queens, new york remedial action report€¦ · qa/qc quality assurance/quality control ... a new...

51-27 QUEENS BOULEVARD

QUEENS, NEW YORK

Remedial Action Report

NYC VCP Project Number 15CVCP027Q

OER Project Number 14EH-N505Q

Prepared For:

Q52, LLC 37‐99 69th Street, Queens, NY 11377

(516) 902-6332 [email protected]

Prepared By:

Athenica Environmental Services, Inc. &

Ariel Czemerinski, P.E.

AMC Engineering

18-36 42nd Street, Queens, NY 11105

[email protected]

JULY 2017

i

REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................ i

LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................. vi

CERTIFICATION .................................................................................................................... vii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ 1

REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT ............................................................................................. 10

1.0 SITE BACKGROUND ................................................................................................... 10

1.1 SITE LOCATION AND BACKGROUND .............................................................. 10

1.2 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN ..................................................................................... 10

1.3 DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY ............................................... 11

1.4 SUMMARY OF PAST SITE USES AND AREAS OF CONCERN ....................... 11

1.5 SUMMARY OF WORK PERFORMED UNDER THE REMEDIAL

INVESTIGATION .................................................................................................... 12

1.6 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS OF REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION ......................... 12

2.0 DESCRIPTION OF REMEDIAL ACTIONS ................................................................. 16

3.0 COMPLIANCE WITH REMEDIAL ACTION WORKPLAN ...................................... 20

3.1 HEALTH & SAFETY PLAN ................................................................................... 20

3.2 COMMUNITY AIR MONITORING PLAN ............................................................ 20

3.3 SOIL/MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PLAN ......................................................... 20

3.4 STORM-WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION .................................................... 20

3.5 DEVIATIONS FROM THE REMEDIAL ACTION WORK PLAN ....................... 21

4.0 REMEDIAL PROGRAM ................................................................................................ 23

4.1 PROJECT ORGANIZATION ................................................................................... 23

4.2 SITE CONTROLS ..................................................................................................... 23

4.3 MATERIALS EXCAVATION AND REMOVAL ................................................... 25

4.4 MATERIALS DISPOSAL ........................................................................................ 24

4.5 BACKFILL IMPORT ............................................................................................... 25

5.0 ENGINEERING CONTROLS ........................................................................................ 30

Remedial Action Report 51-27 Queens Boulevard, Queens, NY July 2017 NYC VCP No.15CVCP027Q

ii

5.1 COMPOSITE COVER SYSTEM ............................................................................. 27

5.2 ENGINEERING CONTROLS FOR SOIL VAPOR ................................................. 27

6.0 INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS ..................................................................................... 33

7.0 SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN ....................................................................................... 34

7.1 ENGINEERING CONTROLS .................................................................................. 34

7.2 INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS ............................................................................... 35

7.3 INSPECTIONS .......................................................................................................... 36

7.4 INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION LETTER REPORT ................................... 37

7.5 NOTIFICATIONS ..................................................................................................... 38

8.0 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT ........................................................................................ 40


iii

FIGURES

Figure 1: Site Location Map

Figure 2: Site Boundary Map

Figure 3: Development Plan

Figure 4: Map of end-point sample location

Figure 5: Map showing location and approximate depth of excavations

Figure 6: Map of soil source area and backfill placement locations

Figure 7: Map of location of Composite Cover System and Design Detail

Figure 8: Map of location of Vapor Barrier System and Design Detail

Figure 9: Map of location of SSDS System

Figure 10: As-built design detail for SSDS System


iv

TABLES

Table 1: Summary of end-point analytical results

Table 2: Disposal quantities and disposal facilities

Table 3: Summary of waste classification analytical results


v

APPENDICES

Appendix A: Remedial Investigation Report

Appendix B: Remedial Action Work Plan and Stipulation List

Appendix C: Community Air Monitoring Program Results

Appendix D: SSDS Conversion Letter and OER Approval

Appendix E: Daily and Monthly Reports to OER

Appendix F: Photographs of Remedial Action

Appendix G: End-point Sample Analytical Laboratory Data

Appendix H: Laboratory ELAP Certification

Appendix I: Disposal Facility Requests and Approval Letters

Appendix J: Shipping and Disposal Manifests

Appendix K: Disposal Characterization Sample Laboratory Testing Results

Appendix L: Bluestone Import Documentation

Appendix M: Vapor Barrier Documentation

Appendix N: SSDS Documentation

Appendix O: SSDS Start-up Documentation

Appendix P: SSDS Monthly Inspection Form


vi

LIST OF ACRONYMS

Acronym Definition

CAMP Community Air Monitoring Plan

DER-10 NYS DEC Division of Environmental Remediation Technical Guidance Manual 10

EC Engineering Control

HASP Health and Safety Plan

IC Institutional Control

NYC VCP New York City Voluntary Cleanup Program

NYC DEP New York City Department of Environmental Protection

NYC DOHMH New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene

NYC OER New York City Office of Environmental Remediation

ORC Oxygen Release Compound

PID Photoionization Detector

QA/QC Quality Assurance/Quality Control

QEP Qualified Environmental Professional

RAR Remedial Action Report

RAWP Remedial Action Work Plan

SCG Standards, Criteria and Guidance

SCO Soil Cleanup Objective

SMMP Soil/Materials Management Plan

SMP Site Management Plan

SVOCs Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds

UST Underground Storage Tank

VOCs Volatile Organic Compounds


1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Q52, LLC has enrolled in the New York City Voluntary Cleanup Program (NYC

VCP) to investigate and remediate a property located at 51-27 Queens Boulevard in the

Woodside section of Queens, New York. A Remedial Investigation (RI) was performed

to compile and evaluate data and information necessary to develop a Remedial Action

Work Plan (RAWP). A remedial action was performed pursuant to an OER-approved

RAWP in a manner that has rendered the Site protective of public health and the

environment consistent with the proposed use of the property. This RAR describes the

remedial action performed under the RAWP. The remedial action described in this

document provides for the protection of public health and the environment, complies with

applicable environmental standards, criteria and guidance and applicable laws and

regulations.

Site Location and Background

The Site is located at 51-27 Queens Boulevard in the Woodside section of Queens,

New York and is identified as Block 1320 and Lot 47 on the New York City Tax Map.

The Site is 5,387-square feet and is bounded by an asphalt-capped parking area to the

north, Queens Boulevard to the south, 52nd Street to the east, and a multi-story

residential building to the west. Prior to redevelopment, the Site was vacant as recently as

2014, according to the City Directory Abstract, and contained a 1-story mixed-use

building with office space and a split level, 1- and 2-story, mixed-use building with a

partial cellar and office space.

Summary of Redevelopment Plan

A new 7-story mixed residential and commercial use building with a full cellar has

been constructed at the Site. The new building occupies 4,227-square feet, or

approximately 80 percent of the lot area with the remaining open area consisting of a

1,160-square foot concrete-paved courtyard area located on the northern portion of the

property.

The total gross square footage of the new building is approximately 32,861-square

feet, including 2,789-square feet of retail space, 3,943-square feet of community facility


2

space, 1,486-square feet of retail storage space, and the remaining area utilized as 29

Class “A” dwelling units, tenant storage, elevator mechanical rooms, sprinkler and water

meter room, electrical meter room, gas meter room, laundry, and compactor room. The

cellar is utilized for commercial use, utility and meter rooms with accessory uses for the

commercial and residential occupancies. The first floor is used for commercial retail,

residential lobby, and one residential apartment. The second floor is used for community

facility space. Floors 3 through 7 are utilized as residential apartment units.

As part of development, the building footprint was excavated to approximately 11-

feet below grade surface (bgs) for installation of the cellar. An additional 9-feet was

excavated in two locations of the cellar for the installation of elevator pits. The remaining

area (1,160-square feet) on the northern portion of the property was excavated to 2-feet

bgs. The total amount of soil removed off-site for excavation of the cellar is 1,494.45

tons. The current zoning designation is C2-3/R7X, denoting it as a residential and light

commercial district. The current use is consistent with existing zoning for the property.

Summary of Description of Surrounding Properties

The Site is located within a mixed use residential and commercial area of Queens,

New York. The Site is bounded by an asphalt-capped parking area to the north, Queens

Boulevard to the south beyond which is Calvary Cemetery, 52nd Street to the east

beyond which is a twelve-story mixed use building, and a multi-story residential building

to the west. There are no sensitive receptors (such as schools, hospitals, and day-care

facilities) within a 500-foot radius of the Site.

Summary of Past Site Uses and Areas of Concern

Based upon the review of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Report

prepared by Athenica Environmental Services (Athenica) in April 2014, the Site history

was established. Prior to redevelopment, the Site was developed with a 1-story building

and a 1- and 2-story building with a partial cellar. The 2-story building was occupied by

different restaurants between 1934 and 1962. The 2-story building was then utilized as a

private lounge between 1970 and 1983. It was then occupied by private commercial

businesses until 2005. The 1-story building was occupied by a florist between 1934 and

1983. The 1-story building was most recently utilized as an office space, and the 1- and


3

2-story building with a partial cellar was most recently utilized as an office of the US

Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW).

The AOCs identified for this site include:

1. Adjacent former auto repair facility across 52nd Street.

2. Presence of urban fill from grade to approximately 2 feet bgs.

Summary of the Work Performed under the Remedial Investigation

Athenica performed the following scope of work at the site in between April and

September of 2014:

1. Conducted a Site inspection to identify AOCs and physical obstructions (i.e.

structures, buildings, etc.);

2. Installed five (5) soil borings across the entire project Site, and collected fourteen

(14) soil samples for chemical analysis from the soil borings to evaluate soil

quality;

3. Installed one (1) groundwater monitoring well at the Site and collected one (1)

groundwater sample for chemical analysis to evaluate groundwater quality;

4. Installed two (2) soil vapor probes and two (2) sub-slab vapor probes and

collected four (4) samples for chemical analysis.

Summary of Findings of Remedial Investigation

1. Elevation of the property ranges from 107 to 109 feet.

2. Depth to groundwater is 71.87 feet at the Site.

3. Groundwater flow is generally from east to west in the immediate vicinity of the

Site.

4. Bedrock was not encountered during the RI.

5. The stratigraphy of the site, from the surface down, consists of 2 feet of medium

coarse silty sand with traces of urban fill underlain by 10 feet of medium to coarse

sand with pebbles.


4

6. Soil/fill samples collected during the RI were compared to 6 NYCRR Part 375-

6.8 Track 2 Restricted Residential Use Soil Cleanup Objectives (SCOs). Soil

sampling results showed no VOCs above detection limits, except for acetone

(max. of 0.069 ppm), a common laboratory contaminant which was found below

its Restricted Residential SCO. Several SVOCs, all Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbon (PAH)s, including Benzo(a)anthracene (max. of 34.80 ppm),

Benzo(a)pyrene (max. of 13.10 ppm), Benzo(b)fluoranthene (max. of 13.90 ppm),

Benzo(k)fluoranthene (max. of 16.70 ppm), Chrysene (max. of 40.60 ppm),

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene (0.53 ppm), Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (max. of 8.36 ppm),

Naphthalene (max. of 12.70 ppm), and Phenanthrene (max. of 107 ppm), were

detected above their Restricted Residential Use SCOs in three shallow soil

samples. Pesticides including 4,4’-DDD (max. of 0.030 ppm) and 4,4’-DDT

(max. of 0.0054 ppm) were identified in shallow soil at concentrations well below

Restricted Residential Use SCOs. Metals including chromium hexavalent (2.71

ppm), copper (max. of 127 ppm), lead (max. of 278 ppm) and mercury (max. of

0.21ppm) were below Restricted Residential Use SCOs. No PCBs were detected

in any of the soil samples. Overall, the findings were consistent with observations

of historic fill sites in areas throughout NYC.

7. Groundwater sample results were compared to NYSDEC Technical &

Operational Guidance Series (TOGS) Class GA Ambient Water Quality

Standards (GQS). Two VOCs, chloroform (17 ug/L) and tetrachloroethylene

(PCE) (15 ug/L), were detected at concentrations exceeding their respective GQS.

Trace concentrations of several VOCs were also detected below GQS, including

bromodichloromethane, carbon disulfide, cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene (3.9 ug/L),

MTBE (2.5 ug/L), toluene, and TCE (0.92 ug/L). SVOCs were not detected above

GQS, and only Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate was detected. Two dissolved metals,

manganese (1,050 ug/L) and sodium (79,800 ug/L) exceeded their respective

GQS. No pesticides or PCBs were detected above their detection limits.

8. Soil vapor samples collected during the RI were compared to the compounds

listed in Table 3.1 Air Guideline Values Derived by the NYSDOH located in the

New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) Final Guidance for Evaluating


5

Soil Vapor Intrusion. Soil vapor results showed a wide range of VOCs at low

concentrations for petroleum related compounds and at elevated levels for

chlorinated compounds. Most compounds were detected at less than 10 μg/m3

except for acetone (max. of 450 μg/m3) and isopropanol (max. of 1600 μg/m3).

Petroleum related BTEX compounds were not detected in any vapor sample.

Chlorinated compounds including trichloroethene (TCE) and carbon tetrachloride

were not detected in any of the soil vapor samples. Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)

was detected in three of the four soil vapor samples, ranging from 14 ug/m3 to

2,500 ug/m3 which is above the mitigation range established by NYSDOH Final

Guidance on Soil Vapor Intrusion (October 2006). 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCA)

was detected in one of the four samples, at a concentration of 88 ug/m3, which is

below the monitoring/ mitigation range established by NYSDOH. PCE

concentration is above the mitigation level range established by NYSDOH

Guidance matrix and requires further action.

9. Supplemental soil vapor samples collected in May 2015 were compared to the

compounds listed in Table 3.1 Air Guideline Values Derived by the NYSDOH

located in their Final Guidance for Evaluating Soil Vapor Intrusion. Sample

results showed low to moderate levels of chlorinated VOCs. Chlorinated VOCs

were detected at concentrations ranging from non-detectable above laboratory

MDLs to 172 ug/m3. PCE was detected across the Site at concentrations ranging

from 8 ug/m3 to 172 ug/m3, which exceeds the mitigation range established by the

NYSDOH Final Guidance on Soil Vapor Intrusion (October 2006). No other

VOCs were detected at concentrations exceeding their respective mitigation

range. BTEX compounds were not detected at significant concentrations in any

vapor sample collected at the Site.

