quarknet 2006 lets go smash some atoms! peripheral collision:central collision head-on collision:...
TRANSCRIPT
QuarkNet 2006
Lets go smash some Atoms!
Peripheral Collision: Central Collision
Head-On Collision: Largest # of Nucleons Participate
Glancing Collision: Small # of Nucleons Participate
QuarkNet 2006
Measuring Collision Centrality
Data
Trigger signal
Peripheral Collision:
Small number of participating nucleons
Central Collision
Large Npart
Lets Focus on the most head-on collisions, where expect the most interesting things to happen.
QuarkNet 2006
Looking at one gold+gold collision.
Beamline
creates over 5000 charged particles!(~600 at ~ 90o to beamline) 2c
Em
90o~ +0.5~ +0.5
QuarkNet 2006
Did we reach critical energy density?
Total energy released in =1 is ~ 1000 GeV
Initial Energy Density Estimate, ~ 5 GeV/fm3
32 200~)1(~ fmfmRMax initial overlap volume
Look at all produced particles in a
Central ‘Head-on’ Collision
Lets do a “FOOM estimate” (coffee napkin estimate)
1000~all
d
dN
GeVE 1~
Energy Density = Total Energy/Volume ~ 1000GeV/200 fm3
= 1
So the answer is YES, we are above the critical value of ~0.7
QuarkNet 2006
What Are We producing?
1. Matter and Antimatter
QuarkNet 2006
Matters of Matter and Anti-Matter
•Tracking in the spectrometer•Alternate 2T magnetic fields•Energy loss and momentum
+
Matter
Anti-MatterK-
p
-
K+
p
+
QuarkNet 2006
Antimatter/Matter Particle Ratios
p/p
K–/K+
Approaching equal production of matter and anti-matter!
A+A central collisions
RHIC
QuarkNet 2006
What Are We producing?
1. Matter and Antimatter2. A “liquid” with quark DoFs
QuarkNet 2006
Liquid or Gas?
Animation courtesy of Brookhaven National Laboratory
QuarkNet 2006
Look More Closely: Emission Patterns
Animation by Jeffrey Mitchell (Brookhaven National Laboratory)
What happens in a peripheral collision?
QuarkNet 2006
Particle emission patterns
Peripheral Collisions: Overlap “hot spot” looks like an almond.
If they do – can learn more about timescales of the “cooling” process and help us distinguish between liquid and gas behavior
Do the particle emission patterns reflect this initial shape?
Reaction plane
x
z
y
QuarkNet 2006
b (reaction plane)
View along beamline
Emission patterns follow the shape of the overlap region.
QuarkNet 2006
Fourier analysis of emission patterns.
)(cos21)( Rn
R
nvd
dN
Extract n=2, elliptic flow
Study v2
Increasing Collision Centrality
Find significant values of v2 for peripheral collisions. Behaving like a liquid (collectively)
QuarkNet 2006
Elliptic Flow for different particles
PRC 72 (05) 014904
200 GeV Au+Aumin-bias
v2 is different for different particles
QuarkNet 2006
Elliptic Flow: Quark Scaling!
solid: STARopen:
PHENIX
PRL91(03)
v2 matches when scaled by the number of quarks
QuarkNet 2006
What Are We Producing?
1. Matter and Antimatter2. A “liquid” with quark DoFs3. The “Perfect” fluid
QuarkNet 2006
Thinking about Fluids…
What is the difference between the behavior of Water and Honey?
Devise an experiment to study this…
2 baby cannons
1
2HONEYHONEY
WATERWATER
CANNON BALL RACESCANNON BALL RACES
WINNER is #1: Or in more precise terms v1 > v2
QuarkNet 2006
Study of High Momentum Particles
mvp
0.2<y<1.4
Momentum distributions of
charged particles
QuarkNet 2006
Need a “Benchmark momentum”
• We are colliding gold + gold nuclei and believe we have created a new state of matter in the large overlap region of the collisions.
• For our benchmark we use collisions of only one proton on another proton where no such overlap exists.
QuarkNet 2006
Rati
o o
f g
old
-gold
to p
roto
n-p
roto
n
Peripheral Central Mid-Central
We “lose” high momentum (speed) particles for Central Collisions
Comparing High Momentum particles
QuarkNet 2006
Where have all the fast particles gone?
They are only missing for central heavy-ion collisions. Could it be direct evidence we have created the quark-gluon-plasma that somehow either slows particles down or just makes much less high-momentum ones?
Can do an even more detailed check→ use direct signature of back-to-back JETS!
QuarkNet 2006
“Fast” Probes of Dense Matter
a “jet”
a “jet”
proton + proton collisions
Can calculate the “jet” cross section very precisely with QCD
QuarkNet 2006
Jets at RHIC
p+p jet+jet (STAR@RHIC)
Au+Au ??? (STAR@RHIC)
nucleon nucleonparton
jet
Find this…STARSTAR
…in this
QuarkNet 2006
Azimuthal Jet Distributions in Au+Au
Au+Au Peripheral
Trigger “jet”
Opposite “jet”
STARSTARp+p
QuarkNet 2006
Azimuthal Jet Distributions in Au+Au
Au+Au central
Trigger “jet”
Opposite “jet” is MISSING in Au+Au
STARSTAR p+p
QuarkNet 2006
Jet “Quenching” in Au+Au collisions
Proton + Proton Central Au + Au
The second “jet” seems to disappear in central Au+Au collisions
QuarkNet 2006
Jet Quenching in our QCD matter
Animation by Jeffrey Mitchell (Brookhaven National Laboratory)
QuarkNet 2006
“Jet Quenching” in Central Au+Au Collisions
• Opposite jets seen in:– Proton + Proton collisions– Deuteron + Gold collisions– Peripheral Gold + Gold
• Opposite jets missing in only one place:– Central Gold + Gold
Something interesting is happening (has not seen before)
QuarkNet 2006
Emerging Experimental Consensus: We have created a “state of matter” with a relevant energy density above the predicted QCD critical point and appears to have the following features:
• Emits large numbers of produced particles.
• In a relatively “baryon-free” environment (approaching equal matter and anti-matter production).
• Behaves collectively (like a fluid)• Is very strongly interacting and has the
ability to significantly affect the characteristics of jet fragmentation and production of high momentum particles.
Is it “the” Quark Gluon Plasma?
QuarkNet 2006
Final Thoughts
• In the brief moment of a relativistic heavy-ion collision, we have created a “different” form of matter with very interesting properties. Only time will tell what it is and what it will teach us about the strong interaction.
• It is an extremely exciting time.
• Research at RHIC will continue “full speed ahead”.
• Another exciting new accelerator at CERN (LHC) will come “alive” next year (and also study heavy ion collisions).