quality for competitiveness college 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/quality for...pl 1....

37
Quality for Competitiveness Quality for Competitiveness From Signboards & Slogans to Workplaces & Practices From Signboards & Slogans to Workplaces & Practices Prof. Dinesh P. Chapagain Honorary Chairman Network for Quality, Productivity and Competitiveness-Nepal

Upload: others

Post on 20-Feb-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Quality for CompetitivenessQuality for CompetitivenessFrom Signboards & Slogans to Workplaces & PracticesFrom Signboards & Slogans to Workplaces & Practices

Prof. Dinesh P. ChapagainHonorary Chairman

Network for Quality, Productivity and Competitiveness-NepalN twor for Qua ty, ro uct ty an omp t t n ss N pa

Page 2: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Quality is a Journey, Q y y,not destination

Page 3: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Quality:Quality:A Dynamic & Continuously Changing Concept

Stakeholder

E

Integr

Enh

anC

o

Comple

Defini

Stakeholder Model of Quality

Cu

sTotal Q

nh

ance com

p

ration of bu

sncin

g Stakeho

rporate socia

Co

exity in Qu

ition, Strat stomer focu

sQ

uality M

anag

petitiveness &

siness in

to socolder R

elational respon

sibili

nfirm

ation to

Inspection

aLess defectiv

uality Conctegy and A ed,

gemen

t, &

market sh

ar

ciety,n

ship

ty

o specificationan

d control,

ve products

CraftsmanshipFunctional

ceptAim

s

re

n, Use

Stone age … Historic age Industrial age Postwar period New Millennium

Page 4: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Quality in Signboard (Nepal)

Page 5: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Quality in Signboard (Nepal)

Page 6: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Quality in Signboard (Nepal)

Page 7: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Quality in Signboard (Nepal)

Page 8: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Quality in Signboard (Nepal)

Page 9: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Quality in Signboard (Nepal)

Page 10: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Quality in Signboard (Nepal)

Page 11: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Quality in Signboard (Nepal)

Page 12: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Quality in Signboard (Nepal)

Page 13: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Quality in Signboard (Nepal)

Page 14: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Quality in Signboard (Nepal)

Page 15: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Quality in Signboard (Nepal)

Page 16: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Quality in Signboard (Nepal)

Page 17: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Quality in Signboard (Nepal)

Page 18: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Quality in Signboard (Nepal)

Page 19: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Quality in Signboard (Nepal)

Page 20: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Quality in Signboard (Nepal)

Page 21: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Quality in Signboard (Nepal)

Page 22: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Development of Quality Concepts

Craftsman-ship

Page 23: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

TQM: Two-Prong ApproachR l ti hi ith P d ti it & C titiRelationship with Productivity & Competitiveness

Reduction of Muda (Unwanted One) I t th ’ K i (W t d O )Improvement thro’ Kaizen (Wanted One)

MUDAManpower Loss: Repetitive work, Rework, Idle time, Doing unnecessary work, etc…

Financial Loss: Improper incentives, Inventory, Bad recovery, etc…Process Loss: Bottlenecks, Breakdowns, delay, etc…Process Loss: Bottlenecks, Breakdowns, delay, etc…Material Loss: Wastages, Scraps, Defective Products and Services, etc…

KAIZENDifferentiation: New product development, New market development, etc…

I i P P d T h l Innovation: Process, Product, Technology, etc…Breakthrough: Standardization, continual improvement, etc…

Page 24: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Competitive Advantages throughp g gTotal Quality Management

I i R iImproving Responsiveness to Customers

ImprovingImprovingResult in a Competitive

Advantage from ImprovingEfficiency

Improving Quality

Advantage from•Low costs

•High Revenue•Differentiation

Improving Innovations

Page 25: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Total Quality Management

A widely applied techniques for productivity improvement through managing organization improvement through managing organization mainly focusing on quality and cost

l d f d Applied in manufacturing, service industry, CSOs and also in public officesA practice and human oriented approachOriginated from Japan with advises from USOriginated from Japan with advises from US

Page 26: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT

Low Quality Betray CustomersSuicidal Strategy

Adequate Quality Satisfy CustomersShort-term Strategy

Competitive Quality Delight CustomersMid-term Strategy

Creative Quality Astonish Customers

gy

L t St tLong-term Strategy

Page 27: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Let us inspect for Quality!

FINISHED FILES ARE THE RESULTFINISHED FILES ARE THE RESULTOF MANY YEARS OF SCIENTIFIC

STUDY AFTER COMBINING WITH THESTUDY AFTER COMBINING WITH THEEXPERIENCE OF MANY YEARS OF HARD WORK

Page 28: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Conceptualizing p gManagement by Quality [TQM]

Promoting Organizationwith a Tightly Knit Group of Peopleg y p f p

having Shared Purpose and Philosophy

“QUALITY COMES FIRST,PRODUCTIVTY FOLLOWS PRODUCTIVTY FOLLOWS, & PROFIT IS ITS LOGICAL SEQUENCE”

Page 29: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

TQMShared Philosophy

Common GoalCommon Languagemm g gCommon Approachto solve the Quality and Productivityto solve the Quality and ProductivityProblems as per the vision and mission of the organization

Page 30: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

TQMCommon Goal

The Common Goal isto achieve the quality that the customers need the customers need most economicallyy

Page 31: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

TQMCommon Language (Mind Set)

Put quality first, other followsNext process is your customerp y mWork with facts onlyGive importance to processGive importance to processAlways prioritize your actionPrevent recurrences of problemsPrevent recurrences of problemsRespect humanity

Page 32: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

TQMCommon Approach

Quality Policy Demonstrate Top management Commitment & Involvement

C ti I tContinuous ImprovementCreating a Continuous Improvement Culture in Organization

Employees EmpowermentEmployees EmpowermentEnsuring Commitment & Involvement of all Employees

Customer FocusCustomer FocusManaging by a Customer driven System & Process

Page 33: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

TQMOrganizational Structure

1. Routine ManagementDay-to-day work as per functional requirements

2. Policy DeploymentTop-down deployment of policy through PDCA

3. Cross Functional ManagementHorizontal department-department collaborationp p

4. Small Group ActivitiesBottom-up suggestions for employees emporementp gg p y p

Page 34: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Malcolm Baldridge Quality Award for Malcolm Baldridge Quality Award for Performance Excellence (USA)

Page 35: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

European Foundation for Quality European Foundation for Quality Management

Page 36: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

FNCCI N ti l E ll A dFNCCI National Excellence AwardDrivers (20%) Systems (40%) Results (40%)

6.Customers Satisfaction & Relationship

2. Organization Form, Work Pl

1. Institutional Policy,

Drivers (20%) y ( ) ( )

5 Work

Relationship150 points (15%)

Plan Development & Deployment100 points (10%)

Planning and Commitment100 points (10%)

5. Work System & Standardization

100 points (10%)

7.Employees Satisfaction100 i t (10%)

3. Operational Information Dissemination 100 points (10%) 100 points (10%)

8 Performance

Dissemination& Utilization100 points (10%)

4 Employees 8.Performance Results150 points (15%)

4. Employees Development100 points (10%)

9. Future Plan100 points (10%)

Page 37: QUALITY for COMPETITIVENESS COLLEGE 2009dineshchapagain.com.np/admin/files/QUALITY for...Pl 1. Institutional Policy, Drivers ( y(5 Work 150 points (15%) an Development & Deployment

Any Question Please ???