quarterly report - lestari-indonesia.org · rpjm district development plan rpjma provincial...

QUARTERLY REPORT

USAID LESTARI THIRD QUARTER OF YEAR 2 WORK PLAN April 1 – June 30, 2017

This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Tetra Tech ARD.

USAID LESTARI Quarterly Report Year 2, April 1 – June 30, 2017 P a g e | ii

This publication was prepared for review by the United States Agency for International Development under Contract # AID-497-TO-15-00005. The period of this contract is from July 2015 to July 2020. Implemented by:

Tetra Tech P.O. Box 1397 Burlington, VT 05402

Tetra Tech Contacts:

Reed Merrill, Chief of Party [email protected] Matthew Edwardsen, Project Manager [email protected]

Cover Photograph: From left to right: Village development planning (RPJMDes) process in Pulo Piku Village, Aceh Tenggara; Gender Mainstreaming Workshop in Mappi; Focus Group Discussion on Reduced Impact Lodging in KLHK.

mailto:[email protected]

USAID LESTARI Quarterly Report Year 2, April 1 – June 30, 2017 P a g e | 3

QUARTERLY REPORT

USAID LESTARI

April 1 – June 30, 2017

DISCLAIMER

This publication is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of Tetra Tech ARD and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.


TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................ 5

Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 6

Ringkasan Eksekutif ........................................................................................................... 7

LESTARI Technical Themes & Progress towards TOC .................................................. 16

Technical Theme 1: Forest & Land Use Governance & Advocacy ................................................ 16 LESTARI 1 – Awareness and Advocacy ........................................................................................... 17 LESTARI 2 – Operationalize Strategic Environmental Assessments (SEAs) and Landscape Conservation Plans (LCPs) to Improve Land Use Governance ....................................................... 17 LESTARI 3 – Sustainable Landscape Governance .......................................................................... 17

Technical Theme 2: Conservation Co-Management ....................................................................... 22 LESTARI 4 – Improved Forest Management Through Co-Management ......................................... 22 LESTARI 5 – Protected Area Management ...................................................................................... 22

Technical Theme 3: Private Sector Engagement ............................................................................. 25 LESTARI 6 – Green Enterprises ....................................................................................................... 25 LESTARI 7 – Private Sector Best Management Practices (BMPs) .................................................. 25 LESTARI 8 – Innovative Financing for Sustainable Land and Forest Management ........................ 25

Landscape Initiatives ........................................................................................................ 29

Leuser Landscape ............................................................................................................................. 29 Katingan-Kahayan Landscape .......................................................................................................... 39 Lorentz Lowlands Landscape ........................................................................................................... 48 Mappi-Bouven ................................................................................................................................... 54 Sarmi Landscape .............................................................................................................................. 57 Cyclops Landscape ........................................................................................................................... 59 Papua Provincial Initiatives ............................................................................................................... 63

National Initiatives ............................................................................................................ 66

Progress This Quarter ....................................................................................................................... 66 Challenges and Opportunities ........................................................................................................... 67 Priorities for Next Quarter ................................................................................................................. 68

Project Coordination, Management, and Communications ........................................... 69

Appendix 1: Detailed Landscapes Activities – 3rd Quarter FY 2017 ............................. 76

Appendix 2: Grants Management .................................................................................... 83

Appendix 3: LESTARI Progress Matrix – 3rd Quarter FY 2017 ...................................... 85

Appendix 4: LESTARI Results Framework ...................................................................... 91


ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AMEP Activity Monitoring and Evaluation Plan ATR Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning BAPPENAS Ministry of National Development Planning BIG Geospatial Information Agency BKPRD Regional Spatial Planning Coordination Agency BKSDA Nature Conservation Agency BMP Best Management Practice BRG National Peatland Restoration Agency CA Conservation Area CMMP Conservation Management and Monitoring Plan DAK Special Budget Allocation Fund DAU Regular Budget Allocation Fund FMU / KPH Forest Management Unit FPIC Free, Prior, and Informed Consent GHG Greenhouse Gas GOI Government of Indonesia HCS High Carbon Stock HCV High Conservation Value IFACS Indonesia Forestry and Climate Support Project KLHK Ministry of Environment and Forestry LCP Landscape Conservation Plan LEDS Low Emission Development Strategy LTTA Long-Term Technical Assistance M&E Monitoring and Evaluation METT Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool MOU Memorandum of Understanding MSF Multi-Stakeholder Forum MSU Michigan State University NP National Park PA Protected Area PES Payment for Environmental Services PHKA Directorate General of Forest and Nature PPP Public-Private Partnership RDTR Detailed Spatial Plan / Rencana Detail Tata Ruang RKT Provincial Development Plan RPJM District Development Plan RPJMA Provincial Development Plan for Aceh RPJMD Regional Development Plan RPJMDes Village-level Development Plan RTRWK District Spatial Plan RTRWP Provincial Spatial Plan SDI Spatial Data Infrastructure SEA / KLHS Strategic Environmental Assessment SIMTARU Management Information System for Spatial Planning SKPD Regional Working Unit / Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah SMART Spatial Monitoring and Reporting Tool STTA Short-Term Technical Assistance UNPAR University of Palangkaraya USAID United States Agency for International Development USG United States Government WCS Wildlife Conservation Society WWF World Wildlife Fund


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Quarterly Progress Report (QPR) summarizes the activities and achievements of the USAID LESTARI project during Year 2, Quarter 3 – April 1 to June 30, 2017. During this quarter, LESTARI continued to focus on deepening its broad range of activities in order to scale up impact and bring about measurable results across its 6 landscapes in Aceh, Central Kalimantan, and Papua. Overall, this cooperation aims to tackle key environmental challenges, support a more stable and secure Indonesia, and promote the U.S.-Indonesia strategic partnership. LESTARI implements a Collaborating, Learning, and Adapting (CLA) management model that, together with Theories of Change, continuously tests underlying assumptions based on evidence and makes adjustments in order to ensure project activities lead to measurable impact for improved forest and land use governance, sustainable forest management, biodiversity and key species conservation, and broad-based constituencies for conservation. In support of the CLA approach and part of the ongoing Mid-term Assessment, the LESTARI team conducted field visits this quarter to develop Landscape-specific Situation Models (LSMs) and conduct a Political Economy Analysis (PEA). The PEA looks at the power dynamics and political drivers underpinning landscape-specific threats. It provides promising new strategies and approaches for LESTARI in addressing these threats by focusing on advocacy and political will gaps in addition to LESTARI’s current focus on capacity building gaps. The PEA assessment findings will be utilized to support ongoing adaptive management, contribute to the Year 3 Work Plan, and prepare for the upcoming mid-term evaluation later this year. This QPR first presents an overview of the various strategic approaches and progress towards each corresponding theory of change. Next, details of this quarter’s progress are presented in dedicated landscapes sections that demonstrate how the technical approach is implemented on the ground in an integrated and synergistic manner. The Project Management, Coordination and Communications section details progress on the LSM and PEA development processes over this quarter as well as communications activities. Appendices at the end of the report include: (1) advocacy and awareness activities, SEA/LCP operationalization, MSF progress, and improved conservation area management support; (2) Grants funding allocations; (3) LESTARI Year 2 Quarter 3 Results Matrix; and the (4) LESTARI Results Framework. Note that indicators #2, #3, #10, #14, and #16 are measured annually and will be reported on in the Year 2 Annual Report.


RINGKASAN EKSEKUTIF LATAR BELAKANG PROYEK USAID LESTARI mendukung Pemerintah Republik Indonesia untuk mengurangi emisi gas rumah kaca (GRK) dan melestarikan keanekaragaman hayati di ekosistem hutan dan gambut yang kaya karbon dan signifikan secara biologis. Proyek USAID LESTARI, yang dibangun di atas landasan yang sudah dirintis oleh proyek USAID IFACS, menerapkan pendekatan lanskap untuk mengurangi emisi GRK dan memadukan kegiatan konservasi hutan dan konservasi lahan gambut dengan pembangunan beremisi rendah (LEDS) pada lahan-lahan rusak. Hal tersebut dilakukan dengan memperbaiki tata kelola pemanfaatan lahan dan pengelolaan wilayah hutan lindung, melindungi satwa dan flora spesies penting, memastikan keberlanjutan praktik - praktik industri dan sektor swasta, dan memperoleh dukungan dan partisipasi dari masyarakat luas dan seluruh pemangku kepentingan yang terlibat dalam kegiatan konservasi. LESTARI beroperasi di bawah pimpinan Tetra Tech dengan menjalin kerja sama dengan suatu konsorsium kemitraan yang terdiri dari WWF-Indonesia, Winrock International, Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), Blue Forests, Yayasan Sahabat Cipta, PT Hydro South Pole Carbon, Sustainable Travel International (STI), Michigan State University dan FIELD Foundation. Proyek LESTARI dilaksanakan mulai Agustus 2015 hingga Juli 2020.

IKHTISAR DAN PENDEKATAN TEKNIS Ringkasan panjang laporan triwulan ini bertujuan untuk memberikan gambaran ringkas dan singkat mengenai berbagai kegiatan dan pencapaian USAID LESTARI pada Triwulan Ketiga di Tahun Kedua, selama periode 1 April–30 Juni 2017. Selama triwulan ini, LESTARI bekerja secara efektif dan efisien bersama dengan berbagai mitra dan staf yang tersebar di 6 lanskap di 3 provinsi berbeda di Indonesia yaitu Aceh, Kalimantan Tengah, dan Papua. Kerja sama yang dijalin LESTARI selama ini tidak lain bertujuan untuk mengentas berbagai permasalahan lingkungan, mewujudkan Indonesia yang lebih stabil dan aman, dan mendorong kemitraan strategis antara Indonesia Amerika Serikat. Pendekatan teknis LESTARI dibangun berdasarkan 3 tema teknis yang terpadu dan sinergis, yaitu (1) Tata Guna Lahan dan Advokasi, (2) Kemitraan dalam Konservasi, dan (3) Pelibatan Pihak Swasta. Setiap tema teknis memiliki pendekatan strategisnya masing-masing dan Teori Perubahan atau Theory of Change (ToC). ToC menjembatani hubungan antara intervensi proyek, ancaman, dan hasil yang pada akhirnya akan berkontribusi kepada tujuan akhir dari proyek ini yaitu mengurangi emisi GRK di sektor hutan dan lahan dan menempatkan 8,42 juta ha kawasan hutan, termasuk habitat orang utan, ke dalam program perbaikan pengelolaan. Pencapaian yang diraih pada triwulan ini diukur berdasarkan 16 indikator kunci dan kontribusinya terhadap pemenuhan target di Tahun Kedua dapat dilihat secara rinci di Apendiks 3. Perlu diperhatikan bahwa indikator #2, #3, #10, #14, dan #16 diukur tiap tahun dan dilaporkan di dalam Laporan Tahunan Tahun Kedua. Pertama-tama Laporan Triwulan ini menjabarkan secara singkat relevansi pendekatan strategis dan kemajuan yang diraih LESTARI per lanskap. Di bagian tersebut, akan terlihat bagaimana pendekatan teknis diimplementasikan di lapangan secara terpadu dan sinergis. Selanjutnya, bagian Manajemen, Koordinasi, dan Komunikasi Proyek akan menjelaskan pencapaian pembuatan Landscape Situation Models (LSM) dan pendekatan analisis ekonomi politik atau Political Economy Analysis (PEA) dan berbagai kegiatan komunikasi


LESTARI selama triwulan ini. Terakhir, bagian Lampiran di akhir laporan akan berisi (1) kegiatan advokasi dan kampanye, operasionalisasi KLHS/RKL, progres MSF, dan peningkatan dukungan bagi pengelolaan kawasan konservasi; (2) alokasi dana hibah; (3) Matriks Pencapaian Tahun Kedua Triwulan Ketiga; dan (4) Kerangka Pencapaian LESTARI.

LEUSER LANDSCAPE Target utama pada tahun kedua bagi lanskap ini adalah menetapkan kawasan seluas 665.000 ha yang memiliki signifikansi biologis dan/atau SDA sebagai kawasan dalam perbaikan pengelolaan. Kawasan-kawasan yang ditargetkan adalah kawasan Tn. Gn. Leuser seluas 627.000 ha (indikator #10) dan kawasan-kawasan yang dikelola secara kolaboratif berdasarkan perjanjian dengan masyarakat setempat seluas 38.000 ha (indikator #11).

Perbaikan Tata Guna Lahan dan Hutan Pada triwulan ini, Surat Persetujuan terkait Kajian Lingkungan Hidup Strategis (KLHS) bagi perumusan RMPJD Aceh telah ditandatangani oleh gubernur Aceh yang baru. Surat Persetujuan tersebut menjamin bahwa dukungan dalam bentuk pendampingan teknis oleh tim KLHS dan rekomendasi-rekomendasi KLHS (terkait pembangunan jalan di lanskap Leuser dan alokasi dana bagi pengelolaan hutan dan lahan) akan diadopsi ke dalam RPJMD Provinsi Aceh. Di Kab. Aceh Barat, pembuatan draf peta zonasi kawasan DAS Susoh dengan tujuan untuk membantu lembaga kehutanan (KPH dan pejabat Tn. Gn. Leuser) memperbaiki peta zonasi penggunaan lahan mereka. Proses pembuatan peta tersebut melibatkan prinsip perencanaan partisipatoris. Hasil pemetan tersebut telah dipresentasikan kepada pihak-pihak berkepentingan di DG Planologi di KLHK. Di Kab. Aceh Selatan, LESTARI berupaya mendorong penyusunan sebuah Perbup terkait RPJMDEs dan Panduan Teknis Rencanan Kerja Pembangunan Desa yang mewajibkan perbaikan pendekatan RPJMDes di seluruh Aceh Selatan. Bupati Aceh Selatan membentuk sebuah kelompok kerja yang terdiri dari akademisi lokal, pejabat publik, dan perwakilan MSF yang akan berkerjasama untuk membuat draf Perbup. Tiga lokakarya diadakan untuk membantu penyusunan PerBup tersebut. Ketiga lokakarya tersebut salah satunya diadakan untuk mempererat kerja sama antara masyarakat desa dengan badan kehutanan demi pengelolaan hutan yang lebih baik.

Perbaikan Pengelolaan Hutan Di tingkat desa, Tim LESTARI berupaya menyematkan visi pengelolaan bersama atau co-management ke dalam RPJM-Des. LESTARI juga memprakarsai berbagai kegiatan atau program co-management di desa-desa prioritas lewat program perhutanan sosial atau program co-management lainnya seperti penjalinan kerja sama dengan KPH dan pejabat taman nasional. Selain itu di tingkat provinsi, Tim LESTARI ikut mendukung pembentukan kelompok kerja perhutanan sosial. Berkat bantuan LESTARI, 3 desa telah mengajukan izin perhutanan sosial dan sementara beberapa desa lainnya akan menyusul di kuartal berikutnya. Enam organisasi penerima dana hibah di lanskap Leuser terus berupaya untuk mengembangkan program co-management dengan cara menjalin kolaborasi dengan KPH atau memanfaatkan program perhutanan sosial. Tim LESTARI juga membantu pengadaan evaluasi internal Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT) di Taman Nasional Gunung Leuser (TNGL). Evaluasi internal ini diadakan untuk mempersiapkan para pengelola taman nasional dengan informasi-informasi


penting yang akan dibutuhkan saat evaluasi partisipatoris METT. Evaluasi partisipatoris tersebut akan diadakan pada triwulan selanjutnya di Taman Nasional Gunung Leuser (TNGL) dan Suaka Margasatwa Rawa Singkil dengan mengikutsertakan semua pemangku kepentingan. Hasil evaluasi tersebut akan menyediakan informasi terkait kelemahan pengelolaan dan kawasan yang butuh perbaikan dan membimbing langkah LESTARI selanjutnya. Saat ini, ada 7 tim patroli SMART yang berpatroli secara rutin di TNGL (4 tim) dan Suaka Margasatwa Rawa Singkil (3 tim). Pada triwulan ini, tim patroli SMART telah 20 perjalanan patroli di KPH VI, TNGL, dan Suaka Margasatwa Rawa Singkil. Totalnya, mereka berpatroli selama 43 hari dengan jarak 65 km. Di taman nasional, mereka telah berpatroli sebanyak delapan kali sepanjang 328,9 km selama 101 hari. Di Suaka Margasatwa Rawa Singkil, tim SMART berpatroli sebanyak 9 kali sepanjang 656 km selama 53 hari. Pada triwulan ini, tim SMART menemukan dan mendata kasus-kasus perdagangan satwa, perambahan, dan penebangan liar. Selain itu, Wildlife Response Unit (WRU) di lanskap Leuser melakukan pemantauan secara berkala di daerah-daerah dengan potensi konflik manusia-satwa tinggi. Tim LESTARI membantu masyarakat dengan menyediakan dan menjaga kandang anti harimau di 14 titik di lapangan. Mereka juga memfasilitasi masyarakat setempat membentuk dan mengoperasionalisasikan sebuah organisasi lokal, KS Batu Napal, di 4 kecamatan di Aceh Selatan dengan harapan mereka dapat mencegah konflik dengan satwa liar secara mandiri. Dalam rangka mendukung perkebunan cokelat yang berkelanjutan, LESTARI meneruskan upaya implementasi program kemitraan publik-swasta atau Public-Private Partnership (PPP) dengan JAVARA. Secara spesifik, LESTARI mengadakan program peningkatan kapasitas bagi 850 petani dalam rangka melatih kemampuan organisasi, teknik tumpang sari, dan praktik-praktik agrikultur yang baik atau good agricultural practices (GAPs). Selain itu, LESTARI juga membantu menyediakan bibit tumpang sari di tiga kabupaten yang kemudian akan disebarkan ke 10 lahan percobaan. Bantuan penyediaan bibit tersebut juga dilengkapi dengan pelatihan teknik panen dan fermentasi.

LANSKAP KATINGAN-KAHAYAN Target utama pada tahun kedua bagi lanskap ini adalah penetapkan kawasan seluas 863.000 ha yang memiliki signifikansi biologis dan/atau SDA sebagai kawasan dalam perbaikan pengelolaan. Kawasan-kawasan yang ditargetkan adalah kawasan TN. Sebangau seluas 596,000 ha (indikator #10), kawasan-kawasan yang dikelola secara kolaboratif berdasarkan perjanjian dengan masyarakat setempat seluas 44,000 ha (indikator #11), dan kawasan-kawasan konsensi sebesar 223,000 ha (indikator #15).

Perbaikan Tata Guna Lahan dan Hutan LESTARI terus berupaya untuk merestorasi lahan gambut melalui penabatan kanal (canal blocking) yang berguna untuk menjaga kadar air sehingga dapat mencegah kebakaran dan dengan bekerjasama dan berkoordinasi dengan pemerintah daerah dan para pemangku kepentingan lainnya. LESTARI mendukung proses Padiatapa atau Free Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) di empat desa. Proses ini kemudian diakhiri dengan pemberitahuan Berita Acara dan yang sesuai petunjuk dari BRG dan USAID. LESTARI mengusung Padiatapa sebagai salah satu model tata kelola yang baik dalam mendukung pengelolaan lahan secara inklusif dan berkelanjutan. Dalam rangkan mendukung restorasi lahan gambut, LESTARI juga bergelut dalam bidang advokasi terkait pengelolaan lahan dan kebakaran di Kalimantan Tengah. LESTARI memberikan dukungan teknis kepada pemerintah provinsi, kabupaten, dan masyarakat


untuk perumusan berbagai kebijakan terkait karhutla: (1) PerGub tentang manajemen darurat karhutla, (2) PerKab Katingan tentang manajemen darurat karhutla, (3) rencana cadang karhutla di Kab. Pulau Pisang, dan (4) Perda Kalimantan Tengah tentang pengendalian karhutla.

