px tdr measurement theory and techniques john rettig [email protected] (503)-627-3232
TRANSCRIPT
Agenda
– TDR Overview– TDR Accuracy Issues– Comparative Reflection Technique– Simple Component Characterization– Advanced Component Characterization
– TDT and Crosstalk
– Coupled Transmission Lines
– TDR and Scattering Parameters
Interconnect Design Issues
– Distributed interconnect (wire, board runs, package lead frames, wirebonds, IC metal, etc.) is a given in today’s designs
– At high-speeds, interconnect limits performance– It is desirable to characterize and model
interconnect to predict the performance early in the design phase. Impedance
Change
Transmitted Energy
Incident Energy
Reflected Energy
Measurement of Interconnect
– Whenever an incident signal encounters a change in impedance, some of the energy is reflected back toward the source; the remainder is transmitted forward in the system
– The reflected signal magnitude is a function of the incident signal magnitude and the nature of the impedance change
– The time elapsed between the incident and the reflected signal is a function of the overall distance traveled and the velocity of propagation
– System must be fast enough to capture these events
– Time Domain Reflectometry - a measure of reflection in an unknown device, relative to the reflection in a standard impedance
– Compares reflected energy to incident energy on a single-line transmission system– Known stimulus applied to the standard impedance is
propagated toward the unknown device– Reflections from the unknown device are reflected back
to the source– Known standard impedance may or may not be present
simultaneously with the device or system under test
TDR Basics
TDR Overview - Typical System
Incident Step
50
Step Generator
Reflections
Sampler
t = 050
Incident Step
TDR System Elements
1. High speed step generator (usually switched current source) running on internal clock
2. High speed sampler
3. Digitizing oscilloscope
4. Reference transmission line standard impedance with back termination
5. Probe
6. Device under test
TDR Results Applicability
– TDR testing is usually done without device powered– The reflected signal is a function only of the incident
signal magnitude and the nature of the device, so vertical scale is arbitrary
– The time elapsed between the incident and the reflected signal depends only on the device and physics
– Therefore, with linear devices, TDR results may be extrapolated to situations using other stimuli
TDR Rho Units Definition
Time
Vreflected
+ 1
0
- 1
t0 t1
Vincident
incident
reflected
V
V
Characteristic (Z = Z0)
Amplitude
Vreflected
KCL at Discontinuity
– Transmission lines support propagation with specific characteristic impedance Z
– Reflected and forward propagating signals will be such that i = 0 is satisfied at discontinuity
– Can easily solve for Z knowing , Z0
StepSource
Forward
Z = Z0Z > Z0
Incident
ReflectedDiscontinuity
- Z Relationship
Where is directly indicated by the oscilloscopeZ represents the test impedanceZ0 is the reference impedance
0
0
ZZ
ZZ
1
10ZZ
TDR Waveforms
– TDR systems observe the superposition of incident and reflected signals at source
– Time separation t1-t0 assures ability to discern difference
Time
reflected
+ 1
0
- 1
t0 t1
Amplitude
incident=+1
TDR Waveforms
TDR Waveforms - Open, Short and 50 terminations
AmplitudeOpen (Z =)
(Z = 50)
Short (Z = 0)
Time
reflected =+1
+ 1
0
- 1
t0 t1
incident=+1 reflected =-1
Measuring Impedance
1
10ZZ
020406080
100
120140160180200
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
500 Z
Z-1 0
-0.6 12.5-0.5 16.67
-0.282 28-0.2 33.33
0 500.2 750.4 116.670.5 1500.6 2001 ®
