quality improvement research

18
Quality Improvement Quality Improvement Research Research Carolyn Clancy, MD Carolyn Clancy, MD Director Director Agency for Healthcare Research and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Quality AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting Washington, DC – June 9, 2008 Washington, DC – June 9, 2008

Upload: dympna

Post on 28-Jan-2016

49 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Quality Improvement Research. Carolyn Clancy, MD Director Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting Washington, DC – June 9, 2008. Quality Improvement Research. Health System Transformation Challenges in QI Research What We Know So Far - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Quality Improvement Research

Quality Improvement ResearchQuality Improvement Research

Carolyn Clancy, MDCarolyn Clancy, MDDirectorDirector

Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality

AcademyHealth Annual Research MeetingAcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting

Washington, DC – June 9, 2008Washington, DC – June 9, 2008

Page 2: Quality Improvement Research

Quality Improvement ResearchQuality Improvement Research

Health System Health System TransformationTransformation

Challenges in QI Challenges in QI ResearchResearch

What We Know So FarWhat We Know So Far

What We Need to Move What We Need to Move ForwardForward

Page 3: Quality Improvement Research

AHRQ’s MissionAHRQ’s Mission

Improve the quality, safety, Improve the quality, safety, efficiency and effectiveness of efficiency and effectiveness of health care for all Americanshealth care for all Americans

Page 4: Quality Improvement Research

The Quality ChallengeThe Quality Challenge

What Is Quality?What Is Quality?

Health carecosts up 6.7%

per year

Health care quality up

2.3%

A Quality DisconnectA Quality Disconnect

The Right Care

For The Right Person

At The Right Time

Page 5: Quality Improvement Research

Health Care Quality and AccessHealth Care Quality and Access

Disparities in health care quality and access Disparities in health care quality and access are staying the same or increasingare staying the same or increasing

n=

nu

mb

er

of

core

me

asu

res

n=

nu

mb

er

of

core

me

asu

res

QualityQuality AccessAccess

2007 National Healthcare Disparities Report2007 National Healthcare Disparities Report

Page 6: Quality Improvement Research

The Complexity of QI ResearchThe Complexity of QI Research

Quality Improvement Research is complex Quality Improvement Research is complex

– Not an intervention in the way we understand Not an intervention in the way we understand clinical interventionsclinical interventions

– Can be multi-levelCan be multi-level

– Involves organizational and behavioral changes as Involves organizational and behavioral changes as part of implementationpart of implementation

– Context beyond the “it” is importantContext beyond the “it” is important Quality improvement is local (often single site), but Quality improvement is local (often single site), but

Federal, State, professional policies impactFederal, State, professional policies impact

– QI interventions may change over time and QI interventions may change over time and between sites between sites

– Potential for harm – to whom?Potential for harm – to whom?

Page 7: Quality Improvement Research

Source: JAMA, May 21, 2008: D. Dougherty and P.H. Conway, pp. 2319-2321. The “3T’s Roadmap to Transform U.S. Health Care: The ‘How’ of High-Quality Care.” Source: JAMA, May 21, 2008: D. Dougherty and P.H. Conway, pp. 2319-2321. The “3T’s Roadmap to Transform U.S. Health Care: The ‘How’ of High-Quality Care.”

T indicates translation. T1, T2, and T3 represent the 3 major translational steps in the proposed framework to T indicates translation. T1, T2, and T3 represent the 3 major translational steps in the proposed framework to transform the health care system. The activities in each translational step test the discoveries of prior research transform the health care system. The activities in each translational step test the discoveries of prior research activities in progressively broader settings to advance discoveries originating in basic science research through activities in progressively broader settings to advance discoveries originating in basic science research through clinical research and eventually to widespread implementation through transformation of health care delivery. Double-clinical research and eventually to widespread implementation through transformation of health care delivery. Double-headed arrows represent the essential need for feedback loops between and across the parts of the transformation headed arrows represent the essential need for feedback loops between and across the parts of the transformation framework.framework.

