public hrm in the united states: facing the future
DESCRIPTION
Public HRM in the United States: Facing the Future. Stephen E. Condrey, Ph.D. President, American Society for Public Administration. Overview. United States Federal Government State and Local Government. Recent U.S. Civil Service Reform History: 2009 to Present. President Obama. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Public HRM in the United States: Facing the Future
Stephen E. Condrey, Ph.D.President, American Society for Public Administration
Overview
United States Federal Government State and Local Government
2
Recent U.S. Civil Service Reform History: 2009 to Present
President Obama
President Obama
Appoints John Berry as Director of OPM
Berry is most visible OPM Director in 30 years – now set to become Ambassador to Australia
Obama initially poised to make major HR reforms
Obama harkens back to President Kennedy and a call to public service
American Society for Public Administration (ASPA) – HRM Policy Committee
Chairman, Federal Salary Council
“I believe this is an historic opportunity for comprehensive reform of our civil service system. The stars are aligned in a way that occurs only once in a generation. We have a President who deeply values service and wants to restore the dignity and respect for our civil service to what it was during Kennedy’s stirring call. We have a Congress that is willing to help and a public that increasingly recognizes that our current approaches to hiring, rewarding, appraising and training our employees are inadequate.”
John Berry, OPM Director
December 2009
“When I first took office in the spring of 2009, I spoke to our members about what appeared to be an inflection point in our recent history, where we seemed to embrace government as the solution and not just the problem. Many of us posted our new president’s inaugural remarks on our walls and refrigerators: “It’s not a question of right or left but what works.” Well, that is the unique calling card of professionals and academics in public administration. ASPA members are the first people that political leaders turn to when they get serious about improving the delivery of public services throughout the nation. By the time I turned the leadership over to the next ASPA president, the environment had changed drastically. In the short space of one year, we went from what was heralded as era of hope to one of seeming despair and public anger.
Paul Posner, Past-President American Society for Public Administration (ASPA)
October 2010
Change in National Mood from 2009-2010
Reasons for the Change in Mood
Deep recession
High unemployment – greatest since the Depression of the 1930s
Resource scarcity results in fractious politics
Politics of 2013
Republican-controlled House of Representatives
Two-year pay freeze for Federal workers extended for a third year
Republicans continue to push for cuts to the Federal workforce and a continuing pay freeze
Sequestration forces automatic cuts and furloughs
2013 State of the Union Speech – “Smart Government” Needed
“The American people have worked too hard, for too long, rebuilding from one crisis to see their elected officials cause another.”
10
Memos to National Leaders
Sponsored by ASPA and NAPA
Cover topics vital to the functioning of the Federal Government
Aimed at the 2013 transition – Obama or Romney
Workforce memo co-authored with Rex Facer and Jared Llorens
11
Workforce Memo Topics
1. Compensation
2. Recruitment and Selection
3. Training and Development
4. Employee/Labor Relations
5. U.S. Office of Personnel Management
12
Compensation
Federal Pay has received significant attention over the last few years
Our focus was to look at ways to improve the current system to make federal pay more competitive
13
BLS/Federal Salary Council Wage Comparisons
14
Table. 1 Federal GS Wage Gap - March 2010
GradeBLS - Estimated
Comparable Annual Pay
GS Average Annual Pay w/
Locality Adjustment
BLS - Estimated % Pay Gap w/
Locality Adjustment
1 $20,092 $23,608 -14.89%2 $20,916 $25,011 -16.37%3 $24,819 $28,199 -11.99%4 $29,129 $31,849 -8.54%5 $33,096 $35,585 -6.99%6 $39,239 $40,135 -2.23%7 $44,227 $44,594 -0.82%8 $51,733 $51,616 0.23%9 $58,621 $53,683 9.20%
10 $71,859 $60,481 18.81%11 $76,990 $65,205 18.07%12 $102,496 $78,939 29.84%13 $110,770 $94,632 17.05%14 $147,581 $112,266 31.46%15 $167,877 $134,320 24.98%
Weighted Average $70,330 $61,313 14.71%
Recommendations: Compensation
End uniform pay comparability increases for GS employees and allow grade-level adjustments based upon disaggregated pay disparities
Continue ECI-based adjustments for all grade levels
Expand pay ranges within the existing GS pay system to allow for greater pay progression within GS grade levels
For example, current range is 30% Grade 11: minimum $50,287 – maximum $65,371 Expanded range of 50% Grade 11: minimum $50,287 – Maximum $75,430
15
Recruitment and Selection
60 percent of the federal workforce will be eligible for retirement between 2012 and 2016
Inefficient and overly complex hiring systems, inadequate employment branding strategies, ineffective assessment systems and, in some cases, a lack of expertise among federal human resources managers in cutting-edge recruitment and retention strategies
Starting in 2008 good movement in many of these issues, but there must be more
16
Recommendations: Federal Recruitment and Selection
More strategic hiring efforts
Review and adjust internal hiring processes, procedures, and policies
Enhance assessment strategies emphasizing selection quality, not just cost and speed
Manage the applicant pool while making the process manageable for applicants
Train human resources staff and selection officials to think and act strategically
17
U.S. Conclusion:
Possible policy window for extensive HR reform is closing
Necessary to find common ground
End goal should be an enhanced federal workforce
18
New Public Management – A Global Phenomenon
Private Sector Model Used as a Guide Downsizing Flatter Organizational Structures Reduced Employee Rights – At-Will
Employment Use of Performance Measures Pay-for-Performance Compensation Systems
19
State and Local HR Issues
Diminution of Employee Rights and Protections The Great Recession Renewed Importance of the Public HR Manager
20
State of Georgia
State merit protections abolished for new hires in 1996. Decentralized state human resources administration.
