach

no doesnt like CD 46 (current district)please keep it in OC; use Santa Ana River and ___ as natural dividers; coastal district seal beach to newport beach to make an AD; bottom line keep huntington beach whole and there are three options

50611041 H mayor pro temp

no placentia city placentia yes keep cities whole for admin purposes; keep county-comingling to mini; keep coastal separate from include (eg. See park system); 4th pt?__________

50611042 pass no no50611043 H no cerritos safety

committeecerritos no keep area together (see cities

below)

50611044 H 1990 from Vietnam

no Vietnam Association of So CA in westminister

no wants chance to have viet-amer elected to office


Speaker #

4091100150611039

50611040

50611041

5061104250611043

50611044






Lake Forest connected to Irvine not connected to northern SD Co Also more tied to coastal areas (Laguna Newport); camp pendelton is buffer

no yes kids go back and forth scores are similar

no no

no no

no noartesia buena park cerritos la palma and cypress cross county line into west anaheim

no yes diversity? Coyote problem shared between these communties

GG Westminster no no vietnam pops in GG and Westm and growing - need to keep Viet-Am communitie in these two cities together


Speaker #

4091100150611039

50611040

50611041

5061104250611043

50611044


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

nono

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50611045 H no simi valley? Grew up in santa clarita valley

no keep east Ventura with Santa Clarita and not with Topanga and Malibu (beach cities are very different)

50611046 H no Garden Grove

no keep Viet-Amer community together GG Westm and Fount Valley

50611047 H no La Palma yes La Palma Cypress Cerritors Buena Park together; if need more go south to Stanton ___ Seal Beach

50611048 H public school teacher

no no former rep - supports his proposal?; water district person - only one on South Co - its important; doesnt agree with coastal-inland split because of water shed - rain affects everyone downstream

50611049 S - passed but left handout

lawyer Santa Ana

no Santa Ana - 10 yrs

Orange yes do not split Santa Ana between AD or SD



Speaker #

4091100150611045

50611046

50611047

50611048

50611049

5061104950611050






no no

no yes kids school citizens and voters

no no

no no

no yes Santa Ana is vibrant diverse low-middle calss predominantly working class strong Hispanic presence substantial new immigrant presence (His Asian) sign of young urban professionals buying homes in the city

no nono no


Speaker #

4091100150611045

50611046

50611047

50611048

50611049

5061104950611050


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes proposed map with COI

no

differs from much of OC which is more upper inc concentrated upscale white collar and prof workers and biz.

no yes testimony described in this record

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50611051 H represent sister and mother

no Chattsworth yes keep Chattsworth with Simi valley etc

50611052 pass no no50611053 H no Anaheim no compact eq pop (dont allow

more than 1 deviation); keep nor OC intact and not include with LA or ___ Co; Orange with Anaheim Nor OC would make great AD

50611054 H no laguna hill no try to keep south OC together; not like current CDs not with Riverside; impt for south OC to keep deviation low to get equal representation; Q what is So OC? A Laguna Hills Laguna Beach to San Clemente to SD Co border inland up to Lake Forest

50611055 H Vietnamese no no please do not split up Viet-Amer (GG and Westm together)

50611055.5 H mayor Santa Ana (not supposed to be testimony but talked about OC)

no Santa Ana no


Speaker #

4091100150611051

5061105250611053

50611054

50611055

50611055.5






no no

no nono no

no no

GG Westm no no viet radio telev etc

no yes most bus traffic in OC in Santa Ana; OC is not homogenious areas with in OC that have commonalities


Speaker #

4091100150611051

5061105250611053

50611054

50611055

50611055.5


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nono

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50611056 pass - left after coming up to speak 4 times and each time being asked to wait for something last time for mayor

no no

50611057 pass no no50611058 H no Garden

Grove works in anaheim

no anaheim is split up too much split it into working class (vs hills wealthy) keep more ethnic groups in anaheim and Santa Ana together; use hwy 55 as barrier; keeping working class together

50611059 pass no no50611060 H no anaheim

hillsno districts within city limits and

county limits; complains about current AD; have us represented by someone within our local communities and not a broad swath across.

50611061 pass no no50611062 pass no no50611063 H no San

Clemente - we are OC not San Diego not Riverside

no san clemente san juan and dana pt in same district have been divided freq but do a lot together (packet handout)

50611064 pass no no50611065 pass no no50611066 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100150611056

5061105750611058

5061105950611060

506110615061106250611063

506110645061106550611066






no no

no nono no

no nono no

no nono nono yes camp pendelton divides us (from

SD) use I-5 as divider 6 COIs on handout - she mentioned parks and Capistrano USF

no nono nono no


Speaker #

4091100150611056

5061105750611058

5061105950611060

506110615061106250611063

506110645061106550611066


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nono

nono

nonono yes two page testimony

and 3 maps

nonono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50611067 pass no no50611068 H no council

member?costa mesa no submits plan for whole state

Consistent with 1991 ct plan

50611069 pass no no50611070 H represent self no Santa Ana yes

50611071 H no yes provide two pager - peunete hills north boundary; Pts out prob with CD 42 (not contiguous because no one drives from on pt to another); later asked to provide more - he said hes trying to print maps.


Speaker #

409110015061106750611068

5061106950611070

50611071






no nono no No Co ver So Co- main

difference is different Water supply; agrees south of Irvine is border between Nor and So

no nono no

no no


Speaker #

409110015061106750611068

5061106950611070

50611071


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

nono yes three maps and 2

pages of stats

nono doesnt know the

pecking order of COI vs city county that CRC has chosen; but believes COI is more impt than city boundaries cause cities have lobbyists to protect themselves

no yes two page testimony



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50611072 H no Huntington Beach

no keep H Beach toget; currently gerrymander - connected to Anaheim - not a natural connection lists two togethers; keep beach cities together (even Seal Beach tho missle between us to costa mesa newport beach ok not up to Cyp); keep GG and Westm toget;

50611073 pass no no50611074 H comm college

district boardno orange no

51211001 H spoke in Norco (4 there)

no Riverside Riverside yes do not break up desert communities which are a COI possible Imperial too


Speaker #

4091100150611072

5061107350611074

51211001






ok to go to Fountain Valley no no

no nole sel in Orange is natural div line for COIs west of newport is COI look at school dist lines (Orange USD incl. Orange Villa Park Anaheim Hills); anaheim hills part of Anaheim but many city council members live in hills so flatlanders are underrep

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100150611072

5061107350611074

51211001


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nohave several minority groups to protect careful that COI not competing against each other - but thinks you can do it

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51211002 H mayor catherdal city chochella valleypalm springs biz community

no Chocella Valley 9 cities and lots of incorporated area desert hot springs palm springs thousand palms bermuda dunes (santa rosa area) sky valley indio indio hills garnet catherderal city cochellaunicorported area therma mecca

yes Keep Riverside Co intact and respect county lines not imperial county - not similar to palm springs not same tourism have with monuments

51211003 H no yes 1 CD 2 AD 1 SD with east Rivers Co and Imperial Co - provides packet


Speaker #

4091100151211002

51211003






no no water districts? (west of washington one east of washington one); school districts?

cochella valley share manufacturing solar etc - no govt shared with imperial valley

no no commonalities of imperial and cochella valley ..health care


Speaker #

4091100151211002

51211003


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes packet



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51211004 H no Diamond Bar City Council mayor pro-tempe also League of CA Cities SCAG

diamond bar

LA Co no diamond bar chino hills brea lots in common - shop in the others

51211005 H no French Valley between Hemet and Temecula unincorpt Winchester

no maintain communities of interest and county lines; riverside should have 3 (700K size) districts (based on pop ); south and east

51211006 H no no


Speaker #

4091100151211004

51211005

51211006






57 60 no no 57 60 freeways congested - share massive transport headache with OC; asian high in these cities - asians will have voice in east San Gabriel Valley

no yes a list ( ) of commonalities in his area; dissimilarities with desert that is over mountain

no no


Speaker #

4091100151211004

51211005

51211006


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no dont district politically - reform gerrymandering - get to purity of districts rather than political; goes thru criteria eq pop good vra goodcity county line good dont use COI - that will help you not be political



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51211007 H no Indio Cochella Valley

no Cochella Valley in E Rivers Co is interrlated with Imper CoValley - Salton (Q how far? A work with kids all the way to El Centro) Q is Imperial Valley all the way from cochella to Mexican border? A yes agree with that

51211008 H retired prof san diego state

no Palm Desert

no cochella and imperial valley share geography (saltan trough)

51211009 H Rivers Co Supervisor

no Rivers Co Board of Sups

bermuda dunes

rivers no Board of Sups requested that Riverside Co stay in tact Cochella Valley is a COI unique one

51211010 H no Desert Cities United Community of Interest

Rancho Mirage

no keep Cochella Vally together and dont add in Imperial Co; Q connection to North or West more than Imperial? A yes they are more similar Rivers Co is best but ok to go into south SB Co.


Speaker #

4091100151211007

51211008

51211009

51211010






no yes chochella valley provide school for Imperial Valley - bussed; two valleys have same needs

agricultural base

no no geography retirement draw ecological disaster of Saltan Sea (now 2 reps need one); water supply geothermal energy balancing old and new economies; health care issues (Q share facilties? A; need more sharing by putting two valleys in one district)

agricultural

no no Ch V transport system . Q geothermal asked of previous A under Saltan Sea - if resolve sea problem will get solar and geothermal energy to pay for it.Q what add to make third SD? A; Imperial Co

Cochella Valley Economic Partnership

no no geographically compact share tourism solid income bedroom communities high retirement


Speaker #

4091100151211007

51211008

51211009

51211010


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

very different from Imperial Co and its ag interests - different living standard border issues . (dilute Imperial Valleys interest if put with Cochella V

no 1 vs 5 COI are not ethnicities only shared econ or social interests



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51211011 H no Palm Springs 20 yrs

no cochella valley into 1 AD like were in 91 now split in 2 AD; add banning and beaumont to cochella valley to make an AD dont group with Imperial co - different

51211012 pass no no51211013 H city council

member Palm Springs

no palm springs city council

yes CD 44 is too big geographically - hard for one person to represent; most closely related to Imperial Valley - draw lines from Cochella to Mexican border

51211014 H no city of moreno Valley?

moreno valley

yes carved up now; keep city of morena valley whole; Q who partner with? A close relationship with Perris

51211015 H no San Fernando Valley - reading letter for her friend

no East Ventura Co is COI; thou oaks oak park simi valley camarillo agoura hills in one district

51211016 H no catherderal City SCAG

no washington st as border for ___; banning-beaumont pass is border for ___; will email his comments

51211017 H no Indio yes keep cochella valley whole; indio is separated now; stay with West River Co rather than Imperial Valley - go West


Speaker #

4091100151211011

5121101251211013

51211014

51211015

51211016

51211017






no yes ____? tourism - vs ag of Imperial Valley

no nono yes share Salton Sea; when big one

hits will be unable to get over San Jacinto mts to LA Rivers etc. will be cut off from Riverside;

no yes with Perris (schools March Reserve Air Base)

no no

I 10 hwy 86 boundary is CA-60banning beaumount is where Coch valley ends

no yes solar and wind geothermal in imperiial valley

three economic groups

I10 ieads us no no rail system being consider CBAG govt partners CVAG? economic partners


Speaker #

4091100151211011

5121101251211013

51211014

51211015

51211016

51211017


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes testimony?

nono

no

no yes letter

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51211018 H volunteer with LGBT youth

no LGBT community for Cochella and Imperial Valleys

yes keep Cochella Valley and Imperial Valley together; 1 cd 2 ad 1 sd

51211019 H offered to speak in Eng or Spanish

no no East Riverside Co(Cochella Valley pala verde valley (north past Blithe brawley east to colorado river) and Imperial co together

51211020 H doctor - ER - Eisenhower Hospital Sr Ass Dean at UC Riverside School of Medicine (new?)

no health access org - for Cochella Valley (Coachella Valley Health Initiative)

grew up in city of coachella

no combine E Rivers Co with Imper Co

51211021 H yes Riverside yes Ass mem doesnt represent us; Co needs 3 AD - include Imperial Valley in one

51211022 H yes calexico Imperial yes support speakers 3 8 13 20 not 10; Imperial Riverside more similar than San Diego

51211023 H law professor for 4 decades till recently

no La Quinta no


Speaker #

4091100151211018

51211019

51211020

51211021

51211022

51211023






no yes needs of LGBT youth similar ( health (AIDS ed treatment) economic ___ )

Blithe included I10 no yes issues of immigrants brought different ethnicity together; education needs protect water supply (being taken from SD and LA); expand energy fix Salton Sea; Q more on immigrants? A all over these areas if in Imper Valley shop in Indio vs in San Diego

high employment poverty pockets homelessness

no yes Cochella Valley needs more health care capacity in safety net not enough physicaians Imperial Valley has same barriers (if not worse) both different from W Rivers; similar drop out rates; most watched tv station in valleys is Univsion; Q re immig?

same socio-economic between two valleys

no no

no yes ethnic groups latinos (not as many in SD)

no no


Speaker #

4091100151211018

51211019

51211020

51211021

51211022

51211023


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

better to be together in districts to serve LGBT (youth espec)

no

no

no

no

latinos need representation no

no where u have a chance to make competitive districts should do itwill reduce voter apathy



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51211024 H take care of disabled mother not a lot

no Riverside Co - over 20 yrs

no keep lower inc cities (Cochella La Quinta) together and not with Palm Springs Rancho Mirage

51211025 pass no no51211026 pass no no51211027 pass no no51211028 H no Calimesa yes realize that Rivers goes from

Color River west to 9 miles from Pac Ocean; Cala Mesa belongs with Yucaipa even thou its another county - beaumont and banning want Cala Mesa but better with Yucaipa; Q to add? A go north west

51211029 H renter that was foreclosed on retired social worker speaking on behalf of low income people cause not here

no no

51211030 H no Indio yes reps dont represent her; include Indio in Cochella Valley group of cities (not with San Diego border cities like Calexico)


Speaker #

4091100151211024

51211025512110265121102751211028

51211029

51211030






no no home care public services not being supported by current reps

no nono nono nono yes Q what are similiaries? A

bedroom communities elderly vs Redlands with more investors?

no no foreclosure crisis binds all of So Ca and Cochella Valley

no no


Speaker #

4091100151211024

51211025512110265121102751211028

51211029

51211030


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no thnx for coming here not all of us have to travel to Sac

nononono

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51211031 H did census PR for three counties (Rivers Imperial ?) - but had to haggle with fed govt to get help with Imperial Co - typical of what goes on in eastern Cochella Valley

no UFW cochella valley

no need Cochella Valley with Imperial Valley

51211032 H no La Quinta no agrees with last speaker and gives more detail on what to keep and not

51211033 H no Palm Springs

no keep comm as desert community (use mt pass at BanningBeaumont as dividing line) - will see growth of Saltan Sea area as gets fixed bus line (sun line) is busy fr Desert Hot Springs down to up from Thermal or Mecca - lots of travel updown this area

51211034 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100151211031

51211032

51211033

51211034






no yes social needsprobs in east Cochella Valley - people in Rancho Mirage dont see this

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100151211031

51211032

51211033

51211034


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51211035 H - testified in Norco community activist

no works with hispanic latino voter reg drives

moreno valley

yes keep Moreno Valley intact with Riverside and Perris

51211036 H no mayor pro-temp of Moreno Valley - very populous city (21st in CA); today speaking as resident

Morena Valley

yes keep Moreno Valley in tact now cut up need one distr (state level); keep Riverside Co together as much as possible - huge growth; dont put us with city of Rivers tho we r similar because we are growing so can go south and Perris etc

51211037 H no Cochella (office) - Baker Corp - renewable energy applications; travel through the 3 valleys

no three valleys together (Coch Pala Verde Imer)

51211038 H no cathedral city

no 2 proposals spoke of tonight EastWest vs NorSou?;geography says link Coch to Imperial Valley - NS vs EW; coch valley ends when dont see scrub and sand; sep from River and W Rive Co


Speaker #

4091100151211035

51211036

51211037

51211038






no no health care recreation facilities transportion in common; March Reserve AFB - Joint Powers shared between these communities

add Perris Temecula Winchester San jacinto Murrieta

no no transportation public safety long established COIs in Riverside Co WRCA (West River Co Assoc of Govt)

3 valleys no no suburban with agric high latino high unemployment

hwy 86 corridor unites counties no yes 86 corridor unites NS


Speaker #

4091100151211035

51211036

51211037

51211038


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes maps

no

help to unify the three valleys to address issues and saltan sea

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51211039 H no City Commissioner for Indio

Indio yes do feel represented as Latino

51211040 H retired military flew

no cochella valley

no

51211041 H no city of San Jacinto vice mayor

San Jacinto no got area into one supervisorial district want to be in one state-level distr too (not split like in some proposals from Norco); Q Beaumont or Menifee more similar to? A ?

51211042 H no city of Desert Hot Springs far western edge of cochella valley

no use geography - stop at mts to get to San Diego and mts to get to ____

51211043 H public defender in Indio

no Palm Springs

no coche and Imper valleys into one district


Speaker #

4091100151211039

51211040

51211041

51211042

51211043






no no

no yes habitat and species very specific within cochella valley (not Imperial Valley); have own transportation hwy airports; own health care system own education system (college?)

tourism is 1 industry NOT agriculture; agr in Imperial Valley and San Diego

215 is border no yes utlities school districts all same in that region; history unites this area

citris and __

no no utiltites Imperial District - power for east Coch Valley another one has power for west Coch Valley water districts too desert builders assoc mosquito abatement district - has several representatives

4 prisons 2 in each county - each employ 1000 people

no no moreno valley very different from cochella valley(and Imperial valley) water issue here in coch


Speaker #

4091100151211039

51211040

51211041

51211042

51211043


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51211044 H - 44 is last given yes city of Cochella mayor pro-temp

cochella - larges city in Coch Valley- 110K residents

no cochella valley COI with imperial county

51311001 H no ramona (36500 pop approx)

san diego yes 92065 live in unicorp area (ramona) of San Diego Co 3 AD 2 CD 1 SD; should be one of each

51311002 H no Econdino yes current split 2 AD splits up school district people work in one AD and live in another unite Escondido and keep with inland communities

51311003 pass no no51311004 H - read letter of friend no chattsworth LA yes chattsworth and porter ranch

very similar to simi valley moorpark thousand oaks - areas around Santa Susanna mts make a perfect district - ok that crosses counties


Speaker #

4091100151211044

51311001

51311002

5131100351311004






no yes young minority pop; water rights to Color River - historiclly had foresight to get water rights - st 2nd and 4th; Q Native-Amer? A several tribes (mentions 4) - mostly Cuea(?)- agua caliete too (P Sprngs) two tribes (?) have intermarried

agr is key - saving grace - if not for it unemply much worse; renewable energy - wind solar geotherm develop saltan sea - econ green engine to harvest renew energy potent of saltan sea; water is key - have Colorado River water rights- have to fight for

no yes ag fruit trees growing winery

no yes inland communities very different from coastal Encondido relates to inland agr

no nono no


Speaker #

4091100151211044

51311001

51311002

5131100351311004


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes maps on hard board of existing districts

no

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51311005 H no simi valley grew up in SF Valley (Chattsworth)

Ventura Co yes Chattsworth and Porter ranch are like Simi Valley Thou Oaks Moor park - and are not like other SF Valley cities (which are industrial) - please put those cities across co lines into a district

51311006 pass no no51311007 pass no no51311008 H no ____near

San MarcosSan Diego no


Speaker #

4091100151311005

513110065131100751311008






no no

no nono nono no


Speaker #

4091100151311005

513110065131100751311008


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nonono look at pop growth;

look at northcounty times - 2 editions inland and coast - shows different communities; something about open primary and none of the above and something about heritage re numbering dont have to start at top even tho count from top



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51311009 H no hidden meadows

yes like Escondido but never in district with it - please do that. Q what other areas? A valley center bansel similar rural to hidden meadows; she identiifies with Escondido San Marcos (where shops) does not identify with Murrieta Temecula

51311010 H no yes san marcos vista fullbrook oceanside(?) together

51311011 H no yes keep coastal communities together - oceanside to del mar but not like abomination have now

51311012 H no Fallbrook San Diego Co

no

51311013 H no member of AAPI group

oceanside San Diego yes oceanside san marcos carlsbad san marcos; keep these north county cities together and NOT with orange county

51311014 pass no no51311015 H no oceanside yes oceanside san marcos

carlsbad vista share a lot (tri-city area); not as much in common with Escondido


Speaker #

4091100151311009

51311010

51311011

51311012

51311013

5131101451311015






no no

no no

no no

no no

no yes API - oceanside 23 inc in API Latino increase too white black decreased; Qwhy for COI? Aothers want to answer more than her

no nono yes share hospital districts use major

hwy corridor overlapping school districts regional planning (San DAG?) is for those areas together separate from Escondido she thinks


Speaker #

4091100151311009

51311010

51311011

51311012

51311013

5131101451311015


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no bunch of philosophysomething about parents of fallbrook and school

no

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51311016 H no oceanside yes make county border (between OC and SD Co) district lines; hwy 78 corridor district; hwy 15 cooridor makes COI that is partially in Riverside Co; Q Camp Pendelton yours or San Clemente in OC? A its mostly ours

51311017 H no poway San Diego Co

yes keep Poway intact and add cities below

51311018 H no rancho penasquitos

no

51311019 H no oceanside; lived in area 20 yrs

yes keep oceanside vista carlsbad and san marcos together

51311020 H no hidden meadows (actually kind of part of escondido)

SD yes 4 similar cities (oceanside _________)


Speaker #

4091100151311016

51311017

51311018

51311019

51311020






no no

poway mira mesa ___ ____ranch bernardo

no yes Sikh community - professional educated temples in Poway and Escondido other South Asian communities COI

Rancho Pach Poway carmel valley ___ scripts ranch

no yes APA community - military is economic source for this community also stores; Q what else? A new hwy 56 unites carmel valley and poway

no yes kids go to school in one or the other one mall in these cities and escondido mall is far away

no yes CSU San Marcos serve these cities large Latino pop in each cities(38-78)


Speaker #

4091100151311016

51311017

51311018

51311019

51311020


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51311021 H no mayor oceanside San DAG board

oceanside yes SAN DAG considers north county Del Mar to Camp Pendleton vista from inland to make north county coastal district; north county inlad its own AD

51311022 H educator researcher national Latino research Center here on campus

yes san marcos yes 78 corridor (san marcos oceanside vista escondido)

51311023 H no Vista yes Vista and other cities on hwy 78 make up north county community

51311024 pass no no51311025 H no Tea Party Patriot vista yes east county (drew district at

RAS on Euclid); get 3 AD all within SD Co

51311026 H yes tea party of poway chair

poway yes proposed districts (though mentioned labelling problem- same as maps from 25?); carlsbad to del mar east of poway and up to escondido but not including it.

51311027 H no yes district 66 he calls his proposal hwy 15 etc


Speaker #

4091100151311021

51311022

51311023

5131102451311025

51311026

51311027






no no

no yes Latinos almost 50 of the pop in these cities

san Marcos is now vibrant

no yes diversity Latino is 26 of North County majority of Vista and other cities; low education level among parents

poverty

no noI 14 ocean east border of county

no yes vista has great social problems not representation

no yes common demog of educ lang range of inc citizenship; respects criteria outlined in CRC materials

no yes all rural - farming - land and water issues


Speaker #

4091100151311021

51311022

51311023

5131102451311025

51311026

51311027


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

Latinos have struggled to get adequate representation

no

no yes testimony

nono

no yes proposed maps and petition of 25 people supporting them (who he asked to stand)

deserve to be together and one strong representative

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51311028 H have FAS and cant drive-use public transportation SSDI

no carlsbad born on ____ Indian reservation

yes public transit board director must ride public districts

51311029 H psychatric nurse

no vista? yes oceanside san marcos vista fallbrook - make one district hwys 78 76 and 5 on coast

51311030 H no San Marcos group concerned with K12 funding

San Marcos yes san marcos - needs voice to get better school funding

51311031 H no oceanside yes keep cities together (listed below)

51311032 H no vista - live 50 yrs and work as optometrist there

yes camp pendelton down to fallbrook? East to hwy 15; Q include rainbow? A yes Q why not Carlsbad? A hwy 78 defines area

51311033 H no works in Poway

yes keep together poway san marcos carmel valley mira mesa (cultural hub for API- where food products are) and ____?; Q pls submit map? A yes will submit tomorrow


Speaker #

4091100151311028

51311029

51311030

51311031

51311032

51311033






no yes lots about bus system in ramona - access to public transit; public

no yes only one hospital that is overwhelmed by gang-related ER patients

no yes imbalance in school funding with cities lumped in with; need for remedial eduction; housing problem resulting from school problems? If dont fix schools will get ghettos

vista fallbrook oceanside (check list ??) Q what else? A; Carlsbad Bonsel Valley Center

sprinter and coaster for transit hwy 78 and 76

no no

no no

no yes API in north city of San Diego carmel Valley San Marcos; care about education; similar econ social interests


Speaker #

4091100151311028

51311029

51311030

51311031

51311032

51311033


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

if together in one district - would get fair allocation of federal and state funds to help health care access issues

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51311034 H no volunteer to help API youth prevent gang violence

paradise hills?

yes paradise hills bay terrace and east national city together - API mostly Filipino

51311035 H lawyer no san marcos yes keep san marcos whole and in district where it has a voice

51311036 H analyst for city retired; worked on partnerships worked on census

yes COPOW? - filipino organization

chula vista - 41 yrs currently in east CV - planned community - __ Ranch

yes south bay area of SD county keep east CV bay terrace and east National City and ___? together as much as possible

51311037 H teacher no mira mesa earlier poway military housing (90s)

yes COI from speaker 18 mira mesa curney mesa rancho __ Rancho ___ and ___

51311038 H no Oceanside Chamber of Commerce President

oceanside whole life (7K to 100K)

yes different from OC go more to south riverside (temecula); Oceanside very much like carlsbad vista (tri-city areaall the same)


Speaker #

4091100151311034

51311035

51311036

51311037

51311038






8th St included in National City no yes API - culture unites etc.

no yes API is __ of San Marcos (especially filipino) educational hub of north county - colleges school district one of best in county

no no

no yes filipino americans - culture unites - stores churchestemples socializing centers

no no


Speaker #

4091100151311034

51311035

51311036

51311037

51311038


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51311039 H no North County long time oceanside long time now san marcos

San Diego no can deal with co issues?

51311040 H no yes keep cities and communities together no safe political districts not gerrymandering keep within 1 not 5 america first not ethnic groups

51311041 pass no no51311042 H no oceanside yes agree no gerrymander agree

with mayor to keep coastal communities together oceanside carlsbad down to encinitas and would like to include vista and san marcos because share school districts (in tri-city area)

51311043 H no carlsbad taught at CSU SM and other places

yes oceanside san marcos escondido vista together have large latino community put north carlsbad in even though not high latino.

51311044 H latina no latino redistricting group

san diego and lived in past in Imperial Co

yes keep border communities together - extension of ??


Speaker #

4091100151311039

51311040

5131104151311042

51311043

51311044






no no

no no

no nono no

no no

no yes latinos and growing diversity of regions


Speaker #

4091100151311039

51311040

5131104151311042

51311043

51311044


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

nono

no

important no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51311045 H prof CSU SM no yes propose Escon San Marcos Vista oceanside (not carlsbad? Cause not same SES?) would make perfect AD; Q what pop cut out? A hard to say

51311046 pass no no51311047 H no Encinitas -

many yrsyes link encinitas with carlsbad __

beach rancho __ millionaires too

51311048 pass no no51311049 H CSU SD

facultyno SD Co yes imperial county has needs we

(CSU SD) need to serve so ok to cross border; Q part of Nor Imper Co to cut off? A not much pop above Brawley anyway but below Brawley import to keep with San Diego; Q whole Imper Co? A sure as long as border part w SD

51311050 H no NALEO redistricting coordinator for SD?

San Diego County

yes respect COI of SD County please; Q border district? A says yes?

51311051 H no yes poway school district should be kept together in one district (lots of area - she lists communities)


Speaker #

4091100151311045

5131104651311047

5131104851311049

51311050

51311051






no yes share 78 and sprinter; latino community - cultural educational diversity socio-economic status

no nono yes encinitas has many communities

but we are all the same

no nono no

no no

no yes poway school district


Speaker #

4091100151311045

5131104651311047

5131104851311049

51311050

51311051


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nono

nono

no

no do 1 vs 5



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51311052 H no rancho bernardo tea party

yes why is Rancho Bernardo in 3 CD (its 27K pop)?? Should be in one. Feel excluded by APA community - how they talk about what they want..why?

51311053 H no valley center rural area at north east county

yes dont use unicorporated as filler; lists communities bonsa.etc

51311054 pass no no51311055 H was on City of

SD R Committee in 2001

no yes all Imper Co with south San D for CD

51311056 pass no no51311057 pass no no51311058 H no culver city LA co yes Westside is very active

poltiically - break three ways west of 405 north of 10; one south of 10; one is bordered mulhulland

51311059 pass no no51311060 H no encinitas yes agrees with earlier 2 speakers

keep esconidido inland keep oceanside coastal; san marcos with escondido; keep oceanside with Camp Pendelton Encinitas Solana Beach


Speaker #

4091100151311052

51311053

5131105451311055

513110565131105751311058

5131105951311060






no no

no yes rural agr etc

no nono no

no nono nono yes Q why around these city

centers? A transportation hospitals gang in each area (LOL); tried to draw state lines

no nono yes military tie of oceanside and __;

water district shared between oceanside and ___;


Speaker #

4091100151311052

51311053

5131105451311055

513110565131105751311058

5131105951311060


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

noVRA districts in Imp Riverside etc

no glad to have citizens vs politicians drawing lines

nonono yes maps? Proposal - talks

about submitting a state plan

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51311061 H no Escondido SD Co yes keep us with san Marcos Vista and Oceanside and maybe either Carlsbad or Basal

51311062 pass no no51311063 H prof at CSU

SMno yes escondido san marcos vista

oceanside and possibly? Carlsbad as COI

51311064 pass no no51311065 H no escondido

all lifeyes inland district vs coastal district

for North County; coast camp pend to del mar 15 corridor for inland

51311066 H no encinitas yes agree 47 60 funky beach towns belong together; Q what about oceanside? A belongs with 78 corridor BUT with bigger CD and SD all should be together; Qnorth county? A; yes we are not San Diego so North County should be together for bigger distr.s

51311067 H no city of escondido elected official

escondido yes keep 4 cities together (see below)


Speaker #

4091100151311061

5131106251311063

5131106451311065

51311066

51311067






no yes Latinos are majority in escondido are not represented not getting elected when run - why need to be together.

no nono yes seen great demog and economic

changes in this area; big festival across the street - cultural corridor between these areas.

no nono yes reinforce 60 - between

Escondido and San Marcos affinity for years and years dating across HS same hospitals college districts public cemetary district utlities emerged together;

carlsbad encinitas del mar __ highlands carmel valley fairbanks banch rancho sante fe

pay attention to City of SD neighborhood designations - have strong affinities

yes yes funky beach towns work in high tech and ____

escondido vista san marcos oceanside

no yes water district Latinos


Speaker #

4091100151311061

5131106251311063

5131106451311065

51311066

51311067


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nono

nono

no

increase odds for latinos to be elected (shes first elected in Escondido in 100 yrs)

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51311068 H no escondido yes keep escondido intact dont go south to border go east-west (east? or west (?))

51411001 H no mono yes trans-sierra AD either side of sierras hwy 80 and hwy

listed eastern sierra mountains counties; handout provided Q Inyo Co? A not so much (more desert) except Bishop is in COI with us

51411002 pass no no51411003 H no El Centro Imperial yes border community of interest

nothing in common with Riverside Co except Cochella Valley; imperial relation to border connects it to san diego

51411004 H yes Pastors on Point Redistricitng Latino and African-American

no

51411005 H yes org serves international refugees from Africa Carribean (TACRA)

yes chula vista san diegoEast of I15 to el cajon ___ ____


Speaker #

4091100151311068

51411001

5141100251411003

51411004

51411005






no yes cultural ties that run East-West rather than North-South;

no yes choose to live in mountains committed to mountain lifestyle

tourist-related economy

no nono yes go across border a lot for cultural

events

San Diego - AD 78 79 no no

no yes refugees need services that are affected by redistricting


Speaker #

4091100151311068

51411001

5141100251411003

51411004

51411005


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

nono

no yes handout

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51411006 H yes TACRA too - welcome refugees at airport get them into services(training jobs ESL get CA state id etc.) - orient them to the country; Tabernacal African-Carribean Refugee Association

yes AD 747576

51411007 H yes TACRA yes refugees reside in city heights downtown city of SD along 15 to el cajon down to chula vista __ to national city

51411008 H yes TACRA (the person which the speakers before say will answer all questions)

yes as others said understand impt of redistricting for refugee community

51411009 H no simi valley yes cities of Vent and LA together


Speaker #

4091100151411006

51411007

51411008

51411009






no yes counseling job placement health care

no no

no yes 40 of pop of San D 31 of workforce

Chattsworth Porter Ranch Santa Clarita Simi Valley Thousand Oaks Camarillo Oakpark moorpark??

no yes lots in common and NOT with towns as go west to Santa Barbara Solivang


Speaker #

4091100151411006

51411007

51411008

51411009


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51411010 H - letter read no west hills yes westhills porter ranch westake village agoura hills simi valley? thousand oaks??

51411011 H sudanese community

no yes sudanese live in ___ parts of San Diego

51411012 H sudanese - spoke twice before

yes Nine Cities - services for refugees

yes city heights north park el cajon

51411013 H no lemon grove

yes keep assembly district 78 and CD 59 because good for us

51411014 H yes Karen Foundation of San Diego represent people from Burmese

yes adams ave I 15 university 805 S 38th? - 56th St?

51411015 H yes Karen Foundation of San Diego - Karen is ethinic group from Burma

yes city heights 30th 61st (same as before); need to be together in district

51411016 H yes somalia community of San Diego - second largest Somalian community in USA (after twin cities Minn.)

yes mostly live in city heights area


Speaker #

4091100151411010

51411011

51411012

51411013

51411014

51411015

51411016






no no

no yes unemployment because of lang accent discrimination - need jobs for community

no no

no no

no yes ?

no no

Q what streets? A ________el cajon blvd 7th st

no yes most live under poverty line and all the needs related; like to live together to help each other


Speaker #

4091100151411010

51411011

51411012

51411013

51411014

51411015

51411016


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51411017 H yes SCAPL - Asian Law org

San Diego yes AAPI in south bay (nat cty chula vista bay terrace and ) north ( rancho panecitas ) __ area

51411018 H CSU - SD prof yes org for health of filipino

chula vista? Or paradise hills?

yes national city is hub of filipino life

51411019 H no yes maintain SD and Imperial county in one district; 2 AD ok -like having 2 Ass members Q split Imperial into North and South? A no all of Imperial with

51411020 H no rancho panesquitos

yes API in ___ Rancho PRanch _ Poway carmel Valley together

51411021 H no san diego yes linda vista (W of 63 East of ) - vietnamese pop; city heights el cerrito __ ___east of 15 north of 94 along el cajon and university

51411022 H professor and binational

no yes border culture

51411023 H worked with UFW

yes promote hispanic vote and election

calexico yes dont change districts(AD SD CD) - they have worked for us like being with san diego more than would like to be with Riverside; if had to take out? A take out of Riverside Co (Mecca for one of the districts)


Speaker #

4091100151411017

51411018

51411019

51411020

51411021

51411022

51411023






no no

east Nat Cty Paradise Hills Chula Vista

no yes ?

no yes very interconnected - lives go between two counties ( gave lots of exs one was boyscouts joint county org)

no yes

no yes shopping center with Vietnamese owned biz

Vietnamese lower income

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100151411017

51411018

51411019

51411020

51411021

51411022

51411023


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

Latino VRA? no

no

API need voice no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51411024 H yes vice mayor City of Nat Cty

national city yes COI of Nat Cty put with Ch Vista and South Bay communities of San Diego

51411025 H yes APALC - data to support API proposals - re CAPAFR San Diego

yes API communities (on handout)

51411026 H teacher in __ school district works with filipino community

no Chula Vista yes paradise hills bay terrece chula vista alta vista and ___ - Filipino area; keep Filipino other API community of South County together

51411027 H yes tea party patriots of OC?

Orange County

yes Orange County as COI OC should have 6.5 AD and only have 5

51411028 H yes something re latino

yes AAPI paradise hills etc ( ); Q what add? A some townsarea; ok to split chula vista sn National City? - AAPi live in east Ch Vista and eas Chuia vista

51411029 H yes same as previous?

orange county

yes talks about capistrano school district; keep school districts together in general

51411030 H no carmel valley

yes APA; scripps ranch poway ___ ______


Speaker #

4091100151411024

51411025

51411026

51411027

51411028

51411029

51411030






chula vista and south bay communities of San Deigo - Coronado and Imperial Beach could be added for s (after Q)

no yes cultural events lower education levels

no yes common interests in area and divergent interests from other specific areas (Rancho Sante Fe was one)

no yes filipino - many navy families

no yes share school district media contiguous area

805 is westeast divider of Chula Vista 8th ave (or 805?) in National City

no no

no no

curny mesa (lots listed) no no


Speaker #

4091100151411024

51411025

51411026

51411027

51411028

51411029

51411030


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

to get entreprise zone easier with one rep rather than 2

no

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51411031 H no island in the hills - tierra sante (official neighborhood of cty of San Diego) - 32K pop and split into 3 AD (767778)

San Diego Co

yes put whole community into one AD and one SD; gave proposal

51411032 H phd in planning study demographics

yes works for non-profit studying demog

yes proposed maps of swaths of diversitytrapestry (maps posted on internet)

51411033 H yes workers council for 2 counties

yes border COI

51411034 H yes latino . yes 2 counties and border community; draw from south of state so we arent left overs

51411035 H outreach coordinator for Census- increase count of latino

yes Latino Redistricting Committee

grewup Calexico lives in San Diego

yes CD SD join Imperial and San Diego and for AD join Imperial and Riverside; Q how do we nest? A thats more for you than for pop; Q how far go up? A Indiocochella valley


Speaker #

4091100151411031

51411032

51411033

51411034

51411035






gave hwys streets as borders no yes ?

no yes diversity

no yes unemployment jobs

no no

no yes latino; for CD better to join border counties AD good to join with Cochella valley


Speaker #

4091100151411031

51411032

51411033

51411034

51411035


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51411036 H no yes if dont have San D with Imper Co then lose raceethnic districts or else these communities will be joined with north and not ever get elected.

51411037 H no national city yes San Diego Imperial County

51411038 H no no

51411039 H no yes 4 cities stay more with San Diego rather than with Imperial; Q what about other areas inbetween? A 4 cities show area but he means general area

51411040 H no raised in Imperial now in San Diego

San Diego Co

yes Imperial Co and San Diego Co very intertwined; keep them together - especially the south bay part of San Diego to not dilute LatinoLatina vote.

51411041 H yes San Diego Latino Redistricting Committee

yes keep San Diego Imperial Co together for minority empowerment


Speaker #

4091100151411036

51411037

51411038

51411039

51411040

51411041






no no

no yes share community colleges state colleges boyscouts; also need two counties linked to ever get Latinos elected

no yes minority retirees paid off home bought in 60s and minority in own neighborhood as others are naturalized citizens

lakeside santee el cajon ____ no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100151411036

51411037

51411038

51411039

51411040

51411041


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no something about federal VRA and 1 person1 vote

no

no

some of your ques answered by looking at VRA

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51411042 H no Imperial (city of)s

Imperial Co. yes two counties inter-connected - keep together when draw maps

51411043 H no city of Imperial

Imperial Co yes Imperial Co depends on San Diego Co - keep together

51411044 H yes works w filipino youth in nationality city paradise hills bay terrace

grew up paradise hills

yes keep API together in three areas (NC PH BT)

51411045 H no yes re city heights and oak park - large vietnamese pop; existing AD - Viet community in 2 please put in 1 AD

51411046 H yes COPA yes national city is hub of filipino keep API together in BT PH CV and NC?

51411047 H yes pastors on point united Af-amer latino redistricting committee

yes proposed maps will be submitted but wants to make a point; looked at AD 78 79 and reconfigured

51411048 H Product of imperial valley city planning active advocate for communities

no yes SD 40 stay as is; connect 77 79 and 80?; keep SD and Imp Cos together


Speaker #

4091100151411042

51411043

51411044

51411045

51411046

51411047

51411048






no yes work in one live in other recreate in other; historical link; Imper Co work play depends on San Diego Co.

no yes go to San Diego for better medical care

no yes Filipino cultural festivals

gave boundaries hwys and streets

no yes cultural events etc

no yes ?

no yes collective desire to improve life ethnic groups livework well together

no yes strong family ties across mexican border and county border; medical services survival needs


Speaker #

4091100151411042

51411043

51411044

51411045

51411046

51411047

51411048


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51411049 H no yes move northern boundary of 78 to La Jolla area include UC; chula vista with south bay; then those two could be SD; wants CD to be more central San Diego

51411050 H no yes keep chula vista united with historical barrio district

51411051 H yes Latino Redistricting Committee

sherman heights (one of 5 parts of) historic barrio district

yes keep historic barrio district intact and be united with chula vista and imperial valley

51411052 H yes Pan Pacific Law Enforcement Association (API Police Officer association; Lao American Coalition (advocacy for Lao community) one of co-founders of each

SD co - over 30 yrs

yes two temples located in different AD (one in AD76 one in AD 78 please put in same AD (something like 78 now)


Speaker #

4091100151411049

51411050

51411051

51411052






no no

no no

no yes cultural events

mid-city and city heights area from email this area in one district Chollas View Neighborhood consisting of E of Freeway 805 S of Freeway 8 and N of Market St

gave district s and will email them

no yes 2 temples serve as centers of social cultural relig gatherings of Lao community Eng and non-Eng speaking; if neighborhood described in one district puts Lao with Southeast Asian and E African Refugees w whom share common interests


Speaker #

4091100151411049

51411050

51411051

51411052


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

respect VRA no

no

do not divide the refugees and immigrant community of interest in city of San Diego

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51411053 H no yes support of Latino Redistricting Committee plan - keep boundaries that work for us take into consideration local redistricitng groups

51411054 pass no no51411057 pass no no51411058 H no chula vista

on 805yes he has more in common with

west chula vista than east

51411059 pass no no51411060 pass no no51411061 H no Coronado SD Co yes recommends how to change

53 CD and make it a strict coastal district



Speaker #

4091100151411053

514110545141105751411058

514110595141106051411061

5141106251411063






no yes Imper Valley and San Diego interconnected chicano movement evolved etc

no nono nono no

no nono nono no

no nono no


Speaker #

4091100151411053

514110545141105751411058

514110595141106051411061

5141106251411063


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nono

ask for VRA to be honored that gains latino made as community are respected and allowed to advance.; realign 78 AD and 79 AD - allow latino to maintain electibility (in 78?)

no

nonono

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51411064 H no Del Saro community of San Diego

yes traffic congestion where 128 and 5 merge; all in AD would be great

51411065 H yes east county community action org

yes east county do NOT lump us in with Imperial Co.

51411066 pass no no51411067 pass no no51411068 pass no no51411069 H no yes Ventura Co camirillo Thou

Oaks moorpark simi valley very similar and if need more include santa clarita not with Oxnard and coastal area of Ventura; San Diego Co. consider economic drivers

51411070 H no Lemon Grove

yes lemon grove - consider factors below when draw lines

51911001 H yes group in SJ Co private sector hospitals etc

San Joaquin yes brought maps to show you

51911002 H with speaker 1 presenting the maps w ppt

yes San Joaquin yes all of east SJ Co in one AD rest of co goes into AD with CC Co; next slide is CD proposal but out of time


Speaker #

4091100151411064

51411065

51411066514110675141106851411069

51411070

51911001

51911002






gave borders no yes CSU SDiego is a hub

gave list (lakeside alpine decanso credit el cajon el mesa

no yes equestrian rural

no nono nono nono no consider economic drivers -

military in San Diego

no yes multi-ethnic no majority large immigrant pops struggling middle class

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100151411064

51411065

51411066514110675141106851411069

51411070

51911001

51911002


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

nononono

no

no yes ppt with maps of proposed districts

05.19.11.A

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51911003 H yes Sac City speaking on behalf of city manager

Sac Sac yes city should be in one CD

51911004 H no North Auburn

Placer yes AD 4 excludes Auburn Auburn in AD 3 with Nevada CityGrass Valley which dominates; AD line should be county line; submits maps all 3 distr along county lines ADplacereldorado counties intact take out Apline Co keep sch sup districts in tact

continued SD 7 counties on nevada border (Modoc - Mono) plus plumas and yuba CDModoc Lassen Plumas Sierra Placer El Dorado and part of Butte

51911005 H census supervisor in El Dorado

yes vice chair of group of sierra club

cameron park near Shingle Springs

el dorado yes mountain redistricting plan submitting next week; el dorado hills cameron park shingle springs in with rancho cordova; rochlinroseville similar to citris heights orangevale


Speaker #

4091100151911003

51911004

51911005






no yes vibrant collection of cohesive neighborhoods community orgs meet with city regularly; big challenges ahead- flood protection transpor system - best served by single voice in Congress

no no

cameron park shingle springs ___ hills; separate from Roseville area and LincolnRochlin??

no yes widespread COI of in Sierra (So LT to chico) tourism agric wine grapes apples

distinct rural area in eastern Placer see soc interest is very diff from more suburban area in western Placer and western El Dorado; eg disagree over water - build auburn damn (congressmember for Auburn against)


Speaker #

4091100151911003

51911004

51911005


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes letter from city manager

05.19.11.B

no yes proposed three districts and handwritten note explanations

05.19.11.C

no yes Mountain Redistricting Plan map of 5 proposed AD

05.19.11.D



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51911006 H lawyer used to be Public Defender for Yolo Co

no west sac office in davis previous public defender for Yolo in Woodland

Yolo yes include Yolo Co as part of I-80 corridor (rather than I-5 corridor) pair with Solano Co with which have historic ties; mistake to go north and pair with Colusa Glenn Butte Yuba

51911007 pass no no51911008 pass no no51911009 H commissioner

on adult and aging commission Sac Co

yes representing AAPI community in Sac (not Commission above); council of asian pacific islanders together for advocacy and leadership CAPITAL - CAPAFR

yes elk grove and west sac in same district for API community

51911010 H yes filipino org - active in census - CAPAFR

yes south sac and elk grove filipino community - keep those together


Speaker #

4091100151911006

519110075191100851911009

51911010






no yes public defender offices both statutory vs north counties have contract public defenders; also UCD (biggest employer in county) partly in Solano Co. Davis borders Solano Co

no nono nono yes chinese hmong laotion

vietnamese(one morein order of size)

no yes filipino community - one big neighborhood use same social and commercial services


Speaker #

4091100151911006

519110075191100851911009

51911010


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nonono yes testimony w 2 thematic

maps05.19.11.E

no yes testimony 05.19.11.F



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51911011 H yes APALC reading ARI testimony; ARI provides naturalization services ESL classes employment services to any low-income LEP - CAPAFR

yes ARI South Sacramento office serves southeast asian pop 2nd office serves downtown and West Sac northern office in Citris Heights and serves North NatomaNorth Highlands (see SEAsian Latino and Slavic)

51911012 H yes TOFA (sac co - for Tongan community) CAPITAL (see 9 above) - CAPAFR

yes elk grovesouth sacnorth natomasnorth point area west sac pacific islander; west sac more associated with Sac city than with rest of Yolo because of services and Asian culture

51911013 pass no no51911014 pass no no51911015 H no nevada city nevada yes current districts have

northsouth orientation - rural - please keep the same change as little as possible if not broke dont fix it do 3 or less

51911016 H no grass valley - history in gold mining home of Draft Horse Classic.

nevada co yes satisfied with current lines going northsouth wants small deviations so that rural areas not represented less


Speaker #

4091100151911011

51911012

519110135191101451911015

51911016






little saigon in Sacramento city designates Little Saigon as Stockton Blvd from Fruitridge to Florin Blvds

no yes southeast asian pop faces barriers to accessing reources ARI provide service to reduce those barriers (eg ESL classes); ARI also helps immigrants to become citizens

no yes lots of needs health etc

no nono nono yes share similar economies within

current districts would not with coastal districts

no yes rural areas together


Speaker #

4091100151911011

51911012

519110135191101451911015

51911016


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes testimony with 1 thematic map; read by other from APALC

05.19.11.G

no yes testimony with 1 thematic map

05.19.11.H

nonono yes testimony using form 05.19.11.I

no yes testimony using form 05.19.11.J



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51911017 pass no no51911018 H no truckee nevada yes in AD 3 4 - confusing for small

town; more in common with AD 4 towns; please moving AD 3 into AD 4; also split in El Dorado and Placer

51911019 H insurance? no Nevada yes central eastern and coastal CA very different; draw district on NS basis.

51911020 H no grass valley nevada yes dont lump rural in with urban and coastal areasno mega district please; makes no sense to draw eastwest district; keep northsouth lines

51911021 H yes Lake TahoeSouthshore Chamber of Commerces

yes areas around Lake Tahoe Basin remain as one unit with Truckee

El Dorado Placer

51911022 H no Nevada County - rural area

yes mega district is bad idea current districts work well - northsouth is good - cant see any other way to do it; urge 2 or less deviation

51911023 pass no no51911024 H property

owner?no no keep rural rural and keep

representatives that understand our community and not be dominated by urban area


Speaker #

409110015191101751911018

51911019

51911020

51911021

51911022

5191102351911024






no nono yes social too? skiing etc in common with other

areas of AD 4

no no

no no

no yes challenges - snow removal; communities with no infrastructure (eg no broadband); big project __?

no yes yes yes

no nono no


Speaker #

409110015191101751911018

51911019

51911020

51911021

51911022

5191102351911024


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

nono

no

no yes testimony using form 05.19.11.K

no

no yes testimony using form 05.19.11.L

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51911025 H doctor - retired psychologist

yes environmental org

diamond springs

el dorado county

yes keep together sierra foothills as COI; should trump county boundaries; keep from high density border cities; wants to sierra foothills district; keep together Auburn Chico Grass Valley Mamoth Lakes Nevada City Oroville Placerville South Lake Tahoe

11 counties represented by county seats on his list of cities

51911026 H retired air force officer retired lawyer

no Rochlin no

51911027 pass no no51911028 pass no no51911029 H no yes location location location 3

most important things; wants compactness to limit travel times

51911030 H yes El Dorado Co Board of Supervisors President

yes placer and el dorado for AD - tahoe basin; tahoe basin currently in AD 4 should be in own district but need more population - go west?

