quantum communication part 2

109
QUANTUM COMMUNICATION PART 2 Aditi Harish-Chandra Research Institute, India

Upload: wilson

Post on 23-Mar-2016

49 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Quantum Communication Part 2. Aditi Harish-Chandra Research Institute, India. Outline. Classical info transmission. Communication. Without security. Quantum state transmission. Communication. Secure Communication. Quantum Cryptography. DC Capacity: Known/Unknown. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Quantum Communication  Part 2

QUANTUM COMMUNICATION PART 2

Aditi Harish-Chandra Research Institute, India

Page 2: Quantum Communication  Part 2

OUTLINE

Communication

Secure Communication

Quantum Cryptography

CommunicationWithout security

Classical infotransmission

Quantum statetransmission

Page 3: Quantum Communication  Part 2

DC CAPACITY: KNOWN/UNKNOWN

Single Sender – Single Receiver

Many Senders – Single ReceiverSolved

Page 4: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Dense Coding Network 3

Page 5: Quantum Communication  Part 2

DISTRIBUTED DC: TWO RECEIVERS

Alice (A1)

Alice (A2)

Bob (B1)

Bob (B2)

Page 6: Quantum Communication  Part 2

DISTRIBUTED DC: TWO RECEIVERS

Alice (A1)

Alice (A2)

Bob (B1)

Bob (B2)

LOCC

i1

i2

Page 7: Quantum Communication  Part 2

DISTRIBUTED DC: TWO RECEIVERS

Alice (A1)

Alice (A2)

Bob (B1)

Bob (B2)

Page 8: Quantum Communication  Part 2

DISTRIBUTED DC: TWO RECEIVERS

Alice (A1)

Alice (A2)

Bob (B1)

Bob (B2)

Alices send her particles to Bobs

Page 9: Quantum Communication  Part 2

DISTRIBUTED DC: TWO RECEIVERSBob (B1)

Bob (B2)

Bobs task: gather info abt ik by LOCC

Page 10: Quantum Communication  Part 2

DISTRIBUTED DC: TWO RECEIVERSBob (B1)

Bob (B2)

Bobs task: gather info abt ik by LOCC

LOCC

Page 11: Quantum Communication  Part 2

C = Max

DISTRIBUTED DC: TWO RECEIVERS

Page 12: Quantum Communication  Part 2

C = Max Max

LOCC Holevo bound

Maximization over all encodings i.e. over all {pi, Ui }

DISTRIBUTED DC: TWO RECEIVERS

Page 13: Quantum Communication  Part 2

C = Max Max

LOCC Holevo bound

Maximization over all encodings i.e. over all {pi, Ui }

Badziag, Horodecki, ASD, Sen, PRL’03

DISTRIBUTED DC: TWO RECEIVERS

Page 14: Quantum Communication  Part 2

C = Max Max

LOCC Holevo bound

Maximization over all encodings i.e. over all {pi, Ui }

Bruss, D’Ariano, Lewenstein, Macchiavello, ASD, Sen, PRL’ 04

DISTRIBUTED DC: TWO RECEIVERS

Page 15: Quantum Communication  Part 2

DC CAPACITY: KNOWN/UNKNOWN

Single Sender – Single Receiver

Many Senders – Single ReceiverSolved

Page 16: Quantum Communication  Part 2

DC CAPACITY: KNOWN/UNKNOWN

Single Sender – Single Receiver

Many Senders – Single ReceiverSolved

Many Senders – Two Receivers

Page 17: Quantum Communication  Part 2

DC CAPACITY: KNOWN/UNKNOWN

Single Sender – Single Receiver

Many Senders – Single ReceiverSolved

Many Senders – Two ReceiversPartially Solved

Page 18: Quantum Communication  Part 2

DC CAPACITY: KNOWN/UNKNOWN

Single Sender – Single Receiver

Many Senders – Single ReceiverSolved

Many Senders – Two ReceiversPartially Solved

Many Senders – Many ReceiversNot Solved

Page 19: Quantum Communication  Part 2

OUTLINE

Communication

Secure Communication

Quantum Cryptography

CommunicationWithout security

Classical infotransmission

Quantum statetransmission

Page 20: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Quantum Dense Coding

