q2 qrm 2005_ok
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
LTX PSK QRM
CS.Tu
Q1 & Q2 2005
Semiconductors, ATO/PSK, 2005 Q2, LTX V.S PSK QRM 2
Fusion and Synchro in PSK
• Fusion HF x41 Since 2005 , TPG x6 & CPGx1.
• Synchro AC TPG & CPG are all lower loading in Q1~Q2 2005.
• This QRM will focus on Fusion’s status.
Semiconductors, ATO/PSK, 2005 Q2, LTX V.S PSK QRM 3
Fusion operational uptime by monthly
LTX Fusion HF Target
Monthly % Jan'04Feb'04Mar'04Apr'04May'04Jun'04 Jul'04Aug'04Sep'04Oct'04Nov'04Dec'04Jen'05 Feb'05 Mar'05 Apr'05 May'05 Jun'05
Fusion 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 98% 96% 81% 97% 97% 97% 96% 96% 96%
Target 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Jan'04
Feb'0
4
Mar'04
Apr'04
May'04
Jun'04
Jul'04
Aug'04
Sep'0
4
Oct'04
Nov'04
Dec'04
Jen'05
Feb'0
5
Mar'05
Apr'05
May'05
Jun'05
Factory Power
Shutdown for three
days.
Semiconductors, ATO/PSK, 2005 Q2, LTX V.S PSK QRM 4
Fusion operational uptime by quarterly%
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
FusionTarget
Fusion 96.7 96.6 96.9 92.5 97.1 96.2Target 98 98 98 98 98 98
Q1'04 Q2'04 Q3'04 Q4'04 Q1'05 Q2'05
100
Factory Power
Shutdown for three
days.
Semiconductors, ATO/PSK, 2005 Q2, LTX V.S PSK QRM 5
Fusion E-MTBF per monthly
Fusion HF Target
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Jan'04
Feb'0
4
Mar'04
Apr'04
May'04
Jun'04
Jun'05
Aug'04
Sep'0
4
Oct'04
Nov'04
Dec'04
Jan'05
Feb'0
5
Mar'05
Apr'05
May'05
Jun'05
E-MTBF Jan'04Feb'04Mar'04Apr'04May'04Jun'04 Jun'05Aug'04Sep'04Oct'04Nov'04Dec'04Jan'05Feb'05Mar'05Apr'05May'05Jun'05
Fusion 588 644 614 624 789 486 553 578 575 733 667 309 199 234 239 201 267 361
Target 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 550
Hrs
The Calculation of downtimes is
based on ACS ‘s records.
Semiconductors, ATO/PSK, 2005 Q2, LTX V.S PSK QRM 6
Fusion E-MTBF by quarterly
100
200
300
400
500
600
Hrs
Fusion HFTarget
0
Fusion HF 631 611 568 539 224 258Target 550 550 550 550 550 550
Q1'04 Q2'04 Q3'04 Q4'04 Q1'05 Q2'05
The Calculation of downtime is
based on ACS ‘s records.
Semiconductors, ATO/PSK, 2005 Q2, LTX V.S PSK QRM 7
Fusion MTBBF monthly
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Jan'04
Feb'0
4
Mar'04
Apr'04
May'04
Jun'04
Jul'04
Aug'04
Sep'0
4
Oct'04
Nov'04
Dec'04
Jan'05
Feb'0
5
Mar'05
Apr'05
May'05
Jun'05
Fusion HF Target
Hrs
MTBBF Jan'04Feb'04Mar'04Apr'04May'04Jun'04 Jul'04Aug'04Sep'04Oct'04Nov'04Dec'04Jan'05Feb'05Mar'05Apr'05May'05Jun'05
Fusion 692 772 706 803 748 636 585 588 569 904 777 475 489 446 701 468 525 808
Target 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000
Power cut in Dec’04 Caused more 20 ea faults. The MTBBF must be lower in
Dec’04 and Jan’05.
PCF521X ‘s production
caused higher failure rates in
SMS. WK526 & WK529 met power trip.
Semiconductors, ATO/PSK, 2005 Q2, LTX V.S PSK QRM 8
Fusion MTBBF quarterly
Fusion HF
Target
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Fusion HF 684 722 581 688 533 563
Target 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000
Q1'04 Q2'04 Q3'04 Q4'04 Q1'05 Q2'05
Hrs
Semiconductors, ATO/PSK, 2005 Q2, LTX V.S PSK QRM 9
Fusion MTTR monthly
Fusion HF Target
MTTR Jan'04 Feb'04Mar'04Apr'04May'04Jun'04 Jul'04 Aug'04Sep'04Oct'04Nov'04Dec'04Jan'05Feb'05Mar'05Apr'05May'05Jun'05
Fusion 6.3 1.0 3.3 0.6 3.5 7.0 4.4 4.4 8.6 4.6 9.7 26.8 2.9 2.7 3.1 4.5 5.5 9.0
Target 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
Jan'04
Feb'0
4
Mar'04
Apr'04
May'04
Jun'04
Jul'04
Aug'04
Sep'0
4
Oct'04
Nov'04
Dec'04
Jan'05
Feb'0
5
Mar'05
Apr'05
May'05
Jun'05
Power cut in Dec’04! It
Caused more 20 ea
faults.And took much time in double check.
