pump incentives: loyalty strategies rockin’ the rollback · coalition-based program, ... ing its...
TRANSCRIPT
C S P October 2012 183
Given the choice between a rebate
of $2 or $1.20, most Americans
would pick $2, right?
Not at the gas pump. For some rea-
son, 10 cents off 12 gallons of fuel is a
better deal to consumers than a larger
equivalent in cents off a fountain drink
or deli sandwich—or even $2 cash.
California retailer M.J. Castelo has
seen it happen. “We tested where you
could buy a car wash with a fill-up for
$2 off, but found a rollback of 10 cents
with a car wash worked better,” he says.
“People would rather save 10 cents on
an average 12-gallon sale vs. saving $2.
It’s an oddity.”
That’s one of the reasons consumer
packaged goods companies gravitate
to pump-related rollbacks, says Dan
Little, North American fuels marketing
manager for Houston-based Shell Oil
Products U.S.
“Suppliers have existing marketing
dollars for activities they would have
promoted or discounted,” he says.
“They’re taking those activities and
converting them into a cents-per-gallon
(CPG) [approach]. Manufacturers are
telling us there’s greater behavior change
for less investment … because it’s such
an emotional [appeal].”
With rollbacks as a central hook,
major-oil branded programs also appear
to be evolving, incorporating retailers
from other channels, as well as online
shopping. Here’s a short list of the oil
companies participating in pump-based
loyalty programs:
▶ Shell: Evolving to include a
coalition-based program, Shell ties its
program back to the gas pump, allowing
shoppers to redeem rollback CPG off by
shopping at affiliated retailers.
▶ ExxonMobil: Testing with Shop-
kick, a Palo Alto, Calif.-based provider
that uses smartphone technology to
identify loyal customers as they physi-
cally walk into stores. Customers can
Rockin’ the Rollback
Oil brands reshaping loyalty as pump-discount formula evolves
By Angel Abcede || [email protected]
Pump Incentives: Loyalty strategies often give incentives to move from the pump to the store.
C S P October 2012 185
redeem rewards in the store and with
cross-channel partner retailers.
▶ BP: Launched earlier this year,
the rollback program offers rewards for
purchases at BP stations.
▶ CITGO: A rewards program tied to
a Visa messaging platform, designed to
increase store traffic, volume and sales.
For Castelo, a 32-store operator
doing business under the Shell Food
Mart banner who is several months into
his brand’s program, success comes on
two fronts: registration and uplift. Cas-
telo, managing member of Peninsula/
Humboldt Petroleum, Eureka, Calif.,
says as a relatively new participant, he’s
been pleased with the growth in loyalty
program registrations, reward issuance
and redemption.
He’s also seen a “meaningful” uplift
in sales tied to the program. “In an
industry where one percentage point is a
lot, we’ve seen significant improvement
within our network as a result of the
program,” he says, elaborating on how
location also plays a part. “We may have
a site next to a [partner supermarket], so
it’s hard to generalize.”
But despite any notion that rollbacks
have blanket cachet with manufacturers,
Castelo says, “We work this really hard.”
A New ParadigmCastelo’s zeal started before Shell’s cur-
rent offer. Going back to the late 1990s,
there was an enthusiasm for rewarding
customers using promotional strategies,
some tied to vendors, some not.
In recent years, Shell has introduced
CPG discount offers focused on promot-
ing its V-Power fuel or Shell gift cards.
Castelo embraced these programs, which
evolved into Shell Rewards. Part of that
credit-card-tied program was a 2009
move to partner with Cincinnati-based
Kroger, linking fuel-rollback rewards to
what customers spent at the grocery store.
Though not in a Kroger market,
Castelo would take advantage of a
similar relationship when Shell brought
Modesto, Calif.-based Lucky’s/Save Mart
Supermarkets into its program.
Shell made what Castelo calls a “quan-
tum leap” last year by partnering with
Irving, Texas-based loyalty service pro-
vider Excentus Corp., which launched a
program called Fuel Rewards Network
(FRN). That program expanded the base
of non-competing retailers and added an
online component.
Little of Shell says the company is
Excentus’ exclusive national fuel part-
ner for redeeming network points and
rewards. The program is in the middle
of a national rollout, with more than 100
markets on line so far and 200 markets
planned by the end of the year.
