pyp assessment policy

14
POLICY Title: PYP Assessment Issue Date: February 2020 Last Reviewed: February 2020 Next Review Date: February 2021 Authorised by: Principal PYP ASSESSMENT POLICY DATUS INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL

Upload: others

Post on 25-May-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PYP ASSESSMENT POLICY

POLICY

Title: PYP Assessment

Issue Date: February 2020

Last Reviewed: February 2020

Next Review Date: February 2021 Authorised by: Principal

PYP ASSESSMENT

POLICY

DATUS

INTERNATIONAL

SCHOOL

Page 2: PYP ASSESSMENT POLICY

i

Contents

INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................... 1

DEFINITIONS ........................................................................................................................ 1

SCOPE ................................................................................................................................... 1

PHILOSOPHY ........................................................................................................................ 1

STRATEGIES AND TOOLS TO ASSESS STUDENT LEARNING .................................................. 2

FORMATIVE AND SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT: .................................................................... 3

ASSESSMENT TASKS ............................................................................................................. 4

PORTFOLIOS ......................................................................................................................... 4

ASSESSMENT CALENDAR ..................................................................................................... 5

FEEDBACK TO STUDENTS ..................................................................................................... 5

MARKING OF STUDENT WORK ............................................................................................ 5

AIMS OF MARKING POLICY .................................................................................................. 5

WHY DO WE MARK? ............................................................................................................ 5

LEARNING BOOKS ................................................................................................................ 6

LEVELING CRITERIA .............................................................................................................. 6

MODERATION ...................................................................................................................... 6

RECORDING STUDENT PROGRESS ....................................................................................... 6

Aims: ................................................................................................................................. 6 Practice: ............................................................................................................................ 6

REPORTING STUDENT PROGRESS ........................................................................................ 7

The annual reporting cycle .............................................................................................. 7 THE REPORTING PROCESS ................................................................................................... 8

PARENT-TEACHER CONFERENCES ....................................................................................... 8

ANALYZING ASSESSMENT DATA TO INFORM LEARNING AND TEACHING .......................... 9

INTERNATIONAL BENCHMARKS .......................................................................................... 9

STUDENT VOICE IN THEIR LEARNING .................................................................................. 9

PYP EXHIBITION ................................................................................................................... 9

APPENDUM ....................................................................................................................... 10

Datus International School General Grade Descriptors ................................................ 10 IMPORTANT NOTES .......................................................................................................... 11

Holistic Judgments ......................................................................................................... 11 Achieving Above Grade Level ......................................................................................... 11 Difference between “In Line” and “Exceeding” ............................................................. 11 Giving a 7 in Term 1 ........................................................................................................ 11 Frequency/Distribution .................................................................................................. 11 Reading Grades .............................................................................................................. 11

Page 3: PYP ASSESSMENT POLICY

VISION OF DATUS INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL

Provide education to include the development and enhancement

of a child’s spiritual life, an excellence in academics, a child’s well-being,

their social development, and their sense of citizenship

within a safe learning environment.

MISSION OF DATUS INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL

To encourage intellectual diversity, risk taking,

curiosity, creativity, independence of thought and

effective learning habits within a supportive, innovation

and ambitious learning environment. We instill g

ood discipline and a lifelong love for learning.

Page 4: PYP ASSESSMENT POLICY

1

INTRODUCTION The purpose of assessment at Datus International School is to improve student learning, to provide

information on student learning and to contribute to the efficacy of learning programmes. Assessment is

the ongoing process of gathering evidence for and of learning. This evidence will be used to give

recognition and timely feedback to the learners and all other stake holders. Assessment will reflect best

practice that supports the learner and the teacher in the promotion of student achievement.

DEFINITIONS The assessment component in the school's curriculum can itself be subdivided into three closely related

areas.

Assessing – how we discover what the students know and have learned

Recording – how we choose to collect and analyse data

Reporting – how we choose to communicate information

SCOPE This policy applies to all learners from the 3 Year Old program in Early Years through to the completion

of the Primary Years Program at Year 6.

PHILOSOPHY Datus International School Assessment Policy is in line with the requirements and philosophy set by IB

Programme Standards and Practices. We believe assessment is a fundamental practice to support

and enhance the learning experiences of our students. Therefore, assessment – the evaluation of

progress and attainment - is an integral part of learning, not separate from it. By recognising each

person’s unique potential, assessment practices are designed to promote individual excellence and

account for a variety of learning styles. Assessment also enables on-going collaborative reflection between

the students, teachers, and parents, enabling each to become a partner in the learning process.

