Quarterly LARP Monitoring Report September - November 2016 Project Number: Loan 2817-INO

INO: Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Prepared by Directorate General of Highways for the Asian Development Bank

NOTES

This social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the terms of use section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HOUSINGDIRECTORATE GENERAL OF HIGHWAYS

DIRECTORATE OF ROAD NETWORK DEVELOPMENT

Core Team Consultant (CTC) forRegional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

ADB Loan No.2817-lN0 & IDB Financing No.lND-0151

Ref. : RRDP -454 I 28t7 -INO/04_02_0! llll L7

Encl : Repofts

Officer in Charge of PMU-RRDP

Gedung Sapta Taruna, Lt. BJL. Pattimura No. 20, Kebayoran Baru

Jakafta

For the attention by: Ibu Marlia Dyah Salindri, ST,MT

Jakafta, 6February 2017

Subject: Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP) - Loan No.2817-INO (ADB)

and Financing 0161-IND (IDB); CTC-RRDP Quafterly LARP MonitoringRepoft for Period September-November 2015

Dear Ibu,

Please find attached five (5) copies of the CTC-RRDP Quarterly I-ARP Monitoring Report forperiod September-November 2016 in accordance with the requirements of CTC-RRDP Contract

Agreement.

Thank you for your kind attention and cooperation.

Cc.:

1. Director of Road Network Development, DGH (as a repoft)

2. Head of Sub Directorate of Environment and Road Safety, DRND

3. Officer in Charge of Project Implementation Unit (PIU)-RRDP, DRC

4. Project Officer for CTC-RRDP

5. Chief of Satker PAP2PHLN, DRND

6. File

aiointventureof RenardetS.A.PTMulti Phi Beta. PTwidvaGrahaAsana. PTDisiolanConsult. PTAnugerahKridapradanaCTC-RRDP Office: Wisma lskandarsyah, Jl. lskandarsyah Raya Kav. 12-14, Blok C-6, Kebayoran Baru - Jakarta Selatan 12160

Ph. (OZ1-)727 89636; Fax. (O2l\727 89638, Email: ctc.rrdp@smail.com

Team Leader CTC-RRDP

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................... i

LIST OF TABLE .................................................................................................................... ii

I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1

1.1. Backgrounder ........................................................................................................ 1

1.2. Timelines ............................................................................................................... 3

1.3. Land Clearance/Civil Works Schedules ................................................................. 3

1.4. Funds Availability and Sourcing and Limitations to LARP Implementation ............. 4

II. GENERAL PROGRESS IN LARP IMPLEMENTATION .................................................... 5

2.1 LARP Preparation ................................................................................................. 5

2.2 LARP Implementation ........................................................................................... 5

2.2.1 East Java ................................................................................................... 5

2.2.2 Central Java ............................................................................................... 6

2.2.3 North Kalimantan ....................................................................................... 7

2.2.4 West Kalimantan ........................................................................................ 7

III. OUTSTANDING ISSUES ON RESETTLEMENT, CORRESPONDING PLAN OF ACTION,

AND STATUS ................................................................................................................. 8

3.1. Central Java .......................................................................................................... 8

3.2. East Java .............................................................................................................. 8

3.3. North Kalimantan .................................................................................................. 8

3.4. West Kalimantan ................................................................................................... 9

IV. OTHER CONCERNS AND NOTATIONS ......................................................................... 9

5.1. Internal and External Monitoring ............................................................................ 9

5.2. Disclosure, Consultation, Participation, and Grievance ........................................10

5.3. Gender Mainstreaming .........................................................................................10

ii

LIST OF TABLE

Table 1. Summary of Subproject Description by Region and Corresponding ......................... 1

Table 2. Key Timelines Associated with Social Safeguards Imperatives ................................ 3

Table 3. General Progress in Land Clearance and Civil Works as of November 2016 ........... 3

Table 4. LARP Budget and Source of Funds Made Available ................................................ 4