Z
Nonlinear Impedance / Mapping
– Everything else equal, lower impedance line measurements can tolerate more error for a given impedance tolerance
– Assumed conditions– 250 mV step– 50 Reference Line
– 1 mV or 4 m error equates to:– 0.40 for a 50 test line– 0.24 for a 28 test line – 0.79 for a 90 test line– 1.23 for a 125 test line
Measuring Impedance - Sensitivity to
20
21
2
ZZ
020406080
100
120140160180200
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
500 Z
Z dZ/d-1 0 25
-0.6 12.5 39.06-0.5 16.67 44.44
-0.282 28 60.84-0.2 33.33 69.44
0 50 1000.2 75 156.250.4 116.67 277.780.5 150 4000.6 200 6251 ® ®
Z
Transmission Lines and TDR
– Not all devices measured are constant impedance– The waveform is a record of continuous reflection
along a transmission line, not just one location– All reflection results are superpositioned– Additional care is needed after first discontinuity, as
subsequent reflections are relative to immediate impedance and are altered by earlier discontinuities
StepSource
Forward
Z = Z0Z1 > Z0
Incident
Reflected
Z1 > Z2 > Z0
Agenda
– TDR Overview– TDR Accuracy Issues– Comparative Reflection Technique– Simple Component Characterization– Advanced Component Characterization
– TDT and Crosstalk
– Coupled Transmission Lines
– TDR and Scattering Parameters
TDR System Aberrations
TDR System Aberrations
– Aberrations always present on incident edge– Device under test acts as a filter: input = incident,
output = reflected– Therefore reflections contain some portion of
aberrations– Important to index where impedance point or zone is
relative to incident edge– Tektronix 80E04 example -> 70 ps - 550 ps round-trip
travel (35 ps - 275 ps one-way)
TDR Interconnect Issues
– TDR is a measurement of relative reflection in an unknown device, to the reflection in a standard impedance
– If interconnect is present between standard and unknown device, the perception of reflection is relative to the interconnect
– If standard is not immediately adjacent to the unknown device, care must be taken
– If standard and unknown device have uncontrolled elements between them, care must be taken
– Aberrations can be added by interconnect
TDR Interconnect Analogy
– Voltage measurements needed when ground issues are present on the device under test
– Don’t have a differential voltage probe– Volts measured are referenced to scope ground, not
device
TDR Interconnect Issues
The following interconnect-related issues can affect TDR accuracy:– Attenuation– High frequency skin loss in interconnect– Aberrations contributed by connector, interconnect, or
probe
– Incorrect reference impedance level (ZZ0)
TDR Resolution
– Insufficient TDR resolution– Results from closely spaced discontinuities being
smoothed together– Can miss details of device under test– May lead to inaccurate impedance readings
TDR Resolution
SMA through F-F barrel(8.6 mm dielectric)
Each end individually loosened 0.5 turns(0.35 mm)
Both ends loosened 0.5 turns; risetime filters applied
TDR Resolution
– TDR system risetime is related to resolution– Reflections last as long as the incident step and
display as long as the system risetime
Z1, tDZ0 Z0
Displayed Time
t01 t12
tr(system) 2tD
TDR Resolution
– First discontinuity reflection is witnessed at t01
– Twice the one way propagation delay tD between discontinuities elapses
– Second discontinuity reflection is witnessed at t02
– Ideally, leading corner of reflection from second discontinuity arrives back at first discontinuity no earlier than lagging corner of reflection from first discontinuity, thus
)()( 21
systemRresolution TT
TDR Resolution
Why is it important?