Assessment at Datus International School is continuous and student centred and impacts upon student

learning. Assessment practices in our IB PYP Programme include:

1. Student assessment will be both formative and summative and will occur on an on-going basis

through Signs of Success, Learning Questions, Success Criteria, Student Portfolios, Rubrics, Visible

Learning Practice, Student Progress tracking and observations of student performance.

2. Diagnostic assessment will be completed to formally assess students and determine the efficacy

of programme standards.

3. Appropriate summative assessment will reflect collaborative planning and the development of

the same assessments for Units of Inquiry within each subject area. The same shall apply for

formal summative examinations where they are age appropriate.

4. Summative assessments will be moderated after each assessment point within Year groups and

as a whole school to ensure consistency as a cohort and the individual needs of students.

5. Diagnostic testing and any internal tests and examinations will be conducted in a manner

consistent with the KHDA expectations and IB regulations. Every effort will be made to ensure

students have adequate time for preparation and review.

Page 5: PYP ASSESSMENT POLICY

2

6. Student assessments should reflect a variety of measures that give balance to the summative

assessment (tests, written tasks, presentations etc.) consistent with the criteria established for

each subject. All assessment is criteria referenced.

7. Student assessment will be completed according to explicit criteria established at the beginning

of each Unit of Inquiry and assessed using published rubrics.

8. PYP students will be assessed against age- related learning outcomes, IB Learner Profiles,

Concepts and Approaches to Learning, as appropriate.

9. Reporting of student assessment will be completed using a written report issued in term 1 and 3,

consistent with the aims of the IB PYP.

10. Formal reports will be issued to parents in December and June, with one Parent evening and one

three – way conference to discuss student progress and attainment.

11. Culminating learning experiences which include Year 6 Exhibition will be completed by all students

to meet the requirements for the IB PYP.

12. Students use on-going assessment tool ‘Signs of Success’ for Maths in years 2-6. In addition,

Reading and Writing assessments are completed termly. The results are used to set targets,

evaluate performance and for teachers and students to track pupil progress. This is supported by

teacher feedback and feed forward.

Our assessment policy is communicated to the school community via our IB PYP Parent Guide, e-mail, and

School Intranet.

STRATEGIES AND TOOLS TO ASSESS STUDENT LEARNING The school uses a range of strategies and tools to assess student learning. Assessment is integral to

collaborative planning, teaching and learning. Assessment practices will be reviewed regularly in light of

the IB Standards and Practices.

Teachers use a variety of formal and informal assessment techniques to measure learning including:

1. Diagnostic assessment is performed at the start of each unit. It helps teachers to prevent

assumptions on what students know. Teachers also use diagnostic assessment to find out what

students already know about a theme/Central Idea before beginning the Unit of Inquiry.

2. Formative assessment is consistent and ongoing, to guide development through teacher, self and

peer assessment, and will utilize many of the assessment tools outlined. During Formative

assessment results should be used to alter the instructional methods to meet the students’ needs

and inform future planning. Formative assessment is not used in calculating a grade for a student.

It enables the teacher and each student to know where they are in their learning and what the

next steps are to further improve.

3. Summative assessment is usually performed at the end of a complete unit or term. It measures

the standards reached by students using specific criteria. It is used to gauge student attainment

at that moment in time. It is used by teachers to inform them about the quality of their learning

and whether their classes are at age related expectations. It is used to compare student results

from year to year within the school or to compare the school’s results with those of other

institutions worldwide.

Page 6: PYP ASSESSMENT POLICY

3

Formative and summative assessment encompasses:

Reflective evaluation

Signs of Success (Self-assessment)

Self-assessment and peer assessment

Quizzes, small weekly tests

Projects and portfolios

Classroom tasks

Home learning

Class participation

Practical or experimental learning

Teachers’ observations and discussions

Written assessment (such as tasks, short answers, reports, research projects, etc.)

Oral assessment (including student presentations or other oral presentations)

Performance assessment

Subject examinations

FORMATIVE AND SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT: Allows both the student and teacher to assess what the student can do, and how he/she can use

knowledge, concepts and ATL skills.