Perbaikan Pengelolaan Hutan Pada triwulan ini, salah satu kegiatan co-management adalah memfasilitasi masyarakat desa mengajukan izin perhutanan sosial dan memperkuat peran dan kemampuan institusi-institusi lokal dalam mengelola hutan secara berkelanjutan. Tim LESTARI dan kelompok kerja perhutanan sosial di Kalimantan Tengah membimbing masyarakat mengembangkan rencana pengelolaan hutan dan rencana bisnis kehutanan berskala kecil. Pedoman yang dibuat juga akan digunakan di desa-desa lain di Kalimantan Tengah. Empat izin perhutanan sosial–seluas 2.016 ha–telah diterbitkan pada triwulan pertama dan sisanya diharapkan terbit pada triwulan berikutnya. Penulisan laporan evaluasi beberapa KPH di Lanskap Katingan-Kahayan telah selesai. Pada triwulan selanjutnya, LESTARI berencana menunjukkan hasil evaluasi kepada para pemangku kepentingan. Tim LESTARI membantu kegiatan evaluasi METT internal di Bukit Baka Bukit Raya dan Tn. Sebangau. Hasil self-asessment tersebut akan divalidasi ulang lewat evaluasi METT partisipatoris yang mengikutsertakan berbagai pemangku kepentingan. Evaluasi METT tersebut akan dilakukan pada triwulan berikutnya. Draf peraturan tentang pelembagaan dan operasionalisasi SMART telah diselesaikan di TN. Sebangau dan TN. Bukit Baka Bukit Raya. Draf tersebut akan digunakan sebagai pedoman implementasi SMART di lapangan. Peraturan tersebut menunjuk anggota staff KPA sebagai penanggung jawab pengelolaan data dan patroli serta mekanisme pengoperasionalisasian SMART. Di TN. Sebangau, terdapat 8 tim yang telah berpatroli secara bersamaan selama 5 hari di bulan Juni, 2017. BOSF yang merupakan penerima dana hibah LESTARI, ‘melepasliarkan’ 6 orang utan pada bulan Mei, 2017, dan melakukan pemantau keadaan satwa-satwa tersebut pascapelepasannya. Pada bulan yang sama, mereka juga mengadakan patroli bersama dengan staf TN. Bukit Baka Bukit Raya untuk kedua kalinya. Selain itu, mereka juga membimbing 3 desa di Katingan Hulu yang letaknya berdekatan dengan titik-titik pelepasan orang utan melalui fasilitasi pengkaji ulang RPJMDes, peningkatan pengetahuan lingkungan, dan pembangun sekolah lapang untuk petani. Pada triwulan ini, LESTARI terus mendukung pelaksanaan kemitraan public swasta (Public Pirvate Partnership atau PPP) untuk komunitas petani karet melalui mekanisme kerja sama yang telah terbentuk dengan Bank Indonesia, pabrik karet remah dan para penyedia peralatan dan perlengkapan. Inisiatif ini meliputi 1.000 petani di 21 desa di 5 kecamatan di Pulau Pisang. PPP ini membantu Kelompok Usaha Bersama Karet (KUBK) lewat pelatihan pelembagaan dan teknis untuk meningkatkan kualitas panennya dan membantu rehabilitasi perkebunan karet bekas kebakaran. Baru-baru ini, beberapa desa telah berhasil mendapatkan kepastian bahwa mereka akan mendapatkan Dana Desa dari APB-Des. Terakhir, LESTARI mendukung pengadaan pelatihan Reduced Impact Logging (RIL-C). Pelatihan tersebut ditujukan bagi tujuh pemilik konsesi kayu di lanskap Katingan-Kahayan dan telah dimulai secara formal pada triwulan ini. Terkait implementasi kegiatan pelatihan, Tim LESTARI menyediakan dukungan penuh bagi LWA (Lembaga Wana Aksara) dan TFF (Tropical Forest Foundation) sebagai para pelatih RIL-C. Baru-baru ini, tim LESTARI, bersama dengan Dwima dan LWA, menyelesaikan evaluasi internal untuk Modul 1 Sesi Pelatihan. Masukan-masukan yang diberikan oleh LESTARI dan Dwima akan digunakan


oleh LWA untuk mengembangan sesi pelatihannya berikutnya. Proses serupa akan dilakukan oleh TFF untuk memperbaiki modul pelatihan pertama mereka.

LANSKAP LORENTZ LOWLANDS Target utama pada tahun kedua bagi lanskap ini adalah menetapkan kawasan seluas 8.282 ha yang memiliki signifikansi dan/atau kaya SDA sebagai kawasan dalam perbaikan pengelolaan. Kawasan-kawasan yang ditargetkan adalah kawasan-kawasan yang dikelola secara kolaboratif berdasarkan perjanjian dengan masyarakat setempat (indikator #11).

Perbaikan Tata Guna Hutan dan Lahan Pada triwulan ini, KLHS Kab. Mimika dikaji ulang lewat proses yang kolaboratif. Pengajian ulang tersebut dibagi menjadi beberapa subtopik: (1) legitimasi hukum KLHS dan perannya dalam menjembatani pengelolaan lingkungan dan pertumbuhan ekonomi, (2) isu-isu strategis dan rekomendasi KLHS Mimika, (3) kesenjangan informasi, termasuk antara kajian terbaru dengan KLHS yang pertama, (4) visualisasi skenario, dan (5) langkah-langkah selanjutnya dalam pemutakhiran KLHS sehingga ia akan menjadi instrumen yang efektif dan berkualitas tinggi agar kemudian dapat memengaruhi revisi RTRWK secara positif. Dalam rangka memperbaharui KLHS dan merevisi RTRWK, kami mengakui pentingnya sebuah langkah tindak lanjut awal melalui tim kecil yang dibentuk di lokakarya sebagai upaya antisipasi pembentukan kelompok kerja pembaharuan KLHS yang formal (Pokja). Tim LESTARI juga melakukan upaya edukasi dan advokasi terkait peningkatkan kesadaran dan apresiasi publik terkait perlindungan satwa dan keanekaragaman hayati di Papua. LESTARI berhasil menjangkau 1.470 orang pada tahap kampanye pertama dan berhasil mengidentifikasi tiga Community Champion baru yang memiliki komitment terhadap perlindungan dan pelestarikan satwa Papua. Aktivitas kampanye dan advokasi yang telah dilakukan menghasilkan kurang lebih sembilan artikel yang terbitkan di media massa cetak maupun online Papua serta mendorong komitment para pembuat kebijakan untuk melahirkan sebuah kebijakan di tingkat kabupaten yang bertujuan untuk melindungi satwa Papua.

Pengelolaan Hutan Pada triwulan ini, LESTARI membantu 5 desa untuk merumuskan rencana pengelolaan SDA di desanya masing-masing. Fasilitasi co-management akan diadakan pada triwulan selanjutnya. Sebuah kajian juga dilakukan untuk mengidentifikasi kebutuhan kapasitas dan kelembagaan KPH di lanskap Lorentz Lowlands, terutama KPH XVI di Kab. Mimika. Hasil dari kajian tersebut menunjukkan bahwa rencana pengelolaan jangka panjang yang dibuat oleh KPH belum disetujui oleh KLHK. Hal ini tidak mengherankan mengingat bahwa setelah di implemetasikannya UU No. 23 Tahun 2014, KPH tidak lagi memiliki budget yang besar dan tidak lagi memiliki status sebagai SKPD. Sejak adanya UU No. 23 Tahun 2014, KPH berubah menjadi badan implementasi (UPTD) dengan kewenangan merancang dan mengalokasikan dana yang minim. Temuan-temuan ini dipaparkan di sebuah acara dialog kebijakan yang dihadiri oleh badan kehutanan provinsi dan pemangku kepentingan lainnya pada bulan Mei, 2017. Uji coba Patroli SMART kedua diadakan di triwulan ini dan disertai dengan proses evaluasi yang bertujuan memastikan efektivitas pelaksaan program dalam jangka panjang. Sebagian kawasan patroli meliputi kawasan tempat tinggal masyarakat adat, maka oleh karena itu patroli SMART perlu dikombinasikan dengan kegiatan-kegiatan peningkatan kesadaran masyarakat terkait upaya pelestarian alam dan pemantauan keanekaragaman hayati.


Selain itu pada triwulan ini, Tim LESTARI berkolaborasi dengan Direktorat PIKA, memfasilitasi lokakarya mengenai rencana revisi zonasi TN. Lorentz. Kegiatan tersebut meliputi pelatihan zonasi kawasan konservasi bagi staf pengelola TN. Lorentz dan identifikasi data yang dibutuhkan untuk merevisi zonasi tersebut. Lokakarya tersebut membuahkan rencana aksi terkait pengumpulan data dan draf rencana zonasi.

LANSKAP MAPPI-BOUVEN DIGOEL Visi utama LESTARI bagi lanskap ini adalah mengurangi angka deforestasi dan degradasi hutan yang dilakukan oleh sektor swasta. Hal tersebut diharapkan dapat tercapai lewat rasionalisasi penggunaan lahan yang mempertimbangkan fungsi hidrologis, ekologis, dan sosial-ekonomi dalam perencanaan bisnis sektor swasta. Pada triwulan ini, Tim LESTARI mengadakan pertemuan dengan Korindo, kumpulan perusahaan yang bergerak di sektor kertas dan hasil hutan, untuk membahas kemungkinan rasionalisasi penggunaan lahan di Kab. Bouven Digoel. Untuk mendapatkan dukungan yang lebih besar, tim LESTARI berencanakan untuk mengadakan diskusi meja bundar terkait pendekatan lanskap yang rencananya akan dihadiri oleh berbagai pihak swasta, LSM, donatur, dan perwakilan pemerintah. Aktor utama dari pihak swasta, seperti Korindo dan Modern Groups, telah menyatakan dukungan mereka untuk acara ini. Lokakarya terkait integrasi gender yang telah diadakan MSF Mappi dihadiri oleh 35 partisipan, termasuk beberapa perwakilan badan-badan pemerintah, masyarakat lokal, LSM, dan tim LESTARI. Lokakarya tersebut bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kesadaran partisipan tentang pentingnya integrasi gender di MSF dan mempertajam kemampuan mereka dalam melakukan analisis gender.

LANSKAP CYCLOPS Target utama pada tahun kedua untuk lanskap ini adalah menetapkan kawasan seluas 32.680 ha yang memiliki signifikansi dan/atau kaya SDA sebagai kawasan dalam perbaikan pengelolaan. Kawasan-kawasan yang ditargetkan adalah kawasan Cagar Alam Cyclos seluas 31.480 ha (indikaktor #10) dan kawasan-kawasan yang dikelola secara kolaboratif berdasarkan perjanjian dengan komunitas setempat dengan luas total 1.200 ha (indikator #11). Dalam rangka perumusan peta jalan (roadmap) untuk co-management di lanskap Cyclops, pada triwulan ini telah diadakan sebuah lokakarya menulis yang dihadiri oleh seluruh tim LESTARI di lanskap-lanskap Papua. Lokakarya tersebut membuahkan sebuah peta jalan (roadmap) untuk co-management di setiap lokasi dan makalah kerja terkait pendekatan-pendekatan yang akan digunakan untuk mengevaluasi desa dan program co-management, seperti contohnya penilaian lanskap multidisipliner (multidisciplinary landscape assessment), penilaian ketahanan (resilience assessment) dan NKT. Selain itu, pada triwulan ini telah terjadi pembentukan tim patroli baru di Ormu yang melibatkan masyarakat adat (Masyarakat Mitra Polhut). Sekarang sebanyak 4 tim patroli telah beroperasi melakukan patrol routine di empat lokasi berbeda. Pada triwulan ini, sebuah lokakarya diadakan untuk menyelesaikan revisi rencana pengelolaan Cagar Alam Cyclops. Revisi rencana pengelolaannya telah diselesaikan dan diserahkan kepada Direktorat Kawasan Konservasi KLHK dan saat ini kami masih menunggu persetujuan dari pihak Direktorat Kawasan Konservasi KLHK.


Inisiatif Green Enterprise yang mendukung perkebunan vanila berkelanjutan masih berlanjut di Cyclops. Program hasil kolaborasi dengan NCBA bertujuan untuk menginsentif petani agar mereka merelokasi kebun ilegalnya ke luar cagar alam tepatnya ke zona buffer. Didasari oleh kegiatan-kegiatan sosialisasi pada triwulan sebelumnya, tim LESTARI berkolaborasi dengan NCBA untuk memulai program pelatih untuk para petani vanila. LESTARI juga bekerja sama dengan anggota Mitra Polhut dan pemerintah setempat untuk mengoptimalkan bantuan teknis yang diberikan.

LANSKAP SARMI Visi utama LESTARI bagi lanskap ini adalah mengkonservasi kawasan HCV atau HCS, dan mengurangi angka deforestasi oleh pihak swasta lewat adopsi Praktik Manajemen Terbaik (BMP). Pada triwulan ini, LESTARI meneruskan persiapan pelatihan RIL-C bagi 2 konsesi kayu. Proses ini berjalan lebih lambat jika dibandingkan dengan lanskap Katingan-Kahayan, hal ini dikarenakan oleh banyaknya persyaratan yang harus dipenuhi sebelum pelatihan dimulai. Dengan memenuhi persyarartan tersebut para HPH menunjukkan komitmen penuh mereka untuk berpartisipasi dalam program pelatihan RIL-C. Sejauh ini, para HPH sangat responsif terhadap permintaan-permintaan LESTARI dan para pelatih. Pelatihan ini diharapkan dapat dimulai setelah libur panjang Idulfitri.

INISIATIF PROVINSI PAPUA Pada triwulan ini, Pergub tentang SIMTARU diterbitkan bersamaan dengan SOP-nya. PerGub Nomor 19 Tahun 2017 tersebut berhasil memberikan kekuatan hukum bagi SIMTARU. Bersama dengan PerGub No. 18 Tahun 2017 yang ditandatangani di Maret tahun ini, PerGub tersebut menjadi batu loncatan besar LESTARI pada tingkat regional menuju perizinan pemanfaatan SDA di Papua yang lebih baik. Tidak hanya itu, 30 peta masyarakat adat juga telah diunggah ke SIMTARU. Sebagai hasil dari konsultasi dengan berbagai LSM, telah dibuat juga kerangka SOP tentang verifikasi pengakuan sosial dari peta masyarakat adat dan persetujuan untuk mengunggahnya, metode-metode yang dipakai untuk menggambar peta, dan tipe-tipe informasi geospasial yang ada. Presentasi kerja mendalam juga diadakan dengan berbagai seksi relevan dari Dinas Pelayanan Satu Pintu Perizinan (PTSP) tentang penggunaan Sustainability Screening Tool (SST) untuk memperbaiki proses perizinan pemanfaatan SDA. Kepala PTSP meminta agar SST digunakan untuk meninjau ulang status perizinan berbagai macam konsesi. Hubungan-hubungan antara SIMTARU dan PTSP diidentifikasi, termasuk berbagai seksi PTSP yang relevan. Telah disetujui juga bahwa izin-izin konsesi di Bouven Digoel akan menjadi fokus utama.

MANAJEMEN PROYEK, KOORDINASI, DAN KOMUNIKASI Pada triwulan ini, LESTARI memfasilitasi kunjungan lapangan USAID/Indonesia Mission Director and Environment Office Director ke lanskap Katingan-Kahayan untuk menemui berbagai mitra, melihat langsung kegiatan-kegiatan lapangan, dan mendiskusikan tantangan-tantangan yang ada dalam rangka memperkuat dampak positif intervensi proyek.


Kunjungan tersebut mencakupi kunjungan ke Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya, TN. Sebangau, Kantor Kabupaten Pulau Pisang, dan perkebunan karet Blok C. Selain itu, Tim LESTARI juga melakukan kunjungan lapangan ke Aceh, Kalimantan Tengah, dan Papua, dalam rangka melakukan Analisa Ekonomi Politik (Political Economy Analysis atau PEA). PEA ditujukan untuk mengungkap dinamika ekonomi politik dibalik buruknya tata kelola lahan dan hutan di lanskap kerja LESTARI. Studi tersebut menghasilkan rekomendasi-rekomendasi konstruktif tentang proyek ini secara umum, kegiatan di tiap-tiap lanskap, dan cara internalisasi pendekatan PEA ke dalam LESTARI. Salah satu temuan utamanya adalah lemahnya kemauan politik atau political will dari pemangku kepentingan di tingkat provinsi dan kabupaten menyebabkan buruknya tata kelola lahan dan hutan selain dari buruknya kapasitas pemangku kepentingan. Sebagai konsekuensinya, LESTARI perlu memberikan perhatian lebih bagi upaya-upaya advokasi kebijakan untuk mengatasi dinamika ekonomi politik di Indonesia. Pada triwulan ini, semua tim lanskap LESTARI, didukung oleh tim Jakarta, berkolaborasi untuk menciptakan model-model situasi lanskap atau Landscape Situation Models (LSM). LSM dapat mengilustrasikan berbagai ancaman spesifik di lanskap, tantangan, pendekatan strategis, dan integrasi yang dibutuhkan untuk mencapai hasil yang optimal. Keberadaan LSM ditujukan untuk memperkuat Situasi Model LESTARI dengan menyediakan gambaran yang lebih detail mengenai ancaman, tantangan, dan intervensi yang dibutuhkan di tiap-tiap lanskap. Keberadaan PEA dan LSM akan dimanfaatkan oleh LESTARI untuk mendukung pengelolaan adaptif yang ada saat ini, membuat kontribusi bagi Rencana Kerja Tahun Ketiga, dan mempersiapkan diri bagi evaluasi pertengahan semester tahun ini.


Figure 1. LESTARI Landscapes Map


LESTARI TECHNICAL THEMES & PROGRESS TOWARDS TOC LESTARI’s technical approach is built upon three integrated and synergistic technical themes: (1) Forest and Land Use Governance and Advocacy to enable (2) Conservation Co-Management, and (3) Private Sector Engagement as direct drivers of improved land management. Each technical theme is guided by various strategic approaches and their corresponding Theory of Change (ToC). The ToC illustrates the connection between project interventions, threats, and intermediate results, building up towards the key project goals: 41% reduction in GHG emissions from forest and land use sectors and 8.42 million hectares of forest, including orangutan habitat, under improved management (See Appendix 4). The ToC also demonstrates the horizontal connection between strategic approaches, as they are designed to be closely integrated and mutually reinforcing, where relevant. An overview of each Technical Theme and supporting Strategic Approaches is presented within this section. Accompanying ToC diagrams highlight the areas of progress/focus within Quarter 3, Year 2. Details of how the approach is contextualized per landscape are presented in the landscapes section of this QPR.

TECHNICAL THEME 1: FOREST & LAND USE GOVERNANCE & ADVOCACY


LESTARI 1 – Awareness and Advocacy This cross-cutting strategic approach integrates activities to ensure all local stakeholders, including underrepresented and marginalized groups, are equipped to contribute to sustainable land use practices and policy through informed action. During this quarter, advocacy efforts in Central Kalimantan focused on media engagement on orangutan conservation and peatland restoration, production of communications materials to support the FPIC process with communities, and support for regulations on forest and land fires management. In Aceh, advocacy efforts focused on supporting media coverage on key environmental issues, socializing Qanun No.7/2016 to stakeholders at the district and provincial levels, and identifying Community Champions in four districts. In Papua, a broad-based pubic educational campaign was carried out on Papuan wildlife conservation. Further details are presented in the Awareness and Advocacy matrix in Appendix 1. In the fourth quarter and beyond, advocacy efforts will shift towards a more cross-cutting approach and support for the improved implementation of other LESTARI tools and initiatives.

LESTARI 2 – Operationalize Strategic Environmental Assessments (SEAs) and Landscape Conservation Plans (LCPs) to Improve Land Use Governance LESTARI aims to operationalize existing or updated SEAs and Landscape Conservation Plans LCPs drafted under IFACS to inform spatial and development plan rationalization that will ultimately reduce large scale pressures, such as oil palm, mining, and infrastructure, on forests in order reduce GHG emissions from the landscape. This is brought about through revision of spatial plans, new regional development plans, and regional policies (Bupati decrees and regional regulations) as well as make recommendations for improved concession licensing processes. The detailed results of SEA/LCP operationalization during this quarter are summarized in Appendix 1. In Aceh, the Letter of Agreement (LoA) for Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA/KLHS) support to the RPJM Aceh of the new Governor was signed. LESTARI also closely engaged with the Governor’s Advisory Team to ensure that KLHS RPJMA gains political support. In Mimika, LESTARI supported the KLHS revision process aimed at revision of the spatial plan. The meeting findings concluded (Rumusan) of the need to update the KLHS to take into account new relevant studies (e.g., community mapping and identification of sacred areas) and policies (e.g., the mangrove Perda), strategic issues (e.g., land required for a Freeport smelter) identified by the MSF, and in ways that strengthen linkages between environmental management and economic growth. In Central Kalimantan, KLHS integration into the RPJMD did not yield any significant milestones within this quarter.

LESTARI 3 – Sustainable Landscape Governance Improved land use governance can enable enduring conservation and sustainable development actions that reduce GHG emissions. LESTARI strengthens decision-making and policy-making to achieve this outcome by ensuring broad-based citizen support for a transformative sense of multi-stakeholder ownership in better environmental governance. Modalities for achieving this are through MSFs as well as advocacy for policy change and far-reaching communications underpinned by up-to-date geospatial information about sustainable natural resource licensing.


During this quarter, LESTARI-supported MSFs continued to engage in discourse and coordinate action on relevant technical issues related to landscape sustainability. Details of all MSF activities over this quarter are presented in Appendix 1. In Central Kalimantan, LESTARI initiated the process of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent for canal blocking and peatland restoration with local communities in four villages and in coordination with government agencies. In Papua, LESTARI supported the signing of PerGubs to (1) improve land use governance and licensing processes and (2) institutionalize SIMTARU by requiring all SKPD to update and upload their data to the SIMTARU database. Both draft PerGubs underwent public consultation facilitated by LESTARI.


TECHNICAL THEME 2: CONSERVATION CO-MANAGEMENT

LESTARI 4 – Improved Forest Management Through Co-Management The focus of this Strategic Approach in the second year is to leverage initiatives to improve forest management, particularly outside conservation areas (CAs), through a co-management approach to impact broad areas in the landscape. Year 2 work focuses on implementing the initiative in the village and Forest Management Unit (FMU/KPH) levels. In addition, the approach involves facilitating communities to obtain and implement co-management agreements. This quarter marked the expansion of LESTARI community facilitation for ensuring sustainable forest stewardship through co-management and sustainable livelihoods through ensuring the integration of such a vision into 22 village development plans (RPJMDes). Next quarter, the focus will be on following this up in the village work plans. This approach is closely integrated with Technical Theme 1 with regards to support for participatory mapping and land use zonation. In addition, LESTARI streamlined its support for the development and operationalization of several targeted FMUs in LESTARI Landscapes and ensured the linkage of FMU initiatives at the local level with provincial and national level initiatives. All assessments in Aceh, Central Kalimantan, and Papua Province have been completed and the results have been disseminated through policy dialogues in Papua and Aceh. A similar event will be organized in Central Kalimantan Province and the national level.