Semiconductors, ATO/PSK, 2005 Q2, LTX V.S PSK QRM 10
Fusion MTTR quarterly
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
FusonHF
Target
FusonHF 2.5 4.3 5.4 13.7 2.9 5.6
Target 4 4 4 4 4 4
Q1'04 Q2'04 Q3'04 Q4'04 Q1'05 Q2'05
Semiconductors, ATO/PSK, 2005 Q2, LTX V.S PSK QRM 11
Average Delivery Time in hours2005 PSK Repair & Exchange Turnaround Time Chart
306.38
450.89 436.15
309.00
228.52 220.57
12.77
18.7918.17
12.88
9.52 9.19
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Hrs
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Days
Hrs 306.38 450.89 436.15 309.00 228.52 220.57 Days 12.77 18.79 18.17 12.88 9.52 9.19
Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05 Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05
Semiconductors, ATO/PSK, 2005 Q2, LTX V.S PSK QRM 12
LTX Pre-ship Hit Rate
2005 Pre-ship Hit Rate Chart
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
67%
100%100% 100% 100%
50%
0% 0% 0%0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05 Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05 Jul-05
%FusionSynchro
Semiconductors, ATO/PSK, 2005 Q2, LTX V.S PSK QRM 13
Top 5 Failures from Q1~Q2 2005
PECHF SMS_DIG FARMNT SMS HR PSCM
103
56
44
20 1913.2%
45.2%
5.6%
32.3%
46.3%
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
PECHF SMS_DIG FARMNT SMS_HR PSCM0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%Part number05-01 05-0205-0305-0405-0505-0605-07 Total Faults Rates
PECHF 19 21 6 23 19 9 6 103 13.2%
SMS_DIG 7 8 11 9 7 7 7 56 45.2%
FARMNT 13 11 4 2 3 2 9 44 5.6%
SMS_HR 3 2 6 6 2 1 20 32.3%
PSCM 3 2 1 5 7 1 19 44.3%
865-1545-01 8 2 3 2 2 2 19 9.3%
865-7368-04 1 4 1 2 2 1 11 14.1%
876-5083-02 2 2 1 3 2 10865-2743-02 1 1 2 2 3 9
876-5100-01 1 2 1 1 2 2 9
876-5105-00 4 1 1 3 9
865-2742-02 3 1 1 1 1 7876-5101-01 3 1 1 2 7
Others 12 3 7 12 13 5 5 57Grand Total 80 58 44 63 59 42 34 380
• PECHF has 103 ea of fault board in Q1and Q2.• PSCM met problem on wrong EEPROM rewritten by LTX repair house in Q1’05.• Higher DOA & DUW rates.• Fusion’s digital power supply are all very sensitive to power cut.• SMS_DIG and SMS_HR are with higher faults rates than 2004. And it is the top one fault.• Seriously reworked boards are present in PSK.
Semiconductors, ATO/PSK, 2005 Q2, LTX V.S PSK QRM 15
DOA & DUW Parts Faults Status in 2005
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
Total 25 44 11 253Rates % 7.5% 13.2% 3.3% 76.0%
DOA DUW PRE R&R
2005 Jan~Jun
9
7
61
33
48
55
32
6
13
40
11
45
7
31
4
29
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
05-01 05-02 05-03 05-04 05-05 05-06 05-07 PRE DOA DUW R&R
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
20.0%
10.3%
22.7%
30.2%
22.0%21.4%
14.7%
(DOA+DUW Rates/ I.B)
Service Code 05-01 05-02 05-03 05-04 05-05 05-06 05-07
R&R 61 48 32 40 45 31 29
DUW 7 3 5 13 11 7 4
DOA 9 3 5 6 2 2 1
PRE 2 2 4 1 2DOA+DUW % 20.0%10.3%22.7%30.2%22.0%21.4%14.7%
• The Qty’s of DOA +DUW : Q1’05+Q2’05 69 ea >> Qty’s in 2004.• Average Faults Rates of DOA + DUW : 2005 average 20.7% >> 10% in 2004.
(ea)
Semiconductors, ATO/PSK, 2005 Q2, LTX V.S PSK QRM 16
• Fusion’s digital power supply are all very sensitive to power cut.
Power supply are very sensitive to power cut
Part number 05-01 05-02 05-03 05-04 05-05 05-06 05-07 Grand Total
876-5083-02 2 2 1 3 2 10876-5100-01 1 2 1 1 2 2 9876-5105-00 4 1 1 3 9876-5101-01 3 1 1 2 7Grand Total 10 3 3 1 3 9 6 35
Power cut since 25th ~27th Dec
2004.
Power cut at WK526
Power cut at WK529
Semiconductors, ATO/PSK, 2005 Q2, LTX V.S PSK QRM 17
SMS DIG (865-2728-0X) Fault Rates
• SMS digital & SMS Hr become the top fault parts in PSK.
How many boards will we get this
years ?
20050
10
20
30
40
50
60
2002 2003 2004 Q4'04 Q1'05 Q2'05
From 2002 ~Q2
?
Semiconductors, ATO/PSK, 2005 Q2, LTX V.S PSK QRM 18
• Re-worked parts are with higher failure rates and more unstable.
Seriously reworked boards are present in PSK.
Semiconductors, ATO/PSK, 2005 Q2, LTX V.S PSK QRM 19
Reworked boards are damaged easily