question of the authorities of austria, france, & switzerland:

46
3

Upload: iris-jensen

Post on 03-Jan-2016

25 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland: What are the health costs of traffic-related air pollution ?. UNECE1.ppt. Requires interdisciplinary approaches. Air pollution concentrations Air Hygiene Population exposure distribution GIS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

3

Page 2: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

4

Question of the Authorities of

Austria, France, & Switzerland:

What are the health costs of traffic-related air pollution ?

UNECE1.ppt

Page 3: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

5

Requires interdisciplinary approaches

Air pollution concentrations Air Hygiene

Population exposure distribution GIS

Exposure - Response function Epidemiology

Derivation of attributable cases Epi Risk Assess.

Costing Economy

UNECE.ppt

Page 4: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

6

Uncertainties

– multiple sources of uncertainties

– majority: not statistical uncertainties

– conceptual and data uncertainties

– gaps at interdisciplinary interface

UNECE.ppt

• “At least” approache

• with risk function based 95% CI

Page 5: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

7

Definition of Air Pollution Exposure

– Availability of effect functions

– Availability of exposure data

– no multiple counting (correlated pollutants; same sources)

UNECE.ppt

PM10 „at least“

Page 6: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

8

Selected Attributable Health outcomes

Attributable DeathLong-term effect

Hospital admissions (cardio-resp.) Short-term effect

Chronic bronchitis incidence (adults) Long-term effect

Bronchitis episodes (children) Short-term effect

Restricted activity daysShort-term effectAsthma attacks (children & adults) Short-term effect

UNECE.ppt

Page 7: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

9

Impact Assessment Model

Exposure-response function

PM10

# Death

Attributable death

PM10 reference

7.5 ug/m3

„at least“

Page 8: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

10

Exposure-Response Functionfor Mortality

Weighted average of :

– ACS-Study (Pope et al., 1994)

– Harvard 6-City Study (Dockery et al, 1993)

• 4.3 % (95% CI: 2.6-6.1%) increase per 10 g/m3 PM10

• ~ 360 (200-520) attributable death per 10 g/m3 PM10 and 1 Mio. inhabitants

UNECE.ppt

Page 9: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

UNECE.ppt

Page 10: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

Frequency distribution of total PM10 population exposure

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

0 - 5 5 - 10 10 - 15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 -50 > 50

PM10 concentration (g/m3, annual mean)

Pop

ula

tion

%

Austria France Switzerland

UNECE.ppt

Page 11: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

13

Air Pollution Attributable Death in Austria, France and Switzerland

Attributable Death (adults 30 yrs.)

Total # cases: 40‘600 (24‘600-56'900)

or: ~ 6% (3.6-8.4%) of total deaths

Traffic related: 21’800 (13’300- 30’600)

UNECE.ppt

Page 12: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

14

See: Sommer et al, in OECD Report: Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, New York; 2000

Monetarization of attributable death in the Trinational Study

source: Willingness-To-Pay estimates

value: 900‘000 EUR per statistical fatality

total: 36.5 Mio. EUR

UNECE.ppt

Page 13: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

15

Air pollution related health costs ~ 50‘000 Mio. EUR per year

traffic related: ~ 27‘000 Mio EUR per year

6% 1%0%0%

73%

20%

mortality (long-term) chronic bronchitisrestricted activity days hospital admissionsacute bronchitis asthma attacks

6%

UNECE.ppt

Page 14: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

16

Key Outcome Uncertainties

1) Why cohort study estimates?

2) Attributable death and life time lost

3) Are US-Studies relevant for Europe?

4) Are effects source specific?

5) Are “attributable” death “preventable”

UNECE.ppt

Page 15: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

17

1) Why Cohort study based Attributable Death ?

UNECE.ppt

OR:

Why not time-series based estimates, which are 5-10 times smaller ?

Page 16: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

18

Frailty and Death

Frailty(susceptibility for death)

TimeBirth

Death

Age at death

Page 17: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

19

Frailty and Exposure

Frailty(susceptibiltiy for death)

TimeBirth

Death

Age at deathStart smoking

Page 18: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

20

Contribution of Air Pollution

Frailty(susceptibility for death)

TimeBirth

Death

Age at death

SMOG EPISODE

Cumulative exposure

Chronic Bronchitis

Page 19: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

21

Focus of the Time-series analysis

Frailty(susceptibilty for death)

TimeBirth

Death

Page 20: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

22

Time-series: counting advancement of death

UNECE.ppt

Period of exposure

Time

Time to event

Period of events

Death counts

Pollution

SHORT PERIODSSHORT PERIODSSHORT PERIODSSHORT PERIODSSHORT PERIODS

Page 21: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

23

Time-series

• 1) Time-series captures – short-term effects only– not all short-term effects

• 2) Life time lost not known

> > incomplete impact assessment

• 3) Long-term effect on life shortening not measured

Page 22: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

24

Focus of the Cohort Study

Frailty(susceptibilty for death)

TimeBirth

Page 23: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

25

Cohort studies

• capture cumulative total effects on time to death

> more complet counting of effects

BUT:• no distinction of acute and long-term • only US studies• YoLL not published /QALY not assessed

Page 24: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

26

Long-term and short-term cases(Künzli et al, Am J Epidemiol 2001 in press, adapted from COMEAP, 1998)

All Death

long-term effect

short-term effect

All Air Pollution cases

Mixed effects

Page 25: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

27

2) Number of deathversus years of life lost

Both:

• Life expectancy in a population • annual number of deaths

depend on:

age specific death ratesage specific death rates

Page 26: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

28

BUT:

published are only number of deaths !

