r euters 150 y ears david parrott reuters/chief technology office 18 july 2001 report on reuters...

19
REUTERS 150 YEARS David Parrott Reuters/Chief Technology Office 18 July 2001 Report on Reuters Response to MPEG-21 CfR Report to XACML Committee Face-to-Face Meeting This presentation is a report of a meeting between Dr David Parrott of the Reuters Chief Technology Office and the XACML Committee which took place on 18 July 2001. The contents of this presentation relate to a fuller paper submitted as Reuters response to the MPEG-21 call for requirements (ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 N4044: "Reissue of the Call for Requirements for a Rights Data Dictionary and a Rights Expression Language" dated March 2001) on 1 June 2001. The full MPEG submission contains greater detail of the issues, and the context in which the statements contained in the presentation are made. The full response submitted by Reuters on 1 June 2001 can be found at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ xacml /docs/response-v1.0-public.doc . This presentation and the statements contained within it do not necessarily reflect Reuters current or future policy, position or plans in relation to the topics discussed, nor does it purport to cover all the relevant topics in this area. Reuters accepts no responsibility for the consequences of any reliance placed on the contents of this presentation.

Upload: milo-freeman

Post on 30-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: R EUTERS 150 Y EARS David Parrott Reuters/Chief Technology Office 18 July 2001 Report on Reuters Response to MPEG-21 CfR Report to XACML Committee Face-to-Face

REUTERS 150 YEARS

David Parrott

Reuters/Chief Technology Office

18 July 2001

Report on Reuters Response to MPEG-21 CfRReport to XACML Committee Face-to-Face Meeting

This presentation is a report of a meeting between Dr David Parrott of the Reuters Chief Technology Office and the XACML

Committee which took place on 18 July 2001. The contents of this presentation relate to a fuller paper submitted as Reuters

response to the MPEG-21 call for requirements (ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 N4044: "Reissue of the Call for Requirements for a

Rights Data Dictionary and a Rights Expression Language" dated March 2001) on 1 June 2001. The full MPEG submission

contains greater detail of the issues, and the context in which the statements contained in the presentation are made. The full

response submitted by Reuters on 1 June 2001 can be found at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/xacml

/docs/response-v1.0-public.doc. This presentation and the statements contained within it do not necessarily reflect Reuters

current or future policy, position or plans in relation to the topics discussed, nor does it purport to cover all the relevant topics in

this area. Reuters accepts no responsibility for the consequences of any reliance placed on the contents of this presentation.

Page 2: R EUTERS 150 Y EARS David Parrott Reuters/Chief Technology Office 18 July 2001 Report on Reuters Response to MPEG-21 CfR Report to XACML Committee Face-to-Face

REUTERS 150 YEARS

• Private networks give tight access control

• Reuters client-site components allow fine-grained permissions

• Control is reduced on satellite feeds

• Many data types, all with different permissioning models and

implementations

• Heavyweight subscription contracts.

The Permissioning Problem

Reuters Today

Page 3: R EUTERS 150 Y EARS David Parrott Reuters/Chief Technology Office 18 July 2001 Report on Reuters Response to MPEG-21 CfR Report to XACML Committee Face-to-Face

REUTERS 150 YEARS

Digital Rights Management (DRM)

• Managing:– Rights (IPRs, Permissions, Access Controls, Usage, etc)…

– Obligations…

– Audit trails…

– … across the entire value chain (of IPR creators, publishers, distributors, consumers…)

• Electronic, machine-readable contracts

• In equal measures:– Legal Infrastructure

– Business Infrastructure

– Technology Infrastructure.

Page 4: R EUTERS 150 Y EARS David Parrott Reuters/Chief Technology Office 18 July 2001 Report on Reuters Response to MPEG-21 CfR Report to XACML Committee Face-to-Face

REUTERS 150 YEARS

• Standardised Markup for Expressing Rights and Obligations

• Detection of IPR Infringement– Watermarking

– Fingerprinting/Traitor Tracing

– Tracking/Searching

• Rights and Obligations Enforcement– Permissioning and Access Control (encryption technologies if appropriate)

– Licensing and contracts

– Sandboxes (protected environments).

Many Approaches to DRM

Page 5: R EUTERS 150 Y EARS David Parrott Reuters/Chief Technology Office 18 July 2001 Report on Reuters Response to MPEG-21 CfR Report to XACML Committee Face-to-Face

REUTERS 150 YEARS

Why are we Interested in Digital Rights Management?

