ral - 2 lots into 13 lots - mackay council · page | 1 hrp17064 shd pty ltd ral lot 602 kerrisdale...

P a g e | 1 HRP17064 SHD Pty Ltd RaL Lot 602 Kerrisdale Cres

RaL - 2 Lots into 13 Lots

Lot 602 Kerrisdale Crescent, Kerrisdale

HRP17064

Prepared for SHD Pty Ltd

July 2017

melissas

Received (Auto Date)


Contact Information Document Information Cardno Ltd

Cardno

ABN 70 108 112 303

71 Maggiolo Drive

Paget QLD 4740 4740

Australia

www.cardno.com

Phone 07.4957.5880

Fax 07 4951 1070

Prepared for SHD Pty Ltd

Project Name Lot 602 Kerrisdale Crescent,

Kerrisdale

File Reference Lot 602 DA Report

Job Reference HRP17064

Date 13 July 2017

Version Number V1

Author(s):

John Viklund

Senior Planner

Effective Date 13/07/2017

Approved By:

Michael Jewell

Office Manager & Planning Director

Date Approved 13/07/2017

Document History Version Effective

Date Description of Revision Prepared by: Reviewed by:

1 13/07/17 Original John Viklund Michael Jewell

© Cardno. Copyright in the whole and every part of this document belongs to Cardno and may not be used, sold, transferred, copied or reproduced in whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on any media to any person other than by agreement with Cardno.

This document is produced by Cardno solely for the benefit and use by the client in accordance with the terms of the engagement. Cardno does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by any third party on the content of this document.


Executive Summary 1.1 Site Details

Site Details

Address Lot 602 Kerrisdale Crescent, Kerrisdale

RPD Lot 601 SP271139 & Lot 602 SP271139

Owner Lorna Grace Shuttlewood; Lawrence Norman Shuttlewood; Darcy Gordon Shuttlewood; Barry Clive Shuttlewood; Kenneth William Shuttlewood; Ronald Douglas Shuttlewood; Heather Joy Harmer

Locality Frame

Precinct McCreadys Creek

Zoning Urban Expansion

Overlays Bushfire Management Airport Development Distances (813km)

Site Area Lot 601 – 2,242m2 Lot 602 – 8,316m2

1.2 Application Details Application Details

Development Type Development Permit for Reconfiguring a Lot

Level of Assessment Code

Proposal Summary To subdivide the subject land into 13 residential lots

Defined Land Use NA

Referral Nil

Applicant SHD Pty Ltd C/- Cardno (Qld) Pty Ltd

Applicant’s Representative Michael Jewell

Reference HRP17064


Table of Contents 1.1 Site Details 3 1.2 Application Details 3

2 Introduction 6 2.1 Existing Approvals 6 2.2 Pre-lodgement Advice 6

3 Site Details and Characteristics 7 3.1 Site Details 7

3.1.1 Location 7 3.2 Site Characteristics 7

3.2.1 Current Use of the Site 7 3.3 Land Use 7

3.3.1 Road Frontages 7 3.3.2 Ownership 7 3.3.3 Easements 7 3.3.4 Site Contamination 7 3.3.5 State Government Trigger Mapping 7 3.3.6 Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning 8 3.3.7 Access 9 3.3.8 Existing Infrastructure and Services 9 3.3.9 Topography 9

4 Proposed Development 10 4.1 Application Particulars 10 4.2 Layout and Design 10

4.2.1 Setbacks 10 4.2.2 Footpaths 10

4.3 Services 10 4.4 Infrastructure Charges 11

5 Statutory Town Planning Framework 12 5.1 Introduction 12 5.2 Planning Act 2016 12

5.2.1 Code Assessment 12 5.2.2 Referral 12 5.2.3 Public Notification 13

5.3 State Planning Policy 13 5.4 State Development Assessment Provisions 13 5.5 Infrastructure Charges 13 5.6 MIW Regional Plan 14 5.7 Mackay City Planning Scheme 2006 14

5.7.1 Area Classification 14 5.7.2 Applicable Development Codes 14

5.8 Mackay Region Planning Scheme 2017 14 6 Compliance Summary 15

6.1 Introduction 15 6.2 State Planning Policies 15 6.3 State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) 15


6.4 Mackay City Planning Scheme 2006 15 6.5 Compliance with Applicable Codes 15

6.5.1 Mackay Frame Locality Code 15 6.5.2 Reconfiguration of a Lot Code 15 6.5.3 Environment and Infrastructure Code 16 6.5.4 Bushfire Management Overlay Code 16 6.5.5 Development in the Vicinity of Mackay Airport Overlay Code 16

7 Conclusions and Recommendations 17

Appendices Appendix A Statement of Code Compliance Appendix B Plan of Development Appendix C Owner’s Consent Appendix D Current Title Search Appendix E Survey Plan & Smartmap Appendix F EMR & CLR Appendix G SDAP DA Mapping Appendix H Engineering Report


2 Introduction

This planning report accompanies a development application over land located at Lot 602 Kerrisdale Crescent, Kerrisdale.

SHD Pty Ltd is seeking a Development Permit for a Reconfiguration of a Lot to undertake the proposed development.

Section 4 – The Proposed Development of this report together with Appendix B Plan of Development contains detailed information with regard to the design of the proposed development.

The proposal is assessable development under the Mackay City Planning Scheme 2006, as amended (the Planning Scheme). The Planning Scheme requires a Code Assessable development application to be made in this instance.

Section 45(3) of the Planning Act 2016 (“Planning Act”) prescribe the requirements for Code Assessment.

Section 6 – Summary of Compliance of this report provides a summary of compliance of the proposed development with the applicable provisions of the relevant planning framework. Appendix A Statement of Code Compliance to this report contains the complete assessment of the proposed development against the applicable criteria of the relevant codes of the Planning Scheme.

2.1 Existing Approvals The subject lots were created under approval DA-2004-254, and are referenced in the following condition:

5. Medium Density housing Lots within this Estate may be developed at a density of not more than 1 unit per200m2 site area and must comply with the provisions of the Planning Scheme in force at the time that anapplication is made to develop. This approval does not authorise building approval at this density, but willrequire a separate Material Change of Use Development involving code assessment to be made.

As outlined in the condition, this possible medium density development is only one option i.e. not required, but may occur. The applicant in this instance has decided not to take up this option, but rather comply with the current 2006 Planning Scheme “Urban Expansion” zoning requirements.

2.2 Pre-lodgement Advice 3/7/17 – Agreement with Council Manager of Planning Services & Manager – Strategic Planning that the

application is consistent development pursuant to the Mackay City Planning Scheme 2006. 7/7/17 – Council GIS services email confirming Pellage & Torquay are available for use as new road names

and have been reserved for Kerrisdale.


3 Site Details and Characteristics

3.1 Site Details

3.1.1 Location

The subject site comprises two lots at the southern (main) entrance to Kerrisdale – a residential estate located on Golflinks Road, Beaconsfield.

3.2 Site Characteristics

3.2.1 Current Use of the Site

The subject site is currently cleared and vacant with a grass cover established.

3.3 Land Use Vacant.

3.3.1 Road Frontages The subject site is bound by Golflinks Road, Kerrisdale Crescent and Norwood Parade.

Table 3-1 Road Hierarchy and Jurisdiction

Road Hierarchy Jurisdiction

Golflinks Road Traffic Distributor Local

Kerrisdale Crescent Minor Collector Local

Norwood Parade Major Collector Local

3.3.2 Ownership Both lots are held in 1/7 ownership by Lorna Grace Shuttlewood, Lawrence Norman Shuttlewood, Darcy Gordon Shuttlewood, Barry Clive Shuttlewood, Kenneth William Shuttlewood, Ronald Douglas Shuttlewood and Heather Joy Harmer. Refer to Appendix D Current Title Search for details.

3.3.3 Easements

There are no easements across the subject land. Refer to Appendix D Current Title Search and Appendix E Survey Plan & Smartmap for details.

3.3.4 Site Contamination

Searches of the Environmental Management Register and Contaminated Land Register were executed, which confirm that the subject lots are not included in either register.

Refer to Appendix F EMR & CLR for details.

3.3.5 State Government Trigger Mapping The subject site is not impacted by State Government Trigger mapping, except for Bushfire Hazard buffer area, reflecting the Mackay Golf Course opposite Golflinks Road. Refer to Appendix G SDAP DA Mapping for detail.


3.3.6 Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning

Table 3-2 & Figures 3-1 & 3-2 below outlines the various land uses and zones of the properties surrounding the subject lot.

Table 3-2: Surrounding land uses and Zoning

Direction Zoning Land use

North Urban Expansion Residential lots

East Urban Expansion Vacant

South Sport and Recreation Golf course

West Urban Expansion Vacant

Figure 3-1: Surrounding Land Uses (Source: MiMAPS 2015 Imagery)

Figure 3-2: Surrounding Zoning (Source: MiMAPS)


3.3.7 Access

Access is via the Kerrisdale Crescent frontage. At present there is no constructed access to the subject site.

3.3.8 Existing Infrastructure and Services

All urban services are available to the subject site. Servicing methodology is detailed in Section 4 & Appendix H Engineering Report of this report.

3.3.9 Topography

Site levels range from RL 13m AHD (western extent) to RL 6m AHD (eastern extent) at an average gradient of approx. 5%. Refer to Appendix H Engineering Report for further detail.

Figure 3-3: Existing services & site topography (Source: MiMAPS)


4 Proposed Development

4.1 Application Particulars Application Particulars

Development Type Development Permit for Reconfiguring a Lot

Level of Assessment Code

Proposal Summary To subdivide 2 lots into 13 residential lots

Defined Land Use NA

Referral Nil

4.2 Layout and Design The proposed development comprises

13 freehold residential lots between 520m2 and 880m2 (approx.)

New 13.5m road (local access place) with vehicle turnaround for a garbage truck and 5 marked car parking spaces. “Pellage Court”.

Lot 1 will access via Kerrisdale Crescent.

Lots 3-12 will access via Pellage Court.

Lots 2 & 13 will have optional access via Pellage Court or Kerrisdale Crescent.

4.2.1 Setbacks

Proposed setback variations apply to principal setbacks where the principal frontage is to Pellage Court, and secondary frontage setbacks only.

Principal frontage setback (Pellage Court): 4.0m to Class 1 wall; 5.5m to garage door

Secondary frontages: 3m (class 1 & 10).

Refer to Appendix B Plan of Development.

4.2.2 Footpaths

No new footpath is proposed.

4.3 Services The below table sets out proposed servicing methodology. For further detail refer to Appendix H Engineering Report.

Service

Roads Local access place with 13.5m reserve, 5.5m pavement layback kerbing, street trees, no footpaths

Water Water supply is proposed to be provided via a 100mm ring main around the Pellage Court cul de sac. To avoid underboring the existing Kerrisdale Crescent to connect to the 150mm diameter main on the northern side it is proposed to extend the new 100mm main westward along Kerrisdale Crescent to connect to the existing 150mm diameter road crossing originally provided to service Lot 601.

Sewerage The development site is currently serviced by two existing manholes. It is proposed to retain these manholes to service the new lots. Manhole 1/103 will service Lots 1 and 2 by use of the existing connection stubs. Manhole 1/102 will service the balance of the new lots by extending a 150mm diameter sewer main from the existing southern facing stub.


Stormwater The development site is currently drained via a field gully pit and 600mm diameter outlet pipe located in the north-eastern corner of Lot 602. It is proposed to raise and modify the existing pit and extend the underground stormwater drainage to collect flows from Pellage Court and development lots. The internal underground drainage will be designed to accommodate the 1% AEP storm flows. The internal catchment is relatively small and the cul de sac area will be shaped to fall towards a centrally located inlet pit with a raised grated inlet to ensure that capacity to collect flows from the major storm event is adequate. To further reduce road flows, and avoid roofwater trickle flows across the cul de sac pavement, Lots 6, 7, 8, 10, 11 and 12 will be provided with roofwater lot pits connected directly to the underground stormwater system.

Electricity & Telecommunications

Underground servicing proposed. Detailed reticulation plans to be provided with the Operational Works application.

4.4 Infrastructure Charges In accordance with Council’s Adopted Infrastructure Charges Resolution (“AICR”) (December 2014), Council infrastructure charges and credits are applicable to any development approval for Material Change of Use or Reconfiguring a Lot.

The following table summarises the charges relevant to the development, per AICR Section 5 Table 2 – Adopted Charges (Inside PIA) and in accordance with the Plan of Development (Appendix B). Reconfiguring a Lot – residential lots (credits)

Item Credit Units Total

Lots >500m2 $25,200 2 $50,400 Reconfiguring a Lot – residential lots (charges)

Item Charge Units Total

Lots >500m2 $25,200 13 $327,600

Lots 450-549m2 $23,000 0 $0

Lot < 450m2 $21,000 0 $0

Gross Charge $327,600

Net Charge

Gross Charge Net Credit Net Charge

$327,600 $50,400 $277,200


5 Statutory Town Planning Framework 5.1 Introduction This section of the town planning report explains the applicable components of the statutory town planning framework and their relevance to the proposed development.

5.2 Planning Act 2016 The Planning Act is the statutory instrument for the State of Queensland under which, amongst other matters, development applications are assessed by local governments.

5.2.1 Code Assessment

In this instance, a Code Assessable development application is required to be made to the assessment manager to acquire the necessary development approval.

According to Section 45(3) of the Planning Act:

“(3) A code assessment is an assessment that must be carried out only—

(a) against the assessment benchmarks in a categorising instrument for the development; and

(b) having regard to any matters prescribed by regulation for this paragraph.”

Assessment benchmarks are described in Section 26 of the Planning Regulation 2017 (“Planning Regulation”):

“(1) For section 45(3)(a) of the Act, the code assessment must be carried out against the assessment benchmarks for the development stated in schedules 9 and 10.

(2) Also, if the prescribed assessment manager is the local government, the code assessment must be carried out against the following assessment benchmarks—

(a) the assessment benchmarks stated in—

(i) the regional plan for a region, to the extent the regional plan is not identified in the planning scheme as being appropriately integrated in the planning scheme; and

(ii) the State Planning Policy, part E, to the extent part E is not identified in the planning scheme as being appropriately integrated in the planning scheme; and

(iii) any temporary State planning policy applying to the premises;

(b) if the local government is an infrastructure provider—the local government’s LGIP

(3) However, an assessment manager may, in assessing development requiring code assessment, consider an assessment benchmark only to the extent the assessment benchmark is relevant to the development.”

At the time of the lodgement of the development application, the common material comprises the application material only. The application material includes an assessment of the proposed development against the relevant assessment benchmarks. Information arising from the Referral and Information Request stages will also form part of the common material to be assessed by Council.

Relevant Assessment Benchmarks are identified below.

5.2.2 Referral

Section 55(2) of the Planning Act states that:

“For any other referral agency, a regulation may prescribe may prescribe the matters the referral agency–

(a) may, must or must only assess a development application against; and

(b) may, must, or must only have regard to for the assessment. “

Part 4, Section 22(1) of the Planning Regulation states that:

“Schedules 9 and 10 prescribe—

(a) for section 54(2)(a) of the Act, the referral agency for the development applications stated in the schedules; and


(b) for section 55(2) of the Act, the matters the referral agency—

(i) may or must assess the development application against; and

(ii) may or must assess the development application having regard to.”

