rajasthan urban sector development investment program – … · 2014-09-29 · december 2011)...

Social Monitoring Report

Project Number: 40031

June 2012

India: Rajasthan Urban Sector Development Investment Program –

Implementation of short resettlement plans (July – December 2011) Prepared by Local Self Government Department The Resettlement plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

RAJASTHAN URBAN SECTOR DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT PROGRAM ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK LOAN ASSISTANCE

(LOAN NO. 2366-IND & 2506 IND)

BIANNUAL SOCIAL MONITORING REPORT

IMPLEMENTATION OF SHORT RESETTLEMENT PLANS

(July – December 2011)

Social Monitoring Report

ABBREVIATION

ADB Asian Development Bank AP Affected Persons BDO Block Development Officer BPL Below Poverty Line CAPP Community Action and Participation Program CBO Community Based Organization CPR Common Property Resources GoI Government of India GoR Government of Rajasthan IP Indigenous Peoples IR Income Restoration ISA Initial Social Assessment LA Land Acquisition LAA Land Acquisition Act LIG Lower Income Group M&E Monitoring and Evaluation NGO Non-Government Organization PAF Project Affected Family PAH Project Affected Household PDP Project Displaced Person PIU Project Implementation Unit PMU Project Management Unit PRI Panchayat Raj Institution ROR Record of Rights RoW Right of Way RP Resettlement Plan R&R Resettlement and Rehabilitation RUIDP Rajasthan Urban Infrastructure Development Project RUSDIP Rajasthan Urban Sector Development Investment Programme SC Scheduled Caste SES Socio-Economic Survey SHG Self Help Group ST Scheduled Tribe UDD Urban Development Department WHH Women Headed Household

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section Page No.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

A. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 4

B. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS 4

C. IMPLEMENTATION OF RESETTLEMENT ACTIVITIES 5

D. OVERVIEW OF IIRM UNDER CAPP ACTIVITIES 5

E. PROJECT IMPACT 7

F. POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK 9

G. VALIDATION AND VERIFICATIONS OF AP’S 9

H. COMPENSATION AND ASSISTANCE 9

I. PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS AND DISCLOSURE OF SRPS 10

J. GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL 11

K. ISSUES AND ACTION PLAN 12

L. LESSONS LEARNT AND GOOD PRACTICES 14

M. CONCLUDING REMARKS 16

APPENDIX 1 DETAILS OF ACOS MOBILIZATION SCHEDULE 17

APPENDIX 2 STATUS OF SUBPROJECT UNDER IMPLEMENTATION 18

APPENDIX 3 LIST OF SRPS TO BE PREPARED/REVISED DUE TO CHANGE IN SCOPE OF WORK/ ADDITIONAL WORK IN TRANCHE TRANCHE 1 & 2 20

APPENDIX 4 STATUS OF OTHER ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED BY ACO FOR PUBLIC AWARENESS FROM JULY TO DECEMBER 2011 21

APPENDIX 5 DETAILS OF COMPENSATION PAID TO APS AS ON 31 DECEMBER 2011 24

APPENDIX 6 STATUS OF DISBURSEMENT CLAIM PAID TO APS BY ACO FOR SRP IMPLEMENTATION UP TO DECEMBER 2011 33

APPENDIX 7 STATUS OF CONSULTATION WITH APS BY ACO FOR SRP IMPLEMENTATION UP TO DECEMBER 2011 39

APPENDIX 8 GRIEVANCE REDRESS PROCESS 44

APPENDIX 9 GRIEVANCE ADDRESS/ RECEIVED (IN CURRENT QUARTERS) 45

1

RAJASTHAN URBAN SECTOR DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT PROGRAM

BIANNUAL SOCIAL MONITORING REPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF SHORT RESETTLEMENT PLANS

Duration (July - December 2011)

Executive Summary

1. The Government of Rajasthan (GoR), with the financial assistance from Asian Development Bank (ADB) in form of a multi-Tranche financing facility (MFF), decided to strengthen urban management and support for priority investments in urban infrastructure in towns namely Alwar, Baran, Barmer, Bharatpur, Bundi, Chittorgarh, Churu, Dhaulpur, Jaisalmer, Jhalawar-Jhalarapatan, Karauli, Nagaur, Rajsamand, Sawai Madhopur and Sikar under the Rajasthan Urban Sector Development Investment Program (RUSDIP). The total population of these towns was about 1.6 million as per the Census 2001. The Investment Program is designed to cover major urban infrastructure works under water supply, waste water management, solid waste management, urban transport and roads, social infrastructure, support infrastructure for cultural heritage and urban drainage sectors.

2. The Executing Agency (EA) for the Investment Program is Local Self Government Department (LSGD) under the Urban Governance Department of GoR. The program will support overall improvement of urban environment cum living conditions as well as increase in tourism activities. State Cabinet on 5 March 2008 approved RUSDIP, in three Tranches, with loan financing from ADB and corresponding shares of state and ULB. Responsibility for repayment of loan and payment of own contribution is determined with respect to ownership.

3. The Loan Agreement and Project Agreement of Loan 2366-IND Tranche 1 of $75 million, with a loan component of $60 million, were signed on 17 January 2008 and made effective from 28 February 2008 where Tranche 1 consisted of 20 packages of civil works. Under Tranche 2, 25 packages were finalized by GoR costing $219 million. The periodic financing request (PFR) for Tranche 2 was submitted by GOR for $150 million loan component, and was approved by ADB as Loan 2506-IND. The Loan Agreement and Project Agreement for Tranche 2 were signed on 18 February 2009 and made effective from 28 February 2009. The loan processing for Tranche 3 is over and made effective from 16 June 2011.

4. The Investment Program envisaged strengthening urban management and support for priority investments in urban infrastructure in 3 towns of Alwar, Jaisalmer and Jhalawar- Jhalarapattan under Tranche 1 and 12 towns namely Baran, Barmer, Bharatpur, Bundi, Chittorgarh, Churu, Dhaulpur, Karauli, Nagaur, Rajsamand, Sawai Madhopur and Sikar, under Tranche 2. The short resettlement plans (SRPs) were prepared for 10 subprojects under Tranche 1 and 25 subprojects under Tranche 2 (a total of 35 SRPs) following ADB’s Involuntary Resettlement Policy, 1995. (See Appendix 2). All these SRP’s have been approved by ADB and are under various stages of Implementation. It may be noted however, that in some cases, additional or change in scope of work has made revision of SRP mandatory and this process is on going.

5. 04 additional subprojects were proposed to be included under Tranche 1 and Tranche 2 Out of these 4 subprojects , 03 suprojects have been approved by ADB (execept Bharatpur Street (Circular roads in Bharatpur) ) ,. During current quarters (July-September and October – December 2011) 2 more additional packages Dholpur Waste Water and Sikar Street are proposed to be included in Tranche 1 and Tranche 2; these 2 additional packages will be merged with the already approved SRPs.

2

6. After including the initial SRPs and Additional/Revised SRPs, in Tranche 1, there are 63 affected persons (APs) while in Tranche 2 there are 505 APs. Of the total 568 APs, 95 belong to the vulnerable groups1. The implementation of SRPs started in June 2008. The Investment Program Implementation Units (IPIUs) of the RUSDIP under Investment Program Management Unit (IPMU), headed by a Project Director, are implementing the SRPs.

7. Community Action and Participation Program (CAPP) has been undertaken in RUSDIP for mobilization, motivation, participation and community awareness. M/s Indian Institute of Rural Management (IIRM), Jaipur has been engaged as CAPP consultant from August 2008. Community mobilization has been activated through various public meetings, campaign and media means. CAPP has been organizing the public awareness campaigns for appraising the short-term inconveniences and long-term benefits of the project in order to gain full support of the beneficiaries. CAPP has also been helpful to make beneficiaries aware of preventive care to avoid environmental health-related hazards during construction and of their responsibilities to avoid the wastage of water, including issues such as water rates, metering, user charges and property tax reform, etc. for achieving the goals of the Investment Program in totality. In addition, it provides feedback to the IPMU with a view to adjusting the work program based on the impact of the campaign and concerns raised by the beneficiaries/stakeholders.

8. Indian Institute of Rural Management (IIRM), Jaipur was also assigned the responsibility of implementing the social safeguard requirements and to assist the IPIUs in implementing SRPs. The social expert of the Investment Program Management Consultancy (IPMC) was entrusted with the responsibility of monitoring the implementation of these SRPs, and assess its performance and effectiveness, on the basis of review of reports, field observations, consultations with APs, other stakeholders, IPIUs and IPMU.

9. This report covers the 13 and 14th quarter of the implementation programme till December 2011 According to RF, after initial two years of project implementation, the monitoring reporting schedule changes from quarterly to bi-annually. Accordingly, this report covers Second half of 2011 (July – December 2011). During this time, in addition to the identification and verification process of APs, distribution of identity cards and disbursement of compensation were undertaken. It is confirmed that in all the subprojects which are covered in this report, there is no indigenous people (IP), no land acquisition issue and all impacts are temporary in nature2, where the livelihood of the people would get impacted only during the construction activity, for which they would be compensated as per the ADB guidelines.

10. During the first quarter, the City Level Committee (CLC), also acting as Grievance Redress Committee (GRC), became functional at the district level. Identity cards for APs have been prepared after verification and validation by the NGO. However, in most cases, assistance money has not been disbursed because civil works are yet to commence in that section. The remaining tasks of the NGO include finalization of entitlement, distribution of identity cards to all APs, opening of bank/ post office account for the APs, distribution of resettlement assistance and organizing HIV awareness campaign, which are ongoing. During July - December 2011, atotal of 105 , Consultation and Orientation Programs on SWM & Health, hygiene and HIV AIDs etc awareness for Rag Pickers Community were organized at Bharatpur (11), Dholpur (8), Karauli (9), Sawai Madhopur (16), Barmer (10), Churu (7), Jaisalmer (7), Nagarur (4) Sikar (1) Bundi (11), Baran (4), Chittorgarh (4),

1 Vulnerable groups include BPL, ST, WHH, disabled persons, etc 2 Barring Sikar solid waste management project, wherein two small community property resources (CPRs) and one shrine may have to be relocated from the site of the landfill after mutual agreement and consultation with the villagers of the Nani.