51911031 H contractor biz owner

no placerville el dorado yes NS line keep counties east of it (foothillmt culture) together

51911032 H yes city of auburn city clerk

auburn placer yes coast to inland do all districts have some of everything and so are the same

51911033 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100151911025

51911026

519110275191102851911029

51911030

51911031

51911032

51911033






bridgeport markleyville sonora san andreas Jackson Placerville auburn downey quincy Susansville nevada city

no yes history rural low density rural character businesses ecosystem

no no

no nono nono no

no yes riverswater sheds (areas carved out by rivers) roads define communities; connect historical culture of 2 counties

historic trading commerce

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100151911025

51911026

519110275191102851911029

51911030

51911031

51911032

51911033


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes testimony with handwritten notes

05.19.11.M

no keep bias out.

nonono you will be judge on

___ criteria

yes

no yes testimony 05.19.11.N

no visualize bar codes across state.; coast to inland

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51911034 H yes Nevada County? board of supervisors

Truckee yes nevada county in AD 4; recommends Truckee with Placer Co??

51911035 H retired architect and engineer

yes league of Placer County tax payers -reduce taxes and lawsregulations

yes share with other counties that are similar

51911036 H yes Lincoln City Councilman

Lincoln Placer yes keep similar interests together of Placer El Dorado and Nevada Counties

51911037 pass no no51911038 pass no no51911039 pass no no51911040 H no Diamond

SpringsEl Dorado Co yes dont want to be with Rancho

Cordova - keep rural communities together - we love being rural

51911041 H no Somerset southeast of Placerville

El Dorado yes keep NorthSouth districts;

51911042 H yes Auburn City Council

Auburn Placer Co yes keep Placer Co whole - 330 K we are a COI; take 130K from El Dorado Q where A east to Placerville; Q sierra district? A no not an isolated sierra district not good - wants what he said (above)


Speaker #

4091100151911034

51911035

51911036

51911037519110385191103951911040

51911041

51911042






no yes Q state of Lake Tahoe? A hornets nest but one state rep would help

no no

no yes placer co transportation planning agency six county council of govt - blueprint for ___


no no

no yes Auburn State Recreation Area -runs __ to Folsom;


Speaker #

4091100151911034

51911035

51911036

51911037519110385191103951911040

51911041

51911042


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no follow rules compact as much as possible

no

nononono

keep rural areas together to keep voice

no

keeping placer whole to allow accountability.

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51911043 H retired military real estate

no ___ area of Nevada Co

Nevada Co yes keep rural in tactsomething about exception of Truckee?

51911044 pass no no51911045 H no yes actually likes having two reps

but did work hard to get Prop 11 passed; after 91 almost had parity in Legislature lasted one year (1995); he wants the state fixed as a whole

51911046 H no no

51911047 H yes city of lincoln mayor pro tem

Placer yes like having 2 Senators one has feel for urban areas one for rural areas; describes two main areas of county; do not do super district that goes up north?; Q if propose to split Placer where do you go? A Lincoln can go with either

51911048 H - read letter of friend no Woodland Yolo yes I -80 corridor linking Fairfield with Yolo county cities on I-80 - likes east-west orientation


Speaker #

4091100151911043

5191104451911045

51911046

51911047

51911048






no no

no nono no

no no

no no

no yes water; I-80 growing viticulture


Speaker #

4091100151911043

5191104451911045

51911046

51911047

51911048


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nono

no be apolitical no agenda blank slate; draw straight line eg. place grid for 40 spaces and adjust pop

no

no yes testimony 05.19.11.O



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51911049 H yes Sac Hispanic Ch of Commerce ___ ____

rochlin roseville biz owner

Placer yes weve been underrepresented because of our growth; fortunate to be represented by two senators who both care - please dont reduce that to one; no east-west district - Humboldt too far too hard to get there

51911050 H yes Peoples Advocate - 15 yrs on redistr reform

yes ?? Spirit of law

51911053 H yes town of Loomis councilman

Loomis Placer yes Placer El Dorado Nevada Cos - similar small town rural; these 3 together at least could go up to sierra; Q what about AD? A could do Placer and Nevada (hwy 80) or Placer and El Dorado (hwy 50); Q Granite Bay? A used to be part of Loomisrural2

comes back later dont go south to get population

51911054 H no grass valley Nevada yes we are linked to Placer because only method of escape path to Roseville and Sacramento auburn is larger and has shopping and medical we do think alike nevada and Placer belong together


Speaker #

4091100151911049

51911050

51911053

51911054






no no

no no

no yes we think differently from urban areas

no no


Speaker #

4091100151911049

51911050

51911053

51911054


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51911055 H no Granite Bay Placer yes terribly gerrymandered districts - and wants nesting for more communication between reps; AD her neighborhood is lopped off and stuck with citris heights and fairoaks (shes at end of Folsom); dont keep the same at all

52011001 H retired county sup Sonoma

no yes do as little as humanly possible to change districts for Sonoma County; districts have served us well (he describes them)

Sonoma

52011002 H yes Redwood Empire Fair appt by Governor to serve on

Willits (says on handout)

Mendocino yes keep Lake and Mendocino County together (because of college district)

52011003 H yes sonoma county board of sups president

yes likes sharing districts w neighboring counties sonoma lake mendo napa share wine sonoma and Humbo DN share fishing; has worked well for us to split county. Q where? A how is now good; s will tell you; Q all levels? A yes


Speaker #

4091100151911055

52011001

52011002

52011003






no no

realizes that Davis needs to expand because of viticulture?

no no

eureka crescent city fort bragg - college of redwoods.

no yes Fair is very important College of Redwoods coast guard serves coastal counties - need to stay together

no yes agr wine natural resources coastal issues share with neighboring counties


Speaker #

4091100151911055

52011001

52011002

52011003


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no thinks nesting and compactness should be more important

no

no yes info about Medicino-Lake Community college district and Redwood Community College District and Division 8 of Coast Guard

no yes letter from Sonoma County Board of Sups



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52011004 H pomo tribal nation

yes tribal council mendo county grand jury third term

yes AD SD CD del norte - sonoma - good for tribesmentions VRA

52011005 H news biz no Willits Mendocino no

52011006 H no no group Santa Rosa Sonoma yes submitted maps for AD SD CD; advocating to keep Sonoma County as whole as possible;havent had representation cause split; combine with Mendocino and Napa - wine areas

52011007 H no Sonoma - 20 yrs

yes Marin and Sonoma share most common interests; should be with each other cant if Marin with East Bay or SF

52011008 H no San Rafael Marin yes want Marin with Sonoma not with SF; CD with two SD with two plus napa AD Marin plus Sonoma up to Santa Rosa

52011009 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100152011004

52011005

52011006

52011007

52011008

52011009






no no

no no news describes north coast papers and where cover and that hearings werent in coast media.

no yes different from Bay Area not like Marin; wineries more rural etc

no yes suburan and rural outside activities

no yes common lifestyles recreationoutside activities viticulture

econ biz interest along 101 corridor agriculture

no no


Speaker #

4091100152011004

52011005

52011006

52011007

52011008

52011009


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no no transcripts or minutes or FF on video

yes testimony says that already sent emails about NS coast is cohesive unit and EW district would not be good for north coast left copy of emailed comment

no yes testimony and maps

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52011010 H no Novato formally Mill Valley

Marin yes AD all of Marin linked with Southern Sonom incl all of Santa Rosa SD all Marin Sonoma Napa CD all Marin and Sonoma marin not with SF

52011011 H no Marin - 40 yrs

yes Marin and Sonoma are 2 members of same family go over GGB and flow into Sonoma; keep Marin and Sonoma togetherdont dilute North Bay with other counties; Q what cut to make AD A if have tocut below Santa Rosabut hate to do it

52011012 H - will submit specifics by email

no Santa Rosa Sonoma no

52011013 H co-own manufacturing company in Sonoma

no Sonoma yes Sonoma and marin are very different more commonality in northern neighbors than with marin; submits maps that meet 5 and 1 person for CD; our maps try 2 keep Santa Rosa and urban areas intact and 2 keep rural areas in tact


Speaker #

4091100152011010

52011011

52011012

52011013






no yes worlds apart from SF lots of agriculture environmental concerns share with Sonoma

no yes common belief in rural living education and family life

no yes culture shock when moved from SF all walks of life in Santa RosaSonoma; keep Sonoma county whole

no yes look at economic development reports for Marin and Sonoma


Speaker #

4091100152011010

52011011

52011012

52011013


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes maps (same as 6)

no yes testimony and maps and also same maps as 6 and 12



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52011014 H yes LWV Mendo member

little river mendocino yes North coast is rural isolated area linked by hwy 1; historically DN Co to Mendo - NS - League concerned with westeast idea - bec cant travel

52011015 H yes LWV of Mendo fort bragg mendocino yes keep DN H M and Trinity and Lake for AD fight over Sonoma; will bring AD up to pop need

52011016 H no Mendocino yes audobon map - where birds live - DN H M T S L Co include DN in SD as much as Sonoma as possible; for AD stay same; for CD less of Yolo more of Sonoma.

52011017 H school principal

yes LWV of Mendo Little River Mendocino yes put DN in SD keep current AD; keep NS orientation.

52011018 H own few acres of grapes in Yountville

no Napa yes need to stay same; napa stay in one district napa needs to stay with Yolo Sonoma Lake and other wine areas; southern border of county should be border of district - not with Solano Co there (north Solano near Yolo ok)


Speaker #

4091100152011014

52011015

52011016

52011017

52011018






no no

no yes share economies fishing (salmon) recreation sports agriculture viticulture

no no

no yes colleges bind the counties (he lists); coast guard serves coast - unified help for recent tsunami

I-80 no yes united through wine industry and tourist industry


Speaker #

4091100152011014

52011015

52011016

52011017

52011018


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes map

no yes proposed district and pop counts

no yes Californias important bird areas

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52011019 H no Mendocino yes proposed district descirbes counties for each AD (one AD del norte Siskiyou trinity Mendocino lake; other AD Shasta lassen Tehama glenn) and nested in SD

52011020 pass no no52011021 H no Napa yes join with Yolo sonoma lake

and mendo and napa should remain intact (agrees with 19)

52011022 H no Napa - 55 years

yes napa with yolo lake sutter glenn colusa and parts of Sonoma - wine areas

52011023 H junior Marin Academy - map on Calitics.com

no yes Marin and Sonoma together not Marin with SF

52011024 H no napa yes preserve city and county lines to have greater accountability; respect transport and biz interest Santa Rosa San Rafael Petaluma along 101; SD 2 should not incl Davis Fairfield? And 80 corridor stop SD __ at GGB and not include SF


Speaker #

4091100152011019

5201102052011021

52011022

52011023

52011024






no no

no nono yes rural agriculture area

no yes old days prunes cattle; now Wine

no yes marin and sonoma alike marin not like SF; marin is 85? rural?; small towns - like Sonoma SF is 100 urban - bad to put marin with it

no no


Speaker #

4091100152011019

5201102052011021

52011022

52011023

52011024


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes testimony map petition

nono

no

no yes testimony and mpa

no yes testimony



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52011025 H no greater santa rosa area

sonoma yes North Bay is COI lines begin at GGB move North no further east than Napa up to Mendo Lake; SF is not part of COI nor is East Bay industrial communities of I-80 corridor; written statement

52011026 H fire fighter EMT all over Bay Area

no Sebastapol Sonoma yes nothing in common with SF; core is 101 corridor thru marin and sonoma; dont get rid fo CD 6; change as little as possible. Q where stop in Sonoma? A incl Santa Rosa cut out Bodega and other coastal areas and put them with northern coastal counties.

52011027 pass yes no52011028 H no Napa yes Napa in common with Yolo

Lake Sonoma NOT solano52011029 H retired small

biz ownerno Napa - 63

yearsyes with Lake Glenn Colusa Yolo

and Sutter; Q any of Sonoma A rural part town of Sonoma which is closest to Napa

52011030 H teacher FA have vinyard

no Napa yes want to be grouped with other agric interested areas; Mendo Lake Sonoma and Yolo would be good - more common interests


Speaker #

4091100152011025

52011026

5201102752011028

52011029

52011030






no no

no no

no nono no

no yes rural more than Solano; proud of current tourism but also of heritiageprune pickers

no yes agriculture


Speaker #

4091100152011025

52011026

5201102752011028

52011029

52011030


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

nono

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52011031 H small fruit orchard lives on

no Novato Marin yes keep Marin and Sonoma together - they have a COI; two counties make close to CD

52011032 H self-employed __ cleaner?

no Marin yes marin and sonoma unified district separate from SF

52011033 pass no no52011034 H no Mill Valley Marin yes dont throw Marin under the

bus the way people here want to doesnt say what hes referring to

52011035 H clinical pyschologist

no practice in Marin and Sonoma

yes districts are schizophrenic - dont make sense cant tell what district in; Marin and Sonoma together; Q where split Sonoma? A above the city boundary of Santa Rosa

52011036 pass no no52011037 H no SF 10 yrs

Larkspur last 6

Marin no


Speaker #

4091100152011031

52011032

5201103352011034

52011035

5201103652011037






no yes rural agric suburan thousands of wineries more families and children than SF 101 is connector natural social and economic boundaries to separate from SF and East Bay

no no

no nono no

no no

no nono yes care about grass fires mt tam

watershed 101 corridor; not all the things in SF; SD should not go over GGB


Speaker #

4091100152011031

52011032

5201103352011034

52011035

5201103652011037


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

nono highest priority is to

reduce as much as possible overlapping district that led to back room politics

no

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52011038 H yes Humboldt Co Board of Sups President

Humboldt yes keep north coast counties link in all three districts; letter from Arcata City council submitted tonight; Q DN Co in same district? A yes issues that divide us from inland exist for over 100 yrs.

52011039 H no pt reyes station west marin isolated from 101 corridor

Marin yes identify with Sonoma county

52011040 H no Windsor Sonoma yes Sonoma County in one district; dont divide anymore and keep away from Marin and SF; very different life from both SF and Marin; impt to keep wine areas together (lists counties lake napa mendo?)

52011041 H no Santa Rosa larkfield area

Sonoma yes hates SD thats like worm and goes through larkfield; compact districts please

52011042 H no Sausalito Marin yes SD 3 problem AD and CD are fine; marin sonoma Mendocino and Humboldt together - makes perfect SD

52011043 H no Marin biz in Sonoma

yes please make SD marin sonoma and Napa AD up to highway 12


Speaker #

4091100152011038

52011039

52011040

52011041

52011042

52011043






no yes self identify as north coast or redwood region dont share interests with inland north CA; unique range of issue fishing cruise lines etc; 1853 Humb Co exists because didnt want to be governed by people on other side of mountains.

no yes rural lifestyle rural agri latino workforce shop in petaluma Santa Rosa Fairfax and San Rafael

no yes different from Marin - more rural dont commute to SF in same way; share wine with other counties

no no

no yes SMART etc

no no


Speaker #

4091100152011038

52011039

52011040

52011041

52011042

52011043


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes County of Humboldt and City of Arcata letters

no

no yes list current districts for Sonoma County also same maps as 6 12 13

no

no yes ppt about how redistricting affects North Bay

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52011044 H teach? at CSU Sonoma supervises teachers

no Valley of Moon area

yes keep Sonoma together dont separate at hwy 12; napa lake mendo sonoma

52011045 H yes represents Napa Valley wine industry Napa County Board of Sups

yes keep Napa whole and with sonoma mendo lake

napa mendo lake sonoma - premium wine grape growing

52011046 H no Santa Rosa Sonoma yes AD7 is very gerrymandered urban part of Santa Rosa put with Napa and with Vallejo- Santa Rosa nothing in common with Vallejo; Sonoma Co as one AD or split and put with wine country

52011047 H yes sausalito city council member

yes SD 3 should begin at GGB marin in COI w sonoma mendocino and humboldt

52011048 H yes Flood mitigation league of Ross Valley

san anselmo

marin yes respect land mass contiguity water issues- flood drainage

52011049 H radio talk show host media consultant

no Marin no

52011050 H teacher no yes keep marin and sonoma together


Speaker #

4091100152011044

52011045

52011046

52011047

52011048

52011049

52011050






Valley of Moon santa rosa city line to ___ line thru Sonoma to 80

no yes commonalities of schools around Sonoma County and neighboring counties

no yes premium wine group growing

no yes

no yes coast

no yes flood drainage agricultural - equestrian industry

no yes media landscape - Marin doesnt use SF media

no yes SMART 101 corridor concern with environment similar environment (eg redwoods) same water shed; education system same in Marin and Sonoma very different from SF


Speaker #

4091100152011044

52011045

52011046

52011047

52011048

52011049

52011050


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes Napa Board of Sups resolution

Vallejo - filipin and Af-am pop vote diluted being with Napa Santa Rosa

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52011051 H no penngrove South Sonoma Co

yes AD 6 all of marin and southern slice of Sonoma - so we are ignored

52011052 H no San Anselmo work in Novato

Marin yes Marin and Sonoma

52011053 pass no no52011054 H no no

52011055 H yes Lake Co Board of Sup member - 150 yrs ago today separated from Napa County; resolution from Board has been sent

Lake yes remain in same CD; lake napa mendo sonoma and yolo in one district; North sonoma only?

52011056 H no no

52011057 H yes Mendo Co Board of Sups Chair MCOG - transportation authority

yes link with napa sonoma


Speaker #

4091100152011051

52011052

5201105352011054

52011055

52011056

52011057






no yes ground water sent to Marin we are running out

no yes common way of life hospitals schools etc

no nono yes north bay biz journal north bay

biz (magazine) north bay leadership council - none serve SF or East bay

no yes premium wine grapes geothermal energy water rights (lake county (cache creek drains into) is headwaters to yolo counties russian eel river start in Lake

no no

no yes services to seniors fishing tourism harbor concerns (with Hand DN Cos)


Speaker #

4091100152011051

52011052

5201105352011054

52011055

52011056

52011057


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

nono

no

no draw competitive districts

no echo Humboldt Sup that not having hearing on coast for Region IX is problem

yes letter from Mendo Board of Sups



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52011058 H no North Marin yes keep CD 6 all Marin and Sonoma SD Marin Sonoma Napa AD Marin and Sonoma up to healdsburg? Q still need to reduce A likes firefighters idea of carve out coast of Sonoma

52011059 H no Novato Marin yes stop at GGB blend Marin and Sonoma Counties

52011060 H no San Rafael Marin yes SF vs Marin country lifestyle; stop at GGB

52011061 H - came to Redding no yes NS vs EW districts; advocate for EW district - 19 was interesting

52011062 pass no no52011063 H no Santa Rosa Sonoma yes keep sonoma co whole as

much as can sonoma with marin instead of with Napa santa Rosa should with marin rather than Napa some sonoma towns (glenn ellen?) with napa; look at tourism and wine

52011064 H home care provider SEIU member

no __ Hot Springs

Sonoma yes go north and east and marin and solano and a little bit of Yolo

52011065 home care no Sonoma (town) - lived in Marin before

Sonoma yes Marin and Sonoma tied together

52011066 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100152011058

52011059

52011060

52011061

5201106252011063

52011064

52011065

52011066






no yes quality of life issues - commute from Sonoma through Marin;

no yes lifestyles etc tourism wine and food

no no

no no

no nono no

no no

no yes homeless same funding for health care tied 101 corridor is key

no no


Speaker #

4091100152011058

52011059

52011060

52011061

5201106252011063

52011064

52011065

52011066


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no wants citizen-based process

no

no

nono dont let special

interests influence process

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52011067 H - extended remarks handed out; will present state plan on Tuesday

no San Francisco

San Francisco

yes nesting can be done - will show that; AD 6 could go up and include Santa Rosa and incl rural areas around russian river other AD go into napa; talks about senate and how must stop at GGB to protect SF representation

52011068 H no no

52011069 H no Sonoma yes all of Marin and Sonoma for SD and all of Napa (cities of Napa and american canyon) and Mendocino Lake

52011070 H no Sebastapol Sonoma yes keep sonoma county whole and with counties that share interests (rural agr etc) and NOT grouped in with Marin Marin more like SF


Speaker #

4091100152011067

52011068

52011069

52011070






no no

no no

no yes family is COI - lives all over Marin and Sonoma

no no


Speaker #

4091100152011067

52011068

52011069

52011070


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes ltr and maps of districts from different eras

no video turnaround is too slow and window too small. no transcripts inline to process review updated copy of comment database furnished to public every 48 hrs

no

no yes maps same as 6 12 13 40



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52011071 H no no

52011072 pass no no52011073 H no sebastapol

family has 5 generations

sonoma yes AD 6 - marin and a little part of Sonoma; would like to keep Sonoma whole describes how Sonoma split up; provides map wants CD from Petaluma north

52011074 pass no no52011075 H no Santa Rosa

since 2002Sonoma yes keep coast line in district;

sonoma and marin lots more in common than marin does with SF; if have split Sonoma to keep 101 corridor and coast together put town of Sonoma with Napa healdsburg? with Napa

52011076 pass no no52011077 pass no no52011078 pass no no52011079 pass no no52011080 pass no no52011081 pass no no52011082 pass no no52011083 pass no no52011084 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100152011071

5201107252011073

5201107452011075

520110765201107752011078520110795201108052011081520110825201108352011084






no no

no nono no

no nono no

no nono nono nono nono nono nono nono nono no


Speaker #

4091100152011071

5201107252011073

5201107452011075

520110765201107752011078520110795201108052011081520110825201108352011084


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no use hexagon based on pop with max number of sides touching - to avoid gerrymandering - people closest to each other have more in common

nono yes maps same as 6 12 13

40 70

nono

nonononononononono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52011085 H no marin 23 yrs yes huge difference between marin and sf lots in common with Sonoma rural water transport flood issues wildland fires; dont divide Marin - if divide us become inconsequential with issues; Q where go? A prob Napa but key is more in common with Sono

52011086 pass no no52011087 pass no no52011088 pass no no52011089 H no Marin yes Marin and Sonoma work

together - SMART transport similar economies share water; dont divide Marin?

52011090 H no tiburon marin yes San Rafael Bridge should be barrier dont go east to east bay - nothing in common over there; put marin and sonoma together



Speaker #

4091100152011085

52011086520110875201108852011089

52011090

5201109152011092520110935201109452011095






no no


no yes marin and sonoma share recreation issues GGNRA wine country face similar issues



Speaker #

4091100152011085

52011086520110875201108852011089

52011090

5201109152011092520110935201109452011095


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nononono

no

nonononono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52011096 H 13 yr old - Sonoma Day School - going to Branson or MA grandparents in Marin

no Sonoma yes Marin and Sonoma share a lot - I didnt know for years where border was; sonoma should be split in north northern parts are different.

52111001 H no Livermore Alameda no

52111002 H no Pleasanton and biz there

Alameda yes pleasanton shares various things with cities listed below

52111003 H no Fremont Alameda yes Freemont Newark Hayward San Leandro union city milpitas together - keep CD together look at 1991 lines; Q along hwy 83? A yes

52111004 H no Fairfield Solano yes Co west boundary mountains south by __ suisan bay and east by; currently split up keep Solano Co intact and put with (similar counties) Napa and Yolo


Speaker #

4091100152011096

52111001

52111002

52111003

52111004






no no

no no

livermore dublin san ramon pleasanton Tri-Valley Area

western boundary of valley south border of valley east boundary is Altamonte Hills

no yes transportation fire

no yes economies need to be together

no no


Speaker #

4091100152011096

52111001

52111002

52111003

52111004


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no congress low approval non-competitive districts; must maximize competitive to improve govt; whole state is a COI

yes several pages explaining his position (not numbers or maps)

no yes 2 page testimony and google maps showing 4 cities together

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52111005 H realtor - sell communities not houses

yes association of realtors

yes area where look for home - ended up in Black Hawk; its a COI then and more so now

52111006 H doctor yes bio-tech company owner (Hayward)

Berkeley Alameda yes Berkeley not like cities on other side of hills so shouldnt be with them. His COI is children of CA

52111007 H yes San Mateo County Board of Sups President - submitted proposal

San Mateo yes SD - want one that will allow someone from county to get elected central San Mateo County SD; Q problem with coast district? A no just not a lot of pop - most on bay side; Q which way add? A see submitted proposal

52111008 pass no no52111009 H yes (testifying on

behalf of ) East Bay Asian Voter Education Consortium (lists groups in it - on handout its 10 groups) working with CAPAFR

yes API most rapidly growing pop in AL Co 3 concentrations 1)Oakland Alameda Berkeley2) 3) Freemont Newark

52111010 H yes with CAPAFR Oakland Alameda yes keep Oakland china town whole (8th and webster sts)


Speaker #

4091100152111005

52111006

52111007

5211100852111009

52111010






no no

no no

no no

no nono no

no yes API need services and so need fair and adequate representation


Speaker #

4091100152111005

52111006

52111007

5211100852111009

52111010


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no fair districts equal population

no yes ppt with maps

nono yes testimony with 2 maps

no yes testimony with 1 map



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52111011 H yes FAJ (Filpino Advocates for Justice) - part of CAPAFR; shes Executive Director

mostly berkeley and oakland over 35 yrs

AL Co - 35 yrs

yes keep Union City in tact for all district levels Hayward San Lorenzo San Leandro

52111012 H no Alameda - almost 30 yrs

yes keep Union City in tact Castro Valley and Hayward with it need more take San Leandro San Lorenzo Ashland Cherryland

52111013 H yes Chair of Bay Area Chapter of statewide org (APAPA) to promote API at all levels of govt - CAPAFR

Fremont Alameda yes see maphandout Freemont Newark Milpitas and the Berryessa part of San Jose together; Q cross county cause COI stronger? A yes

52111014 H yes Asian Law Caucas - CAPAFR

San Francisco - 7 yrs

San Francisco

yes Chinatown in SF and immediate area where API live; Visitation Valley Excelsior Bayview - respect this please- keep together

52111015 H yes Asian Pacific American Commmunity Center (APACC); In SF(Visitacion Valley) part of CAPAFR

yes API in San Francisco; Visitation Valley and Chinatown in same district Q but not contiguous? A right but currently VV cut off of district with Chinatown would like to see together.


Speaker #

4091100152111011

52111012

52111013

52111014

52111015






no yes API and Latino

no yes API need services

no yes API shopping etc;

no no

Q where is Chinatown A kerney to powell california to broadway chinatown

no yes language services are critical help new immig with housing low per capita income

economic issues shared


Speaker #

4091100152111011

52111012

52111013

52111014

52111015


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes testimony with map

no yes testimony only






Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52111016 H yes Gay Asian Pacific Alliance (GAPA) - with CAPAFR

San Francisco - 6 years

San Francisco

yes tenderloin soma are home to many API LGBT; they access services for LGBT and attend community-bldg events in upper market castro and Haight-Ashbury; respect geographic integrity of both API LGBT communities (and end the eastwest divide?)

52111017 H yes Pilipino Bayanihan Resource Center (PBRC)

Daly City San Mateo yes Daly City - largest Filipino pop outside of philipines (and in US) Daly City pop is 13 Filipino 12 Asian; AD currently splits Daily City in 2 and it needs to stay together; Q ask re linking Daly City with south parts of SF (says this in handout)

52111018 H teacher volunteer

no Concord 10CD 11AD 7 SD

Contra Costa yes now have 2 CDs; please put Concord in one CD

52111019 H no Clayton (east of Walnut Creek) - very small town

Contra Costa yes to do anything go to Lamorinda walnut creek danville alamo


Speaker #

4091100152111016

52111017

52111018

52111019






5th to Van Ness Market to Post South of Market 5th to South Van Ness

no yes language issues need services

Daly City South San Francisco Broadmoor Colma; also remain connected w other Asian-Americans in Sunset Richmon (says in handout)

no yes history of immigration cultural; current AD does not respect Daly City cause splits it;

no yes increasing diversity in Concord

no yes same type of living and shopping


Speaker #

4091100152111016

52111017

52111018

52111019


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #



no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52111020 H no Diablo Valley (WC Orinda Lafayette San Ramon Clayton) Q Concord? A yes kind of part of D Valley

Contra Costa yes natural boundary between berkeley area and diable valley - should be in separate districts;

52111021 H no Martinez county seat - works in Walnut Creek

Contra Costa yes I - 680 corridor from Martinez to Walnut Creek - her COI - east to hwy 4; richmond in I-80 district

52111022 H no Danville Contra Costa yes Keep San Ramon Valley together (Walnut Creek down to Dublin) join with Lamorinda;

52111023 H no 10CD 7 AD 15 SD

Contra Costa yes CD 10 - with part of Solano - they have nothing to do with us; her COI - west border is East Bay hills Bay on north San Joaquin Valley on east.

52111024 H no yes keep San Ramon Valley and Walnut Creek area in same CD; CD 10 CD 11 is confusing should not be with San Joaquin area.(as in CD 10)


Speaker #

4091100152111020

52111021

52111022

52111023

52111024






no yes different climates

no no

no yes similar economic interests - commuters shop in other areas

no no

no yes rural san joaquin Valley nothing to do with San Ramon Valley


Speaker #

4091100152111020

52111021

52111022

52111023

52111024


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52111025 H no Lafayette Contra Costa yes history of forming CC AL counties - based on ridgelines rivers bay; use NS ridgeline to draw districts one to water (nw to Bay?) one down to Pleasanton; Q what about co lines? A important generally but in this one case ridgeline takes priority

52111026 H no Oakland 25 yrs

yes district lines respect on city and county boundaries; respect transport corridor and natural geographic boundaries; Oakland Piedmont Alameda and Emeryville together rather than Oakland with Orinda Moraga

52111027 H no Glenview district part of Oakland

Alameda yes COI is her neighborhood

52111028 H no Oakland - 51 yrs

Alameda yes 2 decades ago - judges - nesting - easier to understand who legislator is; expensive for ROV to print ballots - would be more efficient to use city and county lines


Speaker #

4091100152111025

52111026

52111027

52111028






no no

no no

between hwy 13 and 580 - mid hills

yes yes similar needs values concerns housing

no yes diverse city - live harmoniously


Speaker #

4091100152111025

52111026

52111027

52111028


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes small paper with notes

no

no draw the lines to benefit all Californians

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52111029 H no speaks about special interests influencing process

Oakland Alameda no

52111030 H yes representing Alice B. Toklas LGBT Democratic Club on board of directors

concord yes being part of SD 3 has helped LGBT in SF and Marin; Marin stay with SF so that LGBT community in marin has voice

52111031 H no yes City of Alameda with Oakland rather than Freemont

52111032 H no no

52111033 H no walnut creek - 20 yrs CD 10 AD 15

Contra Costa yes COI is Lamorinda Walnut Creek San Ramon Valley (along 24 and 680; CD 10 includes rural areas (like Dixon) which dont have anything to do with; AD 15 includes part of Sacramento - not good either

52111034 H no Martinez Contra Costa yes urge to keep COI based on job centers ..?


Speaker #

4091100152111029

52111030

52111031

52111032

52111033

52111034






no no

no no

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100152111029

52111030

52111031

52111032

52111033

52111034


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes testimony

no yes testimony

no

no fair compact districts that reflect community with all its differences not have those differences parceled out.

yes testimony

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52111035 H no Pleasanton - 41 yrs

Alameda yes Pleasanton has been gerrymandered; hard to know who her rep is; Dublin san ramon pleasanton livermore is greater San Ramon Valley - 580680 corridor dont cut off at san ramon Co line

52111036 H no CD 7 SD 7 AD 11

yes diablo valley and san ramon valley on 680 corridor is COI keep CC Co together as COI

52111037 H ran for CD 13 so knows how district constructed and how it confuses people

no lives in CD 13 unincorporated Alameda Co

Alameda yes alameda fits better with Oak Berk; ___with san Lorenzo San RamonCherryland and __; Newark Freemont; Pleasanton with Livermore Dublin Sinol

52111038 H no Lamorinda Contra Costa yes with some bayside communities in some districts; need to be with Dublin and San Ramon Valley; not with towns over berkeley oakland hills

52111039 H no Berkeley Alameda yes remove east Oakland communities from communities on 680 corridor; alameda co should be separated from Western and Eastern hubs

52111040 pass - then came back - made 43

no no

52111041 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100152111035

52111036

52111037

52111038

52111039

52111040

52111041






no no

no no

no no

no yes commute first to sf then to walnut creek same for shopping and recreation

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100152111035

52111036

52111037

52111038

52111039

52111040

52111041


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52111042 H no Camarillo Ventura yes East Ventura should link to west side of LA Co (Westlake Village etc)

52111043 H - 40 who missed slot was given 43 cause no 43 - statement in Chinese

no San Francisco work in Sunset live in another area

San Francisco

yes dont split up San Francisco; being treated unfairly - sunset with other specific areas in SF

52111044 H no San Pablo Contra Costa yes bad district that San Pablo County in has Solano Co part which has nothing in common with west and east CC Co; AD 1 that San Pablo is in is good.

52111045 H yes AC Transit District - at large measure

yes special district 1 which is west of ridgeline and west of CC Co

52111046 pass no no52111047 H immigrant to

bay areano yes CD 7 - Contra Costa to Solano

(to Vacaville but cuts off cities on way there); keep CC Co together in one CD as much as possible

52111048 pass? Janeece marked as speaking but KMD and I had as a pass

no no

52111049 H - had handout yes Tri-Valley City Councils

Pleasanton (part of tri-valley communities)

Alameda yes respect tri-valley communities


Speaker #

4091100152111042

52111043

52111044

52111045

5211104652111047

52111048

52111049






hwy 23 34 and interstate ___ corridors

no yes east ventura different from coastal part of Ventura

no no

no no

no yes COI based on transportation and what willing to pay for; use to see where boundaries are

no nono no

no no

Pleasanton Livermore Dublin San Ramon Danville

no yes media delivery area


Speaker #

4091100152111042

52111043

52111044

52111045

5211104652111047

52111048

52111049


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes testimony in Chinese

no

no

nono

no

no yes Tri-Valley City Councils (ltr petition map)



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52111050 H no Livermore (tri valley area)

Alameda yes Tri Valley area - Livermore Dublin Pleasanton; put this with Tracy (area that people move to cause less expensive)

52111051 H no El Sobrante Contra Costa yes Hercules Pinole close to El Sobrante are similar please keep with El Sobrante

52111052 H was on AC Transit Board

no no

52111053 pass no no52111054 H no Orinda Contra Costa yes include transportation corridors

areas of similar interests and geographic barriers (oakland hills); lamorinda with _____ - will email her testimony

52111055 H no Concord Contra Costa yes maintain integrity of county lines- CD

52111056 H no unicorporated area near Pleasanton Bart

Contra Costa yes Lamorinda is a COI; towns on 680 corridor are similar should be together (Lamorinda with San Ramon and Danville); berkeley hills and Caldecott tunnel are natural boundary


Speaker #

4091100152111050

52111051

52111052

5211105352111054

52111055

52111056






no no

no no

no no

no nono no

no yes history of CCAL Co - before gold rush were together being separate makes sense historic basis of difference of opinion

Lamorinda cities with San Ramon and Danville

no yes Bart rail hwy 680


Speaker #

4091100152111050

52111051

52111052

5211105352111054

52111055

52111056


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no wants nesting to make it easier to see who represents you? Submitted maps?

nono

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52111057 H no San Ramon south Contra Costa

yes San Ramon Valley Tri-Valley Lamorinda - keep that area compact all similar

52111058 H no Oakland Alameda yes keep us (mentally ill) together if can - Tenderloin and East Oakland

52111059 H - read others letter no Folsom Sacramento yes Folsom Dam - unique area that should be recognized in drawing lines in 3 counties

52111060 H no no

52111061 H no Fremont Alameda yes geographic features impt; Area in hills (Mission Hills) should be___?

52111062 H no Pleasanton tri-valley

Alameda yes CD lists cities to add to Pleasanton(lamorinda clayton brentwood byron but not Sinol); AD proposal too; keep pleasanton whole? Keep cities whole

52111063 H no Oakland Alameda no

52111064 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100152111057

52111058

52111059

52111060

52111061

52111062

52111063

52111064






San Ramon Valley wDanville Alamo Walnut Creek Dublin Livermore Pleasanton

580 and 680 defines no yes bonded by civic and cultural attractions retail dining; live work play worship

no yes people labelled mental goals is to stay out of institutions but lots are homeless - need better housing

no no

no no

no no

no yes share common resources media

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100152111057

52111058

52111059

52111060

52111061

52111062

52111063

52111064


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no allow us to be enfranchised be fair

no

no

no supports the two party system??

yes testimony

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52111065 H no Oakland 4th generation biz in Oakland now lives in NorthBeach? (since 1986?)

yes SF should be one CD; in sunset line goes down street - feels bad for them

52111066 H - in chinese no Sunset District SF

yes professional scammer in neighborhood afftected by representation at highest level

52111067 H - translator of Chinese no yes CD 6 CD 7 - Pelosi and Spier (who also represents San Mateo) - makes it hard to get representation in Sunset I dont belong with San Mateo I belong with SF; make SF whole in CD

52111068 pass no no52111069 H no Oakland Alameda yes keep melting pot going rather

than salad bowl of micro-cultures; Berk-Oak Hills boundary down to water. One group one objective


Speaker #

4091100152111065

52111066

52111067

5211106852111069






no no

no no

no no

no nono no


Speaker #

4091100152111065

52111066

52111067

5211106852111069


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes testimony in Chinese

no yes testimony with a google map

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52111070 H no Oakland Alameda no

52111071 H no Oakland Alameda yes dont take district over hills to Lamorinda - to suburbs; Q to make SD go north or south; A north

52111072 H no Oakland Alameda yes all of Oakland in same Assembly District Dublin and Livermore removed from SD with urban Oakland; CD - Alameda not with Oakland and should be.

52111073 H no San Francisco

yes parents in SF in different district

52111074 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100152111070

52111071

52111072

52111073

52111074






no no

no no

no no

no yes minority in SF cause straight property -owner; leave special interest out

no no


Speaker #

4091100152111070

52111071

52111072

52111073

52111074


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no return to common sense drawing of districts - use geographical boundaries hills bay cities and communities; ignore calls for racial balkanization; Q county boundary over communities? A yes if just based on race no if based on ruralurban economics

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52111075 H yes Tri- Valley Coaltiion (see handout)

Diablo Contra Costa yes unite Diablo ValleyTri-Valley Area; ok to cross county line; free pleasanton from 3 counties; map shows cities to keep together for ADCDSD; petition says ok to add similar towns such as walnut creek Lamorinda by going north along 680

52111076 pass no no52111077 pass no no52111078 H no yes Danville includes Alamo Diablo

Blackhawk-Camino Tassajara (school district includes this_); proposes CD and AD with cities

52111079 H no Oakland (downtown 11 yrs)

Alameda yes keep cities and county boundaries as much as possible to avoid confusion

52111080 H Democratic party delegate

no Oakland; in Oakland for 46 of her 52 yrs rest in San Leandro

Alameda yes respect diversity - draw lines for good rather than special interests

52111081 pass no no52111082 H no Fremont Alameda yes diversity of Freemont -

different ethnicities religions; combine Freemont with Hayward Union City Newark Milipitas


Speaker #

4091100152111075

521110765211107752111078

52111079

52111080

5211108152111082






from map Castle Hill Alamo Diablo Danville Blackhawk Camino-Tassajara San Ramon Norris Canyon Dublin Pleasanton Livermore;

no yes shopping area; mayors and councils work together on issues for greater good of area (from testimony)

economic area - this area work together for economic growth (says testimony)

no nono nono no

no no

no no

no nono yes depend on health care shopping


Speaker #

4091100152111075

521110765211107752111078

52111079

52111080

5211108152111082


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes testimony map and petitiion

nonono

no

no

nono yes 2 testimonies (from

83? from 84 with map of Columbia U CD 14) - joint submission between 82 83 84



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52111083 pass - but S? - joint-submitter of folder left by 82 84 in folder testimony by Hayward resident who did not speak)

no no

52111084 H no submitting Columbia University map that combines 5 cities (Milipitas Fremont Newark Union City Hayward) just like did in 1991

Fremont Alameda no

52111085 H yes UAW Fremont (person with them)

yes san leandro newark fremont union city hayward part of milipitas? Not livermore and not pleasanton

52111086 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100152111083

52111084

52111085

52111086






no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100152111083

52111084

52111085

52111086


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes See abovebelow; testimony of one who didnt speak Hayward resident please keep Hayward w Fremont Union City Newark bec similar needs re econ devel schools social services; if w affluent Pleasant Liverm Dublin Hayward needs will be overlooked

no yes 2 testimonies (from 83? from 84 with map of Columbia U CD 14) - joint submission between 82 83 84

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52111087 H no yes CDs in southern california - 4 impt military facilities; dont put Ridgecrest ChinaLake with Antelope Valley

52111088 H no yes want Oakland to have its own representative (noone elected to Assembly? who lives in Oakland); odd and even number districts issuevoting for 2 versus none

52111089 H no Berkeley several generations; now lives in Oakland

Alameda yes a previous speaker captured how he wants to see Oakland

52111090 H no Livermore 32 yrs

Alameda yes Livermore been gerrymandered in CD 10; best thing is to keep cities of tri-valley together (lists 4 or 5? san ramon Dublin pleasanton livermore)


Speaker #

4091100152111087

52111088

52111089

52111090






no no

no no

no yes low-income communities of color face disparities (health jobs) need to work as coaltion to meet needs

no no


Speaker #

4091100152111087

52111088

52111089

52111090


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no




Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52111091 H no Lafayette Contra Costa yes 925 area code

52111092 H no Oakland Alameda yes Oakland communty is Oakland urge to keep Oakland whole if cant look at city council districts - rather than demographics (common interests between different demograp; use West CC School District lines for Richmond; communities around Folsom Dam together

52111093 pass no no52111094 H no Moraga Contra Costa yes danville san ramon not like

Lamorinda52111095 H retired federal

agentno vacaville Solano yes CD 7 - look at changing this

way dont let incumbants keep winning


Speaker #

4091100152111091

52111092

5211109352111094

52111095






no no

no no

no nono no

no no


Speaker #

4091100152111091

52111092

5211109352111094

52111095


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no transparency numbering nesting helps people understand open-minded about cross-county especially when following transportation barriers (or corridors?)

no

nono

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52111096 H no west oakland

alameda yes strong geographic identity and historical identity of west oakland (describes history ethnic groups - eg italian portugese); West Oakland should remain intact all of Oakland should remain intact. Q go where? A north2 Berkeley2 flat (downtown) or 2_

52211001 H S no yes Mont with SLO and not with Santa Cruz

Montery

52211002 H S no yes three counties (Mont SLO northern Santa Barbara Co) together and not with Santa Cruz

52211003 H S no yes agrees with last speaker Monterey Co paired with SLO Co and further south; Mont Co couldnt be more different than Santa Cruz Codont pair with it; Q how far down in Santa Barbara Co? A go down 101 and look at agricultural communities

Monterey SLO counties

52211004 H no yes keep Monterey Co whole not w Santa Cruz add SLO and Santa Maria city in SB Co

52211005 H S no Monterey - 27 yrs

Monterey yes Monterey more in common with south SLO Co based on military; keep Montery SLO together


Speaker #

4091100152111096

52211001

52211002

52211003

52211004

52211005






no no

no no

no no

no yes share water issue - salinas river basin - without that 2 counties would be dust bowl physically and economically

share wine industry recreation opportunities salinas river water shed key to economies of 2 counties

no no

no yes share military facilities interests


Speaker #

4091100152111096

52211001

52211002

52211003

52211004

52211005


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no


no yes testimony 05.22.11.B

no yes testimony 05.22.11.C

no

no yes handwritten testimony 05.22.11.D



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52211006 H S no Monterey yes Monterey and SLO Co and town of Santa Maria (of Santa Barbara Co) to make a coastal district; all Monterey in one district; nothing in common with Santa Cruz Co; Q draw line at Santa Maria for SB Co? A Yes include Santa Maria; Q San Benito?? A??

Monterey SLO and part of Santa Barbara

52211007 H S no yes Montery and SLO and SB Co

52211008 H S Navy Veteran no Monterey Valley

Monterey yes Combine Monterey with SLO Co

52211009 H no Santa Clara no

52211010 pass no no52211011 H no unicorporat

ed Co (island in San Jose?)