No referral has been identified relevant to the proposal.

5.2.3 Public Notification

According to Section 53 of the Planning Act –

“(1) An applicant must give notice of a development application if—

(a) any part of the application requires impact assessment; or

(b) the application includes a variation request.

The proposal does not require impact assessment and is not for a variation request.

5.3 State Planning Policy The State Planning Policy was released on 3 July 2017. It is a State planning instrument made under Chapter 2 Part 2, Section 10 of the Planning Act.

As prescribed in Section 26(2)(a)(ii) of the Planning Regulation, the State Planning Policy represents an assessment benchmark and the assessment manager must have regard to State Planning Policies, if it is not identified as being appropriately reflected in the planning scheme.

Part 1 of the Planning Scheme identifies the extent the State Planning Policy is appropriately reflected in the Planning Scheme.

5.4 State Development Assessment Provisions The State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) sets out the matters of interest to the State for development assessment (Assessment Benchmarks), where the chief executive administering the Planning Act, being the Director-General of the department, is responsible for assessing or deciding development applications.

No SDAP provisions have been identified as relevant to the proposal.

5.5 Infrastructure Charges Section 119 of the Planning Act deals with the levying of infrastructure charges and applies if –

“(1) (a) a development approval has been given; and

(b) an adopted charge applies to providing trunk infrastructure for the development.

(2) The local government must give a notice (an infrastructure charges notice) to the applicant.

(3) The local government must give the infrastructure charges notice—

(a) if the local government is the assessment manager—at the same time as, or as soon as practicable after, the development approval is given.

Section 120 Limitation of levied charge –

“(1) A levied charge may be only for extra demand placed on trunk infrastructure that the development will generate.

(2) When working out extra demand, the demand on trunk infrastructure generated by the following must not be included—

(a) an existing use on the premises if the use is lawful and already taking place on the premises;

(b) a previous use that is no longer taking place on the premises if the use was lawful at the time the use was carried out;


(c) other development on the premises if the development may be lawfully carried out without the need for a further development permit.

5.6 MIW Regional Plan The Mackay Isaac Whitsunday Regional Plan (MIW) came into full effect on 8 February 2012. Its primary purpose is to provide a sustainable growth management strategy for the region that articulates strategic direction and certainty that will accommodate a significant increase in population in MIW to 2031.

5.7 Mackay City Planning Scheme 2006 The Mackay City Planning Scheme 2006 (as amended) (“the Planning Scheme”) took effect on 24 March 2006 and is the relevant planning scheme for the assessment of development proposals within the former Mackay City local government area.

5.7.1 Area Classification

The site is located within the Urban Expansion Zone, McCreadys Creek Precinct of the Mackay Frame Locality of the Planning Scheme.

5.7.2 Applicable Development Codes

As the proposal is Code Assessable development, the proposal is assessed against the relevant Codes as required by Table 5-1 – Assessment Categories and Relevant Assessment Criteria for Making a Material Change of Use – Mackay Frame Locality. Below is a list of the codes (Assessment Benchmarks) relevant to the proposal.

Codes

Primary Codes

Mackay Frame Locality Code including the Urban Expansion zone

Reconfiguration of a Lot Code

Environment and Infrastructure Code

Secondary Codes

Development in the Vicinity of Mackay Airport Overlay Code

Bushfire Management Overlay Code

A summary of compliance is set out in Section 6 of this report. A detailed assessment against the all of the relevant provisions of the abovementioned codes is provided at Appendix A Statement of Code Compliance.

5.8 Mackay Region Planning Scheme 2017 The Mackay Region Planning Scheme 2017 (“the new Planning Scheme”) has been adopted by Council and is awaiting commencement.

In this instance, compliance with the current 2006 Planning Scheme has been given precedence over the new Planning Scheme which is not yet in force.


6 Compliance Summary

6.1 Introduction The following sections comprise a summary of compliance against the relevant provisions of the planning framework as they apply to the proposed development, identified in Section 5 of this report.

More detailed information and responses to the Mackay City Planning Scheme 2006 (the Planning Scheme) provisions are included in the Appendices to the proposal report. Appendix A Statement of Code Compliance is particularly relevant in this regard, as it contains an assessment of the proposed development against the relevant codes of the Planning Scheme.

6.2 State Planning Policies The development application must have regard to all relevant and applicable State Planning Policies, which are not incorporated or reflected in the Planning Scheme.

The State Planning Policies in force at the time of lodgement, and those which are identified in the Planning Scheme as being appropriately reflected in the Planning Scheme are listed in Section 5.3 of this Report.

6.3 State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) No SDAP Code has been identified as relevant to the proposal.

6.4 Mackay City Planning Scheme 2006 Assessment of the development’s compliance with the relevant criteria in the Planning Scheme has been undertaken below.

6.5 Compliance with Applicable Codes A comprehensive assessment of the development compliance with the relevant codes of the Planning Scheme is included as Appendix A Statement of Code Compliance of this Town Planning Report. Compliance with the Codes is summarised below.

Development that achieves the Specific Outcomes of the relevant Code, complies with the code. Where an alternative solution is proposed or a Specific Outcome cannot be complied, a summary is provided below.

6.5.1 Mackay Frame Locality Code

The proposed development achieves compliance with each of the Specific Outcomes of the Mackay Frame Locality Code, including the Urban Expansion zone.

Alternative Solutions Proposed: nil.

Non-compliance with Specific Outcomes: nil.

It is therefore concluded that the proposed development complies with the Mackay Frame Locality Code, including the Urban Expansion zone.

6.5.2 Reconfiguration of a Lot Code

The proposed development achieves compliance with each of the Specific Outcomes of the Reconfiguration of a Lot Code.


Non-compliance with Specific Outcomes:

P4 Irregular shaped lots are designed to have: (i) a frontage to depth ratio of no more than 1:3; (ii) for land in the Urban Residential Zone:

a. a minimum frontage of 10m to any cul-de-sac road or alongany curved road alignment; and

S4 No solution specified.


b. an area within the lot with the minimum dimensions of 15 by 15m; and

(iii) for land in the Higher Density Residential Zone, a minimum width of 20m at a point 6 m in the lot parallel to the longest road frontage.

Comment:

Due to the irregular shape of the parent lots, a number of irregular-shaped lots result. The following lots do not comply with the requirements for a frontage to depth ratio of 1:3:

Lot 5 – f: 8.4; r: 1:3.7 Lot 9 – f: 7m; r: 1:4.6 Lot 11: f: 5.5m; r: 1:6.6

Notwithstanding, each lot provides a width to depth ratio of less than 1:3 when measured at a distance 4m inside the property boundary, and contains a suitable building area of 15m x 15m. The proposed layout achieves RaL Code Overall Outcome (2)(b) “new lots, including small lots, have areas and dimensions which meet use requirements and reflect environmental characteristics” insofar:

the degree of variation is minor, each lot provides a practical building envelope, and the proposed lots respond to the irregular shape of the parent parcels.

It is therefore concluded that the proposed development complies with the Reconfiguration of a Lot Code.

6.5.3 Environment and Infrastructure Code

The proposed development achieves compliance with each of the Specific Outcomes of the Environment and Infrastructure Code.



It is therefore concluded that the proposed development complies with the Environment and Infrastructure Code.

6.5.4 Bushfire Management Overlay Code

The proposed development achieves compliance with each of the Specific Outcomes of the Bushfire Management Overlay Code.



It is therefore concluded that the proposed development complies with the Bushfire Management Overlay Code.

6.5.5 Development in the Vicinity of Mackay Airport Overlay Code

The proposal is exempt development under the Development in the Vicinity of Mackay Airport Overlay Code as the criteria for code assessment within Table 8-7 of the Planning Scheme do not apply. No further assessment of the Code has been undertaken.


7 Conclusions and Recommendations

This proposal report accompanies an application by SHD Pty Ltd seeking a Reconfiguring a Lot Development Permit to subdivide 2 lots into 13 residential lots.

Technical assessments have been undertaken with regard to the proposed development in order to assess potential impacts and to address the relevant codes used by Council to assess the proposed development.

The information provided in this proposal report (and accompanying technical appendices) demonstrates that the proposed development complies with all applicable provisions of the relevant planning framework.

The proposed development complies, and is consistent with the relevant and applicable provisions of the statutory town planning framework. In particular, the proposed development:-

I. Is consistent with the relevant parts of the Mackay City Planning Scheme 2006;

II. Is consistent with the character and amenity of the locality; and

III. Is able to be serviced by existing infrastructure in the locality.

We therefore recommend that Council favourably consider the proposed development and approve the proposed development application, subject to reasonable and relevant conditions.

Yours faithfully

John Viklund Senior Planner For Cardno (Qld) Pty Ltd – Town Planning

Michael Jewell Office Manager & Principal For Cardno (Qld) Pty Ltd – Town Planning



APPENDIX

A STATEMENT OF CODE COMPLIANCE


Statement of Code Compliance Consolidated Mackay City Planning Scheme 2009

Primary Codes

Mackay Frame Locality Code including the Urban Expansion Zone

Reconfiguration of a Lot Code

Environment and Infrastructure Code

Secondary Codes

Bushfire Management Overlay Code


MACKAY FRAME LOCALITY CODE Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Proposal

Assessable Development

P1 Commercial development is located in the commercial zone and does not detract from the network of centres referred to in the Desired Environmental Outcomes.

S1 No solution specified. Not Applicable

P2 Residential development where residential use is the predominant activities (as distinct from farming for example) occurs on land located within the Village zone, Urban Residential zone and the Rural Residential zone.

S4 No solution specified. Complies The development is for the subdivision of new residential lots.

P3 Tourist development sites generally exhibit a number of the following characteristics: (i) proximity to infrastructure and services

adequate to meet the day-to-day needs of the tourist population likely to be generated by development on the site; and

(ii) proximity to a natural attraction without the potential for adverse effects upon the attributes or values which give rise to the attractiveness of the site; or

(iii) an area of land sufficient to contain fully the extent of the proposed development and the potential impacts likely to flow from it;

(iv) land suitable in its physical characteristics to accommodate the form, scale and intensity of development proposed without imposing unnecessary or unacceptable impacts upon the surrounding area; or

(v) are not located within established residential areas or accessed only via residential street.


P4 Industrial activities are located within the zoned industrial areas of the City.


P5 Land uses adjacent to industrial areas and key extractive resources areas which are incompatible with those areas include a buffer which mitigates



Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Proposal any adverse impacts from the industrial use on the new use.

P6 Residential development on land zoned for residential uses, adopts or creates new traffic and transport systems which: (i) are based on the hierarchy of roads; (ii) are appropriate to the transport and traffic

tasks required by the proposed development, having regard to its scale, intensity and character;

(iii) are linked efficiently and safely with the existing road network;

(iv) promote the safe movement of traffic, cyclists and pedestrians throughout the development area; and

(v) minimises the potential for through traffic and local traffic conflicts and for industrial and non-industrial traffic conflicts.

S6 No solution specified. Complies The proposal includes an access place to service up to 12 residential lots with an intersection to a minor collector order road.

P7 Rail infrastructure corridors in the City are protected from the constraining effects of proximate, sensitive land uses by seeking buffers, acoustic screens or other forms of physical separation. Where development occurs in close proximity to a rail corridor, appropriate mitigation measures in the design and siting of buildings and recreation space are provided.


P8 New uses and development within the rail corridor, including rail freight yards, stations and shunting yards, has regard for the environmental impacts upon adjacent and adjoining properties.


P9 The network of cane tramways throughout the City is protected from the effects of incompatible development. New estate development for urban residential, rural residential or village purposes is planned to minimise the potential for tramway traffic to conflict with vehicular, bicycle or pedestrian traffic through a combination of careful design and maintaining adequate buffers or separations.


P10 New development is serviced by the full range of urban infrastructure in an orderly, efficient and

S10 No solution specified. Complies


Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Proposal equitable manner as established in the priority infrastructure plan.1

The development will be connected to all urban services. For detailed discussion refer to Appendix H Engineering Report.

P11 Land fronting the Bruce Highway has limited direct access, if any, to the highway in accordance with the requirements and specifications of the Department of Main Roads.


P12 The route of the possible future Port Access corridor linking the industrial areas of the City with the Mackay seaport is preserved.


P13 The use and development of port land subject to freehold lease or similar title, or land adjacent to the airport, includes mechanisms to minimise, mitigate and manage any environmental impacts on the freehold land which may arise from the port operations.


P14 The operational efficiency of the major road transport routes serving the Mackay seaport, the airport, the railway and the Paget industrial area is maintained by: (i) ensuring adequate buffers or separations

between noise and traffic sensitive activities and these major routes; and

(ii) planning development according to the road hierarchy illustrated on the Information Map – Key Infrastructure.


P15 Open space areas are protected from the adverse affects of development through: (i) limiting development within open space

areas to low impact activities, facilities and works that maintain the value of the area;

(ii) locating development on adjoining land in parts of the site less likely to have adverse effects;

(iii) providing buffers to open space areas of sufficient width to mitigate any adverse effects; and

S15 No solution specified. Not Applicable The proposed subdivision does not adjoin any open space area, and furthermore is a low impact use.

1 A Priority Infrastructure Plan identifies where growth is expected to occur, the nature and scale of that growth, and the plans and service standards for the trunk infrastructure necessary to service the growth.


Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Proposal (iv) adopting impact mitigation and

management measures for development likely to cause adverse effects.

P16 Open space and recreation areas are preserved by providing that development of land in proximity to high use areas (e.g. the racecourse at Ooralea) is designed and sited to take into account: (i) noise; (ii) lighting; and (iii) traffic impacts of activities and major

events.

S16 No solution specified. Complies The Mackay Golf Course is directly across Golflinks from the subject site. The adjoining area of the golf course is unlit and screened by roadside trees and presents a low impact to the development site.


URBAN EXPANSION ZONE IN THE MACKAY FRAME LOCALITY Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Discussion


P1 Urban development on land within the Urban Expansion zone occurs in an orderly and efficient manner in locations where: (i) the land is connected to development

infrastructure and extends the infrastructure network on the basis of the planned capacity requirements of the development and the network; and

(ii) Development located on land in the Urban Expansion Zone is Master Planned.2

S1 No solution specified. Complies The proposal constitutes development of a vacant lot at the entrance to Kerrisdale. The development is able to be serviced by all essential infrastructure. The new road proposes a logical intersection with Kerrisdale Crescent, a minor collector road.

P2 Urban residential development within the Pioneer River (Urban) precinct, includes a network of streets and paths which combine to provide direct pedestrian, cyclist and vehicle access to the university campus and to public open space.


P3 Urban development on land within the Urban Expansion Zone adjoining any habitat areas as shown on the relevant Coastal Management and Biodiversity Overlay Map including the Pioneer River, Baker’s Creek, McCready’s Creek, wetlands, fish habitat areas, coastal areas and remnant vegetation adopts suitable design and siting measures and adequate separation distances to protect the: (i) amenity of the locality; (ii) remnant and ridge-top vegetation; and (iii) environmental values of the habitat area.

S3 No solution specified. Not Applicable The subject site dos not adjoin a habitat area.