Table 5. Details of AH Compensation and Reasons for Rejection ......................................... 7

Table 6. Remaining Outstanding Issues from Central Java as of November 2016 ................. 8

Table 7. Remaining Outstanding Issues from East Java as of November 2016 ..................... 8

Table 8. Remaining Outstanding Issues from North Kalimantan as of November 2016 ......... 8

Table 9. Remaining Outstanding Issues from West Kalimantan as of November 2016 ......... 9

LIST OF APPENDIX

Appendix 1. Photo Documentation Of Losses For Giriwoyo-Duwet .....................................11

1

I. INTRODUCTION

1. The Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP) is being implemented in four provinces of Indonesia, namely West and North Kalimantan; Central and East Java – envisaged to address important national or strategic road corridors in northern Kalimantan and southern Java to encourage economic growth in these less developed and poorer areas of Indonesia. The rehabilitation, capacity expansion and new construction of roads will improve connectivity and access to services. Specifically, improved road infrastructure in southern Java is necessary for increased economic growth to improve access to markets and to attract investment in that area. Road network development in Kalimantan will ensure that economic development will occur in less developed and remote areas.

2. The Project is a four-year undertaking by the Director General of Highways (DGH or Ditjen Bina Marga) of the Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing (MPWPH) purposely to rehabilitate, improve or newly construct about 476 km of roads and bridges where of the 476 km subproject roads, about 3,860 m will involve rehabilitation or replacement of bridges and 40 km will be construction of new roads in agricultural areas with existing earthen tracks in some sections.

3. Project financing is with the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the Islamic Development Bank (IDB) as approved 24 November 2011 by the ADB Board. The Government of Indonesia and ADB signed the loan agreement on 07 May 2012. The ADB-financed component covers 399 km of road (3,390 of which are bridges) while the IDB-financed component includes 77 km of road (470 m of which are bridges).

1.1. Backgrounder

4. RRDP is divided into eleven (11) construction packages. Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plans (LARP) were prepared in October 2011 and uploaded on to the ADB website (Table 1).

Table 1. Summary of Subproject Description by Region and Corresponding

Social Safeguard Document

No Package No Project Name Length (km)

District Type of Works Safeguard Document

CENTRAL JAVA

1 CW-0124-RCP01 Tambak Mulyo-Wawar

38.46 Kebumen Widening, resurfacing and new bridge construction

LARP

2 CW-0224-RCP01 Giriwoyo-Duwet (Section-1)

23.75 Wonogiri New road construction, widening and new bridge construction

Simple LARP

3 CW-0324-RCP01 Wawar-Congot 14.3 Purworejo Widening and resurfacing

EAST JAVA

4 CW-0428-RCP01 Jolosutro-Sendang biru

21.3 Malang New road construction including raising grade and new bridge construction

LARP

NORTH KALIMANTAN

5 CW-0834-RCP01 Tanjung Selor-SP. 3 Tanjung Palas

34.82 Bulungan New road construction including raising grade and reconstruction

LARP

SP. 3 Tanjung Palas – SekatakBuji (Section-1)

6 CW-0934-RCP01 SP. 3 Tanjung Palas – SekatakBuji (Section-1)

Bulungan Grade improvement and resurfacing

2

No Package No Project Name Length (km)

District Type of Works Safeguard Document

7 CW-1034-RCP01 SP. 3 Apas - Simaranggis (Section-1)

45 Nunukan New road construction including raising grade and reconstruction

LARP

8 CW-1134-RCP01 SP. 3 Apas - Simaranggis (Section-2)

43.04 Nunukan

Widening and reconstruction

Simaranggis-Bts Negara (Sendong)

WEST KALIMANTAN

9 CW-0530-RCP01 Sosok-Tayan 79.2 Sanggau Reconstruction and resurfacing (direct overlay)

LARP

Tanjung-Batas Kota Sanggau

10 CW-0630-RCP01 Tebas-Sinkawang (Section-1)

55.97 Singkawang & Sambas

Reconstruction, resurfacing, and widening Tebas-Sinkawang

(Section-2)

Bypass Sambas Sambas

Galing-Tanjung Harapan

11 CW-0730-RCP01 Sp. Tanjung-Galing (Section-1)

52.03 Sambas New road construction including raising grade and reconstruction Sp. Tanjung-Galing

(Section-2)

Aruk (Bts. Serawak)-Sp. Tanjung

Note: Packets 2 and 3 have minimal impacts, if at all at time of LARP preparation thus simple LARPs were developed for straightforward implementation and compliance.