10. One supplemental sub-slab soil vapor sample collected in November 2016,

subsequent to Site excavation, was compared to the compounds listed in Table 3.1

Air Guideline Values Derived by the NYSDOH located in their Final Guidance

for Evaluating Soil Vapor Intrusion. Sample results showed no concentrations of

VOCs in sub-slab soil vapor at the Site. One VOC, acetone, a common laboratory


6

contaminant, was detected at a concentration above its laboratory MDL. No other

VOCs were detected at concentrations above their respective laboratory MDLs.

Summary of the Remedial Action

The remedial action achieved protection of public health and the environment for the

intended use of the property. The remedial action achieved all of the remedial action

objectives established for the project and addressed applicable standards, criterion, and

guidance; was effective in both the short-term and long-term and reduced mobility,

toxicity and volume of contaminants; was cost effective and implementable; and used

standards methods that are well established in the industry.

A summary of the milestones achieved in the Remedial Action is as follows: A Pre-

Application Meeting was held on April 29, 2014. A Remedial Investigation (RI) was

performed from April 2014 to June 2015. A RI Report was prepared to evaluate data and

information necessary to develop a Remedial Action Work Plan (RAWP). A Site Contact

List was established. A draft RAWP was prepared and released with a Fact Sheet on

October 6, 2014 for a 30-day public comment period. The RAWP and Stipulation List

dated November 19, 2014 were approved by the New York City Office of Environmental

Remediation (OER) and the Notice to Proceed was issued on February 6, 2015. A Pre-

Construction Meeting was held on April 30, 2015. A Fact Sheet providing notice of the

start of the remedial action was issued on May 13, 2015. The remedial action was begun

in May 2015 and completed in March 2017.

The remedial action consisted of the following tasks:

1. Prepared a Community Protection Statement and implemented a Citizen

Participation Plan.

2. Mobilized site security, equipment, utility mark outs and marking & staking

excavation areas.

3. Performed Waste Characterization Study prior to excavation activities. Nine (9)

waste characterization soil samples were collected on March 16, 2015. Waste

characterization samples were collected at a frequency dictated by disposal

facilities.


7

4. Performed a Community Air Monitoring Program for particulates and volatile

organic carbon compounds.

5. Established Track 4 Site-Specific Soil Cleanup Objectives (SCO’s). The

following Track 4 SCO’s were utilized: Total SVOCs: 250 mg/kg; and lead: 600

mg/kg.

6. The following excavations were performed as part of development: soil was

removed to a depth of 11 feet from grade beneath the area of the new building for

the cellar level, 19 feet from grade for two elevator pits within the building

footprint, and to a depth of 2 feet in the remaining open space areas. Urban fill

identified in the shallow soil as Areas of Concern (AOC) were removed across

the site as part of construction. A total of 1,494.45 tons of soil/fill was excavated

and removed from the property.

7. Excavated 1,494.45 tons of non-hazardous soil/fill and transported to the Clean

Earth facility located at 24 Middlesex Avenue, Carteret, New Jersey.

8. Screened excavated soil/fill during intrusive work for indications of

contamination by visual means, odor, and monitoring with a PID.

9. Conducted materials management of excavated materials including temporarily

stockpiling and segregating in accordance with defined material types and to

prevent co-mingling of contaminated material and non-contaminated materials.

10. Appropriately segregated excavated media onsite prior to disposal. Transported

and disposed all soil/fill material at permitted facilities in accordance with all

applicable laws and regulations for handling, transport, and disposal, and the

RAWP.

11. Collected and analyzed four (4) end-point samples to determine attainment of

SCOs. Track 2 Restricted Residential SCOs were achieved for soil; however due

to the elevated concentrations of vapors in soil, an active sub-slab

depressurization system (SSDS) was installed beneath the new building.

12. As part of development, constructed an engineered Composite Cover System

consisting of two feet of clean soil capped with a 6-inch concrete surface in the

open area on the northern portion of the Site and a 4-inch concrete building slab

underlain by clean compacted soil across the entire new building footprint. The


8

contractor for the cover construction was Allstate 12 General Contracting

Corporation.

13. As part of development, installed a Vapor Barrier System that consisted of a 20-

mil vapor barrier beneath the structure’s slab and along foundation sidewalls.

The barrier chosen for this project was manufactured by Raven Industries, Inc.

Vapor Block Plus 20, a seven-layer co-extruded 20 mil vapor barrier made from

polyethylene and EVOH resins. The contractor for the vapor barrier installation

was Allstate 12 General Contracting Corporation.

14. Installed and operating an active Sub-Slab Depressurization System consisting of

one depressurization pit installed beneath the slab and surrounded by a

depressurization area approximately 170-square feet in size that has been

backfilled with ¾-inch clean bluestone to a depth of approximately 6-inches

below the slab. The depressurization pit is approximately 5.5-feet by 3-feet in

area and 1.5-feet in depth and consists of an open void beneath the slab that is

framed with concrete blocks and covered with a diamond steel plate. A 4-inch

diameter schedule 40 PVC perforated pipe was installed in the pit and connected

to an exhaust pipe that penetrates the building slab and extends vertically to the

roof of the elevator bulkhead. A trench filled with 4-inches of crushed bluestone

was placed around the horizontal perforated pipe. The 4-inch PVC vertical

standpipe is connected to a hardwired RadonAway RP265 vacuum blower

installed inline at the roof level. A sample port, vacuum pressure alarm system,

and magnehelic vacuum gauge were installed on the riser pipe in an access panel

in the building’s basement to confirm system operation. The exhaust discharge

point is located a minimum 10-feet away from any operable window or air intake

for any building. The design engineer for the active SSDS system was Ariel

Czemerinksi, P.E. of AMC Engineering. The SSDS piping system was installed

by Neda Development Incorporated and the SSDS fan was installed by United

Electric. The SSDS system installation was observed on behalf of the P.E. by

Athenica and confirmed to be built according to design and equipment

manufacturer specifications.


9

15. Performed all activities required for the Remedial Action, including permitting

requirements and pretreatment requirements, in compliance with applicable laws

and regulations.

16. Implemented storm-water pollution prevention measures in compliance with

applicable laws and regulations.

17. Submitted daily reports during construction oversight activities. Daily reports

were submitted from May 22, 2015 to March 23, 2017.

18. Soil used for backfill and cover completed in compliance with the Remedial

Action Work Plan and in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.

19. Submitted a Sustainability Report.

20. Submitted a RAR that describes the Remedial Action, certifies that the remedial

requirements defined in the Remedial Action Work Plan have been achieved;

defines the Site boundaries; describes all Engineering and Institutional Controls

applicable to the Site; and describes any changes from the RAWP.

21. Submitted a Site Management Plan (SMP) for long-term management of residual

soil, including plans for operation, maintenance, inspection and certification of

the performance of Engineering Controls and Institutional Controls. Inspections

will be performed annually. Inspection and Certification reports will be

submitted by July 31, 2019 (for the reporting period calendar year 2018), July 31,

2020 (for the reporting period calendar year 2019) and every year thereafter (for

the reporting period consisting of the prior calendar year). Inspection and

Certification Reports will cover all calendar years since the prior reporting

period.

22. The property will continue to be registered with an E-Designation by the NYC

Department of Buildings. Engineering Controls and Institutional Controls will be

managed in compliance with the SMP.


10

REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT

1.0 SITE BACKGROUND

Q52, LLC has enrolled in the New York City Voluntary Cleanup Program (NYC

VCP) to investigate and remediate a property located at 51-27 Queens Boulevard in the

Woodside section of Queens, New York. The boundary of the property subject to this

Remedial Action is shown in Figure 2 and includes, in its entirety, Queens Block 1320

and Lot 47. The Remedial Action was performed pursuant to the OER-approved RAWP

in a manner that has rendered the property protective of public health and the

environment consistent with its intended use. This RAR describes the Remedial Action

performed under the RAWP. The remedial action described in this document provides for

the protection of public health and the environment and complies with applicable

environmental standards, criteria and guidance (SCGs) and applicable laws and

regulations.

1.1 SITE LOCATION AND BACKGROUND

The Site is located at 51-27 Queens Boulevard in the Woodside section of Queens,

New York and is identified as Block 1320 and Lot 47 on the New York City Tax Map.

Figure 1 shows the Site location. The Site is 5,387-square feet and is bounded by an

asphalt-paved parking lot to the north, Queens Boulevard to the south, 52nd Street to the

east, and a multi-story residential building to the west. A map of the site boundary is

shown in Figure 2.

Prior to redevelopment, the Site was developed with a vacant as of 2014 1-story

commercial building previously utilized as an office and a 1- and 2-story building with

partial cellar utilized as an office.

1.2 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN

A new 7-story mixed residential and commercial use building with a full cellar has

been constructed at the Site. The new building occupies 4,227-square feet, or

approximately 80 percent of the lot area with the remaining open area consisting of a

1,160-square foot concrete-paved courtyard area located on the northern portion of the

property. The layout of the redevelopment is shown in Figures 3A and 3B.


11

The total gross square footage of the new building is approximately 32,861-square

feet, including 2,789-square feet of retail space, 3,943-square feet of community facility

space, 1,486-square feet of retail storage space, and the remaining area utilized as 29

Class “A” dwelling units, tenant storage, elevator mechanical rooms, sprinkler and water

meter room, electrical meter room, gas meter room, laundry, and compactor room. The

cellar is utilized for commercial use, utility and meter rooms with accessory uses for the

commercial and residential occupancies. The first floor is used for commercial retail,

residential lobby, and one residential apartment. The second floor is used for community

facility space. Floors 3 through 7 are utilized as residential apartment units.

As part of development, the building footprint was excavated to approximately 11-

feet below grade surface (bgs) for installation of the cellar. An additional 9-feet was

excavated in two locations of the cellar for the installation of elevator pits. The remaining

area (1,160-square feet) on the northern portion of the property was excavated to 2-feet

bgs. The total amount of soil removed off-site for excavation of the cellar is 1,494.45

tons. The current zoning designation is C2-3/R7X, denoting it as a residential and light

commercial district. The current use is consistent with existing zoning for the property.

A map showing the building location, basement location and open space location is

shown in the Development Plan in Figures 3A and 3B.

1.3 DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY

The Site is located within a mixed use residential and commercial area of Queens,

New York. The Site is bounded by an asphalt-capped parking area to the north, Queens

Boulevard to the south beyond which is Calvary Cemetery, 52nd Street to the east

beyond which is a twelve-story mixed use building, and a multi-story residential building

to the west. There are no sensitive receptors (such as schools, hospitals, and day-care

facilities) within a 500-foot radius of the Site.

1.4 SUMMARY OF PAST SITE USES AND AREAS OF CONCERN

Based upon the review of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Report

prepared by Athenica Environmental Services (Athenica) in April 2014, the Site history

was established. Prior to redevelopment, the Site was developed with a 1-story building

and a 1- and 2-story building with a partial cellar. The 2-story building was occupied by


12

different restaurants between 1934 and 1962. The 2-story building was then utilized as a

private lounge between 1970 and 1983. It was then occupied by private commercial

businesses until 2005. The 1-story building was occupied by a florist between 1934 and

1983. The 1-story building was most recently utilized as an office space, and the 1- and

2-story building with a partial cellar was most recently utilized as an office of the US

Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW).

The AOCs identified for this site include:

1. Adjacent former auto repair facility across 52nd Street.

2. Presence of urban fill from grade to approximately 2 feet bgs.

1.5 SUMMARY OF WORK PERFORMED UNDER THE REMEDIAL

INVESTIGATION

Athenica performed the following scope of work at the Site between April and September

of 2014:

1. Conducted a Site inspection to identify AOCs and physical obstructions (i.e.

structures, buildings, etc.);

2. Installed five (5) soil borings across the entire project Site, and collected fourteen

(14) soil samples for chemical analysis from the soil borings to evaluate soil

quality;

3. Installed one (1) groundwater monitoring well at the Site and collected one (1)

groundwater sample for chemical analysis to evaluate groundwater quality;

4. Installed two (2) soil vapor probes and two (2) sub-slab vapor probes and

collected four (4) samples for chemical analysis.

1.6 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS OF REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION

1. Elevation of the property ranges from 107 to 109 feet.

2. Depth to groundwater is 71.87 feet at the Site.

3. Groundwater flow is generally from east to west in the immediate vicinity of the

Site.


13

4. Bedrock was not encountered during the RI.

5. The stratigraphy of the site, from the surface down, consists of 2 feet of medium

coarse silty sand with traces of urban fill underlain by 10 feet of medium to coarse

sand with pebbles.

6. Soil/fill samples collected during the RI were compared to 6 NYCRR Part 375-

6.8 Track 2 Restricted Residential Use Soil Cleanup Objectives (SCOs). Soil

sampling results showed no VOCs above detection limits, except for acetone

(max. of 0.069 ppm), a common laboratory contaminant which was found below

its Restricted Residential SCO. Several SVOCs, all Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbon (PAH)s, including Benzo(a)anthracene (max. of 34.80 ppm),

Benzo(a)pyrene (max. of 13.10 ppm), Benzo(b)fluoranthene (max. of 13.90 ppm),

Benzo(k)fluoranthene (max. of 16.70 ppm), Chrysene (max. of 40.60 ppm),

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene (0.53 ppm), Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (max. of 8.36 ppm),

Naphthalene (max. of 12.70 ppm), and Phenanthrene (max. of 107 ppm), were

detected above their Restricted Residential Use SCOs in three shallow soil

samples. Pesticides including 4,4’-DDD (max. of 0.030 ppm) and 4,4’-DDT

(max. of 0.0054 ppm) were identified in shallow soil at concentrations well below

Restricted Residential Use SCOs. Metals including chromium hexavalent (2.71

ppm), copper (max. of 127 ppm), lead (max. of 278 ppm) and mercury (max. of

0.21ppm) were below Restricted Residential Use SCOs. No PCBs were detected

in any of the soil samples. Overall, the findings are unremarkable and are

consistent with observations of historic fill sites in areas throughout NYC.

7. Groundwater sample results were compared to NYSDEC Technical &

Operational Guidance Series (TOGS) Class GA Ambient Water Quality

Standards (GQS). Two VOCs, chloroform (17 ug/L) and tetrachloroethylene

(PCE) (15 ug/L), were detected at concentrations exceeding their respective GQS.