Reuters needs to permission its data and protect its IPR…

• Data is inherently valuable

• Unified approach across “Slice and dice” service offerings

• Unified approach across flexible and varied distribution channels– e.g., proprietary networks, satellite broadcast, public Internet

• Broadcast mode delivery is required in many cases for scalability– permissioning restricts access to just those parts paid for

• Third party content comes with complex and exacting distribution rules– plus regulatory requirements

• Data flows are multi-directional and include contribution rights.

Page 6: R EUTERS 150 Y EARS David Parrott Reuters/Chief Technology Office 18 July 2001 Report on Reuters Response to MPEG-21 CfR Report to XACML Committee Face-to-Face

REUTERS 150 YEARS

What Digital Rights Management is NOT

DRM

Encryption

Content

Rules &Consequences

Security/Trust Problems:• Software inherently unsafe• Trusted applications restrictive• Vulnerable to systematic attack

Restricted Actions:• View, Print, Save, …• No “fair use”• B2C dominated

Proprietary Implementations:• Lacking interoperability• Closed user-base• Risk backing the wrong player

(i) It is not just enforcement by locking up content in a layer of encryption

Page 7: R EUTERS 150 Y EARS David Parrott Reuters/Chief Technology Office 18 July 2001 Report on Reuters Response to MPEG-21 CfR Report to XACML Committee Face-to-Face

REUTERS 150 YEARS

What Digital Rights Management is NOT

(ii) It is NOT the exclusive domain of “Eyes and Ears” B2C data delivery

Vs Reuters

Channel

Partner

(Schwab)

News feed

Customer

(Yahoo!)

Real-Time

Customer

(Banks)

Custom

Analytics

Risk

Mgmt

Auto

Trading

Data feed

Processing

Service

Provision

Value

Add

...

...

...

...

Page 8: R EUTERS 150 Y EARS David Parrott Reuters/Chief Technology Office 18 July 2001 Report on Reuters Response to MPEG-21 CfR Report to XACML Committee Face-to-Face

REUTERS 150 YEARS

Content, Permissions, Obligations, and Trust

PermissionsThe most you can do with content

ObligationsThe least you must do in order to gain access

T

R

U

S

T

T

R

U

S

T

Page 9: R EUTERS 150 Y EARS David Parrott Reuters/Chief Technology Office 18 July 2001 Report on Reuters Response to MPEG-21 CfR Report to XACML Committee Face-to-Face

REUTERS 150 YEARS

• Intellectual Property

Management and Protection

• Financial Management

• User Privacy

• Resource Abstraction

• Event Reporting

• Content– Creation and Production

– Distribution

– Consumption and Usage

– Packaging

– Identification and Description

– Representation

MPEG-21

Page 10: R EUTERS 150 Y EARS David Parrott Reuters/Chief Technology Office 18 July 2001 Report on Reuters Response to MPEG-21 CfR Report to XACML Committee Face-to-Face

REUTERS 150 YEARS

Contributors ReutersSystems

AndProducts

Distributors NetworkService

Providers

Customers

Rights Expressions Everywhere

Page 11: R EUTERS 150 Y EARS David Parrott Reuters/Chief Technology Office 18 July 2001 Report on Reuters Response to MPEG-21 CfR Report to XACML Committee Face-to-Face

REUTERS 150 YEARS

Contributors ReutersSystems

AndProducts

Distributors NetworkService

Providers

Customers

“Straight-Through” Rules Processing

RulesRules

RulesRules

RulesRules

RulesRules

Page 12: R EUTERS 150 Y EARS David Parrott Reuters/Chief Technology Office 18 July 2001 Report on Reuters Response to MPEG-21 CfR Report to XACML Committee Face-to-Face

REUTERS 150 YEARS

Contributors ReutersSystems

AndProducts

Distributors NetworkService

Providers

Customers

Unified Rules Definitions

Relational

Database

E-commerceAdmin

(Directories)

Microsoft

Exchange

Policies and

Rules

Policies and

Rules

Web

Access

Real-Time

Permissioning

Billing

Page 13: R EUTERS 150 Y EARS David Parrott Reuters/Chief Technology Office 18 July 2001 Report on Reuters Response to MPEG-21 CfR Report to XACML Committee Face-to-Face