Measures the application of knowledge, concepts and ATL skills rather than recalling facts.

Reflects achievement against criteria for the learning area.

Involves student participation and reflection.

Provides students an opportunity to analyse their own learning and to recognise what areas

need improvement.

Is based on agreed standards of performance suitable for the Year level

Is informative for students, parents and teachers, and provides direction for further learning.

Provides equal opportunities for all students to be successful.

Provides an opportunity for students to take responsibility for their own work, their own

learning and their own actions and reflect upon these actions to make improvement.

Source: IB Principles into Practice - Learning and Teaching 2018

Teachers will use a variety of assessment tools to help them identify systematically the learning

needs of their students. They will:

1. Have strategies for monitoring, tracking, assessing and moderating the achievements

demonstrated in the work of individual learners.

2. Have methods of evaluating programs and units of inquiry, and of involving students in reflecting

on and evaluating their own progress.

3. Develop individual student profiles and reporting systems that usefully reflect the full range of a

student’s achievement and meet the individual needs of the students, their parents and the

criteria set by external agencies.

Page 7: PYP ASSESSMENT POLICY

4

ASSESSMENT TASKS Writing assessment tasks are prepared and administered at regular scheduled intervals to measure

student learning at an individual and cohort level. There is a written task within every UoI, which is

assessed by the teacher. In addition to this, the children will participate in 3 written assessment tasks that

link to Language Learning Outcomes but not necessarily the UoI. These tasks are devised to include a

balanced measurement of the skills required in the subject area and are measured against specific criteria

of each year group. Assessment activities are constructed to allow students the potential to achieve the

highest level available. They are marked to a consistent standard and moderated within Year groups and

as a whole school. Results of these assessments are analysed in order to improve instruction by informing

teachers and departments of student learning gaps. Year Leaders collate the results of all common

assessments and inform both their teams and the senior leadership team of their progress towards set

targets.

PORTFOLIOS A child’s portfolio is a collection of his or her work to demonstrate reflection and growth, creativity and

engagement. Portfolios should celebrate student learning through the PYP showing the development of

the whole child, both within and outside of the Program of Inquiry in all subject areas.

Portfolios are used by students to communicate this development with parents and with teachers and

peers throughout the year.

Portfolios are intended to be student-managed with teacher guidance so students take ownership of their

portfolios. The balance of ‘teacher-selected’ versus ‘student-selected’ content in portfolios depends on

the age and maturity of students. Teachers should help students learn how to thoughtfully choose which

items to include/keep in their portfolios and provide students opportunities to thoughtfully remove items

also.

Portfolios should be easily accessible to students. Students should understand the purpose of portfolios,

the process used to compile them, and be able to explain why specific materials are in the portfolios.

Portfolio content need not be limited to written work. A variety of media can be represented to reflect

different learning styles and experiences, including drawings, photos, voice recording, videos, and

multimedia.

Portfolios are stored in plastic display folders in classrooms. Students will take their portfolio home at the

conclusion of each term and return them at the beginning of the following term, with the exception of

the end of year when portfolios will be kept at home.

Portfolio content at each year level should include the following:

Per Term

One student-generated reflection for each unit from our POI, either:

a general reflection on the unit of inquiry, including the knowledge and understanding gained and

possible future investigations or

the student’s response to a piece of work from the unit of inquiry

Page 8: PYP ASSESSMENT POLICY

5

A brief student reflection for each student-selected piece in the portfolio Evidence of:

Literacy development

Mathematical thinking and skills

Writing development and skills

Student learning in Art, Music, PE and French or Mandarin

Student-initiated action (when/if it happens)

Students as inquirers and producers of knowledge

Per Year

A current year student photograph on the front cover

In the term students undertake the PYP Exhibition; all pieces will be student selected and include

an exhibition reflection

(Each selection relating to a POI unit will include the Transdisciplinary Theme and Central Idea)

ASSESSMENT CALENDAR An internal assessment calendar is created to indicate key dates for submission of summative assessment

tasks grades or examination results to the school assessment management system. All students are

informed of summative assessment dates.

FEEDBACK TO STUDENTS The school provides students with regular oral and written feedback to inform and improve their

learning across all Year groups. Leveling is undertaken positively and consistently. Teachers are

expected to look for evidence of what students know and understand.

