purpose of presentation to submit that equal education and economic opportunity in america cannot be...
TRANSCRIPT
Purpose of Presentation
To submit that equal education and economic opportunity in America cannot be ensured unless we address three underlying issues: 1) school funding, 2) tax policy, and 3) economic development.
To provide you knowledge and data that can be useful in the work you do, especially lobbying and organizing.
How far have Washington’s schools fallen behind?
• 46th in class size out of 50 states and Washington, D.C.
• 42nd in education spending per student, adjusted for regional cost differences.
• $2 billion less for schools due to spending not keeping pace. Twenty-five years ago, Washington spent 50.4% of the state Operating Budget. Now we spend just 42.1%.
• $548 less per student compared to 1992. Inflation has risen and demands have increased. Yet, today’s schools are asked to do more with less.
• Dead last in compensation among the five West Coast states.
-- Overview of State Funding --What Is the State’s Responsibility?
Washington State ConstitutionArticle IX
Section 1. “It is the paramount duty of the state to make ample provision for the education of all children residing within its borders, without distinction or preference on account of race, color, caste, or sex.”
Section 2. “The legislature shall provide a general and uniform system of public schools . . . and such . . . normal and technical schools as may hereafter be established.”
Enrollment
Formula Staff Ratios(Teachers, Administrators & Aides)
Salaries & Benefits
Nonemployee Related Costs (NERC)
=State General Apportionment Allocation
Basic Funding Concepts#1
#2
#3, 4, 5
#6
What has been the effect of state funding?
Expenditures per student as a percent of the national average have declined since the state took over “full” funding of basic education.
Figure 5Washington Current Expenditures Per Pupil In Average Daily Attendance
As A Percent of National Average (1959-2000)
90%
100%
110%
120%
First year of full state funding of basic education
Start of HB 1209 Ed Reform
Source: US Dept. of Education, Digest of Education Statistics, Table 168, 2002.
112%113%
100%
94%
National Average operating dollars per pupil from all sources.
47.6%47.0%
46.1%
44.9%43.8% 43.3%
42.1%
30.0%
32.0%
34.0%
36.0%
38.0%
40.0%
42.0%
44.0%
46.0%
48.0%
50.0%
1993-95 1995-97 1997-99 1999-01 2001-03 2003-05 2005-07
Percent of the State General Fund Spent on K-12 Public Schools
2004-05 SY Revenues
Dollars in Millions
State $5,365
Local Taxes 1,258
Federal 783
Other 319
Total $7,724
School districts receive about 70 percent of their general fund revenues from the state.
State70%
Local16%
Federal 10%
Other 4%
Where does our money Where does our money come from???come from???
Not
trees…
But TAXES……
The state collects several types of taxes…• Sales taxes• Business and occupation taxes• Property taxes
Who pays?
• Lower and moderate income folks pay a higher % of their income in taxes than high-income folks do…
• Washington places greater tax responsibility on its low and middle income families…
Who Pays State and Local Taxes?
(Adjusted to Scale)
Problem: Revenue in WashingtonRelies Heavily on Retail Sales Taxes
Retail Sales52%
B & O19%
Property11%
Real Estate Excise5%
Public Utility2%
Other7%
Use4%
Note: These figures are for state taxes for the 2005-07 biennium.
What about the lottery????
True, the lottery generates income,but not as much as you would think….
only the equivalent of 2% of K-12 education spending.
1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001100
300
500
700
900
1100
1300
Percent of 1971 value
Excluding tax base and rate changes, over the past 30 years General Fund revenue has grown
more slowly than the economy.
Revenues(excluding tax base and rate
changes)
The Economy (Personal Income)
Based on growth in major General Fund tax sources.
Based on constant rate, constant base assumptions, excluding legislative changes.
1971 = 100
100
300
500
700
900
1100
1300
1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001
Percent of 1971 value
Meanwhile, operating expenses grew at about the
same pace as the economy. Expenditures from all operating funds
Expenditures grew at 8.9 percent
Personal Income grew at 8.8 percent.
1971 = 100
Operating Expenses
Personal Income
…and the base of traditional sales taxes is declining
Durable and Non-durable Goods, Less Food for Home Consumption, As a Share of Personal Consumption Expenditures
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
1929
1931
1933
1935
1937
1939
1941
1943
1945
1947
1949
1951
1953
1955
1957
1959
1961
1963
1965
1967
1969
1971
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
46%
33%
Trends such as the continual shift toward consumer services and internet purchases are likely to cause
this trend to continue
Ratio of Low 20-Top 1 Tax Burdens, 2000
Ratio of Burdens, 2000>300%: 8 states
200-300%: 3 states100-200%: 37 states
<1: 3 states
—
100%
200%
300%
400%
500%
600%
Was
hin
gto
nF
lori
da
So
uth
Dak
ota
Wyo
min
gN
evad
aT
enn
esse
eN
ew H
amp
shir
eT
exas
Pen
nsy
lvan
iaIl
lin
ois
Ala
bam
aM
ich
igan
Lo
uis
ian
aA
rizo
na
Ind
ian
aC
olo
rad
oC
on
nec
ticu
tG
eorg
iaN
ort
h D
ako
taH
awai
iO
klah
om
aR
ho
de
Isla
nd
Uta
hN
ew J
erse
yM
issi
ssip
pi
Kan
sas
New
Mex
ico
New
Yo
rkA
lask
aA
rkan
sas
Mas
sach
use
tts
Mis
sou
riIo
wa
Vir
gin
iaW
isco
nsi
nK
entu
cky
Mar
ylan
dN
ort
h C
aro
lin
aN
ebra
ska
Oh
ioM
inn
eso
taId
aho
Wes
t V
irg
inia
Cal
ifo
rnia
Ore
go
nV
erm
on
tM
ain
eS
ou
th C
aro
lin
aD
istr
ict
of
Co
lum
bia
Mo
nta
na
Del
awar
e
Is Washington’s tax regressivity that much different than other states?
Yes
–Why Invest in Public Education?
We live in a new economic age. New evidence suggests that, dollar for dollar, investing in
K–12 public education will create more jobs and income than would
an equal amount spent in any other sector.
Direct Labor 48.0%
State Corporate
Income Taxes 0.27%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Shares of Total Business Costs
“There is no greater return to an economy or to a society than an educational system second to none.”
John F. Kennedy