radiation exposure monitoring (rem) profile kevin o’donnell toshiba medical research inst. - usa...

18
Radiation Exposure Monitoring (REM) Profile Kevin O’Donnell Toshiba Medical Research Inst. - USA Co-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Cmte IHE Radiology

Upload: bertha-silvia-dorsey

Post on 04-Jan-2016

223 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Radiation Exposure Monitoring (REM) Profile Kevin O’Donnell Toshiba Medical Research Inst. - USA Co-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Cmte IHE Radiology

Radiation Exposure Monitoring(REM) Profile

Kevin O’DonnellToshiba Medical Research Inst. - USACo-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Cmte

IHE Radiology

Page 2: Radiation Exposure Monitoring (REM) Profile Kevin O’Donnell Toshiba Medical Research Inst. - USA Co-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Cmte IHE Radiology

2

MotivationMotivation• X-Ray based imaging can provide tremendously

useful information

• Patient Dose is an important consideration

• Potential benefit > potential risk … but risk should be managed responsibly

Page 3: Radiation Exposure Monitoring (REM) Profile Kevin O’Donnell Toshiba Medical Research Inst. - USA Co-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Cmte IHE Radiology

3

A New IHE ProfileA New IHE Profile• IHE Radiation Exposure Monitoring Profile – Integration of systems reporting dose and systems

which receive, store, or process those reports– Modalities, PACS, RIS, Workstations, Registries

– Facilitate compliance with Euratom 97/43,ACR Guidelines, etc.

– Directly based on DICOM Dose Reports

Page 4: Radiation Exposure Monitoring (REM) Profile Kevin O’Donnell Toshiba Medical Research Inst. - USA Co-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Cmte IHE Radiology

4

IHE Radiation Exposure Monitoring ProfileIHE Radiation Exposure Monitoring Profile

some text: #Numerical Details 12.2 14.5 11.8 7.6 9.5 10.9

National Registry

ArchiveDose Information

Reporter

some text: #Numerical Details 12.2 14.5 11.8 7.6 9.5 10.9

Outlier: #Performing Phys.Over Target: 12.2%

Outlier: #Performing Phys.Over Target: 12.2%

Outlier: #Performing Phys.Over Target: 12.2%

some text: #Numerical Details 12.2 14.5 11.8 7.6 9.5 10.9

some text: #Numerical Details 12.2 14.5 11.8 7.6 9.5 10.9

some text: #Numerical Details 12.2 14.5 11.8 7.6 9.5 10.9

some text: #Numerical Details 12.2 14.5 11.8 7.6 9.5 10.9

some text: #Numerical Details 12.2 14.5 11.8 7.6 9.5 10.9

some text: #Numerical Details 12.2 14.5 11.8 7.6 9.5 10.9

some text: #Numerical Details 12.2 14.5 11.8 7.6 9.5 10.9

some text: #Numerical Details 12.2 14.5 11.8 7.6 9.5 10.9

Numer 12.2 14.5 9.5 10.9

Page 5: Radiation Exposure Monitoring (REM) Profile Kevin O’Donnell Toshiba Medical Research Inst. - USA Co-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Cmte IHE Radiology

5

REM Profile: Actors & TransactionsREM Profile: Actors & Transactions

Page 6: Radiation Exposure Monitoring (REM) Profile Kevin O’Donnell Toshiba Medical Research Inst. - USA Co-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Cmte IHE Radiology

6

DICOM Dose ReportsDICOM Dose Reports• “SR Objects” – DICOM Structured Reports– Easily ingested (and regurgitated) by PACS

• Granularity : “Irradiation Event”– & Accumulated Dose over Study, Series

• Templates : – CT, Projection X-Ray (Mammo, Fluoro)– DR/CR

• Not yet addressed: NM, RT

Page 7: Radiation Exposure Monitoring (REM) Profile Kevin O’Donnell Toshiba Medical Research Inst. - USA Co-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Cmte IHE Radiology

7

Key MeasurementsKey Measurements• CT Dose– DLP, CTDIvol, kVP, mA, sec– Effective Dose [ Optional ]

(Reference estimation method)

• Projection X-Ray Dose– DAP, Dose@RP, kVP, mA, sec– Fluoro Dose, Fluoro Time

• Mammography Dose– AGD, Entrance Exposure@RP, kVP, mA, sec– Compression, Half Value Layer

ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/2009/09_16pu.pdf

Page 8: Radiation Exposure Monitoring (REM) Profile Kevin O’Donnell Toshiba Medical Research Inst. - USA Co-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Cmte IHE Radiology

8

Other Details in Dose SROther Details in Dose SR• Full Patient / Order / Study Details• Unique ID for each Irradiation Event• Equipment ID, Ordering Doc, Performing Tech

• Patient Position, Anatomy imaged• Imaging Geometry (projection)

• Collimation• X-Ray Filters, Anode Target Material• Calibration, Phantom, Dosimeter