Santa Clara Co

yes gave his CD AD SD


Speaker #

4091100152211006

52211007

52211008

52211009

5221101052211011






no yes share 101 coast historical bldgs hiking trails big sur coastline superior retirement living; nothing in common with Santa Cruz Co

no no

no yes help students going to school cause cheaper to live in SLO Co; geographically connected Salinas River hwy 1 101 coast and valley same infrastructure?

no no

no nono no


Speaker #

4091100152211006

52211007

52211008

52211009

5221101052211011


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #


no yes handwritten testimony 05.22.11.F

no yes handwritten testimony 05.22.11.G

no want fair districts and dont want alphabet groups running show. Dont divide us by race ethnicity how much have. Race ethnicity not a good criteria

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52211012 H S no yes county grouping including San Benito (heard tail end) based on Latino ability to get elected??; Monterey San Benito Santa Cruz nothing in common with SLO and the 101 Monterey corridor see testimony

52211013 H yes NALEO Ed Fund no

52211014 H S former mayor city council member (City of Watsonville); currently ( for 34 yrs) a secondary public school educator several other affiliations

no Watsonville 20 yrs

Santa Cruz yes Monterey Santa Cruz San Benito together; need new SD with these three like current CD 17; Q how far up in S Cruz? A into Scotts Valley to Greenfield Capitola Aptos Aromas Hollister in S Benito


Speaker #

4091100152211012

52211013

52211014






no no

no no

no yes diversity among three co.s is great and want own district; Begonia Festival?

economy of Watsonville Martinellis lite manufacturing some tech


Speaker #

4091100152211012

52211013

52211014


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes testimony 05.22.11.H

notes that in a Section 5 county

yes Monterey

significant to hold hearing there

thanks and look forward to seeing maps

no yes testimony 2 maps (current CD 17 suggested SD 15)

05.22.11.I



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52211015 H served at Fort Ord scholar of region

no Santa Cruz Seabride neighborhood?

Santa Cruz yes Recs re Salinas Valley; S Cruz and Monterey and not SLO and not Palo Alto go E to pick up pop; expand AD 27 28 and nest them and CD 17 in one SD; keep tog ag areas around Salinas Watsonville Hollister Gilroy ( rest of So S Clara Co) - 101 corridor

52211016 H no live in Gilroy work in Monterey Co

Santa Clara yes Gliroy Morgan Hill and San Martin very similar family oriented communities - currently gerrymandered (especially Morgan Hill and she describes her district as well)

52211017 H former elementary teacher parent grandparent

no Sunnyvale 42 years

Santa Clara no

52211018 H no Sunnyvale 52 years

Santa Clara yes his AD SD CD should include cities of sunnyvale santa clara saratoga cupertino los gatos Qneed more go where? A South to Saritoga


Speaker #

4091100152211015

52211016

52211017

52211018






no yes multiple overlapping COIs each need a voice not swallowed by far away counties

rural communities of Salinas Vall more in common w Western part of Merced Co than with SLO

no no

no no

no yes shares roads schools retail centers houses of faith

COI is Silicon Valley


Speaker #

4091100152211015

52211016

52211017

52211018


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

recognizes that CRC needs to meet this requirement qualifies recomm with that.

yes Monterey

just reference to VRA in this area

no fairness not based on raceethnicity religion language or how much earn

no wants fair lines compact with smallest possible perimeter 1 deviation

no draw fairly and not based on what groups want (listed MALDEF NALEO Greenlining Institute CAUSE) we are Californians first dont draw based on race religion language wealth



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52211019 H no Morgan Hill Gilroy over 30 yrs in south S Clara Co

Santa Clara yes south Santa Clara County in one district (Morgan Hill San Martin Gilroy); we are geographically together - can understand why not in same CD.

52211020 H no Santa Cruz Mts Loma Prieta Mt

Santa Cruz County but address in Los Gatos and schools in Santa Clara Co too

yes CD14 - most gerrymandered district disenfrachises me as a voter; what does Palo Alto have in common w Boulder Creek

52211021 H S no Marina Monterey yes SD 15 proposal Santa Cruz Monterey San Benito and then can take predominately agricultural parts of Santa Clara (such as Gilroy) parts of Kings and Fresno

52211022 H S teacher - 4th grade Spanish-speaking

no Salinas (previously lived in Watsonville in scruz co and worked in Las Lomas in Mont Co)

Monterey yes wants SD to be nested with 2 current AD; Monterey Santa Cruz San Benito together; doesnt want to be with Merced Fresno Modesto SLO or Santa Barbara


Speaker #

4091100152211019

52211020

52211021

52211022






no yes family-oriented mardi gras in Morgan Hill Garlic Festival

share economics - agriculture (garlic especially)

no no

no yes three counties have vision of being intergated area.

core is agriculture hospitality tourism and higher education; UCSC CSU Mont Bay Cal Poly SLO now all in SD 15 - so cut SD 15 at SLO Co line and have one advocate for Cal Poly SLO and one for other two

no yes never go to Merced Fresno SLO for a class; travel often to S Cruz Monterey Penisula to see family shop

coastal agriculture using local water to grow up to three crops in one field not same as ag in Merced


Speaker #

4091100152211019

52211020

52211021

52211022


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no fairness not special interests

no dont use race ethnicity voter demographics to draw lines draw lines to reflect communities that comprise districts

no good to have two advocates for central coast or for agricultural area

yes testimony proposal for SD 15 w map and stats

05.22.11.J

no yes testimony 05.22.11.K



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52211023 H served at Fort Ord former military

no Montery Peninsula

Monterey yes keep Mont SLO Cos together (military and agr families kids to CSU CalPoly); S Cruz Co more BerkSF than like Mont;CD 17 not include S Cruz city or any part of S Cruz Co; CD 17 SD 15 AD 27 should be Monterey south to SLO not incl Santa Cruz

52211024 H S stay at home mom

no Hollister raised in S Cruz Co husband works in Monterey Co

San Benito yes Santa Cruz San Benito Monterey

52211025 H no Monterey yes keep current AD s; does not like SD 12 15 reps live away and dont rep our interests; please nest AD into SD

52211026 H S no Carmel Valley

Monetery yes SD 15 dont have representation with it; want it to be centered in mont co include all of Mont Co santa cruz Co san benito Co south santa clara Co incl Morgan Hill

52211027 H no yes Mont SLO Santa Maria52211028 H no yes S Cruz Mont S Benito So S

Clara52211029 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100152211023

52211024

52211025

52211026

5221102752211028

52211029






no yes military interests with Mont and SLO Santa Cruz Co is nuclear free zone very unfriendly to military; communist party member on city council of S Cruz

no yes share sports school compete in same leagues share educationschool districts overlap share charities -eg. Jacobs Heart Uway has umbrella

share economy residents of S Benito mostly work in S Clara S Cruz Monterey Co.s

no yes media markets develop organically and show where COI are

no no

no nono no

no no


Speaker #

4091100152211023

52211024

52211025

52211026

5221102752211028

52211029


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

S Benito smaller but interests are entwined with S Cruz and Mont and dont feel lost by being rep with them

no yes testimony 05.22.11.L

no

no yes testimony with RedrawCA maps

05.22.11.M

nono

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52211030 H S no Hollister San Benito yes S Cruz S Benito Mont

52211031 H no Monterey yes keep Mont whole add SLO and Santa Maria

52211032 H S no Monterey yes Mont SLO 246 around Santa Ynez (santa Barbara co)

52211033 H S mother military wife

no CD 17 SD 15 AD 27

Monterey yes Monterey down to Santa Maria

52211034 H no since 97 Monterey and Pacific Grove husband native of Salinas

Monterey yes Monterey pair up with SLO

52211035 H no Monterey yes Mont should be whole go south into SLO S Barbara not Santa Cruz

52211036 H S no Bonny Doon

Santa Cruz yes re military

52211037 H S no Salinas 13 yrs

Monterey yes current CDs ADs represent her county(or area?) well - SD does not; interests not with Merced Madera or Stanislaus; please put in SD with Santa Cruz (south) Santa Clara San Benito

52211038 H S no Salinas Monterey yes Mont not with SLO


Speaker #

4091100152211030

52211031

52211032

52211033

52211034

52211035

52211036

52211037

52211038






no no

no no

no no

no yes keep economic area in tact from Monterey to Santa Maria

no yes military university agriculture in Monterey and SLO

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100152211030

52211031

52211032

52211033

52211034

52211035

52211036

52211037

52211038


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes testimony 05.22.11.N

no

no yes testimony 05.22.11.O

no fair and just decisions please

yes testimony 05.22.11.P

need strong voice for ag in two counties

no

no

no yes testimony 05.22.11.Q

no yes testimony 05.22.11.R

no yes testimony 05.22.11.S



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52211039 H S Mont Co Supervisor federal VRA plaintiff against City of Salinas in 1987 member of NALEO and lots of other orgs (read them all)

yes Mont Co Board of Supervisors

East Salinas

Monterey yes keep Monterey intact and dont delete voting strength of Latinos in Monterey County; put with Santa Cruz San Benito with whom have much in common.

52211040 H S LGBT community

no Hollister San Benito yes SLO Merced Santa Barbara should not be in same district with San Benito Monterey and Santa Cruz. San Benito in COI with Monterey and Santa Cruz.

52211041 H - came back after 44 no Malibu Los Angeles yes dont identify with East Ventura Co; dont like to go over the hill go to S Monica or LA to shop; put with Pacific Palisades S Monica go east; Q where add people? Why not commun on other side of Santa Monica mts? A its cultural rather than proximity


Speaker #

4091100152211039

52211040

52211041






no no

no yes landuse and water issues in Salinas Valley are different from S Joaquin Valley coastal range and other regions

no no


Speaker #

4091100152211039

52211040

52211041


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

comply with VRA to allow Latinos to elect candidate of choice

no yes testimony 05.22.11.T

no yes testimony 05.22.11.U 05.22.11.V

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52211042 H S no Prunedale Monterey yes Santa Cruz over to Morgan Hill catching ag areas (hollister prunedale paso robles); do not include South San Jose or go north to Palo Alto etc;

52211043 H no Monterey Monterey yes Include Monterey with SLO take in Vandenberg AFB in Santa Barbara Co; feel no closeness to Santa Cruz Co (not only nuclear free zone also handing out pot at city council mtg)

52211044 H no no52211045 H no Santa Clara no52211046 pass no no52211047 H no Salinas Monterey yes AD 27 - agree with last

speaker?; dont dilute voting strength of minorities they need to be able to elect candidate of choice have lots of needs and need to be represented; monterey S Benito together

52211048 H no Seaside Monterey yes Mont not with SLO or Santa Cruz Co


Speaker #

4091100152211042

52211043

52211044522110455221104652211047

52211048






no no

no yes share with SLO Coa; military agriculture water wine corridor 101 corridor big sur everyone goes to CalPoly


no no


Speaker #

4091100152211042

52211043

52211044522110455221104652211047

52211048


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes testimony 05.22.11.W

no

nono fairnessno

impt to elect candidate of choice where he lives is diverse and had many needs and need to be represented

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52211049 H S - longer version handed in than speaking notes

yes LWV of Monterey and Santa Cruz

yes AD 27 want to see all of Santa Cruz and coastal areas of Monterey Co (its already like this); for SD 15 want Monterey Santa Cruz and San Benito (three counties in AMBAG- Association of Mont Bay Area Govts); Q other AD? A out of my LWV jurisdiction

52211050 pass no no52211051 H yes many hats

parent President of Santa Cruz Co Board of Education

Rio Del Moore

Santa Cruz yes many school districts

52211052 H S yes member of AMBAG mayor of Watsonville

Watsonville Pajaro Valley

Santa Cruz yes COI with San Benito and Monterey Co

52211053 pass no no52211054 H no no52211055 H S no yes COI is tri-county of S Cruz

Mont S Benito; go from So S Clara Co (border or take towns?) to Paso Robles in SLO Co


Speaker #

4091100152211049

5221105052211051

52211052

522110535221105452211055






no no

no nono no

no yes city is 83 Latino (mostly mexican-american); north Monterey shares a zip code with us; water shed shared with Monterey; AD 27 28 nested into new SD??; agriculture; Q what is Salinas Valley? A

no nono nono no


Speaker #

4091100152211049

5221105052211051

52211052

522110535221105452211055


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes testimony 05.22.11.X

nono

section 5 yes Monterey

must be reviewed

yes business card 05.22.11.Y

nonono yes testimony 05.22.11.

Z



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52211056 H co-founded CA Forward

no yes agrees with using 3 county area of AMBAG; also look at history (1991 good 2001 not well served by)

52211057 H no Monterey yes Mont S Cruz S Benito52211058 H no yes Mont NOT with SLO but with

San Benito and with Freedom Watsonville (both in S Cruz Co)

52211086 H - signed up for high number because wanted to be last

no yes agrees with 12335; from Mont Co go South

52311001 H no Foster City San Mateo 48 yrs

yes county border doesnt reflect county.

52311002 H S no no

52311003 H technical writer

no Livermore 8 yrs Hayward before that

Alameda yes CD 10 - octopus; want Livermore with Pleaston Dublin San Ramon and Sunol - areas around 580680 intersection.

52311004 H S yes Center for Employment Training (CET) CEO serve low-incom people in San Jose area

yes keep San Jose (their service areas) as one community in one CD


Speaker #

4091100152211056

5221105752211058

52211086

52311001

52311002

52311003

52311004






no no

no nono no

no no

no no

no no

Tri-valley area Livermore Pleasanton Dublin Danville San Ramon Sunol Q why Sunol? A it could go to Fremont but wants it lots friends live there. Q where go to add pop? A not over east bay hills to haywardOak..

Continued Go north to Alamo Concord or east to Tracy (which is similar - Tracy Hills) not northeast to Brentwood - too rural

no yes share a lot of life between cities fire district shared between Livermore Pleasanton;

no yes san jose area has long had concern for needs of community and continues to do so; resources are slim now. Q how funded? A federal


Speaker #

4091100152211056

5221105752211058

52211086

52311001

52311002

52311003

52311004


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nono

no

no

no yes RedrawCA maps 05.23.11.A

no




Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52311005 H no Redwood City

San Mateo yes wants district around San Mateo Co.; Q where split for AD? A doesnt want to split Co but if had to from San Mateo city to ocean.


San Mateo yes Redwoord City is her COI

52311007 H S yes Asian Law Alliance part of CAPAFR

San Jose 26 yrs

Santa Clara yes keep AAPI community together - was cut in 4 by 2001 redistricting; provided map

52311008 H S yes with CAPAFR - has handout

Cupertino born raised and lives there now

Santa Clara yes talks about Taiwanese pop and also Little Saigon

52311009 H S filipino-american

no Berryessa area NE San Jose with 100K residents

Santa Clara yes Berryessa divided into 4 AD and totally disenfranchised API community; Berryessa Milpitas Fremont make a COI please make into one AD; Q cross co line? A yes bec community go across for shopping etc; Q Berryessa U SD is neighborhood? A yes

52311010 H S yes Berryessa Neighborhood Association

Berryessa area

Santa Clara yes Berryessa USD - has map of school district city council district map


Speaker #

4091100152311005

52311006

52311007

52311008

52311009

52311010






no no

no no

Berryessa etc no yes AAPI make up over 34 of S Clara County; have common needs

no yes largest Taiwanese pop and now Taiwanese biz district

boundaries of Berryessa city of Milpitas on north alviso mckee rd Mt. Hamilton

yes no

yes yes festivals API community needs voice keep together to get pop for AD go to Milpitas and Freemont


Speaker #

4091100152311005

52311006

52311007

52311008

52311009

52311010


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes CAPAFR testimony with 2 maps

05.23.11.C

no yes CAPAFR testimony and map

05.23.11.D

no yes CAPAFR testimony 05.23.11.E

no yes map of Berryessa High School District San Jose City Council Districts

05.23.11.F



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52311011 H S no Berryessa area

Santa Clara yes Fremont - north San Jose over 50 Asian which is unusual (state is 15); now voting rights been diluted please correct that; Q which way to go to add? A go north to Union City to get more API if go south get Latino

52311012 H yes Berryessa School District Superintendent

Berryessa area

Santa Clara yes 10 mile sq area cut up into so many districts; share districts with other interests and dont get voice; Q as well as going N for pop try W toward Sunnyvale Santa Clara

52311013 pass no no52311014 H no Campbell Santa Clara yes Q what want? A dont break up

areas in Campbell52311015 H S no Sunnyvale Santa Clara yes Mt View Sunnyvale Los Altos

one AD?; Berryessa together in one AD?; SD proposed CD proposed? COI is Silicon Valley

52311016 H no San Jose Santa Clara yes 1.city county boundaries 2.natural geographic boundaries 3. draw regardless of raceethnicity

52311017 H no yes CD 14 is laughably gerrymandered; draw district not like that


Speaker #

4091100152311011

52311012

5231101352311014

52311015

52311016

52311017






yes yes Asian pop and all minorities together is COI which transcens county borders; wetlands mountains corridor flea market

yes no

no nono no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100152311011

52311012

5231101352311014

52311015

52311016

52311017


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes testimony 05.23.11.G

no

nono fair for everyone


no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52311018 H S yes VVO (Vietnames Voluntary Organization)

Evergreen area of San Jose

Santa Clara yes boundaries are Story rd to N King Rd to E Capitol Exp to S Senter Rd To W; Evergreen area with Tully Road area - please keep together for Vietnamese

52311019 H S no Evergreen live and work (real estate)

Santa Clara yes Evergreen used to be rural and now urban please put with Downtown San Jose and use Evergreen Sch District lines

52311020 H S yes Japanese American non-profit

Santa Clara Santa Clara yes Contiguous cities of Silicon Valley San Jose Sunnyvale Cupertino Mt View Q go which direction to add pop A north or to Campbell.

52311021 H no Los Gatos Santa Clara yes want to be part of community (now vote with S Cruz Co) and vote with community - please redraw

52311022 H S no Cambrian Park (live work in 24 hrs a day) neighborhood of San Jose

Santa Clara yes Cambrian Park is split up now; keep Cambrian Park together with Saratoga Los Gatos and Campbell rather than with rest of S Jose.


Speaker #

4091100152311018

52311019

52311020

52311021

52311022






see geographic comment yes no

yes no

no no good school districts high-tech companies transport (101) shopping along El Camino Real in Sunnyvale or Asian Plaza off Wolf Rd in Cupertino

no no

yes no


Speaker #

4091100152311018

52311019

52311020

52311021

52311022


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #


no yes testimony 05.23.11.J


no




Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52311023 H no Los Gatos Santa Clara no

52311024 H no Sunnyvale Santa Clara yes CD 15 doesnt make sense; need fair districts equal pop etc

52311025 H no San Jose Santa Clara yes agree with 15 16 23 - do away with gerrymandering

52311026 pass no no52311027 H no Sunnyvale

SD 14Santa Clara yes agree with 15; fair open

transparent based on constitution so daughter will feel like her votes count

52311028 H no Mountain View

Santa Clara yes clean up districts please (raised to not look at race - surprise to hear that discussed here)


Speaker #

4091100152311023

52311024

52311025

5231102652311027

52311028






no no

no no

no no

no nono no

no no


Speaker #

4091100152311023

52311024

52311025

5231102652311027

52311028


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

Does not believe VRA requires race to be taken into consideration in redistricting

no

no

no

nono

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52311029 H family from India grew up all over

no dont draw lines based on ethnicity - I dont need Indian to represent me I need an American to represent me; VRA doesnt say you should discriminate based on raceethnicity

from all over world

no

52311030 H no Gilroy 7 yrs Santa Clara yes gave her districts; wants Gilroy Morgan Hill and San Martin in same CD

52311031 H engineer no Santa Clara valley

Santa Clara yes Saratoga Los Gatos Sunnyvale Cupertino Campbell western San Jose that borders on Los Gators; western portion of 88017 is part of his COI

52311032 H S professor no yes Sunnyvale Cupertino Santa Clara Mt View together (submits map) - API communities

52311033 H S no Milipitas Santa Clara yes Milipitas with Fremont and Berryessa in a single AD


Speaker #

4091100152311029

52311030

52311031

52311032

52311033






no no

no yes share commonalities families horses large farms

natural boundary on hwy 880 hwy 17

no no

no no

no yes Filipino pop but also diverse and we all workliveshopfamilyfriends in all 3 areas


Speaker #

4091100152311029

52311030

52311031

52311032

52311033


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no yes CAPAFR testimony and two maps

05.23.11.M

no yes CAPAFR testimony 05.23.11.N



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52311034 H S yes Asian Amer for Community Involvement (AACI) - service HHS needs (lists services) in San Jose area

yes Asian American community should be viewed as COI and not be split up

52311035 H S (presents state-wide Assembly Plan)

no yes map that doesnt cross city and county lines as much as possible 1100 of 1 deviation - please use something to this standard; value neutral turned off race politics; use only clear communities

52311036 H yes UAW Numi Job Placement Project

yes keep CD 13 in tact; absorb Milpitas if need to not Pleasanton Livermore; Q if have to drop? A north of San Leandro before Oakland

52311037 H youth organizer

no yes Fremont Newark Union City (tri-city area - gateway to Silicon Valley); then add Milpitas Berryessa for Suburan Silicon Valley District


Speaker #

4091100152311034

52311035

52311036

52311037






no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100152311034

52311035

52311036

52311037


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes CAPAFR testimony 05.23.11.O

no yes Starting Assembly Plan 05.23.11.P

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52311038 H no western San JoseSaragtoga area

Santa Clara yes his area is nothing in common with Centralurban San Jose; nor with Gilroy; keep western San Jose Campbell Los Gatos Saratoga together have most in common; wants better looking districts

52311039 H yes APALC presenting state plan

no

52311040 H no Mt View and now Sunnyvale

Santa Clara yes separate Bay Area from Central Valley (800 mi stretch in center of state)

52311041 H no Montara unicorporated San Mateo Co

San Mateo yes CD 12 AD 21; dont divide by race ethnicity religion have; would like Half Moon Bay in district and be fair

52311042 H yes Silicon Valley Leadership Group speaking on behalf of

yes please consider Silicon Valley a COI and kept in one CD

52311043 H no yes keep cites in tact use natural and geographic boundaries

52311044 pass no no52311045 H S worked in high

tech for.no Mountain

ViewSanta Clara yes Pacifica down to Capitola and

Aptos - make a CD; green bluepink purple on map; says how to add in various areas

52311046 H S no yes keep our little district united - zip code area 95120


Speaker #

4091100152311038

52311039

52311040

52311041

52311042

52311043

5231104452311045

52311046






Q 88017? A yes not Cupertino no no

no no

no no

no no

San Mateo Co Santa Clara Co Scotts valley (S Cruz) Alameda Co part (Fremont? Etc?..)

no no area of economic vitality

no no

no nohwy 880 hwy 17 no no

no yes diverse 30 national ethnic groups


Speaker #

4091100152311038

52311039

52311040

52311041

52311042

52311043

5231104452311045

52311046


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no

nono yes map of proposed CDs 05.23.11.

Q

no yes demographics of zip code 95120

05.23.11.R



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52311047 H retired from Hollister City Govt service

yes LULAC national vice president - cover 5 states

Hollister San Benito yes keep us with similar areas similar to Monterey (city?) Salinas areas

52311048 H - in Spanish no Hollister yes indigenous Johaquin community be in or with Monterey

52311049 pass no no52311050 pass no no52311051 H S no Alamden

Valley neighborhood of San Jose

Santa Clara yes Alamden Valley in only 1 CD 1 AD 1 SD;

52311052 H - spoke in Salinas no no

52311053 H no San Jose Santa Clara yes use natural boundaries mts rivers even freeways

52311054 pass no no52311055 H no Campbell

23 yrsSanta Clara Co 55 yrs

yes COI is around Campbell and Campbell School District west san Jose los gatos saratoga

52311056 H no Cambrian area

Santa Clara yes Saratoga Campbell Los Gatos with us rather than with San Jose; dont separate people by race


Speaker #

4091100152311047

52311048

523110495231105052311051

52311052

52311053

5231105452311055

52311056






no yes large Latino farmworker communities

no no

no nono noyes no

no no

no no

no nono yes same education level

no no


Speaker #

4091100152311047

52311048

523110495231105052311051

52311052

52311053

5231105452311055

52311056


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

nonono yes redistricting issues

affecting Almaden Valley in south San Jose

05.23.11.S

no special interest group - have own goals missions etc; looked at 12 CBO listed on CRC website - each one side of political spectrum.

no

nono

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52311057 H no no

52311058 pass no no52311059 H yes NALEO no52311060 H S yes tech industry org yes see Silicon Valley as COI impt

of high tech industry52311061 H CRLA lawyer no Morgan Hill

30 yrs - before that Gilroy

southern Santa Clara Co

yes divided every which way and not represented by the same person as Gilroy in any of three; keep together Gilroy San Martin Morgan Hill COI

52311063 H yes on a school board

san jose (district 8)

Santa Clara yes talks about city council districts and Latinos; create districts for latinos - big part of area they are not at meeting

52311064 H no yes look at why counties drawn (geographic); take hypen out of america all americans

52311065 pass no no52311066 H yes silicon valley

democratic club?San Jose Santa Clara yes give 2 proposed AD - Latino

pop - will get effective representation dont dilute latino voting blocks


Speaker #

4091100152311057

523110585231105952311060

52311061

52311063

52311064

5231106552311066






no no

no nono nono no

no yes diverse county - 5 languages for ballot materials

no no

no no

no nono yes transportation corridor similar

incomes


Speaker #

4091100152311057

523110585231105952311060

52311061

52311063

52311064

5231106552311066


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no re alphabet groups funded by Soros

nonono yes testimonyletter to

commission05.23.11.T

no yes testimony 05.23.11.U

no yes

no

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52311067 H yes Sunnyvale City Council member

Sunnyvale Santa Clara yes any city of less than 400K should not be split - this is the case with Sunnyvale; a co district (dont include S Jose) with Morgan Hill Santa Clara Palo Alto Mt View Los Altos.; also west valley communities that work together

52311068 pass no no52311069 H from India 26

yrs agono Fremont 26

yrsAlameda yes CD 13 has held on to Fremont

Newark Union City; Columbia U says keep it same; please keep it the same; if need to add go to Milpitas Dublin Castro Valley are ok but NOT livermore pleasanton

52311070 H no Milpitas Santa Clara yes respect city lines of Milpitas; align with Fremont Union City Newark. not with Cupertino or Campbell

52311071 H no no

52311072 H - after 74 no yes CD 11 - sprawls SJoaq Valley to East Bay down to Morgan Hill another district is bad too - for fairness


Speaker #

4091100152311067

5231106852311069

52311070

52311071

52311072






no yes VTA - transportation authority - contigous with SClara Co share water shed public safety services community college district

no nono no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100152311067

5231106852311069

52311070

52311071

52311072


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nono

no

no racists talk about dividing by race

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52311073 H no Sunnyvale Santa Clara no

52311074 H no Menlo Park CD14 SD 11 AD 21

San Mateo no dont split Campbell

52311075 H no San Jose (1 mile from here)

Santa Clara yes dont take hwys as such a strong boundary - sometimes they arent especially in small parts of S Clara Valley

52311076 H no yes AD 21 bad - split in two pieces not contigous; start at GGB and go south

52311077 H was on recreation commission

no Cupertino since 1987

Santa Clara yes COI is West Valley Cupertino Los Gatos Saratoga Almaden Valley; Q who add for AD? A west of 280 (Los Altos Los Altos Hills) or South of S Clara Co.


Speaker #

4091100152311073

52311074

52311075

52311076

52311077






no no

no no

yes no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100152311073

52311074

52311075

52311076

52311077


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no opinion on process NALEO MALDEF etc do they really represent the people? No reason to draw around racial groups - these orgs just want political power

no please dont put emphasis on testimony by union thugs and race pimps; be representative and fair

no yes map of Strong Neighborhood Initative Areas

05.23.11.V

no yes testimony 05.23.11.W

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52311078 H no no

52311079 H no no

52311080 H yes Menlo Park City Council member

Menlo Park San Mateo yes COI of suburban communities that does cross county lines Menlo Park Palo Alto Atherton Woodside Stanford Portola Valley Ladera Los Altos Los Altos Hills North Silicon Valley; could also add Mt View Cupertino along 280 if needed

52311081 H no no


Speaker #

4091100152311078

52311079

52311080

52311081






no no

no no

no yes 280 hwy ties together suburban communities similar demog income tech suburbs of Silicon Valley

no no


Speaker #

4091100152311078

52311079

52311080

52311081


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no criticism of selection process lack of transparency; use common sense.

no lines drawn irregardless of race ethnicity go back to drawing board common sense natural boundary lines based upon geography; CD 11 makes no sense - eg of what not to do;

no yes map with line drawn 05.23.11.X

no no group should have special representation; SCOTUS cases dont trump constitution if not rightly decided



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



52311082 H yes South Bay Labor Council

San Benito yes Silicon Valley is set of cohesive COIs incl S Clara Co parts San Mateo County;Barryessa is a COI should be one AD; West valley (Sunnyvale is heart) - 1 AD East San Jose - 1 AD Q what is East San Jose? AAD 23 boundaries defines it well

52311083 H no San Jose 3 yrs (before Mexico)

Santa Clara no

52311102 H no San Jose Santa Clara yes describes San Jose and Santa Clara Co (north county west county east county south county) Q how divide S Jose? A 680280 boundary; S Clara County is COI

61611001 H - first 107 are purple spoke at LA City Hall

yes Exec Director Academia Advance

yes keep Northeast LA with LA - you did this and stick with it


Speaker #

4091100152311082

52311083

52311102

61611001






no no

no no

no no

no yes


Speaker #

4091100152311082

52311083

52311102

61611001


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no draw blocks like states in US

thanks for coming not good outreachdont see neighbors; dont be corrupt (Ive seen lots of corruption hear and in mexico)

no yes testimony 05.23.11.Y

need to focus on VRA now (did COI pop contiguity)

no good job - did listen to people; good first pass adjust and hold fast



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611002 H S yes represent former mayor City of Monrovia

yes good that didnt split Monrovia in AD dont separate Monrovia from Pasadena in AD

61611003 H S yes CA NAACP President National Board member

yes mostly acceptable in AD SD BOE concerns re CD; want multi-cultural districts instead of bi-cultural district.; to add more ethnicities Davis district - leave Koreatown; Waters district add cities on south or west.

61611004 H environmentalist

no Manhattan Beach

Los Angeles yes SD - LAPVB Palos Verdes up coast then goes to Beverly HillsW Holly - one hour drive any time of day; rec cut out Beverly Hills and West Hollywood and include Century City Westwood Brentwood - make more contiguous - ex of general pt


Speaker #

4091100161611002

61611003

61611004






AD Monrovia Pasadena Altadena Duarte Bradbury; dont split SGV cities in CD currently split 6 cities.

start with Pasa Alta and go East along I-210 minimally include 5 cities listed ideally stop at co border line

no yes Monrovia Pasadena share health center air support for police dept jail job training program newspaper; 4 cities (first 4 listed above) are African American community of upper SGV; Burbank Pasadena Glendale airport COI only applies to CD;

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161611002

61611003

61611004


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #


no need to have economic viability - can have rich and poor districts; ex took airport out of Waters district.

yes testimony 06.16.11.B

no make districts rounder (see ex above) so that easier to get to meetings for district



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611005 H no Long Beach Los Angeles yes re CD; ignoring conflicting set of public testimony i.e. keep LB whole vs. split LB.


Speaker #

4091100161611005






no yes advocacy groups serving PI separated


Speaker #

4091100161611005


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

possibly violations - Samoan-American and other API communities in Carson Long Beach; In CD API in LB separated from Compton Carson etc

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611006 H no Long Beach Los Angeles yes concern re CD s that incl Carson Compton Watts Willowbrook and then those that incl Long Beach Cerritos Bellflower Lakewood Paramount

61611007 H S no Harbor City Los Angeles yes CD omitted 3000 people from South Bay district - doesnt make sense Put all of 90710 within South Bay CD


Speaker #

4091100161611006

61611007






yes yes

Harbor Freeway is natural boundary; Q boundaries of area that was cut out? A N by Sepulveda E by Harbor Fwy W by strip of county (not sure if st or abandoned railroad right of way) S by Lomita Blvd

no yes vital diverse community (rainbow coalition) - get along well


Speaker #

4091100161611006

61611007


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

violation by separating Af-Am communities of Long Beach from Carson Compton; had heard testimony re not splitting similar communities LB espec North LB from Carson Compton WattsWillowbrook neighborhoods

no

no yes testimony maps 06.16.11.C



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611008 H S (list of concerns and alt maps)

yes Pres Community Coalition in South Los Angeles representing AARC tonight (coalition of groups)

South Los Angeles Westmont Census Place

Los Angeles yes draft does alot of what AARC suggest except a few; re curr CD 33 35 37 re InglewoodSouthgate District - airport Westchest and Marina DR out so transp (105) corridor econ engine of dist remov placed with coastal dist; also concern w N LB

61611009 H S (testimony maps of draft SD and nested SD)

environmentalist

yes there as individ but Chair of water qual control district for LA and Ventura Co also on Boards of LConservVoters Heal-the-Bay

yes AD s that are good Westside Santa Monica and ThousOaksSMmts; please nest into SD draft SD (LASClaritaVal) ignores 70 of contig Westside Santa Monica AD instead capped on far N by Santa Clarita AD; S Clar 2 ADs agree this is awkward to be toget

61611010 H yes Valley Industry Commerce Association (VICA) President

yes Thnk CRC for keep SFV communs whole - maps r great; few tweaks reduce neighborhood splits put small Val areas (3 of dist) back in w Val districts; will prov options for clean up that dont change dev.s or affect CVAPof the majmin district.


Speaker #

4091100161611008

61611009

61611010






no yes by pushing district east pits minority groups against each other unnecessarily

no yes 2 AD respect COI (environmental coastal transportation corridors critical COI for communities in around S Monica Mts National Recreation Area)

will provide draft maps overlaying neighborhood boundaries; Q what neighborhood boundaries use? A LA neighborhood council boundaries which split official LA communities ; e.g. N Holly is commun and split into 3 Neigh Councils

yes yes


Speaker #

4091100161611008

61611009

61611010


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

pits minority group ag each other and advantage a group not protected by VRA

no yes memo and maps 06.16.11.D

no yes testimony proposed AD SD

06.16.11.E

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611011 H yes CEO of Greater SFV Chamber of Commerce member of SFV Redistricting Coalition

yes happy that respected most SFV communities; CD Studio City Sher Oaks cut into West Side Studio City Taluca Lake with East LA; Granada Hills cut in half for AD and SD; Rosita (hub of west valley) cut up in CD should have one unified CD.

61611012 H business consultant

yes formerly pres Inglewood COC currently on LA Co ROV advisory committee

Hawthorne 30 yrs

Los Angeles yes concern with CDs not reflecting multi-cultural coalition call coastal district Ivory District;

61611013 H yes former mayor of Culver City

no


Speaker #

4091100161611011

61611012

61611013






Want district wholly win SFV or district where majority of voters are SFV residents

no yes

Westchester Hawthorne Gardena Inglewood Playa del Ray El Segundo Lawndale

no yes multi-cultural coalition in cities listed above; collaborate on many projects some with LAX as apex others with Loyola Maramount ; attribute success to diversity

empowered communities resulted in improvements in employment transportation economic development education

no no


Speaker #

4091100161611011

61611012

61611013


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no look at how assets (education employment environment ) divided up across districts

no problem with website confusing hard to find submitted maps - not attached and have to go to groups website to find them. Lettering so big that blacks out Culver City on some maps espec true on CD map



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611014 H yes represents neighbors work on election board 30 yrs

Hollywood area lower hills

Los Angeles yes keep Hollywood all together - want to be with East Holly always been with Los Feliz and now Silver Lake is included; in past been with West Holly - work well together jobs there now (Kodak Hollywood Highland).

61611015 H no Rancho Palos Verdes 35 yrs

Los Angeles yes appreciate that RPV put back in Beach Cities District; however dont go to LAX but distr goes beyond that; would like to see places she does businesshas friends (Lawndale Hawthorne and Gardena) added

61611016 H S yes speaking on behalf of Granada Hills COC and Granada Hills North Neighborhood Council

Grenada Hills area of SFV

Los Angeles yes AD map SE boundary - line going up is Balboa Blvd to right is the 5; boundary splits 2 communs of G Hills G Hills neighb council; move boundary south to 5 to 405;add LA reservoir area 2-3000 pop to Santa Clarita AD;put back toget 2 comm of G Hills


Speaker #

4091100161611014

61611015

61611016






yes yes not one ethnicity - mixed group of people all together

no yes

yes yes


Speaker #

4091100161611014

61611015

61611016


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes testimony map 06.16.11.F



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611017 H S yes HOPE (Hispanas Organized for Political Equality) Exec Director

Pico UnionKoreatown area

Los Angeles yes draft maps would decrease Latinas political progress and other people of color facing economic disparities; Latinas 18 of state pop and growing; ex 1)Pico Union (Latino) with affluent Beverly Hills and Pacific Palisades yet share nothing w them

(cont) 2) Southgate with Inglewood would diminish political progress of Latinos and Af-am and pit them against each other rather than creating fair and equal represent for both

61611018 H S retired missile engineer 38 yrs

no Torrance Los Angeles yes SD LAPVB South Bay with Beverly Hills West Hollywood but those 2 not part of South Bayaerospace industry ; Carson and Gardena are part of South Bay - put them in LAPVB and take out BH WH


Speaker #

4091100161611017

61611018






no yes

North border of LAPVB SD should be Santa Monica Blvd

no yes won cold war proud of their work Japanese-Americans that returned from WWII went to school became engineers in aerospace industry bought homes in Torrance Carson Gardena and always considered selves part of South Bay

South bay is historic center of aerospace industry whose employees live in Carson Gardena Torrance Palos Verdes Beach Cities Santa Monica.


Speaker #

4091100161611017

61611018


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

comply with VRA to fairly represent all communs and make sure growing Latino pop is not marginalized nor positioned against other communities


want State Senator that knows and represents south bay - that is 100 south bay; hard economic times for Aerospace Industr lack of employment - need good representation in Sacramento




Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611019 H no Torrance (whole life - 54 yrs total in TorranceGardena area)

Los Angeles yes AD SD covering Torrance Gardena; asked at Long Beach hearing for two cities to be toget 2 respect Japanese community there for over 100 yrs; Harbor Gateway NS corrid run EW betw Normandy and Vermont r w Gardena in draft - pls keep it that way

(cont) Gardena friends colleagues support draft maps.

61611020 H no no

61611021 H yes Korean-American Coalition Exec Director part of CAPAFR

yes thank you for keeping Koreatown together as we requested; but also want Thai town Chinatown Historic Filipinotown were not taken care of as well- concerned that these communities were not kept together


Speaker #

4091100161611019

61611020

61611021






Gardena south of Rosencrantz Torrance - greatest Japan-Amer pop in South bay

no yes life continuous across two cities cross borders on daily basis

business owners in one live in other

no no

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161611019

61611020

61611021


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no your methodology needs to be more clear why made decision how weighed testimony - have openness BUT not transparency

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611022 H yes Exec director Thai Community Development Center

yes AD draft splits Thaitown-pls reverse keep Thaitown whole win East Hollywood Biz Improvement District (boundaries subm at earlier mtg);SD keeps all 5 API ethnic neighborh.s whole togeth; for AD try at least 2 API ethnic neighborh.s in a district.

61611023 H no yes need North LB Carson Compton together; do not put North and South LB together - more affluent parts of LB historically commandeered majority funding

61611024 H S (testimony maps) yes SOHA (Sherman Oaks Homeowners Association)

yes pleased that Sherman Oaks kept whole in AD SD; boundary of both distr at Mulholland Drive is right answer; concerned that CD draft split Sher Oaks into NS at Ventura Blvd - southern 12 of Sherman Oaks separated from SFV COI puts with 17 mile wide dst

(Cont) for Western SFVCalabasas CD include all of Sherman Oaks move southern boundary from Ventura Blvd to Mulholland Drive; Q what take out to balance? A will think about and send in email marked 24 to link to testim


Speaker #

4091100161611022

61611023

61611024






Thaitown is on Hollywood Blvd between Western Normandy; draft map uses Holly Blvd as boundary and therefore splits Thaitown into North of Holly Blvd and South of Holly Blvd; draft cuts Chinatown into 3 AD s - CAPAFR submitted boundaries of Chinatown

yes yes

no yes share common problems (lack of Ed resources and gang violence)

economically challenged

Sherman Oaks bounded by Mulholland on S 405 fwy on W Oxnard St on N and Coldwater Canyon on E

no yes SOHA formed in 60s - has history; several 1000 members collaborate well together on local projects for COI of SFV 500 at community mtgs


Speaker #

4091100161611022

61611023

61611024


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

follow law which means prioritize VRA

no

Section 2 protects this area

no

ADSD boundaries in draft allow united voice in state government

no yes testimony letter alt maps

06.16.11.I 06.16.11.J



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611025 H yes Greater West Valley Alliance represent Woodland Hills area

Woodland Hills area

Los Angeles yes dont use Ventura Blvd as divider tears Woodland Hills in two; instead use Mulholland Ridge (higher than Mulh Driv); our community is val dont dislike commun on other side of mountain (like Malibu) but they are really a mountain away from us

(cont) support Conservancy and last speakers idea of using Mulholland Drive rather than Ventura Blvd.

61611026 H yes Woodland Hills Neighborhood Council

Woodland Hills area

Los Angeles yes West SF Valley boundaries are Mullholland Ridge on South 405 on East

61611027 H yes Woodland Hills Homeowners Assoc

Woodland Hills area

Los Angeles yes agrees with previous speakers; keep west SFV cities intact as well as whole west SFV; use VICA maps

61611028 H S no Compton Los Angeles yes CD dislikes HTGCC map; disenfranchise Af-Am community; wants San Pedro in it

61611029 H no no

61611030 H S (testimony) no Culver City 60 yrs

Los Angeles yes Culver City should stay in AD w other areas that also surround Inglewood Oil Company fields


Speaker #

4091100161611025

61611026

61611027

61611028

61611029

61611030






no yes

no yes keep W SFV together to maintain its economic viability

no yes

no yes

no no

no yes COI of bordering oil fields problems that creates


Speaker #

4091100161611025

61611026

61611027

61611028

61611029

61611030


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no yes testimony on form from outside group

06.16.11.L

no wants hwys on map to get idea where they are; compactness measure for each map

need to be together to deal with oil fields

no yes testimony 06.16.11.M



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611031 H yes Americans for Democratic Action Board member

Culver City Los Angeles yes resolved that CRC should comply with VRA; concern with CD IGWSG - east to Bell which has no commonalities (and sets up undesirable black - brown clash) CD West LA to Downtown - take out east area put in Santa Monica Venice maybe beach cities south

61611032 H no yes her neighborhood split; when draw lines break communities up

61611033 H S (map showing population exchange)

yes Beachwood Canyon Neighborhood Assoc.(BCNA)

yes Santa Monica Mountains have a COI (e.g.. aircraft and helicopter problems); dont separate east from west in CD; East Downtown LA (nothing in common w us) should be with East LA CD Los Feliz w west LA CD


Speaker #

4091100161611031

61611032

61611033






no yes

yes yes

no yes homogenous area common geography (e.g. aircraft problems) and political issues


Speaker #

4091100161611031

61611032

61611033


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes map of suggested CD s map showing pop exchange

06.16.11.N



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611034 H S (same as 33) yes President Civic Association part of Coalition of 3 neighborhoods east of Hollywood freeway; founder vice president of BCNA (see speaker 33)

yes all want be in SM mt CD; propose pop exchang(see handout) Los Feliz Griffith Park w Westside (their CD) Hollywood in Westside CD to Downtown CD (unites Hollywood) E part of Downt LA goes E LA CD so Silverlake area (E Holly fwy) Chinatown intact

61611035 H S no Huntington Park

Los Angeles yes CD keep southeast together Walnut Park Southgate Huntington Park Maywood Bell Cudahy Vernon sometimes Bell Gardens Latino COI in same school districts; lots shared associationsagencies; one big family football rivalries all poor

61611036 H yes Long Beach Democratic Club

North Long Beach

Los Angeles yes ADSD North LB w Carson Compton not w Belmont Shore Naples; College Sq neighborh (backyard is Compton College) go into ComptonCarson districts (everything west of LA River Q southern boundary? A Del Amo; at least move 11K (triangle W of river)


Speaker #

4091100161611034

61611035

61611036






yes yes

no yes

yes yes


Speaker #

4091100161611034

61611035

61611036


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes map of suggested CD s map showing pop exchange

06.16.11.O

no yes testimony w old map 06.16.11.P

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611037 H S no North Long Beach

Los Angeles yes ADSD same prev N LB w Compton Carson Paramount not w Belmont Shore Bixby (greater LB). Draft distr split COIs. at least move 11K (triangle W of river)

61611038 H no yes echo previous 2 speakers for AD SD none of Paramount w LB or voice lost instead w N Compton N Carson; many socio-economic problems. Q swap Lynwood for Paramount? A Sure

61611039 H no North Long Beach 16 yrs

Los Angeles yes repeats college patterns that make community; also Af-am Latino API working families; everything west of LA River in CarsonCompton distr; unites historic neighborhoods

61611040 H no North Long Beach

Los Angeles yes AD SD also N LB with CarsonCompton; N LB nothing in common w areas to east or even downtown LB; over 50 Latino 20 Af-Am much more like Carson Compton

61611041 H pastor yes PTA North Long Beach

Los Angeles yes youth in N LB identify w Carson Compton; not in Signal Hill Belmont Hills


Speaker #

4091100161611037

61611038

61611039

61611040

61611041






no yes Econ issues the same among the areas and go to college in that area (CSU Dominguez Hills Compton College) vs in Long Beach.

no yes

yes yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161611037

61611038

61611039

61611040

61611041


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes suggested AD SD map map of city council district with 2010 ethnicity breakdown

06.16.11.Q 06.16.11.R

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611042 H S yes Latino Coalition Pico Union Neighborhood Council

yes propose AD48 SD26;draw majority black Latino Asian districts - comply w VRA; Latino Coalition sensitive to needs of Afr-Am and As-Am (notes in particular Korean). Q CD? A havent had a chance will submit in 72 hrs

61611043 H S yes NW San Pedro Neighborhood Council Board member

San Pedro Neighborhood

Los Angeles yes draft breaks San Pedro into 3 AD s (LAPVBLAIHGLAWBC) but all of San Pedro wants to be together so propose put all of SP in LAIHGw western side of Port of LA and Harbor CityHarbor Gateway neighborhood councils - these all part of LA City

61611044 H S no Playa del Rey 17 yrs

Los Angeles yes ok w CD SD incl Playa del Rey (PDR); not ok w AD PDR is too small part of it playa vista and portion wetlands separated from PDR; strong affinities w beach cities south El Segundo Redondo B Torrance. Move north bound N like w current AD 53.