LESTARI 5 – Protected Area Management LESTARI supports mainstreaming the application of the Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT) to assess management effectiveness in protected areas embedded in its landscapes by engaging multi-stakeholders. LESTARI strives to ensure broader public participation in the process of METT evaluation and enable public access to the result of the evaluation. Key community representatives have been involved at every METT evaluation event in protected areas in LESTARI landscapes LESTARI also provides more programmatic support for CAs in implementing key aspects of conservation area management plans and establishing effective conservation area management. After completing joint annual work plans in quarter 1 in all conservation areas, in this quarter, the LESTARI team supported the implementation of the plans and deepened the approach with tools such as SMART Patrols, key species monitoring, improving management and zonation plans, reducing illicit activities through operationalizing wildlife crime and forest crime units, and human-wildlife conflict mitigation, among others.


TECHNICAL THEME 3: PRIVATE SECTOR ENGAGEMENT

LESTARI 6 – Green Enterprises This strategic approach supports enhanced market access for key commodities that are produced sustainably in order to support reducing deforestation and encroachment pressures. It is also a strategic entry point to secure buy-in from local governments. During the third quarter, this strategic approach focused on the continuation of the ongoing sustainable livelihood program, especially identifying and providing specific required technical assistance. The LESTARI team expanded several sustainable livelihood initiatives to reach out to larger beneficiaries as well as ensure greater impact on the improvement of land and forest management. This approach works closely with Technical Theme 2 to coordinate technical assistance on the sustainable livelihood aspects from social forestry initiatives.

LESTARI 7 – Private Sector Best Management Practices (BMPs) During this quarter, LESTARI commenced the training in Reduced Impact Logging to Reduce Carbon Emissions (RIL-C) for the timber concession (HPH) partners in the Katingan-Kahayan and Sarmi Landscapes. The RIL-C training supports HPHs to implement practices that are more sustainable and less damaging to the natural environment. It can result in commitment for reduced deforestation and carbon emissions from the natural forest production sector beyond the life of the LESTARI project.

LESTARI 8 – Innovative Financing for Sustainable Land and Forest Management This strategic approach focuses on two key areas: (1) sustainable tourism development and (2) community-based Payment for Environmental Services (PES). For the sustainable tourism initiative, the focus initially was to provide assistance to local governments in developing master plans, supporting policies and regulations, and developing several pilot sites within Leuser and Katingan-Kahayan Landscapes. However, the submitted proposals from the potential sub-contractors were not of sufficient quality. Therefore, based on internal discussion, the sustainable tourism initiative has been postponed and will be addressed during the upcoming Year 3 Work Plan session. For the innovative financing-related approach, the LESTARI team is in the process of finalizing the team for the Sebangau National Park sustainable financing initiative. This work will commence after the Idul Fitri holiday.


LANDSCAPE INITIATIVES Leuser Landscape

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

G

GG

GGG

GG

GG

G

GGG

G

GG

G

G

G

G

_̂̂_

_̂_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂_̂

_̂_̂_̂

_̂

_̂̂__̂̂_

_̂̂__̂

_̂_̂

_̂

_̂̂_

_̂

_̂

_̂_̂_̂

_̂_̂

_̂̂_

_̂̂__̂̂_̂_̂_

_̂̂_̂_̂_̂_̂_

_̂

_̂̂__̂

_̂

_̂_̂_̂_̂ _̂

_̂_̂ _̂̂_

_̂

_̂_̂_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂_̂

_̂_̂

_̂

_̂_̂̂_

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂_̂̂__̂

_̂̂_

_̂̂_̂_̂_

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂̂_

_̂

_̂̂_̂_̂_

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

IND IA N O C EA N

Alas

River

N O R T H S U M A T R A

Gu n u n g Le us e r

Nat i on a l Par k

Rawa S in g k i l

Wi ld l i fe Res e r ve


Nat i on a l Par k


Nat i on a l Par kK

luet R

iver

Batee

River

Sin

gki l

River

Tripe River

Rawa K l u et

Me ng gama t

Ekan

Leme

Naca

Alai

Adan

Gulo

Koto

Palok

Uring

Pasar

Pasar

SetulBukut Gajah

Pangur

Agusan

Rerebe

Terlis

Tongra Berhut

Pertik

Pisang

Pining

Sentang

Papelah

Tingkem

Penosan

Mutiara

KenyaranCane BaruAtu Kapur

Kutambaru

Penampaan

Muhajirin

Istiqomah

Pulo Piku

Kuning II

Panjupian

Bukit mas

Jambo Apha

Paya Ateuk

Paya Dapur

Kayee AcehSuka Damai

Lawe Sawah

Suri Musara

Indra Damai

Pantan Kela

Reje Pudung

Pasir Putih

Kuta Lesung

Cinta Damai

Ie Jeureneh

Siurai Urai

Babah Lueng

Penggalangan

Kapai Seusak

Blang Temung

Panton Pawoh

Gunung Rotan

Gelah Musara

Jambo Papeun

Gunung Rotan

Keumumu Hulu

Krueng Kluet

Lawe Cimanok

Krueng Batee

Melelang Jaya

Blang Bengkik

Rambah Sayang

Alue Seulaseh

Kisam Gabungan

SM Rawa Singkil

Batee Meucanang

Penosan Sepakat

Lawe Buluh Didi

Pasar BlangpidieK a b . L a n g k a t

K a b . D a i r i

K a b . K a r o

K a b . P a k p a k B h a r a t

K a b . T a p a n u l i T e n g a h

SINGKIL

TAPAK TUAN

BLANG PIDIE

SUBULUSSALAM

KUALA SIMPANG

A C E H T A M I A N G

A C E H T E N G A H A C E H T I M U R

N A G A N R AYA

S I M E U L U E

K O T A L A N G S A

G A Y O L U E S

A C E H T E N G G A R A

A C E H S I N G K I L

A C E H B A R A T D AY A

S U B U L U S S A L A M

A C E H S E L A T A N

Esri, DeLorme, GEBCO, NOAA NGDC, and other contributors

98°0'0"E

98°0'0"E

97°30'0"E

97°30'0"E

97°0'0"E

97°0'0"E

4°0

'0"N

4°0

'0"N

3°3

0'0

"N

3°3

0'0

"N

3°0

'0"N

3°0

'0"N

2°3

0'0

"N

2°3

0'0

"N

SU

MA

TR

A

Resort Manggamat

Legend

!. District Capital

_̂ Village distribution activity

G WRU distribution activity

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Detail Spatial Plan (RDTR)

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

RPJMDes Indicative areas

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Smart Patrol areas

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Camera Trap areas

Provincial Boundary

District Boundary

Road

River

Leuser Operational Landscape

Conservation Area

Value Landscape:

Primary Dryland Forest

Secondary Dryland Forest

Primary Swamp Forest

Secondary Swamp Forest

Peatland

FIELD ACTIVITIES IN

LEUSER LANDSCAPE

APRIL - JUNE 2017

Source : Compile of LESTARI activities data

during April - June 2017

0 10 20 30 40 505 Km

:


Overview

The Leuser Landscape encompasses an area of 1.6 million hectares in Aceh that is rich in natural resources and dominated by the agriculture industry. Crops such as cacao, nutmeg, rubber, and oil palm are important contributors to the region’s development and community livelihoods as well as export markets, including the U.S. The value landscape is largely defined by two protected areas, Leuser National Park and Singkil Wildlife Reserve, which support Sumatran mega diversity and key species (tiger, elephant, rhino, and orangutans). The operational landscape includes the districts of Gayo Lues, Aceh Tenggara, Aceh Selatan, and Aceh Barat Daya. LESTARI’s overall vision for this landscape is to reduce deforestation and improve biodiversity conservation through sustainable co-management of forestlands and PA management. This is achieved through the following initiatives:

Watershed management to safeguard water resources and mitigate natural disasters as entry points to disincentivize deforestation through sustainable livelihoods that depend upon maintaining natural forest cover

Protected forest management (including peatlands)

The key Year 2 target for this landscape is to achieve 665,000 hectares of biological significance and/or natural resources under improved management. This is expected to be met via 627,000 hectares from Leuser National Park (indicator #10) and 38,000 hectares from areas covering co-management agreements with communities (indicator #11).

Progress This Quarter – Improved Forest & Land Governance

Aceh Province – KLHS RPJMD Aceh The Letter of Agreement (LoA) for Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA/KLHS) support to the RPJMD Aceh of the new Governor was signed. The LoA ensures the embedding of TA support into the formal KLHS team, access to framers of the RPJMD (Province and Gayo Lues District), and a commitment that KLHS recommendations (notably road construction across the Leuser Landscape and allocation of sufficient budget for forestry land management) will be adopted in the RPJMD Aceh (RPJMA) at the provincial level. LESTARI also closely engaged with the Governor’s Advisory Team, which includes two LESTARI personnel to ensure that KLHS RPJMA gains political support so that KLHS recommendations are incorporated in major regional policies, plans, and programs. Aceh Barat Daya District – Improved Spatial Planning Draft zonation maps were produced within the strategic watershed area of DAS Susoh to inform forestry agencies (KPH and TNGL) about how to improve their land use zonation maps. In all cases, the principles of participatory planning were applied. The participatory process began with awareness building among village and local government stakeholders using high-resolution maps obtained from NASA as well as more readily-available imagery (e.g., Landsat) and inputs of indigenous knowledge about sacred areas and forest land use. The next step was participatory zonation, respecting formal forestry areas. Thus legal and social legitimacy was assured. Specifically, the participatory approach to improving zonation in state forest areas and private land involved discourse between local government, village communities, and forest management unit FMU V across the selected village areas of Babah Lueng and Alue Selasih. Aimed at improving zonation in the long term forest management plan of KPH V as well as making recommendations for improved zonation in TNGL including appropriate zonation in private lands adjacent to state forest areas. The approach ensures that all types


of zonation are harmonized and at a scale that promises local sense of ownership and protection. DG Planologi at KLHK was pleased to note the proportion of KPH V zonation input for Abdya. Approximately 20% (59,000 ha) of KPH V area (295,000 ha) occurs within similar agro-ecological areas in Abdya District. The two village sites represent 10% of the entire KPH V area. Some encouraging insights were of relevance to scaling up beyond the 20,000-hectares KPH V area within the two villages to entire comparable areas in the Leuser landscape:

- It should be possible to use more readily-available Landsat imagery (30 meter) for this zonation purpose and not require the higher resolution (30 cm) imagery.

- Local communities already safeguard significant forest areas because of their sacred value;

- Village communities generally respect the TNGL boundaries, though KPH areas have historically been less well recognized by local people.

Interim results were presented at the national level to an enthusiastic relevant audience at DG Planologi at KLHK. A similar presentation to ATR is planned for July to inform drafting of village area spatial (Kawasan Perdesaan) guidelines. RPJMDes Support in Aceh Selatan District Work continued on the framing of a PerBup on RPJMDes and Rencana Kerja Pembangunan Desa Technical Guidance that will mandate the improved RPJMDes approach across the entire District of Aceh Selatan. A working group was established by the Bupati consisting of local academics, government officials, and MSF representatives to work on the draft. Three workshops were conducted to draft the PerBup, which particularly emphasizes closer collaboration between village communities and forestry agencies as well as land use zonation that promotes improved forest management. The Technical Guidance adopts LESTARI’s livelihood analysis (Analisis 5 Modal) that is expected to be more effective for recognizing village potential in forestry development than the standard analytical tools introduced by national government. Further details of RPJMDes support across Leuser Landscape are presented in the matrix on the following page. MSF FORLAST A study tour for stakeholders from Aceh Selatan to West Sumatra about Taman Hutan Raya (TAHURA) management increased capacity for management of the one type of forest area that UU23/2014 did not transfer authority from District to Province forestry agencies. As a result of the study tour, the Dinas Lingkungan Hidup established a working group to develop a proposal for Tahura Trumon, which will be submitted to the Bupati. MSF FORLAST Coordination Team for TAHURA Planning of Trumon drew on this experience and a draft decree was further refined for review by the legal division under Sekretariat Daerah Aceh Selatan District. MSF FORLAST also continued to support discussion from last quarter on harmonious ways to resolve the impasse between District Government sentiments to maintain production and protection forestry management at that level rather than at the Province level, the former regulated by regional autonomy law for Aceh (UU18/2001), the latter by UU23/2014. Advocacy and Community Champions The Advocacy team finalized the guidelines to identify and interview Community Champions to advocate for LESTARI conservation and sustainable landscape issues. Subsequently, FGDs were held with 11 Community Champions across all four districts in Leuser Landscape, emphasizing RPJMDes, mitigating human-wildlife conflicts, watershed protection, and policy advocacy.


Moreover, LESTARI supported the dissemination of Qanun No. 7/2016 on Aceh Forestry, which supports forest conservation and sustainable forest management. Together with the Aceh government, LESTARI conducted roadshows to socialize the Qanun to stakeholders. Gender A gender integrated planning workshop was held in May 2017 to improve the capacity of LESTARI grantees in the landscape. The workshop was attended by representatives of 5 grantees and 3 potential grantees as well as LESTARI team. The workshop resulted in the revision of grantees’ gender action plans, in which the achievements will be monitored regularly.

Progress This Quarter – Improved Forest Management

Communities’ Engagement in Conservation/Forest Management and Support for Forest Management Units (FMUs) The LESTARI team continued to facilitate the integration of co-management vision in RPJMDes and initiate activities to support the co-management initiative in priority villages through social forestry and other forms of co-management (partnership with FMUs and National Park, among others). In addition, the team supported the establishment of a social forestry working group at the provincial level. Three communities have been facilitated to submit permit applications for social forestry and several others will follow next quarter. There are 6 co-management grants that are up and running. Progress is summarized in the table below.

Province/ District

Village/Cluster Progress

Province N/A

The LESTARI team participated in the social forestry workshop held by MoEF in Banda Aceh and provided peronnel support for the establishment of SF working group in the province. This is an opportunity to link provincial level initiatives to national targets.

Aceh Selatan District

Lawe Cimanok Village Application for obtaining HKm permit has been submitted to MoEF and is currently under review

Lawe Melang and Koto Village (Grantee OIC)

The application for HKm has been submitted to MoEF and is currently under review

Jambu Papeun and Bukit Meuh Village

Identification of socio-economic aspects and local potential to support the development of social forestry applications. It will be followed with participatory mapping and facilitation of RPJMDes that integrates social forestry initiative (HKm)

Aceh Barat Daya

Kayee Aceh and Alue Jeurjak Village

Facilitate the establishment of village institution (LPHD) to prepare the management of forest and develop an agreement for protecting water catchment area

Adan and Pane Geulempang Village (Grantee: AID)

Communities have received IUPHKM in 2016 and have been facilitated to prepare and agreed on forest management plan

Aceh Tenggara

Setul, Pulo Gadung, Pulo Piku, Istiqamah, Terutung Kute, Ujung Baru, Kuta Ujung and Kotan Jaya Village

RPJMDes and co-management facilitation continues in these villages

Gayo Lues

Cane Baru, Kenyeran, Suri, Musara and Atu Kapur Village

Village and environmental assessment carried out in these four villages as a preparation phase for developing co-management agreement between communities in these villages and FMU V

Blang Temung, Pepalan, Pangur, Panglime Linting and Uning Gelung Village

RPJMDes and co-management facilitation continues in these villages


Province/ District

Village/Cluster Progress

Sentang and Bustanussalam Village

Kick off community facilitation for possible PPP agreement with PT. Kencana HBL, a pine and patchouli concessionaire

Agusen, Palok, and Penggalangan (Grantee: JAVLEC)

A social and economic assessment of forest resources has been completed. This is a required document for obtaining a social forestry permit. The communities have also been facilitated to establish a local institution for village forest management (LPHD)

Sangir Village

An assessment of village potential is complete and documents are prepared (i.e. area delineation, area description and map) to develop a partnership agreement between communities and FMU III

Gulo Village

Identification of encroachment areas has been completed. Communities have been facilitated to engage in initial discussions with village and sub-district government and Leuser National Park to develop a co-management agreement

The Leuser Landscape team has facilitated a discussion with FMUs V and VI to design the development of a zonation plan, which is one important component of the FMU’s long term management plan (RPHJP). In this discussion, the team agreed that LESTARI will provide the necessary technical support on zonation. A series of workshop and activities will be kicked off next quarter to facilitate the process, in close collaboration with FMUs V and VI and relevant government agencies at the provincial level. Grants for Co-Management and Social Forestry 6 grantees continued working, in different stages, to develop and prepare co-management agreements in Leuser Landscape, either through social forestry or through co-management with different FMUs. Some highlights include:

OIC in Aceh Selatan has submitted the social forestry application for Lawe Melang and Koto villages in Kluet Tengah and they are currently waiting for the verification visit from KLHK or their designees.

AGC kicked off project implementation in May 2017, for which they will facilitate collaborative management between communities in four villages in Wih Pining watershed (Uring, Gajah, Pepelah and Pintu Rime) with KPH 3 to strengthen the protection of water resources, while helping to develop palm sugar commodity as the community livelihood to support co-management.

Javlec facilitated the establishment of 3 LPHDs in Palok, Penggalangan and Agusen villages that will develop social forestry applications for Hutan Desa.

FORPALA has provided training 590 to participants in 15 target villages on the production of forest nutmeg seedlings, grafting of pala sambutan and production of compost, as part of livelihood development and rehabilitation of deforested areas in their target villages. To ensure the sustainability of this initiative, semi-permanent greenhouses were provided in Jambo Apha, Lhok Rukam, and Pucok Krueng Villages to be used by the communities in producing the seedlings.

METT The LESTARI team supported an internal METT assessment in Gunung Leuser National Park (TNGL). The internal assessment aims to prepare the national park managers to provide the necessary information that will be used in the upcoming participatory METT evaluation. This participatory evaluation that engages relevant stakeholders will be facilitated next quarter in Leuser National Park and Rawa Singkil Wildlife Reserve (RSWR). The results will provide information on management deficiencies and areas that need improvement, and will guide LESTARI’s support.


SMART Patrols In the Leuser Landscape, there are currently 7 SMART patrol teams carrying out routine patrolling activities in Gunung Leuser National Park (4 teams) and Rawa Singkil Wildlife Reserve (3 teams). In this quarter, the patrol teams conducted 20 trips in FMU VI, TNGL and RSWR. In FMU VI, the teams patrolled for 43 days in total and reached 65 km. In the national park, the teams’ patrols in 8 trips covered 328.9 km in 101 days, while in RSWR the patrols covered 9 trips for 53 days with total distance of 656 km. During this period, the patrol teams recorded data for poaching, encroachment, and illegal logging incidents. The team also found 44 illegal loggers in RSWR and 12 in TNGL (see human encountered in the graph below), and were given warnings by the patrol team.

Figure 2. Smart Patrol Efforts and Findings in Leuser Landscape (April – June 2017)

Human Wildlife Conflict Mitigation During this quarter, the Wildlife Response Unit (WRU) in Leuser Landscape carried out routine monitoring in conflict prone areas to prevent potential human-wildlife conflicts. The LESTARI team has supported the communities to establish and maintain tiger proof cages in 14 locations. The team also facilitated local communities to establish and operationalize a local community organization, KS Batu Napal, to independently mitigate human-wildlife conflicts, particularly in 4 villages (Seneubok Kranji, Panton Luas, Alue Kejrun and Jamboo Papeun) located in 4 sub-districts in Aceh Selatan District. In addition, the LESTARI team has kicked off a workshop for supporting Conflict Response Unit (CRU) Trumon to support efforts to mitigate human-elephant conflicts in Trumon Corridor and beyond. Species Survey and Monitoring The LESTARI team continued to monitor the density and distribution of key species – Sumatran Tiger and Rhinoceros – through camera traps, particularly in selected locations in Aceh Tenggara and Aceh Selatan District. Using capture and recapture methods, the biodiversity monitoring was completed in 4 clusters, a so-called core area, covering 5,810 km2. LESTARI has identified various species including key species such as Sumatran tiger and rhinoceros. The team is currently analyzing the population density that will serve as the foundation for developing the species conservation strategy. A follow up workshop will be held to inform BKSDA Aceh, FMU V and TNGL of the findings and to discuss a coherent key species conservation strategy that engages multiple institutions for the area.


