quantifying lateral flow tests
TRANSCRIPT
Quantifying lateral flow
tests Reader and label options
Innovation Results Partnership Quality
Steven Lamont
Technical Manager
Quantification
How to?
Reporting
Calibration curves
Label options
Comparison
Readers
Options
Reader technologies
Novarum
Overview
Version 1 Final
Semi- quantitative Semi-quantitative Fully-quantitative
Score card Number of
test lines
Calibration
curve
How to quantify
Version 2 Draft
Requires the use of a score card
Control
3
2
1
High positive
Score card Result
Control
3
2
1
Weak positive
Visual semi-quantification
Version 2 Draft
Reader quantification requires numbers
A calibration curve needs to be generated from which data points can be
read off
Quadratic
Log
Linear
4-PL
mV Grayscale RGB
Concentration
Va
lue
Reader quantification
Version 2 Draft
Quantification of an assay can be presented to the end user as:
Yes / No
Qualitative
Pre-defined
bins
Semi-quantitative
ng/ml readout
Fully-quantitative
In most cases test values require to be read off a calibration curve with the
difference being the post-processing of the data
Reporting quantification
Version 2 Draft
0.00
200.00
400.00
600.00
800.00
1000.00
1200.00
1400.00
1 10 100 1000 10000
Test
valu
e
Log of concentration
4PL Fit: y=(A-D) / (1 + (x/C)^B) + D
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6
OD
valu
e
Concentration
4-P
L
Quad
tra
tic
Calibration curve
Version 2 Draft
An appropriate number of standards across the range of interest
Number of replicates of each standard
Curve fit and specifications around the curve parameters
Simplest curve fit should be chosen
Concentration
Va
lue
Calibration curve
Version 2 Draft
Points to consider
Algorithm – Test line only or a Test/Control
ratio?
What is the goal of the assay?
Curve dynamics and your analytical range
% CV requirements for calculated
concentration
Detection Particle Advantages Disadvantages
Gold colloid
Compatible with most
reflectance, absorbance and
camera system readers
Can be visually read
Polystyrene beads (latex)
Range of colours available
Clear visual multiplexing
Range of sizes
Flow up the strip can be more
problematic due to size –
membrane can require
treatment to improve flow
Fluorescent labels
Huge range commercially
available
No visual signal for the end
user to interpret
Particle based or direct
labelling
Need to be careful of
potential auto fluorescence
with materials eg.
Nitrocellulose
Dependent on reader
Filters required
Magnetic latex Perceived sensitivity increase Dependent on reader
Limited choice of readers
Label options
Version 2 Draft
Utilises the camera on a smart phone to quantify your test strip
Novarum uses intelligent real time image processing which ensures the data is
usable before it is captured
Novarum
Version 2 Draft
Pro’s Con’s
Cheap Tend to have a small
aperture
Tuneable to appropriate
wavelength
Can be fixed or scanning
Pro’s Con’s
Provides an image Expensive
Technology moves on
quickly
LED / Photodiode
CCD / CMOS
Reader technologies
Version 2 Draft
Scanning
Test strips or optics move over a pre-defined distance to scan the length of
the test strip
These readers are more flexible
Fixed point
Disposable in-cassette readers
These readers require no moving parts, but there is then a necessity for
tight tolerances on line position
This has an impact on the equipment used to manufacture the test
Reader technologies
Version 2 Draft
Quantification can be visual or reader based
Particle choice will determine what readers
can be used
Think about the goal of your assay – what
benefit does quantification bring?
Assay precision is key to reliable
quantification
Summary
Version 1 Final
Version 1 Final
Contract Development & Manufacture
Lateral Flow Test Development
Lateral Flow Test Manufacture
Full Regulatory & Post Market Support
Sensitivity Enhancement Technology
Platforms
Readers
Raw Materials
Antibodies
Antigens
Enzymes
Gold Nanoparticles
Serum & Plasma
Cell Culture Reagents
www.bbisolutions.com [email protected]