r e 1 modelling (perceived) environmental quality
TRANSCRIPT
Modelling (Perceived) Environmental Quality
Modelling PEQ | Ric van Poll, IAPS 2004
RIVM:
– Dutch National Institute for Public Health and Environment
scientific advisory institute ministries of Health (VWS) and Environment (VROM)
• MGO– centre for Environment-Health Research
Environment-health research: experimental (animal + human) - observational (large scale epidemiological studies)
• ELO– unit for Environmental Health Effects
Main topics: air pollution, traffic noise, residential satisfaction/perceived environmental quality
Modelling PEQ | Ric van Poll, IAPS 2004
VROM: from quantity towards quality, from national to local
•‘National ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY PLAN 4’- Quality of Life- Safe and Healthy- High Quality (‘Nice and Cosy)
•Document on ‘HOUSING’
- accommodate ‘maximal’ freedom of choice, - housing quality and residential quality- sustainability, social (environmental justice),- livability
•Fifth Document on ‘SPATIAL PLANNING’
- complete, accessible, attractive, vital cities - (COMPACT CITY) limit colonising open space through living and work
Modelling PEQ | Ric van Poll, IAPS 2004
Review on Environmental Quality
• Theories on environment and health/well-being• Definitions on EQ, QoL, SD• Models and frameworks on EQ and QoL
– Van Kamp Irene, Kees Leidelmeijer, Gooitske Marsman, Augustinus de Hollander. (2003). Urban Environmental Quality and Human Wellbeing; Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; A literature study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65 (1-2) pp 5-18.
Modelling PEQ | Ric van Poll, IAPS 2004
health
Quality of life
health statusquality of thelocal environment
livability
localenvironment
perceived health
physical environment
housing spatialcharacteristics
environmentalquality
social environment
personal-characteristics
lifestyle social quality
legal en social security(family) relations, employment,activities, consumption a.s.
H e a lth
P h y s ic a l e n v iro n m e n t
N a tu ra l re s o u rc e s ,g o o d s a n d se rv ic e s
C o m m u n ity d e v e lo p m e n t
P e rso n a l d e v e lo p m e n t
S e c u r ity
Q u a li ty o f l ife
M enta l health Physica l hea lth
N uisance
Visua l percep tion and scen ic quality
C lim ate
Po llu tion
N atu ral re sources
G oods
Soc ia l in fras tructu reand serv ices
Po litical participation
Soc ia l netw orks andgroup relations
C om m unity structure
Ind iv idua l deve lopm entthrough recrea tion and le isu re
Ind iv idua l deve lopm ent through lea rning
Persona l econom ic securityand standard o f liv ing
H ousing
A dm in is tra tion o f justicec rim e and sa fety
Objective environmentalattributes(Eo)
Perceptions of environmentalattributes (Es)
Assessm ents of perceivedenvironmental attributes
Person characteristics
Standards of comparison
Eo Es Assessm ents
Eo Es Assessm ents
Eo Es Assessm ents
Communitysatisfaction
Macro-neighborhoodSatisfaction
M icro-neighborhoodSatisfaction
HousingSatisfaction
Other dom ainSatisfaction
Quality o f Life
Experience
CO MM UNITY
MACRONEIG HBORHO OD
MICR ONEIG HBORHO OD
DW ELLING AND LOT
RESIDENTIAL M ILIEUOF AN INDIVID UAL
Objective environm ental attributes
Perception Assessment
Appreciationx
im portanceResidentia l satisfaction
Appreciationx
im portance
Appreciationx
im portance
im portance
Satisfaction
Person and household characteristics
Environmenta l sources of annoyance
Social environment
Physicalenvironment
Dwelling
Evaluation
Evaluation
Evaluation
Evaluation
Length of residence in neighbourhood
Estimated socio-economic level
Number of persons living together
Length of residence in Rome
Buildings’ aesthetic pleasantness
Lack of opportunities
Lack of green areas
Quiet
Presence of social relationships
Inadequacy of cultural activitiesand meeting places
Neighbourhood attachment
Positive relation
Negative relation
Modelling PEQ | Ric van Poll, IAPS 2004
health
Quality of life
health statusquality of thelocal environment
livability
localenvironment
perceived health
physical environment
housing spatialcharacteristics
environmentalquality
social environment
personal-characteristics
lifestyle social quality
legal en social security(family) relations, employment,activities, consumption a.s.
Modelling PEQ | Ric van Poll, IAPS 2004
Question
• What is Environmental Quality:– how can we represent EQ with respect to urban residential
environments
• Practical approach:– EQ:
abstract and complex concept
define in context
– Models and techniques Behavioural Decision Theory
MAUT
Modelling PEQ | Ric van Poll, IAPS 2004
Multi-Attribute Evaluation of EQ
• Inventory (and structuring) of attributes• Assign attribute weights• Evaluate object(s) on attributes• Aggregate• Sensitivity Analysis
Modelling PEQ | Ric van Poll, IAPS 2004
Respondents
• 59 civil servants– 7 national (ministries)– 12 provinces– 40 local (municpalities)
health, housing, environment, social welfare, justice, police etc.