Trace concentrations of several VOCs were also detected below GQS, including

bromodichloromethane, carbon disulfide, cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene (3.9 ug/L),

MTBE (2.5 ug/L), toluene, and TCE (0.92 ug/L). SVOCs were not detected above

GQS, and only Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate was detected. Two dissolved metals,


14

manganese (1,050 ug/L) and sodium (79,800 ug/L) exceeded their respective

GQS. No pesticides or PCBs were detected above their detection limits.

8. Soil vapor samples collected during the RI were compared to the compounds

listed in Table 3.1 Air Guideline Values Derived by the NYSDOH located in the

New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) Final Guidance for Evaluating

Soil Vapor Intrusion. Soil vapor results showed a wide range of VOCs at low

concentrations for petroleum related compounds and at elevated levels for

chlorinated compounds. Most compounds were detected at less than 10 μg/m3

except for acetone (max. of 450 μg/m3) and isopropanol (max. of 1600 μg/m3).

Petroleum related BTEX compounds were not detected in any vapor sample.

Chlorinated compounds including trichloroethene (TCE) and carbon tetrachloride

were not detected in any of the soil vapor samples. Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)

was detected in three of the four soil vapor samples, ranging from 14 ug/m3 to

2,500 ug/m3 which is above the mitigation range established by NYSDOH Final

Guidance on Soil Vapor Intrusion (October 2006). 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCA)

was detected in one of the four samples, at a concentration of 88 ug/m3, which is

below the monitoring/ mitigation range established by NYSDOH. PCE

concentration is above the mitigation level range established by NYSDOH

Guidance matrix and requires further action.

9. Supplemental soil vapor samples collected in May 2015 were compared to the

compounds listed in Table 3.1 Air Guideline Values Derived by the NYSDOH

located in their Final Guidance for Evaluating Soil Vapor Intrusion. Sample

results showed low to moderate levels of chlorinated VOCs. Chlorinated VOCs

were detected at concentrations ranging from non-detectable above laboratory

MDLs to 172 ug/m3. PCE was detected across the Site at concentrations ranging

from 8 ug/m3 to 172 ug/m3, which exceeds the mitigation range established by the

NYSDOH Final Guidance on Soil Vapor Intrusion (October 2006). No other

VOCs were detected at concentrations exceeding their respective mitigation

range. BTEX compounds were not detected at significant concentrations in any

vapor sample collected at the Site.


15

10. One supplemental sub-slab soil vapor sample collected in November 2016,

subsequent to Site excavation, was compared to the compounds listed in Table 3.1

Air Guideline Values Derived by the NYSDOH located in their Final Guidance

for Evaluating Soil Vapor Intrusion. Sample results showed no concentrations of

VOCs in sub-slab soil vapor at the Site. One VOC, acetone, a common laboratory

contaminant, was detected at a concentration above its laboratory MDL. No other

VOCs were detected at concentrations above their respective laboratory MDLs.

For more detailed results, consult the RIR presented as Appendix A and the

Supplemental Soil Vapor Sampling Letter Report presented as Appendix D.


16

2.0 DESCRIPTION OF REMEDIAL ACTIONS

The remedial action was performed in accordance with an OER approved Remedial

Action Work Plan and achieved the remedial action objectives established for the project.

The remedial action was evaluated in an alternatives analysis and was determined to be

protective of human health and the environment, compliant with standards, criteria, and

guidelines (SCGs), effective in the short-term, effective in the long-term, capable of

attaining appropriate levels of reduction of toxicity, mobility, or volume of contaminated

material, implementable, cost effective, acceptable to the community, consistent with

land uses, and sustainable.

A summary of the milestones achieved in the Remedial Action is as follows: A Pre-

Application Meeting was held on April 29, 2014. A Remedial Investigation (RI) was

performed from April 2014 to June 2015. A RI Report was prepared to evaluate data and

information necessary to develop a Remedial Action Work Plan (RAWP). A Site Contact

List was established. A draft RAWP was prepared and released with a Fact Sheet on

October 6, 2014 for a 30-day public comment period. The RAWP and Stipulation List

dated November 19, 2014 were approved by the New York City Office of Environmental

Remediation (OER) and the Notice to Proceed was issued on February 6, 2015. A Pre-

Construction Meeting was held on April 30, 2015. A Fact Sheet providing notice of the

start of the remedial action was issued in May 2015. The remedial action was begun in

May 2015 and completed in March 2017. Appendix A includes the Remedial

Investigation Report and Appendix B contains RAWP and Stipulation List.

The remedial action consisted of the following tasks:

1. Prepared a Community Protection Statement and implemented a Citizen

Participation Plan.

2. Mobilized site security, equipment, utility mark outs and marking & staking

excavation areas.

3. Performed Waste Characterization Study prior to excavation activities. Nine (9)

waste characterization soil samples were collected on March 16, 2015. Waste


17

characterization samples were collected at a frequency dictated by disposal

facilities.

4. Performed a Community Air Monitoring Program for particulates and volatile

organic carbon compounds.

5. Established Track 4 Site-Specific Soil Cleanup Objectives (SCO’s). The

following Track 4 SCO’s were utilized: Total SVOCs: 250 mg/kg; and lead: 600

mg/kg.

6. The following excavations were performed as part of development: soil was

removed to a depth of 11 feet from grade beneath the area of the new building for

the cellar level, 19 feet from grade for two elevator pits within the building

footprint, and to a depth of 2 feet in the remaining open space areas. Urban fill

identified in the shallow soil as Areas of Concern (AOC) were removed across

the site as part of construction. A total of 1,494.45 tons of soil/fill was excavated

and removed from the property.

7. Excavated 1,494.45 tons of non-hazardous soil/fill and transported to the Clean

Earth facility located at 24 Middlesex Avenue, Carteret, New Jersey.

8. Screened excavated soil/fill during intrusive work for indications of

contamination by visual means, odor, and monitoring with a PID.

9. Conducted materials management of excavated materials including temporarily

stockpiling and segregating in accordance with defined material types and to

prevent co-mingling of contaminated material and non-contaminated materials.

10. Appropriately segregated excavated media onsite prior to disposal. Transported

and disposed all soil/fill material at permitted facilities in accordance with all

applicable laws and regulations for handling, transport, and disposal, and the

RAWP.

11. Collected and analyzed four (4) end-point samples to determine attainment of

SCOs. Track 2 Restricted Residential SCOs were achieved for soil; however due

to the elevated concentrations of vapors in soil, an active sub-slab

depressurization system (SSDS) was installed beneath the new building.

12. As part of development, constructed an engineered Composite Cover System

consisting of two feet of clean soil capped with a 6-inch concrete surface in the


18

open area on the northern portion of the Site and a 4-inch concrete building slab

underlain by clean compacted soil across the entire new building footprint. The

contractor for the cover construction was Allstate 12 General Contracting

Corporation.

13. As part of development, installed a Vapor Barrier System that consisted of a 20-

mil vapor barrier beneath the structure’s slab and along foundation sidewalls.

The barrier chosen for this project was manufactured by Raven Industries, Inc.

Vapor Block Plus 20, a seven-layer co-extruded 20 mil vapor barrier made from

polyethylene and EVOH resins. The contractor for the vapor barrier installation

was Allstate 12 General Contracting Corporation.

14. Installed and operating an active Sub-Slab Depressurization System consisting of

one depressurization pit installed beneath the slab and surrounded by a

depressurization area approximately 170-square feet in size that has been

backfilled with ¾-inch clean bluestone to a depth of approximately 6-inches

below the slab. The depressurization pit is approximately 5.5-feet by 3-feet in

area and 1.5-feet in depth and consists of an open void beneath the slab that is

framed with concrete blocks and covered with a diamond steel plate. A 4-inch

diameter schedule 40 PVC perforated pipe was installed in the pit and connected

to an exhaust pipe that penetrates the building slab and extends vertically to the

roof of the elevator bulkhead. A trench filled with 4-inches of crushed bluestone

was placed around the horizontal perforated pipe. The 4-inch PVC vertical

standpipe is connected to a hardwired RadonAway RP265 vacuum blower

installed inline at the roof level. A sample port, vacuum pressure alarm system,

and magnehelic vacuum gauge were installed on the riser pipe in an access panel

in the building’s basement to confirm system operation. The exhaust discharge

point is located a minimum 10-feet away from any operable window or air intake

for any building. The design engineer for the active SSDS system was Ariel

Czemerinksi, P.E. of AMC Engineering. The SSDS piping system was installed

by Neda Development Incorporated and the SSDS fan was installed by United

Electric. The SSDS system installation was observed on behalf of the P.E. by


19

Athenica and confirmed to be built according to design and equipment

manufacturer specifications.

15. Performed all activities required for the Remedial Action, including permitting

requirements and pretreatment requirements, in compliance with applicable laws

and regulations.

16. Implemented storm-water pollution prevention measures in compliance with

applicable laws and regulations.

17. Submitted daily reports during construction oversight activities. Daily reports

were submitted from May 22, 2015 to March 23, 2017.

18. Soil used for backfill and cover completed in compliance with the Remedial

Action Work Plan and in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.

19. Submitted a Sustainability Report.

20. Submitted a RAR that describes the Remedial Action, certifies that the remedial

requirements defined in the Remedial Action Work Plan have been achieved;

defines the Site boundaries; describes all Engineering and Institutional Controls

applicable to the Site; and describes any changes from the RAWP.

21. Submitted a Site Management Plan (SMP) for long-term management of residual

soil, including plans for operation, maintenance, inspection and certification of

the performance of Engineering Controls and Institutional Controls. Inspections

will be performed annually. Inspection and Certification reports will be

submitted by July 31, 2019 (for the reporting period calendar year 2018), July 31,

2020 (for the reporting period calendar year 2019) and every year thereafter (for

the reporting period consisting of the prior calendar year). Inspection and

Certification Reports will cover all calendar years since the prior reporting

period.

22. The property will continue to be registered with an E-Designation by the NYC

Department of Buildings. Engineering Controls and Institutional Controls will be

managed in compliance with the SMP.


20

3.0 COMPLIANCE WITH REMEDIAL ACTION

WORKPLAN

3.1 CONSTRUCTION HEALTH & SAFETY PLAN

The remedial construction activities performed under this program were in

compliance with the Construction Health and Safety Plan and applicable laws and

regulations. The Site Safety Coordinator was Joseph Yahudaii.

3.2 COMMUNITY AIR MONITORING PLAN

The Community Air Monitoring Plan provided guidance for the collection and

analysis of air samples during remedial construction activities to ensure proper

protections were employed to protect workers and the neighboring community.

Monitoring was performed in compliance with the Community Air Monitoring Plan in

the approved RAWP. No exceedances of dust or VOCs were recorded at the Site during

the entirety of remedial action. CAMP data was not recorded during one remedial

construction day, June 17, 2015, due to equipment malfunction. During that time no

excessive visual dust was observed. The results of Community Air Monitoring are shown

in Appendix C.

3.3 SOIL/MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PLAN

The Soil/Materials Management Plan provided detailed plans for managing all

soil/materials that were disturbed at the Site, including excavation, handling, storage,

transport and disposal. It also included a series of controls to assure effective, nuisance

free remedial activity in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Remedial

construction activities performed under this program were in compliance with the SMMP

in the approved RAWP.

3.4 STORM-WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION

Storm water pollution prevention included physical methods and processes to control

and/or divert surface water flows and to limit the potential for erosion and migration of

Site soils, via wind or water. Remedial construction activities performed under this

program were in full compliance with methods and processes defined in the RAWP for

storm water prevention and applicable laws and regulations.


21

3.5 DEVIATIONS FROM THE REMEDIAL ACTION WORK PLAN

The PE who certified the Remedial Action Work Plan dated October 2014 was

Reza Sharif. However Ariel Czemerinski, P.E. took over the project prior to

construction. He has reviewed all the plans and remedial design and oversaw the

installation of vapor barrier, composite cover, and sub-slab depressurization

system. Mr. Czemerinski is the PE certifying this Remedial Action Report.

The QEP who certified the Remedial Action Work Plan dated October 2014 was

William Silveri. However the project was taken over by Spiro Dongaris who is

the QEP certifying this Remedial Action Report.

The Remedial Action Work Plan dated October 2014 proposed a Track 4 remedy

based on the installation of an active sub-slab depressurization system. However,

Track 2 SCOs were achieved for soil upon completion of the excavation event. A

total of 1,494.45 tons of non-hazardous soil/fill was removed from the Site.

The Remedial Action Work Plan dated October 2014 described the

depressurization pit as an area 2 by 2 feet and 2 feet in depth with the entire

footprint of the building under the influence of the suction pit. However, the

actual depressurization pit was constructed in an area 5.5 by 3 feet and 1.5 feet in

depth within an area of influence approximately 170-square feet backfilled with

¾-inch clean bluestone. Due to the design of the footings and strap beams,

communication under the entire slab was not possible and the area under the

influence of the suction pit was reduced to the area identified to have elevated

PCE concentration during the RI. One round of supplemental soil vapor sampling

prior to excavation and one round of sub-slab soil vapor sampling subsequent to

excavation were conducted in conjunction with the change in SSDS design. The

change in pit size and area under influence does not alter the operation of the

SSDS system and focuses the system onto the area of concern. The SSDS as built

remains protective of public health and the environment. A letter summarizing the

results of the supplemental sub-slab soil vapor sampling, as well as the proposed

change in SSDS design, and an email confirmation from OER approving the

change in design are provided in Appendix D.


22

The Remedial Action Work Plan dated October 2014 included plans to cap the

open space located on the northern portion of the Site with 2 feet of clean soil;

however, during the course of development, the open area was redesigned to

include a Composite Cover System consisting of 2 feet of clean soil and 6 inches

of poured concrete. A demarcation barrier was not installed beneath the open

space Composite Cover System.

No other significant deviations from the Remedial Action Work Plan occurred during

implementation of the plan.


