qqy yuality of u.s. soybean meal compared to the quality
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: QQy yuality of U.S. Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d56fcef10da6237507d65/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Quality of U.S. Soybean Meal Q y yCompared to the Quality of
Soybean Meal from Other OriginsSoybean Meal from Other Origins
M it i Th k & Ch l R H b hMaitri Thakur & Charles R. Hurburgh
i i h kPresenter: Maitri Thakur
Department of Agricultural & Biosystems EngineeringDepartment of Agricultural & Biosystems EngineeringIowa State University, Ames, IA
![Page 2: QQy yuality of U.S. Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d56fcef10da6237507d65/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Introduction
• Soybeans - important source of protein and iloil
• US - dominant producer producer
• Year 2004:Area planted: 75 2
World Protein Meal Consumption 2004
Area planted: 75.2 million acres Production: 3.14 billion bushelsCrop value
di $17 7 exceeding $17.7 billion
World Protein Meal Production 2004
Source: Soy Stats 2005
![Page 3: QQy yuality of U.S. Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d56fcef10da6237507d65/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Project Motivation
• South America • Soybean production
increasing in Brazil and Argentina- 34% and Argentina- 34% in 1999 to 42% in 2004
• NOPA soybean meal trading specifications
• True Processed Value of soybeans ≈ End-
Soybean Production in Brazil & Argentina
useSource: Soy Stats 2005
![Page 4: QQy yuality of U.S. Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d56fcef10da6237507d65/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Objectives
• To survey the quality of 2004 crop• To survey the quality of 2004 cropsoybeans and soybean meal from non-U.S. vs. U.S. originsU.S. vs. U.S. origins
• To compare the results from this survey• To compare the results from this surveywith the data from previous studies
![Page 5: QQy yuality of U.S. Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d56fcef10da6237507d65/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Soybean Processing Model
Source: SPROC 3
![Page 6: QQy yuality of U.S. Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d56fcef10da6237507d65/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Methods• Samplesp
115 soybean and 153 SBM samples 500-1000g each gCollected by ASA representatives in 8 countriesShipped to GQL, Iowa State University
Soybeans Soybean Meal
![Page 7: QQy yuality of U.S. Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d56fcef10da6237507d65/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Analysis
• All samples divided into 4 fractions: Electric Grain DividerDivider
![Page 8: QQy yuality of U.S. Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d56fcef10da6237507d65/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Analysis- Soybeans
1: Eurofins Scientific, Des Moines, Iowa Moisture: AOCS Ac 2-41Oil: AOCS Ba 3-38Protein: AOCS Ba 4e-93FFA: AOCS Ac 5-41
2: University of Missouri-Columbia Exp Station Labs
Amino Acids - AOAC 982.30 (a,b,c)
3 & 4: Retained for other work
![Page 9: QQy yuality of U.S. Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d56fcef10da6237507d65/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Analysis- Soybean Meal
1: Eurofins Scientific, Des Moines, IowaMoisture: AOCS Ba 2a-38Moisture: AOCS Ba 2a-38Protein: AOCS Ba 4e-93Oil: AOCS Ba 3 38Oil: AOCS Ba 3-38Fiber: AOCS Ba 6-84A h AOCS B 5 49Ash: AOCS Ba 5a-49NSI: AOCS Ba 11-65N P t i Nit AOAC 941 04Non Protein Nitrogen: AOAC 941.04Mold Count: AACC 42-50KOH Protein Solubility: AOAC 971.09
![Page 10: QQy yuality of U.S. Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d56fcef10da6237507d65/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Analysis- Soybean Meal
2: University of Missouri-Columbia Exp. Station LabsStation Labs
Amino Acids: AOAC 982.30E (a,b,c)
3: Grain Quality Lab, Iowa State UniversityParticle Size Analysis: ASAE S319.2a a y 3 9
4: Retained for other worketa ed o ot e o
![Page 11: QQy yuality of U.S. Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d56fcef10da6237507d65/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Comparison with previous studies
• SoybeansGrieshop & Fahey: 2001–Grieshop & Fahey: 2001
–U.S. annual soybean quality surveys 2003 2003 2004
• Soybean mealy1995-1999 by Moizzudin1999 by John Baize and Associates1999 by John Baize and Associates
![Page 12: QQy yuality of U.S. Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d56fcef10da6237507d65/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Amino Acids
• 5 key AA: Lysine, Threonine, Methionine Cysteine TryptophanMethionine, Cysteine, Tryptophan
% by weight% f i% of protein
• Measure of Protein Quality:Digestible AA = AA * KOH Solubility