The 3 T’s Road Map to The 3 T’s Road Map to Transforming U.S. Health CareTransforming U.S. Health Care

Page 8: Quality Improvement Research

AHRQ Investments AHRQ Investments in QI Researchin QI Research

Since 1993, AHRQ (often in Since 1993, AHRQ (often in partnership with NIH, VA and partnership with NIH, VA and others) has generated research others) has generated research on topics including:on topics including:– CancerCancer

– DiabetesDiabetes

– AsthmaAsthma

– Health ITHealth IT

– Patient Safety Patient Safety

– Chronic Care ModelChronic Care Model

Using mechanisms ofUsing mechanisms of– GrantsGrants

– ContractsContracts

Page 9: Quality Improvement Research

Pronovost StudyPronovost Study

Settings: Volunteer MI hospital Settings: Volunteer MI hospital ICUs for adults (108 intention to ICUs for adults (108 intention to treat)treat)

Primary hypothesis: Rate of Primary hypothesis: Rate of CABSIs would be reduced during CABSIs would be reduced during first 3 months of intervention v first 3 months of intervention v baselinebaseline

Interventions (sequential and Interventions (sequential and parallel)parallel)

Outcome measure: Incidence-Outcome measure: Incidence-rate ratios for CABSIs rate ratios for CABSIs

Pronovost et al., NEJM 355(26); Dec. 28, 2006Pronovost et al., NEJM 355(26); Dec. 28, 2006

Analytic approach: Generalized linear latent and mixed Analytic approach: Generalized linear latent and mixed model with robust variance estimation and random effects model with robust variance estimation and random effects to account for clustering within hospitals and hospitals to account for clustering within hospitals and hospitals within regions, adjusted for hospital teaching status and within regions, adjusted for hospital teaching status and number of bedsnumber of beds

New Yorker, December 2007New Yorker, December 2007

Page 10: Quality Improvement Research

The Current Evidence BaseThe Current Evidence Base

Diabetes care: Diabetes care: No single strategy more effective than No single strategy more effective than anotheranother

Hypertension care: Hypertension care: All assessed strategies may be All assessed strategies may be beneficial under some circumstances, and in varying beneficial under some circumstances, and in varying combinations.combinations. There may be other useful strategies There may be other useful strategies that have not been studied that have not been studied

Reducing antibiotic prescribing: Reducing antibiotic prescribing: No individual QI No individual QI strategy (or combination of strategies) was more strategy (or combination of strategies) was more effectiveeffective

Reducing healthcare-associated infections: Reducing healthcare-associated infections: studies studies are of suboptimal quality. Some strategies may be are of suboptimal quality. Some strategies may be worth more study.worth more study.

Care Coordination:Care Coordination: Evidence about key intervention Evidence about key intervention components is lackingcomponents is lacking

http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcindex.htm#qualityhttp://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcindex.htm#quality

Page 11: Quality Improvement Research

What We Need to Move What We Need to Move Forward in QI ResearchForward in QI Research

DefinitionsDefinitions ConstructsConstructs Frameworks Frameworks Methods appropriate to answering QI Methods appropriate to answering QI

questionsquestions Methods for synthesizing resultsMethods for synthesizing results ResourcesResources

– ResearchersResearchers– Research Participants (policymakers, delivery Research Participants (policymakers, delivery

systems, providers)systems, providers)– FundingFunding

Page 12: Quality Improvement Research

Some Provisional DefinitionsSome Provisional Definitions

Quality improvement InterventionQuality improvement Intervention– An effort to enhance the extent to which health care is An effort to enhance the extent to which health care is

safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable, and patient-safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable, and patient-centered and results in the best possible patient centered and results in the best possible patient outcomes. It can occur at the policy, delivery system, outcomes. It can occur at the policy, delivery system, or clinical microsystems levels (or all of these) and will or clinical microsystems levels (or all of these) and will enhance the way care delivery is structured, organized, enhance the way care delivery is structured, organized, and operationalized to ensure that patients receive and operationalized to ensure that patients receive care based on the best available evidence.care based on the best available evidence.