23

4.0 REMEDIAL PROGRAM

4.1 PROJECT ORGANIZATION

Principal personnel who participated in the remedial action include Ezgi Karayel

(Project Manager) and Curtis Breuer (Environmental Scientist/Geologist). The

Professional Engineer (PE) and Qualified Environmental Professionals (QEP) for this

project were Ariel Czemerinski, P.E. and Spiro Dongaris, P.E. respectively. The

developer throughout the remedial action was Joseph Yahudaii of Neda Development,

Inc. and the project architect is Victor Filletti, R.A. of T.F. Cusanelli & Filletti Architects

P.C.

4.2 SITE CONTROLS

Site Preparation

Mobilization was conducted as necessary for each phase of work at the Site.

Mobilization included field personnel orientation, equipment mobilization

(including securing all sampling equipment needed for the field investigation),

marking/staking sampling locations, and utility mark-outs. Each field team

member attended an orientation meeting to become familiar with the general

operation of the Site, health and safety requirements, and field procedures.

Mobilization at the Site occurred in October 2014;

Fencing was installed at the Site by October 2014;

Erosion and sedimentation controls were established by May 2015;

The presence of utilities and easements on the Site was fully investigated prior to

the performance of invasive work such as excavation or drilling under this plan by

using, at a minimum, the One-Call System (811). Underground utilities may pose

an electrocution, explosion, or other hazard during excavation or drilling

activities. All invasive activities were performed in compliance with applicable

laws and regulations to assure safety. Utility companies and other responsible

authorities were contacted to locate and mark the locations. Proper safety and

protective measures pertaining to utilities and easements, and compliance with all

laws and regulations were employed during invasive and other work. The


24

integrity and safety of on-Site and off-Site structures were maintained during all

invasive, excavation or other remedial activity performed under the RAWP;

The building department issued a building permit for the Site on March 9, 2015;

A pre-construction meeting was held with all contractors on April 30, 2015; and

An OER Project Notice was erected at the project entrance and was in place

during all phases of the Remedial Action.

Soil Screening

Excavation activities began in May 2015. Intrusive soil excavation activities were

overseen by an Athenica as discussed with OER. In addition to extensive sampling and

chemical testing of soils on the Site, excavated soil was screened continuously using

hand-held instruments, and by sight to ensure proper material handling and management.

No visual or olfactory evidence of a spill was observed during Site excavation. VOC

readings were continuously observed and recorded during excavation as part of the

Community Air Monitoring Plan. No elevated readings were recorded.

Stockpile Management

The excavation of on-Site soils was accomplished by directly loading the materials

onto trucks for off-Site disposal/reuse. Stockpiling was minimized. Recognizable C&D

were stockpiled for off-Site disposal on bare soil adjacent to the excavation and near the

trucking gate located in the northeast corner of the Site. Soils utilized for on-Site reuse

were also briefly staged in the northeast corner of the Site prior to use as backfill in the

same area.

Truck Inspection

Outbound-trucks were inspected and cleaned prior to departing the Site from the

trucking gate located in the northeast corner of the Site to prevent any off-Site migrations

of contamination. Cleaning of the adjacent streets was performed as needed during all

trucking events. No evidence of significant off-Site migration of soil was observed during

remedial construction.

Site Security

Site access was controlled through gated entrance of the construction fence. The

fence was locked with a chain and padlock during non-working hours/days.


25

Nuisance Controls

There were no complaints of odor at the Site. VOCs and dust levels at the Site were

not detected at concentrations warranting corrective action.

Reporting

Daily reports were prepared and submitted to the OER. All daily and monthly reports

are included in Appendix E. Digital photographs of the Remedial Action are included in

Appendix F.

4.3 MATERIALS EXCAVATION AND REMOVAL

Soil/Fill Excavation and Removal

Demolition

Prior to the start of foundation work, the two former on-Site buildings were

demolished under DOB Job No. 420952570 following the approval notice on February

27, 2014 until the sign off notice on May 5, 2015.

Soil Excavation

Followed by the completion of demolition, as part of development, the entire 4,227-

square foot footprint of the new building was excavated to a depth of 11 feet below grade

surface (bgs). In addition, the remaining 1,160-square foot open area was excavated to a

depth of 2 feet bgs to remove historic fill identified during the RI. Additional excavations

of 9-feet were required in two locations in the cellar for the installation of elevator pits. A

map showing the approximate locations where excavations were performed and

approximate thickness of excavated material is shown in Figure 5.

During remedial excavation, the Site was divided into equal quadrants for reporting

purposes, consisting of Grid 1 located in the southwest corner of the Site, along Queens

Boulevard, and progressing clockwise to Grid 4 located in the southeast corner of the

Site, on the corner of Queens Boulevard and 52nd Street. Excavation activity began on

May 22, 2015 with excavation and off-Site disposal of historical fill material from zero to

2 feet below grade across the entire Site. Excavation further progressed from the southern

boundary of the Site, Grid 1 and Grid 4, to the northern extent of the building footprint to

allow for construction of the basement. Excavation of the building’s footprint and off-


26

Site soil disposal was completed on June 22, 2015.

A total of 1,494.45 tons of non-hazardous soil/fill was removed from the Site.

Approximately 153 cubic yards of clean native soil excavated from the deep (4- to 11-

feet) interval of Grid 1 was utilized as backfill for the northern open portion of the Site

that was excavated to 2-feet bgs for disposal of historic fill and as backfill behind

foundation walls along 52nd Street and Queens Boulevard. The material encountered

during excavation consisted of brown silty sand and medium to coarse-grained sand with

cobbles. A map showing the approximate source location of reused soil and the location

of placement of reused soil is shown in Figure 6.

Soil Cleanup Objectives

The SCOs for this Site are listed in the 6NYCRR Part 375, Table 6.8(b) Track 2

Restricted Residential Use SCOs as amended by the following Track 4 Site-Specific

SCOs:

Contaminant Site-Specific SCOs

Total SVOCs 250 mg/kg

Lead 600 mg/kg

The SCOs for this Remedial Action are provided in Table 1.

End Point Sample Results

The SCOs for this project were achieved.

Following the completion of excavation activities at the Site, end-point bottom soil

samples were collected at four (4) locations across the Site as proposed in the Stipulation

List dated November 19, 2014. The end-point soil samples were collected using a

dedicated, disposable sampling scoop from three locations at a depth of 11 feet bgs (base

of final excavation) and one location at a depth of 2 feet bgs (base of excavation in open

portion of the Site). Collected end-point soil samples were containerized in laboratory

provided glassware, labeled and placed in coolers. Samples were picked up by the

laboratory on the same day as the collection date. They were preserved on ice in the

coolers to maintain a temperature of 4ºC. York Analytical Laboratories located at 120

Research Drive, Stratford, CT 06615 (New York ELAP Certification No. 10854) was


27

used. All end-point soil samples were analyzed for VOCs via EPA Method 8260, SVOCs

via EPA Method 8270, TAL Metals by EPA Method 6010, PCBs and Pesticides via EPA

Method 8081/8082. Analytical laboratory reports for the end-point soil samples are

included in Appendix G. A copy of the laboratory’s ELAP certification is included in

Appendix H.

A map of end-point sample locations is shown in Figure 4. A tabular summary of

end-point sampling results (and representative RI sampling results) compared to SCOs is

included in Table 1.

The end-point samples were compared to Part 375 Track 2 Restricted Residential Use

SCOs and Track 4 Site-Specific SCOs. Significant findings and results of the end-point

soil sampling are as follows:

The subsurface soils did not exhibit field evidence of petroleum or solvent

contamination (i.e. staining, odor).

End-point soil sampling results indicate that soil conditions achieved Track 2

Restricted Residential Use SCOs. Two VOCs, one SVOC and several metals were

detected at minor concentrations well below Track 2 Restricted Residential SCOs.

There was only one minor detection of the pesticide 4,4,4’-DDT also below Track

2 Restricted Residential SCOs. This pesticide was detected in three out of four

samples and the results are from an analysis that required a dilution.

One RIR soil sample, SB-1 (2’-4’), was collected in northern open space area of

the Site and is also representative of the remaining material left at the base of the

excavation. One metal, mercury, was detected at a concentration of 0.21 mg/kg,

slightly above its Track 1 Unrestricted Use SCO but well below its Track 2

Restricted Residential SCO. No other compounds exceeded any of their Part 375

SCOs in SB-1 (2’-4’). The complete analytical data package for the RIR is

included in Appendix A.


28

4.4 MATERIALS DISPOSAL

As indicated below, soils and fill were properly characterized for off-site disposal

and/or re-use in accordance with the RAWP and/or specific requirements of the off-site

disposal and/or reuse facilities. For characterization of soils and fill for off-site disposal,

five (5) test pits were excavated, and representative soil samples were collected from

each test pit for laboratory analysis. A brief summary of the classification of soils and fill

are found below:

Results of waste classification sampling for historic fill/soils and native clean

soils were sent to Clean Earth for its review and approval at its disposal facilities.

A letter from Clean Earth dated May 22, 2015 and revised June 17, 2015

indicated its approval to accept non-hazardous soils from the Site for disposal at

its Carteret, New Jersey facility.

Excavated material disposal occurred at the Site on May 22, 2015; and June 17,

18, and 22, 2015.

The material type, quantity and disposal location of material removed and disposed

off-Site is presented below:

Disposal Location/Address Type of Material Quantity

Clean Earth of Carteret 24 Middlesex Avenue

Carteret, NJ 07008

Non-Hazardous Soil 1,494.45 tons

A letter from Athenica to Clean Earth providing materials type, source and data, and

acceptance letters from disposal facility stating it is approved to accept above materials

are attached in Appendix I. Waste disposal manifests are included in Appendix J.

Trucking logs with disposal quantities and facilities is provided in Table 2. The waste

characterization sample laboratory analytical report is presented in Appendix K and a

summary of the sample results are presented in Table 3.


29

4.5 BACKFILL IMPORT

Approximately 2 yards of ¾-inch clean bluestone was imported to the Site and

utilized as backfill for the SSDS suction pit and horizontal pipe trench. Appendix L

includes the bluestone importation documents from Olsen’s Nursery Inc. located at 386

Lake Avenue South in Nesconset, New York. The material originated from Tilcon New

York Inc.’s Clinton Point Quarry and was certified to meet ASTM #57 Stone and ASTM

#8 standards.

Approximately 153 yards of clean soil was excavated as part of development from the

deep (4- to 11-foot) interval of Grid 1 and re-used on-Site as backfill on the northern

open portion of the Site and behind foundation walls along 52nd Street and Queens

Boulevard. A map showing the approximate source location of reused soil and the

location of placement of reused soil is shown in Figure 6.


30

5.0 ENGINEERING CONTROLS

5.1 COMPOSITE COVER SYSTEM

Track 2 Restricted Residential SCOs for soil were achieved and Engineering Controls are

not required to address residual soil. However, as part of construction, several protective

systems including a composite cover system and vapor barrier was installed across the

entire property. The composite cover system is comprised of a 4-inch concrete building

slab underlain by a vapor barrier and compacted native soil within the building footprint.

Open areas of the property in the northern portion of the lot are covered with an

approximately 6-inch thick concrete paved surface underlain by 2-feet of clean native

soil. Figure 7 depicts the as-built design for each cover type used on this Site.

Photographs of construction of the Composite Cover System are included in Appendix F.

The composite cover system was installed by Allstate 12 General Contracting

Corporation.

5.2 VAPOR BARRIER SYSTEM

As part of construction, a vapor barrier system was installed beneath the entire

building footprint. The vapor barrier was installed vertically on all exterior sub-grade

foundational walls, beneath structural footings, and beneath the entire building slab and

elevator pits. The vapor barrier system consists of VaporBlock Plus 20-mil vapor barrier

manufactured by Raven Industries. The vapor barrier is composed of seven-layers of co-

extruded polyethylene and ethylene vinyl-alcohol copolymers (EVOH) resins. The vapor

barrier was overlapped 6-inches and then sealed utilizing VaporSeal 4” Seaming Tape as

per the manufacturer specifications. All penetrations were sealed with VaporSeal 4”

Seaming Tape. The professional engineer for the Vapor Barrier System was Ariel

Czemerinski, P.E. of AMC Engineering. The contractor for the Vapor Barrier System

construction was Allstate 12 General Contracting Corporation.

Figure 8 shows the as-built design for the Vapor Barrier System used on this Site.

Photographs of installation of the Vapor Barrier System are included in Appendix F. A

copy of the vapor barrier specifications and documentation is included in Appendix L.


31

5.3 ENGINEERING CONTROL

5.3.1 Active Sub-Slab Depressurization System

One Engineering Control (EC) was employed in the remedial action to address

residual soil vapor remaining at the Site. The ECs employed at the Site is:

(1) An Active Sub-Slab Depressurization System (SSDS)

Exposure to soil vapor is prevented by an active Sub-Slab Depressurization System

that has been built on the Site. The SSDS is located in the southeastern portion of the

cellar where elevated concentrations of PCE were encountered during the original RI.

The SSDS consists of one depressurization pit installed beneath the slab and surrounded

by a depressurization area approximately 170-square feet in size that has been backfilled

with ¾-inch clean bluestone to a depth of approximately 6-inches below the slab. The

depressurization pit is approximately 5.5-feet by 3-feet in area and 1.5-feet in depth and

consists of an open void beneath the slab that is framed with concrete blocks and covered

with a diamond steel plate. A 4-inch diameter schedule 40 PVC perforated piping was

installed in the pit and connected to a 4-inch diameter schedule 40 PVC riser pipe that

penetrates the building slab and extends vertically to the roof of the elevator bulkhead. A

trench filled with 4-inches of crushed bluestone was placed around the horizontal

perforated pipe. The vertical standpipe is connected to a hardwired RadonAway RP265

vacuum blower installed inline at the roof level. A sample port, vacuum pressure alarm

system, and Dwyer Series 2005 magnehelic vacuum gauge were installed on the riser

pipe in an access panel in the building’s basement to confirm system operation and the

riser pipe is labeled “SSDS Vent: DO NOT TAP”. The exhaust discharge point is located

a minimum 10-feet away from any operable window or air intake for any building. The

design engineer for the active SSDS system was Ariel Czemerinksi, P.E. of AMC

Engineering. The SSDS piping system was installed by Neda Development Incorporated

and the fan and electric elements were installed by United Electric. The SSDS system

installation was observed on behalf of the P.E. by Athenica and confirmed to be built

according to design and equipment manufacturer specifications. Figure 9 shows the

location of the SSDS system and Figure 10 shows as-built design details of the system as

constructed. Material/equipment specifications, RadonAway alarm instructions, and

RadonAway blower manual are included in Appendix M.