• face-to-face interview– attribute selection and structuring– rank-order (weights)
Modelling PEQ | Ric van Poll, IAPS 20047
Selection and grouping (similarity)
Attribute
1 dwelling
2 neighbours
3 malodour
…
73 safety
1
59
1
2 3
1
1
11
1
2
3
24
1
32
5
4
3
Modelling PEQ | Ric van Poll, IAPS 200411
Similarity matrix
1 2 3 4 .. 72 73
1 1 0 0 1 .. 1 1
2 1 1 0 .. 0 0
3 1 1 .. 1 0
4 1 .. 1 1
.. 1 .. ..
72 1 0
73 1
1 2 3 4 .. 72 73
1
1 2 3 4 .. 72 73
1
1 2 3 4 .. 72 73
1
1 2 3 4 .. 72 73
1 .89 .05 .34 .01 .99
2 .24 .67 .04 .90
3 .20 .00 .05
4 .03 .56
.. ..
72 .07
73
:+1
2
..59
Modelling PEQ | Ric van Poll, IAPS 2004
InventoryBetween-Cluster
Sum
of
Squares
0
10
20
30
Name of Observation or Cluster
OB1
OB45
OB21
OB13
OB30
OB53
OB64
OB2
OB9
OB19
OB51
OB59
OB61
OB18
OB50
OB7
OB54
OB10
OB17
OB56
OB24
OB36
OB27
OB26
OB41
OB3
OB22
OB71
OB32
OB60
OB46
OB25
OB44
OB58
OB4
OB15
OB12
OB34
OB69
OB16
OB11
OB52
OB68
OB20
OB67
OB23
OB70
OB55
OB42
OB57
OB63
OB5
OB6
OB72
OB31
OB38
OB35
OB47
OB8
OB14
OB62
OB43
OB29
OB65
OB28
OB66
OB73
OB48
OB37
OB33
OB40
OB39
OB49
Modelling PEQ | Ric van Poll, IAPS 2004
Clusters
• Reside
• Buildings
• Social Environment
• Social safety
• Traffic
• Accesibility + Facilities
• Environmental Hygiene
• Nuisance
Dwelling size: m2
Density: OAD
Removals: % per neighbourhood
Robberies/thefts: %
Traffic intensity: vehicles/24h
Greenery: m2 within radius of 400m
Sound: dwellings > 50dB(A)
Noise neighbours: # of complaintCriteria:
•Redundancy
•Relevance
•Available data
•Policy goals
Modelling PEQ | Ric van Poll, IAPS 2004
1 .1 D w e llin g
1 .2 H o u s in g su p p ly
1 R e s id e
2 .1 A p p e a ra n c e
2 .2 M a in te n a n c e
2 B u ild in g s
3 .1 C o n ta c ts
3 .2 C o h e s io n
3 S o c ia le n v iro n m e n t
4 S o c ia l S a fe ty
5 .1 A m o u n t tra ff ic
5 .2 S a fe ty
5 T ra ffic
6 .1 A c c e ss ib ility
6 .2 A m e n itie s
6 .3 L e isu re
6 A c c e s ib ility+ F a c ilitie s
7 .1 D is tu rb a n c e
7 .2 N o ise
7 E n v iro n m e n ta lh y g ie n e
8 .1 N o ise
8 .2 D e b ris
8 N u isa n c e
(P )E Q
Model for (Perceived)Environmental Quality
Modelling PEQ | Ric van Poll, IAPS 2004
Procedure: Specification of procedure:-Multi-attribute evaluation
-Identifying 'judges': - Civil servants,residents, sub-groups
-Multi-attribute evaluation:
- Multi-Attribute Evaluation - inventory of relevant attributes. - hierarchical structuring of attributes
- ranking of attributes.
-Analysis: - Cluster analysis
-Report: - hierarchical model EQ of residential quality attributes.- Overview of important residential attributes.
-Evaluation of (P)EQ - by whom: - tools:- spatial aggregation level:
- presentation:
- (on-site) Residents.- Questionnaires or face-to-face interviews- Neighbourhood level.- Bar-charts or PEQI
-Feed-back of results: - inventory environmental problems- criteria for (P)EQ indices.- gauge implemented policy measures.- monitor perceived EQ.
Modelling PEQ | Ric van Poll, IAPS 2004
Sum up
• Multi Attribute Evaluation procedure feasible
• EQ determined by physical, psycho-social and aspects of built environment
• Tool:– inventory environmental problems– criteria for (P)EQ indices.– gauge implemented policy measures.– monitor perceived EQ.
Modelling PEQ | Ric van Poll, IAPS 2004
Thank you for your attention!
• Ric van Poll• RIVM-MGO• [email protected]