5. Per Loan Agreement,

Schedule 5, Para 5: The Borrower shall, and shall cause the Project Executing Agency to ensure that any involuntary resettlement and/or activities impacting ethnic minorities be carried out in accordance with the agreed LARAPs, ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS), and the Borrower’s relevant laws. In case of differences between Borrower’s laws and regulations and the SPS, the SPS shall prevail. In case of such involuntary resettlement, the Borrower shall ensure (a) the Project Executing Agency shall be responsible for internal monitoring of resettlement activities, including engagement of an external monitoring agency 1 month before commencement of the resettlement activities. The internal and external monitoring reports shall be submitted to ADB every quarter and uploaded on DGH's website within 2 weeks of their submission; and such monitoring and reporting activities shall be carried out until resettlement has been completed; and (b) the timely provision of counterpart funds for resettlement in order to satisfy the requirements and objectives of resettlement.

Schedule 5, Para 8: The Borrower shall, and shall cause the Project Executing Agency to ensure that ADB’s SPS requirements are applied and implemented for all Project components regardless of financing source.

6. As such, internal monitoring reports are prepared to determine the extent the LARP documents have been implemented in the field and identify constraints and problems encountered during the implementation process. Specifically, this report intends to cover the following concerns:

Compensation and/or other entitlements are provided as per Final LARP, with no discrimination according to gender, vulnerability, or any other factor;

Livelihood restoration measures are designed and implemented including modifications in the programs and provision of additional cash and in-kind assistance to the participating affected households as and when necessary;

Public information, public consultation and grievance redress procedures are followed as described in the Final LARP;

3

Capacity of APs to restore/re-establish livelihoods and living standards. Special attention given to severely affected and vulnerable households.

Affected public facilities and infrastructure are restored promptly; and

The transition between relocation or site clearing and commencement of civil works is smooth and that sites are not handed over for civil works until affected households have been satisfactorily compensated, assisted and relocated.

1.2. Timelines

7. Key timelines (Table 2) are pertinent to note under social safeguards as Project management transitions to more relevant and comprehensive documentation of forthcoming monitoring periods.

Table 2. Key Timelines Associated with Social Safeguards Imperatives

Year Activity / Milestone

2010 Detailed design of all eleven (11) subprojects completed by DGH in December 2010.

Feasibility

2011 5 LARPs prepared

Loan approval by ADB Board on 24 November 2011

2012 The Government of Indonesia and ADB signed the loan agreement on 07 May 2012.

DGH updated the detailed design completed by Directorate of Technical Affairs (or Bintek, DGH) in May 2012.

2013 External monitoring conducted for all LARPs

2014 The Core Team Consultant (Renardet) was mobilized on March 2014

2 Monitoring reports produced

2015 2 Monitoring reports produced; the 2nd

being from Dec 2015 – Feb 2016

Request for contract addendum in West Kalimantan requiring new LARPs.

2016 5 Monitoring reports produced: edited and resubmitted the Sept-Nov 2015 Quarterly Internal Monitoring Report, the Dec 2015-Feb 2016 Quarterly Internal Monitoring Report, Mar to May 2016 Quarterly Internal Monitoring Report, June to Aug 2016 Quarterly Internal Monitoring Report and this document – the Sept-Nov 2016 Internal Monitoring Report.

