raising the bar north of the border: the ins and outs of canada’s new evaluation process for...
TRANSCRIPT
© 2015 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC
Raising the Bar North of the Border: The Ins and Outs of Canada’s New
Evaluation Process for Oil-Grit Separators
Presented by:
Derek Berg
StormCon Austin
August, 5th 2015
1
© 2015 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC
Stakeholder driven protocol development and regulatory overview
CETV protocol specifics CETV protocol in practice, testing a full scale CDS®
Discussion
Presentation Overview
2
© 2015 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC
BMP evaluation has come a long way but remains imperfect Equipment, methods and best practices continue to be refined Merits of lab vs. field still debated Resource constraints straining existing programs Consistent implementation is essential
BMP Evaluation
3
© 2015 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC
Canadian regulatory framework requires predominantly local decision making and vetting of MTDs
Historically no Canadian specific protocols or evaluation programs for MTDs
Local decision makers often lack resources and/or expertise to complete evaluations
Some regions relying on programs such as NJCAT/NJDEP but data from those programs not always well suited for direct adoption
Drivers for a CETV Protocol
4
© 2015 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC
In 2013 Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) convened a diverse stakeholder group to gauge interest and establish goals for a national protocol
Group agreed to use 2013 NJDEP protocol as a foundation for the process
Changes needed to make resulting data applicable to diverse local regulations
Stakeholders wanted a protocol that yielded a flexible data set After initial stakeholder meeting TRCA took lead on drafting
protocol with several rounds of stakeholder review
CETV Development
5
© 2015 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC
Mandatory performance trials at 7 operating rates ranging from 40 l/min/m2 to 1400 l/min/m2 of sedimentation areao Additional tests optionalo All testing using modified mass balance with target influent of 200mg/l
PSD analysis on source sediment as well as sediment captured during each test run
Scour test component with system filled to 50% sediment capacityo Uses 1-1000um PSD for scouro 5 target loading rates between 200-2600 l/min/m2 of sedimentation areao Duplicate effluent and PSD samples collected at each operating rate
Voluntary light liquid re-entrainment testo A scour test for floatableso Low density polyethylene beads used to simulate oils
CETV Protocol Specifics
6
© 2015 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC
All testing, reporting and data submission must be completed by 3rd party facility
SSC method specified for all solids analysis Specifies NJDEP 1-1000um PSD
o D50 ~65 micronso ~20% of material less than 8 microns
CETV Protocol Specifics
7
© 2015 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC
CETV Process Overview
8
Application
Test at 3rd Party
Facility
Submission of Results
Establish Performance Claim
Review by Verification Entity
CETV Verification
Environment Canada
Globe Performance Solutions
Manufacturer/3r
d
Party Lab
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
Regional/Local Regulatory Authority
Stakeholders:
© 2015 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC
2014: CDS-4 tested at Alden Research Labs in Holden, MA
CETV in Practice
9
© 2015 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC
Initial PSD tolerances and sampling requirements made sediment compliance difficulto + or – 3% tolerances changed to + or – 6%
Mass balance approach results in lengthy run times at low operating rateso Min 11.3kg sediment per trialo CDS trial at 40 l/min/m2 was 21.4 hourso Test run in 3 chunks over 3 days
PSD sampling before each test run adds appreciable cost and increases likelihood of non compliance
Lessons Learned
10
© 2015 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC
Protocol is robust and has been proven feasible to implement Protocol and process require substantial financial investment Protocol implementation could be improved with tweaks to test
requirements CDS in early stages of CETV verification process Process creates a substantial amount of data but there is little
guidance for using data at local levelo Ideally policy or guidance on use of results should be created to aid local
users and drive consistency
Consistent implementation of verification process and local regulatory policy will be critical to success of program
Discussion
11
© 2015 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC
Questions
Derek Berg
207-885-6174
Thank You!!
12