P4 Separation distances and design and siting measures are provided for future urban development of land in the Urban Expansion Zone and adjacent to high impact activity areas and valuable economic resources such as the Racecourse Mill so that: (i) land uses achieve an appropriate level of

amenity; and

S4 Urban development on Urban Expansion zoned land: (i) is located a minimum of 1 km from

the Racecourse Mill; and (ii) provides a minimum buffer of 400 m

between any activity areas on the site and the operation areas of the adjoining valuable resource.

Not Applicable

2 “ Master Plan” for the purpose of this code is a plan prepared in accordance with the Master Plan Planning Scheme Policy.


Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Discussion

(ii) the operations of the high impact activities are not impeded by the proximity to incompatible land uses.

P5 Rural Residential Development does not occur. S5 No solution specified. Complies The proposal is not for rural residential development.

ENVIRONMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE CODE

Infrastructure

Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Discussion Infrastructure Provision P1 Adequate infrastructure is provided in time to meet

the needs of the development. S1 The timing for provision of infrastructure for

development complies with the standards and contribution requirements detailed in the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy

Complies All essential infrastructure is available to the subject site.

P2 Premises are provided with appropriate areas of private and public open space.

Note: Guidance in regards to the design and provision of open space is provided in the Open Space Planning Scheme Policy and the Contributions Planning Scheme Policy.

S2 The provision of open space complies with the standards and requirements detailed in the Open Space Planning Scheme Policy and the Contributions Planning Scheme Policy.

Complies Infrastructure charges apply to the development.

P3 Premises have (i) an adequate, safe and reliable supply of

water, including potable water, and is connected, where possible, to an existing reticulated water supply.

(ii) the planning and design of potable water infrastructure considers Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) such as water conservation initiatives.

S3.1 Premises are connected to Council’s reticulated water supply system.

S3.2 If connection to Council’s reticulated water supply system is not possible, a potable water supply is provided in accordance with the standards detailed in the Engineering Design guidelines Planning Scheme Policy).

Complies Each lot will be connected to Council’ reticulated water network. Refer to Appendix H Engineering Report for details.

P4 Treatment and disposal of waste water ensures: 1. no adverse ecological impacts on the

environment, particularly nearby receiving

S4.1 Connection to Council’s reticulated sewerage treatment system; or

S4.2 Where connection to Council reticulated sewerage system is not possible, and where 20 people or

Complies Each lot will be connected to Council’s reticulated sewerage network. Refer to Appendix H Engineering Report for details.


Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Discussion environments including surface waters and ground water; and

2. the cumulative impacts of on site waste watertreatment will not cause deterioration of environmental conditions;

3. the planning and design of wastewaterinfrastructure considers Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) such as wastewater management measures.

less, Council will refer to the requirements of the Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 1997 and the On Site Sewerage Code (NR&M July 2002) and AS 1547 to ensure the premises are suitable for effluent disposal.

S4.3 Where more than 20 people, no solution specified.

Stormwater Management P5 Drainage works are planned for and designed to

ensure that adjoining land and the existing upstream and downstream drainage systems are not adversely affected by development, taking into account: (i) Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD)

principles such as: 4. protect natural systems;5. enhance natural waterway systems

within urban development using naturalchannel design principles;

6. detention of stormwater instead ofrapid conveyance;

7. minimise impervious areas;8. utilisation of stormwater to conserve

potable water;9. integrate stormwater treatment into the

landscape;10. water efficient landscaping; and11. protection of water related

environmental values .(ii) need for a stormwater system that can be

economically maintained; (iii) safety of pedestrians and vehicles; (iv) location of discharge; (v) construction of buildings, structures or

paving up to site boundaries which avoid blocking or concentrating natural flow paths3.

S5 Drainage works complies with the requirements of the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy

Complies The Stage is within the Kerrisdale south catchment, which will discharge to the constructed wetland to the east via the underground network. Stormwater management is detailed in Appendix H Engineering Report.

3 Guidance on the design and construction of drainage systems is provided by the Queensland Urban Drainage Manual 1994.


Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Discussion (vi) fauna movement is provided for through

bridges and culverts.

External Works P6 Kerb and channelling is provided to a satisfactory

standard and constructed to: (i) prevent edge fretting; (ii) perform required drainage functions; (iii) provide the appropriate level of control for

vehicle movement; (iv) allow ready access to abutting properties

at suitable locations; and (v) contribute to the desired streetscape

character of the locality.

S6 Premises are provided with kerb and channel in accordance with the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy.

Complies The new road will have mountable kerb and channelling.

Roads P7 All proposed road pavement surfaces:

(i) are of a quality and durability suitable to the intended traffic volumes and loads;

(ii) provide all-weather access; (iii) allow the discharge of rainfall; (iv) provide the safe passage of vehicles and

pedestrians; and (v) provide a reasonable, comfortable riding

quality.

S7 Roads are provided in accordance with the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy ‘.

Complies The new road will be constructed to Council standards. Road construction is detailed in Appendix H Engineering Report.

Drainage networks P8 In urban areas, the major drainage network is

designed and constructed with the capacity to control stormwater flows under normal and minor system blockage conditions for the DFE applicable to drainage so that:

floodways are restricted to areas wherethere is no damage to property or hazards for motorists, and

runoff is directed to a lawful point ofdischarge through competently designed and constructed outlet works

S8 Design requirements of the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy.

Not Applicable No change to the major drainage network is proposed.


Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Discussion Public Utilities P9 Street lighting and signs are provided to ensure

the safety of both vehicles and pedestrians, and to facilitate access and movement.4

S9 Street lighting and signage comply with the requirements of the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy.

Complies Street lighting will be provided to the required standard.

Infrastructure Payments P10 The costs of providing infrastructure is funded by

the development giving rise to the need for the infrastructure.

S10 The funding of infrastructure complies with the requirements of the Contributions Planning Scheme Policy.

Complies Applicable infrastructure charges are addressed in section 4.4 of the Town Planning Report.

Car Parking and Access P11 Premises are provided with:

(i) adequate vehicle parking spaces to satisfy the anticipated requirements of the activity;

(ii) safe and efficient access and manoeuvring areas to meet the anticipated volume and type of traffic;

(iii) large vehicles are able to enter and leave the site without prejudicing the safety and efficiency of the road;

(iv) access driveways are located and designed to minimise conflicts with traffic and pedestrians; and

(v) vehicle crossings from the carriageway to the frontage of the site are constructed and finished to appropriate standards for the expected volume and type of traffic generated by activities on the site.

S11.1 Vehicle parking on the site is in accordance with the rates specified in Schedule 2.

S11.2 Vehicles are able to enter and exit the site (with the exception of dwelling house and duplex) in a forward gear.

S11.3 The design of car parking and access complies with the requirements detailed in the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy.

Complies The development is not for a use which triggers car parking assessment. On-street car parking will be designed to Council standards.

Environmental Amenity

Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Discussion Lighting Management P1 Outdoor lighting does not cause a loss of amenity

to adjacent premises or adversely impact on native fauna as a result of the light it emits either directly or by reflection.

S1 No solution specified. Complies Street lighting only is proposed. Lighting will be designed and installed to the required standard.

4 ‘Australian Standards and Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices’ provides guidance in relation to these matters.


Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Discussion Note: Council will refer to the provisions of AS4282 – Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting

Overshadowing P2 The amenity of adjacent residential land is not

adversely affected by shadows cast by adjoining building or structures.

S2 Buildings do not cast a shadow over more than 30% of an adjoining residential lot at any time between the hours of 9am and 3pm on 22 June.

Not Applicable

Building Setbacks P3 Residential buildings are sited to minimise loss of

amenity for residents’ adjacent to cane tram lines. S3 Residential buildings are set back a minimum of:

(a) 50m from cane tram lines; and (b) 100m from cane tram line level

crossings and sidings.

Not Applicable

P4 Buildings are set back from a road frontage to: (i) complement the existing built form; and (ii) preserve the safety of vehicle movement

along adjoining roads.

S4 No solution specified. Complies Section 4.2.1 details proposed principal and secondary frontage setbacks. Standard side boundary setbacks apply in all circumstances.

Noise and Vibration Management

Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Discussion P1 Noise and vibration do not detract from the

amenity of residents or employees of any adjacent premises.


P2 Premises accommodating uses which are likely to generate noise are designed and constructed with noise attenuation measures to avoid noise nuisance to nearby uses.

S2 No solution specified.


Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Discussion P3 Noise sensitive uses locating adjacent to State

controlled transport infrastructure incorporate attenuation, building design and orientation measures.

Note: Development adjacent to State controlled roads complies with the Department of Main Roads – Road Traffic Noise Management Code of Practice.


Air Quality

Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Discussion P1 Premises used for purposes likely to generate

emissions such as air pollutants, heat and odours incorporate: (i) physical measures for removing pollutants

from emissions prior to discharge to the atmosphere;

(ii) physical measures for reducing the temperature gradient between emissions and the atmosphere prior to discharge; and

(iii) operational systems, including monitoring systems for major industry and major infrastructure, which maintain emissions within ANZECC guideline standards.


Flooding Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Discussion Assessable Development P1 Premises subject to risk of inundation or

damage through flood are provided with immunity to that risk in order to reduce potential property damage and to ensure public safety.

S1.1 Development is sited on land that would not be subject to flooding during a DFE; or

S1.2 For development comprising a residential element, the floors of all habitable rooms are located 300mm above the DFE; or

S1.3 For non-residential development or development involving temporary or moveable residential structures (e.g. caravan parks): (i) buildings are located and designed so

that floor levels (except areas used for car parking) are 300mm above the DFE; or

Not Applicable The subject site is not identified to be at risk of flooding and inundation.


Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Discussion (ii) there is at least one evacuation route that

remains passable for emergency evacuations during all floods up to and including the DFE.

Assessable Development P2 There is no increase in the number of people

living or working on a flood prone site, except where the premises are occupied on a short term or intermittent basis.


P3 Development does not result in adverse impacts for the safety of people or the capacity to use land within a floodplain and does not involve: (i) Any physical alteration to a watercourse; or (ii) Net filling of 50 cubic metres; or (iii) The proposed works either:

(A) avoid any reductions of on-site flood storage capacity and contain within the subject site any changes in depth/duration/velocity in flood waters of all floods up to and including the DFE; or

(B) do not change the flood characteristics at the DFE outside the subject site in ways that result in:

- loss of flood storage; - loss of / changes to flow paths; - acceleration or retardation of flows; or - any reduction of flood warning times elsewhere on the floodplain.


P4 Storage and handling of hazardous substances on sites that are subject to risk of inundation or damage through flood, ensures that persons and property are not placed at unreasonable risk.

S4 Storage or handling of substances that may be a hazard to the environment or human safety by the risk of contamination due to flooding:

(i) is undertaken in accordance with a risk assessment; and

(ii) provides for the storage of any hazardous substances above or securely isolated from the DFE level.

Not Applicable

P5 The use is designed to minimise the impact of Cyclonic Hazards



Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Discussion Undefined Flood and Inundation Areas P6 Where flood limits are not identified,

development is undertaken such that there is no adverse effects on flood levels or flows on the site or up-stream and down-stream of the site


Water Quality

Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Proposal

P1 Development does not detract from the maintenance of water quality in the City’s watercourses and bulk water storages, in particular its: (i) environmental values; and (ii) where applicable, potability of the water

supply.

S1 No solution specified. Complies Stormwater is to be directed via the underground system to the constructed wetlands servicing the catchment.

P2 Premises incorporate: 12. physical measures for intercepting and treating

surface water drainage and spilled substances prior to their release to the watercourses; and

13. bunding of sites or areas within sites orintegrated drainage systems which include waste water treatment measures, where chemicals, fuels, lubricants or other soluble pollutants are being handled or stored.

Note: Council will refer to the Environmental Protection Policy (Water) 1997


P3 The City’s groundwater resources and surface waters are maintained by: (i) providing a stormwater system that

manages stormwater quantity and quality prior to discharging into receiving waters;

(ii) providing non-structural source control measures;

(iii) providing structural source control measures;

(iv) retaining or rehabilitating natural waterway corridors such as natural channels, wetlands and riparian vegetation;




(v) providing storage of waste water in secure and sealed storage facilities;

(vi) ensuring efficient disposal areas and ground and surface water retrieval areas are buffered from each other;

(vii) ensuring that contaminants do not enter the groundwater resources; and

(viii) with reuse of reclaimed water, ensuring safe treatment and disposal of contaminated water.

P4 The biodiversity and habitat values of coastal areas and associated estuarine systems are protected from: (i) increased nutrient or sediment levels; or (ii) changed flow, inhibited passage, or

hydrologic regimes of the natural coastal and marine margins, which may result from development.5


P5 Sediment and nutrient loadings into a watercourse are minimised through: (i) treated on-site effluent; (ii) adequate stormwater run-off controls; and (iii) on-site and off-site erosion and sediment

controls.

S5 No solution specified. Not Applicable There is no watercourse in close proximity to the proposed lots.

Erosion and Sediment Control


P1 Minimisation of the risk of erosion and sedimentation either on-site or elsewhere, by a comprehensive approach to soil erosion control and sedimentation management, including: (i) the minimisation of: (ii) earthworks; (i) clearing of land;

S1 The control of Erosion and Sedimentation complies with Planning Scheme Policy 15.07 - Engineering Design Guideline D7 Soil and Water Quality Management.

Complies On-site sediment control will be implemented as required; all surfaces disturbed during construction will be either sealed or a grass cover established completion of works.

5 See ANZECC Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality, 2000.



(ii) long term stockpiling of excavated materials;

a. use of appropriate constructionmanagement techniques;

b. diverting surface water drainagearound disturbed areas; and

c. treating and removing sediments fromstormwater over disturbed areas prior to release from the site.

P2 Progressive rehabilitation of disturbed areas occurs within the site through a comprehensive rehabilitation program including:

a. the grading and reshaping of thedisturbed areas to provide controlled and stable drainage flow paths;

b. the construction of drainage pathswhich divert high velocity flows away from disturbed areas;

c. the re-spreading of stored top soilstripped from the site; and

d. the planting of the disturbed area withnative species of grasses, ground covers and trees.

S2 No solution specified. Complies Refer response to P1 above.

Coastal Management


P1 (i) there is no net loss of public access to the

foreshore, or of public useability of coastal waters;

(ii) appropriate location and design is achieved with respect to sensitive coastal resources and their values;

(iii) roads that run parallel to the coast, are set back from erosion prone areas and significant coastal resources, with only smaller access roads running to the coast; and

(iv) minor spur roads to the foreshore and associated car parks provide access to the




foreshore at locations that are convenient to the public, have low environmental sensitivity, and avoid locations that may increase storm tide hazard.

Erosion Prone Areas

P1 Development and permanent buildings are minimised in erosion-prone areas as defined in this code (apart from temporary or relocatable structures required for safety and recreational purposes).

S1.1 Reconfiguring a lot within an erosion prone area incorporates erosion prone land as undeveloped open space.

S1.2 Relocatable structures such as picnic tables, barbecues, coastal trails, bikeways, demountable structures, equipment sheds, lookouts, elevated decks, shelter sheds etc are located within erosion prone areas only where they remain relocatable.