MARKING OF STUDENT WORK Regular and focused feedback to students about where they are in their learning is crucial to

successful learning and teaching. All marking needs to be accompanied by feedback suggesting

appropriate means to improve.

AIMS OF MARKING POLICY To provide a coherent picture of good and outstanding practice in marking

To provide positive reinforcement of the teaching and learning process

WHY DO WE MARK? To provide a dialogue with pupils as to how they can individually take the next steps to

improve and make progress.

To inform adult understanding of pupil attainment, progress and individual targets.

To set a standard easily identified by pupils

Page 9: PYP ASSESSMENT POLICY

6

LEARNING BOOKS To inform planning & assessment

To share children’s achievement with parents and guardians.

To encourage and celebrate achievement.

Learning books must be marked after a recorded piece of learning before the children record

learning again. Student learning must be returned with clear feedback that refers to students

successes and areas they need to develop. Time must be given for children to reflect and respond to

feedback. Students must be able to understand what they need to accomplish to move their

learning forward. Senior Leaders and Year Leaders are regularly required to monitor them for

moderation purposes. Learning books should include evidence of Learning Questions, Success Criteria,

Target Setting and Self-Reflection. School wide learning book reviews complement regular quality

assurance systems.

LEVELING CRITERIA Teachers use criterion referenced Level descriptors which are clearly communicated to the students in

advance. These level descriptors match course and program attainment standards for each subject area,

ATL’s and Learner Profile, in line with IB PYP aligned Scope and Sequence documents.

MODERATION Senior Leaders and Year Leaders use a number of methods to provide consistent marking of all

students’ assessments. Clear mark schemes and rubrics are provided for all assessments, and

meetings of assessors are held to clarify areas where there may be questions.

RECORDING STUDENT PROGRESS All assessment data is recorded digitally. At the completion of summative assessments, assessment data

is entered into our data management system for reporting and analysis purposes.

All teachers are required to maintain clear and accurate records which adhere to department

requirements regarding format, frequency and type of assessment recorded.

Aims: Record keeping is a strict requirement of teaching. All teachers are expected to maintain clear and

accurate data to support and justify a student’s grades and reports.

This is to ensure that when midyear and final grades on reports are produced there is evidence of

how the grade was awarded.

Practice: All levels awarded for assessed work are recorded on a computer spreadsheet.

Digital assessment is reviewed regularly by Senior Leaders and formally at the end of each data

capture point (once per term).

Page 10: PYP ASSESSMENT POLICY

7

REPORTING STUDENT PROGRESS Teachers provide regular feedback to parents via Parent Student Teacher Conferences, Term 1 goal setting

reports and End of Year progress and attainment reports. The latter involves issuing students with levels

against criteria based on on-going summative and formative assessment and provides students with PYP

reports that include all levels achieved against specific criteria. In addition, we also report on moral

education, welfare indicators and curriculum specific measures.

Parents may communicate as necessary with teachers, preferably by appointment after school or email.

Parents are discouraged from interrupting the school day but staff must be always willing to discuss parent

concerns.

The annual reporting cycle is as follows:

1. First Term Report: A report containing data which measures progress against Term 1 learning

outcomes, Approaches to Learning and IB Learner Profiles. Targets for key curriculum areas are

set and welfare information given.

2. First Term parent – teacher conference on individual student goals and progress so far.

3. Second Term Parent Student Teacher Conferences (PSTC’s) consisting of students presenting

their learning and progress toward their targets.

4. End-of-year report on progress, attainment, Approaches to Learning and the Learner Profile.

Generation of written reports is done using Managebac. The roles of PS staff in generation of reports are

as follows.

Curriculum Management team: sets dates of issue of reports

Head of School:

1. signs each report before issued

2. sets deadlines for submission of reports through various levels of control

3. memos to Primary school staff with procedures and deadlines outlined

4. coordination with PYP Coordinator and IT staff

5. proofread random samples of reports for accuracy

6. ensure all teachers in Year Groups meet report card deadlines

PYP Coordinator:

1. liaise with Year Leaders to ensure all reports submitted on time

2. identify any reports that need to be altered

3. approve reports to be generated in Managebac per Year groups.

4. Inform parents of report card issue via school website and email.

5. maintain and update departmental grade descriptors outlining achievement levels for every

subject at every grade level in Managebac.