1.3. Land Clearance/Civil Works Schedules

8. Table 3 provides a summary of affected households as monitored viz land clearing/civil works being conducted within the Project sites during the monitoring period. With the 2 Draft LARPs, it will be noted that an additional 333 AHs have been added: 245 for Aruk and 88 for Tanjung Harapan. Thus the total AHs for the project changed from 2,017 in the previous monitoring periods to 2,350 in this current monitoring period. The numbers will be finalized once the new LARPs for West Kalimantan are approved and implemented.

Table 3. General Progress in Land Clearance and Civil Works as of November 2016

Section

No. of AHs Eligible for Compensation/

Allowance/ Assistance

Relocating Households

Date for Civil Works

Date of Contract

Commencement of Works

Completion Date

CENTRAL JAVA 1,222 31

CW-01: Tambakmulyo - Wawar

1,214 31 12-Jan-15 3-Aug-15 2-Aug-18

CW-02: Griwoyo -Duwet 8 13-Jan-15 23-Jul-15 22-Jul-17

CW-03: Wawar – Congot - 7-Jan-15 5-Jun-15 4-Jun-16

EAST JAVA 54

CW-04:Jolosutro – Sendangbiru, East Java

54

21-Aug-13

18-Oct-13 10-Apr-16 24-Dec-13

18-Dec-14

20-Mar-15

4

Section

No. of AHs Eligible for Compensation/

Allowance/ Assistance

Relocating Households

Date for Civil Works

Date of Contract

Commencement of Works

Completion Date

NORTH KALIMANTAN 127

CW-08: Tanjung Selor – Sp 3

3

3-Nov-14

12-Dec-14 9-Jun-17 Tanjung Palas Sp 3 Tanjung Palas – Sekatak Buji (Sec-1)

18-Mar-16

CW-09: Sp 3 Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji (Sec-2)

88 25-Jun-14

4-Sep-14 2-Mar-17 18-Mar-16

CW-10: Sp Tiga Apas – Simanggaris (Sec-1)

4 2 11-Apr-14 10-Jul-14 25-Dec-16

CW-11: Sp Tiga Apas – Simanggaris (Sec-2)

32 1 11-Apr-14 1-Oct-14 29-Sep-17 Simanggaris – Batas Negara (Serudong)

WEST KALIMANTAN 947

CW-05: Sosok – Tayan. 369 15-Jan-15 15-Jun-15 14-Jun-18 Tanjung – Batas Kota

Sanggau

CW-06:Tebas – Singkawang (Sec -1)

230

14-Nov-13

17-Dec-13 15-Dec-16 Tebas – Singkawang (Sec-2) 28-Aug-15

Baypass Sambas

Galing – Tanjung Harapan 88

CW-07:Sp Tanjung – Galing 15

26-Nov-13 4-Dec-13 4-Jun-17 Aruk (Batas Serawak) – Sp

Tanjung 245 20-Oct-15

GRAND TOTAL 2,350 34

1.4. Funds Availability and Sourcing and Limitations to LARP Implementation

9. Table 4 summarizes availability and source of funds for LARP implementation and the associated cost. LARP budget is drawn from national budget. In both Kalimantan and Java provinces, timely release of funds was a constraint despite assurances from local governments.

10. In Central Java Lot 2 – CW-02 (Griwoyo-Duwet) is currently experiencing constraints that may impinge on progress of civil works inasmuch as 7 AHs refuse to accept the compensation package now kept with the court. Two packages in West Kalimantan require the preparation of LARPs as these were not covered in the original LARPs produced in 2011.