REUTERS 150 YEARS

Requirements for Rights Data Dictionary & Rights Expression Language

3.1.1 Division of the Standard into an Extensible Core and Standard Prelude

3.1.2 Inclusivity

3.1 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE STRUCTURE OF THE STANDARD

Page 14: R EUTERS 150 Y EARS David Parrott Reuters/Chief Technology Office 18 July 2001 Report on Reuters Response to MPEG-21 CfR Report to XACML Committee Face-to-Face

REUTERS 150 YEARS

Requirements for Rights Data Dictionary & Rights Expression Language

3.2.1 The Relationships between Rights and Obligations

3.2.2 Rights and Obligations Transfer (Inheritance)

3.2.3 Rights and Content Independence

3.2.4 The Types of Content over which Rights and Obligations Apply

3.2.5 Matching Rights and Obligations to Digital Objects

3.2.6 Matching Rights to Contexts

3.2.7 Location, Form, and Access Control of Data Dictionaries

3.2.8 Management of Issued Rights and Obligations

3.2.9 Fail-Over and Behaviour Modification

3.2.10 Privacy of Terms Expressed in the Language and Data Dictionary

3.2.11 Expression Evaluation

3.2 REQUIREMENTS FOR RIGHTS STRUCTURE AND MANAGEMENT

Page 15: R EUTERS 150 Y EARS David Parrott Reuters/Chief Technology Office 18 July 2001 Report on Reuters Response to MPEG-21 CfR Report to XACML Committee Face-to-Face

REUTERS 150 YEARS

Requirements for Rights Data Dictionary & Rights Expression Language

3.3.1 Operational Specifications

3.3.2 Reporting

3.3.3 Acknowledgement of Source

3.3.4 Rights and Obligations for Real-Time Data

3.3.5 Rights and Obligations for a Stream of Digital Objects

3.3.6 Rights and Obligations for Transactional Data

3.3.7 Rights and Obligations for Database or Server Access

3.3.8 Usage Rights

3.3.9 Managing Communities

3.3.10 Contract Management

3.3.11 Business Models

3.3 REQUIREMENTS FOR RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS DEFINITIONS

Page 16: R EUTERS 150 Y EARS David Parrott Reuters/Chief Technology Office 18 July 2001 Report on Reuters Response to MPEG-21 CfR Report to XACML Committee Face-to-Face

REUTERS 150 YEARS

Requirements for Rights Data Dictionary & Rights Expression Language

3.4.1 Temporal

3.4.2 Geographic

3.4.3 Environmental

3.4 ATTRIBUTES ON WHICH RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS ARE PREDICATED

Page 17: R EUTERS 150 Y EARS David Parrott Reuters/Chief Technology Office 18 July 2001 Report on Reuters Response to MPEG-21 CfR Report to XACML Committee Face-to-Face

REUTERS 150 YEARS

Requirements for Rights Data Dictionary & Rights Expression Language

3.5.1 Identification of Trusted Entities

3.5.2 Trusted Time Services

3.5.3 Trusted Applications and Environments

3.5.4 Certifiable Audit Trails

3.5.5 Agent Authentication

3.5.6 Data Integrity

3.5.7 Agent Mandated Privacy

3.5.8 Confidentiality

3.5 REQUIREMENTS PERTAINING TO TRUST

Page 18: R EUTERS 150 Y EARS David Parrott Reuters/Chief Technology Office 18 July 2001 Report on Reuters Response to MPEG-21 CfR Report to XACML Committee Face-to-Face

REUTERS 150 YEARS

Requirements for Rights Data Dictionary & Rights Expression Language

3.6.1 Specialised Support for Business to Business (B2B)

Commerce

3.6.2 Machine Processing of Digital Objects

3.6 ADDITIONAL FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS

Page 19: R EUTERS 150 Y EARS David Parrott Reuters/Chief Technology Office 18 July 2001 Report on Reuters Response to MPEG-21 CfR Report to XACML Committee Face-to-Face

REUTERS 150 YEARS

Requirements for Rights Data Dictionary & Rights Expression Language

4.1 CHANNEL DEFINITION

4.2 OBJECT MODELS

4.3 WORKFLOW

4 OTHER AREAS FOR CONSIDERATION IN BUILDING THE STANDARD