– Even with slower signals, systems built with mixed components and technologies add uncertainties to signal path - some quite short
– Analytical tools must exceed system performance in order to debug
– 17.5 ps resolution TDR instrument equates to discontinuity spacing of– 3.5 mm on surface etched board traces
– 4 mm in most plastics
– 5.5 mm in air
TDR Resolution
– Note that– This rule assumes 0-100% ramp model; real world specifies
10-90% quadratic-type responses– System rise time is characterized by fall time of reflected
edge from ideal short at test point– Other second order factors enter picture– System rise time approximated by:
2ect)(interconn
2(sampler)
2(stepgen)(system) RRRR TTTT
Agenda
– TDR Overview– TDR Accuracy Issues– Comparative Reflection Technique– Simple Component Characterization– Advanced Component Characterization
– TDT and Crosstalk
– Coupled Transmission Lines
– TDR and Scattering Parameters
Comparative Reflection TDR Measurements
– Comparative reflection technique inserts check with known impedance at the exact location of the device under test
– Impedance standard is transferred to interconnect segment immediately preceding device under test
– Linearity guarantees that TDR signal experiences identical source, interconnect, and sampler imperfections with both standard and DUT present
– Greatly improves and Z accuracy– Documented in IPC-TM-650
TDR Accuracy Improvement - Concept:
TDR
DUT
INTERCONNECT
STD IMPEDANCE
– Assume that you have a primary standard impedance and you wish to use TDR to characterize a device against this standard
TDR Accuracy Improvement
1. Characterize the interconnect immediately adjacent to the disconnect point, as a secondary standard:– Open circuit end of interconnect and measure size of step reflected from standard impedance R-OPEN as seen by
TDR system over specified time zone
R-OPEN
intercon
Open
R-STDinterconstandard
Open
– Connect standard impedance and measure size of step reflected from standard impedance R-STD as seen by TDR system over specified time zone
ZINT = ZSTD(R-OPEN - R-STD) / (R-OPEN + R-STD)
TDR Accuracy Improvement
2. Measure the DUT impedance against this interconnect impedance– Connect DUT and measure size of step reflected R-DUT
as seen by TDR systemR-DUT
intercon device
Open
ZDUT = ZINT(R-OPEN + R-DUT) / (R-OPEN - R-DUT)
What can comparative reflection do?
– Takes care of accuracy issues related to:– TDR system aberrations– Interconnect– Incident amplitude variance
– Must still be careful with:– Launch resistance– Launch inductance– Measurement zone movement
Launch Resistance
– Lumped and indiscernible from device impedance– Effect is additive, always positive, and similar to
an equal amount of reference level error
Incident Step
Step Generator
ReflectionsSampler
t = 050
Incident Step
Launch Resistance
– May not necessarily be repeatable– Is a problem with lower impedance levels, e.g.
28Rambus measurements– Most often is reasonable bounded (tens of m)
– Can be measured with 4-wire measurement - replicate several in series if necessary
– May be present in both signal and ground contacts
– Use of exchanged standard impedance will only cancel launch resistance if it is constant
Launch Inductance
– Caused by– Non-characteristic launches– Air gaps at launch– Contorted launch paths– Poor attention to ground attach
– Time constant is longer for smaller Z0
DUTZZ
L
0
0Z DUTZL
Launch Inductance
– May affect measurement zone– Lumped time constant decay usually lasts much longer
than propagation through inductance element– Multiple reflections carried into measurement zone– If C present, may have second order ring (though
usually only a larger ZDUT is more vulnerable)
– May be partially compensated– Must be absolutely repeatable attach geometry
– Standard impedance Z0 must be very close to ZDUT
Launch Inductance
Launch from 0.141” semi-rigid coax to microstrip through center and ground wires, with gap
L-R: gap = 0/1/2/3 mm
Agenda
– TDR Overview– TDR Accuracy Issues– Comparative Reflection Technique– Simple Component Characterization– Advanced Component Characterization
– TDT and Crosstalk
– Coupled Transmission Lines
– TDR and Scattering Parameters
Simple Component Analysis
– High frequency behavior observed– Both lumped and distributed nature observed
– Can derive equivalent C, L, Z0, t values to put into simulation
– Can verify physical location of discontinuity
Limits:– First or most significant discontinuity only
Shunt Capacitance and Series Inductance Discontinuities