Indirect estimates of years of life lost:

• life table approache• assumptions about age structure of

cases

Page 27: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

29

Mortality in the Trinational Study

1) Direct estimates of „attributable death“ ( > age 30; non-violent death)2) Years of life lost: • Indirect estimates, used for costing• assumptions:

– the attributable death are due to cardiopulmonary causes– same age distribution as all cardiopulmonary death– thus: typical age of an „air pollution death“ ~75-80 yrs.

Page 28: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

30

Average reduction in population life expectancy

For a population with a 10 g/m3 higher PM10

Sommer et al. (Trinational Study): ~0.5 yr

other estimates: ~6 mo. to ~2 yrs.

(Brunekreef; Pope; Leksell; Hurley; Miller; Rabl etc.)

Page 29: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

31

3) We transfered the US cohort results to Europa !

UNECE.ppt

• Consistency for other outcomes between US and European countries

• Coherence between different outcomes

Page 30: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

32

Mortality (adjusted Relative Risk) and long-term mean pollution (PM2.5)

Harvard Six-City Cohort Study, Dockery et al, NEJM 1993; 329 (24):1753-9

1.00

1.05

1.10

1.15

1.20

1.25

1.30

0 10 20 30 40

Rel

ativ

e R

isk

mean PM2.5UNECE.ppt

Page 31: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

33

Annual mean PM10 and expiratory capacity (FVC) in the 8 SAPALDIA areas

Ackermann-Liebrich et al, AJRCCM 1997; 155 (1):122-129

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

0 10 20 30 40

PM10 annual mean (g / m3)

FV

C

% d

evia

tio

n f

rom

pre

dic

ted

UNECE.ppt

Page 32: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

34

Other Evidence?

UNECE.ppt

Europe French PAARC suggestive abstractDutch cohort suggestive abstractSAPALDIA ?? Needs other 10 yrs.ECRHS ?? ?

USA: Abbey et al 1999 interaction with sex?Krewski et al 2000 interaction with SES?

Page 33: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

35

4) Are attributable death source specific?

UNECE.ppt

Assumption in tri-national study:

• PM10 effects are independent of PM source• -> one single effect slope

Page 34: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

36

Percent Change (and 95th CI) in Daily Death per 10 g/m3 PM2.5 mass an source specific elements

1979-1988, Harvard Six Cities; Laden et al, Env Health Perspect 2000; 108 (10): 941-947

3.4

1.1

-2.3

1.6

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

low

mean

highPM2.5 mass

Crustal (Si)

Motor (Pb)

Coal (Se)

Page 35: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

37

Percent Change (and 95th CI) in Daily Death per 10 g/m3 PM2.5 mass an source specific elements

1979-1988, Harvard Six Cities; Laden et al, Env Health Perspect 2000; 108 (10): 941-947

3.4

1.1

-2.3

1.6

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

low

mean

highPM2.5 mass

Crustal (Si)

Motor (Pb)

Coal (Se)

Page 36: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

38

Percent Change (and 95th CI) in Daily Death per 10 g/m3 PM2.5 mass an source specific elements

1979-1988, Harvard Six Cities; Laden et al, Env Health Perspect 2000; 108 (10): 941-947

3.4

1.1

-2.3

1.6

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

low

mean

highPM2.5 mass

Crustal (Si)

Motor (Pb)

Coal (Se)

Page 37: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

39

Percent Change (and 95th CI) in Daily Death per 10 g/m3 PM2.5 mass an source specific elements

1979-1988, Harvard Six Cities; Laden et al, Env Health Perspect 2000; 108 (10): 941-947

3.4

1.1

-2.3

1.6

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

low

mean

highPM2.5 mass

Crustal (Si)

Motor (Pb)

Coal (Se)

Page 38: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

40

5) Are „attributable death“ also „preventable death“?

UNECE.ppt

Page 39: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

41

Unknown time domaines

Duration of ‘long-term’ exposure

Relevant time window of exposure

Time between exposure and effect

Time between intervention and benefit?

UNECE.ppt

Page 40: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

42

Time-to-Benefit (death, long-term)(Sommer et al., 1999)

UNECE.ppt

Attributable Costs

Time (yrs)Clean air intervention

10 20

Page 41: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

43

Competing risks

Removal of one long-term health risk factor will modify the importance of the remaining risks

“attributable death” > “preventable death”

UNECE.ppt

Page 42: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

44

TSP decrease and reduction in bronchitis prevalence (Germany, 1993 versus 1995, children, age 5-14 yrs)

30 40 50 60 70annual mean of TSP g/m3

30

40

50

60

70b

ron

chiti

s p

reva

len

ce (

%)

19931995

Year:

Hettstedt

Bitterfeld

Zerbst

(Heinrich et al, AJRCCM 2000; 161:1930-36)COP6DenHaag.ppt

Page 43: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

45

5 10 15 20 25 30 35Jahresmittel PM10(g/m3)

5

7

9

11

13

15

17

19

21

23

25

Montana

Payerne

Langnau

Rheintal

Biel

Lugano

Genf

ZürichBern

Anières

Annual mean PM10 g/m3

Acute bronchitis in children and annual mean PM10

The SCARPOL Study

C. Braun-Fahrländer; AJRCCM 1997UNECE.ppt

Page 44: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

46

Conclusion

• Air pollution accounts for 4-8% of death

• “Attributable death” from cohorts: adequate approache

• BUT: gaps in evidence and uncertainties: • Best effect estimate?• Years of life time lost?• European long-term studies?• Source attribution ?• How many are “preventable death”? When?

UNECE.ppt

Page 45: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

47

Thanks

[email protected]

Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine University Basel

Page 46: Question of the Authorities of Austria, France, & Switzerland:

48

Susceptibility and Time-to-event

Probability of

event

Time

•High susceptibility•Early response

•Low susceptibility•Late response

Exposure