public support for free learning: a policy framework
DESCRIPTION
In this talk I make the case for a community-based model of learning, where courses are structured as connectivist networks, describe some of the thinking behind the model, and outline a policy framework for the support of free learning. For audio and more please see http://www.downes.ca/presentation/282TRANSCRIPT
Public Support for Free Learning: A Policy Framework
Stephen DownesOctober 25, 2011
Open Learning
• Long associated with distance learning– correspondence schools – 1880sff– 1915, creation of the National University
Extension Association(NUEA)– U.S. radio broadcasting licenses to 202 colleges,
universities, and school boards – 1920s, 30s– 1926, historian J C Stobart wrote a memo
advocating a 'wireless university’ while at BBC
Bizhan Nasseh, A brief History of Distance Education, http://www.downes.ca/files/nasseh_history.html History of the OU, http://www8.open.ac.uk/about/main/the-ou-explained/history-the-ou
Open Institutions
• Open University opens in 1971– did not insist on prior educational qualifications– required students to take two foundation courses
• New York State’s Empire State College– commenced operation in 1971
• Athabasca University (1970/72), Indira Gandhi National Open University (1985)
Empire State College, College History http://alumni.esc.edu/inauguration/collegehistory.phpIGNOU http://www.ignou.ac.in/ignou/aboutignou/profile/2
Open Learning (2)
• Over time – enhanced accessibility– distance learning– reduction of financial barriers• tuition reductions• subsidies
– progressive pedagogies• Creation of distance learning pedagogies – Moore,
Merrill, Gagne
Open Resources
• Project Gutenberg• Open Archives Initiative– BOAI– DSpace
• Wikipedia– Curricki– Wikiversity– WikiEducator – Commonwealth of Learning
The OERu Logic Model
Taylor, J.C. 2007. Open courseware futures: Creating a parallel universe. e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology (e-JIST), Vol 10, No. 1. Online: http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/e-jist/docs/vol10_no1/papers/full_papers/taylorj.htm
Criticism of the Logic Model
• Traditional Curricular based approach– a focus on articulation & credit transfer– closed federation of traditional institutes
• Tight link to traditional credentials• The Black Box problem – ‘open’ this or that
(eg. ‘open business model’) unstudied and undeveloped
Contrasts in Design
• Learning objectives– concrete and stated Learning Objectives vs.
unstated and multiple objectives • Organization of subject matter– knowledge of vs knowledge about– linear organization vs knowledge community
Contrast in Assessment
• Subject and content-focused assessment, vs. performance-based and networked-based
• Assessment against external criteria vs. self-assessment
• Assessment by-instructor vs. 3rd-party assessment
Free Learning
• Based on the principles of connectivist, or network, learning
• Network design principles: distributed, disintermediated, dynamic
• Design based on the ‘semantic principle’:– autonomy– diversity– openness– interactivity
Connectivist Learning Design
• A non-curricular based approach– course content is the ‘McGuffin’ vs (Freire) the
‘banking system’– learning takes places through interaction and
creativity• Seymour Papert – constructionism• Aggregate, remix, repurpose, feed forward
• Learning a matter of growth, not accumulation
But… why
• It’s a formal recognition that people have different destinations, different tastes
• Based on an understanding that knowledge varies according to these
• Expresses the principle that networks – communities – are stronger with multiple diverse perspectives
• Knowledge learned is better – indeed, known
A Map of the Community
Connectivism: A Theory of Personal LearningStephen Downes, December 3, 2008, Educational Development Centre, Ottawahttp://www.downes.ca/presentation/208
The MOOC Model
• MOOC: Massive Open Online Course• There is no central core feature – no core
content, group, etc• Course design is a network, or a map, or a
community• Resources are distributed, and aggregated• Participants are encouraged to create their
own resources, communities, groups
2010: Stephen Downes, Rita KopCritical Literacies & PLENK 2010
PLENK 2010 involved a significant research efforthttp://connect.downes.ca/
PLENK Analytics
Supporting ongoing MOOC participationhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/882
Rita Kop
Critical Literacies
Understanding how we use artifacts to communicate in online and other learning networks http://www.downes.ca/presentation/232