3

Jhalawar (10), , Rajsamand (3). Total 309, Focus Group Discussion or Small Group Meetings and public awareness for Health, hygein and HIV AIDs etc with (RWAs, Women's Group, Project Labourers, Slums Areas public, ) were organized at Bharatpur (14), Dholpur (8), Karauli (23), Sawai Madhopur (29), Barmer (31), Churu (36) Jaisalmer (23), Nagaur (11), Sikar (26), Bundi (19), Baran (6), Chittorgarh (23) and Jhalawar (45) and Rajsamand (15). 307 no of Consultations with ULB & Line Departments, NGOs/CBOs, Contractors, Ward Parshads,School Principle, ADB Team, Sarpanch and Villagers etc. were held at Bharatpur (27), Dholpur (10), Karauli (21), Sawai Madhopur (26), Barmer (5), Churu (40), Jaisalmer (23), Nagaur (1), Sikar (54), Bundi (18), Baran(32) Chittorgarh (6), Jhalawar (34) and Rajsamand (10). 105 nos. of Public Consultation on Water Meter, Solid Waste, Water Management were organized at Bharatpur (7), Dholpur (1), Karauli (1), Sawai Madhopur (26), Barmer (1), Churu (8) Nagaur (4), Sikar (4), Baran (9), Chittorgarh (24), Jhalawar (16) and Rajsamand (4). Essay Competition for awareness & participation on water conservation in a school of Barmer was organized. 419 nos. of work site visits were organized at Alwar (1), Bharatpur (42), Dholpur (37), Karauli (47), Sawai Madhopur (24), Barmer (42), Churu (32), Jaisalmer (28), Nagaur (28), Sikar (40), Bundi (23), Baran (33), Chittorgarh (33), Jhalawar (18) and Rajsamand (18). 29 Meeting with Media were organized at Bharatpur (4), Sawai Madhopur (19), Churu (1), Chittorgarh (2) and Rajsamand (3). 132 Community Awareness through NUKKAR NATAK was provided at Bharatpur, Dholpur, Karauli, Barmer, Churu, Nagaur, Bundi, Baran Chittorgarh, Jhalawar, Rajsamand (12 Natak at each town). 02 Drawing Competition on water conservation were organized at Rajsamand.College Debate Competition on Water Conservation & Water Metering was organized at Jaisalmer. Social Survey was conducted at 55 locations of Alwar (4), Karauli (3), Sawai Madhopur (6), Churu (2), Jaisalmer (5), Bundi (7) and Baran (28) . 32 Training Program on Safety Measures for Project Labourers were provided at Bharatpur (1), Dholpur (10), Churu (2), Nagaur (6), Bundi (1), Baran (10), Chittorgarh (1) and Rajsamand (1). 19 School Students Awareness Rally on Installation of Water Meter was organized at Alwar (1), Bharatpur (5), Churu (1), Jaisalmer (2), Bundi (1), Baran (2), Chittorgarh (4), Jhalawar (2) and Rajsamand(1). 08 Awareness Meeting Program for Stakeholders was organized at Bharatpur (1), Jaisalmer (6) and Sikar(1). 02 Drawing Competition on Solid waste maangent were organized at Rajsamand . 4 Household Surveys were organized at Dholpur (1), Jaisalmer (1) and Chittorgarh (2). 165 nos of Survey for Willingness to pay with Ward Parshad , for Consumer for water, sanitation and solid waste management was organized at Alwar (55), Bharatpur (12), Dholpur (4), Karauli(1), Sawai Madhopur (14), Barmer (9), Churu (10), Jaisalmer (1), Nagaur (12), Sikar (2), Bundi (9), Baran (9), Chittorgarh(30) and Jhalawar (2). 2 Orientation Programs for Plumbers on service connections were organized at Churu and Jhalawar. 32 Slum & Poor Comunitee awareness through Puppet Shows on Water, Solid Waste Management, Water Metering, Tariff reforms were oganized at Bharatpur(4), Dholpur(4), Karauli(4), Sawaimadhopur(4), Jaisalmer(4), Bundi(4), Chittorgarh(2) and Jhalawar(4). The details of NGO Activities are summarized at Appendix 4.

4

RAJASTHAN URBAN SECTOR DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT PROGRAM

BIANNUAL SOCIAL MONITORING REPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF SHORT RESETTLEMENT PLANS

Duration July – December 2011

A. Description of the Project

1. Background: The Local Self Government Department (LSGD) under the Urban Governance Department of Government of Rajasthan (GoR) is executing the Rajasthan Urban Sector Development Investment Program (RUSDIP) in 15 towns namely, Alwar, Baran, Barmer, Bharatpur, Bundi, Chittorgarh, Churu, Dhaulpur, Jaisalmer, Jhalawar-Jhalarapatan, Karauli, Nagaur, Rajsamand, Sawai Madhopur and Sikar with financial assistance from Asian Development Bank (ADB) under Multi-tranche Financing Facility (MFF). The investment program covers major urban infrastructure works viz., water supply, waste water management, solid waste management, urban transport and roads, social infrastructure, support infrastructure for cultural heritage and urban drainage. The Investment Program period is for 7 years i.e. up to 2014 starting in 2008. It is expected that the Investment Program would improve infrastructure through the development, design and implementation of a series of subprojects, each providing improvements in a particular sector (water supply, sewerage, solid waste, etc.) in each town.

2. Tranche 1 of Investment Program covers Alwar, Jaisalmer and Jhalawar-Jhalarapatan towns and is currently under construction stage. Tranche 2 covers the remaining 12 towns namely, Bharatpur, Karauli, Dholpur, Sawai Madhopur, Churu, Sikar, Barmer, Nagaur, Chittorgarh, Rajsamand, Bundi and Baran. Tranche 1 and Tranche 2 are under different stages of implementation while the loan processing for Tranche 3 is over and and made effective from 16 June 2011. 04 additional subprojects were proposed to be included under Tranche 1 and Tranche 2, Out of these 4 subprojects , 03 suprojects have been approved by ADB (execept Bharatpur Street (Circular roads in Bharatpur) ) ,. During current quarters (July-September and October – December 2011) 2 more additional packages Dholpur Waste Water and Sikar Street are proposed to be included in Tranche 1 and Tranche 2; these 2 additional packages will be merged with the already approved SRPs thus overall there are now 38 SRPs under Tr-1&2. The Investment Program is intended to optimize the socio economic development in district headquarters and towns, improve the urban environment cum living conditions as well as boost tourism activities.

3. The Investment Program Management Unit (IPMU), headed by Project Director with assistance by experienced engineering and finance officers, is responsible for project execution, implementation and management cum supervision of subprojects. The NGO (IIRM under CAPP) is assisting the Investment Program Implementation Unit (IPIUs) in implementation of the R&R activities successfully. The short resettlement plans (SRPs) have been prepared according to the Involuntary Resettlement Policy, 1995 of the ADB. This report deals with the implementation progress of these plans under Tranche 1 and Tranche 2 subprojects for the period July – December 2011.

B. Institutional Arrangements

4. The Executing Agency (EA) for the Investment Program is LSGD under the Urban Governance Department of GoR. The program will support overall improvement of urban environment cum living conditions as well as increase in tourism activities. The IPIU internally monitors the implementation of SRPs and looks after other safeguard issues. IPIU field offices have been established for different packages to assist in the coordination and day-to-day implementation and management of the Investment Program. The Executive Engineers were deployed as Resettlement Officers (ROs) at the field office level and are

5

working closely with the District Collector, Panchayat Level Committees and NGO, to expedite the payments of assistance to affected persons (APs). To implement social safeguard documents, the EA engaged IIRM, Jaipur based NGO, who was mobilized on 2 August 2008 for implementation of SRPs and to assist IPIUs in the implementation of SRPs with a specific program called Community Action and Participation Program (CAPP).The social expert of the Investment Program Management Consultancy (IPMC) was entrusted with the responsibility of monitoring the implementation of these SRPs, and assess its performance and effectiveness, on the basis of review of reports, field observations, consultations with APs, other stakeholders, IPIUs and IPMU. Internal monitoring is done on regularly while reporting has been on quarterly basis for the first two years and subsequently has been bi-annually. At present the process of appointment of External Monitor is being initiated by RUIDP.The monitoring is conducted at field by the ACOs of CAPP with DSC Social experts. They verify APs, distribute ID cards, Open bank accounts and conduct public consultations with APs w.r.t project implementation, likely schedule of initiation of civil works etc. CAPP collates all information of their activities in the form of a report and submits to IPMC/PMU on a monthly basis. DSC social experts also submit M& E reports quarterly to IPMC. IPMC social expert compiles all such information from CAPP and as well as DSCs related to R&R implementation in that particular time period and submits to PMU for onward submission. IIRM is assisting the IPIUs in implementation of SRPs through their Assistant Community Officers (ACOs) engaged for different towns. Each ACO is in charge of all subprojects that fall in that particular town. A total of 15 ACOs, having experience between 3 to 12 years, were mobilized at all 15 project towns’ upto December 2011. Their knowledge about the local area and familiarity with local dialects is expected to facilitate the implementation process. The core unit of CAPP imparted training to ACOs on resettlement and rehabilitation (R&R) before mobilizing them at the respective project town. The ACOs and the social expert in charge of the overall CAPP activities are trained on R&R activities and have attended several workshops to enhance their skills in SRP implementation. Details about the mobilization schedule of ACO are provided at Appendix 1.

C. Implementation of Resettlement Activities

5. This subsection deals with the implementation of resettlement activities under various subprojects in 3 towns under Tranche 1 and 12 towns under Tranche 2, which are under construction, during the monitoring period. Details are provided at Appendix 2. Please note that Initially 35 SRPs/CCLs were prepared sector wise (excluding ROB’s) which includes one or several packages under one sector. For example in Alwar Waste Water there are 4 packages i.e. RUSDIP/TR-1/ALW /WW/02 (Lot-1), RUSDIP/TR-1/ALW/WW/02 Lot-2, RUSDIP/TR-1/ALW/WW/01 Lot-2, and Additional Package RUSDIP/TR-01/ALW/WW/03 but one single SRP (Alwar Waste Water) including the Additional package was revised and submitted to ADB for Approval.

6. During past quarters, 3 Additional SRPs have been approved by ADB (Sikar Street, Sikar Solid Waste and Bundi Street); the list of additional subprojects being considered for the coverage under Tranche 1 and Tranche 2 in this quarter is provided at Appendix 3.

D. Overview of IIRM under CAPP Activities

7. The field officials of IIRM under CAPP are engaged and assisting IPIUs in SRPs implementation in the Project area. The resettlement activities are as under:

• To identify affected persons (APs), key stakeholders and consult closely with them on their views about the project and resettlement impacts, To identify vulnerable groups (for example the very poor- BPL, households headed by women, ST, the disabled) who require special assistance and consult with them.

6

• To provide assistance to APs for opening bank account if required

• To disburse the assistance money (in cheques) to APs.

• Public Information and Disclosures of SRP in local vernacular language

• Distribution of AP’s Identity Cards

• Employment of APs in Project Civil Works

• Coordinate with Grievance Redressal Committee (GRC) - City Level Committee to function as GRC.

• Collection of data on the progress of implementation and internal monitoring.

