raj jain the ohio state university

22
Raj Jain The Ohio State University Future All I want you to tell me is what will be the networking technology in the year 2000. Joan Quigly White House Astrologer High-Speed Networking: Trends and Issues Raj Jain The Ohio State University Columbus, OH 43210 [email protected] http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~jain/

Upload: networkingcentral

Post on 20-May-2015

404 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Raj JainThe Ohio State University

Future

All I want you to tell me is what will be the networking technology in the year 2000.

JoanQuigly

JoanQuigly

WhiteHouse

Astrologer

WhiteHouse

Astrologer

High-Speed Networking: Trends and Issues

Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Columbus, OH [email protected]

http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~jain/

Page 2: Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Raj JainThe Ohio State University

Networking Trends Life Cycle of Technologies Trends in Applications Issues: Economy of scale, Performance Bottleneck

Ref: R. Jain, FDDI Handbook: High-Speed Networking using Fiber and Other Media," Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA 01867, Phone: (800)822-6339, (617)944-3700X2391, Fax: (800)333-3328, (617)944-7273, Email: [email protected], ISBN: 0-201-56376-4, April 1994.

Overview

Page 3: Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Raj JainThe Ohio State University

Trend: Telecommunication and Networking From computerization of telephone traffic switching to telephonization of computer traffic switching. Communication more critical than computing

Bus performance vs ALU speedI/O performance vs SPECMarks

User Location:

– 1960: Computer room 1970: Terminal room

– 1980: Desktop 1990: Mobile System Extent:

– 1980: 1 Node within 10 m

– 1990: 100 nodes within 10 km

Page 4: Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Raj JainThe Ohio State University

Last 10 years: Individual computingNext 10 years: Cooperative computing

Past: Corporate networksFuture:

– Intercorporate networks

– National Info Infrastructures

– International Info Infrastructures

Page 5: Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Raj JainThe Ohio State University

Life Cycles of Technologies

Time

Number of Problems Solved

Page 6: Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Raj JainThe Ohio State University

Life Cycles of Networking Technology

You are here

Time

Number of HostsBytes per HostsNumber of NetworksMIPSMemory SizeStorage

Page 7: Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Raj JainThe Ohio State University

Trend: Exponential Growth

0200,000

1,000,000

1,800,000

Jul-81

Oct-85

Jul-88

Oct-89

Oct-91

Oct-92

Oct-93

Number of Hosts on the Internet

Page 8: Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Raj JainThe Ohio State University

Networking in Social Fabric

USENET: Ten million news articles/month

18 on-line coffee houses in San Francisco

National Public Radio Program

Supreme court decision within one day

Real estate, on-line catalog

137 countries reachable via Email

Page 9: Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Raj JainThe Ohio State University

Trend: Standardization Religion must be forgotten

Improve on someone else’s ideas as naturally as yours

Can’t succeed alone Innovation + Technology partnerships

To impact: Participate in standardizationPublication is too late and insufficient

Vertical vs horizontal specialization Switch, router, host, applications

Hubs

Switches

Routers

Page 10: Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Raj JainThe Ohio State University

Trends in Applications

Little Voice AT&T: 125 to 130 M calls/day @ 5 min/call 64 kbps

= 28.8 Gbps = 1/1000 of one fiber 200 Million X 24 hr/day X 64 kbps = 12.8 Tbps Survey of 1750 businesses:

Ref: IEEE Spectrum, August 1992, p 19.

1985 1990 1995 2010

75%

56%39%

Percent ofVoice onPublic Nets

Page 11: Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Raj JainThe Ohio State University

Networking Failures vs Successes

1980: Broadband (vs baseband) 1981: PBX (vs Ethernet) 1984: ISDN (vs Modems) 1986: MAP/TOP (vs Ethernet) 1988: OSI (vs TCP/IP) 1991: DQDB 1992: XTP (vs TCP)

Page 12: Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Raj JainThe Ohio State University

Requirements for Success

Low Cost High Performance Killer Applications Timely completion Manageability Interoperability Coexistence with legacy LANs

Existing infrastructure is more important than new technology

Page 13: Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Raj JainThe Ohio State University

Challenge: Economy of Scale Technology is far ahead of the applications.