S1.3 All other development is; (i) located outside of the erosion prone area;

or (ii) as far landward as practical within the lot ;

and (iii) is coastal dependent development (as

defined in this code). S1.4 All building works (excluding demolition), including

extension to existing buildings, on lots wholly or partly within the erosion prone area are: (i) For rural areas and undeveloped urban

areas, located landward of the erosion prone area to minimise the extent of permanent building inside the erosion prone area; and

(ii) For urban areas, located wholly landward of the alignment of existing neighbouring buildings and of a scale and intensity similar to that of the surrounding development.

Not Applicable

P2 Where there is existing development within an erosion-prone area, redevelopment and extensions do not (as defined in this code):- (i) extend the intensity of the existing level; or (ii) compromise coastal management

outcomes and principles

P2 No solution specified. Not Applicable



Note: Supporting information required in order to demonstrate compliance is set out in the Erosion Prone Area Planning Scheme Policy.



High Impact Areas

High Impact Activity AreasP1 Land uses adjoining high impact activity activities, including activities as indicated on Figure 9-8.1; and Figure 9-8.2 “High Impact Activities” and Information Map “High Impact Activities”, are designed and sited to manage adverse effects on site users by providing: (i) noise attenuation measures; (ii) buffers between sensitive uses and the

high activity areas; (iii) landscaping including bunding between

sensitive use areas and high impact activity areas; and

(iv) any other measures required to ensure that a nuisance is minimised.

Not Applicable



P2 Specific Sewerage Treatment Plants meet the following criteria:


PLANT BUFFER DISTANCE Mackay Southern Water recycling Facility 97,000 EP

1.0km


Landscaping and Fencing


P1 Development is provided with adequate and suitable landscaping and screening on the site which ensures: (i) an attractive streetscape appearance; and (ii) the privacy and amenity of any adjoining

residences.

S1 Landscaping is provided in accordance with the Landscaping Planning Scheme Policy

Complies Street trees to be provided as required. To be detailed in a Landscaping Plan with the OW application.

P2 Landscaping is designed to prevent encroachment upon electricity infrastructure.

S2.1 Landscaping near electricity lines or substations, are designed and developed so that any vegetation at maturity or landscaping structures or works will not exceed 4.0m in height on land: (i) in an electric line shadow6; or (ii) within 5m of an electric line shadow; or (iii) within 5m of a substation boundary.

S2.2 Elsewhere, vegetation is planted in a position that is further from the nearest edge of an electric line shadow or substation boundary than the expected maximum height at maturity of vegetation.

S2.3 On land adjoining an electricity substation boundary, the vegetation foliage at maturity will not be within 3m of the substation boundary. However, where a substation has a solid wall along any part of its boundary, foliage may extend to, but not above or beyond, that solid wall.

Complies Underground electricity is proposed. Compliance to be demonstrated in the Landscaping Plan.

P3 Landscaping provides a 2m wide landscaped strip adjacent to the road frontage incorporating existing vegetation wherever possible.


P4 A landscape strip is provided comprising either a 1.8m high solid fence or 2m wide planted screen adjacent to all side and rear boundaries of a site which adjoins any residential area.


P5 Landscaping around buildings is designed to maximise shade and redirect cooling breezes in summer and to provide a windbreak in winter.

S5 No solution specified. .

Not Applicable

6 Electric Line Shadow is defined in Schedule 1



P6 Landscaping incorporates planting for shading summer sun, including:

a. tall shade trees to the west and east ofthe building; and

b. trellises or pergolas adjacent towindows to the north of the building.


P7 Landscaping is designed to maximise the outdoor shade areas and minimise use of hard reflective surfaces around the building.


Landscaping for Outdoor Vehicle Parking Areas

P8 Landscaping for outdoor vehicle parking areas, where development is for the purposes of Accommodation units, multiple dwelling units, Sport and recreation, indoor entertainment, outdoor entertainment, child care centre, service station, motel, Industrial uses and retail or commercial uses, will: (i) visually enhance the area along any road

frontage; (ii) screen the area from any adjoining

residential or other sensitive uses; (iii) provide visual relief and shade throughout

the area; and (iv) be compatible with local native species.

S8.1 Landscaping of outdoor vehicle parking areas provides planting of trees and shrubs: (i) in a strip 2m wide along any primary road

frontage at a density and a scale appropriate to the size of the vehicle parking area and the function of the adjoining road; and

(ii) in median areas throughout the vehicle parking area at a rate of 1 shade tree for every 6 parking spaces.

S8.2 Provide a wall, fence or continuous screen planting, to a height of at least 1.8m along any boundary to land used or likely to be used for residential or other sensitive use.

Not Applicable The proposed development will not introduce a use listed in Specific Outcome P8.



Landscaping - General Requirements

P9 Landscaping is designed and established to: (i) an appropriate scale relative to both the street

reserve width and to the size and nature of the development;

(ii) incorporate remnant vegetation, where possible; (iii) provide summer shade and shelter for

pedestrian comfort and energy efficiency of buildings;

(iv) maximise areas suitable for on-site infiltration of stormwater;

(v) allow for pedestrian and vehicle safety; (vi) generate a cohesive and distinct visual

character for the streetscape and locality; (vii) be suitable to the tropical climate; (viii) provides planting, paving and other landscape

treatment according to a Landscaping Plan; and (ix) minimise irrigation requirements through

appropriate plant selection, mulching and water efficient irrigation systems.

Note: The Landscape Planning Scheme Policy should be referred to for information that may be required by Council to assist in assessment of an application.

S9 No solution specified. Complies Compliance to be demonstrated in the Landscaping Plan.

Vegetation Management

P10 Natural vegetation is maintained wherever possible.

Note: Assessable development being operational work that is clearing of native vegetation of freehold land consistent with Schedule 8, Part 1, 3A of IPA will be assessed under the provisions of the Vegetation Management Act 1999 and the State code for clearing of vegetation on freehold land.

S10 No solution specified. Not Applicable The proposal does not involve any clearing or result in additional exempt clearing.


Community Safety Design Principles

Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Proposal P8 Landscaping is designed and maintained to

provide informal surveillance and clear sight lines on accessways and to other public spaces.

S8 “Vulnerable premises” provide landscaping designed to promote safety including: (i) planting which does not obscure doors and

windows overlooking public spaces and isolated areas;

(ii) shrubbery and low-level planting associated with footpaths which does not exceed 0.5m in height where abutting pavements;

(iii) trees in vulnerable settings which do not have branches below 1.5m; and

(iv) hard landscaping elements such as low fencing and walls (below 1.2m) which guide pedestrians and vehicles along designated paths.

Complies Species will be selected as street trees which do not provide concealment opportunities at ground level.

P9 The design of premises provides for unimpeded sightlines, particularly along pedestrian and bicycle routes.

S9 All barriers (including landscaping features) along bicycle and pedestrian routes are visually permeable (i.e. can be easily seen through to reduce concealment points).

Not Applicable

P13 The design and location of laneways and alleyways promotes community safety.

S13.1 Laneways are straight and have more than one entrance.

S13.2 Unnecessary access to buildings from laneways is avoided.

Not Applicable

P15 Lighting is provided which: (i) increases safety and security in and

around the premises; (ii) considers vegetation, in both its existing

and mature forms, or other elements that may have the potential to block out light;

(iii) illuminates inset spaces, access/egress routes car parking areas and signage; and

(iv) supports visibility for pedestrians, as well as road users.

S15 No specific solution.

Note: Council will refer to the following as guidance in assessment of compliance: Security lighting is consistent with Australian Standard S 4282 (1997) (The Control of Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting. Lighting of pedestrian and bicycle movement routes, public spaces and outdoor signage in public spaces is to the minimum Australian Standard of AS1158 (Public Lighting Code).

Complies Street lighting will be provided to the required standard.


Constructed Lakes

Not Applicable – No constructed lakes are proposed.

RECONFIGURATION OF A LOT CODE Table 9-18 Specific Outcomes and Acceptable & Probable Solutions for the Reconfiguration of a Lot Code

Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Response

Overall Design P1 The proposed lot layout facilitates the desired future use of land in

accordance with the relevant Locality Code by: (i) Establishing an orderly and acceptable land use pattern; (ii) Providing a road network consistent with the road hierarchy

identified on the Key Infrastructure Maps (A and B); (iii) Providing a network, incorporating linkages, of public open

space meeting community needs and protecting valuable features; and

(iv) Providing an integrated drainage system based on natural drainage patterns and ecological processes.

S1 No solution specified. Complies The development is in keeping with the Kerrisdale Masterplan, which sets out street networks, road hierarchy, pedestrian and cycle linkages and open space connectivity.

Lot Areas and Dimensions



P1 Each lot has an area and dimensions such that it: (i) is suitable for the range of likely uses; (ii) offers a high level of utility and amenity for its subsequent

use and the use of adjoining allotments by providing ample opportunity for the separation of uses within adjoining lots;

(iii) where in the Higher Density Residential zone, is able to be developed to achieve the desired dwelling unit density levels for the zone; and

(iv) does not prejudice the desired future use of the land such that:

a. suitable access is provided for pedestrians, cyclists, andvehicles; and

b. adequate provision is made for any other area necessaryfor the conduct of the intended use for the site;

(v) takes account of the physical characteristics of the site; and (vi) provides efficient servicing of the lot. (vii) Where on site effluent disposal is proposed, the allotment

size and dimensions need to take into consideration the following issues: the number of existing on site domestic water treatment

plant systems in the locality; the cumulative effect of the proposed and existing

systems in the locality on water quality objectives for waters in the locality;

the size of the lots and the soil types, land slopes, hydrology and hydrogeology in the locality;

the proximity of systems to surface water and ground waters in the locality

the rainfall and other climatic conditions of the locality; the existing quality of waters in the locality and the water

quality objectives for the waters; any relevant ground water protection plan.

S1 No solution specified. Complies Each lot is of regular shape and dimensions, ranging in area from 520m2 to 880m2. A range of lot sizes is proposed to cater for contemporary demand in the residential market. All lots can be efficiently connected to reticulated services.

P2 Each lot is consistent with the minimum area and dimensions as set out in Table 9-18.1 Minimum Area & Dimensions.

Table 9-18.1 Minimum Area & Dimensions

S2

“Note: Proposals involving lots with an area less than the minimum area set out in the

Complies The lots are intended for Urban Residential use and are above the minimum lot size of 300m2.

Zones Area Frontage Rural 100ha Rural Res 1ha 60m



Industry (LI) Refer to acceptable probable solution S2 acceptable solution must provide lot layout plans for each of with an area less than the minimum. The lot layout plans must demonstrate that the relevant vehicle size (refer to Schedule 2, Table 12-2) can enter and leave each lot in forward motion after performing no more than a three point turn.

Industry (HI) Refer to acceptable probable solution S2 City Centre No minimum area or dimension specified

Commercial No minimum area or dimension specified

Public Purposes No minimum area or dimension specified

Sport & Recreation No minimum area or dimension specified

Open Space No minimum area or dimension specified

Special Activities No minimum area or dimension specified

Zones Area Frontage Urban Residential Min 300m2 10m Higher Density

Res 800m2 20m

Village 1000m2 20m P3 In the Rural Zone, new lots are not created unless:

(1) the result of the reconfiguration is that new lots and the balance lot are above the minimum area stated for the Rural Zone; or

(2) the result of the reconfiguration is that an equal or lesser number of lots is created and the utility and accessibility of all subject lots is an improvement on the original situation in relation to enhancing or supporting the rural use of the lots.


P4 Irregular shaped lots are designed to have: (iv) a frontage to depth ratio of no more than 1:3; (v) for land in the Urban Residential Zone:

a. a minimum frontage of 10m to any cul-de-sac road oralong any curved road alignment; and

b. an area within the lot with the minimum dimensions of 15by 15m; and

(vi) for land in the Higher Density Residential Zone, a minimum width of 20m at a point 6 m in the lot parallel to the longest road frontage.

S4 No solution specified. Does Not Comply Due to the irregular shape of the subject site, a number of irregular-shaped lots result. The following lots do not comply with the requirements for a frontage to depth ratio of 1:3:

Lot 5 – f: 8.4; r: 1:3.7 Lot 9 – f: 7m; r: 1:4.6 Lot 11: f: 5.5m; r: 1:6.6

Notwithstanding, each lot provides a width to depth ratio of less than 1:3 when measured at a distance 4m inside the property boundary, and contains a suitable building area of 15m x 15m.

The subject site is not in the Urban Residential or Higher Density Residential zones.



P5 Battleaxe lots do not occur in any proposal for reconfiguring a lot that creates more than 1 additional lot. Battleaxe lots are provided only where: (i) there is no increase in the density that is applicable to the

zone that the subject land is included in; (ii) the lot handle is not less than 5m in width; (iii) both sides of the lot handle are landscaped for the full length

of the handle; (iv) the maximum length of the lot handle is not greater than the

minimum depth specified in Table 9-18.1 Minimum Area and Dimensions;

(v) the area of the lot handle is not included in the calculation of the area of the lot for minimum area purposes; and

(vi) for land in the Urban Residential Zone, two adjacent lots have a combined frontage of 50% of the minimum road frontage for a single lot, and a common access drive is provided between the kerb and the head of the access handle.

S5 No solution specified. Complies The proposal does not involve any battleaxe lots.

Small Lots in the Urban Residential Zone P1 Lots having areas less than 450m2 or an average width less than 18

m enable the design and siting of buildings such that they do not detract from the amenity or character of the area.

S1 Development proposals where lots with areas with 450m² or less are proposed are accompanied by a Plan of Development showing at least the following:

1. North point.2. Access to lots.3. Footprint of buildings on subject

lots.4. Footprints of buildings on

adjoining lots.5. Building setbacks.6. Existing and proposed services.

S2 Lots having areas less than 350 m² form part of an integrated residential development of at least 4 lots, except where: (i) the lot is located in a Residential Character Area; and

Not Applicable The subject site is not in the Urban Residential zone.



i. there is an existing dwelling ofcharacter located on theexisting residential lot;

in which case, such a lot, less than 350m2 will be considered, if the existing dwelling of character is retained.

Road Layout and Design P1 Each road has sufficient reserve and pavement width to cater for all

the functions that the road is expected to fulfil, including: (i) the safe and efficient movement of all users, (ii) provision for parked vehicles, (iii) provision of cycle and pedestrian networks; (iv) provision of public utilities landscaping, sound attenuation;

and (v) public transport use.

S1 Road layout and design complies with the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy.

Complies Pellage Court has a proposed width of 13.5m, designed in accordance with Council’s Engineering Design Guidelines Policy. Five dedicated on-street car parking spaces are proposed. Grass verges are proposed for informal pedestrian movement. For further detail refer to Appendix H Engineering Report.

P2 The road layout is designed to have street intersections: (i) as T-junctions, roundabouts or other appropriate means; and (ii) adequately spaced to enable efficient and safe operation.

S2 The road layout provides corner truncations including: (i) at major intersections, acute

angled intersections, not less than a 10mx3 chord truncation; and

(ii) at minor intersections, not less than a 6mx3 chord truncation.

Complies A T-junction is proposed at the intersection of Pellage Court with Kerrisdale Crescent. 6m x 3 chord truncation is proposed.

P3 Roads are designed to make provision for adjoining potential development sites.

S3 The road layout indicates possible connections to external roads and provision to service adjoining development sites.

Not Applicable The adjoining lot is not intended to be developed for residential lots.

