quantitative analysis in management assign
DESCRIPTION
Quantitative Analysis In ManagementTRANSCRIPT
F-2, Block, Amity CampusSec-125, Nodia (UP)India 201303
ASSIGNMENTSPROGRAM:SEMESTER-ISubject Name : Master of Finance and Control
Study COUNTRY : Zambia
Permanent Enrollment Number (PEN) :
Roll Number : MFC001412014-2016002
Student Name : DERICK MWANSA
INSTRUCTIONSa) Students are required to submit all three assignment sets.
ASSIGNMENTDETAILSMARKS
Assignment AFive Subjective Questions10
Assignment BThree Subjective Questions + Case Study10
Assignment C40 Objective Questions10
b) Total weightage given to these assignments is 30%. OR 30 Marksc) All assignments are to be completed as typed in word/pdf.d) All questions are required to be attempted.e) All the three assignments are to be completed by due dates (specified from time to time) and need to be submitted for evaluation by Amity University.f) The evaluated assignment marks will be made available within six weeks. Thereafter, these will be destroyed at the end of each semester.g) The students have to attach a scan signature in the form.
Signature:______Date:__20/01/2015____( ) Tick mark in front of the assignments submittedAssignment AAssignment BAssignment C
QUATITATIVE APPLICATIONS IN MANAGEMENTASSIGNMENT AQuestion oneAnswer
No. of TabletsMid-Point (X)No. of People CuredFX
4- 861166
8- 121013130
12- 161416224
16- 201814252
20- 2422X22X
24- 28269234
28-323017510
32- 36346204
36- 40384152
Total90+X1772+22X
ASSIGNEMENT AQuestion twoAnswer
(a) The variances given show that boys have greater variability in individual heights. Boys have variance of 9 whereas Girls have variation of 4. (b) Common average heightSexAverage Frequency(f)
Boys68724896
Girls61382318
Totals1107214
Common Average Height = (f (f)= 7214 110 =65.58 inches
(c) Standard deviation Statistical DataDetailBoysGirls
Number (f)7238
Average Height( ) 6861
Variance 94
Standard deviation 32
Total ( f ) 48962318
332,928141,398
Variance = (Total Squared)/n - (x Squared)/nTnT-1
= 474,326 473,107.24109
= 11.18Therefore (for both heights) = 3.34
(d) Combined variability = 11.18
ASSIGNEMENT AQuestion threeAnswerYearTSales
XYXY
1965132321
1966247944
19673651959
196849236816
1969513266025
19706190114036
19717275192549
Total288334414140
Average4119
Trend Equation
ASSIGNEMENT AQuestion fourAnswer
XYXYy2
112121144
211224121
313399169
4156016225
5147025196
61710236289
71611249256
81915264361
91816281324
Total451357312852085
Average515
Standard deviation of X
Standard deviation for Y
Covariance of XY ()
Coefficient of correlation between X and Y ()
ASSIGNEMENT AQuestion 5AnswerYearIndex5 Yearly Cycles5 Yearly Trend Values
1941225
1942210
19432011074214.8
19442151094218.8
19452231119223.8
19462451143228.6
19472351161232.2
19482251187237.4
19492331207241.4
1950249
1951265
ASSIGNMENT BQuestion oneAnswerWe establish the null and alternative hypothesis. Ho: Die is not biasedH1: Die is biasedP (success) =1/6P (failure) = 5/6No. (X)Frequency(f) (Observed)ProbabilityP(X)ExpectedP(X)120O-E(O-(O-
1301/620101005
2251/6205251.25
3181/620-240.2
4101/620-101005
5221/620240.2
6151/620-5251.25
12012.9
Chi square test at 0.05 significance level.Degrees of freedom ( d f ) = (r 1) (c --1) = (6-1) (2-1) = (5) (1) = 5The Critical value is: Since the calculated chi square value of 12.9 is greater than the critical value of 11.1, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the die is biased.
ASSIGNEMENT BQuestion twoAnswerLet X1 be units of material A X2 be units of material B Minimize Subject to
Corner PointCoordinatesObjective function
Value
A (20,14)1520
B(2,14))1160
C (0,14))1200
Therefore, optimal solution is:No of units of product A = 2 UnitsNo of units of product B = 14 UnitsTotal cost, = 1160 which is the minimum
ASSIGNEMENT BQuestion threeAnswerBelow is the probability decision tree showing different alternatives and the associated benefits.
A critical analysis of the decision tree reviews that bidding would result in a loss in monetary terms of 8750. Therefore, the company should not bid.
ASSIGNEMENT BCase StudyAnswer Part (A)YearQuarterTime Population Level (Y)SM4SM2C%MASeasonal IndicesDeseasonalised
112931.11882261.88
1996222462630.94888259.25
332312652640.87500.86383267.41
44282266.5265.751.06111.07162263.15
15301265.52661.13161.11882269.03
199726252267.75266.6250.94510.94888265.58
37227268.5268.1250.84660.86383262.78
48291270.25269.3751.08031.07162271.55
19304273.25271.751.11871.11882271.72
1998210259274.5273.8750.94570.94888272.95
311239275274.750.86990.86383276.67
412296276.5275.751.07341.07162276.22
113306276.75276.6251.10621.11882273.50
1999214265277.75277.250.95580.94888279.28
3152400.86383277.83
4163001.07162279.95
Unadjusted Seasonal Indexes
Q11.118814964
Q20.948883544
Q30.863833919
Q41.071620734
SUM4.00315316
Adjusted Seasonal Indexes
Q11.117933708
Q20.948136137
Q30.863153504
Q41.070776651
SUM4.000000000
Case StudyPart (B)Answer
YEARTIME (X)SALES (Y)XYX2
12932931
199622464924
32316939
4282112816
5301150525
19976252151236
7227158949
8291232864
9304273681
1998102592590100
112392629121
122963552144
133063978169
1999142653710196
152403600225
163004800256
T0TALS1364332371351496
MEAN8.5270.75
Regression Line
Case StudyPart CAnswerWinter (X)Summer (Y)X-Y(X-Y)2
1293301-864
2246252-636
3231227416
4282291-981
530630424
6265259636
724023911
8300296416
Totals21632169-6254
Mean270.38271.13
H0: pollution levels are higher in winter than in summer and that they are increasing over the yearsH1: pollution levels are not higher in winter than in summer and that they are not increasing over the years
Level of significance: 0.05
Test statistic:
Since critical t of 1.895 is greater than the calculated t (-0.355). We reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not statistical significance in the levels of pollution in winter and summer.
ASSIGNEMENT CMULTIPLE CHOICEAnswer.
1C9A17D25B33A
2A10B18A26C34A
3C11B19D27C35B
4A12A20B28A36E
5B13A21B29C37C
6C14C22B30B38C
7C15A23B31E39B
8A16C24C32D40A