quality rating & improvement systems powerful policy for improving and unifying early care and...
TRANSCRIPT
Quality Rating & Improvement Systems
Powerful Policy for Improving and Unifying Early Care and
Education
From Judy GoldfarbHartford Area Child Care Collaborative
From Louise Stoney & Anne MitchellAlliance for Early Childhood Finance
Forum to Explore A QRIS for ConnecticutMarch 20, 2008
Karen RainvilleCT Association for the Education of Young Children
CT Head Start Association
DSS Director’s Forum
Our Goals
• Overview of what a Quality Rating & Improvement System may look like
• Where CT is in the development of a QRIS
• Gather feedback from you as providers
So what is it??
• QRIS is a system to easily identify quality levels of programs using an identifying symbol (usually stars), as well as offering incentives and supports to help programs improve quality and move through the various levels.
So What Is Its Purpose??
• Helps to benchmark quality for consumers• Provides incentives and resources to
programs• Creates stronger infrastructure to support
and sustain the quality of programs regardless of setting or funding stream
A Guide for States and Communities Developing QRS
• Designed as a hands-on, practical resource
• Organized as a planning tool to use as States consider how to develop a new QRS or improve an existing one
• Outlines the common elements and State and community examples
Available at www.ecpolicycouncil.org
Financing QRIS
Designed to provide guidance on QRIS funding, including:
• Planning
• Administration
• Technical Assistance
• Financial Supports and Incentives for programs and practitioners
• Engagement & Outreach
QRIS Starts from the perspective of ECE being
Market-Driven
Families
Gov't
PrivateSector
• Providers offer services for a price
• Consumers choose and pay
• Tuition is the largest source of revenue
ECE is a Unique Market because it serves both public & private needs
• Enables parents to work (private)• Prepares children for school & life (public)• Enhances productivity of educational
system (public)• Strengthens future workforce (public)
Good Outcomes = Higher Standards
Higher Standards = Higher Costs
Higher Costs = Higher Prices
When consumers pay most of the bill,
the result is CONFLICT!
So Where Does QRIS Fit In??
QRIS isn’t just about ratings, it is a market intervention. It includes:
1. Quality Assurance – standards, assessment & monitoring
2. Supply Side Interventions – program and practitioner supports (TA and PD) and financial incentives
3. Demand Side Interventions – ratings, consumer education and financial incentives
The Five Common Elements of a QRIS
• Standards
• Accountability (assessment & monitoring)
• Program and practitioner outreach and support
• Financial incentives specifically linked to compliance with quality standards
• Family/consumer education
Source: Mitchell (2005.
Within the Standards Category
▪ Staff Qualifications & Professional Development
▪ Environment
▪ Curriculum and Learning
Included in most QRIS and backed by research
Often Included in the Standards Category
▪ Family Engagement
▪ Leadership and Management
Included in some QRIS Research not available or not
strong
National Accreditation and QRISWhere does it fit?
In all but 1 state QRIS, accreditation is:
▪ the highest rating (top level), or▪ accreditation + extra criteria is top level,
or▪ accreditation is one way to reach the top
level, or▪ in points system, accreditation =
points.
Supply Side: Program and Practitioner Support
• Technical assistance – Quality Improvement Plans– Mentoring and Coaching– Accreditation Facilitation
• Professional development – Training, workshops– College courses leading to degrees, distance
learning
• Financial incentives
Supply Side: Financial Incentives
• Grants, bonuses and awards
• Scholarships
• Wage supplements
• Tax credits for ECE programs, practitioners and investors
All linked to QRIS levelsSource: Mitchell (2005)
Demand Side: Financial Incentives
• Tiered reimbursement rates (or other 3rd party tuition subsidy)
• Tax credits – higher, refundable state income tax credits for parents (DCTC)
• Be creative!
Consumer Engagement: a Demand Side Strategy
• Symbols - establish a QRIS indicator (usually star) as a consumer guide
• Education and Outreach – ensure that consumers, funders, practitioners, the general public understand QRIS symbols and rating system
• Multi-faceted – communication in many forms; many messengers
If we don’t fundamentally change consumer behavior we won’t change the system!
Broad Participation is Key to Effective Demand
• All states include child care centers and family child care homes
• Most include school-age programs and Head Start
• Some QRIS include Pre-K
• None include unregulated family, friend, and neighbor careHigh participation (among the many types of
programs parents use) is key to success!
Bottom Line, What Have We Learned From Other States??
Does QRIS Work?
• Yes!
• Quality is improving
• Better child outcomes in higher quality centers (NC)
• Evaluations in NC, OK, PA and TN
Trends & Implications
QRIS is:
▪ an accountability system
▪ a framework to unify sectors of ECE system
▪ a finance strategy that addresses market failures
• a fast growing trend
It’s a SYSTEM!
So What Do These Things Look Like??
Block/Step System• Level 1: all the Level 1 criteria must be met.• Level 2: all the Level 1 and Level 2 criteria
must be met. • Level 3 : all the Level 1 and Level 2 and Level 3
criteria must be met• Level 4: all the Level 1 and Level 2 and Level 3
and Level 4 criteria must be met• Level 5: all the Level 1 and Level 2 and Level 3
and Level 4 and Level 5 criteria must be met
Point System
Each level determined by number of points earned in each set of common standards
• Program administration• Family support/engagement• Staff qualifications/Professional Development• Compensation• Program Evaluation• Licensing/Compliance
Combination System
• Level 1: all the Level 1 criteria must be met. • Level 2: all the Level 1 and Level 2 criteria must
be met. • Levels 3-5: all the Level 1 and Level 2 criteria
must be met, and then the program must earn a minimum of one point in each of the Level 3-5 categories. For levels 3-5, the level is determined by the total number of points earned.