Year Leaders:

1. proofread all their Year Group reports and ensure all corrections are made

2. ensure all teachers in their Year Group meet report card deadlines

Subject Teachers:

1. input correct data on the reports based on assessments that give clear feedback to parents

on academic progress

2. assist with proofreading colleagues reports

Page 11: PYP ASSESSMENT POLICY

8

3. meet all internal deadlines

IT Department

1. Assist PYP Coordinator with generating reports or trouble shooting in Managebac.

THE REPORTING PROCESS

Step 1 SLT sets reporting timeline

Step 2 Subject Teachers inputs grade/level description for level achieved by students and inputs data from assessment task into Managebac.

Step 3 Head of School/Year Group Leaders/PYP Coordinator proofread teacher reports and inform classroom teachers if editing required.

Step 4 PYP Coordinator perform a final check of reports data and grade descriptors in Managebac. PYP Coordinator oversees distribution of email accounts of parents in Managebac.

Step 5 PYP Coordinator generate reports per Year group in Managebac. Parents receive reports to access in Managebac on specific data.

PARENT-TEACHER CONFERENCES Teachers and parents communicate regularly and routinely regarding students’ performance, as part of

the school’s duty of accountability. This cannot be done solely on paper, since parents need opportunities

to state views and ask questions. Hence there is a cycle of parent-teacher conferences as well as written

reports.

Parents or guardians are invited into school twice a year - once in the first semester and once in the second

semester to discuss with teachers results, student progress, conduct and strategies for improvement

where necessary.

Roles of staff in organization of PSTCs:

Head of School:

1. Expectations of conference content clearly outlined for staff

2. Memos to PS staff with booking procedures and booking sheets outlined

PYP Coordinator:

1. Letters to parents communicating dates of PSTCs and booking procedures

2. Contact staff members to identify students whose parents will get letters encouraging them

to attend due to academic progress

3. Organize Parent Teacher Conferences

Teachers:

1. 1. Book 15 minute appointments with each student they teach

2. Have mark book and learning available for parents to see at the conference

Page 12: PYP ASSESSMENT POLICY

9

3. Follow-up with phone calls to parents who are not able to book an appointment on the given

days

Prefects:

1. 1. Organize students to help with refreshment tables and to act as parent guides

2. Supervise students on day of PSTCs

ANALYZING ASSESSMENT DATA TO INFORM LEARNING AND TEACHING The school analyses assessment data to inform teaching and learning in a myriad of ways – in the

classroom, at the department level and at a school wide level. Datus International school collects and

analyses information on how well students are achieving in order that the effectiveness of the primary

school teaching and learning can be evaluated.

Internal reviews such as the Departments Self Evaluations, Learning book reviews, Learning Style

outcomes, Gifted and Talented analysis and At Risk Analysis are conducted at regular intervals and will aid

in:

Providing an analysis of current student learning outcomes;

Comparison of learning outcomes with international standards (PYP);

Setting action plans with clear and measurable targets;

Taking action – implementing the revised plans and programmes, reviewing success and then

beginning the cycle again.

INTERNATIONAL BENCHMARKS Datus International School uses information on international benchmarks as part of its data analysis. Data

on performance benchmarks is used to assess annual performance on the part of Datus International

School students and set performance targets for the school. The data also enables the school to

identify performance trends. This data is used to inform the planning and delivery of courses at Datus

International School.

STUDENT VOICE IN THEIR LEARNING Students in the IB programmes are expected to reflect on their learning and to take part in the reflection

and planning process throughout and at the end of each unit studied. All PYP students check their progress

through self assessment and target setting against ATL’s, learning outcomes and Learner Profiles. Students

use Summative Assessment Matrix provided and through school wide scheduled target setting and

reflectiontime periods or pupil response through marking.

PYP EXHIBITION Culminating activities which include Year 6 Exhibition will be completed by all students to meet the

requirements for the IB PYP. At Datus International School students in Year 6 demonstrate their

understanding of the program through engagement in the Exhibition. The Exhibition is shared with the

DATUS community and engages teaching and non-teaching staff from across the school.

Page 13: PYP ASSESSMENT POLICY

10

APPENDUM

Datus International School General Grade Descriptors Background

Datus International School’s 1-7 Grading Descriptors were adapted from official IB Grade Descriptors.