Shunt Capacitance Discontinuity
Series Inductance Discontinuity
Z0 C
Z0
L
Z0
Z0
L
thru
thru
seconds)-in (Area
2
0
Z
AreaC
C
AreaZL 02
Capacitive and Inductive Terminations
Capacitor Load Termination
Inductor Load Termination
Z0 C
Z0 L
open
short
C
L
02 Z
AreaC
20 AreaZ
L
Distributed Discontinuities
– Over short distances (</10), distributed discontinuities may be treated as an equivalent lumped L or C
– Impedance looking in is given by Richard’s transform
j
ZZ
ZZZZ
L
Lin
)sinh()cosh(
)sinh()cosh(
0
00
Z0, ZLZin
Distributed Discontinuities
CapacitiveDiscontinuity
InductiveDiscontinuity
Z
Time
100
50
0
incident
Z0Z0 Z0
1
1
2Z
tCeq 2
22tZLeq
Z1Z2
t1 t2
Z1
Z2
Agenda
– TDR Overview– TDR Accuracy Issues– Comparative Reflection Technique– Simple Component Characterization– Advanced Component Characterization
– TDT and Crosstalk
– Coupled Transmission Lines
– TDR and Scattering Parameters
Problem of Backscatter
– At any given point in time, TDR trace is by nature a net reflection superposition tool, not a true impedance profile
– Multiple reflections occur between downstream discontinuities and confuse true reflection
– Always has the effect of smearing discontinuities out longer in time
– Resolution may be lost due to rise time degradation
Problem of Backscatter
– Caused by superposition of multiple reflections– Can be sorted out by pulse-bounce diagram
Time
Z1 Z2 Z3 Z4 Z0Z0
Advanced Component Analysis
– Solve backscatter problem first, then impedance profile matches 1:1 with circuit Z
– Not limited to first or most significant discontinuity– Has all advantages listed under simple component
analysis– Can window out and disregard portions of
impedance profile that is not of interest
Advanced Component Analysis
– Impedance profile can be deconvolved with DSP– Upper-triangular system matrix is well-conditioned
for stable solution– Tektronix used to offer product that does this;
outside vendor now offers product– Also converts impedance profile to either short
transmission line sections, or equivalent shunt capacitance and series inductance discontinuities, for insertion into simulator
Advanced Component Analysis
Z1 Z2 Z3 Z4 Z0Z0
Z100
50
0
Impedance profile
L1
Z0Z0
Agenda
– TDR Overview– TDR Accuracy Issues– Comparative Reflection Technique– Simple Component Characterization– Advanced Component Characterization
– TDT and Crosstalk
– Coupled Transmission Lines
– TDR and Scattering Parameters
– Time Domain Transmission - a measure of signal transmission through an unknown device, relative to the incident signal.
– Compares transmitted energy to incident energy on a single-line transmission system– Known stimulus applied to the standard impedance is
propagated toward the unknown device– Second channel measures transmitted signal
– Gives a second (but alternate) look at TDR information
TDT Overview
TDR Reflected Units Definition
Time
reflected
+ 1
0
- 1
t0 t1
incident
incident
reflected
V
V
Characteristic (Z = Z0)
Amplitude
TDT Transmitted Units Definition
Time
transmitted
+ 1
0
- 1
t0 t1
1incident
reflectedincident
V
VV
Amplitude
Vtransmitted = Vincident + Vreflected
reflected
incident
TDT Example
- - Z Relationship
Where or is directly indicated by the oscilloscopeZ represents the test impedanceZ0 is the reference impedance
0
0
ZZ
ZZ
1
10ZZ
0
2
ZZ
Z
20ZZ
Crosstalk
– The coupling of energy from one line to another– Three Elements Contribute to Crosstalk:
– Port terminations– Stimulus – Moding on transmission system
– Generalities:– If saturated, crosstalk energy is proportional to line length– If unsaturated, crosstalk energy is proportional to rise time of
driving signal– Can be positive or negative (inductive or capacitive)– Occurs in both forward (near-end) and backward (far-end)
directions– Non-characteristic port terminations make it worse
Crosstalk Measurement Techniques
– Set up TDR on aggressor line– Observe victim lines with TDT– Take care to terminate all other lines
TDR1
2
+DUT
50
50
Crosstalk Example
Crosstalk between adjacent 50 runs on FR4 withW=2.5 mmS=2 mmFar end 50 terminations
Aggressor: 200 m/divVictim: 4%/div
Crosstalk
– Adjacent microstrips and striplines will always crosstalk to a degree if fringing fields overlap
– Impedance measurements include loading of adjacent lines, whether intended or not
– Three key questions:– Is the geometry measured representative of the geometry
in the application?– Are the port terminations of adjacent lines representative?– Are the driving conditions of adjacent lines representative?
