ranking as tool for creation diverse and competitive higher … · 2011-10-14 · yakutsk 100...
TRANSCRIPT
Ranking as tool for creation diverse and competitive higher education landscape in Russia
Prof. Evgeny KnyazevDirector, Center for University Management, National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russian Federation
Structural problems of Russian Education
schoolsschools
Colleges and HEIsColleges and HEIs
Structure of System of the HE Institutions
Number of HEIs
Yearly enrollment
( Number of students)
Number of students
Graduates in 2007
Total 658 1 384 018 6 208 410 1 108 938
Academies 166 207 645 903 247 161 162
Universities 346 1 002 086 4 571 234 821 107
Institutes 133 139 925 598 881 106 154
Russian universities
Number EnrollmentTotal number of
studentsGraduated in
2007
Technical/technological 136 407018 1831822 331894
Agricultural 22 49218 218667 39827
Pedagogical 63 146081 687414 133544
Medical 18 17216 87040 13575
Humanitarian 49 183020 826264 147249
Others 58 199533 920027 155018
Researarch at the HEIs
2009
год
Удельный вес средств, полученныхот проведения научных
исследований
Удельный вес бюджетного
финансирования фундаментальных
и прикладных исследований в
общем объеме бюджетного
финансирования
Allocation of the HE Institutions
38
84
53
77
77
120
209
14.10.2011 Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO 7
• LLL as ideology– На практике – отказ от жесткого государственного регулирования «образования для
взрослых» + мягкое стимулирование в важных для общества секторах (например, курсыпереобучения для безработных или корпоративные университеты в госкомпаниях)
• Increasing selectiveness of the tertiary education content
• Development of the Education program Market
• Selection and support of talents («future innovators»)
– В том числе, создание бизнес-инкубаторов, инвестиции в студенческие старт-апы иподдержка перспективных выпускников на рынке труда
– создание для них особых условий, позволяющих реализовать свойпотенциал и найти ему применение на практике
Towards new Model of Education: some basic principals
14.10.2011 Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO 8
• New requirements for staff:– Professor as a navigator for student– Стимулирование создания свободного рынка кадров профессорского-
преподавательского состава (эффективный контракт – как основа)– Attractive financial conditions for staff (average level in economics) – Inclusiveness of staff members in practical activity (2020) as a norm (по крайней мере, для
ведущих вузов)
• Modernization of management in education:– Less state control on quality– Main regulators are professional society and families– New legal status (more autonomy) – More professionalism– More outcome orientation
Towards new Model of Education: : staff and management
Budget funding: structural dynamics (2006 – 2009)(I.V.Abankina)
M XLL XXL
<100 100 - 250 250 - 500 >1000
2006
2007
2008
2009
S
59
114
177
95
141
104
177 82
26
41
119 72 28
15
6
3
500 - 1000
14
34
21
18
Average - 222Mediana - 176
Average - 472Mediana - 320
M. rub .
State policy implementation: tools for differentiation in HE
• Priority national project “Education”– short termsinvestments изменения, вне регулярных механизмов финансирования, в сжатые сроки и по
ограниченному набору приоритеных направлений развития
• Federal programs – 5-years, targeted system changes программы для общесистемных изменений, их осуществления и закрепления
• Governmental grants – involvement of universities into the National economy innovative development (кооперация с предприятиями, развитие инновационной инфраструктуры вузов и т.д.)
Priority national project “Education” for Higher Education
• National competition of the HE institutions implementing innovative educational programs of new generation ( 57 HEIs, up to 40 M USD)
• Creation the System of Federal universities (2007-2011: 9 HEIs, 400 M USD)
• Development of the System of National Research Universities (2009-2010: 29 HEIs, up to 70 M USD)
MSU SPSU
Siberian FU Southern FU ... 9
…MIPhI ... 29
Other HEIs
Fundamental investments in Russian HE
Geopolitical tasks,Regional socio-economic development
Intellectual investments in Hi-Tech-Sectors
Accessibility and quality
Current Institutional Landscape of Russian Higher Education
Network of National research universities
• Purpose – advanced R&D at universities– 50% of budget funding – contracts for R&D
(now – only 15%)– Funding of international research centers at
universities– Infrastructure for support of graduates (till
20%)
Geography of leaders
4
5
4
7
3
8
26
Leading Russian Universities Network
Archangelsk
Rostov
Ekaterinburg
Krasnoyarsk
Yakutsk
Vladivostok
Kazan (3)
S-Petersburg (4)
Moscow(11)
Samara
Perm (2)
N.Novgorod
Tomsk (2)
Novosibirsk
Belgorod
Irkutsk
Saransk
Saratov
Chelyabinsk
- MSU, SPSU - Federal university - National research university
15
Kaliningrad
Stavropol
Ranking as tool for creation diverse and competitive higher education landscape in
Russia (1)
Special set of indicators for federal universities: «National and international recognition»
• Business reputation• Public opinion• Positions in rankings
FU Position in ranking
Ranking
Archangelsk 250 TIMES
Kazan 350 TIMES
Ekaterinburg 300 QS
Yakutsk 100 Interfax
Krasnoyarsk 20 Interfax
Rostov 250 TIMES
Russian federal universities to 2020
Independent ranking (sponsored by «Interfax»)
6 sets of indicators:• education• research• social servises• International activity• brand• Innovation and commercialization of intellectual property
Problems
• Wrong motivation (on federal political level – national task, on regional political level – source of pressure, on institutional level -positive reports) «Внешняя, но не внутренняя адресность» на всех уровнях
• Difficulties of measurement (MSU, SPSU МГУ и СПГУ забивают всех).
• Weaknesses of methodology and statistics
Ranking as tool for creation diverse and competitive higher education landscape in
Russia (3)
• Competition of HEIs implementing educational programs of new generation
• Competitive selection of National research universities• Competitive selection of HEIs for state support for
creation of Hi-Tech-enterprises and innovative infrastructure development
Model of selection
Two sets of the measurable criterias :
– Quality of project– Quality of potential
Three stages of selection procedure– Quality of project => ranking 1=> semifinalists
– Evaluation of the HEI potential => ranking 2=> short list
– Debates of independent selection juries => winners