32

System start-up and testing was performed on March 23, 2017 by Ariel Czemerinksi,

P.E. of AMC Engineering and Spiro Dongaris, P.E. of Athenica Environmental Services.

The SSDS was operating in accordance with design requirements. The following

summarizes the observations made during the SSDS start-up testing event:

Standpipe vacuum pressure was measured by a manometer to calibrate

magnehelic gauge; vacuum on the exhaust standpipe was measured at -2.6 inches

of water (WC)

The alarm system was tested and found to be operating correctly

A sub-slab vacuum pressure test point was drilled through the slab and installed

in the cellar slab in the area covered by bluestone; vacuum pressure as measured

by a manometer read -2.57” WC. The temporary sub-slab boring was patched

following testing.

SSDS start-up documentation is included in Appendix N. Figure 9 shows the location

of the SSDS system with sub-slab vacuum pressure test point location. SSDS operation

training and monitoring details are included in the SMP in Section 7.0.


33

6.0 INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS

A series of Institutional Controls are required under this Remedial Action to

implement, maintain, inspect and certify the Engineering Controls and prevent exposure

to residual material. Adherence to these Institutional Controls is required under this

remedial action and will be implemented under the Site Management Plan included in

this RAR.

Institutional Controls for this property are:

(1) The property will continue to be registered with an E-Designation by the NYC

Department of Buildings. Property owner and property owner’s successors and

assigns are required to comply with the approved SMP;

(2) Compliance with an OER-approved Site Management Plan including procedures

for appropriate operation, maintenance, inspection, and certification of

performance of EC’s and IC’s. The property owner and property owner’s

successors and assigns will inspect EC’s and IC’s and submit to OER a written

certification that evaluates their performance in a manner and at a frequency to be

determined by OER;

(3) Engineering Controls will not be discontinued without prior OER approval; and

(4) OER has the right to enter the Site upon notice for the purpose of evaluating the

performance of EC’s and IC’s.


34

7.0 SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Site Management is the last phase of the remedial process and begins after the

approval of the Remedial Action Report (RAR) and issuance of the Notice of Completion

(NOC) by the OER. It is the responsibility of the property owner to ensure that all Site

Management responsibilities are performed. The penalty for failure to implement the

SMP includes revocation of the Notice of Completion and all associated certifications

and liability protections. If the building is sold, the new owners will be notified of the

SMP requirements.

Engineering Controls and Institutional Controls have been incorporated into this

Remedial Action to ensure that the site remains protective of public health and the

environment. Generally, EC’s provide physical protective measures and IC’s provide

restrictions on Site usage and establish remedial operation, maintenance, inspection and

certification measures. This Site Management Plan has been established to govern long-

term performance of EC’s and IC’s for this property.

The SMP provides a detailed description of procedures required to manage residual

material at the Site following the completion of remedial construction in accordance with

the NYC Voluntary Cleanup Agreement with OER. This includes: (1) operation and

maintenance of Engineering Controls; (2) inspection of EC’s and IC’s; and (3)

certification of performance of EC’s and IC’s.

7.1 ENGINEERING CONTROLS

Engineering Controls were employed in the remedial action to address residual soil

vapor remaining at the site. The Site has one Engineering Control System. Engineering

Control for this property is:

(1) Active Sub-Slab Depressurization System

Operation and Maintenance of Active Sub-Slab Depressurization System

Chapter 5 describes the Active Sub-Slab Depressurization System utilized in this

Remedial Action and provides as-built design details and the system location. The SSDS

is a permanent Engineering Control for the Site. The system will be inspected and its

performance certified at specified intervals defined in this SMP.


35

The SSDS will be operated and maintained as prescribed below:

The manometer and alarm installed for the system manifold are located immediately

on the SSDS riser pipe in a control box in the northwestern corner of the retail storage

room in the cellar. The system is designed to establish a vacuum of 1.0 inches of water or

higher. If the blower is found to be non-operational by the inspector during an inspection,

or if the blower is operating, but no vacuum reading is observed on the vacuum gauge,

the blower must be replaced or repaired. The SSDS components to be evaluated and

inspected include:

RadonAway RP265 Radon Fan;

RadonAway Checkpoint Mitigation System Alarm;

Dwyer Magnehelic Manometer Gauge Series 2005; and

Control box for the alarms and gauges.

A complete list of components to be inspected is provided in the Monthly SSDS

Inspection Checklist provided in Appendix O.

7.2 INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS

A series of Institutional Controls are required under this Remedial Action to assure

permanent protection of public health by elimination of exposure to residual materials.

These IC’s define the program to operate, maintain, inspect and certify the performance

of Engineering Controls and Institutional Controls on this property. These Institutional

Controls will be implemented in accordance with the Site Management Plan included in

this RAR.

Institutional Controls for this property are:

(1) The property will continue to be registered with an E-Designation by the NYC

Department of Buildings. Property owner and property owner’s successors and

assigns are required to comply with the approved SMP;

(2) Compliance with an OER-approved Site Management Plan including procedures

for appropriate operation, maintenance, inspection, and certification of

performance of EC’s and IC’s. The property owner and property owner’s

successors and assigns will inspect EC’s and IC’s and submit to OER a written


36

certification that evaluates their performance in a manner and at a frequency to be

determined by OER;

(3) Engineering Controls will not be discontinued without prior OER approval; and

(4) OER has the right to enter the Site upon notice for the purpose of evaluating the

performance of EC’s and IC’s.

7.3 INSPECTIONS

Engineering Controls and Institutional Controls will be inspected by a qualified

environmental professional on an annual basis beginning with the initial startup

inspection of the active SSDS performed on March 23, 2017. In addition to these

inspections, the building superintendent will inspect the active SSDS on a monthly basis.

The inspections will evaluate the following:

If Engineering Controls or Institutional Controls employed at the Site continue to

perform as designed and continue to be protective of human health and the

environment;

If anything has occurred that impairs the ability of the Engineering Controls or

Institutional Controls to protect public health and the environment;

If changes are needed to the remedial systems or controls;

If compliance with this SMP has been maintained;

If site records are complete and up to date; and

General Site conditions at the time of inspection.

In an addition, if an emergency occurs, such as a natural disaster, or if an unforeseen

failure of any of the Engineering Controls occurs, an inspection of the Site will be

performed within 14 days to evaluate the Engineering Controls and a letter report of

findings will be submitted to OER.

Inspection of Active Sub-Slab Depressurization System

Inspections of the active SSDS are to be performed on a monthly basis by the

building superintendent and recorded on the SSDS Inspection Checklist provided in

Appendix O. All completed monthly SSDS Inspection Checklists are to be kept on-Site

for review by the qualified environmental professional during the annual inspection. The

monthly SSDS inspection should include confirmation that the audible/visual alarm has


37

not been triggered and that the vacuum gauge depicts a minimum vacuum reading of

approximately 1.0 inches of water.

In addition, the RadonAway RP265 Radon Fan located on the roof must be inspected

to determine if the fan is operating by checking for air flow at the exhaust. If the fan is

found to be non-operational by the building superintendent during a monthly inspection,

or if the fan is operating, but no vacuum reading is observed on the vacuum gauge, the

fan must be replaced or repaired. The Owner’s representative(s) shall immediately

contact the appropriate parties from the contact list provided on the monthly SSDS

Inspection Checklist.

A complete list of components to be checked is provided in the SSDS Inspection

Checklist presented in Appendix O. The components of the Active SSDS will also be

inspected annually by a qualified environmental professional to assure that the Active

SSDS is functioning properly.

7.4 INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION LETTER REPORT

Results of inspections performed during a reporting period and certification of

performance of all Engineering Controls and Institutional Controls will be included in an

Inspection and Certification Letter Report. Inspections will be performed in 2018, 2019,

and every year thereafter. Inspection and Certification Letter Reports will be submitted

by July 31, 2019 (for the reporting period calendar year 2019), July 31, 2020 (for the

reporting period calendar year 2019) and every year thereafter (for the reporting period

consisting of the prior calendar year). Inspection and Certification Letter Reports will be

submitted to OER in digital format. The letter report will include, at a minimum:

Date of inspections;

Personnel conducting inspections;

Description of the inspection activities performed;

Any observations, conclusions, or recommendations;

Copy of all inspection forms;

A determination as to whether groundwater plume conditions, if any, have

changed since the last reporting event; and


38

Certification of the performance of Engineering Controls and Institutional

Controls, as discussed below.

The certification of the performance of EC’s and IC’s will establish:

If Engineering Controls or Institutional Controls employed at the Site continue to

be in place and perform as designed and continue to be protective of human health

and the environment;

If anything has occurred that impairs the ability of Engineering Controls or

Institutional Controls to protect public health and the environment;

If changes are needed to the remedial systems or controls;

If compliance with this Site Management Plan has been maintained;

If site records are complete and up to date;

If the Site continues to be registered as an E-Designated property by the NYC

Department of Buildings;

OER may enter the Site upon notice for the purpose of evaluating the performance of

EC’s and IC’s.

In addition to the Inspection and Certification Letter Reports, during the first year of

function, soil vapor beneath the Site will be sampled to evaluate the function of the active

SSDS. The soil vapor sampling will be conducted to evaluate whether a decrease in

SSDS function to a passive system is applicable. The results of the sampling will be

provided to the OER for their review and no alterations will be made to the system

without their written consent. The sampling will be performed no earlier than 6-months

after active SSDS function.

7.5 NOTIFICATIONS

Notifications will be submitted by the property owner to OER as described below:

60-day advance notice of any proposed changes in Site use, such as an upgrade

from existing use to unrestricted residential use that was not contemplated is the

Remedial Action.


39

Notice within 30 days of any emergency, such as a fire, flood, or earthquake that

has the potential to reduce the effectiveness of Engineering Controls in place at

the Site.


40

8.0 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT

This Remedial Action Work Plan provides for sustainable remediation and

redevelopment (if applicable) through a variety of means that are defined in this

Sustainability Report.

Reuse of Clean, Recyclable Materials. Reuse of clean, recyclable materials reduces

consumption of non-renewable virgin resources and can provide energy savings and

greenhouse gas reduction since these materials can be locally-derived.

Approximately 153 yards of clean soil generated as part of construction was reused at

the Site to backfill locations where historic fill was removed and behind foundation walls.

Conservation of Non-Renewable Resources. Reduced consumption of non-

renewable resources such as soil and top-soil lowers the overall environmental impact of

the project on the region by conserving these resources.

Conservation of non-renewable resources was achieved by reusing on-Site soil as

backfill. An estimate of the tonnage of non-renewable resources, the use of which will be

avoided under this plan, is 153 yards.

Conversion to Clean Fuels. Use of clean fuel improves NYC’s air quality by

reducing harmful emissions.

Natural gas is utilized as the principal fuel in the new building.

Recontamination Control. Recontamination after cleanup and redevelopment is

completed undermines the value of work performed, may result in a property that is less

protective of public health or the environment, and may necessitate additional cleanup

work later that could impede future redevelopment. Recontamination can arise from

future releases that occur within the property or by influx of existing contamination from

off-Site.

The composite cover system, consisting of a minimum 4-inches of concrete underlain

by a vapor barrier or 2-feet of clean soil, will prevent underlying soil contamination from

future leaks or spills, and migration of vapors into the structure in the future. The

composite cover system covers the entire property boundary; therefore, the area of the

Site that utilizes recontamination controls under this plan is 5,387 square feet.


41

Paperless Voluntary Cleanup Program. Q52, LLC participated in OER’s Paperless

Brownfield Voluntary Program. Under this program, submission of electronic documents

replaced submission of hard copies for the review of project documents, communications

and milestone reports. A best estimate of the mass (pounds) of paper saved under this

plan is 25 pounds.

Low-Energy Project Management Program. Q52, LLC participated in OER’s

low-energy project management program. Under this program, whenever possible,

meetings were held using remote communication technologies, such as

videoconferencing and teleconferencing to reduce energy consumption and traffic

congestion associated with personal transportation. A gross estimate of the number of

miles of personal transportation that was conserved in this process is 35 miles.

Trees and Plantings. Trees and other plantings provide habitat and add to NYC’s

environmental quality in a wide variety of ways. Native plant species and native habitat

provide optimal support to local fauna, promote local biodiversity, and require less

maintenance. The number of trees planted as part of this redevelopment is 3.

FIGURES

SITELOCATION

Date:

Drawn by:

Checked by:

Drawing Scale:

Project No.:

VOLODYMYR PROTSYUKSite:

Figure:NOT TO SCALE 145-09 GREENPOINT AVENUE

LONG ISLAND CITY, NY 11104TEL: (718) 784 - 7490FAX: (718) 784 - 4085

Title: REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT.SITE LOCATION MAP

LEGEND:

SITE LOCATION

MARCH 23, 2017

A.J. INFANTE

14-133-0759

51-27 QUEENS BOULEVARDWOODSIDE, NY 11377

45-09 GREENPOINT AVENUELONG ISLAND CITY, NY 11104

TEL: (718) 784 - 7490FAX: (718) 784 - 4085

LEGEND:

SITE

- SITE BOUNDARY

Date:

Drawn by:

Checked by:

Drawing Scale:

Project No.:


Figure:NOT TO SCALE 2Title: REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT.

SITE BOUNDARY MAP

MARCH 23, 2017

A.J. INFANTE

14-133-0759


SITE


TEL: (718) 784 - 7490FAX: (718) 784 - 4085

LEGEND: Date:

Drawn by:

Checked by:

Drawing Scale:

Project No.:


Figure:NOT TO SCALE 3ATitle: REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT.

DEVELOPMENT PLAN

MARCH 23, 2017

A.J. INFANTE

14-133-0759


FRONT ELEVATION


TEL: (718) 784 - 7490FAX: (718) 784 - 4085

LEGEND: Date:

Drawn by:

Checked by:

Drawing Scale:

Project No.:


Figure:NOT TO SCALE 3BTitle: REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT.

