rare b decay searches with babar using hadronic tag ...steven/stevenwebfiles/talks/cap...jun 10,...

26
Rare B decay searches with Rare B decay searches with BABAR using hadronic tag BABAR using hadronic tag reconstruction reconstruction Steven Robertson Institute of Particle Physics CAP Congress 2009 Moncton, NB

Upload: others

Post on 24-Jan-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Rare B decay searches with Rare B decay searches with BABAR using hadronic tag BABAR using hadronic tag

    reconstructionreconstruction

    Steven RobertsonInstitute of Particle Physics

    CAP Congress 2009Moncton, NB

  • Jun 10, 2009 2Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    Physics with BABARPhysics with BABAR

    PEP-II Asymmetric B Factory produced e+e- interactions at the Υ(4S) resonance (~10.5 GeV)

    σ(BB) ~ 1.1nb ⇒ 1.1M/fb-1 Total of 430 fb-1 collected by BABAR

    between 1999 – 2008:

    ~500 million BB pairs

    BB

    thre

    shol

    d

    B0B0 pair is produced in a coherent L=1 state

    See talk by Tom Mattison on Weds afternoon

  • Jun 10, 2009 3Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    Rare decay searches with BABARRare decay searches with BABAR

    Substantial potential for New Physics searches in rare B decays

    e- (9.0 GeV)

    e+ (3.1 GeV)

    EM calorimeter6580 CsI(Tl) crystals

    1.5 T solenoid

    5-layer silicon vertex detector

    DIRC – RICH utilizing total internal reflection

    Magnet flux return instrumented with RPCs ( LSTs)→

    40-layer drift chamber

    u l+

    νb

    W+, H+B+

    rH

    ● non-SM contributions can be comparable to or larger than (suppressed) SM contribution:

    ● Experimental challenge is to identify rare signal decays with missing energy or limited kinematic information

  • Jun 10, 2009 4Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    Rare decay searches with BABARRare decay searches with BABAR

    How can we distinguish particles associated with the “interesting” signal event from those arising from the decay of the second B meson in a Υ(4S)→ BB event?

    ● Reconstruct the other B instead, then check if whatever is left looks like a signal decay

    B+→l+νγ signal simulation

    Y(4S)B- B+

    ν

    l+

    γ

  • Jun 10, 2009 5Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    Hadronic “tag” reconstructionHadronic “tag” reconstructionReconstruct a large sample of hadronic (or semileptonic) B decays in

    specific “clean” decay modes

    ● method based on a D(*) “seed”, to which individual charged and neutral pions and kaons are added until a B candidate is identified

    ● exploit knowledge of CM energy and tag B kinematics

    mES (GeV/c2)

    BB-- →→ D D(*)0(*)0 X X-- ΚΚ π π ΚΚ π π π π00 ΚΚ π π ππ π π ΚΚ00ss π π

    ππ

    Advantages:

    ● clean separation of signal and tag decay products

    ● improved determination of missing energy and signal B 4-vector

    ● strong suppression of (and precise determination of) continuum backgrounds

    Disadvantage:

    ● efficiency ~0.3%

    correctly reconstructed

    mis-reconstructed

  • Jun 10, 2009 6Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    Leptonic B decays Leptonic B decays

    Helicity suppressed SM process with potential sensitivity to tree-level New Physics contributions

    ● SM BFs scale with final state lepton mass squared, hence τ mode is most prominent (BF ~10-4), but mode is within μ statistical reach of B current factories (BF ~10-7),

    u l+

    ν

    W+,H+

    bB+

    fBVub

    In MSSM (or generic 2HDM), charged Higgs boson gives equal relative enhancement/suppression in all modes

    ● At one-loop level, large (Higgs mediated) lepton flavour violating effects can break hierarchy imposed by helicity suppression

    i.e. NP constrained by measuring ratios of branching fractions of leptonic modes

    Standard Model Rates B(B+ → τ+ν) 1x10-4

    B(B+ → μ+ν) 4x10-7 B(B+ →e+ν) 10-12

  • Jun 10, 2009 7Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    LHC vs Flavour ConstraintsLHC vs Flavour Constraints

    Results of hadronic and semileptonic tag searches for B+ → τ+ ν have been reported by both BABAR and Belle

    ● Resulting charged Higgs bound is fairly model-independent and substantially constrains region of parameter space accessible to LHC experiments

    arXiv:0901.0512

    U. Haisch arXiv:0805.2141 [hep-ph](presented at FPCP 2008)

    ATLAS

  • Jun 10, 2009 8Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    Tagged Tagged BB++ →→ll++ ν ν ((ll = e, = e, μμ) )