“I will also bring you legislation to revise the State Merit System, which was established more than 50 years ago to create a professional workforce that was free of political cronyism…But too often in government, we pass laws to fix particular problems of the moment, and then we allow half a century to roll by without ever following up to see what the long-term consequences have been…A solution in 1943 is a problem in 1996. The problem is governmental paralysis, because despite its name, our present Merit System is not about merit…It can take six to eight weeks to fill a critical position in state government. It takes a year to a year-and-a-half to fire a bad worker, because of the mountain of endless paperwork, hearings and appeals.”
- Former State of Georgia Governor Zell Miller (1996)
Georgia – A Perfect Storm?
Factors Influencing the Legislative Success of the Georgia Reform
Right-to-work state with weak public employee unions
Gubernatorial success in passing his legislative agenda
Editorial support of the state’s largest circulation newspapers
Support of the state’s bureaucratic leadership
Today over 90% of state employees are “unclassified”
HR Professionals’ Experience with EAWProper Use of At-Will Employment*
%
Agree/Disagree Mean Factor LoadingEmployees have been terminated at-will because of changing managerial priorities/objectives
40.7/35.0 3.02 .655
Employees have been terminated at-will in order to meet agency budget shortfalls
46.0/37.2 3.09 .902
Employees have been terminated at-will in order to meet agency downsizing goals
47.3/35.9 3.14 .924
*Respondents were asked to indicate their agreement or disagreement with survey statements related to employment at-will using the following scale: 1 = “Strongly Disagree”; 2 = “Disagree”; 3 = “Neither Agree/Disagree”; 4 = “Agree”; and 5 = “Strongly Agree.” Percentages reported in the table do not sum to 100 percent due to rounding and omission of “neither agree or disagree” responses.
Cronbach’s Alpha = .842
HR Professionals’ Experience with EAWMisuse of At-Will Employment*
%
Agree/Disagree Mean Factor LoadingEAW is sometimes used to fire competent employees so other people with friends or connections to government can be hired.
30.2/49.5 2.61 .806
I know of a case where a competent employee was fired at-will so that another person with friends or connections to government could be hired
10.3/74.1 1.91 .886
Employees have been terminated at-will because of personality conflicts with management
32.4/46.7 2.71 .772
Cronbach’s Alpha = .802
*Respondents were asked to indicate their agreement or disagreement with survey statements related to employment at-will using the following scale: 1 = “Strongly Disagree”; 2 = “Disagree”; 3 = “Neither Agree/Disagree”; 4 = “Agree”; and 5 = “Strongly Agree.” Percentages reported in the table do not sum to 100 percent due to rounding and omission of “neither agree or disagree” responses.
Fundamental Flaw?
“EAW systems may have a fundamental flaw in that they may undermine trusting workplace relationships necessary for effective public management.”
- R. Paul Battaglio & Stephen E. Condrey Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
Has EAW Diffused?
Among the U.S. States, the overall trend is toward lessening of employee rights and decentralized methods of personnel administration.
Great Recession
Public Sector is still feeling the effects Public Employment has contracted – lowest
level in 30 years Some positions will not return Doing more with less is now standard operating
procedure
27
28Source: http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/jobs/posts/2012/08/03-jobs-greenstone-looney
Renewed Importance of the Public HR Manager
Role shift from gatekeeper/rule enforcer Organizational consultant and leader Involved in the actual management of organizations Skilled at navigating difficult economic and political
times Rising retirement rates – increased importance of
strategic recruitment and selection Key to a successful and healthy organization All managers are HR Managers
29
Conclusion
There is no “one best way” to organized public human resource management systems
HRM is never neutral – can help or hurt an organization
New Public Management continues to have a global influence on HRM – positive and negative
HRM solutions should fit your organization – learn from others but find your own path
Effective HRM now more important than ever