Table 4. LARP Budget and Source of Funds Made Available

Package/Location LARP Budget (Rp) Source of Funding

CW-01: Tambakmulyo - Wawar 60,766,622,418.75 APBD Province/District

CW-02: Griwoyo -Duwet No access APBD District

CW-03: Wawar – Congot No access APBD District

CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendangbiru, East Java 14,442,500,000.00 APBD District

CW-05: Sosok – Tayan. Tanjung – Batas Kota Sanggau

3,067,812,125.00

APBD Province

CW-06: Tebas – Singkawang (Sec -1) Tebas – Singkawang (Sec-2) Bypass Sambas Galing – Tanjung Harapan

4,215,393,653,00

APBD Province

CW-07: Sp Tanjung – Galing Aruk (Batas Serawak) – Sp Tanjung

CW-08: Tanjung Selor – Sp 3 Tanjung Palas Sp 3 Tanjung Palas – Sekatak Buji (Sec-1)

439,648,437.00 APBD Province

CW-09: Sp 3 tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji (Sec-2)

5

Package/Location LARP Budget (Rp) Source of Funding

CW-10: Sp Tiga Apas – Simanggaris (Sec-1)

CW-11: Sp Tiga Apas – Simanggaris (Sec-2) Simanggaris – Batas Negara (Serudong)

11. This report covers the period September to November 2016. For this monitoring period, a total of 3 nationals constituted the CTC Social Safeguards Team: 2 Community Development Specialists and 1 Social Impact Specialist. The two Specialists were joined by a new one midway this monitoring period.

12. The International Specialist was engaged towards the latter part of November 2016 as home support.

II. GENERAL PROGRESS IN LARP IMPLEMENTATION

2.1 LARP Preparation

13. Aruk. A LARP for whole length project for 30-RCP-03 (CW-07) had been completed on October 2011, but did not cover widening to 4 (four) lanes road pavement for segments STA 40 + 800 to STA 46 + 423 (5.623 KM). Thus on November 10 to 19, 2015, the Safeguard team conducted a field survey that began in STA.40-800 s / d STA. 46 + 423 (5,623 KM). The survey results are in the process of data processing, for the preparation of the LARP. The Draft LARP was submitted for review and discussed with the Safeguard Officer (Resettlement) ADB and PMU at ADB Office Jakarta on 27 January 2016. The revised Draft LARP was submitted unofficially to ADB 0n 24 June 2016, but document completion awaits final decisions from the Ministry of Forestry associated with landuse change from protection forest to APLThis was kept hanging during this monitoring period awaiting for decisions from top management as there was stale mate in the arrangement for compensation coming from the Ministry of Forestry.

14. Tanjung-Harapan - Missing Link. Originally, the road section connecting Sambas-Tanjung Harapan in West Kalimantan located between packages CW-06 and CW-07 was not included under the Project as this was intended to be implemented under RRDP II. However, to ensure connectivity of the road sections in West Kalimantan, this section was subsequently proposed to be included under the current RRDP. ADB therefore approved the inclusion of this section under a contract variation of package CW-06 on 15 June 2016. The completion of this Resettlement Plan (RP) is a precondition for signing of the contract addendum under Package CW-06. Under RRDP II, Draft RP was prepared in January 2014. This RP takes off from the 2014 Draft RP to ensure all APs along the road section of Sambas–Tanjung Harapan are fully compensated in line with the ADB SPS 2009. To finalize the LAR{, the Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS) was carried out from 2 – 5 August 2016 by the Core Team Consultant (CTC) safeguard team in collaboration with the local government. Draft LARP was submitted to ADB on 11 October 2016. ADB give response on 24 October 2016 included some comments. Revision of Draft LARP Sambas-Tj. Harapan was submitted to ADB on 7 November 2016. Based ADB request, on 9 November 2016 was carried ot discussion with ADB, PMU-RRDP and CTC, ADB asking related depreciation cost that apllied in structure price. ADB request to meet the MAPPI for advice. Currently ongoing finalization of the LARP document.

2.2 LARP Implementation

2.2.1 East Java

15. No monitoring conducted and status remains the same as the previous monitoring period. CTC focus on 2 LARP preparation in West Kalimantan.