Figure 3. Clouded Leopard (Neofelis nebulosa)

Figure 4. Malayan Sun Bear (Helarctos malayanus)

Conservation Area Zonation Plan and Spatial Data Management LESTARI and PIKA Directorate teamed up to facilitate a training for developing the zonation of Rawa Singkil Wildlife Reserve. The training resulted in spatial data collection and analysis that will be utilized for developing the zonation plan. Wildlife Crime Unit and Forest Crime Unit The Wildlife Crime Unit (WCU) team carried out 4 investigations in 3 districts within Leuser Landscape. The team collected information on illegal tiger skin trading network, location of illegal log storages and illegal pangolin trading network, which involved local villagers. More information is still needed to process the case in court. In addition, the team closely monitored 4 cases, including tiger and pangolin skin smuggling, that are now proceeding in court. The team routinely coordinated with law enforcement agencies and journalists to share information and updates on wildlife trafficking and illegal logging threats and incidents. Conservation Area Management Plan A socio-economy and biodiversity survey was conducted to support the development of zonation and management plan of Rawa Singkil Wildlife Reserve. The drafting of the management plan will continue in the next quarter and is expected to be finalized by the end of this year. PPPs and Sustainable Livelihood Initiatives In support of sustainable cacao, LESTARI implements a PPP with JAVARA, a retailer and exporter of Indonesian artisanal food products. The partnership provides technical training and support for farmers in Aceh to improve quality and yield, prices, and market access. In 2014, U.S. cocoa imports from Indonesia amounted to USD 252 million. Activities for this PPP continued implementation with capacity building for 850 farmers on organizational management, intercropping technique, and good agricultural practices (GAPs). During this quarter, LESTARI supported the provision of intercropping seedlings in 3 districts to be further distributed to the 10 demo-plot areas. This was followed by training on proper harvesting and fermentation. The LESTARI team has also been supporting capacity building for the farmer groups in identifying and producing good quality cacao seedlings as well as proper tree and land maintenance for the organic certification process. The ultimate objective for acquiring organic certification is to enhance the sustainability across the value chain for the commodity. This is done by managing the origin of the cocoa bean, which will be regularly audited by an authorized third party to ensure that farmers do not conduct agriculture


activities in illegally deforested areas. This will have to be proven by the farmers through legal documents as well as direct field verification. For improved market access, LESTARI has facilitated several farmer groups to negotiate a better price with local buyers/cooperatives in Aceh. The process of negotiating with Cooperative Bireun for fermented cacao sale is finalized for the first sale batch. Cooperative Bireun is one of the major suppliers for Pipiltin (partner of JAVARA for Cacao processing). The cooperative is also interested in buying the harvest from the intercrop products (cardamom and moringa), which will be available within 1-3 months. To scale up this initiative and support its sustainability, LESTARI is empowering community champions through training in better management and accounting practices (an internal control system, or ICS). Some of these community champions have expanded the trainings through their own networks. Some have also received additional income through providing services for other farmers. LESTARI is in the process of approaching the local government to develop a partnership model to be further supported.

Figure 5. Training on proper cacao bean fermentation

Figure 6. Negotiation between Farmers and Cooperative Biruen, facilitated by LESTARI

For the sustainable freshwater fisheries initiative to support conservation of the watershed area (PASTI initiative) in 4 districts within Leuser Landscape, the LESTARI team conducted a site visit to discuss and implement the USAID recommendation to integrate a PES scheme into the ongoing activities. The trip was also used to encourage stronger collaboration and teamwork among the various institutions implementing the initiative (MSF, KPH, Dinas Perikanan, Dinas Kehutanan). Thus far, socialization for all 28 villages has been conducted. Approximately 1000 fish farmers are involved in the initiative.

Challenges & Opportunities

The approach for KLHS RPJMD assistance in Aceh goes beyond that for the Central Kalimantan KLHS initiative by being linked to a District KLHS RPJMD, in this case Gayo Lues and is intended to provide capacity-building opportunities related to PP46/2016 and potentially, the new KLHS Ministerial Decree currently being formulated by KLHK. This, in turn, should serve as a model to respond to Papua Province requests for KLHS assistance.

While technical and social progress has been made, there remains the imperative for greater engagement with the Head of KPH V in Banda Aceh and Head of TNGL in Medan.

The PerBup RPJMDes in Aceh Selatan District should not only encourage more landscape-wide adoption of improved RPJMDes planning, implementation and


monitoring, but also serve as a model for the other districts in the Leuser Landscape. One notable challenge is making sure that village facilitators (Pendamping Desa) in Aceh Selatan are able to master and implement the technical guidance for all District forest villages.

Aceh’s new provincial administration renews hope for improved forest management in the Provincial level. Both the new governor and a newly appointed head of forestry agency at the provincial level have a strong commitment to support the operationalization of forest management units and communities’ partnership with the FMUs.

The discussion among FORPALA, LESTARI and Givaudan on the PPP for sustainable nutmeg/essential oil development, to be implemented by LESTARI grantee FORPALA, is still ongoing. There has been issue on the ownership of the equipment, but it has been agreed upon. Currently both parties are finalizing the arrangement.

One potential grantee under RFA#04, Tropical Society, identified a high-potential location within Gayo Lues District for the freshwater fisheries and PES mechanism, which is also next to the proposed location for reforestation and ecotourism development. These synergistic initiatives could amplify the awareness and value placed on environmental conservation.

Positive support from KPH in Leuser landscape regarding LESTARI’s activities in the development of freshwater fisheries to support the watershed conservation initiative. KPH III and V are so far actively involved in the activities. Leveraged funding from the local government has also been indicated. With the integration of PES mechanism in the initiative, the approach needs to be adjusted to ensure successful implementation.

Organic certification for cacao requires farmers to establish an Internal Control System (ICS) that involves detailed accounting protocols. Although it is a challenge to facilitate farmers to understand and implement this practice, it also presents an opportunity to build their capacity in improved management practices and foster long-term impact.

Priorities for Next Quarter

Draft final zonation for the selected two villages in Abdiya District as optimal scenario for KLHS

Prepare an appropriate zonation module for RPJMDes+

Draft PerBup RPJMDes for Aceh Selatan District finalized

Series of workshops and activities to support the zonation plan development for FMU V and VI

Further development of the draft decree for the Trumon TAHURA

Continue to facilitate the submission of social forestry permits and facilitate the development of local institution to manage forest areas

Participatory midterm assessment of METT will be facilitated in Rawa Singkil Wildlife Reserve and Gunung Leuser National Park. The assessment results and action plans will be reported to MoEF


A workshop on the medium term management vision of Rawa Singkil Wildlife Reserve to be held in July 2017 in Subulussalam District

SMART evaluation will be held in Medan engaging all partners of Gunung Leuser National Park to develop a more coherent mechanism in implementing SMART

New PPP for sustainable forest honey will be under cooperation with Jaringan Madu Hutan Indonesia (JMHI) in Gayo Lues District. The LESTARI team will collaborate with KPH III since the forest honey will be under the management of this particular KPH. The draft MoU is expected to be finalized next month

PPP signing for sustainable forest honey and essential oils

Strengthening the technical assistance in preparing farmers for the internal audit process related to cacao organic certification

Finalization of module development for the PES scheme under PASTI initiative


Katingan-Kahayan Landscape

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

"/

"/

_̂̂__̂̂_̂_

_̂_̂

_̂_̂

_̂_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂_̂

_̂_̂

_̂

_̂_̂

_̂

_̂_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂̂__̂_̂

_̂

WE ST K A LI MA NTA N

PR OV IN CE

J AVA SE A

Bukit Baka - Bukit Raya

National Park

Sebangau National Park

Tanjung PutingNational Park

Mentaya

River

Katin

gan

River K

ah

aya

n

River

Seb

an

gau River

BL

OC

K

C

K o t a w a r i n g i n

T i m u r

K o t a

P a l a n g k a r a y a

Purwodadi

Sei Baru Tewu

GandangPaduran Sebangau

G u n u n g M a s

PT.HUTAN DOMAS RAYA

PT.CARUS INDONESIA

PT.DWIMA JAYA UTAMA

PT.HUTAN MULYA

PT.KAYU WAJA

PT.DWIMA JAYA UTAMA

PT.SARANA PIRANTI UTAMAPT.FITAMAYA ASMAPARA

PT.GRAHA SENTOSA PERMAI

Tusang Raya

Bawan

Tumbang Miwan

Mangkuwuk

Tambak

Tumbang TarusanTangkahen

Tahura Lapak Jaru

Talio

Perigi

Kalawa

Garung

Karuing

Tampelas

Galinggang

Sakakajang

Mekar Jaya

Tumbang Posu

Tumbang Anoi

Lawang Kanji

Tumbang Bulan

Tumbang Mahuroi

Sampit

Kasongan

Puruk Cahu

Nangapinoh

Kuala Kurun

Kuala Pembuang

K a p u a s

S e r u y a n

M u r u n g R a y a

B a r i t o U t a r a

K a t i n g a n

P u l a n g P i s a u

114°30'0"E

114°30'0"E

114°0'0"E

114°0'0"E

113°30'0"E

113°30'0"E

113°0'0"E

113°0'0"E

112°30'0"E

112°30'0"E

112°0'0"E

112°0'0"E

0°0

'0"

0°0

'0"

0°3

0'0

"S

0°3

0'0

"S

1°0

'0"S

1°0

'0"S

1°3

0'0

"S

1°3

0'0

"S

2°0

'0"S

2°0

'0"S

2°3

0'0

"S

2°3

0'0

"S

3°0

'0"S

3°0

'0"S

3°3

0'0

"S

3°3

0'0

"S

0 20 40 60 80 10010 Km

:

Legend

_̂ Village Distribution Activity

"/ Provincial Capital

!. District Capital

Provincial Boundary

District Boundary

River

Operational Landscape

National Park Boundary

! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Improved management in Tahura

(Conservation area)

! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !

Community Forest

! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !

Smart Patrol Areas

! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! RIL-C Training for Logging

Concession

Value Landscape:





Secondary Mangrove Forest

Peatland

FIELD ACTIVITIES IN

KATINGAN-KAHAYAN LANDSCAPE

APRIL - JUNE 2017

KALIMANTAN

TENGAH

NORTH KATINGAN




Overview

The Katingan-Kahayan Landscape in Central Kalimantan covers more than 4 million hectares in Katingan, Pulang Pisau, Gunung Mas Districts; a small part of Kotawaringin Timur; and Palangkaraya municipality. It includes both deep peatland of the ex-mega rice project and Sebangau National Park as well as mineral soils including Bukit Baka Bukit Raya National Park. The region’s economy depends on forestry, agriculture, commodities, trade, services, and mining sectors. Much of the landscape is vulnerable to forest and peatland fires, illegal logging, forest degradation, conversion for oil palm plantations, habitat destruction, and biodiversity loss. Unsustainable land use management continues to release large emissions while also negatively impacting the health and livelihoods of local communities. For the peat sub-landscape, LESTARI’s overall vision is to reduce GHG emissions from peat degradation, deforestation, and fire through improved peatland management for sustainable livelihoods and conservation, and/or improved CA management. This is to be achieved through the following initiatives:

Integrated Fire Management

Integrated Water Management

For the mineral soil sub-landscape, LESTARI’s overall vision is to reduce deforestation and improve biodiversity conservation through sustainable co-management, forest management, or CA management. This is to be achieved through the following initiatives:

Improved sustainable livelihoods

Best Management Practices through implementation of RIL-C

The key Year 2 target for this landscape is to achieve 863,000 hectares of biological significance and/or natural resources under improved management. This is expected to be met via 596,000 hectares from Sebangau National Park (indicator #10), 44,000 hectares from areas covering co-management agreements with communities (indicator #11), and 223,000 hectares from improved management in timber concessions (indicator #15).


FPIC/Padiatapa for Peatland Restoration LESTARI continued its support for the peatland restoration initiative together with relevant government and community stakeholders for the construction of canal blocking dams. After initial strained relations with the Ministry of Public Works (PU) because of a lack of adequate communication from the national level, close collaboration was achieved in the implementation of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC/Padiatapa) with communities for the construction of dams in the primary, secondary and tertiary (handil) canals of sub-block C2 of KHG14 peatlands (Kecamatan Kahayan Hilir). This proceeded with support from the Pulang Pisau District Government and with the active involvement of the MSF working group (Tim 9 of Forum Hapakat Lestari) on canal damming and zero fire use for land clearing. FPIC in line with BRG Social Safeguards and USAID FPIC guidelines was conducted in four of the five villages (starting with Gohong, then Garung, Buntoi and Kalawa), and concluded with formal notification of due process through a Berita Acara. This Berita Acara, a public document accessible to local communities, local government, and the canal blocking contractors, can be used to ensure that canal blocking on the ground conforms with the consent of the affected communities. The process began with FPIC awareness building among stakeholders, participative planning of the process, followed by multi-stakeholder implementation.


Counterpart national level meetings were held with BRG, PU, local government, and MSF members, that included clarification about the FPIC role of LESTARI as well as a formal letter to BRG urging more effective field-level coordination. At one such meeting with PU, FPIC was for the first time proposed for the SOP for canal blocking design and implementation. Policy Advocacy for Forest and Land Fire Management In conjunction with peatland restoration efforts, the LESTARI team continued to be involved in policy advocacy efforts in support of improved fire and land management in Central Kalimantan. The LESTARI team engaged with district and provincial governments and community stakeholders to provide technical support for: (1) Governor’s regulation on forest and land fires emergency management, (2) Katingan District regulation on forest and land fires emergency management, (3) forest and land fires contingency plan in Pulang Pisau District, and (4) Central Kalimantan regional regulation on land and forest fires control. University Partnerships Initiative Update During the first quarter of Year 2, the LESTARI – Michigan State University (MSU) team finalized the planning document on the development of curriculum material and the creation of a Certificate Program in Low Carbon Forest Management through an online Learning Management System (LMS). During this quarter, MSU facilitated a workshop with University of Palangka Raya (UPR), Muhammadiyah University (MU), Bogor Agricultural University (IPB) and the LESTARI team to review the demo version of the Low Carbon Forest Management and LEDS online LMS. In addition, a visit to the Bawan Village Community Forest site explored opportunities for integration with the LMS. UPR and MU expressed interest in working with the community to develop academic training opportunities with students using the village forest.


Communities’ Engagement in Conservation/Forest Management and Support for Forest Management Units (FMUs) In this landscape, co-management initiatives have achieved greater progress than other landscapes, which can be attributed to the higher level of support from relevant local government agencies. 4 social forestry permits were issued in the first quarter (covering 2,016 ha), and several permits are expected to be issued within the next quarter. In this quarter, most activities focused on facilitating communities to obtain social forestry permits and strengthen local institutions to manage forest sustainably. The LESTARI team and social forestry working group in Central Kalimantan assisted communities to develop a forest management plan and small scale forestry business plan. The guidelines will be also used in other villages within Central Kalimantan. In Tangkahen Village, the business plan of the Hutan Desa has received funding from the village budget in the amount of around USD 12,000. In addition, the LESTARI team ensured the inclusion of co-management in RPJMDes in the targeted villages. To support the expanding work areas, new village facilitators have been hired and a Training of Trainers (TOT) for RPJMDes and co-management was held in Palangkaraya in the first week of April 2017. After the training, the newly hired village facilitators will facilitate RPJMDes review in several villages in the Katingan-Kahayan Landscape. The assessment report of FMUs in Katingan-Kahayan Landscape has been completed. In the next quarter, the STTA will present the findings to relevant stakeholders. In addition,


LESTARI initiated technical support for the improvement of Tahura Lapak Jaru's (4,119 ha) forest management and zonation plan in Gunung Mas District.

District Village/Cluster Progress

Katingan Tumbang Runen, Jahanjang, Karuing, Parupuk, Telaga

Communities have submitted the revised HKm permit application submitted last quarter as requested by MoEF

Gunung Mas

Tumbang Miwan Village

Communities have delineated boundaries of each forest user’s holding within HKm area (permit obtained last year)

Mangkawuk dan Tusang Raya Village

Area verification has been carried out for HKm permit application. The communities have also submitted the revised HKm permit application, which was submitted last quarter, as requested by MoEF

Rabambang Village A village forest permit has been obtained in the end of 2016. Communities have been facilitated to revise the village forest map and will be supported to develop their forest management plan

Pulang Pisau

Tangkahen, Tumbang Tarusan, Tambak Bawan Village

Village forest permits obtained last year. In this quarter, communities finalized their village forest management plans. They also identified potential partners for developing community forest enterprises

METT The LESTARI team supported internal METT assessments in Bukit Baka Bukit Raya and Sebangau National Parks. The result of the self-assessment will be validated again through participatory METT evaluation that engages relevant stakeholders. The participatory assessment will be facilitated next quarter. Activities and tools implemented to improve the management effectiveness of these national parks are described below. SMART The draft decree for institutionalizing and operationalizing SMART has been completed in Sebangau and Bukit Baka Bukit Raya National Parks and will be used to guide the implementation of SMART. The decree includes the appointment of PA staff members to be responsible for SMART data management and patrol as well as a mechanism to operationalize SMART. In Sebangau National Park, there are 8 patrol teams that have carried out simultaneous patrolling for 5 days in June 2017. The findings are currently being analyzed by the data operator in the park. Human Wildlife Conflict Mitigation A series of workshops were held to facilitate the curriculum development process and team assignment for training on Orangutan conflict mitigation in Central Kalimantan together with the Center of Training and Education, MoEF in Bogor. The training will be held next quarter in Palangkaraya. Biodiversity Survey and Monitoring LESTARI participated in a workshop on advanced wildlife inventory and monitoring in protected areas held by DOI in April 2017 in Tanjung Puting National Park. The training aimed to build internal capacity and will support LESTARI’s intervention on human-wildlife conflict mitigation. Grants for Orangutan Conservation and Co-Management

1. BOSF released 6 more orangutans in May 2017, while continuing post-release monitoring activities. They also conducted the second joint patrol with TN BBBR staff in May. They continued their community engagement in three villages in Katingan Hulu, located close to their current release points through facilitation of RPJMDes


review, environmental education and establishment of a farmer field school (Sekolah Lapang).

2. YTS continued preparation for building co-management agreements, likely through social forestry, through participatory mapping activity in three villages (approximately 3,000 ha).

3. KARSA started project implementation for Hutan Desa (approximately 5,000 ha) in June and have conducted coordination activities with two target villages in Kamipang.

PPP for Sustainable Rubber On aggregate, rubber is a key component of the Indonesian economy. According to the American Chamber of Commerce, rubber represents the second largest agricultural export from Indonesia to the U.S., valued at $973 million in 2015. LESTARI implements a rubber initiative in Central Kalimantan that aims to support the improvement of land management to reduce fire risk while also improving the production and post-harvest processes, including improved market access for local farmers. In aggregate, this initiative targets a total of 6,000 ha and approximately 3,000 farmers. During this quarter, LESTARI continued to support the implementation of its PPP for community-based rubber with partners Bank Indonesia Kalteng, crumb rubber factories, and equipment suppliers. The initiative covers 21 villages in 5 sub-districts in Pulang Pisau and engages approximately 1,000 rubber farmers. The PPP supports the rubber farmer groups, Kelompok Usaha Bersama (KUBK), through building institutional capacity, providing technical training for improved quality and yield, and supporting rehabilitation of burnt rubber plantations. Recently several villages have confirmed fund allocation from the APBDes, thus it is crucial to ensure that the KUBKs will be able to channel and utilize the funding optimally. The rubber initiative is also expanding to sub-district Sebangau Kuala (the buffer-zone area of TN Sebangau) where farmers are currently being identified for further engagement.

Figure 7. Discussion with KUBK managers

Reduced Impact Logging (RIL-C) Training for Timber Concessions During this quarter, RIL-C training formally began for all 7 of the partner timber concessions (HPHs) operating within the Katingan-Kahayan Landscape. The LESTARI team has been providing full support for LWA and TFF as the RIL-C trainers to implement the training activities. Recently, LESTARI team, together with Dwima and LWA, finalized the internal evaluation for Module 1 Training Session. The inputs from LESTARI and Dwima will be used by LWA for the improvement of the next training session. A similar process will be undergone with TFF to improve their first module training session. Preparation with selected HPHs for operationalization of CMMP has also been conducted. The schedule and planning have been developed and are currently being discussed by the HPHs. Three HPHs are selected for this initiative: Dwima Jaya, Hutan Mulia and Graha


Sentosa Permai (all 3 have previously received technical assistance for CMMP development under IFACS).

Figure 8. Classroom component of RIL-C training

Figure 9. RIL-C training in the field

HPH Area (ha) Status Progress

PT. Hutan Mulia 51,100 IFACS and LESTARI

partners

1. Has been receiving RIL-C training for Modules 1& 2 from LWA. Training is given through theory in the classroom as well direct practice in the field.

2. Has been conducted interval evaluation fro module 1 and will be conducted similar process for module 2.

3. Under discussion with LESTARI for CMMP operationalization/HCV monitoring implementation. Estimated to be started during 4th quarter of 2nd year

PT. Hutan Domas Raya

99,870 LESTARI partners

1. Has been receiving initial training & undergone baseline assessment from TFF.

2. Training for Module 1 will be given in early July 2017, right after Idul Fitri holiday.

PT. Graha Sentosa Permai

44,970 IFACS and LESTARI

partners

1. Has been receiving RIL-C training for Modules 1& 2 from LWA.


3. Under discussion with LESTARI for CMMP operationalization/HCV monitoring implementation. Estimated to be started during 4th quarter of 2nd year.

PT Sarana Piranti Utama




PT Fitamaya Asmapara






PT Sikatan Wana Raya




PT Kayu Waja 38,450 LESTARI partners

1. Has been receiving RIL-C training for Modules 1& 2 from LWA.


Challenges and Opportunities

While the entire KLHS RPJMD was included as an appendix, admittedly the text did not completely reflect the recommendations of the KLHS. On the other hand, the KLHS was used in capacity building for the SKPD to produce their Renstra. The LESTARI team has yet to verify how far the Renstra has impacted government action on the ground.

Given that BRG is struggling to achieve its planned expenditure and implementation goals at the local level, there may yet be increased pressure for LESTARI to make up the difference, say by expanding FPIC beyond the five villages. MSF Tim 9 has expressed reticence to take on this task before an evaluation of the extent to which PU and BRG have indeed adapted the canal blocking process and dam designs as agreed during FPIC.

The recent implementation of Law 23/2014, which takes the authority to management forest area to the provincial government creates confusion in provincial and district level, especially in Central Kalimantan Province.

Despite having a roadmap to FMU development, the unclear institutional arrangement and limited forestry budget at the provincial level could hamper the FMU development. LESTARI has not been able to move forward FMU initiative as the team is waiting for the completion of transition period to re-assign staff members from the province to FMUs.