• In addition, several awareness campaigns, seminars, orientations, trainings, sewer and water connectivity camps have been organized at different levels on various aspects like health, hygiene, water and sanitation, solid waste management, sewerage, property connection, road safety and other program related activities. IEC material is circulated to APs and other stakeholders on the above issues. The programs are designed to help enhance the understanding of the program and through people’s participation ensure sustainability of the assets/services provided.

o A total of 105 , Consultation and Orientation Programs on SWM & Health, hygiene and HIV AIDs etc awareness for Rag Pickers Community were organized at Bharatpur (11), Dholpur (8), Karauli (9), Sawai Madhopur (16), Barmer (10), Churu (7), Jaisalmer (7), Nagarur (4) Sikar (1) Bundi (11), Baran (4), Chittorgarh (4), Jhalawar (10), , Rajsamand (3).

o Total 309, Focus Group Discussion or Small Group Meetings and public awareness for Health, hygein and HIV AIDs etc with (RWAs, Women's Group, Project Labourers, Slums Areas public, ) were organized at Bharatpur (14), Dholpur (8), Karauli (23), Sawai Madhopur (29), Barmer (31), Churu (36) Jaisalmer (23), Nagaur (11), Sikar (26), Bundi (19), Baran (6), Chittorgarh (23) and Jhalawar (45) and Rajsamand (15).

o 307 no of Consultations with ULB & Line Departments, NGOs/CBOs, Contractors, Ward Parshads,School Principle, ADB Team, Sarpanch and Villagers etc. were held at Bharatpur (27), Dholpur (10), Karauli (21), Sawai Madhopur (26), Barmer (5), Churu (40), Jaisalmer (23), Nagaur (1), Sikar (54), Bundi (18), Baran(32) Chittorgarh (6), Jhalawar (34) and Rajsamand (10).

o 105 nos. of Public Consultation on Water Meter, Solid Waste, Water Management were organized at Bharatpur (7), Dholpur (1), Karauli (1), Sawai Madhopur (26), Barmer (1), Churu (8) Nagaur (4), Sikar (4), Baran (9), Chittorgarh (24), Jhalawar (16) and Rajsamand (4).

o Essay Competition for awareness & participation on water conservation in a school of Barmer was organized.

o 419 nos. of work site visits were organized at Alwar (1), Bharatpur (42), Dholpur (37), Karauli (47), Sawai Madhopur (24), Barmer (42), Churu (32), Jaisalmer (28), Nagaur (28), Sikar (40), Bundi (23), Baran (33), Chittorgarh (33), Jhalawar (18) and Rajsamand (18).

o 29 Meeting with Media were organized at Bharatpur (4), Sawai Madhopur (19), Churu (1), Chittorgarh (2) and Rajsamand (3).

7

o 132 Community Awareness through NUKKAR NATAK was provided at Bharatpur, Dholpur, Karauli, Barmer, Churu, Nagaur, Bundi, Baran Chittorgarh, Jhalawar, Rajsamand (12 Natak at each town).

o 02 Drawing Competition on water conservation were organized at Rajsamand.

o College Debate Competition on Water Conservation & Water Metering was organized at Jaisalmer.

o Social Survey was conducted at 55 locations of Alwar (4), Karauli (3), Sawai Madhopur (6), Churu (2), Jaisalmer (5), Bundi (7) and Baran (28) .

o 32 Training Program on Safety Measures for Project Labourers were provided at Bharatpur (1), Dholpur (10), Churu (2), Nagaur (6), Bundi (1), Baran (10), Chittorgarh (1) and Rajsamand (1).

o 19 School Students Awareness Rally on Installation of Water Meter was organized at Alwar (1), Bharatpur (5), Churu (1), Jaisalmer (2), Bundi (1), Baran (2), Chittorgarh (4), Jhalawar (2) and Rajsamand(1).

o 08 Awareness Meeting Program for Stakeholders was organized at Bharatpur (1), Jaisalmer (6) and Sikar(1).

o 02 Drawing Competition on Solid waste maangent were organized at Rajsamand .

o 4 Household Surveys were organized at Dholpur (1), Jaisalmer (1) and Chittorgarh (2).

o 165 nos of Survey for Willingness to pay with Ward Parshad , for Consumer for water, sanitation and solid waste management was organized at Alwar (55), Bharatpur (12), Dholpur (4), Karauli(1), Sawai Madhopur (14), Barmer (9), Churu (10), Jaisalmer (1), Nagaur (12), Sikar (2), Bundi (9), Baran (9), Chittorgarh(30) and Jhalawar (2).

o 2 Orientation Programs for Plumbers on service connections were organized at Churu and Jhalawar.

o 32 Slum & Poor Comunitee awareness through Puppet Shows on Water, Solid Waste Management, Water Metering, Tariff reforms were oganized at Bharatpur(4), Dholpur(4), Karauli(4), Sawaimadhopur(4), Jaisalmer(4), Bundi(4), Chittorgarh(2) and Jhalawar(4)...

The details of NGO Activities are summarized at Appendix 4. 8. Data is being collected on the prescribed format by all Assistant Community Officers (ACOs) stationed at different subproject towns to monitor the progress of RP implementation.

E. Project Impact

9. The Investment Program is intended to optimize the socio economic development in district headquarters and towns, improve the urban environment cum living conditions as well as induce enhanced tourism activities. Under the 6 subprojects in Tranche 1, and 6 subprojects in Tranche 2 mentioned in appendix 2, no land acquisition and no permanent impact including any impact on the IPs were entailed. These subprojects have no APs as of date. Out of total 38 Subprojects, remaining 26 nos of sub-projects have only temporary impacts barring the Sikar solid waste management subproject which involves relocation of 5 small CPRs.

8

10. List of the various sub projects with their Impact and corresponding AP’s have been included in the Tables 1, & 2 below. For further details of AP’s, assistance disbursement date and status refer Appendix 5.

Table 1: Summary Status of AP’s under Tranche 1 (Amount in INR)

Subproject Name Type of Impact

No. of APs

No. of Vulnerable

APs

Time Period

Livelihood

Assistance

Other Entitlements

Alwar Bridge

Temporary* 0** 0 90 0 0

Alwar Waste Water

Temporary* 15 0 14 25,260 0

Alwar Water Supply

Temporary* 0** 0 14 0 0

Jaisalmer Waste Water

Temporary* 23 13 14 92,450 0

Jaisalmer Water Supply

Temporary* 23 13 14 92,450 0

Jhalawar Water Supply

Temporary* 2 0 14 3,864 0

Total 63 26 214024 * Temporary loss of livelihood for a period of minimum of 14 days to a maximum of 90days ** SRPs revised and due to change in alignment/scope no. of APs have been reduced

Table 2: Summary Status of APs under Tranche 2 (Amount in INR)


No. of APs

No. of Vulnerable

APs

Time Period

Livelihood Assistance

Other Entitlements

Baran Bridge Temporary* 24 2 90 463,280 0Barmer Waste Water Temporary* 35 1 14 49,000 0Barmer Water Supply Temporary* 35 1 14 49,000 0Bharatpur Drainage Temporary* 03 0 20 10,800 0Bharatpur Water Supply

Temporary* 10** 4 14 59130 0

Bundi Waste Water Temporary* 50 0 14 387,100 0Bundi Water Supply Temporary* 24 15 14 101,028 0Chittorgarh Bridge Temporary* 3 0 90 50,080 0Churu Bridge Temporary* 1 0 90 7,400 22000#Churu Water Supply Temporary* 2 0 14 3,200 0Dholpur Waste Water Temporary* 01 0 14 1,600 0Nagaur Waste Water Temporary* 12*** 1 14 20580 0Nagaur Water Supply Temporary* 98 15 14 203,840 0Rajsamand Waste Water

Temporary* 27 1 14 110,740 0

Rajsamand Water Supply

Temporary* 13 0 14 43,498 0

Sawai Madhopur Bridge

Temporary* 06 0 90 67,700 0

Sawai Madhopur Waste Water

Temporary* 01 0 14 3,500 0

9


No. of APs

No. of Vulnerable

APs

Time Period

Livelihood Assistance

Other Entitlements

Sikar Waste Water Temporary* 90 2 14 160,100 0Sikar Water Supply Temporary* 7** 0 14 31506 0Sikar Street Temporary* 14 4 14 96684 10000Bundi Street Temporary* 49 23 14 209622 0Total 505 69 2,129,388

* Temporary loss of livelihood for a period of minimum of 14 days to a maximum of 90 days NB: This list excludes the subprojects with no Impacts/APs ** SRPs revised and due to change in alignment/scope no. of APs have been increased in Sikar Water Supply and Bharatpur Water Supply (WS). *** SRPs revised and due to change in alignment/scope no. of APs have been reduced in Nagaur WW. # Compensation amount for boundary wall ^ Cost of CPR 360000.00 (Sikar SW) not reflected in above table

F. Policy and Legal Framework

11. The policy framework and entitlements for the Program are based on national laws: The Land Acquisition Act, 1894, (amended in 1984) the National Resettlement and Rehabilitation Policy, 2007 (NRRP); and ADB’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement, 1995 and the agreed Resettlement Framework (RF). Subsequently, SRP was prepared for each sub-project. The main objective of the Investment Program is to reduce poverty levels in the State. Project and project components (subprojects) assisted by ADB warrants safeguards in the form of resettlement plan in order to address adverse social impacts such as losses of land, resources, and means of livelihood or social support systems.

G. Validation and Verifications of AP’s

12. All the APs have been validated and verified by the implementing NGO at their respective towns this was done with field verification (both signature, photos & proof of identification like voter ID etc were taken) were made before Subproject ID Cards disbursement. Thereafter during lively hood assistance disbursement some APs could not be located or traced. Efforts are still being made by the NGO to trace them. In Bundi Water Supply minimum wages of Rs. 73 has been fixed and the compensation has been revised accordingly, the amount paid has been adjusted from contingency.Compensations has been made/is being made on the basis of approved SRP. Details of payment made are appended in Appendix 5. At end of Civil works, It will be ensured that APs are at least paid minimum wages as compensation additionally against livelihood loss at the time of disbursement.The additional amount on the basis of minimum wage rates applicable at the time of disbursement will be paid at the end of civil work. The final payment made as per applicable minimum wages will be sent to ADB separately for approval and will be made an integral part of approved SRPs. A concurrence from ADB is needed which is being prepared for additional compensation to all APs for all works based on minimum wages applicable at that point of time. Distribution of Identity Cards

13. Out of total 63 APs under Tranche 1 and 505 APs under Tranche 2, identity cards have been distributed to 42 APs and 318 APs, respectively. The distribution of identity cards to remaining APs is under process.

H. Compensation and Assistance

14. APs will be provided 30 days advance notice to ensure no or minimal disruption in livelihood. If required, they will also be assisted temporarily to shift for continued economic activity. For example, they will be assisted to shift to the other side of the road where there is

10

no construction. Ensuring there is no income or access loss during sub-project construction is the responsibility of contractors. Consistent with the initial environmental examination, contractors will ensure: leaving spaces for access between mounds of soil, providing walkways and metal sheets to maintain access across trenches for people and vehicles where required, increased workforces to finish work in areas with impacts on access, timing of works to reduce disruption during business hours, phased construction schedule and working one segment at a time and one side of the road at a time.