6

2.2.2 Central Java

16. Compensation Payment. On 5-6 November 2016, CTC conducted a site visit to Giriwoyo – Duwet to determine terms and conditions for involuntary resettlement and the reasons as to why AHs refuse. Of the 8 AHs, 7 AHs remain to collect their compensation payment from the District Court office for Package 24-RCP-02 (CW-02). Figure 1 indicates thee location of the AHs relative to the project. Table 5 on the other hand provides information on the the affected area, compensation value, and comments of the AHs. Appendix 1 is a photodocumentation of the losses.

Figure 1. Map referencing AHs with road project Package 24-RCP-02 (CW-02)

2017

Giriwoyo

Km.Ska. 77 + 200

/ STA 0+000

Glonggong

Km.Ska.84+ 200

Giribelah,Km.Ska.90+ 700

Km.Ska.89+ 950 /STA12+750

Dringo,Km.Ska.82 + 400

/STA5+200

KelurahanGiritontro

Ds.Pucanganom

Ds.Platarejo

Ds.Sirnoboyo

Ds.Tawangharjo

Ds.SendangAgung

Ds.Sejati

Km.Ska.86+ 400/STA9+200

Km.Ska.87+ 700/STA10+500

Rmh Bpk.Rusmanto,

STA3+450

Rmh Bpk.Yoseph Arief Gunawan,

STA3+460

Rmh Bpk.Arnold,

STA3+500

Rmh Bpk.Karyadi,

STA3+700

(Sudah Bebas

Konsinyasi)

Rmh Bpk.Tardi,

STA4+950

Rmh Bpk.Sopawiro /

SLamet,STA5+175

Rmh Ibu Hartatik,

STA5+150Rmh Ibu Mulyatmi,

STA5+200

Rmh Ibu Hartatik,

STA5+250

7

Table 5. Details of AH Compensation and Reasons for Rejection

Name Village Land area

(m2) Value of

Compensation Comment

Hartatik Platarejo 343.0 205,138,350.00 Asking price is 1.4B, current rate too low; cannot find replacement land of same value

120.0 9,006,000.00

Th. Mulyatmi Platarejo 288.0 199,296,410.00 Asking price is 1-1.4B, current rate too low; cannot find replacement land same value

Yoseph Arif Gunawan Platarejo 52.0 14,327,700.00 Can be renegotiated

Karyadi Platarejo 52.0 24,275,400.00 Sick, needed money; took compensation

Tardi Platarejo 182.0 14,676,320.00 Offended by price; those with smaller size get higher value than what he has (ex village master)

Rusmanto Platarejo 178.0 14,172,000.00 50M

Arnold Platarejo 82.0 11,876,400.00 Not found at time of CTC fielding

Sopawiro / Slamet Tawangharjo 78.0 20,234,000.00 Not found at time of CTC fielding

17. Income Restoration. No monitoring conducted and status remains the same as the previous monitoring period.

2.2.3 North Kalimantan

18. As of this monitoring period, there has still been no hand over from the Bulungan LG to the DGH as regards LARP Implementation. CTC similarly has not included monitoring activities for Bulungan and Nunukan this monitoring period – both for compensation and income restoration.

2.2.4 West Kalimantan

19. Activities related to IRP was not monitored within this period as focus was on the verification and preparation for Aruk LARP and start of preparations for the CW-6 LARP. Discussions on IRP still have to be made and DGH with CTC to follow through.

20. Aruk. Continuous improvement if the Aruk LARP was done. A total of 245 households will permanently be affected by the 4-lane subproject of which more than half are found in Desa Kaliau, followed by those from Desa Tapang (30%) and Desa Sanatab (11%). There are four general types of losses or impacts under this RP: (i) loss of land, (ii) loss of structure, (iii) loss of trees and crops, (iv) loss of business income, and (v) high risk of impoverishment or vulnerability.