Speaker #

4091100161611042

61611043

61611044






In letter describes 4 COI w streets

no yes

(geographic comment cont) add Lawndale Del Rey to LAPVB - South Bay aerospace community; West Carson into LAWBC to reunite it wCarson

yes yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161611042

61611043

61611044


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes Press Release re Press Conf on 615 letter to commission map proposed AD 48 map proposed SD 26

06.16.11.U 06.16.11.T 06.16.11.V 06.16.11.W (in same order as description)

no yes pop of San Pedro in 3 draft AD s and what to swap w

06.16.11.S

no yes testimony 06.16.11.AV



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611045 H S no Westchester

Los Angeles yes like prev. pleased w CDSD; Westchester needs to be w rest of west LA City area (Playa Vista Marina del Rey) my COI (where I do everything) local paper serves these areas;

61611046 H no South LA Los Angeles yes For Watts CD Figueroa corridor needs to be included stretching CD from Inglewood to Southgate is not good (nothing in common); go west w this one

61611047 H no yes good that Afr-Am not packed in 50 distrs; dont disassemble existing COI (affected by pollution jobs etc esp LAX); revisit shape; Put Inglewood district back closer to original form and take in more of Port; put North LB w Carson Commerce

61611048 H yes AARC consultant for

downtown LA 5 yrs till recently

Los Angeles yes dont want unnecessary clashes instead of traditional majority districts; VRA issue; Inglewood district goes too far east; coastal district also needs to be changed; LAX areas can be swapped w Southgate


Speaker #

4091100161611045

61611046

61611047

61611048






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161611045

61611046

61611047

61611048


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes testimony 06.16.11.AW

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611049 H former yes former community leader (neighborhood council)

south LA for 48 yrs

Los Angeles yes worked w airport on noise reduction; taking LA port out of district bad as a major employer for Af-Am; pits brown black ag each.Qwhat r LAX areas? AWestchester El Segundo; Qexpl ethnic conflict?Anot good Inglewood Southgate in the same distr

61611050 H speaks on behalf of CD 35

no yes CD draft took assets of a community away from it Westchester El Segundo Loyola Marymount Otis Parsons other U.s (Pepperdine) to a different district; railroad down Crenshaw to LAX - need LAX incl in area

61611051 H S no Santa Clarita Valley 16 yrs

Los Angeles yes please be aware another speaker from Santa Clarita Valley pretends to not be partisan but is heavily involved w Republicans and is proposing safe seats for him and other Republicans


Speaker #

4091100161611049

61611050

61611051






yes yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161611049

61611050

61611051


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes testimony documentation about another speaker being partisan

06.16.11.X



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611052 H yes NALEO yes 90 of growth in CA was in Latino pop but districts do not reflect that; need to draw 50 CVAP districts not cut down on of districts from last time instead reflect Latino pop growth increase ability to become electedLatino political progress

61611053 H yes MALDEF yes drafts not compl VRA;CRC AD 13 Latino opportun districts vs MALDEF 18; SD draft elim 2 of 7 opport distrs; dismantl Sec. 2 distr of Santa Ana Anaheim; CRC method is preserve coast and Long Beach city overly foc on COI concentr like-mind packs distrs

(geog comment cont) CD CRC 6 opp dist one married w large Af-am vs. MALDEF 10 opp distr

61611054 H no Long Beach Los Angeles yes LBPRT CD on does part of it keep Carson Compton w LB but add LB Port because COI based on pollution along Alameda corridor port ships fuel types - worked so hard to form alliances to work on these issues

61611055 H no Long Beach Los Angeles yes Compton Carson in w Ports of LA LB traffic pollution affects all of us on 710 corridor - need one rep to deal w this.


Speaker #

4091100161611052

61611053

61611054

61611055






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161611052

61611053

61611054

61611055


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611056 H S yes Save LA River Open Space

Studio City Los Angeles yes Studio City is small and unicorp so please keep it intact also should not be w Santa Clarita Lake Castaic. Problem w LASCV SD ADs around SM mts; to fix nest the 2 AD.s Thou Oaks-SM Mt West Side-Santa Monica

61611057 pass no no61611058 H yes Committee of

Young Professional Recent Graduates

Torrance Los Angeles yes respect VRA espec for S LA; likes her districts for Torrance

61611059 H S yes Mayor of Carson Carson Los Angeles yes multi-ethnic city council - want CRC to consider holistic multi-ethnic approach to districts; Carson Wilmington area in particular; School districts really impt and great tool for drawing that people will not criticize

61611060 H yes Coastal San Pedro Neighborhood Council Latino group etc

San Pedro heart of Port of LA

Los Angeles yes draft separates SP from harbor in all three maps so SP has no voice. Take out B Hills W Hollywood etc bring in Hawthorne Lynwood Gardena Willmington.SP is tied to harbor economic harbor is our bread and butter 90 of biz in SP relate 2 harbor.


Speaker #

4091100161611056

6161105761611058

61611059

61611060






no yes

no nono yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161611056

6161105761611058

61611059

61611060


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes memo from org w maps

06.16.11.Y

nono

no yes resolution of city council of Carson adopted same day (June 16 2011)

06.16.11.Z

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611061 H S no East LA Los Angeles yes East LA should not be lumped w Hollywood Hills Silver Lake Los Feliz; East LA ( Lincoln Heights etc) should be with other eastside communities east of LA River

61611062 H no East LA Los Angeles yes same as previous speaker; East LA should not be lumped w Hollywood Hills Silver Lake Los Feliz; breaking up Latino vote

61611063 H S no Pasadena Los Angeles yes 210 corridor cities have to stay together

61611064 H S no yes Pasadena Altadena have to be together (Altadena is bedroom community of Pasadena Pasadena has all the services); no to foothill dist

61611065 H no Altadena Los Angeles yes Pasadena Altadena have to be together; w draft have to leave district to get through district; dont draw racialethnic districts

61611066 H no Altadena Los Angeles yes Pasadena needs to stay together as is heart of the whole area; unite all the 210 corridor cities; use 14 corridor for mt district and Acton aqua dolce go in the mt district


Speaker #

4091100161611061

61611062

61611063

61611064

61611065

61611066






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161611061

61611062

61611063

61611064

61611065

61611066


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes petition w printed list of signatories

06.16.11.AA

no

no yes proposed grouping for 2 AD nested into SD and CD

06.16.11.AB

no yes same proposal as 63 w maps of 2 AD and CD

06.16.11.AC

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611067 H no Altadena Los Angeles yes Do not put Alhambra with Pasadena; 210134 hwys are good dividers; do not draw Asian district

61611068 H no yes re CD called SFVWC Unite Reseda and put back in this district; 405 should be boundary

61611069 pass no no61611070 pass no no61611071 pass no no61611072 pass no no61611073 pass no no61611074 H S no Pacific

PalisadesLos Angeles yes nest Thousand Oaks AD and

LASCV AD to make LASCV SD

61611075 H foster care rep no South LA Los Angeles yes Do not divide South Bay cities and south LA as that will dilute resources

61611076 H yes Lawndale City Council

Lawndale Los Angeles yes In CD Lawndale w LAX (South Bay Workforce Investment Board); Westchester w Gardena Hawthorne.

61611077 H no Inglewood Los Angeles yes make CD of Inglewood Hawthorne Gardena El Segundo and it will circle Inglewood. Has not been in Southgate wince 1969

61611078 H no Inglewood Los Angeles yes Inglewood works w other South Bay cities but not with this particular configuration


Speaker #

4091100161611067

61611068

616110696161107061611071616110726161107361611074

61611075

61611076

61611077

61611078






no yes

no yes

no nono nono nono nono nono yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161611067

61611068

616110696161107061611071616110726161107361611074

61611075

61611076

61611077

61611078


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

nononononono yes testimony maps 06.16.11.

AD

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611079 H no Watts Los Angeles yes Does not like the CD which pushed its boundaries east; eastern border should be Alameda corridor

61611080 H no Jefferson Park area

Los Angeles yes use AARC proposed district

61611081 H no yes does not like SD or CD w San Marino and South Gate which have nothing to do w each other; South Gate should be w 710 corridor

61611082 H yes South Bay Workforce Investment Board

yes Inglewood w Lawndale Hawthorne

61611083 H S no Rolling Hills Estates

Los Angeles yes thnx for Palos Verdes Peninsula cities w beach cities to North; CD w Torrance Hermosa Beach is good but disappointed that Lawndale and Hawthorne are taken out of the district (were in June 2 version) and replaced w Venice Santa Monica.

(geogr comment cont) Lawndale is heart of South Bay but have nothing in common w Santa Monica or Venice. Swap out SM Venice w Lawndale Hawth and then add the 12K in the Harbor Gateway south of 405 and all of Gardena

61611084 H no yes Palos Verdes Peninsula Palos Verdes Estates Rancho Palos Verdes should be together (COI based on emergency services planning); also add Gardena and Lawndale


Speaker #

4091100161611079

61611080

61611081

61611082

61611083

61611084






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes Inglewood is one stop center for transportation education public service

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161611079

61611080

61611081

61611082

61611083

61611084


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no yes testimony proposal submitted May 22 how amended proposal wrt June 10 draft including pop stats

06.16.11.AE

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611085 H no yes Venice Santa Monica do not want to be w Palos Verdes and vise versa.

61611086 H no Gardena Los Angeles yes COI boundaries are west of Harbor freeway and North of 405

61611087 H no Signal Hill Los Angeles yes Cambodian community formerly from LB (now Signal Hill LB Carson Compton); COI formed around disasters in SE Asia w fundraising cultural events; keep cultural ethnic COIs together

61611088 H no yes Cambodian economic cultural COI many seniors (Compton Carson w LB Signal Hill)

61611089 H Cambodian genocide survivor from 1975

no Signal Hill Los Angeles yes keep Cambodian community together; LB w Signal Hill

61611090 pass no no61611091 H no Pico Union Los Angeles yes WLADT district has nothing in

common from W to E; drafts do not do justice to Latino community

61611092 pass no no61611093 pass no no61611094 H S yes City of Malibu

city council member

Malibu Los Angeles yes keep current Malibu district - dont like draft


Speaker #

4091100161611085

61611086

61611087

61611088

61611089

6161109061611091

616110926161109361611094






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no nono yes

no nono nono yes


Speaker #

4091100161611085

61611086

61611087

61611088

61611089

6161109061611091

616110926161109361611094


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

nono

nonono yes testimony 06.16.11.

AF



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611095 H S yes City of Malibu mayor pro-tem

Malibu Los Angeles yes Granada HillsMountainPacific Palisades SD does not work

61611096 H no yes El Segundo Westchester are excluded from CD that needs to be fixed

61611097 H S no Long Beach Los Angeles yes put Carson Compton and LB together (an educational COI); not fixing will disenfranchise

61611098 H no Westchester

Los Angeles yes re CD 35 36 LAX is largest employer so dividing COI if LAX not with Westchester; Westchester is not a beach cities community.

61611099 H S no West SF Valley

Los Angeles yes CD draft splits 8 SFV Neighborh (North Hills N Hollywood Northridge Reseda Sherman Oaks Studio City Valley Glenn and Van Nuys; suggested revisions reduces to 4 splits (Studio City North Hills Lake Balboa Lake View Terrace) 3 for VRA.

61611100 H S no yes proposes way to fix CD s around Westside

61611101 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100161611095

61611096

61611097

61611098

61611099

61611100

61611101






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no no


Speaker #

4091100161611095

61611096

61611097

61611098

61611099

61611100

61611101


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes testimony letter from Las Virgenes Homeowners Federation w maps

06.16.11.AH 06.16.11.AG

no

no yes lettertalking pts w appeal from Congressmember to writeread letter at hearing

06.16.11.AI

no

no yes draft CD and suggested revision

06.16.11.AK

no yes suggested corrections to CD around Westside

06.16.11.AL

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611102 H no yes traditional Jewish communities in are greater Westwood area including Pico Robertson Beverly Hills Fairfax Belair; west of 405 is different from east of 405

61611103 H yes City of Inglewood Mayor

Inglewood Los Angeles yes Inglewood should be w Westchester Hawthorne Gardena Lawndale. LAX is the South Bay economic engine; also traffic and environmental issues

61611104 H no yes South Bay cities have nothing in common w South Gate. This sends a bad signal to black community to put them together

61611105 H no Long Beach Los Angeles yes Put together Carson Compton LB and LB Port

61611106 H no yes LB should be w Carson Compton; Gardena Lawndale should not be with Compton

61611107 pass no no61711001 H yes Alhambra City

Council member San Gabriel Council of Govts

Los Angeles yes likes AD SD CD; but please look at if can split less cities its hard on cities to have split representation at state and federal level


Speaker #

4091100161611102

61611103

61611104

61611105

61611106

6161110761711001






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no noQ which? A off top of head Monrovia Duarte

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161611102

61611103

61611104

61611105

61611106

6161110761711001


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61711002 H no yes like SD cause keeps together Pico Union Echo Park etc; but not together in CD please use Latino Coalition for that.

61711003 H yes citizens for San Gabriel Mountains

Los Angeles yes CD is good unites mts with many of people who use it; but notice that mts cross county line; also users are in S Bern Co - please know that; dont need it in AD SD cause federal lands

61711004 H yes also Citizens of San Gabriel Mts

Los Angeles yes please recognize S Bern Co users of mts - put Rancho Cucamonga in SG Mt CDprovide map showing how this is easy.

61711005 H no Westlake community in City of LA

Los Angeles yes dont feel represented well in CD for LA center; MALDEF has map to help; pls dont put us with Beverly Hills

61711006 H yes Latino Coalition of Los Angeles a collaborative

Los Angeles yes SD good grouping Pico Union Westlake etc.; please consider map submitted last nite for AD; asked for CD last nite - his did maps all night - likes current districts.


Speaker #

4091100161711002

61711003

61711004

61711005

61711006






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161711002

61711003

61711004

61711005

61711006


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61711007 H yes CHURLA work w low inc in Pico Union area

Los Angeles yes re look at maps and prioritize VRA Latino not well represented in AD SD and even lose a Latino CD; doesnt like district that goes to Pacific Palisades; also AD that goes from Pico Union really far

61711008 H no Highland Park near San Gabriel Mts

Los Angeles yes thank you for SG Mt districtextend to eastSan Bernardino Co rancho cucamunga also extend north


Los Angeles yes South Pasadena put with low-income area in SE LA; against race-based districts; group with Pasadena etc - similar communities

61711010 H avid hiker no Downey SG mountains

Los Angeles yes concern w Ontario CD; dont live there but visit it frequently

61711011 H armenian family

no Sierra Madre

Los Angeles yes keep together cities below. Draft maps seem to recognize various ethnic groups too heavily

61711012 H no Altadena Los Angeles yes SG mt AD SD CD not covering her COI - she has maps Pasadena as hub and includes surrounding cities - she doesnt know anything about the cities along the forest


Speaker #

4091100161711007

61711008

61711009

61711010

61711011

61711012






no yes impt political issues like immigration reform people in disctrict on opposite sides

no yes

no yes

no yes

Sierra Madre Monrovia Duarte Arcadia Bradberry

no yes

Altadena Pasadena (as hub) no no


Speaker #

4091100161711007

61711008

61711009

61711010

61711011

61711012


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

prioritize section 2

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61711013 H S no Arcadia Los Angeles yes whole in SG mt district between Sierre Madre and Monrovia need to be with other foothill cities

61711014 H no Arcadia Los Angeles yes SG foothill towns arent a COI; more commonalities with cities closer to him.

61711015 H yes Duarte Mayor Pro Temp

Duarte Los Angeles yes commend for draft however split cities which is burden for cities to serve its residents especially split in Duarte

61711016 H S mom nurse no Pasadena 37 yrs

Los Angeles yes has map for AD SD CD; keep cities below together goes into what cities share (schools church girl scouts sports leagues library system and all together ethnicly diverse)

61711017 H S no Pasadena 37 yrs

Los Angeles yes history of Pasa and S Pasa and greater Pasadena area - how grew - railways came thru center to meet their need - cities below are COI and should be kept together. Share School District churches - provide alternative showing this


Speaker #

4091100161711013

61711014

61711015

61711016

61711017






no no

Arcadia Altadena Pasadena Monrovia Sierre Madre

no no

Monrovia Duarte etc no no

Pasadena La Canada Sierra Madre Altadena South Pasadena Arcadia

no no

Pasadena S Pasadena Altadena Sierra Madre La Canada-Flintridge Arcadia are COI; also mentions Monrovia San Marino Glendale in history

no no


Speaker #

4091100161711013

61711014

61711015

61711016

61711017


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes petition w maps

no

no

no yes

no yes



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61711018 H no San Marino 14000 pop small bedroom community near Pasadena

Los Angeles yes go to Pasadena Altadena to needs (like market) share school districts college districts human society; San Marino Pasadena are joined at hip must be same district - Hacienda Heights Diamond Bar have nothing in common with us.

61711019 H S no grew up in Playa Del Rey now in Pasadena

Los Angeles yes CD draft does not reflect her COI (described below); maps favor uninhabited national forest; cities below share boy scouts fire police library college districts shopping centers - Altadena is mostly Af-Am but all one community

61711020 H no Pasadena Los Angeles yes good job in some of areas but this is opp for Pasadena San Marino S Pasadena and some other community to be brought together

61711021 H S (map of neighborhood Council area)

no Boyle Heights

Los Angeles yes low inc community of 150 residents but split in AD draft; active neighborhood council; voice is only resource (COI of common issues challenges security education)


Speaker #

4091100161711018

61711019

61711020

61711021






San Marino Pasadena Glendale La Canada-Flintridge etc

no no

Pasadena is hub with spokes Altadena Sierra Madre La Canada San Marino S Pasadena

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100161711018

61711019

61711020

61711021


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes

no

no yes



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61711022 H S yes SG Valley Economic Partnership

yes CD generally good but pls connect foothill towns by move south bound of foothill district to 210 fwy move south boundary of Covina district to 10 fwy; AD good cause 3 SGV AD s but keep cities win one distr if can - SGV COG said similar thing;

(cont) TY for nesting but each SD mostly outside Val so nest on EastWest corridor to make at least one SD w majority of pop in Val

61711023 H no San Marino Los Angeles yes Pasadena must be w San Marino; San Marino is BR community that depends on Pasadena for everything (shop schools restaurants etc); San Marino w places like Monterey Park that have nothing in common w - you ignored COI

61711024 H S no Whittier Los Angeles yes Good that Whittier is whole; should not be in district w. Montebello and Bellflower - this are a totally different COI and will dominateundermine Whittier voice


Speaker #

4091100161711022

61711023

61711024






no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100161711022

61711023

61711024


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes

no

no yes



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61711025 H S yes Whittier City Council

Whittier Los Angeles yes Good that Whittier is whole; AD is good (w La Habra LH Heights etc) but should not be nested with northern AD for SD - instead go east for SD; CD is not ok COI that is in AD is not in CD Whittier should be w La Habra La Habra Heights etc

61711026 H S (maps) no yes rather than draft SG mt SD wants nesting of 2 draft SG mt AD s - submits maps

61711027 H S no AltadenaPasadena area

Los Angeles yes draft for S. Pasaden does not incl water distr or school dist - hard for state legislator; Altadena w Upland Santa Clarita is not a COI Altadena voice is diluted

61711028 H no San Marino Los Angeles yes COI is w Pasadena where everything is for San Marino; have nothing to do w Diamond Bar

61711029 H S no Altadena Los Angeles yes propose divide SG mt BY Angeles Crest highway (instead of joining along it) segment by putting w adjacent communities


Speaker #

4091100161711025

61711026

61711027

61711028

61711029






no no

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100161711025

61711026

61711027

61711028

61711029


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes

no yes

no yes

no

no yes map showing CRC proposal and citizen proposal for SG mt CD



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61711030 H public school teacher

no Carson Los Angeles yes west Carson should be w Carson in same AD; ; keep API communities together in AD SD; put small pieces of west LB in w Gardena Wilmington

61711031 H S (ltr from Mayor opposing CD)

yes Diamond Bar City Council member

Diamond Bar

Los Angeles yes likes AD SD w Diamond Bar; does not like draft CD - East SGV-Diamond Bar - cities that have nothing in common will be in conflict; works w four corners areas- use that for CD

61711032 H no yes Carson should be w Wilmington San Pedro (which is in 3 different AD s); Carson should not be w Compton and South LA; for CD Carson should not be w LB

61711033 H no yes Keep southeast cities together in all districts Maywood South Gate Cudahy Vernon Bell Gardens Bell Huntington Park

61711034 H yes former member Yorba Linda City Council

Yorba Linda Orange yes Orange and Tustin should be w Yorba Linda in one AD

61711035 H no Diamond Bar

Los Angeles yes Good job but concern w SD in 4 corner area (suburban housing school districts are COI)


Speaker #

4091100161711030

61711031

61711032

61711033

61711034

61711035






no no

no no

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100161711030

61711031

61711032

61711033

61711034

61711035


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61711036 H S no San Marino Los Angeles yes San Marino should not be in CD w Diamond Bar; draw CD on COI as in submitted map Burbank to Arcadia and incl. Monrovia

61711037 H S (petition signed by 73) no Pasadena Los Angeles yes CD keep Pasadena whole w Altadena which is a COI; AD s keep S Pasadena whole w Pasadena Altadena. Pasadena Altadena tightly intergrated (schools shopping etc); draft AD dilutes Afr-Amer voice of area

61711038 H S yes City of South Gate mayor

South Gate Los Angeles yes re SD put South Gate w Arcadia San Marino Alhambra which is not good because Downey Lynwood Paramount LA USD are school districts for their kids; instead break at Alameda Corridor and incl S Bell Bell Gardens Cudahy w South Gate

61711039 H S yes City of South Pasadena council member

South Pasadena

Los Angeles yes keep South Pasadena whole prefer to be put in North w Pasa San Marino Alhambra

61711040 H no Norwalk Los Angeles yes dont put downtown LA in Pico Rivera AD


Speaker #

4091100161711036

61711037

61711038

61711039

61711040






no no

no no

railroad tracks divide LA south cities from other end

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100161711036

61711037

61711038

61711039

61711040


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes map for proposed CD

no yes petition signed by 73

no yes

no yes testimony maps

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61711041 H no South El Monte

Los Angeles yes in CD AD drafts linked to cities that have no COI; for CD El Monte S El Monte West Covina La Puente; for AD do not take out of SGV

61711042 H S no South Whittier

Los Angeles yes put LA county cities together and not w OC cities

61711043 H no Cerritos 40 yr

Los Angeles yes in SD Cerritos Artesia should be w other LA Co cities not in OC

61711044 H yes La Habra Heights City Council member

La Habra Heights

Los Angeles yes small BR community should be w Whittier Le Habra; our interests run East not to SGV; AD is ok except S El Monte Montebello; SD not ok because w SGV better to put w Diamond BarYorba Linda; for CD prefer being w Whittier or Le Habra

61711045 H S (map alternative) no Gardena 60 yrs

Los Angeles yes 2 AD s elongated - each one not COI - Inglewood w Harbor City WillowbrookLynwood on N w WilmingtonSan Pedro on S; solution (see map) is divide each and make N AD and S AD (would be very racially integrated)

61711046 H yes Sierra Club SF Valley Los Angeles yes use MALDEF maps as starting pts in So CAL


Speaker #

4091100161711041

61711042

61711043

61711044

61711045

61711046






no no

no no

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100161711041

61711042

61711043

61711044

61711045

61711046


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes

no

no

no yes

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61711047 H S yes Chinese American Citizens Alliance CAPAFR SG Valley

Monterey Park 36 yrs

Los Angeles yes SGV AD is good (lots of cities together that wanted) but slight adjust to put CVAP over 50 for Sec 2 AD; for AD SD incl Hacienda Hts Rowland Hts Diamond Bar Walnut; for SD join east SGV west SGV like in CD

61711048 H no Downey Los Angeles yes draft CD is not good; keep Downey whole and w Paramount Bell Flower Norwalk

61711049 H S yes Glendale City Council member

Glendale Los Angeles yes SD CD are good but put Pasadena and Altadena in AD

61711050 H no La Crescenta

Los Angeles yes good that CD keeps unincorpated LaCr w incorported LaCr but AD splits it would like to see it together like in CD; like being w La Canada; agree that mountain district should be vertical chunks not long EW district

61711051 H yes Crescenta Valley Town Council member - unincorporated areas of La Crescenta-Montrose

La Crescenta

Los Angeles yes like that unicorp LaCr-Mont kept together in drafts; please also keep La Canada w unincorp La Crescenta-Montrose (share emergency response resources)


Speaker #

4091100161711047

61711048

61711049

61711050

61711051






no no

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100161711047

61711048

61711049

61711050

61711051


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes

no

no yes

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61711052 H no Bell Gardens

Los Angeles yes does not like draft CD that splits up southeast cities; keep southeast cities together including Cudahy Bell Bell Gardens Lynwood Maywood Commerce; cities have good partnership working w eachother; 710 fwy makes a transportation COI

61711053 H yes Downey City Council member

Downey Los Angeles yes draft CD splits Downey put Artesia into district and keep Downey whole

61711054 H yes APALC yes Like draft CD for Diamond Bar to Arcadia unified voice for Asian-Americans immigrant COI and same media markets

61711055 H S (map) yes Chinese American Citizens Alliance

yes AD is good; CD like cause joins east SGV west SGV; for SD (see map) take CD and add Chino Hills Brea Fullerton

61711056 H S no Monterey Park

Los Angeles yes support Chinese-American alliance SD that joins east west SGV; doesnt like SD draft and details why

61711057 H no yes drafts violate VRA Sec.2 particular in LA So CA- supports Chinese-Amerc Citizens Alliance alternative maps - their 29 SD works


Speaker #

4091100161711052

61711053

61711054

61711055

61711056

61711057






no no

no no

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100161711052

61711053

61711054

61711055

61711056

61711057


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no yes

no yes

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61711058 H no yes AD w La Palma Artesia Cypress Cerritos would like more of Buena Park Lakewood in that AD if can (maybe cannot bec of Sec 2); nest that AD w AD (Buena Park Fullerton Artesia) so have SD running along hwy 91; CD is improveme follows travel pattern

61711059 H no northeast LA

Los Angeles yes good to have northeast LA COI (lang minority) together

61711060 pass no no61711061 H yes City of

Commerce Mayor

Commerce Los Angeles yes Commerce should be w southeast cities

61711062 H no yes split cities in mts are a problem

61711063 H no Pico Union neighborhood of LA City

Los Angeles yes COIs in area based on SES which are disenfranchised by draft - do not put in district w Beverly Hills and Pacific Palisades. Draw opportunity districts for Latinos

61711064 H no yes Put all of Thai Town and Chinatown into Downtown AD; Cerritos - west OC district is good


Speaker #

4091100161711058

61711059

6171106061711061

61711062

61711063

61711064






no no

no no

no nono no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100161711058

61711059

6171106061711061

61711062

61711063

61711064


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

nono

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61711065 H no yes Do not split Pasadena in CD; for AD put Pasadena w South Pasadena Altadena East Pasadena Sierra Madre

61711066 H S (letter) yes Pasadena City Council member

Pasadena Los Angeles yes Keep Pasadena together; move southern portion in SGV foothills; move Upland from SGV into foothill; move portion of Chino Hills to foothill district.

61711067 H no Pico Union Los Angeles yes re Pico Union SD do not split Boyle Heights; supports Latino Coalition proposal which respects COI of same SES same public transportation statefederal resource needs

61711068 H yes Latino Coalition yes draft SD ok; for CD use Latino Coalition proposal; for AD look at Coalition proposal; need to put COIs (educational - LAUSD San Luis FD same work entertainment) in same AD

61711069 H no yes Hancock Park w wrong areas physical barriers and gated communties

61711070 H no Pico Union Los Angeles yes SD almost ok ok if put all of Boyle Heights in it; see Latino Coalition map for AD and for boundaries


Speaker #

4091100161711065

61711066

61711067

61711068

61711069

61711070






no no

no no

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100161711065

61711066

61711067

61711068

61711069

61711070


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61711071 H S no yes supports immigrant community maps; maps should reflect 90 Latino growth; look also at Chinese Amer Citz Alliance map; cerritos Artesia should not be w OC; W LB and E LB should be separated.

61711072 H no San Pedro city of LAPort of LA

Los Angeles yes good to separ San Pedro LBLB Port;but concern that AD SD CD use 110 (Harbor fwy) as border split LA City communs SP Wilmington Harbor City Harbor Gateway Harbor Gateway N; put togeth w Carson to expand go W to Palos Verdes along waterline

61711073 H no Cerritos Los Angeles yes AD is good; but CD split Cerritor please do not; for SD put Cerritos w Buena Park not Orange

61711074 H S no yes draft AD East LA and Boyle Heights should not be w Los Feliz Atwater (geographically separated culturaleconomically different); look at pushing SE boundary westward.

61711075 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100161711071

61711072

61711073

61711074

61711075






no no

no yes COI of communities w same city council rep water district etc

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100161711071

61711072

61711073

61711074

61711075


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes

no

no

no yes

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61711076 H no Cerritos Los Angeles yes Cerritos should be w Buena Park La Palma Fullerton Brea in AD; Asian-American area; CAPAFR maps are good

61711077 pass no no61711078 H no Pasadena

SGV lifetime resident

Los Angeles yes do not split Pasadena from Altadena

61711079 H S yes Former City Council member

South Pasadena

Los Angeles yes in CD South Pasadena should be with Pasadena (common history etc)

61711080 pass no no61711081 pass no no61711082 H S yes LA City Council

Member Chief of Staff

Los Angeles

Los Angeles yes oppose CD draft boundaries separates pico union westlake (COI of immigrants low income challenges like inadeq pub transpaffordable housing - share also w areas to east); dont share interests w affluent communities (palisades rodeo drive)


Speaker #

4091100161711076

6171107761711078

61711079

617110806171108161711082






no no

no nono no

no no

no nono nono no


Speaker #

4091100161711076

6171107761711078

61711079

617110806171108161711082


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nono

no yes

nonono yes



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61711083 H yes Cudahy City Council member

Cudahy Los Angeles yes AD SD is good; CD (Ingle-SG) not good; cause no COI w anything W of Alameda corridor like Inglewood; commonalities (eg 710 pollution) w southeast cities like Maywood Commerce Vernon H Park Bell Gardens Bell - go N instead of W.

61711084 H no Whittier (unincorpated South)

Los Angeles yes good to have whittier unincorp south Whittier in same districts add Sante Fe Springs into LACVN SD (where dine shop cultural events part of specific Rio Honda College District area); keep Cerritos Artesia in same LA Co district

61711085 pass no no61711086 pass no no61711087 pass no no61711088 pass no no61711089 pass no no61711090 H no East LA Los Angeles yes glad East LA kept whole in AD

SD CD; lost Latino CDs not in line w 90 growth or VRA; SD for East LA w Temple City Arcadia San Marino ( nothing in common SES w those);instead grp East LA w Boyle Hts El Sereno Lincoln Hts (so Lat represented)


Speaker #

4091100161711083

61711084

617110856171108661711087617110886171108961711090






no no

no no

no nono nono nono nono nono no


Speaker #

4091100161711083

61711084

617110856171108661711087617110886171108961711090


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

nononononono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61711091 H no El Monte Los Angeles yes keep El Monte whole in AD and recognize environmental COI of SG Mt


Los Angeles yes keep South Pasadena whole and in CD put S Pasa back in w SG Valley

61711093 S no yes61711124 S no yes61711125 S no yes61711128 S no yes61711135 S no yes61711142 S no yes61711171 S no yes61811001 H no southern

anaheimOrange yes problem with AD SD CD of

southern anaheim (flatlands) - more in common with Santa Ana than with Anaheim Hills - more working class and lower income than anaheim hills

61811002 H no live and work in Anaheim

Orange yes keep flatlands of anaheim and santa ana together- concerned with AD SD CD; include northwest Orange with Santa Ana; Westminister Garden Grove

61811003 H yes service org Orange yes flatlands of Anaheim with Santa Ana also include other lower income areas like SW orange


Speaker #

4091100161711091

61711092

6171109361711124617111256171112861711135617111426171117161811001

61811002

61811003






no no

no no

no nono nono nono nono nono nono nono yes

Anaheim Santa Ana Orange Fullerton

boundaries of areas mentioned west 57 and ; SW Orange is west of 55

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161711091

61711092

6171109361711124617111256171112861711135617111426171117161811001

61811002

61811003


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yesno yesno yesno yesno yesno yesno yesno

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61811004 H yes Fullerton College Student Trustee represents 22000 students

Orange yes consider students; south Fullerton with anaheim and keep all S Fullerton together; dont put Chino Hills in SD - not a COI with us - no students from Chino Hills at college

61811005 H yes LULAC Orange yes keep Santa Ana and flatlands of Anaheim add in in south fullerton (south of chapman incl Fullerton College) east G Grove SW Orange incl Chapman college; concern that with AD SD CD dont have SA with Flat Anaheim

61811006 H no Orange yes by separate Santa Ana Anaheim together in CD to allow woman to be elected to Congress

61811007 H no Orange yes two problems with CD 1) separation of SA and Ana - not cause Latino but because communities are the same 2) GG and West w SA - pits Latino and Asian must compete for congress representation; gives alternative

61811008 H yes LULAC Orange yes same as previous flat anaheim santa ana S Fullerton (S of Chapman) and part of GG


Speaker #

4091100161811004

61811005

61811006

61811007

61811008






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161811004

61811005

61811006

61811007

61811008


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61811009 H yes community development in Santa Ana and all of OC works now at Del High center

Santa Ana - live and work

Orange yes santa ana anaheim (S of 91 W of 57) add parts of cities like previous

61811010 H no Orange yes concern with Latino representation in AD SD CD; something about Latinos of votin age making difference in last ten years

61811011 H yes serves victims of crimes - talks about crime in different cities

Santa Ana (lives and was raised in)

Orange yes same as previous keep flat Ana with SA

61811012 H S (thematic maps - income )

yes service org Orange yes same as previous flat Ana with SA

61811013 H S (thematic map of Latinos and of speaking Eng - both from MALDEF)

yes same org as 12 - more on their demographic data changes over time in OC

Orange yes impt to capture trends in maps too


Speaker #

4091100161811009

61811010

61811011

61811012

61811013






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161811009

61811010

61811011

61811012

61811013


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no yes thematic maps

no yes thematic maps



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61811014 H S yes Mana de Orange City - Latino use

lives in Santa Ana; raised in Anaheim strip where working class family settled at turn of century - has official name La Colonia

Orange no

61811015 H no Anaheim west of 57 West Central Anaheim

Orange yes West Central Anaheim (flatlands) shouldnt be with more affluent areas (as is in current maps) should with SA

61811016 H yes rep of non-profit that does community organizing affordable housing development community renewal victims of domestic violence

Orange yes echo previous speakers - need to keep these similar areas together to have voice in Sac which need to develop affordable housing etc


Speaker #

4091100161811014

61811015

61811016






no no

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161811014

61811015

61811016


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61811017 H yes Santa Ana City Council

Orange yes same as previous comments - discusses how past AD SD CD have been good for this area - overlapping districts that provide our collective voice

61811018 H attorney yes part of legal team of LULAC

Santa Ana (live work)

Orange yes keep SA and Ana together (doesnt say part of Ana)

61811019 H S (maps and data) yes LULAC president (spoke in Santa Ana)

Orange yes COI overlaps city boundaries and more impt to keep COI together than city

61811020 H yes LULAC rep Orange yes LULAC defined COI in court in 90s; will sue; also drew lines for LA and for OC. Latinos need to be represented

61811021 H GI yes American GI forum President

Orange no

61811022 H no Orange yes Transportation COI Central Anaheim Santa Ana West part of Orange Garden Grove

61811023 H yes Santa Ana School Board

Orange yes Santa Ana w Central and West areas of Anaheim; VRA was violated no Latino effective districts drawn. LULAC 147 maps should be used


Speaker #

4091100161811017

61811018

61811019

61811020

61811021

61811022

61811023






no yes share public safety (Homeland Security defined area includes these areas) and many other interests

no yes share high teen pregnancy rate - needs legislative attention

no yes

no yes

no no

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161811017

61811018

61811019

61811020

61811021

61811022

61811023


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no must have Lao Hmong Vietnamese translator for a meeting in OC; these are common languages in OC

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61811024 H S (testimony) yes Anaheim School District rep

Orange yes respect boundaries of school districts (SA has school COI with Ana) and same as previous speakers

61811025 H - in Spanish parent no Orange yes continue to join SA and Ana as have been now. Separation could be a disaster affect children culture history.

61811026 H yes president of a committee (DELAC)

Anaheim Orange yes keep Ana and SA together for students and their education

61811027 H S no Orange yes draft CD 47 - splits Latino community; bring West Ana together with SA - multi-generational homes and work in hospitality in Anaheim (Disneyland); also SD 24 same thing.

61811028 H yes Mayor City of Tustin also on boards of Transportation agencies - representing all of OC with three positions

Tustin Orange yes Assoc of CA Cities proposed maps to help you - within 3 deviation - AD SD; want your work to be credible


Speaker #

4091100161811024

61811025

61811026

61811027

61811028






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161811024

61811025

61811026

61811027

61811028


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no yes

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61811029 H no Orange yes references work of Association of CA Cities that 28 spoke about - elected officials worked hard on it (AD SD only) within 97; in draft seems to split more cities than necessary; also have north and south OC together and thats impossible to represent

61811030 H S (map of proposed CD s)

yes OC water district on Board of Directors

costa mesa Orange yes watergeographic considerations drove their map and their map also respects Asian communities and Latino communities (flat Ana with SA)

61811031 H no Irvine Orange yes re importance of Irvine support Water District map of CD s

61811032 H adopted asian child represents parents of Asian-american children

no Garden Grove

Orange yes Little Saigon is center of Asian community; Asians and Latinos each need own representatio


Speaker #

4091100161811029

61811030

61811031

61811032






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161811029

61811030

61811031

61811032


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes map of proposed CDs

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61811033 H CSU Fullerton alum org Owner of small biz in G Grove

yes Vietnamese-American COC

live and work in Little Saigon lives specifically in Fountain Valley

Orange yes praise that Little Saigon kept together in maps - please continue that. Q care about who else in district? A concern only with being together

61811034 H yes Vietnamese American COC small biz owner (inherited from parents) in Westminister; little Saigon is over 2000 businesses and has grown into other cities from one mile strip in Westminister

Orange yes appreciate AD SD CD draft that keep Little Saigon together - please continue

61811035 H talks about Little Saigon Vietnamese-American community

no Little Saigon

Orange yes keep Little Saigon together for Vietnames COI


Speaker #

4091100161811033

61811034

61811035






no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161811033

61811034

61811035


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61811036 H speaking on behalf of Vietnamese family

no Garden Grove

Orange yes Little Saigon biggest Vietnamese community in nation - in GG Westm north FV west SA (Qwhere? A1st st) ; asks that dont cut upneed voice for Vietnamese in Ass Sen Cong.

61811037 H yes City of Westminister city council

Orange yes keep Little Saigon together (Westm G Grove FV); 24 405 fwys G Grove School District; Q please submit a map showing us what we left out A ok later

61811038 H yes Westminister School Board member

Orange yes Little Saigon together (GG Westm FV)

61811039 H no Garden Grove

Orange yes thanks for work to keep our vietnames community together; SD CD maps combine Vietnames Latino; better if Latinos Santa Ana with other Latino area Q where? A Euclid between 68th and 69th is border

61811040 H latino community

no former resident of Santa Ana

Orange yes AD SD CD called SNNAA - keeps Santa Ana together brings together large Vietnamese community; failed to nest correct AD s in SD; different COIs for Asian and Latino in terms of culture and language.


Speaker #

4091100161811036

61811037

61811038

61811039

61811040






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161811036

61811037

61811038

61811039

61811040


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61811041 H no Santa Ana Orange yes Split SA along Asian and Latino lines; keep SA w Ana

61811042 H no Orange yes keep Westminister G Grove together; others ask for Ana with SA rather than w GG - we agree

61811043 H S (letter) yes City of Santa Ana council member - but represent all of OC

Orange yes SA flat Ana together; Q Orange and GG split? A if have to add those to keep flat Ana and SA together then thats fine.

61811044 H no Le Habra City Council

Le Habra (northern rim of OC)

Orange yes first draft allows competitiion minority COULD get elected; concern that SD and AD in LA; keep W Anaheim and SA together cause thats what inspired her to run for office

61811045 H no Santa Ana Orange yes dont fail us - protect minorities as per VRA; Ana w SA

61811046 H works with Latino and Asian pops in OC

no Garden Grove

Orange yes West St W is one E is other - Latino and Asian communties; Resort area is not a divider its the hub of our area (where people work) a community Center; Ana w GG; Ana is different from Ana Hills


Speaker #

4091100161811041

61811042

61811043

61811044

61811045

61811046






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161811041

61811042

61811043

61811044

61811045

61811046


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes letter

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61811047 H yes city of Santa Ana (not part of Assoc of CA Cities)

Orange yes likes santa ana-based districts; keep SA whole look at 55 and 91 fwys; put SA with Ana and GG (issues are forclosure rates and lack of open space). VRA Sec. 2 applies here

61811048 H no LULAC of Santa Ana

Orange yes Districts should reflect growth in Latino Community; Latinos are 44 of OC pop; see SA LULAC map

61811049 H S grad student at CSU Long Beach

yes Altadena Los Angeles yes San Gabriel mt district not good; should be La Canada Altadena Pasadena So Pasadena Sierre Madre Arcadia

61811050 H S (maps addendum to testimony in Whittier - he was 29)

no yes see maps for testimony night before

61811051 H no yes SG mt AD; same as 49 does not like

61811052 H no Orange yes Ana GG SA together or violate VRA; maps submitted by the cities violate VRA

61811053 H no Orange yes Fullerton Artesia Cerritos La Palma Buena Park Cypress for As-Am COI


Speaker #

4091100161811047

61811048

61811049

61811050

61811051

61811052

61811053






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161811047

61811048

61811049

61811050

61811051

61811052

61811053


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no yes addendum to testimony in whittier - was 29 there

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61811054 H S (big map) no yes Brea La Mirada Fullerton Buena Park Cerritos Cypress together; AD should be 22 fwy area south incl Stanton GG Westm FV (COI of different religions culture); also AD with Anaheim Orange

61811055 H Korean Community

no Korean Business Association

Orange yes dont put Cerritos with Garden Grove; put cerritos with La Palma Artesia Buena Park Fullerton - all signif Korean pop

61811056 H yes city council member La Palma

La Palma 20 yrs

Orange yes concerns and comments CD La Palma and one other OC city with bunch of cities in LA County); put us with other North OC cities Cypress Bueana Park Fullerton Los Alimtos

61811057 H Asian Community

no Orange yes make Asian district - keep Vietnames and Korean together

61811058 H yes vietnamese org Orange yes keep Little Saigon together61811059 H S (list of mobile home

parks in OC)speaking for people who live in mobile home parks

no Orange yes mobile home parks do not have representatives - please take us into consideration


Speaker #

4091100161811054

61811055

61811056

61811057

6181105861811059






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yesno yes


Speaker #

4091100161811054

61811055

61811056

61811057

6181105861811059


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes big board map

no

no

no

nono yes list of mobile home

parks in OC



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61811060 H no Brea Orange yes Armenian Community wronged in draft maps want 3 cities (Montebello Whittier Pico) together - they are in AD CD but not SD. Also Crescenta Valley; take La Habra out

61811061 H no La Habra City Council member

La Habra Orange yes concern with AD and SD that combine with LA cities

61811062 H S (testimony) no works Huntington Beach - private therapy practice; does pro-bono work in flatlands of Anaheims - supported by NIMH

Orange yes concerned re anaheim - keep CD 47 as is; no SA w beach cities - left remarks

61811063 pass no no61811064 H no Dana Point City

CouncilDana Point Orange yes Dana Point is split in draft;

please make whole in AD SD and put with other south county cities (shares schools hwy water So County Ch of Commerce); Laguna Woods into Coastal

61811065 H S (poem read) no Buena Park no


Speaker #

4091100161811060

61811061

61811062

6181106361811064

61811065






no yes

no yes

no yes

no nono yes

no no


Speaker #

4091100161811060

61811061

61811062

6181106361811064

61811065


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes testimony

nono

no yes poem



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61811066 H no La Palma yes support AD (OC west) Cerritos La Palma Cypress Buena Park - please keep this going and resist those who dont like it; CD that has La Palma with Long Beach - not good - put us with other OC cities

61811067 H no anaheim Orange yes how could you separate SA and flat Ana - its clear they are one community - connect with bridge of GG; COI is education foreclosures poverty English lang learners; draft is not compliant with VRA

61811068 H - in Spanish no Santa Ana Orange yes Santa Ana and Anaheim face similar probs (eg home burgleries) and east GG too.

61811069 H kids in Santa Ana schools

no Santa Ana Orange yes keep SA with Ana and east GG - is a COI

61811070 H no Orange yes SA Ana east GG (COI w similarities same issues same problems - like home security)

61811071 H S (maps) no Orange yes also want Ana with SA; to do this AD based in SA AD based in Anaheim then nest them into a SD; describes what bridge is between SA Ana (east GG and SW Orange and gives streets - small immigrant area)


Speaker #

4091100161811066

61811067

61811068

61811069

61811070

61811071






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161811066

61811067

61811068

61811069

61811070

61811071


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no yes maps



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61811072 H no Anaheim Orange yes flat Ana SA and E GG kept together in all 3 district types. (COI is immigrant and income lack of parks housing open space); Also mentions Anaheim resort triangle

61811073 H yes mayor of Huntington Beach

Orange yes oppose our CD; share water and school districts with neighbors integrating police fire; attend each others fairs parades festivals; support Water District map proposal for CD

61811074 H no mayor of Orange Orange yes Do not use so much of Orange as bridge between SA Ana use only west of 57 (same as river) called platinum triangle east GG; does not like water district map

61811075 H yes OC Communities Organized for Responsible Development a community organizer

Santa Ana Orange yes same grouping as other with SA Ana GG together in all districts


Speaker #

4091100161811072

61811073

61811074

61811075






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161811072

61811073

61811074

61811075


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61811076 H no Orange yes concern with separation of Asian community talks about Shaun Duane map that complies with VRA; westminister w Huntington Beach Fountain Valley; Costa mesa w Sunset Beach

61811078 H yes City of La Palma Transportation Agency

La Palma Orange yes doesnt like being in CD with 90 LA cities esp Long Beach; put in proposed Loma Linda CD or Le Habra CD

61811079 H no Orange yes CD with Huntington Beach Fountain Valley Westminister; concern with Oceanview School District (work closely with Huntington Beach Unified School District FV school district) and federal funding

61811080 H no Dana Point Orange yes our little city split in half for AD SD - please dont do this; pull Dana Pt in So OC AD which is 2 under and it wont affect deviation much.

61811081 H yes Planned Parenthood

Orange yes SA flat Ana (share problems like high teen birth rate - wants same config of others west of 57 S of 91 each GG south Fuller SW orange

61811082 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100161811076

61811078

61811079

61811080

61811081

61811082






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no no


Speaker #

4091100161811076

61811078

61811079

61811080

61811081

61811082


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61811083 H no Diamond Bar

Los Angeles yes like AD and SD for her town doesnt like CD

61811084 pass no no61811085 H yes Anaheim City

Council Anaheim part of Ass of CA Cities and worked on their maps for OC

Anaheim Orange yes our maps respect city lines like Dana Point; and county lines (there is an Orange Curtain); agree with mayor of Orange that bridge is west of SA River and East GG

61811086 H no unincorporated part of West OC Rossmore (county may merge Rossmore Los Alimitos and Seal Beach into SuperCity)

Orange yes small bedroom community nothing in common with Long Beach or port.