Page 9: Radiation Exposure Monitoring (REM) Profile Kevin O’Donnell Toshiba Medical Research Inst. - USA Co-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Cmte IHE Radiology

DICOM SR TemplateDICOM SR Template

9

Page 10: Radiation Exposure Monitoring (REM) Profile Kevin O’Donnell Toshiba Medical Research Inst. - USA Co-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Cmte IHE Radiology

10

Creating SR Dose ReportsCreating SR Dose Reports• Modalities– CT, XA/XRF, X-Ray, Mammography

• “Readers”– CR, DX, Film Digitizers– Note challenge if tube and detector don’t talk…

• 3rd Party Workstations

• RIS, PACS

Page 11: Radiation Exposure Monitoring (REM) Profile Kevin O’Donnell Toshiba Medical Research Inst. - USA Co-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Cmte IHE Radiology

11

Storing SR Dose ReportsStoring SR Dose Reports

• Usually stored in the Study folder– Archive, Backup, Reconciliation– Query / Retrieve

• Can be sent to other destinations

Page 12: Radiation Exposure Monitoring (REM) Profile Kevin O’Donnell Toshiba Medical Research Inst. - USA Co-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Cmte IHE Radiology

12

Using SR Dose ReportsUsing SR Dose ReportsPossible applications:• Radiation QA

– Periodically Query / Retrieve Reports from Archive– Set policies/standards and flag deviations– Set goals for improvement and track; – Implement protocol changes and compare difference in dose

• Patient Impact Evaluation– e.g. if Patient identified as pregnant post-facto

• Dose Mapping– Store data in realtime from Modality to Mapping Workstation

Page 13: Radiation Exposure Monitoring (REM) Profile Kevin O’Donnell Toshiba Medical Research Inst. - USA Co-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Cmte IHE Radiology

13

Using SR Dose ReportsUsing SR Dose Reports• National Registries– Anonymize and submit Dose Reports to Register– Compile Population Risk Estimations– Derive Dose Reference Levels– Provide Site-Site Comparisons

• Individual Dose Record– Collect Dose Reports over time

• Clinical Trials– Collect Dose together with Images– Demonstrate both improved detection & reduced dose

Page 14: Radiation Exposure Monitoring (REM) Profile Kevin O’Donnell Toshiba Medical Research Inst. - USA Co-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Cmte IHE Radiology

IHE REM Changes• Final Text CPs

– CP195 - Internationalize Series Description (RAD-62)– CP197 - Replace Register with Registry– CP198 - Remove weakening of DICOMDIR (RAD-63)

• Almost Final Text CPs– CP196 - REM De-identification (RAD-63)– CP199 - Patient Longitudinal Record Use Case– CP200 - Alternative Submission Transport Mechanisms (RAD-63)– CP203 - Require Irradiation Event UID in Images– CP204 - Record Patient Characteristics in Dose Reports

( See www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/ )

14

Page 15: Radiation Exposure Monitoring (REM) Profile Kevin O’Donnell Toshiba Medical Research Inst. - USA Co-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Cmte IHE Radiology

DICOM SR ChangesDICOM SR Changes• Incorporated CPs

– Use DICOM 2009 PS3.16 – incorporates CP-874 and more

• Final Text CPs– CP-957 – Add CT Exposure Modulation Type– CP-963 – Add DateTime Started to Irradiation Event

• WIP CPs– CP-1063 – Clean-up Dose Reports– CP-1065 – Improve Device Identification– CP-1068 – CT Scan Location– CP-1070 – Additional Codes for Dose Information Source– CP-1075 – CT Dose for Constant Angle Acquisitions– CP-1076 – Fix participant relationship in TID1020– CP-1077 – CR Dose Report

( See dclunie.com/dicom-status/status.html )15

Page 16: Radiation Exposure Monitoring (REM) Profile Kevin O’Donnell Toshiba Medical Research Inst. - USA Co-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Cmte IHE Radiology

Profile Overviews:Profile Overviews:wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Profiles

Profile Specs.:Profile Specs.:www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework

Page 17: Radiation Exposure Monitoring (REM) Profile Kevin O’Donnell Toshiba Medical Research Inst. - USA Co-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Cmte IHE Radiology

17

Why not use Image Headers?Why not use Image Headers?

• Mostly Exposure details (for interpretation)

• No image; no dose– deleted due to quality / patient motion

• More images; more dose– extra reconstructions; post-processing

• Lacks complete dose details

Page 18: Radiation Exposure Monitoring (REM) Profile Kevin O’Donnell Toshiba Medical Research Inst. - USA Co-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Cmte IHE Radiology

18

Why not use MPPS?Why not use MPPS?

• Modality Performed Procedure Steps– Status messages back to RIS / PACS

• Transient Information– designed for workflow; not persistent archiving

• Lacks complete dose details