Agenda
– TDR Overview– TDR Accuracy Issues– Comparative Reflection Technique– Simple Component Characterization– Advanced Component Characterization
– TDT and Crosstalk
– Coupled Transmission Lines
– TDR and Scattering Parameters
Types of Coupled Lines
– Symmetric Coupled Lines - “Differential” or "Balanced"– Homogeneous– Inhomogeneous
– Non-Symmetric Coupled Lines - “Unbalanced”
R
R
Odd and Even Mode Propagation
+ + +-Odd Mode Even Mode
Definitions - Symmetric
– Zodd is the single-ended driving impedance of a transmission line, given the boundary condition that the other line is driven with an equal amplitude and opposite polarity signal (anti-phase sourcing)
– Zeven is the single-ended driving impedance of a transmission line, given the boundary condition that the other line is driven with an equal signal (in-phase sourcing)
Models for Symmetric Coupled Lines
Pi Tee
Ra
RbRb R2
R1 R1
Odd Mode Characterization
Ra/2 R1 R1Ra/2
Zodd = (Ra/2)|| Rb
+-
+-
Pi Tee
RbRb R2
Zodd =R1
Even Mode Characterization
2R2
R1
Zeven = R1 + 2R2
2R2
R1Ra
+-
+-
Pi Tee
Rb
Zeven =Rb
Rb
Model Values
Pi
Tee
2oddeven ZZ
oddeven
oddeven
ZZ
ZZ
2
evenZ
oddZ oddZ
evenZ
oddeven
oddeven
ZZ
ZZ
edunterminatcrosstalk reverse
Measurement Environment
Pi
Tee
2oddeven ZZ
oddeven
oddeven
ZZ
ZZ
2
evenZ
oddZ oddZ
evenZ
0Z
0Z
0Z
0Z
Symmetric Line Example
Symmetric coupled lines on FR-4
w = 2.5 mm
s = 2 mm
h = 1.5 mm
Zeven = 56.0
Zodd = 47.85
Model Values
Pi
Tee
56.0
658.6
47.85
56.0
47.85
4.08
Zeven = 56.0Zodd = 47.85
Higher Order Systems of Lines
Z30Z20
Z34
Z10
Z12
Z40
Z23
– n coupled lines produce n orthogonal modes of propagation
– Requires n(n+1)/2 resistors to describe coupling network and for characteristic termination
– May have n velocities of propagation
Z13
Z24Z14
Agenda
– TDR Overview– TDR Accuracy Issues– Comparative Reflection Technique– Simple Component Characterization– Advanced Component Characterization
– TDT and Crosstalk
– Coupled Transmission Lines
– TDR and Scattering Parameters
TDR and VNA Derived s-parameters
– Vector Network Analyzer (VNA) measures scattering parameters using a swept CW sinusoidal stimulus and relative magnitude and phase measurements on incident and reflected signals that are picked off with directional couplers
– TDR and TDT measure reflection and transmission parameters using step stimulus and voltage-time measurements on superpositioned incident and reflected signals
TDR and VNA Derived s-parameters
– But they can be correlated:
dt
dffts
dt
dffts inc
21
11
Questions?