61811087 H yes on LACO as well as other orgs

Orange yes speaking about CD draft - support CD proposed by water district

61811088 H no Orange yes disagree with splitting Irvine wants CD split at Costa Mesa coastal district

61811089 pass no no61811090 H yes letter from

council woman Seal Beach

Orange yes Seal Beach Huntington Beach with similar communities ones linked with now are NOT similar


Speaker #

4091100161811083

6181108461811085

61811086

61811087

61811088

6181108961811090






no yes

no nono yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no nono yes


Speaker #

4091100161811083

6181108461811085

61811086

61811087

61811088

6181108961811090


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nono

no

no

no

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61811091 pass no no61811092 pass no no61811093 pass no no61811094 pass no no61811095 pass no no61811096 pass no no61811097 H no yes one letter re Diamond Bar

Yorba Linda Norwalk districts Le Habra drawn out of those and concern with Le Habras representation; also a letter from Orange council member concern with splitting OC into two or more CDs

61811104 H no Orange yes concern w Diamond BarWalnutLe Habra district - instead want to rotate around and have a North Co OC Highlands district (with Ana Hills) and So OC highlands district

61811105 H S (maps) no Orange yes like previous has alternative to draft moving around various parts of OC - did population exchanges


Speaker #

4091100161811091618110926181109361811094618110956181109661811097

61811104

61811105






no nono nono nono nono nono nono yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161811091618110926181109361811094618110956181109661811097

61811104

61811105


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

nonononononono

no

no yes maps



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61811106 H no Garden Grove city

Orange yes Cerritos Artesia with N OC (Cypress La Palma Buena Park) rather than central OC; happy that GG westm and FV together for Vietnamese but please add west SA; need to unite Latinos in SA and part of Ana for VRA district

61811107 pass no no61811108 H no Orange yes pleased with Westminister

district in draft; talks about congresswoman having been to vietnam and established that connection - doesnt want to start over on that

61811109 H testified at Oakland

yes young professionals for better government founder

yes org submitted SD map before now submitting AD map (taking into acct coastalenvironmental issues)

61811110 H no yes submit proposalplease consider

61811114 H no yes its political61811115 H S (testimony maps) no San

ClementeOrange yes San Clemente should be with

Dana Pt San Juan; CD stuck with San Diego

61811116 H no North OC Orange yes 55 freeway separate Ana and SA - a Mason-Dixon line; anaheim hills has nothing to do with us


Speaker #

4091100161811106

6181110761811108

61811109

61811110

6181111461811115

61811116






no yes

no nono yes

no yes

no yes

no nono yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161811106

6181110761811108

61811109

61811110

6181111461811115

61811116


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nono

no

no

nono

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61811120 H S (maps) no Orange yes maps of AD proposals and maps showing how put COIs together like split GG - east is Latino and west is Asian; pitting latino ag. Vietnamese and latino or vietn ag Indian in Cerritos etc

61811123 H yes CCAG no

61911001 H no Bloomington

San Bernardino

yes AD s drafts look like old one

61911002 H no yes BOE draft - East district - S Bern should be w Rivers Imperial OC (because of water similarities recreation etc; do not split S Bern

61911003 H no yes CD called SBRIA - problem to split Fontan and other cities; school districts are split share freeway repair problems

61911004 H no yes AD proposal of Rancho C with Fontana Bloomington and half of Rialto; this is a watershed COI also a COI based on shared police and other services


Speaker #

4091100161811120

61811123

61911001

61911002

61911003

61911004






no yes

no no

no no

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161811120

61811123

61911001

61911002

61911003

61911004


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes maps

no process issues instructions RPV biz mtg transcripts COI database

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61911005 H no Chino Hills San Bernardino

yes for draft AD CD include Chino Hills and 12 of Chino; Chino Hills Chino Pomona other Pomona Valley towns are COI; this COI should not be with LA

61911006 H no Riverside Riverside yes wants Perris in CD instead of Norco; importance of 215 corridor

61911007 H no Ontario San Bernardino

yes AD CD SD for western S Bern Co has Upland Chino Hills cut out of S Bern Co.; put pomona back in with LA districts

61911008 H yes Inland Action advocacy org for biz leaders economic development based in Redlands - presented 0 deviation maps for Inland Empire

Redlands San Bernardino

yes please look at our maps - 0 deviation plan for AD SD CD

61911009 H yes Inland Empire Economic Partnership (submits maps w Inland Action)

Riverside Riverside yes CD draft displace IE residents such as Upland Chino Hills Temecula; their maps (speaker 8) cut down on city splits and create VRA seat around Fontana


Speaker #

4091100161911005

61911006

61911007

61911008

61911009






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161911005

61911006

61911007

61911008

61911009


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61911010 H yes Inland Action rep and University of Redlands rep

yes Chino Hills and Upland back in IE dont split Redlands in CD

61911011 H yes Inland Action President

yes propose maps that are better CD draft splits us in agregious fashion their CD proposal keep Redlands whole; their AD proposal keeps Rivers whole uses major freeways and splits fewer cities

61911012 H yes Inland Action yes used draft maps to make IE maps better based on knowledge of IE and looked at complying with VRA especially in CD; and put people back in IE. Please look at. Q Equivalency Files? A will get from RedrawCA

61911013 H yes represent 46 hospitals in two IE counties


yes drafts hard to understand far flung; wants IE in tact in AD SD CD (because of growth and health care needs)- likes Inland Action maps; keep Redlands whole

61911014 H yes mayor city of redlands


yes CD splits Redlands does disservice to residents - provided comment; keep Redlands whole


Speaker #

4091100161911010

61911011

61911012

61911013

61911014






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161911010

61911011

61911012

61911013

61911014


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61911015 H no yes supports Inland Action maps its vital to region to keep Upland and Ranch C together

61911016 H yes Mayor of Chino Hills Four Corners Coalition

yes CD draft (of four corners area) divides chino hills oppose it; support AD SD in four-corner area; four-corner area has lots of local districts in common; Q in your map chino hills is split? A yes

61911017 H S (document describing Four Corners area)

yes Four Corners Coalition - cross county lines parts have more in common with each other than with parts of own county

yes cross county lines Chino Hills w Diamond Bar w Brea

61911018 H no San Bernardino

San Bernardino

yes list of cities that are COI (Colton Bloomington San Bernardino Highland etc); also draft has too many districts for one county

61911019 H yes 4-3-21 Coalition yes no connection between Rancho C and Redlands geographically or community wise school shopping etc. Rancho C needs to go in another district to its west


Speaker #

4091100161911015

61911016

61911017

61911018

61911019






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161911015

61911016

61911017

61911018

61911019


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61911020 H yes Coalition 4-3-21 - number of districts S Bern Co should have;

yes want S Bern Co in tact want one district for 100 representation of entire co.

61911021 H no Rancho Cucamunga

San Bernardino

yes Fontana Rialto with Rancho C. NOT redlands; AD Rancho C with Fontana cause school districts need to be together.

61911022 H yes LatinoLatina Roundtable

yes Ranch C and Chino Hills removed from OntarioPomona AD and Fontana should be added. Revisit whole plan to include income and ethnic issues; do not reduced Latino representation

61911023 H yes city manager Moreno Valley

Riverside yes Moreno Valley intact in all three draft districts which is great - support first draft maps Dont change

61911024 H no Redlands San Bernardino

yes reject draft maps in entirety - violate all criteria - fundamentally flawed cant be worked with.


Speaker #

4091100161911020

61911021

61911022

61911023

61911024






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161911020

61911021

61911022

61911023

61911024


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61911025 H no Rancho Cucamonga

San Bernardino

yes AD draft cuts part RC out want it in tact. Also split Redlands want rest of Rancho Cuc back get rid of part of Redlands (which is also split so make it whole again too); CD makes sense RC w communs to south - RC shares HS district with Ontario

61911026 H no yes AD SBCUCuse dev.s to keep more cities toget; support 4321 concept dont use S Bern Co as a filler; doesnt like Redlands being split; natural COI around I15 highway and lists cities to put together (Redlands Loma Linda Highland Mentone Yucaipa)

61911027 H - in Spanish no Moreno Valley

Riverside yes re CD Riverside Moreno Valley Perris is COI (family educational family assistance and hospital programs)); also March AFB should be with it


Speaker #

4091100161911025

61911026

61911027






no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161911025

61911026

61911027


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61911028 H no Riverside (prior to that Moreno Valley)

Riverside yes good draft AD SD close to ours; concern w CD - left out city of Perris (put it back in with Rivers Mor Vall for several reas - Joint Authority for March) - Q what take out if put Perris in? A submitted better CD that meets pop reqtakes Norco out

61911029 H no no

61911030 H yes 4-3-21 coalition yes keep S Bern School District in tact and other school districts - has concerns re education

61911031 H no yes happy to be back in CD AD SD as you drew it. However want San Bern intact - do not split at waterman ave.

61911032 H no desert Riverside County

yes look at my proposalpackage as 3 in Palm Springs; eastern Coachella Valley and Imperial together for all maps


no

61911034 H yes Monday Morning Group (non-partisan advocacy)

Riverside Riverside yes likes maps


Speaker #

4091100161911028

61911029

61911030

61911031

61911032

61911033

61911034






no yes

no no

no yes

no yes

no yes

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100161911028

61911029

61911030

61911031

61911032

61911033

61911034


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no Section 5 is a historical accident - messes up map drawing

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61911035 H yes Monday Morning Group

Riverside Riverside yes group supports the maps; if changes keep us with rest of IE NOT LA NOT OC

61911036 pass no no61911037 H no Pico Union Los Angeles yes must comply with VRA; should

not be w Beverly Hills

61911038 H no Montclair San Bernardino

yes like being with Ontario and Pomona as in CD draft remove R C and Chino Hills and put in Fontana; montclair should not be with dissimilar interests and SES.

61911039 H no Pomona Los Angeles yes upset with lack of representation for Latino in CD s; Pomona Montclair Chino Ontario Fontana is COI AD is good SD is good except too big; for CD Chino should be in there with Pomona Valley

61911040 H yes LWV of Riverside

Riverside yes like and support maps especially re Norco Jurupa Valley Riverside Moreno Valley etc.; like nesting


San Bernardino

yes Pomona Upland Chino Hills San Bernardino Redlands together; dont divide by race and income dont use freeways which are proxies for that; submitted maps that improve


Speaker #

4091100161911035

6191103661911037

61911038

61911039

61911040

61911041






no yes

no nono yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161911035

6191103661911037

61911038

61911039

61911040

61911041


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nono

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61911042 H no Riverside Riverside yes thanks for keeping Riversid Moreno Valley whole add Perris March AFB Mead Valley Good Hope

61911043 H no yes Water transportation COIs watershed of Santa Ana River 215 freeway.

61911044 H no Crestline San Bernardino

yes Crestline Lake Arrowhead Running Springs together

61911045 H professor no yes likes that Rivers wMoreno Val in AD SD CD; take out Norco Corona from CD put in Perris (school district has Perris and Moreno Valley)

61911046 H yes IEAAC yes put unincorporated areas in one district; thanks for paying atten to Ebony Tri; make focus the 1 district that is totally in San Bern incl Font.; RLTFO district tract 27 is part of Rialto 29 blocks1460 residents left out - see last 2pg of submission

61911047 H no Moreno Valley

Riverside yes very excited to be kept in tact; AD SD are very good; CD should include Perris (Perris residents shop in Moreno Valley); take corona and norco out of CD


Speaker #

4091100161911042

61911043

61911044

61911045

61911046

61911047






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161911042

61911043

61911044

61911045

61911046

61911047


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61911048 H no chino Hills - neophyte - young town

San Bernardino

yes chino hills is a family works together studies together stays together and vise versa

61911049 H yes member 4-3-21 coalition

Redlands own biz in San Bern

San Bernardino

yes supports 4321 principle; keep S Bern Co together; also please dont split Redlands in half; Colton and Grand Terrace together.

61911050 H no yes how define COI? How is pinhole of Cochella Valley a COI how is Perris not with Rivers Moreno Valley?

61911051 H yes Hemet City Council

yes HemetSan Jacinto good in AD SD; not in CD - take out of Cochella district put in another (replace Corona); put HemetSan Jacinto Valley with similar areas


yes Upland should stay with S Bern Co in AD SD and CD rather than with LA County; possibly move Chino Chino Hills to be Diamond Bar


Speaker #

4091100161911048

61911049

61911050

61911051

61911052






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161911048

61911049

61911050

61911051

61911052


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?




yes as wife just said made Upland an appendage of LA Co district and takes away its voicenothing in common w Glen Burb; need to put Upland w S Bern Co (esp w Montclair Rancho C) Chino Hills go with Diamond Bar Yorba Linda; keep CD s win co.s


San Bernardino

yes Highland Redlands and San Bernardino City together because form a COI (lists shared projects especially transportation cultural ties too )


yes District called SBCUC splits Crestline off from other mt communities but they are all a COI; make mountain dist all the way to Big Bear

61911056 H no yes Running Springs Lake Arrowhead Crestline are COI; want to be with unicorpated area of S Bern Co (high desert) rather than cities

61911057 H yes Riverside Black Chamber of Commerce - June teenth Committee

Riverside Riverside yes salutes maps thanks for meeting many more would be here but will send comments other ways


Speaker #

4091100161911053

61911054

61911055

61911056

61911057






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no no


Speaker #

4091100161911053

61911054

61911055

61911056

61911057


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?




yes Crestline Lake Arrowhead Running Springs are COI (common school districts etc); need voice of people on Mt. - small communs wsmall voices so need to be together.

61911059 H no Cedar Pines Park - on mountain

San Bernardino

yes agrees w previous speaker; dont split up families of communities

61911060 H no Redlands San Bernardino

yes dont want Redlands split - dont want two Congressmembers consider proposal of 1 for CD

61911061 H no Apple Valley

San Bernardino

yes also likes proposal of speaker 1 happy to have Crestline and other high dessert areas with us in high dessert rather than being with Lancaster Palmdale; Oak Hills and Hesperia should be w mt district - drop mono inyo

61911062 H yes Chamber of Commerce Riverside

yes spoke on May 5 proposing nesting; support draft maps even though Riverside city split; mayor of Riverside has no problems; we believe you did your job. Q ok with way split city of Riverside? A yes Jackson street etcits fine.


Speaker #

4091100161911058

61911059

61911060

61911061

61911062






no yes

no yes

rialto colton muskland redlands half of Fontana etc together in 1 proposal for CD

united by 215-210 no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161911058

61911059

61911060

61911061

61911062


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61911063 H yes arrowhead arms neighborhood association president

arrowhead arms neighborhood - 750 residents county island around city of San Bern

San Bernardino

yes like others want to be in tactwe have 2 SD for our 750 residents; if any way to keep communities together please do it.


San Bernardino

yes want to be with other mountain areas like Crestline Cedar Pines Park Running Springs - wildlife wildfire area - face same issues want one AD and SD

61911065 H no Ontario San Bernardino

yes talked 3 times to you wow you listened to us Not perfect but suggest two areas to fix Rancho Cucha with Redlands splitting of Redlands.

61911066 H no Eastern Cochella

Riverside yes concern with splits; Eastern Cochella different from Western Coch (working class vs snowbirdsvacationers); please re-connect Eastern Cochella (Indio for ex) to Imperial economy. Q which cities w Imperial? A no answer - recogn this main artery


Speaker #

4091100161911063

61911064

61911065

61911066






yes yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161911063

61911064

61911065

61911066


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?




San Bernardino

yes San Bernardino doesnt have parts dont have neighborhood names - its a valley that needs to be together; pair with Redlands but NOT w Rancho C

61911068 H no Rialto San Bernardino

yes supports 4-3-21 plan

61911069 H no La Quinta Riverside yes Coachella Imperial area (asked earlier speaker) Indio Coachella to Calexico on border

61911070 pass no no61911071 pass no no61911072 H yes S Bern NAACP yes supports recommendation

earlier; Rialto with San Bern also add Colton Muscoy Bloomington Grand Terrace; put Fontana in another AD


yes Crestline and Lake Arrowhead is one mountain top - one COI so must be together. Only 2 ways to get their thru Running Springs or 138; share emergency services

61911074 H HS teacher no Riverside Riverside yes fully support AD and SD you drew with CD just add Perris


Speaker #

4091100161911067

61911068

61911069

619110706191107161911072

61911073

61911074






no yes

no yes

no yes

no nono nono yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161911067

61911068

61911069

619110706191107161911072

61911073

61911074


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no complaint about this mtg being in Fathers Day and so far from Cochella Valley - no time to get to it and get a good number especially after mass.

nonono

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?




yes echo 73 re mt COI (emergency services etc)


yes echo 73 75 re mt COI (emergency services etc)

61911077 H no Perris Riverside yes AD and SD great just concern with CD; Mead Valley Good Hope are part of Perris (same zip sch dist) so put all three with Rivers Moreno Vall in CD please; Q what take out? A Corona Norco maybe Eastvale

61911078 H no Perris Riverside yes Perris Rivers Moreno Val are a family - do not break us up - one family like 3 muskateers

61911079 H - in Spanish yes ExecDirector of non-profit

yes keep Rivers Moreno Val and Perris together (work with farmworkers affected by NAFTA in difficult situations so this grouping is impt)

61911080 H no Crestline 40 yrs

San Bernardino

yes cant imagine being separate from other mt areas Cedar Park Running Springs Lake Arrowhead

61911081 H no Crestilne over 37 yrs

San Bernardino

yes mt communities have strong COI (also mentions emergency services); need to be with Running Springs and Lake Arrowhead and not necessarily Big Bear

61911082 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100161911075

61911076

61911077

61911078

61911079

61911080

61911081

61911082






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no no


Speaker #

4091100161911075

61911076

61911077

61911078

61911079

61911080

61911081

61911082


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?




yes need to be with S Bern (where sphere of influence is) and NOT with LA Co

61911084 H no mt communities

San Bernardino

yes CalTrans Distr same for mt communities economy is tied to their common roads; definitely include Big Bear with mt communities too

61911085 H yes Redlands San Bernardino

yes keep Redlands whole wLoma Linda San Bern city Highland

61911086 pass no no61911087 pass no no61911088 pass no no61911089 pass no no61911090 H on radio no no

61911091 H no Cedar Pines Park

San Bernardino

yes mt communities are different from rest of So CA- flatlanders - we love it up there - shovel snow etc.; same water districts same school districts

61911092 pass no no61911093 H no Redlands San

Bernardinoyes draft CD splits Redlands

removes conservative CD and makes safe district for liberal Bacca who doesnt represent us - does not like CD



Speaker #

4091100161911083

61911084

61911085

6191108661911087619110886191108961911090

61911091

6191109261911093

6191109461911095






no yes

no yes

no yes


no yes

no nono yes

no nono no


Speaker #

4091100161911083

61911084

61911085

6191108661911087619110886191108961911090

61911091

6191109261911093

6191109461911095


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

nonononono got to work together -

born in USA w freedom

no

nono

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61911096 pass no no61911097 H yes group of

companies (restaurants shops etc)

yes support SD. s proposed; keep Pomona Ontario Chino together in ADSD

61911098 H no yes happy with Pomona chino ontario montclair district - keep that area (Pomona Valley) together


Riverside yes happy that Moreno Valley in tact; did research for March JPA - real communty the five areas - keep together (Rivers MV Perris Mead valley Good Hope)

61911100 pass no no61911101 H no Crestline San

Bernardinoyes must be with mt communties

which share services Will be disenfranchised if divided


San Bernardino

yes Crestline wLake Arrowhead Running Springs (same water district fire recreation community hospital district school district - well defined community - keep together


Riverside yes Perris w Moreno Valley Riverside in CD; three are a COI; happy w AD SD let down by CD


Speaker #

409110016191109661911097

61911098

61911099

6191110061911101

61911102

61911103






no nono yes

no yes

no yes

no nono yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

409110016191109661911097

61911098

61911099

6191110061911101

61911102

61911103


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

nono

no

no

nono

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61911104 H - Spanish Speaker interpreter spoke only (after pre-reviewing testimony with him)

no perris 23 yrs

Riverside yes happy with AD SD not happy w CD; Perris w Moreno Valley

61911105 H - Spanish Speaker interpreter spoke only (after pre-reviewing testimony with him)

no yes perris Moreno Valley Riverside together

61911106 pass no no61911107 H - Spanish speaker with

same interpreter presenting

no Perris Riverside yes same re Perris Rivers MV; perris nothing in common with other cities

61911108 H - Spanish again with same interpretor speaker did speak a little Spanish at first in mic

no Perris Riverside yes joining Perris Rivers MV

61911109 H - Spanish speaker - interpreter spoke only

no Perris Riverside yes same as other two AD SD good CD must have us with Rivers MV

61911110 H no Perris Riverside yes same as other three AD SD good CD must have us with Rivers MV

61911111 H no yes keep Redlands together; keep cities together

61911112 H no Riverside Riverside yes generally happy espec eliminating OC from us support adding Perris to CD(less in common with Corona and Norco)


Speaker #

4091100161911104

61911105

6191110661911107

61911108

61911109

61911110

61911111

61911112






no yes

no yes

no nono yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161911104

61911105

6191110661911107

61911108

61911109

61911110

61911111

61911112


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

nono

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61911113 H yes on a transportation board

Riverside Riverside yes support Perris with Rivers Mareno Valley in CD- especially transportation issues working on together such as metrolink)

61911114 H no Riverside Riverside yes same re three cities (riverside MV Perris) needed in CD


Riverside yes same as previous for CD include Perris and possibly Mead Valley and Good Hope March ARB; not as much in common w Corona Norco; confused re AD not sure if meant to include Mead Valley Good Hope but should

61911116 H yes Ridgecrest COC Ridgecrest Kern yes fully support maps- happy all in Kern County

61911117 pass no no61911118 pass no no61911119 pass no no61911120 pass no no61911121 H no Moreno

ValleyRiverside yes 8 communities put with other

part of Riverside Co please put them together (Moreno Val Rivers Norco Corona Mead Valley Eastvale) so that Af-Am pop maximized in CD - Comply w VRA


Speaker #

4091100161911113

61911114

61911115

61911116

6191111761911118619111196191112061911121






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no nono nono nono nono yes


Speaker #

4091100161911113

61911114

61911115

61911116

6191111761911118619111196191112061911121


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

nonononono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61911122 H physician no Redlands San Bernardino

yes need to link cities in S Bern Co (Redlands Highland Loma Linda S Bern) in all three districts; do not use hwys as borders as that cuts communities that live on both sides; agrees re Rivers MV Perris too based on work in that area

61911123 H - speaks in Spanish and English

no Riverside Riverside yes adhere to VRA for Latino low income communities - dont ignore Section 2 of VRA

61911124 pass no no61911125 pass yes no61911126 pass no no61911127 H no Mt

communitySan Bernardino

yes put Crestline back with rest of us

61911128 pass no no61911129 pass no no61911130 pass no no62011001 H S no Calexico Imperial yes coachella valley should be with

imperial because of COI around Salton Sea cleanup health education (CSUUC) cultural and natural resources enterprise zones shared water ways canals. Nothing in common w S Diego but border so no Imperial w SD.


Speaker #

4091100161911122

61911123

61911124619111256191112661911127

61911128619111296191113062011001






no yes

no yes

no nono nono nono yes

no nono nono nono yes


Speaker #

4091100161911122

61911123

61911124619111256191112661911127

61911128619111296191113062011001


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

nononono

nononono yes



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62011002 H S no Imperial yes draft AD SD CD do not have imperial w Coachella Valley and that is the COI (cultural economies linked restoring Salton Sea natural resources renewable energy potential)

62011003 H S yes Imperial County Board of Supervisors Chair

Imperial yes COI is w Coachella Valley (Indio Mecca Thermal La Quinta Oasis) based on Salton Sea issues desert renewable energy (all major employers for both Imperial and Coachella Valley). Align with COI except ok to have south SD areas close to border w Imp.

62011004 pass no no62011005 H S yes SCAPAL part of

CAPAFRSan Diego yes good to have north SD area in

one district; in draft AD problem with Poway Linda Vista and South Bay draft SD also a problem CAPAFR will submit new maps; please follow VRA

62011006 H S no National City

San Diego yes AD draft for South Bay not good; in Chula Vista map Filipino community is divided; SD draft for east Chula Vista east National City is not good; do not prioritize nesting


Speaker #

4091100162011002

62011003

6201100462011005

62011006






no yes

no yes

no nono yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162011002

62011003

6201100462011005

62011006


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes

no yes

nono yes

no yes



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62011007 H S (testimony) no Mira Mesa San Diego yes good to have API community together; Poway should be in RCHMM; look at CAPAFR maps

62011008 H S no yes good that Linda Vista whole but in wrong AD SD cause w wealthy communtiies; put LV in RCHMM because its urban not coastal and has Vietnamese and Hmong; CAPAFR will present maps

62011009 H S yes director of Pacific American Charter School

Linda Vista San Diego yes LV needs to be in RCHMM for AD and moved in SD too; should not be w wealthy communities of La Jolla

62011010 H no Imperial yes CD of Imperial w SD is ok; AD SD Imperial should be with border areas of SD not w east SD (nothing in common w El Cahon)

62011011 pass no no62011012 H S no San Diego yes draw NS districts for API

community; for Filpino district - Bay Terrace; for ADSD have suburban w urban areas but not w east.

62011013 H no Talmadge San Diego yes CD fine; draft AD SD separate Kensington Talmadge so divides community; Kensington w Talmadge is one neighborhood and impt to be together


Speaker #

4091100162011007

62011008

62011009

62011010

6201101162011012

62011013






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no nono yes

yes yes


Speaker #

4091100162011007

62011008

62011009

62011010

6201101162011012

62011013


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes

no yes

no yes

no

nono yes

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62011014 H S no Rancho Sante Fe Homeowners Assoc

Rancho Sante Fe

San Diego yes AD CNSAN has RSF w downtown but it should be w north county communities; submitted maps to fix

62011015 H immigration consultant

yes Calexico City Coucil member

Calexico Imperial yes Imperial w east Coachella Valley; farm workers follow the work into Coachella Valley; for low income people all 3 levels of districts should include eastern Coachella

62011016 H no Imperial yes impt to have Imperial w eastern Coachella Valley does not matter what else is in district. COI is based on desert similar economic needs Salton Sea pollution water renewable energy develop agricultural regiona airquality; south SD is not agricu

62011017 H yes Calexico City Coucil member

Calexico Imperial yes Imperial w eastern Coachella Valley because lots of commonalities (mainly agric); if Imperial in w SD in AD then its voice muted based on social economic ethnic racial differences.


Speaker #

4091100162011014

62011015

62011016

62011017






no yes

no yes

eastern Coachella Valley (Indio Thermal Mecca La Quinta Visa Santa Rosa)

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162011014

62011015

62011016

62011017


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62011018 H yes Calexico School Board member

Calexico Imperial yes Imperial must be w east Coachella vs w SD; impoverished ESL communities students w non English-speaking parents

62011019 H no Imperial yes do not put with SD which is far away; put Imperial w Coachella Valley

62011020 H S no Chair of a Filipino org

Chula Vista San Diego yes Bay Terrace Alta Vista w paradise Hills Bonita east Chula Vista and east National City

62011021 H S no City Heights San Diego City

San Diego yes City Height is diverse community of 30 languages 100 dialects at 80515 intersection; like ADSD draft; in one map piece of City Heights separated and that is fixed in submitted maps

62011022 H no yes eastern Coachella Valley w Imperial not SD w Imperial; low income senior pop cant go to SD as its too expensive

62011023 H Filipino-American

no Oak Park San Diego City

San Diego yes API COI of urban San Diego City Heights Oak Park and Paradise Hills in AD LMSAND; nest LMSAND SNSAND to make SD - unite urban parts along hwy I -8 El Cajon University Ave


Speaker #

4091100162011018

62011019

62011020

62011021

62011022

62011023






no yes

no yes

no yes

yes yes

no yes

yes yes


Speaker #

4091100162011018

62011019

62011020

62011021

62011022

62011023


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes

no yes

no

no yes



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62011024 H no El Cajon east SD county area

San Diego yes El Cajon in east county should not be connected to Imperial; Alpine Rancho San Diego Julian Warner Spings Santee together w us go north along east border (share fire danger state park forest tribal lds) - current AD 77 is good and reflect our COI

62011025 H no Lake Marina Village area east SD County

San Diego yes Lake Marina Campo connect w El Cajon Alpine Santee Rancho SD Jamul Pine Valley; share forest state park use borders of AD 77

62011026 H S no Santee east SD County

San Diego yes do not include east County w Imperial Co (now is in AD SD ISAND); instead put in area east of I15 - wildfire protection area; likes CD NESAN - use that to guide AD SD.

62011027 H S no Alpine San Diego yes El Cajon through forest tribal lands (recreational outdoors); Ramona Poway can be included; same type of fire ara

62011028 H no yes Barrio district does not need to be split link Pt Loma w Barrio Logan


Speaker #

4091100162011024

62011025

62011026

62011027

62011028






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162011024

62011025

62011026

62011027

62011028


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes

no yes

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62011029 H no yes Kensington Talmadge together w normal heights etc; in SD put w uptown district; nothing in common w Imperial Co

62011030 H no yes use CD draft as model to draw area in AD SD need to have east SD County separate from imperial; all the way up to Julian

62011031 H no Rancho Penesquitas San Diego City

San Diego yes Rancho Penesquitas with Escondido Poway

62011032 H S yes Filipino-Amer org yes COI submitted on May 14 not reflected in draft South Bay AD not goodeastern Chula Vista split Eastlake neighborhood split (Chula Vista APIs employed there so dilutes voting power; east National City split hospital there employs serves Filip-Ams)

(cont.) see new CAPAFR maps

62011033 H S fire chief yes Rancho Sante Fe FD Fire Chief

Rancho Sante Fe

San Diego yes Fire district is COI Ranch Sante FeFairbanks Ranch incl in coastal but should be w inland where have same fire threat; incl western portion of FD w inland portion in RCHMM


Speaker #

4091100162011029

62011030

62011031

62011032

62011033






no yes

no yes

no yes

yes yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162011029

62011030

62011031

62011032

62011033


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no yes

no yes



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62011034 H - 4 on May 14 yes Collaborative of Pastors on Point Af-Amer org Latino Redistr group African immigrant org

yes pastors Latinos etc submitted maps that were disregarded in drafts - concern w AD 78

62011035 H S (report map) no Culver City Los Angeles yes City County Splits report; BOE split 2 counties 8-9 cities - redid so no cities or counties violated stuck close to CVAP for Sect 5 districts did adjustments w in LA County; will provide equivalency files

62011036 H S no Rolando Village in College Area of San Diego City

San Diego yes reconsider ISAND map that links college area to east SD Co and to Imperial Co; nest LMSAND AD w CNSAN AD to make Sen Distr w urban SD - keep urban SD together

(Cont) we rely on underfunded city services ( all in SDUSD) city needs its own unified voice in Sac)

62011037 H no University City neighborhood of San Diego City

San Diego yes I-5 used as border and splits University in ADSD; put both sides of UCSD campus in same district so have unified voice in Sacramento put all of campus in CNSAN AD CSAND SD


Speaker #

4091100162011034

62011035

62011036

62011037






no yes

no yes

no yes

University City is triangle between hwys 5 805 52; just inland of La Jolla; contains east campus and med center

yes yes


Speaker #

4091100162011034

62011035

62011036

62011037


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62011038 H no City Heights neighborhood San Diego City

San Diego yes LMSAND AD is good - like current; but please change ISAND SD; nest CNSAN w LMSAND for SD; keep City Heights w rest of SD City - City needs voice in Sac

62011039 pass no no62011040 H yes non-profit in

Imperial serves disadvantaged Imperial county (including border region) and Coachella residents

Imperial yes Imperial should be with low inc commun.s in (east) Coachella Valley to have a voice for farmworker commun.s; COI based on poor quality life (high unemployment poor health lack of affordable housing lowest performing education poor air water quality)

(cont) to have fairjust representation need to be combined not anymore w affluent communities

62011041 H no yes keep east SD Co together Jamul Julian Santee El Cajon

62011042 H no Downtown San Diego

San Diego yes keep as much as possible of SD city united so that one rep


Speaker #

4091100162011038

6201103962011040

62011041

62011042






City Heights area is east of 15 north of 94 south of 8

yes yes

no noIndio Thermal Mecca Coachella Catherderal City Blythe Palm Desert

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162011038

6201103962011040

62011041

62011042


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nono

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62011043 H no no (process comment)

62011044 H pastor yes pastor on point; collaborative Afr-Amer w Latino pop

San Diego 57 yrs

San Diego yes May 14 submiited AD proposal (Pastors on Pt Latino Redist org third org ) Latino African immigrants; concerned that you ignored that; Sherman Heights Golden Hills excluded; exclude areas north of I-8

62011045 H from Sudan no City Heights 12 yrs; represents refugee community in City Heights

San Diego yes keep city heights intact; another community member submitted map


Speaker #

4091100162011043

62011044

62011045






no no

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162011043

62011044

62011045


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

VRA is big problem - groups threatening to sue - RPV and inline process review needed asap - why taking so long?

no concerned w lawsuit wants CRC to draw lines instead of cts

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62011046 H S no San Diego 13 yrs in county

yes AD RCHMM most of API but excludes Poway (put in NESAN);Poway connect to RCHMM cities not to east; PUSD split cause schls in Carmel Mountain Ranch Rancho Pensaq Rancho Bernardo; SD NESAN is urbansuburban rural; June 24 CAPAFR will submit fix

62011047 H S no yes Poway needs to be in AD RCHMM to reflect COI; school district is split; SD NESAN puts urban w suburban which makes no sense

62011048 H S no represents Border Patrol in Imperial Co

Imperial yes re border in Imperial County draw ADSD like CD

62011049 H S no represents Cambodian-Amer community

City Heights San Diego yes keep together cambodianAPI community in City Heights - 45th 47th street; has nothing in common w rural communities

62011050 H no Golden Hills San Diego yes Golden Hills should be w Hillcrest City Heights Rolling Hills

62011051 H no Normal Heights City of San Diego

San Diego yes Do not connect to Imperial co


Speaker #

4091100162011046

62011047

62011048

62011049

62011050

62011051






Sikh community is mostly in Poway Mira Mesa Rancho Penasquitos Sabor Springs Rancho Bernardo

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162011046

62011047

62011048

62011049

62011050

62011051


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62011052 pass no no62011053 pass no no62011054 H S no North Park San Diego yes problem w AD SD CNSAN

should be w LMSAND not SSAND; CNSAN is not good for North Park as splits school district

62011055 H no Sherman Heights

San Diego yes Sherman Heights should be w Barrio Logan

62011056 H S no yes Poway should be w rest of API communitysikh (same school district importance of education); similar to Mira Mesa Kerney Mesa Rancho Penesquitas Rancho Bernardo Sorrento Valley Paradise Hills

62011057 H yes Latinos in Action representative

City Heights San Diego City

San Diego yes keep Latino communities together

62011058 H UCSD undergrad on student govt

no yes AD s split the UCSD undergrad community; live off campus in UTC area and in different AD than campus itself; move AD boundary to 805 fwy takes in 25000 people w same demographics

62011059 H UCSD undergrad SD local

no yes same as 58 - move AD boundary to 805 so undergrad together and have voice


Speaker #

40911001620110526201105362011054

62011055

62011056

62011057

62011058

62011059






no nono nono yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

40911001620110526201105362011054

62011055

62011056

62011057

62011058

62011059


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

nonono yes

no

no yes

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62011060 H UCSD undergrad

no yes move boundary so UCSD with UTC area

62011061 H S yes East County Action Coalition

Lakeside east SD County

San Diego yes east SD County is a COI (recreation area equestrian BR communities for City fire risk watershed shared) if merge w Imperial Co would devastate east Co.

62011062 H S yes represents LGBT community in SD

College Area (34 yrs) City of SD

San Diego yes LGBT meets definition of COI but hard to know where live cause not in Census; first draft did good job uniting LGBT in CNSAN except Tamladge College West communities - fix by nesting LMSAN w CNSAN

62011063 H no Point Loma San Diego yes coastal areas in SD should be nested with college areas in LMSAND

62011064 H no yes SD s should be nested w common SES; look at topography not freeways; take south orange from san diego and put in Del mar and Solana Beach; Santee goes into NE San Deigo in college area intact

62011065 H yes Calexico city Council member

Calexico Imperial yes Imperial should be w east Coachella


Speaker #

4091100162011060

62011061

62011062

62011063

62011064

62011065






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162011060

62011061

62011062

62011063

62011064

62011065


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes

no yes

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62011066 H yes Latino Redistr Group of San Diego

yes keep historic Latino areas together; also in OrangeSan Diego area; refer to previous testimony

62011067 H no yes City Heights needs to be united; Oceanside Escondido together w other Latino areas - will submit testimony

62011068 pass no no62011069 H S no Imperial yes Imperial Valley w eastern

Coachella; water agricultural COI also historical ties of both valleys

62011070 H no Oceanside City Council

Oceanside San Diego yes Oceanside should not be w OC in AD SD as nothing in common w OC (different jobs media) orients itself toward San Diego

62011071 H no Lemon Grove

San Diego yes Lemon Grove is part of Af-Amer community needs to be with other Afr-Amer neighborhoods in AD SD; maximize Afr-Amer in districts especially in LMSAND

62011072 H no Imperial Valley

Imperial yes Imperial Valley needs good representation; wants to be w east Coachella because share unemployment pollution poverty



Speaker #

4091100162011066

62011067

6201106862011069

62011070

62011071

62011072

6201107362011074






no yes

no yes

no nono yes

no yes

yes yes

no yes

no nono no


Speaker #

4091100162011066

62011067

6201106862011069

62011070

62011071

62011072

6201107362011074


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

nono yes

no

no

no

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62011075 H S no Rancho Sante Fe Assoc. homeowners association since 1927

Rancho Sante Fe

San Diego yes Rancho Sante Fe should not be in AD SD of draft maps; only unincorporated area in AD AD border cuts through school districts fire sewer ambulance districts

62011076 H no yes Rancho Sante Fe Fire District in 2 districts in AD SD draft maps; should not be in Ocean or city districts; would be good to be in RCHMM

62011077 H no yes AD SD lines not good for UCSD undergrads; move line from 5 to 805 to unite UCSD community

62011078 H no El Cajon San Diego yes District should go northeast; city heights should be reunited; barrio logan w sherman heights. Hwys 1578 more in common than OC

62011079 pass no no62011080 H no yes Navajo area at hwys 8 15;

Terra Santa from Navajo area is good - keep that way

62011081 H no yes keep UCSD area together by moving border from 5 to 805

62011082 H no yes north Claremont split from south Claremont Bay Park should be together


Speaker #

4091100162011075

62011076

62011077

62011078

6201107962011080

62011081

62011082






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no nono yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162011075

62011076

62011077

62011078

6201107962011080

62011081

62011082


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes

no

no

no

nono

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62011083 H no yes Normal Heights Logan Heights and Sherman heights should be together; Chicano Park is cut out of Barrio Logan historic area; look at 8th district council map to see where community is;VRA district at Logan Heights Fire Station.

62011084 pass no no62011085 H no yes Do not nest in south san diego

area; do not connect east San diego w imperial; ok to put paradise hills w national city; imperial should be w border area that goes up west side of San Diego; dont split Barrio Logan; do not put OceansideEscondido w OC

62011086 H no yes unifiy Barrio Logan w Sherman Heights; nest LMSAND CNSAND

62011087 pass no no62011088 H no Golden Hill San Diego yes Oceanside should not be w

OC; CSAND w Linda Vista other low-inc communities makes no sense. No SD w imperial; VRA district for SD is big issue - CAPAFR has proposal for that - follow it.

62011089 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100162011083

6201108462011085

62011086

6201108762011088

62011089






no yes

no nono yes

no yes

no nono yes

no no


Speaker #

4091100162011083

6201108462011085

62011086

6201108762011088

62011089


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

nono

no

nono

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62011090 pass yes no62011091 H S Cambodian

interpreterno City Heights San Diego yes SE Asian community should

be together in LMSAND; put with north San Diego communities and not with rural communties

62011092 H no yes east county AD dont put east county w Imperial County; put w northeast El Cajon - this is a shopping and recreation COI

62011093 H no yes Coachella Valley w Imperial in AD (agriculture Salton Sea renewable energy); imperial has nothing to do w San Diego nothing in common w country clubs

62011094 H no City of Coachella Mayor

Coachella City

Riverside yes concern w all draft districts; 98 Latino community median age 24 yrssimilar to Imperial Co; poor community; Palm Desert 89 white same as Rancho Mirage Indian wells; West Imperial East Coach together; tourism Riverside only 1Bill vs 5Billyr agr.

62011095 pass no no62011096 pass no no62011097 H no San Diego

Imperial Labor Council

San Diego yes two letters about border area COI

62011098 pass no no


Speaker #

409110016201109062011091

62011092

62011093

62011094

620110956201109662011097

62011098






no nono yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no nono nono yes

no no


Speaker #

409110016201109062011091

62011092

62011093

62011094

620110956201109662011097

62011098


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

nono yes

no

no

no

nonono

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62011099 pass no no62011100 H no Carlsbad San Diego yes fix UCSD area62011101 H no yes east Coachella Val should be

VRA district w Imperial and along the border; redo the nesting

62011102 H no Chula Vista San Diego yes largest Filipino community in continental US keep it together

62011103 pass no yes62011104 H no Rancho

Santa FeSan Diego yes for North County Oceanside

down to the coast;keep UCSD together to hwy 805 add in Kearny mesa.

62211001 H no simi valley ventura yes Simi Valley should not be with Santa Clarita. Santa Clarita is 3 freeways and over 40 minutes from Simi Valley. There is no COI for Simi Valley with Santa Clarita Lancaster. Fillmore and Santa Paula might be better with SCL because they are connected.

62211002 H no Ventura yes Santa Catalina should be with Long Beach. People move to Simi Valley to get out of SFV. Officials would have to travel very far based on this draft it is one of the biggest districts in the state. dont separate Ventura county.

Ventura Long Beach


Speaker #

40911001620110996201110062011101

62011102

6201110362011104

62211001

62211002






no nono yesno yes

no yes

no nono yes

Simi Valley Santa Clarita Lancaster Santa Paula Fillmore

no no

Simi Valley Santa Catalina Long Beach

no no


Speaker #

40911001620110996201110062011101

62011102

6201110362011104

62211001

62211002


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

nonono

no

nono

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62211003 H no Thousand Oaks

Ventura yes Want East county cities Simi Valley Thousand Oaks West Lake Village Oak Park Moor Park together in the CD AD and SD. Separate from SFV (dont want to be with Calabasas Woodland Hills Northridge Rolling Hills etc).

Ventura

62211004 H S yes Las Virgines Homeowners Federation President

Las Virgines

yes LASCV district is barely contiguous the connection is artificial and seperates COIs. COIs are eastwest bound to coast NOT NS. Santa Clarita and Las Virgines should not be together. S Clarita should be with Antelope Valley (Lancaster Palmdale).

62211005 H S no yes SD should be combined AD 41 and 42 (Santa Monica Mountains Bay Las Virgines Malibu). 405 and 401 and PCH. Built around backbone of Santa Monica Mtns.


Speaker #

4091100162211003

62211004

62211005






Simi Valley Thousand Oaks West Lake Village Oak Park Moor Park Northridge WoodlandHills Calabasas Rolling Hills

no yes safer in Ventura share community sports etc.

In their small business they serve customers from Oak Park Thousand Oaks (previously mentioned COI) (not Conoga Park Northridge Calabasas) NOT from SFV. Sales tax is cheaper in Ventura.

Santa Clarita Las Virgines Lancaster Palmdale Antelope Valley

no no

Las Virgines Malibu Santa Monica Mountains

no yes public education institutions


Speaker #

4091100162211003

62211004

62211005


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes long comment with map on three sheet of taped together paper - from Las Virgines Homeowners Federation

no yes map with comment taped to it from Las Virgines Homeowners Federation



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62211006 H S no Las Virgines Homeowners Federation delegate

yes CDs do not work because they split up Santa Monica Mountains Recreation Area. It splits this area 3 ways. Keep Santa Monica Mtns Recreation Area intact. Las Virgines is a distinct area including Agoura Hills Calabasas etc.

62211007 H S no Malibu yes Do not put Gorman Santa Clarita Chatsworth to Malibu district. Take lower part of LASVC and combine with LAVSF and LAVS. They share fire protection etc.

62211008 H no yes Simi Valley and Moor Park in Ventura county CD and the AD with Santa Clarita Valley.

Ventura

62211009 H S no City Council for city of Simi Valley

Simi Valley yes Keep Simi Valley intact and with all the communities in Ventura county. Boundaries for Simi Valleys CD are bad it splits Simi Valley divides neighborhood.

Ventura

62211010 H S yes Latino Policy Forum

yes Malibu has different issues than Santa Clarita. N. Ventura is more agricultural than Malibu. COIs in North Ventura county with Santa Clarita not Malibu.

Ventura


Speaker #

4091100162211006

62211007

62211008

62211009

62211010






Las Virgines Agoura Hills Calabasas

no no

Gorman Santa Clarita Chatsworth Malibu

no no

Simi Valley Moor Park Santa Clarita

no no

Simi Valley no no

Santa Clarita Malibu no no


Speaker #

4091100162211006

62211007

62211008

62211009

62211010


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no map with comment taped to it from Las Virgines Homeowners Federation

no yes 2 letters with maps attached

no

no yes 1 letter from City of Simi Valley

no yes 3 maps



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62211011 H yes California League of Conservation Voters Vice President

yes Westside Santa Monica AD - keep Ballona wetlands in one district. LASCV SD - keep Santa Monica Mountain Conservancy and wetlands together. Thanks for numbering odd SDs North to South. Keep odd SDs odd. Wetlands boundaries are Marina del Rey and LAX.

62211012 H yes Ventura County Board of Education

Simi Valley Ventura yes AD should be all of eastern Ventura county (include Camarillo Casa Conejo Thousand Oaks Moor Park Simi Valley.SD should be with Santa Clarita not Santa Barbara (group w other inland valley towns) CD-Simi ValleyMpark should be with rest of Ventura.

Ventura


yes CD - Moor Park Simi Valley and T. Oaks should be together. Combine Ventura with Santa Barbara for CD. SD -do not split Thousand Oaks. You could make an E county seat and W county seat if you have to split T. Oaks. Oxnard can be sepearted from others

Ventura Santa Barbara


Speaker #

4091100162211011

62211012

62211013






no no

Camarillo Casa Conejo Thousand Oaks Simi Valley Moor Park Santa Clarita Santa Barbara

no yes

Simi Valley Moor Park Thousand Oaks

no no


Speaker #

4091100162211011

62211012

62211013


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62211014 H no Santa Rosa Valley

Ventura yes Keep Simi Valley and Moor Park with East Ventura County not with Lancaster. East Ventura County with Santa Clarita AD. Keep inland suburbia cities together and coastal cities together. East Ventura can go with Santa Barbara.


62211015 H yes California Lutheran University President

Thousand Oaks

yes AD - Thousand Oaks should be unified. Oxnard should be unified. SD - inland areas with Santa Clarita makes more sense than with coastal. Thousand Oaks not similar to Santa Barbara. CD - Simi Valley and Moor Park together with Ventura.


62211016 H S no Thousand Oaks

Ventura yes Thousand Oaks Moor Park and Simi Valley are a COI. 101 and 23 Freeways bind these three. Do not make Thousand Oaks part of LA County. Do not split Thousand Oaks.

Ventura

62211017 H no Ventura yes LA and Ventura do not have anything in common. Do not put Ventura county with LA in CD.

Ventura LA


Speaker #

4091100162211014

62211015

62211016

62211017






Lancaster Simi Valley Moor Park

no no

Thousand Oaks Oxnard Moor Park Santa Barbara

no no

Thousand Oaks Moor Park Simi Valley

no yes equestrian firefighting

no no


Speaker #

4091100162211014

62211015

62211016

62211017


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes 1 testimony 1 map

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62211018 H no Canejo Ventura yes do not split Thousand Oaks in AD. Thousand Oaks shares interest with Simi Valley. Use county line as boundary.

62211019 H no Camarillo yes CD - Simi Valley and Moor Park should not be with Lancaster. Ventura should be with coastal Santa Barbara.


62211020 H no yes CD - Simi Valley and Moor Park are linked. Move Ventura into district with Santa Barbara. Let Simi Valley and Moor Park stay with East Ventura county.


62211021 H no Malibu yes SD - Malibu and Thousand Oaks do not have common interest. Coastal communites are COI do not have things in common with inland communities. PCH is deadly and shared interest of the coastal communities not inland communities.

62211022 H no Oxnard yes Simi Valley should be kept with San Fernando Valley. Keep Oxnard whole in AD


Speaker #

4091100162211018

62211019

62211020

62211021

62211022






Thousand Oaks Simi Valley no yes share schools

Simi Valley Moor Park Lancaster

no no

Simi Valley Moor Park Santa Barbara

no yes Simi Valley and Moor Park are linked by geographic area and roads that go to and from them.

Thousand Oaks Malibu PCH no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162211018

62211019

62211020

62211021

62211022


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62211023 H S yes Chairmen of Board Santa Clarita Valley Chamber of Commerce

yes SD - Santa Clarita AD with Eastern Ventura County AD (including Simi Valley Moor Park Camarillo). CD - excludes Newhall. Put Newhall with West Santa Clarita.