After a pilot of 10 stores in Mon-
terey and Santa Cruz counties, Castelo
expanded the program north into
Eureka, Calif.
“You never have to pay full price for
gasoline again,” he says. “We’ve sur-
passed the idea of saving a penny. People
are saving dimes, quarters, dollars.”
A customer may spend $100 to $150
at the grocery store and earn 15 CPG
off his or her next trip to the gas station.
The next day, that customer may buy
something online from a retailer in the
coalition. More CPG off. A $50 dinner
from a coalition restaurant may add
another nickel.
On average, Little says, customers
are earning 33 CPG off their fueling
purchases. Many of Castelo’s customers
have saved 75 cents cumulating rewards,
many of which come from buying
energy drinks, car washes and propane
at his stores. “The idea is create grav-
ity to our stores and the Shell brand,”
he says. “We save internally, while you
save on the fuels you need by buying the
products you want.”
Virtual Box: The potential of coalition-based rewards lies in extending the parameters of the traditional c-store box, bringing in shoppers who may not have initially intended to come in.
C S P October 2012186
Program LogisticsTo participate in Shell’s program, cus–
tomers pick up their free FRN card in
store and register it online, or they can
request and register a card fully online.
Customers can go online to review the
account and, through a portal, review
the breadth of offerings. The coalition
players vary by market and are in flux
as new retailers see its value and join in.
In terms of physical infrastructure,
Castelo says he had been working with
Shell to upgrade his site for payment
card industry (PCI) data-security stan-
dards. Those deadlines came to a head
about two years ago, and with the equip-
ment upgrades came the software and
hardware necessary to participate in the
current loyalty program.
He descr ibes the upgrade as a
“splitter box” that separates the loyalty
interchange of data from other transac-
tion information. A user interface on
the store computer allows the retailer
to populate the program with specific
promotions.
Castelo does pay a fee associated with
the program, but with his customers
averaging 30 CPG in discounts, he says
it’s a “minuscule portion” of that reward.
“When you look at actual customer
value, it’s far, far in excess from our fees,” he
says. “And it’s what’s driving the program.”
Loyalty InsightThrough its work with grocery partner-
ships, Shell discovered that the program
attracts a new customer base, including
female shoppers, customers who hadn’t
considered the Shell brand before and
those who now come in more often so
they can redeem their rewards.
The Kroger relationship initially gar-
nered a 35% to 40% penetration into
Shell markets, Little says. Now with ties
to more regional grocers, the program
is hitting 65% to 75% of its markets. So
far, he says, customers have saved more
than $200 million in reward discounts.
The beauty behind this type of
marketing alliance, Little says, is that
rewards are largely paid by third parties
and other retailers issuing the rewards
redeemed at gasoline stations—be it a
grocer, online retailer or restaurant.
The value, again, is a better use of
marketing dollars, he says.
“We keep using two terms: relevancy
and frequency,” Little says. “We know in
this business that gas prices are relevant
to everybody and it does change behav-
ior. There are loyalty programs across
the retail industry, and what makes this
program [unique] is the currency—that
CPG discount.”
To stay relevant, the program acts in
both a passive and an active way, Little
says. Passively, it allows customers to go
to the website to learn about the pro-
gram and ways to earn, but actively, it
also reaches back to customers.
E-mails and texts address members
by name and introduce them to new
promotions, restaurants and other dis-
counting opportunities relative to the
area. In the near future, the program
will allow customers to tailor the site to
what’s relevant to them, he says.
Another ApproachMajor-oil loyalty programs typically
have ties to CPG discounts, with many
focusing on increasing sales at the
c-store or site-related business such as
car washes. ExxonMobil announced in
March that it is testing a relationship
with Shopkick, a coalition-based pro-
vider that uses proximity-based technol-
ogy. The loyalty provider ties to people’s
The incremental sale on a candy bar may ultimately not be enough to offset supporting a fuel rollback.
Loyalty TendenciesTo determine the appetite for loyalty programs in general, Houston-based Shell sponsored a study by Washing-ton, D.C.-based StrategyOne that the research firm conducted this past June. Here are a few of its findings:
85%Would sign up for a program that
cut fuel prices by giving them rewards on purchases of everyday items.
82%Are participating in a loyalty
rewards program, with 68% using these programs most or some of the time.
76%Have a tendency to be brand loyal
based on the specific rewards programs they participate in.