15. Should construction activities result in unavoidable livelihood disruption, compensation for lost income or a transitional allowance for the period of disruption whichever is greater will be provided. Vulnerable APs will be given priority in project construction employment.

16. Of the total 568 APs, 95 APs belong to the vulnerable groups (BPL, ST, WHH, disabled persons etc)3. All the APs will be compensated and/or are being compensated in accordance with the agreed entitlement matrix of SRPs. APs would be compensated for varied number of days based on the type of subprojects. Due to the impacts of subprojects for water supply and waste water; drainage and bridge; and ROB projects, 14 days, 20 days, and 3 months compensation amount would be paid to the APs respectively. The shifting assistance would also be provided to kiosks and those APs who are vulnerable and are entitled for additional assistance. If any structure gets temporarily affected, then also the contractor would re-establish that particular structure after the project is over. Besides this assistance, ramps would be provided in front of residences and shops to provide access to people and also the mobile vendors would be assisted in shifting to nearby area or to the opposite side of the road when construction in that particular stretch would take place. The loss of frontage/ structures if any would be borne by the contractor and this has been included in the contractor’s TOR. The PIU is however, advised to review the assistance disbursement process carried out by the NGOs and finalize it, so as to facilitate assistance to the APs.

17. Total INR 680614/- is disbursed (including boundary wall compensation paid Rs. 7400) under Tranche 2 and Tranche 1. Out of 568 Nos. of affected persons (APs - livelihood affected), 71 Nos. of affected persons (APs) have been paid disbursement claim up to end of December 2011. During July- December 2011, a total 24 Nos of affected persons (APs) have been paid compensation amounting to Rs. 106366/-. Amount of disbursement claim for livelihood remaining to be paid is Rs. 1670198 /- (2343412 -673214) to 497 Nos. of affected persons (APs). Reconstruction Cost of CPRs for Sikar Solid Waste Project amount to Rs. 3,60,000 and Sikar Street amounting to Rs. 10,000 is estimated and will be taken care during construction. The Status of Disbursement Claim Paid to APs is provided at Appendix 6.

18. Approval of the SRP is required prior to award of civil works; and disbursement of compensation/ assistance of APs is required prior to commencement of civil works.

I. Public Consultations and Disclosure of SRPs

19. A series of meetings and consultations were held with the APs and other stakeholders on the project, entitlement options, impacts etc. were held on different stretches since the inception of the RP implementation. These are mainly organized by the CAPP. During July - December 2011, IIRM under CAPP programme organized 139 Nos. of public consultation meetings with APs and a total no. of 569 meetings have been organized

3 The list of APs will be provided in the subsequent external monitoring reports.

11

till December 2011 in which 4457 persons participated. The issues raised in Public Consultation Meetings were related to R&R Implementation Activities. Opening of Bank A/c, and Disbursement of Assistance were the prime issues raised, which were suitably addressed by the ACO of the respective towns. It was further communicated that 30 days notice would be provided to APs before Civil Works initiate (in that section) and disbursement would be completed prior to the mobilization of the contractor. Other related issues with regard to Water Supply, Sewerage, Personal Hygiene and health, HIV AIDS were discussed through various awareness campaigns. The details of Public Consultation meetings are provided at Appendix 7.

20. A town-wide stakeholder consultation workshop was conducted which provided an overview of the Investment Program. During the workshop, Hindi versions of the RF was provided to ensure stakeholders understood the objectives, policy principles and procedures for any land acquisition, compensation and other assistance measures for any AP. During consultations, key issues raised were: (i) participants expressed satisfaction that there was a subproject taking care of their needs which they have waited for 25-30 years; (ii) they are not hesitant to move or shift if necessary to accommodate the work; (iii) they are willing to provide labor for the subproject; and (iv) they raised that it is important to cover up the dug holes properly and restore the roads after sub-project construction. Information continues to be disseminated to APs and beneficiaries through various media. English and Hindi versions of the RF and SRP are placed in the Urban Local Body (ULB) office and APs have access to the SRPs. The NGO engaged to implement the SRP will continue consultations, information dissemination, and disclosure. The SRPs are available in the ULB office, IPMU’s and IPIU’s offices, and the town library, wherever present. The finalized SRPs will also be disclosed in ADB’s website, and the RUIDP website. The information will also be made available at a convenient place, especially in all the relevant offices, which will be accessible to the APs.

J. Grievance Redressal

21. The City Level Committee (CLC), acting as a grievance redress committee (GRC) is chaired by the District Collector with representatives from the ULB, state government agencies, IPIU, community-based organizations (CBOs) and NGOs. As GRC, the CLC meets at regular intervals based on the availability of the CLC /GRC members and also as per requirement or pending issues Till now, one case has come to GRC in any of the 15 towns where the implementation of the subprojects is under progress. The grievance redress mechanism is provided at Appendix 8.. Total 136 number of CLC/GRC meetings has been held so far. The information w.r.t CLC/GRC is communicated to APs personally by the ACO in the concerned town. Further, the complete detail of the CLC meeting is also displayed at the IPIU notice board and the notice board of the collector’s office too. In the past quarter, a minor grievance was lodged by one APat Baran ROB site where a minor grievance was put up by Mr. Aslam Khan before the implementing NGO (CAPP) that he is running business near proposed site and that during construction of service road earlier, his business had hampered. He also informed that during survey, he was out of station due to some personal work and later during joint visit conducted by PIU & DSC, it was decided that assistance will be disbursed to him after discussing this issue in GRC. The issue has been discussed in GRC meeting held on 31.10.2011 and it has been agreed to include Mr. Aslam Khan in the list of APs and distribute the compensation amount to Mr. Aslam Khan as per ADB guidelines. The SRP of the packages is under revision. The Minutes of GRC is enc losed as Appendix 9. Further in this quarter a grivence has been received from the Gadaria Lohar community for compensation (not justified on the ground as they have moved on site after the cutoff date) in Bundi Water Supply. District administration (Jila Parishad) has forwarded the complanint to the Collector and the matter is to be put up in GRC. Documentary evidence has been attached in Appendix 9.

12

22. IPIUs along with ACOs and DSCs have been entrusted with the responsibility to maintain a proper register of the grievance (if any) which will be endorsed by the all three agencies involved in implementation. General directions for registering grievances of APs were communicated in the meeting organized on 26.12.2011 followed by minutes issued vide letter no. 32060-67dated 30.12.2011. GRC registers are in place at all the towns.

23. Further ACOs have been given instructions to arrange more public consultations and register all the grievances (including verbal) in writing whether substantial or non substantial and put them up for the perusal of IPIU for proper disposal, either at their level or through GRC/CLC meeting.

K. Issues and Action Plan

24. Urbanisation has increased at a rapid pace in India over the recent years, much faster than the increase in urban infrastructure facilities to support them. Also, pressure of population has been more on larger towns/cities putting enormous pressure on the resources of municipalities so much so that most are unable to keep up with the provision of even basic services and infrastructure resulting in irregular availability of water, sanitation and public amenities. In extreme cases, this has aggravated risks to public health and safety. Rajasthan is no exception and all the 15 towns selected under this programme is in dire need of up gradation of such urban infrastructure facilities which includes, augmentation of water supply, sewerage network, drainage facilities, road improvement, ROB construction and of course solid waste management.

25. Experience from ADB-funded urban projects show complex social, economic, legal, institutional, and management issues in urban development – largely derived from realities of urban life in developing countries like India. Urban projects typically consist of a variety of infrastructure such as roads, power, water, sewerage, gas pipelines, and slum improvement/upgrading activities. It is important to mention in this context that the final detailed engineering design in each sub project of RUIDP was prepared keeping in mind to avoid or minimize social impact as far as possible. However, since all the developments foreseen are town centric, it is difficult to avoid any impact whatsoever in densely populated towns.

26. The social impact in all 15 towns is primarily temporary in nature affecting mobile/ambulatory vendors who are earning their livelihood by using public land and therefore non-tile holders. But according to ADB guidelines, their legal status is not a determining factor for livelihood entitlement. Recognising the adverse impacts of the project and the need to address the involuntary resettlement and other related adverse social impacts, RUIDP (on behalf of Govt. of Rajasthan) & ADB jointly prepared the resettlement and rehabilitation framework (RPF 2007 ) consistent with applicable laws, notifications and policies that are relevant in the context of the implementation of the project activities. Thus provision of livelihood assistance for mobile/ambulatory vendors was made in the R&R Framework in view of disruption likely to be caused due to implementation of project activities. It was agreed that for implementation of different infrastructure works the livelihood disruption would vary between 14 days to 3 months and assistance would be accordingly paid/given APs. Therefore 14 days for water supply, waste water& road improvement, 20 days for drainage and 90 days for ROBbridge were considered/ as the disruption period for which compensation/livelihood assistance would be provided to the APs. Additional assistance for vulnerable APs and shifting assistance where ever applicable is being provided to the APs as per the Resettlement Framework. Therefore it may be considered as one of best practices of resettlement plan implementation.

27. It was further agreed that that resettlement assistance would be disbursed just before civil works initiate in a particular section or stretch just before the contractor moves in. This is

13

being done on purpose so as to avoid unnecessary interference in the construction job leading to delay in implementation work.

28. There are no indigenous peoples (IPs) in any of the subprojects and also there is no land acquisition involved in Tranche-1 and Tranche-2 sub-projects. Further there is no permanent impact except in Sikar SWM (proposed under Additional Package of Tr-2) where a few structures are likely to get impacted. (Refer to SRP for further details).

29. After transect walk and census and socio-economic survey of affected persons present at site were conducted. SRPs were prepared providing details of APs (name, location, socio-economic status and entitlement).But after approval of SRP when ACOs (Assistant Community officer) went to site for verification of identified APs for distribution of I-D cards and to further help APs in opening of bank accounts for disbursement claims, most of AP’s (in many cases about 40%) could not be traced/located as they had/have migrated from the town and or shifted to some other places in demand for job/occupation.

30. After identification of APs ID Cards were distributed but some were found missing; efforts are being taken by NGO to trace them. It has been very difficult to locate these APs in Tranche 1 and 2. The ACOs however tried their best but were unable to trace even after repeated attempts. After all attempts failed, ACOs have collected records of written information from surrounding venders or shopkeepers that the APs who are missing or cannot be located have migrated or shifted to some other town.

