qcat
DESCRIPTION
Australian Court Hierarchy. QCAT. Doctrine of Precedent. The decision of a court on a matter of law is binding on all courts lower in the judicial hierarchy. Encyclopaedic Australian Legal Dictionary. This fundamental principle binds the Australian court hierarchy together. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
High Court of Australia
Court of Appeal Supreme
Court
District Court
Magistrates Court
Federal Court
Federal Circuit Court
Family Court
QCAT
Australian Court Hierarchy
The decision of a court on a matter of law is binding on all courts lower in the judicial hierarchy.
Encyclopaedic Australian Legal Dictionary
Doctrine of Precedent
This fundamental principle binds the Australian court hierarchy together.
Australian Constitution
Legislature Executive Judiciary
CourtsSenate
House of Representativ
es
Government Departments
Separation of Powers
Legislature Executive Judiciary
Legislature
The House of Representatives at Parliament House, Canberra
The Senate and House of Representatives have the power to make laws
Executive
The Hon Tony Abbott MP, Prime Minister. The Governor-General is constitutionally the head of the Executive Government, but in practice the Governor-General acts on the advice of the Prime
Minister.
Government Departments have the power to administer and carry out laws
Judiciary
A criminal courtroom in the Queen Elizabeth II Courts of Law
The courts have the power to enforce laws, independent of the other arms of government
The Rule of Law is the principle that no one is above the law and everyone is equal before the law regardless of social, economic, or political status.
Albert Dicey, 1885
The Rule of Law
Each arm of government is bound by this fundamental principle.
If a person physically assaults another person by striking them with a fist – does the matter fall under criminal law or civil law?
Civil and Criminal Law
It can fall under both:• Criminal: Assault (under ss 245
and 246 of the Criminal Code)• Civil: Battery (under tort law)
So what’s the difference?
Criminal LawCriminal cases are brought by the State through the Department of Public Prosecutions (DPP) against a defendant.
A jury of twelve members are used to determine a defendant’s guilt.
The Crown Prosecutor must prove the defendant’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
A defendant can appeal against a verdict and sentence. The DPP can only appeal against a sentence.
Civil Law
Civil cases involve disputes between individuals or private parties.
A jury of four members are used in very rare cases, for e.g. defamation.
The elements of a claim are proved on the balance of probabilities.
Either party can appeal against a decision.
Criminal Trial Process
The Court of Appeal
An offence is committed
Police investigation Charge and arrest
Bail is considered
Committal hearing inMagistrates Court
Guilty plea
Sentencing
Not guilty / No pleaTrial
Not guilty verdict
Charges dismissed
Guilty verdict
Sentencing
Possible appeal to Court of Appeal.
Possible appeal to High Court.
Hearing in Supreme or
District Courts
Matter committed for trial
Not enough evidence for trial.
Case Dismissed.
Criminal Trial Process
Judge
Barrister
Solicitor
A Day in the Life of a …
A Day in the Life of a Judge
A judge presides over a trial. In criminal trials, they determine questions of law, whereas a jury determine questions of fact.
A judge guides the jury to follow the law when determining the guilt of the defendant. After the jury deliver their verdict, the judge hands down the sentence.
Judges uphold the Rule of Law by ensuring that the trial follows the law and due process without fear, favour or affection. Hence, the judge cannot show bias towards either party.
A Day in the Life of a Barrister
Barristers are officers of the court, which means they have an obligation to never mislead the court, even if it could advantage their client.
They specialise in advocacy as
They have expert knowledge of the law, especially in relation to evidence and court procedure.
They wear black robes, horsehair wigs and jabots to court.
They are rarely hired directly by clients, but usually by solicitors on behalf of a client.
Solicitors sometimes seek the expert opinion of barristers when confronted with an unusual point of law.
Barristers work case-by-case, whereas solicitors work hours.
A Day in the Life of a Solicitor
Solicitors are also officers of the court.
They may represent their client on minor criminal or civil matters in court.
They conduct much preparatory work, for e.g. drafting legal documents, interacting directly with clients, the daily administration of case.
The provide support to barristers both before and during court, for e.g. managing large volumes of documents in court, preparing material before a trial.
The Research Process
Start with Secondary Sources: Textbooks
Legal Encyclopaedias Journal Articles Law Reform Webpages
Identify Primary Sources:- Case Law
- Legislation
For journal articles and cases:
LexisNexisvia the State Library of Queensland
Secondary Sources
Secondary Sources
The State Library of Queensland provides free electronic access to LexisNexis
www.slq.qld.gov.au
www.austlii.edu.au
Search Tip:Use the Noteup function.
Secondary Sources
For journals, legislation and cases:
www.sclqld.org.au
Primary Sources (Case Law)
For Queensland cases:
Primary Sources (Case Law)
www.hcourt.gov.au
For High Court cases:
www.legislation.qld.gov.au
www.comlaw.gov.au
Primary Sources (Legislation)
Interesting Cases
Negligence – Duty of Care
Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562
• Ms Donoghue was drinking a bottle of ginger beer and unknowingly consumed a decomposing snail – as a consequence she suffered shock and severe gastroenteritis
• The House of Lords held, for the first time, that Stevenson owed Donoghue a duty of care
Jervis v R [1993] 1 Qd R 643
• Tracey Wiggington claimed to be a Vampire and claimed she needed to drink human blood to survive.
• Jervis and two other women devised a plan with Wiggington to hunt a victim for her to feed upon.
The Vampire Murder
Interesting Cases
R v Sebo [2007] QCA 426
• A 28 year old defendant killed his 16 year old girlfriend in a jealous rage after she taunted him about her relationships with other men, telling him that he was easy to cheat on.
• The defendant reached into the backseat of his car, grabbed a steering wheel lock, and struck his girlfriend in the head with great force multiple times.
Provocation
Interesting Cases
Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Ltd (1935) 54 CLR 49
The Itchy Underwear Case• Plaintiff purchased woollen underwear• Developed a rash from a ‘chemical substance’ in
the underwear
Interesting CasesMerchantable Quality
R v Hallett [1969] SASR 141• The accused knocked the victim unconscious on a
beach.• Later, the tide came in and the victim drowned.
Is the defendant responsible for the victim’s death?
Interesting CasesCausation
Interesting CasesDuty of Care
Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40
Facts:• A deep channel was dredged in a shallow lake by a local
authority.• Four signs were erected in the bed of the lake saying
“DEEP WATER”• A water-skier fell and struck his head on the bed of the
lake.• Shirt sued the local council for breaching their duty of
care.
Vairy v Wyong Shire Council (2005) 223 CLR 422
Facts:• A man dived into shallow water and hit his head on the
sea bed.• The council had not erected signs prohibiting diving.• Vairy sued the council for breaching its duty of care.