P4 All lots have frontage to a road. S4 Lots do not rely on an easement for access to a road.

Complies All lots have direct road frontage.

Open Space Requirements P1 In residential, commercial and industrial areas, public open space is

provided as part of development involving reconfiguration of a lot: (i) as part of a linked open space system for safe pedestrian

and cycling paths linking centres; (ii) in a location, size and shape to satisfy the local, district or

regional recreational needs of the community; and

S1 The provision and design of open space complies with the requirements of the Open Space Planning Scheme Policy and the Parks Contributions Planning Scheme Policy.

Complies Infrastructure Charges to apply.



(iii) to have a multi-functional role such as for stormwater management or fauna habitat.

Note: Guidelines for complying with Council information requirements is detailed in the Open Space Planning Scheme Policy. Community Title P1 Community Title Development for a specific use is provided at the

same density for that use in the relevant zone and locality codes in which the site is located and the overall and specific outcomes for the relevant zone and locality codes apply.


Infill Development P1 Infill development addresses the social outcomes of IPA. S1 Infill development achieves

sustainable development outcomes, and occurs where amenity is addressed and achieves integrated networks of pleasant and safe public areas and cultural, recreational or social interaction are provided within well-serviced communities.

Not Applicable

BUSHFIRE OVERLAY MANAGEMENT CODE



P1 Development maintains the safety of people and property by: (i) avoiding the areas of High or Medium bushfire hazard as

indicated on the Bushfire Management Overlay Map; or (ii) mitigating the risk through:

(a) allotment design and the appropriate siting of building; and

(b) including firebreaks that provide adequate setback between buildings / structures and hazardous vegetation and access for fire fighting and other emergency vehicles; and

(c) providing adequate road access for fire fighting and other emergency vehicles and safe evacuations; and

S1.1 Development is located on land that is not subject to High or Medium bushfire hazard as indicated on the Bushfire Management Overlay Map; or S1.2 For all development:

(i) buildings and structures on lots greater than 2,500m²; (a) achieve setbacks from

vegetation of 1.5 times the predominant mature canopy tree

Complies S1.1 The subject site is cleared with a grass cover, and therefore does not constitute medium or high risk. Adjoining vegetation along the Golflinks Road frontage is landscaping only and is low risk.

S1.2 Not applicable. S1.3 Golflinks Road provides a 20m+ firebreak to the golf course.



(d) providing an adequate and accessible water supply for firefighting purposes.

Note: To assist Council in assessing an application for Assessable Development in a bushfire hazard area information should be provided as detailed in the Bushfire Management Planning Scheme Policy.

height or 10 m, whichever is greater; or

(b) 10 m from any retained vegetation strips or small areas of vegetation;

(ii) buildings and structures on lots 2,500m² or less are serviced by the following: (a) a reticulated water

supply that has sufficient flow and pressure characteristics for fire fighting purposes at all times (minimum pressure flow of 10 litres a second at 200 KPA); or

(b) an on site storage of not less than 5,000 litres (e.g. accessible dam or tank with fire brigade fittings, or swimming pool).

S1.3 Firebreaks are provided by: (i) a perimeter road that

separates lots from areas of bushfire hazard and that road has: (a) a minimum cleared

width of 20m; and (b) a constructed road

width and all weather standard in accordance with Engineering Standards Planning Scheme Policy or

(ii) fire maintenance trails which: (a) have a minimum

cleared width of 6m;



(b) have vehicular access at each end;

(c) provide passing bays and turning areas for firefighting appliances;

(d) are either located on public land, or within an access easement that is granted in favour of Council and QFRS; and

(e) cleared breaks of 6m minimum width are provided within retained bushland within the site (e.g. creek corridors and other retained vegetation) to allow burning of sections and access for bushfire response.

P2 For development that will result in multiple buildings or lots (being Community Title Lots):

(i) buildings and structures are sited on lots that are designed so that their size and shape allow for: (a) efficient emergency access to buildings for firefighting

appliances (e.g. by avoiding long narrow lots with long access drive to buildings);

(b) setbacks and buildings siting in accordance with 1.2 above.


P3 Roads have: (i) a maximum gradient of 12.5%; (ii) exclude cul de sacs, except where a perimeter road isolates

the development from hazardous vegetation or the cul de sac is provided with an alternative access linking the cul de sac to other through roads.

S3 No solution specified. Complies Golflinks Road provides a function as a perimeter road to the golf course.

P4 Public safety and the environment are not adversely affected by the detrimental impacts of bushfire on hazardous materials manufactured or stored in bulk.



APPENDIX

B PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT

e W e W e W e W e W e We W

OAD

LOT 601

SP271139

LOT 600

SP271139 LOT 602

SP271139

eS

eS

11.3

23.9

4.2

3.016

.1

PELL

AGE

COUR

T

4.8

3.0

2.92.9

4.3

7.22.1

6.6

Date Description Verif. Appd.XREF

's: xA

DG_A

1HS_

ADG2

; x25

6063

-001

-XRF

-CC-

Exist

ing F

utur

e De

sign;

2560

63-0

01-X

R-S-

E-RP

S Su

rvey

DATE

PLO

TTED

: 12 J

uly 20

17 2:

07 PM

BY

: JUL

IE S

MITH

Des.

ApprovedA3

Rev

Scale

Status

Client

Drawing Number Revision

Size

Project

Title

Drawn Date

Checked

Date

Date

DateVerified

CAD

File:

S:\J

OBS\

!Oth

er B

U's\H

RP 1

7064

-002

Ker

isdale

Lot

602\

3 De

liver

y\Des

ign\C

ivil D

esign

\Dra

wing

s\HRP

1706

4-00

2-00

2 (1)

.dwg

SHD PTY LTDPROPOSED SUBDIVISIONLOTS 601 & 602 ON SP271139KERRISDALE CRESCENT, BEACONSFIELDGENERAL ARRANGEMENT AS SHOWN

HRP17064-002-002 1

Designed

© Cardno LimitedAll Rights Reserved.

This document is produced by Cardno Limitedsolely for the benefit of and use by the clientin accordance with the terms of the retainer.

Cardno Limited does not and shall notassume any responsibility or liability

whatsoever to any third party arising out ofany use or reliance by third party on the

content of this document.

®

1 PRELIMINARY

PRELIMINARYNOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES

Cardno (Qld) Pty Ltd ABN 57 051 074 99271 Maggiolo DrivePaget QLD 4740

Tel: 07 4957 5880 Fax: 07 4951 1070Web: www.cardno.com.au

2.5 0 5 10 15m5

1:500 - A3SCALE

SETBACK - PRINCIPAL FRONTAGE4.0m TO CLASS 1 WALL5.5m TO GARAGE DOOR

SETBACK - SECONDARY FRONTAGE3.0m (CLASS 1 & 10)

566m24

688m23

824m22

821m21

651m25

609m26

632m27

670m28

767m29

651m210

881m211526m2

13

519m212 EASEMENT A

EMT

BEM

TC

LEGEND


APPENDIX

C OWNER’S CONSENT


APPENDIX

D CURRENT TITLE SEARCH

CURRENT TITLE SEARCHDEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES, QUEENSLAND

Request No: 26391703Search Date: 11/07/2017 11:07 Title Reference: 50977012

Date Created: 20/01/2015

Previous Title: 50894457

REGISTERED OWNER Interest

Dealing No: 716264827 16/01/2015

LORNA GRACE SHUTTLEWOOD 1/7LAWRENCE NORMAN SHUTTLEWOOD 1/7DARCY GORDON SHUTTLEWOOD 1/7BARRY CLIVE SHUTTLEWOOD 1/7KENNETH WILLIAM SHUTTLEWOOD 1/7RONALD DOUGLAS SHUTTLEWOOD 1/7HEATHER JOY HARMER 1/7

AS TENANTS IN COMMON

ESTATE AND LAND

Estate in Fee Simple

LOT 601 SURVEY PLAN 271139Local Government: MACKAY

EASEMENTS, ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS

1. Rights and interests reserved to the Crown byDeed of Grant No. 10268050 (POR 9)

ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICES - NILUNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL

CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

** End of Current Title Search **

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2017]Requested By: D-ENQ CITEC CONFIRM

Page 1/1

CURRENT TITLE SEARCHDEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES, QUEENSLAND

Request No: 26391705Search Date: 11/07/2017 11:07 Title Reference: 50977013

Date Created: 20/01/2015

Previous Title: 50836116

REGISTERED OWNER Interest

Dealing No: 716264827 16/01/2015

LORNA GRACE SHUTTLEWOOD 1/7LAWRENCE NORMAN SHUTTLEWOOD 1/7DARCY GORDON SHUTTLEWOOD 1/7BARRY CLIVE SHUTTLEWOOD 1/7KENNETH WILLIAM SHUTTLEWOOD 1/7RONALD DOUGLAS SHUTTLEWOOD 1/7HEATHER JOY HARMER 1/7

AS TENANTS IN COMMON

ESTATE AND LAND

Estate in Fee Simple

LOT 602 SURVEY PLAN 271139Local Government: MACKAY

EASEMENTS, ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS

1. Rights and interests reserved to the Crown byDeed of Grant No. 20313031 (POR 9)

ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICES - NILUNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL

CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No

** End of Current Title Search **

COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2017]Requested By: D-ENQ CITEC CONFIRM

Page 1/1


APPENDIX

E SURVEY PLAN & SMARTMAP

2CI3562

FH

17.684ha

44SP237257

FH

803m²

40SP237257

FH

814m²

41SP237257

FH

853m²

42SP237257

FH

802m²

43SP237257

FH

803m²

60SP237257

FH

750m²

61SP237257

FH

750m²

62SP237257

FH

769m²

63SP237257

FH

733m²

64SP237257

FH

983m²

65SP237257

FH

856m²

66SP237257

FH

849m²

67SP237257

FH

851m²

68SP237257

FH814m²

69SP237257

FH

1019m²

45SP237257

FH

844m²

46SP237257

FH

844m²

59SP237257

FH

982m²

58SP237257

FH764m²

70SP237257

FH

780m²

71SP237257

FH

793m²

501SP237257

FH

6946m²

800

SP256177

FH

6059m²

163

SP256177

FH

764m²

161SP256177

FH656m²

162SP256177

FH764m²

160SP256177

FH

648m²

158SP256177

FH

647m²

157

SP256177

FH

600m²

ASP

195524

ESP237257

EA

1278m²

BSP

237256

291SP268112

FH

4739m²

292

SP268112

FH

2709m²

602SP271139

FH

8316m²603SP271139

FH

452m²

600SP271139

FH

1.388ha

601

SP271139

FH

2242m²

2SP272702

FH

485m²A

SP272702

ENTSC

REC

KERRISDALE

JACKMAN CT

NO

RW

OO

DPD

E

NORWOOD

PARA

DEADRO

NKSLFLI

GO

ROADSLFLINKGO

TUICRICEL

MARYVACR

ES

KERR

ISDA

LE

DCDBLot/Plan 602/SP271139Area/Volume 8316m²Tenure FREEHOLDLocal Government MACKAY REGIONALLocality BEACONSFIELDSegment/Parcel 62954/545

SUBJECT PARCEL DESCRIPTION

SCALE 1 : 2000HORIZONTAL DATUM:GDA94 ZONE:55

m

40 80 120 160 2000

8755-41313STANDARD MAP NUMBER

149°09'32".134

21°05'03".032

BEACONSFIELD

1.01 KM

MAP WINDOW POSITION &NEAREST LOCATION

PRINTED (dd/mm/yyyy) 11/07/2017

DCDB 10/07/2017

Users of the information recorded in this document (the Information) accept all responsibility andrisk associated with the use of the Information and should seek independent professional advice inrelation to dealings with property.

Despite Department of Natural Resources and Mines(DNRM)'s best efforts, DNRM makesno representations or warranties in relation to the Information, and, to the extent permitted by law,exclude or limit all warranties relating to correctness, accuracy, reliability, completeness orcurrency and all liability for any direct, indirect and consequential costs, losses, damages andexpenses incurred in any way (including but not limited to that arising from negligence) inconnection with any use of or reliance on the Information

For further information on SmartMap products visit http://nrw.qld.gov.au/property/mapping/blinmap

CLIENT SERVICE STANDARDS

SmartMapAn External Product of

SmartMap Information Services

Based upon an extraction from theDigital Cadastral Data Base

(c) The State of Queensland,(Department of NaturalResources and Mines) 2017.

72 42 00m E

42

43

43

44

44

766 69 00 m N69

766 70766 70

7171

GDA

21°05'08".367

149°09'27".316 149°09'30" 149°09'36".951

21°05'08".367

21°05'00"

21°04'57".696

149°09'36".951149°09'30"

21°04'57".696

149°09'27".316

21°05'00"


APPENDIX

F EMR & CLR

Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (EHP)ABN 46 640 294 485

400 George St Brisbane, Queensland 4000GPO Box 2454 Brisbane QLD 4001 AUSTRALIA

www.ehp.qld.gov.au

SEARCH RESPONSEENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGISTER (EMR)

CONTAMINATED LAND REGISTER (CLR)

Transaction ID: 50391179 EMR Site Id: 11 July 2017This response relates to a search request received for the site:

Lot: 601 Plan: SP271139

EMR RESULT

The above site is NOT included on the Environmental Management Register.

CLR RESULT

The above site is NOT included on the Contaminated Land Register.

ADDITIONAL ADVICE

All search responses include particulars of land listed in the EMR/CLR when the search was generated.The EMR/CLR does NOT include:-

1. land which is contaminated land (or a complete list of contamination) if EHP has not been notified2. land on which a notifiable activity is being or has been undertaken (or a complete list of activities)

if EHP has not been notified

If you have any queries in relation to this search please phone 13QGOV (13 74 68)

Administering Authority

Page 1 of 1

Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (EHP)ABN 46 640 294 485

400 George St Brisbane, Queensland 4000GPO Box 2454 Brisbane QLD 4001 AUSTRALIA

www.ehp.qld.gov.au

SEARCH RESPONSEENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGISTER (EMR)

CONTAMINATED LAND REGISTER (CLR)

Transaction ID: 50391180 EMR Site Id: 11 July 2017This response relates to a search request received for the site:

Lot: 602 Plan: SP271139

EMR RESULT

The above site is NOT included on the Environmental Management Register.

CLR RESULT

The above site is NOT included on the Contaminated Land Register.

ADDITIONAL ADVICE

All search responses include particulars of land listed in the EMR/CLR when the search was generated.The EMR/CLR does NOT include:-

1. land which is contaminated land (or a complete list of contamination) if EHP has not been notified2. land on which a notifiable activity is being or has been undertaken (or a complete list of activities)

if EHP has not been notified

If you have any queries in relation to this search please phone 13QGOV (13 74 68)

Administering Authority

Page 1 of 1


APPENDIX

G SDAP DA MAPPING

Date: 11/07/2017 0 30 60 90 120

MetresDepartment ofInfrastructure, Local

Government and Planning ¢ Disclaimer:This map has been generated from the information supplied to the Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning for the purposes of the Development Assessment Mapping System. Note that this is a print screen only. The map generated has been prepared with due care based on the best available information at the time of publication. The State of Queensland holds no responsibility for any errors, inconsistencies or omissions within this document. Any decisions made by other parties based on this document are solely the responsibility of those parties. This information is supplied subject to the full terms and conditions available on the department’s website.