It has been found that the percentage of rubber farmers that produce higher quality bokar bersih is increasing. However there are still a number of farmers that opt for bokar kotor because it is faster to produce and hence the farmers receive cash within a shorter period of time. Advocacy and engagement efforts should focus on clearly demonstrating the long-term benefits of higher quality rubber production. LESTARI is also exploring the possibility to collaborate with rubber end-users to engage in more sustainable activities at the grassroots level with farmers and local stakeholders.

Based on the result of the USAID visit to Kahayan-Katingan Landscape in May 2017, the rubber initiative should be expanded to accommodate a larger area and more beneficiaries. The LESTARI team will also explore new PPP partners that contribute to the value chain of the U.S. rubber market.

Although the top-level management has to fully understand and approve the use of RIL-C, the real implementation of RIL-C in the field is conducted by field teams that mostly consist of staff with limited educational backgrounds. Therefore, it is crucial


that the trainers understand this potential barrier and are able to speak the proper “language” to make sure that all information can and will be well understood and received. Hence the LESTARI team is working closely with HPH management and the trainers to ensure that all trainings are well suited for the participants to ensure an optimal result.


Evaluation of FPIC impacts on actual canal blocking design

Subject to the above evaluation, leveraging of support to apply FPIC for canal blocking across the entire KHG14

A high-quality report of the FPIC process and its results

Continue facilitating co-management initiatives in various stages of development and implementation. Some communities are expected to receive the social forestry permits by next quarter, while others continue to develop and implement community based forest management

Presentation on the results of FMU assessment in front of relevant government agencies in the Central Kalimantan Province

Training on gender integrated planning will be held in Katingan-Kahayan Landscape engaging LESTARI grantees, community facilitators and other relevant LESTARI staff members

Participatory midterm assessment of METT will be facilitated in Bukit Baka Bukit Raya and Sebangau National Park and TWA Tangkiling. The assessment results and action plans will be compiled into a report and shared with Directorate KK in KLHK in July and August

Training on Human-Orangutan conflict mitigation will be held in September 2017

Series of activities to be implemented for improving long-term management plan of BBBR National Park and communities’ engagement in the traditional zone management

Continuation of technical assistance for community rubber to ensure allocated funding by local government can be utilized optimally. Local government in several villages have agreed to provide budget support for KUBKs. This should be further affiliated with BUMDes and village development plans

Sign new PPPs with RMU on peatland restoration in DAS Mantaya and BNI for BUMDES strengthening with rubber farmer groups

Expand community-based rubber PPP and explore for PPP partners

Technical assistance for social forestry permit applications and subsequent training village institutions for managing forest

Continuation of RIL-C training practice

Preparation for the operationalization of CMMP/HCV monitoring implementation with selected HPHs. Priority will be given to the HPHs that have received technical assistance under IFACS for CMMP development


Create sustainable business models and conduct FGDs with local government stakeholders for the Sebangau Sustainable Financing initiative, now that the business model development team has been officially established

Grant RFA for ecotourism work in Central Kalimantan that will focus on site development in BBBR and Dwima concessions


Lorentz Lowlands Landscape

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.!.

!.

!.

!.

!.!.

_̂̂__̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

_̂

WEST

PAPUA

A R A F U R A S E A

L o r e n t z N a t i o n a l P a r k

Nayaro

Keakwa

Ohotya

Mile point 15

Kuala Kencana

Timika Airport

Yepem

Syuru

Tiom

Kepi

Ilaga

Dekai

Agats

WageteWamena

Elelim

Timika

Karubaga

Moanamani Enarotali

M A P P I

YA H U K I M ON D U G A

P A N I A I

P U N C A K

D O G I YA I

YA L I M O

N A B I R E

L A N I J AYA

D E I YA I

I N T A N J AY A

B O U V E N D I G O E L

J AY AW I J A YA

P U N C A K J AYAT O L I K A R AM E M B E R A M O T E N G A H

A S M A T

M I M I K A

Sources: Esri, GEBCO, NOAA, National Geographic, DeLorme, HERE, Geonames.org, and other contributors

139°0'0"E

139°0'0"E

138°0'0"E

138°0'0"E

137°0'0"E

137°0'0"E

136°0'0"E

136°0'0"E

135°0'0"E

135°0'0"E

4°0

'0"S

4°0

'0"S

5°0

'0"S

5°0

'0"S

6°0

'0"S

6°0

'0"S

0 20 40 60 80 10010 Km

:PAP UA

Legend


!. District Capital

Provincial boundary

Kabupaten boundary

River

Empowerment Tradional Community

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

KAP Survey & Validation map


Conservation areas

Mangrove

Value Landscape:





FIELD ACTIVITIES IN

LORENTZ LOWLANDS LANDSCAPE

APRIL - JUNE 2017




Overview

The Lorentz Lowlands Landscape covers an extensive 4.8 million hectares, including the districts of Mimika and Asmat and Lorentz National Park. The landscape consists of largely intact dryland, mineral soil forests in the northern parts of the landscape, extensive lowland swamp forests along the central belt, and the world’s most rich and intact mangrove ecosystems on the southern coast. The bordering freshwater swamp forest (approximately 1M ha) is important for maintaining the mangroves and together harbor some of the highest carbon stock and biodiversity per hectare of similar forests on the planet. LESTARI’s overall vision for this landscape is to reduce degradation and future deforestation of primary forest and mangrove and improve biodiversity conservation through sustainable co-management, improved spatial planning, and CA management. This is to achieved through the following priority initiatives:

Improvement and implementation of the spatial plan focusing on peat, through the operationalization of SEA-LEDS recommendations

Protected forest management (includes peatlands) through co-management

Maintenance of mangrove and peatland resilience (including hydrological and socio- economic resilience) through sustainable livelihoods

The key Year 2 target for this landscape is to achieve 8,282 hectares of biological significance and/or natural resources under improved management. This is expected to be met via areas covering co-management agreements with communities (indicator #11).

Progress This Quarter – Improved & Land Forest Governance

KLHS Operationalization At the BKPRD meeting for RTRWK Review, those parts of the draft spatial plan that had incorporated the KLHS were identified. As a member of the team working with BAPPEDA for RTRWK revision, LESTARI had obtained the Head of BAPPEDA’s verbal agreement to insist that the consultant for the revision take into account KLHS recommendations. The existing KLHS, however, needs to be updated. At the subsequent two-day MSF Mimika event, a KLHS review was initiated aimed at updating the KLHS. There was agreement of the need to update the KLHS 2014 to take into account new relevant studies and policies (e.g., Perda Mangrove, community mapping, and LCP) as well as strategic issues identified by the MSF. The collaborative exercise was divided into: (1) legal legitimacy of the KLHS role and its utility to strengthen linkages between environmental management and economic growth, (2) strategic issues and recommendations from KLHS Mimika, (3) information gaps including important new spatial assessments since the original KLHS, (4) development scenario-building in visual ways, and (5) next steps towards actual updating of the KLHS to be an effective and high quality instrument to positively influence the revision of the spatial plan. Under current regulations, a Berita Acara for a revised RTRW (or RPJMD) declares that the recommendations of the KLHS have been incorporated. The roadmap for updating the KLHS for RTRWK revision recognized the importance of early follow up through a small team (Tim Kecil, with members identified under the auspices of Dinas LH) that was identified at the workshop in anticipation of the formation of a formal KLHS updating working group (Pokja). Breakout groups visualized two major spatial development pathways, degradation from short-term actions and optimal settings based upon sustainability principles. Each development pathway was guided by the strategic issues identified by KLHS 2014 and an updating exercise conducted in 2016 to identify more recent strategic issues (e.g.,


conversion of natural forest to oil palm, smelter industrial area, and disturbance of sacred areas). As well as forming a small team (Tim Kecil, see above), the head of Dinas LH further stated that he would bring to the attention of the Bupati the importance of timely and high-quality updating of the KLHS for RTRWK Mimika. Given that the exercise will be an updating, a few but significant additional recommendations should emerge such as the best way to approach accommodation of the need for a smelter-processing complex for PT Freeport Indonesia. During the KLHS Review, two Champions shared with MSF participants their positive experiences supported by LESTARI to participate in events outside Mimika, Ibu Mariana, Dinas Kehutanan, and Pak Mitro, BAPPEDA, both on the subject of community-based mangrove management.. Biodiversity Education and Advocacy Campaign The LESTARI team conducted a broad-reaching education and advocacy campaign aimed at increasing awareness, appreciation, and action towards the conservation of Papuan wildlife and biodiversity. 1,470 individuals were reached during the first stage of the campaign and three new Community Champions (Superintendent of Reclamation and Biodiversity, Environment Department, Freeport Indonesia; Head of KSDA SKW II Timika; and member of Papua Animal Care / Komunitas Pecinta Satwa PANIC) were identified who committed to protect and preserve Papuan wildlife. The activity also resulted in at least 9 articles published in Papua-based online and print media and spurred policymakers to commit to issuing a new Mimika District law on Papua wildlife protection.


Communities Engagement in Conservation and Forest Management In this quarter, LESTARI continued to facilitate communities in the priority areas for co-management. The team completed its support to facilitate communities in 5 villages (Ohotya, Nayaro, Suwruw, Keakwa, Yepem) to develop village natural resources management plans. Co-management facilitation will be kicked off next quarter.

Figure 10. FGD with community members in Ohotya to a develop village natural resources management plan.

In addition, the LESTARI team participated in the International Mangrove Conference held in April 2017 by MoEF and presented a paper based on the lesson learned in improving mangrove management in Lorentz Lowlands.



Asmat

Yepem Village Community facilitation has been started for the village forest initiative

Suwruw Village Community facilitation has been started for co-management of water and other ecosystem services.

Mimika

Ohotya Community facilitation has been started for ecotourism, which will later be followed up with setting up a co-management agreement between communities and Lorentz National Park

Keakwa Community facilitation has been started to prepare a social forestry initiative and non-timber forest product management

Nayaro Series of discussions with communities, sub-district government and PT. Freeport has been initiated to develop a co-management agreement

Kanmapri, Sempan Timur, Noema and Wenin, Ipam, Waituku, Sumapro, and Wapu

Initial activities to prepare trainings for developing RPJMK and village regulations and gap analysis on the existing RPJMK drafts

FMU Support The main findings of the FMU assessment in Lorentz Lowlands are described in the callout box below. The findings were presented during a policy dialogue with the Provincial Forestry Agency and other provincial stakeholders in May 2017. In addition, the revision of the long-term management plan and zonation for FMU VI were completed and submitted to MOEF for final approval.

Summary of FMU Assessment in Lorentz Lowlands Landscape

An assessment has been held to examine capacity and institutional building needs of FMU development in Lorentz Lowlands Landscape, especially FMU XVI in Mimika District. The assessment finds that the FMU’s long-term management plan has not been approved yet by the MoEF. Prior to the implementation of Law 23/2014, the FMU obtained significant budget and political support from the district government and had a status as a SKPD. After the implementation of the 2014 law, however, the FMU became an implementing agency (UPTD) with minimal authority for budget planning and allocation. There are three main challenges that are encountered by FMU in Mimika: first, limited availability of data and information on the biodiversity and natural resources in the forest management unit, which make it difficult to develop a comprehensive management plan. Second, due to limited facility in the field, which is located nearly 9 hours away from the district capital, most of FMU staff choose to stay in the office in Timika rather than carrying out day to day management in the field. It has raised concern on the effectiveness of FMU management. Third, the FMU has also encountered change in traditional communities, which no longer depend only on hunting and gathering activities to fulfill their daily needs, but also seek other modes of production such as plantation and agriculture, among others. The change of mode of production will re-shape their interaction with forest and forest management practices.

To conclude, there are several main recommendations: first, it is important to push forward the transition process in the transfer of authority on forest management from the district government to the provincial government. Without a clear roadmap for facilitating this process, it can hamper the development of FMU, not only FMU VI but also other FMUs in the province; second, there is a need to establish a clear incentive and disincentive mechanism to ensure FMU managers will effectively carry out their duty to ensure sustainable forest management; third, FMU need to be supported by institutional and


SMART SMART patrol second testing has been carried out and an evaluation was held to ensure effective long term implementation in Lorentz National Park. As the patrol area covers some indigenous communities’ area, the patrol routines need to be combined with awareness raising activities to local communities and students on the importance of biodiversity conservation and biodiversity monitoring activities. Species Survey and Monitoring The LESTARI team disseminated the result of the pig-nosed turtle survey during a one-day workshop in Mimika in April 2017. The pig-nosed turtle is a venerable species that is protected under Indonesian Law No. 5/1990. Survey results indicate the species continues to be threatened from unsustainable harvesting and illegal wildlife trafficking, eventually reaching places such as Singapore and China where they are often sold as exotic pets or delicacy items. The workshop results included recommendations for an action plan and policy development to support pig-nosed turtle conservation in Lorentz Lowlands Landscape. CA Zonation Plan and Spatial Data Management In this quarter, the LESTARI team, in collaboration with PIKA Directorate, facilitated a kick off workshop on zonation plan revision of Lorentz National Park. The event includes a conservation area zonation training to Lorentz National Park staff members and identification of data needed for the zonation revision. The workshop resulted in an action plan for data gathering and modeling for the draft zonation plan. Green Enterprise Development The survey for potential local commodities for sustainable livelihood development in the Mimika mangrove area has been finalized. The findings indicate that while there are opportunities, support would require activities not in line with the LESTARI project. Therefore, activities related to sustainable livelihoods within this landscape will be revised under the upcoming Year 3 Work Plan.

capacity building. Specifically, several topics for capacity building activities will be needed to improve the FMUs capacity in forest management, such as basic forest management planning, tenure conflict resolution, and agroforestry, among others.

Figure 11. Mangrove Forest in FMU VI, Mimika District



The role of KLHS is paramount but the awareness of its utility is still below what it should be. Petanisasi is important for specialists but visualizasi expands this to get the attention of non-specialists such as Champions, administration leaders, let alone local people (e.g., the Adat Kamoro motto of Sungai, Sampan and Sago). KLHS continues to offer a unique way for good studies to have an impact on KRP because KLHS recommendations need to be explicitly incorporated in the Berita Acara for major policies and plans such as RTRW and RPJMD (see above).

The highly participative KLHS review and visualization approach as initiated for Mimika will next be applied to the Mappi-Boven Digoel landscape ahead of the technical updating of the KLHS to ensure its influence on revision of the RTRWK and natural resource licensing.

In contravention of the RTRWK and the Perda Mangrove, coastal areas, including riparian zones, are being converted to gold prospecting masquerading as iron sand mining or other uses as evidenced from a visit by the LESTARI team from Timika to Pomako Port. This is a reminder that it is not enough to issue environmentally-sound spatial regulations. They must be enforceable as well.

Enforcement could be encouraged by a citizen-based watchdog such as Forest Watch Indonesia (FWI) or Indonesia corruption Watch (ICW) through a “RTRWatch” initiative not just for Mimika but for all LESTARI landscapes, informed by SIMTARU and SST.

Although the vast forested areas of the Lorentz Lowlands remain buffered against encroachment in the near term because of challenging transport conditions, at the margins there is increasing evidence of uncontrolled small-scale logging, which will eventually appear in remote sensing imagery.


Participatory midterm assessment of METT will be facilitated in Lorenz National Park. The assessment results and action plans will be reported to MoEF

Conservation Area Director at KLHK and his team plan to visit the park management office in August 2017 to provide oversight and guidance for ensuring better alignment between LESTARI and the national park management

Review of zonation plan in Lorenz National Park will be continued next quarter through biodiversity survey and other data collection as needed to improve the zonation system

Ensure that the enthusiasm amongst stakeholders in PK KLHS continues, first through the activities of the small team formed by the Head of BLH, and then the formation of a Working Group


Mappi-Bouven Digoel Landscape

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

!.

!.

!.

_̂_̂

_̂

ARA FUR A S EA

M A P P I

Ima

Kepi Wanggate

E D E R A

S U A T O R

O B A A

V E N A H A

J A I R

K A I B A R

A S S U E

K I A

A T S Y

M A N D O B O

N A M B I O M A N B A P A I

P A S S U E

S U B U R

A K A T

S I R E T S

A Y I PC I T A K M I T A K

H A J U

K A W A G I T

J E T S Y

F O F I

F A Y I T

Y A N I R U M A

S A F A N

F I R I W A G E

K O M B A Y

A R I M O P

M I N Y A M U R

B O M A K I A

K O U H

K O L F B R A Z A

K O P A Y

U N I R S I R A U

J E T S Y

S A W A E R M A S U R U - S U R U

D E R K O U M U R

M A N G G E L U MK O L F B R A Z A

P A N T A I K A S U A R I

B E C T B A M U

A M B A T K W I

A G A T S

Kepi

Tanah Merah

A S M A T

M E R A U K E

YA H U K I M O

B O U V E N D I G O E L

140°0'0"E

140°0'0"E

139°0'0"E

139°0'0"E

5°0

'0"S

5°0

'0"S

6°0

'0"S

6°0

'0"S

7°0

'0"S

7°0

'0"S

8°0

'0"S

8°0

'0"S

0 20 40 60 80 10010 Km

:PAP UA

Legend


!. District Capital

Kabupaten boundary

River

! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Village Profile Survey


Value Landscape:





Primary Mangrove Forest

Secondary Mangrove Forest

Peatland No Forest

FIELD ACTIVITIES IN

MAPPI-BOUVEN DIGOEL LANDSCAPE

APRIL - JUNE 2017




Overview

The Mappi-Bouven Digoel Landscape covers 3.3 million hectares in south Papua. The landscape is comprised of a large undeveloped expanse of lowland forest on lowland mineral terraces and extensive peatland, swamps, and some mangrove in the lower reaches towards the coast. The landscape is characterized by Papua’s largest river, the Digul, which forms the eastern boundary of the landscape. Southeast Papua has long been the focus of large development plans for the expansion in agricultural (oil palm and pulp plantations) and land-based energy estates. Hence LESTARI’s overall vision for this landscape is to reduce future deforestation and degradation of forest by large-scale private sector. This is to be achieved through land use rationalization to include essential hydrological, ecological, socio-economic functions in private sector planning.


Land Use Rationalization The LESTARI team held a meeting with Korindo, a group of international companies in the paper and forest products sector, to discuss land use rationalization opportunities within Boven Digoel District. In order to gain wider support, the LESTARI team is proposing to hold a roundtable discussion on the landscape approach that will be attended by private sector, donors, NGOs, and government representatives. The main private sector actors in the Boven Digoel area (Korindo and Modern Groups) have expressed their support. Currently the LESTARI team is in the process of finalizing the TOR for the initiative. Green Enterprises The assessment for potential commodity investments was finalized during this quarter. The report was submitted to USAID for approval prior to distribution to stakeholders. The report will be used to engage with key stakeholders in discussion for sustainable land use investment opportunities. MSF Mappi and Gender Integration A workshop on gender integration in MSF Mappi held on June 7-8, 2017 attended by 35 participants including representatives from government agencies, local communities, NGOs and LESTARI team. The workshop aimed at improving the participants’ awareness on the importance of gender integration in multi-stakeholder forum and activities and equip them with gender analysis method. As a apart of the workshop, the participants carry out the gender assessment in Ima Village to apply gender analysis method in the context of natural resources management. The result of the workshop were recommendations for gender integration in the MSF of Mappi-Boven Digoel Landscape. Implementation of these recommendations will be the responsibility of an additional dedicated working group.

Figure 12. Gender Assessment in Ima Village, Mappi District



Adapt the framework for applying the FPIC process from Katingan-Kahayan Landscape to plantation zonation licensing in BoDi.

Developing a sustainable investment model that is suitable for Papua is a complex task since there are environmental, social-cultural, and economic aspects unique to Papua. Based on certain standards, a company might claim to implement sustainable practices, but it might not be the case for their suppliers located in Papua where (primary) forest clearing must occur in order to open a plantation.

The rationalization plan will not be successful if there is no common agreement from all key stakeholders on the sustainable development plan. The LESTARI team is facilitating a roundtable discussion as the first step to discuss this issue.

Operationalizing the MSF has been difficult in Bouven Digul due to a few stakeholders wanting to control the forum and turn it into an implementing arm of LESTARI. Staff are now focusing more in the participation of a broad range of members and trying to instill the multi-stakeholder approach rather than develop an organization. The Bupati has remained disengaged with the MSF due to tensions between members and a reshuffling of agency leadership.

BoDi represents a major opportunity for LESTARI to safeguard large tracts of land from ecosystem degeneration. The reaction of vested interests against zonation or even the loss of their licenses for inactivity should, however, not be underestimated. Simply revoking licenses for inactivity will not prevent the re-allocation of new licenses.

Translate the results of the HCV analysis into a pragmatic HCVF approach. Notably, the recognition of HCV in oil palm concession areas is already recognized in national government policy. More sophisticated approaches could be used such as the application of an optimized trade-off to achieve sustainability as done in Merauke with Medco, with particular emphasis on water resources, livelihoods, and cultural values.

Attempts to follow up in the field regarding HCV utility, KLHS updating, and FPIC for licensing processes are often frustrated by the absence of key local government stakeholders (notably the Bupati, Wakil Bupati, SekDa, and head of Bappeda).