21. Tanjung Harapan. The detailed measurement survey (DMS) for all potential AP losses due to the project was conducted from 02 - 04 August 2016 by the Core Team Consultant (CTC) in collaboration with the local government personnel of District Bina Marga (DGH), Sambas District, Bappeda, Satker, and PPK. Data was processed and completed during this monitoring period. There are four general types of losses or impacts under this RP: (i) loss of structure, (ii) loss of trees, (iii) loss of business income, and (iv) high risk of impoverishment or vulnerability. A fifth potential impact is the temporary loss of land during civil works. A total of 88 AHs or 428 persons will be affected by the partial or total loss of structures (main and secondary) and footbridges, while the local government will lose a police outpost and 71 trees.

8

III. OUTSTANDING ISSUES ON RESETTLEMENT, CORRESPONDING PLAN OF ACTION, AND STATUS

3.1. Central Java

22. Outstanding issues from Central Java subprojects for this monitoring period are summarized in Table 6 with corresponding follow up actions, status and comment/s.

Table 6. Remaining Outstanding Issues from Central Java as of November 2016

OUTSTANDING ISSUE FOLLOW UP ACTIONS STATUS/COMMENT

Compensation for land loss. For Package 24-RCP-02 (CW-02): In Giriwoyo – Duwet, there are still 7 APs from 8 APs of people who have not taken their land compensation payment from District Court office.

CTC engaged with the AHs and secured details about IR and reasons for not agreeing to project terms.

Still unresolved though court already decided in favor of the government project. Discuss with DGH.

Empowerment of vulnerable groups and seriously affected.

No follow up action done CTC to continue monitoring.

Allowance for vulnerable groups, transition allowance, and deduction of depreciation compensation: The Public Works office of Kebumen, on behalf of Kebumen Regency, said that they can not pay the (1) transition allowance and vulnerable group, (2) Income restoration, and (3) Deduction of depreciation

No follow up action done CTC to present verification findings to LG and DGH. CTC to assist DGH and Dinas to develop social programs to incorporate AHs towards income restoration. CTC to follow up developments.

Payment of transition allowance for the relocation AHs and stall owners affected (could take the form of cash or in kind).

3.2. East Java

23. Table 7 provides the key issue, corresponding response/action plan to address the issue, and status during this monitoring period.

Table 7. Remaining Outstanding Issues from East Java as of November 2016

OUTSTANDING ISSUE FOLLOW UP ACTIONS STATUS/COMMENT

Payment of forest land to replace land owned by PT. Perhutani at Malang District to Bondowoso District; Delayed payment partly due to limited budget APBD Malang District

Already paid partly for 26-plot area of about 20.28 Ha or 14% of all plots.

CTC to monitor.

Income restoration No monitoring activity this period.

Requires close CTC monitoring.

3.3. North Kalimantan

24. Remaining issues are shown in Table 8.

Table 8. Remaining Outstanding Issues from North Kalimantan as of November 2016

9

OUTSTANDING ISSUE FOLLOW UP ACTIONS STATUS/COMMENT

Bulungan

Compensation payment for lost land; Further, compensation for lost lands acquired for the project located are in the existing ROW, forest areas, and state land used by peoples for farming without legal evidence.

2 AHs have not received their compensation though concessions are being discussed

CTC to continue monitoring.

Assistance to vulnerable groups. APs that require relocation/fixed of shops/ structures should be provided easier access to materials and provision of labour, as needed. Assistance may be in cash or in kind.

CTC followed up. Per LG, while there is no program addressing income restoration from LG to AHs, the Bulungan LG is committed to addressing income restoration.

Requires further discussions and follow up by CTC. Review verification data of AHs and suggest programs as aligned with LG programs.

Nunukan

The Mission reminded that any losses (affected land, buildings, and trees/crops) should be compensated at replacement cost either in cash or in kind agreed by the affected HHs prior to the land clearing commencement.

The DGH was committed to settle the outstanding compensation payment by end of 2015.

No update

3.4. West Kalimantan

25. Resettlement impacts have been verified for Package 6 - the Tebas-Singkawang (Section 1) of West Kalimantan Province and incorporated in the September – November 2015 monitoring report. Table 9 provides the summary outstanding issues, follow up actions and status for this monitoring period.