Invention is becoming the mother of necessity.We have high speed fibers, but not enough video traffic.

Low-cost is the primary motivator. Not necessity. Buyer's market (Like $99 airline tickets to Bahamas.) Why? vs Why not?

Ten 100-MIPS computer are cheaper than one 1000-MIPS computer Parallel computing, not supercomputing

Ethernet was and still is cheaper than 10 one-Mbps links. No FDDI if it is 10 times as expensive as Ethernet.

10/100 Ethernet adapters = $50 over 10 Mbps Q: Given ATM or 100 Mbps Ethernet at the same cost,

which network will you buy? A: Ethernet. Proven Technology.

Page 14: Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Raj JainThe Ohio State University

Challenge: Tariff

High-speed is important for LANsLow-cost is critical for WANs.

Phone company’s goal: How to keep the voice business and get into data too?

Customer’s goal: How to transmit the data cheaper? Tariff Today:

– 64 kbps voice line = $300/year

– 45 Mbps line (coast to coast) = $180 k-240 k/year 155 Mbps line = $540 k - $720 k/year

Tomorrow: 155 Mbps = $1k/month+ $28/G cells $13k - $45k/year

Page 15: Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Raj JainThe Ohio State University

Challenge: Performance

Faster link Faster applications Need to consider trends of all layers

Application DesignersApplication Designers

Protocol Architects/ImplementersProtocol Architects/Implementers

O/S Architects/ImplementersO/S Architects/Implementers

CPU, Memory, Disk DesignersCPU, Memory, Disk Designers

LAN Interface DesignersLAN Interface Designers

Media Access (LAN) ArchitectsMedia Access (LAN) Architects

Optic Device DesignersOptic Device Designers

Video Coding, FTP

TCP/IP, UDP

UNIX, DOS

Pentium, Alpha

Adapters

FDDI, ATM

Fibers, Lasers

Page 16: Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Raj JainThe Ohio State University

Summary

Networking is critical and growing exponentially.

Computer and Telecommunications industry merging High-speed links iff economy of scale. If users can’t see it, they will not pay for it.

Shared switching rather than shared media

Page 17: Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Raj JainThe Ohio State University

References

All our papers are available on-line at: http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/~jain/papers/

Raj Jain, “ATM Networking: Issues and Challanges,” NetWorld+InterOp Engineering Conference, Las Vegas, April 1995.

K. Siu and R. Jain, "A Brief Overview of ATM: Protocol Layers, LAN Emulation, and Traffic Management," Computer Communications Review (ACM SIGCOMM), April 1995.

R.Jain, "Congestion Control and Traffic Management in ATM Networks: Recent Advances and A Survey", Invited submission to Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, February 1995.

Page 18: Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Raj JainThe Ohio State University

References (Cont)

Craig Partridge, Gigabit Networking, Addison-Wesley, 1993.

D. Clark and D. Tennenhouse, “Architectural Considerations for a New Generation of Protocols,” Proc. SIGCOMM-90, pp. 200-208, August 1990..

IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Special Issue on High-Speed Computer Network Interfaces, February 1993.

Craig Partridge, “Building Gigabit Network Interfaces,” ConneXions, 1993.

J. Smith and C. Traw, “Giving Applications Access to Gb/s Network,” IEEE Network, July 1993.

Page 19: Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Raj JainThe Ohio State University

Electro-optic Bottleneck

Bandwidth of fiber = 25 THz/window Bandwidth of electronics = 1-10 Gbps Switching bottleneck

Optical switching All-optical networks Switching bottleneck

Switches more expensive than media Less switches and more links

Higher connectivity, less hops Distributed media shared switching (like WANs) and not

distributed switching shared media (like LANs)

Page 20: Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Raj JainThe Ohio State University

Switching vs Transmission

Switching

Transmission

Electronic Switching

Time

Cost

Mechanical Switches

Microwave & Multiplexing

Optical fiber

Page 21: Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Raj JainThe Ohio State University

Shared Media vs Shared Switches

Variable bandwidth/station Cost bandwidth Incremental upgradability Natural spatial reuse

Page 22: Raj Jain The Ohio State University

Raj JainThe Ohio State University

Thank You!