87%Believe there is more they could be
doing on a daily basis to save money, with 73% trying to cut down on spend-
ing overall.
Almost 90%Would be interested in earning
rewards from online shopping, but only 34% currently do so.
Source: StrategyOne, Shell Oil Products U.S.
C S P October 2012188
smartphones and gives them points for
merely walking into a store.
Live in three markets—Washing-
ton, D.C., Miami and New York—the
program uses a sound frequency heard
by cellphones to check in customers.
Customers collect “kicks” and turn them
in for electronic gift cards to be used
instantly, according to Jim Kurp, global
brand adviser for Irving, Texas-based
ExxonMobil’s global cards and loyalty
programs.
“By leveraging cutting-edge technol-
ogy that appeals to today’s tech-savvy
consumers, Shopkick increases foot
traffic into the store and potentially
increases the total amount a consumer
spends per visit,” Kurp says. The tests are
“operating as we expected.”
ExxonMobil, according to Kurp, is
the first oil company to roll out this type
of program, “and we’re learning signifi-
cantly from the process.”
Shopkick augments ExxonMobil’s
“return and earn” rollback program,
which began in January 2011 with its
branded wholesalers. “What’s unique
about the program is that we offer them
the ability to individualize the customer
offer,” Kurp says. “It is not one size fits
all.”
For example, retailers have flexibil-
ity when selecting types of promotions
and can leverage their own alternate
profit centers. “For the consumer, they
save money on fuel,” Kurp says. “It’s
simple and easy and enhances the loy-
alty between the fuel business and the
c-store.”
Jury Still Out?While other oil companies such as Shell,
ExxonMobil, BP and CITGO continue
to push loyalty programs, some believe
the power of rollback programs may
be cyclical. An industry resource who
requested anonymity says success hinges
on the enthusiasm of the one holding
the biggest bill. If a grocer or a manu-
facturer sees numbers falling or failing
to meet expectations, it may not return
next year, leaving retailers to face cus-
tomer wrath.
Coalition-based programs can help,
the source believes, with more parties
“throwing money into the pot” to pay
for the discounts.
“But when you talk about manufac-
turers, they’re typically willing to invest
in a new promotional activity for a time
period,” he says. “If it’s successful, they
will reup or increase spend if they think
it’s more efficient.”
Inevitably, at some point consultants
will tell the company it doesn’t need to
give that much away, the source says.
For manufacturers of consumer
packaged goods, the incentive may be
far less than those pushing bigger-ticket
items such as $100 grocery spends or
trips to restaurants. The incremental
sale on a candy bar may ultimately not
be enough to offset supporting a fuel
rollback. In addition, companies often
find demand exceeding supply.
“They have to look at the capacity
of the plants they have and ask: What
is their optimum capacity?” he says.
“Are they near that? And if so, they can’t
deliver.”
Other factors include product recalls
and the volatility of raw materials, any
of which could go up in price during the
year. “I can see partnering with [com-
puter maker] Dell and advancing people
money on a rollback of gasoline,” he
says. “But if you’re talking [energy drinks
or candy bars], I don’t know whether
that model is sustainable.”
A year or so down the road, kinks in
the program will begin to show, he says.
For instance, loyalty programs in general
have redemption stipulations ranging
from lenient to harsh. Fuel rewards may
expire after a certain time period. While
on one hand it may stimulate frequency
with shoppers trying to redeem rewards
before they expire, on the other hand it
may stifle customer enthusiasm.
In this vein, some fuel retailers
may opt to increase street prices on
days when rewards are set to expire, in
essence manipulating the value of the
reward.
“When you start looking at the
long-term big picture, it may or may
not influence consumer buying and
whether they will accept it,” the source
says. “They may feel like they’re being
controlled by ‘the man.’ ”
Tech TwistStill, whether or not rollback programs
continue to help retailers, current
technologies appear to be pushing the
boundaries of the traditional store.
“You’re expanding the box virtually,
through cross-promotion,” Little says.
“So instead of building a hyperbox,
you’re linking with multiple partners
and expanding your reach, making
[your store] relevant.”
Castelo agrees, saying, “Like any other
business, the c-store industry has been
getting more competitive. We’re always
looking for tools to create value for cus-
tomers and give opportunities to enhance
customer satisfaction and loyalty.” n
“People would rather save 10 cents on an average 12-gallon sale vs. saving $2. It’s an oddity.”