DA Mapping System – Print Screen

© The State of Queensland 2017.

Date: 11/07/2017Department ofInfrastructure, Local

Government and Planning

LegendCadastre

Cadastre

Regulated vegetation management map (Category Aand B extract)

Category A on the regulated vegetationmanagement map

Category B on the regulated vegetationmanagement map

Coastal management district

Coastal management district

Coastal area - erosion prone area

Coastal area - erosion prone area

Wetland protection area trigger area

Wetland protection area trigger area

Wetland protection area wetland

Wetland protection area wetland

Area within 25m of a State-controlled road

Area within 25m of a State-controlled road

Future State-controlled road

Future State-controlled road

Area within 100m of a State-controlled roadintersection

Area within 100m of a State-controlled roadintersection

DA Mapping System – Print Screen

© The State of Queensland 2017.

Disclaimer:This map has been generated from the information supplied to the Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning for the purposes of the Development Assessment Mapping System. Note that this is a print screen only. The map generated has been prepared with due care based on the best available information at the time of publication. The State of Queensland holds no responsibility for any errors, inconsistencies or omissions within this document. Any decisions made by other parties based on this document are solely the responsibility of those parties. This information is supplied subject to the full terms and conditions available on the department’s website.


APPENDIX

H ENGINEERING REPORT

Kerrisdale – Lot 601 / 602 Development Engineering Report SHD Pty Ltd ATF the SHD Unit TrustReference: 256063

Revision: 0

13 July 2017

Project 256063 File 256063 Kerrisdale - Lot 601 & 602 Development - Engineering Report - Rev 0.docx 13 July 2017 Revision 0

Document control recordDocument prepared by:

Aurecon Australasia Pty Ltd ABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

TFEW

+61 7 4977 5200 +61 7 4977 5201 [email protected] aurecongroup.com

A person using Aurecon documents or data accepts the risk of: a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy

version.b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Aurecon.

Document control

Report title Engineering Report

Document ID Project number 256063

File path P:\Aurecon\256063 - Lots 601 and 602 Development\5 Deliver Design\501 Engineering\Reports\Engineering Report Working\256063 Kerrisdale - Lot 601 & 602 Development - Engineering Report - Rev 0.docx

Client SHD Pty Ltd ATF the SHD Unit Trust

Client contact Lawrie Shuttlewood Client reference -

Rev Date Revision details/status Author Reviewer Verifier (if required)

Approver

0 13 July 2017 For Submission D Nelson J McGarry J McGarry

Current revision 0

Approval

Author signature Approver signature

Name Duncan Nelson Name Justin Harris

Title Technical Director Title Office Manager

Contents1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1

1.1 Site description .................................................................................................................................... 11.2 Project description ............................................................................................................................... 1

2 Earthworks ................................................................................................................................................... 22.1 Existing and proposed site topography ............................................................................................... 22.2 Geotechnical requirements ................................................................................................................. 4

3 Roadworks ................................................................................................................................................... 53.1 Internal roadworks ............................................................................................................................... 5

3.1.1 Pedestrian network ................................................................................................................. 53.1.2 Approval of street name ......................................................................................................... 53.1.3 Pellage Court .......................................................................................................................... 53.1.4 Allotment access .................................................................................................................... 53.1.5 Pavement design .................................................................................................................... 6

4 Sewerage reticulation ................................................................................................................................. 64.1 Sewerage reticulation .......................................................................................................................... 6

5 Water reticulation ........................................................................................................................................ 65.1 Water reticulation ................................................................................................................................ 6

6 Electricity and telecommunication services ............................................................................................ 76.1 Electrical services ............................................................................................................................... 76.2 National Broadband Network (NBN) services ..................................................................................... 7

7 Stormwater drainage ................................................................................................................................... 77.1 External stormwater catchments ......................................................................................................... 77.2 Internal stormwater ............................................................................................................................. 87.3 Stormwater quality .............................................................................................................................. 9

8 Acoustic requirements ............................................................................................................................... 9

9 Safety in design ........................................................................................................................................... 9

Appendices Appendix A

Development PlansEngineering Report Plans

Figures Figure 1 Proposed Development Site (Google Earth 2017)Figure 2 Steep Lands Assessment (Mackay Regional Council MiMaps)Figure 3 Acid Sulfate Soil Mapping (Mackay Regional Council MiMaps)Figure 4 Design Flow “Catchment Plan and Stormwater Management Plan”

Project number 256063 File 256063 Kerrisdale - Lot 601 & 602 Development - Engineering Report - Rev 0.docx, 13 July 2017 Revision 0 1

1 Introduction Reference Drawings

HRP17064-002-002 Rev 1 - Kerrisdale Lot 601 & 602 General Arrangement Plan

1.1 Site description The proposed development site is situated within the combined area of Lots 601 and 602 on SP271139. The site is bounded by:

Kerrisdale Crescent to the north

Norwood Parade to the east

Golflinks Road to the south

Transport and Main Roads controlled land to the west

Access to the site will be from Kerrisdale Crescent with no access allowed from Norwood Parade or Golf Links Road.

1.2 Project description Kerrisdale is located in Beaconsfield, approximately 8km north of the Mackay CBD. There are currently a number of Development Approvals in place for the estate which cover the following stages:

Already Constructed

Stage 1

Stage 2

Under Construction

Lot 275 – 282 (Approved – construction progressing)

This report supports the RoL Application for 13 new residential allotments by addressing the engineering items associated with the development and providing conceptual design details sufficient to allow the development assessment to be completed. The following subjects will be discussed further in the report:

Earthworks & Roadworks;

Sewerage and Water Reticulation;

Electricity and Telecommunication Services;

Stormwater Drainage

Acoustic Requirements

Safety in Design


Figure 1 Proposed Development Site (Google Earth 2017)

2 Earthworks Refer Drawings

ENG-CC-0004 – Earthworks Plan

ENG-CC-0006 – Site Cross Section Plan

2.1 Existing and proposed site topography The proposed development site is situated between three existing roads and an area of vacant land that may ultimately be utilised for provision of expansion of the Mackay-Bucasia Road / Mackay-Habana Road intersection. The western site area has a gentle to medium gradient which becomes flat in the eastern part of the site. Site levels vary from RL 12 at the western extent to approximately RL 6 along the eastern frontage with Norwood Parade.

To provide level house pads for all allotments it is proposed to construct a concrete sleeper retaining wall along the western boundary and along the internal common boundaries of Lot 1, 2 and 3 generally as indicated on the earthworks plan. Filter media and subsoil drainage along the wall will also assist in controlling groundwater infiltration anticipated to enter the site from the hillside west of the site.


Lots 1 to 8 and 12 &13 will be shaped to fall from the rear boundary to the road frontage in accordance with Council policy. Lots 9 to 11 will fall towards Norwood Parade away from the internal road and consistent with the existing direction of fall. It is proposed that a low retaining wall approximately 500mm high will be constructed along the Norwood Parade frontage to provide slight elevation for Lots 9 to 11 and prevent direct vehicular access. The wall is proposed Flush Face Keystone generally in accordance with Council’s Standard Drawing A4-153 and includes an integral pool type fencing along the length of the wall.

It is anticipated that the earthworks will generally be balanced with potentially a small volume of spoil to be removed from the site during construction.

Figure 2 indicates that the development does not include any areas requiring steep land assessment.

Figure 2 Steep Lands Assessment (Mackay Regional Council MiMaps)


2.2 Geotechnical requirements Mackay Regional Council mapping indicates that no Acid Sulphate Soils are expected to be present within the development site. (Refer Figure 3 below). With the exception of a very short length of sewer, (below the excavated volume trigger threshold), it is not expected that there will be any requirement to excavate below RL 5.0. It is therefore not proposed to undertake any acid sulphate investigations.

Figure 3 Acid Sulfate Soil Mapping (Mackay Regional Council MiMaps)


3 Roadworks Refer Drawings

ENG-CC-0005 – Roadworks Plan ENG-CC-0006 – Site Cross Section Plan ENG-CC-0007 – Autoturn Layouts – Sheet 1 of 2 ENG-CC-0008 – Autoturn Layouts – Sheet 2 of 2

3.1 Internal roadworks

3.1.1 Pedestrian network The internal Access Place has no requirement for formal pedestrian facilities. The external shared path along Kerrisdale Crescent will be modified with kerb ramps where crossing the new access road.

3.1.2 Approval of street name The street name “Pellage Court” has been previously submitted to Council and is approved for use on the new Access Place.

3.1.3 Pellage Court Pellage Court will be constructed in accordance with Council’s standard drawing A3-3618 for an Access Place as follows:

Minimum 13.5m road reserve

Mountable kerb

5.5m invert to invert road width

4m minimum verge

No concrete footpath

A turning area with additional on-street parking has been provided generally in accordance with Queensland Streets Figure 2.12.h(a) Central Island with Parking in Island. Where required the dimensions have been increased to accommodate the garbage truck turning circle. Turn paths are illustrated on the Autoturn layout plans.

3.1.4 Allotment access No allotment access will be allowed from Golflinks Road or Norwood Parade. Allotment access will be as follows:

Lot 1 - Kerrisdale Crescent

Lot 2 to 13 - Pellage Court


3.1.5 Pavement design Pavement will generally consist of granular unbound pavements with a 30mm asphalt wearing surface as per Mackay Regional Council’s standard requirements. 50mm asphalt wearing surfaces shall be applied at the intersections to cater for turning movements. Pavements will be designed based on an assumed subgrade CBR and will be in accordance with the current edition of the Austroads ‘Pavement Design Manual’.

4 Sewerage reticulation Refer Drawings

ENG-CC-0009 – Overall Services Plan ENG-CC-0010 – Sewerage and Water Reticulation Plan

4.1 Sewerage reticulation The development site is currently serviced by two existing manholes. It is proposed to retain these manholes to service the new allotments. Manhole 1/103 will service Lots 1 and 2 by use of the existing connection stubs. Manhole 1/102 will service the balance of the allotments by extending a 150mm diameter sewer main from the existing southern facing stub.

Due to good available site falls all sewer lines will be steeper than the minimum allowable sewer grades. No section of main will be deeper than 3m and the main running through Lots 11, 12 and 13 will be covered by a 3m easement.

5 Water reticulation Refer Drawings

ENG-CC-0009 – Overall Services Plan ENG-CC-0010 – Sewerage and Water Reticulation Plan

5.1 Water reticulation Allotment water supply is proposed to be provided via a 100mm ring main around the Pellage Court cul de sac. To avoid underboring the existing Kerrisdale Crescent to connect to the 150mm diameter main on the northern side it is proposed to extend the new 100mm main westward along Kerrisdale Crescent to connect to the existing 150mm diameter road crossing originally provided to service Lot 601.

An existing hydrant is located on the northern side of Kerrisdale Crescent opposite the new intersection. To maintain the maximum 80m hydrant spacing 2 additional hydrants will be provided on the 100mm main along Pellage Court.


6 Electricity and telecommunication services

6.1 Electrical services Underground electricity services for the development will be supplied by extension of the existing electrical services provided within Kerrisdale Crescent as part of the original development. A more detailed electricity reticulation design will be submitted with the Operational Works Application.

6.2 National Broadband Network (NBN) services Underground telecommunications services for the development will be supplied by extension of the existing services provided within Norwood Parade as part of the original development. A more detailed NBN reticulation design will be submitted with the Operational Works Application.

As part of the works, the existing light pole on Kerrisdale will be relocated clear of the new intersection.

7 Stormwater drainage Refer Drawings

ENG-CC-0004 – Earthworks Plan ENG-CC-0009 – Overall Services Plan ENG-CC-0011 – Stormwater Drainage Plan

7.1 External stormwater catchments A small area of vacant land to the west of the development site currently contributes sheet flow towards Lot 601. These flows are collected in a swale and flow to field gully pits located adjacent Golflinks Road and Kerrisdale Crescent. The future development of the adjacent external area as an intersection will significantly reduce stormwater flows to the development site. Pre-lodgement discussions have been held with Transport and Main Roads (TMR) and the email below, dated 26th

May 2017, confirms that TMR have agreed to the construction of a new swale external to the development site to collect external stormwater flows.

The new swale will be located adjacent the western site boundary and will direct flows to the existingfield gully pit adjacent Golflinks Road generally in accordance with the current flow pattern. In addition


to the swale, it is proposed to provide increased immunity to the allotments by extending the height of the concrete sleeper retaining wall a minimum of 150mm above the existing ground level along the western site boundary.

7.2 Internal stormwater The development site is currently drained via a field gully pit and 600mm diameter outlet pipe located in the north-eastern corner of Lot 602. It is proposed to raise and modify the existing pit and extend the underground stormwater drainage to collect flows from Pellage Court and development allotments. The internal underground drainage will be designed to accommodate the 1% AEP storm flows.

The internal catchment is relatively small and the cul de sac area will be shaped to fall towards a centrally located inlet pit with a raised grated inlet to ensure that capacity to collect flows from the major storm event is adequate. To further reduce road flows, and avoid roofwater trickle flows across the cul de sac pavement, Lots 6, 7, 8, 10, 11 and 12 will be provided with roofwater allotment pits connected directly to the underground stormwater system.

The cul de sac will be depressed below the level of the surrounding lot frontages allowing the inlet pit to generate head and provide immunity to the allotments. In the event of blockages or storm events exceeding 1% AEP a positive overland flow path to Norwood Parade has been provided through Lot 11. Under normal and flood conditions the path is not expected to carry any flows as these will be contained in the pipe system, however a concrete invert will be provided to define the flowpath levels and ensure it will not be inadvertently blocked by construction of garden beds or similar.

In the event of a pipe blockage downstream of the development, stormwater will surcharge from the field gully pit located in Lot 11 at the eastern end of the overland flowpath and flow overland to Norwood Parade.


7.3 Stormwater quality As indicated by the Design Flow wetland catchment plan (below) the development area is included in the catchment treated by the Kerrisdale wetlands. No further water quality treatment or offset is proposed for this site.

Figure 4 Design Flow “Catchment Plan and Stormwater Management Plan”

8 Acoustic requirements Pre-lodgement discussions have been held with Transport and Main Roads (TMR) to determine requirements for acoustic treatments. The development site does not fall within the current Mackay-Bucasia Road Noise Corridor and TMR have provided advice as follows: “Given the uncertainty with funding of the grade separated intersection, a 1.8m high timber screen fence along the boundary of Lots 600/601 is acceptable to TMR.” (Email from Ross Young - Principal Advisor (Corridor & Land Management) dated 24th May 2017).

Based on this advice it is proposed to provide a timber screen fence along the western boundary of Lots 1, 3, 4 and 5. The fence will be constructed integral to the concrete sleeper retaining wall. It should be noted that the wall will generally vary between approximately 1.2 to 2.5m in height and will provide an effective acoustic barrier to houses which will be set below the adjacent retained land to the west

9 Safety in design A preliminary safety in design assessment has been completed and included on plan ENG-CC-0002. Additional safety in design assessments will be undertaken throughout the detailed design phase of the project.