62211024 H S no yes Keep Oxnard whole in AD. dont use NS lines. dont put Oxnard with Simi Valley (because Oxnard has a lot of immigrants). Unify Thousand Oaks in AD. Apply EW demarcation for East Ventura County. Same problem in CDs.

Ventura

62211025 H no Simi Valley yes CD - Do not put Simi Valley and Moor Park with Victorville (too far away). No COI of Simi Valley with Victorville or Lake LA.

62211026 H no City Council of Santa Barbara

Santa Barbara

Santa Barbara

yes Keep Santa Barbara county whole inluding longpoke

Santa Barbara

62211027 H no San Buenaventura

yes Keep Simi Valley with rest of Ventura county.

Ventura


Speaker #

4091100162211023

62211024

62211025

62211026

62211027






no no

Oxnard Simi Valley Thousand Oaks

no no

Simi Valley Moor Park Victorville Lake LA

no no

Longpoke Santa Barbara no no

Simi Valley no no


Speaker #

4091100162211023

62211024

62211025

62211026

62211027


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes 1 letter from Santa Clarita Valley Chamber of Commerce

no yes 1 testimony (2 copies)

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62211028 H S yes Supervisors office of LA County

yes respect intergrity of 101 corridor Santa Monica Bay and Westside region. SD Santa Clarita does not utilize good principals needs to be corrected. 2 AD - Thousand Oaks and Santa Monica are logical starting points

62211029 H S no yes SD - LASCV you should nest Thousand Oaks and Westside Santa Monica district together w. Malibu AD. Keep mountain community intact. Include WSFV into Thousand Oaks along 101 corridor. NS is not a COI. Santa Clarita has more in common with Antelope Valley.

62211030 H S yes Studio City Residents

yes Studio City should be whole with San Fernando Valley not with Santa Clarita. Studio City belongs to Santa Monica going to the West. Nest Studio City in with Malibu and West Santa Monica Mountains. Clean up Studio City boundaries

62211031 H S no Pacific Palisades

yes Santa Clarita should NOT be with Santa Monica Mtns. Nest ADs LAVSF and LAWSC.


Speaker #

4091100162211028

62211029

62211030

62211031






Santa Clarita Santa Monica Thousand Oaks

no no

Thousand Oaks Antelope Valley Santa Clarita Malibu

no no

Studio City no no

Santa Clarita no no


Speaker #

4091100162211028

62211029

62211030

62211031


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes 1 letter from LA Board of Supervisors

no yes 1 letter

no yes Blue folder - Studio City Residents Association

no yes 1 testimony



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62211032 H no Moor Park yes SD - Simi Valley up to Santa Barbara is bad Moor Park should be part of Santa Clarita. AD - Simi Valley and Thousand Oaks should be together. CD - Simi Valley and Moor Park should be part of inland communities. Ventura city with Santa Barbara

Santa Barbara

62211033 H no Simi Valley Ventura yes SD - does not nest the right districts together. Inland seats need to be with inland coastal need to be with coastal. CD - Simi Valley and Moor Park should not be with Lancaster Ventura should be with Santa Barbara. Keep Simi Valley intact in general.


yes United county is important. Thousand Oaks Camarillo do not have anything to do with San Fernanado Valley. CD - Simi Valley Moor Park should be with E. Ventura Santa Barbara with Ventura City


Speaker #

4091100162211032

62211033

62211034






Ventura Simi Valley Moor Park Thousand Oaks

no no

Simi Valley Moor Park Lancaster Ventura Santa Barbara

no no

Simi Valley Moor Park Santa Barbara Ventura Thousand Oaks Camarillo

no no


Speaker #

4091100162211032

62211033

62211034


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62211035 H yes Moor Park Chamber of Commerce President

yes AD - keep E. Ventura County together dont split Thousand Oaks. SD - Simi Valley Moor Park need to be nested keep Coast with Coast and Inland with Inland. CD - remove Ventura.

Ventura

62211036 H no Santa Paula yes Keep Oxnard intact keep Thousand Oaks intact and should be with E. Ventura county. Include Simi Valley and Moor Park with Santa Clarita in SD.

62211037 H no Simi Valley yes Simi Valley is not related to Oxnard or anything west of it or any coastal. Thousand Oaks should be with Simi Valley. Agricultural and Coastal do not have anything in common with Simi Valley. Inland cities have more in common with Santa Clarita.

62211038 H S yes Sycamore Canyon Village Homeownders Association Board of Directors

Simi Valley yes CD - divides neighborhoods. Not good. Residents living on same street will be in different districts. Keep Simi Valley intact and in Ventura county.


Speaker #

4091100162211035

62211036

62211037

62211038






Thousand Oaks Simi Valley Moor Park Ventura

no no

Thousand Oaks Oxnard Simi Valley Moor Park

no no

Simi Valley Thousand Oaks Oxnard

no no

Simi Valley yes no


Speaker #

4091100162211035

62211036

62211037

62211038


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no yes Sycamore Canyon Village map



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62211039 H no Somas yes dont break up Ventura county CD - Ventura city with Santa Barbara. Put Coast with coast inland with inland for SD. AD - Woodranch should not be cut in two take out Oxnard and put with Santa Barbara.

Ventura

62211040 H S no Oxnard School District Trustee

yes Keep Thousand Oaks whole in AD. Simi Valley has more in common with Santa Clarita and LA. EVENT district should follow CD pattern.


yes Santa Clarita should not be included with Agoura Hills Westlake Village Thousand Oaks. CD - should be from Thousand Oaks to Woodland Hills because of high tech areas and environmental reason of Santa Monica Range.

62211042 H no Thousand Oaks West Lake Village

yes Thousand Oaks should be put in all three districts that go EAST along 101. T.Oaks has most in common with those in Canejo Valley. AD and SD ok. Santa Clarita is too far away to be w. T.Oaks.CD-put T.Oaks with Woodland Hills West Valley Agoura Hills


Speaker #

4091100162211039

62211040

62211041

62211042






Ventura Santa Barbara Woodranch Oxnard

no no

Santa Clarita Thousand Oaks Simi Valley

no no

Santa Clarita Agoura Hills Westlake Village Thousand Oaks Woodland Hills

no no

Thousand Oaks Santa Clarita Woodland Hills West Valley Agoura Hills

no no


Speaker #

4091100162211039

62211040

62211041

62211042


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes 1 letter from Oxnard School District

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62211043 H no Border Ranch

West San Fernanado Valley

yes Unite WSF valley communities that are split. Dont split Reseda and Northridge and put with West Valley. SFValley Redistricting Collaborative has good proposal.

62211044 H yes LA City Board of Neighborhood Commissioners

yes keep Tarzana whole. CD - West Valley district. West Valley communities should swap with East Valley communities (E and S of 405) to make a more unified West Valley district. Keep Reseda whole.

62211045 H S yes San Fernanado Valley Redistricting Coalition

yes CD - Reunify Northridge Reseda Lake Balboa and Sherman Oaks into West SFV district. Reunify N. Hollywood Van Nuys in ESFV. All of Studio City in WLA. Shadow Hills Tohunga into Foothill D. Swap pop. Between valley districts. Section 2 district


Speaker #

4091100162211043

62211044

62211045






Reseda Northridge no no

Tarzana Reseda no no

Northridege Reseda Lake Balboa Sherman Oaks North Hollywood Van Nuys Studio City Shado Hills Tohunga

no no


Speaker #

4091100162211043

62211044

62211045


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes 5 large CD maps from VICA



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62211046 H S no San Fernanado Valley Redistricting Coalition

yes ADs - Reunify Canoga Park Valley Glen and Van Nuys in WSFV. West Hills and Studio City into Ventura. Granada Hills w. Santa Clarita. N. Hollywood in ESFV. Split Northhills into Santa Clarita and ESFV. Likes SDs- Teluca Lake should be nested.

62211047 H no West San Fernando Valley

yes Reunify Reseda and Northridge in WSFV. Valley communities should be kept whole and either in East or West Valley

62211048 H no Valley Industry and Commerce Association

yes Neighborhood vs. Community maps. Use neighborhood council lines when cities need to split. Some cities do not have neighborhood councils. Neighborhood council lines are inaccurate in many cases and leave out pieces of communities.

62211049 H S no Reseda yes Reseda is considered hub of WSFV. Do not split Reseda in CD. Keep Reseda in WSFV. Good job keeping other WSFV communities together. Dont split Northridge.


Speaker #

4091100162211046

62211047

62211048

62211049






Canoga Park Valley Glen Van Nuys West Hills Studio City Ventura Santa Clarita Granada Hills Northhills Teluca Lake.

no no

Reseda Northridge no no

no no

Norhtridge Reseda no no


Speaker #

4091100162211046

62211047

62211048

62211049


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes 6 large AD maps from VICA

no

no Neighborhood vs. Community maps. Use neighborhood council lines when cities need to split. Some cities do not have neighborhood councils.

no yes photo of Reseda sign



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62211050 H S no Canejo Valley

Ventura yes AD and SD LASCV - OxnardThousand Oaks is COI. Bond is strong with E and S to the Ocean. Coastal and Inland are distinct. SD - OxnardThousand Oaks Unity map is better. Dont split Thousand Oaks dont put with Santa Clarita

Ventura

62211051 H S no Thousand Oaks

yes SD - LASCV Keep Thousand Oaks together do not link with Santa Clarita. Link Santa Clarita with Palmdale Lancaster. Thousand Oaks is better connected to Malibu. Extend SD along 405 including Santa Monica Bay area. SD is bad Malibu w. Santa Monica Bay

62211052 H S yes CAUSE yes AD - EVENT. Keep Oxnard whole. Keep Thousand Oaks whole. Moor Park into SBWV. LOOK AT CAUSE MAP

62211053 H no yes CD - South Asian population in SFV. Keep Tarzana Reseda along 405 intact in CD


Speaker #

4091100162211050

62211051

62211052

62211053






Oxnard Thousand Oaks no yes Hiking in Santa Monica Mountains. Oxnard and Thousand Oaks work together.

Thousand Oaks Santa Clarita Palmdale Lancaster Thousand Oaks Malibu

no no

Oxnard Thousand Oaks Moor Park

no no

Tarzana Reseda no no


Speaker #

4091100162211050

62211051

62211052

62211053


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes 1 testimony

no yes 1 testimony

no yes USB stick with nothing on it 4 maps on 2 pages

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62211054 H S no Clergy United for Economic Justice Ventura County

Thousand Oaks

yes Do not divide Oxnard. Simi Valley and Oxnard should be separate in AD. SBVENT unity map keep everything whole

62211055 H S no member of CLUEJ Mexican American Bar Assoc.

yes EVENT AD-keep Oxnard and Port Hueneme together with Camarillo and Thousand Oaks (SBVENT). COI with Oxnard and Port Hueneme. Simi Valley is distinct and should not be with them. 126 splits city of Ventura

62211056 H S yes Ventura County supervisor

Oxnard Ventura yes Oxnard has been split historically where their representation is marginal. Keep Oxnard whole. AD - keep Oxnard and Port Hueneme together. Likes OxnardThousand Oaks unity make from CAUSE

62211057 H no Chatsworth yes SD - Chatsworth Malibu is not good. Include upper Chatsworth with Santa Clarita with Simi Valley and E Ventura C. Reincorporate Reseda and Northridge into WSFV. ResedaNorthridege in West SFV for CD.

Ventura


Speaker #

4091100162211054

62211055

62211056

62211057






Oxnard Simi Valley no no

Onard Port Hueneme Simi Valley Camarillo Thousand Oaks Ventura

no no

Oxnard Port Hueneme no no

Chatsworth Malibu Santa Clarita Simi Valley Reseda Norhridge

no no


Speaker #

4091100162211054

62211055

62211056

62211057


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes 1 testimony 4 maps

no yes 4 maps on 2 pages

no yes 2 letters - Board of Supervisors Ventura County 1 other 4 maps

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62211058 H no Simi Valley yes SD - Simi Valley has nothing in common with Santa Barbara. Keep inland with inland and coastal with coastal.

Santa Barbara

62211059 H no Oak Park Ventura yes Eastern Ventura County communities should be kept together. Oak Park bw Westlake Village and Thousand Oaks Ventura County all in one AD. SD - should be all inland together. Nest EVENT AD with Santa Clarita AD for SD. Share housing land use patterns

Ventura

62211060 H no yes CD - dont split Northridge and Reseda. Swap with Studio City and Sherman Oaks

62211061 H no Agoura Hills no Agoura Hills has COI with West Valley communties. Communties between Westlake Village and 405 freeway. Move Sherman Oaks and Studio City into East Valley.

62211062 H yes Camarillo Chamber of Commerce

yes Keep Camarillo whole with East. SD - Heritage Valley and Santa Clarita River Valley dont end at LA line.


Speaker #

4091100162211058

62211059

62211060

62211061

62211062






Simi Valley no no

Oak Park Westlake Village and Thousand Oaks Santa Clarita

no no

Northridge Reseda Studio City Sherman Oaks

no no

Agoura Hills Sutdio City Westlake Village Sherman Oaks

no no

Camarillo Heritage Valley Santa Clarita

no no


Speaker #

4091100162211058

62211059

62211060

62211061

62211062


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62211063 H yes Mayor of Thousand Oaks

yes AD - Thousand Oaks should remain part of Ventura County. Supports CAUSE proposal. SD - Simi Valley and Moor Park should be part of northern LA county. Thousand Oaks should NOT be w. LA county. CD-Northern county has more in common with Santa Clarita good

62211064 H yes Mayor pro tem of Thousand Oaks

Ventura yes CD is good. Thousand Oaks should remain whole with Ventura county it will get swallowed by LA. Thousand Oaks are in COI with Ventura (public services) NOT with Valley. Would rather be split with Ventura than whole with LA.

62211065 H yes Greater Conejo Valley Chamber of Commerce

yes Thousand Oaks should remain part of Ventura County NOT with LA. SD - Santa Clarita should not be with Thousand Oaks.

Ventura

62211066 H no Simi Valley yes AD - keep Oxnard intact dont let EVENT hit ocean. SD - nest NWSFV and Santa Clarita with EVENT. Put in Woodranch and take out Piru.


Speaker #

4091100162211063

62211064

62211065

62211066






Thousand Oaks Simi Valley Moor Park Santa Clarita

no no

Thousand Oaks Ventura LA no no

Thousand Oaks Santa Clarita LA

no no

Woodranch Piru Oxnard Santa Clarita

no no


Speaker #

4091100162211063

62211064

62211065

62211066


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62211067 H S yes CAUSE yes Oxnard Port Hueneme El Rio Santa Clara Valley are COI. AD is bad because it splits Oxnard and doesnt align with W and E Ventura county COIs. Other districts ok because they keep COI together.

62211068 H yes Mayor of Malibu yes SD - Malibu shares school district with Santa Monica. 101 405 PCH are transit corridors. (COI) Nest ADs and keep spereate from Santa Clarita. SD is bad.

62211069 H no Studio City yes SD - Dont divide between neighborhood council lines use them as demarcations. Sherman Oaks Teluca Lake Universal City are in COI with Studio City.

62211070 H yes Topanga Town Council

Topanga yes SD - there is no connection between Topanga and Santa Clarita

62211072 S no no62211073 H S no Topanga yes Keep Topanga with Pacific

Palisades and Santa Monica. Topanga is NOT a COI with Santa Clarita. Do not include Gorman.

62211074 H S no Studio City yes keep Sudio City whole (speaker 30 and 69 make same points)

62211075 H S no Studio City yes support speaker 74 and 30


Speaker #

4091100162211067

62211068

62211069

62211070

6221107262211073

62211074

62211075






Port Hurneme Oxnard Ek Rio Santa Clara Valley

no no

Malibu Santa Monica Santa Clarita

no no

Sherman Oaks Teluca Lake Universal City Studio City.

no no

Topanga Santa Clarita no no

no noTopanga Pacific Palisades Santa Monica Santa Clarita Gorman

no no

Studio City no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162211067

62211068

62211069

62211070

6221107262211073

62211074

62211075


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes 1 letter - CAUSE 3 pages of maps

no

no

no

no yes 1 letterno yes mapquest directions to

Gorman CA

no yes 1 letter

no yes 1 letter



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62211076 H S no yes Ojai Valley in favor of EVENT CD if lines exlude Simi Valley and Moor Park. Dont split Ojai Valley from North Ojai Valley (Thatcher school and Upper Orange Rose).

62211077 H no yes dont split Ojai keep whole from summit to Casitas Springs. EVENT and SLOSB boundary cuts off a neighborhood. Keep Ojai valley whole.

62211078 H no Ojai yes happy with AD - SBWVENT and SD. Keep Ojai with West Ventura and Santa Barbara. Ojai is similar to SB.


62211079 H S no Ventura yes CD and SD are good. Put Thousand Oaks in and get Simi Valley out in AD. Oxnard Port Hueneme and Santa Clara Valley are COI. Santa Paula was a section 2.

62211080 H no Santa Paula yes AD - ideally would include all of Santa Barbara and and exclude Simi Valley Moor Park and Thousand Oaks. Keep Oxnard whole. dont include Santa Paula Piru with Ventura in SD.

Ventura


Speaker #

4091100162211076

62211077

62211078

62211079

62211080






Simi Valley Moor Park Ojai no no

Ojai no no

no no

Thousand Oaks Simi Valley Oxnard Port Hueneme Santa Paula Santa Clara Valley

no no

Oxnard Santa Paula Piru Thousand Oaks

no no


Speaker #

4091100162211076

62211077

62211078

62211079

62211080


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no 1 letter 3 maps

no

no

no yes 1 letter 1 court document

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62211082 H no Channel Island Services

yes AD - dont use NS line of Ventura Blvd. to split Oxnard and Port Hueneme. Use Gonzalez EW line and put North Oxnard with Santa Barbara.

62211083 H no League of United Latin American Citizens Oxnard Council

Port Hueneme

yes AD - Do not split Oxnard. Do not include Simi Valley. Oxnard makes more sense with Piru Santa Clarita Santa Paula Fillmore.

62211084 H S no Oxnard yes Oxnard Camarillo Port Hueneme Fillmore are a COI (western Ventura). Do not inlcude Oxnard with LA county. Like SD and CD. Fix AD

62211085 H S no Oxnard Ventura yes CD and SD are good. AD - keep Oxnard whole (with Santa Clara Valley) and NOT with Simi Valley. Oxnard with Port Hueneme and Santa Clara Valley are COI

62211086 H S no CAUSE yes likes SD and CD. AD - keep Oxnard whole. Oxnard and Port Hueneme are a COI. Supports CAUSE map which does not split Ventura

62211087 H S no Oxnard yes AD - supports CAUSE map. Oxnard Thousand Oaks Unity Plan.


Speaker #

4091100162211082

62211083

62211084

62211085

62211086

62211087






Oxnard Port Hueneme no no

Oxnard Simi Valley Piru Santa Clarita Santa Paula Fillmore.

no no

Oxnard Camarillo Port Hueneme Fillmore

no no

Oxnard Port Hueneme Simi Valley

no no

Oxnard and Port Hueneme no no

Oxnard Thousand Oaks no no


Speaker #

4091100162211082

62211083

62211084

62211085

62211086

62211087


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes 1 testimony (3 copies)

no yes hand written letter

no yes 1 letter 1 report 4 maps

no yes 1 letter 1 map



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62211088 H S no Oxnard yes COI is Oxnard Fillmore Piru Port Hueneme. Supports Oxnard Thousand Oaks Unity Map - CAUSE map

62211089 H S no yes Keep Conejo Valley Thousand Oaks area whole and with Simi Valley. Keep Oxnard whole with its COI including El Rio Port Hueneme (in West Ventura)

62211090 H no pass no62211092 H no yes Keep Oxnard whole.

62211093 H S no Santa Paula yes support CAUSEs map that keeps Oxnard whole. Dont disconnect Santa Clara valley (Piru Santa Paula Fillmore) - it needs to be connected to city of Ventura.


yes AD - Camarillo Moor Park Thousand Oaks (keep whole) are a COI. CD - Thousand Oaks and Simi Valley and Moor Park should be together.

62211099 S no no62211100 S no no62211101 S no no

62211105 S no no


Speaker #

4091100162211088

62211089

6221109062211092

62211093

62211097

622110996221110062211101

62211105






Oxnard Fillmore Piru Port Hueneme Thousand Oaks

no no

Oxnard Thousand Oaks Conejo Valley Port Hueneme El Rio

no no

no noOxnard no no

Oxnard Ventura Piru Santa Paula Fillmore

no no

Thousand Oaks Moor Park Camarillo Simi Valley

no no

no nono nono no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162211088

62211089

6221109062211092

62211093

62211097

622110996221110062211101

62211105


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes 1 map

no yes 4 maps 1 letter

nono applauds citizen

participationno yes 1 map

no

no yes 1 mapno yes hand written notesno yes 1 map 1 letter (2

copies)no yes 1 letter - Lompc Valley

Chamber of Commerce



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62211109 S no no62211110 S no no

62211113 S no no62211114 S no no

62211136 S no no62211140 S no no

62211150 S no no62311001 H S no Ridgecrest yes Like all 3 districts. Thanks for

keeping Ridgecrest within Kern county lines and with China Lake Air Station. We want these first lines to be the final lines.

62311002 H yes Nissei Farmers League

yes San Joaquin Valley is distinct. Extending valley lines into Foothill regions and into Bay Area is bad. SJV has own air district. Keep Merced intact in San Joaquin Valley. San Joaquin is heavy agricultural.

62311003 H S yes Merced County Supervisor

yes StanislausMerced County SD should not extend to San Jose Santa Cruz. Drive over a mountain range different water needs is why MRCD district is bad. Previous plan was better. Salinas should not be with central valleythis district.


Speaker #

409110016221110962211110

6221111362211114

6221113662211140

6221115062311001

62311002

62311003






no nono no

no nono no

no nono no

no nono no

no no

no no


Speaker #

409110016221110962211110

6221111362211114

6221113662211140

6221115062311001

62311002

62311003


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes hand written notesno yes 1 testimony 1 map 1

book passageno yes 1 letter 3 mapsno yes hand written testimony

no yes 1 testimonyno yes 1 letter - City of

Lompocno yes 1 testimonyno yes 4 letters

no

no yes 1 map



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62311004 H yes California Latino Water Coalition

yes opposes Merced SD and Foothill SD. Latino farmworkers will lack voice in Sacramento with 1st draft lines. Sacto foothills and Bay Area dont understand issues of Latinos in the valley. High unemployment.

62311005 H S no Merced County Farm Bureau

yes Salinas Silicon Valley and San Joaquin Valley are not COI. San Joaquin is agricultural has unique burdens. Current SD is bad. One rep cannot serve both San Joaquin and Salinas. No Salinas in this district.

62311006 H no yes Foothill SD- Madera is a straddle county (mountain and valley). Bulk of population lives in valley not in foothills. Split county is ok. Madera and Chowchilla goes best with Merced or Fresno.

62311007 H S yes Mexican American Political Association (MAPA) San Jaoquin valley

yes Foothills SD - splits westside of Fresno county. Not good because farmerworkers are COI across the county. See map.


Speaker #

4091100162311004

62311005

62311006

62311007






no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162311004

62311005

62311006

62311007


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes 1 letter - Merced County Farm Bureau

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62311008 H S yes El Concilio de Fresno

yes AD Fresno 2 (western)- good map. Area for removal in Fresno North boundary - Kings Canyon Rd. East - Armstrong St South - California Ave. West - Minniwawa. Removes Sunnyside. (see map)

62311009 H yes Madera County Farm Bureau

yes Foothill and MRCD SDs-Flatlands of Madera not in common w. Foothills like Placer etc. Foothills are white and affluentnot like valley floor. Madera 54 Latino24 unemployed. Madera with Fresno and Merced.CD Split is ok valley has agriculture interests

62311010 H yes Madera Unified School District

yes Madera shares concerns with Merced and Fresno not with Foothill region and Silicon Valley. Madera has high Latino pop. Who are employed by agriculture. Valley floor are poorer communities no COI with Foothills.


Speaker #

4091100162311008

62311009

62311010






no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162311008

62311009

62311010


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes 1 letter - El Concilio de Fresno 1 map

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62311011 H no Merced yes bad air in Merced. MercedMonterey SD - bad pollutionstrict regulation. MercedMonterey need own rep. Monterey Santa Cruz Santa Clara should not be w. Central Valley. Central Valley Stanislaus Fresno Merced Madera ok Salinas ok if needed for VRA.

62311012 H S yes Lompoc City Council

Lompoc Santa Barbara

yes Dont split Longpoc in AD or SD. Longpoc is NOT a correctional facility. Do not split Longpoc is 40000 people. Look into Ojai valley if needed or San Inez.

62311013 H S yes UC Merced yes San Joaquin Valley - keep Valley together

62311014 H S yes Merced County Supervisor

yes SD - is not good for Merced. Merced is aligned with Central Valley NOT coastal counties. Merced should not be with Monterey Santa Cruz Santa Clara. Make district NS along 99

62311015 H no yes Merced and Foothill SD - Do not include Merced with Coast. Do not include Merced and Fresno with Foothills.


Speaker #

4091100162311011

62311012

62311013

62311014

62311015






no no

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162311011

62311012

62311013

62311014

62311015


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes 1 letter - City of Lompoc

no yes 1 letter

no yes 1 letter - Merced County

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62311016 H S yes Merced County Chamber of Commerce

yes Merced SD - Merced is agricultural Scilicon Valley is tech. Merced should be entirely in Central Valleym NOT with Scilicon Valley. Merced should be with 99 corridor (Stanislaus Madera). Nothing in common with coast.

62311017 H S yes Tuolomne County Board of Supervisors

yes Foothill district in AD SD CD. The district is too big for one rep to drive through. Stanislaus was historically part of Tuolomne. Our interest are EW. Modesto. Align Foothills with Central Valley.

62311018 H yes Tuolomne Board of Supervisor

yes Foothill SD CD and AD - Boundaries should be pulled in from north and south and expanded to the West. The population mostly comes from the N and S in this district. Tuolomne has COI with Stanislaus. Receive medical community college through EW.


Speaker #

4091100162311016

62311017

62311018






no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162311016

62311017

62311018


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no 1 letter

no yes 7 letters - Fluetsch and Busby Insurance Merced County Sheriff City of Merced Tuolumne County Board of Supervisors Tuolumne County Chamber of Commerce EL Dorado Board of Supervisors

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62311019 H S no San Louis Obisbo

yes CD - Bakersfield should not be split. Fix claw in Bakersfield. No more ethnic gerrymandering. Lets end safe districts.

62311020 H S yes Communities for New California

yes support Maldef plan. Fresno AD1 and 2 - Move Sunnyside from Fresno 2 to Fresno 1. Sunnyside is unincorporated and should be with Old Fig Garden.

62311021 H no Fowler yes AD SD and CD are good so far. Foothills should not be drawn into Central Valley districts. Fowler should be out of Foothills in SD.

62311022 H S yes Dolores Huerta Foundation Farmworker Membership

Bakersfield yes CD KINGS - Clovis out East Porterville Orange Cove East Orosey. Support Maldef map but include Shafter. AD - split Bakersfield on 99 north to Bernard St. Dont split Arden.

62311023 H yes Dolores Huerta Foundation United Farm Workers of America

yes Support Maldef proposal for SD. KINGS AD and CD - Keeping farmworkers together is imporant. Farmworkers that work in Salinas come to San Joaquin Kettlemen City and go to the coast coast and central valley more in common than you think.


Speaker #

4091100162311019

62311020

62311021

62311022

62311023






no no

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162311019

62311020

62311021

62311022

62311023


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes 1 letter 2 maps

no yes 1 letter

no

no yes 3 maps

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62311025 H yes Fresno Center for New American CAPAFR Fresno.

yes Lao Hmong are drawn in different districts in Fresno split. South East Asian community share poverty and unemployment with Latino pop. South East Asian community is COI with Latinos in VRA district.

62311026 H yes CAPAFR yes South East Asian community is split twice in AD SD split 3 times. We know the neighborhood is large but if it must be divided inlcude area immediately south of Sunnyside. SE Asian COI boundaries FSEC2 N-Shields S-41 E-Temperence Jensen. See Map.

62311027 H no Fresno yes Fresno API is split into 3 SD. Keep API together as much as possible in SD. AD - include Sunnyside whole in FSEC2. Swap out sunnyside with FSEC1 as Latino community suggests

62311028 H yes CAPAFR Fresno yes SE Asian pop is mostly in SE Fresno. Farmer COIs should be is FSEC2.


Speaker #

4091100162311025

62311026

62311027

62311028






no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162311025

62311026

62311027

62311028


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62311029 H no Fresno yes CD - Freeway 41 should be district divide would keep old neighborhoods together. Divides Fresno in half. 5 CDs in Fresno makes the election administration costs higher unnecessarily and means less polling places.

62311030 H S no yes Consider place based communties in the Merced SD. MercedMont SD is bad. King City and Hollister Santa Clara residents should not be part of Central Valley place based district.

62311031 H S no yes San Joaquin COI - largest agricultural are in USA can be recognized from space Keep San Joaquin together. Do not inlcude Santa Cruz and Santa Clara with San Joaquin. Should not lose population in Valley and gain in Santa Clara.

62311032 H no yes CDs in general - population standard is too tight this isnt what the US law says. We think it should not be held to one person but could be higher like 1.


Speaker #

4091100162311029

62311030

62311031

62311032






no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162311029

62311030

62311031

62311032


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes 1 letter

no yes 1 letter

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62311033 H no yes Doesnt support Maldef. Dont use raceethnicity in drawing lines. Other race based organizations are just going after tax payer money.

62311034 H yes Veterans Action Alliance

yes 300000 veterans in Central Valley. Fresno CD - use 41 as dividing line. Make only 4 CDs NOT 5 it is bad for election administration costs too much.

62311035 H yes Former Merced County Supervisor

yes Merced Stanislaus Fresno and Central Valley communities are COI distinct from urban or bedroom communities. Nest Merced AD with FSEC2. SD that goes from Fresno to Placer is bad.

62311037 H no Fresno yes Kings and Fresno AD are good keep as majority Latino CVAP. Please create one Latino majority CD. 90 of growth was Latino but no additional seats were drawn. Make Kings AD a Section 2. Support MaldefNaleo plan. CRC are dilution Latino strength.


Speaker #

4091100162311033

62311034

62311035

62311037






no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162311033

62311034

62311035

62311037


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62311038 H no Fresno yes CD current divider is through 40 streets - too confusing. instead use hwy 41 as the divider. Simplify and reduce number of CDs so that Fresno doesnt have so many reps.

62311039 H yes China Lake Alliance

yes Keep Kern in one district for AD SD CD. Most people at the Naval base live in Kern. COI with Mojave airport.

62311040 H yes Tuolomne County Republican Central Committee

Tuolomne yes dont draw Nevada county to Fresno it is too far and that gives rural communities less of a voice. Tuolomne should go with Merced or Stanislaus. Draw in blocks not so great a distance across.

62311041 H no Stanislaus yes Traffic flow is EW. A NS district that focuses on Sacramento bedroom community would be a loss of representation.

62311043 H no Fresno yes CD - Freeway 41 should be dividing line. Limit CDs Fresno is needlessly divided and 5 CDs is too many. It is too expensive for election administration.


Speaker #

4091100162311038

62311039

62311040

62311041

62311043






no no

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162311038

62311039

62311040

62311041

62311043


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62311044 H no yes CD - Hwy 41 is good divider for Fresno. It is totally logical and 41 as divider makes it easy for citizens to know who their representative is.

62311045 H yes MAPA yes CD is bad. Latino growth is not reflected the CDs dilute Latino districts. Consider Maldef and Naleos congressional maps.

62311046 H yes Fresno Redistricting Coalition

Fresno yes explains previously submitted maps.

62311047 H no yes CD - Inyo Mono San bernadino district is not compact enough. Mono should be with Foothills. Glen and Siskiyou counties should not be split. Imperial San Diego CD is not in the spirit of CRC guidelines. Fresno - split into less CDs.

62311049 H no yes reconsider SDs especially Foothill and Merced districts. Central Valley should not be with Coastal areas like San Jose and Santa Cruz.


Speaker #

4091100162311044

62311045

62311046

62311047

62311049






no no

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162311044

62311045

62311046

62311047

62311049


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62311051 H no yes good CDs in central valley they will be competitive. AD KingsKern and Bakersfield CD are ethnically gerrymandered. It is better if AD . Madera county is 2 counties; lowland and highland. Match Stanislaus lines with existing lines.

62311054 H no Fresno yes CD - split Fresno EW down 41. Merced going to the coast is a bad .

62311055 H no Fresno yes CD - draw divider for Fresno at 41 5 CDs in Fresno is bad.

62311056 H no Placer yes CD - linking Placer to Fresno is bad. Depending on where rep. is from they might be biased. Keep Northern CA away from Central Valley.

62311058 H no Clovis friends in Auberry

yes NS district is bad going all the way to Placer is too far. NS districts mean too much travel time for representatives.

62311059 H no Modesto yes SD - Santa Clara County has no similarity to Modesto. Do not include Modesto with Santa Clara County


Speaker #

4091100162311051

62311054

62311055

62311056

62311058

62311059






no no

no no

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162311051

62311054

62311055

62311056

62311058

62311059


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62311060 H yes Modesto City Council

Modesto yes Central Valley concerned with agriculture unemployment foreclosure rates. Since the population is heavily centered on the west side the Central Valley will loose their voice. Hard for a rep to represent tech and agriculture in same district.

62311062 H no Atwater yes CD - Merced. Central Valley has high unemployment and foreclosure rate. Nothing in common with Bay Area and Santa Clara. COI is with 99 NOT 101. Go up NS not EW. The district as is is too big

62311063 H no Merced yes MercedFoothill SD - housing problems extreme foreclosures low property taxes people leaving empty houses. Need representative from Central Valley. Central Valley is distinct from Placer Calavaras Santa Clara.

62311064 H no Fresno yes Take piece from Squaw Valley and put back into Fresno in order to have 4 CDs not 5. 99 split in Fresno is good.


Speaker #

4091100162311060

62311062

62311063

62311064






no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162311060

62311062

62311063

62311064


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62311065 H no yes Good job CRC. You are doing a fair job in the Valley. Good job placing SW Fresno into a new CD and keeping cities whole. Stay strong and focused.

62311069 H no Madera yes Central Valley should not include Santa Cruz Santa Clara San Jose. Madera is part of San Joaquin Valley base should be with Central Valley.

62311070 H no Fresno yes KINGS CD - thank you for excluding Fresno to preserve rural community voice. Clean up rural areas around northern Kings. KINGS AD - Oakland Ave. in Fresno and north of Lemore are areas of farming concern some of the farmers were divided in this AD.

62311071 H no yes Supports what speakers 38 47 44 and 43 said. Make less then 5 CDs in Fresno. Use 41 not 99. 41 is city divider 99 is more rural.


Speaker #

4091100162311065

62311069

62311070

62311071






no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162311065

62311069

62311070

62311071


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62311073 H no Merced yes Merced Tuolomne Stanislaus Mariposa - should not be with coastal in SD and CD. Trying to connect Placer and Fresno in the same distrcit is a bad idea.

62311075 H yes Merced County GIS

yes SD MERCEDMONT - Stanislaus Madera Merced work together in San Joaquin Valley. Rural and Agricultural in nature. COIs along 99 and I5. Merced has nothing in commeint with Santa Cruz and Monterey need senators from Merced region.

62311076 H no yes Suppots Maldef and Naleo plans.

62311077 H yes Ridgecrest Chamber of Commerce

Kings yes Look at Kern curl.

62311078 H no Fresno yes Curl into Kings county could be fixed.

62311079 H no Fresno yes If you use 41 as the divider it will disenfranchise minorities. The way the city is split right now is okay.

62311080 H no yes 41 is most appropriate place to divide Fresno.


Speaker #

4091100162311073

62311075

62311076

62311077

62311078

62311079

62311080






no no

no no

no no

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162311073

62311075

62311076

62311077

62311078

62311079

62311080


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62411001 H S no Turlock yes Foothill SD-Foothills are different from flatlands. Proximity matters as do EW transit corridors. Lodi should not be in Northbay Contra Costa. Unite San Joaquin County and get pop from Stanislaus.Drop San Jose and Santa Cruz add flatlands on 99

62411002 H S yes Turlock Chamber of Commerce

yes Merced SD - high unemployment in interior counties should not be with coast. Drop Santa Cruz and add Madera and Fresno. Need reps that represent inland and not coastal.

62411003 H yes Turlock Chamber of Commerce

yes Merced SD - Santa Clara Monterey and San Benito are not part of San Joaquin Valley. San Joaquin has distinct needs water agriculture. Coast and inland needs are different and contradictory. We need San Jaoquin district.


Speaker #

4091100162411001

62411002

62411003






no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162411001

62411002

62411003


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #



no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62411004 H yes Mayor of Ceres yes Merced SD - air quality needs different in San Jaoquin. Limit split that has Lodi coming into district. There are two VRA counties because of gerrymandering. Draw Salinas and Watsonville along 101 into San Jose.

62411005 H S no Lake Comanche

Amador yes supports FoothilsMotherload maps (all). Foothill residents do not go to flatlands. Watershed is not a COI because they produce the water but the East Bay drinks it. Please preserve these districts

62411006 H no yes AD StocktonTracy - Lodi does not go with Bay Area. Pair with Sockton and Galt. Since Lodi is same as Davis add Davis to Yolo and Lodi to Sac district.

62411007 H no Turlock yes AD West Stanislaus - Thanks for putting my community with N. Modesto and not with S. Modesto and Foothills. Keep 1st draft maps same.


Speaker #

4091100162411004

62411005

62411006

62411007






no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162411004

62411005

62411006

62411007


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes print out from Union Democrat

06.24.11.C

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62411008 H no Stockton Lathrop

yes Stockton Tracy AD - Tracy and Stockton are similar. Try to put Lathrop with Tracy and Stockton. Swap Lathrop with unincorporated areas E of 99.

62411009 H no yes Likes 1st draft maps. Good to keep poor and more diverse areas separate from the affluent. The difference between the two is obvious on her drive to work.

62411010 H no Escalon yes Thank you for keeping Sierra communities and Valley communities separate in first draft. Valley is agriculture and dairy and Sierra is recreation and tourism.

62411011 H no Atwater Merced yes AD West Stanislaus - Turlock separate from Merced is good. Have son in special ed in merced but dont want to move to get better services. So worked to improve services in Merced.


Speaker #

4091100162411008

62411009

62411010

62411011






no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162411008

62411009

62411010

62411011


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62411013 H no Turlock yes Merced SD - Turlock could be in either district. We are agricultural based economy in Turlock and we dont have anything in common with Silicon Valley and San Jose. Create Central Valley seat for this area. Presently it is too diverse.

62411014 H S yes Lathrop City Council Member

yes Stockton AD should include Lathrop. Doesnt want to be on fringes of Stanislaus county which will dilute Lathrop voice. A lot in common with Stockton and Tracy not Manteca.

62411015 H no yes Merced SD - Santa Cruz Monterey and San Jose should not be with Merced. Maybe drop nesting idea in areas where VRA comes into play. Region needs a leader who will not beholden to the two area.

62411016 H yes VP of Modesto City Schools

yes Merced SD - Likes idea of nesting but not nesting in this SD. Mixing urban and rural 101 and 99 bad. Consider nesting with Fresno AD. San Benito and Salinas could be nested with San Jose.


Speaker #

4091100162411013

62411014

62411015

62411016






no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162411013

62411014

62411015

62411016


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes letter from City of Lathrop

06.24.11.D

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62411017 H S no yes Merced SD. Central Valley is unique with water education economy etc. Different from Santa Clara Monterey. Should be included with Merced Madera San Joaquin. Combine Merced AD with Fresno AD. Likes map - 200110601q2sdmerced

62411018 H yes Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors

yes San Joaquin SD makes sense. Put Lodi in take out pop from Stanislaus and portion into Merced. Foothill SD - Madera and Fresno dont belong with Placer and El Dorado. Merced SD - hard to represent areas with opposing interests (rural vs. urban)

62411019 H S yes Chief Executive Office of Stanislaus

yes Merced SD - Split through center of Stanislaus is bad and dilutes Stanislaus polical power. Central Valley is COI work together on issues and lobby together in DC.


Speaker #

4091100162411017

62411018

62411019






no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162411017

62411018

62411019


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #


no

no yes letter from Stanislaus County

06.24.11.F



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62411020 H S no Lodi yes CD is good with San Joaquin whole. Stockton AD - Lodi is part of Central Valley. Part of 99 corridor NOT part of I-80. Not same demographic as Napa. Switch Davis with Lodi. Davis with Solano Lodi with Central Valley and Gault.

62411021 H S yes Peoples Advocate

yes So Cal SD maps - We think you can fix coastal COI farmworker issues by renesting Ads (which are good). AD in ventura is good but nesting is bad. Nest LASCV with EVENT. SLOSB and SBWVE together.

62411022 H S no Davis yes ECC AD - Davis should not be on Sac side of river. Has COI with Yolo county. Lodi and Galt dont belong with West. Switch Davis with LodiGalt. Then put W Sac. Into ECC and move Oakleyto east of river. Sac river is natural boundary. Davis is agricultural.


Speaker #

4091100162411020

62411021

62411022






no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162411020

62411021

62411022


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes landscape notes 06.24.11.G

no yes AD and SD maps 06.24.11.H

no yes testimony and map 06.24.11.I



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62411023 H S yes Tuolumne County Supervisor

Tuolumne yes Proposed map is about geographic commonality but people might not be similar. West Tuolomne county is COI with Stanislaus. There is watershed that runs though and with population on opposite sides will creat competition

62411024 H no Stockton yes Having a district that isnt spread out is important. San Joaquin AD - Stockton Tracy Lathrop together. The corridor moves people and product to Port of Stockton railroad airport.

62411025 H yes Tracy Planning Commissioner

yes San Joaquin CD - Include Tracy and Manteca exlude Antioch Oakley and Brentwood. Tracy not with Modesto with Stockton. Library newspapers etc. shared with Stockton.

62411026 H yes Yolo County Supervisor

yes ECC AD - on the way here passed through 3 proposed Ads. Many divisions of Yolo County in every district. Yolo County is a COI. Cooperation across county.

62411027 H S no Lathrop yes keep Lathrop as part of Stockton AD. Everything passes through Lathrop.


Speaker #

4091100162411023

62411024

62411025

62411026

62411027






no no

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162411023

62411024

62411025

62411026

62411027


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes letter 06.24.11.J

no

no

no

no yes map 06.24.11.K



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62411028 H no yes CD - does not want to be with Merced and Fresno. Wants to stay in San Joaquin. Tracy and Manteca should be in CD. United county for better Latino representation.

62411029 H yes Ceres City Council Member

yes Merced SD - splits a lot if you must split Stanislaus for VRA in other county split in way that makes sense for Latinos and all residents. Ceres want to be with Modesto Patterson Turlock Merced not San Jose. District down 99. Salina San Benito ok.

62411030 H no Lodi no Northbay CC SD and AD - these will be bad for Lodi. Wants to be in San Joaquin Valley San Joaquin should have its own AD and SD. If have to split off a Stanislaus city should be Tracy because they work in the Bay Area.

62411031 H S yes City Council of City of Newman

yes Merced SD - Urbanized and Agricultural areas are totally different. Move SD more inline with Central Valley


Speaker #

4091100162411028

62411029

62411030

62411031






no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162411028

62411029

62411030

62411031


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no




Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62411032 H yes Newman City Planner

yes Merced SD would not be good for Newmans representation. Remove Bay Area portion and include Ag parts of Madera and West Stanislaus county

62411033 H no Manteca yes CD - San Joaquin county is COI - Tracy Stockton Manteca Lathrop

62411034 H yes Lodi Chamber of Commerce

yes Northbay CC SD - this district is bad for Lodi (erases identity of Lodi). 1st draft puts Lodi with larger Eastern cities not with Central Valley.

62411035 H yes San Joaquin County Consitutional Resdistricting Council

Lodi yes Keep San Joaquin together. No COI with counties North and West of Lodi. Submitted map.

62411036 H yes San Joaquin County Citizens for Constitutional Redistricting

yes Do not sacrifice real COIs for maybe fabricated COIs. Link local foothills to local valleys. Not COI with Placer. Calaveras Tuolomne county people do not commute to Fresno.

62411038 H no Tuolumne yes All 3 Foothill districts - districts are too long with population at N and S ends. Move West instead.


Speaker #

4091100162411032

62411033

62411034

62411035

62411036

62411038






no no

no no

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162411032

62411033

62411034

62411035

62411036

62411038


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62411039 H no Tracy yes CD - Tracy and Manteca should be with Stockton. Medical Association and patient referrals come to Stockton. Need rep who will improve health programs in the area.

62411040 H S no yes San Joaquin is diverse. Lodi Unified School District - it is in Stockton and Lodi better to have only one rep. Remove Bay Area make San Joaquin Valley whole. Have Agricultural tourism pollution issues.

62411041 H no Tracy yes Thank you for putting Tracy with Stockton. Lathrop should be in Western AD too. Tracy should be with Stockton in CD not with Modesto. Antioch should not be with Stockton.

62411042 H no Ceres yes Ceres should be with San Joaquin and with Modesto. Not in Merced SD.


Speaker #

4091100162411039

62411040

62411041

62411042






no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162411039

62411040

62411041

62411042


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes letter 06.24.11.M

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62411043 H no Stockton yes San Joaquin County has been hit hard by recession. Need congressman to represent Sjoaquin county. Include Tracy Manteca Redmond and Escalon to make CD. Only 29k short of having own SanJ congressperson.

62411044 H no yes Tracy is integral part of Stockton. CD - Tracy should be with Stockton. Shared COI with Stockton not with Modesto. Preference is CD.

62411045 H S no Modesto yes Thank you for taking out Stockton finger and putting countaies together. Wants Stanislaus intact with Merced. Education interests. If Stanislaus must be splitW and S ModestoCeres NewmanGraysonWestleyPatterson together linked down i-5 (see exhibit)

62411046 H yes Yosemite Community College District

yes AD - Keep Latino communities together like Ceres and Modesto. Likes maps they unite Latinos is South Modesto. Unite west of 99 communities


Speaker #

4091100162411043

62411044

62411045

62411046






no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162411043

62411044

62411045

62411046


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes letter 06.24.11.N

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62411047 H S yes Mayor of Paterson letter read

Ceres yes AD - Patterson Ceres Newman Westley Grayson Crows Landing are not as well represented. West side of Stanislaus is Latino and shares COI with Modesto. Want to see Ceres and Modesto in AD

62411048 H no yes African American and Latino communities have been building bridges for years. Glad that draft maps bring together similar communities. Need culturally competent representatives.

62411049 H no Yolo yes Yolo county general plan is a demonstration of COI. Yolo is agricultural. Not a bedroom community of Sacramento. Supports Lodi out of Contra Costa.

62411050 H yes Mayor of Galt Galt Sacramento yes AD and SD - Galt has things in common with Lodi southern most town in Sac. County. Concerned about Galts boundaries. If Galt expands the city could be divided into several districts. Share fire depart. and transit w Elk Grove. School District w Lodi.


Speaker #

4091100162411047

62411048

62411049

62411050






no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162411047

62411048

62411049

62411050


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes letter from City of Patterson

06.24.11.O

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62411051 H no Stockton no all three districts in San Joaquin - unite San Joaquin to better serve COI. Dont split Lodi Manteca from Tracy.

62411052 H yes San Joaquin County Supervisor

no ECC AD - Lodi has strong COI with Valley and San Jaoquin County communities through agriculture.

62411053 H no Galt yes Lodi and Galt should stay together with Sacramento maybe.

62411054 H no Lodi yes Lodi AD - has worked and lived in Stockton. There is no COI along hwy 12. Lodi should be with Stockton not with Fairfield Vacaville.