2011: Year of the MOOC
Connectivism & Connective Knowledge
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eW3gMGqcZQc
CCK11: How to Learn in a MOOC
How to be Successful in a MOOC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8avYQ5ZqM0
Dave Cormier
Learning Analytics
http://scope.bccampus.ca/course/view.php?id=365
LAK11: How to measure success in a MOOC
MobiMOOC
http://mobimooc.wikispaces.com/
Supporting Mobile Learning Technology
Inge de Waard
The madness and mayhem of DS106
DS = Digital StorytellingDS106 redefined activities and participation
Jim Groom
http://ds106.us/
eduMOOC
Large, well publicized, but not very interactive
http://sites.google.com/site/edumooc/
eduMOOC underground
Jeff Lebow, Google+ hangout, and Livestream:Taking something ordinary, and making it something special – YOU make the MOOChttp://www.livestream.com/jefflebow/
Jeff Lebow
AI-Class: Redefining Massive
More than 100,000 people signed up for pre-registration
http://www.ai-class.com/
Change 2011
http://change.mooc.ca
Downes, Cormier and Siemens try again
Image: http://steve-wheeler.blogspot.com/2011/04/running-mooc.html
New Roles for Government
• Communications and Education Infrastructure• Support for Open Educational Resources• Support for Free Learning• Management of assessments and
credentialing
The Digital Infrastructure
• Public high-speed backbone networks– used not only for education but for other public
services: police, fire and emergency, hospital, municipalities, etc.
• Local Access– eg. CAP Centres
• Legal Framework– policy on digital rights and copyright– net neutrality and similar regulations
A Note on Sustainability
Whatever we really want is sustainable
Like, say, highways
Sustaining Infrastructure
• Support for existing programs and services– cost reductions in communications overhead– improved efficiency of public service delivery
• Overhead on entertainment and commercial infrastructure– similar to broadcast ‘CanCon’ requirements
Open Educational Resources
• Traditional Resources– Already developed and paid for by government– Open access initiatives
• Public Policy Resources– design to serve a public end or objective– focus on basic literacies & community
empowerment
Sustaining OERs
• Redirection of existing resource allocations– eg. OA mandates for grants and programs– community outreach for existing agencies• eg, NASA
• Support for community-based OER process– integration of OER development and use within
publicly supported curricula– use of OERs in public services and programs
- Stephen Downes, Models for sustainable Open Educational Rsources, ijklo.org/Volume3/IJKLOv3p029-044Downes.pdf http://www.downes.ca/presentation/76- OER Help with Keynote Slides, OER-Forum http://lists.esn.org.za/pipermail/oer-forum/2011-October/thread.html
Software and Service Support
• Software and environment support– eg. Public Knowledge Project, – Open Journal Systems, Moodle, et
• Service networks and support– JISC / CETIS, EdNA, etc.– Common Services - eFramework
Sustaining Support Systems
• Development and systems research support• Public adoption of open licensing– FLOSS• GNU/GPL, BSD, etc• Creative Commons
– directs resources toward multi-sector development
• Community service requirement for commercially sourced software
Assessment and Credentialing
• Major policy initiatives– separation of delivery and assessment• an end to Digital Diploma Mills
– management of credentialing by professional associations under a regulatory framework
– development of community-based assessment metrics and infrastructure• move away from simple testing, toward authentic
community engagement and referrals
Assessment and Credentialing (2)
• Support for Personal Learning– provision of personal learning environments and
frameworks• promote lifelong learning• link to skills database, corporate training registries• direct support for employment and funding
– personal portfolios and credential banks• voluntary, self-managed• optional identity frameworks
The Old School 2.0
School 2.0 etoolkit http://etoolkit.org/etoolkit/
New Models for Schools
New Roles for Research
Community = Interactions
• Not ‘spreading the word’• Not ‘amplification’• But rather, the creation of our own society,
together– emergent from the free actions of each of us– not based on the ideas of one (or a small number)
of individuals
Open Communities are Free
Dave Pollard, the Metamovement http://howtosavetheworld.ca/2011/10/20/the-metamovement-moving-beyond-marches-and-people-in-the-street/
Stephen Downeshttp://www.downes.ca