List of SRPs where AP’s migrated or are non-traceable* S. No. Town Sub project Total

APs I-Card

Distributed

Tranche -1

1 Jaisalmer Water supply 23 15

2 Jaisalmer Waste water 23 15

Tranche -2

3 Barmer Water Supply 35 22

4 Barmer Waste Water 35 22

5 Nagaur * Water Supply 98 64

6 Nagaur* Waste Water 12 6

7 Rajsamand Waste Water 27 16

8 Sikar Waste Water 90 65

*Under process of revision due to change of scope

31. Additionally, it must be noted that since the total figures of APs remain the same, and due to no change in status of migrant APs, the resettlement activities can never get updated on those missing APs and in all monitoring reports this gap exists.

32. So the policy should be accordingly revised to address this issue. It clearly should define that APs who are not available after a certain time period (may be one year) of SRP approval should be deleted from the list of APs and SRP revised accordingly.

33. In some towns differences arose due to pronunciation problem during noting down the actual name of APs during census survey. After SRPs were prepared and approved, when ACOs visited site for verification exercise, they noted the difference in actual spelling in the name of APs in comparison to names written in SRPs due to pronunciation of name in

14

Rajasthani languge (local dialect). There should be provision in the RF or policy to allow correcting the name and accordingly proceeding with disbursement. Rectification of name or spelling should not call for a revision in SRP.

L. Lessons Learnt and Good Practices

34. Good practices in RP implementation vis-a-vis RUIDP is presented below:

Sl No

Good Practices in RP implementation Good Practices Incorporated in RUIDP

1 All affected persons – titled and non-titled – were covered by the project

The resettlement policy covered all affected persons, titled and non-titled , affected persons

2 All types of losses were identified through census and socio-economic surveys

All data were collected through 100% census/surveys so that everyone affected is covered

3 Detailed entitlement matrix established to compensate for all kinds of losses, dislocation and resettlement

The entitlement matrix has covered all types of probable impacts with scope for even any non conceivable impact with particular emphasis on additional assistance

4 Photo ID Card with description of losses and entitlements

ID Card for all affected persons prepared

5 Special assistance to vulnerable groups Special attention to and assistance for vulnerable groups, including female-headed poor households, disabled family members etc.

6 Livelihood assistance Livelihood assistance to all those temporarily affected (mobile/ambulatory vendors) in accordance to days of impact

7 GRC for disputes GRCs have been established at all 15 towns. In fact it was decided that the CLC would doubly function as GRC. It has been decided by IPMU that any grievance by AP would be brought to the notice of GRC for settlement

8 Public participation in resettlement management

Major initiative undertaken for public consultation, disclosure and participation of the affected persons

9 Regional /local project monitoring PIUs in each town to monitor implementation and social experts of DSCs to visit PIUs at regular intervals for regular monitoring. Social Expert, IPMC will also visit at least one DSC in each Quarter.

10 NGO involved in resettlement operations IIRM under CAPP program has been engaged for RP implementation, income restoration, skill training, gender plans, public health, AIDS/HIV awareness and prevention activities

Lessons Learnt

• Dissemination of information and transparency in monetary disbursement is essential.

• Employment generation by making mandatory for contractors to employ local labour for construction works (unskilled works) wherever applicable.

15

• Vendors mostly offer to shift voluntarily.

• Frequency of GRC/CLC meetings should be more and one review Meeting should be organized every month.

• Implementation could have been smoother and faster with appointment of one coordinator at each town (Proposal under approval).

• Coordination with line agencies responsible for land acquirsition is also important for smooth implementation.

Developing Learning Mechanism in the Project

35. The project is doing the following to promote learning:

• Promoting cross learning within organization through scheduled Monthly Review Meeting at all level, for information flow among staff.

• Organizing exposure visit of staff and community from one project district to another district.

• The functional head at IPIU should be responsible of counselling their respective staff through SDES.

• The project staffs would participate in the knowledge sharing platforms in workshops organized at PMU level at quarterly basis.

Good Practices 36. Some of the good practices that have been adopted in these subprojects have been listed below.

• Ongoing and efficient operation and maintenance (O&M) : Successful projects typically are those that (i) are run by financially self-sustaining water supply/waste water institutions, (ii) put in place user committees (UCs), and (iii) adopted the “user pays” principle. A lesson learned was that the early establishment of UCs fostered greater beneficiary participation, resulting in a stronger sense of ownership and willingness to accept O&M responsibility among project beneficiaries.

• Community-based approach to water supply or waste water projects in particular: projects are designed incorporating the learned experience from the community, and communities directly participate in rendering the systems sustainable.

• Designing projects in a cost-effective manner and strengthening institutional capacities.

• Technical innovation: In Bharatpur Waste water project (under RUSDIP Tranche 3), a new technology called Sequential Batch Reactor (SBR) technology has been adopted in Municipal Sewage Treatment. SBR reactors are utilized to treat waste water such as sewage or output from anaerobic digesters or mechanical biological treatment facilities in batches. The SBR technology (Somewhat Similar and comparable to ASP) is being introduced by RUSDIP for the first time in Bharatpur.

• Participatory approach: This approach helped to foster a sense of ownership and ultimately contributed to improving the sustainability of the projects. In several RUSDIP projects, community has actively participated and suggested alternative solutions to problems encountered while implementation.

• Strong commitment by governments, both national and local, is one of the key determinants of project success. In RUSDIP, the coordination among the different PIUs and PMU at the centre is very active and smooth. Regular workshops are

16

organized at the nodal headquaters at Jaipur to discuss all cross cutting issues like standardization, tendering, social and environmental safeguards etc.

• Institutional strengthening and training : Training activities were not limited to human resource development (as in IIRM under CAPP) but also focused on technical and engineering aspects of the projects.

• Environmental Protection and Capacity Building: The projects with successful wastewater components, in particular, had a strong positive environmental impact due to the reduction of untreated wastewater allowed to flow back into the ecosystem. Further the more rational use of water resources in water supply components also had a positive effect on water aquifers and water tables in the project areas. This has been the principle motto behind all waste water projects under RUSDIP. Capacity-building initiatives, as noted above, also contributed to the success of projects.

• Poverty Reduction and Support for Gender/Children Issues: Poor and disadvantaged persons in the project areas benefited both directly from improved health, thereby reducing medical expenses, as well as indirectly from increased availability of scarce medical services due to other nonpoor persons being healthier. As a result of improved water supply, greater productivity and improved health were achieved, as more time was available for family care, education, and income-generating activities that would have otherwise been used for water fetching.

M. Concluding Remarks

37. In conclusion, certain characteristics may be mentioned as common to all successful Water Supply/Wastewater Treatment Projects under RUSDIP. They are as below:

• Rapid urbanization created a strong demand for the output of water supply/wastewater treatment projects.

• There were positive impacts on intended beneficiaries, particularly women as they are the primary users of water which is needed for all household activities including cleaning utensils, washing clothes, cooking etc..

• There was an ability to learn from past lessons and incorporate the lessons in project design.

• Technical innovation and a positive impact on the environment occurred.

• Proper O&M helped ensure long-run sustainability.

• The projects typically (i) were run by financially self-sustaining water supply institutions, (ii) put in place WUCs, and (iii) adopted the “user pays” principle.

• A participatory approach contributed to success.

• Committed Executing Agencies (EAs) were, highly involved in project implementation, supported by institutional strengthening and training activities, and provided with counterpart funds in a timely manner.

• Consultants and contractors performed well.

• Regular ADB review missions proactively helped to solve problems.

17

Appendix 1

Details of ACOs Mobilization Schedule

S. No.

Towns Name Date of mobilization

Experience of Social

No. of Trainings Attended

1 Alwar Mr. Hanuman Sahay Meena

20-09-2011 7 Yrs. CAPP Core Unit impart training /orientation to the ACOs before joining the project town about the CAPP activities under RUIDP and how to organize various awareness camps/training / consultations etc. in addition 2 formal training to the ACOs were organized by CAPP Core Unit till date on various issues relating to implementation of CAPP activities

2 Jaisalmer Mrs. Seema Tanwar 29.07.2009 5.6 Yrs.

3 Sikar Mr. Govind Singh 17.11.2009 7 Yrs.

4 Sawai Madhopur

Mr. Devendra Singh 01.12.2009 6.6 Yrs.

5 Bharatpur Mr. Nawal Kisore Sharma

06.10.2010 5.6 Yrs.

6 Bundi Mr. Chiranji Lal Chandel

11.01.2010 8.6 Yrs.

7 Churu Mr. Sant Lal Saran 13.05.2010 11.6 Yrs.

8 Dholpur Ms. Seema Rathore 12.01.2010 3.6 Yrs.

9 Jhalawar Mr. Peeyush Kr. Dixit 11.01.2010 4.6 Yrs.

10 Karauli Mr. Shri Kant Sharma 04.04.2011 8 Yrs.

11 Nagaur Mr. Aslam Khan 14.11.2011 7.2 Yrs.

12 Rajsamand Mrs. Neetu Joshi 15.09.2011 7 Yrs.

13 Baran Pardeep Singh Kashyap

27.12.10 07 Yrs

14 Barmer Mr. Ram Gopal Sharma

13.07.2010 5.6 Yrs.

15 Chhitorgarh Mrs. Indira Chauhan 12.07.2010

08 Yrs.

18

Appendix 2

Status of Subproject under Implementation Tranche 1

S. No.

Town Sub project Type of Document

Total APs

I-Card Distributed

No. of consultative

meetings

Nos. of APs Paid

disbursement claim

Amount Disbursed

(INR)

1. Alwar Water supply SRP 0 0 18 -

2 Alwar Waste water SRP 15 10 10 16840

3 Alwar ROB SRP 0 0 -

4 Alwar Solid waste management

CCL 0 0

5 Jaisalmer Water supply SRP 23 15 31 -

6 Jaisalmer Waste water SRP 23 15 -

7 Jaisalmer Drainage CCL 0 0 -

8 Jaisalmer Solid waste management

CCL 0 0 --

9 Jhalawar–Jhalarpatan

Water supply SRP 2 2 54 2 3864

10 Jhalawar–Jhalarpatan

Solid waste management

CCL 0 0 -

Tranche -2

S. No.


Total APs

I-Card Distributed

No. of consultative

meetings

Nos. of APs Paid

disbursement claim

Amount Disbursed (INR)

11 Baran ROB SRP 24 23 26 23 442560

12 Barmer Water Supply SRP 35 22 52

13 Barmer Waste Water SRP 35 22

14 Barmer ROB CCL 0 0

15 Bharatpur Drainage SRP 03 0 20

16 Bharatpur Water Supply SRP 10 4

17 Bundi Water Supply SRP 24 24 86 24 104250

18 Bundi Waste Water SRP 50 49

19 Bundi Street SRP 49 0

20 Chittorgarh Bridge (Gambhiri)

CCL 0 0

21 Chittorgarh High Level SRP 03 03 33 3 49990

19

S. No.


Total APs

I-Card Distributed

No. of consultative

meetings

Nos. of APs Paid

disbursement claim

Amount Disbursed (INR)

Bridge (Bedach)

