pyloric stenosis 2

Upload: jino-bugna

Post on 05-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 Pyloric Stenosis 2

    1/4

    Infants with vomiting

    Prepared by.........Nuthapong Ukarapol , M

    CC : Two infants were referred to the hospital because of vomiting.

    Clinical presentations Case 1 Case 2

    Age 3 weeks 4 weeks

    Sex Female Male

    Birth weight 2700 grams 2700 grams

    Body weight on admission 3080 grams 2750 grams

    Onset of symptoms 5 minutes after feeding 5- 30minutes after feeding

    Characteristic of vomitus Digested milk Digested milk with bile

    Abdominal mass Negative Negative

    Abdominal distension Present PresentHistory of meconium passage within 24 hours within 24 hours

    Feeding Formula Breast feeding

    Initial investigations

    Investigations Case 1 Case 2

    Sodium 141 139

    Potassium 5.3 5.3

    Chloride 109 108

    TCO219 18

    Plain abdomen dilated stomach with small air in the

    small intestine

    dilated stomach with fair

    amount of air in the smallintestine

    What are the differential diagnosis for an infant with vomiting?

    Group Diseases

    GI obstruction Pyloric stenosis

    Duodenal obstruction

    Malrotation withintermittent volvulus

    Hirschsprung's disease

    GI disorders Gastroenteritis

    Gastritis/duodenitis (CMA)

    Eosinophilic/allergic

    esophagitisGastroparesis

    Achalasia

  • 7/31/2019 Pyloric Stenosis 2

    2/4

    Neurologic conditions HydrocephalusMass lesions

    Infections Meningitis/sepsisUrinary tract infection

    Metabolic/endocrine disorders Urea cycle defectCAH

    Galactosemia

    Organic acidemia

    Toxic substances Iron

    Vitamin A or D

    What is/are the investigations for an infant with vomiting?

    1. Ultrasound abdomen: to evaluate the presence of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis

    2. UGIS: to evaluate mechanical obstruction e.g. achalasia, pyloric stenosis, duodenal web, duodenal stenosis,anular of pancreas, malrotation with ladd's band, volvulus, and jejunal or ileal atresia

    3. Barium enema: to evaluate Hirshchsprung's disease

    4. EGD: to evaluate mucosal diseases in the stomach e.g. cow's milk allergy, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, reflux

    esophagitis

    5. Metabolic screening e.g. electrolytes, LFT, urine reducing substances in suspected cases

    6. Neuroimaging studies: to evaluate increased intracranial pressure in suspected cases

    Discussion and disease progression

    Case 1: This was a female newborn presenting with nonbillous vomiting. The initial diagnosis was gastric outlet

    obstruction (hypertrophic pyloric stenosis). However, because there was neither physical finding (abdominal massnor electrolyte abnormality (hypochloremic hypokalemic metabolic alkalosis) characteristic of hypertrophic pytoristenosis, and because of the fact that the patient was a female other differential diagnoses should be considered. These include cow's milk allergy and eosinophilic gastroenteritis. An ultrasonography was performed and showedmild thickening of pyloric muscle (3.8 mm)(Fig. 1). During admission, the patient developed upper GI hemorrhagtherefore EGD was done to evaluate any feasible GI mucosal disorders. Reflux esophagitis and prolapse gastropath

    were responsible for upper GI bleeding, The scope could be forcefully passed into the duodenum. There was a

    pyloric obstruction noted during the procedure. The pathology revealed no evidence of cow's milk allergy or

    eosinophilic gastroenteritis. An UGIS was finally confirmed the diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (Fig. 2)

  • 7/31/2019 Pyloric Stenosis 2

    3/4

    Figure 1 An ultrasonography scans pyloric region.

    The markers are measuring the thickness of pyloric

    muscle, which is 3.8 mm.

    Figure 2 An upper GI series demonstrates pyloric

    obstruction with a string sign. The findings are

    consistent with pyloric stenosis.

    Case 2: Because of billous vomiting, an UGIS was carried out first.The intestinal malrotation is demonstrated as

    figure 3 and figure 4.

    Fig 3 An upper GI series reveals a point of obstrution

    at the fourth part of the duodenumFigure 4 An upper GI series demonstrates

    malposition of the DJ junction, which is supposed

    to be at the same level of the duodenal bulb. The

    finding indicate intestinal malrotation.

    Diagnosis: Case no. 1: Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis; Case no. 2: Intestinal malrotation with Ladd's band

    Treatment:Case no.1: pyloromyotomy; Case no. 2: Lysis band

    Points of discussion

    1. Vomiting during newborn period should be considered as pathological condition until proved otherwise.

    2. Poor weight gain is an important clinical clue to exclude overfeeding or problems in feeding techniques. As not

  • 7/31/2019 Pyloric Stenosis 2

    4/4

    in our cases, both of them had failure to thrive.3. Mode of inheritance in pyloric stenosis is multifactorial with male predominance (4-6:1). However, when femal

    is affected, recurrence rate in all offspring is much higher than when male is affected (13% vs. 2.5-4%). Therefore

    careful genetic counseling is very crucial.

    4. A palpable abdominal mass in pyloric stenosis may be difficult to detect because of an overlying, dilated antrum

    However, it can be more easily palpated after vomiting and gastric decompression. Overall, an experiencedexaminer could palpate a mass in only 60-80% of cases.

    5. Electrolyte abnormality might not be present in all cases, particularly in a patient with short duration of thedisease.

    6. Billous vomiting is an important history that leads us to investigate for small bowel obstruction rather than gastr

    outlet obstruction. Therefore, the ultrasonography would not be useful in such case.