Sarmi Landscape

Overview

The LESTARI Sarmi Landscape covers 1 million hectares in northern Papua and is almost entirely comprised of natural forests, from the low coastal land up to the Foja Mountains in the hinterlands. This includes extensive areas of lowland peat swamp forest as well as mangrove forests along the 200 km coast. The region is known for its rich biodiversity in all forest types including tree-kangaroos, the enigmatic Northern Cassowary, 16 species of parrot and cockatoos, and 6 species of birds of paradise – all of which are relatively common throughout the landscape. LESTARI’s overall vision for this landscape is to ensure HCV/HCS conservation and reduce future deforestation by large-scale private sector through improved adoption of BMPs. With the proper implementation of RIL-C, the impacts from logging can be minimized; through participatory HCV monitoring with the local stakeholders, illegal logging can be reduced.


Reduced Impact Logging (RIL-C) Training for Timber Concessions During this quarter, LESTARI continued with preparations for delivering RIL-C training to the 2 partner timber concessions. This process, however, is progressing slower than in the Katingan-Kahayan Landscape due to the longer prerequisite list prior to the start of the training. The list must be fulfilled by the HPHs to demonstrate their full commitment to participate in the training and implement RIL-C practices. The HPHs have been responsive to these requests by LESTARI and the RIL-C trainers, and based on the latest progress, it is expected that the training can be initiated after the Idul Fitri holiday.


PT. Wapoga Mutiara Timber

130,755 IFACS and LESTARI partners

1. Recently finalized the initial assessment by TFF as RIL-C trainers.

2. RIL-C training is scheduled to start in July 2017, provided the minimum prerequisite has been met.

PT. Salaki Mandiri Sejahtera


1. Recently finalized the initial assessment by TFF as RIL-C trainers.

2. RIL-C training is scheduled to start in July 2017, provided the minimum prerequisite has been met.


The actual implementation of RIL-C is conducted by field teams that largely consist of staff with limited educational background. It is crucial that the trainers understand this obstacle and tailor their style of language to suit the audience. LESTARI is working closely with HPH management and the trainers to ensure this.

Given the remoteness of this region and difficult road access, it is a significant challenge to find appropriately qualified field staff and reach the field sites.



Resolve any pre-requisite issues with HPHs to clear the way for RIL-C training implementation


Cyclops Landscape

!.

"/

P A C I F I C O C E A N

C y c l o p s

N a t u r e R e s e r v e

Abepura

SE NTA NI L AK E

YO UT EFA

GU LF

K A B U P A T E N J AY A P U R A

NECHEIBEYONGSU DOSOYO

SEREH

ORMUWARI

YEWENA

YEPASE

TABLASUPA

DORMENA

WAMBENA

Sereh

Moi

Ormuwari

Dofonsoro

Neichebe

WA I B U

S E N T A N I

R A V E N I R A R A

S E N T A N I B A R A T

K E M T U K

D E PA P R E

A B E P U R A

S E N T A N I T I M U R

H E R A M

Y O K A R I

E B U N G FA U

J A YA P U R A S E L A T A N

M U A R A T A M I

J A YA P U R A U T A R A

K E M T U K G R E S I

Sentani

K O T A J AY A P U R A

Jayapura

140°45'0"E

140°45'0"E

140°40'0"E

140°40'0"E

140°35'0"E

140°35'0"E

140°30'0"E

140°30'0"E

140°25'0"E

140°25'0"E

140°20'0"E

140°20'0"E

2°2

5'0

"S

2°2

5'0

"S

2°3

0'0

"S

2°3

0'0

"S

2°3

5'0

"S

2°3

5'0

"S

2°4

0'0

"S

2°4

0'0

"S

0 5 10 152.5 Km

:

P A P U A

FIELD ACTIVITIES IN

CYCLOPS LANDSCAPE

APRIL - JUNE 2017

Legend

"/ Provincial Capital

!. District Capital

Kabupaten Boundary

River

Road

Conservation Area


! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Smart Patrol Area

! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Natural Resoures Village Mapping

Value Landscape:


Secondary Dryland ForestSource : Compile of LESTARI activities data



Overview

The Cyclops Landscape in northern Papua is the smallest LESTARI Landscape (47,000 ha) but nevertheless rich in forest and biodiversity resources. The large population centers in nearby Jayapura and Sentani depend directly upon Cyclops’ forests for their water supply. However, the mountain range is under threat from illegal logging, charcoal making, wildlife poaching, and encroachment for agricultural land by mountain communities migrating to the capital. The value landscape is defined by the remaining forest within and surrounding the nature reserve. The operational landscape contains the bordering buffer zone to the reserve. The overall vision for this landscape is to reduce deforestation and degradation of Cyclops Nature Reserve through improved co-management of the PA. This is to be achieved through improved management through the KPH and co-management with communities to improve livelihoods. The landscape also serves as a learning site for other landscapes to apply LESTARI’s approaches and scale up impact. The key Year 2 target for this landscape is to achieve 32,680 hectares of biological significance and/or natural resources under improved management. This is expected to be met via 31,480 hectares from Cyclops Nature Reserve (indicator #10) and 1,200 hectares from areas covering co-management agreements with communities (indicator #11).

Progress This Quarter

Improved Governance for PES and Sustainable Tourism Ormu Necheibe Village has had success in promoting a payment for environmental services (PES) scheme to supply 10,000 m3/day of water from a major spring to PDAM Kota Jayapura at Rp 1,150/m3 while ensuring that two thirds of the flow remains untapped for habitat conservation. A PT Adat has been formed to distribute revenue. As the pipeline and spring are inside Cyclops Nature Reserve, an SK KLHK Blok Khusus has been obtained. Additionally, Ormu has proposed a 200 ha educational forest (Hutan Pendidikan) as an ecotourism area around so-called Pasir 6 (6 kilometers from Jayapura) within the village area but outside the Nature Reserve (currently APL status). This forest area encompasses the above spring with management support from Universitas Manokwari. Access is to be assured through a gateway to mitigate encroachment threats. Thus far this initiative is still in the concept development stage with no specific intervention by LESTARI. Communities’ Engagement in Conservation/Forest Management In order to refine the approach for community facilitation and develop roadmaps for co-management, a writing workshop was held on April 4-6, 2017 engaging LESTARI team members from all landscapes in Papua. It resulted in clear roadmaps for co-management in each location and working papers on the approaches used for village and co-management assessment, such as multidisciplinary landscape assessment, resilience assessment, and HCV, among others. Moreover, communities in Ormuwari and Neichebe completed RPJMK revision integrating conservation issues with the support from LESTARI.


Jayapura District Neichebe and Ormuwari

Community facilitations on RPJMK and village regulation have been completed in both villages. The villages have agreed allocate budget for MMP


SMART Patrol In this quarter, a new additional patrol team in Ormu area has been established engaging indigenous community rangers (Masyarakat Mitra Polhut). Therefore, there are 4 patrol teams operational and they have carried out routine patrols in 4 locations. The results of SMART patrol are presented in the figure below:

Figure 13. Smart Patrol Efforts and Findings in Cyclops Landscape (April – June 2017)

The team has also carried out SMART evaluation in June 2017, which will be followed up with a series of activities to address the threats to the nature reserve. Conservation Area Management Plan A workshop was held on June 25-26, 2017 to complete the revision of the management plan for Cyclops Nature Reserve. The revised management plan has been completed and submitted to the Directorate of Conservation Area at KLHK in Jakarta for final approval. Green Enterprise Development The sustainable vanilla initiative continued implementation in the Cyclops Landscape. The initiative aims to provide incentive for migrant farmers to relocate illegal agriculture practices from within the protected area to the buffer zone area. More broadly, it also aims to develop a sustainable model that can be scaled up to a greater area to support overall improvement in land and forest management in the landscape. Building on last quarter’s socialization activities, the LESTARI team is currently collaborating with NCBA to start training specifically for targeted vanilla farmers. LESTARI is also working with members of Mitra Polhut and local government to optimize the technical assistance. NCBA is an organization that has received funding from USAID to enhance sustainable livelihoods through improving the development of several local commodities and market access.


The change of conservation area management staff in Papua with the new appointment of the head of BKSDA Papua, Timbul Batubara, could open new opportunities for improving conservation areas protection and management, including SMART Patrol and foster collaboration with other stakeholders in the provincial level.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Moy Holorowa Dofonsoro Ravenirara

Dis

tan

ce (

km

)

SMART Patrol

Patrol days Illegal logging Land utility

Poaching Human (encoutered) Distance (km)


A district agency for villagers’ empowerment (BMPK) has expressed interest to scale up the development of village development plans that integrate conservation issues in the villages located around Cyclops. They have requested the LESTARI team to provide technical assistance for carrying out training for village facilitators while the district government allocates the budget to do so.

Cultural differences between migrant farmers and farmers from the bufferzone area may cause some friction. Engagement is crucial to secure buy-in from both parties.

There are obvious opportunities for modular PES and ecotourism in Papua whereby social and legal legitimacy need to be connected.

The Cyclops Landscape while only a 100th of the landscape areas of Lorentz Lowlands and Mappi-Bouven Digoel represents a model approach for collaborative management with relatively quick scale up. Cyclops is readily accessible for capacity-building study tours and has provincial / political relevance for other trans-Kabupaten areas such as the Lorentz Lowlands.


Kick off biodiversity monitoring in Cyclops Nature Reserve with KPHK

Facilitate Neichebe and Ormuwari Village to develop village regulations

Carry out participatory mapping in 5 villages (Doyo Baru, Bambar, Hinekombe, Sabron Sari, Maribu)

Series of follow up policy dialogues with relevant provincial agencies will be held next quarter to discuss some priority topics (FMU, mangrove management and social forestry)


Papua Provincial Initiatives

Progress This Quarter

Increasing SIMTARU Utility After repeated and proactive interventions, BAPPEDA obtained formalization of the Governor’s Decree (PerGub) for SIMTARU together with its SOP, PerGub 19/2017, that gives regulatory force to the SIMTARU. In combination with PerGub 18 signed in March this year, these Governor’s Decrees represent milestone regional policy achievements supported by LESTARI towards the improvement of natural resource licensing processes in Papua. Mimika BAPPEDA’s willingness to adopt the SIMTARU approach and be dynamically linked with SIMTARU Province has been given greater commitment by the agreement to provide training funding from local government budget, requesting only technical assistance from LESTARI. This should be a model for Province – District SIMTARU e-connectivity. BAPPEDA commitment to SIMTARU in the long run is being assured by its own funding to purchase a mirror server for SIMTARU BAPPEDA to take over from the current main server in BIG as the main server. Furthermore, 30 traditional (adat) community maps were uploaded to SIMTARU. In consultation with relevant NGOs, a framework SOP was produced covering verification of social recognition of the maps and agreement to upload them, information about the mapping methods used as well as the geospatial information types. A smartphone application for SIMTARU was developed. While not yet in the public domain, it has been upgraded with spatial planning maps. Sustainability Screening Tool (SST) In-depth working presentations were conducted with relevant sections of Dinas Pelayanan Satu Pintu Perizinan (PTSP) about the application of the SST to improve natural resource licensing. The PTSP Head asked that SST be applied to a review of the status of plantation and forestry concession licenses. Modalities for more workable linkages with SIMTARU were elaborated such as the PTSP section responsible. It was agreed that licenses in Boven Digoel will be a high-priority focus. KLHS Operationalization Three out of the six requests in a formal letter from Head of BAPPEDA Papua Province to LESTARI were for province-level support to increase KLHS quality and utility (RPJMD, RTRWP revision and formulation Strategic Economic zones). An internal lessons-learned exercise was conducted for relevant LESTARI staff in anticipation of the need to review KLHS for BoDi and Mappi and Cyclops, drawing on the lessons from initiation of KLHS Review for RTRWK Mimika Revision. Multi-Stakeholder Processes An internal LESTARI exercise was held to analyze principles and processes of MSF as well as actual experience in Papua. The working exercises were divided into, (1) perceptions of what a successful MSF is and how it should be assessed, (2) AMEP indicators and MSF principles, (3) breakout groups by landscape distinguishing between past MSF development experiences and the ideal, (4) breakout groups by landscape proposing improved indicators and milestones as well as their verifiers, and (5) next steps in view of the exercise to propose improved indicators and milestones for MSF.


There is no doubt that MSF are valued by LESTARI staff and partners as means of better achieving better collaboration and coordination among local government, private sector and local communities. It was understood, however, that emphasis should be placed more on the need for multi-stakeholder processes than formal institutionalization of MSF. Some of the most successful MSFs such as Forum Hapakat Lestari in Pulang Pisau have not wanted Bupati recognition for fear of over-dominance by government institutions while accepting that this means it will be more difficult to acquire government funding. The nascent MSF at the Papua provincial level, a strengthening of the existing Forum Tata Ruang that will change its name to Forum Papua Pembangunan Berkelanjutan (FPPB), is an example that not all multi-stakeholder processes supported by LESTARI need to be new MSFs. Forum Tata Ruang has the additional advantage of having institutional identity since 2015. Some MSFs have been much more successful than others, even within the same landscape, in the case of Mappi-BoDi, Mappi (the MSF of a thousand lakes) has had singular success not only in encouraging better collaboration and coordination between sectors but even within sectors. SKPD in Mappi have noted that even within a given SKPD, communication since the MSF is now better than before. MSF Mimika noted that relations between the private sector (PTFI) and adat communities have improved.


Ensure that Provincial SKPDs systematically update the SIMTARU monthly without the need for prompting. The present PerGub should help by re-enforcing the role of the Center for Data and Analysis (Pusat Data dan Analisa), which may also play a pivotal role in the preparation of KLHS.

The Provincial BAPPEDA’s increased emphasis on KLHS is encouraging because it is aligned with LESTARI goals and emphasizes the utility of KLHS to influence policies, plans, and programs that affect land use allocation and decision-making. The best entry point is likely to be as in Central Kalimantan, focusing first on a spatially based KLHS for RPJMD and RENSTRA SKPD followed by updating of the KLHS for review of the RTRWP.

The paramount role of KLHS is undermined without sufficient stakeholder awareness of its operational utility. Too often the KLHS is perceived by local government as an administrative obligation for major plans, programs, and policies, especially in Papua. As noted in Mimika, it was clear that updating of KLHS cannot begin without increased awareness of the value of KLHS and that the KLHS review process serves this function. To launch straight into KLHS updating would risk turning the exercise into an expert product with little impact. Adding visualization of KLHS development scenarios can increase awareness among stakeholders and accountability of local government to take KLHS more seriously in PPP formulation.

Efforts to enable citizen-based influence over decision-making should continue to emphasize the strengthening of existing appropriate fora rather than trying to create a new MSF.

Currently AMEP indicators overly-stress institutionalization and administrative metrics. As important as multi-stakeholder processes are, they are less easy to verify than institutional milestones though outputs and other proxies for success can be used. There is a need to enrich to the present AMEP metrics ahead of work planning to better capture how MSF processes are and should be operating.



Build capacity for SKPD to systematically update the SIMTARU with license information in part through training but also through increased awareness of chapter 5 article 8 of Governor’s decree on SIMTARU establishment that requires such updating

Explore modalities for motivating the SKPD and central agencies to systematically update the SIMTARU with license information (e.g., publication of which SKPD are late in updating the SIMTARU, administrative sanctions for such delinquent SKPD)

Share with the KLHS Review RTRWK Mimika small team and MSF the first visualization results for stakeholder feedback

Initiate KLHS Review for Mappi and BoDi RTRWK

Roundtable discussion with corporate concession owners to verify willingness for improved zonation of plantations that safeguard HCV values while ensuring sufficient profitability

Produce a proposed set of better indicators and milestones to track the progress and impact of MSF processes


NATIONAL INITIATIVES Progress This Quarter The LESTARI team ensures that lessons learned from initiatives at the landscapes level can contribute to support broader change at the national level. This includes showcasing best practices and success stories from the landscapes to be scaled up at the national level (see Emerging Centers of Excellence matrix within this section). It also involves informing challenges in implementing particular policy actions in the landscape, hence contributing to policy improvement at the national level. During this quarter, key highlights included:

LESTARI actively participated in roundtable discussions to establish a task force on Social Forestry and Agrarian Reform under the Presidential Office (KSP). The task force will be responsible for fostering the progress to achieve ambitious target for social forestry (12.7 million hectares) and agrarian reform (4.5 million hectares).

LESTARI team has been in close collaboration with USAID BIJAK to move forward policy advocacy at the national level to support the development of FMUs through workshop and policy dialogues.

The LESTARI team has been in close communication with the ASLI project to ensure synergy on ASLI's upcoming training on indigenous rights and FPIC.

As a part of the national working group of METT and SMART, LESTARI team actively provided technical feedback during routine meetings of the working groups to ensure insights from LESTARI landscapes are considered and integrated in the planning and implementing activities related to METT and SMART.

The LESTARI team continued to actively participate in meetings organized by conservation working group and Foretika for the revision of Law 5/1990 on natural resources and ecosystem conservation. A national seminar is planned to gather more inputs for the revision and align two versions of law revision.

LESTARI continued its assistance for the completion of conservation area zoning system. This initiative is aimed not only to improve the effectiveness of protected area management, hence improving the METT score, but also to contribute to the completion of the One Map Initiative initiated by PIKA Directorate.

The LESTARI team has been facilitating and participating in the development of national standards for the RIL-C implementation and evaluation. The process is currently at the stage of finalizing documents that will be used as technical reference for the Permen (Minister Regulation) on mandatory RIL-C implementation for each HPH in Indonesia. This is co-facilitated by APHI, TBI, and TNC with full support from Ditjen PHPL as the government counterpart.

LESTARI team participated in a workshop on gender integration held by USAID in June 2017. During the workshop, LESTARI team presented overall gender integration strategy and achievements. The team also identified several key recommendations to move forward. As each project will be required to submit gender responsive indicators, which needs to be reported regularly to USAID by October 2017, LESTARI gender specialist along with M&E team will develop and finalize the indicators by next quarter.


LESTARI continued to respond to KLHK requests for assistance to improve the draft national KLHS decree, especially calculation of carrying capacity and assurance of greater KLHS utility and quality. KLHK recognizes the value for policy development from of LESTARI’s experience achieving participatory as well as technically-proficient KLHS in the field.

Challenges and Opportunities While the RKTN revision process does not seem to have progressed much beyond

the stage of the national public consultation held on March 21, this raises questions about the value of RKTP. There remains a need, however, to provide more effective support for RPJHP for the KPH. LESTARI continued to seek an appropriate resource person for this activity and explore ways in which improved KLHS scenarios might feed into this goal.

There have been a series of discussions to integrate agrarian reform and social forestry initiative with village development policies and programmes at the national level. If the plan succeeds, it could ensure better integration and sustainable impacts of the initiative.

Focus on the national social forestry taskforce is mostly given to the process of getting the social forestry permit but still lacking plan in providing support for the activities after the permit is received. The government needs to provide better attention and allocate proper support/resources on providing assistance to the community in sustainable forest management.

The new assignment of Ir. Wiratno, MSc as the DG of KSDAE could stimulate the adoption of a more collaborative and inclusive approach in the management of conservation areas. He has been an ardent advocate for an inclusive approach to conservation and forest management in Indonesia.

The progress of law 5/1990 revision remains slow due to different views and draft versions between the parliament and the MoEF. It is considered crucial to push efforts to align both versions to move forward the law revision.

The Director of Usaha Hutan Lestari under Ditjen PHPL as our main focal point for the RIL national standards initiative has been recently replaced. The former Director, Bapak Gatot Isbiantoro, has been replaced by the Director Bapak Istanto. LESTARI team has been actively engaging the new director to ensure continuous support and buy-in from our government counterpart.

Some HPHs have expressed objection to the government plans to enforce the obligatory RIL practice policy. Further discussion and facilitation are required to address this issue.

Various local governments are keen on developing sustainable tourism and have requested LESTARI to facilitate the development process of the master plan. However, there are very limited local/national institutions that are specialized in the sustainable tourism sector and understand in detail the complexity of the issues.

There continues to be a clear lack of national government leadership, policy, and/or guidance on how climate change mitigation targets are to be met at the sub-national level. This also represents an ongoing constraint for LESTARI’s climate change mitigation efforts at the landscape level.


Priorities for Next Quarter The result of FMU assessment in Papua, Aceh, and Central Kalimantan Province will

be presented in front of relevant government agencies at the national level (DG Planologi, DG DAS and HL, DG PHPL) to ensure broader impact of the initiative.

LESTARI STTA will present the assessment results in front of relevant DGs (DG Planologi, DG DAS and HL, DG PHPL) in Jakarta and Provincial Forestry Agencies and stakeholders in Central Kalimantan.

LESTARI team will support Festival Perhutanan Sosial (PESONA) on September 6-8, 2017 to promote community entrepreneurship for sustainable social forestry initiatives.

Provide technical assistance to facilitate Training of Trainers for SMART patrol held by the training and education center (Pusdiklat) of MoEF. The TOT is foundational to support nation-wide adoption of SMART patrol and database management.

LESTARI team and partners will participate in the SMART study visit in the Philippines held by BIJAK on July 17-20, 2017.

LESTARI team will present a regular update on the progress of LESTARI in Conservation Area Directorate inviting other relevant directorates and gather initial inputs for Y3 work plan priorities.

The issuance of the Permen for nationwide RIL-C implementation

Develop gender responsive indicators for overall LESTARI activities. The achievement of indicators will be monitored and evaluated regularly.

Identify the plan for the sustainable tourism initiative during the Year 3 Work Plan.