    CM frame B rest frame

    μν

    B+

    B-

    e+

    e-

    Can use the hadronic B reconstruction method to search for other leptonic modes (e, μ) as well as τ mode● only 1 neutrino, so reconstruction of tag B

    completely constrains event kinematics

    ● Signal B rest frame estimated from tag B 4-vector, permitting 2-body signal kinematics to be exploited

  • Jun 10, 2009 9Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    Tagged Tagged BB++ →→ll++ ν ν ((ll = e, = e, μμ) ) and LFVand LFVHadronic tag reconstruction method used

    for first time for this search by BABAR (thesis work of M. Klemetti, McGill)

    ● also placed limits on LFV neutral B modes

    PRD-RC 77, 091104 (2008)

    Mode Data Sample 90% CL limit

    ● Sensitivity limited by statistics with BABAR data sample but excellent control of kinematics and background suppression would make this a slam-dunk for SuperB

    μν

    B+

    B-

    e+

    e-

  • Jun 10, 2009 10Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    BB++ →→ll++ ν ν γγ ((ll = e, = e, μμ)) Presence of (hard) photon removes helicity suppression in purely

    leptonic decay modes, but adds factor of and form factor αuncertainties:

    G. Korchemsky, D. Pirjol, T.-M. Yan Phys. Rev. D61:114510, 2000. (hep-ph/9911427)

    B(B+→l+νγ) ~(1-5)x10-6 for all three modes

    ● In practice, can extract λB which

    is related to B light cone wave function

    Model uncertainties make it desirable to provide model-independent measurement...

  • Jun 10, 2009 11Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    BB++ →→ll++νν γ γTagging provides precise measurement of

    tag B (and hence signal B) 4-vector

    ● in combination with lepton and photon, neutrino 4-vector is fully determined

    ● strong suppression of (dominant) b→ ulν decay background

    ● no additional particles should be present in the event

    μν

    B+

    B-

    γ

    Work by Dana Lindemann (McGill)

    μν

    B+

    B-

    γγB+ →π0 l+ν

  • Jun 10, 2009 12Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    BB++ →→ll++νν γ γ backgroundsbackgroundsNon-B backgrounds are strongly suppressed by tag reconstruction

    procedure, and remaining background can be estimated directly from data

    reconstructed invariant mass of tag B candidate

    ● Only B “peaking” backgrounds rely on MC, and this can be explicitly verified against data

  • Jun 10, 2009 13Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    BB++ →→ll++νν γ γ resultsresultsUnblinded data revealed

    slight excess over expectation, but consistent with no signal

    BABAR preliminary

    To be submitted to PRL

    Model independent branching fraction results:

  • Jun 10, 2009 14Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    SummarySummary

    Tag reconstruction techniques provide an extremely clean analysis environment for studies of rare B decay processes which would otherwise lack sufficient kinematic constraints

    ● tag efficiency is low, but large B factory datasets still make these methods viable

    ● very interesting sensitivity for high luminosity SuperB factory!

    Recent BABAR results on rare leptonic B decays B+ → l+ ( )ν γ provide interesting constraints on New Physics which are fully competitive with expected direct LHC sensitivity

  • Jun 10, 2009 15Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    BB+/-+/- tag reconstruction tag reconstruction

    Realistic tagging efficiency (per B+/-) of ~0.24% in events containing a low-multiplicity “signal” event

    ● typically “signal-side” selection is fairly efficient (~10% - 70%)

    Assuming ~30% efficiency gives “single-event sensitivity” at

    Br(B → rare) ~2x10-8 with 75 ab-1

    mES (GeV/c2) mES (GeV/c

    2)

    After continuum background suppression

    No combinatorial background in signal events!