22 Churu ROB SRP 01+1s

1* 42 0* 7400*

23 Churu WS Water Supply SRP 02 2

24 Dholpur Waste Water SRP 01 1 26 1 1600

25 Dholpur Water Supply CCL 0 0

26 Karauli Water Supply CCL 0 0

27 Nagaur Water Supply SRP 98 64 44

28 Nagaur Waste Water SRP 12 06

29 Rajsamand Water Supply SRP 13 11 21

30 Rajsamand Waste Water SRP 27 16

31 Sawai Madhopur

ROB SRP 6 4 39 4 40700

32 Sawai Madhopur

Waste Water SRP 1 1 1 3500

33 Sawai Madhopur

Water Supply CCL 0 0

34 Sikar Waste Water SRP 90 65 77 3 9910

35 Sikar Drainage CCL 0 0

36 Sikar Water Supply SRP 7 0

37 Sikar Street SRP 14 0

38. Sikar Solid Waste Management

SRP 0** 0

* Compensation Paid for Structure

** CPRs will be affected

20

Appendix 3

List of SRPs to be prepared/revised due to change in Scope of Work/ Additional Work in Tranche Tranche 1 & 2

Additional SRPs to be prepared and to be submitted S. No. Subproject Name Description Remarks 1 RUSDIP/TR-2/

BPR/ST/01 Circular roads in Bharatpur SRP Prepared to be

submitted to ADB for Approval

2 RUSDIP/TR-02/SKR/ST/03

Widening & strengthening of roads and Draiange work at Sikar

Will be merged with previously approved SRP of Sikar Street

3 RUSDIP/TR-02/ DLP/WW/06

Supply, Laying, Joining, testing and commissioing of main sewer and lateral sewers and construction of sewerage pumping station, along with construction of manholes appurtenances etc. in eastern zone Part B of Dholpur Town under Phase II

Will be merged with previously approved SRP of Dholpur Waste Water

SRPs expected to be revised due to change in Alignment

S. No. Subproject Name Description Remarks

1 Nagaur Waste Water (RUSDIP/TR-02/ NGR/WW/01)

Design, construction, supply, erection, testing, commissioning and five years Operation & Maintenance of 8 MLD sewage treatment plant near Balwa road and sewage pumping/ lifting station including all civil, electrical, mechanical, pumping and other allied

To be further revised due to change in scope and reduction of APs

2 Nagaur Water Supply (RUSDIP/TR-02/ NGR/WS/01)

Construction of OHSRs and CWRs including Providing, Laying, Jointing, Testing and Commissioning of uPVC and DI pipelines in Distribution system and Transmission system; Construction of Pumping stations and ancillary works; Replacement of Water Meters

To be revised due to change in scope and reduction of APs

*.

21

Appendix 4 Status of Other Activities Conducted by ACO for Public awareness from July to December 2011

S. No.

Name of Activity Alwar

Bharatpur

Dholpur

Karauli Sawai madhop

ur

Barmer Churu Jaisalmer

Nagaur Sikar Bundi Baran Chittorgarh

Jhalawar

Rajsamand

Up to jun 11

Total

1.

Consulatation and Orientation Program on SWM & Health, hygein and HIV AIDs etc awrness for Rag Pickers Community

0 11 8 9 16 10 7 7 4 1 11 4 4 10 3 188 293

2.

Focus Group Discussion or Small Group Meetings and public awrenessfor Health, hygein and HIV AIDs etc with (RWAs, Women's Group, Project Labourers, Slums Areas public, )

0 14 8 23 29 31 36 23 11 26 19 6 23 45 15 1096 1405

3.

Consultations with ULB & Line Departments, NGOs/CBOs, Contractors, Ward Parshads,School Principle, ADB Team, Sarpanch and Villagers etc.

0 27 10 21 26 5 40 23 1 54 18 32 6 34 10 924 1231

4.

Public Consultation on Water Meter, Solid Waste, Water Management

0 7 1 1 26 1 8 4 4 9 24 16 4 75 180

5.

Essay Competition for awareness & participation on water conservation in school

0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 50

6. Work Site Visit 1 42 37 47 24 42 32 28 28 40 23 33 33 18 18 417 863

7. Meeting with Media 4 19 1 2 3 61 90

22

S. No.


Bharatpur

Dholpur


ur



Jhalawar

Rajsamand

Up to jun 11

Total

8. Community Awareness through NUKKAR NATAK

12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 132 264

9. Drawing Competition on Water Conservation 2 40 42

10.

College Debate Competition on Water Conservation & Water Metering

1 2 3

11. Social Survey 4 0 0 03 6 0 2 5 0 0 7 28 0 0 0 17 72

12. Training Program on Safety Measures for Project Labourers

1 10 2 6 1 10 1 0 1 7 39

13.

School Students Awareness Rally on Installation of Water Meter

1 5 1 2 1 2 4 2 1 3 22

14. Awareness Meeting Program for Stakeholders

1 6 1 2 10

15.

Drawing Competition for School Students on Solid Waste Management

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 44 46

16. Household Survey 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 134 138

17.

Willingness to pay Surveys with Ward Parshad , Consumer for water, sanitation and solid waste management

55 12 4 1 14 4 10 1 12 2 9 9 30 2 0 425 590

18.

Orientation Program for Registered Plumbers on Service Connection & Installation of Water

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2

23

S. No.


Bharatpur

Dholpur


ur



Jhalawar

Rajsamand

Up to jun 11

Total

Meters

19.

Slum & Poor Comunitee awarness through Puppet Shows on Water, Solid Waste Management, Water Metering, Tariff reforms

4 4 4 4 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 2 4 0 44 74

Total 61 140 95 121 164 106 152 101 78 101 105 145 143 144 69 3714 5144

24

Appendix 5

Details of Compensation Paid to APs as on 31 December 2011 S. No. Name/Father’s Name

of Affected Person (With address & phone no.)

Sub-Project

Vulnerability

Status

Name of Bank

Account No. I.D. Card Distributed (Yes/No)

Assistance Amount disbursed (Yes / No)

Actual Amount Disburse

d

Detail of amount

disbursed with

Cheque No. and Date

Remarks

Compensation for Structure CHURU (ROB) 1. MR. HARPHOOL

PRAJAPAT S/o Pooranmal Village-Dabla, Churu Mobile 9414676192

ROB NO RAJ. GRAMIN BANK

1300200000170

YES YES 7400 09915900003000

11.02.11

Compensation amounting Rs.

7400 has been paid for

boundary Wall , remaining

amount will be paid

Compensation for lively hood and vulnerability Assistance SAWAI MADHOPUR ROB 2. MR. MADAN LAL S/o

Ram Vilas Sharma R/o NH 116, Kherda Phatak, Ward No. 5, Sawai Madhopur Ph:-9314101251

ROB NO PRGB, Bhadoti

2007310 YES YES 13500 14137119.04.10

3. MR. BABUL AL S/o Chauha Lal R/o Near JVVNL, Ward No. 8, Kherda Phatak, Sawai Madhopur.

ROB NO SBBJ 61007903625 YES YES 13500 14137219.04.10

4. MR. BADRI LAL S/o Prabhu Lal R/o NH 116, Kherda Phatak, Sawai Madhopur

ROB NO BRGB, Maan Town

20013306 YES YES 13500 14137319.04.10

25

S. No. Name/Father’s Name of Affected Person (With address & phone no.)

Sub-Project

Vulnerability

Status

Name of Bank




d

Detail of amount

disbursed with

Cheque No. and Date

Remarks

5. MR. RAMDEEN KHAN S/o Mandora Khan R/o NH 116, Ward No. 9, Sawai Madhopur PH: 9352755287

ROB NO DENA Bank, Aalanpur

109610024176

YES YES 200 14137419.04.10

Total 40700Sawai Madhipur WW 6. MR. KAMAL SHARMA

S/o Gajendra Sharma R/o Dausa Road, NH 116, Adarsh Nagar, Sawai Madhopur

WW NO Union Bank 499902010017827

YES YES 3500 14137019.04.10

Total 3500 SIKAR (WWM) 7. MR.PAPPU SONI R/O

RM Leela Maidan,Rani sati Road,Sikar

WWM (WW-01)

NO Post office 310480 YES YES 1670 84839807.12.10

8. MR.KARTAR R/O 226 Housing Board ,Sikar

WWM Yes IntiGirl.urban co. Bank

1843 YES YES 6570 84839707.12.10

9. MR.RAMESH R/O Somnath Trihan Ki Gali,Ward No.7 Sikar

WWM(WW-01)