DEVELOPMENT PLAN

MARCH 23, 2017

A.J. INFANTE

14-133-0759


CELLAR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN

Date:

Drawn by:

Checked by:

Drawing Scale:

Project No.:



MAP OF END-POINT SAMPLING LOCATIONS

MARCH 23, 2017

A.J. INFANTE

14-133-0759


- PROJECT SITE BOUNDARY

- END POINT SAMPLE LOCATION

- 2014 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION SAMPLE LOCATION

-X

Block 1320Lot 47

QU

EEN

S B

OU

LEV

AR

D

52ND STREET

EP-4 (11' BGS)

EP-3 (11' BGS)

EP-2 (11' BGS)

EP-1 (2' BGS)


TEL: (718) 784 - 7490FAX: (718) 784 - 4085

LEGEND:

SB-1 (2' BGS)

-X


TEL: (718) 784 - 7490FAX: (718) 784 - 4085

LEGEND: Date:

Drawn by:

Checked by:

Drawing Scale:

Project No.:



MAP OF LOCATION AND APPROXIMATEDEPTH OF EXCAVATIONS

MARCH 23, 2017

A.J. INFANTE

14-133-0759


- PROPERTY BOUNDARY

- EXCAVATION DEPTH: 2 FEET BGS



QU

EEN

S B

OU

LEV

AR

D

52ND STREET

Block 1320Lot 47

Date:

Drawn by:

Checked by:

Drawing Scale:

Project No.:



MAP OF SOIL SOURCE AREA ANDBACKFILL PLACEMENT LOCATIONS

MARCH 23, 2017

A.J. INFANTE

14-133-0759


- PROPERTY BOUNDARY

- AREA OF BACKFILL

- APPROXIMATE SOURCE AREA FORBACKFILL/GRID 1, 4'-11'

QU

EEN

S B

OU

LEV

AR

D

52ND STREET

Block 1320Lot 47


TEL: (718) 784 - 7490FAX: (718) 784 - 4085

LEGEND:

0-11'

0-2'

Date:

Drawn by:

Checked by:

Drawing Scale:

Project No.:


Figure:

NOT TO SCALE

7Title: REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT.

MAP OF LOCATION OF COMPOSITECOVER SYSTEM AND DESIGN DETAIL

MARCH 23, 2017

A.J. INFANTE

14-133-0759


X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

WELDED WIRE FABRIC (W.W.F.)

20-MIL VAPOR BARRIER

4" CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE

4"

COMPACTED SUBGRADE

DETAIL OF COMPOSITE COVERFOR BUILDING SLAB

- PROPERTY BOUNDARY

- LOCATION OF COMPOSITE COVER SYSTEM

QUEENS BOULEVARD

52N

D

STR

EET

Block 1320Lot 47


TEL: (718) 784 - 7490FAX: (718) 784 - 4085

LEGEND:

6" CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE

6"

CLEAN COMPACTED SOIL

DETAIL OF COMPOSITE COVERFOR OPEN AREAS

2'-0"

Date:

Drawn by:

Checked by:

Drawing Scale:

Project No.:


Figure:

NOT TO SCALE


MAP OF LOCATION OF VAPOR BARRIERSYSTEM AND DESIGN DETAIL

MARCH 23, 2017

A.J. INFANTE

14-133-0759


- PROJECT SITE BOUNDARY

- VAPOR BARRIER SYSTEM LOCATION

CROSS SECTIONPLAN VIEW

QUEENS BOULEVARD

52N

D

STR

EET

20-MIL VAPOR BARRIER

COMPACTED SOIL

T/SLAB CELLAR

T/SLAB 1ST FLOORSIDE WALK

CONCRETE FDN WALL

Block 1320Lot 47


TEL: (718) 784 - 7490FAX: (718) 784 - 4085

LEGEND:

Date:

Drawn by:

Checked by:

Drawing Scale:

Project No.:


Figure:

NOT TO SCALE


MAP OF LOCATION OF SSDS SYSTEM

MARCH 23, 2017

A.J. INFANTE

14-133-0759



TEL: (718) 784 - 7490FAX: (718) 784 - 4085

LEGEND:

- AREA FILLED WITH 34" BLUESTONE

- 4" DIA SCH.40 PVC PERFORATED PIPE

- 4" DIA SCH.40 PVC STAND PIPE

See Figure 10, Detail 2

Date:

Drawn by:

Checked by:

Drawing Scale:

Project No.:


Figure:

NOT TO SCALE


AS-BUILT DESIGN DETAIL FORSSDS SYSTEM

MARCH 23, 2017

A.J. INFANTE

14-133-0759


AAB

B

CB

3'-0"

5'-6"

SSDS DETAIL FOR SUCTION PIT (PLAN VIEW)NTS

CONCRETE BLOCK16" X 8" X 8"

Fig.102

SSDS DETAIL FOR SUCTION PIT (SECTION A)NTSFig.10

3

TYPICAL SSDS DETAIL FOR SUCTION PIT (SECTION B)NTSFig.10

4

12" MIN

4"

4" MIN

NEW CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB

VAPORBLOCK PLUS 20-MIL VAPOR BARRIER

4" DIA SCH.40 PVC PERFORATED PIPE

EXCAVATE TRENCH TO A DEPTH OF 12" MIN

RISER SECTIONNTSFig.10

1


TEL: (718) 784 - 7490FAX: (718) 784 - 4085

LEGEND:

PRECAST STEEL DIAMOND PLATE


RAIN CAP

RADONAWAY RP265 BLOWER

DWYER MAGNEHELIC GAUGE SERIES 2005AND RADONAWAY CHECKPOINT ALARM SYSTEMALARM TO BE FED WITH INDEPENDENT CIRCUITFROM ELECTRIC PANEL

TO SSDS SUCTION PIT


4" DIA SCH.40 PVC RISER

ELEVATOR BULKHEAD

BULKHEAD ROOF

MAIN ROOF

CELLAR

1ST FLOOR

5'-6"

CB

CB

CB CB

CB

34" BLUESTONE, NO FINES

5'-6" x 3' PRECAST STEEL DIAMOND PLATE

CONCRETE SLAB16"x8"x8" CONCRETE BLOCK

34" BLUESTONE, NO FINES

TO SSDS RISER

TABLES

Table 1

End Point Soil Sampling Results

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Soil Samples

51‐27 Queens Boulevard, Queens, New York

Sample IDLaboratory IDSampling Depth (ft)Sampling DateSampling Matrix

Dilution Factor

Units of Measure mg/kg mg/kg1,1,1,2‐Tetrachloroethane 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NC1,1,1‐Trichloroethane 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 100 1001,1,2,2‐Tetrachloroethane 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NC1,1,2‐Trichloro‐1,2,2‐trifluoroethane (Freon 113) 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NC1,1,2‐Trichloroethane 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NC1,1‐Dichloroethane 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 26 261,1‐Dichloroethylene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 100 1001,2,3‐Trichlorobenzene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NC1,2,3‐Trichloropropane 0.0022 ND NT NT 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NC1,2,4‐Trichlorobenzene 0.0022 ND NT NT 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NC1,2,4‐Trimethylbenzene 0.0030 J 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 52 521,2‐Dibromo‐3‐chloropropane 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NC1,2‐Dibromoethane 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NC1,2‐Dichlorobenzene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 100 1001,2‐Dichloroethane 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 3.1 3.11,2‐Dichloropropane 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NC1,3,5‐Trimethylbenzene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 52 521,3‐Dichlorobenzene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 49 491,4‐Dichlorobenzene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 13 131,4‐Dioxane 0.045 ND 0.048 ND 0.046 ND 0.041 ND 0.043 ND 13 132‐Butanone 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 100 1002‐Hexanone 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NC4‐Methyl‐2‐pentanone 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCAcetone 0.0045 ND 0.033 0.0089 J 0.0041 ND 0.0043 ND 100 100Acrolein 0.0045 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0046 ND 0.0041 ND 0.0043 ND NC NCAcrylonitrile 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCBenzene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 4.8 4.8Bromochloromethane 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCBromodichloromethane 0.0022 ND NT NT 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCBromoform 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCBromomethane 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCCarbon disulfide 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCCarbon tetrachloride 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 2.4 2.4Chlorobenzene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 100 100Chloroethane 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCChloroform 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 49 49Chloromethane 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCcis‐1,2‐Dichloroethylene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 100 100cis‐1,3‐Dichloropropylene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCCyclohexane 0.0022 ND NT NT 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCDibromochloromethane 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCDibromomethane 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCDichlorodifluoromethane 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCEthyl Benzene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 41 41Hexachlorobutadiene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCIsopropylbenzene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCMethyl acetate 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCMethyl tert‐butyl ether (MTBE) 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 100 100Methylcyclohexane 0.0022 ND NT NT 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCMethylene chloride 0.0045 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0046 ND 0.0041 ND 0.0043 ND 100 100n‐Butylbenzene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 100 100n‐Propylbenzene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 100 100o‐Xylene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCp‐ & m‐ Xylenes 0.0045 ND 0.0048 ND 0.0046 ND 0.0041 ND 0.0043 ND NC NCp‐Isopropyltoluene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCsec‐Butylbenzene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 100 100Styrene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCtert‐Butyl alcohol (TBA) 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCtert‐Butylbenzene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 100 100Tetrachloroethylene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 19 19Toluene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 100 100trans‐1,2‐Dichloroethylene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 100 100trans‐1,3‐Dichloropropylene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCTrichloroethylene 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 21 21Trichlorofluoromethane 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND NC NCVinyl Chloride 0.0022 ND 0.0024 ND 0.0023 ND 0.0021 ND 0.0021 ND 0.9 0.9Xylenes, Total 0.0067 ND 0.0072 ND 0.0068 ND 0.0062 ND 0.0064 ND 100 100

NOTES:

mg/kg = miligrams per kilogramJ = analyte detected at or above the MDL (method detection limit) but below the RL (Reporting Limit) ‐ data is estimated

D = result is from an analysis that required a dilution

ND = analyte not detected at or above the level indicated

NC = this indicates that no regulatory limit has been established for this analyte

NT =analyte not tested by laboratory

Track 4 Site‐Specific

SCOs

Bolded and Shaded values exceed NYSDEC Part 375 Track 2 Restricted Residential Use Soil Cleanup ObjecBolded and Shaded values exceed Track 4 Site‐Specific Soil Cleanup Objectives (SCOs)

EP‐115F0710‐01

6/18/2015Soil

2

mg/Kg

SB‐114F0888‐02

26/20/2014

Soil

5

mg/Kg

NYSDEC Part 375 Track

2 Restricted Residential

Use SCOs

1

mg/kg

1

mg/Kg

1

mgKg

EP‐415F0710‐04

6/18/2015Soil

1

111111

EP‐215F0710‐02

6/18/2015Soil

EP‐315F0710‐03

6/18/2015Soil

Table 1 (cont'd)


Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs) in Soil Samples


Sample ID

Laboratory ID

Sampling Depth (ft)

Sampling Date

Sampling Matrix

Dilution Factor

Units of Measure mg/kg mg/kg

1,1'‐Biphenyl 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

1,2,4,5‐Tetrachlorobenzene 0.089 ND NT NT 0.089 ND 0.088 ND 0.090 ND NC NC

1,2,4‐Trichlorobenzene 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

1,2‐Dichlorobenzene 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND 100 100

1,2‐Diphenylhydrazine (as Azobenzene) 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC



2,3,4,6‐Tetrachlorophenol 0.089 ND NT NT 0.089 ND 0.088 ND 0.090 ND NC NC

2,4,5‐Trichlorophenol 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

2,4,6‐Trichlorophenol 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

2,4‐Dichlorophenol 0.045 ND 0.092 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

2,4‐Dimethylphenol 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

2,4‐Dinitrophenol 0.089 ND 0.18 ND 0.089 ND 0.088 ND 0.090 ND NC NC

2,4‐Dinitrotoluene 0.045 ND 0.092 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

2,6‐Dinitrotoluene 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

2‐Chloronaphthalene 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

2‐Chlorophenol 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

2‐Methylnaphthalene 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

2‐Methylphenol 0.045 ND 0.092 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND 100 100

2‐Nitroaniline 0.089 ND 0.046 ND 0.089 ND 0.088 ND 0.090 ND NC NC

2‐Nitrophenol 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

3‐ & 4‐Methylphenols 0.045 ND 0.092 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

3,3'‐Dichlorobenzidine 0.045 ND 0.18 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC


4,6‐Dinitro‐2‐methylphenol 0.089 ND 0.092 ND 0.089 ND 0.088 ND 0.090 ND NC NC

4‐Bromophenyl phenyl ether 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

4‐Chloro‐3‐methylphenol 0.045 ND NT NT 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

4‐Chloroaniline 0.045 ND NT NT 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

4‐Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC


4‐Nitrophenol 0.089 ND 0.092 ND 0.089 ND 0.088 ND 0.090 ND NC NC

Acenaphthene 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND 100 100

Acenaphthylene 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND 100 100

Acetophenone 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

Aniline 0.18 ND NT NT 0.18 ND 0.18 ND 0.18 ND NC NC

Anthracene 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND 100 100

Atrazine 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

Benzaldehyde 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

Benzidine 0.18 ND 0.18 ND 0.18 ND 0.18 ND 0.18 ND NC NC

Benzo(a)anthracene 0.045 ND 0.060 J 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND 1 1

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND 1 1

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND 1 1

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.045 ND 0.092 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND 100 100

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND 3.9 3.9

Benzoic acid 0.045 ND 0.12 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

Benzyl alcohol 0.045 ND NT NT 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

Benzyl butyl phthalate 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

Bis(2‐chloroethoxy)methane 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

Bis(2‐chloroethyl)ether 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

Bis(2‐chloroisopropyl)ether 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

Bis(2‐ethylhexyl)phthalate 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

Caprolactam 0.089 ND 0.046 ND 0.089 ND 0.088 ND 0.090 ND NC NC

Carbazole 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

Chrysene 0.045 ND 0.070 J 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND 3.9 3.9

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND 0.33 0.33

Dibenzofuran 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND 59 59

Diethyl phthalate 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

Dimethyl phthalate 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

Di‐n‐butyl phthalate 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

Di‐n‐octyl phthalate 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

Fluoranthene 0.045 ND 0.093 J 0.055 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND 100 100

Fluorene 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND 100 100

Hexachlorobenzene 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND 1.2 1.2

Hexachlorobutadiene 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 0.045 ND 0.092 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