![Page 13: QQy yuality of U.S. Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d56fcef10da6237507d65/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Statistical Analysis by Origin
• Soybeans: 13% moisture basisSoybean meal: 12% moisture basis• Soybean meal: 12% moisture basis
• Asia: UAE, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines & Korea (n = 15)
• Others: Guatemala, El Salvador, Panama, Costa Rica, Trinidad, Barbados & Paraguay (n = 7)
• Least Significant Difference (LSD, P = 0.05) in JMP 5.1 0.05) in JMP 5.1
![Page 14: QQy yuality of U.S. Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d56fcef10da6237507d65/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Results: Soybean Quality Protein (%)
36.0
37.0Oil (%)
19.2
19.6
34.0
35.0
18.4
18.8
33.0USA Brazil Argentina Other
18.0USA Brazil Argentina Other
Protein Quality: 5 Key AA (% of P) Oil Quality: FFA (%)Protein Quality: 5 Key AA (% of P)
14.6
14.8
15.0Oil Quality: FFA (%)
1.2
1.4
1.6
14.0
14.2
14.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
USA Brazil Argentina Other
13% Moisture Basis
USA Brazil Argentina Other
![Page 15: QQy yuality of U.S. Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d56fcef10da6237507d65/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Results: Soybean Meal QualityProtein (%) Protein Quality: 5 AA (% of Protein)Protein (%)
48.0
49.0Protein Quality: 5 AA (% of Protein)
14.6
15.0
46.0
47.0
13.8
14.2
45.0USA Argentina Brazil India China
13.4USA Argentina Brazil India China
KOH S l bilit (%) NSI %KOH Solubility (%)
88.0
90.0NSI %
15 0
16.0
17.0
84.0
86.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
82.0USA Argentina Brazil India China
12.0USA Argentina Brazil India China
12% Moisture Basis
![Page 16: QQy yuality of U.S. Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d56fcef10da6237507d65/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Results- Soybean Meal QualityP i l SiParticle Size
Origin Mean particle % in desired range g psize (microns)
g(250-1700 microns)
USA 1070 84.1Argentina 1074 79.8Brazil 1088 83.7Brazil 1088 83.7India 1262 65.5China 1131 88 1China 1131 88.1Asia 1138 91.1Others 1125 82.3
![Page 17: QQy yuality of U.S. Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d56fcef10da6237507d65/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Soybean Meal Samples
USA
India
![Page 18: QQy yuality of U.S. Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d56fcef10da6237507d65/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Soybeans: Comparison with previous studies
ResultsSoybeans: Comparison with previous studies
Protein (%)40.0
37.0
38.0
39.0
34.0
35.0
36.0 Oil (%)
19.0
19.5
33.0Grieshop &Fahey 2001
Annual survey2003
Annual survey2004
This Study2004
17.5
18.0
18.5
16.5
17.0
Grieshop & Annual survey Annual survey This Study
13% Moisture Basis
Fahey 2001 2003 2004 2004
![Page 19: QQy yuality of U.S. Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d56fcef10da6237507d65/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Soybean Meal: Comparison with previous studies
Protein (%) 5 key AA (% of P)Protein (%)
47.0
48.0
49.05 key AA (% of P)
14.4
14.6
0
45.0
46.0
13 8
14.0
14.2
O S %
44.01995-
99Baize1999
2004 1995-99
Baize1999
2004 1995-99
Baize1999
2004 1995-99
Baize1999
2004
USA Argentina Brazil India
13.81995-
99Baize1999
2004 1995-99
Baize1999
2004 1995-99
Baize1999
2004 1995-99
Baize1999
2004
USA Argentina Brazil India
KOH Sol %
83
85
87
77
79
81
83
752004 1995-
99Baize1999
2004 1995-99
Baize1999
2004 1995-99
Baize1999
2004 1995-99
Baize1999
USA Argentina Brazil India
![Page 20: QQy yuality of U.S. Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d56fcef10da6237507d65/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Conclusions• U.S. soybeansU.S. soybeans
Lower protein than Brazil, higher thanArgentina
Crude protein disadvantage of U.S. beanswas offset by higher concentrations of AAAdvantageous if market recognizes aminoacids rather than protein as indicator offeeding valueg
• U.S. SBM more consistent
Higher digestibility
Lower fiber
Better quality of protein
![Page 21: QQy yuality of U.S. Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d56fcef10da6237507d65/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Conclusions• U S soybean meal• U.S. soybean meal
Higher digestibility & key AA
U.S. producers would benefit if diets wereU.S. producers would benefit if diets wereformulated on actual AA of meal being fed
Mean particle size: within desired rangeMean particle size: within desired range
• Previous studiesGeneral quality trend similar to previous studiesq y p
U.S. SBM held an advantage in digestibility &concentrations of key amino acids in all threestudiesU.S. SBM - ↑↑ Protein Solubility & Brazilian SBM - ↑↑ProteinProtein
![Page 22: QQy yuality of U.S. Soybean Meal Compared to the Quality](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d56fcef10da6237507d65/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)