Task: Classical info transmission

Quantum Dense Coding

Page 21: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Quantum Dense Coding

Task: Classical info transmission

Medium: Quantum State

Quantum Dense Coding

Page 22: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Quantum Dense Coding

Task: Classical info transmission

Medium: Quantum State

Task: quantum state/info transmissionTask: Quantum state/info transmission

Quantum Dense Coding

Page 23: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Quantum Dense Coding

Task: Classical info transmission

Medium: Quantum State

Task: Quantum state/info transmission

Medium: Quantum State

Quantum Dense Coding

Page 24: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Task: Classical info transmission

Medium: Quantum State

Task: Quantum state/info transmission

Medium: Quantum State

Quantum Dense Coding Quantum Teleportation

Page 25: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Quantum TeleportationBennett, Brassard, Crepeau, Jozsa, Peres, Wootters, PRL

1993

Page 26: Quantum Communication  Part 2

QUANTUM TELEPORTATION

Task: Sending arbitrary quantum state

Page 27: Quantum Communication  Part 2

QUANTUM TELEPORTATION

Task: Sending

Page 28: Quantum Communication  Part 2

QUANTUM TELEPORTATION

Task: Sending

Page 29: Quantum Communication  Part 2

QUANTUM TELEPORTATION

Task: Sending

Classical: Infinite communication

Page 30: Quantum Communication  Part 2

QUANTUM TELEPORTATION

Task: Sending

Classical: Infinite communication

Page 31: Quantum Communication  Part 2

QUANTUM TELEPORTATION

Ain B

Alice Bob

Page 32: Quantum Communication  Part 2

QUANTUM TELEPORTATION

Ain B

Alice Bob

Alice performs measurements on “in’’ and A

Page 33: Quantum Communication  Part 2

QUANTUM TELEPORTATION

Ain B

Alice BobAfter measurement

Page 34: Quantum Communication  Part 2

QUANTUM TELEPORTATION

Ain B

Alice BobAfter measurement

2 bits of classical comm.sent by Alice to Bob

Page 35: Quantum Communication  Part 2

QUANTUM TELEPORTATION

Ain B

Alice BobAfter measurement

Bob performs unitary

Page 36: Quantum Communication  Part 2

QUANTUM TELEPORTATION

Ain B

Alice BobAfter measurement

State is with Bob

Page 37: Quantum Communication  Part 2

MORAL

Classical QuantumVs.

Task: sending arbitrary quantum state

Infinite classical comm 2 bits of classical comm

Page 38: Quantum Communication  Part 2

MORAL

Classical Quantum

Task: sending arbitrary quantum state

Infinite classical comm 2 bits of classical comm

Vs.

Page 39: Quantum Communication  Part 2

IS IT MAGIC?

Page 40: Quantum Communication  Part 2

IS IT MAGIC?

Of course not!

Page 41: Quantum Communication  Part 2

IS IT MAGIC?

Ingredient: Quantum Mechanics

Page 42: Quantum Communication  Part 2

IS IT MAGIC?

Entangled states

Page 43: Quantum Communication  Part 2

WHAT IS ENTANGLEMENT?

Unentangled/Useless states:

Entangled/Useful states:

Page 44: Quantum Communication  Part 2

WHAT IS ENTANGLEMENT?

Unentangled/Useless states:

Entangled/Useful states:

Page 45: Quantum Communication  Part 2

WHAT IS ENTANGLEMENT?

Unentangled/Useless states:

Entangled/Useful states:

Page 46: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Is it just theory?