Hexachloroethane 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

Indeno(1,2,3‐cd)pyrene 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND 0.5 0.5

Isophorone 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

Naphthalene 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND 100 100

Nitrobenzene 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

N‐Nitrosodimethylamine 0.045 ND 0.092 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

N‐nitroso‐di‐n‐propylamine 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

N‐Nitrosodiphenylamine 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND NC NC

Pentachlorophenol 0.045 ND 0.092 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND 6.7 6.7

Phenanthrene 0.045 ND 0.052 J 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND 100 100

Phenol 0.045 ND 0.046 ND 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND 100 100

Pyrene 0.045 ND 0.11 J 0.045 ND 0.044 ND 0.045 ND 100 100

Total SVOCs ND 0.38 ND ND ND N/A 250

NOTES:

*Track 4 Site Specific SCO established for Total SVOCs in the Remedial Action Work Plan for the Site

Bolded and Shaded values exceed NYSDEC Part 375 Track 2 Restricted Residential Use Soil Cleanup Objectives (SCOs)

Bolded and Shaded values exceed Track 4 Site‐Specific Soil Cleanup Objectives (SCOs)

mg/kg = miligrams per kilogram

J = analyte detected at or above the MDL (method detection limit) but below the RL (Reporting Limit) ‐ data is estimated





NYSDEC Part 375

Track 2 Restricted

Residential Use

SCOs

Track 4 Site‐Specific SCOs

mg/Kg mg/kg

2 11 11 11

6/18/2015 6/18/2015 6/18/2015 6/18/2015

Soil Soil

2 2

EP‐1 EP‐2 EP‐3

Soil Soil

2

6/20/2014

Soil

5

mg/Kg

2 2

mg/Kg mgKg

EP‐4

15F0710‐01 15F0710‐02 15F0710‐03 15F0710‐04

SB‐1

14F0888‐02

Table 1 (cont'd)


Pesticides and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in Soil Samples


Sample ID

Laboratory ID

Sampling Depth (ft)

Sampling Date

Sampling Matrix

Dilution Factor


4,4'‐DDD 0.0026 ND 0.0018 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0027 ND 13 13

4,4'‐DDE 0.0026 ND 0.0018 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0027 ND 8.9 8.9

4,4'‐DDT 0.012 D 0.0018 ND 0.0057 D 0.011 D 0.0027 ND 7.9 7.9

Aldrin 0.0026 ND 0.0018 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0027 ND 0.097 0.097

alpha‐BHC 0.0026 ND 0.0018 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0027 ND 0.48 0.48

alpha‐Chlordane 0.0026 ND NT NT 0.0026 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0027 ND 4.2 4.2

beta‐BHC 0.0026 ND 0.0018 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0027 ND 0.36 0.36

Chlordane, total 0.11 ND 0.0072 ND 0.11 ND 0.11 ND 0.11 ND NC NC

delta‐BHC 0.0026 ND 0.0018 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0027 ND 100 100

Dieldrin 0.0026 ND 0.0018 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0027 ND 0.2 0.2

Endosulfan I 0.0026 ND 0.0018 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0027 ND 24 24

Endosulfan II 0.0026 ND 0.0018 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0027 ND 24 24

Endosulfan sulfate 0.0026 ND 0.0018 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0027 ND 24 24

Endrin 0.0026 ND 0.0018 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0027 ND 11 11

Endrin aldehyde 0.0026 ND 0.0018 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0027 ND NC NC

Endrin ketone 0.0026 ND 0.0018 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0027 ND NC NC

gamma‐BHC (Lindane) 0.0026 ND 0.0018 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0027 ND 1.3 1.3

gamma‐Chlordane 0.0026 ND NT NT 0.0026 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0027 ND NC NC

Heptachlor 0.0026 ND 0.0018 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0027 ND 2.1 2.1

Heptachlor epoxide 0.0026 ND 0.0018 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0026 ND 0.0027 ND NC NC

Methoxychlor 0.013 ND 0.0090 ND 0.013 ND 0.013 ND 0.013 ND NC NC

Toxaphene 0.13 ND 0.091 ND 0.13 ND 0.13 ND 0.14 ND NC NC

Dilution Factor

Aroclor 1016 0.027 ND 0.019 ND 0.027 ND 0.026 ND 0.027 ND NC NC







Total PCBs 0.027 ND 0.019 ND 0.027 ND 0.026 ND 0.027 ND 1 1

NOTES:







Bolded and Shaded values exceed Track 4 Site‐Specific Soil Cleanup Objectives (S

NYSDEC Part 375

Track 2 Restricted

Residential Use SCOs


SCOs

Pesticides

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)

15F0710‐02 15F0710‐03 15F0710‐04

2 11 11 11

6/18/2015

Soil Soil Soil Soil

1

EP‐1

6/18/2015

SB‐1

14F0888‐02

2

6/20/2014

Soil

5

mg/Kg

1

6/18/2015 6/18/2015

EP‐2 EP‐3 EP‐4

15F0710‐01

Bolded and Shaded values exceed NYSDEC Part 375 Track 2 Restricted Residenti

5 5 5 5

mg/Kg mgKg mg/Kg mg/kg

111

Table 1 (cont'd)


TAL Metals in Soil Samples


Sample ID

Laboratory ID

Sampling Depth (ft)

Sampling Date

Sampling Matrix

Dilution Factor


Aluminum 4,730 5,400 4,140 5,760 4,850 NC NCAntimony 0.53 ND 0.55 ND 0.53 ND 0.53 ND 0.54 ND NC NCArsenic 1.07 ND 2.35 1.07 ND 1.06 ND 1.08 ND 16 16Barium 33.80 55.10 31.50 46.10 47.30 400 400Beryllium 0.11 ND 0.11 ND 0.11 ND 0.11 ND 0.11 ND 72 72Cadmium 0.32 ND 0.33 ND 0.32 ND 0.32 ND 0.32 ND 4.3 4.3Calcium 1,020 874 1,190 1,870 1,390 NC NCChromium 11.20 10.90 12.30 17.10 14.60 NC NCCobalt 4.35 4.25 4.40 6.01 6.16 NC NCCopper 12.20 30.20 10.50 17.70 19.70 270 270

Iron 9,350 11,400 9,940 12,000 13,000 NC NC

Lead 11 40.20 4.52 15.10 6.85 400 600Magnesium 1,310 2,130 1,550 2,090 1,700 NC NCManganese 218 260 239 265 359 2000 2000Nickel 8.28 9.82 7.98 10.20 10.90 310 310Potassium 662 686 801 1,120 958 NC NCSelenium 2.31 2.31 2.33 3.83 3.08 180 180Silver 0.53 ND 0.55 0.53 ND 0.53 ND 0.54 ND 180 180Sodium 157 104 191 195 175 NC NCThallium 1.07 ND 1.09 ND 1.07 ND 1.06 ND 1.08 ND NC NCVanadium 16.60 15.30 17.60 23.60 21.30 NC NCZinc 21.20 358 ND 19.80 34.60 26 10000 10000Mercury 0.032 ND 0.21 0.032 ND 0.032 ND 0.032 ND 0.81 0.81Chromium, Hexavalent 0.53 ND 0.55 ND 0.53 ND 0.53 ND 0.54 ND 110 110

Chromium, Trivalent 11.20 9.98 12.30 17.10 14.60 180 180

NOTES:

*Track 4 Site Specific SCO established for Lead in the Remedial Action Work Plan for the Site








SCOs

Bolded and Shaded values exceed NYSDEC Part 375 Track 2 Restricted Residential

Bolded and Shaded values exceed Track 4 Site‐Specific Soil Cleanup Objectives (SC

EP‐1 EP‐2 EP‐3 EP‐4

15F0710‐01 15F0710‐02 15F0710‐03 15F0710‐04

Soil Soil Soil Soil

1 1 1

mg/Kg mgKg mg/Kg mg/kg

11

2 11 11 11

6/18/2015 6/18/2015 6/18/2015 6/18/2015

NYSDEC Part 375

Track 2 Restricted

Residential Use SCOs

mg/Kg

SB‐1

14F0888‐02

2

6/20/2014

Soil

Table 2: Disposal Quantities and Disposal Facilities Soil Disposal Trucking Log

51-27 Queens Boulevard

Date Manifest # Trucking CompanyLicense

Plate QuantityTons/Yard Receiving Facility Material Type On-Site Grid

5/22/2015 1135074 RLS Trucking AP207R 34.36 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, & 3

5/22/2015 1135075 Shirley Express AR770E 34.21 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, & 3

5/22/2015 1135076 Shirley Express AP494Y 32.78 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, & 3

5/22/2015 1135078 Shirley Express AS125L 32.71 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, & 3

5/22/2015 1135077 RLS Trucking AP993P 34.24 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, & 3

5/22/2015 1135079 Shirley Express AS352F 34.5 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, & 3

5/22/2015 1135081 Shirley Express AR770E 31.66 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, & 3

5/22/2015 1135082 Shirley Express AP494Y 31.64 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, & 3

5/22/2015 1135080 RLS Trucking AP207R 34.17 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, & 3


5/22/2015 1135085 Shirley Express AS352F 33.96 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, & 3

5/22/2015 1135084 RLS Trucking AP993P 29.73 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, & 3

6/17/2015 939281 JDC Trucking AS709D 34.92 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 3 & 4

6/17/2015 939282 JDC Trucking AS813M 32.5 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 3 & 4

6/18/2015 1104994 Shirley Express AP161M 35.09 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, 3, & 4

6/18/2015 1104995 Shirley Express #12 34.42 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, 3, & 4

6/18/2015 1105013 RLS Trucking AP207R 35.87 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, 3, & 4

6/18/2015 1105012 Shirley Express AP752U 35 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, 3, & 4

6/18/2015 1105011 Shirley Express AS836B 32.56 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, 3, & 4




6/18/2015 1105010 Shirley Express AR770E 31.88 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, 3, & 4

6/18/2015 1104997 JLD AS109D 34.99 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, 3, & 4


6/18/2015 1104998 RLS Trucking AS252C 35.53 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, 3, & 4


6/18/2015 1105008 Shirley Express #12 29.84 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, 3, & 4



6/18/2015 1105006 Shirley Express AR770E 28.86 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, 3, & 4


6/22/2015 1105001 Shirley Express AP752U 29.79 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, & 4

6/22/2015 1105002 RLS Trucking AS193R 35.6 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, & 4

6/22/2015 1105003 Shirley Express AR922F 33.89 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, & 4

6/22/2015 1105004 Shirley Express AP645E 33.27 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, & 4


6/22/2015 1105101 RLS Trucking AS252C 31.45 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, & 4


6/22/2015 1105104 RLS Trucking AS193R 32.24 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, & 4

6/22/2015 1105103 Shirley Express AP752U 31.98 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, & 4



6/22/2015 1105102 Shirley Express AR922F 33.53 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, & 4


6/22/2015 1105088 Shirley Express AP645E 32.1 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, & 4


6/22/2015 1105100 RJT AP297P 32.02 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, & 4

6/22/2015 1105098 Hales Trucking #2 33.32 tons Clean Earth of Carteret Non-Hazardous Soil 1, 2, & 4

1494.45

Table 3

Waste Characterization Sampling Summary


Sample IDSample DepthLaboratory IDSampling DateSample Matrix

Compound Result Q Result Q Result Q Result Q Result Q Result Q Result Q Result Q Result Q

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons‐GRO (C5‐C10) mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kgDilution Factor 100 100 100 100 100

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons‐GRO 91.50 ND 145 ND 105 ND 123 ND 100 ND

Volatile Organics, NJDEP/TCL/Part 375 List mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kgDilution Factor 1 1 1 1 11,1,1,2‐Tetrachloroethane 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 ND1,1,1‐Trichloroethane 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 ND1,1,2,2‐Tetrachloroethane 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 ND1,1,2‐Trichloro‐1,2,2‐trifluoroethane (Freon 113) 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 ND1,1,2‐Trichloroethane 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 ND1,1‐Dichloroethane 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 ND1,1‐Dichloroethylene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 ND1,2,3‐Trichlorobenzene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 ND1,2,3‐Trichloropropane 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 ND1,2,4‐Trichlorobenzene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 ND1,2,4‐Trimethylbenzene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 ND1,2‐Dibromo‐3‐chloropropane 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 ND1,2‐Dibromoethane 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 ND1,2‐Dichlorobenzene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 ND1,2‐Dichloroethane 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 ND1,2‐Dichloropropane 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 ND1,3,5‐Trimethylbenzene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 ND1,3‐Dichlorobenzene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 ND1,4‐Dichlorobenzene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 ND1,4‐Dioxane 0.047 ND 0.055 ND 0.054 ND 0.049 ND 0.045 ND2‐Butanone 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 ND2‐Hexanone 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 ND4‐Methyl‐2‐pentanone 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDAcetone 0.0047 ND 0.027 0.078 0.0049 ND 0.0045 NDAcrolein 0.0047 ND 0.0055 ND 0.0054 ND 0.0049 ND 0.0045 NDAcrylonitrile 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDBenzene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDBromochloromethane 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDBromodichloromethane 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDBromoform 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDBromomethane 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDCarbon disulfide 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDCarbon tetrachloride 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDChlorobenzene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDChloroethane 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDChloroform 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDChloromethane 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDcis‐1,2‐Dichloroethylene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDcis‐1,3‐Dichloropropylene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDCyclohexane 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDDibromochloromethane 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDDibromomethane 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDDichlorodifluoromethane 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDEthyl Benzene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDHexachlorobutadiene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDIsopropylbenzene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDMethyl acetate 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDMethyl tert‐butyl ether (MTBE) 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDMethylcyclohexane 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDMethylene chloride 0.0047 ND 0.0096 J 0.0054 ND 0.0077 J 0.0066 Jn‐Butylbenzene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDn‐Propylbenzene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDo‐Xylene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDp‐ & m‐ Xylenes 0.0047 ND 0.0055 ND 0.0054 ND 0.0049 ND 0.0045 NDp‐Isopropyltoluene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDsec‐Butylbenzene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDStyrene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDtert‐Butyl alcohol (TBA) 0.0047 ND 0.0055 ND 0.0054 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDtert‐Butylbenzene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDTetrachloroethylene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDToluene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDtrans‐1,2‐Dichloroethylene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDtrans‐1,3‐Dichloropropylene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDTrichloroethylene 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDTrichlorofluoromethane 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDVinyl Chloride 0.0024 ND 0.0028 ND 0.0027 ND 0.0025 ND 0.0023 NDXylenes, Total 0.0071 D 0.0083 ND 0.0081 ND 0.0074 ND 0.0068 ND