Project 256063 File 256063 Kerrisdale - Lot 601 & 602 Development - Engineering Report - Rev 0.docx 13 July 2017 Revision 0

Appendix A Development Plans

Engineering Report Plans ENG-CC-0001 – Drawing Index and Locality Plan ENG-CC-0002 – Safety in Design ENG-CC-0003 – Existing Features and Overall Constraints ENG-CC-0004 – Earthworks Plan ENG-CC-0005 – Roadworks Plan ENG-CC-0006 – Site Cross Section Plan ENG-CC-0007 – Autoturn Layouts – Sheet 1 of 2 ENG-CC-0008 – Autoturn Layouts – Sheet 2 of 2 ENG-CC-0009 – Overall Services Plan ENG-CC-0010 – Sewerage & Water Reticulation plan ENG-CC-0011 – Stormwater Drainage Plan

e

W

e

W

e

W e

WWWWW

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

NORTHS LEAGUES CLUB

MACKAY GOLF CLUB

MACK

AY B

UCAS

IA R

OAD

GOLFLINKS ROAD

NORWOOD PARADE

KERRISDALE CRESCENT

SITE OF WORKS

CLIENT

DATE TITLE

REVISION DETAILSDATEREV APPROVED

CHECKED

APPROVED

PROJECT

DRAWN

DESIGNED

PROJECT No. TYPE REVWBS DISC NUMBER DRAWING No.

SCALE SIZEA1

.SHD Pty Ltd ATF THE SHDUNIT TRUST

KERRISDALELOTS 601 & 602 DEVELOPMENT

DRAWING INDEX AND LOCALITY PLAN

256063 0001 ENG CC 0001 A

1:2000FOR APPROVAL

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

N.VOLLMERHAUSE

N.VOLLMERHAUSE

J.MCGARRY J.HARRIS

A 13.07.17 FOR APPROVAL JMH

BEACONSFIELD, MACKAY

LOCALITY PLANSCALE 1:2000

KERRISDALE - LOTS 601 & 602 DEVELOPMENT

SHD Pty Ltd ATF THE SHD UNIT TRUST

0

SCALE 1:2000

20 40 80m

DRAWING INDEXDRAWING NO. DRAWING TITLE REVISION REVISION DATE

0001 DRAWING INDEX AND LOCALITY PLAN A 13.07.20170002 SAFETY IN DESIGN A 13.07.20170003 EXISTING FEATURES AND OVERALL CONSTRAINTS A 13.07.20170004 EARTHWORKS PLAN A 13.07.20170005 ROADWORKS PLAN A 13.07.20170006 SITE CROSS SECTION PLAN A 13.07.20170007 AUTOTURN LAYOUTS SHEET 1 OF 2 A 13.07.20170008 AUTOTURN LAYOUTS SHEET 2 OF 2 A 13.07.20170009 OVERALL SERVICES PLAN A 13.07.20170010 SEWERAGE & WATER RETICULATION PLAN A 13.07.20170011 STORMWATER DRAINAGE PLAN A 13.07.2017

CLIENT

DATE TITLE


CHECKED

APPROVED

PROJECT

DRAWN

DESIGNED


SCALE SIZEA1



SAFETY IN DESIGN

256063 0001 ENG CC 0002 A

N/AFOR APPROVAL


N.VOLLMERHAUSE

N.VOLLMERHAUSE

J.MCGARRY J.HARRIS


Safe Design Risk Register – 256063 - Kerrisdale - Lots 601 & 602 DevelopmentIDENTIFY SAFE DESIGN RISK ASSESSMENT SAFE DESIGN RISK - CURRENT EXPOSURE IMPLEMENT SAFE DESIGN RISK TREATMENT

ID Risk Title Event / Cause / Consequence PersonsAffected

ApplicablePhases

ApplicableDisciplines

Inhe

rent

Con

sequ

ence

(Risk Treatment)Current Control Measures

Con

sequ

ence

Like

lihoo

d

Ris

k Le

vel

Ris

k O

wne

r

Eval

uatio

n

(Risk Treatment)Action Summary Comments

1 Existing ServicesDuring excavtion operator/contractor comes in contact with

existing live infrastructure, resulting in damage toinfrastructure and/or injury to contractor (worst case death)

ConstructorsOperators Construction Civil

A -

Cat

astro

phic

Contractor to conduct a Dial Before YouDig (DBYD) prior to commencing

construction

C -

Mod

erat

e

2 - U

nlik

ely

Med

ium

TBC

-C

ontra

ctor

Acc

epta

ble

2Noise and Air

pollution

During construction the operation of machinery on sitecausing noise and air pollution affecting the neighbouring

houses across the road from the site.Neighbours Construction Civil

C -

Mod

erat

e

Contractor to ensure compliance withrelevant requirements

D -

Min

or

1 - R

are

Low

TBC

-C

ontra

ctor

Acc

epta

ble

3 Erosion andSediment wash off

Rainfall events occuring during construction washingsediment and rubbish into stormwater drainage network. Enviroment Construction Civil

C -

Mod

erat

e

Contractor to supply an Erosion andSediment Control (ESC) plan to thesuperintendent prior to construction D

- M

inor

1 - R

are

Low

TBC

-C

ontra

ctor

Acc

epta

ble

4 Retaining Walls Contractor and/or resident (kids) falling from top of +1m highretaining wall causing serious injury

ConstructorsNeighbours Construction Civil

B -

Maj

or

Contructor is to ensure there is safetyfencing at the top of retaining wall

D -

Min

or

2 - U

nlik

ely

Low

TBC

-C

ontra

ctor

Acc

epta

ble

5Traffic

Management

Contruction works adjacent and on trafficable road, whichcould result in a car accident resulting in serious damage to

vehicles and/or serious injury (worse case death) tocontractor or resident

ConstructorsNeighbours Construction Civil

B -

Maj

or

Contractor to supply a Traffic Managementplan to superintendent prior to construction

D -

Min

or

2 - U

nlik

ely

Low

TBC

-C

ontra

ctor

Acc

epta

ble

LikelihoodDescriptor

The threat may be realisedin reasonably foreseeablebut exceptionalcircumstances.

The threat is not expectedto be realised.

The threat may berealised.

The threat is likelyto be realised.

The threat is expectedto be realised.

Likelihood(i.e. % chance of realisation during applicable period: construction phase, operating cycle or decommissioning)

0% < Likelihood ≤ 0.1% 0.1% < Likelihood ≤ 1% 1% < Likelihood ≤5%

5% < Likelihood ≤90%

90% < Likelihood ≤100%

Industry Incidences(only applicable to common systems/assets)

Consequence Analysis Descriptions

No known incidents incomparable internationaloperating regimes.

No known nationalincidents. One or a fewincidents in comparableinternational operatingregimes.

One or a fewincidents nationally

Several incidentsnationally

Common incident

People Property Environment Community 0 - Eliminated 1 - Rare 2 - Unlikely 3 - Possible 4 - Likely 5 - Almost Certain

Con

sequ

ence

Single or multiplefatality

Virtual complete loss ofplant or system

Permanent / irreversiblewidespread ecologicaldamage not able to beremediated

Outrage by a sizeablecommunity or manycommunities. Riots.

A - CatastrophicHigh Critical Critical Critical Critical

Disabling injury orillness i.e. amputationand/or permanent lossof bodily function, orany kind of permanenthealth impact

Extensive damage toplant or system

Extensive ecologicaldamage, lengthyremediation process

Community/NGO legalactions. Pickets,demonstrations.

B - Major

High High Critical Critical Critical

Any Lost Time Incident(LTI), ie. an illness orinjury resulting in one ormore consecutive daysor shifts off work

Significant damage toplant or system

Substantial ecologicaldamage but able to beremediated

Persistent formalcommunity complaints.Formal complaints topoliticians orcomparablerepresentatives.

C - Moderate

Medium Medium High High Critical

A medical treatmentcase (MTC) / orrestricted work case(RWC)

Damages impact onbudget and program

Localised ecologicaldamage, easilyremediated

Formal complaints fromlocal Communitycomplaints locally

D - MinorLow Low Medium High High

First Aid Case, or aninjury or illness notrequiring treatment

Minor damage to plantor system

Negligible ecologicaldamage, may notrequire remediation

No Informal communitycomplaints &/ornegative comments /views.

E - IncidentalLow Low Low Medium Medium

eE

eE

eE

eE

e

E

e

E

eE

eEe

EeEe

EeEe

E

ee

eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

450

161

162

158

60

44

6162

4342 41 40

63

64

292

46

160

157 59

45

JACKMAN CT

NORW

OOD

PARA

DEe

We

We

W

eW e

W eW e

W eW e

W eW e

W eW

e W e W

eW

eW

eW

eW

602SP271139

603SP271139

600SP271139

601SP271139

ELECTRICAL ANDTELSTRA KERB MARKERS


SEWER MANHOLELID RL 6.66 RMU

PMT

STORMWATER FIELDINLET IL 7.60

SEWER MANHOLELID RL 9.69

6.96

9.53

SITE BENCHMARKOPM184491 RL 6.13

SITE BENCHMARKOPM184490 RL 6.51

STORMWATER FIELD INLETIL 4.54 600Ø RCP


SW APRONRL 7.78

BLOCK WALL


GOLFLINKS ROAD

KERRISDALE CRESCENT

CLIENT

DATE TITLE


CHECKED

APPROVED

PROJECT

DRAWN

DESIGNED


SCALE SIZEA1



EXISTING FEATURESAND OVERALL CONSTRAINTS

256063 0001 ENG CC 0003 A

1:500FOR APPROVAL


N.VOLLMERHAUSE

N.VOLLMERHAUSE

J.MCGARRY J.HARRIS


0

SCALE 1:500

5 10 20m

LEGEND

EXISTING SEWERAGEEXISTING LOT BOUNDARYSDESCRIPTIONSYMBOL

e S

EXISTING WATERe W

EXISTING STORMWATERe SW

EXISTING ELECTRICALe E

W e W e W e W e W e W e W e W e W e W e W e W e W e We W

e We W

e W

WW

12

3

4

5

6 7

8

9

10

11

12

13

8.50

7.80

7.30

6.70

6.0

7.10

7.20

7.608.20

7.70

8.30

7.80

8.507.90

8.60 8.10

7.90

8.60

7.10

7.00

7.60

8.00

7.90

7.30

7.0

6.40

7.00

6.60

6.70

10.50

8.70

8.00

7.40

7.20

7.80

7.10

eW

8.70

10.0

(1.30)

9.80

8.70

9.40

8.70

(1.20)

(0.80)

11.20

(1.20)

8.80

(2.50)

10.30

11.00

12.0

12.20

12.20

(1.80)

10.30

10.50

9.90

8.50

8.80

(1.50)

(1.90)

6.70

(0.40)

6.40(0.40)

6.90 6.20

(0.60)

6.70

(0.70)

6.706.5

0

8.00

7.70

7.65

6.80

We

4.50m3.00m

4.50m

4.00m

GOLF LINK ROAD

NORWOOD PARADE

KERRISDALE CRESCENT

EXISTING BLOCK WALLSCREEN FENCE &RETAINING WALL

POOL TYPE FENCE &BLOCK RETAINING WALL

APPROXIMATECUT/FILL LINE

EXISTING TIMBERFENCE TO REMAIN

MANHOLE LID RL 6.66 EXISTING LEVELSAROUND MANHOLE TO BE RETAINED

MANHOLE LID RL 9.69 EXISTING LEVELSAROUND MANHOLE TO BE RETAINED

EXTEND TO ENDOF EXISTING WALL

PELLAGE COURT

DEPRESSED 'VEE' SHAPED DRIVEWAYTO PROVIDE OVERLAND FLOW PATH

CLIENT

DATE TITLE


CHECKED

APPROVED

PROJECT

DRAWN

DESIGNED


SCALE SIZEA1



EARTHWORKS PLAN

256063 0001 ENG CC 0004 A

1:250FOR APPROVAL


N.VOLLMERHAUSE

N.VOLLMERHAUSE

J.MCGARRY J.HARRIS


0

SCALE 1:250

2.5 5 10m

LEGEND

PROPOSED RETAINING WALL

DESCRIPTIONSYMBOL

11.20 PROPOSED DESIGN LEVELS

(1.20)

DESIGN MOUNTABLE KERB & CHANNEL

EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPOSED OVERLAND FLOW PATH

TOP OF BATTERTOE OF BATTER

CONCEPT LOT BOUNDARYS

PROPOSED FENCE

PROPOSED SWALE

PROPOSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT

AREA OF CUT

AREA OF FILL

SW


e We W

e W

12

3

4

5

6 7

8

9

10

11

12

13

13.50m

26.00m

A

GOLF LINK ROAD

NORWOOD PARADE

KERRISDALE CRESCENT

CREST

PELLAGE COURT

EXISTING STREET LIGHT TO BELOCATED CLEAR OF INTERSECTION

RAISED CONCRETE MEDIAN

B

5.50m

6.25m

6.25m5 CARPARKS

3.2m x 5.5m

CLIENT

DATE TITLE


CHECKED

APPROVED

PROJECT

DRAWN

DESIGNED


SCALE SIZEA1



ROADWORKS PLAN

256063 0001 ENG CC 0005 A

1:250FOR APPROVAL


N.VOLLMERHAUSE

N.VOLLMERHAUSE

J.MCGARRY J.HARRIS


0

SCALE 1:250

2.5 5 10m

LEGENDDESCRIPTIONSYMBOL


EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARYCONCEPT LOT BOUNDARYS

PROPOSED DRIVEWAY

A.C.