Page 47: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Experiments

Page 48: Quantum Communication  Part 2

PHOTONS

Page 49: Quantum Communication  Part 2

PHOTONS

143 Km Teleportation

Page 50: Quantum Communication  Part 2

~100KM

Page 51: Quantum Communication  Part 2

ENTANGLEMENT SWAPPING

Zukowski, Zeilinge, Horne, Ekert, PRL 71, 4287 (’93)

Page 52: Quantum Communication  Part 2

ENTANGLEMENT SWAPPING

Zukowski, Zeilinge, Horne, Ekert, PRL 71, 4287 (’93)

Page 53: Quantum Communication  Part 2

PHOTONS

Photons

Page 54: Quantum Communication  Part 2

PHOTONS

Photons

Page 55: Quantum Communication  Part 2

IONS

Page 56: Quantum Communication  Part 2

IONS

14 ions entangled

Page 57: Quantum Communication  Part 2

ION ENTANGLED STATES

Phys. Rep. 2008

Page 58: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Quantum Teleportation between Light and Matter

Page 59: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Quantum Teleportation between Light and Matter

Page 60: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Quantum Teleportation between Light and Matter

Polzik’s group, Nature 443, 557 (’06)

Page 61: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Quantum Teleportation between Light and Matter

Polzik’s group, Nature 443, 557 (’06)

Page 62: Quantum Communication  Part 2

IONS: TELEPORTATION

Page 63: Quantum Communication  Part 2

IONS: TELEPORTATION

Page 64: Quantum Communication  Part 2

IONS: TELEPORTATION

Page 65: Quantum Communication  Part 2

IONS: TELEPORTATION

Page 66: Quantum Communication  Part 2

NMR

Entangled states in NMR

Page 67: Quantum Communication  Part 2

TELEPORTATION BY NMR

Page 68: Quantum Communication  Part 2

TELEPORTATION BY NMR

Nielsen, Knill, Laflamme, Nature 395 (’98)

Page 69: Quantum Communication  Part 2

OPTICAL LATTICES

Page 70: Quantum Communication  Part 2

OPTICAL LATTICES

Entangled states inOptical lattices

Page 71: Quantum Communication  Part 2

OPTICAL LATTICES

Entangled states inOptical lattices

Page 72: Quantum Communication  Part 2

OPTICAL LATTICES

Resonating valence bond states in

Optical lattices

Page 73: Quantum Communication  Part 2

TELEPORTATION: NEUTRAL ATOMS

Wu, Yang, Shen, Zheng, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 46,185502 (’13)

Page 74: Quantum Communication  Part 2

TELEPORTATION: SPIN CHAIN

1. Initially the spin chain is in the ground state:

Page 75: Quantum Communication  Part 2

TELEPORTATION: SPIN CHAIN

1. Initially the spin chain is in the ground state:

2. Alice places an arbitrary state at her end:

Page 76: Quantum Communication  Part 2

TELEPORTATION: SPIN CHAIN

1. Initially the spin chain is in the ground state:

2. Alice places an arbitrary state at her end:

3. The state evolves according to some Hamiltonian:

Page 77: Quantum Communication  Part 2

TELEPORTATION: SPIN CHAIN

1. Initially the spin chain is in the ground state:

2. Alice places an arbitrary state at her end:

3. The state evolves according to some Hamiltonian:

4. Bob receives the state after some time.Bose, PRL(’03), Subrahmanyam, PRA

(’03)

Page 78: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Many other systems …….

Page 79: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Teleportation for arbitrary states

Page 80: Quantum Communication  Part 2

A B

Alice & Bob share a state

Page 81: Quantum Communication  Part 2

A B

Alice & Bob share a state

Page 82: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Ain B

Task: To send to Bob single copy of is

available

Cd

Page 83: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Ain B

Allowed operations: LOCC

Page 84: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Ain B

Not allowed operations: exchange qubits

Page 85: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Ain B

Alice & Bob perform some LOCC, T,

Page 86: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Ain B

Alice & Bob perform some LOCC, T, and create at Bob’s side

Page 87: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Ain B

Alice & Bob perform some LOCC, T, and create at Bob’s side

Check its closeness with

Page 88: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Ain B

Quantify closeness:

integration over all inputsTeleportation fidelity

Page 89: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Singlet Fraction:

: max singlet fraction from by LOCC

Bennett, Divincenzo, Smolin, Wootters, PRA 54, 3824 (’97)MPR Horodeccy, PRA 60, 1888 (’99)M.A. Nielsen, quant-ph/0205035

Page 90: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Singlet Fraction:

: max singlet fraction from by LOCC

Horodeccy, PRA 60, 1888 (’99)Nielsen, arXiv: 0205035Verstreate, Verschele, PRL 90, 097901 (’03)

Page 91: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Popescu, PRL 72, 797 (’94)

Alice & Bob share separable state, then fmax =2/3

Page 92: Quantum Communication  Part 2

TELE CAPACITY: KNOWN/UNKNOWN

Single Sender – Single Receiverdd Solved

Page 93: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Teleportation Network 1

Page 94: Quantum Communication  Part 2

TELEPORTATION: MONOGAMY

Alice

Debu

Charu

Nitu

.

.

.

.

Bob

Senders Receiver

Page 95: Quantum Communication  Part 2

TELEPORTATION: MONOGAMY

Alice

Debu

Charu

Nitu

.

.

.

.

Bob

Senders Receiver

Teleportation monogamy

Faithful teleportation cannot be freely performed

Page 96: Quantum Communication  Part 2

TELEPORTATION: MONOGAMY

Tele mono ineq:

Lee and Park, PRA 79, 054309(’09)

Page 97: Quantum Communication  Part 2

TELEPORTATION: MONOGAMY

Holds for pure states:

Lee and Park, PRA 79, 054309(’09)

Page 98: Quantum Communication  Part 2

TELEPORTATION: MONOGAMY

Holds for pure states:

Lee and Park, PRA 79, 054309(’09)

Follows from monogamy of concurrence squared in 2d

Page 99: Quantum Communication  Part 2

TELEPORTATION: MONOGAMY

Does Not hold for mixed states:

Lee and Park, PRA 79, 054309(’09)

Page 100: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Teleportation Network 2

Page 101: Quantum Communication  Part 2

TELEPORTATION NETWORK

Alice (A1)

Alice (A2)

Bob (B1)

Bob (B2)

ASD, U. Sen, PRA 81, 012308 (’01)

Page 102: Quantum Communication  Part 2

TELEPORTATION NETWORK

Alice (A1)

Alice (A2)

Bob (B1)

Bob (B2)

ASD, U. Sen, PRA 81, 012308 (’01)

Page 103: Quantum Communication  Part 2

TELEPORTATION NETWORK

Alice (A1)

Alice (A2)

Bob (B1)

Bob (B2)

ASD, U. Sen, PRA 81, 012308 (’01)

Establish relation between capacity & entanglement

Page 104: Quantum Communication  Part 2

TELE CAPACITY: KNOWN/UNKNOWN

Single Sender – Single Receiverdd Solved

Page 105: Quantum Communication  Part 2

TELE CAPACITY: KNOWN/UNKNOWN

Single Sender – Single Receiverdd Solved

Many Senders – single Receiver Not Solved

Page 106: Quantum Communication  Part 2

TELE CAPACITY: KNOWN/UNKNOWN

Single Sender – Single Receiverdd Solved

Many Senders – single Receiver Not Solved

Many Senders – many ReceiverNot Solved

Page 107: Quantum Communication  Part 2

Single Sender – Single Receiver

Many Senders – Single Receiver Solved

Many Senders – Two Receivers

Many Senders – Many Receivers

Partially Solved

Not Solved

Classical info transmit

known/UnknownQuantum info transmission

Single Sender – Single Receiverdd

Solved

Many Senders – Single Receiver

Not Solved

Many Senders – Many Receivers

Not Solved

Page 108: Quantum Communication  Part 2

QIC@HRI

Page 109: Quantum Communication  Part 2