National Lessons Learned
▪ Make it simple - older QRIS are being revised, for simplicity & cost-effectiveness.
▪ Make it dynamic – QRIS standards can change, based on new knowledge.
▪ Align with child outcomes – QRIS can effectively incorporate child assessments.
▪ Align QRIS Standards and Finance – programs can’t succeed without funding; funding won’t produce results without standards.
Quality Early Care
& EducationSystem
A Standards-Based ECE System Design
Engagement & Outreach
(Selling the Vision)
for Programs, Practitioners, &
Consumers
Engagement & Outreach
(Selling the Vision)
for Programs & Practitioners
Monitoring & Accountability
(to ensure compliance with
standards)
Programs: Technical Assistance & Support
Practitioners: Professional Development
Support/Infrastructure to Meet StandardsLegal/Regulatory StandardsFunding StandardsVoluntary Standards
Quality Standards for Programs and Practitioners
for Programs, Practitioners, & Consumers
On-going Financial Assistance(Linked to Meeting Standards)
Aligned with Early
Learning Standards
to ensure compliance with
standards
Monitoring & Accountability
linked to meeting standards
On-going Financial Assistance
to meet /maintain standards
Professional/Program Development
For consumers, programs
practitioners
Engagement & Outreach
for programs and practitioners aligned to Early Learning Standards
Quality Standards
QRIS = the Framework for the Early Care and Education System
CT’s ECE Government Structure
Governor’s Office
ECE Cabinet
Established by the Governor in 2005
Subcommittees:•Accountability •Family/Community
EC Research & Policy Council
Established by the Governor in 2006
Subcommittees:•Research •Management/Infrastructure•Finance/Cost Modeling
QRIS
Why Connecticut?• This work is specified in Connecticut statute 07-03
section 20 which states:
– “The ECE Cabinet established under section 10-16s of the general statutes, as amended by this act, shall develop minimum standards and a range of higher standards of quality for all early care and education programs receiving state funding. Not later than December 31, 2008, and annually thereafter, the cabinet shall report, in accordance with the provisions of section 11-14a of the general statutes, on the plan developed in accordance with this section to the joint standing committees of the General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to appropriations and the budgets of state agencies, education, human service and higher education and employment advancement.”
Work GroupA QRIS workgroup under the auspices of the Early Childhood Research & Policy Council was convened to deliberate on the
core components of a QRIS in the CT context and provide recommendations to the Early Childhood Education Cabinet.
• Mary Budrawich • Devon Conover • Christine Devine • Marta Diez • Dona Ditrio – Head Start• Nanci Dower - CAEYC• Rita Esposito • Deb Flis • Amparo Garcia • Judy Goldfarb • George Hensinger • Dawn Homer-Bouthiette • Shaun McNally
• Mary Jane Newman – DSS Centers• Joan Parris • Gerri Rowell • Jessica Sager • Gwen Samuels• Kim Sandor • Carlota Schechter • Joyce Staples • Sherri Sutera • Myra Jones Taylor • Amy Watson • Sue Wilson
2008 Timeline• February-September: monthly Work Group
meetings
• September: recommended plan presented to the Governor’s Early Childhood Research & Policy Council (ECRPC)
• October: recommendations to Early Childhood Education Cabinet
• QRIS WG will communicate regularly with the ECRPC throughout the process via Janice Gruendel.
Standards & Accountability
• Establish & recommend Program Standards and criteria
• Develop & recommend accountability measures and monitoring system
• Recommend strategy for selecting administrative entity
There are 4 sub-groups of the QRIS Work Group, each
working on specific pieces
Program & Practitioner Supports & Outreach
• Develop & recommend model for responsive program and practitioner support (building strategically on current resources)
• Create & recommend outreach plan to recruit & retain providers in QRIS
Financing & Incentives
• Develop & recommend model for incentives and rewards
• Identify financial needs of recommended CT QRIS
• Assist in costing out components of QRIS in CT
• Identify & recommend current and potential resources & strategies for financing
Consumer Education & Outreach
• Develop & recommend identity and “brand” for CT QRIS
• Create & recommend outreach plan to inform families and fundamentally change consumer behavior
QRIS Work Flow & Internal/External Communications
• Issues
• Proposal
• Consideration/Discussion
• Confidentiality
• Recommendations
Decision-making
• Thumbs Up = Yes, I agree and support this• Thumbs Sideways = this is OK; I can live with it.• Thumbs Down = No, I have a serious problem and cannot
support this.
• Majority thumbs up on important matters• Voters are committed to explaining the reasons for their votes• All votes are thumbs up or sideways, a decision is made• If one or more thumbs are down voter and group will try to
reach acceptable agreement
Draft Recommendations
• The CT QRIS will be a voluntary system for Early Care and Education (ECE) and School Age (SA) programs that provides strong incentives to draw all programs into the system and help all programs continuously improve quality. State agencies will require participation for funded programs.
Draft Recommendations
• Programs serving all children B-12– Phase 1 = Birth to 5– Phase 2 = 6 - 12
• All center settings (licensed and exempt)• All regulated home-based settings• Voluntary• Five steps
Resources
http://ecpolicycouncil.org/ http://nccic.org/topics/topic/index.cfm?topicId=44
Sign up for QRIS Network List to obtain
information going forward: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=Zmn0b7FYbBfLSyIkoItayg_3d_3d
www.naeyc.org • www.ctaeyc.org