NO SBBJ 61017692704 YES Yes 1670 84839607.12.10

Total 9910DHOLPUR (WW) 10. MR. KESHAV SINGH

BAGHELA S/o Ramswaroop R/o Shiv Nagar, Nanderi Road, Dholpur

WW NO SBI 11096857564 YES NO 1600 627137 04.10.10

Total 1600

26


Sub-Project

Vulnerability

Status

Name of Bank




d

Detail of amount

disbursed with

Cheque No. and Date

Remarks

BUNDI WS 11. MR. RAM SWAROOP

R/o New Dhan Mandi, Maliyon Ki Gali, Bundi

WS NO POST OFFICE

217410 YES Yes 1050 “005234”02.02.11

12. MR. DHARMENDRA R/o Prem Nagar Colony, Rajat Grah, Bundi

WS NO POST OFFICE

YES Yes 1120 “005235”02.02.11

13. MR. DEVI LAL R/o Village Karnara, Post Guhada, Bundi

WS NO AXIS BANK 5330101000016030

YES Yes 1400 “005236”02.02.11

14. MR. KALYAN R/o Chittor Road, Opp. Power House, Bundi

WS NO POST OFFICE

217416 YES Yes 1050 “005237”02.02.11

15. MR. SHANKAR SINGH R/o Opp. Post Office, Nainwa Road, Bundi

WS Yes POST OFFICE

217399 YES Yes 6122 6310330.09.2011

16. MR. NARAYAN R/o Opp. Post Office,

Nainwa Road, Bundi

WS Yes POST OFFICE

217421 YES Yes 6122 6310430.09.2011

17. MRS. PUSHPA BAI R/o Opp. Post Office, Nainwa Road, Bundi

WS Yes POST OFFICE

217400 YES Yes 6122 6310530.09.2011

18. MRS. GORI BAI R/o Opp. Post Office,

Nainwa Road, Bundi

WS Yes URBAN CO-OP

10549 YES Yes 6122 6310630.09.2011

19. MR. MADAN LAL R/o Opp. Post Office,

Nainwa Road, Bundi

WS Yes POST OFFICE

217402 YES Yes 6122 6310730.09.2011

20. MR. DURGA LAL R/o Opp. Post Office, Nainwa Road, Bundi

WS Yes POST OFFICE

217422 YES Yes 6122 6310830.09.2011

27


Sub-Project

Vulnerability

Status

Name of Bank




d

Detail of amount

disbursed with

Cheque No. and Date

Remarks

21. MR. KANYA BAI R/o Opp. Post Office,

Nainwa Road, Bundi

WS Yes POST OFFICE

217420 YES Yes 6122 6310930.09.2011

22. MRS. GYARSI BAI R/o Opp. Post Office,

Nainwa Road, Bundi

WS Yes POST OFFICE

217358 YES Yes 6122 6311030.09.2011

23. MRS. RUKMINI BAI R/o Opp. Post Office, Nainwa Road, Bundi

WS Yes POST OFFICE

381287 YES Yes 6922 6311130.09.2011

24. MR. KALU LAL R/o Opp. Post Office,

Nainwa Road, Bundi

WS Yes POST OFFICE

217398 YES Yes 6122 6311230.09.2011

25. MRS. JAMUNA BAI R/o Opp. Post Office, Nainwa Road, Bundi

WS Yes POST OFFICE

217403 YES Yes 6122 6311330.09.2011

26. MRS. SEETA BAI R/o Opp. Post Office,

Nainwa Road, Bundi

WS Yes POST OFFICE

11210 YES Yes 6122 6311430.09.2011

27. MR. KALU R/o Opp. Post Office, Nainwa

Road, Bundi

WS Yes POST OFFICE

217401 YES Yes 6122 6311530.09.2011

28. MRS. JAMUNA BAI R/o Opp. Post Office, Nainwa Road, Bundi

WS Yes POST OFFICE

371658 YES Yes 6122 6311630.09.2011

29. MR. JAGDISH R/o Opp. Post Office,

Nainwa Road, Bundi

WS Yes POST OFFICE

217361 YES Yes 6122 6311730.09.2011

30. MR. ABDUL HAKIM R/o Near Islami

WS NO URBAN CO-OP.

7035 YES Yes 1750 6311830.09.2011

28


Sub-Project

Vulnerability

Status

Name of Bank




d

Detail of amount

disbursed with

Cheque No. and Date

Remarks

Madarsa, Mahaveer Colony, Nainwa Road,

Bundi 31. MR. RAJESH SAIN

R/o Chetna Ji Katla, Kekriwalon Ka Makan,

Bundi

WS NO URBAN CO-OP.

1112 YES Yes 1400 6311930.09.2011

32. MR. GIRDHAR SINGH R/o Behind Police Line,

Beebanwa Road, Bundi

WS NO POST OFFICE

217417 YES Yes 1050 6312030.09.2011

33. MR. MUSTKIM R/o Meera Gate, Nagdi

Dewra, Bundi

WS NO URBAN CO-OP.

3079 YES Yes 1400 6312130.09.2011

34. MR. RAJU LAL R/o Ishwari Niwas, Opp. Circuit House, Bundi

WS NO YES Yes 1400 6312230.09.2011

Total 104250* Amount paid as per

minimum wages of Rs.

73 ALWAR WW 35. MR. BAKSHI SINGH WW NO YES YES 1684 DD No.

74684720.09.10

36. MR. ASHRAF KHAN WW NO YES YES 1684 DD No. 746848

20.09.10

29


Sub-Project

Vulnerability

Status

Name of Bank




d

Detail of amount

disbursed with

Cheque No. and Date

Remarks

37. MR. KAILASH WW NO YES YES 1684 DD No. 746843

20.09.10

38. MR. MOHAR SINGH WW NO YES YES 1684 DD No. 746846

20.09.10

39. MR. SHYAM LAL WW NO YES YES 1684 DD No. 746844

20.09.10

40. MR. ANAND CHAND WW NO YES YES 1684 DD No. 746845

20.09.10

41. MR. CHAHAT KHAN WW NO YES YES 1684 67140102.12.11

42. MR. LALA RAM WW NO YES YES 1684 67140202.12

11 43. MR. NAGA BABA

MAHENDRA WW NO YES YES 1684 02.12.11

44. MR. OM PRAKASH SAIN

WW NO YES YES 1684 67139902.12.11

Total 16840

JHALAWAR WS 45. MR. KAILASH

CHANDRA SEN R/o Gopal Ghat Road, Jahlrapatan

WS NO CBI 1713406583 YES YES 1932 000082 06/08/10

30


Sub-Project

Vulnerability

Status

Name of Bank




d

Detail of amount

disbursed with

Cheque No. and Date

Remarks

46. MR. MANGILAL DHABAI R/o Gopal Ghat Road, Jahlrapatan

WS NO CBI 1713406584 YES YES 1932 000083 06/08/10

Total 3864 CHITORGARH HLB (BEDCHA) 47. MR. DEVI LAL KEER BRIDGE Kendriya

Sahkari Bank 5311 YES YES 19280 322589

20/06/11

48. MR. SHYAM LAL KEER

BRIDGE Canara Bank 3034101000241

YES YES 10350 32259020/06/11

49. MR. RATAN LAL KEER

BRIDGE Canara Bank 3034101001678

YES YES 20360 32259120/06/11

Total 49990*BARAN ROB 50. Ram Kishan Kandara ROB NA HADOTI

KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANK

6141 YES YES 18920 5110270214.12.10

51. Salauddin Ansari ROB NA SBBJ 51032593356 YES YES 12620 5110270314.12.10

52. Puran Mal Meena ROB Yes SBBJ 610251170401

YES YES 32700 5110270414.12.10

53. Ram Ratan Gurjar ROB NA HADOTI KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANK

879 YES YES 12620 5110270514.12.10

54. Sattar Khan ROB NA UCO 303992 YES YES 15140 5110270614.12.10

31


Sub-Project

Vulnerability

Status

Name of Bank




d

Detail of amount

disbursed with

Cheque No. and Date

Remarks

55. Amrit Lal Gochar ROB NA UCO 3003/16 YES YES 22700 5110270714.12.10

56. Rameshwar Agrawal ROB NA NAGRIK SEHKARI BANK LTD.

807/5 YES YES 10190 5110270814.12.10

57. Ram Niwas Sen ROB NA BOB 25560100006957

YES YES 13880 5110270914.12.10

58. Ibrahim ROB NA KENDRAIYA SEHKARI BANK

12685 YES YES 22700 5110271014.12.10

59. Siddique Mohammed ROB NA KENDRAIYA SEHKARI BANK

12684 YES YES 22700 5110271114.12.10

60. Suraj Mal Suman ROB NA HADOTI KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANK

875 YES YES 12620 CH. NO. 5110271214.12.10

61. Krishna Kumar Sharma ROB NA PNB 730001011436058

YES YES 15140 5110271314.12.10

62. Badri Lal Nagar ROB NA HADOTI KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANK

876 YES YES 20180 5110271414.12.10

63. Nand Lal Suman ROB NA POST OFFICE

722253 YES YES 9200 5110271514.12.10

64. Rajendra Kumar ROB NA PNB 73000100103256

YES YES 13880 5110271614.12.10

65. Surendra Kashyap ROB NA BOB 25560100002832

YES YES 37640 5110271714.12.10

32


Sub-Project

Vulnerability

Status

Name of Bank




d

Detail of amount

disbursed with

Cheque No. and Date

Remarks

66. Shanti Lal Rathore ROB NA UCO 1777/9 YES YES 27200 5110271814.12.10

67. Rajendra Prajapati ROB NA BOB 25560100001089

YES YES 27200 5110271914.12.10

68. Dinesh Sakyawal ROB YES HADOTI KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANK

877 YES YES 12620 5110272014.12.10

69. Satya Narayan Agarwal

ROB NA SBBJ 51032596448 YES YES 27200 5110272114.12.10

70. Ram Vilas Jogi ROB NA HADOTI KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANK

784 YES YES 27650 5110272214.12.10

71. Rajendra Suman ROB NA SBBJ 61030493416 YES YES 10190 5110272314.12.10

72. Ram Kalyan Meena ROB Yes HADOTI KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANK

1974 YES YES 17670 5110272414.12.10

Total 442560

Source Community Action Participation Program (CAPP), RUIDP * difference in Amount due to roundingoff

33

Appendix 6

Status of Disbursement Claim Paid to APs by ACO for SRP implementation up to December 2011 S.

No. Town Package No. Total Affected Persons

Amount of disbursement

claim to be paid

Nos. of ID card

Distributed during Sep

.2011 to Dec 2011

Nos. of ID card

Distributed up to Dec

2011

Nos. of Bank Account Opened

During July 2011 to Dec 2011

Up to Dec 2011

Nos. of APs Paid

disbursement claim

Amount paid to

APs

Nos. of APs Paid

disbursement claim

Amount paid to

APs

1

Alwar

RUSDIP/TR-01/ALW/BR/01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 RUSDIP/TR-01/ ALW/WS-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 RUSDIP/ TR-01/ ALW/WW/02 Lot-1 15 25260 0 10 10 4 6736 10 16840

4 RUSDIP/ TR-01/ ALW/SW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 15 25260 0 10 10 4 6736 10 16840

5 Baran

RUSDIP/ TR-02/ BRN/BR/02 24 463280 0 23 23 0 0 23 442560

Total 24 463280 0 23 23 0 0 23 442560

6

Barmer

RUSDIP/TR-02/ BMR/WS/02 35 49000 o 22 19 0 0 0 0

7 RUSDIP/ TR-02/ BMR/ WW/02 35 49000 0 22 15 0 0 0 0

34

S. No. Town Package No. Total

Affected Persons


claim to be paid

Nos. of ID card


.2011 to Dec 2011

Nos. of ID card


2011



Up to Dec 2011

Nos. of APs Paid

disbursement claim

Amount paid to

APs

Nos. of APs Paid

disbursement claim

Amount paid to

APs

8 RUSDIP/ TR-02/ BMR/ BR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 70 98000 0 44 34 0 0 0 0

9

Bharatpur

RUSDIP/ TR-02/ BPR/DR/02 3 10800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 RUSDIP/ TR-02/ BPR /WS/03 10 59130 0 4 2 0 0 0 0

Total 13 69930 0 4 2 0 0 0 0

11

Bundi

RUSDIP/ TR-02/ BND/WS/02 24 101028 0 24 24 20 99630 24

104250

12 RUSDIP/ TR-02/ BND/WW03 50 387100 0 49 44 0 0 0 0

13 RUSDIP/TR-03/BND/ST/01 49 209622 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 123 697750 0 73 68 20 99630 24 104250

14 Chittorgarh RUSDIP/TR-

02/CHT/BR /01 (Bedach)

3 50080 0 3 3 0 0 03 49990

35


Affected Persons


claim to be paid

Nos. of ID card


.2011 to Dec 2011

Nos. of ID card


2011



Up to Dec 2011

Nos. of APs Paid

disbursement claim

Amount paid to

APs

Nos. of APs Paid

disbursement claim

Amount paid to

APs

15 RUSDIP/TR-02/CHT/BR

/01(Gambhiri) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 3 50080 0 3 3 0 0 03 49990