62411055 H no yes Keep Stockton in one CD. Manteca Tracy with Stockton in CD. Sikh community resides in Stockton Manteca Lodi and Tracy. Keep them together in CD


Speaker #

4091100162411051

62411052

62411053

62411054

62411055






no no

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162411051

62411052

62411053

62411054

62411055


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62411056 H no yes San Joaquin CD - place inlcude Tracy and Manteca with San Joaquin CD. Keep Stockton whole and with San Joaquin County. Antioch is connected to Stockton by 2 lane road but connected to Bay Area by 4 lane hwy so better to put Anitoch with Bay Area.

62411057 H no Lodi yes Include Tracy Manteca in same CD as Lodi and Stockton. Sikhs come to Stockton from Tracy and Manteca to worship at oldest Sikh temple in US in Stockton. Sikh communites should be together in CD centered around Stockton. No connection with Modesto or Stan

62411058 H no Tracy yes Tracy and Stockton medical services part of San Joaquin Valley. Legal system connected to Stockton. No connection to Modesto. Newspaper is Stockton Record education system in Stockton.


Speaker #

4091100162411056

62411057

62411058






no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162411056

62411057

62411058


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62411059 H S no Tracy yes Keep Tracy and Manteca together with Stockton for CD. Not connected education-wise to Modesto everything goes through Stockton. Mountain House H.S. students go to Tracy School District Mountain House is with Stockton Tracy should too.

62411061 H S yes Citizens for Conservative Action

Contra Costa yes need summary list and transcripts of COI testimony. Pay attention to all COI testimony and realize all is backed with legal action.

62411062 H yes Stockton Unified School District Boardmember

yes AD - bring Lodi into Stockton district. Works with law enforcement hospitals economic development agencies. Suggest taking out Lathrop or Manteca which are not in district. Part of Lodi is ok if it cant be kept whole.

62411063 H no Stockton yes Tracy gives medical assistance to Stockton residence. Put Lodi with Stockton. Supports San Joaquin as its own CD then one SD but not more than two Ads in the county.


Speaker #

4091100162411059

62411061

62411062

62411063






no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162411059

62411061

62411062

62411063


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes letter 06.24.11.P

no yes article 06.24.11.Q

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62411064 H yes Stockton Unified Trustee.

yes CD goes too far to Merced and Fresno counties. Wants to be with neighbors in San Joaquin county more than with other hispanics two counties away. Does not want to be with Merced and Bay Area for CD. Not more than 2 Ads for the county.

62411071 H no Stockton yes Wants Lodi as part of Stockton. Stockton kids go to Lodi schools. Two Lodi high schools in Stockton proper and elementary schools. Keep San Joaquin intact. The Altamont is big dividing line.

62411073 H no Southern San Joaquin

yes had rep from Stanislaus county and they tried to work together but it does not work San Joaquin needs own rep. Tracy Manteca Escalon Ripon should be in San Joaquin CD. Your current map is outside the COI and makes is difficult to be represented


Speaker #

4091100162411064

62411071

62411073






no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162411064

62411071

62411073


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62411074 H S yes Sierra Club Cameron Park

El Dorado yes Sierra Club likes 80 percent of lines. Switch nesting to have Southern Sac and Northern Sac for SD. Ads-Shasta w Redding Lassen Modock MTNCAP needs more than a sliver of Tahoe basin. Foothills is too long. Galt and Lodi are more like Sjoaquin than Sac.

62411076 H yes San Joaquin Farm Bureau

yes CD - drop Antioch and add Tracy Manteca Escalon Ripon. Does not want Stockton finger. Stanislaus w Foothills. AD ECC- no justification for splitting Lodi off of San Joaquin. Keep San Joaquin whole. Put E Stanislaus with Foothill. Bring Lodi back.

62411078 H yes Mayor of Lodi Lodi yes AD and SD- Lodi is a part of San Joaquin Valley not Bay Area. Napa and Bay Area reps would be bad for Lodi. Lodi has agricultural interests.


Speaker #

4091100162411074

62411076

62411078






no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162411074

62411076

62411078


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes handout with maps 06.24.11.R

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62411081 H yes former Mayor of Patterson

yes Merced AD - approves because it links Newman Ceres and other like communities keeps minorities together. Thank you for getting rid of Stockton finger. Nothing in common with East Modesto or East Stanislaus.

62411082 H no Merced yes happy with first draft map. SE Asian community has more in common with Stanislaus than with Stockton

62411086 H no Tracy yes Keep San Joaquin together in CD SD AD- we have everything in common. Diversity Education Medical. Include Lodi Manteca Escalon etc.

62411088 H no Oakley yes ECC AD - Oakley is part of Bay Area. Links are transit public safety hospitals educations. Connected to Martinez Antioch. Oakley should be kept with CC not paired with cities across the river.


Speaker #

4091100162411081

62411082

62411086

62411088






no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162411081

62411082

62411086

62411088


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62411089 H yes Oakley Mayor yes SD - first map is not compact. Oakley should be in AD and SD with majority of Contra Costa county. They have a big stake in Hwy 4 going East. Put American Canyon in ECONT district and take Oakley out.

62411091 H no yes keep San Joaquin whole in all three districts. 2 Ads is okay. School medical tranport in common.

62411092 H no Stockton yes Stockton residents are San Joaquin people. Keep San Joaquin whole. Tax themselves to provide tranportation. If Lodi was in another district their rep might not push what they would want. Asian population prefers to stay in Stockton.

62411093 H S yes CA State Conference of NAACP

yes Presents alternative maps for CD in Southern CA.


Speaker #

4091100162411089

62411091

62411092

62411093






no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162411089

62411091

62411092

62411093


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no yes map with CVAP numbers

06.24.11.U



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62411095 H S yes NAACP Stockton Branch Secretary on behalf of President

yes Does not want voting strength of minorities diluted just to have San Joaquin county reps. Important to be with neighbors but not at the expense of African American community. San Joaquin should be its own CD. Preserve city and county boundaries

62411096 H no Lodi yes Keep San Joaquin county together. Lodi does not have much in common with Yolo or Bay Area. Keep Lodi with San Joaquin in CD and SD. Agrees with other speakers. SJ has sufficient population centers to make this work.

62411099 H no Ceres yes Latino COI - Ceres Paterson Grayson Crows Landing Newman. Drink same water watch Spanish News from Modesto. Keep this COI with Modesto.

62411101 H no Merced yes Merced and Stanislaus should be together. Over a million dollars in agriculture business. Need reps for water for Agriculture and that know about school situation. Foreclosures on farms and houses.


Speaker #

4091100162411095

62411096

62411099

62411101






no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162411095

62411096

62411099

62411101


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes letter from NAACP 06.24.11.V

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62411102 H no Manteca yes Keep San Joaquin county together. Manteca has more in Stockton than Modesto. Escalon Tracy Ripon should be included. Antioch does not belong in San Joaquin CD.

62411103 H yes Contra Costa Citizens Redistricting Taskforce

Antioch yes Thank you for keeping AntiochDiscovery Bay and Oakley together in CD.Ok with being part of San Joaquin county district.Access to river water is important issue. Mountainhouse should be with them too.People drive west on 4 to work or on 680580 to Silicon

62411104 H yes Lodi Grape Grower Association

yes Agriculture is COI with Victor Lockford Clements and should be with Lodi. Keep San Joaquin county Agriculture whole keep Lodi with SJ county. If not for SD Lodi and Galt have commonality with N SJ county and Southern Sac county.

62411105 H no Lockford yes San Joaquin is currently respresented by people who do not reside there. Worried that it will be the same this time around.


Speaker #

4091100162411102

62411103

62411104

62411105






no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162411102

62411103

62411104

62411105


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62511001 H no AD 28 yes need nearby areas together for community organizingcampaigning; Watsonville Gilroy Salinas should not be w S Jose; Gilroy Morgan Hill Salinas Watsonville should be in a new AD; now Morgan Hill is w Stanislaus

62511002 H no Morgan Hill Santa Clara yes Great that Morgan Hill San Martin Gilroy not split; for CD keep S Jose w Morgan Hill do not include AL Co look at South Bay Committee for Fair Redistr (SBCFR) map

62511003 H no San Jose 30 yrs

Santa Clara yes draft for what is AD 23 would break up central east SJ into 3 AD s split Latino community; Q where? A Mayberry Rd on N S to Capitol expressway; incorporate foothills on E; keep downtown intact

62511004 H yes Center for Employment Training President CEO serve mostly E SJ

yes SBCFR map is better for AD keep Alum Rock in w east SJ; keep CD win SJ; agree w 3 re Mayberry Rd as N border of east SJ


Speaker #

4091100162511001

62511002

62511003

62511004






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162511001

62511002

62511003

62511004


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62511005 H S yes South Bay Committee for Fair Redistricting (SBCFR) Redistricting Partners helps coalition of groups draw maps

yes started w Sec 5 protected dist MONT has to maintain 44 CVAP; 1)urban Lat AD in SANJO 2)unify LGBT comm in SANJO 3)protect As-Am comm in Milp in SD when nest SANJO w SILIV 4)reduce city splits to 1 (E Foothills - CAPAFR says necessary)

62511006 H yes Dolores Huerta Foundation La Raza Roundtable LULAC district 14

yes agrees with speaker 3 re boundaries for SJ district; support MALDEF map too

62511007 H S yes SBCFR part of east SJ Santa Clara yes E SJ AD keep whole because made a lot of progress working together - and will increase Latino of AD to 30

62511008 H yes La Raza Roundtable of S Jose La Raza Lawyers of S Clara

yes CD is horrific as puts San Jose in an AL Co district and it might be the only CD that can elect Latino; AD had diluted Latino - SBCFR map shows are that need to be included - Eastside Union HS district incl Downtown to define E SJ Mayberry on N

(cont) Mayberry Rd to not go into Berryessa; CD AD divide Latino low-inc community into at least 4 districts


Speaker #

4091100162511005

62511006

62511007

62511008






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162511005

62511006

62511007

62511008


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes

no

no yes

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62511009 H yes Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors member

Santa Clara yes use McKee Rd to keep Berryessa whole try to keep same boundaries as current AD 23

62511010 H S SJSU student no yes opposes CD SANJO which splits SJSU campus SJSU is a COI; need to look at neighborhood maps

62511011 H yes Sunnyvale City Council member and past mayor

Sunnyvale Santa Clara yes Milpitas-Berryessa AD goes too far south instead draw line at Mayberry; look at MALDEF CAPAFR AARC unity map. Silicon Valley includes Sunnyvale Cupertino - they are very connected and must be together

62511012 H S public interest lawyer

yes Law Foundation of Silicon Valley

Downtown San Jose

Santa Clara yes east side of San Jose must stay together (might be Sec 2 violation re dilution of Latino voting block) w centraldowntown San Jose (LGBT community); echoes concern of SBCFR - consider their proposed maps.


Speaker #

4091100162511009

62511010

62511011

62511012






no yes

yes yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162511009

62511010

62511011

62511012


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes

no

no yes



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62511013 H political activist on volunteer basis former community organizer

no Eastside San Jose

Santa Clara yes do not split eastside San Jose which has history of political struggle for Latinos and is working class lower income level than surrounding areas and currently has a level of political cohesion. Current AD is best but SBCFR is best compromise.

(cont) use SBCFR map which takes 22 latino in draft to 31 Latino (currently AD is 34 Latino).

62511014 H S no yes concerned re AD s; LGBT community in downtown S Jose is one of densest in state but split into 3 AD s should not be; passed out data on LGBT households showing its a COI as defined by Prop 11 should be in one AD


Speaker #

4091100162511013

62511014






no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162511013

62511014


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62511015 H voting rights attorney

no no (see VRA fields)

62511016 H yes County of Santa Clara employee

San Jose Santa Clara yes SBCFR is good plan; would like AD 23 28 maintained and nest them in SD

62511017 H yes representing Silicon Valley Democratic Forum SBCFR

San Jose Santa Clara yes keep east San Jose with central San Jose; have cohesive set of communities; draft would split Latino voting bloc

62511018 H yes La Raza Lawyers of Santa Clara County member of SBCFR

yes east San Jose is social economic political COI should not be split; long history of Latino leadership

62511019 H no Alum Rock San Jose

Santa Clara yes need Alum Rock w east San Jose in AD SD CD or will be disenfranchised


Speaker #

4091100162511015

62511016

62511017

62511018

62511019






no no

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162511015

62511016

62511017

62511018

62511019


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

concern re SD s and intent requirement

yes Monterey Kings Merced

not numerical retrogression problem but maps by group show CVAP can go way up - so may be evidence of discrimination

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62511020 H S no San Benito yes re SD AD San Benito rural agricultural has nothing in common with Monterey. Ok to have S Benito w. Gilroy Morgan Hill and Salinas but not ok to be with Watsonville.

62511021 H S no east San Jose

Santa Clara yes keep east San Jose together

62511022 H S no Santa Clara yes east San Jose is split into 3 AD s and splits up a Latino COI; recommends keeping AD 23 boundaries w minor adjustments nest w AD 28 for SD.

62511024 H no downtown San Jose

Santa Clara yes keep both east San Jose downtown San Jose together; would help state county city; giving us one voice would help us to get better schools jobs

62511025 H S school district trustee

no Santa Clara yes oppose draft maps; keep AD 23 boundaries as is or w minor adjustments because its a COI based on income poverty level educational need cultural activities employment needs transport corridor runs thru; nest AD 23 AD 28 for SD


Speaker #

4091100162511020

62511021

62511022

62511024

62511025






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162511020

62511021

62511022

62511024

62511025


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes

no yes

no yes

no

no yes



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62511026 H no downtown San Jose

Santa Clara yes keep east S Jose together SJSU together; keep AD 23 boundaries as is; concern w split of east SJ from central SJ Montgomery St to King Rd Hedding St to Tulley Rd; diverse multicultural community strengthened by being toget; better 1 rep than 2or3

62511027 H S yes Fremont City Council member

Fremont Alameda yes Keep Fremont Newark Union City together in a district anchored in AL Co. COI of history media etc. Provided alt CD map to FRNWUC CD which has lots of other benefits re San Leandro Richmond whole parts of Tri-Valley w SANJO.

62511028 H no Livermore Alameda yes speaker and others in Livermoreeast AL Co support the Fremont proposal. Do not want to lump in Hayward Fremont rather want to be part of an inland district.

62511029 H no Fremont Alameda yes for CD keep Fremont Newark Union City whole in Alameda County

62511030 H yes India Community Center founder

Fremont Alameda yes for CD do not split Fremont from tri-cities as that will disenfranchise the southasian community


Speaker #

4091100162511026

62511027

62511028

62511029

62511030






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162511026

62511027

62511028

62511029

62511030


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62511031 H no yes for CD keep tri-cities area (Fremont Newark Union City) in tact

62511032 H no yes for CD keep tri-cities area (Fremont Newark Union City) in tact; this is important for the many non-profits in the area

62511033 H yes Newark City Council member

Newark Alameda yes TY for keeping Newark whole; want CD of tri-cities; COI Newark has a public safety COI with Fremont and Union City; Newark U City fire services are contracted out to Alameda County; also police dispatch in three cities is coordinated.

62511034 H yes Fremont Numi Plant Union rep when plant closed and 5000 layed off yr ago

yes Keep Fremont Union City Newark together in CD; the Fremont proposal puts everyone into Alameda County; keep tri-cities as one economic entity

62511035 H yes S Clara County Dept of Community Services retired

yes keep east San Jose together; join San Jose with AD 28 to make new SD


Speaker #

4091100162511031

62511032

62511033

62511034

62511035






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162511031

62511032

62511033

62511034

62511035


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62511036 H yes Union Sanitary District elected to Board of Directors currently President

yes tri-cities are covered by one waste water district (Union Sanitary District); keep three cities together in CD; first Asian woman elected in area wants to continue that progress

62511037 H yes Santa Clara County Water District

yes for east San Jose keep roughly the boundaries of AD 23

62511038 H no yes keep eastside San Jose together; COI based on recession impact foreclosure political disenfranchisement; Also east San Jose is COI with rest of San Jose and east San Jose has no COI with Livermore; supports SBCFR maps

62511039 H S no yes keep Sunnyvale Cupertino Santa Clara Saratoga Campbell Burbank Cambrian Park Los Gatoes and San Jose together in CD; most importantly keep east San Jose with San Jose.

62511040 H no yes does not like Central CoastMonterey SD because it is not compact


Speaker #

4091100162511036

62511037

62511038

62511039

62511040






no yes

no yes

east S Jose boundaries 101 Tulley Rd Mayberry foothills. Hwys 101 87 85 are downtown S Jose.

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162511036

62511037

62511038

62511039

62511040


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no yes

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62511041 H yes Berryessa Union School District Board member

San Jose Santa Clara yes keep east San Jose together and with the rest of San Jose

62511042 H yes Fremont Planning Commission commissioner

Fremont Alameda yes keep tri-cities area (Fremont Newark Union City) together and in Alameda Co; keep Fremont whole

62511043 H yes City of Watsonville mayor

Watsonville Santa Cruz yes for AD Watsonville Gilroy and Morgan Hill together; area west of 101 is not a COI nest variations of current AD 23 and AD 28.

62511044 H no San Jose Santa Clara yes marriage equality silicon valley (speaker 14); LGBT community diluted in draft AD; keep LGBT community together in SANJO

62511045 H no yes keep eastside San Jose together and connect to downtown San Jose; eastside San Jose has COI based on small businesses and low SES that needs representation and does not have a COI with Livermore.

62511046 H no San Jose Santa Clara yes opposed Merced SD because it goes into Alum Rock in San Jose and splits a COI in San Jose; big difference between Silicon Valley and Central Valley; keep east San Jose whole.


Speaker #

4091100162511041

62511042

62511043

62511044

62511045

62511046






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162511041

62511042

62511043

62511044

62511045

62511046


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62511047 H yes Fremont Planning Commissioner

tri-cities 26 yrs

Alameda yes presents map of CD with tri-cities whole that preserves Tri-City COI and keeps Richmond intact and splits Oakland

62511048 H no Newark Alameda yes supports map of CD with tri-cities whole that preserves Tri-City COI and keeps Richmond intact and splits Oakland

62511049 H yes CCAG yes re CD FRNWU - CCAG supports tri-cities is working with them to make sure CD does not go over hills between Tri-Valley and Tri-cities

62511050 H represents Vietnamese Community

no yes Thanks for keeping Berryessa whole please also keep Evergreen whole and keep it with Little Saigon; boundaries are Story Rd King Rd Center Rd and Capital. In draft Evergreen split into 3 districts


Speaker #

4091100162511047

62511048

62511049

62511050






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162511047

62511048

62511049

62511050


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62511051 H no yes wants a CD of Milpitas north San Jose Alum Rock to keep Berryessa together going down to Morgan Hill and Gilroy. Have nothing to do with Newark and Fremont so keep out Alameda County from this CD. Use Eastside Union School District as boundary line.

62511054 H yes Story Rd Business Assocation

Morgan Hill Santa Clara yes Morgan Hill has nothing in common with Merced and shouldnt be in Merced SD. Morgan Hill is urban not ruralagricultural

62511055 H no yes SBCFR map is good; protect COI of eastside San Jose and do not split it especially not into 3 AD s where all 3 reps could potentially live outside of Santa Clara County

62511057 H yes Gilroy City Council SBCFR

yes important to keep east S Jose and downtown S Jose together.

62511058 H yes Berryessa Community Council

yes Berryessa must be with Milpitas; look at Berryessa Union School District for boundaries


Speaker #

4091100162511051

62511054

62511055

62511057

62511058






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162511051

62511054

62511055

62511057

62511058


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62511059 H S yes Silicon Valley Leadership Council

yes for CD look at tech industry as a COI use northern border of S Clara County; include Golden Triangle (101880237) which has 2000 high-tech employers and over 100000 employees

62511060 H S former member of Richmond City Council

no yes put Richmond back in CD with Contra Costa County

62511061 H no San Jose Santa Clara yes Keep current AD s as much as possible and nest AD 23 AD 28 for a SD; largest portion of SD should be in Santa Clara County

62511062 H S yes San Jose Silicon Valley COC

yes San Jose high tech industry is a COI; draft CD is not good because in with FremontNewark; keep CD entirely in Santa Clara County

62511063 H S yes Technet representative

yes keep Silicon Valley intact which is Santa Clara County and southern San Mateo County; keep Golden Triangle with downtown San Jose


Speaker #

4091100162511059

62511060

62511061

62511062

62511063






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162511059

62511060

62511061

62511062

62511063


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes

no yes

no

no yes

no yes



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62511064 H S yes CAPAFR yes Fremont should be with Milpitas; east San Jose should be whole; Evergreen neighborhood should be whole and w Little Saigon; Alum Rock should be wBerryessa; City Council Districts 3578should be together

(cont) CAPAFR maps will be submitted next week

62511065 H no yes good that Berryessa is whole in draft maps; put Little Saigon Evergreen downtown S Jose in one district; keep east S Jose together; Cupertino Mt View Sunnyvale Santa Clara should be together (have common school district).

62511066 H no San Jose Santa Clara yes keep east San Jose together; has COI of working class families; supports SBCFR map

62511069 H no east San Jose resident

Santa Clara yes current boundaries of AD 23 are good because have east S Jose with downtown S Jose; ok to go to Milpitas and Fremont with AD

62511070 H no east San Jose resident

Santa Clara yes SJSU is divided; 9thJulian is in different district from 5thKeyes; unite Evergreen neighborhood; supports maps of South Bay Labor Council


Speaker #

4091100162511064

62511065

62511066

62511069

62511070






yes yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

yes yes


Speaker #

4091100162511064

62511065

62511066

62511069

62511070


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62511071 H no San Leandro

Alameda yes S Leandro should not be with Oakland or Alameda it should be with Eden Area (Castro Valley etc). In draft SD S Leandro is split from Eden area and draft CD is also not good for S Leandro

62511072 H no yes keep east S Jose Alum Rock area together rather than in Merced SD. A mountain range (Mt Hamilton) divides Alum Rock from the rest of the Merced SD.

62511073 H S no San Francisco

San Francisco

yes do not split Siskiyou; 8 counties in north state make up a perfect CD and another CD can be built down from Modoc. Do not split small counties.

62511074 H S yes Silicon Valley Latino Democratic Forum

yes keep AD 23 AD 28 as they are and nest them for a new SD which will unite S Clara S Benito Monterey Counties; AD 23 AD 28 are a COI based on SES inc povert level transport corridor runs thru; recent history related to electing Latinos

(cont) submitted electronic maps will submit data.


Speaker #

4091100162511071

62511072

62511073

62511074






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162511071

62511072

62511073

62511074


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes

no yes



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62511075 H yes Vietnamese Voluntary Foundation

Evergreen neighborhood of San Jose 22 yrs

Santa Clara yes draft splits evergreen into 3 AD s and from Little Saigon but all must be togetherl Little Saigon is Story Rd to N King Rd to E Capitol Expressway to S Center Rd to W. Evergreen is defined well by school district boundaries.

62511076 H no San Jose Santa Clara yes east San Jose is working class community business and schools COI; draft AD dismantles political leadership of east San Jose - maintain AD 23 as is.

62511077 H no ShastaHanchett neighborhood of San Jose (west side of San Jose)

Santa Clara yes CD SNACL combines his neighborhood with Gilroy Morgan Hill have nothing in common; put eastside S Jose w downtown S jose run that district to south county to pick up Gilroy Morgan Hill; put his neighborhood into a westside district (see cities)

62511078 S no no


Speaker #

4091100162511075

62511076

62511077

62511078






yes yes

no yes

ShastaHanchett should go with west S Jose Alamaden Blossom Valley neighborhoods and with cities of Cupertino Campbell Los Gatos Saratoga and Santa Clara.

yes yes

no no


Speaker #

4091100162511075

62511076

62511077

62511078


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no yes



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62511081 H S yes Japanese Community Center Director

Santa Clara 37 years

Santa Clara yes COI of Santa Clara Cupertino Sunnyvale Mountain View split by draft; they share sch distr transport corridor (101 to 280 El Camino Real) shopping areas major high tech companies (Google Apple etc); keep 4 cities together

(cont) Good to have Berryessa with Milipitas but need Evergreen neighborhood whole not split into 3 AD

62511082 H no San Jose Santa Clara yes Latino dilution in east San Jose; need a measure for dilution to show with maps so that can correct it can use simple standard deviation coloring of maps - could be core of Sec 2 challenge

62511083 H teacher substitute currently w Alum Rock School District does youth advising

no yes not much improvement in youth situationgang prevention in eastside Alum Rock despite talk about it


Speaker #

4091100162511081

62511082

62511083






yes yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162511081

62511082

62511083


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes

no creat a dilution index to review maps

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62511084 H yes Sunny Hills Neighborhood Association President

Milipitas Sunny Hills neighborhood

Santa Clara yes Milpitas is part of Santa Clara County; in AD draft it is with mostly Alameda County district and that reduces representation; put with Santa Clara County districts in all district levels draw boundary at county line

62511085 H no Montara coastside

San Mateo yes south San Mateo and Santa Clara AD s Menlo Park and East San Jose cut out finger consolidate w Santa Clara district to remove discontinuity - cut coast at Half Moon Bay but should be kept together.

62511086 H no Sunnyvale Santa Clara yes move Sunnyvale which is contiguous to S Clara and Cupertino back into Silicon Valley as its a Silicon Valley community. Hwy 85 N boundary of Sunny E boundary of Mt View is boundary between Silicon Val mid-peninsula cities

(cont) Sunnyvale is very different from Mt. View it does not have the same standard of living


Speaker #

4091100162511084

62511085

62511086






yes yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162511084

62511085

62511086


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62511087 H yes CCAG yes east S Jose (defined as S of Milpitas down to bottom of EvergreenCoyote Valley east of 101) needs to be whole; its 336K and should not be in 3 AD; CD boundary on S Clara St splits downtown down middle; AD boundary on San Fernando St splits SJSU.

62511088 H no yes Sunnyvale Cupertino Santa Clara and Mountain View in one AD because share business and community interests

62511089 H S yes Tri-County Association of Latino Elected Officials

yes support draft SD 15; keep Hollister Salinas Valley w Watsonville in Senate; Scotts Valley Davenport are in CD 14 now but make current CD 17 part of CD 27 28; to have fair electoral opportunit do not draw lines that dilute minority voting strength

62511090 H will serve on SF Redistricting Task Force

no San Francisco

San Francisco

yes SF AD split is not logical; use oshanessy twin peaks and Stanyon St for AD boundary as now roughly exists. Use 19th Ave for CD boundary and go as far into SF as need to get pop

(cont) nesting is good and do it with correspon numbers (SD s 110 are in BOED 1) to make it easy to understand


Speaker #

4091100162511087

62511088

62511089

62511090






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162511087

62511088

62511089

62511090


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62511091 H yes Contra Costa Redistricting Task Force CCAG

yes 4800 people split off of Antioch on its west side west of Summersville Rd; put those back and keep Antioch east CC Co in a San Joaquin district; move unincorporated areas out by Terminals and hwy 12 into Solano-Yolo district

(cont) look at original CCAG maps for east central S Jose and tri-cities area; use hills between valley and S Clara Co as boundaries

62711001 H yes Greenlining Institute but speaking as Fremont resident

Fremont Alameda yes want Fremont to remain whole (asian area) rather than split into 2 AD 2 CD with Newark and Union City or w Newark and Milpitas; East Palo Alto with CD AD with Redwood City as opposed to what its with in draft

62711002 H no Richmond Contra Costa yes keep Richmond whole at state and federal level (Richmond is COI)

62711003 H S yes city council Menlo Park

Menlo Park San Mateo yes concern that city is split into 2 CD; COI with Menlo Park PA EPA Atherton; MP EPA in N S Clara Co CD Redwood City in S Mateo Co CD - perfect pop exchange

62711004 H no yes likes CCAG maps though not affliated with them; COI in San Mateo County; keep job engine going in san jose


Speaker #

4091100162511091

62711001

62711002

62711003

62711004






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162511091

62711001

62711002

62711003

62711004


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no yes letters and map 06.27.11.A

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62711005 H yes represents 5 trade orgs - napa wine

Napa yes unify Napa County american canyon must be with Napa County

62711006 H S yes wine growers of napa county

Napa yes need 4 wine growing counties (Napa Lake Mendo Sonoma) together and american canyon with napa (big part of wine industry in American Canyon)

62711007 H S yes Napa County BofSups

Napa yes propose Wine Coastal District - rearranged three draft CD - its a compromise for us has a lots of improvements; similarities greater than differences

62711008 H S spoke on June 9

yes American Canyon City Council brought quorum of city council including mayor vice mayor

Napa yes keep american canyon whole

62711009 H S yes East Bay Asian Voter Education Consortium (EBAVEC) part of CAPAFR

yes 3 API concentrations in Alameda Co Fremont Newark whole together w nearby areas in S Clara Co; oakland alameda berkeley one AD; ashland cherryland san leandro San Lorenzo Hayward Union City for another AD; CAPAFR will submit new AD SD

(cont.) Q what about Fremont issue? A their proposal ok for CD for AD we want to be w Berryessa


Speaker #

4091100162711005

62711006

62711007

62711008

62711009






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162711005

62711006

62711007

62711008

62711009


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes letter 06.27.11.B

no yes maps using redrawca.org and explanation of how changed 3 CD

06.27.11.C

no yes City of American Canyon opposition packet of letters City of American Canyon petition wsignaturs; letter w exhibits from City of Napa resident

06.27.11.D 06.27.11.E 06.27.11.F




Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62711010 H S civil rights lawyers worked with Lawyers Committee Disability Rights CA Chinese for Affirmative Action

yes participated in CAPAFR map development process

yes TY for keeping Oakland Chinatwon whole; in AD Oakland should be kept with Alameda and Berkeley rather than San Leandro and areas to south; in three cities COI of similar SES education among AAPI Latino and African American pops - underserved groups

62711011 H S letter read by another

no Alameda 30 yrs

yes S Leandro S Lornezo Ashland Cherryland Castro Valley Hayward Union City are COI (share school districts religious institutions ethnic shopping center and cultural activities lots of LEP that needs help accessing vital govt services)

62711012 H S yes Executive Director Filipino Advocates for Justice (FAJ) part of CAPAFR

Alameda 35 years

yes Union City San Leandro San Lorenzo Cherryland Ashland Castro Valley Hayward in same AD SD CD (all under certain pop except Hayward and should be kept whole); As-Am in Central AL CO share a lot.

62711013 H S yes Asian Pacific Islander American Public Affairs Association (APAPA)

Fremont 30 years

Alameda yes Fremont should be whole with Newark Milipitas and Berryessas area to keep API community together in AD SD CD; large AAPI pops w commonalities and ties


Speaker #

4091100162711010

62711011

62711012

62711013






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162711010

62711011

62711012

62711013


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #



no yes testimony 06.27.11.J




Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62711014 H S yes Asian Law Caucas part of CAPAFR

yes unite LGBT in eastern SF AD (Haight-Ashbury Twin Peaks Diamond Hts in EastSFAD); unite As-Am immig COI by Outer Mission Crocker Amazon w Excelsior Vistition Valley in East SF AD; remove from that AD pacific heights presidio marina

(cont) TY for preserving COI in Viz Valley Excels Mission greater Chinatown areas and for keeping Daly City whole.

62711015 H yes representing Latinos in northerh Monterey Co

yes concern with number and not being allowed to vote in 2012 if in northern monterey

62711016 H S - came back about 852pm

high school student

no Marin yes keep marin with most of Sonoma; doesnt want to be with Del Norte; at end response to marin doesnt have wine - but do share dairy farming w Sonoma (coast Bodega to Marin) also Napa w coast is good for more pop add Yolo (connect is UCD viticulture)

62711017 pass no no62711018 H no yes does not like Santa Rosa and

Napa out of CD and Marin instead; dont share economic social interest w Marin dllutes wine industry and ; restor SR and Napa back in Coastal CD


Speaker #

4091100162711014

62711015

62711016

6271101762711018






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yesno yes


Speaker #

4091100162711014

62711015

62711016

6271101762711018


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #


no

no yes testimony map 06.27.11.M

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62711019 H S no Mendicino yes proposed Yuba CD bad road to travel if go normal way go thru 6 other CDs; border divides huge economic entitiy in wine industry.

62711020 H yes LGBT SF Community

San Francisco

San Francisco

yes eastern SF district depends on our State Senator. If it gets an even number wont have representation for 2 year - please keep SF odd; also keep east SF together and for that see letters from 5 grps (SF log cabin reps ABToklas LGBT Demo Club etc)

(cont) next speaker 21 submits the letter by the 5 groups

62711021 H S yes SF Board of Sups represents Castro area

San Francisco

yes same as previous give SD in SF an odd number keep east SF together to elect Assembly from LGBT community (disagree with CAPAFR; dont take Pac Hts Laurel Hts Marina out of EastSF AD; add in Diamond Hts TwinPeaks Cole Valley Haight-Ash Glen Park

62711022 H S yes RAS client San Mateo yes do not split zip codes Zip codes are COI


San Mateo yes use zip codes

62711024 H S yes on Cloverdale city council

Cloverdale Sonoma yes keep Sonoma intact and within one coastal district; need Santa Rosa in too


Speaker #

4091100162711019

62711020

62711021

62711022

62711023

62711024






no yes

yes yes

no yes

no yes

no no

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162711019

62711020

62711021

62711022

62711023

62711024


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes long memo 06.27.11.N

no

no yes ltr from speaker and resolution from 5 LGBT groups

06.27.11.O 06.27.11.P

no yes CD proposals from RedrawCA

06.27.11.Q

no

no yes ltr from speaker 06.27.11.R



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62711025 H S yes City council Dana Point

Dana Point San Diego yes keep Dana Point whole and with South OC district; put some North OC cities in w LA

62711026 H S yes Dana Point City Manager

Dana Point San Diego yes echos last speaker keep Dana Point whole add back in Monarch Beach (tells history of this) and there is COI of northern areas w LA

62711027 H S no Santa Rosa Sonoma yes Santa Rosa has to be with rest of Sonoma keep it in coastal district and take out Marin which has less in common with coast counties mendo humbold DN

62711028 H S - comes back at 856pm

yes CCAG; Log Cabin republicans SF

San Francisco

yes re CCAG maps - has hot spot; also echoes re LGBT communities in SF; comes back at end Californians need to understand that half do not get to elect Senator in 2012 - nothing can be done about that - make this clear to public

(also at end) explains method for LGBT data provided

62711029 H yes CCAG Lafayette Contra Costa yes hot spots marin with American canyon lists lots of other city splits and other problems revised Assembly plan addresses all of these issues


Speaker #

4091100162711025

62711026

62711027

62711028

62711029






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162711025

62711026

62711027

62711028

62711029


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes ltr from City of DP w resolution ltr from DP Chamber of Commerce

06.27.11.S 06.27.11.T

no yes ltr from City of DP w resolution ltr from DP Chamber of Commerce

06.27.11.S 06.27.11.T

no yes testimony 06.27.11.U

no yes ltr w map about LGBT community

06.27.11.V

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62711030 H yes CCAG Walnut Creek

Contra Costa yes hot spots of SD plan- lots of same ones with AD plan so lists others in SD plan - revised SD plan addresses all these successfully

62711031 H S yes CCAG San Ramon Contra Costa yes hot spots of CD plan; GGB to oregon border and excludes Santa Rosa; Yuba Co with Valley of Moon; Santa Clara San Mateo Tri-Valley area divided Fremont with divided Downtown San Jose

62711032 H S yes CCAG Oakland Alameda yes violation of criterion 3 4 5 - our maps are better for underrepresented groups and majority of district to elect rep that represents them

62711033 H no San Ramon Valley

Contra Costa yes tri-valley has COI with Contra Costa - please listen to us

62711034 H no San Ramon Contra Costa yes do not go over oaklandberkeley hills want to be with other CCC cities those that read CC Times etc

62711035 H no yes keep San Ramon Valley together - like last two speakers


Speaker #

4091100162711030

62711031

62711032

62711033

62711034

62711035






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162711030

62711031

62711032

62711033

62711034

62711035


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes memo form completed 06.27.11.W

no yes memo form completed 06.27.11.X

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62711036 H S - came back at 846pm no San Ramon Contra Costa yes Tri-Valley area San Ramon Danville Dublin Pleasanton Livermore - 5 city councils meet every few months bring new biz to area has letters from each major;

(comes back at end) Tri-Valley connected to Lamorinda by 68024 but nothing in common between Orinda and Albany

62711037 H S yes CCAG pleasant hill contra costa yes likes first draft CCC for AD SD does not like CD; CD tri-valley does not belong with Fremont dont put parts of S Joaquin Co with CCC.

62711038 H yes realtor org - re San Ramon Valley

yes wants 24 corridor district; do not put San Ramon Valley w Fremont

62711039 H no Berkeley Alameda yes supports CCAG CD maps62711040 H yes SF Log Cabin

Republicans President

yes proposed AD in SF; upper market LGBT community in with Mission which is less than 3 same sex unmarried households; unusual to collaborate w ABToklas group - but agree on this

62711041 H no walnut creek

Contra Costa yes tri-valley should NOT be with Fremont - use Oakland hills as border between Fremont and Tri-valley area - supports letter of 5 tri-valley cities

62711042 H S yes city council cotati cotati Sonoma yes Yuba CD keep Cotati whole with nearby similar communities


Speaker #

4091100162711036

62711037

62711038

6271103962711040

62711041

62711042






no yes

no yes

no yes

no noyes yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162711036

62711037

62711038

6271103962711040

62711041

62711042


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes letter signed by 5 mayors letter from Danville mayor letter from San Ramon business person

06.27.11.Y 06.27.11.Z 06.27.11.AA

no yes testimony 06.27.11.AB

no

nono

no

no yes memo with small map at bottom

06.27.11.AC



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62711043 H no Siskiyou County

yes considering adding good portion of county to Del Norte - that is great injustice to residents of Siskiyou County; to keep similar communities together use western border of Siski Co as border of district

62711044 H S - came back at 844pm no Sausalito Marin yes thanks for not jumping GGB; agree that American Canyon should be back with Napa; proposes maps that also put Santa Rosa back in with Sonoma; comes back at end please consider nesting

62711045 H no Diablo valley

Contra Costa yes likes CCAG maps

62711046 H - came back at 849pm yes CCAG Berkeley Alameda yes our plans are for diverse districts fair districts not for lilywhite countryclub districts; came back at endLamorinda nothing to do with Albany; Albany is across st from him Lamor is far-believes current rep wants to fund raise in Lamorinda


Speaker #

4091100162711043

62711044

62711045

62711046






no yes

no yes

no no

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162711043

62711044

62711045

62711046


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes suggested changes to AD draft

06.27.11.AD

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62711047 H yes city council american canyon

american canyon (AC)

Napa yes economic interests that AC represents for Napa Count - huge support base of wine industry truck route through hwy 29; Assembly member in past got them to resolve diffference cause all (Napa County) in same district

62711048 H yes Napa County Board of Sups

American Canyon

Napa yes AC has had identity crisis because lumped in w Vallejo; 1992 incorporated but still had identity crisis. What CRC has done rallied Napa Co to recognize importance of AC to county

62711049 H S no Castro neighborhood San Francisco

San Francisco

yes concern with numbering LGBT of Haight Glen Park in district w LGBT

62711050 H yes SF Board of Sups represents southeast SF (diverse area)

San Francisco

San Francisco

yes needs partner in Sac

62711051 H S no East Bay yes natural boundary of ridgelines on west and one east of San Ramon Valley Tri-Valley Diablo Valley; dont have much in common with either side.


Speaker #

4091100162711047

62711048

62711049

62711050

62711051






no yes

no yes

yes yes

yes yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162711047

62711048

62711049

62711050

62711051


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes ltr from SF City Attorney

06.27.11.AE

no

no yes testimony 06.27.11.AF



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62711052 H retired social worker

no Albany Alameda yes draft AD removes Lamorinda from current 14th AD and puts in hwy 80 cities; but want Lamorinda with us share alot (see COI);extend AD more into OaklandAfr-Amer commun relies on ethnic-based services in Oakland; want 2 or more Assemblymembers for Oakland.

(cont) hwy 80 cities placed with in draft Hercules Port Costa Rodeo Crockett Pinole; Lamorinda is Lafayette Moraga Orinda and Canyon

62711053 H no Oakland Alameda yes put Lamorinda back with us in our AD and balance by taking out 5 hwy 80 cities (see speaker 52) Lamorinda has lots in common with us as opposed to I-80 cities; move southern border of West COCO AD in Oakland from lincoln ave to park blvd

62711054 H no American Canyon (AC)

Napa yes history of AC long time establishing identity with Napa County; do not take that away.

62711055 H S - came back at 850pm no south San Mateo county

San Mateo yes you fixed a few things; need to fix othersmove line at Stanford; and in SF keep together except at border with san mateo countynot anywhere else in SF with San Mateo county

(comes back at end) does not understand SD going SF down to S Mateo will look at it send email tomorrow


Speaker #

4091100162711052

62711053

62711054

62711055






extend AD 14 more into Oakland pick up Piedmont and hills but want farther into urban Oakland

no yes AD 14 shares with Lamorinda inc ed level intellectual cultural pursuits (UCB Berkeley Rep) recreational (Sierra Club members Tilden Park) media markets (SF Chronicle NYTimes) med care (Alta Bates Childrens Summit Hosp)

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162711052

62711053

62711054

62711055


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no yes testimony 06.27.11.AG



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62711056 H no American Canyon

Napa yes diverse community - had to fight for everything (education cityhood zipcode); split us off from Napa affects schools badly; American Canyon is gateway to Napa valley

62711057 H yes city of american canyon mayor

american canyon

Napa yes 1103 signatures on petition - supervisor provided maps and he lists where to find pop (part of Santa Rosa etc)

62711058 H Search Rescue team

no Yountville area

Napa yes double whammy - take AC out ; impt to keep napa county together; napa lake mendo - when doing SAR cant tell difference.


Speaker #

4091100162711056

62711057

62711058






no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162711056

62711057

62711058


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62711059 H S yes American Canyon Chamber of Commerce

American Canyon

Napa yes keep us with Napa in AD SD CD

62711060 H yes American Cancer Society legilsative advocate

American Canyon

Napa yes American Canyon is with areas that vote against ACS issues in Sac; Napa County reps vote for ACS causes

62711061 H S no American Canyon

Napa yes American Canyon with Napa


Napa yes keep with Napa Cp

62711063 H no American Canyon 15 yr resident 15 yrs old

Napa yes keep AC with Napa Co


Speaker #

4091100162711059

62711060

62711061

62711062

62711063






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162711059

62711060

62711061

62711062

62711063


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes ltrs from COC and various businesses in American Canyon

06.27.11.AH 06.27.11.AI 06.27.11.AJ 06.27.11.AK 06.27.11.AL 06.27.11.AM 06.27.11.AN 06.27.11.AO 06.27.11.AP

no

no yes testimony 06.27.11.AQ

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62711064 H - came back at 848 not American Canyon resident - spoke Saturday

no San Francisco

San Francisco

yes thinks should totally (not mostly) nest AD in SD and SD in BOE; ok to keep Sunset etc in San Mateo district; use O-shannasy as demarcation between West East SF (agree with LGBT on this)

(back at end) re CD s Marin most of Sonoma one CD; another CD of Del Norte Humboldt Mendocino Lake Napa maybe Trinity - fix the concern of North Coast people.


Napa yes ditto keep AC with Napa County

62711066 H no Napa yes about wine industry farm workers - housing problem for farm workers; need to keep AC with Napa and Napa with other wine-growing regions.

62711067 pass no no62711068 pass no no62711069 H S yes Black American

Political Action Committee (BAPAC) of Contra Costa County

born raised in North Richmond

Contra Costa yes CD cutting richmond in half violates criteria; while sharing some socialeconomic interests richmond competes with oakland berkeley alameda emeryville for resources - better to have own congressional rep than 8 of district with those cities to south

half with AL Co cities to South half with central eastern CCCo


Speaker #

4091100162711064

62711065

62711066

627110676271106862711069






no yes

no yes

no yes

no nono nono yes


Speaker #

4091100162711064

62711065

62711066

627110676271106862711069


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

nonono yes letter opposing CD

draft06.27.11.AR



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62711070 H S (maps narrative equivalency files)

yes Sierra Club yes Monterey Bay Area provided AD maps; will submit south CA maps by COB tomorrow


Napa yes ditto of other AC residents

62711072 H worked on Census Complete Count Committee for SF

yes Commission on Status of Women works at Equality California

Castro District San Francisco

San Francisco

yes supports LGBT proposal - will work on providing CRC data on same sex households

62711073 H - came back at 849pm no Pleasanton Alameda yes AD SD are great for Tri-Valley area CD is problem; agree 33-37 41 45 re keeping 5 cities together; ag fremont coalition map disagr(they dont speak for me); give about five suggests for what to move around specific (no hardcopy but will send email)

(comes back at end) keeping San Joaquin whole move Tracy Manteca out of Stanislaus back in San Joaquin


Speaker #

4091100162711070

62711071

62711072

62711073






no yes

no yes

yes yes

what to move in CD s Antioch Brentwood into COCO move Alamo San Ramon Danville Blackhawk into FRNWU; Newark half of Fremont into SANJO; southern end of SANJO into Santa Clara district; move southeast rural parts of

Santa Clara Co (possibly Gilroy) into STANI; Tracy Manteca

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162711070

62711071

62711072

62711073


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes notes from line drawer w revised proposed regional (Monterey SF Bay Area) maps and w CVAP stats

06.27.11.AS

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62711075 H no Benecia Solano yes re CD north and south of co are very different (explains how state has split Co in many ways); Benecia should be with Bay Area crocket rodeo also; all do not belong with central valley very differ from nor co in terms of transp infrastr needs

(Cont) representation on ABAG and MTC very different than Nor county; Q have maps of districts that show how state splits up Solano County? A she will submit

62711076 S speaker 109 San Jose June 25

no Montara San Mateo yes 4 concerns 1)Menlo Park EPA not in SNMSC CD 2)do not split S Mateo Coast from Pacifica to S Cruz Co line 3)do not split downtown S Jose do not extend AD from S Jose to Monterey Co while bypass Morgan HillGilroy 4)Marin wOreg border NapaCo split

62711077 H fire fighter in SF african-american gay community

no AD 13 yes look at ltr from LGBT groups keep SD odd number; AD move norther border to Arguello; Haight Glen Park Laurel Hts Diamond Hts Twin peaks Nob Hill Presidio should be included in LGBT district; lots of LBGT in Laurel Hts

(cont) try to maintain close to current AD shape to allow LGBT to get elected


Speaker #

4091100162711075

62711076

62711077






no yes

no yes

yes yes


Speaker #

4091100162711075

62711076

62711077


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes memo w 4 concerns and maps

06.27.11.AT

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62711078 H no San Rafael Marin yes re CDnothing in common with Humboldt Del Norte; Marin should be with most of Sonoma; COI of Marin Sonoma-lives revolve betweencommerce events sports comp; people commute from Sonoma to Marin move to Sonoma from Marin cause more affordable.

62711082 H yes Russian Hill San Francisco

yes quote City Atty letter LGBT - same as others SD odd and for AD incl Diamond HtsGlen Park Haight Laurel Hts in ESF AD - charts of data provided from 28.

62711083 H yes SF Pride Board member LGBT community

San Francisco

yes about same letter SD odd number

62711084 H - came back at 842pm yes vice mayor but not speaking for city but for self

San Pablo Contra Costa yes glad to be same CD (Miller) but Richmond split off need it with us; strong connect with Richmond; help each other out many collaborations e.g. violence prev; CD rep gets grant for all ;also share firepolice communicat; we are COI low-inc Latino

(comes back at end) do not split Latino COI in San Pablo Richmond - cultural ties festivals; also work on 23rd St runs through both cities generally a COI of West CoCo


Speaker #

4091100162711078

62711082

62711083

62711084






no yes

yes yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162711078

62711082

62711083

62711084


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62711087 H no Fremont Alameda yes share sanitary water volunteer public safety hosp Ohlone College in tri-city area dont split also dont split San Jose City

62711089 H yes former president of Oceanview Elementary PTA in Albany CA

Albany Alameda yes Albany shops north Richmond Pinole; but for educational discussions look to east to Lamorinda - similar education levels of children - support Lamorinda with us.