Implementation researchImplementation research– The scientific study of how specific sets of activities The scientific study of how specific sets of activities

and strategies are used to integrate evidence-based or and strategies are used to integrate evidence-based or evidence-informed policy-, organizational-, or provider-evidence-informed policy-, organizational-, or provider-oriented interventions within specific settings toward a oriented interventions within specific settings toward a goal of improving the quality of health caregoal of improving the quality of health care

Page 13: Quality Improvement Research

An Interlocking Set of An Interlocking Set of ChallengesChallenges

QI QI InterventionsInterventions

Poorly Poorly DefinedDefined(Field)(Field)

Concept/ScopeConcept/Scope ofof

QI Poorly QI Poorly UnderstoodUnderstood

( IRBs, ( IRBs, Funders, Funders,

Mainstream Mainstream Health Health

Research Research Community,Community,

Healthcare Industry)Healthcare Industry)

Focus Focus OnOn

RCT/RCT/Patient levelPatient level

As As ““Gold Gold

Standard” Standard” For EvidenceFor Evidence

Lack ofLack ofInterest inInterest inRigorousRigorous

EvaluationEvaluation

Paucity ofPaucity ofBasicBasic

Science onScience onContextContext

Limited $Limited $

LimitedLimitedPublicationPublication

VenuesVenues

Limited Limited Academic Academic

InterestInterest

Page 14: Quality Improvement Research

What Evidence Can We Share?What Evidence Can We Share?

What can we as What can we as researchers and researchers and disseminators of disseminators of funded research funded research findings share about findings share about effective quality effective quality improvement improvement strategies? strategies?

Page 15: Quality Improvement Research

2121stst Century Health Care Century Health Care

Improving quality by promoting a culture of safety Improving quality by promoting a culture of safety through Value-Driven Health Care through Value-Driven Health Care

21st Century Health Care

Information-rich, patient-Information-rich, patient-focused enterprisesfocused enterprises

Information and Information and evidence transform evidence transform

interactions from interactions from reactive to reactive to

proactive (benefits proactive (benefits and harms)and harms)

Evidence is Evidence is continually refined continually refined as a by-product of as a by-product of

care deliverycare delivery

Actionable information available – to Actionable information available – to clinicians AND patients – “just in time”clinicians AND patients – “just in time”

Page 16: Quality Improvement Research

ConclusionConclusion

We need researchers and research We need researchers and research participants in order to learnparticipants in order to learn

We need to focus on resolving research We need to focus on resolving research ethics issues to enhance research capacity ethics issues to enhance research capacity

Implementation of effective QI interventions Implementation of effective QI interventions can and should proceed unfetteredcan and should proceed unfettered

QI researchers should understand the QI researchers should understand the flexibility provided by the Common Rule – flexibility provided by the Common Rule – both in terms of allowable exemptions and both in terms of allowable exemptions and waivers of informed consentwaivers of informed consent

Page 17: Quality Improvement Research

Questions?Questions?

HTTP://WWW.AHRQ.GOVHTTP://WWW.AHRQ.GOV

Page 18: Quality Improvement Research

Design Design Unit of AnalysisUnit of Analysis Potential for Use Potential for Use Level of difficulty in Level of difficulty in current environmentcurrent environment

Randomized Randomized Controlled Controlled Trial (RCT)Trial (RCT)

Individual patient Individual patient level level

RareRare High High

--applies to few interventions--applies to few interventions

RCTRCT Providers/delivery Providers/delivery systems/policy systems/policy

RareRare HighHigh

--Refusal to be randomized--Refusal to be randomized

Cluster RCTCluster RCT Clinical practices, Clinical practices, States, etc.States, etc.

When more than one When more than one site can be randomized site can be randomized

High High

--single site studies the norm--single site studies the norm

--criteria for randomization --criteria for randomization unknownunknown

Quasi-Quasi-experimentsexperiments

(ITS)(ITS)

AllAll Frequent Frequent HighHigh

--academic acceptance--academic acceptance

--acceptance in practice--acceptance in practice

--funding--funding

QualitativeQualitative All?All? ?? HighHigh

--above, plus cost--above, plus cost

Research Designs and Research Designs and Methods for Internal ValidityMethods for Internal Validity