qsm507 assignment 1

8/10/2019 Qsm507 Assignment 1

1/6


2/6

PROGRAMME OF QUANTITY SURVEYING

FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND SURVEYING

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

1.3 Format

1. Format your work to a single column with1.5 line spacing.

2. Use font Arial, size 14, bold style for title, and Arial size 11 for main text.

3. Your work must be presentablyjustifyat both margins, at all columns.

4. Create numberingof each title and subtitle.

5. Use footnotein your work as references.

6. Createpage numberat the bottom right of every page.

7. Put your full nameas header of every page.

8. References should be in Harvard format.

9. Stapleyour assignment at top left of your assignment.


3/6




3

NUI/2011/PERAK

1.4 Assessment Rubrics

Your work shall be graded as follows :

NO ITEMS MARKS &ASSESSMENTDESCRIPTION

RUBRIC DESCRIPTION

1 INDIVIDUALASSIGNMENT

DisputeResolutionMethods (DRM)

Assignment

marks will beconverted torubrics scale of5

Marks awarded based on: -WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT (50 marks)

Introduction (5 marks)

ContentExplanation on the Standard Form Clauses which relevant to the ADR (22 marks)

ContentComparison on the Standard Form Clauses which relevant to the ADR (12 marks)

Conclusion (5 marks) References (2 marks)

Ethics & Moral Professionalism EM1, EM2, & EM3 (2 marks)

Life-long learning & Information management LL1, LL2 & LL3 (2 marks)

a) Introduction 5 marksExemplary 5 : Insightful introduced and overview on the DRM that commonly

applied in Malaysia.Excellent 4 : Insightful introduced and overview the DRM.Good 3 : Clear introduced and overview the DRM.

Average 2 : Introduction is introduced and somewhat discussed.Poor 1 : Introduction is introduced and somewhat is irrelevant.

Very poor 0 : No introduction.


4/6




4

NUI/2011/PERAK

b) Content 22 marksExcellent 22 - 18 : Work is clearly introduced and discussed on the relevant clauses

in Malaysian Standard Forms on Dispute Resolution Methods.

Good 17 - 13 : Work is discussed on the certain clauses that applied on DRM.Average 12 - 8 : Clear introduced and somewhat discussed on the DRM clauses.Satisfy 7 - 3 : Work is introduced on the DRM clauses.Poor 2 - 1 : Work is not clearly introduced and irrelevant on the DRM clauses.Non compliance 0 : No work is done.

c) Content 12 marksExcellent 12 - 10 : Work is clearly compared and discussed on the relevant clauses

in Malaysian Standard Forms on Dispute Resolution Methods.Good 9 - 7 : Work is compared on the certain clauses that applied on DRM.

Average 6 - 4 : Clear introduced and somewhat compared on the DRM clauses.Satisfy 3 - 2 : Work is introduced on the DRM clauses.

Poor 1 : Work is not clearly introduced and irrelevant on the DRM clauses.Non compliance 0 : No work is done.

d) Conclusion - 5 marksExemplary 5 : Conclusion is presented outstandingly clear, and demonstrated

the ability to relate to the whole work.Excellent 4 : Conclusion is presented clearly, and demonstrated the ability to

relate to the introduction part of the work.Good 3 : Conclusion is presented clearly.

Average 2 : Conclusion is moderately presented.Poor 1 : Conclusion is irrelevant.Very poor 0 : No conclusion presented.


5/6




5

NUI/2011/PERAK

e) References (2 marks)Good 2 : References are presented with a good and acceptable format, and

cross referred to the whole work.

Poor 1 : References are presented with poor format, and not all are crossreferred.Very poor 0 : No references are presented.

f) Ethics & Moral Professionalism EM1, EM2, & EM3 (2 marks)Good 2 : Demonstrates the ability to understand economic effect,

environment, socio-culture and professional practice of a quantitysurveyor in legal environment. Demonstrates the ability to analyseand decide based on ethics using standard forms of contract.Demonstrates the ability to be ethical, and responsible towardssociety.

Poor 1 : Demonstrates some ability to understand economic effect,environment, socio-culture and professional practice of a quantitysurveyor in legal environment. Demonstrates some ability toanalyse and decide based on ethics using standard forms ofcontract. Demonstrates some ability to be ethical, and responsibletowards society.

Very poor 0 : Does not demonstrate the ability to understand economic effect,environment, socio-culture and professional practice of a quantitysurveyor in legal environment. Does not demonstrate the ability toanalyse and decide based on ethics using standard forms ofcontract. Does not demonstrate any ability to be ethical, andresponsible towards society.


6/6




6

NUI/2011/PERAK

g) Life-long learning & Information management LL1, LL2 & LL3 (2 marks)Good 2 : Demonstrates the ability to find and manage relevant information

from various resources; demonstrates the ability to learn

independently and accept new ideas in the findings; demonstratesthe ability to develop inquisitive nature for knowledge.Poor 1 : Demonstrates poor ability to find and manage relevant information

from various resources; demonstrates poor ability to learnindependently and accept new ideas in the findings; demonstratespoor ability to develop inquisitive nature for knowledge.

Very poor 0 : Does not demonstrate ability to find and manage relevantinformation from various resources; to learn independently; and todevelop inquisitive nature for knowledge.

The total marks (per 50 marks) shall be converted using the following rubric scales:41 - 50 = 5 marks (Excellent)

31 - 40 = 4 marks (Good)21 - 30 = 3 marks (Satisfactory)11 - 20 = 2 marks (Poor)1 - 10 = 1 marks (Unsatisfactory or does not show evidence of originality)0 = Non-submission

qsm507 assignment 1

Documents