Table 9. Remaining Outstanding Issues from West Kalimantan as of November 2016

OUTSTANDING ISSUE FOLLOW UP ACTIONS STATUS/COMMENT

Compensation of affected land, structures, crops

New LARPs is still under process.

Awaiting finalization and approval of new LARPs.

Income restoration. LG made commitments but until now there has been no program of Sambas district government and Singkawang. However, the local government has planned an empowerment program for people whose land is affected by land acquisition.

Still ongoing discussions with Sambas and Singkawang LGs.

DGH with CTC need to follow up on this

IV. OTHER CONCERNS AND NOTATIONS

5.1. Internal and External Monitoring

26. External monitoring is still a concern and DGH has to coordinate the different units tasked with this undertaking.

27. With respect to internal monitoring, it is currently being addressed by DGH and reports from 2016 being completed, this report being the last save the quarter bridge for 2016-17.

10

5.2. Disclosure, Consultation, Participation, and Grievance

28. The Project Information Booklets developed at IOL stage for the 2 new LARPs will have to be updated and circulated for West Kalimantan; PIBs for North and West Kalimantan to be updated yet to incorporate results of the verification process.

5.3. Gender Mainstreaming

29. No movement with respect to LARP concerns on Gender Mainstreaming.

11

APPENDIX 1. PHOTODOCUMENTATION OF LOSSES FOR GIRIWOYO-DUWET

Nama Penghuni : Hartatik Desa : Platarejo Lokasi : STA. 5+150 Bukti Kepemilikan : HM 1536 Luas Tanah (m2) : 343 m2 Nilai Ganti Rugi : Rp. 205.138.350,00 Status : Not Free

12

Nama Penghuni : Hartatik Desa : Platarejo Lokasi : STA. 5+250 Bukti Kepemilikan : HM 120 Luas Tanah (m2) : 120 m2 Nilai Ganti Rugi : Rp. 9.006.000,00 Status : Not Free

13

Nama Penghuni : Th. Mulyatmi Desa : Platarejo Lokasi : STA. 5+200 Bukti Kepemilikan : HM 121 Luas Tanah (m2) : 288 m2 Nilai Ganti Rugi : Rp. 199.296.410,00 Status : Not Free

14

Nama Penghuni : Yoseph Arif Gunawan Desa : Platarejo Lokasi : STA. 3+460. Bukti Kepemilikan : HM 1190 Luas Tanah (m2) : 52 m2 Nilai Ganti Rugi : Rp. 14.327.700,00 Status : Not Free

15

Nama Penghuni : Karyadi Desa : Platarejo Lokasi : STA. 3+700 Bukti Kepemilikan : HM 225 Luas Tanah (m2) : 52 m2 Nilai Ganti Rugi : Rp. 24.275.400,00 Status : Took Compensation

16

Nama Penghuni : Tardi Desa : Platarejo Lokasi : STA. 4+950 Bukti Kepemilikan : HM 1184 Luas Tanah (m2) : 182 m2 Nilai Ganti Rugi : Rp. 14.676.320,00 Status : Not Free

17

Nama Penghuni : Rusmanto Desa : Platarejo Lokasi : STA. 3+450 Bukti Kepemilikan : C.594 P 32b/II Luas Tanah (m2) : 178 m2 Nilai Ganti Rugi : Rp. 14.172.000,00 Status : Not Free

18

Nama Penghuni : Arnold Desa : Platarejo Lokasi : STA. 3+500 Bukti Kepemilikan : HM 824 Luas Tanah (m2) : 82 m2 Nilai Ganti Rugi : Rp. 11.876.400,00 Status : Not Free

19

Nama Penghuni : Sopawiro / Slamet Desa : Tawangharjo Lokasi : STA. 5+175 Bukti Kepemilikan : HM 356 Luas Tanah (m2) : 78 m2 Nilai Ganti Rugi : Rp. 20.234.000,00 Status : Not Free