PROJECT COORDINATION, MANAGEMENT, AND COMMUNICATIONS CLA MODEL & MID-TERM ASSESSMENT LESTARI implements a Collaborating, Learning, and Adapting (CLA) management model that, together with Theories of Change, continuously tests underlying assumptions based on evidence and makes adjustments in order to ensure project activities lead to measurable impact for reduced deforestation and improved biodiversity conservation in project landscapes. In support of the CLA approach and part of the ongoing Mid-term Assessment, the LESTARI team conducted field visits to develop Landscape-specific Situation Models (LSMs) and conduct a Political Economy Analysis (PEA). LSM The LSM are developed based on the general LESTARI Situation model but adapted to the landscape project context. These involved:

1. Preparing a draft of Papua Landscape Situation Model, based on the general LESTARI situation model, and results of any previous internal discussion on adaptations needed

2. Facilitation of a process of reviewing and adapting the model, including: o Key emissions threats for this landscape, and underlying causes o Notable program successes and obstacles during implementation so far o Key Strategic Approaches to deal with these threats o Integration needed between the key Strategic Approaches

3. Agreement on the revised Landscape Situation Model, with notes on any further processes/discussions needed

The development process of Landscape Situation Model (LSM) for each landscape was conducted in a participatory manner with landscape staff. The participants started the process by defining each step in the situation model development process, as follows:

1. Biodiversity Program Scope The biodiversity program scope defines the boundaries of where or on what the program will focus. In other words, it encompasses the program’s biodiversity focal interests.

2. Biodiversity Focal Interest Biodiversity focal interests are the species, habitats, and/or ecosystems that a program is working to conserve. Biodiversity focal interests, through the ecosystems services they provide, contribute to human well-being on many fronts.

3. Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being Interest Ecosystem services are services that functioning ecosystems, species, and habitats provide and that can benefit people

4. Direct Threats and Stress


Direct threats are the human actions that negatively affect the biodiversity focal interests.

5. Define and Add Drivers (Constraint and Opportunities) Information about the drivers (constraints and opportunities) that are causing, exacerbating, or mitigating the direct threats to the program’s biodiversity focal interests. These drivers are the factors that positively or negatively affect the direct threats and usually include economic, political, institutional, social, and/or cultural influences. As the results, we came up with the narratives and draft of situation model for all landscapes.

Political Economy Analysis Preparation Study A Political Economy Analysis (PEA) was undertaken as a part of LESTARI’s ongoing mid-term assessment, to increase the effectiveness of project strategies, tools and approaches toward meeting high level outcomes for emissions reduction and biodiversity conservation. This involved visits to Aceh, Central Kalimantan and Papua project offices, interviews with various internal and external stakeholders, and a workshop with LESTARI staff to introduce them to PEA. These activities were undertaken in a month from the period of April 3 to May 12, 2017 and conducted by an experienced PEA consultant in close collaboration with the LESTARI MEL Coordinator. The agenda was interactively delivered through a series of presentations and group discussion to cover some steps of the PEA’s study as follows:

1. Introduction Explain PEA concepts, USAID guidance on PEA, Problem-driven governance and political economy analysis and thinking and working politically.

2. PEA Concepts This session is intended to introduce some of the concepts with sufficient clarity so as to provide a basis for the afternoon’s practical sessions, but also to provide a ‘teaser’ regarding other concepts/tools.

3. Practical Sessions I: Stakeholder analysis on selected bottlenecks This session is intended to develop a basic stakeholder analysis and recommended project approach based on the stakeholder analysis.

4. Practical Sessions II: Theory of Change (ToC) review for selected Strategic Approach Critical reflections on ToC using PEA lens, oriented towards the particular Strategic Approach selected as most important for discussion in this landscape.

5. Closing Reflections Reflections on result and process of the workshop, need/interest for additional analysis in this landscape, ideas on how to do it.

The PEA is expected to be of use in the refining of the LSM, and the discussions held during the field trip to develop the LSM will be of use in narrowing the focus of the PEA. PEA summarizes some key political economy dynamics behind weak governance of forests and land in the landscapes, and suggests some implications for LESTARI. It is based on an in-progress political economy analysis undertaken as a part of LESTARI’s mid-term assessment as previously mentioned, which also includes workshops with LESTARI staff to introduce political economy tools for ongoing program planning processes. The study came up with some constructive recommendations for general LESTARI project, operations in each landscapes well as on how to embed the PEA approach in LESTARI. The detailed findings are presented in the following table.


LANDSCAPE PROGRAM SCOPE THREATS GROUP OF DRIVERS

Sarmi Tropical Forest, Mangroves

- Timber and Palm Oil Concession - Small Scale Illegal Logging - Infrastructure development - Settlement Expansion

- Poor Private Company Management - Poor of Economy Development - Poor Governance - Poor of Land use Planning

Cyclops

Tropical Forest, Water Resources, Wildlife Trafficking, Habitat Protection

- Small Scale Agriculture - Settlements - Encroachment - Illegal Trade of Key Species

- Poor Conservation Area Management - Lack of Livelihood - Lack of Public Awareness - Poor Governance

Lorentz Lowlands

Tropical Forest, Mangroves, Wildlife Trafficking, Habitat Protection

- Timber and Palm Oil Concession - Large Mining - Mining Infrastructures Development - Small Illegal Mining - Small Illegal Logging - Industry Development - Inappropriate ES Practices - Illegal Trade of Key Species - Over Poaching

- Poor Governance - Poor Conservation Area Management - Top Down Policies - Socio-Economics Dynamics - Lack of Capacities - Lack of Monitoring - Lack of Law Enforcement

Mappi-Bouven Digoel

Tropical Forest, Mangroves, Wildlife Trafficking, Habitat Protection

- Food Estate Development Program - Infrastructure Development - Small Scale Illegal Logging - Illegal Gold Mining - Overharvest of Gaharu - Forest Fire, Encroachment - Illegal Trade of Key Species - Poaching - Habitat Fragmentation

- Livelihood Pressure - Low Capacity of Civil Society - Market Demand of NTFP & Illegal Species - Poor Governance - Lack Awareness and Advocacy - Sectoral Ego

Katingan Kahayan

Tropical Forest and Wildlife

- Large Scale Deforestation

- Small Scale Deforestation

- Forest & Peat Fire

- Excessive Illegal Commercial Trade

- Loss of Habitat and Food of

Endemic/Specialties Species

- Poor governance at district,

province and national level in

allocating land of district authority

- Market demands

- Ineffective conservation Area

Management at National Level

- Unclear rights & limited livelihood

options adjacent to conservation

areas

- Macroeconomic forces

- Lack of support

Leuser Tropical Forest and Wildlife

- Large Scale Deforestation

- Small Scale Deforestation

- Excessive Illegal Commercial

Trade

- Habitat Fragmentation/Loss of

Specialties Species

- Poor governance at district,

province and national level on policy

implementation

- Insufficient community livelihood

option

- Low of stakeholders capacity

- Unclear connection between Rural

Development with forestry

governance

- Lack of support on incentives,

budget and managements structures

for any green development initiatives


Additional project coordination and management highlights from this quarter included:

LESTARI facilitated a successful field visit for the USAID/Indonesia Mission Director and Environment Office Director to the Katingan-Kahayan Landscape in order to meet with landscape partners, observe field activities, and discuss challenges and opportunities to scaling up impact. The trip included visits to Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya, Sebangau National Park, Pulang Pisau District Government Office, and Block C rubber plantations.

The LESTARI team attended the USAID Environment Office Partners meeting in June to learn of the upcoming USAID budgeting timeline, the new administration’s priority thematic clusters, and guidelines on messaging. LESTARI will work to communicate how its activities and impacts contribute to the relevant thematic clusters.

The LESTARI team has developed a Centers of Excellence matrix that documents the core models (i.e., FPIC, RPJMDes, SIMTARU, SST, SMART Patrol) being implemented successfully. It will be used as the basis for Year 3 Work Planning to deepen activities and scale up impact. The matrix also identifies how national policy initiatives can strengthen beneficial actions at the landscape level to ensure their sustainability.

Senior management and technical team conducted regular visits to landscapes, including implementation of a policy requiring senior technical staff to spend a minimum of two weeks per month working in the landscapes to support and mentor LESTARI staff and partners in relevant sustainable landscapes and biodiversity conservation work.

Regular Senior Management Meetings were held each Monday morning and included senior staff, while also open to other technical staff and subcontractors, to ensure coherence and impact of LESTARI work.

Regular communication was conducted with USAID through weekly meetings.

PERSONNEL New personnel were recruited during this quarter in order to obtain key technical inputs and fulfill required positions in an efficient manner and in line with the approved Year 2 Work Plan. A summary of STTA and LTTA staff mobilized over this quarter is provided below.

Title STTA/LTTA Office Base

Socio-economic Specialist STTA Banda Aceh

Biodiversity and Peatland Conservation Specialist STTA Banda Aceh

Landscape General Advisor STTA Banda Aceh

SIMTARU Spatial Planning and Resource Licensing Specialist STTA Jakarta

Grants Coordinator LTTA Jakarta

Biodiversity Conservation Advisor LTTA Jakarta

Landscape Coordinator LTTA Palangkaraya

Landscape Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist LTTA Jayapura

Gender Specialist LTTA Jakarta


Title STTA/LTTA Office Base

Landscape Protected Area Management Specialist LTTA Palangkaraya

Landscape Stakeholder Engagement Coordinator LTTA Palangkaraya – Gunung Mas

Landscape Stakeholder Engagement Coordinator LTTA Palangkaraya – Pulang Pisau

COMMUNICATIONS During this quarter, the LESTARI Communications Team continued to produce and strategically disseminate a range of communication products on key technical issues, including canal blocking for peatland restoration, forest and biodiversity conservation, and LEDS. This was aimed at awareness-raising as well as sharing project impacts, challenges, and successes. Details are provided in the table below.

The Communications Team continued to maintain a strong social media presence for National and Landscape-specific pages. The National page focused on broad issues involving deforestation and biodiversity conservation in Indonesia, as well as LESTARI-supported activities. Landscape pages consistently shared content involving threats, challenges, and opportunities facing that particular landscape as well as LESTARI-supported activities. Graphs below illustrate the volume of posts generated and reach rate.

Communication Products Theme/Topic

Story from the Field

On the Frontline of Orangutan-Human Conflict Mitigation

Mimika Gets Its Act Together to Save Wildlife

Fire Prevention Through Village Fund Use

Permaculture Farmers and Change in Menggamat

Pak Lasmari and Reduced Impact Logging

Strengthening Women’s Role in Conservation

Making A Difference

CRU Trumon

Improved Land Use Licensing in Papua

Revitalizing the Central Kalimantan Rubber Sector

Communications Materials for MSF

Animated informational video about canal blocking

Animated informational video about the FPIC process

FPIC scheme

Advocacy Campaign Communication Materials

Educational campaign in Lorentz Lowlands on biodiversity and key species conservation: posters, billboards, banners, leaflets, and short videos

Infographic Lorentz Lowlands mangroves infographic


Figure 14. Total posts published during Quarter 3, Year 2

Figure 15. Total post outreach during Quarter 3, Year 2

Finally, LESTARI Communications, as a cross-cutting approach, works closely with and in support of the Awareness and Advocacy strategic approach under Technical Theme 1. Further details of Communications’ support provided to Awareness and Advocacy initiatives over the last quarter are presented in Appendix 1.

8 8

4

65

11

9

1

4

2

13

7

10

19

11

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Fan Page National Fan Page Leuser Fan Page KatinganKahayan

Fan Page Papua Fan Page MappiBouven Digoel

Total Published Post per Month (photo, link and status)

APRIL MAY JUNE

50278427

371 661 552649 1640 860 523 1931200 1076

38348

2269 835

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

45000

Fan Page National Fan Page Leuser Fan Page KatinganKahayan

Fan Page Papua Fan Page MappiBouven Digoel

Total Post Outreach (person)

APRIL MAY JUNE


CHALENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES The regular shuffling of personnel at GOI partner institutions is an ongoing challenge

for LESTARI regarding both coordination efforts and long-term advocacy aimed at inspiring government champions. However, this also presents an opportunity to build new bridges and improve engagement with new government staff.

Ensure staff and partners understand and utilize the ToC and therefore LESTARI interventions demonstrate and target links that ultimately contribute to the project’s overall reduced deforestation and improved biodiversity conservation results.

There is a need to enrich the present AMEP metrics to better capture how multi-stakeholder processes are and should be operating.

Some LESTARI subcontractors have demonstrated inadequate finance and administration processes. This underscores the need for ongoing support from Jakarta to ensure our subcontractors’ work is both transparent and accountable.

To meet requests in various provinces and districts, most notably in Aceh and Papua, LESTARI has developed and is implementing procedures to inform police/military/security authorities of large gatherings, public consultations, and visits of foreigners to the LESTARI landscapes.

For the last 2 months the LESTARI website has been experiencing technical difficulties. The LESTARI Communications team, LESTARI web developer and IT are working together with the Tetra Tech IT department to resolve the issue.

PRIORITIES FOR NEXT QUARTER Finalize mid-term assessment write up

Technical Annual Report and Year 3 Work Plan meetings in Jakarta

Year 3 Work Planning sessions in Aceh, Central Kalimantan, and Papua, ensuring that landscape teams and partners are focused on deepening activities and producing results

Conduct and document periodic technical and financial reviews of subcontractors and remind them of required financial audits

LESTARI subcontractor partners coordination meeting in Jakarta

Field visit with BAPPENAS and USAID to Lorentz Lowlands Landscape

Recruit new Biodiversity Conservation Advisor based in Jakarta

Work with USAID to demonstrate and document how LESTARI activities contribute to new administration’s priority clusters

Continue to package and disseminate project achievements, impacts, and findings through Briefs, Stories From the Field, social media, and other relevant channels

Build and disseminate knowledge products for improved gender integration for partners and staff


APPENDIX 1: DETAILED LANDSCAPE ACTIVITIES – 3RD QUARTER FY 2017

AWARENESS AND ADVOCACY

LESTARI Landscape Advocacy Activities (April 1 – June 30 2017)

Landscape Media Outreach Advocacy Campaigns Purpose Target Audience

Katingan-Kahayan

1. USAID Visit Encourages Students to Care about the Environment (Mei, TVRI Kalteng)

2. USAID Gives Lecture in UMP (May, Tabengan)

3. Obstacles of Orangutan Reintroduction: Difficult, Expensive, and in Carefully Selected Location (May, Mongabay)

4. Six Orangutans are Reintroduced in Central Kalimantan (May, Merdeka.com)

5. Lapak Jaru Forest Park is Promising (June, Radar Sampit)

6. Gunung Mas Government partakes in Environmental Change

7. Peatland Restoration: Former Primary Canal for Farming Permanently Closed (June, Mongabay)

1. Draft the Gubernatorial Regulation on Forest and Land Fires Emergency Management in Central Kalimantan

2. Draft Katingan District Regulation on Forest and Land Fires Emergency Management

3. Draft the Forest and Land Fires Contingency Plan in Pulau Pisang District

4. Push the legitimation of Central Kalimantan Regional Regulation on Land and Forest Fires Control

1. Establish clear criterias for the declaration of fire emergency status which enables collaboration between stakeholders under such circumstances in Central Kalimantan

2. Optimizing coordination and building a cohesive plan in addressing forest and land fires

3. Push the passage and implementation of the newly proposed provincial regulations and its derivatives

1. Provincial government of Central Kalimantan

2. District Government of Katingan

3. District Government of Pulang Pisau

4. Provincial government of Central Kalimantan

Leuser

1. They Never Give Up Protecting Forest Leuser (May, Mongabay)

2. SMART Patrol: Patrol Based on Reliable Information (June, Mongabay)

3. Ketambe Research Station: Orangutan not the Sole Object of Research (June, Mongabay)

1. Preservation of Leuser Forest as the key to water sustainability and food self-sufficiency (PENAS)

2. Socialize Aceh Regional Regulation (Qanun) Number 7 Year 2016 on Forestry to district and pronvincial audience

1. Promote LESTARI-facilitated grass-root initiatives and innovations to wider audience

2. Increase public awareness on Qanun Number 7, 2016

3. Increase public awareness on Leuser Ecosystem

1. The people of Aceh Province

2. Communities at district and provincial levels

3. Communities at district and provincial levels

4. Identified champion


4. Gayo Lues Protests Tampur Coal Plant in Leuser (June, Mongabay)

3. Conduct Leuser Guardian 2017 contest (writing, photography, and saman dance contests)

4. Assess Community Champions in four districts

5. Encourage citizen journalism through LeuserLestari.com and three YouTube videos

4. Build a database of LESTARI champion network

5. Bring up conservation issues and establish community-based news media

5. Environmentally aware citizen journalists

Lorentz Lowlands

1. Interactive MSF dialogue about species reintroduction (Mimika Public Radio, April)

2. Nine articles published on print and online media as a part of wildlife educational campaign

1. Educational campaign and advocacy on papuan wildlife (KSDA, PT FI and LESTARI):

2. Papuan wildlife photography contest

3. Photography workshop and exhibition

4. Reintroduction of protected species (Crocodylus novaeguineae)

5. Hand over of protected species (cassowary) from Timika Naval Base (Komando LANAL)

6. 2. Environmental exhibition 2017 by Timika Natural Resources Conservation Agency (KSDA) and USAID LESTARI

1. Increase public awareness on protected and endangered species and their reintroduction programs

2. Build and strengthen wildlife protection committment of MSF and the general public

3. Increase local media’s coverage on illegal wildlife trade

1. The general public, journalists, MSF, local governments, the milirary and the police

Cyclops

1. Vital to Jayapura, but Why is Cyclops Still Under Threat? (May, Mongabay)

2. Amos Ondi: Cyclops Mountains is an Ill Mother (June, Mongabay)

3. Papuan Clan Leader Laments Influx of Migrants to Sacred Cyclops Mountains (Juni, Mongabay)


4. Sowang: Endemic Plant of Cyclops Under Threat (June, Mongabay)

Mappi Bouven-Digoel

1. Women Invited to Protected Forest (Papua Selatan Pos, June)

2. Environment Agency Celebrates World Environment Day (Papua Selatan Pos, June)

3. Research Shows Manggate Villae is in a Catchment (Info Pembangunan, Mappi District, June)

SEA/LCP OPERATIONALIZATION

Landscape [Province /

District] SEA, LCP, Position Paper Progress (April – June 2017)

Leuser

[Aceh Province]

In response to Bappeda request LESTARI prepared STTA assistance for the SEA RPJMD 2017-2022 for the newly-elected Governor. Core SEA STTA team to be complemented by appropriate local experts in sustainable land use and disaster management.

A seminar to socialize SEA RPJMD being conducted by Bappeda by inviting resource person from Ministry of Home Affairs and KLHK. The seminar was attended by provincial level stakeholders. As a follow up Bappeda established a working group for SEA RPJMD.

LoA between Bappeda Aceh and LESTARI signed by both parties. The LoA ensures that the SEA process is an integral part of the RPJMD and SEA recommendations will be integrated into RPJMD.

Green growth is one of the program priorities of Irwandi Yusuf that gained attention both from Bappeda and Irwandi Yusuf’s RPJMD team. It is expected that SEA RPJMD will support this program. LESTARI is closely communicating and engaging with the governor’s RPJMD team to ensure LESTARI inputs on RPJMD will also be politically recognized.

Leuser

[Aceh Selatan]

Ex-IFACS SEA, LCP, Position Paper, are being used again as reference for replication to a cluster of 6 villages

Aceh Selatan government is preparing a draft of Technical guidance on RPJMDes. LESTARI is facilitating the drafting process and bringing the lessons learned from the pilot villages into the draft such as by bringing in the KPH as one of strategic stakeholders in the RPJMDes process.

Leuser

[Aceh Barat Daya]

Results of zonation harmonization in Kawasan Strategis DAS Susoh as a model to be used to update SEA for revision of RTRWK

The village zonation teams formed in each village consists of women, youth, elderly, and village officials.

Developed a proposed draft of both village zonation.


Meeting with BKPH V on the participative zonation at pilot villages which appreciated the participative process and keen to collaborate on the village zonation process, which could be a valuable input on rationalizing the KPH V blocking area.

Meeting with KLHK: Zuhdan (Kepala Seksi Pembentukan Wilayah Pengelolaan Hutan, Sub Direktorat Pembentukan Wilayah dan Alokasi Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Hutan). Discussed the process of participatory zonation at two villages in Abdya, and how it may contribute to blocking development of KPH V.

Katingan-Kahayan

[Kalteng Province]

SEA recommendation:

Promotion of participative community mapping process so that village and smallholder forests can be increased in area

Restoration forest in functional areas to increase biodiversity

To scale up the RPJMDesa + initiative, LESTARI support Pulang Pisau Government to develop peraturan Bupati on Village Authority. The support will take lessons learned from pilot villages.

A working group involving LESTARI was established.

A sensus of local and origin village authority will be conducted as an initial step for the drafting process.

All LESTARI Papua

[Papua Province]

One of two Governor decrees for SIMTARU-SST enabling already signed

BAPPEDA obtained formalization of the Governor’s Decree (PerGub) for SIMTARU together with its SOP, PerGub 19/2017, that gives regulatory force to the SIMTARU which, in combination with the PerGub 18 signed in March this year, together represent milestone regional policy achievements towards improvement of natural resource licensing processes in Papua.

Lorentz Lowlands

[Mimika]

(A) Draft RTRW 2017 revision proposals based upon LCP and SEA

(B) Updated SEA

(A) LESTARI had obtained the Head of BAPPEDA’s agreement to insist that the consultant for the revision take into account KLHS recommendations.

(B) At the subsequent two-day MSF Mimika event KLHS Review (Peninjauan Kembali) was initiated. There was unanimous agreement of the need to update the KLHS 2014 to take into account new relevant studies and policies (e.g., Perda Mangrove, community mapping, LCP). The Head of BLH formed a Small Team (Tim Kecil) to follow up the results of the meeting including its findings, next steps such as identification of what parts of the KLHS need updating and what resources would be required to ensure a high-quality and swakelola approach.