Volatile Organics, Tentatively Identified Cmpds. mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kgDilution Factor 1 1 1 1Tentatively Identified Compounds 0 ND 0 ND 0 ND NTUnknonw aliphatic isomer NT NT NT 0.0048 J

Semi‐Volatiles, NJDEP/TCL/Part 375 List mg/kg mg/kgDilution Factor 2 11,1'‐Biphenyl 0.046 ND 0.023 ND1,2,4,5‐Tetrachlorobenzene 0.092 ND 0.045 ND1,2,4‐Trichlorobenzene 0.046 ND 0.023 ND1,2‐Dichlorobenzene 0.046 ND 0.023 ND1,2‐Diphenylhydrazine (as Azobenzene) 0.046 ND 0.023 ND1,3‐Dichlorobenzene 0.046 ND 0.023 ND1,4‐Dichlorobenzene 0.046 ND 0.023 ND2,3,4,6‐Tetrachlorophenol 0.092 ND 0.045 ND2,4,5‐Trichlorophenol 0.046 ND 0.023 ND2,4,6‐Trichlorophenol 0.046 ND 0.023 ND2,4‐Dichlorophenol 0.046 ND 0.023 ND2,4‐Dimethylphenol 0.046 ND 0.023 ND2,4‐Dinitrophenol 0.092 ND 0.045 ND2,4‐Dinitrotoluene 0.046 ND 0.023 ND2,6‐Dinitrotoluene 0.046 ND 0.023 ND2‐Chloronaphthalene 0.046 ND 0.023 ND2‐Chlorophenol 0.046 ND 0.023 ND2‐Methylnaphthalene 0.046 ND 0.023 ND2‐Methylphenol 0.046 ND 0.023 ND2‐Nitroaniline 0.092 ND 0.045 ND2‐Nitrophenol 0.046 ND 0.023 ND3‐ & 4‐Methylphenols 0.046 ND 0.023 ND3,3'‐Dichlorobenzidine 0.046 ND 0.023 ND3‐Nitroaniline 0.092 ND 0.045 ND4,6‐Dinitro‐2‐methylphenol 0.092 ND 0.045 ND4‐Bromophenyl phenyl ether 0.046 ND 0.023 ND4‐Chloro‐3‐methylphenol 0.046 ND 0.023 ND4‐Chloroaniline 0.046 ND 0.023 ND4‐Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 0.046 ND 0.023 ND

NTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNT

NTNT

NT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NT

NTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNT

NT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNT

NTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NT


NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNT

NTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNT

NTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNT

NT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNT


NTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNT

NTNT

NT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

C‐1

15C0447‐013/16/2015

Soil

0'‐3' 0'‐3'C‐2

15C0447‐023/16/2015

Soil

C‐3

15C0447‐033/16/2015

Soil

0'‐3'

NTNTNTNTNT

G‐21

15C0447‐083/16/2015

Soil

G‐26

15C0447‐093/16/2015

Soil

7'‐11'3'‐7'C‐4

15C0447‐043/16/2015

Soil

C‐5

15C0447‐053/16/2015

Soil

0'‐3'0'‐3'C‐6

15C0447‐063/16/2015

Soil

C‐7

15C0447‐073/16/2015

Soil

7'‐11'3'‐7'

Table 3



4‐Nitroaniline 0.092 ND 0.045 ND4‐Nitrophenol 0.092 ND 0.045 NDAcenaphthene 0.29 D 0.023 NDAcenaphthylene 0.046 ND 0.023 NDAcetophenone 0.046 ND 0.023 NDAniline 0.18 ND 0.090 NDAnthracene 0.52 D 0.023 NDAtrazine 0.046 ND 0.023 NDBenzaldehyde 0.046 ND 0.023 NDBenzidine 0.18 ND 0.090 NDBenzo(a)anthracene 0.78 D 0.023 NDBenzo(a)pyrene 0.41 D 0.023 NDBenzo(b)fluoranthene 0.35 D 0.023 NDBenzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.15 D 0.023 NDBenzo(k)fluoranthene 0.39 D 0.023 NDBenzoic acid 0.046 ND 0.023 NDBenzyl alcohol 0.046 ND 0.023 NDBenzyl butyl phthalate 0.046 ND 0.023 NDBis(2‐chloroethoxy)methane 0.046 ND 0.023 NDBis(2‐chloroethyl)ether 0.046 ND 0.023 NDBis(2‐chloroisopropyl)ether 0.046 ND 0.023 NDBis(2‐ethylhexyl)phthalate 0.046 ND 0.023 NDCaprolactam 0.092 ND 0.045 NDCarbazole 0.11 D 0.023 NDChrysene 0.76 D 0.023 NDDibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.077 JD 0.023 NDDibenzofuran 0.046 ND 0.023 NDDiethyl phthalate 0.046 ND 0.023 NDDimethyl phthalate 0.046 ND 0.023 NDDi‐n‐butyl phthalate 0.046 ND 0.023 NDDi‐n‐octyl phthalate 0.046 ND 0.023 NDFluoranthene 1.77 D 0.046Fluorene 0.28 D 0.023 NDHexachlorobenzene 0.046 ND 0.023 NDHexachlorobutadiene 0.046 ND 0.023 NDHexachlorocyclopentadiene 0.046 ND 0.023 NDHexachloroethane 0.046 ND 0.023 NDIndeno(1,2,3‐cd)pyrene 0.16 D 0.023 NDIsophorone 0.046 ND 0.023 NDNaphthalene 0.046 ND 0.023 NDNitrobenzene 0.046 ND 0.023 NDN‐Nitrosodimethylamine 0.046 ND 0.023 NDN‐nitroso‐di‐n‐propylamine 0.046 ND 0.023 NDN‐Nitrosodiphenylamine 0.046 ND 0.023 NDPentachlorophenol 0.046 ND 0.023 NDPhenanthrene 2.12 D 0.037 JPhenol 0.046 ND 0.023 NDPyrene 1.38 D 0.032 J

Semi‐Volatiles, PAH Target List mg/kgDilution Factor 202‐Methylnaphthalene 0.46 DAcenaphthene 1.56 DAcenaphthylene 0.21 DAnthracene 2.28 DBenzo(a)anthracene 5.42 DBenzo(a)pyrene 1.22 DBenzo(b)fluoranthene 1.16 DBenzo(g,h,i)perylene 1.23 DBenzo(k)fluoranthene 1.54 DChrysene 10.40 DDibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.46 DFluoranthene 17.70 DFluorene 1.66 DIndeno(1,2,3‐cd)pyrene 0.81 DNaphthalene 0.89 DPhenanthrene 17.40 DPyrene 16.30 D

Semi‐Volatiles, Tentatively Identified Cmpds. mg/kg mg/kgDilution Factor 2 1Tentatively Identified Compounds 0 NDunknow aromatic 1.59 JD

unknow aromatic #2 0.84 JD

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons‐DRO (C10‐C28) mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kgDilution Factor 1 1 1 1 1

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons‐DRO 446 22.50 265 32.50 50.70

Herbicides, NJDEP/TCL/Part 375 List mg/kg mg/kgDilution Factor 1 12,4,5‐T 0.022 ND 0.022 ND2,4,5‐TP (Silvex) 0.022 ND 0.022 ND2,4‐D 0.022 ND 0.022 ND

Pesticides, NJDEP/TCL/Part 375 List mg/kg mg/kgDilution Factor 54,4'‐DDD 0.0018 ND 0.0018 ND4,4'‐DDE 0.0018 ND 0.0046 D4,4'‐DDT 0.0059 D 0.022 DAldrin 0.0018 ND 0.0018 NDalpha‐BHC 0.0018 ND 0.0018 NDalpha‐Chlordane 0.0018 ND 0.0018 NDbeta‐BHC 0.0018 ND 0.0018 NDChlordane, total 0.0073 ND 0.0071 NDdelta‐BHC 0.0018 ND 0.0018 NDDieldrin 0.0018 ND 0.0018 NDEndosulfan I 0.0018 ND 0.0018 NDEndosulfan II 0.0018 ND 0.0018 NDEndosulfan sulfate 0.0018 ND 0.0018 NDEndrin 0.0018 ND 0.0018 NDEndrin aldehyde 0.0018 ND 0.0018 NDEndrin ketone 0.0018 ND 0.0018 NDgamma‐BHC (Lindane) 0.0018 ND 0.0018 NDgamma‐Chlordane 0.0018 ND 0.0018 NDHeptachlor 0.0018 ND 0.0018 NDHeptachlor epoxide 0.0018 ND 0.0018 NDMethoxychlor 0.0091 ND 0.0089 NDToxaphene 0.092 ND 0.090 ND

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) mg/kg mg/kg mg/kgDilution Factor 1 1 1Aroclor 1016 0.018 ND 0.018 ND 0.018 NDAroclor 1221 0.018 ND 0.018 ND 0.018 NDAroclor 1232 0.018 ND 0.018 ND 0.018 NDAroclor 1242 0.018 ND 0.018 ND 0.018 NDAroclor 1248 0.018 ND 0.018 ND 0.018 NDAroclor 1254 0.018 ND 0.018 ND 0.018 NDAroclor 1260 0.018 ND 0.018 ND 0.018 ND

NTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNT

NTNTNT

NTNT

NT

NT

NT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNT

NT

NT

NT

NTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNT

NT

NT

NT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNT

NTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NT

NT

NTNT


NTNT

NTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNT

NTNT

NTNTNTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNT

NTNTNT

NT

NTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NT

NTNTNT

NT

NTNTNT

NTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NT

NTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNT

NT

NTNTNTNTNT

NT

NT


NT

NTNT

NT

NT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNT

NTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNT

NTNTNT

NTNTNT

NTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NT

NTNT

NT


NTNT

NTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNTNTNT

NTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNT


NTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NT

NT

NTNTNT

NTNTNTNT

NT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNT

NT

NTNTNT

NTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NT

NTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNT

Table 3



Total PCBs 0.018 ND 0.018 ND 0.018 ND

NJDEP EPH (Cat. 2 Non‐Fractionated) mg/kg mg/kgDilution Factor 1 1

Total EPH NT 55.10 ND 53.80 ND

Metals, RCRA mg/kgDilution Factor 1Arsenic 2.68Barium 68.10Cadmium 0.33 NDChromium 32Lead 80.60Selenium 2.85Silver 0.55 ND

Metals, Target Analyte mg/kg mg/kgDilution Factor 1 1Aluminum 6,020 4,540Antimony 2.70 0.54 NDArsenic 2.63 1.35Barium 49.70 34.90Beryllium 0.11 ND 0.11 NDCadmium 0.33 ND 0.32 NDCalcium 1,100 921Chromium 14.90 10.70Cobalt 5.83 4.60Copper 35.30 17.60Iron 10,700 10,100Lead 59.50 11.40Magnesium 1,700 1,820Manganese 243 231Nickel 12.20 10.80Potassium 704 572Selenium 1.17 1.32Silver 0.55 ND 0.54 NDSodium 167 134Thallium 1.10 ND 1.08 NDVanadium 20.60 16.40Zinc 147 43.80

Metals, TCLP RCRA mg/L mg/L mg/LDilution Factor 1 1 1Arsenic 0.0040 ND 0.0040 ND 0.0040 NDBarium 0.58 0.51 0.39 NTCadmium 0.0080 0.0030 ND 0.0030 ND NTChromium 0.0050 ND 0.0050 ND 0.0050 ND NTLead 0.19 0.070 0.063 NTSelenium 0.010 ND 0.010 ND 0.010 ND NTSilver 0.0050 ND 0.0050 ND 0.0050 ND NT

Mercury by 7473 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kgDilution Factor 1 1 1

Mercury 0.090 0.081 0.032 ND

Mercury TCLP by 7473 mg/L mg/L mg/LDilution Factor 1 1 1

Mercury 0.0002 ND 0.0002 ND 0.0002 ND

Chromium, Hexavalent mg/kg mg/kgDilution Factor 1 1

Chromium, Hexavalent 0.55 ND 0.54 ND

Corrosivity pH units pH units pH unitsDilution Factor 1 1 1

pH 7.92 8.68 7.69

Cyanide, Total mg/kg mg/kgDilution Factor 1 1

Cyanide, total 0.55 ND 0.54 ND

Ignitability ‐ ‐ ‐Dilution Factor 1 1 1

Ignitability Non‐Ignit. Non‐Ignit. Non‐Ignit.

Reactivity‐Cyanide mg/kg mg/kg mg/kgDilution Factor 1 1 1

Reactivity ‐ Cyanide 0.25 ND 0.25 ND 0.25 ND

Reactivity‐Sulfide mg/kg mg/kg mg/kgDilution Factor 1 1 1

Reactivity ‐ Sulfide 15 ND 15 ND 15 ND

TCLP Extraction for METALS EPA 1311 N/A N/A N/ADilution Factor 1 1 1

TCLP Extraction Completed Completed Completed

Total Solids % % % % % % % % %Dilution Factor 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1% Solids 90.60 91.20 90.90 91 91.40 90.80 93 92.60 95.40

NOTES:Any Regulatory Exceedences are color coded by Regulation

Q is the Qualifier Column with definitions as follows:D=result is from an analysis that required a dilutionJ=analyte detected at or above the MDL (method detection limit) but below the RL (Reporting Limit) ‐ data is estimatedB=analyte found in the analysis batch blankE=result is estimated and cannot be accurately reported due to levels encountered or interferencesNT=this indicates the analyte was not a target for this sampleNC=this indicates that no regulatory limit has been established for this analyteND=non‐detect

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNT

NTNT

NT

NT

NT

NTNT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NTNTNTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNT

NTNT

NT

NT

NT

NTNTNTNT

NT

NTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNT

NTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NT

NT

NT

NTNTNTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNTNT

NTNT

NT

NTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNT

NTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNT

NTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NT

NTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NTNTNTNT

NT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNTNTNT

NTNTNT

queens, new york remedial action report€¦ · qa/qc quality assurance/quality control ... a new...

Documents