62811001 pass no no62811002 H no West

SacramentoYolo yes CD s are good; AD s problem

that West Sac in Yolo-Solano area and should be in greater Sac area

62811003 pass no no62811004 H S no Sacramento Sacramento yes oppose WSAC AD SD

because split off some neighborhoods (Elmhurst) from City of Sac that have nothing to do w Roseville; North Highlands Foothill Farms into Roseville AD put rest of Sac back in WSAC AD

62811005 H no yes same as 4 re Sacramento; North Highlands Foothill Farms are split in WSAC

62811006 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100162711087

62711089

6281100162811002

6281100362811004

62811005

62811006






no yes

no yes

no nono yes

no noyes yes

no yes

no no


Speaker #

4091100162711087

62711089

6281100162811002

6281100362811004

62811005

62811006


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

nono

nono yes

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62811007 H S no yes re BOED; Ventura with Central Valley SFV with LA; letters of Support - LA Afric-Amer COC

62811008 H no yes Citris Hts united and put El Dorado Hills back up to do this for AD then nest for SD

62811009 pass no no62811010 H no Galt San Joaquin yes wants Galt Lodi with Sac

District not with Solano says how to exchange pop

62811016 H S no Davis Yolo yes Davis with YoloSolano district (1-80 corridor district) and gives swap suggestion re Galt - hwy 99 corridor

62811018 H S yes speaking on behalf of Asian group

yes South Sac Elk Grove together - keep together put together in CD; do not put Davis with Sacramento (UCD is agr focus school and doesnt below with urban area)

62811019 H S yes Chinese-American organization

yes thank you for North Natomas North Highlands together - immigrant API community here; keep together please


Speaker #

4091100162811007

62811008

6281100962811010

62811016

62811018

62811019






no yes

no yes

no nono yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162811007

62811008

6281100962811010

62811016

62811018

62811019


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes

no

nono

no yes

no yes

no yes



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62811020 H S yes CAPAFR Davis Yolo yes history Asian-American representation that comes out of redistricting; object to Yolo County division Davis with Sacshould be West Sac only with Sac

62811021 H no Davis since birth

Yolo yes disagrees with Commissioner Forbes that Davis is BR community of Sacramento and lots of his Davis neighbors agree

62811022 H S yes NALEO yes glad taking VRA more seriously; report on discrimination toward Latino back to 19th Century SES of latinos in CA - many low income lack of health care LEP etc.

62811023 H yes NALEO yes adds comments about certain regions

62811024 H S yes Equality California LGBT group

yes submits maps

62811025 H yes Equality California LGBT org

yes describes how built dataset bec sex orientation not in Census voting records (prop 8 opposers donors to no on Prop 8) same sex households from Census member of gr- rank each Census Block Group in state - to get pop density of LBGT in different regions


Speaker #

4091100162811020

62811021

62811022

62811023

62811024

62811025






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162811020

62811021

62811022

62811023

62811024

62811025


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes

no

no yes

no

no yes

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62811027 H S no Lodi resident letter read

San Joaquin yes do not put Lodi with Solano - we are different socially economically politically

62811028 H no West Sacramento

Yolo yes AD s and CD s of West Sacramento AD ok CD is not because with Davis and should be with Sac and NOT with Davis

62811029 H yes Davis city council Davis letter read for city council member cause at city council meeting

Yolo yes put Davis with rest of Yolo and w Solano - COI on I-80 transportation corridor (links Davis to bay area as does train) and agricultural areas

62811030 H S no Carson resident ltr read for

Los Angeles yes CRC pays too much attention to our COI - re Ports - people work there and dont live there

62811031 H S yes Flood Control Board for Sacramento

Sacramento Sacramento yes do not split Sac because will make flood control hard - federal level


Yolo yes pleased w CD AD should have W Sac w Sac and not w Davis


Speaker #

4091100162811027

62811028

62811029

62811030

62811031

62811032






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162811027

62811028

62811029

62811030

62811031

62811032


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes

no

no

no yes

no yes

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62811033 H yes Davis Unified School District

Davis Yolo yes in favor of Lodi Galt back with hwy 99 corridor; Davis with Solano; Davis and Solano are true COI (because of university); cant get to Sac from Davis certain time of day - shop in Vacaville instead;

(Cont) Q what about those that live in Davis and commute to Sac? A there is a relationship but historically and because of UCD the relationship is more toward east

62811034 H S yes lots of orgs Davis Yolo yes reunite Yolo County (COI agr connection to land values way of life flood control)

62811037 H yes API org CAPITAL - part of CAPAFR reach out to lots of other communities LGBT Slavic pop

yes keep South Sacramento Elk Grove together at Florin

62811038 H no Sacramento River Delta

yes like ECC AD (with Davis and Sac together in another AD) because its a delta-interested district; if take GaltLodi out and put with Central Valley then can take more of Delta to south

62811039 H S (maps diagrams) yes ?? yes keep cities and counties together


Speaker #

4091100162811033

62811034

62811037

62811038

62811039






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162811033

62811034

62811037

62811038

62811039


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes

no

no

no look at cities intact - I did it better; also keep communities intact

yes



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62811040 H no yes object to way Yolo County divided - Yolo has unity of purpose (sustainable agriculture land and waterway preservations balance economics and way of life); each pop center has own role; shattering into 9 districts makes it hard for us to move forward.

62811041 H no UCD Yolo yes Yolo split 3 ways for each AD SD CD - so totally of 9 partial districts - COI of Yolo is agriculture (UCD is ag school) and recently wine institute and commonalities with SolanoNapa

62811042 H S yes APALC CAPAFR yes discussions with public to develop own proposals and then re June 10 drafts and developed response (w AARC MALDEF) based on drafts - providing CDs to CRC today - not racial gerrymandering

62811043 H S yes Asian American Institute

yes like SGVDB in San Gabriel area concern with Inglewood and Port of LA districts; agree re SAC; has comment re Sunnyvale


Speaker #

4091100162811040

62811041

62811042

62811043






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162811040

62811041

62811042

62811043


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes

no yes



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62811044 H no Placerville El Dorado yes want county to remain whole; wanted Tahoe Basin to be not only together but also with three counties; concern re El Dorado Hills being separated outand that distr goes too far south into Central Valley

62811045 H S yes Yolo County BOSups

yes mistake to split in all three levels (COI of careful land use air water quality etc); Davis Enterprise article Daily Democrat article (keep Woodland with Davis)

62811046 H S yes City of Woodland letter from Mayor read; reader is UCD student represents a dept at UCD

Woodland Yolo yes oppose separating county of Yolo - county is COI (land use preservation etc)

62811047 H yes Dana Point City Council

Dana Point Orange yes small coastal city; must be kept whole and keep with So OC district; cities in south OC use OC county services NOT SD Co services; some north OC cities DO use LA Co services

62811048 H yes Dana Point City Manager

Dana Point Orange yes ditto 47 please google Data Point and see how impt it is to CA and shouldnt be marginalized in Sac


Speaker #

4091100162811044

62811045

62811046

62811047

62811048






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162811044

62811045

62811046

62811047

62811048


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes

no yes

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62811049 H S yes AARC yes drafts and june 24 visualizations still dont reflect Afr-Am COI and do not promote ability to elect; Section 2 packing violation is likely; some areas to link Compton Carson Signal Hill ____

62811050 H S yes MALDEF yes submitting 3 updated statewide maps; worked with communities and with other groups; VRA compliant and respect COI even more within VRA context; maps with AARC CAPAFR - unity maps for AD nested for SD new CD

62811051 H no Elk Grove work in West Sac

Sacramento yes Happy that Elk Grove is not split and is currently But Galt must be with us. Good to be with Sac and with West Sac but not good to be with Davis instead of with GALT Consider a hwy corridor district

62811052 H no no (see non-COI district comment)


Speaker #

4091100162811049

62811050

62811051

62811052






no yes

no yes

no yes

no no


Speaker #

4091100162811049

62811050

62811051

62811052


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes

no yes

no

no use nesting for BOE either 20 AD or 10 SD to make one BOE so borders align - this helps to lessen voter confusion



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62811053 H yes Bird Cage Neighborhood Association in Citris Hts Board Member

Citris Hts Sacramento yes Citris Hits wants to be with Rancho Cordova rather than with Folsom and Elk Grove. Put Folson with south Placer County - COI of Folsom Dam area strong very different from Citris Hts.

62811054 H S WWII veteran yes Veterans Board provides services to veterans

Davis Yolo yes provide services to veterans all over Co (Woodland Davis Winters Esparto West Sacramento); draft would require org to go to 9 districts for services for veterans; each one is less than 20 Yolo County residents

62811055 H S no Siskiyou yes no justification for spliting Siskiyou County and putting west with coastal district; Reasoning was about American Indian community but they do not want this. County should be with Shasta Modoc

62811056 H S no Coachella Valley

Riverside yes happy to have desert communities together good to have two reps for Salton Sea to get it cleaned up - 50 letter into you about this; dont want Coachella and Indio with Imperial County; finger up to grab a city looks like favoring


Speaker #

4091100162811053

62811054

62811055

62811056






yes yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162811053

62811054

62811055

62811056


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes

no yes

no yes



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62811057 H no Davis Yolo yes Yolo Co is a historical COI - keep it together.

62811058 H no Citris Heights

Sacramento yes do not want to be divided and keep us part of Sac- love CD and like nestingmake sure we are together

62811059 H S yes City of Sacramento Redistricting group tonight on behalf of River Park Neighborhood Association (RPNA)

Sacramento yes east Sac College Park .all with River Park; support map from speaker 4

62811060 H yes Yolo Co Board of Sups member

Yolo yes Board voted (4-0 one didnt vote cause had conflict of interest) to opposed drafts; Sacramento is a different world from Yolo County share interest in ag open space - unique area of state.

62811061 H no Loomis near Granite Bay

Placer yes do not divide Citris Hts from Sac Co and put with us. Unite Citris Hts and put El Dorado with us and Lake area.

62811062 H no Rocklin Placer yes re El Dorado El Dorado Hills62811063 H no Lincoln Placer yes like because center of new

AD; should have extended to El Dorado Hills to east.


Speaker #

4091100162811057

62811058

62811059

62811060

62811061

6281106262811063






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yesno yes


Speaker #

4091100162811057

62811058

62811059

62811060

62811061

6281106262811063


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes

no

no

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62811065 H S no yes Yolo County COI - collaboration nurtures small business; divided into 9 districts is wrong putting any of us with Sac is wrong

62811066 H S yes County Clerk Siskiyou County

Yreka Siskiyou yes keep Siskiyou County whole - its a COI - transportation county-wide newspaper community college district school districts; Q if keep whole what about being with coast? A


Sacramento yes good when incorporated; keep us with Sac and not w Davis- suggest Davis with Solano Co

62811068 H S no Yolo yes AD s keep Yolo County COI whole - agr-based community; not as many commute to Sac from Davis as people think - its not a BR community to Sac; UCD and Davis valuable part of Yolo COI

62811069 H S no yes ditto to 68 and especially remove Davis from Sac District

62811070 H S no yes ditto on Yolo comments62811071 H no yes keep Yolo whole and Davis

Woodland together w common representation


Speaker #

4091100162811065

62811066

62811067

62811068

62811069

6281107062811071






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yesno yes


Speaker #

4091100162811065

62811066

62811067

62811068

62811069

6281107062811071


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes

no yes

no

no yes

no yes

no yesno



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62811073 H yes non-profit childrens therapy centers in Yolo (all towns)

Davis Yolo yes keep Yolo County together - we need the county pop to donate and fund our services so that we can continue to not deny any child.

62811074 H no Sac River Delta Clarksburg

Yolo yes lives in in primary zone of Delta- we live water - lives revolve around water; likes that kept part of Delta together - Davis is urban

62811075 H yolo hikers no Davis Yolo yes ditto to all davis residents - work in Sac but I am a Yolo County resident

62811076 H yes ?? yes Yolo-Solano region has strong COI - water management etc; keep Davis and UCD with Yolo-Solano

62811077 H S works with non-profits

no Davis Yolo yes non-profits need to work with legislators so do not make them work with nine; non-pofits are critical to county and provide services at lower cost than govt agencies

62811078 H no Davis Yolo yes do not split Yolo into 9 districts; example of COI in action - Yolo County Climate Change Project - collaboration of academia government etc and state and congressional legislators have all provided needed support to project


Speaker #

4091100162811073

62811074

62811075

62811076

62811077

62811078






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162811073

62811074

62811075

62811076

62811077

62811078


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no yes

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62811079 H no Fairfield Solano yes Want Lodi with us more than Davis - do not change districts keeping Davis out of our district

62811080 H no Vacaville Solano yes ditto to last speaker and support draft maps re Yolo Solano

62811081 H S no Butte yes Butte with YubaSutter district (COI of fruit and nuts rice farming - versus alfalafa timber in other district its with now); take out Shasta to put Butte in Q what about numbers? A just telling you COI and what fits better

62811082 H no Davis Yolo yes corridor community - common to commute out of county; county has been split and that violates what CRC should do; keep border at west of Yolo Causeway

62811083 H yes CCAG no

62811084 H no yes AD - not good to have Davis and West Sac with Delta area dilutes Latino pop if put them with Delta rather than with Sac


Speaker #

4091100162811079

62811080

62811081

62811082

62811083

62811084






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no no

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162811079

62811080

62811081

62811082

62811083

62811084


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes

no

no not been critical thinking debate instead it has been grow-with-the-flow

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62811085 H no Clarksberg primary region of Delta

Yolo yes agree with where Davis placed

62811086 H S yes letter from former Sacramento city council woman

yes Oak Park neighborhood of Sac has been split - diverse community - mostly people of color; extend NE boundary of South Sac from Broadway to hwy 50 or use Enterprise Zone.

62811087 H S yes remarks of Assemblywoman Yolo area

yes Yolo should be with Solano Napa ag wine etc. Keep Yolo in odd number SD

62811088 H S small biz owner Gulf War veteran

no Suisun City Solano yes Solano County does not love Davis; differences we do ag they do ag science; more state govt workers live in Davis than in other towns; easier for them to get here than us - see how many are here

62811089 H no Vacaville Solano yes likes draft agrees w 85 etc62811090 H yes San Juan School

Districtyes School District is big part of

EDCO but school district split around citris heights; keep Citris Hts together; does not see right to have sliver of El Dorado and El Dorado Hills


Speaker #

4091100162811085

62811086

62811087

62811088

6281108962811090






no yes

yes yes

no yes

no yes

no yesno yes


Speaker #

4091100162811085

62811086

62811087

62811088

6281108962811090


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes

no yes

no yes

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62811092 H no Antioch Contra Costa yes AD Antioch Oakley btu Antioch Oakley and Brentwood are a COI (share economic development ); put Oakley back in Antioch district and give suggested exchange

62811093 H yes Yolo County controller

yes Yolo County COI UCD is all about ag; Yuba County District can allow Yolo to be whole

62811095 H S speaker 74 in Stockton June 24

no Cameron Park

El Dorado yes passes out maps (done with Maptitude) that solve about seven problems discussed tonight re North CA (Yolo Yuba Butte Siskiyou etc) with letter deviations; suggest create N Sac Co and S Sac Co district

62811097 H no Citris Heights

Sacramento yes leave Citris Heights whole

62811098 H yes San Juan School Distirict Board member

Sacramento yes Citris Heights should be kept intact - would help us; take out El Dorado Hills


Speaker #

4091100162811092

62811093

62811095

62811097

62811098






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162811092

62811093

62811095

62811097

62811098


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes more on pop exchanges-followup to June 24

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62811099 H S (map of Delta) no West Plainfield rural area of Yolo County near a part of UCD campus (which spans Yolo and Solano)

Yolo yes importance of UCD to ag and to Delta water shed. Move UCD into AD and SD with Delta

62811100 H no Davis Yolo yes speaking as Yolo Co resident worked long to bring county together - cohesion is key more than whether with west or east; interests align more with West but still must not have 9 districts we get left out in redistricting but our numbers are less than

(cont) one whole AD SD CD

62811101 H no Sonoma yes Sonoma COIs 1)Coast 2)GrapesWine Industry; how keep together Del Norte Humboldt Mendo Lake and Napa and part (250K) of Sonoma - get from North; Southern Sonoma with Marin for another district


Speaker #

4091100162811099

62811100

62811101






no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162811099

62811100

62811101


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62811104 H yes Yolo County Planning Commission

Yolo yes keep Yolo County whole - in the dirt ag community and small growth cities support that - Galt and Lodi in same situation

62811107 H yes Davis School Board

Davis Yolo yes keep Yolo whole because health social services provided through County - elder services children services through county; example all HIV funding to county cut off; Q What about West Sac? A they access county services too

62811108 H no Tahoe Park City of Sacramento

Sacramento yes AD SD drafts split communities and splits Latinos; this area has strong ties to Sac not to El Dorado area

62811109 H S (two packets) no yes AD on westside - suggests how to group like areas together in west; CD plan that corrects county city splits in CRC draft

62811110 pass no no62811111 H no no62811112 H no yes politics maps coastal districts

62811113 pass no no


Speaker #

4091100162811104

62811107

62811108

62811109

628111106281111162811112

62811113






no yes

no yes

yes yes

no yes

no nono nono yes

no no


Speaker #

4091100162811104

62811107

62811108

62811109

628111106281111162811112

62811113


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no yes

nonono

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62811114 H no Phelan San Bernardino

yes took our suggestions from Lancaster except our community took off from where want to be; our COI is with Victor Valley (Victorville Apple Valley Hesperia) not with PalmdaleLancaster (lists common share resources in Victor Valley not with LA Co AntelV

62811118 H no Sacramento Sacramento yes do not carve up Sacramento

62811121 H no Monterey yes VRA important for Monterey - Latinos Ag - does not have maps just dropped in

62811122 H S no Vacaville Solano yes concern with Latino voters in Solano Co kept together in next ten yrs; sent email on may 23; wants Dixon with Vacaville?

4.13.11.A S - speaker 041311038 no no written testimony memo to CRC same essentially as spoken testimony

4.13.11.B S - speaker 041311038 no no handdrawn map of Santa Clara Valley

4.13.11.C S - speaker 041311033 no no map of Ventura county with boundary around area

4.13.11.D S - speaker 041311040 no no community of interest testimony

4.13.11.E S - speaker 041311034 no no CAUSE ppt


Speaker #

4091100162811114

62811118

62811121

62811122

4.13.11.A

4.13.11.B

4.13.11.C

4.13.11.D

4.13.11.E






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no no

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100162811114

62811118

62811121

62811122

4.13.11.A

4.13.11.B

4.13.11.C

4.13.11.D

4.13.11.E


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no yes

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



4.13.11.F S - speaker 0413110__ no no Maps Proposed Assembly Districts in Santa Barbara Ventura Counties (nested in proposed Senate and with Latino Majority in one AD) and current Assembly districts that disenfranchise Santa Maria and Oxnard

4.13.11.G S - speaker 0413110__ no no Map County Populations with Hispanic and Hispanic VAP

4.13.11.H S - speaker 0413110__ no no Maps Proposed Senate District in Santa Barbara Ventura Counties (which breaks at grade in Ventura) and current Senate District that is a distinct racial gerrymander

4.13.11.I S - speaker 041311051 no no written testimony memo to CRC same essentially as spoken testimony

4.13.11.J S - speaker 0413110__ no no SLO County Dept of Ag 2009 Annual Report

4.13.11.K S - speaker 0413110__ no no SLO County Dept of Ag Press Release April 1 2011 re Crop Statistics for 2010


Speaker #

409110014.13.11.F

4.13.11.G

4.13.11.H

4.13.11.I

4.13.11.J

4.13.11.K






no no

no no

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

409110014.13.11.F

4.13.11.G

4.13.11.H

4.13.11.I

4.13.11.J

4.13.11.K


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



4.13.11.L S - speaker 0413110__ no no Paso Robles Wine Country Alliance - Executive Summary of Report on the Economic Impact of Wine and Grapes in the Paso Robles AVA and Greater San Luis Obispo County 2007

4.13.11.M S - speaker 0413110__ no no Paso Robles Wine Country Alliance - Reference list for Report on the Economic Impact of Wine and Grapes in the Paso Robles AVA and Greater San Luis Obispo County 2007

4.13.11.N S - speaker 0413110__ no no San Luis Obispo County Clusters of Opportunity Economic Strategy by Economic Vitality Corp of SLO Co November 2010

4.13.11.O S - speaker 0413110__ no no USDA 2007 Census of Agriculture data on San Luis Obispo County

4.13.11.P S - speaker 0413110__ no yes SLO County Dept of Planning and Building - Rural Land Use Category Map - noting that 65 of SLO County is farmland

4.14.11.A S - speaker 041411014 no no written testimony memo to CRC - essentially same as spoken testimony map with boundaries of proposed district?


Speaker #

409110014.13.11.L

4.13.11.M

4.13.11.N

4.13.11.O

4.13.11.P

4.14.11.A






no no

no no

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

409110014.13.11.L

4.13.11.M

4.13.11.N

4.13.11.O

4.13.11.P

4.14.11.A


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



4.14.11.B no no written testimony memo to CRC - essentially same as spoken testimony

4.14.11.C S - speaker 041411002 no no written testimony memo to CRC - essentially same as spoken testimony map of COI with boundaries

4.14.11.D S - speaker 041411005 no no map of Kern High School District Boundaries

4.14.11.E S - speaker 041411013 no no Dolores Huerta Foundation 1 pg description of Lamont and Weedpatch and 1pg description of Arvin

4.14.11.F S - speaker 041411013 no no Dolores Huerta Foundation Community Needs Assessment Report September 2009

4.14.11.G S - speaker 041411017 no no written testimony memo to CRC - essentially same as spoken testimony

4.14.11.H - duplicate of 04.14.11.G

S - speaker 041411017 no no duplicate of 04.14.11.G

4.14.11.I S - speaker 041411017?? no no map with boundary highlighted

4.14.11.J S - speaker 041411017?? no no map with boundary highlighted

4.14.11.K S - speaker 041411023 no no map with highlighted boundary


Speaker #

409110014.14.11.B

4.14.11.C

4.14.11.D

4.14.11.E

4.14.11.F

4.14.11.G

4.14.11.H - duplicate of 04.14.11.G4.14.11.I

4.14.11.J

4.14.11.K






no no

no no

no no

no no

no no

no no

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

409110014.14.11.B

4.14.11.C

4.14.11.D

4.14.11.E

4.14.11.F

4.14.11.G

4.14.11.H - duplicate of 04.14.11.G4.14.11.I

4.14.11.J

4.14.11.K


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



4.14.11.L S - speaker 041411032 no no Southwest Bakersfield Community of Interest - includes map common interests description list of boundaries

4.16.11.A S speaker 041611003

no yes three google maps (one with just pushpins at 4 hospitals one with blue CD 11 and pushpins at 4 hospitals one with red SD 5 pink SD 14 and pushpins at 4 hospitals

SJ County

4.16.11.B S speaker 041611004

no yes three google maps (one with blue CD 11 and red Manteca Unified School District one with blue Manteca Unified School District one with points showing locations of schools in Manteca Unified School District)

4.16.11.C S speaker 041611007

no yes 1 Goog map (showing blue CD 11 dividing Manteca Stockton Lodi School Districts 3 maps from SJ County website (School Districts Enterprise Zone 2008 and Impt Farmland 2006)

4.16.11.D S speaker 041611007

no yes SJ Co Gen Plan(412-76) - copy UCB IGS library - describes region of Co.


Speaker #

409110014.14.11.L

4.16.11.A

4.16.11.B

4.16.11.C

4.16.11.D






no no

around Stockton Lodi no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

409110014.14.11.L

4.16.11.A

4.16.11.B

4.16.11.C

4.16.11.D


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



4.16.11.E S speaker 041611009

no yes pg of 6 bullet pts ( layout of distr in SJ Stan Co) 2 maps (one of SJ Co and one of a district drawn around Merced with some of Stan Co some of Madera and some of Fresno that would meet fed requirments (Sec 5??) and allow SJ Co to stay whole

4.16.11.F S speaker 041611015

no yes map of proposed foothill district within state with pops added (6 whole counites eastern part of Madera Fresno)

4.16.11.G S speaker 041611015

no yes map of highway 49 corridor to east of state

4.16.11.H S speaker 041611030

no yes written testimony memo to CRC same essentially as spoken testimony - see above

409110xx H Native American school teacher

no Shasta yes

409110xx H no Redding area (30 yrs)

Shasta yes Del Norte Humboldt Mendo grouped not with eastern counties


Speaker #

409110014.16.11.E

4.16.11.F

4.16.11.G

4.16.11.H

409110xx

409110xx






no no

no no

no no

no no

Redding has rancheria Native Americans spread out all over Hoopa Burney Covola (Mendo co)

no yes Native American - do not lump in with all brown

no yes people do not go mountain to coast-bad roads foggyruggedrather go to SoCA for coast; very little in co


Speaker #

409110014.16.11.E

4.16.11.F

4.16.11.G

4.16.11.H

409110xx

409110xx


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no what is def of minority? Native Am are very different

here first of the earth

mountain area little in common with coastal

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



409110xx H no been in Tehama 44 yrs

Tehama no

409110xx H no no

409110xx H no no

409110xx H no yes keep coast inland together in Dist - even tho roads bad -hard only on representative

409110xx H no yes keep rural together409110xx H no yes not trying to make easier for

politicians409110xx H no yes hard to get to Del Norte no

matter what409110xx H no yes it matters if politician wants to

go to see people in district

409110xx H no yes if cross-state with district travel harder than if up 101 corridor

409110xx H no no

409110xx H no no


Speaker #

40911001409110xx

409110xx

409110xx

409110xx

409110xx409110xx

409110xx

409110xx

409110xx

409110xx

409110xx






no yes 44 yrs ago were Democratic county; demog have changed and will change; cant say we are conservative or liberal

no no

no no

no no

no nono no

no no

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

40911001409110xx

409110xx

409110xx

409110xx

409110xx409110xx

409110xx

409110xx

409110xx

409110xx

409110xx


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

keep counties together cause political bodies - but other wise hard job for you.

no will try to respect each other whatever difference and diversity where we live

no great staff - flyers advertising signs

no current CD - Southern part of dist doesnt represent rural Nor Co - but has more population

no

nono

no

no

no

no politicians can fix roads-you guys made it there

no overlap CDADSD - corollary that dist radiate out from there



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



409110xx H no no

409110xx H no yes why is Modoc with Placer? Southern part of CD has more voters than northern. If run from Modoc wont get votes

409110xx H no no

41011001 - return

H return of speaker 1

no no

41011008 - return


no no

41011008 - return


no no


Speaker #

40911001409110xx

409110xx

409110xx

41011001 - return

41011008 - return

41011008 - return






no no

no no

no yes from coast and our backyardrecreation area is east

count Native Americans-so could add numbers

no yes how different from metropolitan - drive 20 mile to take kids to school dont cry when electricity off etc

80 corridor going east move to Nevada city on 49 corridor

no yes foothill dwellers above fog and below snow; if Grass Valley was connected to us they would be herecant say that we want to be with them

no no


Speaker #

40911001409110xx

409110xx

409110xx

41011001 - return

41011008 - return

41011008 - return


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no CRC should go to Coast - they do have different interests

no

no

no do you know what its like to live in rural counties

no Asian community not outgoing (like us) but if you go to them they speak clearly have strong family culture which he likes

no reduce level of language of outreach materials - they just had general plan process and people are exhausted - dont feel bad about turn out



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41011008 - return


no yes Yuba county foothills very different from grass valleyNevada city foothills

41011014 - return

H no Brownsville returns

Yuba yes lives pretty far up in Yuba county and is tied to Yuba-Sutter - bec of HS district that goes up to Plumas county - bus kids down and sports play Yuba City

41011021 - return

H return re 99 corridor

no yes add to 3 county Glenn and Colusa get close to assembly district and these 5 are like counties - rural

Yuba Sutter Butte Colusa Glenn

41011021 - return

H return of speakers 21

no Yuba city? Sutter co? no

410110xx H return no no

410110xx H returnee no yes response to west-east ns issue -harder with adding DN

Yuba Sutter separate AD but same SD


Speaker #

4091100141011008 - return

41011014 - return

41011021 - return

41011021 - return

410110xx

410110xx






no yes Yuba foothills pop is older average than MarysvilleYuba city - connection with Nevada county has not surfaced with any social club

no no

99 corridor - tri-county no no

no yes Sikh festival - well over 100K people - some in Yuba too mostly agricultural

no yes Yuba shares clubs health facilities etc cause Yuba cannot do it on own

farming in Sutter is dominant some in Yuba Co but different type

no no


Speaker #

4091100141011008 - return

41011014 - return

41011021 - return

41011021 - return

410110xx

410110xx


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no Sikhs speak Eng fluently

see agriculture in five counties and see where ___ are?

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?





410110xx H return no weetville? yes NS connection is dominantI-5 corridor strong connection

dont link to Nevada county

41511031 - last issued

H - with ppt re mathematics of compactness

no no

41511032 - but had no

H no Hanford kings yes not a lot of people in East Kings Co. - high mountains (in answer to Comm DeGuillo re east Kings co)


Speaker #

40911001410110xx

410110xx

410110xx


41511032 - but had no






Olivehurst - very much Yuba county

no yes have Hispanic chamber of commerce as well as standard? Chamber of commerce

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

40911001410110xx

410110xx

410110xx


41511032 - but had no


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

yes Hispanic community - migrant workers Hmong population - large pop at school - Hmong are farmers

Hmong very much part of community very respectful blend in well cause of it being an agricultural area

Q why not here? A They dont speak English - as school teacher she needed to translate

no why Hisp and Hmong not here - not active lang barrier

no

no use mathematics to draw maps- espec for criterion of compactness (not using circles)

yes diagrams - proposal

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



41511033 - no

H retired Sheriff of Kings Co

no no Kern dominates Kings in terms of representation; Central valley issues not always heard across state bec dominated by big metro areas- LA Bay Area

41511034 - no

H we are farm dairy people nothing to do with other side of mts to west or each - bread basket of world

no no

42911018 - took turn at end

H - had passed but took turn at end

yes mayor of Rosemead

Rosemead yes include Rosemead with other cities in SG Valley that represent his community (Asian); deliver a map that represents his community



former Senate staffer - drive over 2 hrs in district

no yes never again draw district like SD 29? several proposals a)Arcadia is Asian belongs with Monterey Park etc b)foothills c)



council member Rosemead

no Rosemead yes several cities should be together (about 6); need to have own voice

42911064A H city council member Montclair

no Montclair yes Montclair residents go west not east; add three cities (see below)


Speaker #

4091100141511033 - no

41511034 - no




42911064A






no yes 3 prisons in Kings Co. - 2 in Corcoran 1 in Avernal? Coalinga has 2-3 prison 50 miles from here in Fresno; prisons affect other things in county - get priority in health care system

state jobs for communities but also have people move in to work there; jobs helpful because depressed community.

no no

Montery park Alhambra San Gabriel Arcadia Temple City - along I10

no yes majority asian pop

no no

Arcadia Temple City San Gabriel Rosemeand Alhambra South Pasadena

no yes cities look the same hard to tell difference; Q what are common concerns? A Asian community

Montclairponoma claremont upland

no yes spheres of influence if added with economically disadvantaged cities economic interests will be lost


Speaker #

4091100141511033 - no

41511034 - no




42911064A


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no support commission - long said to get rid of gerrymandering

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



50611066 ( 050611067?)

S - passed but left handout

former Ass candidate planning commissioner for Garden Grove

yes city of garden grove vietnamese community

yes do not split up Little Saigon (G Grove Westm and parts of Santa Ana)

51211022 - return

H - came back no imperial valley - calexico

no

51211042 - one who mentioned prisons came back to answer Commissioner Q re prisons

Answer quest from Commissioner re prisons

no no

51311042 - return

H - return to answer question re oceanside

no no

51311069 - but no issued

H - wasnt planning to speak but disturbed by things being said

no yes reflection on tonight rich communities want to be together but same people dont like Latinos wanting to be together Need Latino representation - a voice

51411055, 051411056

H - another speaker read letters from 55 56 who had left

no sherman community

yes 55 maintain Latino communities; 56 support Latino Redistricting Committee


Speaker #

4091100150611066 ( 050611067?)

51211022 - return


51311042 - return51311069 - but no issued

51411055, 051411056






no yes Little Saigon is thriving economic zone that spans three cities and froms a continous neighborhood community has balance harmony continuity unity; worked hard over decades to build

no yes geothermal solar potential; need assisted living in imperial

no no

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100150611066 ( 050611067?)

51211022 - return


51311042 - return51311069 - but no issued

51411055, 051411056


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

if split would disrupt the harmony no yes testimony described in this record

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51411063 - returned

H worked at educational cultural center until 1986

no yes bring Lemon Grove Spring Valley and area where the ed cultural center is together


H yes latino redistricting committee

no


H worked at college?

no yes keep API communities together (he describes where those are)

51911005 returns

H no yes pop increase in northern districts less pop in Bay Area - will be taking pop from areas like Amador Co; combine SD to North consider divide placer county northsouth (west of newcastle) vs eastwest

51911018 returns

H no Truckee Nevada yes move truckee south into AD 4; for SD Nevada Co with lake tahoe basin (El Dorado and Placer) - Q go south? A no go North

51911030 returns

H no El Dorado yes keep AD4 Placer and El Dorado (notes difference in supervisors testimony); Q go south for SD? A yes


Speaker #

4091100151411063 - returned



51911005 returns

51911018 returns

51911030 returns






no yes African-American communites must be kept together

no no

no yes API communities must be together so that they will have representation and be engagedinvolved

no no

no no

no no


Speaker #

4091100151411063 - returned



51911005 returns

51911018 returns

51911030 returns


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no respect our wishes

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



51911034 return

H no Nevada Co yes west county is agricultural and share interests within current AD; consider moving eastern Nevada County to AD 4 - interests (lake transportation all special districts) mean a lot 2 us and need cohesive level of represention to fight for these interests

51911051 - last given

H political and environ activist in Yolo for years

no yes link along water sheds that go into the delta

51911052- assigned on the spot

H yes colfax mayor; Sierra Economic Development Corporation

colfax Placer yes likes how is now (2 Ass member and 2 Senators); against drawing lines straight across the state; understand similarities with each other and how support each other

51911052 -returns

H yes Sac Div League of CA Cities

Placer yes go west north (Butte Sierra Yuba - agr smaller communities) and not south to metro SacDavis; metro Sac almost to metro SF stay same rural above going north and west

616110w1 pass no no616110w2 H - 1st white number no West Valley Los Angeles yes Reseda needs to be unified w

West Valley; Reseda has nothing in common w LA


Speaker #

4091100151911034 return



51911052 -returns

616110w1616110w2






no no

no yes share water rights; air quality farming

no no

no no

no nono yes


Speaker #

4091100151911034 return



51911052 -returns

616110w1616110w2


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

need voice to protect those rights

no

no

no

nono



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



616110w3 pass no no616110w4 H no Westcheste

rLos Angeles yes likes draft district

616110w5 H no yes Inglewood Lawndale Gardena Westchester Hawthorne are a religious COI and need a common rep to solve the problems of the contiguous community

616110w6 H no Inglewood Los Angeles yes CD for African-Americans is diluted; do not put Inglewood w South Gate; preserve current district

616110w7 pass no no616110w8 H no yes put Reseda Northridge are

part of SF Valley so put back in SFV district

61611g12 H - lowest green number but spoke at end

no Hawthorne Los Angeles yes just found out will get many more comments want something different from previous speakers for Hawthorne - want to be w beach city communities where have community commitment ties


Speaker #

40911001616110w3616110w4

616110w5

616110w6

616110w7616110w8

61611g12






no nono yes

no yes

no yes

no nono yes

no yes


Speaker #

40911001616110w3616110w4

616110w5

616110w6

616110w7616110w8

61611g12


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

nono

no

no

nono

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611g13 H S - 1st green number no Compton Los Angeles yes (from hardcopy) use AARC map for Compton Carson LB Signal Hill (COI based family friends shopping Alameda Corridor across cities;similar economics race culture size activities education); different from West AthensTorrance joined w in HTGCC

61611g18 S no yes draft divides Chinatown into 3 AD which will ensure will not have fair representation;put Chinatown in 1 AD; boundaries of LA City Historic Cultural Neighborhood Council best capture Chinatown. High percentage linguistically isolated and monoling Chinese

(Cont) so Chinatown is central core of social support

61611g23 H no yes CD w harbor want Port of LA w San Pedro in same CD; describes 3 census tracts in Port; HQ for harbor in SP - dont want different Congressmember than Port itself when need federal funding; move 800-2000 people 16000 that work at harbor live in SP


Speaker #

4091100161611g13

61611g18

61611g23






said at hearing Compton Carson LB Signal Hill together

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161611g13

61611g18

61611g23


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes testimony (completed form outside group include draw map)

06.16.11.BA

no yes testimony in form from outside org

06.16.11.BN

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611g25 H no yes North Coast draft SD is improvement over current; draft CD is improvement cause current extends to far to south east; disagrees w incumbent because new CD makes sense; concern w splitting S-Asian pop in Fremont is this bec VRA in Monterey Merced?

61611g35 H no lived in LA Riverside Reseda Westchester

Los Angeles yes Reseda is part of West Valley; Westchester is part of Beach Cities; can carve LAX out to Inglewood Westchester out to west side; wants more competitive districts to not get ignored

61611w13 H no Pico Union area

Los Angeles yes draft map does not represent Latino or reflect growth does not comply with VRA; for AD reccom (see strts);SD is good; CD not bec connects Latinos commun.s with Beverly Hills


Speaker #

4091100161611g25

61611g35

61611w13






no yes

no yes

COI is Rampart Village Westlake Koreatown Pico Union University Park South LA Rancho Salvador corridor etc

propose for AD on N Sepulveda to Wilton Place along 101 fwy on S Arlington to Florence Ave on W Wilton Place to Arlington Blvd and on E 210 to city of Huntington Park

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161611g25

61611g35

61611w13


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611w16 H no Woodland Hills West SFV

Los Angeles yes concern re SD LASCV all over to beach canyon country desert etc; likes Mulholland boundary on S; does not want to be w Brentwoood Bel-Air arm that shoots out is Latino but divides us up; pls respect W Val - real thing from 405 west; Simi Val ok

61611w18 H no Inglewood 30 hrs

Los Angeles yes always been part of South Bay until saw draft map; will resubmit what things should be done; does not know anything about area to East of 110 or even closer

61611w19 H mixed ethnicity - drawing district based on ethnicity is insult to him

no yes Reseda Lake Balboa need to be in West SFV district rather than w areas on east of 405

61611w20 H yes City of Inglewood City Council member

Inglewood Los Angeles yes Inglewood Westchester Playa del Ray (all affect by LAX ); unfair to link Inglewood w area to east

61611w22 H yes Concerned Citizens of Compton

Compton Los Angeles yes LB Carson Compton in same CD (COI based on transportation railway)


Speaker #

4091100161611w16

61611w18

61611w19

61611w20

61611w22






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161611w16

61611w18

61611w19

61611w20

61611w22


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no

no



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611w23 H no yes Same economic challenges for LB Carson Compton Signal Hill Watts Willowbrook

61611w25 H S yes Coalition of Suburban Communities for Fair Representation

yes AD (SCV -WSFV) is near perfect - salute you - move Aqua Dolce from Ant Val seat into it oppose Santa Clarita Valley-Malibu Senate Seat; instead support nesting S Clarita Val - W SFV AD w east Ventura Co AD (like CD); historically E Vent w SCV in SD

61611w27 S yes Canterbury Knolls Block Club in S LA

Canterbury Knolls Los Angeles

Los Angeles yes draft AD Vermont Sq-Florence AD Firestone CD Ingle-Southgate diminish our communities political economic educational voice worked hard to establish

61611w28 H S school psychologist - LAUSD

no Topanga Los Angeles yes opposed to putting us w Santa Clarita Valley; instead keep school district-based communities (where parents active for special needs children) together; SD ignores school community especially by going into SCV which has different concerns


Speaker #

4091100161611w23

61611w25

61611w27

61611w28






no yes

no yes E Vent SCV tied together thru SG mt S Clarita Woodlands Wildlife corridor

E Vent SCV 118 corridor serves job centers share biotech aerospace defense film industries

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161611w23

61611w25

61611w27

61611w28


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no yes testimony re support oppose map

06.16.11.AM

no yes testimony 06.16.11.AN

no yes testimony 06.16.11.AO



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611w32 H no Long Beach Los Angeles yes LB Carson Compton area - setback in recent gains in education w 2 CD s w 9 different school districts that is too many for 2 congress members - do not let children suffer.

(handwritten on hardcopy) wanted and hoped to get based on overwhelming supportCompton Carson LB and Port of LA.

61611w33 H part of minority group - psychologically pained; shes bipolar paranoid schizophrenic

no no

61611w34 S no yes came up to say would like to submit comments in writing (Ms. Slaughter)

61611w37 S no yes does not like CD 36 for members of union - alienates members and citizens in Port of LA

61611w38 H S no Lawndale Los Angeles yes consider South Bay region (see cities column - taken from hardcopy) as a COI keep region intact; especially Redondo Beach w Lawndale


Speaker #

4091100161611w32

61611w33

61611w34

61611w37

61611w38






no yes

no no

no yes

no yes

from hardcopy Beach Cities (Manhattan Beach Hermosa Beach Redondo Beach) El Segundo the PV Peninsula Inglewood Hawthorne Gardena Carson Lawndale Harbor City Torrance Lomita and San Pedro

no yes South Bay widely regarded as economic COI given presence of aerospace industry formation of South Bay Association of Chambers of Commerce (SBACC)


Speaker #

4091100161611w32

61611w33

61611w34

61611w37

61611w38


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes testimony (typed and handwritten)

06.16.11.AP

no include component for psychologically pained and how will suffer from being isolated

no yes testimony - Ms. Slaughter?

06.16.11.AQ

no yes Letter from International Longshore and Warehouse Union

06.16.11.AR

no yes testimony 06.16.11.AS



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611w39 H Persian community

no Reseda Los Angeles yes Reseda into 2 CD in draft; want Reseda whole; please put all of Reseda in West Valley district Valley Glen Van Nuys in East Valley district

61611w42 H no La Crescenta

Los Angeles yes La Canada-Flintridge Foothill Blvd and 2 fwy go through share 91214 zip code also connected to BurbankGlendale area - keep together

61611w43 H S (maps for AD SD CD) no Wilmington LA Harbor area

Los Angeles yes LA Harbor Area Wilmington San Pedro Harbor City lower Harbor Gateway; keep them whole and together and w communities of common interest

61611w44 S yes Thai-American Chamber of Commerce of California Secretary-General

yes from written submission for Thai-American community SD is good but split in AD; make small change on Hollywood Blvd and all of Thai Town can be in one AD

61611w51 H S no Reseda Los Angeles yes know as hub of West SFV; draft split Reseda down middle please correct and keep it together


Speaker #

4091100161611w39

61611w42

61611w43

61611w44

61611w51






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161611w39

61611w42

61611w43

61611w44

61611w51


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no yes proposed changes to AD SD CD around Palos VerdesBeach Cities

06.16.11.AT

no yes letter and Thai Town Information Guide

06.16.11.AU 06.16.11.AJ

no yes 1989 news article about Reseda as pursuing lost popularity hoping to be hub of West Valley

06.16.11.AX



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611w58 H no Topanga Los Angeles yes finished reading school psychologist testimony(speaker w28); objects to same district; Topanga should not be considered part of SFV

61611w59 H yes HS district Board member

Santa Clarita

Los Angeles yes like AD draft; for SD draft take New Hall school district away from Santa Clarita maybe because of ethnicity but need community over ethnicity

61611w66 H yes City Council Gardena Los Angeles yes April 28 ltr CD 35 AD 51- dont change; if split us up from rest of area (Inglewood Hawthorne Lawndale) then split up council of govt water district environment services center workforce center sanitation district etc

61611w79 S no South LA Inglewood

Los Angeles yes give LAX Westchester Marina Del Rey back to Inglewood CD (IGWSG)

61611w81 H no Del Rey City of Los Angeles

Los Angeles yes want to stay whole whole in CD now split along Centinela (our main st) for AD and SD shouldnt be

61611w82 S no Lives in LA works in Inglewood

Los Angeles yes put LAX back in AD CD with Inglewood; have formed coalitions to work on airport related issues


Speaker #

4091100161611w58

61611w59

61611w66

61611w79

61611w81

61611w82






no yes

no yes

no yes

no yes

south of Washington-Butte Blvd east of Marina Del Rey north of Jefferson west of culver city

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161611w58

61611w59

61611w66

61611w79

61611w81

61611w82


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

no

no yes testimony in form from outside org

06.16.11.CB

no

no yes testimony (completed form from outside org)

06.16.11.AY



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



61611w88 S no yes Describes Mid-City Jewish community states that draft maps dilute this COI by adding in neighborhoods not connected like Venice Marina Del Rey Westchester Santa Monica

61611w89 H S - two speakers afterwards so time is guess

office at UCLA; spoke at April 28 mtg re compactness scores

no no (see non COI comment)

61611w95 S yes Hatzolah Emergency Medical Rescue

yes Los Angeles Orthodox community in Los Angeles Basin; very interdependent and lives that resolve around area only; please keep in one ADone SD one CD

61611w96 H S (map w boundaries) yes Del Rey Homeowners Neighbors Association president

Del Rey City of Los Angeles

Los Angeles yes Del Rey is COI; been split in AD CD and want to stay whole; draft CD is good (keeps DR intact incld MDR and LAX) please pattern AD SD after that; traffic goes through us so impt that kept together whichever way go (with Santa Monica or Westchester)

glad dropped from 3 to 2 in AD SD but want to be one of each which ever way go; Q preference? A more in common w Westchester than Santa Monica


Speaker #

4091100161611w88

61611w89

61611w95

61611w96






Beverly Hills Westwood Beverly-Fairfax Pico-Robertson Hancock Park Beverlywood Bel Air

yes yes

no no

no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100161611w88

61611w89

61611w95

61611w96


VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no yes testimony 06.16.11.BB

no wants density-variationcompactness scores so citizens can better judge plans - did them wout trying did well - wants these to be published for public access

yes ppt re density-variationcompactness (DVC) scores

06.16.11.BC

no yes letter from Hatzolah Emergency Medical Rescue re Orthodox community incl map of where live

06.16.11.BD

no yes letter from Del Rey Homeowners and Neighbors Assoc maps of boundaries of Del Rey

06.16.11.BE



Speaker Background



City of Residence

County of Residence

Geographic Comment?



62711090 - not signed up

H no American Canyon

Napa yes AC issuses been covered; object to CD of Napa to Central Valley do not want Napa Lake County to be with Colusa Glenn County - impossible to get to nothing in common - profound geographic divide


H no Oakland Alameda yes re AD 16 ADdraft that splits Oakland pulls in S Leandro w S Oakl; keep Oakland in tact;S Leandro (friends) not want to be w Oakland cause will dominate their interests will be ignored instead be with Eaton area wwhich interests more aligned.

(cont) Q Eaton area? A S Leandro S Lorenzo Ashland Hayward - Central Alameda)


Speaker #

4091100162711090 - not signed up







no yes

no yes


Speaker #

4091100162711090 - not signed up



VRA Sec. 5 Comment?

Sec. 5 County






Exhibit #

no

no

public hearing excel 070611application.wedrawthelines.ca.gov/downloads/meeting_handouts... ·...

Documents