Mappi-Bouven Digoel

[Bouven Digoel]

(A) Updating of SEA RTRWK

(B) Improved planning, implementation and monitoring of production forest and oil palm licenses through participatory mechanisms

(A) Internal lessons-learned exercise was conducted for relevant LESTARI staff in anticipation of the need to review KLHS for BoDi and Mappi and Cyclops, drawing on the lessons from initiation of KLHS Review for RTRWK Mimika Revision.

(B) Dialogue with PT. Korindo about setting up signature oil palm concession site to achieve participative zonation based upon HCV assessments and determined by FPIC. Working with private sector engagement for a national-level roundtable discourse for more effective concession zonation to ensure biodiversity conservation and GHG emission mitigation.


MSF STRATEGIC THEMES AND PROGRESS

Landscape / District

MSF Name Strategic Issues (SI) /

Specific Technical Thematic Priority

Progress

April-June 2017

Leuser

Gayo Lues

Forum Masyarakat untuk Leuser,

(F-MUL)

(SI) Collaborative Management, Water Resources Protection, and Payment for Environmental Services (PES)

Integrated Tourism Plan (Rencana Induk Pengembangan Pariwisata / RIPP)

Conflict mitigation in community level

Growing essential oil industry and threats against land use and forest conservation

Disaster including prolong-drought during summer and flood/landslide during monsoon

The new Qanun No.7 on Aceh Forestry was socialized to F-MUL that was

attended by 67 participants from Aceh Tenggara and Gayo Lues. The participants

consisted mostly of government officials, (KPH V, KPH VI, Bappeda,

Environmental Agency, Tourism Agency, Agriculture Agency, Mining Agency,

BKSDA, TNGL), civil society organizations, NGOs, and community member

representatives.

Leuser

Aceh Tenggara

Forum Lanskap Kabupaten Aceh Tenggara (FORLAT)

(SI) Collaborative Management, Biodiversity and Deforestation

Bupati Decree (PerBup) to allocate at least 15% of Village Fund (Dana Desa) for conservation

Leuser

Aceh Selatan

Forum Lanskap Kabupaten Aceh Selatan (FORLAST)

(SI) Water resource protection and related forest management

Qanun for environmental protection and management especially water and related forestry resources

Strengthening FORLAST to be more involved in communication and policy advocacy

Village information and communication access to better manage village funds

Development of Draft Technical Guidance on Mid-Term Village Development Planning (RPJMGampong) in Aceh Selatan that needed 1-2 consultations before being enacted.

Enactment of Local Regulation (Qanun) on Protection and Environmental Development (PPLH) of Aceh Selatan.

Agreement among key stakeholders on steps needed to be taken for the development of Trumon Forest Park (TAHURA Trumon). The meeting was attended by Vice Head of Bupati, Head of Environment Agency and relevant government unit in Aceh Selatan.

Katingan-Kahayan

Pulang Pisau

Forum Hapakat Lestari (FHL)

(SI) Integrated Land, Water and Fire Management (ILFM)

Fire-Free farming (Pengelolaan Lahan Tanpa Bakar, PLTB)

Local peatland restoration unit (Tim Restorasi Gambut Daerah) capacity building

MSF Forum Hapakat Lestari – The technical working group of the MSF transitioned from information gathering and planning to facilitating and completing FPIC in all villages. This represents a key success in orienting MSFs towards meeting LESTARI goals, in this case keeping peatlands wet during the dry season, safeguarding orangutan habitat, and safeguarding local livelihoods.


Canal damming to keep water levels high in dry season for fire prevention and reduce risk of flooding in rainy season

Village planning (RPJMDes, APBDes, RKPDes)

More active MSF involvement in National Plan of Action on Low Emission Development Strategies (LEDS)

Improve community development especially for villages who just received community forest licensing

Upon large-scale canal blocking development across Block C in Pulang Pisau, 3 villages (Gohong village, Garong village, Buntoi village) completed FPIC process and agreed with the canal blocking design through a series of public consultations. However, 2 villages, Mentaren 1 and Kalawa remain unsure if they want to take a fully participatory engagement of FPIC in their villages. Inadequate FPIC and related adaptation of dam design could lead to destructive flooding. There is also a reputational risk for LESTARI. It is better to deal with these issues before rather than after environmentally, economically, and socially-disruptive events. Therefore, the field team needs to closely engage with these two villages to ensure their final decision will lead to long-term environmentally sustainable outcomes.

While FPIC with LESTARI support proceeds, it is essential that BRG play a more active role in coordination in case actual canal-blocking efforts do not reflect FPIC agreements resulting in potential flooding that damages local livelihoods.

Katingan-Kahayan

Gunung Mas

Initiating MSF Development

LESTARI was invited by Bupati Gunung Mas to attend Corporate Social Responsibility Forum (CRS Forum) in May. This forum can be a seed to develop a multi-stakeholder platform in Gunung Mas that LESTARI is currently identified.

Cyclops

Kabupaten / Kota Jayapura

Sahabat Cyclops

(SI) Cyclops Landscape as a Major Water Catchment Area

Forming Sahabat Cyclops, a provincial-level MSF

Need for specific regulation to protect Cyclops as a major water source

Concern over declining volume of Lake Sentani

Initiation of a multi-stakeholder forum has reached a new understanding that Forum Tata Ruang that was initially plan to be formed as MSF Cyclops face a challenge regarding coordination and communication among stakeholder. LESTARI Papua and key stakeholder decided to form a new forum and currently engaging with relevant stakeholder and plan a meeting to speed up the establishment of a MSF Cyclops.

To follow up the new finding on threats of land clearing and illegal logging, there is a need to have a strong multi-stakeholder platform established in this area.

Lorentz Lowlands

Mimika

MSF Perubahan Iklim Kabupaten Mimika

(SI) Mangrove’s biodiversity and Eco-tourism

Land Use Functions of Spatial Plan (Pola Ruang)

Prevent wild life trafficking and threats against mangrove eco-system

More communications outreach related to mangrove eco-system and preventing wildlife trafficking

Promote Lorentz Lowlands as potential landscape for eco-tourism

At the two-day MSF Mimika event of 8-9 June to initiate review (Peninjauan Kembali) of the existing KLHS, there was unanimous agreement of the need to update the KLHS 2014 to take into account new relevant studies and policies (e.g., Perda Mangrove, community mapping, LCP, etc.) as well as strategic issues identified by the MSF. The collaborative exercise was divided into (i) legal legitimacy of the KLHS role and its utility to strengthen linkages between environmental management and economic growth, (ii) strategic issues and recommendations from KLHS Mimika, (iii) information gaps

including important new spatial assessments since the original KLHS, (iv) development scenario-building in visual ways to strengthen awareness and social legitimacy, and (iv) next steps towards actual updating of the KLHS


Improved Mangrove Management through the formalization of the KKMD (District-level mangrove coordination group)

to be an effective and high quality instrument to positively influence policies, plans and programs in Mimika especially the revision of the spatial plan.

Environmental Exhibition successfully conducted in Timika in collaboration with PT. Freeport Indonesia as part of MSF agenda on community raising awareness strategy on protection and conservation of wild life.

Lorentz Lowlands

Asmat

MSF Perubahan Iklim Kabupaten Asmat

(SI) Mangrove’s biodiversity and Eco-tourism

Land Use Functions of Spatial Plan (Pola Ruang)

Prevent wild life trafficking and threats against mangrove eco-system

More communications outreach related to mangrove eco-system and preventing wildlife trafficking

Promote Lorentz Lowlands as potential landscape for eco-tourism

Improved Mangrove Management through the formalization of the KKMD (District-level mangrove coordination group)

Finalization of Surat Keputusan Bupati on MSF Asmat as well as establishment of new working group under MSF to focus their work on most pressing issue in the area, which is clean water management in Kampung Yepem.

Mappi-Bouven Digoel

Mappi

MSF Mappi Lestari Sejuta Rawa

(SI) Land Use Governance and the revision of spatial plan

Deforestation and Degradation

Tenurial conflict and the importance of strengthening indigenous people (masyarakat adat) in policy-making processes

Growing pressure on forest and land as almost 80% of the area is designated for corporate investment

Land use permit and licensing accountability

Tenure conflict between indigenous people with licensed corporation

Horizontal conflict between communities caused by unclear village borders (bentang adat)

The first workshop and training on gender mainstreaming with the MSF in Mappi-Bouven Digoel has successfully completed with the main outputs to raise awareness of the community regarding the impact of gender inequality toward the sustainability of natural resource management in their respective areas. Better understanding of how access and control toward resources between men and women can affect their livelihood is important awareness to build that can contribute to mindset change in better natural resource management.

Assistance provided to BoDi to improve maps and inputs to BoDi for the Bupati’s pocketbook in ways that highlight the importance of applying KLHS, MSF and FPIC to improved natural resource licensing processes.


IMPROVED CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT

Landscape Conservation Area Progress

April – June 2017

Leuser

Gunung Leuser National Park (TNGL)

4 SMART patrol teams are operational

Overall SMART patrol evaluation in the national park to improve its effective operationalization

Analyzing data for PA budget management effectiveness

Wildlife Response Unit is operational

Wildlife Crime Unit (WRU) is operational

Forest Crime Unit (FCU) is operational

Internal METT assessment

Rawa Singkil Wildlife Reserve (RSWR)

3 SMART patrol teams are operational

WRU is operational

WCU is operational

Survey for biodiversity and socio-economic aspects of Rawa Singkil Wildlife reserve to improve the management plan and zonation plan

Continue Investigation on oil palm chain that becomes major threats in RSWR

Katingan-Kahayan

Sebangau National Park

Internal METT evaluation

2 SMART patrol operational

Initial phase of institutionalizing data management and SMART patrol.

Bukit Baka Bukit Raya National Park

Institutionalizing data management and SMART patrol.

Long term roll out of SMART patrol will be kicked off next quarter

Kick off LESTARI facilitation to improve the national park long term management plan

Kick off LESTARI facilitation for community engagement in traditional zones

TWA Tangkiling (BKSDA Central Kalimantan) Designing training curriculum for human-Orangutan conflict mitigation

Cyclops Cyclops Nature Reserve 3 patrol teams are operational operational, 1 new additional team has been established and trained

Community facilitation on RPJMK and Perkam activities in 2 villages

Lorentz Lowlands Lorentz National Park

Second phase of SMART patrol testing completed.

Awareness raising activities on biodiversity conservation engaging MSF

Pig-nosed turtles survey completed and the results have been presented during MSF workshop


APPENDIX 2: GRANTS MANAGEMENT

KATINGAN-KAHAYAN LANDSCAPE

Grant No. Grantee Grant Value Start Date End Date

G-003 Borneo Orangutan Survival Foundation (BOSF) IDR 2,999,053,694 $220,519 1-Aug-16 31-Jul-18

G-006 Yayasan Tambuhak Sinta (YTS) IDR 1,939,643,000 $146,942 1-Feb-17 31-Jan-19

G-009 Lingkar Pembaruan Desa dan Agraria (KARSA) IDR 1,944,340,000 $145,643 5-Jun-17 4-Jun-19

Total Committed IDR 7,125,211,094 $531,044

Total Active Grants IDR 6,883,036,694 $513,104

Total Closed Grants IDR 242,174,400 $17,940

Under RFA & Procurement IDR 4,990,000,000 $375,753

LEUSER LANDSCAPE

Grant No. Grantee Grant Value Start Date End Date

G-002 Yayasan Orangutan Survival Lestari (OIC) IDR 1,999,750,950 $145,968 11-Mar-16 10-Nov-17

G-004 Forum Pala Aceh (FORPALA) IDR 1,921,816,500 $148,690 22-Nov-16 21-Aug-18

G-005 Institute for Promotion of Sustainabe Livelihood (INPROSULA) IDR 1,877,962,000 $144,015 27-Mar-16 26-Nov-18

G-007 Yayasan Javlec Indonesia (JAVLEC) IDR 1,925,503,000 $148,975 11-Jan-17 10-May-18

G-008 Atjech International Development (AID) IDR 1,973,474,000 $148,048 7-Feb-17 6-Feb-19

G-010 Aceh Green Community (AGC) IDR 1,971,281,000 $147,662 22-May-17 21-Jan-19

Total Committed IDR 11,669,787,450 $883,358

Total Active Grants IDR 11,669,787,450 $883,358

Total Closed Grants IDR 0 $0

Under RFA and Procurement IDR 6,444,831,000 $485,304

ALL LANDSCAPES

Total Committed IDR 18,794,998,544 $1,414,402 39.3%

Total Active Grants IDR 18,552,824,144 $1,396,462 38.8%

Total Closed Grants IDR 242,174,400 $17,940 0.5%

Under RFA and Procurement IDR 14,722,681,000 $1,108,636 30.8%

Grand Total as of 6/30/2017 IDR 33,517,679,544 $2,523,037 70.1%

Programmable $1,076,963 29.9%


APPENDIX 3: LESTARI PROGRESS MATRIX – 3RD QUARTER FY 2017

Indicator Target of FY 2017

Actual (Q1)

Actual (Q2)

Actual (Q3)

Actual (Q4)

% of Completion (Accumulati

ve Actual vs Target)

Data Reporting

Remarks LOP

Target

% of Complet

ion (Accumulative

All Year vs LOP)

#1 – Percentage reduction in GHG emissions as a result of USG assistance measured using actual emissions compared to REL (Outcome –

contributes to FACTS 4.8-7)

Not measu

red

Not measu

red

Not measu

red

Not measure

d

Not measure

d - Annual - 41% 0%

#2 – Number of hectares of biological significance and/or natural resources under improved natural resource management as a result of USG assistance (Outcome

–FACTS 4.8.1-26)

1.7 M - - - - - Annual This indicator will be reported in the Y2 Annual Report

8,700,000 0%



Actual (Q1)

Actual (Q2)

Actual (Q3)

Actual (Q4)



Data Reporting

Remarks LOP

Target

% of Complet

ion (Accumulative

All Year vs LOP)

#3 – Percentage reduction in poaching (Outcome)

10% - - - - -

Please see remarks

Annual

Routine SMART Patrols continued in order to reduce poaching in Gunung Leuser National Park (TNGL). 4 SMART Patrol teams carried out patrols for a total of 60 days and reached 217.47 km in patrol distance. 2 snares were removed; 6 encroachment and 9 illegal logging spots were identified; 5 incidents of other threats were identified; and 2 encrochers and illegal loggers were given warning by the patrol teams.

40% 0%

#4 – Number of public policies addressing climate change and/or biodiversity conservation introduced, changed or adopted consistent with citizen input (Outcome)

9 3 2 - - 56% Quarterly

and Annual

Various areas of policy advocacy were supported by LESTARI such as:

Raperda of Central Kalimantan Province on forest and land fire control

Regent Regulations on Technical Guidelines for the Preparation of RPJMG and RKPG and Qanun Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup in South Aceh District

28 29%

#5 – Number of sub-national government with improved licensing and permitting mechanism (Outcome)

2 - -

According to the milestones the

progress is 40%, please

see remarks

- 40% Quarterly

and Annual

Significant milestone progress of around 40% has been made by SIMTARU and SST not only for their technical development, but also for engagement with local stakeholders to establish exactly how these tools can fit into the existing government processes to improve licensing and permitting.

14 0%



Actual (Q1)

Actual (Q2)

Actual (Q3)

Actual (Q4)



Data Reporting

Remarks LOP

Target

% of Complet

ion (Accumulative

All Year vs LOP)

#6 – Number of sub-national government incorporating high quality SEA-LEDS & LCPs into draft spatial plans, zonation regulation or draft mid-term development plan (Outcome)

6 1 - - - 17% Quarterly

and Annual

SEA/LEDS for spatial plan (RDTR) DAS Susoh and zoning regulation in Aceh Barat Daya District was in the process of development

POKJA KLHS RPJM has agreed on the framing of KLHS RPJM in Aceh Province

SEA/LEDS and new RTRW will be revised in Asmat

Recommendations from SEA/LEDS and LCPs were used in draft of RTRWK revision in Mimika District

14 7%

#7 – Number of Multi Stakeholder Forum (MSF) operational as citizen based mechanisms for public input on land use (Outcome)

7 1 1 - - 29% Quarterly

and Annual

The MSF FMUL has synergized its program with local government programs and involved in Socialization of Qanun No.7 on Aceh Forestry

MSF FORLAST was actively involved in planning initiation of Taman Hutan Raya in

Trumon and developed technical guidance on RPJMG in South Aceh

MSF Asmat restructured the board, agreed on new stewardship, and will change the SK for MSF

MSF Hutan Lestari in Boven Digoel was involved in training for gender integration

14 14%

#8 – Number of community champions engaged in advocacy interventions (Output)

175 17 35 12 - 37% Quarterly

and Annual

12 people (Male: 11 and Female: 1) engaged in various advocacy interventions

500 18%



Actual (Q1)

Actual (Q2)

Actual (Q3)

Actual (Q4)



Data Reporting

Remarks LOP

Target

% of Complet

ion (Accumulative

All Year vs LOP)

#9 – Number of people reached by LESTARI communication programs to improve awareness and understanding of LEDS and biodiversity conservation (Output)

3,550 26,399 185,98

8 6,987 - 6,179%

Quarterly and

Annual

6,987 people (Male: 4,653 and Female: 2,334) reached mostly through event, website, social media, and blog

15,000 2,266%

#10 – Number of Conservation Areas (CAs) with at least 70 point in METT scores across LESTARI landscapes (Outcome)

0 - - Please

see remarks

- -

Please see remarks.

Annual

There is no target for CAs with at least 70 point in METT score in Year 2 since it will be evaluated by year 2019. Capacity building activities were conducted to equip them to meet that target such as:

Routine SMART patrols, animal conflict mitigation and review of RP and blocking were conducted in order to increase METT score in TNGL and SM Rawa Singkil

An internal review of the METT assessment of BTNS was conducted then followed by public consultation with relevant stakeholders. For TN BBBR there will be an internal review

Zonation revision of Lorentz National Park and SMART Patrol activity

Process of discussion, signing and finalization of the Cyclops Nature Reserve management plan. Other activities such as SMART Patrol and the promotion of Cyclops Nature Reserve protection were also conducted

6 0%



Actual (Q1)

Actual (Q2)

Actual (Q3)

Actual (Q4)



Data Reporting

Remarks LOP

Target

% of Complet

ion (Accumulative

All Year vs LOP)

#11 – Number of co-management agreements signed that secure community rights and benefits (Output)

10 4 - - - 40% Quarterly

and Annual

Some social forestry initiatives facilitated by LESTARI were in process of verification and obtaining IUPHKm from KLHK in Gunung Mas and Katingan District

3 villages in South Aceh, Lawe Cimanok, Lawe Melang and Koto Menggamat have been facilitated by LESTARI to apply for HKm licenses from KLHK

Matrix of social forestry development scheme has identified in 9 villages of KPHL unit VI based on the commodities of each kampung in Mimika. Indigenous peoples' options in forest management under a co-management scheme in Asmat and Mimika District also identified

40 13%

#12 – Number of people receiving USG supported training in natural resources management and/or biodiversity conservation (Output – FACTS 4.8.1-27)

3,920 240 1,090 987 - 59% Quarterly

and Annual

987 people (Male: 821 and Female: 166) received trainings

10,000 33%

#13 – Amount of investment mobilized (in USD) for climate change as supported by USG assistance (Output – FACTS 4.8.2-10)

4,750,000

94,656 3,188 21,061 - 3% Quarterly

and Annual

$21,061 (IDR 282,050,000) has been mobilized from local government and NGO

20,000,000

18%



Actual (Q1)

Actual (Q2)

Actual (Q3)

Actual (Q4)



Data Reporting

Remarks LOP

Target

% of Complet

ion (Accumulative

All Year vs LOP)

#14 – Number of people receiving livelihood co-benefits (monetary or non monetary) (Outcome)

7,500 52 80 181 - 4% Annual

181 people (male: 155 and female: 26) received economic benefits from the sale of Bokar bersih in Pulang Pisau District. In addiiton, some farmers in Aceh have sold the fermented cocoa beans and some women have produced nutmeg derived products.

30,000 1%

#15 – Number of private sector firms that have improved management practices as a result of USG assistance (Outcome –FACTS 4.6.2-9)

2 - -

According to the milestones the

progress is 40%, please

see remarks

- 40% Quarterly

and Annual

RIL-C training being conducted in 7 concessions in Central Kalimantan by LESTARI, TFF and Wana Aksara Institut.

Guideline for RIL-C standardization at the national level through series of FGDs and public consultations with relevant stakeholders (KLHK, TNC, TBI, HPHI and LESTARI)

10 0%

#16 - Number of new USG-supported public-private partnerships (PPPs) formed (Output – FACTS PPP 5)

6 1 - - - 17% Annual

Several PPPs are in the process of development in Leuser Landscape:

PPP with Givaudan – the MOU for the partnership is being reviewed

Draft of PPP with PT Kencana is being developed

20 20%


APPENDIX 4: LESTARI RESULTS FRAMEWORK

LESTARI

Wisma GKBI, 12th Floor, #1210 Jl. Jend. Sudirman No. 28, Jakarta 10210, Indonesia

Phone: +62 21 574 0565 Fax: +62 21 574 0566

Email: [email protected]

quarterly report - lestari-indonesia.org · rpjm district development plan rpjma provincial...

Documents