16

Churu

RUSDIP/TR-2/CHU/BR/01 1 7400 0 1 1 0 0 00

7400*(14600 more to be paid for boundary

wall)

17 RUSDIP/TR-2/CHU/WS/ 01 2 3200 0 2 2 0 0 0 0

Total 3 10600 0 3 3 0 0 1 7400

18

Dholpur

RUSDIP/ TR-02/ DLP/WW/04 1 1600 0 1 1 0 0 1 1600

19 RUSDIP/ TR-02/ DLP/WS/03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 1 1600 0 1 1 0 0 1 1600

20 Karuali RUSDIP/ TR-02/ KRL/WS/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

36


Affected Persons


claim to be paid

Nos. of ID card


.2011 to Dec 2011

Nos. of ID card


2011



Up to Dec 2011

Nos. of APs Paid

disbursement claim

Amount paid to

APs

Nos. of APs Paid

disbursement claim

Amount paid to

APs

21

Jaisalmer

RUSDIP/TR-01/ JSL/WW-01 23 92450 0 15 14 0 0 0 0

22 RUSDIP/TR-01/ JSL/WS-02 23 92450 0 15 14 0 0 0 0

23 RUSDIP/TR-01/ JSL/DR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

24 RUSDIP/TR-01/ JSL/SW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 46 184900 0 30 28 0 0 0 0

25

Jhalawar

RUSDIP/TR-01/ JHL/WS-02 2 3864 0 2 2 0 0 2 3864

26 RUSDIP/TR-01/ JHL/SW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 2 3864 0 2 2 0 0 2 3864

27

Nagaur

RUSDIP/ TR-02/ NGR/WS/01 98 203840 0 64 52 0 0 0 0

28 RUSDIP/ TR-02/ NGR/WW/01 12 20580 0 6 5 0 0 0 0

37


Affected Persons


claim to be paid

Nos. of ID card


.2011 to Dec 2011

Nos. of ID card


2011



Up to Dec 2011

Nos. of APs Paid

disbursement claim

Amount paid to

APs

Nos. of APs Paid

disbursement claim

Amount paid to

APs

Total 110 224420 0 70 57 0 0 0 0

29

Rajsamand

RUSDIP/ TR-02/ RSM/WS/03 13 43498 0 11 4 0 0 0 0

30 RUSDIP/TR-

2/RSM/WW/ 02 (Lot-1)

27 110740 0 16 12 0 0 0 0

Total 40 154238 0 27 16 0 0 0 0

31

Sawai Madhopur

RUSDIP/TR-2/SMD/BR/01 6 67700 0 4 4 0 0 4 40700

32 RUSDIP/TR-02/ SMD/WW/02 1 3500 0 1 1 0 0 1 3500

33 RUSDIP/TR-02/ SMD/WS/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 7 71200 0 5 5 0 0 5 44200

34 Sikar

RUSDIP/ TR-02/ SKR/ WW/01 90 160100 0 65 43 0 0 3 9910

35 RUSDIP/TR-02/SKR/WS/03 7 31506 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

38


Affected Persons


claim to be paid

Nos. of ID card


.2011 to Dec 2011

Nos. of ID card


2011



Up to Dec 2011

Nos. of APs Paid

disbursement claim

Amount paid to

APs

Nos. of APs Paid

disbursement claim

Amount paid to

APs

36 RUSDIP/TR-03/SKR/ST/01 14 106684** 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

37 RUSDIP/TR-03/SKR/SW/01 0 * **360000.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

38 RUSDIP/TR-03/SKR/DR/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 111 658290 0 65 43 0 0 3 9910

Grand Total 568 2713412# 0 360 295 24 106366 72**** 680614

Source Community Action Participation Program (CAPP), RUIDP *Payment made for structure

** including 10000 for structure * **Cost of reconstruction of CPRs

**** Compensation to 71 APs for livelihood (673214) and 01 AP for structure (7400) # Livelihood assistance = 2713412 – 370000(360000+10000) = 2343412

39

Appendix 7

Status of Consultation with APs by ACO for SRP implementation up to December 2011

S. No. Town Package No.

Total Affected Persons

Consultation With Affected Persons

Total NO. of CLC /

GRC Meetings up to Dec.

2011

Nos.of Consultati

on with APs

during July. to Dec. 11

Nos.of

Consultation with

Affected Person up to

June.2011

Nos.of Consultation

with Affected

Person up to Dec. 2011

NO. participants participated in meetings

Issue Discussed with Affected Persons

(APsP

1

Alwar

RUSDIP/TR-01/ALW/BR/01 0

4 4 14 18 325

Resettlement policy of ADB, Bank account opening ,Claim disbursement RUSDIP/TR-01/

ALW/WS-02 0

RUSDIP/ TR-01/ ALW/WW/02 Lot-1 15

RUSDIP/ TR-01/ ALW/SW 0

Total 15

2 Baran

RUSDIP/ TR-02/ BRN/BR/02 24

10 7 19 26 357

ID Card distribution & payment of resettlement ADB Social

Total 24

3

Barmer

RUSDIP/TR-02/ BMR/WS/02 35

2 16

36 52 210

Resettlement Policy of ADB,Bank Account Opening,Community participation,Personal health and hygiene,Payment of resettlement

RUSDIP/ TR-02/ BMR/ WW/02 35

RUSDIP/ TR-02/ BMR/BR 0

Total 70 Bharatpur RUSDIP/ TR-02/

BPR/DR/02 3 4

20 283

Personal health and hygiene,ID Card

40




Total NO. of CLC /


2011

Nos.of Consultati

on with APs


Nos.of

Consultation with


June.2011

Nos.of Consultation

with Affected




(APsP

4

RUSDIP/ TR-02/ BPR /WS/03 5

4

16

preparation, distribution & payment of resettlement Resettlement Policy of ADB,Bank Account Opening,Formation of ID Card,Community participation

RUSDIP/ TR-02/ BPR /WS/02 5

Total 13

5 Bundi

RUSDIP/ TR-02/ BND/WS/02 24

10 23 63 86 581

Resettlement Policy of ADB, Bank Account Opening, Community participation,ID Card distribution & payment of resettlement

RUSDIP/ TR-02/ BND/WW03 50

RUSDIP/TR-02/ BND/ST-03

49

Total 123

6 Chittorgarh

RUSDIP/TR-02/CHT/BR /01 3

11 14

19 33 686

Resettlement Policy of ADB,Bank Account Opening Community participation Personal health and hygiene,Collection of documents for ID.

Total 3

7 Churu

RUSDIP/TR-2/CHU/BR/01 1

7 6 36 42 75

Resettlement Policy of ADB,Bank Account Opening,Community participation,Personal

RUSDIP/TR-2/CHU/WS/ 01 2

41




Total NO. of CLC /


2011

Nos.of Consultati

on with APs


Nos.of

Consultation with


June.2011

Nos.of Consultation

with Affected




(APsP

Total 3

health and hygiene,Payment of resettlement ,Bank Account Opening,Community participation ,Personal health and hygiene, Aids awreness

8 Dholpur

RUSDIP/ TR-02/ DLP/WW/04 1

53 1 25 26 244

Resettlement Policy of ADB,Community participation,Disbursement claim to APs through account payee cheque

RUSDIP/ TR-02/ DLP/WW/04 0

Total 1

9 Jaisalmer

RUSDIP/TR-01/ JSL/WW-01 23

3 5 26 31 89

Community participation,Personal health and hygiene ,Resettlement Policy of ADB,Disbursement of claim

RUSDIP/TR-01/ JSL/WS-02 23

RUSDIP/TR-01/ JSL/SW 0

RUSDIP/TR-01/ JSL/DR 0

Total 46

10 Jhalawar RUSDIP/TR-01/ JHL/WS-02 2 2 4 50 54 470

Resettlement Policy of ADB,Community

42




Total NO. of CLC /


2011

Nos.of Consultati

on with APs


Nos.of

Consultation with


June.2011

Nos.of Consultation

with Affected




(APsP

RUSDIP/TR-01/ JHL/SW 0

participation,Disbursement claim to APs through account payee cheque Total 2

11 Nagaur

RUSDIP/ TR-02/ NGR/WS/01 98

3 18 40 44 256

Resettlement Policy of ADB,Bank Account Opening,Community participation,Personal health and hygiene,Collection of documents for ID

RUSDIP/ TR-02/ NGR/WW/01 12

Total 110

12 Rajsamand

RUSDIP/ TR-02/ RSM/WS/03 13

4 2 19 21 166

Personal health and hygiene, ID Card distribution & payment of resettlement, Resettlement Policy of ADB, Bank Account Opening, Formation of ID Card,Community participation

RUSDIP/TR-2/RSM/WW/ 02

(Lot-1) 27

Total 40

13 Sawai Madhopur

RUSDIP/TR-2/SMD/BR/01 6

18 17 22 39 225

Resettlement Policy of ADB, Community participation,Personal health and hygiene, Payment of resettlement

RUSDIP/TR-02/ SMD/WW/02 1

RUSDIP/TR-02/ SMD/WS 0

Total 7

43




Total NO. of CLC /


2011

Nos.of Consultati

on with APs


Nos.of

Consultation with


June.2011

Nos.of Consultation

with Affected




(APsP

14

Sikar

RUSDIP/ TR-02/ SKR/ WW/01 90

5 16 61 77 490

Bank Account Opening,Formation of ID Card, ID Card distribution & payment of resettlement,Resettlement Policy of ADB,Community participation,Personal health and hygiene,Disbursement of Claim to APs

RUSDIP/ TR-02/SKR/ST/01 14

RUSDIP/TR-2/SKR/WS/ 02 7

RUSDIP/TR-2/SKR/DR 0

RUSDIP/TR-2/SKR/SW/01 0*

Total 111

Grand Total 568 136 139 446 569 4457

* 5 CRPs

44

Appendix 8

Grievance Redress Process

CLC = City Level Committee, GRC = Grievance Redress Committee, IPIU=Investment Program Implementation Unit, IPMU = Investment Program Management Unit, NGO = Nongovernmental organization, SDS = Social Development Specialist.

NGO/SDS/IPIU

Not Addressed

DPs/APs

IPMU

Grievance Addressed

GRC/CLC

Grievance Addressed

Court of Law

Grievance Addressed

GGrievance AAddress/ Re

BARAN RO

ceived (In c

OB GRIEVA

current Qua

NCE

arters)

Appendix 9

Minutes of CLCC/GRC (Bara

ran ROB)

*Decision Aslam Kha

- include Mr.an as per ADB

. Aslam KhanB guidelines

n in the list o

f APs and disstribute the ccompensation amount to M

Mr.

Girvancces Received (Bundi WWater Supplyy)

MMinutes of GGRC (Bundi

di WS)

* Decision – Grrievance not jjustified as theey have moved on site after

r the cutoff daate

rajasthan urban sector development investment program – … · 2014-09-29 · december 2011)...

Documents