SETOUT POINT

200

WHITE REFLECTORIZED ROAD PAINT TOALL SURFACES

200mm THICK N32 STRENGTH SLAB WITH 1LAYER SL82 MESH

100 200 200 200

SECTION B-NTS

PROPOSED FALL

1.8 100Ø WATER MAIN

CL

3% 3%

LEVEL

PROP

ERTY

BOU

NDAR

Y

2.752.75

5.5

13.5ROAD RESERVE

LEVEL

SUBSOIL DRAINTYPE C

MOUNTABLE KERB & CHANNEL

PAVEMENT AS SPECIFIED

0.8

PROP

ERTY

BOU

NDAR

Y

4.0VERGE

4.0VERGE

0.9

LOT 1 LOT 2 PELLAGE COURTROAD RESERVE

LOT 13 LOT 11

10.1 10.0

8.7 8.6 1:68.0 7.8 1:4

7.16.7

6.1

EXISTING SURFACEPROPOSED SURFACE

NORWOODPDE

FUTURE TMR ROAD RESERVE

NOM. 1.8m TIMBER SCREEN FENCE

LOT 1

PROP

ERTY

BND

Y

FILTER MEDIA

300m

m NO

M.EXTEND PALING TOCOVER EXPOSED WALL

HARDWOOD TIMBER POST

TOP SLEEPER TO BE MIN. 150mmABOVE OUTSIDE GROUND LEVEL

CONCRETE SLEEPERS

PROP

ERTY

BOU

NDAR

Y

POOL TYPE FENCEINTEGRAL WITH WALL

KEYSTONE FLUSH FACEWALL (MRC STD DRG. A4-153)OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT6.7

6.1

LOT 11

NORWOOD PARADEWALL TO BE STEPPED DOWN ATOUTLET OF OVERLAND FLOW PATH

CLIENT

DATE TITLE


CHECKED

APPROVED

PROJECT

DRAWN

DESIGNED


SCALE SIZEA1



SITE CROSS SECTION PLAN

256063 0001 ENG CC 0006 A

AS SHOWNFOR APPROVAL


N.VOLLMERHAUSE

N.VOLLMERHAUSE

J.MCGARRY J.HARRIS


0

SCALE 1:200

2 4 8m

PELLAGE COURT (ACCESS PLACE)TYPE CROSS SECTION

1:50

SECTION ACC-00051:100V 1:200H

0

SCALE 1:100

1 4m20

SCALE 1:50

1000500 2000mm

1

2

3

DETAIL 1-1:25

DETAIL 2-1:20

DETAIL 3-1:10

3

4

5

6 9

10

11

12

3

4

5

6 9

10

11

12

CLIENT

DATE TITLE


CHECKED

APPROVED

PROJECT

DRAWN

DESIGNED


SCALE SIZEA1



AUTOTURN LAYOUTSSHEET 1 OF 2

256063 0001 ENG CC 0007 A

AS SHOWNFOR APPROVAL


N.VOLLMERHAUSE

N.VOLLMERHAUSE

J.MCGARRY J.HARRIS


0

SCALE 1:200

2 4 8m

SYMBOL

LEGEND

BACK OF KERBINVERT OF KERBLIP OF KERBDESCRIPTION

PELLAGE COURT DIFFICULT PARKING SPOT 11:200

PELLAGE COURT DIFFICULT PARKING SPOT 21:200

DETAIL 1-1:50

0

SCALE 1:50

1000500 2000mm

1

Lock to Lock Time

WidthTrack

:::

metersPASSENGER-CAR

6.01.841.94

3.050.95

5.20

Steering Angle 33.6:

213

KERRISDALE CRESCENT

PELL

AGE

COUR

T

213

KERRISDALE CRESCENT

PELL

AGE

COUR

T

3

4

5

6 9

10

11

12

CLIENT

DATE TITLE


CHECKED

APPROVED

PROJECT

DRAWN

DESIGNED


SCALE SIZEA1


0

SCALE 1:200

2 4 8m

SYMBOL

LEGEND

BACK OF KERBINVERT OF KERBLIP OF KERBDESCRIPTION

INTERSECTION OF PELLAGE COURT &KERRISDALE CRESENT RIGHT TURN IN & OUT

1:200

INTERSECTION OF PELLAGE COURT &KERRISDALE CRESENT LEFT TURN IN & OUT

1:200


AUTOTURN LAYOUTSSHEET 2 OF 2

256063 0001 ENG CC 0008 A

1:200FOR APPROVAL


N.VOLLMERHAUSE

N.VOLLMERHAUSE

J.MCGARRY J.HARRIS


PELLAGE COURT CUL-DE-SACSERVICE VEHICLE TURN MOVEMENT

1:200

Lock to Lock Time

SERVICE VEHICLEWidthTrack

Steering Angle

1.50 5.00

meters

::

2.502.50

:38.7:6.0

8.80

SW

602SP271139

603

600SP271139

601SP271139


e We W

e W


e We W

e W

eS

eS

eS

eS

eS

e

e S e S e S

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SWSW

SWSW

SWSW

SWSW

SWSW

SWSW

SWSW

SW

S

S

S

S

S

SS

S

S

S

S RW

RWRW

RWRW

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

SS

SS

SS

SS

100Ø 100Ø100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø100Ø

RW

RW

RW

RW

PELL

AGE

COUR

T

12

3

4

5

6 7

8

9

10

11

12

13e

W

RWRW

RWRW

RWRW

RW

RWRW

RWRW

RWRW

W-CONDUIT

W-CONDUIT

GOLF LINK ROAD

NORWOOD PARADE

KERRISDALE CRESCENT

3m EASEMENT

3m EASEMENTA

EASE

MENT

BOU

NDAR

Y

PROP

ERTY

BOU

NDAR

Y

1.25 1.250.5

250m

m NO

M.

CONCRETE STRIPPROPOSED STORMWATER PIPE

CLIENT

DATE TITLE


CHECKED

APPROVED

PROJECT

DRAWN

DESIGNED


SCALE SIZEA1



OVERALL SERVICES PLAN

256063 0001 ENG CC 0009 A

1:250FOR APPROVAL


N.VOLLMERHAUSE

N.VOLLMERHAUSE

J.MCGARRY J.HARRIS


0

SCALE 1:250

2.5 5 10m

SYMBOL

LEGEND

EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARYFUTURE PROPERTY BOUNDARYCONCEPT LOT BOUNDARYS

STORMWATER & GULLY PITSW

DESCRIPTION

100Ø WATER MAIN STOP VALUE & HYDRANTWATER CONNECTION CROSSING

100Ø

WATER CONNECTION ADJACENTEXISTING WATER MAINWW

DESIGN MOUNTABLE KERB & CHANNELEXISTING SEWERAGE & MANHOLEe S

PROPOSED SEWERAGE, MANHOLE& HOUSE CONNECTION

W-CONDUIT

SS

SECTION A-1:25

SW

602SP271139

603

600SP271139

601SP271139


e We W

e W


e We W

e W

eS

eS

eS

eS

eS

e

e S e S e S

S

S

S

S

S

SS

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

SS

SS

SS

SS

100Ø 100Ø100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø

100Ø100Ø

PELL

AGE

COUR

T

12

3

4

5

6 7

8

9

10

11

12

13

8.50

7.80

7.30

6.70

6.0

7.10

7.20

7.608.20

7.70

8.30

7.80

8.507.90

8.60 8.10

7.90

8.60

7.10

7.00

7.60

8.00

7.90

7.30

7.0

6.40

7.00

6.60

6.70

10.50

8.70

8.00

7.40

7.20

7.80

7.10

eW

8.70

10.0

(1.30)

9.80

8.70

9.40

8.70

(1.20)

(0.80)

11.20

(1.20)

8.80

(2.50)

10.30

11.00

12.0

12.20

12.20

(1.80)

10.30

10.50

9.90

8.50

8.80

(1.50)

(1.90)

6.70

(0.40)

6.40(0.40)

6.90 6.20

(0.60)

6.70

(0.70)

6.706.5

0

W-CONDUIT

W-CONDUIT

8.00

7.70

7.65

6.80

GOLF LINK ROAD

NORWOOD PARADE

KERRISDALE CRESCENT

IL. 7.

2IL.

7.1

IL. 7.07

IL. 6.8

IL. 6.77

IL. 6.5 IL. 6.46

IL. 5.9

IL. 5.86

IL. 5.6

IL. 5.57

CONNECT TO EXIST.STUB IL. 4.114

EXISTING MH 1/103LID RL 9.69INLET IL 7.007

EXISTING MH 1/102LID RL 6.66INLET IL 4.114

HYDRANT

HYDRANT

3.0m SEWERAGE

EASEMENT

EXISTING HYDRANT

CLIENT

DATE TITLE


CHECKED

APPROVED

PROJECT

DRAWN

DESIGNED


SCALE SIZEA1



SEWERAGE & WATER RETICULATION PLAN

256063 0001 ENG CC 0010 A

1:250FOR APPROVAL


N.VOLLMERHAUSE

N.VOLLMERHAUSE

J.MCGARRY J.HARRIS


0

SCALE 1:250

2.5 5 10m

LEGENDPROPOSED LOT BOUNDARYDESCRIPTIONSYMBOL

100Ø WATER MAIN STOP VALUE & HYDRANTWATER CONNECTION CROSSING

100Ø

W-CONDUIT

WATER CONNECTION ADJACENT

EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARY

FUTURE PROPERTY BOUNDARY

EXISTING WATER MAINe W


ROAD RESERVE BOUNDARYS

LOCATE EXISTING 150Ø WATER MAIN ANDCONNECT NEW 100Ø WATER MAIN

EXISTING 150Ø WATER MAIN

WATER END CAP

EXISTING SEWERAGE & MANHOLEe S

PROPOSED SEWERAGE, MANHOLE& HOUSE CONNECTION

SS

SW

602SP271139

603

600SP271139

601SP271139


e We W

e W

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SW

SWSW

SWSW

SWSW

SWSW

SWSW

SWSW

SWSW

SW

RW

RWRW

RWRW

RW

RW

RW

RW

PELL

AGE

COUR

T

12

3

4

5

6 7

8

9

10

11

12

13e

W

RWRW

RWRW

RWRW

RW

RWRW

RWRW

RWRW

SS

SS

SS

GOLF LINK ROAD

NORWOOD PARADE

KERRISDALE CRESCENT

JOIN NEW SWALE INTO EXISTING

150 u

PVC

150 u

PVC

150 uPVC

450Ø RCP

375Ø RCP

525Ø

RCP

525Ø RCP600Ø RCP

EXISTING 600Ø RCP IL 4.54

150Ø uPVC ROOFWATER LINE300 SQ PRECAST ALLOTMENT PITWITH ROOFWATER CONNECTION

300 SQ PRECAST ALLOTMENT PITWITH ROOFWATER CONNECTION

300 SQ PRECAST ALLOTMENT PITWITH ROOFWATER CONNECTION300 SQ PRECAST ALLOTMENT PIT

WITH ROOFWATER CONNECTION

300 SQ PRECAST ALLOTMENT PITWITH ROOFWATER CONNECTION

150Ø uPVC ROOFWATER LINE

3.0m DRAINAGE

EASEMENT

EXISTING FIELD PIT TO BE DEMOLISHED & REPLACEDWITH GRATED ALLOTMENT PIT WITH ROOFWATERCONNECTION TO SUIT NEW ALLOTMENT LEVEL

EXISTING FIELD PIT TO BE DEMOLISHED& REPLACED WITH GRATED ALLOTMENTPIT FOR ROOFWATER CONNECTION

RAISED GRATED INLET PIT

CONCRETE INVERT

603SP271139

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

GOLF LINK ROAD

SUBSOIL DRAIN FROM RETAININGWALL TO OUTLET INTO EXISTING PIT

CLIENT

DATE TITLE


CHECKED

APPROVED

PROJECT

DRAWN

DESIGNED


SCALE SIZEA1


KERRISDALELOTS 601 & 602 DEVELOPMENTSTORMWATER DRAINAGE PLAN

256063 0001 ENG CC 0011 A

1:250FOR APPROVAL


N.VOLLMERHAUSE

N.VOLLMERHAUSE

J.MCGARRY J.HARRIS


0

SCALE 1:250

2.5 5 10m

INSET A1:250

JOINS BELOW

INSET A

LEGENDCONCEPT LOT BOUNDARYSDESCRIPTIONSYMBOL

EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARY

FUTURE PROPERTY BOUNDARY


STORMWATER & GULLY PITSW

PROPOSED FALL

ROAD RESERVE BOUNDARYS

Aurecon offices are located in:Angola, Australia, Botswana, China,

Ghana, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Kenya,Lesotho, Macau, Mozambique,

Namibia, New Zealand, Nigeria,Philippines, Qatar, Singapore, South Africa,

Swaziland, Tanzania, Thailand, Uganda,United Arab Emirates, Vietnam.

Document prepared by

Aurecon Australasia Pty Ltd ABN 54 005 139 873 Level 1 Tennyson House 9 Tennyson Street Mackay QLD 4740 PO Box 1060 Mackay QLD 4740 Australia

TFEW

+61 7 4977 5200 +61 7 4977 5201 [email protected] aurecongroup.com

Application summary report — 1707-228

Report created: 13 July 2017, 4.08 pm User: John Viklund Applicant: SHD Pty Ltd

Development details

Nature of development Approval type Category of assessmentReconfiguring a lot Development permit Code assessmentDescription of proposal: Subdivide 2 lots into 13 residential lots & open new road

Location details

Lot and plan Adjacent or adjoining

Address Local government area

601SP271139 No Kerrisdale Crescent, Beaconsfield

Mackay Regional Council

602SP271139 No Kerrisdale Crescent, Beaconsfield


Coordinates

Interested parties

Name Application responsibility

Cardno Planning - North Queensland

Applicant representative

Mackay Regional Council Assessment manager

Assessment triggers

Trigger Description Category Assessment manager

8.2.1 If table 1 does not apply and the development application is for- (a) development completely in a single local government area and any of the following apply- (i) the development is building

Other development in a single local government area or tidal area


1707-228

page 2 of 2

Trigger Description Category Assessment manager

work; (ii) any part of the development is assessable development under a local categorising instrument or schedule 10, part 13, division 4 or part 16; (iii) the development is reconfiguring a lot, other than a lot that is, or includes, airport land; (iv) the development is for a brothel; (v) the development is operational works relating to reconfiguring a lot; or (b) prescribed tidal works completely in the tidal area for a single local government area; or (c) prescribed tidal works- (i) partly in the tidal area for a single local government area; and (ii) not in the tidal area for another local government area or a port authority's strategic port land; or (d) prescribed tidal works- (i) starting in the tidal area for a local government area; and (ii) extending into the tidal area for another local government area; and (iii) not in the tidal area for a port authority's strategic port land; or (e) operational work that is constructing an artificial waterway in the tidal area of a single local government area, if the work- (i) is carried out completely or partly in a coastal management district; and (ii) relates to reconfiguring a lot

Referral triggersNo referral triggers were added.

Documents

Supporting documentsFile name Uploaded by Version Date uploaded

Lot plan report MyDAS2 Admin 2 11 July 2017, 3.04 pmHRP17064 Lot 602 Town Planning Report V1

John Viklund 1 13 July 2017, 4.06 pm

Pay itemsNo payitems were added.

Record of download 1707-228

The following documents were downloaded on 13 July 2017, 4.12 pm by John Viklund. The compressed file contains:

Document name File name Version Version date

Lot plan report Lot plan report 2 11 July 2017

HRP17064 Lot 602 Town Planning Report V1 HRP17064 Lot 602 DA Report V1.pdf 1 13 July 2017

1707-228 DA Form1 Application details 1707-228 DA Form1 Application details 1 13 July 2017

Application summary report 1707-228.xml Application summary report 1707-228 QDA.xml 1 13 July 2017

Application summary report 1707-228.json Application summary report 1707-228 QDA.json 1 13 July 2017

Application summary report for 1707-228 1707-228__application summary_13 July 2017 4.08 pm 1 13 July 2017

1707-228_QDA_Documents_13072017 1707-228_QDA_Documents_13072017 1 13 July 2017

Matters of Interest for all selected Lot Plans

Matters of Interest by Lot PlanLot Plan: 601SP271139 (Area: 2,242 m2)Lot Plan: 602SP271139 (Area: 8,316 m2)

Date: 13/07/2017State Assessment and Referral Agency

Departm ent of InfrastructureLocal Governm entand Planning© The State of Queensland 2017.

Disclaim er:This m ap has been generated from the inform ation supplied to the Departm ent of Infrastructure, Local Governm ent and Planning for the purposes of the Developm ent Assessm ent Mapping System . The m ap generated has been prepared with due care based on the best available inform ation at the tim e of publication. The State of Queensland holds no responsibility for any errors, inconsistencies or om issions within this docum ent. Any decisions m ade by other parties based on this docum ent solely the responsibility of those parties. This inform ation is supplied subject to the full term s and conditions available on the departm ent’s website.