public response to the namma metro project

8/7/2019 Public Response to the Namma Metro Project

1/25

Chinmay


2/25

` Objective

` Background ofthe metro project

` Benefits

` Limitations` Stakeholders

` Problem on CMH Road


3/25

` The main objective istostudy and record the

detailsoftheBangalore Metro and the

publicresponsetothetrack alignmenton the RV

Road and Nanda Road stretch and alsoon CMHRoad.


4/25

` Purpose

` Cost

` Affordability


5/25

` As perapprovalofGOI in theirletterdated 11 May

2006, thetotal projectoutlay envisaged is Rs.

6395 crore, which is proposed tobefinanced by

way ofEquity, Subordinate debt and seniortermdebt as perthe pattern given in thetable


6/25

Particulars GOI GOK Total

1.Equity 959.25(15%)

959.25(15%)

1918.50(30%)

2.Subordinate debt

639.50(10%)

959.25(15%)

1598.75(25%)

3.Sub-total(1+2)

1598.75(25%)

1918.50(30%)

3517.25(55%)

4.SeniorTermdebt

2877.75(45%)

GrandTotal

6395.00(100%)

` Accordingto

sourcesthecostof

construction has now

been increased to Rs.9000 crore in the

same proportion


7/25

` Fastermodeoftransport atreasonable prices

` Saferand morecomfortable modeoftransport

` Signifies development

` Betterconnectivity within thecity

`

Greaterfrequency hence making it moreconvenientforthecommuter` Traffic decongestion


8/25

` Lossofparks and trees which hasled to manyprotests

` Lossofprivate property in certain areas

` Noise pollution in places where metrogoesoverhead

` Usersrestricted tothe middleclass.

` Possibility ofvendorscausingchaos at metrostations


9/25

` Govt. OfIndia

`

State Government

` BBMP

`

BMRCL

` Public


10/25

` ThetreeofficerMr. Venkatappa hassaid that he

has not passed any ordersforthefellingoftrees

in Lal Bagh. TheBBMP hasbooked theBMRCL

forthefellingoftrees in this area.


11/25

` Fellingoftrees

` Child labor

` Unwillingnesstoshare information with the public


12/25

` Againsttheover-head metroconstruction on R.V

Road and Nanda Theatre Road.

` In favoroftheover-head metroconstruction on

R.V Road and Nanda Theatre Road.


13/25

` Hasiru Usiru (HU)

` EnvironmentSupport Group (ESG)

` Sanmathi (MothersAssociation)

` Maraa


14/25

PadayatraPadayatra


15/25

Peoplegathered atPeoplegathered atLalBaghLalBagh West Gateto protestWest Gateto protest


16/25

` Treefelling damagestheenvironment

` Treefelling and acquisition ofparks done illegally

` SourceofElectricity

` Rightto information


17/25


18/25

EnvironmentSupport Group, LeoF. Saldanha

and Hasiru Usiru havefiled a PIL in the Honble

High CourtofKarnataka challengingthe Govt.

ordinance and notificationsrelatingtoLalbaghland transferto Namma Metro. Honble Justices N.

K. Patil and V. Jagannathan constituting a Division

Bench (on vacation) heard thePIL and ordered

noticeson the Respondentsto appear in thematterduring its hearingon 21 May 2009.


19/25

` On hearingthe presentationsfrom both sideson

21 May 2009, the High Court hasconsidered it

inappropriateto interfere with the project and

refused tostay theon-going work.


20/25

` AShraadh ceremony was held by theSanmathi

group and Hasiru Usiru


21/25

` TheFederation of Jayanagar Residents

Association supportsthe metroconstruction on

thisstretch. They have putup bannerssayingthat

they wantthe metroon NandaT

heatre Road.` Acase hasbeen filed by the protestors againstthe

secretary ofthis association as he was not willing

tocooperate with theorganizations involved in the

protests.


22/25

` Fellingoftrees

` Possibility ofdestruction ofprivate property


23/25

` Old Madras Road would be a betteralignment


24/25

` Objective

` Background

` Benefits

` Limitations` Stakeholders

` Problem on CMH Road


25/25

public response to the namma metro project

Documents