raoul mulder, jon pearce, mark elgar
DESCRIPTION
Raoul Mulder, Jon Pearce, Mark Elgar. 2a.Review others’ work Choose assigned work Complete feedback form Submit. Assignment > Topic > Work > Review > Feedback. Students choose a topic for a written assignment. Others comment on their work and they in turn give feedback on the comments. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Raoul Mulder, Jon Pearce, Mark Elgar
Assignment > Topic > Work > Review > Feedback
1. Choose topic
Select assignment
Choose topic
Submit
2. Submit work
Choose file
Submit
3. Look at reviews
Select review
Complete feedback
Submit
4. Submit revision of report for assessment
2a. Review others’ work
Choose assigned work
Complete feedback formSubmit
Students choose a topic for a written assignment. Others comment on their work and they in turn give feedback on the comments.
Students choose a topic for a written assignment. Others comment on their work and they in turn give feedback on the comments.
Student’s View
[Peer review of teamwork]
Coordinator’s View
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Yuck ugly!
Yuck ugly!
Other modes of use
Assignment > Topic > Work > Review > Feedback
2a. Every three weeks team:
Completes feedback on each member’s performance
Submit
Students work in teams of 5. Each are required to regularly peer review the contribution of every other team member.
Students work in teams of 5. Each are required to regularly peer review the contribution of every other team member.
1. Choose topic
Select assignment
Choose topic
Submit
System forms teams
2. Team works...
3. At end of assignmentView aggregate of team’s assessment of your work
Assignment > Topic > Work > Review > Feedback
1. Students give presentation
2. Few days later...View feedback comments from others
1a. Students view presentation
1b. Submit review
Select assignment
Choose topic (oral presentation)
Submit
Complete review formSubmit
Students attend class presentations made by other students. Each is required to critically comment on the presentation.
Students attend class presentations made by other students. Each is required to critically comment on the presentation.
Current status
Sem 1 ‘07: Prototype (in ‘Neo’) used 4 subjects:
most functionality
some administrator functions not complete
Sem 2 ‘07: Improved version - ?? subjects:
complete missing admin functions
creating/administering groups
user interface & navigation
Sem 1 ‘08: Port to more open environment
Sakai?
27
Thoughts for forming groups
28
Conclusion