  • Jun 10, 2009 16Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    BB++ →→ll++νν γ γ at SuperBat SuperBBABAR analysis (optimized for ~0.5ab-1 ) can be naively extrapolated

    to SuperB luminosities

    ● Simple cut-and-count with no kinematic or angular constraints on the signal lepton or photon

    Sensitive to entire SM range with 75ab-1

    ● Ultimate limitation will likely be b→ ulν form factors needed for “peaking” background estimate

    Dedicated SuperB study currently in progress

  • Jun 10, 2009 17Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    Neutral B tagsNeutral B tags

    Realistic tagging efficiency (per B0) of ~0.16% in events containing a low-multiplicity “signal” event

    ● Assuming 30% efficiency gives “single-event sensitivity” at

    Br(B → rare) ~3 x 10-8 with 75 ab-1 Obviously, actual sensitivity depends on the level of background...

    mES (GeV/c2) mES (GeV/c

    2)

    After continuum background suppression

  • Jun 10, 2009 18Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    Run 7Run 7

    ● Data taken between December 16, 2007 and April 7, 2008

    ● 30.2 fb-1 at ϒ(3S)● 14.5 fb-1 at ϒ(2S)● ~5 fb-1 above ϒ(4S) scan● Several ϒ(3S) analyses and

    above ϒ(4S) scan presented at ICHEP 2008

  • Jun 10, 2009 19Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    Tagged Tagged BB++ →→ll++ ν ν ((ll = e, = e, μμ)) ● Signal lies at kinematic endpoint in lepton p* for B decays, hence

    essentially no B background

    ● Continuum background can produce high p* leptons, but this background can be directly determined from data using the tag B mES sideband

    ● Narrow signal peak would lead to a very compelling signal with a very small number of events

  • Jun 10, 2009 20Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    BB++ →→ττ++ ν ν Experimentally challenging due to presence of multiple neutrinos:

    ● Search for 1-prong τ decays: e , , and τ→ νν τ→μνν τ→πν τ→ππ0 ν● “Topological” signal candidate selection, then require residual

    calorimeter energy to be consistent with “noise”

    Phys. Rev. D76, 052002 (2007)

    Phys. Rev. D77, 011107 (2008)

    BABAR searches based on 383 x 106 B meson pairs

    Combined result: (2.6 significance) σ

    (SL tag)

    (Had tag)

  • Jun 10, 2009 21Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    BB++ →→ll++ ν ν γγ ((ll = e, = e, μμ)) In limit of zero photon energy

    (actually, below a few 100 MeV) “signal” is helicity suppressed leptonic modes

    - KPY model only valid down to ~few hundred MeV

    ● Difference in models mainly impacts angular distributions

  • Jun 10, 2009 22Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    BB++ →→ll++ ν ν γγ ((ll = e, = e, μμ))

  • Jun 10, 2009 23Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

  • Jun 10, 2009 24Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    NP @ tree level and beyondNP @ tree level and beyond

    ● Uncertainties from Vub and fB cancel in ratio of modes!

    ⇛ NEED DETERMINATION OF BOTH τ AND μ MODES

    Tree-level charged Higgs (Type-II 2HDM or MSSM) contribution has the same relative effect on all leptonic modes:

    B(B+→l+ν)MSSM = B(B+→l+ν)SM x [ 1 – (m2B/m2H+) tan2 /(1+β ϵ0 tan2 )β ]2

    ● “Universality” preserved at tree level

    At one-loop level, potentially large Lepton Flavour Violation (LFV) effects entering from e.g. SUSY in grand unification scenarios:

    i.e. B+ → l+ νl' where l' ≠ l via effective l H+ ν coupling● Observable effects in ratios, Rb

    l/τ, of B leptonic branching ratios:

    G. Isidori and P. Paradisi hep-ph/0605012A. Masiero, P. Paradisi and R. Petronzio hep-ph/0511289

  • Jun 10, 2009 25Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    Lepton Flavour ViolationLepton Flavour Violation

    ● In Standard Model, lepton flavour conservation is not associated with any underlying symmetry principle

    ● LFV generally permitted in New Physics models containing more than one Higgs doublet

    ● In SUSY seesaw models, flavour changing insertions arise from Yukawa couplings in the slepton mass RGEs:

    ● ⇛ New Physics effects in τ→ l (γ l = e, )μ can saturate experimental bounds in natural and well-motivated models

    ● MSSM with heavy right-handed neutrinos and seesaw mechanism: Br~10-7

    ● heavy Dirac neutrinos, RPV SUSY models, flavour changing Z' models...

  • Jun 10, 2009 26Steven Robertson Institute of Particle PhysicsCAP Congress 2009

    Higgs mediated LFVHiggs mediated LFV

    ● Higgs mediated LFV present in MSSM at loop level given that there is a source of LFV among sleptons:

    From A. Dedes, Super B Factory proceedings: hep-ph/0503261

    Effective SUSY

    ● Predicts LFV effects in a variety of τ and B decay modes (with preference for 3rd generation couplings):