These descriptors support the PYP-mandated use of criterion-referenced assessment, and also assist in

maintaining consistency throughout the Primary School.

Having a shared understanding of the meaning of the 1-7 scale is a vital part of standardising

assessment between and across grade levels, and therefore avoiding situations where students achieve

at similar levels yet receive different marks.

Datus International School General Grade Descriptors

Grade Managebac: PYP Achievement

PYP Effort These effort grade descriptors describe all subjects. The grade indicated reflects the levels in terms of effort and serve as a guide for students, parents and teachers. Self-management: punctual, arrives to class on time, personally organized, brings

necessary materials to class, meets deadlines, focused, completes work requirements (homework, assignments, tests etc)

Research and Thinking: active and independent learner, participates in class discussions, asks questions, committed to learning, enthusiastic

Social and Communication: collaboration, working alone or with others, practical work, projects etc

1 Need Support to reach

Expectations (NS)

Minimal participation and personal organization

2 Very limited participation in class activities and meeting ongoing work requirements. The student has difficulty in being punctual, managing personal organization and being actively involved in class activities. The student is unable to demonstrate these skills fully, even with support.

3 Approaching Expectations

(AE)

Limited participation in classroom activities and meeting work requirements, or clear difficulties in some areas. The student demonstrates a limited capacity for punctuality, personal organization and active involvement in classes and ongoing work. The student is only able to demonstrate these skills with support.

4 Meeting Expectations

(ME)

Generally participates constructively in classroom activities, meets ongoing work requirements and works effectively in normal situations. The student generally demonstrates co-operation, punctuality, personal organisation and active involvement in classes.

5 Consistent and constructive participation in classroom activities, meets ongoing work requirements and works effectively in a variety of situations. The student frequently demonstrates punctuality, personal organisation and active involvement in classes. The student is co-operative, occasionally demonstrates initiative and often works to the best of her/his ability.

6 Exceeding Expectations

(EE)

Consistent and constructive participation in classroom activities, meets ongoing work requirements and works effectively in a wide variety of situations. Consistently demonstrates punctuality, personal organisation and active involvement in classes. The student is cooperative, generally demonstrates initiative and usually works to the best of their ability.

7 Consistent and constructive participation in classroom activities, meets all ongoing work requirements and works conscientiously in a wide variety of situations. Always demonstrates punctuality, personal organisation and active involvement in classes. The student consistently demonstrates co-operation and initiative and always works to the best of their ability.

Page 14: PYP ASSESSMENT POLICY

11

IMPORTANT NOTES Holistic Judgments:

These descriptors are meant to describe the student’s achievement over a large range of content and

skills. The teacher must select the grade which BEST describes the student’s overall achievement, even

though achievement on individual benchmarks might be higher or lower. It is neither the highest nor the

lowest achievement which determines the grade- it is the big picture view. (For this reason, the

Mathematics example is actually not an accurate representation, but it is the best we can provide without

making a multi-page example.)

Achieving Above Grade Level:

A student who has achieved their current years’ standards and benchmarks should receive a mark

between 4 and 7, depending on how much they can do with the content and skills. It is not required that

a student demonstrate ability above their current grade level in order to receive the highest mark for that

grade level. While it is likely that a student receiving a 6 or a 7 is working above year level in some areas,

it is not required.

Difference between “In Line” and “Exceeding”:

For the higher bands, it’s not a question of whether the student knows the content and skills, but how

much the student can do with the content and skills. If the student just knows the basic requirement and

can use them in basic situations, that’s a satisfactory level of achievement, and that’s a 4. If the student

can use higher-order thinking skills to do more with the knowledge and skills, that’s a higher level of

achievement, and a higher mark.

Giving a 7 in Term 1:

It is perfectly acceptable to record a 7 in any term, 1, 2 or 3. A mark of 7 indicates very high achievement

with whatever has been taught up to that point although requires rigorous evidence that a student is

excelling beyond expected Year level.

Frequency/Distribution:

There is no required pattern into which grades must fall. If every student succeeds in the learning task,

than every student should receive a high mark. However, in practice, in a specific group there are usually

VERY FEW marks of 1, 2 or 7. Most often, students demonstrate achievement in the 3-5 range, with 6s

more rare than 3-5, but less rare than 7s.

Reading Grades:

Like all other marks, the Reading grade should be based on all available evidence of the child’s

achievement.